WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema: Time After Time

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind production of I

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you, welcome to Weird House Cinema. This

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is Rob Land, and this is Joe McCormick, and it

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>is Time Travel a clock on Weird House Cinema. Today's

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>movie selection is the nineteen seventy nine romantic sci fi

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>adventure Time after Time by the American writer and filmmaker

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Meyer. So this is a movie that I had

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>never seen until this week. Uh, And I came across

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it by way of a plot description in some article

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I was reading somewhere. I don't even remember what it

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 1>was now, but I discovered in this article that there

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>was allegedly a time travel adventure movie in which the

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>English writer H. G. Wells, real historical figure author of

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the novel The Time Machine, played in this movie by

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm McDowell. Must you was a real time machine to

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>chase Jack the Ripper played by a smooth and sadistic

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>David Warner through space and time in this time machine

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to prevent the Ripper from slashing twentieth century disco dancers.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And the premise was it sounded so bonkers that I

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>immediately thought this had to be a good option option

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for weird House. And then the really surprising thing was

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the more I read about it, the more it seemed

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that most critics really liked this movie, even though I

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>had somehow never really heard of it, or if I

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>had heard about it, it didn't make enough of an

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>impression that I remembered it. So so I saw it

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this out, and I gotta say I was really impressed.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>You know. On the downside, for for weird House context,

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>at least, I will say this movie doesn't actually when

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you're watching it, feel quite as weird in its execution

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as a straight read on the premise would lead you

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to assume. But nevertheless, I think this is mostly just

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a really great movie and it opens up all kinds

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of interesting bigger question is about the themes and ambitions

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of time travel stories and science fiction in general. Yeah.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to view this film again, um, especially

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>after watching Spookies last week. Uh, in part because I

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was excited because you had never seen it and and

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so that would make it fresh. It's a film that

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I had not seen in a long time. I remember

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>watching it on TV. I don't know if they used

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to show it on like t NT, or maybe it

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>came on an E or something back in the day.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>But I remember watching it on television and uh oh

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's uh it does it holds up so well? I

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't I've I've spoken to various people and folks who

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>have seen this movie. They tend to like it. I

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't met anybody who hated it. It's kind of like

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>an Orange Julius. I guess, as long as you just

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really hate orange Joes or really hate um, you know, malls,

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>malls or something. I don't know. It's a terrible analogy,

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. It's something about about this film

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just seems to to sit well with most people. I

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Everything's very well calibrated, like it's sci fi,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's not so sci fi that it turns off

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>people that would be opposed to say, rampaging more locks,

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And yet people like like us, who might say why

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are there no more locks in this picture? It's still

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still so captivating and well acted and well put

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>together that I ultimately can't argue too much about the results. Yeah,

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I I agree. I mean, I would have, of course

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed if it if it went much weirder and wrapped

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in more h G. Wells Lower had more locks and

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff like that. It doesn't, And in fact,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the film is almost the opposite of that. I would say,

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for a science fiction movie involving one of the most

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like notorious, sadistic serial killers in history, this is an

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely uh cozy feeling movie. Would you agree? I would agree.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe this was a PG, but it was a

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine PG, so I do not recommend watching

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>this with with your young children. There is there is blood,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's some mature themes that are explored. But but

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>he even those mature themes, which are you know, just

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the tapestry you're invoking by bringing in a

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>character like Jack the Ripper, they are they are handled

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in a very light and ultimately kind of comforting way,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess, And I think it also helps that uh,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny. I wanna criticize myself because I

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think in a previous episode of Weird House Cinema, I

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was trying to list actors that just have that evil look,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that unfortunately just have faces where maybe they can't overcome

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they look sadistic and sinister, and one

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of the actors I singled out in this regard is

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm McDowell. Like, it's gonna be hard to have Malcolm

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>McDowell as a hero because he just looks like an

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>evil person. That's not a nice thing to say, but

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for some reason he does. And yet I haven't seen

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this movie at the time. In this movie, he's so sweet.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He is this he is, He's very lovable in this

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a Victorian teddy bear. Uh. And and he he

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>also feels smaller than usual. Uh, probably by design the

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>way they were shooting him and maybe leaning into his

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>actual hide a little bit instead of putting him in

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>on an apple box or something. Um. Yeah, it's also

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinating that he This was the film that followed up

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the notorious Caligula, in which he very much played a

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>villain and a nasty character in a in a nasty film,

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and apparently that was part of it. He's like, I

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really don't want to play a villain for for once?

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I play the hero of a picture? And yeah,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he's great in this. It's almost hard to imagine the

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gap that has crossed going from Caligula to this sweet

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>romantic time travel adventure, you know, love story. Galloping across

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the time. Caligula is it's It's a movie that I

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>have tried to watch for badness sake years ago with

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with some friends, and I I couldn't make it through

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie. It is just so so repulsive and like

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it it's the one of the ugliest movies I've ever seen.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Like the colors hurt the eyes. It's just relentless depressing

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>violence and and depravity. There's one part that's, uh, you know,

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it would have been funny in a different movie because

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's so ridiculous. There's a part where like, um, I

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think Malcolm McDowell is like watching a gigantic lawnmower in

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ancient Rome, just like cut off the heads of people

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who were buried up to their necks. But but the

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>movie is like so depressing, Like even that wasn't funny.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, so it's just yeah, just awful. And then yeah,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>going from that to this which is just this this spry,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>sprightly beautiful time travel adventure. Yeah, yeah, it's it's it's

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a quite elite. But yeah, he's he's very good

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in this. And I will say that, as Malcolm McDowell aged,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he kind of aged into that face

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>even more to where it's harder to imagine older Malcolm

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>McDowell playing um a likable character and a non villain.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But but I say that he's been in so many films.

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he pops up later on playing like a

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>kind grandfatherly character. But but also I think he became

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>increasingly typecast as he got older too. Yeah, and he's

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>still active. We'll get into his bio open in a bit.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's still active, so there's still time. Okay,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>how about a movie where Malcolm McDowell plays Santa Clause

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>he could go to Kurt Russell route. You know, I

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I guess the part of the thing is

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are going to pay out and get Malcolm

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>McDowell to play Santa Claus in your film, then clearly

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you want villainous Santa Claus. Like what are you doing?

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You know at this point? One of the Yeah, one

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of those Santa Claus is a is the Monster movie

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is like the one with Goldberg? Remember that one I

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>know of it. Yeah, Well, and maybe we should uh

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>give a little historical context for the premise of this movie,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>which is once again h G. Wells must pursue Jack

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper through time in a time machine to stop

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>him from from ripping the twentieth century. Yeah, well, let's

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>let it rip here. So, first of all, what do

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about H. G. Wells and the

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Time Machine to enjoy this film? Well, not a lot,

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but here the basics. Time Machine is an excellent five

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>novel by English writer H. G. Wells who lived eighteen

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty six through nineteen five. It's a short read, widely available,

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and in my opinion, it holds up really well. It's

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a very readable text today. One thing that's worth noting

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the time this movie is set before H. G.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Wells wrote the novel. So, uh so he wrote the

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>novel in I don't remember exactly the year, but I

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is set in eighteen one or ninety three

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>something like that, or at the beginning is before they

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>travel through time eight I believe that would be the

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be prime ripping uh time right there? Okay,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>al right? At any rate, U this is not the

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>absolute first time travel yarn. That's a it's an interesting

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>discussion to get in. I think we've talked about this

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>in the show when he's trying to figure out like

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>who was the first person to deal with time travel?

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But it was the first time travel story to gain

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>just a huge degree of popularity, and Wells actually coined

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the term time machine. Now, to be clear, the character

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in the book is just the time traveler and is

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>not Wells himself. Alf Wells from a first person perspective,

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and it is. But I don't think we're really supposed

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to assume that Wells made a time machine. No, no,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>no no. This this film, however, takes a different approach.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Um Wells was a futurist, though in real life he

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was not an inventor outside of the invention of sci

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>fi concepts and the like and the exploration of new ideas.

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The book has been adapted a few different times, including

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the famous nineteen sixty George Powell adaptation. This one has

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a really iconic look for the time machine, wonderful morelock designs,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Like when you think more locks, these are the more

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>locks you probably picture. But there was also a nine

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>eight TV movie and a two thousand to remake that

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, and as uh, I remember it being all right.

