WEBVTT - Listener Questions 67

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.159
<v Speaker 1>If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It comes

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with the privacy and security you expect from Apple. Plus,

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>you earn up to three percent daily cash back on

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>every purchase, which can automatically earn interest when you open

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a high yield savings account through Apple Card. Apply for

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Card in the wallet app subject to credit approval.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Savings is available to Apple Card owners subject to eligibility.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple Card and Savings by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Lake Sidney Branch, Member FDIC, terms and more at applecard

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I'm Jackie Thomas, the host of a brand new

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Black Effect's original series, black Lit, the podcast for diving

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>deep into the rich world of black literature. Black Lit

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 2>is for the page turners, for those who listen to

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 2>audiobooks while running errands or at the end of a

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>busy day. From thought provoking novels to powerful poetry, we'll

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>explore the stories that shape our culture. Listen to Black

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Lit on the Black Effect Podcast Network iHeartRadio, app, Apple Podcasts,

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>So Black Effect Podcast Network is sponsored by diet Coke.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 4>From tips for healthy living to the latest medical breakthroughs,

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 4>WebMD's Health Discovered podcast keeps you up to date on

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 4>today's most important health issues. Through in depth conversations with

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 4>experts from across the healthcare community. WebMD reveals how today's

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 4>health news will impact your life tomorrow.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not that people don't know that exercise is healthy,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 5>it's just that people don't know why it's healthy, and

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 5>we're struggling to try to help people help themselves in

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 5>each other.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Listen to WebMD Health Discovered on the iHeartRadio app or

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 4>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm doctor Laurie Santos, host of the Happiness Lab podcast.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 6>As the US.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Elections approach, it can feel like we're angrier and more

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 3>divided than ever, But in a new copule season of

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>my podcast, I'll Share with the Science really shows that

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 3>we're surprisingly more united than most people think.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 7>We all know something is wrong in our culture and

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 7>our politics, and that we need to do better and

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 7>that we can be better.

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:01:58.800 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>listen to podcasts.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 8>In nineteen eighty two, Atari players had one game on

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 8>their minds, sword Quest, because the company had promised one

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 8>hundred and fifty grand in prizes to four finalists, but

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 8>the prizes disappeared, leading to one of the biggest controversies

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 8>in eighties pop culture. I'm Jamie Loftus. Join me this

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 8>spring for the Legend of sword Quest. We'll follow the

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 8>quest for lost treasure across four decades. Listen to the

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 8>Legend of sword Quest on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 8>or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey or Hey, when was the last time your family moved?

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 9>We moved to our house maybe eleven years ago.

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's been a while. You know. The longer you

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>live somewhere, the harder it is to move.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 9>What do you think that is? Lake indersia or potential energy?

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 9>Are we trapped in a potential energy?

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Well sort of. I think you're trapped by your You

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>gradually accumulate stuff in every corner, makes it impossible to ever.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 9>Leave because of the gravity or the nostalgia.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>The overwhelming task of packing it all up into boxes.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 9>Sounds like you need Marie Coonda to do some consulting

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 9>for you.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's all right. I try to leave the house as

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>little as possible.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 10>Anyway.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 9>Hi, I'm Jorge Amy, cartoonists and the author of Oliver's

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 9>Great big universe.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at UC Irvine, and I've moved a lot of times

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in my life and never was it fun.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's a certain aspect of getting rid of your

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 9>old stuff that's kind of cathartic. Don't you feel lighter

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 9>after you move? Or did you just bring everything with you?

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 11>No?

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I always start out so optimistic and thinking, Oh, this

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>time it's going to be great, and then about halfway

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>through I realized I'm only five percent of the way through.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end of just throwing random stuff away.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 9>Of throwing out your stuff, of packing. Oh, but you know,

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 9>you can hire people to do that, right, or ask

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 9>your friends and buy them a peer.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I usually use moving as an opportunity to cleanse myself

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of all the stuff I should have thrown away earlier.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 9>When was the last time you moved?

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Between two thousand and seven and twenty twelve, the family

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>moved across the Atlantic, I think eleven times.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 9>I think that's just called going on vacation, isn't.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It now when you're living there for nine months and

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>setting up schools and bank accounts.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 9>Soul man, But you've been in the same place now

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 9>for twelve years.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, since the kids got older, we've stayed in California

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and haven't moved back to the Collider as often.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 9>Wow, so it's your house now, just the giant pile

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 9>of stuff.

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't even close the door, it's so jammed full

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of crap.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, fortunately it makes for a good soundproofing, I guess

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 9>for podcast recording.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why I've been doing it.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 9>Yes, one positive thing. But anyways, welcome to our podcast

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 9>Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>In which we help you soar through the ever increasing

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>piles of knowledge that humanity has accumulated along the way.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>We learned this, we learned that, we learned the other thing,

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and our goal is to organize it to marry condo

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>your mind and make it crisp and clean and understandable.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Because we think, we hope, we assume the universe is understandable,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that we can make sense of it with our little minds,

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and that we can explain all of it to you.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 9>That's right. We try to relocate your brain out there

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 9>to the giant, vast cosmos that exists out there for

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 9>us to try to understand, and we try to move

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 9>you with the amazing things that scientists have discovered about

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 9>why we're here and how things work.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And one thing we'd love our listeners to do is

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to participate in this goal directly by asking their own

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>questions about the universe. Don't just sit back and let

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the answers from scientists rain down upon your brain. Go

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>out there and ask your own questions about the universe.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What doesn't make sense to you, how do you think

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it works, Why isn't your idea the right one about

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe? And so On this podcast we talk to

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you about the universe, but we also want to hear

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>from you. Send us your questions to questions at Danielandjorge

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 9>That's right, because it's not just scientists that have questions,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 9>it's everybody. We all look at the night sky, the

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 9>day sky, all of the guys, and we wonder about

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 9>what's out there and how to make sense of it all.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a part of being human trying to make sense

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, wanting to understand it, and it's something

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that everybody can do. You don't have to be a

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>professional scientist to look up at the night sky, and

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder what it all means. Or if you've been listening

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast and there's some ideas that don't quite

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>fit into your mind together, they don't click the way

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that you want them to, then write to me questions

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Everybody gets an answer,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes I got a question that we answer right

0:06:58.200 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>here on the podcast.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and sometimes we'd like to answer your questions. And

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 9>so today on the program, we'll be tackling listener questions

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 9>number sixty seven over five dozen.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>These are questions for listeners that tickled me, or I

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>thought we would have fun talking about, or I needed

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a little extra time to do some research before answering.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 9>So we have three awesome questions here today. They are

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 9>about habitable moons, about the Higgs field, and about Daniel's

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 9>favorite subject, particle colliders and moving it. Right, are we

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 9>going to move the particle collider?

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to move the particle collider, but we

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>might spend tens of billions of dollars on a new one.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 9>Oh boy, isn't it easier just to move it?

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't gain anything from moving it. You need a bigger,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>fancier one or a different flavor of one and those

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are expensive.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 9>Oh boy, Well we'll dig into that, but first we'll

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 9>tackle a question from Lydia, who is eleven years old.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 12>Hi, Daniel Jorge. My name is Lydia and I'm eleven

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 12>years old. I have a question for you. Do you

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 12>think it will ever be possible to move planets or

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 12>moons into more habitable zones? And if you could, which

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 12>planet or moon in our Solar System.

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 7>Would you move?

