WEBVTT - Rubenstein Provides an Investing Master Class

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Earlier this week,

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>US stocks posted their biggest drop in two years. Uh.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>This was after the latest CPI report was surprised to

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the upside the silver lining. Maybe it's a good time

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for savvy investors to buy the dip. At least that's

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>what David Rubinstein told our Bloomberg TV colleagues the day

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.159
<v Speaker 1>after that massive sell off. His comments, I've got a

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of play online because who doesn't want investing tips

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>from the best in the business. And luckily for us,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he's back with some more tips. David Rubinstein is founder

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and co executive chairman of Carlisle Croup. He's also the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>host of Bloomberg Wealth on a Bloomberg Television He joins

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>us to be a zoom from Washington, d C. David,

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>good to have you back with us this afternoon. How

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are you I'm doing fine. Thank you for having me. Yeah,

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. I want to start

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with the markets because I think a lot of people

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are spooked right now. I'm just give us your interpretation

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of what you're seeing when you look at the equity

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>markets right now, clearly the markets are not happy with

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the higher inflation numbers, and I think that's a big factor.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>When you have higher inflation, you can expect higher interest rates,

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed is next week like the increase interest

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>rates by seventy five basis points. There's some who think

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it could be a hundred basis points, but I doubt

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that that that that would happen. That would probably really

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt the markets much more because that would show the

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed is much more nervous about inflation than it has

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>said it is, although it has said it's it's worried,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think a hundred basis points would be much

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>more than their guidance has been. So if they were

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to do a hundred basis points and market will really

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>sell off. In my view, seventy five basis points and

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>markets already assuming that's going to happen, so probably not

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a big surprise of the markets. I think the news

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>from fed X that you were just talking about probably

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to scare people early tomorrow because someone fed

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>X is canceling its guidance. That might mean that other

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>companies are gonna follow suit, and that might mean earnings

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be less than people expect. So I think

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>markets are gonna be choppy for a while, there's no

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it. Well and FedEx here is right now

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>down about shoppy. But you still think there are opportunities,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>especially when we see the equity side of the markets.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>David a lot that that is a time to enter

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you You stand by that the greatest more fortunes in

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>the stock market are generally not made when people see

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a top of the market and they say, now I'm

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get in. Generally markets are down and then

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens is people say, I think it could go

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>down further, and they try to look for the bottom

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of the market. Anybody that's looking for the top of

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the market or the bottom of the market generally is

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on a fool's Errand so markets are shares her off

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>now what more than from the peak, and that's a

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty good downside. It could go down a little bit more,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see another twenty percent down. The markets

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>are pretty much near the bottom. They might be five

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>percent more to go or maybe a little bit more.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think we know a lot of what's going

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on in the markets now and not likely to see

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>big changes. Now the Ukraine Russia situation has had some

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>positive news, maybe that work could be over sooner than

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we once thought. And I think uh now m generally

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the inflation situation not under control, but the FED seems

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be on top of the situation, maybe more than

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it was before. So I'm not expecting we're going to

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>see another decline in stock crisis. David, and I want

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to get into your book in just a moment, but

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>would you concede that it's safe to say that we

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really don't know kind of how things go on the

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>other side of it, considering the pandemic that we're coming

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>out of, the amount of stimulus that was pumped in

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to the global economy, that we still don't quite know

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's still the same risks, right, we could get

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>another variant that sets things back, Um, China still struggling. Uh. Geopolitical,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as you said, some good news out of Ukraine, but

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still a little bit up in the air. Do

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we Is it safe to say we don't quite really

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>know how this all plays out? Um? This is what

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>lawyers often call a case of first impression, which is

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, we have something that's relatively unique in the

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sense that we haven't had five trillion dollars injected into

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>an economy quite the way the federal government did and

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>then know what the impact is going to be an

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation in the markets a year or two later. So

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we had this gigantic injection and to prevent uh A

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>set during COVID. We did prevent it recession, but we

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>also gave us a lot of inflation. UM. If you

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>go back at any time in the market history, you'll

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>always fullfind that there are problems. There's never a case

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>where people say, you know, everything is looking great and

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>actually turns out to be great. It's rarely the case

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have challenges right now. We have the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>challenges you to discuss plus UH. You know, the challenges

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of getting people back to work, the challenges of awarding

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>another UM, COVID type pandemic, the challenge of the U. S.

