WEBVTT - Red Sox MLB Trade Deadline Heating Up!

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Boss the territory. Ladies and gentlemen. There's no

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>game here tonight. It's the day off. So you're probably thinking, Robbie,

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing when we got some news to

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about. We've got some rumors, got some trade deadline juiciness,

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>some trade deadline gossip to bite into. I'm excited, you're excited,

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We're all excited. You know why. You know what feels

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>good about right now is that we get to talk

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>about being buyers at the deadline. Who would have thought

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this a few weeks ago. Oh man, I'm all revved up.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about it. We got a big story here today,

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Zach Netto of the Angels. Could he be a possibility?

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>We got an article from Cam Rosenthal. We're gonna dive

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>into that. We also got a little something from Mark

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>find Son of MLB dot Com. We'll talk about that

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as well here in tonight's episode. We're gonna make it

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick one here. I know you're all enjoying your

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Thursday evening wherever you may be. We'll go over those

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and we'll hang out with the chat at the end

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the show. So if anyone does have a question

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, feel free to super chats are open if

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to drop one in. I'll pay attention to

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the chat as best as I can. But let's get

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to it here, ladies and gentlemen, let's get to it.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>If you are just finding us for the first time,

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>think about subscribing. This is where you're gonna want to

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>be leading up to the trade deadline. I love talking traits,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I love talking all the rumors, I love talking all

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. So absolutely subscribe and get on board. And

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're drawing closer to eight thousand subscribers. We are within

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>two hundred subs of getting there. So with that said,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. Let's not waste any more time.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We got a little something from Kem Rosenthal. The Red

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Sox view Angels shortstop zach Netto as a strong fit.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And listen, there's been no sea could hear about the

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>possibility of zach Netto as a Boston Red Sox. I've

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>been on the record multiple times saying I think he's

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>a great fit multiple times. Now you go this this started,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say a couple of months ago. Remember when

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we had that time where oh man, the Red Sox

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are looking for a right handed bat even Mike Shrout

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>was popping up in the news. Mike freaking Shrout, Well,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't gonna happen, but that's what we all started saying. Well, hey,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>right handed bat, you know, have some injuries in the

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>middle infield. The Angels, they're at organization that's just never

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>really going anywhere. Why not someone like zach Netto, who's

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>got a few years of control, not even twenty six

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>years old. Yet he's shown some pretty good things in

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of years of his major league career.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>A guy that has pop, has speed, Yeah, you get Well,

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about the deficiencies in just a little bit,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of talent with zach Netto. Over

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, he's averaged right around like

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a three and a half Fangraft wins above replacement. That's

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a solid player, just for comparison's sake. Last year, Trevor Story,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>who was finally healthy, finally productive, he was a three

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>f war player last year. Zach Netto, he's been around

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a three and a half in his early twenties. Unfortunately,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>he's just been with a bad Angels organization and uh so, yeah,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't tend to hear a whole lot about him,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 1>But he is I would say, one of the better

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>shortstops in Major League Baseball. Now taking a look at

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the article here. Now also another thing too, I forgot

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to mention as well. The reason he was coming up

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is because he was a guy that popped up last

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>offseason as a possibility for the Red Sox, Craig Breslow

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>making a couple of phone calls. It never materialized, and

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>its said that here. The Red Sox, after expressing interest

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in La Angels shortstop last offseason, continue to view him

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 1>as a strong according to people briefed on their discussions,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but granted a nomine I can't even say that they're

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>anonymous to speak freely, I can never say that word.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The talks between the Red Sox and Angels regarding Nedo

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>last winner did not progress to the point of exchanging names.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Jehan Mazelak has since taken over as interim general manager

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Angels, replacing Perrymanajian. Now, it goes on to

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>say here it is not clear how willing the team

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>would be to trade Neto, who was earning four point

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one to five million this season and under club control

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for three additional years. So you know, before we get

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>into the idea of Netto being a good fit for

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox, let's talk about the Angels here for

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a second. With the Angels, obviously, you know we've seen

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>everything that's been going on over there. But Perrymanajian just

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>let go not too long ago, John Mozzaylok, who was

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the longtime leader of the car Dal's front office, that's

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a guy that he has been within the game of

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>baseball for a very long time. If there is a

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>guy that can convince Arty Moreno to finally go through

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a rebuild, I would say, out of anyone there right now,

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>John moze Lock easily anyone over the last few years

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>or so several years, John mose Loc, I would say,

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is the guy that can finally convince Arty Moreno. Hey, listen,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I know you want to sell the experience. I know

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to sell the tickets. I know you want

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to have the family friendly atmosphere. But you know what,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>people are starting to get a little sick and tired here.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>They want to win ball games. Yes, let's still keep

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that experience. We'll keep guys like trout Right, that's the

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>guy that's gonna put butts in the seats. He's a

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>future Hall of Famer. But we got to start getting

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this organization on the right track because how many times

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>over the years, I mean, you need to make one

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>postseason with Otani and Shrout Trout, what was it twenty

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>fourteen the last time they made the postseason. You've pretty

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>much wasted all of these years of Mike Trout. You

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>got to start figuring things out within the organization. It's

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a lot of work there. But right now,

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 1>with the guys that they have, these talented players like Netto,

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like Greed, Deptmers like Jose Soriano, a couple others as well,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Joe Adell last year thirty eight home runs, thirty seven

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was. They're not winning games. So it's like, yes,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you can make this argument to keep Nedo, you can

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>make the argument to keep Deptmers in Soriano. Yeah, they're

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>good players. If you want to actually win games, keep

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your good players. Well, the problem is is you have

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to build a good team around those guys. Right, Yes,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you have your top guys, but you have no support.

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>The Angels they should go back to the point where

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they got to start building from the ground up. Again,

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to build from the top down. You can't

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>put the roof before the foundation. That's what the Angels

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have been trying to do and it's not working. So

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>they got to Everyone knows it, but Artie Moreno, He's like, no,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to have a competitive team on the field,

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, let's try it. Well, let's figure this out.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And they've been trying to figure it out and it

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>has it worked so in my opinion. And this isn't

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>me trying to be like, oh, I just want them

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to trade Neto to the Red Sox. No as someone

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that wants the Angel because listen, I respect the Angels

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>from back in the day. We ran into the Angels

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times in the postseasons, you know, I

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>mean just saying I remember those Angels teams. They were

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch. They were good teams. I mean, goodness,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what was it two thousand and two thousand and nine,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they knocked the Red Sox out in the division round,

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if I remember correctly. I want the Angels to get

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>back to a good place, right. You know, Angels fans

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are very dedicated. They're good loyal fans. You know, they

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>deserve a winning team. I think they need to start

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>going in the right direction. And Netto with what he

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can bring back. I think that's a very good start

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Angels. And then you look into moving debtvers

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in Soriatto, you'll be able to get a lot back

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for those kind of guys. You look at what these

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>teams have done, like look at the White Sox, Look

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at the White Sox over the last few years. Look

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at the moves they've made, and look at where they are.