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But the interesting thing about it is that it was

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>directed by wells great grandson Simon Wells. Really that's interesting. Yeah,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's worth seeing it on its own, even if it

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>came out in two thousand two, which man movies from

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two, it is hard to escape that early too. Thousands. Look,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it just kind of bleeds in everything. I watched a

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>movie from two thousand two the other day. It was

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>a really bad but enjoyable Clint Eastwood detective movie from

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two called blood Work. I don't know if

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that one. I've not seen that one. Well, so,

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean absolute like hack detective story, hilarious but also

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>quite fun, and it's got that look it just like

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>everything from two thousand two has this I don't know

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this some feature of like the contrast and the colors

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and everything. Just everything looks kind of slick and awful. Well,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while since I saw the two thousand

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>two time Machine, but I remember, I remember being entertained

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>by it, and I remember that it had Jeremy Irons

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is a more lock in it, So oh, good, good

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>choice there. Yeah, I remember the more locks look pretty good.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>But then again, I'm just I'm generally in on the

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>idea of moral it's hard to break more locks from me. Oh.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that was true about the historical figure H. G.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Wells that is also true of the character in the

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>movie is that he was known as something of a

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of progressive utopian socialists and a futurist. So he

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of like visions of the future that

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>involved uh, progressive political ideals. I'm not sure if all

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the exact things stated by the character in the

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>film would be real things that H. G. Wells thought

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or would have said, but it's at least sort of

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>in the ballpark, right. And then ultimately, the film is

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>largely about the idea that if if Wells represents optimism

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for the future coming out of the Victorian Age, and

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the optimism about what was possible in the Victorian

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Age in the late nineteen hundreds, then our other figure

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>represents the worst of that time period, the ricorious character

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of Jack the Ripper. So what do you need to

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>know about Jack the Ripper? Okay, here the basics. So

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, this is the original true crime sensation

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and a topic of continued and largely fruitless intrigue today.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Also referred to as a leather apron, this was an

0:11:55.760 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>unidentified serial killer, active in London's Whitechapel district around eighty eight.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He targeted under privileged members of society, generally prostitutes, and

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was known for the modus operandi of slicing first the

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>throat then the abdomen, as well as his taunting letters

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to the media. Now, one note I do have there

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is that because this movie set me off on a

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>reading spree where I was like, oh, I need to

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>know things about Jack the Ripper. Uh. The letters are

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous things about him, though I

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>think there is serious doubt about the authenticity of all

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of the letters that I think there's only one letter

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>that historians take seriously at all as possibly being from

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the killer himself, and this is the so called from

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Hell letter because and I think the reason this is

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the only one that's really taken seriously is that it

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was accompanied by a jar containing a piece of actual

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>human kidney, allegedly taken from one of the victims, though

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible to confirm whether it actually came from

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a victim or not. They didn't have like DNA testing

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time obviously, and uh and so, and it

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>could have been obtained from a medical college or cadaver

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Yeah, and I believe the police

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time they suspected or that one of their

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>theories was that it that was the origin of the

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>organ as it came from some sort of you know,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>um cadaver situation as opposed to have murder victim. And

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the weird things about it is that the

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>from Hell letter, I will say, just as like a

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>literary appraisal of the interest contained in these letters, it's

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the less interesting ones. Like the really interesting

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>letters are the ones that are pretty much yeah, known

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to be hoaxes that were sent possibly by like journalists

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to gin up interest in the story further to

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sell more newspapers. Yeah. Absolutely, those those are some of

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the more entertaining letters. But also and you can see

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>why they would have been fabricated just to sort of

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>drum up this uh this this paranois and excitement about

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the murders they have that one of them has that

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>line I shan't stop ripping right until I am good

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and buckled or something. Yeah, uh so, so, yeah, you know,

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a high probability that he didn't write any of

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>these letters, but they are very much associated with him

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea of this this figure that is killing and

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>then mocking the press, that is that is the subject

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>out of all this media and public fear and fascination,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but is also potentially feeding it as well and feeding

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>off of it, right. And I think it's these letters,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>even though probably none of them are authentic, or at

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>least most of them are not authentic. It's these letters

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that sort of create one of the most lasting legacies

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of Jack the Ripper, which is this idea that he's

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of playing a game of chess with the police, uh,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and that this is a major part of his motivation.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And this does come through in the movie as well,

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because you see Jack the Ripper in his identity before

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he's revealed to be Jack the Ripper. Uh. He he

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is a friend of H. G. Wells and they play

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>chess together in the movie, and you know he's very

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>into like outsmarting his opponents. Yeah. Now, there are I

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>think just five verified murders if you will, by Jack

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper, though there are others that may or may

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not be attributed to him, depending on where you're falling.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And then likewise, there's a great deal of folklore, fiction

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and pseudo history that just abound within the realm of

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Ripper ology. Um, he was never caught. And there are

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>numerous suspects that have been discussed over the years, and

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they range from the potentially believable to the to the

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>outrageous to the unbelievable even during the time. Um, and

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them, some of these suspects did have a

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>surgical background, because there was the whole apparent removal of

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>organs in the murders, and so you know, some thought,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>well this, this indicates that they had the individual had

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>some level of training or expertise or familiarity with human anatomy. Now,

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in time after time, the Ripper is this character Dr

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>John Leslie Stevenson, who is not an historical person as

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>far as I can tell. But weirdly enough, the Outer

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Limit episode Ripper, which stars David Warner and carry Elis,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was co written by Leslie Stevens. So there you go.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>That's enough of a connection for Ripper ology. I think, Wait,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is Leslie Stevens a real person and it's just a

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>coincidence or is this a pseudonym for saying it was

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like written by David Warner or something? Um, I mean

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's an IMDb writing credit. That's not David Warner, So

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's either just somebody who happens to

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be Leslie Stevens, or is the actual Jack the Ripper

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>having time traveled to the nineties to make a career

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for himself in uh in TV screenplay writing? Okay, So

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the last week I've been wandering around my house NonStop

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>singing that Cindy Lauper song. I can't get it out

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of my head. Is it's not used in the film?

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the song was released after this film came out.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there any connection between them? Allegedly, Cindy Lauper was

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>inspired to write the song because she liked the movie,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and weirdly enough, there was a in re in history,

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there's been a there was an attempt to bring the

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>novel Time After Time back as a TV series, and

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>each episode of the TV series gets its title from

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the lyrics to Cindy Lauper's Time after Time. Nice Nice.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Cindy Lawper doesn't get enough credit as a songwriter. You know,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have you ever have you ever actually listened to the

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like the lyrics of girls just want to have Fun?

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>That's actually like a sort of profound and sad song. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I I like some Cindy Lapper. I haven't really been

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>playing her recently, but but yeah, she had a number

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of hits I would I would generally take the Cindy

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Lapper songs of that era and put them above the

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Madonna songs of that era. Oh, I don't know if

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I would go that far, but definitely I'm a fan.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And now I have to correct myself because I actually

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just looked it up to make sure and found out

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that Cyndy Lawper did not write girls Just Want to

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Have Fun. Her version was a cover version. Whoops. Okay, well,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>great song anyway, and her version is great. So we've

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>already pretty much done our elevator pitch for time after time?

