WEBVTT - TeraWulf CEO on Sustainable BItcoin Mining and New Regulation

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm talking about bitcoin

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and crypto. One of the issues and one of the challenges.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it was an initially called out, notably by

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musko of Tesla, is the carbon footprint left by

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin mining. Our next guest thinks they have a solution.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Here Paul Prager, CEO and founder of Tera Wolf. They

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are based in Eastern East. I'm sorry Eastern Maryland. Uh, Paul,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Talk to us

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>about carbon neutral bitcoin mining. Is that even a real

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>thing at this point? Yeah, Hi Paul here, and thank

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you very much for having me on. Uh. Carols is

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all about zero carbon missions. We've got sixty tho miners

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>on order. It's two hundred megawatts. We have fifty megawatts

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>of minor capacity targeted for this year, three for next,

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and eight hundred and their pipe and and and we're

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>targeting zero carbon emissions. That's not sort of getting even

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutral, that's zero carbon emissions. Are energy resources are nuclear,

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>power and hydro. How do you do that though? How

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>do you get clean energy for bitcoin? So? Um so

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>nuclear doesn't emit any carbon, and hydro doesn't emit any carbon.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And I you know, the genesis of tera Wolf was

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>my company, bail Wolf. I've been in the energy infrastructure

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>business for almost thirty years. At its very core, at

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the very core, bitcoin mining is energy infrastructure. So it's

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the process of taking a locally produced commodity like electricity

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>from a sustainable resource hydro, nuke, turning it into a

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>globally traded commodity that stores value. So that's what we do.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We have a power purchase agreement on the nuclear power

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>facility in Pennsylvania, and we have a site infrastructure ready

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that will be online this year with hydropower coming to it.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, Paul, you know, right now, the Infrastructure Bill,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and here in the studio we're watching video of the

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Senators on the Center floor voting right now as we speak,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>would require miners like tera Wolf to report tax data

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>to the I R. S that I don't even think

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you even have access to. What would that requirement mean

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for miners like you and for the crypto industry more broadly. Yeah, listen,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>I generally would say legislation and regulation is a very

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the bitcoin industry, right. It just further

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>substantiates the legitimacy of bitcoin, So I think it's a winner.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And no matter what. Second of all, I believe that

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there will be several bytes at proper legislation, UH to

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we're given responsibility these for things we can

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>comply with. Um. I I know that they'll focus on

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the details as it goes into the house, but generally

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we like regulation. It's something again, I've been in the

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>power business for thirty years. We've lived with their entire life.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And when legislation does come, I think it's going to

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>come along the lines of what's the energy resource? You know.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it likely comes in the form of a

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax. I don't I don't think that legislation will

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be burdensome if you will, just because you're mining bitcoin

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>or holding bitcoin. Legislation and regulation in the US is

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing, but it's not the only player that's regulating

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space. I mean in China the government banning mining,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering how that affected your operations. I mean,

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I look at what China did as a crackdown as

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>opposed to responsible legislation. UM, I think it was. It

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>was listen net net it was. It was a great

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>result for us. We saw the hash rate come down,

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so we were able to get a bigger piece of

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the pie if you're an early mover in bitcoin mining.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Second of all, there was a shortage of miners um,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and and now they're readily available and there are better

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>prices and terms. So I think we were able to

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of get a more prominent uh position, and we're

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>able to sort of get a bigger piece of the

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>pie now, uh, being that we're ready to roll here

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to where the difficulty rate was much higher.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh just six months ago. Did you see an influx

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese miners after they faned mining. Yeah, there are many, uh,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, really good quality credit Chinese miners that are

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>looking to come to United States. UM. There are some

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>things though here that you have to think about. You

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>have to have a site, you have to have uh

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it permitted properly, you have to have transformers, so you

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>could step down the power. So I think again where

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Tara Wolf is advantages. We have these sites, we have

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the electricity contracted for, we have the transformers, and the

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sites are shovel ready, and so there's a there's a

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>significant first mover advantage. But yeah, I think Chinese miners

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>very much trying to come here, and I think that's

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>good for bitcoin. Right, you're decentralizing, uh, a lot of

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese migration to the United States, and um, I think

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that's all a win for bitcoin. Obviously, a lot of

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this does come down at the end of the day

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to concerns about the environmental impact. And there's a lot

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of conversation when we talk about investing and you know,

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>treating our money with the environment and mine and kind

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of these e s G issues. There's a question of greenwashing.