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>That should be the blueprint for the Angels. Start moving

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>your top guys and get back good talent to get

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you on the right track. Start hiring people within the

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>organization that are gonna help you get there. You know,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they need to start here though. I've been saying this

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for years, and we might maybe maybe be finally getting

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to that point. So we'll see. Now for the Red

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Sox and Neto, I think it's a great fit. I

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very good fit. Now, there are some

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>deficiencies with Netto. Let me pull up the stack cast page.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So I was all over Twitter here today. I was

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>looking around, poking around. I was seeing what people were

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>having to say. I was seeing positives I was seeing

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>negatives and for me, I'm yeah, listen, no player is

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>perfect at the end of the day. Well, I guess

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess you could say Otani pretty much.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, ever, guys, even like Otani,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>they are gonna have their flaws. Netto has definitely had

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>some flaws. Now, as you can see here, we do

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>see quite a lot of blues. He is barreling up

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball quite a bit this year. He is walking

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a good amount as well, but there has been a dip.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>The bat of ball profile has dipped since last year.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You go back to twenty twenty four. Actually he went

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>up last year, but then there's been a deficiency this

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>year with the bat ball metrics going back down a

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit. However, he has still been able to figure out.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Even with the batted ball going down a little bit,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he's still got nineteen home runs on the year. That

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>ranks near the top when it comes to shortstops in

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball the ops at seven seventy two. That's

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid for the most part. Now for the Red Sox,

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>here's why I think the Red Sox view him as

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy that would be a good candidate to a

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>good player within their organization, because well, what are the

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox been good at developing over the years more

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>bat at ball, right, so being able to increase that

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>exit velo a little bit. Yeah, they've changed the approach

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, but they've shown time and time again you

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>know they can get more out of these guys, right,

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at Wilson Contreres having the best

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>season of his career. That's just one example they probably

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, I feel like those guys over there

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like, oh, they could make a couple of tweaks

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with Netto and they can get him straightened out a

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit, get him more towards that twenty twenty five season,

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even further than that. Again, he's only twenty five,

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, there are some things that he's got to

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>do to start hitting the ball harder more consistently. But

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>then you look at the discipline, this is something he

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>could probably work on a little bit. Right. There is

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of strong There is a lot of swing

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and miss here. There are a lot of strikeouts. Over

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of the time he's swinging and missing, he's

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>chasing out of the zone. He's not squaring up, so yeah,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>those are things that I think you're gonna have to

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>get cleaned up a little bit. But with the Red Sox,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, with how they've been able to go about

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>things this year offensively, they've gone you know, yeah, they're

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>still getting a little bit of well, at least over

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the last month or so, they're getting a bit more

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>power from well. Wilson's been good all year, but you know,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see some more a few more home

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>runs over the last month or so. But with the

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox have been very good at over the last

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>month or so. Is getting the bat on the ball,

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>making more contact, striking out less. So I am confident

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that if they bring netto in find a way to

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>do it, that they could get him on a bit

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of a better track. I feel like, I feel strongly

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. But also too, he's still young. He's twenty five,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>turning twenty six soon. You know, there's a lot more

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>room to grow there. I wouldn't be surprised at all

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if they were able to get him right now. Defensively,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a different conversation as well. He has a

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>very good arm, so there's a plus, but the range

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has not been very good. I look at that profile

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>and it screams third base to me. But obviously you

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>got Caleb Durbin at third base right now, So yeah,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he's great there. So, yeah, you do worry about that

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>defense a little bit over its short I don't know.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a conversation, you know, does he end

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>up staying at shortstop in his career? Does he move

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>over to third or second base at some point? I

0:12:54.800 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. When it comes to Neto and his field,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking a little deeper. Defensive run saved wise,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been better. He has that athleticism to make up

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for the inconsistencies. As you can see last year he

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>had thirteen defensive runs saved. He's got two this year.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the range, it's inconsistent. He's definitely been goofing

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. Could you know, the infield coaches

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 1>there with the Red Sox, you know, maybe could they

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>find a way to make a couple of tweaks defensively,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe get a little bit better there. I don't know,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Fielding wise, that is a bit of a concern in

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, especially at a position like short So yeah,

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely a conversation, of course, And then you also

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think about too, if you did bring in Netto, you know,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and stories coming back eventually. I mean, let's say this hypothetically.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's say they figure it out, they can get a

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>deal done. How do you make that work? You know?

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So like, would Netto play short? Would story go back

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to short? You know, I got a couple of different

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>arguments here. One story is the veteran, so he goes

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>back to short. Netto's the new guy in town, so

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he moves over to second base. Okay, that's pretty simple. However,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>with story coming off the hernia, could you make the

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>argument maybe it would be better for him to move

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>over to second base. You need some range over there too,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's not as demanding of a position as short.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So because of him coming off the hernia, maybe second

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>base would be better. What is going on in the chat? Oh?

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Not a good time to be uh for some breaking news? Well,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's always a good time for breaking news.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second. What have we got here? I

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have some breaking news in the chat. Ladies and gente

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>noaks trade. But hold on a second. Speaking of shortstops, Oh, they.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Finally did it. They finally did it. There it is

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Franklinarius is getting to call the Worcester ladies and gentlemen.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Franklinarius going up to Worcester. It is about freaking time.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's been twenty five minutes. Well all right, well

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's breaking news for me. Sorry, I'm talking zach netto

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>over here. I had a planned show with me. When

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the live shows, I do try to

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to the chat as much as possible. When

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I got a planned outline, I tend not to look

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at the chat too much in the beginning. But I'm

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>glad you guys got my attention. Thank you for the effort.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Franklinarius going to the going to the WU socks. Uh

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>needed to happen. It was absolutely needed to happen. It

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was a you know, I'm always gonna be the guy,

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't rush guys right, Let him get their seasoning,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>let them do what they gotta do. But holy cow,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Arius has been He has been killing it this year.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the numbers with Arius, he's hitting three nineteen

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>at double A this year over seventy four games, seventy

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>four games good amount, hitting three nineteen with the four

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>h seven on base five eighty one of the slugging

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen home runs. Arius is projecting to be a very

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>good player. And listen, ladies and gentlemen, this is a

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>very ear like that. The comparison to Zander Bogart's timeline wise,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's eerie because I believe Bogart's played around the

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>same amount of games before he got to Triple A.

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I might be wrong about that. Hold, let me pull

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that up at double A back in twenty twelve or

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in twenty thirteen. Sorry, okay, he played fifty six games, Okay,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So Arius was there a little bit longer. I do remember,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 1>if I recall, there was a I think Arius had

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>been taken out of a game at some point. I

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that came into play a little bit. I

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like we never got like a concrete answer with that.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>People were speculating that maybe it was, you know, like

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a like a disciplinary kind of a thing. I don't

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>know anyway, I wonder if whatever that was had anything

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. However, he's been performing. He's been great.

