WEBVTT - Enzittification with Cory Doctorow & Brian Merchant

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>As media.

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your host ed

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Zitron and this is the third I was about saying inaugural,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not sure that's what that word means. Episode

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>of Better Off Live, the live to tape radio show

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that I shove in there when I'm in cities. Today,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm joined by two titans, Titans of the tech industry. Yes,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I've got Cory doctor Row here of course, author Cory

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>doctor Row and Brian Merchant, other author and journalist. And

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I am so excited because today we're talking about how

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 2>we fix the entire tech industry.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sounds like an easy order. I don't know what

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna do with the excess time after we're done

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>with that.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Looking forward to that's probably twenty minutes, Yeah something Max, Max, Yeah,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about our various holidays.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Brian just got back from the French rivi era. It

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 2>sounds like that's true.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I did. We got stuck in Philadelphia, so my

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 3>brain is still.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>The French revie Riviera of America, of America. Yeah, and

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>welcome to scholar debate, gentlemen. So the thing that I

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>keep thinking at the moment, the thing that really I

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 2>had too. It was like pessimism versus optimism that brought

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you two together today with me and I keep coming

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>back to this, which is everyone's kind of depressed in

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 2>tech at the moment. It feels like everyone's very negative.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>And Brian, I know you've been a ton about lat

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>it's obviously, and I'm wondering how we actually reverse this STrenD, Like,

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>how do we actually get away from the fact that

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone feels miserable with their devices right now? Because I

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>love tech. I adore my gizmos, my gadgets, my apps.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't I care that they're messing with me, and

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I write a lot about it, but I want everyone

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>else to enjoy it again, I just don't how do

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 2>we even begin that well.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that the story that the tech industry wants

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>to tell us is the origin of this depression, because

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 3>the tech industry wants us to think that you have

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to take the bad with the good. Right that you know,

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>if you want to have a friend, Mark Zuckerberg has

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>to be your friend too. If you want to search

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the internet, Sergei Brinn needs to know about it. If

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>you want to have a phone that works, then Tim

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Apple gets to charge everyone who helps you use it

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent of whatever you pay them. And their argument

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>is that like building a phone that works that doesn't

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 3>have this thirty percent viig is like making water that's

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 3>not wet, right, right, And that's just like patently untrue.

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 3>And so I think that, you know, to the extent

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that we're like God, you know, I like being able

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>to talk to my friends and being able to you know,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>download a movie without having to go to the video store,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>and I like all of these other things. I guess

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I just have to live in the apocalyptic wasteland or

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I have to go and you know, live in a

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 3>shack in the woods and be the unibomber. And I'm

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 3>here to argue that there's like, you know, we could

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 3>seize the means of computation. We could decompose the prefeast

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>menu into an a la carde little little French content

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>for you then, Brian and we could have a new

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>good Internet that consists of the stuff we like and

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>throws away the stuff that's bad.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's why the you know, the luddite is

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>such a handy epithet for them in its you know,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>incorrectly deployed sort of context. That's why they use it, right,

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not they say, oh, if you're against any one

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of those things that Corey just brought up, then you

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are against in fact the whole of technology. And then

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we can sort of deride you, we can write you off,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we can cast you aside. And it has made for

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years or so at least kind of

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, actual sort of substantive critiques and attempts to

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>reconfigure some of those systems much more difficult. You have

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to clear that ball bar first, you have to say,

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to start every argument with, well, I'm not

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot I but I actually like technology. But I

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>think that and we are only now kind of reaching

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a point where we have enough sort of a critical mass,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>enough momentum where we don't have to sort of, you know,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>dither around and sort of and make all of that,

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all of that.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Sort of pretext. It's clear now, I think.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Add to your point that the Internet is such a

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>festering mass in so many ways that it's just self evident.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>You log onto this thing and Google barely works. Everything's

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>tracking you, either, surveillance capitalism is at work in every

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nook and cranny and it's just and anybody who uses

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that besides just a few isolated apps can kind of

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>feel it. It makes your skin crawl these days. So

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the task that we have now laid out before us

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to try to fix this stuff, I think is clear

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>than it ever has been. And I do think, you know,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I often get criticized for being a pessimist or a

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>doom sayer, but I'm really not.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually quite idealistic.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a lot that we can do

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's fairly straightforward to start sort of fixing some of

0:04:58.200 --> 0:04:58.559
<v Speaker 1>this stuff.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 3>And I know Corey and are.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 2>In agreement on all, but yeah, and I think that, oh,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to where you disagree later. That's where scholar

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>debate is. So because this is the woke Lex Friedmann show,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 2>of course. And but the thing I keep coming back

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to as well is these people who are like, I'm

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a techno optimist. Not just the people the capital t

