WEBVTT - Tech News: Tesla - The Good, The Bad, and the On Fire

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And this is the

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, August three one, and we've got

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a ton of it, So this might be a slightly

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>longer news episode than I usually do. And we're gonna

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>start off I'm not burying the lead. I've titled this

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Tesla The Good, the Bad, and the on Fire. We're

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna get right to it with a trio of Tesla

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>stories and we're gonna start off with the first one

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>being a positive story involving Tesla autopilot. Now, we typically

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>hear about autopilot when something goes wrong, sometimes tragically wrong,

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but this is different. In Norway, a Tesla owner was

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>driving their car apparently well under the influence of alcohol.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Now that bit is awful. It never should have happened. Obviously,

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>no one should ever drive under the influence, but that's

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>what was going on with this case, apparently, and the

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>driver allegedly passed out behind the wheel of their car.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And obviously this could have led to tragedy, but the

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Testla system. The autopilot system detected that the driver was unresponsive,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it thus went into what it was supposed to do,

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so at that point, the system kept the car traveling

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>smoothly within the lanes of the road until it could

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>come to a safe spot on the side of the

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>road and come to a stop. The driver was later

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>found unconscious behind the wheel of the vehicle and received

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>medical treatment. That driver also denied two authorities that they

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>had been operating the vehicle while intoxicated, but that story

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>was somewhat undermined by the fact that other motor had

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently captured video of this driver unconscious behind the wheel

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>of the car. The authorities subsequently put a temporary suspension

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>on that driver's license and filed a criminal complaint against them.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is a case of Tesla's autopilot, which I

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>should remind you is not technically a fully self driving system,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but rather a driving assist system that was working just

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 1>as it was intended. The autopilot checks for driver responsiveness

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you are attentive and that you

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are prepared to take over driving, and in cases where

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that isn't happening, it will prompt the driver to take

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>control of the vehicle, essentially alerting you so that like

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if you dozed off, you wake up and you can

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>put your hands in the wheel and that way you

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can't just you know, engage the autopilot system and read

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a book or go to sleep or watch the next

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>episode of ted Lasso or whatever. You have to be

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>an active driver, and if you ignore the alerts, then

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the car does what we saw in this case, it

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 1>will come to a stop on the side of the road. So,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks to autopilot, a possible catastrophic car wreck did not happen.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Though again, we do need to remember we're still a

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>long way away from a fully autonomous consumer vehicle, and

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>if we need another reminder, we can move on to

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>our next story about Tesla. This one's also about autopilot,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's less good. It's not terrible, it's just not good.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And this story actually comes from last week, but I

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>only just saw it today, so I thought I would

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>include it in our Tesla trio of news stories. A

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter user named Jordans Nelson posted a video that showed

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Tesla they were in mistakenly identified the moon

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as a yellow traffic light, and thus the autopilot system

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was that was guiding the car, told the car to

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>slow down in anticipation of a red light, that there

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>will be a red light, so let's slow down. This

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can happen on any stretch of road in which the

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>car is facing a low yellow moon, even if you

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>happen to be, say on a highway. You could see

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>how that could be something of an issue if you

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>were engaging autopilot at that time. And in this case,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the autopilot mode was actually Tesla's full self driving feature FSD.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what Tesla calls it, which I would argue is

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>another somewhat confusing name. I've often said I don't like

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the name autopilot. I think it gives the wrong implication

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>as to what that system actually does. Well, I feel

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the same about the full self driving feature because Tesla

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>has fully admitted that none of its vehicles qualifies being

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>truly autonomous vehicles, and so even in FSD mode, the

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>vehicle needs to operate under human supervision. So yeah, that

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>name doesn't really work. But then I guess calling it

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>almost full self driving doesn't have quite the same ring

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to it. Now, that moon issue that Jordan Nelson ran

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>into is not likely to happen all the time. Obviously,

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it would only happen if the moon were particularly yellowish

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that night and low in the sky enough so that

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>it would look kind of like the height of a

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>traffic light. The car would obviously have to be facing

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that direction as well. But this does illustrate how the

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>challenges of developing autonomous cars can include stuff that we

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>humans just wouldn't take into account. Right, humans wouldn't mistake

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a yellow moon for a yellow traffic light. Of course,

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the future, we might have some infrastructure like traffic

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>lights that maybe contained a little transmitter that can communicate

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>directly with compatible vehicles, and thus cars on the road

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>would quote unquote no if a light were about to change,

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>because they'd be in communication with the infrastructure. However, if

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that is ever to happen, it's pretty darn far off.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Because here's the thing. While that technology isn't necessarily that

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>complicated or futuristic, it's something that we could probably do today.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>The scale of rolling it out practically of actually installing

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be enormous even for just a single city,

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>let alone the entire world. But a feller can dream

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>canny and now our third Tesla story rounding them out.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Last Friday, Tesla had a true disaster on its figurative hands.

