WEBVTT - Tech Stocks Rally on the Back of Ceasefire Deal

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and Vow in San Francisco.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Energy prices tumble and

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>global tech stocks rally after the US in Iran agreed

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>to a two week ceasefire.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Pas Anthropics new myth Us model is so powerful. It's

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>giving tech firms and competitors early access to get ahead

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 3>of possible cyber attacks that could reach havoc.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And Apple's first foldable phone it's still on track to

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>launch in September, despite reports of major manufacturing delays.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 3>First check on those markets that you just pointed us

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>towards ed extraordinary moves as we have a tentative moves

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>towards a ceasefire. We of course have up to the

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>moment reporting of concerns in some ways that's being well

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 3>inflated upon at the moment, and Pakistan is speaking out.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But I'm looking at two and a half percent higher

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 3>on the nast that one hundred. We are off five

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>percentage point from the original highs.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 4>As we worry about how this is.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Fire continues to unfold, but I'm looking at Brent crude

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>off like thirteen percent. This is a record move. At

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>one point it had fallen as much as seventeen percent

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>on the international contract. But let's get out to the

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 3>latest with Tyler. Kendall stands by in the White House

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and Tyler, look, we are hopeful, but there are signs

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>of concerns.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, hey, Caroline, Well, at this point, it does appear

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 5>that the ceasefire is very fragile. This White House has

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 5>maintained that the US has achieved all of its military objectives,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 5>touting tactical successes as what led to this truce in

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 5>the first place. But still we heard from Secretary Pete

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 5>Hegseth earlier today who said that the US military remains

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 5>ready to be redeployed and resume military operations if needed.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 5>After the Vice President Jade Vance indicated earlier today that

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 5>the ceasefire or at this point, is something to watch

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 5>very closely because there's already been these reports that attacks

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 5>are continuing in the region, as a person familiar with

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 5>the matter confirms to Bloomberg News that Saudi Arabia's key

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 5>East West oil pipeline was hit by a drone earlier today,

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 5>though it appears that the damage is limited to pair

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 5>that with other reports about attacks against the UAE as

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 5>well as Kuwait now, Pakistan's Foreign minister, in a post

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>just within the last hour, said that Iran could be

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 5>at risk of pulling out of the truce if operations

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 5>against Lebanon continue. Keep in mind, Lebanon was not part

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 5>of this agreement. As Israel continues its military campaign against

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 5>the Iranian backed hesbela militant group ed in Caroline, Iranian

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 5>state media is now reporting that traffic in the Strait

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 5>of Remus has been halted amid Israeli attacks against Lebanon.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 5>This is going to be something to watch very closely,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 5>considering we know that this White House's position has been

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 5>that the strait needs to be reopened and there has

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 5>to be freedom of navigation in order for this truce

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 5>to be maintained.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 4>President Trump is said to meet.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Later today with the NATO Secretary General Mark Rutta here

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 5>at the White House, and no doubt securing the straighter

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 5>removes will be the top topic of discussion.

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Kennall, with the breakdown, we appreciate it. Look markets

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 3>are certainly higher after the Ceasphile has really boosted morale

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street. Now the analyst take Dan ives over

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 3>at web Bush. So the recent geopolitical tensions had pushed

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 3>tech into oversold territory, especially across the mag seven software

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>broader AI winners. He sees room for a remound on

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 3>the buy side. Let's get the take cook Dane gomman'

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>sacceass in management, who is leading on the bullishness, pointing

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to AI Capex, saying stronger for longer. Brook, I'm so

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 3>happy to have you here because there is fragility that

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 3>is also potential to stop buying some beaten up stocks.

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of today's news?

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 6>So, first, thanks for having me on. It's great to

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 6>be here today. So you know, our perspective is that

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 6>investors need to be focused on the size and the

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 6>magnitude of this shift that we're seeing and our baseline forecast.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 6>So when we do our bottoms up work, continue to

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 6>point to acceleration and CAPEX spending and it being durable

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 6>for much longer. So we feel like investors need to

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 6>have exposure to the companies that are directly benefiting from that.

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't think there's any question in anyone's mind right now,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 6>as you're seeing these latest models come out about how

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 6>impactful they're going to be, how much they're going to change,

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 6>how much they're going to be able to do. And

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 6>so while there's uncertainty about how you know which sectors

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 6>get impacted in which way is and how it all

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 6>plays out, fundamentally, right now, we're in the start of

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 6>what's going to be a multi year CAPEX build out

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 6>and investors need exposure to that, and so our baseline is,

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, you want to still be involved in the

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 6>semiconductor names, the networking names, things like that that are

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 6>the direct beneficiars of the spending.

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Brook The corners of the technology market that are rallying

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the hardest in this moment are memory, logic, storage. I'm

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>talking right now in response to the cease fire, but

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 2>that would indicate if you look at some of the

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>names that returned to the prices they were at prior

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>to the start of the war in Iran, that this

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 2>con has done nothing to divert the trajectory that you

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 2>believe capital expenditures are on when it comes to the

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>AI build out.