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 1>China relationship, the challenge of the Russian situation, the energy situation,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>money challenges. But that's what makes great market great investors great.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>They can see through the challenges and get in when

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they going is good and other people think it's bad,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but now it's probably not a bad time to begin investing.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey David, um, is there any concern Do you have

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>any concern that the Fed could overdo it? Because monetary

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>policy it takes a while to take effect in the economy.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still getting some pretty hot numbers when it comes

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to jobs, but an inflation still high, of course, But

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are you concerned that the Fed just goes too hard

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to interest rates? Well, of course, the

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Fed didn't make a mistake that it admitted it thought

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the inflation was was going to be transitory. Obviously was

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>not Um J Pal who used to work at my firm,

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and I've known him for a long time, though I'm

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously not getting inside information from him now. Um. I

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think he's a very cautious person. He likes to tell

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you what he's going to do, and they'd like to

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>then do it. Um, he's pretty much said, I'm gonna

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>go the Fed's gonna FOMC is gonna go up by

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis points. I think if they were gonna

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>go a hundred basis points or more, I think they

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>would have tipped the markets a bit, because, as I

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, a hundred basis points or more now would

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.119
<v Speaker 1>shock the markets, and I think it would be uh

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>something that would see a big sell off in stock.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't see that being tipped from the FED.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And obviously he doesn't control what the FMC does, but

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he has an enormous amount of influence, So I suspect

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>um will be something around seventy five basis points. The

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>real change is whether we will have another fifty basis

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>points increase the remainder of the year, which is what

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the market seven have assumed, or could it be the

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>case that we get more than fifty basis points or

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of the year. And then, of course, right

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>now the markets are generally assuming probably not any real

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 1>increases early next year, and who knows that could change,

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But right now I think we're the markets really want

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>some good inflation numbers. The next time some inflation numbers

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>come out, hopefully they're better than the ones we just saw.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you find it okay? And we promised we're gonna

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>get to your book, But is it wacky that we

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have such a strong labor market and yet, David, you

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>know that we constantly talk about about the labor market.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The unemployment rate is a misleading number in many respects.

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the one we all know. And right now the

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>number is I think three point seven percent. It went

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>as low as three point five per cent um and

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's as low as anything I can recall. Um, But

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't take into account how many people are looking

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for jobs. Uh, the amount of people in the labor

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>force is less than it used to be. And remember,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate is the number of people in the previous

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>month who are in the labor force and looking for

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>jobs that can't find them. Uh, the labor force is

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>actually smaller than it would be ideal, um. And so

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there probably are you know, more people who would like

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs but don't think they can find them in the

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at the salary they want, or they the kind of

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>style work style they want. So I think it is

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe that that that the unemployment rate is

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>so low when you know, I do know people that

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are still looking for jobs, and I think that you know,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we should recognize it. Generally, an adult population, you have

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about six working population and adult population who are in

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. Now that number is probably closer to sixty

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two or six. So we have more people who could work,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but they've taken themselves out of the workforce and that's

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>why the the unemployment rate is so low. All right,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about the book How to invest Masters

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Craft, Uh, And I do wonder, you know, David,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Generally successful investors, I would argue that are successful. It's

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>because of their different says. They find opportunities where others

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do not. So at the same time, I wonder, is

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>there's something that successful investors all have in common. Yes,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they have these things in common. They tend to come

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>from blue collar and uh, middle class families. They don't

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>come from very wealthy families. They tend to be pretty

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>good students. These are not typically college dropouts or high

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>school dropouts. As a general will of thumb, they tend

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty good in math. They tend to like

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions. They tend not like to delegate. They

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>tend to be people who will um defy conventional wisdom.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>The conventional wisdom say now is not the time to

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to invest. That's when they invest. They also tend to

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be relatively humble because they've made a lot of mistakes

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Every investor does. They also tend to

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>get rid of their mistakes pretty quickly. A really good

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>investor when they when he or she makes a mistake,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't labor over it for months and months and

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>months and still about it. They get out of the

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>position and they go into the next thing. They also