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 9>All right, pretty interesting question about lots of things here,

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 9>about habitable zones and solar systems and about I guess

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 9>planet orbits. That's a lot going on in the mind

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 9>of an eleven year old.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I love that Lydia is thinking about the future. She's

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to make the Solar System a better place for humanity,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and she's wondering about all the details of it. So

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>good job, Lydia. Thanks for your forward thinking.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, future president, hopefully seems like we could use some

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 9>some forward thinking in our leadership. But the question is interesting.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 9>It sounds like she's asking whether there are planets out

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 9>there that we can't live in or move us, whether

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 9>we can somehow not terraform it or change it, but

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 9>actually just move it. To a cozier spot.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. For example, some of the planets that are closer

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Sun than Earth, Venus and Mercury, are very

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>very hot, and planets that are further from Earth, like Mars,

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>are very very cold. Neither of those seem very cozy

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to live on. And so I think Lydia's ideas like

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>could we bring Mars closer? Could we push Venus further out?

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Or I love that she even mentions moons. You know,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Jupiter and Saturn have some huge moons. Could we snag

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those and bring them closer and make it

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a place that humanity could survive.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 9>You need a lot of friends and a lot of

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 9>beer to get your friends to move a whole moon.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Depends how much stuff it's accumulated in the years. Right,

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>If you've been keeping it clean and crisp, maybe it's

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a little easier to pack everything up.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 9>I think it just depends on how many friends you have.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Can you call a moving company and be like, hey,

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>do you have a box big enough to fit like Europa?

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 9>I'm sure U haul has something for that. You haul

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 9>the moon, you haul a planet. I mean, they just

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 9>rent you the vehicle of stuff. Then you have to

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 9>do it.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, if they have a device capable of moving a moon,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll drive it. That sounds like fun. I compare aalletl

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>park that thing.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 9>Don't you need a special license?

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Though only if you get pulled over.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 9>By the Solar syst the police. But anyways, it's a

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 9>pretty interesting question, and so let's dig into it, Daniel,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 9>Is it possible to move a planet to a different orbit?

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So it definitely is possible, like the physics doesn't say no,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But in the case of some planets or moons, it's

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a good idea, Like, even if you could

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>do it, it wouldn't really give you a place humans

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>could live. And in other cases, like Mars, it's possible

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and it might solve some of the problems, but it

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>would cost an enormous amount of energy.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 9>Hmm, Well, you mentioned Mars, so maybe let's start but

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 9>that what's wrong with Mars now, isn't it sort of

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 9>already in the habitable zone?

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So Mars is a lot smaller than Earth and a

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>little further out, so it gets a lot less sun

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>than Earth does, which makes it very very cold. It

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>also has a very dilute atmosphere, so it has trouble

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>hanging on to any of the heat that it does

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>get from the Sun. So bringing Mars closer Earth would

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely help that. You also need to increase the atmosphere,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so you couldn't totally avoid doing terraforming. You need to

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>make an oxygen rich atmosphere unless you want to live

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in bubbles your whole life. But bringing it closer to

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Earth would be handy. It would also make it easier

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to colonize Mars, like the round trip time would be shorter,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>connections between the two civilizations could be crisper, So there'd

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of advantages to having Mars closer in.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 9>Oh, I see, it's sort of like that saying, right,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 9>like if Muhammad can't go to the mountain, then you

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 9>bring the mountain to you.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. It's sort of like where you're going to

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>buy your vacation house. Is it just going to be

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>half an hour away or is it a nine our

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>plane flight. It's a lot easier if it's just the

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>short drive.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 9>But is he the biggest problem for Mars? It's I

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 9>know it's cold, but it's not like crazy cold.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Mars is definitely like less comfortable than Antarctica,

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's not cold the way like the surface of

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Pluto is, but it's definitely very cold, too cold for humans.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>But that's all connected to the atmosphere, right. It has

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>a very dilute atmosphere, so it doesn't hold in that temperature.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That thin atmosphere also means that it doesn't protect you

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>from cosmic rays the way the Earth's atmosphere does. It

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>also doesn't have a magnetic field to do a lot

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of shielding. So yeah, there's big problems with Mars that

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't solve even by moving it.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 9>So then would it even help to move it, Like

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 9>if it got warmer, would it maybe just blow off

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 9>all the atmosphere or is this an actual working proposal.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>No, that's definitely an issue. Now you bring it warmer,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to melt some of the frozen CO two

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>for example that's at the poles, and that's going to

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>increase the atmosphere, but you might also blow it off. Right,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as you say, is increasing radiation because Mars is smaller,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't have the same gravity as Earth, so

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's harder for it to hang onto its atmosphere. That's

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>a bigger issue for the moons for example, like Europa,

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or Enceladus or Io. All these big moons of the

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>gas giants. A lot of them have frozen surfaces, and

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>some of them even have like liquid oceans underneath them.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you brought them into the habitable zone, you

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>would melt those surfaces and boil off those oceans and

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>leave yourself with just a rocky core. So moving these

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>things to the habitable zone wouldn't necessarily work.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, let's say that we try with Mars and we

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 9>wanted to make it as warm as Earth. How much

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 9>would you.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Have to move it in Well, given the current atmosphere,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to have Mars be closer to the Sun

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>than Earth, because Mars can't hang on to the heat.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you just wanted to move Mars like near

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's orbit so that it was in the same

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>zone it was easier to go back and forth, which

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>might make terraforming and building an atmosphere easier as well.

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Then you'd need to do what's called a a Homan transfer,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a way to like change orbits. This is

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>what spaceships do. For example, if they're orbiting high and

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they want to go low, or they're orbiting low and

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to go high. It's a classic way to

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>change your orbit by firing your rocket thrusters.

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 9>How does it work? Do you have to like accelerate

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 9>or just move away from the sun or towards the Sun?

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 9>How does that work?

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's a zillion different ways you could do it,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but the Homan transfer is the one that requires the

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>least energy, and it definitely requires some force, some acceleration.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you're in a circular orbits you have a particular

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>velocity and a particular radius, and that's all aligned and nice,

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and now you want to be in a different circular orbit,

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe larger, maybe smaller. What you need to do is

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>change to an elliptical orbit. So you fire your thrusters,

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so you move out of your circular orbit into an

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>elliptical orbit. Elliptical orbit, because an ellipse doesn't have a

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>fixed radius, right, a circle is a fixed radius. You're

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>always the same distance from the Sun or whatever. An

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>ellipse you get closer sometimes and further other times. You

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>go on this elliptical orbit temporarily, and then when you

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the radius you want, you fire your rockets

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>again to put yourself back into a circular orbit at

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that new radius. So it's two firings of your rocket,

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>two accelerations, two delta vs as they call them in

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the space business.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 9>Oh, I see. So you wouldn't have to fire your

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 9>rockets or push the planet the w hallway. You just

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 9>give it like a one initial push, and then later,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 9>when you're further where you want to be, you give

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 9>it another push.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 9>And in the case where you want to get closer

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 9>to the Sun, you're talking about slowing down the planet, right, you.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Want to slow it down, you also have to change

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>its direction, right, because in an elliptical orbit operates differently

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>from a circular orbit, So you want to change your

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>whole vector, not just the magnitude.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 9>But yeah, okay, so we have to slow down Mars.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 9>And then once it gets closer to Earth, or maybe

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 9>even beyond Earth or its orbit, then you want to

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 9>slow it down some more.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, things in the inner Solar System orbit at a

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>higher velocity than things in the outer Solar System, and

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just basic circular motion. So for example, Earth is

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>moving at thirty kilometers per second relative to the Sun

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and Mars is moving at twenty four kilometers per second.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Relative to the Sun, and that doesn't depend on mass,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It just depends on radius. At every radius is a

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>certain velocity you need in order to move in a

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>circular orbit. In the end, you'd have to speed Mars

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up in order to get it to move at the

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Earth's orbit.

