WEBVTT - Tech Stocks Flirt With Worst Week Since 2022

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news from.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Mark Hard We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon.

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Valley, NBN.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Ed Love Love.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 6>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Technology Broadcom. It's falling hard after a disappointing forecast despite

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 6>robust demands for AI products.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 5>Tech stocks flirting with their worst week since twenty twenty

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 5>two ahead of Apple's big launch event, and the.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 6>White House is targeting China again, planning a fresh round

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 6>of chip related export controls. We discussed, but first we

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 6>have some macro breaking news from the Federal Reserve and

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 6>the Mann To bring us the details is one McKee Bluemost,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 6>Chief International Economic Suppose, the correspondent coming from FED speak.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is what everybody's been waiting for all day.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 7>The job's number comes in at one forty two and

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 7>unemployment falls back to four point two. What will the

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 7>Fed do fifty or twenty five? We get a hint

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 7>from Chris Waller, the Federal Reserve governor, often seen as

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 7>the leading guide to FED activity, and he says today's

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 7>data show it's time to cut rates. Determining the pace

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 7>of rate cuts and ultimately the total reduction in the

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 7>policy rate are decisions that lie in the future. As

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 7>of today, I believe it is important to start the

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 7>rate cutting process at our next meeting. If subsequent data

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 7>show a significant deterioration in the labor market, the FOMC

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 7>can act quickly and forcefully to adjust monetary policy. Now,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 7>while Waller says we are not in recession and it

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 7>doesn't necessarily look like we are going into recession, the

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 7>economy looks pretty strong. He says the risks are now

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 7>tilted towards the downside on growth, Inflation has gotten better.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 7>He doesn't say whether it'll be fifty or twenty five,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 7>but says that's a decision that's coming up team.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Once we get through the yield, show me the Nasdaq

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 5>one hundred, or show me the S and P five hundred,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 5>and let's show our audience that the market's kind of

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 5>changed direction on those headlines. Mike, I want to read

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 5>one specific bit back to you, which is the current

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 5>batch of data no longer requires patients. It requires action,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 5>but there's no size and scope to what action means.

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 5>We don't have a basis points number do we.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 8>We don't, And that's a little bit odd.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 7>And in the sense that Chris Waller goes on to

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 7>say that he was an advocate of front loading rate

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 7>increases when inflation went up, and if the data supported

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 7>he would be an advocate of front loading rate cuts.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 8>What data is he talking about.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 7>We really don't get much more before the next FED meeting,

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 7>So I'm not sure why he wasn't more specific, other

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 7>than perhaps he doesn't want the markets to get ahead

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 7>of themselves in pricing.

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 6>That's what markets do. They get ahead before dugging. Michael McKee,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 6>just brilliant to have you on this market moving story.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 6>We appreciate it. Let's get analysis from the market. Shannon

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 6>Sicil is with us for more, CEO of Bannery and

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 6>Capital Management, which helps independent advisors with alternative investing options.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 6>And currently you've got four billion dollars under advice. And

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm really interested into ultimately how much macro the FED

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 6>is guiding investment choices right now, or how much you

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 6>can think about AI and productivity and technology still winning out.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 9>So I think you've got to think of those things

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 9>in two separate ways. Right there is the current economic

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 9>environment in which the FED has been tightening, They've been

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 9>raising rates for a while, they've tried to get inflation

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 9>under control. The ramifications of that is that it softens

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 9>labor markets, it slows growth. The goal, of course, is

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 9>for it to slow growth, not growth go negative, and

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing that kind of play out because it's more

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 9>expensive to borrow money in the capital markets are reacting accordingly.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 9>You can think of that as the current environment and

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 9>still believe that technology trends like AI win longer term.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 9>And it doesn't change the fact that companies, when they

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 9>look at where they're going to deploy capital and where

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 9>the opportunities lies, are going to do it in the

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 9>places they think they need to develop in order to

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 9>compete going forward. And so as they make those capital

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 9>deployment decisions, they are looking at things like AI, which

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 9>is the number one thing that they need to be

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 9>considering to continue to stay competitive. A great example is Apple, Right,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 9>everybody was down on the stock prior to their announcements

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 9>of how they were going to be incorporating AI into

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 9>their iPhone platform and into their other devices. Right before that,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 9>everybody was like, oh, there behind the eight.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 8>Ball shown on the stock.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Hurt let me jump in there, and I'm sorry to

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 5>cut you off. I actually want to continue with some

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 5>of the real time reaction to those fed wallheadlines. One

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 5>of the alternatives that you track closely is bitcoin, right,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 5>And when we got the jobs numbers, bitcoin jumped and

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 5>was in positive territory for much of the session. Going

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 5>into those fed wallheadlines at the top of the eleven

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 5>east an hour, it was markedly lower, about two and

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 5>a half percent.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 8>It came off that a little bit.

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Use that case study of one single session to explain

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 5>why you track bitcoin so closely for your clients.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 9>So again we think bitcoin is using or even ease

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 9>it's crypto in general. Art right are taking advantage of

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 9>a technology of the future in blockchain.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 10>You know, blockchain is.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 9>A protocol, and we've seen the revolutions of protocols throughout

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 9>out the history of the Internet. You know, everything from

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 9>voiceover Internet protocol to HGTP is a protocol, like these

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 9>are all protocols.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 6>Blockchain is a protocol.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 9>Bitcoin works on that protocol, and that is a future

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 9>technology that we believe will be great.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 11>You know, more largely adopted.