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 6>And our fundamental belief is is that there's been nothing

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 6>that's changed in that backdrop that the plans and expectations

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 6>that we had from these companies in terms of their

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 6>levels of spending, where they were putting the capacity, how

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 6>tight compute is right now. None of that has changed.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 6>And yes, the world is more uncertain today than it

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 6>was four months ago, and risk premia have probably moved

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 6>higher structurally because of that. It doesn't change the direction

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 6>and the magnitude of what we're seeing. You remember that

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 6>in this cycle right now, Compute and all the associated

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 6>parts around compute are the most restricted and hardest to

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 6>get the thing in the marketplace. And if you want

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 6>these models to perform better and to keep you know,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 6>doing more and more, the key ingredient is compute and

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 6>power and memory and all of the things that get

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 6>pulled on by that. So you know, there's nothing that

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 6>would change the outlook. We're very close to the big

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 6>spenders around this area. So when you think of the

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 6>mag seven companies, we spend a lot of time meeting

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 6>with those management teams and understanding what their plans look like.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 6>None of them are wavering in their commitment and their

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 6>belief in the opportunity in front of them.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 2>Behind this just very quickly did supply chains for chip

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and chip manufacturing prove to be more resilient in this

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>moment than they were in the early days of the pandemic.

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Yes, but I still think that those supply chains are

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 6>an area where there's a tremendous amount of focus in

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 6>building more resiliency, creating more chip capacity, doing it in

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 6>more geographies, and that build out is likely to persist.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 6>But as of today and what we've seen through this

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 6>latest geopolitical crisis, there hasn't been any material impact on

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 6>supply chains there.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 3>What's been really interesting is when we think about the

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 3>semis in video Marvel Broadcom names that you're in, you're like,

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 3>exposure to is there any hit longer term to the

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 3>margin or any of you point on how you get

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>into the picks and shovels still, because when we think

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>about the energy.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Prices, for example, it does inflate a little bit.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So our perspective is just like you said, like

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 6>we need you investors' neat exposure to the picks and

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 6>shovels and this build up because it's still early and

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 6>still happening. You know, the margin structures right now are

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 6>high relative to history, but we think durable because of

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 6>the fact that you know, this relationship between your ability

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 6>to put compute in the ground and generate revenue for

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 6>the model companies and for the cloud vendors is still

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 6>very tight. So you know, there isn't a big discontinuity

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 6>event happening from either a supplier a demand side that

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 6>would upset margin structures. So you know, you mentioned a

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 6>couple of the names. One of them that we think

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 6>you know right now the market hasn't fully gotten its

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 6>arms around is what's happening with Marvel and last year

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of controversy around Marvel and their ability

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 6>to you know, hold share at Amazon and some of

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 6>the other big vendors. But we think the market's missing

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 6>is around all of the acic business. Marvel has this

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 6>great opportunity to you know, attach XPU attached products and

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 6>grow substantially. So we think that's a specific company where

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 6>there's a real opportunity around the upside.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I love the fundamental analysis and cunning through

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the noise of the moment from a macro perspective, Go

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>go to the anthropic news. Then we started this conversation

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 3>while you're saying, like, look at the changes and the

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 3>in step changes are seeing in models you like the

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>likes of Well Pallel to Networks. They're one of the

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>key forty companies that's helping stress test and understand what

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 3>a cyber.

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Risk is from that.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I describe myself a little bit as a

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 6>reformed software investor.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I grew up.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 6>Following the entire software suite and IBOs. The software has

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 6>some headwinds right now that we can talk about, but

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 6>within that whole industry set, we think that companies that

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 6>are involved in cybersecurity have a massive opportunity in front

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 6>of them. Some of the companies that are helping with

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 6>data problems have really big opportunities in front of them. So,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, the news from Anthropic last night is, you know,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 6>the power of those models is incredible and it is

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 6>exposing a whole bunch of vulnerabilities out there that people

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 6>didn't know existed. That is really good for the cyber companies.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 6>You know, just from a business standpoint, there's going to

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 6>be more vulnerabilities exposed. Bad actors are going to try

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 6>and take advantage of that. Enterprises are going to need

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 6>to be defended in the right ways, and so owning

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 6>leading edge next gen security providers is a really good

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 6>place for INDUSTRISS to.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 5>Be a brook.

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to end this by going back to the

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>ceasefire and the war in Iran. You are an investor

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 2>in some of the biggest hyperscalers and the deployers of

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>capital expenditure, right and this president central policy was to

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>deregulate expedite permits and hold those names accountable to energy spending.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Then we had the war in Iran. And so just

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 2>from the technology investor's perspective, how your desk analysts and

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you are modeling for the wild card that is a

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 2>president who on the one hand has an AI policy

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 2>grounded in deregulation and letting them move quickly and then

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 2>move to an escalated conflict in Iran.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 6>Yes, So with every investment we're making, we're running lots

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 6>of scenarios on different parts of the business and what

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 6>can happen and what can change. So if you're talking

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 6>about like changes in the fundamental input costs of creating

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 6>compute to run these models and to do things as

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 6>we project out where we think, you know, p and

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 6>LS and cash flows can look like. That's one of

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 6>the factors that we're stress testing and we're saying, look,

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 6>if power you know, goes up by x factor, what

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 6>does it do to the ultimate return on a dollar

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 6>of GPU investment and how does that get priced in?

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 6>Similarly on other things, like you know, on memory supply,

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 6>and if we can't get enough memory to fund these things,

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 6>you know what happens there and how does that impact stuff.

