WEBVTT - Not So Fast Episode 20

0:00:01.220 --> 0:00:05.180
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst,

0:00:05.410 --> 0:00:08.690
<v Speaker 1>where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.730 --> 0:00:12.590
<v Speaker 1>sports stories of the day. Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst.

0:00:13.490 --> 0:00:17.810
<v Speaker 2>Not so fast, my friends. Welcome to Not So Fast.

0:00:17.910 --> 0:00:20.550
<v Speaker 2>I'm Andrew Perloff. He's Paul Paps. We are in the

0:00:20.690 --> 0:00:24.189
<v Speaker 2>baseball corner of the Dan Patrick Show Man Cave. One

0:00:24.210 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 2>of the best spots in this whole unbelievable building, Paul.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we got baseball behind us, baseball next to us,

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 3>and baseball all day on NBC and Peacock. Four games

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.860
<v Speaker 3>coming up. You're going to get to those. Lou Merloni

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:36.900
<v Speaker 3>of NBC Sports, our old buddy from the Red Sox,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:38.570
<v Speaker 3>will be joining us to get us ready for baseball.

0:00:38.990 --> 0:00:41.670
<v Speaker 3>And an unbelievable night ahead. That was like a TV

0:00:41.729 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 3>show at Soldier Field last night. We got to chop

0:00:43.380 --> 0:00:43.650
<v Speaker 3>that up.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.500
<v Speaker 2>Awesome. All right. Well, the MLB postseason begins today on

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>NBC and Peacock. First up, Phillies and the Braves, followed

0:00:50.180 --> 0:00:53.430
<v Speaker 2>by White Sox and Astros. Then in primetime, of course,

0:00:53.570 --> 0:00:56.570
<v Speaker 2>Red Sox, Yankees. And then to wrap it up, the

0:00:56.630 --> 0:01:00.230
<v Speaker 2>Cubs face the Padres. MLB Wild Card presented by AbbVie

0:01:00.550 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>begins this afternoon on NBC and Peacock. Paul, there is

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of positivity to this, but there's something I'm

0:01:07.110 --> 0:01:07.500
<v Speaker 2>worried about.

0:01:07.780 --> 0:01:09.190
<v Speaker 3>You're worried as a Phillies guy?

0:01:09.209 --> 0:01:10.910
<v Speaker 2>No, as a human being, how are we going to sleep?

0:01:10.950 --> 0:01:11.830
<v Speaker 2>When are we going to sleep, Paul?

0:01:11.870 --> 0:01:14.030
<v Speaker 3>It's a great point. You've got to get your nap now.

0:01:14.090 --> 0:01:15.589
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how this is going to work, but

0:01:15.610 --> 0:01:17.830
<v Speaker 3>you have to get an hour nap before watching 10 hours.

0:01:18.030 --> 0:01:19.430
<v Speaker 3>And you're up late last night because it was a

0:01:19.450 --> 0:01:23.620
<v Speaker 3>really good game. So October is the embrace not being

0:01:23.700 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>rested month, but enjoying a lot of sports month.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.380
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's going to be so cool. And obviously, as

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.500
<v Speaker 2>you can tell, if you're watching us on NBC and Peacock,

0:01:30.900 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm wearing a Phillies jersey. Paul's wearing a Cubs jersey.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is a little hard because we are

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.100
<v Speaker 2>rooting and trying to be analysts.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start with Braves-Phillies. Braves outscored their opponents by

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.700
<v Speaker 3>116 runs this year. Two years ago, it felt like

0:01:42.740 --> 0:01:44.630
<v Speaker 3>that was the Braves' year, and they didn't get to it.

0:01:45.020 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Last year, a little down. Chris Sale is back, their

0:01:47.420 --> 0:01:50.180
<v Speaker 3>starting pitcher. And the Phillies are wonky. There was a

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.220
<v Speaker 3>point in the season where the Phillies were a big disappointment,

0:01:52.270 --> 0:01:54.770
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest disappointments in sports. And now, do

0:01:54.810 --> 0:01:58.500
<v Speaker 3>they feel like they've made the playoffs to make an appearance,

0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:59.900
<v Speaker 3>or are they threatening?

0:01:59.980 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, in 2022, they were pretty bad during the regular season.

0:02:03.180 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Got all the way to the World Series. I'm hoping

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that magic rekindles, but they can't hit at all, Paul.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.779
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little worried about the inconsistency.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.490
<v Speaker 3>Okay, White Sox over the Astros. The AL West stinks, man.

0:02:13.510 --> 0:02:14.710
<v Speaker 3>I guess they have to have someone out of the

0:02:14.750 --> 0:02:15.870
<v Speaker 3>AL West. I think it's a rule. You have to

0:02:15.889 --> 0:02:18.889
<v Speaker 3>have someone out of every division. The White Sox are

0:02:18.910 --> 0:02:21.010
<v Speaker 3>a feel-good story, but can they be more than that?

0:02:21.070 --> 0:02:23.649
<v Speaker 3>Because I think America would jump on their bandwagon. Two

0:02:23.690 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 3>years ago, 121 losses. Feel good story. Not a lot

0:02:26.940 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 3>of star power. Murakami, the Japanese slugger, he's kind of

0:02:29.820 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 3>their star guy. You remember the celebration after they made

0:02:32.340 --> 0:02:34.740
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs? It feels like that's the team that America

0:02:34.780 --> 0:02:35.660
<v Speaker 3>could jump on the bandwagon.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.740
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, Astro, they're the NFC South of baseball.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 2>First 500 team or lower to win a division. You're right.

0:02:42.540 --> 0:02:44.780
<v Speaker 2>Somebody had to win this, but it feels like they're sputtering,

0:02:45.020 --> 0:02:46.820
<v Speaker 2>which kind of makes them a little dangerous, by the way.

0:02:47.220 --> 0:02:49.139
<v Speaker 3>And of course, the hangover from the Astros. Now, I

0:02:49.180 --> 0:02:51.370
<v Speaker 3>know the scandal with the Astros is like nine years

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:52.850
<v Speaker 3>old now, but it doesn't feel.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.650
<v Speaker 2>Like it ever goes away. No, not to fans.

0:02:54.770 --> 0:02:55.270
<v Speaker 3>Not to fans.

0:02:55.370 --> 0:02:55.610
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox versus Yankees. We have some news on that one.

0:02:58.340 --> 0:02:59.970
<v Speaker 3>The Sox have been streaky all year. There was a

0:02:59.990 --> 0:03:01.810
<v Speaker 3>point in the season where it looked like the Sox

0:03:01.830 --> 0:03:03.850
<v Speaker 3>were sellers at the trade deadline. And then they kind

0:03:03.889 --> 0:03:06.150
<v Speaker 3>of got it back together. But the bigger news is

0:03:06.210 --> 0:03:09.130
<v Speaker 3>it came out today. Yes, network. Aaron Judge is out

0:03:09.230 --> 0:03:11.430
<v Speaker 3>for the wildcard round with the shin injury. He was

0:03:11.490 --> 0:03:14.269
<v Speaker 3>banged up all season. He played 66 games. In those games,

0:03:14.290 --> 0:03:17.030
<v Speaker 3>he hit 241. That's the lowest in eight years for him.

0:03:17.470 --> 0:03:20.210
<v Speaker 3>He's 34 years old, Aaron Judge. He had a really

0:03:20.250 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>good playoffs last year, but they didn't close the deal.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.060
<v Speaker 3>He needs a signature playoff run that results in a

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.609
<v Speaker 3>World Series. And now He's not even in the playoffs yet.

0:03:27.889 --> 0:03:29.850
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't know. I mean, you're already talking about

0:03:29.889 --> 0:03:31.790
<v Speaker 2>his legacy in the end. I mean, this year we

0:03:31.830 --> 0:03:34.460
<v Speaker 2>don't expect much. He's played seven games since May. But

0:03:34.500 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>you can't tell me a 34-year-old Aaron Judge is on

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:37.900
<v Speaker 2>the downside.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 3>You can't be an all-time great Yankee and not have

0:03:40.260 --> 0:03:42.300
<v Speaker 3>a World Series on your docket. It's almost automatic. It's

0:03:42.340 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>like even harder than, it's easy almost with the Yankees.

0:03:44.990 --> 0:03:47.410
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, listen, I guess the big issue is

0:03:47.550 --> 0:03:49.530
<v Speaker 2>if they do get past the Red Sox, will we

0:03:49.550 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>see him at all this postseason? But the Yankees' strength

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 2>is their pitching, so who knows?

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, we had Joey Votto, the former Reds All-Star,

0:03:56.020 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 3>earlier on the Dan Patrick Show. When he heard about

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.420
<v Speaker 3>the injury to Judge and him not playing in this series,

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.869
<v Speaker 3>he thought that it's way worse. If he was available

0:04:03.910 --> 0:04:06.590
<v Speaker 3>and didn't play, you feel okay. But not available means

0:04:06.890 --> 0:04:08.190
<v Speaker 3>he thinks he's out for a longer duration.

0:04:08.210 --> 0:04:09.770
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of a weird dynamic because it seemed

0:04:09.790 --> 0:04:12.050
<v Speaker 2>like Judge wanted to play and the team had different ideas.

0:04:12.390 --> 0:04:16.260
<v Speaker 3>Padres versus the Cubs, late night at NBC. Bullpen issues

0:04:16.500 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>all year long with the Cubs. I mean, their bullpen...

0:04:18.950 --> 0:04:20.830
<v Speaker 3>They just have to out-hit you. They truly have to

0:04:20.870 --> 0:04:22.890
<v Speaker 3>out-hit you with PCA and everyone else on that team.

0:04:23.270 --> 0:04:25.550
<v Speaker 3>And it's the opposite with the Padres. Mason Miller, you

0:04:25.589 --> 0:04:27.290
<v Speaker 3>get it to him in the eighth and ninth, it's

0:04:27.310 --> 0:04:29.190
<v Speaker 3>kind of over, Johnny, at 103 miles an hour.

0:04:29.390 --> 0:04:32.780
<v Speaker 2>You know, I pulled PCA's stats from last year's playoffs. Oh, no.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:33.660
<v Speaker 2>Not good.

0:04:33.700 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 3>Not good.

0:04:34.100 --> 0:04:37.420
<v Speaker 2>But 185, Paul, in the playoffs, I mean, they did

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 2>beat the Padres.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:39.860
<v Speaker 3>185 is the weight you want. It's not what you

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 3>want to hit.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that he's actually under a bit of

0:04:42.460 --> 0:04:44.590
<v Speaker 2>a microscope. It's been his breakout year. He's going to

0:04:44.610 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>win the MVP title. A little bit of pressure. You know,

0:04:47.260 --> 0:04:48.580
<v Speaker 2>young players can feel pressure.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's pressure because he's going to get

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 3>the MVP and he's going to get it over Otani.

0:04:53.860 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 3>It kind of feels like a quarterback where you had

0:04:55.580 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 3>this great regular season. You're going to get the MVP,

0:04:58.100 --> 0:04:59.460
<v Speaker 3>but what do you do first in the playoffs?

0:04:59.920 --> 0:05:02.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's going to be a great night. This is

0:05:02.290 --> 0:05:04.690
<v Speaker 2>an incredible wildcard round. I've got to be honest, as

0:05:04.730 --> 0:05:06.089
<v Speaker 2>a Phillies fan, I'm excited about that.

0:05:06.690 --> 0:05:09.030
<v Speaker 3>It's so tense, though, because if you're a team that,

0:05:09.150 --> 0:05:11.250
<v Speaker 3>let's say you're the Braves and you've got a lot

0:05:11.270 --> 0:05:13.990
<v Speaker 3>of wins, over 90 victories, You lose game one, it's

0:05:14.010 --> 0:05:15.770
<v Speaker 3>like all this for nothing.

0:05:16.130 --> 0:05:16.380
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:05:16.700 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>It could be over so fast.

0:05:18.220 --> 0:05:20.420
<v Speaker 2>And then you have the history with the Yankees, Red Sox.

0:05:20.790 --> 0:05:24.339
<v Speaker 2>Feels to me... You can sit and analyze and predict everything,

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.350
<v Speaker 2>but I'm talking about everything that goes along with that.

0:05:27.730 --> 0:05:29.270
<v Speaker 2>I feel like something wild is going to happen.

0:05:29.290 --> 0:05:31.450
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't it feel weirdly too early in the playoffs to

0:05:31.490 --> 0:05:34.410
<v Speaker 3>have Yankees-Red Sox? Like North Carolina versus Duke in the

0:05:34.470 --> 0:05:35.930
<v Speaker 3>first round of the NCAA tournament. Too early.

0:05:36.510 --> 0:05:37.050
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:05:37.070 --> 0:05:37.630
<v Speaker 3>Great for ratings.

0:05:37.990 --> 0:05:39.610
<v Speaker 2>No, it's going to be great for ratings, and it's

0:05:39.630 --> 0:05:41.930
<v Speaker 2>going to be fun baseball because that's another series. We

0:05:41.970 --> 0:05:43.270
<v Speaker 2>really have no idea what's going to happen.

0:05:43.500 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of good TV, Monday Night Football, your guy, Case Keenum.

0:05:46.940 --> 0:05:47.540
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to it.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.409
<v Speaker 2>So... Chicago Bears, I'll be honest. If you don't know,

0:05:51.450 --> 0:05:52.790
<v Speaker 2>if you haven't watched the show, I wrote a book

0:05:52.810 --> 0:05:54.970
<v Speaker 2>with Case Keenum. He's a good buddy. But last night

0:05:54.990 --> 0:05:59.590
<v Speaker 2>he was playing my Philadelphia Eagles with low expectations. Maybe

0:05:59.630 --> 0:06:01.990
<v Speaker 2>this show predicted that he would do well. But low

0:06:02.050 --> 0:06:04.830
<v Speaker 2>expectations around the NFL and he came out. It was

0:06:05.250 --> 0:06:09.270
<v Speaker 2>almost flawless football in the first half especially. Case looked tremendous.