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 2>kept Low Andresen types and the fans of Nick Land,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I guess, but even the people criticizing, say tech Crunch

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>for being against I don't know a writer saying fuck

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 2>people who who don't like who don't like the AI,

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>which is bullshit. Sorry, Connie. The thing is, these people

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>don't seem to like tech. They seem to like business.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 2>They don't seem to It's not like I see Bajali

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 2>sitting around digging around on his fucking iPhone playing a game.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't see Mark Andreson or hear Mark andries and

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about even using technology. None of these people seem

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 2>to experience tech. They're just experiencing the ways in which

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>McKinsey and their various outgrowths of Sandwich. They're weigh in

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>between the layers of society and and it's so fucking

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>frustrating because I too, get called a pessimist. I have

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 2>people on the Reddit, the people who want I don't know,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>actively stealing the hub caps off of cars as they

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>listen to the show. They're piste off, like, Oh, you

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 2>just don't like it. You're just being negative, You're just

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a pessimist. No, I love this shit, and I'm tired

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of not loving I'm tired of it being bad. Facebook

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>used to be great. I know that that company's deeply evil,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>even to the early days book.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was founded so that Mark Zarkerperg and

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 3>his friends could non consensually rate the fuck ability with

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>their fellow hearts. Undergraduate, it's like truly evil.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But then even then there was a good side of it,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>where like I was in college in two thousand and

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>five and Penn's day when it was going and like there.

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Was something magical. You suddenly these nights for.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Better or for worse that you might have forgotten, or

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>that you might have forgotten moments of these get these

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 2>shitty digital camera pictures. You have people that you'd met

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 2>in passing, that you'd never meet again except you could

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>now and now what over fifteen years later, Facebook actively

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 2>in vines if you try, if you're like, i'd let's

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>find this person, like haha, no, no, no.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>So I can I draw a distinction. So I think

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>that you're the frame of optimism. Pessimism is not very

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>useful because optimism and pessimism, I think, are our beliefs

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that don't leave a lot of room for human agency. Right.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Optimism is just this idea that the history is running

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 3>on rails and it's running to a good place, right,

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>And pessimism is the opposite belief. But neither of them

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 3>really admit of a place where where we act. And

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I like hope, right, yeah, which is the idea that, like,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>if you don't like your situation and you don't know

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 3>how to make it fully better, if you can find

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>even just one thing you can do to materially improve

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>that situation, you will ascend the gradient towards the future

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 3>that you want. And that as you attain that new

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>vantage point, you may find yourself able to see new

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>ways to make things better that were occulted when you

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>were further down the slope. And so you know, it's

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>not the most efficient way to get from A to Z,

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 3>but it's it's also much better than trying to treat

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>your activism in your life like a novel. Right. I'm

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 3>a novelist. I know how novels work. In novels, you

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 3>have a very neat dramatic arc where you do a thing,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 3>and then you do the next thing, and you do

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the next thing. You build to a climax and either

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>it's triumphant or it's tragic, and then that's the end.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>In real life, there's a lot of backtracking, and the

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 3>fact that we can't see a novelistic way from A

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to Z just tells us that we're living in the

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 3>real world and not a simulation.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So where do we find hope then, Like, really, I

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>think that that is it. Yeah, I mean I and

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I would just also the sort of comment on that.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there is you know, there's utility

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in pessimism, right, and there's utility in optimism as well.

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it necessarily forecloses any futures necessarily. There's

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the of course, you know that you have the pessimism

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the intellect and the you know, the optimism of

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the will. I think that's endured for a reason, and

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's applicable here. And I think these two

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like brief snapshots that you just offered a

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to use it as an example sort of can

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>can be illustrative in a sense, right, Like you you know,

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it was founded for truly demonic purposes by a troll

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>man who continues to like wield influence over what is

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>now one of the most powerful platforms of all time.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And yet in that sort of interim period before it

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>became that from its evil origins, there was this period

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>where users had more power right where they were connecting

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>each other. I mean, some of that was somewhat illusory

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're still subject to all of the you know restrictions. Well,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>at the very least they Monk Zuckerbug was scared of

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>his us as being upset. Yeah, and there was a

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the users were dictating the growth. I mean,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>we had this kind of fertile period twenty years ago

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or so, especially with Web two point zero, where it

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was basically the users were taking the lead.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 3>Like Twitter was.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Like nothing before. Users said, oh what about a hashtag?

