WEBVTT - Elon Musk Sows Doubt Over His Twitter Takeover

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all hartnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. So Credit Suite, you know

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they have been announcing an array of management changes. We

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>got that back in April, the departure as CFO, their

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Asia had their general council. Well, we just got a

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal and Credit Suits wearing the

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>exit of the company CEO Thomas Gottstein. Uh. And we

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>have certainly done some reporting over the last month or so. Uh.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Justin late April, the company's chairman Axe Lehman express support

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for that CEO. But this was a again a bank

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that has been overseeing a streak of profit warnings more

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>scandals which have saddled the bank with losses worth billions

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, damaged its reputation for risk management, and triggered

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a shake up of its leadership. So again, just crossing

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>moments ago, a Bloomberg headline credit Sweet weighing the exit

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of Thomas Gottstein as soon as this year well, speaking

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of a leadership shake up. Twitter shares are down nine

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>point five percent after Elon musk tweeted earlier this morning

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that the deal was on hold, this billion dollar takeover

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter. He did follow up a little bit later,

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, trying to clarify. I think when

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>he saw that the stock was down and pre market

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trading um that it's still proceeding. But let's get the

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>details now with Ed Love. Though he's West Coast correspondent

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, he's with us from our Bloomberg nine

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sixties studios in San Francisco. At never a dull moment

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're covering Elon Musk, Um, I do wonder what

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the strategy is here, because if you think about this

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective of somebody who you know, you'd think

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>would do some serious due diligence. Um, the problem that

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>he has is with the spot fake accounts. He's concerned

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are more than five that they make up

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>more than five of Twitter's users. Um, wouldn't this be

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>something that you kind of figure out before you make

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>at four billion dollar takeover? Yeah? Well, first things first,

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember he waived due diligence, and we've known that for

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>some time. And and you're completely right, because there's only

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>one point he's been consistent on throughout this whole process,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>which is he wants to remove bots from the platform.

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>He's very aware of bots on the platform. But then

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to suddenly turn around and be like, WHOA put the

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>brakes on, guys, it's weird. And I'll tell you why, guys.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>The the language Twitter used in its regulatory Friday Friday

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Morning is standard boiler plate. They use it all the time,

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>every quarter, So why now? So sometimes I think ed

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is just as he thinks. He just puts

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it out to everybody, you know, versus editing himself and

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>saying what I you know, like most normal people like

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. But I'm just saying I do feel like synomons.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the thought process and it just comes out. I mean,

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how so is he still committed to

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this deal? What do we know on that front? And

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about all the investors who are lining up

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>behind him, or the money that's lining up behind increasingly

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>other people's right money, not his. Maybe Yeah, So I

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>mean he tim tweet said, he tweeted by the way

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, I'm committed to the deal. So you follow

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it on a blow by blow basis to our listeners

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and tell him to get everything on social media. We

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>should trust well, we have no other mechanism to talk

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to him. Remember, there is no spokesperson, there's no sort

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of active press team. Um, go on the Bloomberg terminal

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a subscribable and Bloomberg dot com if not,

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and read Matt Levin's column. According to Matt Levine Bloomberg

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>opinion columnists, you can't just say I'm putting a deal

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on hold. Why you have a binding contract? That's it. Yeah,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering what this has to do with price,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the SMP five dred is down just

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last month since April four. April four was

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the day that Twitter shares closed hired by after Musk

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>took that nine percent stake, so it was before he

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>made the offer for Twitter. This was a passive one.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder how much this has to do with

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the broader route that we've seen in tech stocks, and

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>if Elon Musk is using this as an opportunity to

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>try to get Twitter for a lower price. Yeah, there

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is a school of thought. Hindenberg short seller research company

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:40.559
<v Speaker 1>put it out there at the beginning of this week

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that this could be a sign of Elon Musk potentially

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>coming back with a lower offer. You know, Twitter has

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not been caught up in the sell off in technology

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks because it's pending a deal, right, and you look