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So Xander, he played fifty six games back in twenty thirteen.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Arius played about twenty more. So, but uh yeah, Arius

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely the real deal. He had always been great

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>with the contact skills. The bat to ball was off

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the charts, a guy that never really he kept the

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts down so much, but also showed a good amount

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of a good amount of plate discipline too. This year though,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he's walking fourteen percent of the time eleven percent of

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the time while also increasing his power. Good bat to ball,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>good plate discipline. But the power was something you wondered

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>about with him, and they said, all right, hey, we

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>got to get you in the weight room. We got

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to get that power going a little bit more. We

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>got to get some pop going a little bit more.

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And he's already up to eighteen home runs. I believe

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he just had a home run today or yesterday. And

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you know, you could say, oh, you know,

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>should he have been called up there sooner? You know,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago. Listen, I am okay with not

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian guys. I'm really okay with it. And in the

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in the long run, that could end up being the

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>best thing. We'll see how he does a triple A.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, all eyes are gonna be on him

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>over the next month or so. Remember Peyton Toley. All

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>eyes are on Peyton Toley. Last year when is he

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get the call? And then eventually he ended

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up helping out the Red Sox over the final month,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>final month and a half or so. Arius, I wonder

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if he's a guy that could end up coming up

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at some point. And you know, I also wonder too,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, since we're talking about netto here, is it possible?

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I listen, I'm not saying to make Arius

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the starting shortstop by any means, but you know you

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can't but wonder, because you have so much depth within

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this organization, you kind of just wonder if that comes

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>into play just a little bit. I will say, I

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you see a situation hypothet speaking of course,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we're obviously nothing is concrete by any means, We're not

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>even close. But let's say they found a way to

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>bring a netto story. What you know, how does he

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>look after the hernia? Could netto actually be some some

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>good insurance here because you don't know what story's gonna

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>look like. Obviously the performance was horrid, and yeah, you know,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>that injury definitely could have been coming into play. I

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even say could, probably was most likely coming into play.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>With that he's trying to play through it. But could

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>bringing a guy like Netto in be some good insurance

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>here in case Story isn't performing. Let's say you bring

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a Netto and you know, Story comes back. Whatever. Let's

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>just say, you know, Stories at short, Netto's at second

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>however you did it, Story's not hitting. Arius is hitting

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>well down at Triple A. Could you see a bit

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of a scenario where if that happens, Arius is hitting,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you give him a call, kind of like with Bogarts

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty thirteen, and then Bogarts ended up taking, you know,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the starting job in the postseason by the Horns. You know,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is there a bit of a similar situation possibly there maybe,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I think Neto would be good insurance

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in the end. And let's say it does happen that way,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Story has another year on his contract, Well, you kind

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of figure that out in the off season, right, you know,

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if Arius ends up coming up and there's a lot

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of i's here, by the way, a lot of ives,

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>big ifs, just having fun. Yeah, you know, if that

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>situation plays out, then you figure something out with Story

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in the off season, you know, and then who knows,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you end up having maybe a middle infield of Netto

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and Arius for the next few years. So you figure

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it out. I see you in the chat seven Moonbeam.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Netto is not good defensively, yeah, I mean there's definitely

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>some deficiencies there, has a very good arm and he's

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 1>very athletic out there, so he's able to make up

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of mistakes. But yeah, you do need

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to see some improvement. But I still think at the

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, you can nitpick all these little

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>thing well, defense isn't a little thing, but you can

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>nitpick right, and you can find deficiencies, you can find flaws.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, though, zach Netto has

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>been a three and a half wins above replacement player

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years, even with not so

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>great defense. He's on pace this year to be again

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:51.239
<v Speaker 1>a three wins above replacement player on fangrafts. So at

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, yeah, you can say all

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the defense isn't good, he strikes out too much. Well, hey,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>he's still overall, he's still a productive player. So and

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I completely left out one thing. Let's talk about this,

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>getting back to the bat of zach Netto. I forgot

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to mention this. I mean, you think about how productive

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he's been with the Angels. Well, imagine how productive he

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>could be at Femway Park. Look at that pole air

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>percentage this year almost at thirty percent. He's near the

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>top when it comes to his poll air percentage twenty

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>four percent last year. The Green Monster already sounds like

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his best friend. He would fit great at Famiway Park.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the results at Femway Park. Maybe clean up some

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of that defense a little bit, tried to at least,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>but he could be amazing at Family Park. Now, if

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we're to take a look at the expected home runs now,

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they would go down a little bit of Femway, however,

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a good amount of wallball if you ask me.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a good amount of extra base hits. If

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you ask me, I think you'd be a great fit

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of Family Park. I think Zach Netto. While yes, there

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are flaws, and yeah, you're gonna have people out there

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>pointing it out, I'll say it one more time. Wins

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>above replacement wise. He has been a productive player a

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>three and a half average on fangrafts over the last

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>few years. And I'll say this too, that is way

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>better than what you've been getting at shortstop this year,

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox rank dead last or at least right

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>near the bottom when it comes to shortstop. Looking at

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the rankings twenty seventh overall in f war this year

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>at shortstop of a zero point six, I would if

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you bring a netto he probably give He probably gives

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you at least a one over the final month or so.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>That's way better the way you mean, that's you've been

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>getting half a war over the whole season. So no

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>matter how you look at it, it's gonna be an upgrade.

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Get some things straightened out a little bit, put that

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>swing at Femway Park, and yeah, you might have to

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>put up with some defense a little bit, but he'd

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be a productive player. I think it'd be a great fit.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Now when it comes to a trade, this is another

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>reason why I think it makes sense, because the Red

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Sox line up on a trade. It's so obvious, like

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>it's this is one of the easier blockbuster trades that

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I've I've seen before that you could put together. It

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just makes so much sense. Vents now Arius, he's not

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere. He is completely off limits. I've been told

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that behind the scenes, he's not going anywhere. However, you

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>have a young another young shortstop in Marcelo Meyer, California

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>native as well. Obviously we all know the deal with Meyer.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't fully worked out up to this point. That

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that means he's going to be a

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>bad player, but you feel like it just since he's

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>come to Boston, just you know, getting drafted, He's had injuries.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just something hasn't clicked fully right. Even

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in the miners. You know, there were some you know,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>hitting against lefties, he was inconsistent with that, had some

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>strikeout concerns on breaking pictures. We saw that in the

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level. So yeah, but he has

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>shown you those flashes like great defensively the guys hit

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of bombs like he really does. Has shown

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you that ceiling. It just hasn't fully worked out up

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to this point. He's been hurt too, so you almost wonder.

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to say this in a negative way.

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean more so the best for him. What a

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>change of scenery'd be the best thing for him, you know,

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to the West Coast where he grew up.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that would be a nice fit for

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>him and people might say he has no value. No,

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he has value. He was a top fifteen prospect last year.