0:06:09.300 --> 0:06:11.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was a little bothered by the lack of

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.900
<v Speaker 3>expectations for Case Keenum. He is the highest end of

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>third string quarterbacks. Most teams don't even have a third

0:06:16.700 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 3>string quarterback. This guy is an all-time college great. He

0:06:19.860 --> 0:06:22.220
<v Speaker 3>was good when he played. Some could make the case

0:06:22.260 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 3>that the Vikings should have never let him go when

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.140
<v Speaker 3>they were better with him. And so when he came out,

0:06:26.180 --> 0:06:28.810
<v Speaker 3>what I really liked about this game was the first

0:06:28.850 --> 0:06:31.550
<v Speaker 3>two plays they passed the ball. Nice, crisp, short passes.

0:06:31.930 --> 0:06:34.669
<v Speaker 3>Not avoid your quarterback case game, embrace your quarterback.

0:06:34.710 --> 0:06:36.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, the Eagles were geared up to stop

0:06:36.750 --> 0:06:38.870
<v Speaker 2>the Bears running games. Last year, the Bears ran all

0:06:38.930 --> 0:06:41.730
<v Speaker 2>over them. And Ben Johnson, head coach of the Bears...

0:06:42.570 --> 0:06:44.830
<v Speaker 2>I'm starting to think he might be, if not one

0:06:44.860 --> 0:06:47.740
<v Speaker 2>of the top three NFL head coaches, maybe the best

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>NFL head coach. He totally toyed with Nick Sirianni and

0:06:50.860 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Vic Fangio. They had no idea what was coming.

0:06:53.140 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 3>They played call that way to a win. Because if

0:06:55.140 --> 0:06:57.860
<v Speaker 3>you look at the two quarterbacks, Caleb Williams is an improviser.

0:06:57.940 --> 0:07:00.820
<v Speaker 3>He makes things happen. Case Keenum is the complete opposite.

0:07:00.930 --> 0:07:04.770
<v Speaker 3>He's a timing quarterback, old school, a smaller dropback quarterback.

0:07:05.130 --> 0:07:06.830
<v Speaker 3>But I bet you he got every pass out in

0:07:06.870 --> 0:07:08.050
<v Speaker 3>under two and a half seconds last night.

0:07:08.070 --> 0:07:09.970
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't even want to say this, but

0:07:09.990 --> 0:07:11.790
<v Speaker 2>I know you're excited about Caleb Williams and the Bears.

0:07:12.470 --> 0:07:14.510
<v Speaker 2>Does it make you think that maybe Caleb Williams is

0:07:14.550 --> 0:07:17.210
<v Speaker 2>in the right style for Ben Johnson? Because Ben Johnson

0:07:17.250 --> 0:07:20.190
<v Speaker 2>was awesome in Detroit with Jared Goff, who never runs

0:07:20.230 --> 0:07:23.020
<v Speaker 2>at all. Caleb Williams wants to extend every play as

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:23.740
<v Speaker 2>long as he can.

0:07:23.780 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you could go back to last year, and they

0:07:25.460 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 3>always wanted Caleb Williams to throw on platform, as they

0:07:28.020 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>like to say, and he doesn't do that that often.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.660
<v Speaker 3>He seems to be better at it. But going back

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 3>to last night, there was a point in the first quarter,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.950
<v Speaker 3>the Bears are playing well, Casey Keenum's a feel-good story,

0:07:36.970 --> 0:07:39.750
<v Speaker 3>and everything's going well, and they didn't score. The Eagles

0:07:39.770 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 3>get the ball back, and they go on this 99-yard drive.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Hurts gets hurt, no pun, and they bring in Dalton. Dalton,

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>one pass into the end zone pick, and it felt

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:49.580
<v Speaker 3>like the air came out of the balloon.

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't know. They had other opportunities, too. I mean,

0:07:52.460 --> 0:07:55.350
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles then, it was 10-7 at halftime after that

0:07:55.490 --> 0:07:57.570
<v Speaker 2>last-second Jalen Hurts touchdown.

0:07:57.610 --> 0:07:57.730
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:07:57.770 --> 0:07:59.850
<v Speaker 3>It felt like at halftime, the feel-good story might have

0:07:59.870 --> 0:08:00.170
<v Speaker 3>been over.

0:08:00.810 --> 0:08:02.390
<v Speaker 2>I don't even think it was a game of momentum.

0:08:02.750 --> 0:08:05.010
<v Speaker 2>There was a part early in the game on that

0:08:05.030 --> 0:08:07.710
<v Speaker 2>99-yard drive where Saquon was running the ball well for

0:08:07.730 --> 0:08:10.820
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles. But I'm not sure that Philadelphia's a great matchup.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.060
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there was any way they were coming

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.610
<v Speaker 2>out with a W last night. They're 2-1 now. It

0:08:14.630 --> 0:08:16.130
<v Speaker 2>felt like they were dying to lose a game the

0:08:16.170 --> 0:08:19.290
<v Speaker 2>first two weeks. So I know what you're saying, that

0:08:19.430 --> 0:08:22.010
<v Speaker 2>one play by Andy Dalton might have affected everything. I'm

0:08:22.050 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>not sure that Chicago just didn't outplay them all night long.

0:08:24.500 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, in the second half, Keenum stepped on the gas, 247,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 3>two touchdowns. He ran in a quarterback sneak where they

0:08:29.700 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>call their, basically like their surprise sneak where the linemen

0:08:33.300 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>pull another way and he ran. The defensive linemen were

0:08:35.620 --> 0:08:39.310
<v Speaker 3>completely surprised. Jalen Hurts couldn't get it together. Saquon Barkley

0:08:39.350 --> 0:08:41.430
<v Speaker 3>didn't run as much in the second half. I want

0:08:41.460 --> 0:08:43.300
<v Speaker 3>to go with the fallout of this before we get

0:08:43.380 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 3>back to Keenum. The fallout of this for the Eagles

0:08:45.660 --> 0:08:47.140
<v Speaker 3>today is what? They're still 2-1.

0:08:47.420 --> 0:08:50.100
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not much. Everyone expected this.

0:08:50.140 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 5>Really?

0:08:50.860 --> 0:08:54.459
<v Speaker 2>They looked awful the first two weeks. Against Washington, they

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.620
<v Speaker 2>didn't have anything going offensively. Then against Titans, they only

0:08:57.660 --> 0:08:59.570
<v Speaker 2>got it going toward the end of the game. That

0:08:59.590 --> 0:09:00.270
<v Speaker 2>was the Titans.

0:09:00.309 --> 0:09:02.210
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of surprised by your reaction here. I thought

0:09:02.270 --> 0:09:04.650
<v Speaker 3>in Philadelphia today this would be like national embarrassment time.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.459
<v Speaker 2>No, I think the Philadelphia fans are very skeptical. They're very,

0:09:08.500 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>very knowledgeable. I mean, they're not like normal fans. They

0:09:10.710 --> 0:09:12.890
<v Speaker 2>know this offense in and out, and they knew that

0:09:13.330 --> 0:09:16.390
<v Speaker 2>something's not clicking for four quarters with Sean Mannion and

0:09:16.410 --> 0:09:18.550
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts. This is my opinion. I listened to the

0:09:18.710 --> 0:09:21.410
<v Speaker 2>Three Eagles podcast this morning. They're like, wow, we saw

0:09:21.450 --> 0:09:23.650
<v Speaker 2>this coming because the offense has not been humming all

0:09:23.700 --> 0:09:24.130
<v Speaker 2>season long.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 3>There was an unbelievable play here. I think we just

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.460
<v Speaker 3>showed where Edwards, the linebacker for the Bears, is looking

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>into the huddle and trying to see what Jalen Hurts

0:09:30.380 --> 0:09:32.460
<v Speaker 3>is saying. And he's reading his lips or actually hearing

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:33.780
<v Speaker 3>what he says, drops back.

0:09:33.820 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Here it is right here.

0:09:34.929 --> 0:09:37.090
<v Speaker 3>It's like he was almost in the huddle there. Drops back,

0:09:37.170 --> 0:09:39.540
<v Speaker 3>almost on cue, and made the interception. It's one of

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:40.260
<v Speaker 3>the plays of the night.

0:09:40.380 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he had a second play like that where he

0:09:41.820 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>dropped back and almost intercepted it. There was some writing

0:09:45.100 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>after the game that Dennis Allen knew this play was coming,

0:09:47.300 --> 0:09:49.780
<v Speaker 2>the defense coordinator for the Bears, and that Hurts is

0:09:49.820 --> 0:09:53.329
<v Speaker 2>not good when the linebacker drops off. Again, Bears outcoach

0:09:53.350 --> 0:09:54.770
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles in every single turn.

0:09:54.870 --> 0:09:57.710
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's look at the Bears going forward. Case Keenum starts,

0:09:57.850 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 3>plays well. It was like one of those major... events

0:10:00.860 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>last night. They were celebrating with their kids. I thought

0:10:03.059 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 3>he was retiring after the game. Maybe he should have.

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.179
<v Speaker 3>Going forward for the Bears, Caleb Williams out a month, likely.

0:10:08.610 --> 0:10:10.770
<v Speaker 3>Do you pivot back to Tyson Bajent, or do you

0:10:10.870 --> 0:10:13.650
<v Speaker 3>ride Case Keenum until it goes poorly?

0:10:13.850 --> 0:10:16.410
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you've got to ride Case for one more game.

0:10:16.429 --> 0:10:18.730
<v Speaker 2>The Jets are coming up. And it feels like this

0:10:18.790 --> 0:10:20.349
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be good for Case because it

0:10:20.390 --> 0:10:23.050
<v Speaker 2>was such a high. How do you go any higher? Typically,

0:10:23.090 --> 0:10:25.229
<v Speaker 2>you come down from that. No, you can't switch up

0:10:25.290 --> 0:10:27.709
<v Speaker 2>and down, especially because the offense moves so well. I

0:10:27.750 --> 0:10:30.050
<v Speaker 2>was actually surprised. I thought Bajan might even play last night.

0:10:30.070 --> 0:10:33.090
<v Speaker 2>He got out of the concussion protocol on Saturday, but

0:10:33.130 --> 0:10:35.710
<v Speaker 2>they went with Case. It just seems like Case fits

0:10:35.750 --> 0:10:38.550
<v Speaker 2>this offense very well. Remember in the preseason, Case played

0:10:38.580 --> 0:10:40.579
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland Browns in week one, had the game of

0:10:40.620 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 2>his life. It was 9 for 10, 180 yards, two touchdowns.

0:10:44.420 --> 0:10:48.140
<v Speaker 2>So he obviously is very comfortable. Bajan is also comfortable,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.739
<v Speaker 2>but you've got to ride this until the wheels come on.

0:10:50.740 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not near the experience. I think the fans would

0:10:52.500 --> 0:10:54.380
<v Speaker 3>revolt if you replaced Case Keenum right now.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.900
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wonder, though, is Caleb Williams definitely out, too?

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, they've said two to four weeks. You see him

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>on the sidelines. Everyone's trying to read body language. They're like,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.140
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't have a hitch in his step, but he's

0:11:04.179 --> 0:11:04.940
<v Speaker 3>walking out of the field.

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Two weeks? That would be two weeks. It would be.

0:11:07.540 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get to helmet stickers last night. I'm

0:11:10.420 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 3>going to let you go first. I think it's obvious

0:11:12.140 --> 0:11:13.490
<v Speaker 3>where you're going. I'm going to yield the floor to

0:11:13.500 --> 0:11:14.870
<v Speaker 3>you and your co-author.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.020
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm not doing Case Keenum. He deserves more than

0:11:18.059 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 2>a helmet sticker for that. He deserves a statue outside

0:11:21.500 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the Not So Fast studio. I'm going to go with

0:11:23.990 --> 0:11:25.650
<v Speaker 2>a surprise wide receiver, Kalief Raymond.

0:11:25.929 --> 0:11:26.890
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:11:27.070 --> 0:11:29.860
<v Speaker 2>Kalief Raymond, he's on his 15th in 10 years. He

0:11:29.980 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 2>is 17th in the league in receiving yards, which is amazing,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.300
<v Speaker 2>because you have Roma Dunze and you have Colston Loveland,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.610
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like the Bears quarterbacks only want to

0:11:38.620 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>throw to Kalief Raymond.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.589
<v Speaker 3>Well, it is funny that I didn't think in week

0:11:41.630 --> 0:11:44.650
<v Speaker 3>three I'd be discussing the Case Keenum-Kalief Raymond connection being

0:11:44.690 --> 0:11:46.870
<v Speaker 3>one of the best, hottest in the NFL, but that's

0:11:46.910 --> 0:11:48.870
<v Speaker 3>a great pick. I'm going to go my helmet ticker

0:11:48.910 --> 0:11:51.190
<v Speaker 3>to Case Keenum. We weren't that surprised. I think we

0:11:51.210 --> 0:11:53.350
<v Speaker 3>had the clip yesterday of us talking about this game,

0:11:53.710 --> 0:11:57.689
<v Speaker 3>and we weren't that surprised. We believed in Case Keenum

0:11:57.710 --> 0:12:00.210
<v Speaker 3>from the standpoint of, Yeah, he's not like an all-star.

0:12:00.250 --> 0:12:01.910
<v Speaker 3>He's not an all-pro, and it's been a long time.