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>A Tesla Mega Pact battery, which is a thirteen ton

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>lithium battery, caught fire. Now, the Mega Pac is meant

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to store electricity for utility scale projects. Like imagine you've

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>got some sort of huge work site and you need

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to supply electricity there. Or maybe you've got, you know,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>some form of electrical generation facility and you need a

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>place to store excess electricity. That's sort of the kind

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of thing we're talking about. This isn't a car battery

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. It's order of magnitude larger than that. Anyway,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>one of these things caught fire on Friday in Australia

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and it took four days, thirty fire trucks and one

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty firefighters to extinguish that fire. Now, if you

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>remember back when Samsung had issues with the Samsung Galaxy

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Note seven battery which exploded in several different instances, you

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>remember how that issue was incredibly serious. Right, the reaction

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is violent, it's it can be deadly. Uh, it also

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>can release a lot of toxic fumes, and that threat

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>was serious enough to prompt airlines to prevent passengers from

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>carrying a Note seven on board the aircraft. They were

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially told they had to hand in their phones and

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>which would not be allowed on the plane, or they

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves would not be allowed to get on the flight. Well,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of like that, only instead of being

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a battery that fits inside handheld smartphone, it's a thirteen

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>ton monstrosity. The battery itself was inside a shipping container,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>which was likely a good thing because it probably helped

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>prevent the fire from spreading to other megapact batteries at

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that site, because if there's anything worse than one thirteen

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>ton battery catching on fire, it's a bunch of them

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Australian authorities say the fire was brought under

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>control on Monday, so that's a good thing. But yeah,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a scary story and a reminder that batteries with

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>volatile components are a bit dangerous. If the battery should

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be damaged in a way that the path for the

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>electrons to travel from the negative terminal to the positive

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>terminal opens up, you know, without having to be connected

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of circuit, well then the battery is

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>going to discharge rapidly, right, the electrons are just going

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to rush from one part of the battery to another.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>This will end up causing the battery to start to

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>heat and then overheat, and that can lead to issues

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>like a fire or explosion. Now I'm not certain if

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what led to the fire in this particular case,

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 1>but just based on how batteries work, I figure it's

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a decent bet. Right. If you create a shortcut or

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a short circuit between terminals, then this is the sort

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of thing that can happen. Moving on from Tesla, a

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity firm called threat Fabric reports that the company's researchers

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have found instances of Android apps downloaded from the Google

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Play Store that are attempting to steal banking log in information.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>This malware, which the firm has called Volter, which is

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like Vulture but without E at the end, essentially takes

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a screenshot when someone uses a bank app to log in.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So you launch your bank application and the malware notices this.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It attacts the data entry form format and it uses

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the screenshot coupled with a key logger, so a program

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that records key strokes in order to get the user

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>name and password uh for whatever that that application is,

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and as I said, it's mainly banking applications. Then the

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>malware uses the phone itself to send that data off

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to whichever computer the hackers are using to gather log

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in information. The researchers found that most instances of this

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>did seem to target banking information, but some were also

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>apparently logging stuff like social media account logins and so

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>far and looks at this malware is mainly concentrated in

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Australia. The Cybersecurity company suggests that Android users

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>install anti virus apps to try and detect if you

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>happen to have any malware on your phone, because it

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>can be a little tricky to figure it out if

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's on there just by yourself until it's too late.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I would also recommend having a really good password vault

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to have a secure place to store

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>passwords where it can automatically insert the password into whichever

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know log inform you need, which means there are

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>no key strokes for it to log right if it's

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>an automated process where you need a master password to

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>log into your account, or if it has biometrics like

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>an ice scan or something that can be more secure,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>assuming that obviously they're not key logging your password account,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which could be devastating. If they add access to all

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>your passwords, that's even worse. So I think that a

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>password vault and anti virus app is those are two

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>good things to have on an Android phone. Um keeping

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in mind nowhere can also affect iOS devices. It's just

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that with Google it has been more of an issue

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>more frequently, partly because the Android operating system is on

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>way more phones around the world than iOS is, so