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 9>What we saw in the short term reaction to information

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 9>had more to do with a risk on risk off trade,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 9>not necessarily the adoption of the protocol. So you can

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 9>believe two things at once. This is the difference between

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 9>a trader and a long term investor. Right, you can

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 9>believe that in the short term you're going to have

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 9>the market movements that you can profit from, and you

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 9>can also believe that, I don't care about what happens

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 9>on one individual day, but the longer term trend wins

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 9>out in the long term.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 6>That's what happening when we're looking at the likes a

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 6>Broadcom today or in video last week, that it's the

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 6>trading that said them so much lower on actually pretty

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 6>fundamentally decent numbers in the long term, but they disappoint

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 6>because expectations have run so far so fast.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 9>It's exactly right now. There's two different type of analysis

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 9>in finance, right, there's technical and there's fundamental. So the

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 9>fundamentals remain strong, but the technicals broke down, and the

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 9>technicals drive a lot of the algorithms that move the

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 9>markets these days, and so that's why you can see

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 9>these short term price dislocations that occur even though fundamental

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 9>information and the actual company itself is in good shape.

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Seana, you stated the line that I've been using all week,

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 5>which effectively is one session a market does not make.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 5>But I just want to stick with what's happening right now.

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, we had that statement from Waller, you know,

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 5>tie it all together the post mortem of Nvidia, what

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 5>the expectation of what the FED will or won't do

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 5>this month is, and where you go from here.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 10>So the post mortem of in Vidia is that in

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 10>Vidia is a great company doing great things, and that

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 10>has really attractive growth, just not the attractive growth that

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 10>they had before.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 9>So when you were experienced in three four hundred percent

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 9>increases in revenue and you fall to one hundred and fifty,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 9>that is a decline in your earnings momentum, but it's

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 9>still one hundred and fifty percent increase in your revenue.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 9>And so overall, as a long term holder of in Video, personally,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 9>I believe that the stock wins in the long term.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 9>I follow the stock forever and the short term, what

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 9>you're seeing is that disappointment and the stock coming back

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 9>to reflect more closely, it's fundamentals when you start to

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 9>look at price to earnings and things of that nature.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 9>So post mortem, I think long term and vida good

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 9>short term would probably have some volatility in terms of

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 9>the FED and what happens next. I think today's data

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 9>and the comments that came from Waller suggests that the

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 9>FED is still in line to make a rate cut

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 9>this month, and it will be the first of many.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 9>And the question really becomes how big will that ratecut be?

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 9>And there was nothing that came out in today's data

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 9>that suggests that it should be anything more than twenty

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 9>five basis points in my opinion.

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 8>Shanna Sisters CEOBE, you messed up?

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 9>Did I miss another question you asked?

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 6>I think you have no?

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, my goodness, you took what I asked and

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 5>you really ran with it. We appreciate it. Shanna Sissl's

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 5>CEO of Bandary and Capital Management, Thank you very much.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Docu sign shares up in today's trading after the signature

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 5>company reported second quarter results, posting revenue of seven hundred

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 5>and thirty six million dollars billings growth of two percent.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 5>But it's margins where a lot of the streets focuses.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Let's bring in doc you sign CEO Alan Tigerson, who

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 5>here in San Francisco with me. I just want the story,

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 5>the DOCU signed story, right. I think historically you've beat

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 5>the market's expectations on billings, and so everyone was very excited.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 5>They're a little concerned on that. The story behind billings growth.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, so.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>When I joined a little out of two years ago,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there were three questions. One, could we stabilize

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the business, could we become more efficient? And then could

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 2>we develop our next chapter? And so this quarter I

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>think is a nice milestone. I think we have really

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 2>stabilized the business. We've made the business much more efficient,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the profitability as you mentioned, and we are now poised,

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I think for growth. We've launched our new product line,

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>which is much broader than the signature that everyone's so

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 2>familiar with, and we saw some early, very positive results

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>this quarter. It's still early, but we're very encouraging.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Dig into those positive results. AI Infused. We're thinking about

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 6>broadening out from contracts. How is it working for the

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 6>companies that use it?

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So we launched it to North American commercial customers

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>and we've had a number of folks that have not

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>only ordered, but deployed, and the early results are really good.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 2>You see, what they're saying is They love the fact

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that we can ingest all of their agreements and give

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>them immediate insight into every contract that they have. And

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>this is valuable for every role in the company. Whether

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 2>you're a CFO or a frontline seller or purchasing agent

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>or an HR recruiter. You want to know the agreements

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that are relevant to you, what are the essential terms,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 2>and how are things going. And that's what we provide,

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and we can do that fairly instantaneously.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 5>When you have an AI enabled product, or a product

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 5>is made more valuable by AI, it's usually required an

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 5>investment on the talent side or the compute side. What

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 5>can you tell me and your investors and the audience

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 5>convince us that that investment is paying off fully?

