WEBVTT - Rob Stringer: The Sony Music Group Chairman Talks Grammys, Industry Challenges and Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>M M yeah. Welcome to Strictly Business Varieties weekly podcast

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>featuring conversations with industry leaders about the business of media

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and entertainment. This is Shirley Halpern, executive editor of Music

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for Variety, with a special episode that we're calling strictly

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Music Business with Me Today. Is the chairman of Sony

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Music Group, Rob Stringer, whoever sees the record labels Columbia,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>r c A, Epic and Arista Records, as well as

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Sony Music Publishing and The Orchard, and leads a staff

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of more than five thousand employees around the world. A

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>music business life for if ever there was one, Rob

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>has spent his entire professional career working his way up

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the ranks of the Sony system, seeing the industry evolved

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>through physical products, to downloads, to streams and whatever may

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lay ahead. A native of the UK, Stringer moved to

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>New York in two thousand and six and has spent

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the last fifteen years shaping Sony's recorded music business in

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the US. As Chief executive of Sony Music Label Group

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and later Columbia, he helped bring to the world a

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>slew of successful new artists, including Adele, Calvin Harris, Harry

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Styles Him, J Cole, The Chain Smokers, and Tyler The Creator,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's also looked after such iconic acts as Beyonce,

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Bob Dylan, Barbra Streisan, A C. D. C. Selene, Dion, Daft, Punk,

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Shaw Day, and David Bowie, whose final album Black Star Columbia,

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>released in In his current role of Sony Music Group Chairman,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>which he assumed in ten after three years as CEO

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of Sony Music, Rob Stringer has met more than his

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>share of challenges, from making the right hires to see

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the company's vision through to banking on talent and not

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>just hits, to segue into a subscription driven business, to

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>getting through a global pandemic and responding to the call

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for social justice. We talked about these subjects and much more,

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>while also getting a sense of Rob's refreshingly British outlook

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on things that are uniquely American, all this as borders

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ceased to exist in this new global music economy. Afterwards,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>stick around for a coda to this episode, a talk

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with Grammy nominated mastering engineer Emily Lazar, who has worked

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on four thousand albums since she started her career in

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Emily has no fewer than ten projects and contention for

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Grammy Awards, including three in the Album of the Year

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>category time Coldplay and Jacob Collier. Welcome back to Strictly Business.

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Rob Stringer, chairman of Sony Music Group,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>for the first ever addition of Strictly Music Business. Rob,

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for being here, So so nice to

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>be on the first ever Strictly Music Business podcast. So

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk a little bit about your background

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because you started out as a CPS records trainee and

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then you got to feel your way around the different

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>departments and find the lane that best suited your skill set.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me about that? Well, yeah, I can

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>tell you about that actually in context of we've actually

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about how that would work in the

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>new company, and that we need to make sure that

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>our employees move around the company more dramatically so they

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>get more experience of the bigger picture. And actually, I

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think what mine was big picture by default. Really, I

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>started as a marketing graduate trainee, and you're talking about

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the mid eighties when human resources was called personnel,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>so it was like it's a different era and I

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>come off being a university social sectory University of London,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which was a very obvious way of going into the

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>music business in that era, and they mapped out this

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>journey for me for three weeks and then they just said, actually,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there you go. There's a three week training. Now, don't

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>set at someone's desk and try and be useful. And

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I tried to be useful and tried not to be

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>like a sort of student brat. But the fact is

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>that I did go to like probably eight departments in

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in that first month, which certainly told me as much

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as what I didn't want to do as much as

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>what I did want to do and what I might

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>be suited to and what I didn't And the conclusion was,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>which eventually came to pass, was that I would be

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in marketing. But I knew straightaway I really want to

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>do A and R. So it took me about four years.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Once I had a good experience in marketing, I moved

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>into A and R because I knew that I needed

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that training to do a different type of journey in

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the music business. So the creative was calling you, Yeah,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, marketing is obviously creative too, but I knew

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that I had to dive into a more schizophrenic sort

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of artistic pool to really be able to understand the

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>psyche of what the art form is we're dealing with.