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at the spread between the offer price fifty four dollars

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty cents and the current share price, it's getting wider wider, wider,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>especially with today's sell off in Twitter stock. And that's

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>an indication, a soft indication that Wall Street is betting

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>this deal is not going to happen, at least not

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in its current form. Yeah, I mean, I just feel like,

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting. Um David western Um talking to

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a guest earlier, Eric Gordon, who follows M and A

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>and teaches it to students and was like, how do

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you teach Elon Musk to business school students? And you know,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just got his own rules right ed. And I

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think about you folks who have to report on him,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Like how you have to interpret these things he does well.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the lack of sleep that's the hardship,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not the interpreting. Um, let's remember, let's recap the reporting,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>multiple media reports, the FTC. The SEC are looking at

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the deal and how Elon Musk steaks was acquired and communicated.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, he's not free or above the law,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but he does have his own way of doing things

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that is atypical for an executive of a large publicly

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>traded or private company. And we have thirty seconds left.

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>What's happening inside Twitter right now? Yesterday the CEO let

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>go of two executives there. What are you thinking if

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you're working at Twitter right now, They're hiring Freeze, they're

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>re sending offers take us into it. Yeah, I mean

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing that in some respects this business is normal. Um.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>They're surprised that Elon Musk didn't know about the bots.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a kind of well known thing. Internally. Um, but

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they're bracing what Twitter looks like. You know, there was

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>expectations that some management would go and we're starting to

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>see that play out now. Yeah. Anyway, all right, it

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>continues the story that continues to give and give and give.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Sleep from Ed luve Blow. Yeah, yeah, it doesn't seem

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like Elon must look sleeps at all all. The West

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Coast correspondent Bloomberg News Twitter share of selling off Tesla shares.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>They're rallying. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>We've Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. We're still in a pandemic everyone, and COVID

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is searching again in the US. Reinfections a chief culprit.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to it. Dr I los Bader is clinical

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Medicine at n y U Landgoing Medical Center.

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>On the phone from New York City. My guess is

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>thou e and first of all, great to have you

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>here with him and myself. You would say it's okay

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be out and about. Well, uh are now it's

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>always fair to be prudent, Happy Friday. But Carol and

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>tim and two years ago we did talk about that

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone would be getting COVID eventually. I certainly did not

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>anticipate all of the mutations and the O macron sub

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>variants that are coming out. And I think we are

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we are certainly seeing and I'm seeing in the office

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more COVID infections a lot of people. I think we're

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>under counting because people are testing at home. The home

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>tests are fairly accurate, and so we really are seeing

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a surge. Some of those people. We are getting taxl

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of it for you're older born, firm underlying disease, but

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are getting it, and I think, um,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, going out to big venues, you know, does

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>pose some risk. Fortunately, most of these omicron infections are

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like that cold sinus cloth, sore throat. We're not really

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing a bump in the deaths. We've had enough deaths,

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a million in the United States, fifteen million

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>excess deaths around the world. So uh, this has been

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>quite ago. But it's frustrating that despite people who have

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>had vaccines two or three, and people even four vaccines,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>or if they've even had COVID, they are still getting

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>O Macron And that's been very frustrating, So going out

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to concerts. Probably it's not a zero risk, let's put

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it that way. And we've seen it front and center

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with our colleagues. Ten Yeah, we have, um I mean,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just in the data. Anecdotally, we've had

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>more and more colleagues who are getting sick dr les better.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so difficult to get packs of it? Still?