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, so as if you look at our past

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>performance here, we've been doing AI for a long time.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 2>We've had AI embedded our products since before the allms

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>came out, and that's been feature that we've embedded as

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>well as charged separately for. But obviously with the advent

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>of these new models, we were able to take a

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>significantly forward. And the feature that I just described is

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>AIAI enabled so we take your contract data, run it

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>through some of these models, score them and then give

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you back the central data about your agreements, and we

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 2>could do that in a very lightweight, instantaneous way. From

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 2>an investment perspective, we have ramped up our investment in

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 2>product and technology, and we are moving to the public cloud.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 2>We have a big partnership with Microsoft. But I think

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>we're holding the line pretty well on expenses. We can

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>do this efficiently, and of course the costs of AI

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 2>continue to drop. The cost of processing and agreement has

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 2>dropped tremendously to the last six months.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 6>We're looking at the moment at an interday, you're up

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 6>three point seven percent. I look back over the five years.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 6>At one point your share price it clips three hundred,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 6>And I'm just wondering as to whether you think this AI,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 6>your foury, is ever going to infuse itself into the

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 6>capitalization the market capitalization of your business once again on

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 6>as the pandemic did once before.

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you know those were days when doc

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>time's growing at fifty sixty percent a year. So I

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know that we have a path to that yet.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I certainly love that, but I'm not projecting that. I

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>think for now we're setting ourselves a milestone and return

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>to double digit profitable growth.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 8>I think we have a.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Path to that, and the early signs here are encouraging,

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see how the market's response to that. We're

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>obviously a much more profitable company now and operating at

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 2>bigger scales, so I'm not going to predict where the

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>market's going to value us, but we are really really

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>pleased with the early progress here.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 8>It's very quickly.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Something you just said, Alan, the cost of AI is dropping.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that I've heard many people say that

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 5>to me at least, what do you mean.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, so, if you look at the efficiency of these

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>models and the cost per item process, whether it's an

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>image or an our case in agreement, the cost has

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>dropped very significantly, by a couple orders of magnitude. With

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 2>that said, obviously people are taking on more ambitious tasks,

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the models are getting larger, and so the compute costs

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>for the large vendors, for example, the amount of capital

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 2>investment they're making is going up and up. I think

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 2>it's because of the expansiveness of the opportunity that they see.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm telling you, as a customer on a per

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>item process perspective, costs of dropping very.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 6>Rapidly fascinating take. We thank you so much, doctor side

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 6>An anti Guison for joining us. Now let's go elsewhere

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 6>in the C suite. Shares of enterprise automation and AI

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 6>software company UiPath that they're down in today's training following

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 6>the software companies actually ten percent revenue growth results and

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 6>a small upward revision and its recurring revenue forecast. That's

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 6>amid a CEO transition and job cuts. AT's bringing UiPath

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 6>CFO and COO Ashim Gutta for more. You're taking on

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 6>more roles and responsibilities. We're seeing an investor base that

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 6>wants certainty, that wants confidence in this period of change,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 6>you're showing execution. Can you give them that at the

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 6>moment issue?

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, And I think this quarter was a good testament

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 12>to that, Caroline. We beat our mental across the board

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 12>from what we got into last quarter. We raised our

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 12>overall operating margin and free cash flow by twenty five

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 12>million dollars, which projects our confidence in our ability to

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 12>execute both efficiently and at the same time with minimum

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 12>distraction on the top line results that we're going to

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 12>continue to drive. And then we've also executed well against

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 12>our buyback. We increased our authorization for another five hundred

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 12>million dollars, bringing to a billion dollars in total. I

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 12>think that really projects the confidence that we have in

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 12>the company and our ability to execute, and then that's

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 12>translating well in the investor discussions that we've had today.

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 6>What about executing against your competition A shame Your role

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 6>before was with about customer excellence and look service now salesforce,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 6>they are rolling out AI agents, they're fueling productivity aims.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm interested to seeing your ability to compete here.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 12>We feel very good about actually our position and the

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 12>execution of our field competing. We close the largest test

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 12>automation deal in the history of the company in one

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 12>of the world's largest tech companies. We've expanded our cloud

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 12>platform significantly. You saw that cross almost eight hundred and

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 12>fifty million dollars of arr now into our into our

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 12>overall top line results. And when you look across our

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 12>customer base, we've increased our customers greater than a million

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 12>dollars by fifteen percent year over year, and that cohort

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 12>of customers or customers greater than one hundred thousand and

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 12>two a million is expanding at one hundred twenty percent.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 12>That shows that we're winning in the market. There's increased

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 12>competition in personal productivity, you know, smaller ROI mundane tasks

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 12>type automations. But where we're competing and where where we're

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 12>winning is in large scale enterprise automations and where AI

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 12>and automation come together. That is what customers want, and

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 12>we are winning in those types of use cases, as

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 12>evidenced by the demo that we actually provided in our

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 12>earnings call that shows them do we can have with

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 12>healthcare customers as the across the industry for a simple

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 12>use case that can save them hundreds of millions of.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 8>Dollars A shame.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Congratulations on being given a second job on top of

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 5>the one you've already got, CFO and COO.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 8>Now, I actually want.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 5>To talk to you about saying I think we probably

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 5>looked at earlier in the year, which is this bigger

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 5>picture of license to subscription. There are lots of people

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 5>that watch this program where that is something that they

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 5>will confront each day because they either administer software agreements

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 5>or whatever. Can you just extrapolate out from your earnings

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 5>of what that trend looks like for you guys going forward.