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, that job, it's quite lonely and odd because

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>it's quite subjective. And it may not be subjective now

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>with research and stats, which I'm sure you will talk

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>to me about, but the fact is then it wasn't that,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was gut reaction and you know, some information

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like you would stand at the back of a club

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and there would be a lot of people there and

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you go, well, this must mean something. But it was

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>subjective in many ways. And and actually you are either

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the hero or the class clown, you know,

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not that much in the middle. So that's the difficult

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>thing to deal with because your metrics success a blatantly obvious.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like diving at the deep end. And

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think maybe I would have had the same

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>pathway if I hadn't made that switch. I mean, it seems,

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, now that we've had sixty years of major

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>labels being in existence, it seems that one thing is

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>abundantly clear, and that is that the leadership has to

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>have very strong in our chops is this as important

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>today as it was in the pre Internet era, because

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you do have a mountain of data available to you

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>at any given moment. How do you sort of balance

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>guts and data Today? Obviously we dig deeper and deeper

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>the data. That process is now anything to get an edge,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>anything to get a little bit more information, to to

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>look at something in a slightly more complex, unusual way,

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to find something that meant something. That's all good, but

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm as interested in once you get the artists or

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the set of songs in the building, then you better

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure you know what to do with it. There's

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>always been hits. There's always been one off its. There's

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>always been novelty hits. There's always been uh, there's always

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>been record sort of started somewhere. You've seen explosion. I mean,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the centies and eighties in America, it would have

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>been a small radio station in Kansas playing something. They

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>played the record once and they got phones. This is

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly sophisticated version of that. Really, we have to

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>maintain a balance between the data and the realities of

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>artistic development. As yet, some social media platforms have not

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>broken two records by an artist, for example, So therefore, okay,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>so you've got to make you've got a platform, it

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>breaks the record when you go back to that platform.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Is the structural capability there to break the second song?

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily. We have young graduates and young people coming

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>into the business who have got great statistical capabilities, are

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>also a massive music fans, and if the balance is

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on the tech, you want to get them to understand

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the music as well. It's got to be a balance

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>from well, I think another thing that plays to your

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage in place to my advantage as well, is being

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just being of a certain age. Is that we do

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>straddle the pre internet world. We remember LPs. You have

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>actually not only lived through every format you know, physical format,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but you've worked every physical format, which I just think

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you know is a huge advantage to being able to

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>run a global music company. You've seen it all, you

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>know the scenarios, what works, what doesn't, and you can

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>apply those things. I'm wondering, is there a through line

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that applies to every evolution of physical media for music?

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Is there something that has stayed the same from the

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>LP days of your youth in the seventies to today

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with streaming and the world of music at your fingertips. Wow,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a fifty year question. I think talent remains the same.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm running constantly to keep up with the changes. And

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like you said, I think there's a certain period of

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>time where my upbringing in the business wasn't like a

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>pioneer in the fifties and sixties, but I had an

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>intimate knowledge of that era of music because I grew

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>up starting in the seventies. You know, I wasn't a

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>pioneer because there was people that boldly went where no

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>one else had gone before, whether it was on the

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>back of Elvis Presley or the Blues or the Beatles

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it may be. That I didn't have that,

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but I had enough to look back twenty thirty years

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>instead now looking back seventy years to get that compendium

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge. So I think that it's a bit of

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a cliche. But what goes around comes around is still

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the case. There's still certainly lineage of ideas and talent.

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>The way that talent and way that artistry interprets those

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>ideas that is prevalent across decades and decades, and I

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>see similarities every day with things. And sometimes I will

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>say to an artist, this is like this. I mean,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't have heard of that, and you know, quite frankly,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the internet sometimes they go, sure, we know that, and

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and we know that artists because Spotify and Apple and

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and all you can eat buffets of all the

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>music for multi generations. But there is a lineage there.

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly talent, as I said, as a lineage.

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, someone being artistically gifted is a lineage someone

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>being an amazing songwriter. There's a lineage there, and it

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>cuts through generations. And you're right. I feel like I

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>started to take on board and resorb that knowledge at

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a crossroads where I could look back, but also I

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>could look forward to. And you know, so far I'm

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping pace with looking forward, you know, I mean, the

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>streaming model is here, and I don't know what next

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>model is. I've seen plenty of models, and hopefully I

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>can navigate those chapters with an understanding of what the

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>musical art for me is and will need to balance

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>out the tech because of course, at the moment, this

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is quite a dramatic chapter of art and tech. And

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>there have been chapters of the recorded music business which

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have just been about the music, where companies like mine

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>would be okay if you had hits, you know, And

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not that simple now because it's moving so fast,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and there would be a debate as whether tech drives

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are or art drives tech. It would be a debate,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's a complex debate in the current chapter of

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the music business. Absolutely, And I see what you're saying

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>about what goes around comes around again, because even when

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I think about podcasts and how popular scripted audio is

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>at the time, I mean, Sony has made an investment

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>into podcasts as well. It's like the old radio teleplays.