0:12:01.929 --> 0:12:03.910
<v Speaker 3>But here's what we had to say yesterday. I think

0:12:03.929 --> 0:12:06.410
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have trouble with Keenum because he is

0:12:06.809 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>beyond a veteran. The guy's 38 years old. He's got

0:12:08.860 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 3>more gray hair than us. But they have no tape

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>on the guy. He doesn't play a lot. He hasn't

0:12:12.500 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 3>started the game in three years.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.500
<v Speaker 2>I think the Bears win this one 21-19. The Eagles

0:12:16.540 --> 0:12:18.420
<v Speaker 2>almost lost to the Titans, and you saw how bad

0:12:18.460 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the Titans were this weekend. The Eagles' offense has yet

0:12:21.260 --> 0:12:22.100
<v Speaker 2>to figure out its rhythm.

0:12:22.179 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll go 24-23 Bears. Completely self-serving by us.

0:12:26.460 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>By the way, we were wrong. It was 27-7. We

0:12:29.750 --> 0:12:32.449
<v Speaker 2>had a close game. It should have been a close game,

0:12:32.490 --> 0:12:35.010
<v Speaker 2>by the way. The teams were evenly matched. But I

0:12:35.050 --> 0:12:37.790
<v Speaker 2>think once the Eagles fell behind too far, they kind

0:12:37.809 --> 0:12:38.370
<v Speaker 2>of gave up on the game.

0:12:38.390 --> 0:12:40.130
<v Speaker 3>You know, a bigger picture, forget about the Eagles and

0:12:40.150 --> 0:12:42.140
<v Speaker 3>the Bears. That was a great night for sports. That

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 3>was a night where you're like, if you didn't have

0:12:43.740 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 3>a dog in the fight and you're just sitting down

0:12:45.220 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 3>to watch Monday Night Football, you're like, this is a

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.180
<v Speaker 3>fantastic story of a guy who's 38 and never really

0:12:50.220 --> 0:12:52.300
<v Speaker 3>had that great moment in the pros. I know he

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.059
<v Speaker 3>had some good days with the Vikings. But it felt

0:12:54.100 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 3>like great TV.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.740
<v Speaker 2>Oh, absolutely. It felt like Case won the Super Bowl.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was going to say, I'm going to

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Disneyland after the game. I don't know if you watch

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.020
<v Speaker 2>all the post-game interviews. His daughter was out with SVP.

0:13:04.380 --> 0:13:06.970
<v Speaker 2>His wife was on camera. Hi, Kimberly, if you're watching.

0:13:07.350 --> 0:13:10.370
<v Speaker 2>It was a great night for Case. Maybe I was

0:13:10.410 --> 0:13:12.650
<v Speaker 2>thinking to myself, you know, you have the Jets in

0:13:12.770 --> 0:13:15.469
<v Speaker 2>six days. Maybe, you know, what if you win that game?

0:13:15.530 --> 0:13:17.530
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be as exciting? Forget it. He's rolling.

0:13:17.550 --> 0:13:19.910
<v Speaker 2>All right. We're going to have a lot more NFL

0:13:19.990 --> 0:13:23.050
<v Speaker 2>coming up, including I have an interesting take. It is

0:13:23.130 --> 0:13:25.410
<v Speaker 2>not the Chinese year of the horse. It is a

0:13:25.490 --> 0:13:29.510
<v Speaker 2>year of the backup quarterback. Get excited. That's next on

0:13:29.550 --> 0:13:30.270
<v Speaker 2>Not So Fast.

0:13:39.570 --> 0:13:41.670
<v Speaker 3>First time I met Andrew Perloff, I remember it well.

0:13:41.690 --> 0:13:44.010
<v Speaker 3>I was with Dan Patrick at the SI Studios in

0:13:44.030 --> 0:13:46.750
<v Speaker 3>New York City in the offices. And we were talking

0:13:46.790 --> 0:13:49.829
<v Speaker 3>to different editors about editing Dan's page. And the first

0:13:49.850 --> 0:13:51.590
<v Speaker 3>guy came in, the second guy came in, and they

0:13:51.610 --> 0:13:54.809
<v Speaker 3>were normal, nice guys. And Andrew came in kind of

0:13:54.830 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 3>like Kramer, just like papers. And then like one shirt,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the thing was out, but he was funny and he

0:14:01.550 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 3>had ideas and he was goofy, but he had ideas

0:14:05.140 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 3>and they were funny ideas. And then we met two

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.349
<v Speaker 3>more people. And when we got done, Dan and I,

0:14:09.340 --> 0:14:10.980
<v Speaker 3>I think we took a train home for God's sake.

0:14:11.140 --> 0:14:13.140
<v Speaker 3>And he goes, which guy do you like? I'm like,

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.340
<v Speaker 3>you know, the tall guy. And we didn't remember anybody's name.

0:14:15.750 --> 0:14:18.210
<v Speaker 3>He goes, the guy who looked like McLovin from Superbad?

0:14:18.230 --> 0:14:19.950
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, well, he's a little older than that, like

0:14:19.970 --> 0:14:22.609
<v Speaker 3>McLovin's uncle. He goes, yeah, that guy. So we call

0:14:22.650 --> 0:14:26.330
<v Speaker 3>back and say, like, we like that guy, like Andrew Perloff.

0:14:26.350 --> 0:14:28.630
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, yeah, I think that's his name, but he

0:14:28.650 --> 0:14:35.030
<v Speaker 3>stuck out in a good way. All right, Pearl, back

0:14:35.090 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 3>on Not So Fast, Paps and Perloff. Midday Pigment. This

0:14:38.620 --> 0:14:42.860
<v Speaker 3>is the Dodgers bonus coverage for the postseason. Baseball glove

0:14:42.940 --> 0:14:46.180
<v Speaker 3>bowl of nachos. You know, sign me up. A plastic

0:14:46.250 --> 0:14:51.190
<v Speaker 3>glove full of questionable cheese and nachos. I would wolf

0:14:51.230 --> 0:14:51.970
<v Speaker 3>that down in a second.

0:14:52.090 --> 0:14:55.050
<v Speaker 2>Oh, absolutely. When did the tradition of putting nachos in

0:14:55.270 --> 0:14:57.470
<v Speaker 2>non-bowls start in baseball? I feel like it's been around

0:14:57.490 --> 0:14:57.890
<v Speaker 2>for a while.

0:14:57.990 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I would like to know. Maybe we could call Peter

0:14:59.620 --> 0:15:01.350
<v Speaker 3>Gammons or some historian like that or.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.940
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a moment that is really, you know,

0:15:04.180 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 2>there's Jackie Robinson, of course, playing, and then there's the

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.540
<v Speaker 2>first person to put nachos into a helmet. Of course.

0:15:09.580 --> 0:15:12.710
<v Speaker 3>Those are classic moments. Now, if you think about those moments, though,

0:15:12.780 --> 0:15:14.510
<v Speaker 3>I've been to Cubs games before, and you get the

0:15:14.550 --> 0:15:16.730
<v Speaker 3>helmet of nachos. You've got to eat them fast. They

0:15:16.750 --> 0:15:19.150
<v Speaker 3>can get a little soupy in inning 7, 8, 9

0:15:19.150 --> 0:15:19.790
<v Speaker 3>in the hot summer.

0:15:19.970 --> 0:15:23.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll be honest. I do like the concept. I

0:15:23.110 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 2>don't like having too messy of food here. I'm more

0:15:25.100 --> 0:15:28.340
<v Speaker 2>of a straight— Peanuts and Diet Coke. Yeah, you are.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.140
<v Speaker 3>A lot of baseball coming up today, but it's time

0:15:30.180 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>for Warm Takes. It's what we do here on Not

0:15:31.980 --> 0:15:34.119
<v Speaker 3>So Fast. And I'm going to go first, Pearl. I'm

0:15:34.140 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>going to stay with baseball. Baseball playoffs are here. It's

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.900
<v Speaker 3>a month-long session of baseball, and it hits you hard

0:15:40.940 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>with the wild card. And as much as I love football,

0:15:43.860 --> 0:15:46.420
<v Speaker 3>there's a difference to the playoffs in baseball. There's attention,

0:15:46.980 --> 0:15:51.020
<v Speaker 3>bat to bat, pulling the pitcher, bringing the pitcher in, bunt,

0:15:51.230 --> 0:15:53.070
<v Speaker 3>all that kind of stuff. And I find it to

0:15:53.110 --> 0:15:56.370
<v Speaker 3>be a more tense sport in the postseason. the pauses,

0:15:56.830 --> 0:15:59.430
<v Speaker 3>the foul ball calls, all the different things that increase

0:15:59.450 --> 0:16:02.130
<v Speaker 3>the drama, the likelihood of extra innings. And there's another

0:16:02.150 --> 0:16:04.410
<v Speaker 3>thing that happens. I think it's unique to baseball, maybe

0:16:04.430 --> 0:16:07.810
<v Speaker 3>not to other sports. It's superstition. I'll be watching a game,

0:16:07.870 --> 0:16:09.490
<v Speaker 3>my team in the playoffs. If I'm sitting in a

0:16:09.510 --> 0:16:11.230
<v Speaker 3>certain chair and they get three hits in a row,

0:16:11.620 --> 0:16:15.260
<v Speaker 3>I'm not leaving that chair. And it works in reverse order.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.580
<v Speaker 3>If I'm standing in the kitchen watching the kitchen TV

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.860
<v Speaker 3>and they give up three runs, I am out of

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the kitchen for the rest of the night. I like

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.090
<v Speaker 3>to think that I'm not superstitious as a person, But

0:16:24.110 --> 0:16:26.450
<v Speaker 3>I think we all have that superstition as a sports

0:16:26.490 --> 0:16:28.970
<v Speaker 3>fan in the moment. If you're watching your football team,

0:16:29.010 --> 0:16:30.989
<v Speaker 3>baseball team, basketball team in a certain room in the

0:16:31.030 --> 0:16:34.210
<v Speaker 3>house and they start playing well, you're not going. I've

0:16:34.230 --> 0:16:36.350
<v Speaker 3>been at bars before with people. And when a team

0:16:36.390 --> 0:16:38.470
<v Speaker 3>is doing well, they're like, let's stay here. Or if

0:16:38.530 --> 0:16:40.090
<v Speaker 3>a team is not doing well, my buddies are like,

0:16:40.210 --> 0:16:41.790
<v Speaker 3>let's go to another bar. It's just not working out

0:16:41.810 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>for Team X. So superstitions is real in sports. And

0:16:45.700 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>as much as I'd like to say I don't have

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 3>it and you'd like to say it, you know you

0:16:49.300 --> 0:16:51.780
<v Speaker 3>have it. Tell me what yours is because everybody has it. Pearl,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 3>what's yours?

0:16:52.220 --> 0:16:55.180
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're saying, by the way, that it's real. Like,

0:16:55.260 --> 0:16:57.380
<v Speaker 2>do you think it actually affects the play? For example,

0:16:57.980 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>if I am standing by my refrigerator and Jalen Hurts

0:17:00.980 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 2>throws a touchdown and then I move, is Jalen Hurts

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>definitely going to suffer? Like, I'm trying to assess what

0:17:06.580 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you're saying here.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 3>You both don't believe it's real, but you don't want

0:17:09.580 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>to mess with it, right?

0:17:10.740 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.699
<v Speaker 3>So you're superstitious-ish.

0:17:14.020 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. No, I'm absolutely, I stand in my house

0:17:18.619 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 2>where they're doing well, and then I move. There's a

0:17:21.260 --> 0:17:23.580
<v Speaker 2>scene in Always Sunny in Philadelphia where Jason Kelsey comes

0:17:23.619 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 2>on and explains that everything we do out on the

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.810
<v Speaker 2>field is because of where you are standing in your kitchen.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.470
<v Speaker 2>I mean, listen, whether it's real or not, it's happening, Paul.

0:17:31.510 --> 0:17:32.629
<v Speaker 2>We are all superstitious.

0:17:32.670 --> 0:17:34.390
<v Speaker 3>We don't walk under ladders, and when our team gets

0:17:34.430 --> 0:17:35.850
<v Speaker 3>four hits in a row, we stay in that chair.

0:17:35.890 --> 0:17:36.389
<v Speaker 3>That's what we do.

0:17:36.750 --> 0:17:40.510
<v Speaker 2>All right. Absolutely. Okay. You know, Paul, I love me

0:17:40.530 --> 0:17:43.229
<v Speaker 2>some backup quarterbacks. I know a lot of backup quarterbacks.

0:17:43.270 --> 0:17:45.689
<v Speaker 2>They're always the friendliest guy on the team. Often they

0:17:45.710 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>become head coaches. I got to tell you, 2026 is

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.580
<v Speaker 2>the year of the backup quarterback. There's a stat that

0:17:51.619 --> 0:17:54.790
<v Speaker 2>was put out by ESPN Insights that really sums it up.

0:17:55.300 --> 0:17:58.100
<v Speaker 2>Quarterbacks who did not start week one for their team

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>are now 6-0 for their team. No quarterback who did

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.050
<v Speaker 2>not start week one and started another game has lost

0:18:05.109 --> 0:18:09.409
<v Speaker 2>a game. Carson Wentz is 1-0. Marcus Mariota is 1-0.

0:18:09.850 --> 0:18:13.330
<v Speaker 2>Jameis Winston, believe it or not, beat the Titans. He's 1-0.

0:18:13.670 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Case. Panics came back and won. And Drew Locke,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you forgot about two weeks ago, won. So there seems

0:18:19.500 --> 0:18:20.940
<v Speaker 2>to be something going on here. And I'm kind of

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.580
<v Speaker 2>making light of this. But I have a theory, Paul,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.219
<v Speaker 2>why backup quarterbacks are doing well. Go ahead. I think

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.410
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing some very strong head coaching around the league.