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 9>All right, So then once you're in this closer orbit

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 9>to the Sun, then you'll eat in a stable orbit.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And so it did the calculation for like

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>how much of a kick would you need to give

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Mars in order to accomplish this, And so initially, to

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>move Mars into an elliptical orbit, you have to change

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>its velocity by like two and a half kilometers per second,

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>which is not a small amount. I mean Mars is

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>currently going like twenty four kilometers per second, so it's

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like more than ten percent of the speed of Mars.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you're in the elyptical orbit. And then to

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>kick it back into a circular orbit, you have to

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>give it a delta v of almost three kilometers per second.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And so those are the two kicks that you have

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to give Mars in order to change its orbit to

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have the same radius as the Earth's orbit.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 9>Oh interesting, And so it sort of sounds like it's

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 9>going to be hard, right, because you have to sloid

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 9>down by ten percent of a whole giant planet.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And it's fascinating because these numbers don't depend

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on mass, Like it's the same for a proton as

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it is for a planet when you're talking in terms

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of delta V. But then when you think about it

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of energy, right, the energy is like one

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>half mv squared, Then the mass really does affect it.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It takes a lot more energy to change the orbit

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of a planet relative to a proton. And these planets

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>just have so much mass. Even Mars, which is kind

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>of small, has like an unfathomable amount of stuff, and

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so to move Mars from one orbit to the other

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>would take like ten to the thirty one jewels.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's a lot of jewels. What would that mean? Like,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 9>could you use rockets to you know, slow yourself down?

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 9>How would you even slow down a planet?

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>This is a huge amount of energy, like orders of magnitude,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>much more than humanity produces and uses every year, So

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you'd need something crazy. You basically have to build like

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a rocket and attach it to the planet and drive

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the planet like a spaceship. So the simplest way to

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>do this is to like dig stuff out of the

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>planet and launch it into space. If you could pick

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>up a rock and throw it into space so it

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like come back to the planet it reaches escape velocity,

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>then effectively that's giving the whole planet a little push, right,

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>because by conservation momentum, the rock goes one way, the

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>planet goes the other way. Now, that's a really tiny

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 1>little push because it's just a little rock. But if

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you keep doing it, and you do a lot of it,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and you push those rocks really really fast, then effectively

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you are pushing the planet. So if you build something

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>which like dig stuff out of Mars and throws it

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>into space, that's essentially a rocket attached to Mars. And

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how you could do it.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 9>Couldn't you just use rockets.

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Like build rockets and just point them at the ground.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, basically build them upside down.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, you can do that. But then where you're

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get all the fuel? Right? The thing is you

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>need an enormous amount of energy, and so you might

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as well take the propulsion from the planet itself. This

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount, like in order to do this on

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Mars and achieve this kind of transfer. You just dig

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>out a trillion kilograms of material and eject it into

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>space at ninety nine percent of the speed of light

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>every single day for almost five thousand years.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 9>WHOA, that sounds crazy. So this is using your like

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 9>scooping up dirt and throw it in into space scheme.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we haven't even talked about, like how do

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you accomplish getting dirt to ninety nine percent the speed

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of light?

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 9>Could you you just use like atomic bombs or something

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, I'm thinking of like a rocket that uses

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 9>nuclear fission.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you might want to use fission or fusion as

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>a way to accelerate this stuff. But you can need

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>some propellant, right, you need to change the momentum of

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the planet, which means you need to eject something from it.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The other thing you could do is like solar power, right,

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>try to use that somehow. But either way, it's just

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>an overwhelming amount of energy, something that humanity you can't

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>even conceive of producing. Not to mention like wrestling into

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this crazy scheme.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 9>Because you need ten to the thirty one jewels, but like,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 9>how much is this then an atomic bomb? Give off.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 9>I'm just trying to get a sense of like, is

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 9>it thirty thousand nuclear bombs or thirty basillion.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, atomic bombs are pretty impressive, but they give off

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>order of magnitude like ten to the twelve, ten to

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the thirteen jewels, and we need ten to the thirty one.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking like, you know, ten to the nineteen

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>nuclear bombs.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 9>Whoa, so that's one followed by nineteen zero number of

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 9>nuclear bombs.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, So pretty impractical. Another way to do this,

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe is to try to take advantage of other things

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>in the Solar System that have energy in them, you know,

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>things like asteroids and comets. These things have a vast

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of gravitational energy as it come towards the inner

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Solar System. They're moving with very high velocity, and we

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>often are using the gravity of other things in the

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Solar System to navigate, like when we send spacecraft out

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there where you slingshot them around Jupiter or this kind

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So if you could somehow direct comets from

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the Ord Cloud or the Kuiper Belt to rain down

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and pass near Mars, each one of them would give

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Mars a little bit of a tug. If you did

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a gravitational slingshot using comets, it would change the trajectory

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the comet and the planet. So if you did

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that enough times, you could change the trajectory of the

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>planet enough to accomplish this same maneuver. But it would

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>still take a lot of comets.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 9>Well, yeah, it sounds like you were just making it

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 9>more complicated because you still have to spend all that

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 9>energy to move the comets to get out there to

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 9>the comets and then move them.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think it would take that much energy

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to move the comets because you're using the energy of

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>the Sun. You just take the comment, give it a

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>little nudge so it falls out of orbit. You know,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>they're moving pretty slow that far out, and so it

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take a big nudge to get them to fall

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>towards the Inner Solar System. And then they gather a

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy as they're coming in, and you take

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it when they're zipping by. But you know

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that's dangerous for other reasons, like you make a miscalculation

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and boom, comet hits the Earth and it's all over.

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, then we'll really need to move to another planet exactly.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So Lydia a great question. I don't think it's really

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>practical anytime in the near future, but I hope somebody

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>figures it out.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 9>It sounds like maybe it's easier just to terror for Mars,

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 9>so that becomes warmer.

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have a whole episode about how you might

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's very challenging and quite impractical. Maybe less

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>impractical than moving the planet. It's still very, very difficult.

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 9>All right, Well, maybe the solution is just to hire

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 9>Marie Konda to come clean up our planet and then

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 9>nobody will want to move.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Lydia, and I hope you clean up your room.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 9>Hey, yeah, and Lydia's parents, you're welcome. All right, Well,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 9>thank you Lydia for that awesome question. Now let's get

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 9>to our other questions of the day. We have a

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 9>question about the Higgs field and about particle colliders, so

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 9>let's get to those. But first let's take a quick break.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 11>AI might be the most important new computer technology ever.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 11>It's storming every industry and literally billions of dollars are

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 11>being invested, so buckle up. The problem is that AI

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 11>needs a lot of speed and processing power, so how

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 11>do you compete without cost spiraling out of control. It's

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 11>time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 11>Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or OCI. OCI is a single platform

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 11>for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. OCI

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 11>has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds,

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 11>offers one consistent price instead of variable regional pricing, and

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 11>of course nobody does data better than Oracle. So now

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 11>you can train your AI models at twice the speed

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 11>and less than half the cost of other clouds. If

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 11>you want to do more and spend less, like Uber

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 11>eight by eight and Data Bricks Mosaic. Take a free

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 11>test drive of OCI at Oracle dot com slash strategic.

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 11>That's Oracle dot com slash strategic, Oracle dot com slash Strategic.