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>When you're that high in the rankings, like, there's a

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>reason you're that high, Like, they're not just gonna put

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you in the top twenty on Baseball America's Top Baseball

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>America's Top twenty pipeline. They're not just gonna put you

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>up there for giggles. Oh he's smooth out there in

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the field. Oh yeah, he looks like a good ball. No,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>they're looking into everything. People out there think there was

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upside with him. I've been told that

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. Behind the scenes. A lot of a lot

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of people out there think so thinks there is a

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>good amount of upside with him. It's just a matter

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of putting it together. So I think for an Angel's team,

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>for an Angel's organization, if they could get back a

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>future shortstop like Meyer with the ceiling that he has,

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great place to start. And you

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>could also get more with him. You can get back

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some picting. So this is where it could get a

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>little uncomfortable in my opinion, Like Meyer seems like the

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>obvious candidate to include, and actually I think there was

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>even something in this article. I think Meyer was even

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>listed in here. Ah, the Angels almost certainly would want

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple young players in return. Marcelo Meyer, who opened the

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>season as the Red sox starting second baseman, could be

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>one of them. And we've been hearing weird stuff about Meyer.

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, going back how long now. It just popping

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>up in a couple of rumors. I think the Diamondbacks

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we had one story like a month ago asking Craig

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>got asked if he was t so like there is

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's smoke around that. So I think

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you could start a package with Meyer. Now again, the pitching,

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this is where it could get uncomfortable. I think it

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>would either be Anthony Iinsten or Connolly Early. I don't

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think totally's going anywhere. There's just they've been so high

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on him. I don't I don't see it. I think

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for the it would This is how I'd like to

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>think about it. It would come down to maybe the

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Angel's preference. I think, I don't know. I know the

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox love both. That's where I think it gets

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a little uncomfortable. You know, Connolly Early. If the Angels

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted a major league arm that could you put in

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the rotation right now? I mean, okay, the power to

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>them Anthony if they or if they'd rather go the

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>route of a guy that hasn't started his clock yet

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in Anthony Ironston, who's moved up into the top fifty

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on pretty much all of the prospect rankings out there.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like, would they want a bit

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>more ceiling or would they want a bit more floor

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>ironsin er Early. So I think that would come down

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what the Angels would want. So I don't know, you

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they did go to the Connolly Early route.

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have Mike Maddox as the pitching coach there.

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what the you know, what's the future

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>outlook of him staying with the Angels, But I mean

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that'd be a great situation for a guy that's already

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level to work with a pitching

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>coach like that. So I think you go either way.

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're both pretty much right around the same whatever,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll just say. I Andsen could go either way, and

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just with those two, you're right there, like you're already there.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a matter of like what, you know,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>what else do you need, yeah, like a couple more

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, lower level prospects. Do you know, do you

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>possibly include Witherspoon, do you include Henry Godbout? Like, could

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you do? You know, a couple of guys a little

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>lower there and maybe you got something done. You know,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you also could maybe think about I've mentioned this as

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>an idea too, and I think this comes down to

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what ends up happening with Roman this year. But could

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you have yourself a situation where one guy that we've

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about that you maybe could argue could use exchange

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of scenery is Jared Duran, another West Coast guy, So

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they could I mean, let's say they

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>did Meyer early and Duran, I mean they're getting cost

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>controlled major league talent back. You know, Duran slow is

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple more years left, you know, Like, I wonder

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>if you could include someone like him in this kind

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of a deal where he's lost a lot of value,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You wonder, I don't know, does Craig feel like he

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>would have a better shot at getting more for him?

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe if they in the off season, if

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they kept him. I don't know that, but that's also

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>dependent on what happens with Roman. I think you could

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>also argue too, though, if even if Roman doesn't come back,

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Masa's been the he's been the better hitter than Duran.

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Duran's been really good in the outfield. He's been good defensively.

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>He's actually been driving in some runs. I'll say that

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he's been doing things. It's just not the most flashy.

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's getting the sack flies. You know he's

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's giving you speed, but you know that slash line

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the ops, it's just way down. So I don't know

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you could, I guess do that. You could make Masa

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>your everyday left fielder, but then you're risking the defense

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>out there, So I don't know that. Duran, I think

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's possible you could include him in a deal like this,

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of that would ride to

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on with Roman. If Roman was coming back,

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>then like that's easy. You know, Roman goes out to

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>left field and you're done. So but yeah, I mean basically,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>my point though, is there's a bunch of different ways

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to do this, and you already have the two building

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>blocks to start this. With Marcella Meyer, who was a

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen prospect last year. Five more years of control.

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You could go either Iron Center Connolly Early. I think

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys makes sense, and then you just

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.959
<v Speaker 1>figure out the rest. I think this is pretty easy.

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>This is not very complicated. I think the more complicated

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is how do you make it all fit? That

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is the big question. I think this trade

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>just makes too much sense. I think it just lines

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>up so perfectly. Not this exactly on the screen, but

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you start here and then you figure it out a

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. So we'll see how that goes. It's

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very interesting though. It's gonna be interesting. But

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>ladies and gentlemen, we are going to take a quick break,

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick little breather, and then uh, we're

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the Mark Fine song article. And then

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll hang out with the chat a little bit. We'll

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>have some fun, but we'll bear back.

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Godfather, are you hitting some games this summer?

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the deal? Oh? Of course?

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 4>And it's real simple, Scotty Braun. You know how it is.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 4>You go to seat Geek and you can find any

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 4>deal you want in any section you want, even if

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 4>the game sold out. Go to seat Geek and you'll

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 4>find something that you love, affordable for your family that

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 4>you can enjoy anywhere, anytime, at any ballpark and stadium

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 4>you want enjoy it. It's the best opportunity to go

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 4>see a beautiful game of.

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Baseball, and that's the thing that you can be so

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 3>last minute. Sea Geek is the official ticket marketplace of

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Major League Baseball. They have you covered for all of

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 3>your baseball ticket needs the entire summer. They also have

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 3>over seventy thousand events on sea Geek that includes concerts, festivals,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of sporting events.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So go check it out right now, FTFAM.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 3>The code is Territory ten for ten percent off your

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 3>next set of MLB tickets at sea Geek. That's ten

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 3>percent off with promo code Territory one zero. Make sure

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 3>you click the link in the description to download the

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 3>app and then the code automatically is added to your

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 3>account so you can use it later.

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Alrighty, let's get back to it here. Let's get back

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. I actually saw a couple of comments in

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the chat. There's actually a good one here, John and

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the chat Brandon Ward would give you the same production

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>as Jared Duran bradon Wards. That's an interesting guy down

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues. You remember he was making some

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>noise in spring training, and you're a wonder could this

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>guy make the opening day roster. He had a whole

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>ton of speed. He was tearing it up. I mean,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>goodness gracious, So he was having a heck of a

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>spring and he's a guy with a ton of speed.