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 6>So all of this comes into the fundamental frameworks and

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 6>the risk reward that we're managing, and we're looking through

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 6>with every investment we make. And what I would just

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 6>tell you, as a guy that's been investing in the

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 6>sector for a long time, I am skeptical of my

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 6>ability to be precise, but I'm really good about my

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 6>ability to understand ranges of outcome, and so we're always

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 6>looking for when those range is favor us and favor

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 6>us putting capital all the work. And so, you know,

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 6>to sort of end where I started with, we still

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 6>think this buildout of capex that were very early in it,

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 6>that were not late cycle, were early cycle to mid

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 6>cycle in this and that there's plenty of opportunity to

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 6>continue to compound wealth and growth in you know, the

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 6>fundamental chip pixel shovels, chip Ecosystems of AI.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Brooke Dayne of Goldman sax Asset Management doing the math

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 2>for us. I really appreciate that, Thank you very much.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, a massive Oracle data center could get roughly

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 2>fourteen billion dollars of debt financing from Pimco with the details. Next,

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>this has been big tech.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>A flurry data center related news today. First, Fine Capital's

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Bridge Data center has dropped neocloud supplier Magaspeed from Malaysia

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Computing harm Now. That's according to the sources citing and

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 3>internal memo. The changes follow a US government probe into

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Magaspeed over its ownerships, ructure and allegations it smuggled.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Advanced in video chips to China.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, here in the US, a city in Wisconsin has

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>passed the nation's first referendum restricting future data center construction,

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>according to the county's unofficial count now, Port Washington is

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 3>home to a one point three gigawatt project from opening

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I on Oracle that won't be impacted by this vote. Still,

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 3>when the AI build out just getting underway, it's a

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 3>signal of the growing tension between local communities and developers.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 4>Said.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 2>The AI build out is still in early days and

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>over in Michigan, a massive Oracle data center could get

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>roughly fourteen billion dollars of debt financing from PIMCO. That's

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 2>according to sources. The deal, if finalized, would make the

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>bond giant a key backer of the project, to mark

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>its second jumbo financing for a data center within the

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>past year. Let's get out to bliding Boks Brady Ford Brady.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the details here. And something that has

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>come up in conversation with you in the past is

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the debt backs the project. It doesn't necessarily go straight

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>onto Oracle's debt load. Explain the mechanics of this and

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>what we need to know.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, zooming out. You know, these centers costs an incredible

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 7>amount of money that a company like Oracle, even with

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 7>its cash flowing database and SaaS applications, it needs to

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 7>bring a lot of partners in. So Pimco in this

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 7>case would be providing some debt essentially loans to get

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.239
<v Speaker 7>this thing built. That would go on to the books

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 7>of related digital and intermediary who's actually building the site,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 7>who then Oracle is going to rent from. If this

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 7>sounds like a lot of steps, it's because it is

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 7>because these projects are just so expensive, and so Oracle

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 7>has been kind of testing the market's appetite for financing

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 7>big data centers, and there have been moments where it

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 7>looked quite rocky. But you know, getting a cosign from

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 7>a company like Pimco which appears in the works, this

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 7>is a good sign for their build out.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting as they name a new CFO that

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 3>they brought over from Schneider Electric, but also as they

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 3>tried to out lining to the market and put to

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 3>bed any anxiety that they were going to take on

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 3>more debt themselves.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 7>Right, they've been doing some pretty incredible financial maneuvering, right,

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 7>I mean, they issued equity which nobody thought they would do,

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 7>they laid out the exact amount they're going to borrow,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 7>and they named a CFO from the world of heavy

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 7>industry now from software. I mean that reflects that we're

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 7>in a new era where software companies are acting more

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 7>like ge or Boeing or industrial giants of the past

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 7>because of just these incredible capital outlays.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 4>The most brady forward is always all across Oracle. We approciate,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it.

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up Anthropping launches a new program aimed at

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>giving cyber defenders early access to its powerful new model

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 3>why to help them spot you threats were on that

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Next is Bring Bad Tech.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Thropic is giving tech firms including Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>access to a powerful but not widely released AI model

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>no as Mythos. It's part of an effort to prepare

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 2>for possible cyber attacks that could result from wider adoption

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>of the technology. Bloomberg cybersecurity report of Margie Murphy's with

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>us and MARGI yesterday just after this news here was

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>on stage with Mike Krieger, who co leads the labs Anthropic,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and he basically explained mythos at the model level incredibly

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 2>powerful relative to what's gone before it, and they don't

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>know if they'll release it generally. That was a big question.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 2>So they have this set of limited technology companies and

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>one capability is cyber What do we need to know

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>about the kind of roll out and what on earth

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>these companies will.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 8>Do with it?

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 9>Correct, So they created this model, realized it was incredibly

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 9>powerful and really really good at finding bugs and flaws

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 9>in a lot of open source software that's out there,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 9>things that's been around for decades, and that companies. You know,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 9>all the apps and services we use are dependent on

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 9>and they realized that not only could their model find

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 9>these bugs, it could automatically exploit them. And so their

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 9>concern was if we let that out into the general public,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 9>that could be abused in some way. So we'll do

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 9>a kind of limited release, getting the people who might

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 9>be most affected by it, and will allow them to

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 9>play around, find some of those bugs, fix them, and

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 9>then feedback, and then they'll figure out from their what

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 9>they're going to do about a general release.