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 13>I'm Buzsknight and I'm the host of the Taking a

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 13>Walk podcast music History on Foot John Oates.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 14>Great songs endured, and I'm very proud and happy to

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 14>know that I was part of something that will endure.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 13>The podcast is an audio diary of insightful conversations with

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 13>musicians and the inside stories.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Behind their music.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 15>Russ Kunkle, the basic connection that I had with someone

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 15>that was great coming out of the whiskey was David Crosby.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>David.

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 15>I met David and Steven and Graham kind of around

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 15>the same time, basically through my wife Leah, who is

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 15>Cass Elliott's sister.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 13>The message of the podcast is simple, honest conversation with

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 13>musicians about the music they create. Mike Campbell of The Heartbreakers.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>It is correct.

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 6>I rarely worked things out. I like to go off

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 6>the cup and try to grab things out of the

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 6>air while you're playing the song and try to catch

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 6>a little magic.

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 13>Listen to the Take in a Walk podcast on the

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 13>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I'm Jackie Thomas, the host of a brand new

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Black Effect original series, black Lit, the podcast for diving

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>deep into the rich world of black literature. I'm Jackie Thomas,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and I'm inviting you to join me in a vibrant

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>community of literary enthusiasts dedicated to protecting and celebrating our stories.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 2>listen to audio books while commuting or running errands. For

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>those who find themselves seeking solad, wisdom, and refuge between

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the chapters, from thought provoking novels to powerful poetry. We'll

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>explore the stories that shape our culture. Together. We'll dissect

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 2>classics and contemporary works while uncovering the stories of the

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>brilliant writers behind them. Black Lit is here to amplify

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the voices of black writers and to bring their words

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to life. Listen to black Lit on the iHeartRadio app,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm doctor Laurie Santos, host of the Happiness Lab podcast.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 3>As the US elections approach, it can feel like we're

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 3>angrier and more divided than ever. But in a new

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>copule season of my podcast, I'll share with the science

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>really shows that we're surprisingly more united than most people think.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 7>We all know something is wrong in our culture and

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 7>our politics, and that we need to do better, and

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 7>that we can do better with.

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 3>The help of Stanford psychologist Jamiale Zaki.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 11>It's really tragic.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 5>If cynicism were appeal, it'd be a poison.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 3>We'll see that our fellow humans, even those we disagree with,

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 3>are more generous than we assume.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 16>My assumption, my feeling, my hunch is that a lot

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 16>of us are actually looking for a way to disagree

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 16>and still be in relationships with each other.

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 3>All that on the Happiness Lap. Listen on the iHeartRadio app,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 8>In nineteen eighty two, Atari players had one thing on

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 8>their minds sword Quest. This wasn't just a new game.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 8>Atari promised one hundred and fifty grand in prizes to

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 8>four finalists, but the prizes disappeared, and what started as

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 8>a video game promotion became one of the most controversial

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 8>moments in eighties pop culture.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I just don't believe they exist. If my reactions shock

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at awe.

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 9>That sword was amazing, It was so beautiful.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 8>I'm Jamie Loftus. Join me this for the Legend of

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 8>sword Quest, a podcast about the fall of Atari and

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 8>the disappearing sword Quest prizes. We'll follow the quest for

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 8>lost treasure across four decades.

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 9>It's almost like a metaphor for the industry and Atari

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 9>itself in a way.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 8>Listen to the Legend of sword Quest on the iHeartRadio app,

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 8>Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 9>All right, we're answering listener questions here today, and our

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 9>next question comes from Mark, who has a question about

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 9>the Higgs Field.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 17>Hey, daniel Le Jorge I'm back with a serious question,

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 17>just as I sort of feel confident that I'm building

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 17>a mental map, at least at the most primitive.

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Level, of how this quantum stuff works.

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 17>This Higgs Boston is I don't understand how does a

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 17>field lend mass to other fields?

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>What does it?

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 8>In part?

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 17>If mass is like what potential energy you're gathered?

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 7>What?

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, that's the question. Where is the mass coming from?

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 17>Then it just seems like we're at another level of

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 17>incomprehensibility here. How is it transferring mass?

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 9>All right? A pretty massive question here about basically how

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 9>does the Higgs field work? How does it give mass

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 9>other particles?

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a really good question, a really deep question. And

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>when that we've been sort of probing in several different

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>episodes on the podcast, trying to give people an intuition

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>for how this works.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, I guess maybe let's go get back to basics.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 9>So the Higgs field is something that was proven to

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 9>exist about ten years ago, and in the media you

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 9>always hear that it's the field and the particle that

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 9>gives other particles their mass.

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And maybe we should start with the concept

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of a field because this is a little bit mysterious

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for people. I mean, particles are something we can sort

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of imagine. We think of them as tiny specks of

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff explaining the microscopic world. You see. They're traces in

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>cloud chambers or particle detectors. But fields are a little

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>bit more in direct We don't ever see fields directly,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and we say that particles move through fields, and particles

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>are excitations of fields. And a field is just like

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a number that you put everywhere in space, like the

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field, for example. It's just a number. It has

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a value here, it has a value there, it has

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a value somewhere else. But those values aren't just random

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and arbitrary. There's mathematics that describe how those values relate

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 1>to each other and how those values change in time.

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The same way. It's like if you have a sheet,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one that you might put on your bed and you

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>wave it in the air, right, waves move through that sheet,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and the same way waves can move through the Higgs

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>field or any other kind of field.

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 18>Right.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 9>Right, But I guess maybe a question is like our

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 9>fields physical things or just sort of like mathematical conveniences

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 9>that physicists use in their equations, Meaning like if you

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 9>have a field, but no particles in it? Is that

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 9>field there?

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows the answer to that question, man. I mean,

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the mainstream view is that fields are the

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamental building blocks of the universe as we know so far.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what they're made out of, and we

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>think of particles as emerging from fields. There're these special

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>ripples in the fields. They move in a special way.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>There's something that comes out of the fields. But nobody

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really knows that the fields are there, or if they's

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just something we think about. To answer your second question,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in our current conception, if you believe fields are there,

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>then they're still there with no particles in them. Right.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>They exist everywhere in space and they can never go

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>down all the way to zero because they're quantum, so

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they're always fuzzing and frothing a tiny little bit. But

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>whether fields are really there, like when we're not looking

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at them, is not a science question. It's a philosophy question.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It's one you can't test. It requires answering the question

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you don't look, And to do science

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to look.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 9>M But I guess you know we talked about and

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 9>I know you said that fields have like an energy

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 9>to them. So if they have an energy to them,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 9>doesn't that mean that they sort of exist when you're

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 9>not looking, well, we.

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Describe them as existing and having energy, that doesn't mean

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that they are there, that they are real. You know,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to interact with a field directly to

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like measure it. You know, you can see this effect

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>on other stuff, but you can't actually measure them directly,

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>even if you do ascribe energy to it. But the

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>energy in the field is a crucial concept for getting

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>an intuition for like how this all works, because what's

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>happening in the field when it's oscillating is sometimes it's

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>oscillating in a way that moves like way you wiggle

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>your sheet and a ripple moves through it. But sometimes

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you can also oscillate in place, and what's happening there

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the field is wiggling sort of the same

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>way that like a ball trapped in a well if

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there isn't any friction, can go up and down for ever.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It's switching between like kinetic energy it's moving fast at

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the well, and potential energy. It's not moving,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but it still has energy of location. When it's at

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of the well. Put a ball in a

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>little well. It can oscillate around that forever. Fields can

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do that too. They can sort of oscillate in place,

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>like a little standing wave, and that's where their mass

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>comes from.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 9>Like the whole field, or just like in a little spot.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>At any point. These fields can do that. So, for example,

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the electron field can be mostly empty and then in

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one spot they can be doing this special oscillation. And

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what an electron is. It's this special oscillation of

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the electron field. It's got some energy and it's oscillating

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in this stable way. And some fields can do this,

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like the electron field can do this. They can just

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>oscillate in place, and that's what we call an electron

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's an electron at rest. And fields that can

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do this are fields that have mass. Like the photon field,

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it can only oscillate in the way the ripples move.