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Shall we go ahead and listen to just a little

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of the trailer audio? Not the full thing, but

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit of the trailer maybe some Oh man,

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this trailer. I feel like it really

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it takes away from the movie. But okay, let's let's

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just get at least get a snippet. The time is

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and novelists and in better H. G. Wells makes us

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>startling announcement, gentlemen, I am talking about traveling through time

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in a machine constructed for that Betty purpose. The first

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to use the machine, however, is Dr John Leslie Stevenson,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>better known to history as Jack the Ripper Time after time. Yea, yeah,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a bad trailer. I hate the

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>comedic trailer narrator who's like Jack the Ripper is on

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a on a vacation, you know, it's like always this

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Casey Cason asked, voice that's like, you're

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a good time at the theater and give

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>me the voice of God any day over this nonsense.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>The trailer is bad in numerous ways, and I do

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not recommend watching it. First of all, because of what

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. The tone and the narrator are irritating and

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I think do not accurately communicate the the spirit and

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>feeling of the movie. And second, the trailer reveals the

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>entire plot, including the ending. It's one of those awful things.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>So like, if you've seen the trailer, the movie is

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of spoiled for you. Yeah. Yeah, not a good

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>way to go into this film. Now, being a time

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>travel movie. One of the things that I was thinking

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about for this episode is it it sort of made

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>me want to create an in house taxonomy of major

0:19:55.680 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>types of time travel stories, sorted by prevalent themes um

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>And of course, any given movie or story can partake

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of multiple different time travel themes, multiple of the themes

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that follow that we're about to talk about. And I'm

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>also sure this list will not be exhaustive. People will

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>probably right in and be like, hey, what about this

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>type of movie? It will be something I didn't even

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think about, But I think here are some of the

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>major categories of time travel stories. Uh and, and we

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>can talk about how time after time fits or does

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>not fit into each of them. So the first one

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention is what I would call the

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>debugging history story. Uh and. This is a type of

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>time travel story that focuses primarily on isolating variables of

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect in the progression of history and human life.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's largely concerned with with the consequences of decisions

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and the long term ripple effects of seemingly minor events

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>and encounters. So this can be seen, for example, in

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Future, where Marty McFly learns that that

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, certain minor interventions with his parents as teenagers

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like he gives his teenage dad a pep talk about

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>standing up for himself and so forth. This radically changes

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances of his family thirty years later. Or it

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can be seen in movies that don't even really feature

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>time travel, but just merely the alteration of past events.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>An example here might be the final act of It's

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a Wonderful Life, where George Bailey learns that, you know,

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if if Clarence the Angel tweaks history so that he

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was never born, everybody else in his life turns out

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>miserable and impoverished, and he sees the impact that his

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>life had. I would actually say that Time after Time

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>does not partake heavily of the debugging history theme, though

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>there are little nods here and there, especially at the ending.

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We can maybe something we can talk about if you

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 1>want or not, though it's a spoiler for the movie.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Um but but this is not the major type we're

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>dealing with in Time after Time. Yeah, this this film. Ultimately,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the character of Wells is more interested in protecting the future.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what That what prompts him to travel through time

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>in the film, or at least no not necessarily protecting

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the actual future. By protecting wells idea all of the future.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So in a sense, the existence of Jack the Ripper

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>in UM, even in the late nineteenth century, is a

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>threat to his worldview and vision for change. The idea

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of Jack the Ripper escaping into his envisioned utopia is

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a total threat to this idea. Now, while we're going

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>through and talking about time after time, I feel like

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we should also just run through this list. The example

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of Transfers to the other time travel movie we've done, Yeah,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think the basic answer is always going to

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be yes, sort of maybe, but who knows, because Transfers

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is all over the place with time travel and why

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it and who's doing it. But I would say, yes,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Transfers definitely does this, but it's messy. Okay, that's a

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>debugging history. The next major time travel theme I would

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>say is Journey to Time Island. This is a time

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>travel story. This is probably one of the least thematically

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting ways of using time travel in the story, and

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a story that uses some time in the future

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>or the past primarily as a hostile setting for adventure.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So in these stories, the past or the future can

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>be thought of as largely equivalent to physical places like

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Skull Island or the Forbidden Planet. It's just a dangerous

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>place for the characters to arrive and then face unfamiliar challenges.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And I will say Time after Time does not largely

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>fall into this category, but actually H. G. Wells novel

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>The Time Machine is more in this vein. Yeah, traveling

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>into a distant future for example. That uh, that definitely

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is a commentary on the present or the Victorian present

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that the author lived in. But also it is just

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of this fantastic place in which to have an adventure, right.

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the time machine also partakes largely of another

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>more interesting category we'll get to in a minute now

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 1>that the time travel the time Island. Rather this idea,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 1>uh I was I was thinking to myself, Okay, well,

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what's something that that falls in line with this? In

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>my mind instantly goes to Ray Bradbury's A Sound of Thunder,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>though that one is also a debugging history tale to

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a to a large extent, sort of accidental debugging of history.

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>That this is bugging history, Yeah, inserting bugs in the

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>lines of code of history. Yeah. Yeah, the idea I

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>can go back into dinosaur days and have a safe

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>adventure hunting dinosaurs, but then you find out no, you

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>cannot by doing so you're totally bugging in the future.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That's very good observation. Okay. Third category, so we had

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>debugging history, journey to time island. Third one, I will

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>say is what I would call fish out of time.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a time based equivalent of the standard fish

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>out of water plot seen most often in comedies, where

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>most of the tension, usually comedic tension is based on

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>failures of the out of place protagonists to understand and adapt,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>understand and adapt to local conditions, expectations, you know, wandering around,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>being confused by surroundings, accidentally violating taboos. So you can

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think of like Borat but with time instead of place,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or Demolition Man with the three cshells. Yeah. Another example

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of this would be um a Connecticut Yankee and King

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Arthur's Court. You know, whether a lot of comedic fodder

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>is made on the fact that, oh, this person is

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>out of time. They don't know what this means, and

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the people that he's around now they don't know what

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this means, and hilarity ensues, and you know, I will say,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>usually fish out of time is not one of my

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>favorite time travel themes. But Time after Time has a

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>good amount of this, and I loved it in this movie.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say, is it works much better in Time

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>after Time than it usually does in other stories of

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this sort. Yeah, it really excels at this, often with

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that on paper just sounds awful, like the idea

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what if what if H. G. Wells traveled to the

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>late seven Days and went to a McDonald's. Uh, it

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds awful, but it's great. It's great. My favorite. That's

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite scenes where he goes into the

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's and he's trying to make sense to everything. And

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 1>then later he's having a meal with the romantic interest

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and and she asked or how the food is and

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>he's like, Oh, it's better than the Scottish restaurant where

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I had breakfast macdougals. So yeah, yeah, this this film

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>excels at the fish out of time. Oh and he

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>gets really excited when he figures out what fries are.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah yeah, he's like, oh, it's palm Fritz Fritz.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Now as far as transfers goes, um, I think they

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>did this. I'm pretty sure they did this. Uh, there's

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a there was a fair amount of humor in transfers.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's if if you have humor in your time

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>travel scenario, you're probably engaging in this trope. Okay, the

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>next category is the one. I feel like I need

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a snappier name for this one, but it's basically what

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I would call the time travel arms race. And these

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that tend to be the most complicated

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of plotting, and that's because they're the ones

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that take the premise the most seriously, like they're thinking

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>really hard about what it would actually be like to

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have the power to travel back in time and uh,

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and not just as a means to get the protagonist

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to an unfamiliar setting, but actually as an ongoing mechanism

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that can be used over and over, often ultimately as

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a weapon, something that grants godlike power, because if you

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen in advance, and you have

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the power to go back in time and approach any

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>situation differently, you can make almost any situation turn out

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>your way. And so this gives anybody who possesses the

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>power of time travel the temptation to use it for selfish, deceitful,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or evil purposes, and so I think these plots often

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>contain both protagonists and antagonists who have the power to

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>travel through time, uh, trying to sort of travel back

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>further and further to gain advantage over one another. So

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the themes of this would usually include thoughts about weaponry, strategy, tricks,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and the dangers of having too much power, especially too

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>much technological power. Good examples of this I think would include,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>like the movie primer Um, the overarching premise of the

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Terminator films, though there's not a lot of this mechanic

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>within the movies themselves Terminator, the setup of each film

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>usually involves something some form of the time travel arms

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>race uh. And I guess in terms of more recent movies,

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you could think about Tenant as a version of this.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Yeah, now, Transfers, I think, I think definitely

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>transfer has got into this territory because there is the

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.959
<v Speaker 1>idea that, yeah, cult members have gone back in time

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and they have they have transfer armies, and so we

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>need to send Transfer cops back in time to deal

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with them. So yeah, Transfers, being a high minded time

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>travel movie, definitely gets in on this action. Though I

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would say Time after Time has very little of this,

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and it would have made it an entirely different film

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in ways that we might mention later when we talk

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about the plot. But uh, I

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really hold this against the movie because it just

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>decided to go in a different direction with the way

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>its structured its story. But but Time after Time could

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have been a completely different film if it had just

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>taken this premise seriously and and h G. Wells it said, Okay,

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I can always just go back one more day in

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the past and do this instead, right right? Um? Or

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess another thing that could have complicated matters is

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of is the question of how many time

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>machines are there? And is the time machine a singular

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>entity or is time travel a technology that may be

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>reproduced in this film? In Time after Time, there is

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>one time machine, um, and there's some interesting plot mechanics

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that keep it that way. And additionally, nobody has subsequently

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>understood the time how time travel works. The time machine

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>winds up in a museum in San Francisco, uh, and

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's fully functional, and nobody has really taken it apart

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how it works. Um. Which, if if

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be really pedantic about about it. Yeah, it's

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it's that's kind of silly, but it works within the

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>context of the film. Yeah, I agreed. So the next

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>category I want to mention is kind of a subcategory

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's more of a category worry that would apply

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to usually how a like a twist at the end

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of an of a time travel story. But this is

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what I would call the have you heard about the

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Fates version. I kind of don't want to list examples

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of this because by including them in this category I

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>would usually be spoiling some kind of good twist in

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the movie. But this is a variation that usually starts

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with something that looks more like debugging history or the

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>time travel arms race, only for the protagonist to discover

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>too late that the Fates cannot be outrun and while

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they thought they were avoiding some bad outcome by going

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>back and changing the past, they in fact we're not

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>avoiding it or were even causing it or something to

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that effect. Yeah, yeah, not so much. In this picture.