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's interesting.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 3>There's cyber companies like Palata Networks. There's also potential competitors

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 3>to Anthropics own ai that are using it. What's interesting

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>is a competitor open Ai had already as well sort

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>of piloted the idea of getting its technology into the

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 3>hands and defenders before the main public. How much is

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>there something written large that everyone has to think about.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're right, it's.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 9>A really unusual agreement for competitors to be coming together,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 9>for someone to be sharing their IP in this way,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, and not you know, claiming not to be.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Profiting off it.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 9>But it shows this wider, real existential threat not only

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 9>to the cybersecurity industry, but to software at large. And

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 9>I have just been hearing so much from my sources

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 9>about how can concerned they are about this incoming potential

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 9>vulnerability apocalypse. They're describing it as which could really impact

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 9>so many of the things that we know in our

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 9>normal day to day use.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 4>And it.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 9>Shows a kind of coming together of cyber defenders and

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 9>trying to do the right thing in this new age of.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 3>AI and Probert continuing to work with the government, even

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>though of course they're in a legal battle with.

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Part of it at the moment.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Margaret Murphy, thanks so much for the reporting. Let's

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>stick with AI with cyber threats and bring in Teresa Payton.

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 3>She's the CEO of FORTELLSS Solutions, which brings strategic cybersecurity

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 3>services to leaders navigating high stakes environments.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 4>You're also with the White House Chief.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Information Officer during the George Bush administration, and Teresa, I mean,

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 3>an apocalypse is what we just heard from, Margie.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Is that what you're thinking.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think it's interesting. So it could be

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 8>from the standpoint of isn't it interesting that Anthropic self

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 8>report that they found thousands of vulnerabilities that could be

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 8>fixed very easily. In sort of the early release of

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 8>this tool, that means that it was outpacing the ability

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 8>of cybersecurity products all the big names on the market,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 8>which happen to also be now in this cohort. And

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 8>so it is interesting from an apocalypse standpoint. It depends

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 8>on I think your point of view. Is it an

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 8>apocalypse or do we now finally have a tool that,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 8>in the hands of cybersecurity practitioners can make sort of

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 8>this limited skill set even more powerful, to be able

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 8>to cover even more than they have in the past.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 8>I see AI as being an incredible assistant here. The

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 8>one concern is if we don't have the right governance

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 8>and guardrails, we could find that this tool or a

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 8>tool like it could end up in the hands of

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 8>the cyber operatives who have negative and criminal intent. And

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 8>I think that's the concern here.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 2>That last point is key, and it relates to what

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about in the show right the war

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>in ira On for many weeks. We've been saying that Iran,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 2>as an example, has a competence in the domain where

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>if you're on the defense or you use a US

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 2>based technology for defense that there's every chance that those

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>going on the offense have access to similar technology, although

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>as Margie outlined, you know mythos is at the cutting

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 2>edge in terms of models. How do you see the

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 2>field in that conflict offense versus defense.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, first of all, even though there is thankfully

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 8>a ceasefire has been announced, that does not mean that

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 8>the Irani and cyber operatives have taken their fingers off keyboards.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 8>So we need to continue to have a heightened sense

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 8>of vigilance and alertness around these issues. But what I

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 8>will say is, you know that they are obviously leveraging

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 8>AI and different types of tools to be able to

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 8>carry off attacks like they did against Striker and some

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 8>of the other attacks that are ongoing against critical infrastructure

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 8>in the United States. Bulletins have come out. If people

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 8>are listening to the show right now and you're thinking,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 8>I don't feel like I'm in the know in this information,

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 8>I certainly can't give it to you publicly, but you

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 8>can contact your local FBI office and they will tell

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 8>you all the things that you need to look for

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 8>as it relates to Iran and some of the cyber

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 8>attacks on critical infrastructure. What I would say is you know,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 8>I would love to hear more from Meanthropic once they

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 8>have this cohort, do sort of an alpha pilot, I

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 8>guess is the best way to put it. What is

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 8>the beta pilot and what is a you know, sort

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 8>of a rollout to trusted vetted you know, smaller maybe

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 8>privately held firms look like to make sure that all

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 8>offensive and defensive teams have these capabilities and are able

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 8>to use them against the attackers. Time is of the essence.

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 4>We're in a race, and we.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 8>Want to make sure that everybody who is on the

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 8>ethical side of cybersecurity is actually empowered, engaged and has

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 8>all the best state of the art tooling possible to

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 8>fight back these attacks.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 3>And Teresa, you make a good point, and it's actually

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 3>we've been hearing Fromanthropic as they've outlined what glass wing

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 3>really looks like. And you can see what certain Newton

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Cheng who's the Anthropics Frontier Red Teams cyber lead, has

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 3>been talking about how this is an industry wide problem,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, for the smaller companies that would like to

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 3>be able to help. There is obviously a chunk of

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 3>change being offered Bianthropic as well. In terms of computing tokens.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 3>How much have you been working perhaps with open ai

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>with its well prototype, it's been letting and working with

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 3>others in the security space to try and ensure that

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>defense has its tools ahead of others as well.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think there's a lot going on in this industry,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 8>and so I have been talking to all of the

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 8>different sort of leading AI providers to find out what

