WEBVTT - Amazon Agrees to Buy MGM Film Studio

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Let's get to the remarks

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine coming out.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a double issue. It's about how America has a

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>housing mess and President Biden wants to fix it. Let's

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>get into it. The story by Bloomberg News Finance reporter

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>no ble Hire with us in Seattle along with Bloomberg

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Business Week at her Joe Webber in our interactive broker

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>studio in New York. It is so true when you

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think of housing policy here in the United States, Joel.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's broken and has been for a while. Um,

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and Noah did a really amazing job of writing a

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>story that UM, I think really uh helps you make

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of it and where it's been and still yet

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe how it might change a little bit. Um.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, part of it is just rooted in, UM.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, the fact that we've had a housing market

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that is on has been on fire. Uh. Inventory is

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>incredibly low, Affordable housing is nonexistent in a lot of places.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing that looks like a growing mess

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and a growing problem. So so UM, no uh uh

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about what a solution might look like. Yeah, Well,

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's I don't think it's uh necessarily

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be just one solution. Um. But part of

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>why I wanted to write this article is to try

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and make sense, um of where we've been and some

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of these proposals that the Biden administration is putting forward

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. Um. First and foremost, uh, what the

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>administration is trying to do um with more than fifty

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that Congress has already allocated, is it fixed

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the immediate problem, which is just the enormous amount of

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>financial strain um that the pandemic has caused. Mostly for renters,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but but also for some homeowners. So there's there's more

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>than fifty billion dollars out there. They're trying to to

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>get out to people, UM to help them cover back

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>rent racked up during the pandemic. UM and if they've

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>missed mortgage payments, to do that as well. So that's

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>part one. But UM, what's really interesting and what a

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of housing policy experts UM I talked with I

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>want to discuss was was what's in the Infrastructure Plan

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and the American Families Plan, which is with the Biden administration,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>UM has has tried it out to you know, help

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the country and their words build back better UM and

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>embedded in there are a lot of strategies to fix

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the housing system. So just for instance, UM,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>one of them, UH, which we talk about in the

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>story is a surge in UH the Low Income Housing

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tax credit. These are tax credits at the federal government.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>What's out there. They're used by affordable housing developers and

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they've really been an engine for affordable housing production in

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this country for a long time. Hey, no, UH, to

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what extent does the US government actually have power? The

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>federal government have power to do this? If if there

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>are zoning laws and regulations and is you write in

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>your story, um, expanding the supply of homes in some

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of these places we require taking on the nimbies, you know,

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not in my backyard. Yeah, that's that's certainly a huge issue. Um.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's it's something that you've seen, uh in

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>places like Minneapolis, where the whole state of Oregon they've

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they've passed laws and were made zoning changes in the

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years to allow for more housing development.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But you you hit the nail on the head. I mean,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the federal government can own do so much here. A

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of what's holding back housing production in this country,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>especially in really prosperous places, it's just the fact that

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't build there or I mean, we make it

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so much harder for people to add more density and

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>more housing. And so the Biden administration's planned there, um,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.559
<v Speaker 1>which has been criticized is too timid, is to give

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>municipalities grants to help them rezone and clear away some

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of these barriers. Um. But they're not you know, at

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>some economists point out really, uh, you know, they're giving

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a carrot, but there's not so much of a stick.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Involved here. Um, some folks pointed out to me that,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a more effective way to deal with this

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would basically be the high transportation dollars from the federal government. Um,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting those to making these sorts of zoning reforms.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I thought was interesting Noah in

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the story that talked about, you know, right now the

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market, you can get government back loans to buy

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>homes and parts of South Florida that are already experiencing

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>seasonal flooding because of rising sea levels. I know the

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>magazine has done stories about this. We're in some communities

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the local governments are actually buying up the homes and

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>taking them off the market because we know it's not

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a good home to own. I mean, there are just

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of the existing infrastructure and housing law and policy

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that just doesn't make sense anymore. Yeah, And I think