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>What about these features? What about you know what, how

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>can we sort of build this into something that's useful

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for us? And you know, a couple of uh, you know,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>white dudes in their in their twenties and and and

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>got pretty lucky because they owned some of that infrastructure

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time, but they at least had the the

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the foresight to sort of let users lead and to

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>see what was you know, what was what was working,

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what wasn't, what was popular, what what helped. Obviously that's

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>imperfect as a model of genuine of sort of generalized

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>growth too, but it's something that is still powerful to me. Right,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a more democratic model of developing technology that

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is not just limited to the company in Silicon Valley,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly not just limited to one founder, and how do

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we sort of knock down some.

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 3>Of those barriers.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.599
<v Speaker 1>This is what Corey writes about a lot like especially

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of knocking down sort of the the monopolistic and

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the oligopolistic instincts and tendencies that these companies have acquired

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>now that they've concentrated so much wealth and power. But

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we do see flashes of what can be. We still

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have models of what's still good. I found myself pointing

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>more recently to like, Wikipedia, for all its flaws, still

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting organization that still operates and creates really accurate,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>good and enjoyable and useful information without you know, having

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>succumbed to so many of these immense like pitfalls and

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>become a disgusting cesspool like many of its other contemporaries.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think that what we're getting at here

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about what's hopeful about the future and

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>when we look back on the past, is that we

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 3>see these people who were at very best imperfect I

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>speak as an imperfect person myself, and sometimes actually just

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 3>genuinely terrible people who nevertheless produce things that we like.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>And that's a very hopeful thing because it suggests that

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 3>We don't need perfect people to make good things. We

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>can imperfect vessels can still hold something of value. And

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 3>so you have to ask yourself, why were they better

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>then and why are they worse now? And Ed, I

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 3>think you got at it right, right in the bullseye

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 3>a few minutes ago, when you said Mark Zuckerberg was

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 3>afraid of his users. Right. So I think that these

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>firms used to be disciplined by external forces, and by

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 3>some internal forces their workforce, and that they no longer

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>feel that discipline. Right. There was a time when firms

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>worried about competition. Hm, that's not so much a worry anymore.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>We relaxed anti trust laws, and the long run effect

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>of forty years of relaxed anti trust laws is five

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 3>giant websites filled with screenshots of text from the other four.

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>In the memorable phrase of Tom Eastman, and so there's

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>nowhere to go, right. Lily Tomlin used to do this

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 3>bit on Saturday Night Live, where she'd play an AT

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and T operator doing commercials for the Bell system. They'd

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 3>end with her turning to the camera and saying, we

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 3>don't care, we don't have to. We're the phone company.

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 3>When you have a ninety percent market share and search

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 3>when you've got twenty five billion dollars a year to

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 3>spend making sure that nobody ever sees a search engine

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 3>other than yours, because you're the default everywhere there's a search.

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Why do you need to make the search good. You're

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 3>just the only game in town. You don't care, you

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 3>don't have to your Google. Right, So they didn't have

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>to worry about competition. They used to have to worry

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 3>about regulation, and we've seen some pretty big regulatory interventions.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>You know. The real big one was Microsoft and the

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 3>DOJ for seven years over antitrust. And they don't have

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 3>to worry about that either anymore because once the sector

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>is really concentrated, it finds it really easy to figure

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 3>out what their lobbying position is and to stay on message.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>If you remember the Napster Wars, right, there were like

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>one hundred little tech companies that in aggregate were still

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>much bigger, like orders of magnitude, bigger than seven entertainment companies.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 3>The seven entertainment companies kick their ass, yeah, because two

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred companies they're a raval, right, seven companies are a cartel,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>and so thank you. Yeah. No, the Calltaeil. Thing is

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 3>my mite.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Phil Broughton's safety officer and a nuclear safety ex But

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>in general he's been telling me Calltel, Calltael, Calltel. And

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I I'm really coming round to this thing that it's

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>not just it's not just about the monopoly. It's about

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they're all sitting there shaking each other's hands.

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Apple being paid at nineteen twenty billion in the year

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>by by by Google to not do.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 3>So how is that Google and Facebook carving up the

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>search the ad market with the political collusive Jedi blue

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 3>arrangement that was revealed by the Texas AG's lawsuit against them.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean, these companies they pretend that they're

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, bitter enemies, but they're all chummy when it

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>comes to the stuff that matters. And you know, once

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>you have your regulators captured, then you also can mobilize

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>law against your adversary. So it's not just about flouting

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the law, it's about using the law against your enemies.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 3>And what used to happen with tech And one of

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the things you asked what we love about tech? One

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 3>of the things I love about tech is how flexible

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 3>it is, right, how you can always change it so

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 3>that it does what you want. And one of the

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>things that we got out of the concentration in the

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 3>tech sector is a capture of regulators that led to

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 3>an expansion of IP law that has now made it

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>illegal to reconfigure your own stuff.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So imagine that this the three of us. We're having

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 3>a board meeting about our ad strategy for our website,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>and you're chairing it at and you say, well, guys,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>our KPI, here is AD revenue top line AD revenue.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I figured out we make the ads twenty percent more obnoxious,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 3>we get two percent more top line revenue. Brian, who

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>may not give a damn about users, can still stick

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 3>his hand up and say, ad, has it occurred to

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 3>you that when we make the ads twenty percent more obnoxious,

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 3>forty percent of our users will type how do I

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 3>block ads? Into a search box? And then our revenue

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 3>from those users goes to zero forever because they're never

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>going back to type how do I start seeing ads again?