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to be i'd say, relatively philanthropic. Clearly, if you're

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if are in the business world and you're an investor,

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to being in the endowment world or or

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or a nonprofit world, you tend to make a lot

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of money as investors, and they tend to give away

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a large percentage of it. So I generally these are

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are quite articulate, quite smart, and quite hard working.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>We're hard work is not a problem for them because

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>what they do is what they love. Investing is not

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for them work, It's it's pleasure. And once they've made

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>whatever they need to make a billion dollars, two billion,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>ten billions, twenty billion dollars, they don't stop working. They

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>work until they you know, I just can't do it anymore. Um.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't tend to retire at fifty five or sixty.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Some of the names on here, I mean, this is

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a who's who of of the Wall Street world and

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>also Silicon value when it comes to alternatives. I mean

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking people like Larry Fink, John Gray, Sam Zell

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are featured in here, Rate Dahio. When it comes to

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, we got John Paulson on hedge funds, Mark Injuries,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to venture capital. I want to

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to what you said about mistakes though, because

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is something that doesn't get enough attention,

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people look at these folks as

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people who have just been so successful, and you know,

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the mistakes aren't really what what's written about. What are

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>some prominent mistakes that you learned about when you were

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>doing reporting for this book. Well, of course, um, every

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>investor has his or her stories of their mistakes, and

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't put myself in the great investor category. But

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I turned down Facebook when Mark Zuckerberg was in college. Um,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I basically didn't. I told Jeff Bezos his company wasn't

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get anywhere, and I sold his stock relatively early,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>right at the I p o UM. When Mark Andreeson

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>came to my firm to try to raise money at

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the beginning for a net escape, I told him it

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>would never get anywhere. So I've you know, made a

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of mistakes myself. I think every investor, UM makes mistakes,

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's what life is all about. So every one

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of these investors will tell you about one mistake they've

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>made or another. And I could go through each of

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>those investors and tell some of the mistakes that they

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>told me they make. But you know, in the end, uh,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they get over it quickly. UM. I I tend to

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be a person who likes to talk about my mistakes

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty years later. Um. They don't do that. They tend

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to go on to the next thing. And that's one

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons the great investors they can clear their

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>mind of their mistakes. Well, you know one thing I

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>found among the investors that you talked to. I always

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think about Sam's l a lot, uh in terms of

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>when he sold his read at the height, um, and

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just before everything came undone from the great financial crisis

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>in the housing mailtown. And I do wonder, is there

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is there a lesson there in terms of who were

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, was he just super smart lucky timing? Like

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Um? You know, really smart people tend

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to have better luck than not people who are people

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are not so smart. So it's Sam's LL's case. He's

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>really smart. He wasn't really looking to sell his company.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>He got an offer, and then he was willing accept

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that offer, and another offer came at a higher price.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He kind of ran an auction, and he wasn't intending to.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>But it shows you he makes mistakes too, because he

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>got a higher price than he ever expected in a

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>higher price, and he would have had had he not

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>run a little auction. The profits that are above the

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>price he initially accepted was a large sum of money

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he made. He took that money and brought the Chicago

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Tribune and it went bankrupt. So he quickly learned that

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>running a newspaper not as easy as running an office building.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of, um, you know, the the

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>average investor out there, people who are listening to our show,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>people who have Bloomberg terminals, who are you know, making

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>their own personal investments, and even beyond those people, David,

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering what lessons they can take away from

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to the pros. The most common mistake that investors make.

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>The pros would say, and I think I'm talking about

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>average investors always. The book is not designed to make

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you into Sam's l or John Gray, that's unrealistic. Note

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>book is going to do that, but it's designed for

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are average investors who um dabble in the market,

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>or they buy funds and they have other people dabbling

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for them in effect. UM. I would say that the

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>cost common mistake that people point out to me is

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that people when the markets are going up, they rush

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in and they want to catch it at the top,

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and then when the markets are going down they want

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell. And even a brilliant person like Sir Isaac

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Newton considered the time the smartest man in the world.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>UM that, you know, the discovery of gravity and a

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>whole variety of other things. He um He invested in

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in a in a south Sea corporation publicly traded stock

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>um uh company, and he got out and made a