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh Well, typically we try and reserve that for people

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>who are older sixty five or of underlying medical problems.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I have not had that much trouble getting it. We

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>use a specific pharmacy, which I'm not going to mention

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on air, but who do seem to be able to

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>get it for most patients? As patients over sixty five

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, or with underlying conditions, not necessarily like you know,

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'm under forty and I got it, I wouldn't

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to get packs of it. It's it's much

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>more difficult um A. You have to upload and document

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one that you have a positive test. Um. I have

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a few patients who are under forty or or under

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, we're getting it. In general, most doctors are

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to reserve it for older people, because most young

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>people do seem to get through it, you know, seven

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to ten days, that's the quarantine. They may have some

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>residual you know, cough. I've had patients coughing for several

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>months after. Unfortunately, we don't have great treatment for post

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID or long long haul at this point, although we're

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at a number of things. But yes, young people,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it is harder to get pack lav it true. You know,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a Bloomberg story out there and it says

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 1>experts say that it's difficult to know what the next

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>few months will bring, uh and just says how the

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>virus is not behaving the same way it has in

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the past, and the majority of the country is living

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like the pandemic is over. How do you think about

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the next the rest of the year

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what we might see when it comes

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic, you know, I think we should be

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>focusing or if I were in leadership, I would try

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and encourage an omicron vaccine or a universal COVID coronavirus

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>vaccine because clearly this virus is mutating faster than we thought.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>People are getting reinfected multiple times. As for the Bloomberg article.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Even natural antibodies are not providing protection, so and paxl

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of it is in limited amounts. So I think we

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think vaccines can be helpful, but they have to

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>be more of a universal like universal flu vaccine or

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>universal coronaviru respect scene. And I would say if you

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>are elderly or from be careful going to concerts. You know,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so outdoors said certainly safer than indoors, and be prudent.

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I just say, I'm getting ready to do some traveling

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>outside the country, and it's it's pretty there's strict rules

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>out there. You got those masks ready. I have the

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>masks ready. But going into a country and then coming

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the US, I mean they want to make

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sure you're not carrying stuff around. I hope you don't

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>get stuck in some beautiful location for ten days because

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you just continue to test positive comment Sorry guys, still positive,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe with like a nice beach or tropical climate comments comment.

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Dr Iain LUs Bader, thank you so much, clinical professor

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of medicine and go to for us throughout the pandemic.

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Key's over at n y U lend Going Medical Center.

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. The remarks in

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the new isshue of Bloomberg business Week really taps into

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>what has been going on in the trade and kind

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of where we are right and and our markets actually

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to make some sense at this point. Well, that's

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the question. I mean, the valuations have certainly come down

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Michael mackenzie is rates reporter who covers the

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bond market here at Bloomberg News. He joins us on

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. He's the author of

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the remarks in the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>It's available on newstands, on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com Slash business Week. Also with us right now

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is Joel Weber, editor at Bloomberg Business Week. He's with

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Joel Ober, the

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>editor of the magazine. Joel Um. The party well today

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding um, but you know these are sort of characteristics

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of bear markets. The party it's over? Do we know

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's over? I mean, we may have time. This

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>article so perfect, guys are perfect with time man. So

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.599
<v Speaker 1>should We talked to Michael this week, and obviously this

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>has been a really interesting week to watch things continue

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to fall. We've seen weeks of declines. Now everyone's kind

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of looking for that bottom. And you know, in our

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>business week way we were we were like, we're in

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the hangover right, Like this is It's been a decade

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>long party, easy money, free money, memestocks, crypto, everything was

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>just you know, so easy. And when we started talking

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to Michael about this, it's like, yeah, this is gonna

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's there's a turn that's happening, and inflation, interest rates,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>all of these things is going to make it much

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a much different, more difficult environment. And and when we

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>talked to Michael about that, we were like, oh, yeah,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that the hangover is here. Uh and maybe we're already

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of that hangover and more powering

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>through on this Friday, Michael. But what were the elements

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that really stood out to you as you dug into

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>writing this story. Well, I think what I've always enjoyed

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>being a financial genus out for twenty years. It's like

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>you do get to make people during that journey. A

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of them has been around mother than I have

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and so people like David Drew a tro price and

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wha why not at research serious? You know, they've been

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sounding the quarter intel for some time. And so when

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking to them a year ago on other stories,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>they were currently, well, it's just things are too easy,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the mean stock to start phrase, cryptocurrencies. Everything suggested to

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>them that things are getting very, very hot, and it

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was time to sort of raise cash and focus on values,

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>focus on doing your homework and prepare for for rougher waters.