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 3>And so when you raise the price of ink, you

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 3>have to worry about third party in cartridges. When you

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>make MySpace terrible, you have to worry about bots that

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>let people leave my space, but still have their messages

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 3>imported into Facebook. You know, all these things that made

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 3>it very easy to lower the switching costs and go

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>where you wanted. Well, IP laws basically made that illegal.

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Jay Freeman calls it felony contempt a business model where

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>break DRM or violating terms of services become a crime.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>And so companies just put DRM in terms of service

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 3>around their stuff so that anything you do that displeases

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>their shareholders as a felony. And then the last thing

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>that used to discipline these companies, something near and Derda

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Bryan's in my heart, was their workforce. Yes, because tech

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 3>workers were powerful, there weren't enough of them, and they

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 3>could get a job somewhere else. And yeah, their bosses

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 3>suckered them into working every hour that God sent by

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 3>telling them they were on a holy mission, and so

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>they missed their mother's funeral and their kids litteral league

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>game to ship the product on time. But that did

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>mean that they would feel profound moral injury when their

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 3>boss said let's make this shitty, and because they could

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 3>get a job somewhere else, they would tell their boss

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 3>to go fuck themselves. But two hundred and sixty thousand

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>tech layoffs last year one hundred thousand year to date

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 3>this year, tech workers aren't telling their bosses to go

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 3>fuck themselves. And so you have a boss who every

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>day went to the wall where there's a giant lever

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 3>labeled in shitification and yanked it as hard as it could.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.119
<v Speaker 3>And they couldn't get that lever to budge very far. Competition, regulation,

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 3>their own workforce, interoperable hacks, they all kept the lever

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 3>from moving freely. Now the lever just goes all the

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 3>way to one hundred, and from the boss's perspective, they're

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 3>just doing what they did every day of their lives.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>They don't know why we're so angry at them.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think this also circles back to, you

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>know that what we were talking about earlier about you know,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the need and the imperative to sort of be critical

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and to sort of oppose certain aspects of how tech

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and tech companies especially are unfolding. Because the current state

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of play, all these things that Corey's describing that are

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.239
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true that you know, they didn't just you know,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they didn't arrive prepackaged that way. I love that you

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just walked us through all all those three things that

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>no longer happen, and it's in large part a result

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>because there were a lot of missed opportunities to regulate

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of missed opportunities to sort of constrict this

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>growth before it became. My favorite example is, like, I

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was twenty thirteen when the Obama administration had

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance to sue Google for when it became quite

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>clear that it was engaging in monopolistic behavior and it

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>was becoming sort of a monopoly of search, and they

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>basically just kind of let them off with the slightest

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>slap on the wrist possible and said go for it.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all think about tech today and all

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these people who are you.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Know what happened there?

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Exactly what happened there? It was so Obama. I mean,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>how far back do we want to go.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 2>That specifically twenty thirteen era, because there's the current antitrust

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>lawsuit now, But what was the predecessor.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was just there was an FTC probe and

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>basically the Obama administration could have sort of green green

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>lit a more aggressive investigation, a more aggressive suit into

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Google's monopoly practices. You know, this was ten years ago,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so it was before it had become so sort of

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like obviously and so stultifyingly sort of the want what

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>does it have ninety percent of the search market, So

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's literally it's just like the textbook definition.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Of an search. So it's twenty thirteen. So that's right.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So Prabagod Ragavan at this point had joined Google. Going

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 2>back to the man who killed Google Search my favorite story,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 2>real piece of.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Shit, motherfucker there, Probagod, come on the shell. I'll take you.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll take you out in the mic.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 2>But what's interesting is that does time really interestingly with that,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>so that that interrogation never happened, They never really went deep,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>and just then they hired Prabagarth from Yahoo after he's

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>done his work destroying Yahoo's search, and that was when

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Google began to sour. And it feels like that could

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>have been a complete that's a historic moment. That's a

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 2>moment where everything could have changed.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was one moment of you know, a

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>number that they could have but yeah, and you know,

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Corey has documented what's happened.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Since it's just old school.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Payola practices, right like Google has just sort of really

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>just kind of strangled the market, not through innovation, not

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>through introducing great products or ensuring that the user has

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the best experience, but just by you know, sheer force of.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Paying people out.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The Apple deal is a great example, just literally just

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>funneling billions to another tech company to make sure that

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>its product shows up at the top of another tech

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>products you know service.