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference. Yeah, I mean everything's blended. I mean,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>even in technology, people are taking you know, there may

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be five components of an idea from a previous technological platform,

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and someone takes one and expands that idea and ships

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis slightly. And that's the case of music too.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a debate constantly, debate, particularly in America about rock

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>music and is rock music dead? And where the next

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>rock band and all that kind of stuff. But and

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at it like that because I look

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at it and go, okay, well, actually, in a strand

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of emo hip hop, there is a blend of rock

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>music and now, and there is a huge component of

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that music that is that is the angst and reflectiveness

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of rock music. But it's a blend, and it's a fusion,

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's new because it's a fusion, you know, and

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't get nostalgic. Was saying, well, the way it

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>should be is that I need to go and stand

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>in a club and see a bass singer, drummer and guitarists,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's how it is. Because that isn't going to

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>be how it is. It's going to be a component, sure,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's not going to be the central because things

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>move on. You know. When I was a kid growing up,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I knew a lot about music being in the past

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>because you had a radio in your front room and

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>your parents taught to you about it. But the fact is,

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>when I liked the Talking Heads in nine and seventy seven,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to listen to Glenn Miller from I

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>knew a Glenmer was, but on listen to that music.

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think people can't understand how that this is

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a very mature art form music. And so therefore people

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twenty don't automatically know a rock

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>band from it doesn't work. It's forty years. If you

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think about forty years and the medium of film or

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>in the medium of television or other art forms, it's

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>light years difference. And the fact is wise music not

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thought of as being different to that. These gaps are

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>big and people have got to get used to to

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>understanding that. You know, you didn't like the music from

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago, so don't expect your kids to like

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>music from forty fifty years ago. But there will always

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be a component and a trace of other forms of

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>music in that blend, because, as I said, this is

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a mature art form now, and I see it all

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the time. I mean, you know, it's like we have

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>young eighteen year old rappers whose musical influences are crazy

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and they go back seven or eight decades, but the

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>fact is they've turned it into something new. I find

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that incredible, exciting and I and honestly it sounds, you know,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>without trying to sound like pizza pan. I don't look

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>back that often and be over nostalgic about what was,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>because I'm fortunate enough to see what is and what

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>will be with that blend. We need to take a

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>quick break, but we'll be back with more from Rob Stringer,

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're back with Rob Stringer, So robbed this might

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>not be the most popular opinion, but I'm doing some

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the math in my head. And the streaming services

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which are currently driving record revenues ten point one billion

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the US and alone, you know, many of

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>them benefited from an early investment by the major labels.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel that record companies maybe haven't gotten enough

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>credit for helping seed those emerging technologies. Yeah, but I

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>also would say that I'm not sure that I'm ever

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>going to come for a place publicly, surely or an

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>interview saying that we deserve to take credit. You know,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably justifiably in many ways, we take a lot

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of grief and stick for the way we behaved in

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>previous chapters, and I'm sure some of that is accurate.

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think it would be safe to say that

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we're certainly not tech phobic, and that we are willing

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to be braver and we're willing to be smarter about

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>how open minded we are. And I understand where because

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>as we just talked about, things didn't change for a

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>long time. Hits for the definition, and you know, and

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that caused all sorts of idiosyncrasies in our business. And

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact is that people only have to think about

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the hits. And we've made plastic and factories and the

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>plastic was viral or the plastic was a CD, and

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, tech changed the landscape and

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we got caught behind. I think we've earned a lot

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>since then. I'm used to people saying we're clueless. That's okay.

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were clueless when downloads came along. But

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>what we did do as a business is we constituted ourselves.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>We changed the head count, we ditch manufacturing, ditch distribution

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that way, and we pushed towards a more creative, innovative,

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial style. And I think we're much better place to

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>day than we would have been twenty years of it.

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, is it perfect? No, it's not perfect. We're

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>not a brand new company. We're not We're not a

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>two year old startup. We've been at this company in

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>some derivation has been around a thirty years. But I

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're much more open minded about how to change

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and how to be flexible now, much more. And my

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges every day are based on that as well. As

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just finding hits. I've heard you say before that you

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>had a headcount of about fifteen thousand at the turn

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of the millennium and you got it down to five thousand,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder does that make major labels more nimble today?

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you able to respond faster than in the past. Yeah,

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's also about the training of those people.