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>He's got a three seventy three on base extra pla

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean, he's not gonna be this power guy,

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's a guy that puts the bat on the ball,

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he gets on base, and he's got forty stolen bases

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>right now. So you know, you kind of wonder could

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he be involved if there were a trade for Netto,

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>could he be involved in some way, shape or form.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, shoot, could you even maybe include him in

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>a trade? I don't know. But or if you if

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you did move Duran, you know, could you call him up?

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's interesting. I tend to kind of

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>forget about bradon Ward a little bit because he's just

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>been down in the minors. But because of the speed

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that he has, he's a dynamic player, so interesting to

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to, even whatever ends up happening. I wonder

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if he could end up helping the Red Sox at

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>some point just because of the speed, I'll say, I'll

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so this in the chat. I'm seeing people saying TD

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the shat, I would take Jeremy Pania over Netto.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem with Paynya. The Astros are not gonna

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>move Painia. It takes the Here's the number one rule

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of a trade. Number one rule. Please listen to this, everybody.

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It takes two to tango. You gotta have one team

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>being willing to trade a guy. You can't go up

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to him, bang on the door, grab him by the

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>shirt and say you're gonna give me that guy, and no,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna. And if they say, all right, fine

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>give us Arias. Sorry, well you're not doing that. But

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you gotta you gotta be match up as trade partners.

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>The Astros never trade their guys. They just don't do it.

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He's an everyday shortstop. They don't have anyone to fill in.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim Crane always wants to compete. Yes, I know, Jeremy Paania,

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>New England Native would be a great story. I would

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>love that. That's great, It's dandy. I can see the

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>story books being written now. But I don't see the

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Astros moving him. I'd be surprised if they did. So. Yeah,

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but TD they might be out of the playoffs, but

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they got next year. They Jim Crane wants to compete

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>every year, just saying I don't think they're gonna move him.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if they're out of the playoffs. And

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you got to look at how organizations run themselves. It's

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>every every organization is different. You look at and you

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just if you want to just go based off of

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the history. The Astros never trade anyone. They've had a

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of opportunities where you thought, oh man, maybe they

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>could maybe they could move a guy, you know, like Bregman,

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Framber they were popping up as possible options

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 1>at one point. Nope, they move those guys. So yeah,

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't think Paynya is gonna get moved.

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>That's just listen. I would like it, Hey, I'm all

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. Jeremy Payne, that'd be cool. I'd like that,

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and he'd fit fed with work very well, good defensively.

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But another thing about Payna too is he's had some injuries.

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>He's he's been on the I l quite a few times.

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Think Netto had an injury at one point last year,

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but Paina, he's been on the I l a little

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more often. So that's something also to think about.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So let me get to a couple of super chats.

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we had a couple of those. Let me

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>get those pull we had two super chats. What do

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we got here? Let me make that a little smaller.

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Let me do of course it disappeared. Can you see

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox doing a multiple prospect for someone like

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Salas or another high prospect. I don't think the Padres

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>would move Salas. I haven't even thought about that. I

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>mean they've they've shown the willingness to do something like that,

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>right with Bennett and peral Us. I think Craig he's

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 1>just he's always looking for opportunities out there. If there's

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>something pops up. Sure, I don't think. I don't know,

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>have the deadline. You usually don't see stuff like that.

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we got all the super chat here from Aiden.

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Man? I would say A sneaky name

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't come up yet for the Red Sox is

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Steer. I believe he'd be able to transition to

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>second base if needed. Didn't he play some infield at

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>some point? I think he wasn't he playing? Yeah, he's

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a utility guy. That's interesting, yas he's mostly he's

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly played first this year. I always think of him

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield. That's just kind of where I always

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>picture him, you know. But yeah, I think that's actually

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sneaky name. I would agree. Let me actually

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>pull up the stat cast. He's got the right handed bat,

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got some pretty bad at ball data, and then uh, yeah,

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 1>he's got a good pull air percentage two. Oh man,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. And you kind of wonder maybe with his versatility,

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Red Sox like guys like that, and

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>he's got a little bit of control. Interesting. I never

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>really thought of Spencer Steer. That's a good one though,

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and you wonder at Famway Park that might actually be

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good fit. I mean, I think if you're

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, like with Netto, he's got a higher ceiling

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, Steer would be you know, you give you

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a good floor, but you wonder if maybe you can

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>maximize him at Femway a little bit. The home runs

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>would come down sixteen this year, that would go down

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to nine at Famway, but you play some wallball, right, Yeah,

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the name to look out for. Yeah,

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've definitely been thinking about him as a

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>candidate for other teams. The one thing with Steer is

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>actually he's been raking against left handed pitching. He's hitting

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>three forty two against the lefties, only hitting two to

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven against righty's. So he's basically like a very versatile

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Rome Gonzalez. So you kind of wonder, I don't know,

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is that like something do they want to add, you know,

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like with Netto, that's a guy that you know, he

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>goes up, he goes he plays every day. So I

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:36.479
<v Speaker 1>don't know, do they want to add another like right

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>handed bat. That's the only question I have there. But

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the profile it fits. So yeah, he's hitting

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>three forty two against lefties. He's got a one four

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus against lefties. Holy cow, guy's raking lefties. So yeah,

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I wouldn't count it out completely because he

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 1>has like the pro file and you'd have him until

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for two more seasons. That's interesting. Yeah, I'd say keep

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>your eye on him. I don't think that's completely out

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of the question. Moving on here we got let me

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>get to this last super chat from Alex. I know

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible, but Bobby Wig Junior, I saw that

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>floating around here today. Where did I see that here today?

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I can't find the right screen hold on where did

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this go? There? It is? Yeah, Bobby Wick Junior. Of course,

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who wouldn't want Bobby Wick Junior to be amazing? My goodness,

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I'd be doing cartwheels if we got someone like him.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, though, well, the Royals. First off, I

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna trade him. But actually I don't

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>think the Red Sox would be able to afford him

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>unless you actually sent back I think you would have.

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>This might sound a little odd, but I think you

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>would have to send back SETI in that kind of

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal, right, young cost control player who's looked really

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>good this year. I feel like you would have to

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>send him back. You'd have to send back SETI. You

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>would have to send back Arius. You'd have to send

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>back either totally or early at least, because that's an

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 1>organization that the Royals they want to compete too. They're

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>not just gonna get rid of Bobby Wick Junior. That's

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a star player. So yeah, Ben Ashman, we're not trading

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>our MVP and Arius. This is Bobby Witck Junior. This

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is Bobby Wick Junior. I don't know if have you

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>checked the numbers. I'm Bobby Wick Junior. He is a

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>top three player in the game every year. Yeah, you're

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to send back SETI. You're gonna to send

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>back Arius and a lot more. It's gonna take a

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more than that. Bobby Wick Jr. I would say

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>value wise, trade value wise. Let me just show you again,

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 1>baseball trade values. It's not the end all be all,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're very good at when it you know, the

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:25.439
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals of a trade for value of a player when

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you consider all things. Looking at the Royals and looking

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bobby Wick Jr. H feast your eyes on this value. Yeah,

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're at a very high point right there.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna be very difficult to acquire. So yeah,

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to put them on the red SOX, let's

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>try throwing this together again. Yeah, it would take a

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>boatload to get this guy. So you need two hundred

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million dollars a surplus value. All right, We've

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>got to start going down the list. So, yeah, Seti,

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>he has a very high value, but he's not Bobbywick Junior.

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 1>So you got to start there, Franklin Aarius, There you go,

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>top prospect of the game. Still not even close. Bobbywick

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Junior is easily a top three player in the game

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on a pretty good contractor I don't think his uh,

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think his contract. When does that start kicking in?

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Let me go to the Royals payroll. I wish there

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>was a way I could look at I can't find it.

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I wish there was a way to look at the

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>contract on their page. Yeah, Bobby Wick Junior for the

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>next two years, he's making under twenty million dollars and

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>he's giving you he's almost at a five war right now,

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and we still got more time. I mean yeah, over

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, he's easily been one of the

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>best players in baseball. So yeah, I know, of course, like, yeah,

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trading I wouldn't want to trade Seti. He's

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>been great, But in this conversation, you would have to

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for Bobby Wit because you you wouldn't be able to

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>make up the value. So that is that on that

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Moving on here, we got a few more things to

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about, a few more things to talk about. We

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:42.359
<v Speaker 1>got another super chat aiden. What's going on one ninety nine.

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on Casey Schmidt? I like Casey Schmid.

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Giants are going to move him though.

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>The Giant that's another team that wants to compete, so

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he's got a lot of control left. They want to

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>have him for the next couple of years, next few

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.399
<v Speaker 1>years because he's turned into a solid player and he's

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>cheapanizations like good players that are cheap, so pro Cannon.

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I might be late, but did you hear about the

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Justin Gonzales That was pretty crazy. I'd be scared to

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>death if I see the giant hand of Justin Gonzalez

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.280
<v Speaker 1>coming down to to to smack me across the head.

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>That catcher that that guy had, That guy had some

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>had some had some guts to start parking at Justin Gonzales.

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a scary man. Man, oh man. Yeah, he's been

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>hitting great. Yeah you can talk about that whole thing

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that happened in that game, but he's been hitting great.

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he ends up getting called up at

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>some point to double a. So moving on here, we

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>got one more thing to talk about, and then we'll

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the chat for a second. Here

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we go MLB dot Com. So right now, so Mark

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Fine sond Uh. He's talking about deadline plans for all

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the teams, and then he goes on to talk about

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox. Of course, he says the primary need

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:11.919
<v Speaker 1>remains a right handed bat, preferably at catcher, either Middlandfield

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or DH adding a high leverage leaver is also on

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Boston's wish list, while a starting pitcher could also be

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the cards. The starting picture one is interesting because

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you think of, you know, the Red Sox

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with all the injuries lately. I mean, you might be

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the first thought you might have had was, really, we

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>need more starting pitching where DoD you have so much

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 1>starting pitching, but you've just had a lot of injuries.

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of wonder if, you know, they end

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>up going for a guy. I think if they did,

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be someone cheap. It would be like some

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a rental guy like I could see Foster

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Griffin on the Nationals, like he would be a rental.

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You have that relationship with Tiboni obviously, so if you

0:49:58.040 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>needed a guy that you know to give you some

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 1>insurance sinnings down the stretch. Yeah, I think that's that

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 1>guy kind of fits that category. He's having a pretty

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:13.919
<v Speaker 1>solid year. You know. I've seen some opinions like maybe

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:18.399
<v Speaker 1>go after someone like Waka Bring Bring walk a home

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox legend right, one of Hein Bloom's better moves

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's made. Yeah, I mean, if I were to

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>go down this list here, just looking at Jeff Passon's

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>top twenty five, I would imagine it's not going to

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be any of these like top Start, you know, Redebtmer's No,

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, you know, maybe Casey Mice, but what

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.799
<v Speaker 1>do the Tigers do? I could maybe see someone like

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Casey Mice. He's good though, he's talented. It would for

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a rental, it would cost a decent amount. Like Clay Holmes,

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely getting some interests. So I don't know if

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox would want to tap into that market.

0:50:57.120 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean Casey Mice too, he would have a good market.

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I could see the Red Sox not wanting to get

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>involved for an expensive starting picture. So like Kevin Gosman,

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can't beat him, trade for him, he's but

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get a lot of interest, so yeah, Like

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I could see them going after like

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a low key kind of a guy. So like Foster Griffin,

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>they have him here at number twenty six. I don't

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>see prool to. I could see even though he's had

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a down year, I could see a bit of a

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>market there, like Waka. I mean, he's a really good

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 1>veteran on a good contract, so I feel like he

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>would get a good amount of interest. I don't know

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 1>if the Red Sox would want to entertain that, like

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray two, Like these are guys that can start

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>postseason games, right, I think the Red Sox would rather

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:53.479
<v Speaker 1>go after innings. Bring Let's bring Dustin May home, Ladies

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, Let's bring him home, Jack Flaherty, let's do that.

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, Like I'm looking here, like I don't

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 5>know Brady Singer, Like I feel like that could be

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 5>a move, Like I'm not sure what kind of a

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 5>market he's gonna get.

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He's had a bad year, so like that kind of

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 1>fits the bill to me. Someone cheap, someone that maybe

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you can help turn around a little bit, you know,

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:25.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe tap into some possible ceiling or go for floor

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like Griffin if I'm looking elsewhere here, Bubick, he's always

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>got injury problems. Yeah, like kind of one of those guys,

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, like someone cheap, someone that's not gonna take

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of prospects to get someone to just give

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you winnings. I know I've said that like a million times.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:50.879
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean, let me listen. We've already talked

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>about trade candidates. Obviously Netto is the star of the

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>show here today, but yeah, right handed, Batt, I'll touch

0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>on the Cattre part before I do, though, now I'll

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>get to that in a second. But Catcher, Like, here's

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing I've talked about this. Yeah, I would love

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>to have someone like Shay Langliers or Hunter Goodman. Right.

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I just it's hard to see catchers getting traded in season.

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah we had Victor Martinez, but you just don't see

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it very often. And uh, I think the A's would

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 1>still like to try and work towards a possible extension.

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I know you got Boris, but I feel like they

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would still like to try and get that figured out

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>because that'd be a great player to have signed up

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:38.919
<v Speaker 1>for the long haul. When you go to Vegas. So yeah,

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it ends up being someone for the

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 1>middle infield. You know, I did make a tweet today

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:47.799
<v Speaker 1>about Luis a Rise. I don't know the more I

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 1>think about it. With a Rise, I know he says

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 1>right handed bat here, But if you didn't, you know,

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 1>want to lean so much into looking for a righty,

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, like a Rise put him at the time

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of the order. He solves the leadoff spot. He kind

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of mixes into what the Red Sox have been doing.

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:08.879
<v Speaker 1>More back to ball. You know, he's having a great year.

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>He's he's always hit well at Feblely Park and he's

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a good defender at second base. So a Rise minus

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you if you are preferring a righty,

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>me checks off kind of all the boxes that you need.

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Minus that solves the leadoff spot, gives you a consistent

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>option at second base two. So yeah, and then you

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.840
<v Speaker 1>know with Romy him and Romy that they share second

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>base in DH. So everybody, we're going to take one

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>more quick break and then we'll hang out with the chat.

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll be right back.

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:50.800
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Fan Duel Baseball Fans.

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 6>Think you know who's hitting a homer today, Well, fan

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 6>duel is giving you a free chance to call your

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 6>shot with Daily Dingers. Joining the action is easy. Just

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 6>make your free pick on who's hitting a home in

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 6>their game, and if you're right, you'll get a profit

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 6>boost to use on your next bet for a chance

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 6>at extra winnings. You've got nothing to lose and a

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 6>lot to gain, and don't forget you can make a

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.720
<v Speaker 6>free pick every day all season long. It's just another

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 6>reason why FanDuel is the home for home runs. So

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 6>are you ready to play your game today? Join all

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:23.279
<v Speaker 6>the action at FanDuel dot com slash podcast. That's FanDuel

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 6>dot com slash podcast to play Daily Dingers and make

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 6>your free pick on who's hitting a homer. Playball and

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 6>swing for the fences on FanDuel, an official partner of

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 6>Major League Baseball.

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 7>Twenty one plus select states for Kansas and affiliation with

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 7>Kansas Star Casino eighteen plus DC Kentucky, Wyoming. No purchase necessary,

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 7>opt in required, bonus issued is non withdrawable. Profit boost

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 7>tokens restrictions supply, including any token expiration and max wager amount.

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 7>See terms at sportsbook dot FanDuel dot com gambling problem

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 7>called one eight hundred. Gambler Call one eight hundred my

0:55:55.360 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 7>reset one eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 7>seven seven. Visit CCPG dot org, slash chat Connecticut, visit

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 7>MD gambling heelp dot org. Maryland visit gambling Helpline m

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:07.879
<v Speaker 7>A dot org. Call eight hundred and three to two

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:10.919
<v Speaker 7>seven five zero five zero, Massachusetts call one eight seven

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 7>seven eight hope and.

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Why text hope and why. New York call one eight.

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:18.240
<v Speaker 7>Seven seven seven seven zero seven eight six seven Louisiana.

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, back to the chat. Hang out here for

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a second. J L. Robbie, what do you think of

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the deadline? If we got a rise, Langleiers, Freddy Pearlt.

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, it'd be a few solid moves right there.

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, I will say this like a rise,

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I do see the fit there. Minus you know again,

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking for a righty, he'd be a lefty.

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I see the fib But he's not

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my top choice for me. I think you know we've

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>already talked about it with Neto. You already know he's

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring you at least, you know, right around a

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:02.799
<v Speaker 1>three war. So so that's already good, that's already gonna

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>be an upgrade over what you have now. But then

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you could possibly tap into more ceiling with him. So

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where I would prefer Neto personally, and

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you'd have him for the next few years. So yeah, again,

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the more I think about it, you know, with Arius

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going up to triple A, Neto I think would be

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>some good insurance, you know, to just in case of

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>story like doesn't come back and he's able to produce.

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That's already gonna be a lot to ask, you know,

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he hasn't played major league games in

0:57:35.360 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, it could be tough when he comes back,

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, So yeah, go with the uh. I see

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>people say zach Netto is the younger Trevor story. Well

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, well put in the younger Trevor story for

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Trevor stories. But yeah, I do see the similarities with

0:57:56.080 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 1>him and the story obviously the strikeouts, but I don't know.

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And the you know, defense has been weird. That's I

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's the best way to say it. At short.

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just weird defense because he makes good plays, but

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he's just not very consistent. So but h Ben Robbie

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of names. I'm floating for the Red Sox

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that nobody's talking about. Elliott Ramos, Luke Weaver, Daniel Lynch.

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I love Luke Weaver. I think he just brings good

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>vibes like I love Bullpen guys like that. You know,

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd love I'd always love Luke Weaver. Daniel Lynch is interesting.

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if the Royals could possibly pair him with

0:58:36.000 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Lane Thomas as a package, you know, to kind of

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could probably you could probably get something decent.

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But if a team needed a right handed bat, you know, Thomas,

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a platoon player. Se'm not gonna get a ton

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. But if you put those two guys together,

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's I think pretty good. So maybe the Red Sox

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 1>could I don't know, well, no, you wouldn't get Lane Thomas,

0:58:57.240 --> 0:58:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Lanch could be a could be an option,

0:59:00.600 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Elliott Ramos. Maybe the Giants are interesting. I

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>actually wonder, you know, how motivated are they going to

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be to try and move some of those contracts. I

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:19.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder if maybe they could attach some prospects to some

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of those contracts possibly, you know, I was thinking about

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this the other day, like the Cardinals got heim Bloom.

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>We remember with Heim Bloom. One example, Jackie Bradley Junior.

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 1>They brought him and his contract from the Brewers with

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of prospects, David Hamilton and ah the other

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>prospect is it was a third baseman? Well, who is

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that other prospect? He was a lefty bat third baseman?

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Who was that? Does anyone in the chat have it?

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Who is the other prospect that got attached to Jackie

0:59:56.720 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Jr. With David Hamilton? Thank you, Alex Binalis. I

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>could not think of that name. But yeah, Like I

1:00:05.600 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder if Heim maybe does something like that where instead

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of giving up prospects where they've been really rebuilding that farm,

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of giving up prospects at this point, why not

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just take on a contract like Matt Chapman and even

1:00:21.880 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and possibly even get some prospects. You know, I wonder,

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Heim could do something like that with

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals Austin. Is it worth calling Arizona for Katl?

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Probably not? At this point they're in contention. Uh, Josea Bray,

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you what do you think of a rise for second base,

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a power bat and a lefty for the bullpen? I mean, yeah,

1:00:45.680 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of good moves, right there, A lot

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of good moves at the end of the day. Though,

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>remember we got a temper expectations with Craig Breslo. The

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>last two deadlines have not been great. You know. Well,

1:00:57.520 --> 1:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I will say the first deadline, at least he made

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of moves. At least he was productive. I'll

1:01:03.840 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>give him that. They just didn't really work out. And

1:01:06.160 --> 1:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Danny Jansen, you know, I remember that you're looking for

1:01:08.640 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the right handed bat, and I'm like, Danny Janssen, like

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I felt like that was a little too cute, you know,

1:01:17.320 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like I felt like they could have really shot for

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>more there. So I don't know, hopefully he's learned his

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>lesson from that. And then like Dustin May, I think

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to shoot big and and then obviously

1:01:31.960 --> 1:01:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work out, so they pivoted to Dustin May.

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And Yeah, so hopefully a couple of bad deadlines is

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>good for Craig here and hopefully he can come up

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with something good. We'll see extra. Will THEO be handling

1:01:48.040 --> 1:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the deadline behind the scenes? All right? Who knows? Yeah,

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, THEO is he's always gonna be there. He's

1:01:56.520 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>always going to be involved somehow bear how much of

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the payroll of the Padres trying to shed? I don't know.

1:02:06.760 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The Padres are interesting. I don't know what's going on

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with them. I do wonder because aj Preller always wants

1:02:12.640 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to compete. If you moved Mason Miller, you'd get back

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a big package, and they still have good bullpen arms there,

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so like that's interesting. They have Morahan as well. That

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>could be a good trade candidate. He wouldn't get you

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much as Miller would, but he get you

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>by something. So yeah, John Breslow, he was too focused

1:02:35.840 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on Joe Ryan. But you know, hey, hopefully these experiences

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and these lessons end up being good for him and

1:02:44.880 --> 1:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he can come up big. But again, you gotta

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>temper the expectations with Breslo. But I'd rather at least

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>feel that way now and then have a happy surprise.

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of how I'm thinking about it right now.

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I don't know, is neddo Is that?

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that shooting too high? So like in the chat,

1:03:04.920 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll get back to the super chat with Spencer Steer,

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, we're all thinking Neto, right now is

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this year's Joe Ryan, Like he has become the Joe

1:03:14.920 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Ryan of the Red Sox trade deadline from last year.

1:03:20.040 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So but like you kind of wonder if Nedo is

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling, do you end up getting a guy like

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Steer who is a right handed bat. He can place

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some infield, you know. So that's where like if they

1:03:34.360 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>got someone like Steer, I wouldn't be surprised about that anyway. Uh,

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Anthony thought on thoughts on the deadline, Brady Singer, Jonah Him,

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and Zach Netto interesting. I mean Jonah Heim's interesting too.

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they wouldn't go with him because if

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go get a catcher, you go get Langleyer's

1:03:53.800 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a good one. I mean, you are getting by with

1:03:57.280 --> 1:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Netto or not ned with Wong and Bias. That's getting

1:04:01.920 --> 1:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the job done, especially defensively and with the pitching staff.

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna go for a guy, you go get

1:04:07.560 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's gonna be a big improvement with the bat.

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>My vote would be Langleyar's because he gives you something

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ball. So I don't see Jonah Him. Yeah,

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Brady Singer, I could see like a depth guy and

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>then uh yeah, ned O, Yeah, Nedo. To me, is

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is a very obvious choice. John Bresla needs to throw

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a wide net. Yeah yeah, I mean he always does.

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>He's always gonna put a lot out there. Ryan might

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>be a shocker, but give me a little. Alejandro kirk

1:04:41.840 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ooh man, the Blue Jays I had like I was

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about, like after that the Blue Jays made that

1:04:49.680 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>run last year, I'm thinking, oh no, we got to

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>deal with this Blue Jays team for the next like

1:04:55.480 --> 1:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>good two to three years now, and they just wow,

1:04:59.080 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>they just fell apart. I thought, man, you're bringing Dylan Cees.

1:05:04.840 --> 1:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You bring in Kazuma Okamoto. Man, remember when we were

1:05:09.160 --> 1:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>all like hoping for Okamoto. Remember guys would come off

1:05:11.960 --> 1:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the board and we're like, all right, next Backstoption, all

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>right Okamoto. But Okamoto was a guy that you're like,

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, yeah, his his his profile that would fit

1:05:20.360 --> 1:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>fem way. He's he's having a good year. But I'm good.

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm good with mister uh, mister Caleb Durbin Ben. His

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>story should be back in a few weeks, and I

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna play well. I hope. So. I love

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Trevor's story the guys. He's a great guy. He's a

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>hard player, so like I hate when he's hurt. That

1:05:41.440 --> 1:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>would be great if he comes back and he's hitting

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, awesome, awesome. So again, though, I still wonder

1:05:52.240 --> 1:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>if they look for insurance. You just never know. You

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>never know, and it's such a tough ask man when

1:05:59.680 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. That's why I don't even want to say

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play well. I'm not saying he's gonna play bad,

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't even want to have those expectations because

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that is sexually a tough ask. The guy had a

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>hernia surgery out for a while. I mean, just you know,

1:06:14.480 --> 1:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to put those expectations on him.

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's fair, you know, because that's a

1:06:20.720 --> 1:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>lot to ask. Major League baseball is really hard. I

1:06:24.360 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know from experience, but obviously it is. So yeah,

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I hope he comes back and plays well,

1:06:32.840 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not gonna expect it. So we'll see. But everybody,

1:06:40.680 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna wrap it up right there. I'm

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna wrap it up right there. I went way longer

1:06:45.760 --> 1:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>than I wanted to here tonight. I was hoping maybe

1:06:47.880 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like thirty minutes and this turned into an hour. So

1:06:52.880 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I am done. This was supposed to be an off day.

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to be relaxing, and all of a sudden

1:06:57.120 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we had this story here today. I'm like, all right,

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go live. So Christopher in the chat, it's

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bold to assume Ardie Moreno will trade netto You're right, I,

1:07:08.080 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said at the start of the show, though,

1:07:09.840 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the one difference. One difference is John Moze. Look, that

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>guy has a lot of run, he has a lot

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of poll. He's been in Major League Baseball a long time.

1:07:21.760 --> 1:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So if Moreno, if there's a guy in that organization

1:07:24.680 --> 1:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that he will listen to, well, I mean, obviously you

1:07:26.840 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just brought him in, but a guy that's had a

1:07:30.040 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience in Major League baseball. If John Moze

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Loock is telling him we need to do this, like

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:39.919
<v Speaker 1>we gotta stop trying to do what we've been doing.

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And I actually wonder if that, if that is the

1:07:43.280 --> 1:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>route the Angels end up going. You kind of wonder,

1:07:48.680 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like when they had the initial conversation, like is that

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>something that mozay Lock brought up to him, Like listen,

1:07:56.280 --> 1:07:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to I don't want to come there

1:07:58.440 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and like just do the same old like we gotta

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do it differently, you know. So I don't know,

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it'll be. It's very interesting to see what the

1:08:08.840 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>angels are gonna do. I hope they do, not just

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to see them bad. I want to

1:08:13.560 --> 1:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>see them get back on the right track. But I'm

1:08:17.000 --> 1:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>out here. Everybody, if you kind of the way out,

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>hit that like button for me. If you are and

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you just finding us for the first time, think about subscribing.

1:08:23.080 --> 1:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of trade deadline stuff coming up

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:28.479
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of weeks. It's gonna be fun.

1:08:28.760 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>This is only the start ladies and gentlemen. But yeah,

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back here tomorrow. Game time seven ten Eastern times,

1:08:34.120 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>so we'll be here around ten pm tomorrow night. We'll

1:08:38.200 --> 1:08:38.519
<v Speaker 1>see that