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It can never oscillate in place. Right. The electromagnet field

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>can't make you a photon that's just sitting there because

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>photons don't have mass, and so in order to do

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing, to oscillate in place, they have to have mass.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 9>Oh, well, that's sort of another philosophical question, right, like

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 9>can an electron stay still? Like, isn't it a quantum particle?

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good point. An electron can never be

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>located to exactly one location, which you have is like

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a little packet. And we talked about like how long

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is a particle, how wide is a particle on a

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>recent podcast. It depends on how much uncertainty there is,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you always have like a little neighborhood of

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the field that's sort of oscillating coherently, and that depends

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on the uncertainty in those measurements. So it's never like

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a dot, it's none. Think of it like a single

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>point in the field as doing the oscillation. Think of

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it like a little localized packet. And the important thing

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to understand is that none of these fields operate independently. Right.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You have a field that has some energy, it's oscillating,

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>but there are also other fields, and the fields can

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>transfer energy back and forth. That's how, for example, the

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>photon field and the electron field, energy can slide between

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Themhotons can turn into electrons and positrons or photons can

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>push on electrons, for example, in the same way the

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field interacts with all of these fields and changes

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>how they wiggle, and then changing how they wiggle it

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gives them mass. It gives some of these fields the

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>capacity to do this wiggle in place thing, which is

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>what gives those particles mass.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 9>I think you're getting to Mark's question now, which is

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 9>that like, how exactly does that happen? And it seems

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 9>like you sort of said it this both ways, like

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 9>you need mass for it to stay in place, or

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 9>it can only stay in place if you give it mass.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, So go back to the thinking about the

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>ball in the well. The ball in the well moves

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way because it has mass. Right now,

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>if the ball didn't have mass, it would operate very differently,

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like it wouldn't feel the same gravitational potential energy, it

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't oscillate in the well that way. So imagine you

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>took a ball without mass and you added some special

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>magic forces that changed the way the ball moved. So

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>now it moves exactly the same way it would if

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>it did have mass. Okay, so every time the ball

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is moving, you give it a little special push to

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.919
<v Speaker 1>change its direction so that it moves exactly the same

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>way it did as if it had mass. That's what

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs field is doing. It's taking particles that naturally

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>don't have mass. The electron wouldn't have any mass without

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field and changing the way it moves in exactly

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the same way that you would expect if the electron

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>field had its own mass by itself. That's why we

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>say it gives the electron mass because it changes the

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>way the electron field wiggles and precisely the way it

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>would if the electron had its own mass. So the

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>mass comes from the Higgs field and the interaction between

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs field and the electron field. It's not inherent

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the electron field itself.

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 9>Meaning I guess I got a little confused with your

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 9>ball analogy because now I'm thinking, like, the ball has

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 9>mass or what. But it seemed interesting to think about that.

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 9>An electron is just a standing wiggle in the electron field,

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 9>And you're saying that because of the way that the

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 9>electron field and the Higgs field interact, then that wiggle

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 9>can stay in place. Is that kind of what you're saying?

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, So for the electron field to wiggle in place,

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be able to trade kinetic energy for

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>potential energy and back to kinetic energy and then back

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to back to potential energy. That's what the wiggle is, right,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And in order to do that, it needs to be

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>able to have potential energy, and that's what the Higgs

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>field gives it. Interactions between the electron field and the

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field create a potential well for the electron which

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lets it oscillate in.

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 9>Place, like it gives it a place for the energy

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 9>to go to.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, it can go from kinetic to potential and

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>then back, whereas a photon field is like just kinetic energy.

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's always flying through space that doesn't slosh back into

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>potential energy and then kinetic energy and potential energy and

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 9>Well, let me recap. Maybe what you're saying is that

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 9>in order for the electron field to wiggle in place

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 9>and therefore have an electron instead of need something to

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 9>suck some energy out of it kind of in place.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 9>Otherwise it we'll just go somewhere, we'll take off.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You could still have an electron, it would be massless, right,

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to have an electron at rest, it has

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to have mass, and so you need something to change

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>how the electron is oscillating. It's not exactly taking the

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>energy out of the electron field. It's just creating potential

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>energy for the electron You know, imagine, for example, a

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>kid on a swing. Right. In order for the kid

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to swing back and forth, that has to be the

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>swing there pushing them back as they move. Without the swing,

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the kid just flies off. So the Higgs field is

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the swing that keeps the kid oscillating

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>back and forth rather than just flying off.

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 9>It pushes the electron wiggle to stay in place.

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And in another universe where you didn't have

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a Higgs field and you had an electron field that

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>actually had mass on its own, it would wiggle in

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:52.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same way.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 9>Are there things that have mass on their own?

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>There are none in our universe. We don't think particles

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>like that can exist because it would break some of

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the other laws of particle physics, some of the symmetries

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that we think are held. That's why you need something

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Higgs field to give these particles mass.

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 9>Ah interesting, And I guess, just to be clear, you

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 9>need the Higgs field to give things resting mass, right.

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, resting mass is the only kind of mass we

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think about. There's this concept called relativistic mass, which is

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>really just a confusing way to think about energy. You

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't think about things gaining mass as they go faster.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>We define mass to be an invarying quantity, the same

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as you would measure at rest.

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 9>But I guess this idea that you know a lot

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 9>of our mass that we have in our bodies comes

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 9>from the energy doesn't necessarily come from particles. It comes

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 9>from the trapped energy between the particles. That's a different

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 9>kind of mass, right, Or does that mass also comes

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:46.760
<v Speaker 9>from the Higgs field?

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh? No, great point. You're right, This is not the

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>only way to get mass, right, Mass in general comes

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>from internal stored energy. What we've been describing is like

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>how the electron gets internal stored energy, is that oscillates

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in place that comes from the Higgs field. Quarks do

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Quarks get energy from the Higgs field.

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>But you put three quarks together into a proton that

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>has much more mass than the mass of the individual quarks.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's because those quarks now have a little bounce state.

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>The proton is like a little box keeping them oscillating

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in place, and that energy comes from the strong force

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>creating that box, not from the Higgs field, and that

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>most of the mass of the proton comes from the

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>energy of the bonds between the quarks, this little bull

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that the quarks live in that we call the proton.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So most of the mass in your bodies comes actually

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>from these bounds created by the strong force that give

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the proton internal stored energy. And that's really where mass

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>comes from, any kind of internal stored energy, not energy

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of motion, energy at rest, internal stored energy.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 9>So then the Higgs field is responsible for some of

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 9>our mass, but not all of it.

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, really a tiny, tiny fraction, because quarks have almost

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>no mass. Almost all of your mass comes from the

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mass of protons and neutrons, which is overwhelmingly from the

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>strong force.

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 9>So when they say, like the Higgs field and the

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 9>Higgs boson gives particles their mass, it's maybe not as

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 9>grand deal as of a statement as it may sound

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 9>to a lot of people.