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Whether you've got five thousand or fifteen thousand's what people

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are doing. And by the way, this wasn't a choice.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we at the era probably did it kicking

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and screaming. We gave up manufacturing, we gave up distribution.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like we want to give up manufacturing distribution.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It was taken away from us. But the fact is

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>now we're able to gear people much more to what

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we need to do. We have way more creative people

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and way more entrepreneurial people in our company than we

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>did a year ago, never mind five years ago or

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago. So there's definitely been a deliberate emphasis

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on that basis. And as I said, of that fifteen thousand,

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.239
<v Speaker 1>many of those jobs are just redundant now and they

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be applicable. And no disrespect to any of those

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>people who were did their jobs probably very well. They're

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not needed. So we've had to change. And I think

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that we were able to make that adaptation when we

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>were written off and I was okay because bear in

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are we misread the turn and millennium and you know,

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we were going to be non existent and by ten

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>years time and we went below ground and we built

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>systems back up more sensibly. We bought companies, and we

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>bought stakes and companies. We bought Burttle Spend in two

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine for what looks like an incredible bargain now

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's probably the value is fifteen twenty times that amount,

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and Universal bought E M. I and we bought in

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>My Music publishing. And so maybe we wouldn't have done

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that in the boom of CDs, but we had to

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>because we had to go back to the drawing board.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And that period between probably two thousand and three four

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the early two thousand and tens, the general

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>perception was we were left behind. So we had to

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>go and get ourselves to be a bit more smart

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about the way we did things. And I do think

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we did that. I think that chapter of the Live

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Business taking over and other areas of the business being

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>more prominent gave us the chance to re evaluate ourselves

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and reconsider what on earth we were doing to be relevant.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I came here during that chapter. I came

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>here and came to American two thousand and six, which

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was in the middle of that time period, you know,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was a bit like starting again, suremy, to

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>be honest, but with fortunately amazing catalog. Obviously, the pandemic

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>has been incredibly difficult from many businesses, but recorded music

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually thriving to the tune of double digit growth. Well,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, you know, tech takes a lot

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of credit for that, because the tech platforms have put

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>music in people's homes and in their cars and in

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their phones so directly that we were able to benefit

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from that, and suddenly a lot of people are a

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more time to listen to music. After the initial

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>shock of COVID for the first couple of months, then

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>people settled into a different routine in their lives and

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>music became a very important part of that routine. So

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>what has been a bit more strategic is understanding the

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>share volume of music that would be going into those

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>platforms and understanding that we would need a bigger share

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of that that quantity, and so we do have nets

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that trall much wider for music than any point in history.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We are now looking at constant ways of finding more

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>music to put through our system and understand where it sits.

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>And certainly at the beginning of COVID, that timing worked

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>very well because we were able to put more music out.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Despite the fact you naturally think with what COVID happening

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that it would be less music, it actually wasn't. We

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't suffer from the fact that everyone stopped. Now I'm

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>not saying there won't be a value gap, because I

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think there will be. There will be creative synergies that

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't happened because COVID. There may have been a meeting

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in a studio, or two people might have met in

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>a school, or there may have been a show that

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>changed the parameters of something. Those connections are very important

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to what we do and how we build artists careers,

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm pretty sure not as many connections happened on

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>certain levels. Obviously, people were communicating in a different way,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and there was positivity of that communication. Even my own company.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like in the last year I've communicated with

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>my staff in some ways in a better way because

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I visibly see them more often than I may have

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>done if we just presumed we were going to bump

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>into each other three times a year. It's different now.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I imagine the Long Tale of COVID

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>will probably be playing itself out for a couple of years.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, live music, even though it's coming back in

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 1>dribs and drabs, it's not going to be what it

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was anytime soon, right, you know, the live chapter is

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the experience that defines the whole music process,

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore to have that missing it may not

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>make a difference for some genres of music, but for

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>some others it's vital. I know from those moments, because

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been fortunate enough to be in those moments when

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>something is transformed, the moment maybe you know, at the

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>festival or just the club with seven people in it,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't had that experience, and I think we

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>missed that experience, you know, I certainly do you know,

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that again, There's been a lot

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff online and artists have done amazing things from

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>their bedrooms and from and readaptation of certain staging and

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff, But the life thing is

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>more important than that. What was the last show you

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>saw before COVID? Oh? God, um, I think it was

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a Tile of the Creator show. My senting year old

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>daughter badges me to go to as many shows as possible,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that was the last one. I know.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It was my wife's birthday. We went to see Harry

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Styles play a radio show at the Barry Bare Room,

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we went on to the Brooklyn Center to

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>see Celine Dion. How schizophrenic is that? And honestly, that

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>isn't just made up for showing. I think that. You know,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting you look back at the year and it

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes blurred about COVID and then into how we really

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>had to up our game on social responsibility. Look, we're

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a genuinely global company. There are a lot of companies

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that are huge corporations that don't have offices in eighty countries.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>We do. So that was very easy to see the

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>effects and the different measurements of those effects in the

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 1>communities around the world. And so that was to me

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that was just obvious. You know, the globality of what

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we do was something that we need to act quickly on.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And I do work for a corporation, and there are

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>big brand name corporation, but honestly, in Japan, they are

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>very philosophically sound. And so therefore, when we realized we

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>needed to do something, it couldn't just be a token gesture,