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, you know, I think that if we want

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to understand why Obama took the decision he did and

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>what's changed, you have to understand that during the Carter administration, right,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>so we have to go way back, we started to

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>see the rise of a crank theory of anti trust law,

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 3>and that Crank theory was that anti trust law was

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>being misapplied that if you saw monopoly in the wild,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 3>what you'd actually encountered was something that was very efficient. Right,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 3>if everyone goes and buys the same product at the

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>same store, uses the same search engine, it's the best.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't it be perverse for the government to spend public

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 3>money to take the best product and make it worse, Right,

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>And so that was the theory that we got under Carter.

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 3>Reagan really liked it because of very monopoly friendly, and

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>every administration since has brought into it as did every

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 3>economic school in the country and eventually in the world.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 3>This is a very thatchery kind of ideology, but it

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 3>also heard in the EU, thank you, and you know

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 3>that these ideas kind of raced around the world and

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>became orthodoxy, and they were funded by very rich people.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 3>So there's a thing called the man seminar m a

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 3>NN that is sorry. So the man seminars are these

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 3>free junkets for federal judges where they teach them about

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 3>anti trust law and they're run by rich guys and

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 3>they fly them to luxury resorts and they explain how

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 3>anti trust law should work. And there's been quantitative work

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 3>on this where they took federal judges and they looked

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 3>at their decisions before and after going to a man seminar,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and they found that after going to a man seminar,

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 3>they weighed more heavily in favor of monopoly. And so

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>they built up this evidouce edifice rather of precedent and

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 3>theory and orthodoxy. And Obama's FTC said, oh, We're going

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 3>to let them walk. What they were doing was just

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 3>continuing a grand tradition of Bush one, Bush two, Reagan, Carter, Clinton,

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 3>right like this was the way that things were done.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 3>It was an absolutely wasted opportunity. But it's more or

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 3>less what Trump did afterwards, and it's what we did

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 3>all the way up to the Biden administration, which for

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 3>reasons I think that have nothing to do with Biden's

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 3>own ideology, but have everything to do with the way

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 3>that he operates as a party powerbroker, where he wants

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to give everyone a little as something. We got a

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 3>handful of appointees at the tops of some of the

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 3>most important agencies that really oriented themselves towards smashing corporate power.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Lena Kahn at the Federal Trade Commission, Jonathan Canter at

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the DOJ Anti Trust Division, Tim Woho's in the White

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>House for several years, and so on, and these people

0:22:55.359 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 3>have really transformed things. We've seen more policy transformation in

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the last four years than in the last forty. It's

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>it's been head spinningly great. It's wonky, it's hard to

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 3>get your head around. It's very structural, right, it's about

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 3>changing the rules of the game, which takes a while

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 3>to show up in the game. Right, But boy, oh boy,

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty substantial. Do you think it could go anywhere? Though?

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you actually we talk about hope. Should we have

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 2>hope from this?

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's very it's very tenuous. It

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>has been great, you know Lina con in particular. I mean,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I wish the administration would do kind of a better

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>job of touting its wins because all this stuff is

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just so popular. What Lenakon has done in awakening sort

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of the FTC from its kind of kind of coma.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it's coma, it's in decades long coma. And then

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>attacking some I mean, who doesn't hate Ticketmaster? Like who

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't you know, who who loves logging onto the Internet

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>as it is today? Like these are these are entities

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that are popular to go.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 3>After junk fees, non competes.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how Amazon which has recently turned so hostile to

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>its own, you know, third party vendors and small businesses

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that that it relies on to operate that it's strangling.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a perfect example of what the you know,

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats and Biden are supposed to be all about

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>standing up for you know this, the little guy, the

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>small business owners, you know. And I think the problem

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with all of these gains is that they're just tethered

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to an administration.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, so if.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>If Trump, I mean some some of them, you know,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>some of them could could be more durable.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 3>They could be. But I mean Lina con is not

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be the head of the FDC if Trump wins.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>They're already coming for Yeah.