0:18:29.770 --> 0:18:31.790
<v Speaker 2>I think last night you can bring in a Case

0:18:31.830 --> 0:18:35.130
<v Speaker 2>Keenum and he's running Ben Johnson's offense. And Ben Johnson

0:18:35.150 --> 0:18:37.270
<v Speaker 2>had so many tricks up his sleeve, the Eagles did

0:18:37.330 --> 0:18:38.290
<v Speaker 2>not know what was coming.

0:18:38.310 --> 0:18:39.469
<v Speaker 3>So they're being propped up a little bit.

0:18:40.109 --> 0:18:41.870
<v Speaker 2>It's not even that they're being propped up. I think

0:18:41.910 --> 0:18:44.250
<v Speaker 2>that the systems are so strong right now that they

0:18:44.290 --> 0:18:47.430
<v Speaker 2>can win with almost any quarterback. You look at, obviously,

0:18:47.490 --> 0:18:50.330
<v Speaker 2>Seattle with Mike McDonald. That coaching staff is great. Kevin

0:18:50.369 --> 0:18:52.770
<v Speaker 2>O'Connell has proven he can win with a variety of quarterbacks,

0:18:53.030 --> 0:18:55.510
<v Speaker 2>even though their offense has been terrible. So I think

0:18:55.650 --> 0:18:58.270
<v Speaker 2>in today's day and age, with the systems we're seeing

0:18:58.310 --> 0:19:02.090
<v Speaker 2>around after Kyle Shanahan, Sean McVay, I think they're set

0:19:02.210 --> 0:19:03.970
<v Speaker 2>up so backup quarterbacks can win.

0:19:04.190 --> 0:19:06.310
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think the backup quarterbacks, we always hear

0:19:06.350 --> 0:19:09.100
<v Speaker 3>the phrases that they don't get first-team reps anymore. It's

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>not like they're not doing anything.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.490
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I know. I mean, they've also, these guys have

0:19:12.510 --> 0:19:12.950
<v Speaker 2>been around.

0:19:13.109 --> 0:19:15.330
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and the more age you have on the backup quarterback,

0:19:15.510 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 3>like a McCown brother back in the day, age is

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a good thing for a backup quarterback. I don't want

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.179
<v Speaker 3>my backup being 23 years old.

0:19:22.420 --> 0:19:22.580
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:19:22.780 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Even a guy like Drew Locke. Surprisingly, he's over 28

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>years old.

0:19:25.980 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, he's been around a while now.

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:28.820
<v Speaker 3>So that's the kind of guy you want.

0:19:29.030 --> 0:19:31.310
<v Speaker 2>It's funny, if you have a young rookie, for example,

0:19:31.510 --> 0:19:34.129
<v Speaker 2>the Rams, of course, draft Ty Simpson, but then they

0:19:34.150 --> 0:19:37.190
<v Speaker 2>want to make Stetson Bennett the backup. So Fernando Mendoza,

0:19:37.470 --> 0:19:39.950
<v Speaker 2>there was talk he'd be third string behind Aiden O'Connell

0:19:40.070 --> 0:19:44.010
<v Speaker 2>or somebody there. Yeah, O'Connell. So basically, coaches are smart.

0:19:44.030 --> 0:19:45.750
<v Speaker 2>They want the old guy to run the system if

0:19:45.790 --> 0:19:46.850
<v Speaker 2>they need to put in the backup.

0:19:46.869 --> 0:19:49.110
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's stay with backup quarterbacks and go back

0:19:49.170 --> 0:19:51.050
<v Speaker 3>last night to Monday night. Football at Soldier Field.

0:19:51.090 --> 0:19:51.470
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:19:51.970 --> 0:19:54.450
<v Speaker 3>I must have heard 38 times last night on the

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.100
<v Speaker 3>air that Case Keenum is 38 years old. I don't

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 3>know why that's such a big topic. There are a

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of quarterbacks over 35 in the league, and now

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not even that big of a deal. We have

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks over 40 playing well, like Aaron Rodgers. But Case

0:20:05.780 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Keenum's age I didn't think was a negative in any way.

0:20:08.170 --> 0:20:08.670
<v Speaker 2>Rustiness?

0:20:08.950 --> 0:20:09.260
<v Speaker 3>Maybe.

0:20:09.580 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Age? No.

0:20:10.580 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a guy like him knows all the ins

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.380
<v Speaker 3>and outs of the sport. And by being on the sidelines,

0:20:14.420 --> 0:20:16.700
<v Speaker 3>he may know even more than some guys who are playing.

0:20:17.100 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, this isn't the 1970s where Ken Stabler looked 70,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.740
<v Speaker 3>even though he was 30. These athletes are in better shape.

0:20:24.420 --> 0:20:26.780
<v Speaker 3>They got all the physical and mental abilities to do

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>what they want to do. They have all the training

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and the eating. So 38 now is not 38 of

0:20:31.340 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the 80s, plus the money. You know, Case Keenum is

0:20:34.340 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 3>making $ 2 million a year to be like a player coach,

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.260
<v Speaker 3>so he had his unbelievable night last night. But you

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.409
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be surprised. A guy like him who threw for

0:20:41.410 --> 0:20:44.350
<v Speaker 3>20,000 yards in college, he doesn't forget how to play

0:20:44.390 --> 0:20:46.149
<v Speaker 3>because he's not playing for three years. And I think

0:20:46.190 --> 0:20:48.570
<v Speaker 3>he was completely underrated by mostly the media and the

0:20:48.609 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 3>fans last night. So back to Keenum. This was one

0:20:51.380 --> 0:20:53.419
<v Speaker 3>of those nights you don't get very often in your career.

0:20:53.500 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 3>If this is his last start, which it probably won't be,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.500
<v Speaker 3>it felt like a celebration. But don't be surprised when

0:20:58.540 --> 0:21:01.390
<v Speaker 3>a veteran does something. Like Joe Flacco a couple years ago.

0:21:01.410 --> 0:21:01.770
<v Speaker 2>Flacco.

0:21:01.910 --> 0:21:03.850
<v Speaker 3>Flacco couldn't run when he was young. What do you

0:21:03.869 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 3>think he's going to run now? Case Keenum wasn't fast

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 3>when he was young. The same player he was. Case Keenum,

0:21:09.380 --> 0:21:11.180
<v Speaker 3>they're like, you know, he doesn't have that big of

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 3>an arm. Calm down a little bit. Just because he's

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 3>a small guy, he has a very good arm. So

0:21:15.940 --> 0:21:17.820
<v Speaker 3>it's almost like it was dismissive going into the game

0:21:18.060 --> 0:21:19.370
<v Speaker 3>and everyone bought into the concept.

0:21:19.570 --> 0:21:21.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, Matthew Stafford is

0:21:21.930 --> 0:21:25.050
<v Speaker 2>playing incredible football at 38 and he's a guy who never,

0:21:25.070 --> 0:21:27.270
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're a mobile quarterback, it's a different formula.

0:21:27.310 --> 0:21:29.730
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen, will he last till 38? I don't know.

0:21:29.780 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Will Lamar Jackson be the same quarterback?

0:21:31.180 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Cam Newton after 30 is not the same Cam Newton.

0:21:33.180 --> 0:21:35.260
<v Speaker 2>But it doesn't affect a guy like Case Keenum. It

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.379
<v Speaker 2>doesn't affect a guy like Andrew Perloff on the basketball

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>court because I could never run and jump anyway. I'm

0:21:39.340 --> 0:21:39.860
<v Speaker 2>just an outside shooter.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.590
<v Speaker 3>And now you can really, really not run and jump.

0:21:41.650 --> 0:21:43.890
<v Speaker 2>But you're right about Case Keenum, though. Case did say

0:21:43.910 --> 0:21:46.810
<v Speaker 2>after the game, he gave an interview, Paul, you'll appreciate this.

0:21:47.150 --> 0:21:49.350
<v Speaker 2>And he said, well, one thing I decided to play

0:21:49.390 --> 0:21:51.510
<v Speaker 2>again this year, I had to change my diet immediately

0:21:51.550 --> 0:21:53.970
<v Speaker 2>to get back in football shape. So he had to

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 2>eat right for a whole summer.

0:21:55.420 --> 0:21:58.940
<v Speaker 3>I want to know the Texas off-the-board diet by Case Ginnis.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:21:59.739
<v Speaker 3>That's the diet I want.

0:21:59.859 --> 0:22:03.740
<v Speaker 2>No, it's probably a lot of barbecue. Come June, he's like, sorry,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 2>no more barbecue. But you're right, 38 is definitely not old.

0:22:07.619 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Although Case did say, I don't know how many more

0:22:10.340 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 2>of these I'm going to have. Feels like he's had

0:22:12.940 --> 0:22:14.869
<v Speaker 2>enough football. You're right, he was in Houston for a

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:15.770
<v Speaker 2>long time. He's good.

0:22:15.850 --> 0:22:17.689
<v Speaker 3>Two more starts and right off into the sunset.

0:22:17.930 --> 0:22:21.950
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Okay, I'm going to have a combo NFL college

0:22:21.970 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 2>football topic here. Now, the University of Michigan, of course,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.469
<v Speaker 2>did win the title, and that was great. But since then, Paul,

0:22:29.609 --> 0:22:33.469
<v Speaker 2>things have not exactly gone according to plan. There's so

0:22:33.490 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 2>many little signs of things that have gone wrong with

0:22:35.859 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the Wolverines. Obviously, all the NCAA problems. Then you get

0:22:40.660 --> 0:22:43.060
<v Speaker 2>Jerome Moore takes over. We know about him. He's a

0:22:43.140 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 2>total disaster. There was a guy with the program, Matt Weiss.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.090
<v Speaker 2>Remember him? He did the things on the computer. I

0:22:49.130 --> 0:22:51.429
<v Speaker 2>don't even know where his legal case is. But it's

0:22:51.530 --> 0:22:54.330
<v Speaker 2>not just that. It's the NFL part, too. Jim Harbaugh,

0:22:54.450 --> 0:22:57.949
<v Speaker 2>who's still associated with that title team, is 0-3. And

0:22:57.990 --> 0:23:00.650
<v Speaker 2>then J.J. McCarthy, I think we can say it now,

0:23:00.930 --> 0:23:03.619
<v Speaker 2>that he's traded from the Vikings to the Giants for

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.719
<v Speaker 2>a fifth-round pick. That is officially a bust. We don't

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 2>like the word bust, but it says bust.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>He's entered the bust zone.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 2>So what has happened now? And then Michigan loses to

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.070
<v Speaker 2>Western Michigan when they kind of cheated. I mean, it

0:23:16.090 --> 0:23:17.830
<v Speaker 2>wasn't their fault, but they got an extra second.

0:23:17.850 --> 0:23:19.850
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've talked about this before, Perloff. We said,

0:23:19.890 --> 0:23:21.810
<v Speaker 3>will you sell your soul for a title? Did Michigan

0:23:21.850 --> 0:23:22.730
<v Speaker 3>sell their future for a title?

0:23:22.730 --> 0:23:24.630
<v Speaker 2>They absolutely did. And then I was going to say Iowa,

0:23:24.910 --> 0:23:27.210
<v Speaker 2>last second touchdown, that whole drive was a mess for Michigan.

0:23:27.490 --> 0:23:30.870
<v Speaker 2>So it feels like everything from the championship team has

0:23:30.970 --> 0:23:34.530
<v Speaker 2>gone downhill. And now people, future generations are going to say, wait,

0:23:34.570 --> 0:23:38.609
<v Speaker 2>was it all Connor Stallions? Harbaugh needs to win to

0:23:38.650 --> 0:23:39.869
<v Speaker 2>help his former team.

0:23:40.010 --> 0:23:41.810
<v Speaker 3>And 10 years from now, you can have the reunion

0:23:41.850 --> 0:23:44.189
<v Speaker 3>of the national title team and all the badness will

0:23:44.210 --> 0:23:45.929
<v Speaker 3>be off it. All right, let's stick to that with

0:23:45.950 --> 0:23:48.150
<v Speaker 3>the college football play of the season. And you just

0:23:48.210 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 3>referenced it, Pearl. Now, it was NC State versus Vandy.

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm very sorry about this one, but this was an

0:23:54.380 --> 0:23:57.290
<v Speaker 3>all-time bad play. So we're tracking this all season. The

0:23:57.330 --> 0:24:00.109
<v Speaker 3>best play, the greatest play, the wonkiest play of the

0:24:00.150 --> 0:24:02.330
<v Speaker 3>college football. You remember this from a couple weeks ago?

0:24:02.350 --> 0:24:04.869
<v Speaker 3>NC State going to win this game. And here's what

0:24:04.890 --> 0:24:07.550
<v Speaker 3>happened against Vandy. Oh, I can't believe we're showing it again.

0:24:07.570 --> 0:24:09.619
<v Speaker 2>This seems cruel and unusual.

0:24:09.660 --> 0:24:11.500
<v Speaker 3>It does seem like we're piling on. We're flogging the

0:24:11.540 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>horse a little bit. You know what, Perloff? Here's the

0:24:14.300 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 3>next play. Here we go, Perloff. This is the next play.

0:24:19.010 --> 0:24:21.750
<v Speaker 3>Iowa quarterback Hank Brown to wide receiver Reese Van Der

0:24:21.770 --> 0:24:24.190
<v Speaker 3>Zee to end the game against Michigan, as you referenced earlier.

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.500
<v Speaker 3>Back shoulder, bango, win, walk off, back to Iowa City.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have a big audience in Michigan, I know.

0:24:29.580 --> 0:24:31.379
<v Speaker 2>We're not trying to rub it in, but this was

0:24:32.060 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 2>play of the year. This was unbelievable.