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Transfers did not really get into this either. Um, but

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I will say that it does remind me. And this

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is not a spoiler because and I'll explain why, but

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the Stephen King time travel novel sixty three, UH is

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>really good for starters. I have recommend this book, but

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it uh, it definitely gets into this area early on

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's this idea that, yes, you can travel back

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>into the past via this portal, but once you get there,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>changing history in any meaningful ways is it is incredibly

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult because there's a sense that it's like time is

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this this surging river, and to try and divert the

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>river's course, there are forces like not not know forces

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>with with names or faces so much, but like just

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>reality itself will revolt against you, like everything will go

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong in your attempt to try and change the course

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of history. Oh that's interesting. Yeah, I haven't read that one,

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but but you've tempted me. Yeah. Basically, it's a uh

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>an individual becomes uh convinced that going back and stopping

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the assassination of John F. Kennedy will make the world

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a substantially better place in the future, and therefore it's

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>worth it. It's worth basically like a one way trip

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to go and see this through. And uh it's in here.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>King explores it for in a very long book, but

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in a in also it's a love story which which

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of course brings us back to to this movie. I

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was wondering as I was watching it, how many subsequent

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>time travel romances would just simply not exist if not

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for Time after Time. I'm thinking about everything from Outlander

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to Highlander, which even though Highlander is not about traveling

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>through time via mechanics, it is about immortal characters living

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>outside of their original time and then falling in love.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, I feel like the film was probably very

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>influential on this sort of subgenre of time travel fiction.

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I think this is another great category we

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 1>should mention, which is the the love across time uh story,

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>which is time after time. I think you could definitely

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>say as an example of it's a type of love story.

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's common in a love story to have

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>people who who clearly want to be together, but there's

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>some kind of tension that keeps them apart, and that

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>could be you know, social expectations, it could be you know,

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in romantic comedies, is often a series of article misunderstandings

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that leads them to fighting each other. Uh in. But

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in in a lot of more sort of serious and

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>tragic love stories across history, it's often been like separation

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of time of space, you know, like like we're from

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>different kingdoms or something and we can't be together for

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that reason. But there are movies that do this with

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>time travel as well. It's like, well, no, I've got

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to go back to my time, and you don't want

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave your time and so forth. Yeah. Other times

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the lady hawks scenario. It's like you're a you're

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a hawk during the day, I'm a wolf at night,

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're just dontline, we can't align. That's accept during

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a total eclipse, right, that's right, okay. And then one

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>last category I want to mention, but because I think

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the one that applies the most to time

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>after time, this is the category I would call fresh

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>eyes for bad eras. And this is the type of

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>time travel story that is primarily about commenting on the

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>particular features of an age of the time in which

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they are set, usually the present, but often also the

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>future as influenced by the present. And so I think

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>these tend to contain the most social commentary of any

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the time travel subgenres. So the time traveler is

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>able to look upon an age such as the present

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and see it with fresh eyes, noticing things usually bad

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>things that the chrono locals have learned to ignore just

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're inured to them. And so Time after Time actually,

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>much like H. G. Wells actual novel The Time Machine,

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>partakes heavily of this theme, uh tying it back into

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the novel The Time Machine itself. Apart from it just

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 1>being a sort of journey to Time Island, it's also

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>very much this one because he was using a dystopian

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>vision of the future to suggest that such a future

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>would follow from negative trends that existed in his present.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So he's commenting on the present by suggesting a horrible future.

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But in in Time After Time, it's just looking direct

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ly at the present. And I think this is one

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the most interesting ideas in the movie. So it

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>takes these two time travelers from eighteen nineties London. So H. G. Wells,

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>who the character in the film, is a progressive, utopian

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>socialist in eighteen nineties London. He believes that humanity will

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon advance to a golden age of peace and

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>prosperity and egalitarianism, where there will be no war, no violence,

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>no inequality, no oppression, and so forth. And then the

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>other is Jack, the Ripper, who is sort of the

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>embodiment of violence, sadistic, misogynist id And what if these

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>two figures suddenly got a look at the world in

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine with without having a chance to get

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>used to it as time progresses slowly in the normal sense,

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what would they think? So, of course, there's a scene

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the present where Jack the Ripper turns on a

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>TV and he just starts flipping channels for Wells to

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>see what's on, and it's just seen after seeing both

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>real and fictional of hatred, violence, murder, war, terrorism, nuclear escalation,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>full contact football, and Wells is horrified to see that

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>his utopian dreams were hopelessly naive, and the Ripper is

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>just like, yes, good war football, I am home. This

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is a lovely scene, you know, taking place in Jack

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the rippers hotel room. Um, that's a you know a

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>little a little messy because he's been staying there. He

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been ripping there, but he's been staying there. Uh.

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>He has this line has several lines that really drive

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>this home, but one of them is ninety years ago,

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I was a freak. Today I'm an amateur, that's right, Um,

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's there's so much to love, and there's some

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:41.959
<v Speaker 1>of the little things, like when he turns on the TV,

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he's like, he's clearly at ease in this world. He's

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>wearing the suit of the day, you know, of the

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>time period. He's he's largely acclimatized to the late nineties

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>seventies at this point. But then he holds the remote

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.399
<v Speaker 1>control in a really weird fashion to turn on the TV,

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a great touch. You know, it's like he

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>because this character, Yeah, he's like, I feel the spirit

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of this age, but I'm not altogether on the technology

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just yet. Yeah, it's great, And there are all these

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>little things in the movie that signaled this as it

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>goes on that um, there's an irony where H. G.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Wells is the progressive futurist and the age that he

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>travels to does include a lot of the the ideals

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he believed in, Like he is pleased to discover that

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that women have more rights now than they did in

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>his time and so forth. But there's this irony because

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>he for some reason doesn't feel comfortable and easy to

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>adapt to the culture of the future in the way

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that Jack the Ripper does. Yeah. Uh, the treatment of

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper, and this it reminds me a lot of

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the ideas that Alan Moore would would later explore in

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>his his now classic graphic novel From Hell about Jack

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper, in which the Ripper is presented as the

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dark um uh embodiment of the Victorian age and ultimately

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the the beginning of the twentieth century, a kind of

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>profit of the modern age to follow. Now, Needles would say,

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a much darker treatment. And our ripper and this

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>film does not see himself as such a grandiose figure.

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>He's he simply shan't stop ripping, and this is an

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>even better age in which to do it. But he like, like,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like that line above that we mentioned implies, he feels

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>like the world has ultimately passed passed him by. It's even,

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it's even it's it's not only met his his his spirit,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but it has surpassed his spirit. But he's happy to

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.439
<v Speaker 1>live in this age, right. And so one could take

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>this in a in a kind of um simplistic way

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and say that, well, maybe the movie is just engaging

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of naive pessimism, the pessimistic bias that

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>makes people always think that times are just the worst

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they've ever been. Things are always getting worse the hell

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in a handbasket thinking, I would say, the movie actually

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite do that. It it pretty frequently acknowledges things

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>that in Wells view are better about the present than

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they were in Wells time. But there's also something off

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>about the modern age of special something about the sort

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of about the sort of indifference to violence and the

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of callousness of the modern world that the Ripper

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>finds very welcoming. What is the headline in the newspaper

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that he picks up about. It's a sports headline. It's

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>like rams massacre cults or something like that. It was

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ramsmall cults or something. Yeah, which I love that moment.