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, when you.

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 12>Look at our you know, we really look at our

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 12>annual recurring revenue as akin to our subscription model, and

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 12>that is growing nineteen percent at a billion five five

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 12>of skill. So we really look at that as a

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 12>very good indicator of where we are as a company

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 12>and how customers look at us as a long.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:58.959
<v Speaker 11>Term part of their architecture.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 12>The second piece is our net dollar expansion rate that

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 12>is still at one hundred and fifteen percent at the.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 11>Scale that we're at.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 12>So when you look at you know, customers buying in

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 12>not just for one time type project, but really subscribing

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 12>to us, it's because we provide continuous and long term

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 12>value in their enterprise processes. So as you extrapolate that

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 12>forward and you say one hundred and fifteen percent net

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 12>dollar expansion rate, continuing to launch new products such as

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 12>Autopilot that is that brings natural language processing for automation

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 12>developers and puts that in their hands, and expanding our

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 12>platform into test automation, and continuing to drive more and

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 12>more complicated use cases.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 11>We feel very good about the trajectory of that subscription

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 11>model for US.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 8>A shame. How is your day to day going to

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 8>be different now that you so as well?

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 12>Look, I think I have a great team in finance

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 12>that has done so much and has built a great foundation. Really,

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 12>Daniel and I look at execution and driving prioritization and

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 12>then dividing and conquering where he can spend time continuing

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 12>to lead us into this agentic wave that is there.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 12>And agentic is such a powerful wave that requires both

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 12>go to market and product innovation, and continuing our leadership

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 12>in that area is great for me to be able

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 12>to help Daniel and help the team by providing day

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 12>to day ownership over the enabling functions that really drive

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 12>our ability to execute against our broader vision. That's where

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 12>I'm going to spend more and more of my time.

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 12>It's frankly an honor and a really good part to

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 12>be a part of the larger team of viipath.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 6>It's a hard time because you're cutting people. How much

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 6>is AI able to offset and replace some of that talent?

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we look.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 12>I think first, as you're right, it's never easy to

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 12>part with employees. And at the same time, I think

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 12>driving continuing to drive shareholder value is important for us

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 12>and efficiency and making sure we have streamlined processes that

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 12>are there.

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 11>I think AI is a really important part of us.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 12>We actually use our platform internally than three hundred and

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 12>fifty automations live doing everything from invoice processing to even

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 12>complex areas like vendor engagements.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 11>That is a big part of our productivity.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 12>With autopilot, we're able to launch that into other areas

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 12>such as our sales processes. And I think that efficiency

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 12>gives us not just productivity and dollars, but really of

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 12>mind shure to spend more time with customers and customer

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 12>centricity is a really key tenant of Daniel's priority for

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 12>the company.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 5>As we go forward, UIPAF CFO and now COO as well. Actually,

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 5>and goodt thank you very much. Like coming up on

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 5>the program, Americans are shifting their stance on a potential

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 5>TikTok ban. We'll have all the details next And as

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 5>we head to the break, take another look at the

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 5>NASDAQ one hundred actually trading their session lows, now heading

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 5>for its biggest weekly decline since November twenty twenty two,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 5>down two and a half two point four percent. In

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 5>this session, you can see the little sort of spike

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 5>or pair in those losses. After the faire wallerheads, we'll

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 5>talk more about the markets in the hour. This has

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 5>boonbo technology. It's time now for talking tech and first start.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Americans are less supportive of a possible TikTok ban than

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 5>they were eighteen months ago. According to a new Pew

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Research survey, just thirty two percent of US adults back

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 5>a TikTok ban, while that number was at fifty percent

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 5>back in March of last year. Plus TikTok parent Bike

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Dance is raising as much as six hundred million dollars

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 5>for its car information and trading platform, dong Cheede. According

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 5>to sources, The fundraising round values the platform at close

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 5>to three billion dollars. And Telegram CEO Pavel Durov defended

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 5>the encryptive messaging app in his first public comments since

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 5>being arrested in Paris last month. He acknowledged quote growing

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 5>pains from a rapid expansion to nine hundred and fifty

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 5>million users and promise to tackle criminal abuse.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 6>Character it's just take a look at these markets and

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 6>anticipate what we're discussing next. Broadcon I mean slumping on

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 6>the back of its numbers. They were pretty strong in

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 6>Ai but the forecast disappointed word by nine percent and

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 6>the NASAQ one hundred offer five point six percent over

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 6>the last five training days, the worst week since November

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty two. This is Blue Meg Technology. Welcome back

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 6>to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Heid in New York.