0:24:33.460 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 3>And so let's let NC State off the hook. Let's

0:24:37.060 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 3>go to Iowa. The quarterback's name is Hank Brown, a

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 3>very Iowa-sounding name, Hank Brown. Great play, Iowa play.

0:24:42.140 --> 0:24:42.419
<v Speaker 4>Of the year.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.940
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and also it's Iowa. They do not have plays

0:24:44.980 --> 0:24:47.630
<v Speaker 2>like this. You know, touchdown passes, things like that. That's

0:24:47.670 --> 0:24:50.430
<v Speaker 2>not an Iowa thing, let alone dramatic touchdown passes.

0:24:50.470 --> 0:24:51.150
<v Speaker 3>Not in big games.

0:24:51.170 --> 0:24:53.550
<v Speaker 2>So you're right. You know, you're right. I do think

0:24:53.570 --> 0:24:55.970
<v Speaker 2>the Vandy NC State play will go down in history,

0:24:56.410 --> 0:24:57.850
<v Speaker 2>but we're going to be positive here.

0:24:58.050 --> 0:24:59.629
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be positive. All right, let's talk some

0:24:59.650 --> 0:25:02.619
<v Speaker 3>more baseball in a little bit. Lou Merloni of NBC

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 3>Sports will be joining us. And coming up next, LeBron

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 3>haircut talking about why he's a Sixer.

0:25:08.100 --> 0:25:08.460
<v Speaker 2>Stick around.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:09.180
<v Speaker 3>This is Not So Fast.

0:25:10.609 --> 0:25:13.889
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Not So Fast. Perloff here. Paps there.

0:25:14.490 --> 0:25:17.980
<v Speaker 2>Big day of baseball at NBC and Peacock. Let's run

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it down. 2 p.m. Phillies at Braves. 5 p.m. White

0:25:21.060 --> 0:25:24.340
<v Speaker 2>Sox at Astros. 8 p.m. Eastern, that is. Red Sox

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.350
<v Speaker 2>at Yankees at NBC and Peacock. And 10 p.m. Paul's

0:25:27.510 --> 0:25:32.430
<v Speaker 2>Cubs at the Padres on Peacock and NBCSN. It's so exciting.

0:25:32.790 --> 0:25:34.950
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you which series I'm more excited for, Paul,

0:25:35.130 --> 0:25:37.970
<v Speaker 2>because I'm into all of them. But the early game

0:25:37.990 --> 0:25:39.290
<v Speaker 2>has got me really nervous about the Phillies.

0:25:39.310 --> 0:25:40.290
<v Speaker 3>You've got to get home fast, bud.

0:25:40.410 --> 0:25:44.860
<v Speaker 2>I've got to get home fast. Prime time is a whopper,

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of course. Red Sox, Yankees, and here to talk about

0:25:47.460 --> 0:25:50.300
<v Speaker 2>it is Lou Merloni. Of course, calls games for Nesson.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.860
<v Speaker 2>He's here on behalf of NBC. He's going to call

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.630
<v Speaker 2>the game tonight with Jason Benetti and Joe Girardi. Lou,

0:25:57.670 --> 0:25:59.730
<v Speaker 2>how you doing? Lou, do you happen to remember when

0:25:59.750 --> 0:26:02.570
<v Speaker 2>you filled in for DP's show? It might have been

0:26:02.609 --> 0:26:05.649
<v Speaker 2>a decade ago. You came in and you were hanging

0:26:05.670 --> 0:26:09.100
<v Speaker 2>with the Danettes in the old Milford Man Cave, and

0:26:09.140 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it was awesome. I don't even know if you remember that.

0:26:11.910 --> 0:26:13.710
<v Speaker 6>I do remember that because I didn't want to leave

0:26:13.730 --> 0:26:15.550
<v Speaker 6>that studio. I think we were shooting hoop. I mean,

0:26:15.609 --> 0:26:17.010
<v Speaker 6>it was the best studio I've ever seen.

0:26:17.170 --> 0:26:19.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Lou, I remember you being here and you judged

0:26:19.950 --> 0:26:22.450
<v Speaker 3>our batting stances and you just had your hand over

0:26:22.470 --> 0:26:25.260
<v Speaker 3>your head like, these guys clearly never played baseball.

0:26:26.100 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, that was a long time ago, so I'm sure

0:26:27.859 --> 0:26:30.899
<v Speaker 6>the stances have improved with all the technology out there.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.100
<v Speaker 2>All right, Lou, obviously big game today. What was your

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>reaction to the official Aaron Judge will not be on

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees playoff roster when the news came out?

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.719
<v Speaker 6>Well, that Stanton, I guess, is apparently closer because, you know,

0:26:43.740 --> 0:26:46.850
<v Speaker 6>if there's one pinch hit opportunity for Stanton in the game,

0:26:46.869 --> 0:26:48.550
<v Speaker 6>they're going to give it to Stanton rather than Judge.

0:26:48.650 --> 0:26:50.990
<v Speaker 6>So I know there was a lot of debate, right,

0:26:51.050 --> 0:26:52.830
<v Speaker 6>like do you want Judge in there or not because

0:26:52.850 --> 0:26:55.230
<v Speaker 6>he can only DH, which may get Goldschmidt or Rice

0:26:55.410 --> 0:26:57.110
<v Speaker 6>out of the lineup because that would be a tough

0:26:57.150 --> 0:26:59.709
<v Speaker 6>decision for Booney. I have a hard time rooting for

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 6>Judge to be in the game because if he do,

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 6>he's going to hit two or three home runs. But, no,

0:27:04.500 --> 0:27:06.899
<v Speaker 6>I thought it was interesting. They don't want to push him,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 6>and they're hoping that they can obviously move on and

0:27:08.900 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 6>he'll be in better shape for the next round.

0:27:10.660 --> 0:27:12.710
<v Speaker 3>You know, Lou, we had Joey Votto on earlier on

0:27:12.730 --> 0:27:14.609
<v Speaker 3>the Dan Patrick Show, and he said his concern was

0:27:14.650 --> 0:27:17.190
<v Speaker 3>when you leave someone out for a series, that makes

0:27:17.230 --> 0:27:19.010
<v Speaker 3>him think that the injury is worse and could be

0:27:19.050 --> 0:27:21.109
<v Speaker 3>the entire playoffs. Is that something you felt or are

0:27:21.130 --> 0:27:21.690
<v Speaker 3>you not sure yet?

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:23.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not so sure.

0:27:23.850 --> 0:27:27.010
<v Speaker 6>You know, Judge is one of the best. When healthy,

0:27:27.030 --> 0:27:28.910
<v Speaker 6>he's the best hitter in the game, right? He's top

0:27:28.950 --> 0:27:30.590
<v Speaker 6>two or three, whatever you want to call it. So

0:27:31.410 --> 0:27:32.890
<v Speaker 6>I know I'm sure he was itching to get back

0:27:32.930 --> 0:27:35.380
<v Speaker 6>into this. No superstar at his level wants to miss

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.700
<v Speaker 6>a playoff game knowing that, you know, this thing could

0:27:37.780 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 6>end without him getting in at bat. So I do

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 6>think it plays a little mind game, but I think

0:27:42.580 --> 0:27:44.699
<v Speaker 6>if they can move on, I think then he's going

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.050
<v Speaker 6>to push hard to hopefully be available after that.

0:27:47.570 --> 0:27:50.530
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Lou, it's funny because the Yankees now are more

0:27:50.550 --> 0:27:52.750
<v Speaker 2>of a pitching team for this series. How concerned are

0:27:52.770 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>you from your Red Sox fandom about the Yankees' three starters?

0:27:58.600 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's what I think.

0:27:59.340 --> 0:28:01.770
<v Speaker 6>I think both staffs, both starters are all capable, all

0:28:01.810 --> 0:28:03.930
<v Speaker 6>six of them. So I think offensively, this is going

0:28:03.950 --> 0:28:05.889
<v Speaker 6>to be, I don't expect to see eight to seven.

0:28:06.250 --> 0:28:07.889
<v Speaker 6>That's why I think, you know, we may see it.

0:28:07.990 --> 0:28:10.010
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, but that's the way it works sometimes.

0:28:10.070 --> 0:28:12.130
<v Speaker 6>But I think runs would be tough to come by.

0:28:12.150 --> 0:28:14.409
<v Speaker 6>I'm with you. The starting rotation is outstanding. I can

0:28:14.470 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 6>tell you tonight, I'd hate to be one of the

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 6>first three or four hitters because these guys are going

0:28:17.940 --> 0:28:20.100
<v Speaker 6>to be throwing about 110, I think, in the first

0:28:20.140 --> 0:28:22.820
<v Speaker 6>couple innings, maybe hitting a bottom third, get them down

0:28:22.859 --> 0:28:26.139
<v Speaker 6>velocity wise. But There's some elite pitching on both sides,

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.230
<v Speaker 6>so it's going to be a challenge, I think, for

0:28:28.350 --> 0:28:31.410
<v Speaker 6>both teams. That's why I think scoring early is going

0:28:31.430 --> 0:28:32.750
<v Speaker 6>to be very important in this series.

0:28:33.270 --> 0:28:35.070
<v Speaker 3>You know Peyton Tolley. You cover the Red Sox on

0:28:35.090 --> 0:28:38.180
<v Speaker 3>a daily basis. He's kind of this breakout star, the mustache,

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.660
<v Speaker 3>the character. He's one of those guys that you're like,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I wish he was on my team. Plus, he's obviously

0:28:42.940 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 3>a great pitcher. When a guy like that has that

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>type of tone, you played with guys like that back

0:28:47.420 --> 0:28:49.310
<v Speaker 3>in the old days. How loose does that make a

0:28:49.470 --> 0:28:50.630
<v Speaker 3>ball club going into the playoffs?

0:28:51.270 --> 0:28:52.709
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's nothing like seeing a guy in game one

0:28:52.730 --> 0:28:55.350
<v Speaker 6>starter in Yankee Stadium kind of joking and laughing before

0:28:55.370 --> 0:28:57.570
<v Speaker 6>a game and just looking at him going, OK, everything's

0:28:57.590 --> 0:29:00.090
<v Speaker 6>the same, right? Like this is the same guy because

0:29:00.130 --> 0:29:00.570
<v Speaker 6>you're right.

0:29:00.610 --> 0:29:01.690
<v Speaker 2>He's a tough guy to hate.

0:29:01.790 --> 0:29:03.510
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I know Yankee fans may not like him

0:29:03.910 --> 0:29:05.370
<v Speaker 6>if he goes out and throws the ball real well.

0:29:05.390 --> 0:29:07.130
<v Speaker 6>But if you know this guy, you'd root for him.

0:29:07.250 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 6>He plays with joy. He's always smiling. He's joking. He's

0:29:10.650 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 6>laughing on the mound. And when that glove comes up

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.620
<v Speaker 6>to his face, it's game on. I mean, he tries

0:29:14.650 --> 0:29:18.700
<v Speaker 6>to bully you. So it's great to see. It's refreshing

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 6>to see. And hopefully he never changes because it's a

0:29:20.780 --> 0:29:21.140
<v Speaker 6>lot of fun.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Lou, take us back to the spring and early summer.

0:29:24.300 --> 0:29:27.060
<v Speaker 2>It really didn't look good for the Red Sox. Was

0:29:27.100 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>there any reason for hope back then? Did you see

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 2>any of this coming?

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, I remember back then it was like you're 10,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.530
<v Speaker 6>14 games under. 500 and you're saying, you know, this

0:29:35.770 --> 0:29:38.390
<v Speaker 6>normally doesn't happen when you look at a team that

0:29:38.450 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 6>is one of the best defensively. team in the American

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 6>League that has a very good rotation and a lights-out

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.940
<v Speaker 6>back end at a bullpen. Like, that type of team

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.180
<v Speaker 6>should not be the worst team in baseball in the

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:50.700
<v Speaker 6>American League.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 7>They should not.

0:29:51.700 --> 0:29:54.460
<v Speaker 6>be 14 games under. But the offense at the time

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.100
<v Speaker 6>was so bad, especially at Fenway Park. They couldn't get

0:29:58.140 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 6>that big hit. They couldn't get the run in the score.

0:30:00.020 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 6>They were averaging two, two and a half runs a

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 6>game at Fenway, which is unheard of. So you say,

0:30:05.180 --> 0:30:08.020
<v Speaker 6>but are there answers here offensively? Who's going to come

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.460
<v Speaker 6>to the rescue? Where's the difference? Where's the changing going

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.770
<v Speaker 6>to take place? And I think as a whole, they

0:30:13.790 --> 0:30:15.810
<v Speaker 6>just grinded out at bats. They had tougher at bats.

0:30:15.830 --> 0:30:18.490
<v Speaker 6>They started getting those big hits. And when the offense

0:30:18.530 --> 0:30:20.310
<v Speaker 6>went from scoring two and a half to three runs

0:30:20.350 --> 0:30:22.690
<v Speaker 6>a game to four and a half, five That elite pitching,

0:30:22.710 --> 0:30:24.610
<v Speaker 6>that elite defense allowed them to go on that run.

0:30:24.690 --> 0:30:27.430
<v Speaker 6>So you could see it, but you were questioning where

0:30:27.470 --> 0:30:28.430
<v Speaker 6>that offense could come from.

0:30:28.450 --> 0:30:30.830
<v Speaker 3>All right, the series before yours, the White Sox are playing,

0:30:30.850 --> 0:30:33.750
<v Speaker 3>and they're a bit of a feel-good story. 121 losses

0:30:33.810 --> 0:30:35.990
<v Speaker 3>two years ago. When you look at a team like that,

0:30:36.330 --> 0:30:37.990
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if America thinks they can go on

0:30:38.010 --> 0:30:39.870
<v Speaker 3>a run. It's like, oh, good for you, kind of cute.