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and it couldn't just be something that was like we'll

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>do a one off donation and hopefully everyone want us

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>leave us alone. That that wouldn't work. Because we worked

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with music, which is so living and breathing and so

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>violent people's lives, that we decided that we need to

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>do something dramatic and it needed to be continuous. And

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>then the terrible events of the beginning of June with

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>George Floyd, if that wasn't a wake up call to everybody,

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>never mind whether it was a music company or a

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>corporation or a government or a country, we needed to

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>act on that too. Than one of the things we

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about when we put together Social Justice Fund, which

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>which we went to Tokyo to get approval, was that

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't a knee jerk reaction and it wasn't something

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that that was going to last a month. And then

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because the issues that we face in the business because

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>black music is the heart of what we do as

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a company right now, that those issues not something we

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>just turned around and face in a minute and then

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>walk away. We have to make it completely part of

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the fabric of the company. So since then, what we've done,

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we've now supported I think over three nine organizations since

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>June globally everywhere. Some of them are tiny and some

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of them are very big organizations. And so now part

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of my legacy is to make that part of everything

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we do, and hopefully, quite frankly, it makes us a

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>better company and makes us a better destination for art really,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which is would be great. That was the case. Okay,

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a little bit about Spotify turning fifteen

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this year, and it was actually Sweden that first return

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>to growth after many years of decline, which we had

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about at the turn of the century. Is there

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>something to be said for looking at a smaller country

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>like Sweden or like the UK, where you came up

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>as a microcosm of how the music business confunction on

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a global scale. Did you look towards that and model

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that when you came to the US. I think, certainly

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on the art side, yes, because you look at the

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>size of the UK and what it's produced artistically, it's

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>out of parameters a number of people. Whether that goes

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 1>back to the Beatles or whatever. I credit the BBC,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the time for that, because

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the BBC was mandated to play every type

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of art form when all of us were growing up,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think that made pop culture front and center.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>If someone headlines Glusterbury, first of all, they're on the

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>front cover of the Times newspaper. I'm not sure there's

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>many countries around the world where popular culture would be

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>so fun instead of so. What we exported out the

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>UK certainly gave me the confidence because I was aware

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that that that we could export something that's art, that's

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not steel or or ball bearings or even tech. That's

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>something very dramatic. And I think that what's happened with

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the tech revolution is that it can be anywhere. And

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Spotify, and I mean this is the most

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>complimentary sense, is uniquely Swedish and if you go to

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>their Stockholm office, you understand the roots of that company.

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it couldn't have been found in anywhere else,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know, TikTok's from China. China is a huge

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>country with potentially incredible industrial prowess for the next chapter

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of history, and TikTok is changing the nature of our

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>day to day business as well. But I think anywhere

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>anything can happen. In anywhere, anything can happen. And I'm

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing trends in popular music now globally. I read streaming

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>charts from all around the world at least twice a week.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And we have a young artist in Argentina. I think

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be fantastic. We're nurturing, we're taking it

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>very gently because she's young, but she's pretty special and

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>she's in the global charts right now. And I'm not

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>sure that would have happened so dramatically with all the

0:27:55.000 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>passport controls that physical distribution and broadcast isssubution had twenty

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago. The truth is that the world has become

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a smaller place. I just saw some statistics a couple

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of days ago for Russia, and that market is booming

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with local language music. And I look at markets where

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we're expanding and where we're building offices. There's a young

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Accle Gideon signed to Epic Records. He is in the

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>US streaming charts in the top twenty. But he's also

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>number one randomly in Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia right now,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>number one in those two cherrs not boarders. Where it

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>went to Europe first the UK and then through passport

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>control that didn't pass the boundaries that would have been

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there twenty years ago. It must be so nice to

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not have that immediate barrier of entry. Like you have

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>BTS they sing in Korean, you have rosaliea she sings

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in Spanish like the local language thing is no longer

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>such an inhibitor of success. That must be so freeing

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as someone who works on music, and that is what

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully keeps me young same excited. I mean, the other

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>week we had Rosalier and Bad Bunny on Saturday Night Live,

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and we worked for both artists. And the fact is

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that who would have said that on S and L

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago there would be a Latin language song

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>times two on that program. It would have been mind boggling,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, it worked and it was magical

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and those I believe those two artists are two of

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the best new artists in the world over the last

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>few years, and the fact is that people have got

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>open ears. I know most of the charts around the world. Now,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure my predecessors had to because there was checkpoints.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think of UK any more or less important

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>than Mexico. Doesn't all have to be in English, no,

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>And and by the way, there's some artists that we

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have on our ross st who, despite the fact they

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>have had huge English language pop records, when they're singing

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>their local language, it's way more transcendental. What moves you,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what inspires you? How do you find yourself motivated every day?