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you know, if you look back

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to what happened in two thousand, what happened before two

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand made a lot of the market turmoil you do

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>get comes when the Fed Reserve decided you to start

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>raising rates. It has to tighten up the cost of money.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've been through an extraordinary period since

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. We didn't just get zero interest rate an

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of bombying from the FED. We got it

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>from other global central banks, some of whom did quantitative

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>easy for the those first time, such as earlier. And

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we also had a huge amount of fiscal stimulus that

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>came the cities in the US, and that combination has

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>given us a legacy of near double digit inflation, and

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you've suddenly got a federal reserve that has a dual mandate.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It's looking there to make sure the employment market is

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>strong but also price stability in the form of an

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate around a target of two. At the moment,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they're doing very well on the employment side of that

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>dual mandate, they're not doing very well on the inflation side.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's very reasonable as an investor be thinking, this

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is a FED that's really focused on one thing, and

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that is getting inflation down. And this is why we

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>keep hearing more and more references back to what poor

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>volcadicament view was share of the said reserves in the

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>late seventies and eighties, when he really did crack the

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>wid and in the end got inflation down, but at

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the cost of a very hard landing for the economy.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And I guess right now the market is called in

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this environment, is the said going to be able to

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>secure a softer landing, and therefore evaluations will continue to

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>under pressure. But there's probably a time now to start

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>scaling into some of the things you'd like and which

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>do look cheap um. But the risk here is that

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we get a harder landing, so it could be for

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Hall to come likely and credit. Michael, That's what's

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>been kind of interesting to watch this. We have just

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>talked NonStop about inflation, inflation, inflation, and so of course

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the FED has to be aggressive when it comes to

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. I feel like that the conversation, especially in

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the last week or two, has aggressively and increasingly moved

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to a wait a minute, FED raising rates, what happens

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to growth? And that's what we're all focusing on that

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the now we're looking at probably some kind of slowdown,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and who knows what kind of a slowdown and how

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>long it lasts, how deep and how long exactly. So

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people are sort of looking

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at the template of team where the Fed raising said

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>times rates around two and a half per cent, and

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we had an I guess, the tantrum in both equities

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and credit, and the FED stopped, but they also could

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>see that the economy was really staring down. I think

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what's problematic this time is that rent and shelter about

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a third nearly a third or how the US calculates

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer price index, and we've had an explosive housing market

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and that re announcing rent increases through big sings big

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>cities such as New York and San Francisco really taking off.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It's also happening in the areas of the country where

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>people have moved to because they have a more flexible

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>work environment. They can work from home, so Florida, Austin, Texas.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've not got to rent and housing price problem

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that's feeding through into CPI and could very well continue

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for much of this year. So you don't have a

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>situation where growth is slowing that inflation remains high. We

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>also still have a war in Ukraine, which is putting

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>pressure on commodity prices, particularly food. Now the flip side,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that high super crisis tend to eat

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>into people's into people's persons and walls to excuse the time,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and therefore that will slow the economy. But I think

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very clicky time and I think it's This

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is why when I was talking to investors, their sort

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of view was, I'm taking long term view and I'm

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>going to scalely in the areas that I like. I'm

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not going full in, but I'm starting to scale in

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen enough of a fall now. But they're

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>also adopting a sort of our strategy here that there

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>could very well be further drops, but from a sort

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of if you sort of take a three to five

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>year time horizon there, it's usually these are these are

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the times to buy. You can hold in the next

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>three to five years, you'll be You'll come out of

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that um looking far better. So the album, the famous

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>album was start making sense? Do markets finally start making sense?