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 8>are the best offensive defensive tools, what are some things

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 8>that are yet to be built, what is on the roadmap,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.719
<v Speaker 8>and then what are really the best solutions depending on

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 8>the size company you are, how much money you have.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 8>Because you're right, everything is token based, how can companies

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 8>learn if they don't have a big technology team, how

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 8>can they learn to optimize the use of the tools

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 8>so that they're spending their token sparingly and get the

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 8>most value out of the money that they're spent. And

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 8>so there's definitely an arms race, you know, a healthy

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.479
<v Speaker 8>competition across the different AI companies, and some of them

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 8>are now cooperating as part of this anthropic rollout. The

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 8>other thing I do want to mention is that answers

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 8>did actually self report that Mythos went rogue and so

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 8>I think that's something also that we need to be discussing,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 8>is that although it's going to help, it also has

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 8>the fine tunity that needs to happen.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Teresa, Paide and CEO for the list Solutions. We'll have

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>you back on the program and we'll discuss it more

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 2>detail coming up. Apple is on track to launch its

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>foldable phone later this year. Right now, markets off session

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>highs but rallying. This Bloomberg Tech Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Technology socks are rallying. There is outside performance, particularly in

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>chip names in memory and the chip name's extent to

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>logic as well.

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 4>The other part of.

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>The story is that oil is down Brent the global

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 2>benchmark below one hundred dollars per barrel. The story is

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that we are in a two week ceasefire in the

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>war in Iran, broken by Pakistan. There is still ongoing

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>headlines about activity in the region and supply chain disruption,

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>but that is what the main driver and main story

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>is at this moment. We're off session highs when it

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 2>comes to the Nazak one hundred, but actually the Philadelphia

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Semiconductor in edental socks, those chip stocks continue to rally

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>pretty hardcater I certainly do.

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 3>And let's focus in on kind of area of supply

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 3>chain right now, because Apple's first foldable phone, it's still

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 3>on track to launched in September now, despite some reports

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>of major manufacturing delays.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Bluemogs Mark German is here with the latest reporting. Yesterday

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Apple was lower.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Today of course we rise with the rest of the market,

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 3>but there is an anticipation here Mark that you'll make

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 3>it clear they're still going to have that foldable phone

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>on time.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 10>So a couple of days ago, the Nickay out of

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 10>Asia put out a report saying that there are major

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 10>engineering and manufacturing snags related to the company's first foldable iPhone,

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 10>which could mean a several month delay. What I'm told

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 10>is that the foldable iPhone will be introduced in September

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 10>during the normal cadence, alongside the iPhone eighteen Pro and

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 10>eighteen promacs, And as of this week, there's a very

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 10>strong likelihood that the foldable phone will actually even go

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 10>on sale at the same time as the new eighteen

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 10>Pro models, which means no shipment delayed. Now things are fluid.

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 10>Mass production has not begun yet, but everything that I

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 10>have been told by several people close to the situation

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 10>is that there are no major engineering snags at this point.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 10>Things are moving as planned. Again, these things can change,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 10>but as of now, I do anticipate the foldable phone

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 10>to go on sale either at the same time as

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 10>the non new foldable madel or very soon thereafter.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>The other way I'm looking at it, Mark is that

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>come September, we're going to get a foldable phone from Apple.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, what do we need to know about? Nice speeches?

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 2>If it's super exciting, if it's on track, how big

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>is product? Is this going to be in Apple's evolution?

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think initially it's going to be quite niche

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 10>I anticipate this to be, in the words of one person,

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 10>very very expensive. Apple believes it has solved some of

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 10>the quirks of the current foldable models. A few things

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 10>I'll point out. One, some of the current foldables from

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 10>other players, they have lots of durability issues. You get

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 10>dust or stand in it, you could break the screen. Obviously,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 10>Apple has very high specifications for durability, and so the

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 10>foldable phone meets that, I'm told. The other quirk related

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 10>to displays, there are creases in many of the foldable

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 10>phones today when you open and shut it. Apple has

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 10>reduced that crease working with Samsung some new display technology Samsung,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 10>of course, is going to bring to its devices. The

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 10>third thing, if you look at the phone, it looks

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 10>like a small little reporter notebook. You open it up

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 10>and it goes wider than the narrower foldable phones you

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 10>see on the market today, which means it's an excellent

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 10>device for watching video and for gaming, but overall it's

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 10>a foldable phone. Samsung has had these on the market

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 10>since around twenty nineteen twenty twenty. All the Chinese phone

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 10>makers have them, Google has it, But now that Apple's

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 10>entering the market, it's going to get a lot more popular.