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean Democratic donors are coming for her too,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>because tech companies don't like Lena Khan either.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>So you have guys like I think it was, is

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 3>it Reid Hoffman? Yeah? Oh god, but that company that

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 3>just turned down a thirty six billion dollar acquisition offer

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>from Google did so because they didn't want to go

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 3>through that wizy trust. Hell it is the security company. Yeah,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, you have had, if nothing else,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 3>four years of companies not being acquired and instead trying

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 3>to be product led and make a thing that people

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>want that they can sell for more than a cost

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 3>to make them, which is you.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Know, that's an insane I don't.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 3>I was raised by socialists, it's right, and even I

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 3>can recognize that this is what capitalism is supposed to look.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Like my dad ran apart of the NHS, like I'm

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 2>the same way. But also this is also something that

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 2>really fucking bothers me about. Take you showed me your

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 2>framework laptop beforehand, and for the listeners, the framework is

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>a laptop that you can actually effectively rebuild, replace the

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 2>motherboard and the screen and all these things. As a

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>regular user. There is still cool shit happening. But also

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I assume that company makes more money than it spends

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>on its stuff. Take can do this, and I feel

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 2>like the Commons, there's this weird paradox at the moment,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 2>we've got Take saying well, it's actually these companies should

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>be able to quote Ilia Suitskava formerly of open Ai,

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 2>we should be able to scale in peace. I by

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the way, Ilia, if you some here this, you will

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 2>never have a moment of piece. As long as I

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 2>have a microphone. Now that you said that, I'm going

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to be watching you, I'm going to be popping out

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of the toilet like the skibberty meme that the children

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 2>look at. But the thing that frustrates me is they

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 2>want this world where they can burn as much money

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 2>as possible, but also the biggest of them can print money,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>prints so much money, more money than any company should

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 2>have while also providing their services. And it's just how

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>is it? How do they not want to be the

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>company that just makes more money than they spend that

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 2>people like.

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And is it just that they don't give a shit?

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it? Is it sunned up a shy and his

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 3>ilk just don't care. Well. I think that what you're

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>looking for, the Fraser looking for here is what Lina

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Khan calls too big to care. Right if you think

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 3>back to the moral philosophers of capitalism or you know,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 3>writing at the time of the Light Eyed uprisings, and

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 3>they were saying, look that the thing that i'm a

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 3>profit driven economy as opposed to a rent driven economy

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 3>will get us is a world in which, instead of

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the lord knowing that the peasants will have to bring

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 3>in the harvest every year because they're legally obliged to

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 3>they can't leave the land, the lord, the capitalist will

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 3>have to mobilize capital, bring free labor into contact with it,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 3>alienate them from the surplus of that labor, and watch

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 3>over their shoulder all the time for someone who shows

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 3>up with a better machine, a better process, a better

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 3>pitch for their workers. You know, if you own the

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 3>building that a coffee shop is in, and that coffee

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 3>shop goes bankrupt because a better coffee shop is just

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 3>open across the street. You're fine. Actually you're great, because

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 3>now you have an empty storefront. You could rent on

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the same block as this new hot coffee shop. Right,

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 3>if you own the coffee shop, if you're the capitalist

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to the rontier, you're fucked. And so every

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>capitalist aspires to being a rontier. Right. They don't want

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 3>to operate in an environment in which they're like the

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>fastest gun in the West, who's always waiting for that

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 3>kid to show up and say draw Brian.

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Actually, Bridgingenolf of that is well, I think it's time

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 2>to much the oscy just very bas what did the

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Ludites actually ask for? Because I've heard people who do

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 2>not like this. They're in people who do. But explain

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>for the listeners because you hear this phrase Ludism mentioned

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>quite long.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, you know, so there's no there's there's no

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, enduring lud eighte manifesto that where all the

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lud Eites and the people who were out on the

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>streets who are part of the campaign, you know, of

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the of the eighteen tens who were organizing basically against

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this new sort of you know, this new this new

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>class of entrepreneur that was rising up to to basically

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>exploit their labor, to use machinery, to uh, to divide labor,

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to to use children to run it, and to sort

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of may force them to compete and to sort of

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and to drive down their wages. So they are against

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>The Ludites are basically against all that they were.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Truly a They were.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, you know, a reactionary force. They had

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>their back against the wall. They weren't a pro active

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>political party or anything like that. So you can't necessarily

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>say every Ledite believe this or this is what they wanted.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 3>But there are a number of things that.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Are clear about what they were that what they were seeking,

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can really boil it down to basically a

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>seat at the table.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 3>This was a profoundly.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Anti democratic way to develop and deploy technology that they

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>were experiencing, and they went to great lengths even before

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they became Luddites to point this out. They went to

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Parliament and said, these new machines are being bought up

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>by this new rising class of capitalists. They are being

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>staffed by either migrant workers or children, or precarious.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Workers Napoleonic war orphans, right exactly, they literally would pipe

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 4>in orphans from London into these factories to staff them,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 4>and they wouldn't pay them until they turned eighteen. They

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 4>and so the Luddites or the people who became Luedites

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 4>would point this out and they would ask for some

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 4>very basic, very common sense reforms, asking for minimum wages,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 4>protections from fraud. And that went on for ten years,

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 4>and they got laughed out of Parliament time and time

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 4>again until those any regulations that did govern the trade

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 4>were thrown up altogether. And so when the Luddites become Lutdites,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 4>they're basically protesting all of the above, the fact that

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 4>this was a profoundly undemocratic process that they are being

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 4>forced to uh to either succumb, to either go work

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 4>in the factories or to give find it, give up,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 4>which wasn't an option. By the way, This isn't a

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 4>diverse economy of you know that we recognize today right

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 4>exactly learned it.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>You can't even learn to code. You grew up in

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a weaving town. Guess what you're John's pretty limited to weaving.