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael really quickly? Like seconds? Um, I think a year

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>ago we had what sixteen crew the negative eut in bonds.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>He is now down to about only about sup treally now, um,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the word. Best thing that tells you that they're

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to make sense when we no longer have negative

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>viewer in bonds. By you're paying someone so your money

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous. I think that's the key. That's killer and

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so perfect. After what a week, Bloomberg Business Week editor

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber in studio, thank you, And of course that

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>voice you just heard Bloomberg News Rates reporter Michael Mackenzie

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in New York City. That is the remarks.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>The new issue of Bloomberg Business Week out now. This

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Crypto though for equities, it's been a vault to work

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of asset classes, including the cryptocurrency markets,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we have seen kind of a crazy week, to say

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the least. We've got a great voice to join us

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk all things crypto right now. Giante Sue is

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the co founder and CEO of alex It's a decentralized

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>finance de FI platform for bitcoin. Santa, Good to have

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you with us. How are you, Hi, Carol, Hi Tiam.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me join you today. Yeah, thanks

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. I want to go back

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to something that Carol shared from our colleague Mike Reagan,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>senior Markets editor here at Bloomberg, about a story that

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he wrote earlier this week. One point eight trillion dollars

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is the value of cryptocurrencies that has evaporate evaporated since

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the market top to three trillion dollars in early November.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>That's more than fifty drop, according to coin get Go.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>When I see numbers like that, I think to myself,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this as Mike Reagan rights could be a turning point

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto industry. What do you think? Well, I

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think the overall my care team is that it is

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely undergoing a massive correction and largely due to you know,

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>delayed fat high tried to curb inflation. And crypto is

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>highly correlated with tech, which is an injurery sensitive sector.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're interesting, right, you know the value of those

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>future and the is greatly discounted. Let's just face it.

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>The macro environment is challenging on several fronts. The conflict UQUES,

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>slowing growth in China, US and other central banks are

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>tight or they are tightening. So all these are contribute

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to the pencil of were seeing not just incredible, but

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the global market as a whole, So I

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>would say the downside race to growth definitely dominates, with

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>very very limited upside for crypto and for the whole

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>market as well. You say we shouldn't think about what's

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>going on um with crypto right now as a Leman moment.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair? Um? That's my personal opinion, Carol, because

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, interestingly, people does people do associate this, particularly

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the collapse of the terror stable point u S t

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>with LIMA moment. Right, my prisents of personal opinion is

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the folling care is that first of all, you know,

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>when we define LIMA moment, we think about the market suddenly.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I understood at that point that the government will not

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>fail our Lima as it has already done so for Bear,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Fannie and Freddie. In crypto, there has never been any

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>talks that the other one would you know, save us

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>or stabbing with spellouts. Um. So that's what I think.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>That is really not a Dima moment. But the only

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say is, you know, do you think

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>investors understood the risk here? Uh in what is turning

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.479
<v Speaker 1>out to be and has been a very volatile market

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with the you know, true possibility of losing everything. Yeah,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I um, I appreciate this terror. I would say two things.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Number one, this terror ust collapse. It is a it's

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a stable coin, but it is turned

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>out to be not to be a stable coin. Right,

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so when we talk about the terrors collapse, first of all,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it is our recently stable coin and it turned out

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's not well designed, so it did not survive this.

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>A market fell up. But if you look at other

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>stable coins such as U S d C. It's back

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>one to one with US dollar reserve. It continues to

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>maintain the very stable value. But also number two about

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto itself as a whole industrial sector. The value of

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies depends crucially on our perceived likelihood of they becoming

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>more widely used in the payment system, so that perception

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>can fluctuate dramatically. Right, events like Terra's collapsed push the

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>likelihood further into the future. Yeah, well, I wonder if

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's there's two sort of issues here. One is the

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>lack of confidence that people might have because of what

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>happened with Tera. I was talking about the reddit posts

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on uh the subreddit for terror Luna, and there are

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are in despair because of the money that

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they've lost, people who've lost their life savings according to

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>these posts. I wonder if it makes it less likely

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for cryptocurrency to be adopted widespread by financial systems around