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a great one of many great moments in the

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>film where it's like, yeah, that headline is just insane.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It implies outside of the you know, the modern sports

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>understanding of it, that uh that like herbivores are are

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tearying each other apart in the streets, you know, like

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we're living in like a biblically misaligned age. Yeah, and

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know, I appreciate the the interesting complexity

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>of the feeling that it has about the present that like,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>some things have definitely progressed and gotten better since the

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>time that Wells is used to, but there are other

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>things that are just sort of like always new sicknesses

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that continually emerge throughout history. And there's something going on

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with a kind of with a kind of inurement to

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>violence and hatred that just is pervasive in the modern world.

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think a lot of this is

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>exemplified by the setting, because you know, I like the

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of setting it in in um in the United States,

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>even though it you know, it begins in what it's

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be London, but you could have easily you

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can imagine someone arguing, well, let's set this in seventies

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, you know, just straight to Hell City. But no,

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you go to San Francisco, and their treatment in San

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Francisco is is this kind of almost fifty fifty split

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of seedier elements and seedier parts of town. But also

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you have so many, uh you have a lot of

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>time in the film to admire sort of modern late

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>seventies architecture in San Francisco, to to walk through the

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>parks in public spaces. So I think it's a nice balance.

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It's achieved through the setting and ultimately the film is

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>like a in a way, it's like, uh, it makes

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to visit of San Francisco. It's like a

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.399
<v Speaker 1>like a tourism brochure for the city that they spent

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time wandering around the Pan America and

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Exposition buildings, which is funny because he's you know, wells

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is admiring them, and Mary Steen Virgin's character, I think

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>she has to break his heart and inform him that

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they're made of plaster. Yeah, he asked if they're made

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of marble, and she says it is no plaster. But

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is that actually worse? I don't. I don't know. They

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>are beautiful to look at. Since I guess it's time

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to jump into the connections anyway, I just wanted to

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>flag a strange fact, which is that. Okay. So this

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>movie was directed and at least in part written by

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Meyer. I know they were was based on a

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>novel and I think there are multiple story credits for

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the movie. But Nicholas Meyer the director and uh he

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I think wrote the screenplay at least or was one

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the writers. Uh he made this movie, which is

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about H. G. Wells and Jack the Ripper traveling through

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>time to nineteen nine San Francisco. And Nicholas Meyer also

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was one of the writers of Star Trek four, The

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Voyage Home, which involves time traveling to present day San Francisco,

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>but from the future instead of the past. Interesting. He

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>knows what he likes, so Nicholas Meyer was born nine

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>five American writer and director who first made a splash

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>with the nineteen seventy four Sherlock Holmes novel The Seven

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Percent Solution, in which Sigmund Freud helps Sherlock Holmes battle

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>his drug addiction. Interesting. Meyer wrote the screenplay for then

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies six film adaptation that starred Nicole Williamson,

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert Duval, Alan Arkin, and Laurence Olivier, as well as

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Charles Gray and Samantha Egger. It was a big hit.

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Meyer wrote more Holmes novels and then went on to

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>direct this film in nineteen seventy nine, followed by Star

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Trek to the Wrath of Con in nineteen eighty two

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and Star Trek Being Discovered Country in among other films,

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but those those were the big ones. One interesting thing

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>about Nicholas Or as a filmmaker was that he was

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>also behind the nineteen eight three TV special or TV

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>movie The Day After, which was a supposedly uh factual

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>look at the possibilities of nuclear war like what if

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War went hot? And uh and this It's

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell exactly how influential it was, but it

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>has been alleged that this TV movie was pretty influential

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 1>even at like high levels of government and and changed

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the thinking of some military and political officials about antagonism

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Cold War now. He also wrote a number

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>of screenplays, including but not limited to, Star Trek, The

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Voyage Home, Um, The Human Stain, and the pilot episode

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>for the two thousand seventeen TV series Time after Time,

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>which we alluded to earlier, which I have not seen it.

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It may be great, but just looking at stills, it

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>looks like it asked the question what do you Time

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>after Time? But hunkier, it's got some very square jaw lines.

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, Nicholas Meyer Saturn Award winner, and he's been

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>nominated for both an Academy Award and three Emmys. But

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 1>if I understand correctly, this movie, much like two thousand

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>one of Space Odyssey was one of the rare cases

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where a movie based on a book is being completed

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously to the completion of the book. That's right. And

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this leads us to the writer Carl Alexander. Uh. This

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is the son of William Tunberg, who wrote the screenplay

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for Old Yeller, and the nephew of Carl Tunberg who

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote the screenplay for Ben Her. This was his This

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was his first novel, Time after Time though. The book

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually option before it was completed by Nicholas Meyer,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>who happened to be a friend of Alexander's who you know,

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>had to heard him talking about it and had I think,

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 1>looked at a part of the uh, the the novel

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>before it was completed. Uh. And so he was like,

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this is it. I want this to be my next film.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So the film is finished, Um, alongside the book. The

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>book in the film are being completed at the same time. Interesting. Yeah.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>He went on to follow this up with a sequel

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>novel in twenty nineteen, or at least it published in

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. I'm not sure if someone else had to

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>finish it for him or how it worked out with

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the manuscript because he lived ninety through two thousand and fifteen,

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so he would not have lived to see Jacqueline the Ripper,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>published in twenty nineteen. Now, the writer Steve Hayes also

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>has a story credit on In This Boord nineteen thirty one. Again,

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this comes back to the fact that the

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>screenplay in the novel were essentially being completed. At the

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>same time, Hayes did a lot of TV writing, including

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for at least two series that I wasn't familiar with

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>based on popular eighties action films Conan which ran eight

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 1>and Rambo from six, which I got excited about and

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:54.439
<v Speaker 1>then realized that it was a cartoon. But then also

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I find that weird that we decided Rambo needed to

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>be a cartoon. Yeah, I didn't know there were a

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Conan or a Rambo TV series. All right, Well, let's

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>come back to Malcolm McDowell, who plays h. G. Wells

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 1>in This Uh born in nineteen forty three, and this

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:10.919
<v Speaker 1>is this is a guy where it's it's it's hard

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to even figure out where to begin. Legendary British actor

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>who played Alex and Stanley Kubrick's clockwork Orange in ninety one. Again,

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he was in the notorious nineteen seventy nine film Caligula,

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>which came right before this one. He was in eight

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>twos Cat People. I fondly remember him from a child

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>watching us Blue Thunder. He plays the villain in that

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>who flies this little helicopter that battles are big combat

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>police helicopter. That is Blue Thunder a helicopter battle movie.

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>How many are there? And I remember, um, there's one

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>called I think Firebirds that has maybe Charlie Sheen or

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody in it. I think, so, yeah, this one. I

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how big of a splash Blue Thunder was,

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>uh at all, but it was big for me as

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a kid because my aunt had taped some films off

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of HBO. This was one of them, and uh, it

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was probably inappropriate for me to be watching it, but

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I I mainly watched it for the helicopter combat scenarios,

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and then I would build the helicopters out of legos

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and have them crash into each other. That's great. I

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. Actually it wasn't Charlie Sheen. It was Nicholas Cage,

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>who was in Firebirds. Firebirds was a one of those

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>bad action movies that I taped off TV. When I

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, because I was like, looks like this

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>will be a military action movie. I'm you know, I'm

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a boy in East Tennessee. This is the kind of

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>movie I'm supposed to be watching. Not great. So Malcolm McDowell,

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>like we said, he continues to work a lot in

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>films and TV. Uh we can't. We can't mention everything

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he's been in before. I believe he's come up on

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the show before, not not maybe in a film that

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we've watched, but in you know, the various connections. But

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he played Dr Loomis and both of Rob Zombies Halloween films,

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>um which I have not seen, but I assume he's

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>villainous in those. Uh oh no, he I mean he

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>looks villainous because scolmcdwell usually does, though he doesn't in

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>time after time. And I don't know how exactly they

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>accomplished that. Maybe with the careful use of hairstyling and

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>facial hair. Um. But no, he's not villainous in the

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Rob Zombie Halloween movies. He's just not super helpful. Now.