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 8>And I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 6>It is a brutal end to this week. When it

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 6>comes to being long these markets, it is the macro data,

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 6>the job's data showing once again a calling in that

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 6>job's market. Wage growth ticked up, but overall we are

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 6>looking for reasons to sell it fields this Friday and

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 6>we are down on the NASA by two point three percent.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 6>In fact, the Nasdaq one hundred having its worst week

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 6>since twenty twenty two. We're on a risk averse environment,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 6>so bomb market catches a bid. The two year yield

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 6>falls down some nine basis points, off of some fourteen

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 6>basis point collapse earlier in the day. This as we

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 6>start to bake in, is there a fifty basis point

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 6>cut as soon as September. I'm looking at bitcoin also

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 6>basically in line with risk sentiment. We're off by three

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 6>point three percent. Look at what so many individual movers

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 6>are doing. I just want to shine a light on

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 6>what a brutal week it has been also for chips.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 6>More broadly, the socks off by another four percent. We're

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 6>basically down nine ten percent on the week. Broad Com

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 6>today is the victim of choice, and we're currently seeing

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 6>it collapse in percentage point perspective, even though it's forecast

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 6>like relatively bright. We're going to dig into that on

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 6>a micro basis, but also super microcomputers. Get this, JP

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 6>Morgan slashing its price target on this company all the

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 6>way down to five hundred, nine hundred and fifty after

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 6>short seller note we're worried about it's ten k. When

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 6>it gets back into compliance is when you're going to

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 6>have to sit on the sidelines until ed. But let's

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 6>just dig into what's happening with Broadcon.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the Broadcom story is important.

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Falling after the company delivered it's sales forecast, which was

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 5>hurt by the parts of its business that are not

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 5>tied to artificial intelligence. I want to bring in Congensubani

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 5>from Bloomberg Intelligence and Okay, so the fistful fourth quarter

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 5>overall revenues fourteen billion not as strong as hoped full

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 5>fiscal year twelve billion dollars in AI sales.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 8>That's good.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 5>So we're basically concluding that this sort of more legacy

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 5>businesses for Broadcom aren't doing as well right now?

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 8>Is that your Reid exactly?

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 13>I mean, that was the only negative, But in my opinion,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 13>it was not very surprising if we have heard the

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 13>same story across of most of its peers who have

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 13>already reported, because remember Broadcom is the last one to report,

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 13>so that should not have caused this kind of a reaction.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 13>I think another thing going here is the AI which

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 13>was upsided to twelve billion. Maybe investors were hoping for

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 13>even stronger upside there.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 5>That's been the story of this entire earning season. I

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 5>do want to look at the sort of non AI

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 5>part because, as you know, Apple and Monday and the iPhone,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 5>did we learn anything new about that business?

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 8>Yes, and perhaps the trajectory of it not.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 13>Really from along with Broadcom and Qualcom and other chip players,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 13>we have not seen significantly stronger than seasonal outlooks coming

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 13>into this iPhone launch, despite the reports that we have

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 13>been hearing that Apple iPhone shipments are preparing for five

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 13>to ten percent higher shipman volume this year now, twenty

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 13>twenty three was a down year, so we do expect

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 13>volumes to be higher because of that, but we are

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 13>not seeing anything out of ordinary from at least Broadcom.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Yesterday. I want to go to what sort of truest

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 6>securities are saying. I hope to name other people on

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 6>the street, congen because your expertise is so important to us,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 6>But he's saying, basically, it's unpredictable. It's a lumpy when

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 6>it comes to AI revenue growth. Because as and when

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 6>we're going to get customers named, we were thinking there

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 6>might be more. When will we hear of actual customers

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 6>warning that chips made by Broadcom?

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 13>Well, at this point it's not clear, but you know

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 13>the fact about being it lumpy, that's true. However, does

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 13>that should not take away anything from the strength of

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 13>the growth.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 8>We expect both the.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 13>Ask and the connectivity businesses to grow even stronger next year.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 13>And remember these are still very highly concentrated, few customers

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 13>three at this point, so you are going to expect

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 13>lumpiness from quarter to quarter as they adjust their timing

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 13>of purchases and buildouts.

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 6>We asked you yesterday a slightly unfair question, but I

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 6>ask it to you again because you are a fundamentally

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 6>driven person. But the market just seemed to be so

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 6>exuberant around these AI names. We've got a deja vu.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia sold off when its numbers were good, broadclm doing.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 13>The same exactly. I mean, what we're seeing is even

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 13>solid or strong reports are not strong enough because the

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 13>expectations are just stronger higher than that. But I just

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 13>remind people to go back to fundamentals and see. We

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 13>saw the same thing again from Broadcom, we saw from

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 13>in media. The demand signals keep going stronger and stronger.

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 13>Their bookings and backlocks continue to increase. So there's no

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 13>such real fundamental risk factors here, especially when it comes

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 13>to AI chips.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 6>Kanjan Sabani, thank you for your expertise being meg Intelligence.

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Now let's talk about another chip name. Intel is considering

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 6>options for its stake and it's struggling automated driving systems

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 6>to provide a Mobili as part of a major strategy overhaul.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 6>That's all according to sources who say the chip maker

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 6>could offload just some of its eighty eight percent holding

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 6>a Mobili on the public market or via sale to

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 6>a third party shares a mobili as you can see,

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 6>falling to a record loan in King joining us. The

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 6>nuance is important here Ian, but this is a company

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 6>struggling to do something to change its poor fortunes.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Two things here.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 4>First one is, let's put this in a world context.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Right Intel needs money to execute on.