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg, Smart German, thank you very much. What was driving

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Apples stock in yesterday's session was that concern manufacturing engineering

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>delays and how it impacted a foldable phone. The stock

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 2>today's rallying for a very different reason, right, and that

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 2>is the cease far with Iran. As geopolitical tensions rise.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 2>In the context of that ongoing war in Iran, global

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>tech supply chains and as well as US China relations

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 2>are being tested. As bringing Reva Goose on, director at

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the policy and economic research firm Rhodium Group. You know,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking again. I'm going to go back to what's rallying.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>We're showing it on the screen. It's technology stocks that

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 2>are pushing higher right now. And one of the reasons is, Okay,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 2>helium comes from the Gulf, critical in stabilization, cooling in

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the etching and deposition process and chip manufacturing. Energy prices

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>have been impacted by this war in Iran. Why is

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 2>it to your mind that the tech industry is seeing

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>some relief from the idea of a ceasefire.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 11>Well, because we're not going to all out war is

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 11>the short answer. And so I think everyone is taking

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 11>this bit of good news that there's a two week

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 11>seeds fire and running with it. But the reality is

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 11>that the Pandora's box and the Persian Gulf has been opened.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 11>And by that I mean, you know, even if we

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 11>have an extended seasfire and cessation of hostilities that last

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 11>longer term. Here, we have now seen Iran demonstrate capability

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 11>and political will to strike critical infrastructure across this region,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 11>to include very high value targets like data centers multi

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 11>billion data centers, including explicit threats against Opening Eyes Stargate

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 11>project in the UAE, not to mention the number of

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 11>AWS sites that have been struck already in Bahrain and UAE.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 11>So that's just a completely different investor climate overall for

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 11>this region. But coming to supply chains though, as you said,

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 11>when we talk about helium supply, bro mind just energy

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 11>supply overall, Iran also has an interest in allowing transit

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 11>through the strait. But that's where we come back to

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 11>political conditions that will be attached to the ceasefire.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Caroline and I discussed in detail the vulnerability of data

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 2>center assets in the Gulf as it relates to China.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>For example, there is a long term threat to Taiwan

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and the concentration of semiconductor manufacturing. With that taken all

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 2>into account, how conscious are companies like Apple on now

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 2>changing where they plan to build future products and have

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a footprint in the future for their manufacturing operations.

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, there are multiple drivers in play here, not just

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 11>geopolitical risk obviously, but also the evolution of US trade strategy,

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 11>which is still in play as we know. There's a

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 11>pending Section two thirty two still on semiconductors that could

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 11>contain component tariffs right that implicate the devices that contain

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 11>those semiconductors, not to mention looking beyond tariffs content requirements

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 11>right so far, for example, we have regional value content

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 11>requirements for automotive parts. Imagine that applied to electronics more broadly.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 11>So I think you know companies like Apple are looking

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 11>at these these issues in parallel to say, yes, there

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 11>is a lot concentrated still in Taiwan device manufacturers also

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 11>in China, that geopolitical risk is is only amplified. But

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 11>at the same time there are going to be a

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 11>lot of disruptors coming from the US who tried to

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 11>drive more not just onshoing, but more regionalized trade and

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 11>bring more of that manufacturing based to the Western hemisphere

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 11>as well.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to just go a little bit further with

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 3>where it took us in terms of China, because there's

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of really well read stories on the Bloomberg

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 3>today thinking about how maybe the US has reduced its

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 3>overall well power among allies and adversaries at the moment

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 3>because of what's happened in Iran in particular when it

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 3>comes to China and the Iran campaign has been quote

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 3>a serious setback for Trump is what one particular Chinese

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 3>foreign ministry advisor.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Had told us. What does that mean for.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 3>US China relations What does that mean about AI access,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 3>cheer access, the relationship that we have.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely So if you contrast where we are today in

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 11>the wake of this Iran miscalculation on part of the US,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 11>and then compare it to where we were late last

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 11>year when the Busan truth was struck. Back then, the

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 11>US was caught flat footed by Chinese expert controls on

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 11>critical raw materials, and so the US was in a

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 11>very reactive mode when it went to Busan. Those truce

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 11>terms were set, and I think the whole intent going

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 11>into the next summit in Beijing was to come with

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 11>a more assertive position with China, to say, look, we're

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 11>doing things to reindustrialize the US, protect critical infrastructure. We're

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 11>not explicitly calling out China in these measures. So you

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 11>know what, you don't get a vote on these areas,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 11>and the US is going to be forging ahead now

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:56.719
<v Speaker 11>because of the Iran dynamic. That certainly tamps down the confidence,

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 11>right that the ability of the US to assert itself

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 11>in the same way, and Beijing sees that. Beijing certainly

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 11>is in a more confident position going into the summit.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 11>It has very explicit demands. For example, not just to reduce,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, maintain tariff levels at the Busan Truce level,

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 11>but to reduce them, not just to restrain the US

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 11>technology controls, but to actually roll them back. And this

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 11>is where the US has been doing more country agnostic

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 11>measures as well, trying to say, look, China, we're not

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 11>out to get you, but Beijing's messages I see what

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 11>you're doing here and it's got to stop. And so

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 11>their interest is to make everything a red line, which

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 11>means that we have a number of friction points heading

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 11>into the summit. Not to mention there where the status

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 11>of the Iran issue is is also going to consume

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 11>a lot of oxygen going into that meeting.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 3>This has such broad implications and you help break down

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 3>many of them today. Riva Boujon, thank you, director of

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 3>the Rodium Group. Now coming up, let's return to all

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>things AI because that's old. That's talking about it the

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Human Next conference in San Francisco. We speak with the

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Snowflake CEO Rabaswami as.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 4>A blom Meg Tech. It's time now for talking tech

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 4>and first.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 3>S up Resolve AI it's going straight to shareholders with

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a hostile bid for Commerce dot Com. This after negotiations

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 3>with the board our management brote down. According to a

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 3>letter to investors seen by Bloomberg, Resolve is now offering

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 3>one of its own shares for every two Commerce dot

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Com shares and says it's earlier one for one proposal

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 3>that gave to the board is no longer valid. Plus,

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Morgan Stanley has become the first Wall Street bank to

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>launch its own bitcoin tracking ETF. Now, the Morgan Stanley

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin Trust is debuting under the ticker MSBT Bitcoin, touching

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 3>three week highs today. Of course, because the US and

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Iran tentively agreeing that sees fire and prompting a surge

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 3>and risk assets and super Micro says a committee of

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>independent directors hired an outside law firm.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 4>To investigate the circumstances tied.