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So I have to create a lot of change in

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this company, and so my remit is very broad and

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>different to running a label as I did for twenty years.

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And so it's more broad based and it's not as

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 1>detailed and maybe on on the individual artists. But the

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that still moves me is the purest art form.

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh Scissor released the track on Christmas Day, and she

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was quick and her and a company put the record

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>out quickly. And I listened to this record, I'm going,

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>how does anybody come up with that hybrid and that

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>fusion of music, which, by the way, sounded like nobody else,

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Despite the fact that she's had hit records before and

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>makes this record that you look at the contributor to

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that piece of music, that it's completely unique, and then

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it come out of nowhere and the audience understand it

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>quickly and it became a huge hit very quickly. Not

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the measurements of hits, it's because it touched

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>people so quickly, that record, and it was out on

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Day. You know, it wasn't put out with a

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>huge campaign, but the music absolutely completely got under everyone's skin.

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, you're talking about good day spaces that right.

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to that record four months later and

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still magical. So those moments moving and now much

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>more kind of things we're talking about. I just want,

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, our artists to be happy with what we

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>do for them, and I want our staff to be

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>happy with what happens in our company. And that's not

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>easy either. This is a combustible business and it is

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>emotional and it can be dramatic. As I just said,

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do really want to achieve that Before

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I am sit with a and rugs somewhere with a

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>flask of soup and listen to music with without some

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the scale of what I have to do at

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Looking at the Grammys, talk about a diverse

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>portfolio between Beyonce, Harry Styles, Travis Scott, dojaquat Her. You know,

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you've really got it covered. How are you feeling coming

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>into the Grammys this year, Well, it's weird. Every year

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when the Grammars comes up, it feels like a lot

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of work and a very busy week. And actually when

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have you got us a will shame the Grammars.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously it's got to be diverse if we

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the company of our scale, and it would be no

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>different for our competitors. You know, if you haven't got

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>diversity of the Grammys, then you're not doing something right. Now.

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>There's always this thing where they only go for the hits,

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and they only go for the things that are happening

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>today and they're not interested in tomorrow. Well that's actually

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not true. From the diversification of music we have. We

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of stuff. We have stuff in our

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and being folk and we have all the categories covered

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>within our organization. You know, I think that it's very

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to judge. I know, Drake stood up and did that,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>said it exactly as it is. It's hard to make

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a competition of music a competition, but the one thing

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we do need to be represented in a

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>well rounded way because we are a big company and

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we want that diversification of music. So I feel good

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about it this year. I mean, you know, I've been

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>lucky enough to be in those moments. I was lucky

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>when Adele came through and one those sets of Grammys

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and Best New Artists, and then twenty one and then

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and I was involved in the campaign for

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>random Acxis Memories and that was kind of weird because

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>two French guys dressed as robots beat the Grammy system

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and one that night, and that was definitely one of

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the best nights of my career because they are wonderful creators.

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, they are the purest form of creators,

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, as is Adele and as is Beyonce and

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>those artists when they were in. It's a great source

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of pride. And I've had great nights and the Grammy

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is sureley really you know, I mean, I've been very fortunate.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of those nights will be you know, those moments

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I'm not doing this anymore. And they

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>were truly fantastic, you know, and so I like more

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of those. But but but I have plenty of memories.

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, David Bowie, Black Star five Grammys,

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get voted Grammedy Album the Year Out of

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Hamley won five Grammars, didn't get many nominations. See,

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I still remember that five years later. Rob, Thank you

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for talking to us. Best of luck at

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Grammys, and we're very much looking forward to seeing

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>what you do well. You'll be kept posting. You'll have

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>an opinion under at Lee Shirley's. So we'll just keep

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on trying to surprise you. And we'll keep this stuff

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>going because it is a transformative time for business, and

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to we're gonna keep changing with it.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And now a word with mastering engineer Emily Lazar, whose

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>work is often the last step the music making process

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and the one whose magic can make the difference between

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a song sounding good or great. For the Grammys, Emily

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>has ten projects in contention, including three in the Album

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Year category. Cole Plays Everyday Life Times, Women

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in Music Part Three and Jacob Collier's j C. Volume three.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Her resume also includes seminal releases by Vampire Weekend, Beck

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and Sia. Lazar's mixing and mastering mothership is New York's

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>The Lodge, which she founded in where she's worked on

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>some four thousand records. Lazar recently launched a charity initiative

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>called Move the Needle, which aims to close the gender

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>gap in music making Emily welcome. Thank you so much

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thanks Charlie, it is great to be here.