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you convince people that what you're doing a

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Tara Wolf is not that well, you know, again, we

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are about zero carbon emission, so there's a big difference

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>between what we do, for instance, and another mining company that,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say uses a thermal resource and tries to get

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the carbon neutrality by buying carbon credits. We don't have

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions, so it's not an issue for us. And

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe that the industry in general is very responsible

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and they disclose where their energy resources are coming from,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that ultimately investors will pick and

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>choose based on what their approaches. I think that the

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>other way that will be, you know, a big factor

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to be in value. Again, we think that

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>legislation to the bitcoin mining industry will come more likely

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in the form of a carbon tax, So that will

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>drive the cost on the margins for miners that are

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>emitting carbon to a higher level than they will for instance,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>for Tera Wolf. So I think at the end of

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the day, that's where the rubber will hit the road

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and people will see the difference in the value opportunity.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul on June of this year, teara Wolf, I guess

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you merged with Iconics a spack. Give us an update

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on that transaction and kind of where you are on that. Sure, Yeah,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we did a reverse combination. It's not a speck. In fact,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a reverse merger where we merge into a currently

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>listed company called Iconics icon x uh and we've filed

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>our S four proxy last week. We await you know,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>all the customary approvals as you see everybody that needs

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to chop on it. And hopefully, uh sometime late in

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter early fourth quarter, we'll be trading on

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 1>the Nastack under the ticker w U l F. Wolf

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>very excited about. It's a great transaction. Iconics was a

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>great company, really clean balance sheet, and so it made

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. And do you view now as

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a friendly time to come to the public markets? Absolutely,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are there are several comps out there,

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so that that's a positive thing in terms of helping

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>people sort of take a look at at at the

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>industry and get a handle on value. I also think

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that if you take a look at what what what's

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in the infrastructure bill today, legislation means that bitcoin is

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. It's part of the ecosystem. It's an

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>important part of it. It's an important generator revenue and

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a store of value. So absolutely couldn't be a better

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>time for us. Well, you mentioned that infrastructure bill, Paul,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and we just had the headline crossing the terminal that

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fifty billion dollar bipartisan infrastructure bill has

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>passed the U. S Senate. We understand that a Vice

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>President Kamala Harris will gabble that vote, but again, that

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>measure has passed. This is the first part of President

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden's long term economic spending plans, Paul. But it has

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>passed that hurdle. Yeah, absolutely, and that's obviously important, and

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>now we will go onto the other bigger, broader spending plan.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Paul Pregor, thanks so much for joining us to really

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate hearing that story. Paul Igor, CEO and founder of

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Tariff based in eastern Maryland. And again, as Kayleie was

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>just reporting, the Senate has passed the infrastructure pack. The Senate,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>as we said, is voting as we speak on this

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>UH infrastructure bill, and one of the hold ups was

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency and taxation of cryptocurrency. I did not see that coming.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about maybe they're talking about a road

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>or a bridge that needed to be included or excluded,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but no, it was crypto. UM, let's get some color

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. We welcome Meltem Demure's chief strategy officer for

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>coin Shares Group. They have about five billion dollars in

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>assets under management. Meltem, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell us about what is or is

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not in this legislation as it relates to cryptocurrencies. Yeah,

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be here, and thanks so much for

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>having me. Look, if there's anything we've learned over the

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>last five days, it's that lawmaking in the United States

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is a very complicated process that many of us, as

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, don't really understand so well. Um, I

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's maybe an understatement. So here's basically what happened. Um.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Within the Infrastructure Bill, there were certain provisions that sought

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to raise tax revenue, and one of those provisions was

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>clearer definition around what types of entities in the cryptocurrency

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>space would be required to provide tax reporting in the

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>form of TON ninety nine and those other documents that

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>your broker would typically send you at the end of

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. And one of the key issues was was