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I mean, without the Higgs field, all the

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.959
<v Speaker 1>fundamental particles would have no mass, and then nothing would

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be possible, like electrons would fly out of orbits at

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, all this kind of stuff. But

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you're right, most of the mass in the universe doesn't

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>come directly from the Higgs field.

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 9>Where does it come from, Daniel?

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Most of the mass in protons comes from the strong force, right.

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It gives internalstored energy to the proton, and that's what

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>gives us mass. A deeper question is like, well, all right,

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about mass, but why is inertial mass a thing? Anyway?

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is internal stored energy change how much force it

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>takes to get some acceleration? And that's a really deep.

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 9>Question, That's what I mean. Yeah, that's still a big

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 9>UNNOI right.

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Still a big unknown. You know, why do we even

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have a inertiut man?

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? Like why are heavier? Or at the same time,

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 9>why are more energetic things harder to move? Like we

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 9>don't know that, right, nobody knows that.

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we describe that using general relativity, but we don't

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>have an answer for like why in the same way

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that like general relativity describes that space does get curved

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>in the presence of mass, but doesn't really tell us

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like why does that happen? What is the mechanism for

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>underlying it? To understand that, we'd need to have some

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>deeper level theory that explains like what space is, but

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we have no idea yet.

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 9>Right, right, Or maybe we could just move to a

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 9>universe in which people have figured it out.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 19>Let's just take a big rocket, put it, we get

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 19>a U haul, we'll put pack all the physicists into it,

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 19>and then and then just ship into a more knowledgeable universe.

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or just more knowledgeable solar system even you know,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to go to another universe. Let's just go visit the

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>aliens and go to their physics school and learn how

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this all works.

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 9>Unless they're also on the move, in which case you

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 9>might get there and then nobody's there. We missed the party, man, Yeah,

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 9>you missed the main course, which might have might be

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 9>you if there are aliens involved. All right, Well, I

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 9>think that answers a question for Mark, which is just

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 9>sort of like, how does the Higgs field work? And

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 9>it sounds like it's mainly about the interaction between the

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 9>Higgs field and the electron field allowing it to wiggle

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 9>in place, which is what looks like mass.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And if you want a deeper intuition into

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what fields are and how this all.

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 9>Works, then it's not possible.

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So then I really recommend Matt Stressler's book Waves In

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.240
<v Speaker 1>an Impossible See, which starts from almost nothing, uses almost

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>no math, and gives you a really deep intuition for Fields.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 9>All right, well, thank you Mark for that question. Now

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 9>let's get to our last question of the day, and

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 9>it's about Daniel's future career. It seems about the particle

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 9>collider at CERN, so let's dig into that. But first

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 9>let's take another quick break.

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 13>I'm buzs Knight and I'm the host of the Taking

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 13>a Walk podcast music History on Foot.

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 14>John Oates Great songs endured, and I'm very proud and

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 14>happy to know that I was part of something that

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 14>will endure.

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 13>The podcast is an audio diary of insightful conversations with

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 13>musicians and the inside stories.

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Behind their music.

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 15>Russ Kunkle, The basic connection that I had with someone

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 15>that was great coming out of.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The Whiskey was David Crosby.

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 15>David I met David and Steven and Graham kind of

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 15>around the same time, basically through my wife Leah, who

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 15>is Cass Elliott's sister.

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 13>The message of the podcast is simple, honest conversation with

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 13>musicians about the music they create. Mike Campbell of the Heartbreakers.

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 6>It is correct. I rarely worked things out. I like

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 6>to go off the cup and try to grab things

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 6>out of the air while you're playing the song and

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 6>try to catch a little magic.

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 13>Listen to the Taking a Walk podcast on the iHeartRadio app,

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 13>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I'm Jackie Thomas, the host of a brand new

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Black Effect original series, black Lit, the podcast for diving

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:14.720
<v Speaker 2>deep into the rich world of Black literature. I'm Jackie Thomas,

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm inviting you to join me in a vibrant

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 2>community of literary enthusiasts dedicated to protecting and celebrating our stories.

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Black Lit is for the page turners, for those who

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 2>listen to audio books while commuting or running errands. For

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>those who find themselves seeking solace, wisdom, and refuge Between

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the chapters, from thought provoking novels to powerful poetry, We'll

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 2>explore the stories that shape our culture. Together. We'll dissect

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 2>classics and contemporary works while uncovering the stories of the

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 2>brilliant writers behind them. Black Lit is here to amplify

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the voices of Black writers and to bring their words

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 2>to life. Listen to black Lit on the iHeartRadio app,

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm doctor Laurie Santos, host of the Happiness Lab podcast.

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Is the US elections approach. It can feel like we're

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 3>angrier and more divided than ever, But in a new

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 3>hopeful season of my podcast, I'll share with the science

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 3>it really shows that we're surprisingly more united than most

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 3>people think.

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 7>We all know something is wrong in our culture, in

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 7>our politics, and that we need to do better, and

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 7>that we can do better.

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 3>With the help of Stanford psychologist Jamil Zaki.

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really tragic.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 20>If cynicism were appeal, it'd be a poison.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 3>We'll see that our fellow humans, even those we disagree with,

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 3>are more generous than we assume.

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 16>My assumption, my feeling, my hunch is that a lot

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 16>of us are actually looking for a way to disagree

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 16>and still be in relationships with each other.

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 3>All that on the Happiness Lab listen on the iHeartRadio app,

0:46:54.880 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 18>I'm Carrie Champion, and this is season four of Naked Sports,

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 18>where we live at the intersection of sports and culture.

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 18>Up first, I explore the making of a rivalry Caitlin

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 18>Clark versus Angel Reese.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 20>I know I'll go down in history.

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 16>People an't talking about women's basketballs just because of one

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 16>single game.

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 9>Every great player needs a foil.

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 7>And hear them wise.

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:24.879
<v Speaker 6>I just come here to play.

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 7>Ask Paul Ray Kendled, and that's what I focused on.

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 18>From college to the pros, Clark and Reeves have changed

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 18>the way we consume women's sports.

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Angel Reese is a joy to watch.

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 8>She is unapologetically black.

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 9>I love her.

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 18>What exactly ignited this fire? Why has it been so

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 18>good for the game? And can the fanfare surrounding these

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 18>two supernovas be sustained? This game is only going to

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.839
<v Speaker 18>get better because the talent is getting better. This new

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 18>season will cover all things sports and culture. Listen to

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 18>Naked Sports on the Black Effect Podcast Network. iHeartRadio, app,

0:47:57.600 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 18>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 4>The Black Effect Podcast Network is sponsored by diet Coke.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 21>We think of Franklin as the doddling dude flying a

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 21>kite in the rain, but those experiments are the most

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.720
<v Speaker 21>important scientific discoveries of the time.

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Evan Ratliffe.

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 20>Last season we tackled the ingenuity of Elon Musk with

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 20>biographer Walter Isaacson. This time we're diving into the story

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 20>of Benjamin Franklin, another genius who's desperate to be dusted

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 20>off from history.

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 21>His media empire makes him the most successful self made

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 21>business person in America. I mean, he was never early

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 21>to bed, an early to rise type person. He's enormously famous.

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 21>Women start wearing their hair and what was called the

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 21>coiffor a la Franklin.

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:46.880
<v Speaker 20>And who's more relevant now than ever.

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 21>The only other person who could have possibly been the

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 21>first president would have been Benjamin Franklin, but he's too

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 21>old and wants Washington to do it.

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 20>Listen to On Benjamin Franklin with Walter Isaacson on the

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 20>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 9>Where we're talking about listener questions here today on our

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 9>last question comes from Bill comes from Union City, California.