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's that's a really good point. It's sort

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of underscores how some things we do in certain parts

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of our government, uh promote a certain kind of activity,

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but while at the same time we're trying to like,

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>uh maybe not develop in these areas that are going

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to be prone to climate change and and that I

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>think is really um the very hard work that has

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to be done, which is how do you align all

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of these policies, be they at the federal level of

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the state level or the local level, local level, so

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they were actually working towards um goals, you know, whether

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they be around climate change or racial equity or affordability.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's just we have this very complex system

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been built up over decades in decades, and just

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>making sense of that is going to be a challenge,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>right especially in politics who are also involved in all

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of this good stuff. Nobu Hire Finance Report at Bloomberg News.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>These are the remarks in the new issue of Bloomberg

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Week magazine. Till Webb, thank you so much. This

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All right, Tim, safe

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to say it's one of the more telegraphed de yields

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in a while. And today we got confirmation Amazon buying

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the MGM Movie Company eight point forty five billion dollars.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Really a bet that a nearly central old Hollywood icon

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>can feed an insationable demand for streaming content. Feed me,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>feed me. It's all about that machine exactly. We've got

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a great pair to talk about the really the two

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sides of this story, the media and content side, as

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>well as what this move means for Amazon. Kitaathan is

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>technology and media analyst re Bloomberg Intelligence, our in house

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>research team. She's on the phone in New Jersey. Spencer.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Soaper is Limberg, news technology and e commerce reporter on

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Seattle. So let's start with you, Gita.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We knew this was coming. So, um, I don't know

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the key takeaways? How do we need to as

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>investors maybe look at what this means and what what

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>else might be out there and what might be to come. Yeah,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Carol of Virsual, Caroline Tim, thank you so

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. And I just want to say that, um,

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is really part of this whole vast

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>reshaping of the media business, of the media landscape. The

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>big are obviously looking to compete by getting bigger. We

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>had the Disney Fox acquisition a few years ago, just

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, we had Discovery with Warner

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and now you have Amazon and MGM and and it's

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>really I think it really speaks to uh, you know

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of content and how everybody is kind of

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.679
<v Speaker 1>looking to consolidate their position in the streaming space. Talking

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about what this means for the other companies, I think, uh,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it really kind of now separates the halves and the half.

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Not that you will, so obviously the independent studios, a

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>few of them being you know, the Lions Gaze of

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the world, probably even a Sony. Obviously they might see

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>their valuations go up as it's kind of, I think,

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>almost to make or a great moment now in media

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when the other remaining players have to really kind of

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>take take a step back, look where they are positioned

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and if they really have enough firepower to last the

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>streaming shake out, if you will, they Spencer Souper, come

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on in here and give us the Amazon perspective, because

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for for years, when I've looked at what Amazon has

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>done with Amazon Prime Instant Video or Amazon Prime Video

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever iteration of it is now, I've always looked

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at it through the lens of of Amazon Prime and

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and sweetening the deal for that year Amazon Prime subscription,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>because the research has shown that people who are Prime

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>members they buy more, they buy more expensive items, and

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they shot more frequently. Is it to the point though,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>where you have to look at Amazon's video ambitions beyond

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime. Uh, that's what they're trying. And there are

0:08:54.920 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>people who are subscribing for the standalone video sub scription.

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's part of the play is Amazon needs to

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>offer more to unbundle. But I think the big thing

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>here with Amazon and this acquisition is Amazon traditionally tries

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to build it on its own. It's spent a lot

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of time and you know, several years and in a

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>boatload of money in Hollywood trying to create its own

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hits and and really doesn't have any. And so they

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>finally had to capitulate and say, you know what, we

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta buy James Bond, we gotta buy Rocky Balboa. Uh

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and kind of, you know, use our purse to get

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>into this business. That that we've been kind of you know,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to get in on our own without without a

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>big hit to show for it. It was really about

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>buying legally Blonde. Come on, Spencer, we know interesting how

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they highlighted that film in the press release? Who what not?