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the initial language and the proposed Infrastructure Bill, the

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>definition of what constituted a broker was really really broad,

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>so that it would include cryptocurrency developers, software developers, bitcoin miners,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people operating nodes in different open blockchain network and basically

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the language was really unworkable, and so we saw flew

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>of amendments that came out in the three days that followed,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>including an amendment um sponsored by Senator to Me, one

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by Senator Apartment, and another by Senator Cruise. None

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of those amendments were voted on the infrastructure bill passed

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as is. But certainly know that the House will be

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>taking up this cause. And we don't think this issue

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is by any means over us as it stands. So

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what does it actually mean for the crypto market and

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto investors if it does indeed happen as it stands? Yeah,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think again. Um, the impact of this this bill

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it would impose a lot of reporting obligations

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on entities that aren't really reporting entities. A lot of

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>activity in the crypto space is done through regulated platforms

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that are registered as brokers. You might know names like

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>claim base or krack in or Gemini, all of whom

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are exchanges that operate here in the United States, and

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they're already providing tax reporting documents to their users. But

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>under this new language, their entities like software developers who

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>might develop an open source piece of software that's used

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>by anonymous people on the Internet that would not be

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>responsible for reporting. And again those individuals are not going

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to have any idea who's downloaded their software and how

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they're using it. That's the whole point of pure to

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>pure open source software, because I think once of the

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge is really the way that the law has written

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and the way that this technology actually works. They're really

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally incompatible. And we continue to see this on the

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>regulatory front. This is a new type of technology, and

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think lawmakers in DC are really struggling to understand

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>how it fits into the existing regulatory frameworks that we

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have so maltime. I know you've spent time in Washington,

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>d C. Talking crypto to the folks down there, and

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I registered just today about how this whole five days

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe have illustrated the fact that the crypto industry really

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to up their lobbying game. What are your thoughts there? Yeah, absolutely, Look,

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.599
<v Speaker 1>a number of firms have been in Washington, D C.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Over the last seven years that I've been working in

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this industry, and seven years doesn't feel like a lot,

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but for the crypto industry, you know, it feels like

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like a lifetime. Certainly, I think at the end of

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>the day, there's sort of this fundamental misperception even in Washington, DC,

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that crypto is not regulated, which is simply false. There's

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>an alphabet stoop of agencies from the SEC, to the CFCC,

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to the i r S to the CFPD who oversee crypto,

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>who have issued guidance and continue to issue guidance. So

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>I think what's really needed is more education and advocacy.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But also I think what we're starting to see fifteen

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans own some type of cryptocurrency. This is

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming an important voter issue and in the next election cycle,

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you better believe that there are a number of Americans

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>who are really motivated and want to see a crypto

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>policy platform from their elected officials. So I believe in

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>future cycles, not only will we see more lobbying, more

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>advocacy from the crypto industry in DC, but on the

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>flip side, will also see more representatives more or less

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the officials recognizing that in order to get elected, an

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>important part of their platform will need to be progressive

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>policy when it comes to not just cryptocurrencies themselves, but

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology and that critical digital infrastructure for America. But regulation.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, Melton doesn't just come

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from Capitol Hill and from legislators. We also have you know,

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the Gensler SEC, and on that front, or you hopeful

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at all that we'll see a bitcoin e t F. UM. Look,

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that bitcoin ets this is something we're an

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>asset manager. We don't have any products in the US market.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We love to have a product in the US market,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but thus far, the regulatory regime here has simply not

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed for a publicly listed e t F for e

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>TP that tracks the underlying prices bitcoin to exist in

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this market. We are optimistic that in the next three

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to five years we will see more structured products in

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the US market, but we're not optimistic that it will

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>happen in the near term. Again, I think there's still

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty, and we have to date no

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>less than thirteen et F applications that have been filed

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and the number of mutual fund applications that are in process.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Will continue to see more filings, more applications, But I

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>think UM Chairman Gunsler of the SEC made it perfectly

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>clear that his administrations certainly does not a plan to

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>prove any et F or any such product construction in

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the near term. So I think for us, you know,

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the outlook we have is sometime in the next nine