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>big profit, and he said, you know, I'm smart and

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>other things, not just physics. But then the market kept

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going up and up and up. He said, maybe I

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>missed the top. He put all of his money and

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>borrowed money to go back in and he in the

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>company went bankrupt, so he went bankrupt too. So here's

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's one of the smartest men in the world,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but he got caught up in the in the temptation

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of seeing other people making money when he wasn't making it.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>So you got to be very careful and I think

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>know what you're doing. Also, one of the advantages of

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of of being a value investor, in a long term

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>investor's Warren Buffett is they tend not to sell a lot.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>And when you sell a lot or you buy a lot,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of transaction costs and you had

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay taxes. One of the things that Warren Buffet

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>has done and over sixty years, he's compounded a year

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for sixty years. Nobody's ever done that before. UM is

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't sell very many things. He therefore he doesn't

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>transaction cost fees, but he also doesn't pay taxes um

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that he's not having capital gains taxes,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but the stocks going up and he's not selling. And

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's an important thing. People should hold on the things

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for quite a bit longer than they they attend to well.

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's an interesting thing to say. And

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>here I am watching shares of I want to go

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>back to that headline of FedEx. It's down about twelve

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>percent and the after hours after the company withdrew its

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year earnings forecast, and it's also taking down shares

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of Ups in the after hours, which are now down

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>about six percent. I mean things like this, David, You know,

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we try to glean so much from it of what

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's telling us about the economy. We start off our

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation talking about this, But I mean, how do investors,

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, have to think about things when they're seeing

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a position that they are going down twelve percent

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>here in the after hours? You know, how do you

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>figure out is this still something I hold onto or

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is this something I sell? Let me ask you this.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>If Warren Buffett was a shareholder in FedEx, I don't

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>know if he is. Do you think he's gonna wake

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>up tomorrow morning and sell that stock? And the answer

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is no, because he's he likes to buy great companies

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and stick with them through thick and thin. They generally

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that will work out, as he proved in a lot

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of companies. As biggest holding now is Ample, which he

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bought was much lower price than it is today. Um,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't know whether the FedEx a remove of guidance

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is because there's some exogenous thing that's unique to to

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>FedEx or UM. It just reflects the fact that there's

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>not much shipping going on because not much economic buying

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and a lone of things are being bought and shipped

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. You just don't know and toy to

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>see what the what the reason is for the withdrawing

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to guidance. That's a big drop, that's for sure, a

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>big drop. But I just don't know yet what the

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>reason is. And let me be fair to you in

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>our audience, the CEO of FedEx and global volumes declined

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as macroeconomic trend significantly worsened later in the quarter, both

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet actually and the US. We are swiftly addressing those headwinds,

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but given the speed at which conditions shifted, first quarter

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>results are below our expectations. Um, there's a little bit

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of color. How does that make you think about something

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like this? Yeah, well, they emphasized the word global, so

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the global um. You know, maybe the economic problem

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is outside the United States more than in the United States.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's no doubt that Europe is on the precipice

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of a recession because of the high energy prices, high inflation,

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>high interest rates, and the whole war in Ukraine and

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the impact on the supply chain in Western Europe. So

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be that's part of the problem. And obviously

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy is slowed down and that could be part

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of the problem as well. I'd be surprised if the

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is only because of the United States. I don't

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably the case. The US economy is chugging along. Okay,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not in a recession. We may or may not

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>go into one, but we're com clearly not in one.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're speaking with David Rubinstein, the founder and

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>co executive chairman of Carlisle Group. He's also the host

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Wealth on a Bloomberg television the author of

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the brand new book How to Invest Masters on the Craft, David,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the people you spoke with, um, again, really interesting names there.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to Mike Novogradha. Can I just

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>say that there's a lot of men. There's a lot

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of men. Well, um, there are a lot of women too.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>UM I would say, obviously it's easy to do a

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>book like that and fill up with old white men.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I tried hard not to do that. UM. I have

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in there, for example, Kim Lou who is the woman

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that runs the endownment for Columbia University. Are really impressive investor.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Also is in there, Paula Belan who runs the endownment

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for Rockefeller University. Sandra Horback, who's the most senior woman

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the enthigher private equity world. She's at Carlisle. UM,

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so I would say, Uh, what I tried to show

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is that there are women and minorities who are moving

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>up into the pantheon of great investors. But let's be honest.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Today there are more white male uh people who are

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>considered great investors than women, right the wrong, and that

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>may change in time. And in part what I wanted

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to do is inspire people who are not white man

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>else to go into this business and see that you

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>can become Paul of Balin or Kim Liu or African

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>American that's in there, John Rodgers, who built the largest

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>African American investment firm in the country, Aerial Capital. Right,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we've talked with John him. Can I talk about crypto? Yes?