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>L come on? Well two questions real quickly. I mean, Spencer,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. I was gonna say it was eight billion

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for RoboCop and then I think half a million for

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it. Alright, alright, but but two questions

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I have. First of all, um, well, let me let

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>me bring you back eight almost eight and a half

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Did they pay too much or they're going

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to get you know, a lot for that amount of money. Um, So,

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think they paid too much. So we

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>ran some numbers. It's a twenty five x multipost for MGM.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much in line with what we've seen in

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the past. So just a few years ago, we had

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Comcast Coops go out and buy Dreamwork for almost thirty

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>five times either it to you kind of look at

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>some of those deals, not too bad. Then again you

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>had Comcasts and Apple who came in and take took

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>a look at MGM and said they really didn't think

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it was worth more than six billion dollars. So so

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>from that context, yes, I think Amazon paid up a

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but I think they're they're they're getting the

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bank for their part. You just look at what they've

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>done during the pandemic. They paid millions for coming to America.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>They paid eighty million for the boor app pequels. Right,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so you look at all of those individual movies and

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you look here at a studio library that they're getting.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely uh uh you know a bank

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for their book. Well, and you me, you beautifully set

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>me up for what I wanted to ask Spencer, and

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that is Spencer, is this all about Jeff and franchise development? Right?

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>You own these brands now and you can just kind

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of run with them. They're remaking everything, right, It's like

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's kind of like, you know, it's a

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>safe bet. It's formula Hollywood. They've taken the risk, they've

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>tried to create their own hits. Uh, they haven't created them.

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's buy what people love to watch in

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the past and try to try to uh make new

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>versions of new iterations of it for the future. Knowing

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that we have that big groad appeal fan base cooked in.

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's definitely a big, a big piece. And we

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>know that Jeff Zos does see hollow even though Hollywood

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>seen is this creative place that he does see a

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the hits as being fairly formulaic. So this

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of appeals more to his his you know, the

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>math part of his brain. Yeah, Ga, come on in

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>here and talk a little bit about what this means

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for consumers of of Hulu and consumers who have been

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>used to watching some of this content in other places.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>The Handmaids sale, for example, it was touted in the

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>press release today announcing the acquisition, and I'm wondering if

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that means that handmaid still leaves it leaves Hulu if

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it goes to Amazon, or is this all about the

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>future future content and less about what exists now. So

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I think him that's an excellent point. I think what

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would be really seeing over the at least past few

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>years is that you have all of these studios that

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>are part of conglomerates, and they're all now trying to

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>use their studios to feed their own streaming platforms. So

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Disney obviously doing that with Disney Class. They also own

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of Hulu. Uh. We're seeing Warner kind of

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>do that with HBO Max. So it's all about, you know,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>using that studio content. Amazon obviously did not have that.

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Now they're getting that with MGM. So we're really gonna

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have to wait and watch and see what they do.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think we can pretty much count on the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that they are going to take the handmade sailor

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at least future um, you know, seasons of the handmade

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>sale and definitely to it on Prime as a way

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to kind of turbo charge their subscribe to me. All right, well,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>great stuff and certainly a company that is always on

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the move. Amazon. Great to get so many multiple sides

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to this story and get them from our own guitar

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Ranganath on Tech and Media analyst of Bloomberg Intelligence are

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in house group of analysts, and Spencer Soper we go

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to him when it comes to Amazon. He is Bloomberg

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>News Technology and e Commerce reporter on the phone in Seattle.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a big deal. Eight half biggs after well and

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>if you think right exactly like they do smaller acquisitions.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. So a lot

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>going on on this Wednesday. No doubt the world has reopened,

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly when it comes to the business and financial world.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We're feeling it. We also are noticing a story on

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg first time activist investor Tiny Tiny Steak in

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>x on Mobile scoring a historic win in its proxy