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to twelve months might be possible, but more realistically we're

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at two at the earliest. All Right, Malton, thank

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We always appreciate getting

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts in perspective. Melton Demure's chief strategy officer for

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>coin Shares based in London, and that et F question

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is really on top of people's minds, Kaylee. And as

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Melton mentioned, um Mr Gensler of the SEC kind of

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he's I think he's positive towards this, but let's take

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>our time. It seems like he just kind of keeps

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>punting it and punting it. Maybe a future is bitcoin ETF,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin futures ETF. Right, he kind of gave those hands,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but still we wait. Paul a lot, you have a

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of demands, certainly for an e t F for bitcoin.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Will follow up on that story. This is Bloomberg. Let's

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>bring on right now. Jack Tran, CEO of James Hardy

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Industries based in Chicago. Dr Tron, thanks so much for

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Uh give us just remind us and

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>remind our listeners what James Hardy Industries does within the

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>housing market. Right, So, good morning, Paul, thank you for

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>inviting me back. James Hardy. We we are the company

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that transformed the way the world built by delivering more

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>athetically beautiful, safe, and more sustainable building products that really

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>grace the exteriors of homes across UM, the US, UM, Europe,

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and Asia Pacific. And we're we're about three plus building

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>down company UM that is quite profitable and it's growing. Uh. So,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously you have a pretty uniqu vantage point here into

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the housing market in the dynamics within it, given how

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>high home prices are, how quickly houses are going off

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the market. Are people now just looking more to renovate

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the homes they're currently in than trying to buy a

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>new one, um, Kaylee, that is a very good insight.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>That is correct because if we look at the new

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>home construction in the US today, uh, it is not

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>enough home built to meet the very big growing demand

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because we do have a very big group of millennials

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>now really sought to to go into housing markets with

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>grown family and also at the same time, we have

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks now that stay at home. The

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Wolf from Home and said they would like to do

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more renovation. But with with the rising prices.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>What that means is that a lot of homeowners want

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to look at how they can renovate their homes um

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time enhance the value of their home.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So we do see a lot of activities that deal

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 1>with the outdoor, how to improve the exterior of their homes,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>how to make their outdoor living space a lot more

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>pleasant and yet at the same time enhance the value

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the home. All right, we just want to update our

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>listeners on the vote ongoing on Capitol Hill and that

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>five fifty billion dollar bi partisan infrastructure package. That vote

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is still ongoing, but we understand that the Senate does

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>have the votes to pass that by partisan infrastructure plans.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So we will continue to bring you up to date.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But it does look like Paul, that measure is going

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to pass. Yes, that's coming in on schedule, So have

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>more of that coming up. Dr Trong. I mean, as

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at going out here, I mean,

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about housing demand, just broadly speaking,

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>over the next several quarters, whether it's renovation, new construction,

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>what's your market outlook? I'll walk it outlook, and it's

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>very robust and very wrong. Um. And what we see

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is the renovation market will continue to grow because a

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lot more homeowners would like to renovate their homes. UM.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>So we do see that means can be grown quite nicely.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>UH and certainly in new construction UH there is also

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a strong demand. But that is that sector a litmited

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>more limited with the lack of skill, labor, and then

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree lack of materials certain materials. Yeah,

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we talk a lot about supply chain

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>constraints in the higher input costs that have resulted from that.

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Are you charging more for your products? We're We're not

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>charging more as much of we are offering more about

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>differentiated products. For example, we uh in in the Hardy

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>brand exterior product to going to outside of the root

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>protected homes of h of the of the house, and

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what we offer is of the Hardy brand products that

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>have already been pre finished in our factory with paints

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and that would allow the homeowners to have different design

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in their homes and be able to uh to really

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>protect their homes with very durable products aesthetically flees in

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>product and also enhance the value of their home. UM.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And that type of material is actually a lot more

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>easy to in install and and fast to install. So

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially would provide the alternative to the homeowners relative to

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>bricks or stuck call um that's more expensive and also

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>slower to bill. So we we offer the alternative to

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to those solutions. So we saw in you know, a

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a folks just kind of leaving urban centers,

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>leaving the city, is going for the bourbs looking for