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna ask you a question that I'm sure

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you've never been asked, or maybe you've been asked at

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a good jillion times. How does it feel to be

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a woman in music? My most favorite least favorite question.

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I hate that question. I behore that question. That question

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>takes you to places that really don't belong in the conversation.

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>The conversation should be about the art you're making, what

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>brought you into the field, what inspires you, what makes

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you feel great, what makes you feel bad? Like? Those

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are the important things that the human side of of

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 1>what we all do, not what gender you are. I've

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>never really been able to even understand the question right

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>people say, what does it feel like to be a

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>female mastering engineer. My answers was like, I don't know.

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't identify as a female mastering engineer. I think

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>people are well meaning when they ask it, but to me,

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually condescending and degrading because it actually makes everything

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that you've done I feel like it's not being judged

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 1>equally in the rest of the world. For example, you're

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the first female master introdeer to do X. I get

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>that stealing breaking moments are really important, but there's this

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>twinge of yeah, but somebody else did it before you.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really matter for me. It was really just

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.479
<v Speaker 1>more important to me to get to do the things

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do, and so those were things that

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I was able to navigate. Now the younger generation has

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>taken none of it. I'm thrilled for them, like they

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Me too movement when the Me Too movement

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>happened such a long time overdue. Still hasn't really come

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>fully to fruition as far as I'm concerned. But like

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we and more kept our head down, did our work,

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>tried to stay out of the fray of elevating this

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation to the fervor that it got to deservedly because

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for fear that we wouldn't get to work right, that

0:37:57.760 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>we would be not taken seriously, that we would be

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>pariah's and not be able to do the things that

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we loved, whether it be a journalist or making records,

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and and that would have been the shame, because we

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>would have been removed from the conversation by virtue of

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we were kind of in an abusive

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>environment by calling out that abuse. But now that this

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>has changed, the paradigm is totally flipped, and I really

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>love it. I applaud it. I think it's really fabulous progress.

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we need even more. I think we're in

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a in a time now where hopefully the tides are

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>changing and we're starting to see some equity. Two point

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>six percent of music producers and engineers being female. That

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is not equitable, and we're just not there. We have

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work to do, and um, I'm really

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 1>excited to try to help take on that challenge and

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>change that statistic, not just with myself but in helping others.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But I do hate that question. I think of mastering

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>as a last step in the ETI process, and maybe

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the first step in the manufacturing and the distribution process.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I just so curious, how do you step in as

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that last person in the process and understand the musicality

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and what that person or the artist is trying to do?

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you even wrap your head around it? That's

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a hugely important part of my process. I make

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge effort to have a dialogue and understand big

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>picture like what are we trying to do here? What

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is this about? What was going on in your life? Like?

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>How is this different from your last album? What was

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there something inspiring you to go in this direction? Is

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this song or this chorus doing what it's supposed to do?

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>As you start to hone in on all the different things,

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is this sequence doing the right thing? Is it telling

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the right story? I'm listening to all your songs and

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing this common thread. Do you think maybe there

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>are some intertextuality here that you didn't see that we

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>should follow and take us down this road that you

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe even subconsciously wrote. It's similar to like artists writing

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>songs and having a meaning and then a listener making

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>their own meaning and it being incredibly meaningful for the listener,

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but actually not but the writer was in ending but

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>still kind of hitting the right buttons. It's that kind

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of thing, and my goal is to always serve the song,

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>tell the story, make that artist feel that we've done

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>every possible thing we can. We're like that last chance

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Texico to gas up, like making sure that we have

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>done everything we possibly can to help them give birth

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to that baby and put it out in the world.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And I really do think of songs and albums as

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>giving birth. It's very similar, having done that as well

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with my own son. It is a it's a you know,

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>labor of love and getting them out, putting them out

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and having people potentially judge them and comment on them

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 1>very nerve wracking experience. I think can be exhilarating and

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>can be devastating um and feel very misunderstood. So helping

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>an artist give birth to that baby and then getting

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>them through that moment where they're like, is my baby ugly?