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>fight with the oil giants, signaling the growing importance of

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>climate change to invest is this is a big deal

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg deal Reporter Scott Devote here in our Interactive Brokers studio. Um,

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like a big deal. Are we putting

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it in perspective in the right way? Yeah? I think

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like what we're seeing out of this one in particular,

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've started to see this a little bit lately,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>is that, UM, it doesn't really matter how big of

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a steak an investor has in a company, UM, if

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>they have a really good argument. So at Exxon, what

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they argued was there was uh an engine number one

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is by the way, the fun they bought a thirty

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollar steak and xxon which is a two

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar company point zero two steak. Yeah, basically nothing.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>They basically spend as much on the proxy fight as

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they did on the initial steak. But they came with

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>an argument that said, you know you've been underperforming your peers,

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>your climate goals are not aggressive enough, and you know

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you're putting your dividend in at risk basically, you know,

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>based on this strategy, So you have to make some

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some you know, significant changes and I think you know,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>well the company probably was not you know, open to

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>these ideas. The other investors were, and they got some

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>momentum and obviously, you know today they got at least

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>two seats on the board. So Scott, what what are

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they going for? What's engine number one going for? In

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of changes? What do they want to see? Well,

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>basically what they argued was up until this point that

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, there's a lot of evidence

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of that. You know, Excellon was a leader in the

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas industry UM, but then started to trail

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>behind some of its piers, Chevron in particular, UM. And

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>then uh they also argued that there was a climate

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>angle on this, that Exxon was entrenched in carbon based UM,

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the carbon based fuels, and wasn't doing it enough to

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>reach the goals or the Paris Agreement, and that you know,

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what they were saying and when it

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>came to climate was lip service, and so they called

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>them on it. And you know, we've seen obviously the

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors like black Rock and whatnot been very vocal

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this year about how they were going to vote based

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on E s G issues and so it really struck

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a chord with a lot of these institutions. UM, and

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I think a lot of people

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, follow activism didn't think that Engine Number

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>one had much of a shot at this, but um,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>they really did have their finger on the pulse of

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the simmering tension between x on itself and its investors.

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>How much is Black Rock pushing kind of the whole

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>momentum here with that? You know, Larry Fink has been

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so vocal in terms of the importance of climate specifically,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and listen, they're the second largest shareholder institutional shareholder when

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to ex On Mobile. Um. Kathy would told

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>me that that she kind of speculated that maybe some

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of what Elon Musk and his kind of pulled back

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin because of its impact, uh and on energy

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>usage and impact on the environment, that maybe Black Rocks

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a big investor in Tesla. How much are they kind

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of moving the needle on this cam station. Well, I

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's no doubt that they're moving the needle on

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. I think that you know, you wouldn't have

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I cover a lot of activism campaigns and I'll put

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it in the perspective from an activist perspective. Now, when

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you see one of these letters go out criticizing a company,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there is always going to be an E s G

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>angle on it. And what they're trying to do is

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not only attract investment from funds that want to invest

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>in you know, these hedge funds, but want to make

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that they're doing an E S G angle. They're

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>also trying to win over the institutions who have you know,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>these these bents on making sure that they're supportive of

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>boards that are implementing these E S G issues. Are

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we going to look back on today, on this period

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of time as being just a turning point when it

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to E S G? As you point out in

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>your piece. On the same day, management at Chevron were

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>reviewed by their shareholders, who voted a proposal to reduce

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>emissions from the company's to pont recently stuffer vote against

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>management on plastic pollution disclosures. Are we to turning point here?

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you're I think what you're seeing is something

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's been simmering from a little while, like, but there

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was a very fine point put on a lot of

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>these institutions. You think pension funds, all these other institutions.