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 22>Hi, Daniel and Jorge. This is Bill Quirk, a retired

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:33.319
<v Speaker 22>astrophysicist living in Union City, California. I'm curious what's going

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.240
<v Speaker 22>to happen now at CERN and the other large particle

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 22>colliders now that you haven't found the supersymmetric particles. What

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 22>are people going to be looking at what possible discoveries

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 22>can this lead to. Daniel, I don't understand how you

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 22>can understand so many different things. You'll explain them so well.

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 22>Thanks for everything, enjoy the show very much.

0:49:59.520 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Bye.

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 9>All right, great question from Bill. So, cern is the

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 9>big facility outside of Geneva where the large Hadron collider is,

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 9>and I think Bill is asking what's going to happen

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 9>to it? You know, there was a lot of fanfare

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 9>about ten fifteen years ago about the Higgs boson, but

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 9>not a lot of news since then. What are the

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 9>plans for it?

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the plans are to keep running it because though

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we haven't found anything after the Higgs boson, there are

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>still lots of possibilities for discoveries. Bill mentions super symmetric particles.

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>These are particles that a lot of physicists hoped to

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>discover shortly after finding the Higgs, but we haven't seen

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:41.919
<v Speaker 1>any of them, which has been a bit of a disappointment.

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 9>Like have you ruled them out totally, like you've given

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 9>up or is there still a possibility or do most

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 9>physicists think they don't exist?

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a little bit of all of that sort of

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.919
<v Speaker 1>We can't ever rule out something exists because it could

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.880
<v Speaker 1>exist but just be really really rare, like if it

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>only happens once every twenty years than our collider and

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:02.959
<v Speaker 1>we only run the collider for one year, we can't

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>rule it out. It could also be really really heavy,

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:09.239
<v Speaker 1>like maybe our collider doesn't have enough energy to make it.

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So all we can do is we can rule out

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.919
<v Speaker 1>low mass stuff that we could make that isn't rare,

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And so it's sort of a statistical statement. The longer

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that we run the collider, the more we can rule

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>out rare stuff, and the higher the energy the collider,

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the more we can rule out heavy stuff. So we're

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>always just ruling out like a fraction of that space.

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So that said, a lot of physicists claimed that nature

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>really wanted very common, very low mass supersymmetric particles, and

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those people were wrong. A lot of the field has

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 1>moved on from supersymmetry. They've sort of given up on it,

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's also a lot of diehards that really believe

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 1>in it.

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 9>And they believe that maybe they're there, but they're just

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.800
<v Speaker 9>heavier or rarer than we thought before.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and maybe we're just looking for them wrong. And

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>so they don't appear the way that we expected, and

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we need to look for them in new interesting ways.

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're hidden in certain ways and we can reveal

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>them if we're clever enough. So there's definitely a lot

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of people looking for supersymmetry. And realize also that, like

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the LEDC has been running for fifteen years or so,

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to run for another fifteen but the rate

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at which the collisions happens increases very quickly. But most

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of the collisions we're ever going to see are in

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the future. That's because we get better and better at

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:24.319
<v Speaker 1>operating the machine, so we can have more collisions per

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:27.439
<v Speaker 1>second as time goes on. So we've seen like one

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of the data we're ever going to see from

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the machine. Most of the data is still in the future,

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and so it could be that that future data reveals

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>something like supersymmetry or something else interesting.

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 9>So to answer Bill's question, that's sort of part of

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:44.760
<v Speaker 9>the plan. The plan is for the Large Hydron Collider

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 9>to just keep smashing particles for another fifteen years.

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, for about another fifteen years. And we're not

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:54.879
<v Speaker 1>just looking for supersymmetry. We're also looking for all sorts

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of other stuff. We're looking for things we didn't necessarily anticipate,

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you land on Mars, so you don't

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.319
<v Speaker 1>just look for cats and dogs and people. You look

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>for any kind of life. So we're trying to broadly imagine,

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>like what new particles might be out there that we

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:11.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't imagine or that are really weird and crazy. And

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite example is actually Bill's last name.

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a theory of a particle called a quirk, not

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a quirk, but a quirk with an eye just like Bill. WHOA.

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 9>That's an interesting coincidence.

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It is really a fun coincidence.

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 9>I mean it sounds like if you just want to

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:29.320
<v Speaker 9>find a quirk, just good call Bill exactly.

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a really quirky theory, and it predicts particles that

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:34.839
<v Speaker 1>look very different from anything we've ever seen before. They

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:37.319
<v Speaker 1>were sort of move in a really weird way in

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 1>our detector, and so far the way we've analyzed the data,

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't be able to see these quirks. And so

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>my group and a bunch of other people are starting

0:53:44.600 --> 0:53:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back and analyze data to see if we

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>can find evidence for these quirks. So that's just one example,

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But there could be stuff in the data we've taken

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>already that we haven't found yet because we haven't figured

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>out how to look for it yet. Some of the

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff is trickier to look for than your standard electrons,

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>muons and this kind of stuff. So as we develop

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>new techniques, we might be able to discover things in

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>existing data, not just wait for more data.

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 9>I see. Well, since you mentioned that, maybe give people

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 9>a quick three minute explanation of what is a quirk

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 9>because I don't think we've talked about it before.

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Have we? No, we have not. Yeah, a quirk is

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>like a quark, but it has a different kind of force.

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>It's like a new version of the strong force. And

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>quirks are much heavier than quarks, and so when you

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 1>produce two quarks at the particle collider, what happens is

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that the strong force doesn't like them being far apart,

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 1>so it creates a bunch of new quarks out of

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that energy. For quirks, that's not possible because quirks are

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 1>too massive, So the universe can't turn that energy into

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:47.240
<v Speaker 1>new quirks because there isn't enough energy to make quirks

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because their mass is higher, And so what that means

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you have these two particles that now fly

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 1>apart from each other, and they still have that great

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>energy between them, which means they wiggle in really weird ways.

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Rather than just flying through a magnetic field like a

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:04.319
<v Speaker 1>charge particle, they oscillate inside the detector, which is really

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a challenge for our current data analysis pipeline to discover.

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 9>So then that's sort of the answer for bills that

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:11.720
<v Speaker 9>you're a large hundred collatter is going to keep running

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 9>and you're looking for I guess rarer or harder to

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 9>find particles.

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and people are also developing techniques to look for

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>things that are completely unexpected, like running machine learning based

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>anomaly detection algorithms to see if there's anything just like

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>really weird in the data. So we're going to keep

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>minding this data hoping to make discoveries.

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 9>And you're also trying to make antimatter, right and stuff

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 9>like that.

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, in a particle collider, you can make basically anything

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that the universe is capable of. You smash those protons

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>together and eventually you make everything on nature's menu. And

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 1>we often make antimatter. We're hoping we might even make

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like dark matter and be able to detect it in

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>our collider, all sorts of stuff. There are other experiments

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that's earned not the collider that do things like make

0:55:55.200 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>anti hydrogen and study its behavior.

0:55:57.800 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 9>Oh, I see, now, are there plans to make more colliders,

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 9>bigger colliders, or to expand the current collider?

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all of those. We just finished put it together

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>like a ten year plan for particle physics, and there's

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:12.439
<v Speaker 1>some interesting proposals. Some people think that when the large

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Hadron collider is done running, we should build a bigger

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>circular collider, and so this would involve like a larger

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:22.799
<v Speaker 1>tunnel under Geneva, and because it's bigger, you could have

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>more energy in it. You're limited by like the strength

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the magnets that you need to curve the particles

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.880
<v Speaker 1>around in that circle. If you can't make your magnets stronger,

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you can just make the circle bigger, and then you

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can get your particles moving faster with the same magnets.