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the world because of the volatility that we've seen because

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of the more than fifty draw down. And this is

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got what non inten cential banks exploring the possibility

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of creating your own digital currencies. I mean, it's moving ahead.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Mmmm yes, by heart broken. You know when you reason

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>treature and ready people lost your shags. They will even

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about suicide. So you know, as a builder bitcoin

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in a defact protocol, I really really I am heartbroken,

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but I want to save this number one. UM you

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>know yell and came out to come and some you

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>know possible regulation, particularly on stable coins. I welcome professor

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>yelling comment. Why because stable coins are supposed to be

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>packed to the SIA dollar. And I believe cryptox industry

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>as a whole welcome regulation that are clear but not

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>limiting the innovation of crypto. Right the cryptal practisers want

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to become from like myself, like our protocol alex build

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>on people. We welcome regulations because greater clarity will accelerate

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the adoption of printle by retail and institutional investors. But

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just as important that this regulation they are not regressive.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So trackonian that you know, us end up lacking itself

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>out of this open crypto networks. Okay, UM obviously will

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have to do more in the future. She anti su

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>shes conancy of the fintech firm there are focused on

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto investing. It's called Alex. She was the global head

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of Quantitative Investment Strategy research over at Morgan Stanley h

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>And what was a wild week, certainly when you think

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about stable coins. This is Bloomberg Moro Journal now. But

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no, all right, please,

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll dovel. I want to drive. Its good question. This

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is the Drive to the Globe on blue Bird Radio.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Right just about thirteen minutes left in today's trading session,

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we're getting ready to trump wrap up the Friday trade.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The week overall a volatile week and even a volatile day.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>We are bouncing around, uh, flipping back and forth here

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with just a few minutes to go here, but we're

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely off our worst levels of the session, near our highs.

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Yeah, the nasdak up more than three point

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>six highed by two point three percent, in the Dow

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>hired by one point four percent. So we're seeing that

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>rally maintain at least late in the day. Let's get

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>into it with the Victoria Green, the chief investment officer

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>at G squared Private Wealth. They've got five fifty million

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets under management. Victoria joins us once again

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on the front from College Station Texas, Victoria today is

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it Is it better than yesterday because we're seeing more

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>green on the screen. Well, yeah, I'm just hoping we

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't jing fit. Man, this last thirty minutes of the

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>market has not been kind, so I'm kind of holding

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>my breath here. I know we only have thirteen minutes

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to go, but I'm like, come on, baby, just hold

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>onto this rally. Why is it important to you? Why

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is it important to you that this rally is held

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>onto at the end of the week here. Yeah, well,

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's some important supports on the SMP five hundred

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>around thirty eight hundred that held this week. Um, and

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we kind of want to relief rally. You know, it

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't if you look at the pattern every single day

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>this week, it pifically didn't necessarily start off bad and

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you even have decent games sometimes through lunch and then

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>we chiled off in the afternoon. So this will be

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of breaking this powder and of just four down

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>days and pretty miserable week. You know, even with this

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>relief rally to day, they're still looking at index is

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>down two to three percent on the week. You know,

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Nassas looking to line up their six straight

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>weekly loss of most What are the important um, you

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>said some important sup ports? It think holding? Did you

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>say this week or just today? Uh? No, this week?

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>So we were really a little nervous yesterday level on

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five that's a pretty big retracement level we

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>were hoping would hold. Uh and it did today. It's

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of putting a little bit more room between

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>us and and today is really one of the first

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>times in a long time we've had a rally that's held,

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's just kind of as a nice little relief

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and kind of helps April go from down eight to

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>six percent, you know that to now the week is

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is looking two to three percent, and that that just

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>makes it a little less worse and a little easier

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to take some time off this weekend. Well, I do

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree, like I would like to see some boy,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, I'm not seeing what I would like.