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 3>This ambitious plan that it's put together.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't really have that amount of money from its operations

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 4>right now, is having to scale back some of the ambitions.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 4>And it's also looking at, you know, other parts of

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 4>what it has and whether those can be monetized in

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 4>some way or find better value in some way. MOBILEI

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 4>would obviously be a part of that, and it's already

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 4>made moves in that direction, selling a stake in the

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 4>IPO and then selling a further steak.

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 3>But and the important but here is if you look

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>at where MOBILEI is a relative to what Intel.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Paid, which is considerably lower, it wouldn't make sense to

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 4>just be dumping it right now unless you could find

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 4>an individual seller that would be willing to pay the

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 4>price that you paid or better.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 8>There are some basics that we should go over.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 5>I think you know, Intel has been over a period

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 5>of time chipping away at its stake in mobili anyway.

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 5>But our understanding from sources in right is that Intel's

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 5>looking at a lot of different things, and I think

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 5>on the Mobilize side, you know, their board's got to

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 5>get together at some point embrace for something that might

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 5>potentially happen.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean again, putting Mobile in the general context of

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Intel is probably the safest thing to do.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Here, what used to be called Terror another Intel acquisition.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 4>They've already started to move that towards independent status. There

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 4>are other business divisions within Intel that perhaps aren't as

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 4>central to the care of what it does.

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>And you know, we had this FO this week talking

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 3>at a conference.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 4>We had the CEO last week talking at a conference

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 4>on They're saying, look, we're looking at these things.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 3>We want to be streamlined.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 4>We want to be quicker to respond to the circumstances

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 4>that we're in and be able to make the kind

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 4>of decisions and rapidly deploy capital to make sure we

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 4>take hold of opportunities. At the same time, Mobilized not

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 4>in the great shape the old terror business is and

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 4>the fantastic shape. So it's a difficult set of circumstances

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 4>and they've not really made concrete decisions yet, is what

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 4>we've been made to understand.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this is a bad time to have to

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 6>offload Mobile. I when shares have been off by what's

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 6>seventy percent year to date, can you remind us of

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 6>the issues that are going on there?

0:29:59.160 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 14>Yeah?

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, anybody who has been playing into the auto

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 4>market going back two three years ago, was you were

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 4>a bell of the ball.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 3>You were fantastic.

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 4>The whole world was going ev the whole world was

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 4>going self driving, we were going to have robot taxis

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 4>on every street corner. Clearly, what's happening and this, whether

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 4>your mobilize, whether you're Intel, whether you're in video, whether

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 4>you're anybody, that hasn't happened at the pace with which

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 4>some had projected. And Mobile has been a victim of

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 4>that kind of up and down cycle, and if you

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 4>look at you know it clearly has had a bad

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 4>particularly in the first quarter earnings.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Reports that have obviously dim sentiment considerably.

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Long term, everybody believes in the direction that they're heading

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 4>in and believes that they have an important role to play,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 4>but right now they're into.

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Spot Bloombergsine and King along with the team reporting so

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 5>deeply on this thank you. In the chip sector, TSMC

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 5>achieved production yields and it's Arizona facility on par with

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 5>established plants back home, an early indicator that its Marquee

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 5>US project is on track to achieve its targets. That's

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 5>according to a source, TSMC had said it started engineering

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 5>wafer production in April with advanced four nanometer process technology,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 5>and we've been tracking their progress there. I think, Caroline,

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 5>we should go back to what's happening in markets. And basically,

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 5>since we got those comments from fed Waller, bonds have rallied,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 5>and despite a moment of relief, the story is still

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 5>equities under pressure with that pressure coming from technology, I think.

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, if you're looking at some of the key points

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 6>drags on the SMP, it is currently no Surprise in

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 6>video dragging us down by some fourteen points. We've got

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Broadcom dragging us lower. But then who's who of the

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 6>mags seven, Amazon, Microsoft, Tesla, Google, Meta, Apple, No wonder

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing such a pressure across the board on the benchmarks.

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 6>And then this has been an ugly week. More broadly,

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 6>then aw's that one hundred having its worst week since

0:31:58.720 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty two.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 5>And real quick just bitcoin for what it's worth, continuing

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 5>this slide down more than three percent below fifty five

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 5>thousand US dollars for token. Good job getting that up, guys,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate it. I went a little bit rogue there.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 5>But there's a lot happening in real time on the week,

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 5>as you know, Carro a tough week broadly for risk.

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 6>Assets totally and volumes actually up on the SMP for

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 6>this Friday. But coming up, we want to dig into

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 6>the micro news again. A UK watchdog is sending a

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.239
<v Speaker 6>warning to Google saying it abuses one area of its

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.479
<v Speaker 6>business that accounts to eighty percent total revenue. You can

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 6>guess what it is. This is a blood technology. Now

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 6>the Biden administration is preparing strict to export rules for

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 6>quantum computing and semiconductive products. It's once again taking aim

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 6>at China Room Megs Mackenzie Hawkins joins us for more

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 6>and this is getting ever clutting edge. Mackenzie right.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 14>So the rules that we saw the Baden administration released

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 14>yesterday as an interim final rule, meaning there's still a

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 14>comment period, nothing is quite set in stone. Are trying

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 14>to take aim at sort of the next generation of technologies,

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 14>looking at a chip architecture called gate all Around that's

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 14>expected to be widely introduced into the market next year,

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 14>as well as cutting edge quantum computing and computer components,

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 14>sort of trying to align with countries around the world

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 14>that have also introduced similar or in some cases identical

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 14>rules and by doing so limit themselves from the impact

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 14>of US export control.