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a target rich environment. We have lots more stories

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to go, but before we get to any of those,

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. I got a question for you,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>dear listener. This is back into the news, and my

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>question to you is how much are your biometrics worth

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to you? How much would a company need to pay

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you in order to, say, register your fingerprints or your

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>retinal scan or maybe a palm print. If your answer

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is ten bucks, well I have some great news for you,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at least if you happen to live somewhere close to

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>one of Amazon's checkout free stores. So the company is

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>offering a ten dollar credit to customers who allow their

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>palms to be scanned by the company and then linked

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to their Amazon accounts, and the idea being that then

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the customers could walk into one of these Amazon stores,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they pick up whatever it is they want, and as

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they're leaving, they just scan their palm and that links

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to their Amazon account and payment is automatically transferred to Amazon.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. That's the payment. You just, you know,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you Jedi style, waive your palm and say these are

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the eight apples I'm looking for or whatever, and you

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can go on your married little way. Uh. As you

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.359
<v Speaker 1>might imagine, this move has prompted a rather divisive response,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are some people who just shrug their shoulders

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and say, this is just tech creating a convenient method

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for transactions, and that's kind of cool. And I like

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea of being able to do this without having

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to fumble for a credit card or put in some

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of code for a transaction. This makes it even

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>more convenient and futuristic. It isn't the future awesome. Then

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who take kind of a middle

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>ground approach and they say, well, yeah, it's more convenient,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's also another way for Amazon to tie purchases

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to a specific person. I would argue that the company

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>could pretty much do it anyway, because presumably all purchases

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>would be linked to an Amazon account in the first place.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Though I guess you could have a household has a

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>shared Amazon account and thus you can't really target the

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>specific person in that case. So anyway, by linking purchases

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to an individual, Amazon could potentially target ads more precisely

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to that person. And then it gets to be a

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>little kind of big Brother creepy invasive. And then you

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have the more extreme privacy advocates. And I use extreme

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not to you know, downplay them, but rather just to

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>say they take privacy far more seriously than most people do.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They are obviously deeply concerned as Amazon has had a

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty shaky record with biometrics, including facial recognition technology, and

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that that that ten dollar credit makes it sound like

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the company is paying people to, in the words of

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Albert fox Cohn, a privacy advocate, sell their bodies. That

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound great. Con also pointed out that with many

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>aspects of your life, you can make changes if you

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>need to get like a fresh start. Let's say something

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>terrible happens. You know, maybe you made a terrible mistake

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you had to go to jail for it.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you were, you know, mistakenly identified for something. Maybe

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you just maybe you just need to start over because

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of your life experiences. So you could move across country,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you could change your name, legally, you could try and

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>start out fresh, but biometrics stick with you and could

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially link you back to a time that you would

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>rather leave behind. And I figure that I am actually

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>falling somewhere in that middle camp where I'm not sold

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on the convenience over privacy feature, but I'm also not

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>quite so dystopian in my mindset as some privacy advocates are.

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And I want to just point out again that that's

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just me, and that could be a failing on my heart.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I might be giving this far too much credit, and

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that maybe I do need to be as paranoid or

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>as passionate is probably a better word for as some

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of these privacy advocates are. So I'm not saying they're wrong.

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that's not where I'm at at the moment.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, the United States Air Force, specifically, the Special

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Operations Command commissioned a study from the RAND Corporation to

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>look into the issue of disinformation campaigns online. As Popular

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Science reports, disinformation is a deliberate attempt to mislead a target,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>like a target audience, by feeding that target a false

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>narrative of some sort, so it is purposeful. Misinformation is

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>something that could be passed on by accident. You know,

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you omit certain facts and not necessarily on purpose,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you just get something wrong in the communication

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of it and it becomes misinformation, whereas disinformation is done

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>on purpose with the intent to mislead. Well. The report

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>gives a pretty dismal assessment of the U. S government's

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>response to disinformation campaigns, calling it dubiously effective and fractured

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and uncoordinated. So the takeaway is that the entities behind

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>these disinformation campaigns, such as various Russian operatives and Russian

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>troll farms, they tend to be at least they tend

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to operate in a way that that makes them seem

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>highly organized and accurate in their targeting, whereas the response

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to these attacks is slipshod and inconsistent. The report also

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>found something that I think a lot of people are

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>probably at least you know, unconsciously aware of which is

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that these disinformation campaigns don't necessarily invent issues out of

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>whole cloth. It's not like they create a story and