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>You can? Alright, I want to ask David about crypto because, um,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know in the alternative section, Mike nova Gradson, who's

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a name very familiar to our audience. Um, but also

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has you know, dabbled just in traditional finance

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>trad FI as it's known, and also in defy with

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to crypto. Um, your thoughts after interviewing

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>him for this book and about whether or not crypto

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>actually has staying power because he did make a lot

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of money and also recently lost a lot of money

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to crypto, Yes, well overall he's ahead. Um.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>He bought bitcoin when it was very very very uh cheap,

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and now while it's below more than half below its peak,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's still well above what he paid for it. So

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>he's still you know, as I think billions of dollars

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin and um, I think he's going okay. Um. Um.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>When I interviewed him, market was a little high for

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for for crypto, so I uh, you know, recognized the

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>markets to come down. But my own view on crypto

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and I don't own crypto currencies myself, like I have

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>invested in companies that service the industry because think the

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>industry is gonna be around for quite a while. The

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>people that buy crypto tend to be younger people. You

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see a lot of seventy and eighty year old

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>white men running out and buying cryptocurrencies. You tend to

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of twenty year old and thirty year

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>old people buying it, or even teenagers buying it. I

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>interviewed for my Bloomberg TV show the other day, Sam

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Bankman Free it was thirty years old worth at the

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>peak billion. I think it's down by more than half

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>now because cryptos come down. He built f t x,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the big trading platform for crypto, and his

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>view is my view as well, is that you tend

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to find uh investment trends started by younger people, and

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>crypto is one that younger people have started. And I

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think they like it in part because they can trade

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>it frequently, of course, but it has fluctuations which makes

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>them think they're gonna make money and they're willing to

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>take the risk about it going down. But also they

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the privacy associated with it. You don't dependent on nobody

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>else knows what you really own. The government can't take

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it away from you. I think a lot of wealthy

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>people around the world saw what happened to the Russian

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>oligarchs and they're saying, maybe I should put some of

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>my money and something that government doesn't know I have,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can't take it away. And there's no doubt some people

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to maybe avoid taxes and therefore they

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>don't report what they own. There's a lot of reasons

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna buy crypto, and I also think that

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people that are buying it to a large extent are

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be very libertarian in many ways. They

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be countered to the government, and they've lobbied Congress,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and I've had a lot of Uh, there are a

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of members of Congress who are Republicans who are

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to what they're saying, and I think it's unlikely

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a lot of over regulation from the

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Congress of the United States or over legislation on the

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry. Do you own crypto, David, I, I, you know,

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I own current I own companies or investments in companies

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that service the industry, like Packs those brothers. But I

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>haven't bought currencies myself, though in hindsight I wish I

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had in some respects. And and I tell people initially,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>if when you go to Las Vegas and you gamble,

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>if you're reasonably intelligent, no, you're gonna lose money, But

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you say I'm having a good time. I don't mind

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>gambling and losing money because I've allocated a small amount

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of money for it. And so if you can lose

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>one or two or three percent in Las Vegas, you

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>can allocate the same money amount of money to crypto.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you lose it, you know you've had the

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of owning it and talking about it and so forth.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you start putting fifty of your net worth

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in that could be more dangerous for sure. Well, David,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we really do always appreciate all the time that you

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>give us and so appreciate you. Also weighing in on

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the day's news, David Rubinstein How to Invest

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>his latest book, Masters on the Craft David of course,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>foundering co executive chairman of Carlisle Group, host of Bloomberg

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Wealth on Bloomberg TV. Great read and as he said,

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a diversity of voices within his book talking about

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>investment theories and ideas UH and what they have learned

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their craft, their investing craft,