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So these are people who are remarkably at the at

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of the whims of the market. And when the

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>market was as poor as it was, and these capitalists

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>were in control of it to the extent that they were.

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they tried, they tried to reason with a

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these uh, these factory owners. They tried before

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it came to it came to what it came to

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>when they sort of organized this gorilla rebellion that was

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.719
<v Speaker 1>incredibly popular that they you know, this was the new

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood movement basically, and what they wanted was, yeah,

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a seat at the table. They opposed the machinery hurtful

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to commonality that was align well must it.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Seems like it wasn't, because the common misunderstanding if lotism

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 2>is that they just wanted to destroy the machines because

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 2>they didn't like them. And it sounds like, I don't know,

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 2>if the market forces would have given a seat the

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>table for the workers, they might not fucking resent.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Under Yeah, I heard Cory, you make this make this

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>observation too again. If like someone had come to town

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with the machine and said, all right, let's figure this out.

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get together, like, how can we all benefit from

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this machine?

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 3>I saw it over there.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I bet the whole town could really benefit from having

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>access to this machine that makes our working lives a

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit.

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe to make the machine better. If we talk to

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the people who'd use it.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe we can all make a little bit more

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>money together. You still have your if you're if you're

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the merchant capitalist who was you know before,

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>was kind of the middleman in charge of distribution.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe this will make you more money too. But it

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't work like that.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It always developed where either somebody would come in from

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>out of town with a lot of money and be

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>set up something truly enormous, or a factory or owner

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>would recognize, or a prospective factory owner would recognize the capacity,

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the productive capacity of these new machines and then try

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to build them for personal gain. And this whole process

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>really was deeply conflicting to the vast majority of factory

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>owners too, because they saw a handful of people using

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the machines this way in a way that then at

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the time was very clearly corrosive to the social contract. Right,

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have one person saying I'm gonna use this machine,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hire kids to run it, I'm gonna sort

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of profit as much as I can drive prices as

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>low as I can to get these guys. You're fucking

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>up the entire town economy, You're fucking over your neighbors.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a disgusting thing to do. And you were hated

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for it. So the people who did it were willing

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to be hated. They were willing, they were they were

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the ones who were willing to take that ire. And

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>few were. And a lot of some people walked away

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>from the trade rather than you know, automate their machines,

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and and some you know, sided with the Ludites and

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>were quietly kind of like cheering, like, yeah, go smash

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>those guys factories. But by and large, you know who

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>did the state. Once the state threw its lot in

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with with with with the factory and back them up

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with arms and with with punitive policies, it was, you know,

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I was going. I want to point out two things

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 3>that I think are really important that that Brian omitted here.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>The first one is that Brian wrote the definitive book

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 3>about Yes, it's called Blood in the Machine. You should

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 3>read it. It's very good. And the second one, which

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I think you just you skipped over maybe too quickly,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 3>is that they already had the legal right to a

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 3>seat at the table. They did. There were laws in

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Parliament that gave them that right. The firms involved were

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 3>moving fast and breaking things, and the Luodites went to

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Parliament and said, we would like the law obey right.

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 3>And this is this is an early example of of

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Wellhet's law. You know that that capitalism consists of exactly

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 3>or or conservatism consists of exactly one proposition that there

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 3>should be powerful people whom the law protects but does

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 3>not bind, and everyone else whom the law binds but

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 3>does not protect right. And this is what the Luddites

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 3>were actually. You know, the thing that drove them into

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the streets was they they watched these people effectively stealing

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 3>from them and Parliament going along with it, and they

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 3>were like, well, I guess we just got to do

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 3>some self defense here.

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think you can draw a direct fucking line

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 2>from this from Luddites to people who would call someone

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 2>like me or someone better like Molly White, a cynic.

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's this thing where what people like

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 2>everyone at this table, Molly White, David Garrett. When talking

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 2>about cryptocurrency these Gary Mark has been talking about AI,

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Roger mcnamy, You've been talking about everything these people are

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 2>not cynics or critics. I guess they are critics if

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 2>you just frame any criticism as big critic. What they're

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 2>doing is saying, hey, can we apply very basic fucking

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 2>societal structure to this stuff that is thieving, that is

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 2>burning things?