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the interesting things about about Malcolm mcdowen this

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>film is that this is where he met his second

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>wife Mary Steinberg in Um, who plays the character Amy

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Robbins Uh born nineteen fifty three. But yeah, they apparently

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:33.399
<v Speaker 1>met on this film. Uh, fell in love on this film,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>were subsequently married, and their son is Charlie McDowell or

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 1>one of their their children anyways, Charlie McDowell, who is

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a director who directed the excellent film The One I

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Love Mary Steen Virgin is also great in this. She

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>has a she has a kind of funny, nervous energy

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. And uh, and she's of course great

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:56.319
<v Speaker 1>as a as a comic actress. Um. She essentially would

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you say that you think she was sort of playing

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a similar character in this to the character she plays

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in Back to the Future three. I guess Back to

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the Future three is one of those films that I

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.959
<v Speaker 1>think most people only see once, so I don't really

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>remember her all that. I remember the basics of the character,

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know how closely they aligned with this. Well.

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking Back to the Future three had

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to in part be based on or partially derived from

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>her role in Time after Time. Yeah, yeah, I would,

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I would think so. I mean, because ultimately I think

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>most time travel romance novels or films or TV shows

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't have to at least in some way look back

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to time after time. It feels very influential. But yeah,

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>she I think it took me a while to figure

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>out that she is so good as a comic actress

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think I recalled the first the first role

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in which I really became familiar with her was as

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like a nefarious uh lawyer defending the bad company in Philadelphia. Okay,

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you remember that. I it's been a long time. Think

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I saw that many years ago. Oh yeah, I think

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>she plays a ruthless lawyer who's who's defending the company

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this being suited and she has like cruel scenes where

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>she grills Tom Hanks on the stand. But that was

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>before I'd seen her really in any comedy stuff. And

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and she's great in comedies. She's uh, she she's great

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in Step Brothers. Where where Will Ferrell is her son?

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think? And well, you know, it makes me wonders

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Will Ferrell her son with H. G. Wells from this movie.

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I always enjoy her when she's she often pops up

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in various comedy things that her husband Ted Danson is in. Uh,

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, she's been very funny in some of those films.

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember she was an elf and had a pretty

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun role in that, but ultimately Academy Award winning

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>actor here with with Mary as his steam burgeon here.

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Um uh, and she's pretty good in this. Yeah, she's

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's it's an interesting role because she's called

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>upon and I think her only second screen presence to

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>play the modern woman to like to represent not only

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the modern woman from the film's perspective, but the future woman,

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the woman of the future from H. G. Wells His perspective.

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's kind of a uh, it mostly holds

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>up today. Uh. There, there's certainly some some choices here

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and there where you're like, well, I think they would

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 1>they would inevitably do that differently if you were to

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to create this again in like one. But well, I

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>would say those are not choices on Mary Stein versions

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>in the script. Yeah, there there are some, Like it

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is ironic that some of the parts of this movie

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that the movie clearly regards as the most illustrative of

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the culture of the modern world are exactly the ones

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that have aged the most poorly. Like they're they're uh,

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a scene where Mary stein Margin's character uses

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>casually using offensive language to refer to lesbians, like she

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 1>says the D word. I assumed that that word was

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>considered derogatory at the time. I think it was. And

0:51:57.960 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>she talks about how she does want to pursue her

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>own career ambitions, but she offers the disclaimer that I'm

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not women's lib which, yeah, she also echoes this this

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 1>idea that one's work should be your life and that

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>that's not like a healthy choice for the modern professional

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 1>um as if Like, ultimately, Jack the Ripper's main flaw

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is that he's making too much time for his hobbies, right, Yeah,

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's interesting though in this film that's

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like comparing these, you know, different expectations for how the

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.880
<v Speaker 1>future will turn out, especially with regards to things like

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>moral values and all that that. Like, some of the

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>things that are that are considered the most like sort

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of textual illustrations of how people think in the modern

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 1>world are some of the things that have aged the worst. Yeah, yeah,

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that is interesting, but but again, ultimately this is the writing.

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Nothing on Mary. Mary's great in this All right, let's

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 1>let's get to our ripper. Let's talk a little bit

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about the actor who plays Dr. John Leslie Stevenson a K.

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper. This is the legendary David Warner. David

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Warner is fantastic in this. Yes, Yeah, he's he is great. Uh.

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Warner borne as of this recording, still still still around

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and either still active or was still active, uh in

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a limited uh to a limited degree as of Like, Um,

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, especially when you're doing a little older

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>individuals like this. I don't know if he has effectively

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 1>retired at this point or he's, you know, going to

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 1>come back and do some more voice acting. But he,

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like McDowell, has been in just everything twice. He has

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>two five acting credits on IMDb. He has done theater,

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he has done audio dramas. Uh. He seems like a

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who has just constantly been working through you know,

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just just NonStop throughout his old career. Yeah. And like McDowell,

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he also has a real knack for playing villains and

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 1>has played some really notable ones. Uh. He was in Titanic,

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 1>he was in Tron Time Bandits. Yeah, he was in

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek be Undiscovered Country also popped up on some

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>key episodes of of Trek television series including the one

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 1>where the Romulan tortures Picard. I'm sorry, not a Romulan.

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a Cardassian. Good what are they? I don't know,

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 1>card not a cardass Dassian. Cardassian, Yes, the Cardassians. He

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>plays a Cardassian in that, a Cardassian interrogator, and he

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is um. He is torturing Picard and trying him to

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to like break him. Very memorable episode. Speaking of being

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in time travel movies, oh, I love him. In Time Bandits.

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>He plays the villain in Time Bandits. He's he's the

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>embodiment of evil. He's sort of the devil, but he

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is obsessed with technology in Time Bandits, which I think

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:45.239
<v Speaker 1>has some sort of satirical content, but like a lot

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of things in Time Bandits and and Terry Gillian movies

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:50.279
<v Speaker 1>more generally, and it's the thing that I like a

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of times, the satire is not super clear, it's

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's satirical in a kind of vague way. But yeah,

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I love the devil. He's he seems to not really

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>understand what subscriber try dialing is, but he really wants

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to know about it, and he really wants to know

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>about you know, about computers and things. I need to

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:16.400
<v Speaker 1>watch that one again. Yeah. So David Warner is an

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>actor who's been in in way too many things to

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 1>list here, but I thought I might mention some of

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 1>some of my additional favorite roles that he's had, and

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I think all of these are roles where he doesn't

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily play a villain. He has a role in John

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter's in the Mouth of Madness. Uh, he plays the

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>head of the Assassin's Guild and the hog Father, and oh,

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>most memorably, he plays both a good guy and a

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:42.000
<v Speaker 1>bad guy in the Quest of the Delta Knights. I

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:45.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know that movie. Oh, oh my goodness. So the

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Quest of the Delta Knights is this low budget RENFESTI

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:54.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy yarn um and uh, it was. It was It

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>was used on Mystery Science Theater three thousand, So it

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was riffed on on that show. And it's a it's

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a it's a strong Mystery Sentence Theater three thousand episode,

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 1>as I recall. Uh, but I it's it's it's what.

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>The thing I love about it is that it's not

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 1>something that comes to mind as a good David Warner film.

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But there was a fabulous interview with David Warner on

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The A V. Club by Will Harris with David Warner.

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>This was in where they basically just run through and

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 1>asked him about various films that he was in, you know,

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>just you know, what kind of stories do you have

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>from this picture? What kind of stories you have from

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this picture? And they they asked him about the quest

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Delta Knights, and he responded with this, wow.

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Well that was, of course a low budget film which

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>what's what's that called mystery science theater? It ended up

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there laughs. But I had great fun doing it, playing

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 1>two parts. Originally I was just asked to play the

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>one part, and I said, would it save you money

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:51.279
<v Speaker 1>if I played two parts for the same money? And

0:56:51.320 --> 0:56:54.359
<v Speaker 1>they said yes. So I had great fun changing from

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a black wig into a gray wig and putting brown

0:56:56.960 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>contact lenses into my normal blue eyes. It was great

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>one logistically. So I have great affection for that little

0:57:02.960 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>low budget film. I've always loved that, this idea, that

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this this film that we think of as being bad

0:57:08.600 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and forgettable for an actor of David

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Warner's pedigree. He's like, no, that was that was tremendous fun.

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad I did that picture wonderful. In that

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>same interview, he also mentions that when it comes to

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>time after time, the studio wanted Mick Jagger for this role.