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>push it out there and just hope it takes hold. Instead,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they usually leverage existing gaps that are in philosophies within

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and then they exacerbate those gaps. So,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, before the pandemic even happened, there was already

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a community of people who were distrustful of vaccines, the

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>anti vaxers. And they're not just in the United States, obviously,

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there are anti vaxers everywhere. And much of that initial

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>distrust here in the United States hinged upon published works

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in respected journals. But later those works got retracted because

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>people discovered that the actual results that were reported had

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>been falsified, that the papers that had been published themselves

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>were disinformation. And yet that distrust remained, you know, the

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 1>distrust towards vaccinations remained within that community, even though the

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>supposed evidence that supported that narrative had been proven to

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>be false. Like, they had already bought into the idea

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't matter that the foundation for that idea

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be false. Well, disinformation campaigns pounced on

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that existing undercurrent of anti vax fear and fed into it,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>creating doubts about the COVID Night teen vaccines, spreading fear

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and uncertainty and doubt. The Good Old Food Brand evaluated

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the Air Forces very young fourteen F Information Operations Division,

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>something that has really just recently come into its own.

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the first trainees of that division graduated very

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>late last year. And according to Rand, that division is

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a good idea, it's a nice step. However, the people

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and it still lacked the training to really recognize and

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>react to modern disinformation campaigns, and they also lack the

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>resources needed to make any sort of real difference. In fact,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>they were saying they might identify disin fformation campaign, but

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the resources to actually, you know, act

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on that and to make aware all the other divisions

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to counteract those disinformation campaigns. So you

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>would just have a division saying, yeah, we know about it,

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but we can't really do anything about it. That's not great.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And while that assessment was specifically aimed at the Air

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Force and disinformation campaigns that could impact say, military operations,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty confident to say the same as true across

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the board for disinformation campaigns in general, we are as

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a rule sorely underprepared and under provisioned to deal with them.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's why they can be incredibly effective because we

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have the resources to deal with them, and people

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>who buy into these disinformation campaigns can become evangelists and

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>effectively they become unwitting agents of the disinformation campaign itself

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and spread it further. Disinformation really in itself is like

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a virus, and there is no real vaccine for it

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>apart from critical thinking skills, so as always I advocate

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to you to exercise critical thinking and compassion. Moving on,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>ours Technica has a great article titled big tech companies

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>are at war with employees over remote work, and it

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>touches on things that we've talked about in other tech

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>news episodes, like how Apple's CEO Tim Cook would really

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>very much like to get all Apple employees back into

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple offices for at least three days a week soon,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>like in September, so that you know that super high

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>tech and incredibly expensive Apple campus isn't left empty all

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. Cook's memo to employees feels a bit out

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of touch to me and honestly, not just to me.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>The Verge reported that an employee survey revealed that the

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of Apple employees felt the memo was out

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of touch. But Cook isn't the only tech leader pushing

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to get folks back into offices. Google had plans to

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>do the same, as did Lift and other big tech companies.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>The Delta variant of COVID has changed things, delaying those

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>plans in several cases. But as the RS Technica piece

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>points out, the pandemic may have simply rushed what was

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>an already growing movement within the corporate world in general,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the tech world in particular, that for at least several

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>types of jobs, remote work is totally feasible and just

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as effective, sometimes more effective than going to the office,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>And for people working for companies in the Bay Area,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it opened up the possibility of relocating to a part

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the country that isn't as insanely expensive to live

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in as the Bay Area. So the idea of getting

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a Bay Area tech salary but living in a place

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>with a lower cost of living is really attractive to

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. And plus you take out the

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>commuting and the other aspects of living in an expensive city,

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and you start to see a lot of pros and

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>only a very few cons. Heck, there's also this general

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>move in the corporate world to the open floor plan.

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about any of y'all who have worked

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in offices with open plans, but I can tell you

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that in my office it is not a popular thing,

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>at least not among the editorial team. It turns out

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>editors and writers like having a bit of space that

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of shuts out the world around them so they

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can focus on their jobs. I suspect a lot of

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>other people feel the same way on their jobs. So

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this escalating tension between companies pushing to get back

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to this corporate norm that feels a bit oppressive and

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit you know again, big brother ish, like, like

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they only feel comfortable if they can see what everyone's

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>doing all the time. And then you have the folks

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>who would really rather work remotely if it's all the

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>same to you. And for some companies that does seem

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to have sunk in. At Twitter, the remote work policy