0:30:39.930 --> 0:30:41.950
<v Speaker 3>You saw them play a lot during the regular season.

0:30:42.170 --> 0:30:43.470
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of the White Sox' chances to

0:30:43.510 --> 0:30:44.510
<v Speaker 3>advance even one round?

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:46.930
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, the thing is, that's part of the

0:30:46.970 --> 0:30:49.390
<v Speaker 6>whole Red Sox when they got hot. They rolled into Chicago.

0:30:49.430 --> 0:30:51.690
<v Speaker 6>They came into Fenway Park, and the Red Sox beat them.

0:30:51.730 --> 0:30:53.810
<v Speaker 6>They were 6-0, you know, and they kind of walked

0:30:53.830 --> 0:30:55.860
<v Speaker 6>through them a little bit. There were some tight games there. So,

0:30:55.870 --> 0:30:58.410
<v Speaker 6>you know, I was actually surprised. I've been on some

0:30:58.430 --> 0:31:00.350
<v Speaker 6>of those teams. Like, I was, I think it was 0-4.

0:31:00.410 --> 0:31:02.350
<v Speaker 6>I was in Cleveland, and we had a great young

0:31:02.410 --> 0:31:05.390
<v Speaker 6>group of guys, and young Victor Martinez and Travis Hafner

0:31:05.430 --> 0:31:08.070
<v Speaker 6>and CeCe and all these guys. But we were young,

0:31:08.530 --> 0:31:11.130
<v Speaker 6>and it really kind of affected us. Like, in August,

0:31:11.170 --> 0:31:13.260
<v Speaker 6>when we started getting to that race, and we just

0:31:13.300 --> 0:31:16.010
<v Speaker 6>really fell off. That's why I was really impressed with

0:31:16.030 --> 0:31:17.890
<v Speaker 6>what the White Sox did. They held on, right? They

0:31:17.930 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 6>rolled into Chicago and won a series in Detroit late

0:31:20.500 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 6>in the seasons and really held that spot. So it

0:31:23.300 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 6>was impressive. It's just you wonder, you know, they're in

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.100
<v Speaker 6>the right bracket, I will say that, but you wonder,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.050
<v Speaker 6>you know, how far that pitching could take them. The

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:32.310
<v Speaker 6>offense has been fantastic.

0:31:32.670 --> 0:31:34.270
<v Speaker 2>All right, Lou, do you have a prediction who comes

0:31:34.370 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 2>out of the American League? Well, let's see. I grew

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 2>up just outside of Boston.

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.020
<v Speaker 6>I played there for 10 years and now I do

0:31:41.020 --> 0:31:43.780
<v Speaker 6>120 games for the Red Sox on Nesson. So and

0:31:43.820 --> 0:31:45.650
<v Speaker 6>I'm not so sure if I'm supposed to give predictions

0:31:45.930 --> 0:31:49.130
<v Speaker 6>right before the game. But I listen to the Red Sox.

0:31:49.910 --> 0:31:51.950
<v Speaker 6>I think the Rays are the best team in the

0:31:51.970 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 6>American League. That doesn't mean that they will win it, right?

0:31:55.780 --> 0:31:58.460
<v Speaker 6>Because this is baseball. This is the 2026 season. So

0:31:59.110 --> 0:32:01.850
<v Speaker 6>I'm very impressed with watching them. And I think Red Sox, Yankees,

0:32:01.870 --> 0:32:04.250
<v Speaker 6>I just think it's coming out of that bracket. You know,

0:32:04.330 --> 0:32:05.850
<v Speaker 6>it's just coming out of that bracket. Obviously, I'm a

0:32:05.890 --> 0:32:06.470
<v Speaker 6>little biased.

0:32:06.670 --> 0:32:07.910
<v Speaker 3>All right, Lou, before we get you out of here.

0:32:07.930 --> 0:32:09.030
<v Speaker 3>By the way, it's great to see you again. It's

0:32:09.050 --> 0:32:11.170
<v Speaker 3>been a long time. We do a thing here called

0:32:11.350 --> 0:32:13.750
<v Speaker 3>Such Thing is a Dumb Question. We did not play baseball.

0:32:14.070 --> 0:32:16.130
<v Speaker 3>When you watch baseball movies, they always tell the kid,

0:32:16.530 --> 0:32:18.450
<v Speaker 3>get hit by a pitch. Were you ever told when

0:32:18.490 --> 0:32:21.020
<v Speaker 3>you played in the pros... Get hit by a pitch,

0:32:21.140 --> 0:32:23.090
<v Speaker 3>or did you ever intentionally get hit by a pitch

0:32:23.130 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and get congratulated by your manager and your teammates?

0:32:26.980 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, I would say I was never told to get

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 6>hit by a pitch, but for me at times when

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.380
<v Speaker 6>it was two strikes, I mean, I wasn't exactly moving.

0:32:33.740 --> 0:32:37.970
<v Speaker 6>You know, two strikes, I'm trying to get on base. Like,

0:32:37.990 --> 0:32:40.370
<v Speaker 6>that was my role. You know, I was utility guy

0:32:40.410 --> 0:32:42.330
<v Speaker 6>for the team. When I played, get on base. If

0:32:42.370 --> 0:32:45.050
<v Speaker 6>it's two strikes and it's a breaking ball or a fastball,

0:32:45.090 --> 0:32:46.550
<v Speaker 6>I just sort of turn that arm and take it

0:32:46.570 --> 0:32:47.130
<v Speaker 6>and move on.

0:32:47.250 --> 0:32:49.670
<v Speaker 2>And then, yeah, and then it's just like, hey, good job.

0:32:50.060 --> 0:32:52.020
<v Speaker 2>You know, wearing one.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>When you're running down to first base, do you act

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 3>like it hurts, like it was a total accident?

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.110
<v Speaker 6>No, I think you want to sort of act like

0:32:59.150 --> 0:33:03.150
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't hurt, right? But sometimes you just can't help

0:33:03.210 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 6>it because it gets you in the right spot where

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.500
<v Speaker 6>you're trying to be the tough guy, but it got

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:07.980
<v Speaker 6>you pretty good.

0:33:08.620 --> 0:33:11.580
<v Speaker 2>Lou, we're working on our stances. This is Mike Schmidt. Yeah, yeah.

0:33:11.620 --> 0:33:13.060
<v Speaker 2>We got a lot of work to do. And you

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.070
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of work tonight. I think everyone will

0:33:15.090 --> 0:33:18.350
<v Speaker 2>be watching 8 p.m. Eastern, Red Sox, Yankees. Have a

0:33:18.390 --> 0:33:22.130
<v Speaker 2>great time tonight. All right. Appreciate it, guys. Enjoy. Oh, man.

0:33:22.870 --> 0:33:24.890
<v Speaker 2>Lou got me fired up for that because, you know,

0:33:24.930 --> 0:33:27.430
<v Speaker 2>he knows this rivalry. It's been a little cooler in

0:33:27.490 --> 0:33:30.060
<v Speaker 2>recent years, but this series, because it's so evenly matched,

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.340
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's back on in a big way.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't feel like either one of them is a heavyweight.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Back in the day, it would be the Dodgers- Sox, Yankees,

0:33:37.740 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and maybe one other. It feels like Sox, Yankees, they're

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 3>just a little down from where they were a decade ago.

0:33:43.220 --> 0:33:45.940
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah. I mean, especially tonight because there's no judge. Yes.

0:33:46.070 --> 0:33:47.870
<v Speaker 2>But that makes it even better because it's going to

0:33:47.890 --> 0:33:50.730
<v Speaker 2>be so evenly matched. I can't wait. Of course, as again,

0:33:50.730 --> 0:33:55.650
<v Speaker 2>8 p.m. Eastern tonight on NBC and Peacock. All right.

0:33:55.670 --> 0:33:57.570
<v Speaker 2>But coming up next, we're going to hear more from

0:33:57.610 --> 0:34:01.630
<v Speaker 2>the Bears-Eagles game. My guy, Case Keenum, with the night.

0:34:02.870 --> 0:34:04.910
<v Speaker 2>Although he did have the Minneapolis miracle, but we'll break

0:34:04.930 --> 0:34:07.010
<v Speaker 2>it all down next. Not so fast.

0:34:12.180 --> 0:34:15.460
<v Speaker 6>The Yankees without Aaron Judge means what for that lineup?

0:34:15.540 --> 0:34:18.620
<v Speaker 7>You're leaning on Schlittler. You're leaning on Cole. I can't

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 7>stand it. And I don't think he's going to be back.

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:25.270
<v Speaker 7>If he can't play now, he's clearly... not going to

0:34:25.310 --> 0:34:27.630
<v Speaker 7>be useful throughout the entirety of the playoffs if they

0:34:27.670 --> 0:34:30.169
<v Speaker 7>do happen to go deep into the playoffs. If you're

0:34:30.230 --> 0:34:32.910
<v Speaker 7>hurt and you can't play, and I watched a bunch

0:34:32.930 --> 0:34:34.730
<v Speaker 7>of his live at-bats yesterday, and you can't play in

0:34:34.750 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 7>the first series, what's he going to be, 50%, 75%

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 7>come the ALCS or the World Series? It's a huge

0:34:44.140 --> 0:34:48.219
<v Speaker 7>hit to that roster because their offense is mediocre at best.

0:34:48.260 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 7>They may be one of the bottom five offenses in

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:52.899
<v Speaker 7>all of baseball without Aaron Judge.

0:34:53.580 --> 0:34:56.910
<v Speaker 3>Back on Not So Fast, Paxton Perloff. Baseball playoffs start

0:34:56.930 --> 0:35:00.290
<v Speaker 3>today on NBC Sports. All day, 10 hours plus of baseball.

0:35:00.890 --> 0:35:02.870
<v Speaker 3>That's Joey Votto. If I'm a Yankees fan and I

0:35:02.930 --> 0:35:06.300
<v Speaker 3>heard that, now he was told moments before about the injury,

0:35:06.340 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 3>so that was his real reaction. That doesn't sound good.

0:35:09.500 --> 0:35:11.540
<v Speaker 2>No, that does sound bad, but it's funny. We had

0:35:11.580 --> 0:35:13.739
<v Speaker 2>Lou Merloni, of course, the Red Sox guy in the

0:35:13.780 --> 0:35:15.900
<v Speaker 2>last segment. He's like, well, I'm glad Judge isn't playing

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.859
<v Speaker 2>because he would have hit two or three home runs.

0:35:17.940 --> 0:35:20.569
<v Speaker 2>When you see Judge at the plate, that man mountain,

0:35:20.860 --> 0:35:22.930
<v Speaker 2>you just have a feeling that he still could hit

0:35:22.969 --> 0:35:25.410
<v Speaker 2>a home run. So I'm not sure I agree with

0:35:25.450 --> 0:35:28.210
<v Speaker 2>Votto in the sense I take 65% of Aaron Judge

0:35:28.270 --> 0:35:29.350
<v Speaker 2>right now. The Yankees need him.

0:35:29.570 --> 0:35:31.690
<v Speaker 3>I read this article about Aaron Judge. It's from like

0:35:31.790 --> 0:35:33.990
<v Speaker 3>seven years ago, and it was talking about his future.

0:35:34.130 --> 0:35:36.570
<v Speaker 3>Once he hits like 28, they said, being that tall

0:35:36.610 --> 0:35:38.450
<v Speaker 3>and with that long swing, He's not going to be

0:35:38.489 --> 0:35:41.069
<v Speaker 3>that good after age 28 or 29. Not so fast

0:35:41.110 --> 0:35:41.430
<v Speaker 3>on that one.

0:35:41.930 --> 0:35:44.310
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what? He's been awesome. I mean, I'm

0:35:44.330 --> 0:35:46.750
<v Speaker 2>going to out you. Pre-show, you started to wonder. He's 34.

0:35:46.750 --> 0:35:48.029
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:35:48.050 --> 0:35:49.770
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's 34. He feels younger than that.

0:35:49.930 --> 0:35:51.570
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, would you bet on him for the

0:35:51.610 --> 0:35:52.550
<v Speaker 2>next six years?

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you have a choice if you're the Yankees. Financially,

0:35:56.260 --> 0:35:58.219
<v Speaker 3>they're already kind of committed to him. But there's a

0:35:58.260 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 3>guy where he's going to go down in history in

0:36:00.700 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 3>some fashion. whether it be a disappointment. Not a disappointment personally,

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 3>but if he doesn't win a World Series.

0:36:05.460 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Disappointment because he's so great that if he didn't get

0:36:07.739 --> 0:36:08.459
<v Speaker 2>all the way, absolutely.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 3>He may get that quarterback treatment of the guy who

0:36:10.460 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 3>does not win the title.

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.950
<v Speaker 2>Well, Barry Bonds never won, and he's still legendary for

0:36:14.969 --> 0:36:15.609
<v Speaker 2>a couple reasons.

0:36:15.660 --> 0:36:16.090
<v Speaker 4>A couple reasons.

0:36:16.219 --> 0:36:18.950
<v Speaker 2>Joey Votto, by the way, he's one of my favorite

0:36:18.969 --> 0:36:21.250
<v Speaker 2>guests with Dan. He's got incredible chemistry. He had another

0:36:21.290 --> 0:36:24.710
<v Speaker 2>take about how cool it is to see left-handed batters.

0:36:24.730 --> 0:36:27.510
<v Speaker 2>Dan actually asked me about that. I am so on board.

0:36:27.930 --> 0:36:29.020
<v Speaker 3>What is this based on?

0:36:29.550 --> 0:36:32.060
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's because everyone loves Ken Griffey, right? Ken Griffey

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 2>and A-Rod were in Seattle together in the 90s. Nobody

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 2>cared about A-Rod. It was all about Griffey's beautiful swing.