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>more space. Is this a trend that you think is

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>going to continue and we'll see that in construction trends

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>or do you expect people to kind of come back

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if you will, to some of those urban centers. Um,

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we we do see a lot of trend moving out

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>into the burbs. But also lately, I would say the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>past a few months that we do see some certain

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>migration back into the cities is because of the affordability

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of certain homes out in the burbs. So it's quite

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>move moving back and forth through It depends on the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>available ability of homes because there's certainly there's a lot

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>more demand right now than the supply. Yeah. Where there

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>also has a lot of demand is for workers. We

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>saw with the jolt stata here in the US yesterday

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there's something like more than ten million jobs that are open,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>more than there are in fact of people unemployed here

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US. I know you have over forty dred

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>employees globally. I'm wondering how many openings you have and

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're struggling to fill them. UM. It's certainly it

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is an area that that that that we also experience

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>in the shortage of labor, and certainly in markets in

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast that we do, we experience a higher

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>shortage of labor in in our facilities. UH. And you know,

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really about come coming down to having to write

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>uh the value propriation for working at James Hardy. And

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it is some something that we work very closely with

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>local communities to do really tell the story to be

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>able to attract the right candidates into our workforce. But

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly that is UH that has been in uh in

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>an issue that persistence throughout the whole summer for us

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. All Right, so I see your stock all

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>time high. Just real quickly, how are your earnings? We

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we just reported our earnings and yesterday and it is

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we're very pleased with the results. Globally, our net sales

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>increase by thirty five percent and our net income increased

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>by and what's very pleased and here is that all

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>three regions that we operated in North America, Europe, Asia

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Pacific all had double digit growth in both the top

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>line and bottom line. And it's really a testament to

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not only the growing market that we operate in, but

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 1>also at the same time we're able to take share

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace and deliver more values to the homeowners

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>across the world. All Right, Dr Jack Tron, thank you

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>so much. We appreciated CEO of James Hardy Industries of

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>strong results of just recently in the stock hitting an

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all time high and the growth of the housing market. Kay,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>we've got some wage inflation on Law Street. I think

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been reading stories really over the last month or

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so about you know, these new investment bankers coming in

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and you gotta pay him some more money and all

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff. But Mary Baker, she's a financial

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg. She joins us here on a Bloomberg

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker story studio. She's got that story out today,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>which is really interesting. JP Morgan boost pay for more

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>staff and not just the investment bankers, but other folks

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Mary, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>So who else is getting pay bumps here on Wall Street? Well?

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Last yesterday, sorry, um, Jeffries Group also announced that they

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>were going to match Goldman Sachs, which announced last week

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that it would be paying its junior investment banking analysts

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten thousands. So basically all summer um, the

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>banks have been raising pay to a hundred thousand. But

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Goldman's text was kind of sitting around for a little

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>while waiting, and the recruiters and pay control and I've

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>been talking to said that they did that purposely and

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of waited to come. They wanted to one up everybody. Yeah,

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>one up everyone. But now Jeffrey's Group is matching them,

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So that came out yesterday as well. But a lot

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these that we've been seeing have been

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>for the junior bankers, the lowest people on the totem pole.

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>What with JP Morgan, it's now expanding beyond that, right, Yeah,

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So basically JP Morgan announced earlier this summer that they

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>would be paying their junior investment banking analysts more, but

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>now they're expanding it out to other analysts within their

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate investment banking division. So that's going to include sales,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>trading and research analysts. It's all under the same division,

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's beyond just investment banking analysts now. So it

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're trying to attract more analysts, which means

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they're probably really busy this summer, which is what we've

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>been seeing in terms of revenue. Yeah. So you know,

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>when I worked on Wall Street, it was you know,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously it was all about compensation. You started thinking about

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>your bonus probably you know midyear, if the summer you

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>started really started jockeying and starting to you know, pitch

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and everything. Um. But now more of the compensations is

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in salary versus bonus. So these pay increases are these

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are salary increases are really important. They are really important.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think analysts that any analysts are in the job

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>market right now are looking at what the base pay

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>will be and all summer long. I mean from what

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>we're we've been hearing and our reporting is that Goldman

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Tax was saying we don't really need the razor base pay.