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 11>So we have this sort of global coalition forming.

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 14>It includes the US, Japan, and the Netherlands, which are

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 14>home to key countries and the chip supply chain, as

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 14>well as other allies such as the UK, Canada.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 8>And Italy. Mackenzie and your story.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 5>You quote Alan Estevez, who runs the Commerce Department's Bureau

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 5>of Industry and Security, and in the quote he talks

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 5>about the alignment of controls being I'm going to read

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 5>it frankly difficult for our adversaries. So adversaries is different

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of words competitives. Can you just explain the strategy

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 5>from the US.

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 14>So a lot of the US measures on chips and

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 14>other emerging technologies are specifically geared towards China as well

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 14>as Russia, North Korea and Iran. So we're talking about

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 14>geopolitical adversaries as opposed to just cutting edge technological rivals.

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 11>The US has companies that of.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 14>Course have significant foreign rivals headquartered in US allied countries,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 14>and this is not trying to get at those companies,

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 14>but rather at the ability of particularly Beijing, to develop

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 14>cutting edge technologies that Washington warriors could run China a

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 14>military edge. And the US has been leading this push

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 14>for several years. But you know, while this particular rule

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 14>is an example of pretty significant multilateral alignment, there are

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 14>also really difficult measures that the US is asking allied

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 14>governments to impose. Who are worried about retaliation from China

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 14>or don't necessary only buy into the same degree of

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 14>national security and geopolitical threat felt here in DC.

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Mackenzie Hawkins with more important reporting, thank you very

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 5>much from China to the United Kingdom. Britain's Competition and

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Markets Authorities says Alphabet's Google is abusing its dominant position

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 5>in advertising technology, paving the way for potential finds and

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 5>changes to one of Google's most lucrative businesses. Bloomberg's Catherine

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 5>Gammill joins US and reported on the news the CMA

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 5>what is the basic conclusion that they've reached.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So today the CMA announced its statement of objections

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that it's sent to Google. So these are preliminary findings

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that Google has broken competition law here by using its

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>dominant market possession and the add tech sector to favor

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>its own services. So these preliminary findings are still at

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the primary stage, but this basically means that Google's using

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>its powers to take the competition away, and it means

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know, UK advertisers and other services are losing out.

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 6>Because of that. The CMA, it's got tathe, right, Catherine,

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 6>kind of exists some pressure.

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does have teethe and we've seen that with

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>its recent probes over the years, and you know, it's

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>grown prominence. I think that it's really interesting that now

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the UK has joined the EU and the US and

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>these similar probes. And on Monday we've got the DJ's

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>case against Google for ad tech and last year as

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>well in Europe we got these charges laid out on

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the ad tech sector. So, you know, Google is in

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a bit of trouble here because it's got three major

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>global regulators that are on its back for this.

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 6>It's in trouble because also it could be fined quite

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 6>a lot of money. I just want to go into

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 6>what Google's actual responses said, Catherine, what have they told you,

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 6>because ultimately they dispute it. Yeah, one hundred percent.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>So Google's response today was that the cmea's findings are

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>based on flawed understanding of the markets.

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 6>It said, it's this agreed and it will respond to this.

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So at this stage with the statement of objections, Google

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>can respond and then the cme will then come to

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a final conclusion from a separate panel. After that, in

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the UK, findings from these sorts of investigations it can

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be up to ten percent of global turnover.

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 6>That's a really extreme end.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Or they can also, you know, offer other sort of

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 1>remedies that might be able to solve this issue.

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 6>Whatever issue have got.

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is worth bearing in the mind of

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the US and the EU have both said that they

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>would like divestments of.

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 6>Google's ad tech as well.

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 5>I've heard this before, sort of Google basically saying, you

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 5>don't understand the market that you're trying to address, but

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 5>there are other participants in the market. I'm assuming the

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.879
<v Speaker 5>CMA spoke to the advertisers themselves what's their position.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 8>In all of it.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, I mean this has been a long run

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in investigation from the CME. These competition sort of probes

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>can go on for years. This one has been going

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on for two years, and the CMA does talk to

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a broad range of market participants. We didn't get specifics

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>on that today, but that's something that they've they've brought

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>up previously in their studies on digital advertisement and other

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>things as well.

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg's Catherine Gemmel out of London, thank you very much.

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to another story that we're watching, and that's

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 5>dark Trace CEO Poppy Gustaffson will be leaving the British

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 5>cybersecurity firm effective today. This is the company gets absorbed

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:27.959
<v Speaker 5>by pe firm Toma Bravo. Gustavhfsen co founded dark Trace

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 5>more than a decade ago and helped to position the

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 5>company for its IPO in twenty twenty one, as well

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 5>as its ultimate sale to Toma Bravo in April.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 6>Apple has greenlitter version of ten cents we chat app

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 6>ahead of the company's I Phoned sixteen debut. Now the

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 6>tech giant approved and update that as new features like

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 6>moments and live streaming to the app. That's according to sources.