0:36:37.460 --> 0:36:40.299
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Ted Williams. Votto said the lefties have more

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.940
<v Speaker 2>of an uppercut. I like watching lefties do anything. I

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>don't care if it's Michael Penix Jr. I don't care

0:36:45.620 --> 0:36:48.340
<v Speaker 2>if it's Harold Miner. Give me a left. Chris Mullen.

0:36:48.700 --> 0:36:51.550
<v Speaker 2>Any left-handed athlete, to me, it's just more interesting to

0:36:51.610 --> 0:36:52.330
<v Speaker 2>watch them play.

0:36:52.410 --> 0:36:54.870
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if this comes back to childhood where lefties

0:36:54.910 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 3>felt special. Remember you being flasked? And someone would go,

0:36:57.489 --> 0:37:00.230
<v Speaker 3>I'm left-handed. You're like, oh, that kid's left-handed. It feels

0:37:00.250 --> 0:37:02.189
<v Speaker 3>like they're special without actually accomplishing anything.

0:37:02.250 --> 0:37:04.910
<v Speaker 2>Well, to me, the prettiest swing in baseball is Bryce Harper.

0:37:05.170 --> 0:37:07.630
<v Speaker 2>It's just when he gets a hold of one, it's beautiful.

0:37:07.710 --> 0:37:10.790
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Schwarber's not far behind. It doesn't even matter if

0:37:10.810 --> 0:37:12.690
<v Speaker 2>they're on my team or not, if they're Phillies. I

0:37:12.730 --> 0:37:16.069
<v Speaker 2>love left-handed hitters. And Votto is so funny talking about that.

0:37:16.700 --> 0:37:18.609
<v Speaker 2>He is so cool. And the outfit, I was like,

0:37:18.660 --> 0:37:20.700
<v Speaker 2>where is this Joey Votto? Is he going to a

0:37:20.739 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 2>prom or something? He looked pretty good.

0:37:22.060 --> 0:37:24.180
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go back to Monday Night Football last night,

0:37:24.260 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 3>career night for Case Keenum. unbelievable night for the bears, 27,

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:29.900
<v Speaker 3>seven over the Eagles. And here's a little bit of

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 3>case Keenum after the game.

0:37:31.700 --> 0:37:36.270
<v Speaker 5>Playing well, anytime in your career feels good, um, to

0:37:36.290 --> 0:37:41.690
<v Speaker 5>do it on Monday night football. Um, after, uh, after you,

0:37:41.810 --> 0:37:48.630
<v Speaker 5>you thought you weren't ever going to play again, multiple times. Um, golly, um,

0:37:50.090 --> 0:37:52.670
<v Speaker 5>this is special. Uh, it's really special. Uh, and I

0:37:52.690 --> 0:37:54.580
<v Speaker 5>don't know if I'll be able to put it into words, uh,

0:37:55.170 --> 0:37:59.610
<v Speaker 5>tonight um but i'm gonna enjoy it tonight that's for sure.

0:37:59.410 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah i love to see our buddy case keenum doing

0:38:02.820 --> 0:38:05.420
<v Speaker 2>so well you know what stands out it's obviously the

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 2>humility he's you know some quarterbacks win and just be

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:09.980
<v Speaker 2>like oh you know this is what i do you

0:38:10.020 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>can tell he wears emotions on the sleeve he was

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:14.260
<v Speaker 2>as happy as the fans were.

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah and if you go if you look at it

0:38:15.219 --> 0:38:17.060
<v Speaker 3>from a reality standpoint if you're a bears fan and

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.580
<v Speaker 3>you're thinking about advancing this season in the playoffs further

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.770
<v Speaker 3>than you did last year This could be a big game,

0:38:21.969 --> 0:38:23.930
<v Speaker 3>and the next two games could be huge because you

0:38:23.969 --> 0:38:26.009
<v Speaker 3>took a loss and made it to a win with

0:38:26.050 --> 0:38:29.569
<v Speaker 3>a third-string quarterback. And if somehow they just barely sneak

0:38:29.590 --> 0:38:31.750
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs, Case will be remembered for that, for

0:38:31.830 --> 0:38:33.310
<v Speaker 3>riding the ship for two or three weeks.

0:38:33.530 --> 0:38:36.700
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. It's a huge deal. It's a conference game. You

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 2>know what? It also was a statement. Ben Johnson and

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Allen, the defensive coordinator, that's an elite coaching staff.

0:38:41.900 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 2>People said Ben Johnson's never done it with a backup,

0:38:44.140 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 2>but there he did.

0:38:44.780 --> 0:38:47.490
<v Speaker 3>By the way, bonus coverage. Big guy, big moment last night.

0:38:47.590 --> 0:38:50.989
<v Speaker 3>Joe Tooney, the offensive left guard for the Bears. Case

0:38:51.010 --> 0:38:53.010
<v Speaker 3>Keenan should thank him. Watch this play on the blitz.

0:38:53.070 --> 0:38:55.110
<v Speaker 3>Watch Tooney, top of your screen. He is about to

0:38:55.150 --> 0:38:58.930
<v Speaker 3>get de-cleated, and that one forearm, complete pass for a

0:38:58.950 --> 0:39:02.060
<v Speaker 3>first down here. Great job by Joe Tooney. We feature

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the big guys here on Not So Fast.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.700
<v Speaker 2>Oh, love it. Love it. I can't believe Case kept

0:39:05.739 --> 0:39:07.900
<v Speaker 2>saying it in the pocket with Jalen Carter coming at him.

0:39:08.260 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Good job all around. All right, speaking of Philly, LeBron

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 2>made his sort of debut yesterday, said lots of stuff,

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.779
<v Speaker 2>and explained kind of why he wanted to go to

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:18.950
<v Speaker 2>the 76ers.

0:39:20.300 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 4>We have to be comfortable with being uncomfortable. That is

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.630
<v Speaker 4>the best way to expedite being great. You have to

0:39:26.670 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 4>fall in love with doing things that's uncomfortable. And if

0:39:29.820 --> 0:39:32.460
<v Speaker 4>we can do that, then we can be a great team.

0:39:33.140 --> 0:39:35.980
<v Speaker 4>If we don't do that, then we'll be like, oh man,

0:39:36.020 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 4>it was a great team on paper and we had

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.700
<v Speaker 4>a lot of great talent and we lost in the

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 4>second round.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Like, I.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.340
<v Speaker 4>Don't want to do that. I didn't leave my family

0:39:46.380 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 4>to lose in the second round. I know that for sure. So,

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 4>Work needs to be done, and I'm ready to put

0:39:52.260 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the work in.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.090
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I'm not 100% sure what he's talking

0:39:55.110 --> 0:39:56.729
<v Speaker 3>about there, but all I know is he looks really

0:39:56.790 --> 0:39:59.810
<v Speaker 3>cool in the Philadelphia uniform, and I like bald LeBron

0:39:59.890 --> 0:40:01.870
<v Speaker 3>a lot better than holding onto the hair LeBron. It's

0:40:01.890 --> 0:40:04.580
<v Speaker 3>like he said, it's over, Johnny. Let's call it. call

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:08.580
<v Speaker 3>my guy, shave it down, streamline for the 2026 season. Well, yeah,

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:09.299
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.460
<v Speaker 2>He has not let himself go in this league.

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 3>No, he looks like he works out.

0:40:12.620 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>He looks like he's 25, which is incredible. But I

0:40:14.900 --> 0:40:17.469
<v Speaker 2>know what he's talking about. On paper, you put Joel Embiid,

0:40:17.530 --> 0:40:22.850
<v Speaker 2>LeBron James, Jalen Brown, Tyrese Maxey. That's pretty crazy on paper,

0:40:22.950 --> 0:40:26.210
<v Speaker 2>but it's so on paper. There, that photo alone, I

0:40:26.230 --> 0:40:26.589
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:40:26.730 --> 0:40:28.590
<v Speaker 3>Do you think people are going to root for this team?

0:40:28.910 --> 0:40:31.230
<v Speaker 3>I find them interesting, and I'm definitely going to watch them.

0:40:31.469 --> 0:40:34.260
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious if the casual fan... roots for the Sixers.

0:40:34.570 --> 0:40:36.660
<v Speaker 2>I think it's confusing because I don't think a lot

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:38.770
<v Speaker 2>of people don't like LeBron. I'd say it's 50-50. You

0:40:38.830 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 2>either love LeBron or you don't like him.

0:40:40.270 --> 0:40:41.190
<v Speaker 3>Brown is polarizing.

0:40:41.430 --> 0:40:44.550
<v Speaker 2>Brown, a little less so. I think everyone loves Tyrese.

0:40:44.650 --> 0:40:47.030
<v Speaker 2>If you know who Tyrese Maxey is and B.J. Edgecombe,

0:40:47.050 --> 0:40:47.670
<v Speaker 2>everyone loves him.

0:40:47.690 --> 0:40:48.430
<v Speaker 3>And Bede when he plays.

0:40:48.510 --> 0:40:50.930
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anybody. Is Embiid popular out of town?

0:40:50.950 --> 0:40:52.630
<v Speaker 2>There aren't a lot of kids who walk around in

0:40:52.710 --> 0:40:54.569
<v Speaker 2>Embiid jerseys. No one wants to be the big man.

0:40:54.630 --> 0:40:56.610
<v Speaker 3>In my neighborhood, they're all in Embiid jerseys. All right,

0:40:56.630 --> 0:40:58.690
<v Speaker 3>let's get to it. John Harbaugh, the head coach of

0:40:58.710 --> 0:41:01.489
<v Speaker 3>the Giants, acquired a new quarterback yesterday. We talked about

0:41:01.530 --> 0:41:03.919
<v Speaker 3>that on Not So Fast, but He talked a little

0:41:03.940 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 3>more about it after practice.

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.980
<v Speaker 8>Really glad, really happy, very excited to add J.J.

0:41:10.020 --> 0:41:10.540
<v Speaker 2>McCarthy.

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 8>I think he's a strong young quarterback, has some experience

0:41:15.219 --> 0:41:18.180
<v Speaker 8>in the National Football League, obviously was a very high

0:41:18.219 --> 0:41:21.410
<v Speaker 8>draft pick, very talented player, and is going to make

0:41:21.469 --> 0:41:24.110
<v Speaker 8>us a stronger football team. So excited about it. I

0:41:24.110 --> 0:41:24.989
<v Speaker 8>think it makes us better.

0:41:26.330 --> 0:41:29.810
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, so obviously this is a favor. Is it

0:41:29.830 --> 0:41:31.810
<v Speaker 2>an older brother or a younger brother? Is Jim older?

0:41:31.890 --> 0:41:32.350
<v Speaker 2>He's older, right?

0:41:32.370 --> 0:41:32.930
<v Speaker 3>I think Jim's older.

0:41:33.130 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Jim's older. He's doing a favor. Jim Harbaugh and J.J.

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.620
<v Speaker 2>McCarthy tied at the hip in Michigan. John calls Jim

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.540
<v Speaker 2>and said, what's the deal with McCarthy? I know Jim

0:41:41.580 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Harbaugh loves him. So John sees something here. Fifth round

0:41:45.020 --> 0:41:45.710
<v Speaker 2>pick's not going to kill you.

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think this is a favor between brothers

0:41:47.500 --> 0:41:49.609
<v Speaker 3>as much as it's like, I could take this risk

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.529
<v Speaker 3>because what if Jackson Dart has knee issues that go

0:41:52.590 --> 0:41:55.240
<v Speaker 3>on for longer? There's no future with Jameis Winston. This

0:41:55.300 --> 0:41:57.700
<v Speaker 3>guy had a rookie year and a second year after

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the injuries, I should say, where he made some great throws,

0:42:01.860 --> 0:42:04.430
<v Speaker 3>but he didn't make normal throws. He didn't make easy throws.

0:42:04.750 --> 0:42:07.090
<v Speaker 3>This guy is a fastball guy with no curveball and

0:42:07.130 --> 0:42:09.430
<v Speaker 3>no off-speed pitch. I think that could be worked on.

0:42:09.510 --> 0:42:12.299
<v Speaker 3>I think John Harbaugh thinks... This guy's 23 years old.

0:42:12.380 --> 0:42:13.780
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting him for almost nothing.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.570
<v Speaker 2>Why not? I don't see it. I think his accuracy

0:42:17.670 --> 0:42:20.810
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be fixed. 57%. That's my problem,

0:42:21.130 --> 0:42:22.370
<v Speaker 2>and I think a lot of people are like this.

0:42:22.390 --> 0:42:24.989
<v Speaker 2>A fifth-round pick is something, but generally I don't see

0:42:25.030 --> 0:42:26.930
<v Speaker 2>him as more than a career backup, which might be fine.

0:42:26.969 --> 0:42:28.029
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you have a problem with that.

0:42:28.050 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I brought this up on the Dan Patrick Show. This

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.660
<v Speaker 3>rookie year stats or first 10-game stats of J.J. McCarthy

0:42:32.980 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 3>and Josh Allen are almost simultaneous.

0:42:35.180 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen was terrible as a rookie.

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 3>He was terrible, but then, of course, he has the

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.950
<v Speaker 3>running ability, as Dan mentioned. But I think there is

0:42:40.989 --> 0:42:43.710
<v Speaker 3>a chance, but it's not going to be instantaneous. And

0:42:43.730 --> 0:42:45.410
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he should play in the next four weeks.

0:42:45.750 --> 0:42:49.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think accuracy cannot always be taught in the NFL.