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I've got a four o one K

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately, well I understand that there are two sides

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to the market. I'm not trying to be just buried

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the backyard. I thought you exactly. You just

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you found the crypto and you buried it's all under

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>my mattress. No, but you know in terms of I

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mean the thing is right now, we're trying to find

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. We're talking about market capitulation. I mean Apple

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>getting just decimated. You know, that was something we've talked

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about a lot this week, right, you know, officially in

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much it has fallen? Um, how much

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>are you guys talking about market capitulation? What to you? Says?

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Market capitulation? Victoria. So unfortunately, I'm not to put a

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>damper on this lovely day to day. But typically you

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>need to have a ninety percent down day, which we

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't had, as well as more breadth of selling if

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at the number of stocks trading below their

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ten other day moving averages, as well as value holding

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>up very well. It's it's not necessarily the indiscriminate sailing

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you typically see when you get a capitulation, because the

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>capitulation is just people throw off their hands and say,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Cathro if I'm done, like I gotta get out of here,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and I just have to sail because I can't take

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. We are starting to see some of that, right,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>some We did see equity outflows this week and last week.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you are seeing you know, clients start to want

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to give up on some position and moving into bonds

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>right into moving into bond funds, and talked about that

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or there. I mean you're still seeing, you're still seeing

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>how you'll come out, I'd say selective bonds, treasuries. You

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>know you're seeing that flight to quality to all about

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a twenty basis point drop in the ten year this week, uh,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and which is is good signs. But if you look

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for the historical when is the bottom? You know, yes,

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to support hell, but is it conpitulation? Not to sound bad,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but typically it gets a little bit more ugly and

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.239
<v Speaker 1>then everybody just wants to throw up and give up,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and then that's that's the bottom. Okay. Um. Victoria helps

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 1>settle something for for Carol and me because during one

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the breaks we were talking about valuations off air,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>about price earnings ratio for the SMP five D. We're

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>using the Bloomberg to pull up the PE ratio for

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the SP five in at twenty right now, um, which

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is the lowest it's been roughly since you know, the

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus pandemic recovery back in back exactly rely exactly two

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>years ago today, but it's still historically high, right, So

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is it fair to say that stocks are so expensive

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>by at least this measure. Some stocks are still expensive, absolutely,

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but you also have to just count in the low

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>rates we still have. And yes, rates are coming up,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but come on, guys, we're not even able to keep

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a book free on the tenure if you look back

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>at worically, this is not a high rate environment. And

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the debate is where's the peg and settle?

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of that ends up with how where a rate's

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna settle? And with that discount looked like, and how

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>much do we want to pay for that dollar earning?

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think because this SMP five is so

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>heavily capuated to tech stocks and growth stocks right now, um,

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a very reasonable valuation of considering where those

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have fallen and when with their growth trajectory looks like

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it for the future. Uh. And because they're so heavily

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>weighted to Teck versus I mean energies like what three

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of the SMP five hundred financial some of your

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>more historical value stops, you know, I know, this is

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>our broad base, this is the market. The SMP five hundred,

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's really not. It's very close to the nast

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>back and the rustle or one thousand growth. And so

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think someone is taking back and not to be existential.

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But what is the market, so you want to say,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is it fairly valued? Tech? Maybe not? Other barstood market

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely and almost pricing in a recession at this point?

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of something like bank stocks which

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are down about twenty or so this year and more so,

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at the high here, oh one thirteen,

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>doing some quick math here on the Bloomberg uh, and

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing them down even more so if I if

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we look at the high back in January. I mean

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my assumption was rates going up good for banks? Um?

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But is that telling you the nervousness about the growth

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>picture recession? Maybe lower loan demands slowdown? Is that what

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that tells you? So? I mean mortgage rights have certainly spiked.