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>has effectively become at least semi permanent, setting Twitter apart

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from some of the other big tech companies. It's also

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny to see these tech companies that base

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>part of their reputations on innovation as being beholden to

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this older idea of what work should be. Anyway, as

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Acson of Ours Technica points out, we're likely at

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a pretty big shift in work cultures

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in general and in the tech sector in particular. I've

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>got a few more tech stories to come up, but

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>before we get into that, let's take another quick break. Now,

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if you've been listening to my tech news episodes, you

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>might remember one that I talked about last month, I think,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in which the video game publisher Electronic Arts was hit

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>with a hacker intrusion in which the hackers were able

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to steal a good amount of digital information. Um. By

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a good amount, I mean nearly a terrabyte of data,

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like more than seven fifty gigabytes of information, and that included,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, the source code for the company's

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>FIFA twenty one soccer game or football if you prefer.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>FIFA is the most popular sports video game franchise in

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the world, so it represents a really important cornerstone for

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>e A. Now, the hackers said that they would sell

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>back this information to e A to the tune of

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight million dollars. But e A did what I

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently say is the best course of action. It did

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not pay up. E A did not play ball with

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the FIFA thiefs, and when that happened, the hackers ended

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>up dumping their stolen data on the dark web. It

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds like they were first trying to sell that off

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to any buyers, but they couldn't find any because that

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>source code actually isn't that much use unless you want

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to try and run your own illegal FIFA servers. Potentially

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that has pretty lim an appeal. There's not there's not

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of profit out of it. E A

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>has said that while that source code was grabbed, the

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>hackers actually didn't access any databases containing customer information, which

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, would have potentially been far more valuable as

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>uh for to a thief than the source code would be.

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So player information was still safe, and the company also

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>updated its security systems and practices in the wake of

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the attack, which that attack involved both some techno wizardry

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as some good old fashioned social engineering. That's

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>when you trick someone into helping you infiltrate a system.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Something that can often surprisingly be pretty easy to do.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I may have to do another episode about Electronic Arts,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because I mean that company has had a rough history.

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there have been years where that company was

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>voted as the worst company to work for. But this

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is a case where I would say that the company

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>did the right thing. Sticking with games, let's talk for

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment about what's happening with ten Cent. That's a

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese holding company that owns a bunch of stuff, including

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a major stake in several video game companies and studios

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world, not just in China. Well back in China,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese media referred to video games in general as

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a spiritual opium and suggested that obsessing obsessively

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>playing games was ruining the children of China, with ten

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>cents game Honor of Kings getting special attention in the article.

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Ten Cent then saw its stock prices take a beating

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>plunging as a result of this scathing attack. In fact,

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the company lost around sixty billion dollars in valuation because

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the drop in stock price. The company says it

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>will now limit minors access to its video game and

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that video games, especially mobile games set

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up a challenge and reward cycle that encourages continued play.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's like a basic element of game design

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>for these kinds of games. Games that monetize through in

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>game purchases only succeed if players want to spend more

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>time in that game and get access to more in

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>game features or content, and so spend money to do so.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>So there definitely is something to the fact the games

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>have an addictive quality to them, so the report is

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not completely off base. However, it's also interesting for me

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>because seeing the Chinese media take aim at a Chinese

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>business is sometimes a little unusual because both the media

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and the businesses in China have strong links back to

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communist government. The Communist government is essentially integrated

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>into every major system in China. Then again, this could

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just be an issue in which the reporting is just sincere.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It could just be a sincere reporting on that social problem,

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or it could also be an issue in which the

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government is a little bit concerned that some of

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>these huge companies are getting powerful enough to have their

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>own authority that in some ways can rival that of

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese governments itself. Maybe it's a combination of a

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of these things, but it's kind of fascinating to me.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And what's also interesting is that the kerfuffle meant that

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for a brief period, Tensent actually found itself knocked off

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the most valuable company in Asia, though it did regain

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that throne. Meanwhile, in space, last week there was an

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>accident that affected the International Space Station. A Russian module

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>called Knocka docked with the station last week, and a

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>few hours after it had docked with the station, it

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>started to fire its thrusters accidentally. It was unplanned, and

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that caused the space station to start to move out

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of alignment and lead to a loss of quote unquote

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>attitude control. Now, in my household, a loss of attitude

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>control means that get really sassy, but in space this

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is way more serious than that. Apparently, the space station

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>ended up spinning one and a half times five forty

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>degrees and it stopped rotating upside down. Now, of course,