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>They're very serious about climate change now, and that's something

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that the oil and gas industries are going to have

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. Well, it's also to be fair, like,

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we know at some point there's going to be probably

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>increasingly greater regulation. We're seeing it globally, we're seeing it

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. I mean, the dynamics of

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this company. Eventually, I'm assuming we will transition to from

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a carbon based economy. I mean that's where the world's going.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>May not happen overnight, right, Well, that was that was

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the argument. I mean, if you don't start now, you're

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be left behind. I mean, I think Engine

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Number one said something along the lines of, you know,

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you there have been great American companies that have missed

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the way the world's going and you know, fall into

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the wayside. And so they were they were saying, you're

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>risking becoming one of these like defunct iconic brands. Well,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's funny, funny, is it the right? And

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like the companies that were in the Dow initially or

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>over it tunder twenty five year lifespan, there are those

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>companies that aren't around anymore, and you do wonder about

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the fate of something like an exent. Yeah, I mean

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that was the argument. So we'll see, we'll see

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Well, it's amazing we ran out of time,

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but I've got to just tell you. Your story and

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your interview with Carl Icon really a killer. It's among

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the most read on the Bloomberg terminal, and I know

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our TV team also caught up with him, but it

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>was greased thanks to your story. So thank you. Everybody

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>can check it all out all of Scott's work at

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. I'm bro journal Yeah, but you let

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>me drive none please, I want to drive. Just drive

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>good questions. Here is the drive to the globe. Thanks,

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll drying us Dawn on Bloomberg Radio. I just got

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about ten and a half minutes left in today's trading session.

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Is time for the drive to the close? And Amy

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Saying is with us. She is executive vice president portfolio

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>manager over it at Alger. She oversees several small cap

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and MidCap stenogies. She is with us on the phone

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>from Connecticut. Amy, nice to have you here, How are

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you great? Thank you, Carol, thank you for having me

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>here today. Well, it's good to have you here in

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting day, interesting week, and maybe partly because of

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the holiday, we had a fair amount of news flow.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But it does feel like investors kind of not quite

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sure where to go next. And maybe it's because we're

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in this Netherlands between earning cycles. But how do you

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>see and how do you see the market environment, especially

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for the midcake MidCap space that you play within. Yeah, well,

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I feel very constructive overall equity market, and

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I am very bullish UM makehaps now, especially UH makehap

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks. I think we can make a strong cage

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>now for those stocks UM. As you know, there's been

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a significant you know rotation from UH growth to value,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think over the long term, you know, value

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is more of a trade not investment in the sense

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that also a lot of value stocks now have built

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of great expectations going forward, whereas a

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of UM growth stocks the structural secular till wings

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for them UH still are intact and the valuation wise

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they come down a lot. But more unfortunately in that

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>algier we are UM stock pickers and we think you

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can really you know, have your growth cake and either

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>recovery too. So those are the company that we have

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>exposure to a the growth, high quality growth stock with

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>cyclic coal and markets exposure. UM. You know today, well

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk picks. I just want to give

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>our audience on YouTube and also here at Bloomberg Radio

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>just a little perspective. If I look at the Russell

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Russell two thousand small camps, it's up almost fourteen percent

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>on the year. The SMP five hundred big cap companies,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it's up just shy of twelve percent. And if I

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the SMP MidCap four hundred index, looking at

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that mid radio sector, it is up about seventeen almost

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent on the year. So Amy, let's let's drill

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit. One of the names that you

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like specifically is US Food Stickers U s f T.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>What's the fundamental story as to why you like it? Uh? Right.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>US Food is the second largest food service distributor in

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States. It's also the most innovative food distributor

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and most tax saving savvy. So it really fit into

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what I talked about. You know, they both

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have the segular trends UH and cyclic covidc RAY. And

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>here's why First of all, you know, there's a multi

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>decade secular trends for dining outside of home UM and

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic, unfortunately that that number, you know, that

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of regress you know, before the pandemic is almost

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>like fifty fifty inside home and outside of home and

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>during at this moment is roughly about say thirty five

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>percent by industry reports. So now as you know, we

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of pendemy men as people have been

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>cooper at cooper at home, and it is also you know,