0:42:49.489 --> 0:42:51.830
<v Speaker 2>So that's my big issue. The issue is he never

0:42:51.850 --> 0:42:53.950
<v Speaker 2>should have been a first-round pick. I think DP said

0:42:53.989 --> 0:42:56.650
<v Speaker 2>that today. All he did was hand the ball off

0:42:56.670 --> 0:42:58.950
<v Speaker 2>to Michigan. We never saw him in a passing offense. Now,

0:42:58.969 --> 0:43:00.870
<v Speaker 2>it was a pro style in Michigan, but nothing like

0:43:00.950 --> 0:43:03.190
<v Speaker 2>what he has to do now. If Kevin O'Connell can't

0:43:03.230 --> 0:43:05.390
<v Speaker 2>make anything out of him, how are the Giants going

0:43:05.410 --> 0:43:05.670
<v Speaker 2>to do it?

0:43:05.670 --> 0:43:07.310
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they just want him out of the building. All right,

0:43:07.330 --> 0:43:09.529
<v Speaker 3>coming up next. More baseball. We're going to get to

0:43:09.730 --> 0:43:12.050
<v Speaker 3>our wild card picks. We're going to get to constructive

0:43:12.070 --> 0:43:14.330
<v Speaker 3>criticism and the feel good. Stick around. Not so fast.

0:43:14.390 --> 0:43:14.850
<v Speaker 3>Right after the break.

0:43:14.870 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 2>All right. We're back on Not So Fast. NBC Sports Now. Peacock.

0:43:19.580 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>All right. Every week we do the NFL and college

0:43:22.780 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 2>football play of the season. Right now, Paul, we have

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 2>a strong contender at the top of the mountain. Of course,

0:43:28.900 --> 0:43:32.210
<v Speaker 2>that is the Jamar Chase team. catch against the Texans,

0:43:32.250 --> 0:43:34.589
<v Speaker 2>I believe, in the corner of the end zone. I've

0:43:34.610 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 2>seen this play replayed so many times already. Jamar Chase

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 2>twists and turns, tracks the ball. Only he can do this.

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.299
<v Speaker 2>Arguably the best receiver in the NFL. This is going

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 2>to be tough to beat.

0:43:43.820 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 3>The more I watch it, the better it gets. He

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.730
<v Speaker 3>actually got pushed right before he had to make the turn.

0:43:48.290 --> 0:43:50.830
<v Speaker 3>That seems impossible even in regular motion.

0:43:50.969 --> 0:43:53.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but for Jamar Chase, I guess it is possible.

0:43:53.190 --> 0:43:56.330
<v Speaker 2>All right, this week's contender coming out of the San

0:43:56.350 --> 0:44:00.489
<v Speaker 2>Francisco 49ers. We got a little hook and ladder. Oh,

0:44:00.530 --> 0:44:03.430
<v Speaker 2>you got to love that play. Debo Samuel runs it in.

0:44:03.570 --> 0:44:05.370
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was against a Cardinals team that did

0:44:05.410 --> 0:44:07.930
<v Speaker 2>not show up at all on Sunday. But I love

0:44:07.950 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 2>this play, and I love Debo. It looks like he's 25.

0:44:10.270 --> 0:44:10.910
<v Speaker 2>He's played great.

0:44:10.930 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 3>Are you a hook and ladder guy or hook and

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 3>lateral guy? Because I don't know which one is correct.

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.299
<v Speaker 2>Are they interchangeable? Oh, I don't know. I call it

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.540
<v Speaker 2>the hook and ladder. Is it called the hook and lateral?

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:22.859
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the hook and lateral, but people use

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 3>hook and ladder because, shout out to the fighter.

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.779
<v Speaker 2>Isn't the most famous one Miami Dolphins way back in

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.610
<v Speaker 2>the day? I feel like Dan Marino to Duper and Clayton.

0:44:31.670 --> 0:44:34.390
<v Speaker 3>The running back was Tony Nathan for the Miami Dolphins

0:44:34.410 --> 0:44:35.790
<v Speaker 3>who caught the hook and lateral.

0:44:36.230 --> 0:44:38.450
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so who do you think should win? Is it

0:44:38.489 --> 0:44:40.690
<v Speaker 2>Jamar Chase or Debo in the hook and lateral?

0:44:40.710 --> 0:44:42.530
<v Speaker 3>I think we're staying with Chase. That thing's freakish.

0:44:43.230 --> 0:44:46.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. It's got to be Jamar Chase. That

0:44:46.469 --> 0:44:49.180
<v Speaker 2>is one of the greatest catches I've seen. Not quite

0:44:49.260 --> 0:44:53.180
<v Speaker 2>Odell Beckham one-handed, but it's not far behind. And Debo,

0:44:53.739 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 2>he didn't really have to do that much work. He

0:44:55.660 --> 0:44:56.739
<v Speaker 2>outran the Cardinals.

0:44:56.780 --> 0:44:57.940
<v Speaker 3>It didn't even count as a catch for him. He

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:00.060
<v Speaker 3>didn't even get a reception on the play. But, you know,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:01.820
<v Speaker 3>he looks pretty fast. You want to hit some baseball?

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:03.259
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get into it.

0:45:03.500 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, here we go. Baseball playoffs later today. NBC Sports, Peacock, NBCSN.

0:45:08.219 --> 0:45:08.720
<v Speaker 1>All day.

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 3>Tune in. Braves over Phillies. I'm going Braves over the Phillies.

0:45:12.390 --> 0:45:15.469
<v Speaker 3>They are so due. Chris Sale, this is career recovery time.

0:45:16.250 --> 0:45:17.370
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to pitch a four-hitter.

0:45:18.110 --> 0:45:20.509
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like the Braves in the series, but I

0:45:20.550 --> 0:45:21.850
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to be close. The Phillies just aren't

0:45:21.890 --> 0:45:24.230
<v Speaker 2>hitting right now, at least not consistently. But the Braves

0:45:24.270 --> 0:45:27.009
<v Speaker 2>don't have much besides Chris Sale. I'm not sure if

0:45:27.090 --> 0:45:28.469
<v Speaker 2>either team is a World Series team.

0:45:28.630 --> 0:45:31.170
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go White Sox over Astros. Astros don't

0:45:31.190 --> 0:45:33.540
<v Speaker 3>look very good. They've been outscored all season. I think

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.540
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox have a wild card victory in them,

0:45:36.620 --> 0:45:38.450
<v Speaker 3>two games out of three. I don't know if they're

0:45:38.469 --> 0:45:39.830
<v Speaker 3>going to go much further than that, but it's a

0:45:39.850 --> 0:45:40.450
<v Speaker 3>feel-good story.

0:45:40.670 --> 0:45:43.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you pitch around Jordan Alvarez, what else is there? Astros,

0:45:43.989 --> 0:45:46.129
<v Speaker 2>the worst division winner of all time. I'm going White Sox.

0:45:46.450 --> 0:45:48.860
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to pick Red Sox over the Yankees, mostly

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 3>because of Peyton Tolley's mustache. It's fantastic. I want to

0:45:51.540 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 3>see more of this guy. But the Judge thing, that's

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.940
<v Speaker 3>a hit. That's a big hit. I mean, no pun intended.

0:45:56.330 --> 0:45:58.469
<v Speaker 3>That's where, if you're a Red Sox fan, if you're

0:45:58.489 --> 0:46:00.190
<v Speaker 3>a Red Sox player, this is it. This is your

0:46:00.270 --> 0:46:02.270
<v Speaker 3>opening in a season where you never thought you'd be here.

0:46:02.469 --> 0:46:05.509
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going Yankees. I like Schlittler. I like, obviously,

0:46:05.860 --> 0:46:09.500
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Cole. So I think pitching actually carries them until

0:46:09.540 --> 0:46:11.500
<v Speaker 2>Judge can get back, if Judge gets back.

0:46:11.780 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 3>Last one, believe it or not, I am going the

0:46:13.860 --> 0:46:16.620
<v Speaker 3>Padres over the Cubs. Shota in the playoffs, I'm worried

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:20.280
<v Speaker 3>about with the Cubs. Their bullpen hasn't done anything almost

0:46:20.340 --> 0:46:22.170
<v Speaker 3>all season. They have to hit their way out of this,

0:46:22.210 --> 0:46:23.689
<v Speaker 3>and if they're not in the lead and the ball

0:46:23.730 --> 0:46:26.250
<v Speaker 3>goes to Mason Miller, I feel terrible about the Cubs' chance.

0:46:26.370 --> 0:46:28.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, is this a location, location, location thing? I'm picking

0:46:28.950 --> 0:46:33.109
<v Speaker 2>the Padres, too. I don't know. PCA kind of choked

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:35.450
<v Speaker 2>last year. He's got to do a lot here. This

0:46:35.860 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most interesting series to me. There's

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 2>so many stars to watch in this series. I feel

0:46:40.580 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 2>like three games is not enough.

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:43.420
<v Speaker 3>I wish it was a five-gamer. All right, let's get

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:46.540
<v Speaker 3>to a little constructive criticism. Your feedback on how we're doing,

0:46:46.580 --> 0:46:49.180
<v Speaker 3>what we're doing, what we're wearing. Perloff, the first one

0:46:49.219 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 3>coming up here is... Here we go. If Andrew Perloff

0:46:53.140 --> 0:46:55.500
<v Speaker 3>put on a Bears uniform, doesn't he look like Case Keenum?

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Like a stretched out Ivy League Case Keenum?

0:46:58.739 --> 0:47:01.150
<v Speaker 2>So something weird happened on social media last night, and

0:47:01.210 --> 0:47:03.689
<v Speaker 2>I can explain this. They're talking about you, Paul. You

0:47:03.710 --> 0:47:06.450
<v Speaker 2>look like Case Keenum. If you put on a Bears uniform.

0:47:06.469 --> 0:47:06.649
<v Speaker 3>Me?

0:47:06.969 --> 0:47:10.069
<v Speaker 2>Yes. You look a lot like Case Keenum. Because last night,

0:47:10.090 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 2>how many people said, Paul, someone sent a social media message, Paul,

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 2>did you write a book with Case Keenum? Which I

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:17.540
<v Speaker 2>replied to, he sure did.

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:19.590
<v Speaker 3>So you wrote the book, I Look Like Him.

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 2>You, of course, you think I look at, I don't

0:47:21.380 --> 0:47:23.259
<v Speaker 2>look at anything like Case Keenum. I was going to say.

0:47:23.380 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 2>I think you look a lot, I mean, who's the

0:47:24.820 --> 0:47:27.379
<v Speaker 2>coach that you're a total doppelganger for? That's not me,

0:47:27.420 --> 0:47:27.879
<v Speaker 2>that's you.

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:31.410
<v Speaker 3>I look like Pat Fitzgerald of Michigan State without 20

0:47:31.410 --> 0:47:32.410
<v Speaker 3>pounds less, less jacked.

0:47:32.530 --> 0:47:35.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, you're starting to sort of veer a

0:47:35.190 --> 0:47:37.509
<v Speaker 2>little bit because Pat Fitzgerald keeps on putting on weight.

0:47:37.610 --> 0:47:39.930
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be mean. But yeah, you look

0:47:39.969 --> 0:47:41.830
<v Speaker 2>exactly like him. You look closer to Case. I do

0:47:41.850 --> 0:47:42.670
<v Speaker 2>not look anything like Case.

0:47:42.690 --> 0:47:44.670
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's stay on the same topic because it's

0:47:44.710 --> 0:47:46.250
<v Speaker 3>time for the feel good. And there's only one to

0:47:46.290 --> 0:47:48.509
<v Speaker 3>choose from from last night. It was Case Keenum night.

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 3>It was as good as it gets before the game,

0:47:51.300 --> 0:47:56.130
<v Speaker 3>after the game. The kneel down. The Bears fans going berserk. Oh,

0:47:56.870 --> 0:48:02.859
<v Speaker 3>and look at this. The kids, Van Pelt. People staying

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:03.859
<v Speaker 3>in the stadium to hug him.

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.270
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that is almost like Justin Berlander's daughter running

0:48:07.310 --> 0:48:11.230
<v Speaker 2>out to the mound when Berlander retired. As two daughters,

0:48:11.270 --> 0:48:12.270
<v Speaker 2>I get really emotional.

0:48:12.590 --> 0:48:15.489
<v Speaker 3>He ran around like Cal Ripken for 18 minutes. He

0:48:15.510 --> 0:48:17.050
<v Speaker 3>was like doing laps in the stadium.

0:48:17.290 --> 0:48:19.490
<v Speaker 2>And he did a lot of very interesting and funny

0:48:19.550 --> 0:48:23.469
<v Speaker 2>post-game interviews. Do you like bringing the kids out after

0:48:23.530 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 2>a Week 3 win? You know what?

0:48:24.950 --> 0:48:27.379
<v Speaker 3>You have nothing to apologize for. It's a Week 3 win.

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:28.860
<v Speaker 3>You didn't think you were going to play it down

0:48:28.900 --> 0:48:31.330
<v Speaker 3>this year if all went right with Bears football. This

0:48:31.390 --> 0:48:33.609
<v Speaker 3>is an all bets are off game with Case Keenum.

0:48:33.850 --> 0:48:36.469
<v Speaker 2>So he had a funny comment. He said, I'm going

0:48:36.489 --> 0:48:38.230
<v Speaker 2>to watch the game again with him tomorrow. I'm sure

0:48:38.250 --> 0:48:40.049
<v Speaker 2>they'll get bored after two plays and want to put

0:48:40.110 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 2>on Bluey.

0:48:40.739 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, put on Bubble Guppies.

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 2>All right, tune in.

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.260
<v Speaker 3>Baseball playoffs all day right here on NBC4. Tune in today.

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll recap them tomorrow right here on Not So Fast

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:50.180
<v Speaker 3>and the Dan Patrick Show.

0:48:50.260 --> 0:48:50.500
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy the baseball.

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:52.020
<v Speaker 2>Take care. Go Bills.