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>But now they've they've come in line. I think they

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>realize that anyone that's looking to go out and get

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a job as an analysis investment analysts wants to see

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>their base pay at least a hundred thousand. They wanted

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to match what where the other banks are coming in.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>But we do think the bonuses are still going to

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be big this year. Yeah, the banks have a lot

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of money coming in. I would bet that the guys

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at the top are getting paid a pretty a pretty

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>nice sum as well. How does this tale into the

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>work from home equation? Because you're paying people more, does

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that mean I'm gonna want you back in the office.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to pay you more if you're gonna

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be sitting at home and not commuting in Well, I

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think the banks, each bank has a different return to

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>work policy going on right now. I mean, we know

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sax and JP Morgan want they're people back in

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the office. We know that helps with camaraderie, um. But

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we do think that the bank, sorry, the pay raises

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are in part to help keep the anilysts that are

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>part working from home. It has been hard working from

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>home from them, they've I mean, in March Goldman Sax

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Anilysts put out presentation outlining just how hard it's Been's

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of what started this whole thing, really, right, Yes,

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean when I was in the same group of

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>these kids working weeks, and it was hard. That's a

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>lot um, but you had the camaraderie of literally being

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in a room like this where all the analysts were

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in a bullpen, that's what we called the bullpen, and

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>y'all could lean on each other and you all could

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>go after drinks afterwards. That likely. But boy, if you're

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>stuck at home by yourself, that would be tough. So

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're trying to, you know, say hey, we

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>recognize what you guys are going through, and we want

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to help out. And one of the ways

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we can do it is pay more money. I guess

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's part of it. And then they want

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep the analysts that they have on. I mean,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we know that there's been a lot of churn going

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>on within their analysts ranks, so analysts are looking to

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>jump out of the banks sooner than when their two

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>year analyst programs are up, so they're looking to go

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>buy side. I've been hearing that a lot of investment

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>banking analysts that go into the banks go in just

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>specifically to stand for two years and get out and

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>go buy side. As fast as they can. They want

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to go to private equity for as they want to

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>go to hedge funds. They see that work is more fulfilling,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>more fun, kind of more like skin in the game.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's so from all the reporting and all the

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>people you've been talking to, do you have any reason

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to believe this kind of race to the top in

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the talent competition is going to cool down anytime? Sooner?

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to keep talking about these stories of

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>banks paying people more. I don't think it's going to

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>cool down anytime soon. It seems like it's just ramping

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>up more and more and more. Are they finding hearing?

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Are they finding competition offers like the tech industry, Because

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>when I came out of business school there really it

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was either you go to consulting, you go to investment banking.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But now technology and like the Amazon's the Apple, I

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a big threat too. I mean, not only

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>are analysts leaving the banks to go to the by

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>side firms, but they're also going in tech. They're going

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to startups any any place that who can pay them

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just as much but maybe offer them a bit of

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a better work life balance. I was going to say,

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those tech companies have, you know, the

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>massive campuses out on the West Coast and all of

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the benefits working from home. It seems as more lenient

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of those kind of Silicon Valley players

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>than it is for banks on Wall Street. Paul, Yeah, exactly.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's gonna be a big issue. And

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that from you know, the business schools. They

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be uh, you know, they have to you know,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>get their people ready to go out to the West

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Coast and technology. Hey, Mary, thanks so much for joining us.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate a great story. Mary Bakert, finance reporter

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg, joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>studio and Kaylee, it's a it's interesting, I think, is

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>your question. Are they're going to keep raising this this

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>these salaries. I think I'll be interesting to see when

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they people do come back to work and and and

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>what that means for the work environment, because that's so

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>important for you know a lot of these uh investment

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>banks that do work long, long hours. Yeah, totally. And

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>then when in terms of doing deals, are you going

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to be getting back on airplanes having more of that

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of grueling travel schedule. It's not just about return

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to the office, it's about return to the general deal

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>making environment, because obviously that has been very different over

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the last year and change. Thanks for listening to the

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform and you prefer.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller N

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>seventy three, and I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.