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 6>The approval taps down some speculation of a dispute between

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 6>the two companies over app store fees, with many believing

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 6>it could have smoothalled to a potential WeChat ban from

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 6>the latest iPhones ed.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 5>One of the most well read stories on bloomberg dot

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 5>com this morning, Let's talk more about Apple. Apple is

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 5>holding a product launch event at its head courses on Monday,

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 5>where it's set to announce details of the iPhone sixteen

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 5>and some other new devices. Bloomberg's Mark Gunman has already

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 5>reported on and told us what to expect. But it's

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 5>work going back to the iPhone sixteen. What's different? That's

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 5>the question every year, what's actually going to make me

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 5>upgrade this time around?

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 15>Well, if you have an iPhone fifteen Pro or Promax,

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 15>I don't necessarily think you're going to upgrade this year

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 15>unless you get a pretty good deal or you're on

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 15>an upgrade path.

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 15>The changes here are going to be on the more

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 15>incremental side. We're going to focus on Apple Intelligence, which

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 15>of course the fifteen Pro in promacs will already support,

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 15>and then there's also going to be some major upgrades

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 15>on the camera. The ultra wide lens is.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Going to move to a forty eight megapixel to match.

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 11>The standard lens.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 15>But if you're coming from an older phone, if you're

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 15>coming from a fourteen or earlier, getting Apple Intelligence, getting

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 15>those new cameras, getting the Titanium, those who are going

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 15>to be some nice upgrades. There's going to be some

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 15>new callers as well. The most significant feature is going

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 15>to be a new camera button on the right side

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 15>of the phone, next below the power button that you'll

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 15>be able.

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 8>To use take pictures and videos.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 15>It's going to be capacitive, so you can swipe on

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.479
<v Speaker 15>it to zoom in and out, move between still and video.

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 15>So that's going to be a nice upgrade there. So

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 15>it's really all about AI and the camera. The bigger changes,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 15>of course, will come to the Apple Watch.

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 8>And the AirPods.

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Bless you, Mark and just talk us about the air

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 6>pods and the Watch. What do we anticipate there, how

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 6>big a change.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 15>So this is going to actually be the ten year

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 15>anniversary to the date of the original Apple Watch introduction

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 15>in twenty fourteen, and you're going to see a new

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 15>series ten Watch. It's going to have displays, it's a

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.359
<v Speaker 15>little bit bigger. You're going to see faster processors. You're

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 15>going to see sleep apnea detection as a major new

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 15>health feature. You're also going to see that sleep appne

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 15>detection come to the Apple Watch Ultra, though that will

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 15>retain the same design that's been running since the introduction

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 15>in twenty twenty two. AirPods Apples revamping the low end

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 15>of the line, so you're going to see a new

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:24.839
<v Speaker 15>entry level and mid tier AirPods bringing noise cancelation down

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 15>the line from the pro models for the first time.

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 15>You're going to see quite a boost there to Apples

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 15>for Wearable's business between the new watches and the new AirPods,

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 15>and I think that's going to be quite exciting for

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 15>customers who have been waiting for a new version of

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 15>the AirPods.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 6>It happened, Mark German, we embrace ourselves. Thank you. Let's

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 6>also just check in on these markets. It is an

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 6>ugly finish to an ugly week, and Nvidia the biggest

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 6>points drag on the benchmarks right now we're seeing off

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 6>by more than five percent. We are now just a

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 6>two and a half trillion dollar company. Folks. Broadcom is

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 6>off by nine percent, and this is the worst day

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 6>for Wallcom since March twenty twenty.

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Socks also ugly, s and P five hundred down the

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 5>most since I think March of twenty three. Na's that

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 5>one hundred worse week since November of twenty two, in

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Vidia having its worst week since September of twenty twenty two.

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 5>The story we're writing about Carr, though, is that you know,

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 5>technology is under pressure in spite of and on top

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 5>of the economic data in the Fed speet we got today.

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 8>Ugly, I think is a fair word to use.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 6>And put it into context. These are stocks that have

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 6>run up more than a one hundred percent over the

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 6>course of the year to date, so we have to

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 6>acknowledge that. But when you get a four hundred and

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 6>thirty three billion dollar erosion in market cap in five

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 6>days alone, that matters to everyone who has a four

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 6>at one K who is exposed to these sorts of benchmarks.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 8>Just one quick comment on Nvidia.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Look at the number of retail investors that have gone

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 5>into that name and then think about that on a

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 5>week or a day like today.

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 6>Incredible and those that are two x leveraged. That does

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 6>it for this edition. Of Bloomberg Technology have.

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 8>To say, what a Friday show. It's been. Recap on

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 8>the podcast.

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 5>You know where to find it, Apple, Spotify, iHeart and

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 5>of course we publish it all over the Bloomberg platforms.

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Thank you to everyone in New York and in San Francisco.

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology.