WEBVTT - Why voters are in their populist era

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to off the cop with me, se Cup. So

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>last weekend I was in Washington, d C. With almost

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone else who does what I do for a living,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and I go every year for the White House Correspondence Dinner.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>In years past, I've attended the dinner and there's parties

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and events and it's a fun chance to see colleagues

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and friends. Sometimes I bring my family down and we

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have a little fun in DC. But in the past

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>few years I've actually gone down to cover the dinner

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for CNN, so not to attend, which is a relief, honestly,

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that dinner is not It hasn't been fun in a

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>long time. I'll just say that, Okay, there was a

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>time it was fun. It's not been fun in a

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>long time. So happy to not be at it. And

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>CNN is one of the only cable networks that airs

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the entire dinner wall to wall, and we have reporters

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on the carpet interviewing guests, we comment on the speeches,

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>all of it. So I've done that the past few years,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and this year I was in studio at CNNDC with

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues covering the dinner. When you know, all held

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>broke loose, and then we had to cover the breaking

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>news for four plus hours, bringing you all the information

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.199
<v Speaker 1>we could from our sources in and out of the room,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>from law enforcement, from our own colleagues who were there,

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>like like Wolf Blitzer, who was actually in the same

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>place as the shooter. He was tackled by police for

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>his own protection. And it was a lot. It was

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot, as breaking news always is. I've had to

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>cover breaking news a lot over my career, from Sandy

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Hook to wars and other incidents and political breaking news,

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's a lot of pressure. The difference

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this time is I was covering a breaking news story

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that involved all my friends, Like I knew lots of

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>people in that room, both you know, in journalism but

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>also in the administration. And I've talked a lot about it,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so we don't need to like get into it all again.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But I did want to take this opportunity, since we

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't spoken since that dinner, to say before we get

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>into the news, that I was so proud of my

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>friends and colleagues for the poise and the professionalism that

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they exhibited that night, even while they were worried about

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>their own safety, they were reporting on what was happening.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>They were running down sources, you know, while they were

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>under tables. They were taking bikes to the White House

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to cover the President's briefing in their ball gowns and tuxas.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And this was a night where they were preparing to

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>be roasted by the president to their faces. And I've

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about that and what I thought, how that was

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a bad decision, But they would have taken it like

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the adults that they are. They wouldn't have tried to

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>sue him or silence him. They wouldn't have threatened or

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>intimidated him. Instead, they would have just sat there and

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>taken it, because that's what we do. We take it.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We take it from the President, we take it from

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Carr, we take it from Pete Hegseth, we take

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it from whomever in the administration because they're the thin

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>skinned ones and we just do our jobs. So they

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>would have taken it, but they didn't have that night. Instead,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>they faced a different kind of chaos and indignity thanks

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to a deranged lunatic who believed that violence was righteous

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and justifiable, even like too many people do these days.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It was an awful night in so many ways, but

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>also it was a real testament to the point of

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the night, which is press freedom. And all the people

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in that room are attacked on a near daily basis

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>by people who call them fake, who call them enemies,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>who send them death threats, myself included. And as professional

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as they were and are, they're also human. So I

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just want to shout out my colleagues. I'm just proud

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of them, and I'm proud to be in this community.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the news. We're gonna

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do a little left right today. I want to start

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>with the right and the news that Trump's DJ is

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>once again going after James call Me, because this is such,

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this is such a layered and interesting story, and in

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>many ways it's a very sad story as well. This week,

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Acting Attorney General Todd blanche who, as you know, is

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>auditioning to drop the acting and just become Trump's new ag,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he announced he had indicted former FBI director James call

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Me for the second time in less than a year,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>over an Instagram post in which Comy had arranged seashells

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on a beach to spell out eighty six forty seven. Now,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump is saying that eighty six means kill. We know.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Forty seven refers to Trump, the forty seventh president, but

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>to literally everyone else in the free world, eighty six

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>means to Nick. Yes, it comes from restaurant jargon. Nick's