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>What is it five point through now that we've been

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so spoiled this last decade that five point three is

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like an astonishing number two was now you backed that

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>out thirty years any one of us would have been

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>happy in get up five set mortgage right. Some of

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is all relative, but I think financials should

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit better. I mean, the kW Bank

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>index is down from January this year. That's huge. Yeah,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of that is you had the issue with

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia and sanctions. You had some write off and that

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hurts some of the financials. Then you had the curve

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not really doing what the curve does to help financials,

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and that ended up, you know, with the concerns on

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation and what rates were going to do. The trajectory

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>became so uncertain. They didn't really get this boost they

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>usually get during a rising interest rate environment because trust me,

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you're only gonna still make your point. You're a one

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>percent interest on your checking account, but they're definitely going

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to charge you a lot more on your loans. So

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they should be making more. Their margins should be doing better.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.959
<v Speaker 1>But you also didn't see consistent results during earnings, right.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You saw them starting to shore up reserves. I mean,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks did not sound super happy about the world. They

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>were more you know, putting more in their reserved budgets

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and generally reducing risk, which is not necessarily a good

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>songt But is that a canary in the coal mine.

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because they're so regulated now that they

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to react. First, I think we have

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a much more cautious banking industry over here in the

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>US than we used to ever have, right oh eight,

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think forever is earned into everybody's mind in the

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>financial industry. Um so slight canary in the coal mine.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's also a little bit the way

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that their industry reacts now to potential bad news. I mean,

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>remember what they set aside for the coronavirus sauces. They're

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>very quick now they start raising reserves and moving a

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>little more conservatively. You don't really have over here aggressive

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>banks anymore. You and then you look at what's happening,

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, say your credit poeee you Deutsche Bank that

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a little bit more aggressive what they

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and they're struggling, But you know, I'll take

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a U S Bank over European Bank any day, Victoria.

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>So it does look like and here we are, you know,

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>less less than about four minutes ago until the market closes,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It does look like the rallies holding the nattack hired

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>by three point six, the SMB five under hired by

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>two point to the how high at one point three.

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So what's the message that today's rally is sending about

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>how you're feeling about where we are in terms of capitulation.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think we're there yet. Uh, you know,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if we're not going to give this

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>back up next week. I really hate to be a

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Debbie Downer on a Friday afternoon. I kind of just

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like I should lie to you right now and

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be like, no, don't here at the bottom. So the

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>vic the Vix, hey, you know, Victoria the vix being

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>down three points on us today We're at twenty nights

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and just dipping below thirty on a day that was volatile. Again, Like,

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that. There's a lot of disconnect. Cryptocurrency

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to offer that inflation. You know, they're all

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of these should haves in the market, and sometimes the

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>market just is its own, its own beast, and it

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>really has a mind of its own. And so that's

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>why sometimes it's better to grin, embarrass and stay invested,

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>because what is logical is not always what happens. I mean,

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>some if you backed out and said, Okay, this is

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the world, where do you think the

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>markets would be I still think people would think we

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>were at a massive question at this point. So sometimes

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to remember the markets don't always react to

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>news the way we think or rational um. And we

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely do not have a rational stock market right now,

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because you do have some indiscriminate selling of stocks that

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>make billions of dollars and strong earnings and great balance sheets.

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter that most of them are going down hostefully.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're saying an apple, just quickly, just got about

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty seconds here, So next week for more FED speakers,

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a retail sales report, what's going to be on your

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>radar just quickly? Yeah, I mean they gotta put seventy

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.359
<v Speaker 1>five bases points on the tables they got, they got

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a man up. They gotta get a kind of inflation.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna do it, but in place

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the FED, don't fight the Fed. The Fed's

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>tightening here, So you've got to realize, you know, up

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hill and a bowl market is running into a major

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>FED headwind. All right, we're gonna leave it on that now.

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Always fine. Victoria gree And Chi's chief investment officer over

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>chief Squared Private Well fifty million dollars in assets under management,

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from college station Texas. Got

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a man app although even yesterday Marketplace, even with that

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>interview in Marketplace yesterday he reiterating it's not going to

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be so many five, but he could change his mind.

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>He could change his mind. Still got a few weeks

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>right before the next meeting. All right. Thanks for listening

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News