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>To last month's indictment of two employees and a contract

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>a religed server sales to China. In a statement, giper

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Micro said it will share an update what's the inquiry

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is complete.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:07.959
<v Speaker 4>It won't comment further until then.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Aad okay human X is underway here in San Francisco,

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.479
<v Speaker 2>bringing together industry leaders focused on turning AI into real

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 2>world results. Snowflake CEO Tridah Ramaswami is set to speak

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 2>at the conference and says it's not about big bets

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 2>but execution. He joins us, now there's something I want

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to take up with you, Shreda. And you and I

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>have discussed this before. You have projects snow work, and

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the idea is that you have this big customer base

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that goes from running agents that give you answers to

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 2>running workloads, And I go back to is an agent

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 2>that only gives answers? Actually an agent? Is it a

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>real piece of agentic AI that acts with autonomy? It

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>seems like now we're getting to that part.

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean a lu storm.

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 12>It is a looser. It's all about it's fundamentally ABODA

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 12>models using tools and learning from how they are using it.

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 12>And for example, or first generation of agents with Snowflake intelligence,

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 12>which gave analytic insights into data, and then Cortex code

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 12>made acting on Snowflake a lot easier. Snowork is a

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 12>natural culmination. What it's able to do is take the

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 12>one hundred tabs that you have open on your computer

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 12>and create a single environment that brings together things like that.

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 12>So not only can you get information about something you want,

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 12>how is the customer doing, she can also take an action,

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 12>send them an email, or make a recommendation for them.

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 12>It's that power that's increasing by the day as AI

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 12>models get stronger and stronger.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 2>The idea, you know, every time you go to an

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 2>event like human X, you're trying to say, what is

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the thing that people are excited about what they're talking about.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And one of the concepts is you go to bed

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and you leave your computer to do work overnight and

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you wake up to tangible results. Is that the idea

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 2>with this that.

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 12>Can be It's one of the consequences we've always said

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 12>scheduled things like scheduled reports. I'm sure you get something

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 12>in the morning that's a summary of all of the

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 12>things that you should know.

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 4>You can think of agents as very summary that.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Has taken an action. It hasn't performed a piece of

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 2>work on the microphaf.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 4>That's right, that's right.

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 12>But with these agents, absolutely you can. I have people

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 12>that are writing code twenty four to seven. They just

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 12>like set the agent on the task of writing new

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 12>code to get some feature done, and they give you

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 12>some instructions, come back check in the morning. I think

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 12>absolutely these agents are getting better and better at taking

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 12>actions on your behalf. But part of the magic is

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 12>how do you do that in a government bay. How

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 12>do you have a control plane that says these kinds

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 12>of actions are fine, but those have large outside world consequence.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 12>They really need to be subject to human scrutiny. Increasingly,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 12>that's going to be what is needed to make AI succeed.

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 3>At scale outside world consequences. You are the man to

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 3>speak to you today about well, the few or the

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 3>concern the anxiety of the latest Anthropic model that is

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 3>being stress tested by forty tech companies because it's so

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 3>powerfully I can't get into the hands of US made models.

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 3>What do you make about the step changes that we're

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 3>seeing models right now and how powerful they were coming.

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 12>I think the impact that they're having on software is profound.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 12>Software is getting easier to create, and this also means

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 12>that people can create value faster. I think Anthropic is

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 12>doing an incredibly responsible thing by taking a model like

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 12>that which has breakthrough capabilities, especially in code generation, and

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 12>giving it to a set of their closest partners to

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 12>ensure that when it comes to security, for example, we

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 12>are able to plug gaps. Security has always been a

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 12>difficult hand done, human led kind of motion. And actually

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 12>think of this as a big advance where we can

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 12>systematically make all of our systems they're so critical for

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 12>our nation, for our own survival a lot more stronger.

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 12>I actually see this as a positive outcome.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 4>You're at the cutting edge of models.

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you're the co founder Niva, you came on

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 3>to Snowflake and you work for a long time at Google.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested actually in how.

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 3>You're finding the narrative around Snowflake right now. We actually

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 3>had the top of the show Brooke Dane on from

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 3>Golm and Sachs as the management. They love Snowflake and

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 3>in particular they're liking and wanting to see from application

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 3>names and from software companies well, more cost optimization, more

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 3>capital return. Is that something you're having to think about

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 3>when you've got some of your coders working twenty four

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 3>hours because they're able to just plug and play while

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 3>they sleep.

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 4>How is that affecting your costs? Well?

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 12>I think the return that we get from investing in

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 12>AI comes back to us many many manyfold. Used to

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 12>be Last year we had maybe a dozen demos that

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 12>we would show our customers. They were all kind of

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 12>cookie cutter. But today I and my sales team is

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 12>a lot more capable can generate a demo for you

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 12>in ten minutes if I want. But and that is

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 12>a lot more personal, It's much more relevant to your business.