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a menu item. But Trump and Blanches DJ are actually

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>making the case that this amounted to a threat of violence.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That sounds silly. It's because it is, and there are

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>many reasons why it's silly. First, a message made out

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of seashells a year ago, photographed and posted on Instagram

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for the world to see. Yes, this sounds like someone

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>who is definitely hatching a plan to go kill the president. Yeah,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna make a I'm gonna make a message in shells,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>take a picture of it and post it with my

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>name on it. Yeah, doesn't really feel like an imminent threat,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>does it? Like? If Trump really felt like he was

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in danger from Jim Comy, wouldn't the FEDS have arrested

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>him immediately. Comy was so dangerous to the president that

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>they waited a year to indict him. That makes no sense.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Come on, weren't born yesterday. Second, it's just impossible. It's

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>flat out impossible to divorce this indictment from the politics

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of revenge that we know Trump is so obsessed with.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>He already tried indicting him last fall. It was tossed.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It was tossed because of a procedural error at the DOJ.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>You'll remember, the judge in that case ruled that the prosecutor,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Helligan, was unlawfully appointed. And that's because the other

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors who got the case refused to take it. They

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>knew it was baseless, they knew it was politically motivated.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>They refused to do it. So Trump had to find

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer who was willing to take the case, and

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>he did, and she was a joke. And that's why

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that judge dismissed the case. So anyway, they're back at it,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and let me just read you some of the headlines

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>about how people think it's going to go this time around.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Close Trump ally in the House shades Jim Comey indictment.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Judge Andrew Napolitano says frivolous Comy indictment will be tossed.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump allies are privately trashing embarrassing Comy indictment. Fox News

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>legal analyst shreds Trump DOJ's absurd Comy prosecution weak case.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Fox is Jonathan Turley skeptical of Trump. GJ is new

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>comy indictment every headline I just read. That's from his

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the aisle. Guys, his friendlies on his networks

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are calling this indictment quote frivolous, embarrassing, absurd. Week with

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>friends like that, who needs enemies? I don't even need

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to come on and do this. His own side is like, dude, dude,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>let it go. This is this is stupid. But that's

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>not all you want it. It gets even stupid, are you? Guys?

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump may have killed this case before it's even begne

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cee an it's Caitlyn Collins asked him this week in a

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>briefing if he really took that message in seashells I'm

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>paraphrasing as a threat to his life, and Trump typical

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump fashion, says, I don't know, probably so good as

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>senior CNN legal analyst Elly Honig pointed out after that, well,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that gives the jury reasonable doubt. If Trump doesn't know

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>whether he thought he was his life was in danger,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Probably how is a jury supposed to

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>know if he thought his life was in danger? And

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the ruling. If he really thought his life was

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in danger, he just said, I don't know. Probably they're

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just so bad at this. Trump can't keep his mouth shut.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>His DOJ is running out of competent prosecutors to take

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>these garbage loser cases. And for what for Trump to

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lose case after case after case. I mean, it's humiliating.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>They have failed to put like any of Trump's enemies

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in prison, and yet he is pathologically consumed with old

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and irrelevant grudges. I think Trump never looks weaker than

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he does in these moments when he's pursuing these personal

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>vendettas and losing. Just in the past year, Trump's DOJ

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>has lost numerous high profile cases it sought to use

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to appease the president's bloodlust. I'm going to tick through them.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It failed to get an indictment against those six Democratic lawmakers,

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>including Senator Mark Kelly, over a video they released regarding

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>illegal orders. Remember he was going to prosecute this gang

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of six. Yeah, nothing, it was dropped. Grand Juries rejected

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>various cases against protesters in Washington, d C. That Trump

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>tried to have arrested, an attempt to charge a man

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with a f tell any assault for throwing a sandwich

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>at an officer, well that failed to secure a felony indictment.