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you like my baby? Is anybody else gonna like

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>my baby? You know? I enjoy that part of it

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>as well. And working with bands like are you dealing

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with one person? Do you talk to the band as

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a unit. It's different every single time. It really depends

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on them their schedule, where they are, if they're touring

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or not, minus things like pandemics, whether the album is

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>being put together in a single driven way, or i e.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting one track every couple of weeks or whatever

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>months and we put it together and they're releasing it

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one a time because there's a new kind of trend

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to you know. I've done tons of zoom calls with

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some people, you know, like have a lot of options

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and pick. Sometimes I'll get people three options for something

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll pick and might say, Wow, I see

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing on one, and then then I see

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.439
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing on number number two, version two. So

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love the choruses in number two, but I

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>love the verses in number one. Can we edit together

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the choruses from due the Chriss Wonica? Yes? Sure, great,

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>awesome idea. So there's things that happened that you wouldn't

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>even imagine, weird, cool edits, and things that make things

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.760
<v Speaker 1>flow and feel dynamic and tell the story that are

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 1>done on purpose, that are specific. It's not just a

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 1>five second decision and here you go. It's not like

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that at all, not for me anyway. I wanted to

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about just one example from your incredibly long discography,

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>which is insane. You've worked on four thousand albums throughout

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>your career. Crazy. This is a Grammy nominated song, seas Chandelier.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 1>That song is so interesting sonically because there's a part

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the course where it really sounds like her voice is cracking,

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>which of course gives it that grit and makes the

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>song so unique. Can you tell me about like a

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>decision like that to leave the sort of the rawness,

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the imperfection of like a guttural vocal. Well, so that

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a production and a see a decision, but

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I specifically can recall that. Look, I listened to music

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>all day long, and not everything affects me as deeply

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>as another thing, but I try really hard to try

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to connect to what's happening, and I do have visceral

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>reactions to these things. And that song made me cry

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and laugh, and I remember being like wow, and I

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was like laughing because I was like, I'm crying. I

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>can't believe I'm crying. This song is unbelievable. I remember

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just listening to it a few times and being like

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I was speechless, and I was just having an emotional

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>response to it and I remember everything about mastering that song,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and I remember doing it a lot of times two

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 1>get it to the point where I thought it was perfect,

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and I leaned into that edginess, and I leaned into

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the wailing of what her vocal which is insane, what

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>she can do with her voice. I kind of leaned

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 1>into that. And I had done her earlier albums as well,

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 1>her indie albums, and so I was familiar with her,

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and that just literally blew my doors off. I'm just

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>grateful and lucky that I got to hear that song

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>before it was even out. Well, so let's talk a

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the three album of the Year contenders

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that you worked on. Albums by Coldplay, Him and Jacob Collier.

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Those seem on the surface to be very different sort

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of artists sonically. How did you approach them? Sonically speaking?

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>They are really all different but equally beautiful and deep albums.

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They all have one thing in common. They're telling stories,

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>like real, big stories, and they all communicate in an

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>intimate way, even in their biggest moments and in their

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest songs on the album. There's an intimacy there in

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the delivery on all three of those albums, and so

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a through line. I don't know if

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a overall sonic tonal mastering through line, but for me,

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a through line because that's a big part of

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 1>mastering for me. I wanted to ask you. You mentioned

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>part of your job is providing the sort of uniform

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>listening experience across platforms devices. However you hear your music

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>UM title, I feel like, has you know really sort

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of found its niche with audio files people who appreciate

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the high quality of sound. UM, does this change what

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you deliver the fact that there's that there's more sort

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of like high fi minded um outlets. No, Yes, And

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been demanding this and I feel like I'm like

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>screaming from the rafters, like that this needs to change.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>This needed to change a long time ago. And Spotify

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>love them, great platform, super easy, everyone has it, everyone

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 1>uses it. Sounded awful. Really sound does not sound as

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>good as it should. It's a disservice to the artists,

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a disservice to the people who are making records

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and crafting this stuff. And it's a huge disservice to

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the consumer because I get to hear it at full

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>res resolution. In my studio, I get to hear it

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.919
<v Speaker 1>on great speakers. I'm not hearing its streaming. I'm hearing

0:46:55.920 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the real deal. My concern is that we're just not

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>giving people the quality that they need, or the quality

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that the art deserves. And I can boil this down

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to an example that I've made before, and I'll use

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it again just because I think it makes it clear.

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>If I were to go to a museum and pay

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the museum entrance fee and wander down the halls and

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:28.399
<v Speaker 1>end up standing in front of the Mona Lisa, if

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the Mona Lisa were hanging on the wall and it

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was a photo copy of a photo copy of a

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>shrunken photocopy of a stamp sized version of a black

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and white photocopy of the Mona Lisa, I can't imagine

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that it would give me the same visceral reaction that

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it would if I actually saw the Mona Lisa smile.

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>And this is to me a very similar experience with

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with music. The representation that the consumer is

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>getting is the equivalent of a photocopy of a reduced

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>size photo a copy. That's a problem. And I appreciate

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>title for standing their ground and offering higher res and

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>actually also addressing the credits issues. Um, and I'm very

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>very grateful that Spotify has made this announcement and that

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna work as hard as they can to offer

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what I think would be a really great start. Streaming

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>things are convenient, but they don't sound good period. Tune

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in next week for another episode of Strictly Business.