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's one possibility.

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 9>So you can make particles go at point nine nine

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 9>nine nine nine nine nine nine with the speed of

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:44.360
<v Speaker 9>light instead of point nine nine nine nine nine nine.

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, currently the collider explores up to about thirteen

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half terra electron volts trillion electron volts, and

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:53.799
<v Speaker 1>this new one would go up to fifty or one

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred terra electron volts. And that doesn't sound like that

0:56:56.800 --> 0:57:00.239
<v Speaker 1>big a jump, but that's like multiplying by four or

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 1>eight the sort of entire energy range we've ever explored.

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:07.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like landing on eight new Earth like

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 1>planets simultaneously. It's an enormous range that we could use

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to discover something.

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:13.839
<v Speaker 9>So how many dines does that give us in terms

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 9>of how fast we can explain particles at a percentage

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 9>at the speed of light.

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I don't even know.

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 9>A lot of nines, half a nine, three nines.

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't even think about it in terms of velocity

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's a crazy asymptopic quantity. We just think in

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of energy. That's right.

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 9>You don't want to think that each nine cause about

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:31.959
<v Speaker 9>ten billion bills.

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to think about that now. But these

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>colliders would be very expensive because you've got to drill

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the tunnel, you've got to build the magnets. The whole

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is expensive. It's tens of billions and a competitor

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>on the international scene is China is proposing to maybe

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>build one of these colliders over there. They think they

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have the money, and they are ramping up very quickly

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of particle physics in their universities, and I

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think they would like to be the leader in particle

0:57:56.520 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>physics in the world. So there's two big competing proposals

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there from CERN, one from China, and then there's a

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>dark Horse, which is saying, hey, maybe we shouldn't be

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>colliding protons or electrons, let's try colliding something else.

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 9>What what else can you collide?

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's a really fun proposal for a muon collider.

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Muons are just like heavy versions of electrons. They're not hadrons,

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not hadrons. No, they're fundamental particles, and they're really

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to use because they don't last very long. Like

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 1>electrons are stable, they last forever, but muons last a

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 1>few microseconds, and so it's hard to get them in

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a collider and keep them going and all this kind

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. You might wonder like, well, why bother, Well,

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the answer is they have more mass than electrons do,

0:58:36.760 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and so colliding muons gives you more Higgs bosons than

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>colliding electrons, because higgs boson interacts with particles that have mass, right,

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and interacts more with particles that have more mass. So

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>when you smash two muons together, you have a much

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>higher chance of making a Higgs boson than when you

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>smash two electrons together. So the muon collider is what

0:58:57.160 --> 0:59:00.120
<v Speaker 1>they call a Higgs factory. It would produce oodles and

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>noodles of Higgs bosons and allow us to study it

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in great detail.

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 9>To answer I guess what question?

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, good point. I mean, the Higgs boson

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was discovered and it acts the way we expect, but

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be that it's not quite the Higgs boson

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we expected. It could have some weird new properties. And

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one way to make discoveries is to like measure all

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the properties of the higgs boson, its mass, it's spin,

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's precise interactions with all the other particles, really really accurately,

0:59:25.640 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and see if it lines up with our predictions. And

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:30.400
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't, that's a hint that there's something new

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>going on, some new particles or feels out there that

0:59:32.520 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>are messing up our calculations.

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 9>All right, now, Daniel, since technically you are employed by CERN.

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 9>Do we need to give a sponsored content warning here?

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I am actually not technically employed by CERN. I'm employed

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with the University of California, though I do my research

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at CERN, and I'm certainly very heavily biased here that

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this stuff is a lot of fun. It's

0:59:55.280 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tens of billions of dollars, so whether or not governments

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>want to spend that money is a very political question. Personally,

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we should spend lots more money on science,

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not just particle physics, but astrophysics and condensed matter physics

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even chemistry. So I'm all in favor.

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 9>Of it, right right, but not philosophy.

1:00:13.360 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Definitely more money for philosophy. I don't know if you

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>call that science or not. That's a philosophy question.

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 9>All right, Well, great questions here today. Thanks for our

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 9>question askers for standing in their questions.

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to everybody who thinks about the universe, wonders about it,

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and tunes into the podcast hoping to gain some understanding.

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We really love hearing your thoughts and answering your questions.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 9>We hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us. See

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 9>you next time.

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>For more science and curiosity. Come find us on social

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, This, Org,

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Instant and now TikTok. Thanks for listening and remember that.

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

1:01:10.120 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>When you pop a piece of cheese into your mouth,

1:01:11.880 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not thinking about the environmental impact. But the

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>people in the dairy industry are. That's why they're working

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hard every day to find new ways to reduce waste,

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>conserve natural resources, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. How

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is US Dairy tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic

1:01:29.000 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>digestors to turn the methane from manure into renewable energy

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that can power farms, towns, and electric cars. Visit usdairy

1:01:36.920 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>dot COM's Last Sustainability to learn more.

1:01:40.160 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I'm Jacklie Thomas, the host of a brand new

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Black Effects original series, black Lit, the podcast for diving

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>deep into the rich world of black literature. Black Lit

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is for the page turners, for those who listen to

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>audiobooks while running errands or at the end of a

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>busy day. From thought provoking novels to powerful poetry, we'll

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>explore the stories that shape our culture. Listen to black

1:02:01.680 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Lit on the Black Effect Podcast Network, iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

1:02:05.680 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:02:07.560 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>The Black Effect Podcast Network is sponsored by diet Coke.

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm doctor Laurie Santos, host of The Happiness Lab podcasts.

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 3>The US elections approach it can feel like we're angrier

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and more divided than ever, But in a new couple

1:02:22.560 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>season of my podcast, I'll Share with the Science really

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.919
<v Speaker 3>shows that we're surprisingly more united than most people think.

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 7>We all know something is wrong in our culture and

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 7>our politics, and that we need to do better and

1:02:34.840 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 7>that we can be better.

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>listen to podcasts.

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 4>From tips for healthy living to the latest medical breakthroughs,

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>WebMD's Health Discovered podcast keeps you up to date on

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 4>today's most important health issues. Through in depth conversations with

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 4>experts from across the healthcare community, WebMD reveals how today's

1:02:56.800 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>health news will impact your life tomorrow.

1:02:59.480 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 5>It's not that people don't know that exercise is healthy.

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 5>It's just that people don't know why it's healthy, and

1:03:04.280 --> 1:03:06.600
<v Speaker 5>we're struggling to try to help people help themselves in

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 5>each other.

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Listen to web md Health Discovered on the iHeartRadio app

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 11>I'm Joe Gatto, I'm Steve Byrne.

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We are two cool moms.

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 11>We certainly are.

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And guess where we could find us now?

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:21.320
<v Speaker 9>Oh, I don't know the iHeart podcast network.

1:03:21.360 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

1:03:21.680 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 17>We're an official iHeart podcast and I'm super excited about it.

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 7>I am too.

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 15>I thought Two Cool Moms was such a fun podcast,

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 15>but now it's even more funner and cooler and hardier.

1:03:32.960 --> 1:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's more ieheartier. I knew it.

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 11>Check your heart rate. We're here at iHeart.

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:39.880
<v Speaker 17>You could find us wherever you listen to your podcasts,

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 17>or on the iHeartRadio app.