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Attempts to prosecute to James New York AG, former CIA

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>director John Brennan, fed Shaer Jerome Powell thus far have

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all failed. Trump's also failed to successfully sue a number

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of his political opponents, from Hillary Clinton to the DNC,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times to CNN. Remember he was going

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to put us all in jail. No judges have overruled

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>his attempts at silencing news outlets, blocking a Pentagon policy

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>limiting reporter access, ordering the White House to lift restrictions

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on the AP after Trump had banned the news agency

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>for refusing to use the term Gulf of America. I

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>remember how stupid that was. Yeah, judge ordered the White

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>House to love you can't do that, and blocking an

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>executive order to cut funding for NPR and PBS. He

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>loses and loses and loses. He's lost so many of

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>these petty personal fights. It's hard to imagine why he

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>keeps going back to the trough only to suffer more

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>humiliating losses. I guess if he thinks the process is

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the pain, right, because he doesn't have to pay for

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>any of these lawsuits. Taxpayers do. We do, we get

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that honor. But the targets of his law fair do

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for their lawyers to defend his nonsense attacks.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's what he gets out of it.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But for a guy who understands optics and appearances like

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the TV of it all, I don't understand why he

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>likes losing over and over and over and over and

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again. I don't get it.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It's so small, it's so embarrassing, it's so dumb. But

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a trophy goes back and back to because he

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just can't help himself. He fired Pambondi because she didn't

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get enough or any scalps. We'll see if Todd Blanche

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>can do better. It's just such a waste. Okay, I

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>want to move on to another story from the week

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>This is over on the Left. Did you happen to

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>catch Pod Save America's John Favreau and his interview with

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>DNC chair Ken Martino. Boy, Oh my god, you gotta

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>go watch it. I watched the whole thing. It was

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>let's just say it was uncomfy. John Favreau asked some

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>very very good questions of Ken Martin of his own side, which,

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>believe me, I know, can be hard to do, but

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 1>it's so necessary and important. So I was really, you know,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but proud of John Favreau, impressed by John Favreau for

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really going after Ken Martin, and he did. And one

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of the main lines of questioning came around the dem

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>autopsy that the party did last year. We've talked about

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it a bit here, and having been through the Republican

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>autopsy in twenty twelve, which which I personally worked on,

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you how valuable this exercise can be.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And in twenty twenty four, when Democrats lost all seven

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>swing states to a convicted criminal and a guy, we

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>knew it was crucial that they do that autopsy. It

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was the right thing to do, to ask how did

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this happen, what mistakes did we make? What can we

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>learn from twenty twenty four and not repeat in twenty

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. Good questions, right, like obvious, obvious need for

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this autopsy. But in December of last year, Ken Martin

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>announced he wouldn't be releasing the results of that autopsy,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>which I could not believe. I couldn't believe when I

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>heard that. What a dumb decision and a huge missed opportunity.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>For a couple of reasons, a releasing the autopsy would

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>have inoculated the party from years of having to answer

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this same question, what was in the autopsy? They look

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so scared running from their own shadow, and they're going

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to face these questions from folks like Jon Favreau for

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years. What was in the autopsy?

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>What were you so afraid of? But it also would

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have given Ken Martin and other Democrats the opportunity to

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do something really important, which is reassure voters, voters who

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at the moment are giving the Democratic Party a twenty

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>eight percent approval rating abysmal. It would have given them

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to reassure voters that they get it. Okay,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they understand, they got what they did wrong, they learned

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from their mistakes, and here's how they're moving forward to

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>win those voters back and put the party in a

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>better position for twenty twenty eight. What Democrat wouldn't relish

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to come out and say we got it,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we got it, we're correcting it, not gonna happen again.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna we're not gonna let you down again.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>They did none of that. They get to do none

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of that because they're scared of whatever's in that autopsy. Now,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are a few surprises in that autopsy. I

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I doubt it. For me, it's hard to see.