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, but but the filmmakers were like, no, we

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want Mick Jagger, we really want David Warner. And

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>they fought for David Warner and thank god they got him. Yeah,

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>because you had to save Mick Jagger for free Jack.

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think free Jack chose this everything we need to

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>know that it would have I'm not saying Mick Jagger

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:48.560
<v Speaker 1>would have made a bad Jack the Ripper, but I

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think he would have been well, he would not

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have been a very good Jack the Ripper. Let's just

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:54.919
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. I like David Warner. Yes, I'm glad

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we got David Warner. Yeah, he's great in this Get

0:57:58.040 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mate. That's your mate, Jagger though, that's not You're

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>David Warner are Ripper in this film. Dr Stevenson Meat.

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He's very very stern um, but at times he has

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a sardonic wit to him. He's it's just it's a

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 1>great role and he has a lot of great lines

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in it. Um. It's it's a very interesting villain and Ultimately,

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this may be my my favorite take on

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper. I mean, Jack the Ripper is a

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 1>character that doesn't automatically mean great film presence, but he's

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Warner's terrific in this film. You know what

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I also love Warner in is uh is Tron where

0:58:35.520 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing in Tron where the same actor will

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>usually play a character in the real world in in

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>mate space, but then also play a character within the

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 1>digital world, And so David Warner does. He's like a

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh corrupt software business leader guy. I think

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he steals somebody's ideas for some video games or something

0:58:57.240 --> 0:59:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in the real world, but then within the computer world

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he plays the villains Sark, who is this evil like

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, frisbee player who works for the Master Control program.

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't seen the Old Tron, it's it's worth

0:59:11.200 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing for a number of reasons. But David Warner is

0:59:13.880 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a great villain in it. Oh yes, he's great. Uh Oh.

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I should also I mentioned that nineties Outer Limits episode

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that has Jack about Jack the Ripper. I watched it

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 1>last night, so I just have to share real quick.

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It's titled Ripper, and it's pretty fun it's maybe a

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 1>little long, like the episode is longer than the premise demands,

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's pretty great. Uh, Carrie els is in it,

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but also Francis Fisher and France Newon of Death Moon

0:59:40.600 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Fame for us of death Men fame. I don't think

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody is actually of death Men fame. But but it's

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 1>got a fun cast and the premise is essentially this,

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what if the Jack the Ripper murders were not due

0:59:53.560 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to a human killer, but we're due to some sort

0:59:56.440 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of of an alien space snake that goes that that

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>travels into people's mouths and then emerges from their bellies,

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thus creating the abdominal wounds associated with the Jack the

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Ripper killings. Yeah, so it's okay. David Warner play the snake. No,

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>David Warner plays um Scotland yard investigator and uh, Carrie

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Ellis plays a former doctor turned opium and um what

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is he is? An he's an opium atic, but also

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he's drinking too much, too much, absentthe and is just

1:00:32.760 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>generally depressed and sweaty all the time. And so so

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>he there's a lot of great overacting from him, like

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just the right level of overacting the type of overacting

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you you want from Carrie Elwis. Okay, well, I guess

1:00:45.120 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see that one. Maybe it'll come up in

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a in a future anthology episode. Al right. Um, as

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>far as other people the film, like, these are really

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the three main characters, I'm not sure how many of

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>these other individuals we need to go into. Some of

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>them are only in it briefly. Um, there are some

1:01:08.960 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>cameos that pop out. Corey Feldman shows up as a child.

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he has any lines, but I just

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>saw him and I was like, wait, that's Corey Feldman.

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And then screen he may say something like look mom,

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a time machine or something like that man's in I

1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, he maybe says something, but yeah, this was

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>his film debut. Another film debut. I believe this was

1:01:31.280 --> 1:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at least his first credit film screen credit is mc gainey,

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>who just plays one of the London Bobbies. But this

1:01:38.920 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is an actor born. You may not envisioned him in

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>your mind when I say his name, but if you

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>look him up, you'll be like, oh, that guy because

1:01:47.280 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a character actor frequently cast as rotund creepers, bikers

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and bad cops. Uh. Yeah, I think about the the

1:01:54.720 --> 1:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>pilot of the plane in con Air. Yeah, yeah, that's right,

1:01:58.520 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that was him. Now, I you really pinpoint the music,

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I should pinpoint the music in this one as well.

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It is a score by Michelos Rosa, who lived nineteen

1:02:08.360 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>o seven through nineteen So if you're watching this in

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the score to this film feels very traditional. Well that's

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because Rosa cut his teeth on film scores in the

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>thirties and forties. He was a Hungarian American child prodigy.

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>His earliest successes included The Four Feathers in nineteen thirty

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>nine and The Thief of Baghdad in nineteen forty. He

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>earned seventeen Academy Award nominations, including three Oscars for Spellbound

1:02:32.760 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in forty five, A Double Life and forty seven, and

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Been Her in fifty nine. So huge name in the

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>score business in the Golden Age of Hollywood. He composed

1:02:41.400 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a good hundred scores and also maintain a career as

1:02:43.960 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a concert composer. So even though it's not the sort

1:02:47.160 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of film score that I would I would want, I

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>would personally want to listen to outside of the viewing experience. Um,

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fine score by a legendary composer. It

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is a nonsense score that you will allow. Yeah, yeah,

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I will allow it. So I guess we're getting kind

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of close to the end here. It doesn't make a

1:03:04.840 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense I think for this one to talk

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in much detail about about the plot or scene by scene,

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but I mean broadly, the main thing is you have

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this set up where you establish the characters in the

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineties, and then there and then there is invocation

1:03:18.640 --> 1:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of the time travel mechanisms. So Jack the Ripper escapes

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to the future and uh, and H. G. Wells realizes

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what has happened, realizes that his friend is in fact,

1:03:27.800 --> 1:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper has escaped to the future using his

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time machine that he invented, and now it's his responsibility

1:03:33.560 --> 1:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to track him down and bring him to justice. So

1:03:36.240 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that's one half of the plot, is this sort of

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>chase through time, and then the other half is broadly

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the love story. When H. G. Wells arrives in the future,

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>he and Mary Steen Virgin, they meet each other at

1:03:45.800 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a bank because he is trying to exchange hundred year

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>old British pounds for money that he can use to

1:03:52.280 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>buy palm Fritz at McDougall's and um and she is

1:03:57.040 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>working there at the currency exchange. They meet and they

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:01.479
<v Speaker 1>fall in love and there's a very sweet love story

1:04:01.520 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that develops between them as as the as the plot

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>goes on, and that the threat of Jack the Ripper

1:04:07.160 --> 1:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is sort of looming in the background. But apart from that,

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess, drawing on the themes, I think

1:04:12.720 --> 1:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's interesting in this movie is, Uh, it's

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>very pointed about h. G. Wells reaction his extreme resistance

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to arming himself with weapons in his struggle against Jack

1:04:28.360 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper. Like he when he goes to try to

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>apprehend him, at first, he doesn't arm himself or try

1:04:33.600 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to use force in any way. He just goes and

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>tries to talk him into coming back with him, and

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>even later on, as the threat becomes more and more dire,

1:04:42.760 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's only at a point of sort of like breakdown

1:04:45.120 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>an extremity that he finally gets a gun. Uh. It's

1:04:48.320 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>something that he's been urged to do, I think by

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Mary Stein Virgin and maybe other characters before that time.

1:04:54.280 --> 1:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And I wondered what you thought about that there was

1:04:56.400 --> 1:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>an interesting decision to make this character who's so almost

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>irrationally resistant to using weapons or arming himself. Yeah, that

1:05:05.840 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I did wonder at that point in the film, like

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>what it was ultimately supposed to mean. Like maybe I

1:05:11.280 --> 1:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>guess it was probably more about the character and the

1:05:14.640 --> 1:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>necessity of the plot, Like it maybe one of those

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>situations where you you you're like, Okay, he's in a

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>life and death struggle. Surely he would break and get

1:05:22.920 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a weapon at this point. Uh. And

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>then it also helps with the whole situation where the

1:05:27.280 --> 1:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>police have apprehended him and they find him not only

1:05:30.520 --> 1:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>behaving suspiciously but also armed. So I guess it has

1:05:34.160 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>its role in the plot. I don't I was I

1:05:36.720 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>struggled to getting anything more significant out of it. Well, well,

1:05:40.240 --> 1:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, I think it probably has something

1:05:42.360 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with like his utopian ideal, because Wells is

1:05:45.680 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>imagining you know, he's his character and the actual H. G.