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in a microgravity environment, up and down are meaningless without

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a frame of reference. So the astronauts aboard the space

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>station were initially unaware of this issue because the movement

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>was actually really gradual. It's not like they were just

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>spinning around like in that film Gravity. NASA reports that

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the station is now back in its correct alignment, having

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>undergone a one eighty degree forward flip. And you thought

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics were just limited to here on Earth now,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all kidding aside, This whole thing sounds pretty intense and terrifying,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But the astronauts aboard the station and the people here

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on Earth were able to handle the emergency and return

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 1>things to their normal operating parameters. And I find that

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just really in orational, like really phenomenal stuff to show

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what can happen when people banned together in the face

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of an emergency and apply human ingenuity to fix the problem.

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, reading up on the full account, it gets

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.239
<v Speaker 1>really crazy. The module fired thrusters as if it were

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>attempting to maneuver away from the station, even though it

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was physically docked to the station. And again this was

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently some sort of automatic error, and only Russian's mission

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>control was able to actually send a command to stop

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the thrusters. But the space station wasn't in range of

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Russian mission control. You know, the station orbits the Earth,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and at that point in the orbit, it wasn't close

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to Russia for a message to go out, it

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in line of sight. It would actually take another

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hour before the station would potentially be reachable by Russian

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>mission control, So the crew ended up using a second

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Russian module as well as a cargo ship, and fired

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the thrusters aboard both of those UH elements in order

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to try and counter the thruster effect of Naka's malfunctioning thrusters.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen minutes after it started the knocka module settled the

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>heck down. At the time I'm recording this, no one

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to know what caused it to start or what

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>made it stop. And I'm sure that had to be

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tense day aboard the space station. And finally,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll end this episode by talking about something that is

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as traumatic, and that's the news we have

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>about the next flagship phones from Google. These are the

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Pixel six and the Pixel six Pro, both of which

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Google previewed yesterday on August two. With a limited preview.

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>The company did not give a full rundown of all

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the specs on both phones, did spend a good amount

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of time talking about the new system on a chip

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>or s o C called the Tensor S oc. This

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>chip includes multiple element it's not just a CPU. That's

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>why you get the system on a chip nomenclature, which

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially means that it has all the necessary components to

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>allow it to act as a computer. It's all present

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on a single chip, so like CPU, GPU, memory, all

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. According to the Verge, the new phones definitely

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>have a higher tier fuel to them than previous Pixel phones.

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That probably means they will be muccio expensive when they

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>come out later this year, but we do not know

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the pricing as of yet. As the Verge piece points out,

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it will probably be north of a thousand dollars for

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>just the base model. The Pixel six Pro is slightly

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>larger than the Pixel six the former. The Pro has

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a screen that measures six point seven inches and the

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>regular Pixel six has a screen that measures six point

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>four inches. The Pro also has a higher refresh rate

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of its screen. It has hurt refresh rate that means

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the screen refreshes times a second. The regular old Pixel

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>six has a refresh rate of ninety hurts, so it

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have quite the same rate. The Pro also has

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>three cameras. The Pixel six has just two, and the

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>pros extra camera is at telephoto camera, so you can

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>get those long distance shots. The new phones will also

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>incorporate AI features in some ways that I don't fully

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>grock yet. I know that some of it relates to photos,

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>which is good, Like if you have a telephoto lens

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on a phone, having AI to help counter stuff like

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>jitter is really good because otherwise, uh, you would get

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very fuzzy images if you were trying

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to take long distance photos and you you could not

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>correct for just the general motion that most of us

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have when we're holding stuff. Anyway, as I said, this

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>was more of a preview than anything else. We're likely

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear a lot more about these phones as we

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>get closer. Talked Ober, and I'm debating on whether I

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>actually stick with the Pixel I have an earlier Pixel phone.

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a Pixel four, or whether I change

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>teams because I am due to upgrade my phone. It's

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a four and so I skipped the five. But

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure that the PIXEL features are

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna be worth whatever that premium price turns out

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>to be. I don't want to be beholden to a

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>flagship phone just because it's a flagship phone. If I

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I'm getting value for whatever the prices,

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna wait a little bit longer to learn

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>more details before I make a decision on that. And

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that is the news for Tuesday, auguste. If you have

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for topics I should cover on tech Stuff, reach

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The best place to do that is

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and the handle we use is text stuff

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 1>hs W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart rate Dio production. For

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from I heart Radio, visit the I heart

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. H