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 12>AI is making a real difference in how we show

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 12>people what is possible with Snowflake, and we are getting

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 12>huge returns in areas like support or even now what

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 12>we call our SR team. There's a team that keeps

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 12>Snowflake the system up. They're using the power of Agent

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 12>DKI to be a lot more effective. SAI has cost,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 12>but the returns we get from it. Problems that used

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 12>to take multiple days to debug and get to the

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 12>bottom er we can get answers now in ten to

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 12>fifteen minutes. There is cost, but I think the returns

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 12>are more than worth it, definitely for us and for

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 12>a lot of our customers that are able to do

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 12>things that honestly were just inconceivable. Just like a year

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 12>ago where companies like United Drenttals basically just released an

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 12>app to their sixteen hundred branches, and what are questions

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 12>these branches have about the current state of the business.

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 12>They can just get it interactively. That is game changing

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 12>for that.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>That's Bloomberg Intelligence are in house research arms thesis that

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 2>as company use of agents grows, you will benefit just

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 2>very quickly. Where you seeing that written true, The most.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 12>Beautiful part right now is across the data life cycle.

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 12>It's increasing migrations because getting data into a place like

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 12>Snowflake where the data is AI ready has an added

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 12>impetus Because of AI, it's also automating the process of migration.

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 12>So people are bringing in more data sets, they're building

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 12>more with products like Snowflake Intelligence because they can get

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 12>value faster, distributed more broadly. Just here was I wanted

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 12>to look up what exactly is United Rentals doing in

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 12>other areas. That was just a single question into my

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 12>Snowflake Intelligence app. That's right on my phone. That's value

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 12>when I want it, where I want it. That's the

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 12>kind of thing that every CEO that I show this

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 12>too wants because they want those insights to be available

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 12>at their fingertips. So it's actually a broad acceleration across

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 12>many many things that we do. And as models like

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 12>mythos come along, we are able to take advantage of

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 12>them in our products and get our customers to do

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 12>even more with Snowflake.

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Snowflake CEO should I Ramaswami. Ahead of your talkover at

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 3>human X, we so appreciate you joining the show. Now

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 3>coming up, social media companies.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 4>Trying to hand and a rebrand and a work. There's

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 4>a bluebog tech.

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 2>TikTok plans to invest one point two billion dollars in

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a second data center in Finland. It's part of the

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.760
<v Speaker 2>company's Project Clover effort to move data storage for European

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 2>users to the continent, the company says. Earlier this month,

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 2>TikTok abandoned plans for a second data center in Ireland Cara.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, there's more on big tech's new spin in social media,

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 3>the new Big Tobacco. Tech giants like Meta, TikTok, YouTube

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 3>are trying to redefine themselves to escape the social stigma.

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Merg's Alex Lavine is here to talk about your story

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 3>your tech in depth today. That really builds upon a

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 3>narrative that maybe was started by Snapchat almost a decade ago,

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 3>but basically a lot of companies trying to tell us

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 3>that they're not actually social media companies at all.

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 13>It's striking because fifteen or twenty years ago social media

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 13>was a sexy thing to be the way that today

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 13>now everyone is an AI need avis or an AI

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 13>power that as sentiment has and we've entered this moment

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 13>where it's common vernacular we talk about social media as

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 13>brain rod and doom scrolling, and we say going analog

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 13>is very in vogue. The sentiment has soured and now

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 13>the social media companies want to be known for something

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 13>other than either what they started as or in some

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 13>cases we could argue what they actually are.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Alex reinventions possible are remember twenty twenty one being at

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 2>number one, hack away and the top is pulled off

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and Facebook is then meta. There's some case studies you've

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 2>looked at and your techond depth.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so, I mean we looked at how meta, as

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 13>you said, was trying to rebrand to a metaverse company,

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 13>and since then we've seen them get into chip making,

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 13>into AI, into consumer tech. YouTube very much wants to

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 13>be known just as TV or as really an entertainment

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 13>and streaming company. TikTok similarly also wants to be known

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 13>as an entertainment company. Snap has said in the pass

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 13>it it's a camera company. I think all these are.

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 13>It's understandable why the companies want to move in this direction,

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 13>but the corporate spin is just not seemingly working.

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Alex Lavine with a must red Tech in debt,

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much. That does it for this edition

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Tech. But this is the story. We have

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.280
<v Speaker 2>a two week cease fire with the war in Iran

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 2>broken by Pakistan. Tech stocks pushing higher, particularly chip stocks, AI, infrastructure, hardware, memory, etc.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin also pushing to the upside. Carro, but we still

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 2>see continued activity in the region.

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we do kuwait sair defenses.

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>For example, I've been dealing with intense attacks from Iran

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 3>since eight am Wednesday and it's still ongoing, the country's

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 3>army says in a post on x So we keep

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 3>abreast on the latest. When it comes to geopolitics and

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 3>the effect on tech and supply chains, you have to

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 3>bring it back to that to a certain extent. I

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 3>forget to check out our podcast finding on the terminal

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 3>as well as online on Apple, Spotify, an iHeart from

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 3>New York and San Francisco.

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Tech,