1:05:49.000 --> 1:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Wells in in the late nineteenth century, like was a

1:05:51.840 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>member of the Fabian Society and didn't think that, you know,

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that incrementalist change in a progressive direction would eventually eliminate

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>war and poverty and all that kind of stuff. And

1:06:01.320 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so if he's thinking of the utopian ideal. I mean,

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems that he is committed to the utopian ideal

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of non violence in a way that even could be

1:06:12.440 --> 1:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>very self destructive and could be seen as irrational in

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these cases where like clearly he's dealing with like a

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>dangerous killer one on one. Yeah. And and it's interesting

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that the time when he breaks this is in a

1:06:24.360 --> 1:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>moment of weakness. It's when he's sort of like lost it. Yeah,

1:06:29.040 --> 1:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but I thought that also had interesting implications. And I

1:06:31.400 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to spoil anything, but for how how the

1:06:33.680 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>conflict is finally resolved in the end. Another point I

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>would I would make about the time machine because I,

1:06:40.520 --> 1:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to step into a movie like

1:06:42.480 --> 1:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this and I expect to sort of geek out about

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the particulars of time travel a bit. And it's interesting

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you ask me to explain exactly how the

1:06:51.200 --> 1:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>time machine works, and I'm not talking about like the

1:06:54.080 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the power system at all. It's supposed to

1:06:55.920 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>be like solar powered or something, but there's still powered

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>even though it's in his basement, right, But there's this

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>whole bit about, uh, the different keys that make it

1:07:04.520 --> 1:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>do different things, and I cannot tell you what how

1:07:08.680 --> 1:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>these exactly worked? Uh? But the film, the film screenplay

1:07:13.400 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and presentation is so effective that you you don't really

1:07:16.800 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have to think too much about it. Uh. But it's

1:07:19.720 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>almost like the whole situation where it's like you you

1:07:22.000 --> 1:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have to try and draw a bicycle. You have this

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>vision of the bicycle in your head and you think

1:07:25.560 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you understand it, but then you really don't, not enough

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to draw it. Uh. And I feel like that's how

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the time machine functions in this this plot, Like they

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it works it. I understand how it functions in the

1:07:35.480 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>plot and ultimately in the the climax of the picture,

1:07:38.880 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>but I also would struggle to explain how these keys

1:07:42.600 --> 1:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>work and which one does what. That's one type of

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>writing skill, I mean, one good quality of writing is

1:07:48.120 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>writing that gives you the illusion of explanatory depth. I mean,

1:07:51.000 --> 1:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>most stories that you enjoy, you probably couldn't go through

1:07:55.320 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and explain in the same level of detail as the

1:07:57.800 --> 1:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>author why exactly everything happen ends and stuff. But there

1:08:01.280 --> 1:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a sort of ease you settle into with certain

1:08:04.720 --> 1:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>types of storytelling, with good writing and all that, where

1:08:07.400 --> 1:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where you just kind of like forget about it. You

1:08:09.320 --> 1:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it, and you you accept that everything

1:08:12.520 --> 1:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense even when it often doesn't. And I mean,

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and one way in which it doesn't that I wanted

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to bring up is how this movie does not get

1:08:21.439 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>into the archetype of the time travel story the arms

1:08:24.920 --> 1:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>race that I was talking about earlier, and I was

1:08:27.720 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how different the movie could have been if

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it had embraced that ethic. So when Jack the Ripper

1:08:32.880 --> 1:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>flees to the future, the way H. G. Wells decides

1:08:37.040 --> 1:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it is he's going to go to

1:08:38.680 --> 1:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time in the future and bring him back

1:08:41.080 --> 1:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of going one day in the past and preventing

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper from stealing his time machine in the

1:08:48.160 --> 1:08:51.639
<v Speaker 1>first place. Like that. That might have been a wiser choice,

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't have made for his fun of motion picture. Yeah, yeah,

1:08:54.960 --> 1:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just different storytelling sensibilities. Um. And ultimately, I mean, I

1:08:58.800 --> 1:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>think it comes down to what is it that the

1:09:01.720 --> 1:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>storyteller really wants us to think about. In this case,

1:09:04.840 --> 1:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they want us to think about, uh, the

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>qualities of the present age in which the movie was made,

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the arc of history, and how that

1:09:13.280 --> 1:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>would be sort of metabolized by somebody from the past

1:09:16.200 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>with utopian ideals and and things like that, and it

1:09:19.520 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>wants to tell that kind of story more than it

1:09:21.479 --> 1:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to tell the kind of story about the power

1:09:25.000 --> 1:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that would be granted by a time machine and and

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>how people would use that power. Yeah. My final note

1:09:32.240 --> 1:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on this film is that there's a scene later on

1:09:34.280 --> 1:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>where H. G. Wells is using a phone booth. Oh

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>my wait, let me back up another great point in

1:09:40.400 --> 1:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this film where I was laughing out loud and disturbing

1:09:43.040 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>my wife while she's trying to work in the next room.

1:09:45.600 --> 1:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It was the whole scene with the garbage disposal. Like,

1:09:48.240 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene where somebody goes to use a garbage

1:09:50.200 --> 1:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>disposal and you just see the hand. It turns out

1:09:52.360 --> 1:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not H. G. Wells, but you're like, oh no,

1:09:55.040 --> 1:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>don't let H. G. Wells use the garbage disposal. He

1:09:57.800 --> 1:10:00.599
<v Speaker 1>is not ready for this technology. Very good point. Yeah,

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's repeatedly confused by phones that he eventually gets

1:10:03.840 --> 1:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the hang of them. Um. But but yeah, there's a

1:10:06.960 --> 1:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>great part where he goes to a telephone booth and

1:10:09.439 --> 1:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's some like graffiti that I think is supposed

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to to display the sort of like violence and callousness

1:10:15.840 --> 1:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of the age. Yes, it says eat razor blades, which

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which is great because it's one of the I love

1:10:21.120 --> 1:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>it when movie graffiti is like clearly orchestrated. It doesn't

1:10:24.520 --> 1:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like an organic bit bit of legit graffiti art

1:10:30.240 --> 1:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>from the age like this is the prop Department. But

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it feels perfect for this film. Like it. It feels

1:10:34.960 --> 1:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in line with the sort of worries about the future

1:10:38.240 --> 1:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in the present that are inherent in this tale of

1:10:40.720 --> 1:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper traveling through time. All right, well, we're

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably go and close it out here. Obviously, we'd

1:10:47.880 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there. If you have

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>not seen Time after Time, well lucky you. It's widely

1:10:53.840 --> 1:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>available on disc and as a digital purchase or rental

1:10:57.000 --> 1:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>or a physical rental if you have a video store

1:10:59.240 --> 1:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like say video Home in your area. As of this recording,

1:11:02.600 --> 1:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>it's currently streaming on HBO Max in the US, So

1:11:06.800 --> 1:11:08.639
<v Speaker 1>if you sign into that app, if you if into

1:11:08.680 --> 1:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that app, if you use that service, you can skip

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>all the Mortal Kombat and Suicide Squad stuff, go right

1:11:13.720 --> 1:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to the classics they have. They really have a great

1:11:15.680 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>selection of older films on there. Oh, Yeah, I've lately

1:11:18.280 --> 1:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>been impressed by by the selection of older movies on HBO.

1:11:21.360 --> 1:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Max thumbs up on that. In the meantime, if you

1:11:23.800 --> 1:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>want to check out other episodes of Weird House Cinema,

1:11:25.720 --> 1:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll find it on Fridays and the Stuff to Blow

1:11:27.840 --> 1:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind podcast feed were primarily a science podcast, but

1:11:31.800 --> 1:11:35.799
<v Speaker 1>on Friday's we put aside most of the science discussion.

1:11:35.800 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's been more of it and here since

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about time travel, but generally Friday's that those

1:11:41.320 --> 1:11:43.599
<v Speaker 1>are those are our days to just talk about weird films,

1:11:43.640 --> 1:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and thus here we are huge thanks as always to

1:11:46.479 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>our wonderful audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

1:11:49.960 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us with feedback on

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>this episode or any other, to suggest topic for the future,

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just to say hello, you can email us at contact

1:11:57.520 --> 1:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to

1:12:07.200 --> 1:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for My Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:15.479
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.