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>restaurants also have a lot of benefits from government support,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the twenty nine billion restaurants revitalizzation found recently.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So so that's a very strong secular trend is still

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in play. And you are, too, specifically as a company,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>is extremely well positioned in all of those you know,

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the hospitality and a restaurant, So it's really a

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>pixel shovel play for us. They also have the scale

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>capital technolog a GM product offerings to really um meet

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>customers needs. And you know, in the indus continue to

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>gain market share from the weaker smaller players because the

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>industry is consolidating. And also it's just great catch up

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>play because US Food still trades as a discount to

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>its piers Cisco and Performance Foods. So we think the

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>company is really well positioned at this point. And takular,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>let me just correct. I think I said U s

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>f T M at U s F D just to

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>make sure our audiencewer that rate. Yeah, I'm curious, Amy

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>about another company that's in that's one of your picks

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that's somewhat in the restaurant industry. Middleby Corporation ticker m

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I D D so far this year up more. Why

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are you bullish on it? Yeah? Which Middleby has been

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a you know, compounder for US and it's a market

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>leader in the food service equipment industry. Um, you know,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was a very well diversified portfolio and customer. Uh. It's

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely recovery play because restaurants have been hit hard by COVID. Uh.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, almost all chain restaurants as their customers. Right.

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>You may it may not be a household name, but

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we all come across Middleby every day if

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you're in Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts, you know Chiefecakes for extra McDonald's.

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So so that Um, but the man is really very

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>very strong that they just reached the back you know,

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>last quarter. They have a very strong quarterback lot is

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>record high, the manage very strong, supply is very tight,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so they actually institute you know, price increases. Uh, they're

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to have like more price increases this year.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And the company also has a very strong segulative when

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been always been very innovative that you know, it's

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>levered to the secular trend of automation within restaurants, right

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and also in the kitchens, so they generate a lot

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of savings in terms of labor, energy, and other carts

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>for restaurants and food processing companies. A great the examples

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Middlebie's recently launched open Kitchen, uh Internet Things based platform,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's really one of its kind and really can

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>automate the whole intel restaurant. And also you know, recently

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the company um I had a transformative um acquisition um

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you know acquired it's a competitor, well built and that's

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, really going to be very accreative to them

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to make them more dominant in the industry.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>And the last but not leastic, the company has very

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>high financial quality. Was actually with low cyclicality. You know, overall,

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so very strong margins and free cash flow. So it's

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 1>really a compoundel that can really transcend sort of economic

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, volatility. But clearly it's extremely well positioned, uh

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize the cyclical recovery. Now, yeah, and the start

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that was up almost eighteen percent last year, I'm assuming

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>as things started to recover a little bit, uh, and

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>it's up about so are this year? Um, are you

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>finding lots of opportunity in the MidCap space right now?

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And just got about a minute or so, Yes, definitely,

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>because mixcap has you know, part of the past twenty years,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>really has outperformed both small large cats because it has

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the best of both worlds. Like small caps, they are

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>less covered and operating an inefficient market, which is a

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very fertile ground for us at Algiers because we're stock pickers,

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and they also offer similar gross potential to small caps.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, they are less risky than small

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>caps because they are more similar to large caps in

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of financial quality and liquidity. But at this point,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are cheaper than large cap growth piers

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and also on a fundamental basis, they are projected to

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>have higher earnings growth compared to the large cap piers. Uh,

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot less. I think on average there's

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>only ten analysts covering, you know, mikecap gross companies, where

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty twenty analysts covering a large cap growth company.

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So so I think it's very attractive at this point,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and we're very bulish on that. And we just recently

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>launched Alger mickcap boody, got it? Yes, all right? And yeah,

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and as you said, MidCap versus large caps versus small caps,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you've definitely seen the out performance so far here in Amy,

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, love talking specific names, Amy saying,

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager over at Alger during us on the phone

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>from Connecticut. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. And

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News