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to imagine that the reasons the party lost

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't the obvious ones we can see, like we can

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>decide like there were bad candidates. Biden should not have run, period,

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and Kamala basically ran as Biden. You know she had

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to because he was still her boss. The divide on

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Israel issue divided the party two. But the main

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>reason I know that they lost, and I'm sure you

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>know that they lost, is because they look voters in

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the eye and they said that the three problems you're

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>most concerned about aren't real, they're imaginary. The economy it's great.

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>What are you complaining about. Crime, it's down, you're safe. Relax. Immigration,

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no migrant crisis. You're just racist. It was such

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>an insane dereliction of duty to campaign that way. It

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was political map practice, and it was just stupid. It

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is not rocket science to figure out what happened. But

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, because I've been through an autopsy, it

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>does reveal things you can't maybe see in front of

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>your face. It might have drilled down into all kinds

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of strategic mistakes, maybe some media mistakes, fundraising mistakes, map

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and math mistakes, all kinds of things that would be

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really great to know. And especially if you're a Democratic voter,

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you deserve to know what the party did wrong and

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what it learned. You should demand that, in fact, because

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just be honest here and say what really happened.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic Party let you down in twenty twenty four.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It let us all down in twenty twenty four. I

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>voted for Biden in twenty twenty first Democrat I have

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>voted for president. It let me down in twenty twenty four.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And we are here today in a war we've never

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>asked for. Tariff, no one wanted immigration policies that have

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>militarized our cities and gotten Americans killed. A Republican Congress

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>who's turning a blind eye to every un American, undemocratic,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional thing. The president is doing, an economy that is tanking,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and on and on. We're here because the Democratic Party

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>let us down in twenty twenty four. We're here because

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the party didn't listen to its voters. Instead of listening

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to the issues that voters said they cared about, it

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to tell voters the issues they should care about.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It's indefensible. It's indefensible what happened in twenty twenty four.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So you shouldn't just assume that the Democratic Party has

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>it's shit together this time. You shouldn't just assume that

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>they're going to run candidates who can win in twenty

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. You shouldn't assume they'll make her decisions. You

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>should demand that the party be accountable to you, the voters,

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is releasing the autopsy and telling

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you what happened. Because it's been accountable, it seems only

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to consultants and corporations and special interests that have their

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>own agendas, and those agendas are hurting the party, they're

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>hurting us. This goes to another issue that became relevant

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this week. Did you see that Janet Mills means pretty

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>popular governor dropped out of her bid for Senate. Mills,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat, was running to unseat Republican Susan Collins, who

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>has been there for twenty nine years. Guys and Mills

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually recruited by Chuck Schumer. Well, she dropped out

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this week because she says she doesn't have the money

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep running, So that leaves Graham Platner, the progressive

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>oyster farmer with no political experience and some baggage to

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>run against Collins. Democrats hope of unseating Susan Collins now

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>rests with Graham Plattner now. Mills campaign reminded me a

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of Andrew Cuomo's campaign in New York City. I

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>covered the Mumdanni mayoral election every day last year, and

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Establishment aka the Party kind of ran the

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>same playbook against Mumdanni as it is against Platner. The

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats tried to make Mumdanni scary in the primary, scary

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to other Democrats. They thought if they pointed out the

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>things that he had said about cops and Israel, that

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that would be enough to turn voters off. And it

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>did turn some voters off. It certainly turned me off,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and they could have ended up being problems for Mumdanni,

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately they weren't because voters were more concerned with

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>issues and ideas. They liked Mumdanni's ideas. They liked that

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't an establishment politician. They ignored the DNC, they

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>ignored Cuomo, and in fact, the Democratic Party hardly helped

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Mumdanni at all. Schumer didn't even endorse Mumdanni when he

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>became the nominee. Jeffries only did the last minute. The

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>main race to me, feels similar. The Democratic Party was

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>backing Mills, and it tried to ward voters off Platner

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>by making him seem scary, the Nazi tattoos, his comments

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about rural America and cops, I mean, all of which

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>could be disqualifying and again turn me off. But it's

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a new era. Voters like Platner because of his ideas,

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's not an establishment politician. They're sick of the

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>gerontocracy telling them how to vote. And Schumer's running a

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>playbook from like twenty twelve, it's twenty twenty six. He

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is so out of touch. How does the party not

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>get that? And look what worked from Momdannie in New

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>York City may not work for Platner in Maine or

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>James tell Rico in Texas will have to see but

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>backing Mills the way that the Democratic Party did, only

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to have her drop out and leave Graham Plattner may

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have guaranteed Collins gets another their term. So they don't

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have it all together. Guys, Trump is an insane person.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>This administration is off the rails, that's for sure. Democrats

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have it together though, And while midterms look like

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be good for Dems, I'm very worried

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about twenty twenty eight. You should be too, okay when

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we come back. I talked to a former DEM operative

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>about all of this. Don't go anywhere. Welcome back to

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Off the cop I'm joined now by my friend Moa Laitha.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Mo was the DNC spokesman. He's a DEM strategist. Currently

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>he's the executive director of the Institute of Politics and

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Public Service at Georgetown University.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcome mo It's so good to be with you.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So good to be with you too. We were talking

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>about the podsave interview with Ken Martin, and I really

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really want to get your take on it, in which

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>John Favreau kind of you know corners. Ken Martin on

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>why the DNC hasn't released the autopsy and apparently has

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>no plans to. And I can't tell you how dumb

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that decision is as someone who did a

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Republican autopsy and we learned a lot from it. But

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on on all of that?

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you and me both, I don't. Uh, I don't

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>get it. Yeah, you know, Look, I'm uh. In my

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>previous life, I was a I was a communications guy. Yeah,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and like and a great one. You're you're too kind.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 2>But like rule number one, like, don't make a promise

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you know you're not going to keep. And so whether

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>or not, like it was smart to release the autopsy,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 2>he promised to release the autopsy. He campaigned on releasing

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the autopsy. So it just set just set up an expectation.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And so if you're not, if you don't want to

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>release the whole thing, release something, right, do something. But

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>when it gets to the heart of the matter itself,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I think here's the problem. I'm a proud Democrat, have

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 2>been my whole life, even though I run this non

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>partisan institute now like I'm a Democrat. We messed up

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 2>the last election, and I think it is important for

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 2>people to see why and how Number two, people don't

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 2>like us right now. They like Republicans less, but that

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean they like us, and to show a little

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 2>bit of self reflection would probably do us some good, right.

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I Mean, one of the reasons people don't trust politics

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 2>in general is because because of that fact, they don't

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 2>they think we're tone deaf in both parties, and so

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 2>being able to go out there and say you know what,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 2>we hear you, we see what you don't like, and

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>we're going to make some changes like that would go

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 2>a long way to restoring public trust.

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just said that, and you weren't here

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>for when I said that, so we didn't coordinate this

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like that's it when you in twenty twelve, someone in

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the party, I forget who it was, said, listen, we

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>got sent to the woodshed, and when you get sent

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to the woodshed, you sit down, shut up, and think

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>about what you've done. And that really stuck with me

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I was a lifelong Republican. That was

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>my team and we lost badly, and so I wanted

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was important we owed it to voters

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to say we're working on ourselves. You deserve a better party,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You deserve answers, you deserve to know that we figured

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some stuff out and it did go a long way.

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>You'll get this right as a parent, like when my

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 2>kids screw up, Yeah, I want them to own up

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>to screwing up. When they don't, when they just say no,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I didn't do anything right, right, that pisses me off

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 2>even more so, Like, you know, it's no different here.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 2>People want to know that we get it and you

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>know we own up to it. It's not going to

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>restore trust overnight. Things might even get worse before they

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 2>get better, but that's the first step. That they won't

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 2>get better if we don't.

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And that worries me because again, I think

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Republicans are such an in such a bad place,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're such an existential threat, like the other party

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to get its act together and be a stronger buffer,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they didn't do that job. In twenty twenty four,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the reports that the big boogeyman in the autopsy is

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>like the fracturing of the party over Gaza. Even if

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that's true, don't you think we can handle it?

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>And don't you think people already know that? Right?

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we saw it play out in front of

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 2>ourselves every single day.

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not a secret issue. It was issue through the

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>whole campaign.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Through the whole campaign. And so if we as a party,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>if people who want to lead this nation can't stand

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>up and talk about the hard things. Yeah, right, Like,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>what's the point? What's the point? Otherwise we're just going

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to continue down this terrible trend of each party winning

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 2>elections by sucking just a little bit less.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Oh, that's a perfect way to put it, right,

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean that we can suck the least.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 2>That's been like the last two or three election cycles

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 2>for us.

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Democrats lost kinds of voters in twenty twenty four.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>They lost a good number of black voters, Hispanic voters,

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>young voters. They left the Democratic Party for Trump. Now

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that support has collapsed, of course on the right.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>But if Democrats want them to return to the party

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and not just stay home in twenty twenty six, have

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they done enough to show that they've earned that vote back?

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I don't know. I mean, this could be what

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>we were just talking about. Right. Look, when Trump won

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 2>with what was an incredible coalition in twenty right, like

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 2>credit where it's due, He built a his campaign, built

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>a coalition to help him win that election, and it

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>set off alarm bells, and rightfully so. Now I was

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 2>quick to caution people like, let's not call this a

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>trend yet, Let's see if it was a blip. And

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 2>in the special elections and the Virginia and New Jersey

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 2>elections last year, we saw it start to move back.

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't mean What that tells me is that

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the voters who were once rock solid for us are

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>no longer rock solid. They are willing to shop around.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 2>They may and they may not like what they're seeing

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>now with Trump and feel let down by him, as

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.719
<v Speaker 2>they should. That doesn't necessarily mean that they're sold on

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>us again. Might be enough to get us through the

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>next election cycle, but we need to worry. That's true

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 2>with black voters. I think we are a long way

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 2>away from black voters shifting permanently into the Republican column.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 2>But if they stay home, that ain't good for us. Latinos, Yep,

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>it's very true. But where it is the most interesting

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and concerning for her young voters. Yes, because the patterns

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you develop early in your voting life tend to stick

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>with you for quite some time.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, and you work with students were you surprised that

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so many young people went for Trump in twenty twenty.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Four I wasn't now, not because I think they are

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>ideologically shifting to the right. I mean, lord, you can

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>say this better than I. Trump isn't on the right

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>right like he's not a conservative, not at all. So

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>it's not an ideological shift. But what they are saying

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 2>is what we are seeing in so many sectors of

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 2>society with young voters right now, they're looking for disruption.

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>They feel like this system isn't going to be there

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 2>for them. And that's true politically, economically, even socially and culturally.

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.239
<v Speaker 2>They think that the system is rigged. They think the

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 2>system is broken, and so they're looking for whatever it

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 2>is that will cause disruption. And Trump was that last time. Now,

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I think like a lot of America, and this was

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 2>true in twenty sixteen, with a lot of America who

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 2>that was also looking for some sort of disruption they

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 2>saw They they're looking at the way he's acting and saying, oh, wait,

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's not the disruption I was looking. That's a

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>little too disruptive. Give us some disruption. We don't want chaos.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm not surprised to see them shifting back

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in the subsequent elections. But it doesn't surprise me that

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>they They're angry, they're frustrated, they're scared, and they're looking

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>for the person that gets that. And he rhetorically got

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that in twenty twenty four.

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Yep, Kama Harris is teasing she may run again. Is

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the third time the charm? Do voters need to see

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>her run a third time? Or have they seen enough?

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I this is going to sound flip. I don't mean

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>it to be. She's got a right to run. If

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 2>she wants to make the case, go out there and

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>make the case. I would if she intends to, if

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 2>she really is serious about it, I hope she makes

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>a different case than she did last time. I have

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>a hard time seeing it. I have a hard time

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>seeing her getting traction in a Democratic party because I

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>do think Democrats want change, they want a fresh face,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and they want someone who is going to be a

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit more disruptive. She ain't that, right. Yeah, And

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>so look here at the end of the day, and

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>you and I may have talked about this before, I

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>think our politics has shifted away from left versus right,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's been shifting away from left versus right for

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>quite some time that the new paradigm that drives our

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 2>politics is front versus back. People who feel like they're

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>stuck at the back of the line versus everyone they

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>see in front of them keeping them at the back

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>of the line. That's why you see a rise of

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 2>populism on the right and why you see a rise

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>of populism on the left. People believe the system is

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 2>rigged that and they cannot no matter how hard they work,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 2>no matter how much they play by the rules, they

0:31:58.120 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>can't get ahead.

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's the billionaire keeping them from that or the

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>migrant worker keeping them from the job. Right, it's one thousand.

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>That's such a good framing.

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>And whoever gets that does well. And we have seen that.

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 2>We have seen that pattern. Actually, if we think about it,

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>over the past fifty years, we have seen our country

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>shifting in that direction. We're in a populist era. Yeah,

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and there's two types of populace, not just left and right.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>There's there's hopeful, aspirational populace right and there's angry populace.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's Reagan and there's Trump.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 2>There's Reagan and there's Trump, there's Obama or Clinton, and

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 2>there's Bernie right, and people start in these eras from

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>an angry place. It takes a very special kind of

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>political leader to pull them over into aspiration and hope

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll see. We'll see, but it's going to take The

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 2>next President of States is going to be President United

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>States is either going to be an angry populist or

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 2>an aspirational populist. It's not going to be a safe

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>mushy in the middle. And I don't mean that ideologically.

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Could be I know, right, it could be a moderate,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 2>it could be a centrist. But if they're aspirational in

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 2>getting this front versus back dynamic, they'll do well.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Such a good point. Okay, let's quickly just talk about Maine.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I was making this comparison between the New York City

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>mayoral last year and the main race because it seemed

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, you know, I covered that race every day.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me the party's running a kind of

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a similar playbook. The party preferred Cuomo, not mum Donnie,

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so they tried to make mum Donni look scary. Voters

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't care. They liked his ideas. Schumer wouldn't even endorse

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>mum Donni when he became the nominee. Now Schumer recruited

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Janet Mills to run against Susan Collins. She tried to

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>make Graham plattn Or look scary, but voters like his ideas,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they like that he's outside of politics. Now she's out,

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Collins could win another term. I mean, give me your

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>assessment of what's going on in Maine.

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it is in part what we were just

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 2>talking about, right, it is Platner gets the front versus back,

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 2>the disruption that it comes down to, who's gonna make

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>me feel heard? Who is going to give voice to

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>my anger and give me a path forward? It's why

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it, right, Like in twenty twenty five, Mom,

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Donnie did very well, but so did Abigail Spandberger and right,

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 2>they all were laser focused on that lane. They didn't

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and where they were running, right exactly, They didn't get

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 2>sucked into cultural battles. They right, they were just laser

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 2>focused on front versus back. True leadership I think is

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 2>run it still is operating on an old paradigm of

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 2>who can appeal to centrist the best? Yeah, how can

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 2>we not have watched the past? How can we have

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>watched the past decade of our politics and not realized

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 2>that ain't the question anymore. Right, It's not about mobilizing

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the base or winning the center. Donald Trump, Donald freaking Trump,

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>was able to do both mobilize his base and pull

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 2>over enough voters from the center. So that's got to

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 2>tell us where it's a different time game. Yeah, it's

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 2>just a different game, and we need to start playing

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 2>that game.

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It feels like Schumer and the Party are running like

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>a twenty ten twelve race. Yeah. I want to end

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>on sort of a positive note for Democrats. Rumors are

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>swirling that Democrats could take the Senate. What do you think?

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Look, I've stopped making predictions over the past decade, same

0:35:55.480 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 2>so so I don't know. I rather be in Democratic

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Party headquarters today than than a year ago. Looking at

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the map, right, I do think things have moved in

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 2>our direction, and I think states, you know, do I

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 2>think we could win Texas U triple bank shot? Maybe?

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 2>But Republicans have to spend a lot of money to

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 2>make sure we don't. And that's money that's not going

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>to North Carolina, which is a state we very much

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 2>can win. You know, do I think we could win

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>in Montana or now with this new candidate in Kansas.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 2>You know again triple bank shot. But suddenly they're in play.

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 2>They're at least, you know, places that are gonna be competitive.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And look, with the President's numbers the way they are

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and people, you know, gas prices not you know, moving

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 2>down fast enough, anything could happen. So I I am.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say I'm bullish on taking the Senate, but

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm also not completely pessimistic. It's it. We got to

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 2>see what happens in the next couple of months. I

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's it's it could happen.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Okay, we're going to our exit poll. It's a

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>series of three questions of varying degrees of seriousness that

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>we always end with. So I'm going to start with

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what is your favorite movie about politics?

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Mamalifah My favorite movie about politics, I'm going to old school.

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 2>It's The Candidate with Robert Redford. Right like it is

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 2>having worked on enough campaigns, it is one of the

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>most true to life of what it's like to be

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>on the campaign trail.

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what people say. We've had We've heard that answer before,

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and what people say is having worked in it that

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is like a documentary one percent. I say the same

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>about broadcast news, which is like the journalist's favorite movie.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Like that's our version, it's a documentary.

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, exactly.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Someone you admire across the aisle.

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>Look, I'm in Arizona. I grew up, and even though

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I worked against him a number of times, John McCain

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 2>is still to me the model of servant leader, even

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 2>though I disagreed with him and his loss was a

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 2>huge blow to the country in today's politics. Look, I

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 2>think there are a number of people out there who

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 2>are interesting voices, who ideologically I could not be more

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>unaligned with, but I appreciate their spirit of service. I

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 2>think of Governor Kemp in Georgia as somebody who I

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>don't like his policies, but I think he's in it

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>for the right reasons. I Look, I think Senator Collins

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 2>is someone who's in it for the right reasons, and

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 2>even though I don't think she has been effective in

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>ways I would like her to be in pushing back,

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 2>I think she Senator Murkowski Senator Tillis are people who

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 2>are at least in it for the right reasons and

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 2>willing to push back when they feel like they need to, and.

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that good. And finally, how do we save

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>our democracy?

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>My day job is working with young people who are

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking about this every single day, and you know, the

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 2>sooner we can turn the keys over to them, I

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 2>think the better it will be for all of us,

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 2>because Lord knows, we haven't figured out we keep screwing

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it up even more. I think the biggest challenge that

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 2>our democracy faces there are two things, and students are

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 2>very keenly aware. One hyper polarization, the fact that we

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 2>won't even talk to each other. We can't even listen

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 2>to each other, and sometimes algorithms don't let us. That's

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a real issue. And the second is AI and AI

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to have such a profound impact on democracy.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know that anybody has any clue as

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>to all the different ways it's going to disrupt us

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 2>what that's going to look like, but we better We

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 2>better figure it out pretty soon and stop being afraid

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of it. And I think those are two keys.

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>To tackle Love it Moa, Letha, this was such a

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>great conversation. You're so wise. I'm really glad you came on.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>It's so good to talk to you. We got to

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 2>do it bit more.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you and thank you for tuning in. We'll

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>see you next week with more Off the Cup. Off

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cop is a production of iHeart Podcast as part

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Reason Choice Network. If you want more, check

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>out the other Reason Choice podcasts, Politics with Jamel Hill

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and Native Land Pod. For Off the Cop, I'm your host,

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Si Cup. Editing and sound designed by Derek Clements. Our

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>executive producers are me Si Cup and Lauren Hanson. Rate

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and review wherever you get your podcasts, Follow and subscribe

0:40:58.080 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for new episodes every week.