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, do we want this thing that seems.

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 2>To enrich in the case of cryptocurrency a very small

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and shadowy group. And the ones who want shadowy are

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 2>very annoying. And these people like the Winklevosses who lost

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars of their customers money. That's fine, But

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 2>when you talk about this stuff, well, you just don't

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 2>like technology. You just don't want progress. Motherfucker. None of

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>this is progress.

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 3>From the very beginning, this was the goal.

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>It was clear to anybody in eighteen twelve when the

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Luddite movement was at its apex, that this was a

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>popular movement. That people were coming out in the streets

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to cheer the Luddites, not the factory owners, because they

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>felt solidarity with them. Yeah, because they saw the shape

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that industrial capitalism was taking. They knew who the winners

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>were going to be, they knew who the losers were

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be, and they cheered the lued Heites on.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And so when the state comes out and it has

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to sort of make its case against the Ludite, it

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has to demonize the Luedites, it has to try to win,

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and it does so again by making frame breaking a

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.479
<v Speaker 1>capital offense. You break a machine, you can get killed,

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get hung.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 3>Both taking too right, oath, taking too saying that you

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 3>were a Luttite became a hang up all offense. You

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 3>could get hung.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>That's why there's no real records left of sort of

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>their their meeting minutes or there anything or any letters

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 1>between the very few and far between.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Classic, and then they mobilize troops. There's more troops in

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>England fighting the lut Heites than they were fighting Napoleons.

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 3>They brought them back from the front, right, they brought

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 3>them back from France to fight the Lutedtite.

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The tens of thousands at one point, so you could

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>literally see you'd see the lines drawn sort of as

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>industrialization was very literally almost a civil war, and the

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>states making the case against the Lutedites, and it's the propaganda,

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you can call it. It's propaganda at the time, and

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>its proclamations and its declarations it's it's it's casting the

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Ludites as backwards looking, as deluded, as malcontent under the

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know they must be you know, they're they're smashing

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the thing that that that that you know that that's.

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 3>Part of their job.

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're smashing, they're smashing. Probably this form of criticism

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is already there. So when the Ludites do lose, when

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they are hung en mass uh, that language is used

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the trial against them, and we can see why

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>because the state needs to have this enemy. They have

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to paint this portrait as anybody who's

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>against the shape that technological development is taking, anyone who's

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>criticizing any element of that, Like, wait, is are there

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>too many losers or winners? No, shut up, you're a luttite.

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Get out, you stand down, or we will hang you.

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think that this is a really I'm so

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 2>glad you went into this specific thing because it really

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 2>feels like now I don't know if the state is

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the state's laziness is more or like a

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 2>lack of focus is the problem. It's not that the

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 2>administrations are being like people who don't like AI are stupid,

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 2>or people who don't like crypto. They're just like, I

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 2>don't really get this, and these people got so much money.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 2>And I love money. I love getting paid, I love

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 2>being lobbied. This is great. So I'm gonna go with

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the guys with the money versus the fact that I

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 2>think that actually the optimists I don't just mean Andresan

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 2>or Bajali, I mean the AI fantasists, all these people

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 2>who claim that if you're against AI, well you don't

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 2>care about progress. I actually have a counterpoint, which is

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 2>they are against progress. They don't want anything new to happen.

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 2>They want whatever money they want the next Google. And

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 2>when I say the next Google, I don't mean Google Search.

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean the giant monopolistic entity that just spits like

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 2>eats people and shits out money. And I'm just gonna

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>put it bluntly. They they are the cynics. They are

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the pessimists that like the SCALEAI guy, like all of

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 2>these people who go around, well if you if you

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>don't believe, we need to do this, we need to

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>train as much as possible. That's what the future likes. Like,

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Fuck no, these people don't care about tag.

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Can I can I I'll give you a little gloss

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 3>on this from Mal Sauter, who's very smart about this

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and who was the first person to point this out

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 3>that that I encountered, which is that AI and indeed,

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 3>all statistical methods of prediction are intrinsically conservative because because

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 3>if what you're doing is predicting what should happen next

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 3>based on what already happened, what you're doing is you're

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 3>driving a future that looked like the past. So think

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 3>of it this way, Right, you pick up your distraction

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 3>rectangle and you type hay, and then it finishes it

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 3>with darling, because that's what you type every time. That's

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 3>what a cool mclenns you might be. You might want

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 3>to type hay, asshole, but it wants you to type hey, darling. Right,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and now, if you type something you've never type before,

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 3>it's going to pick the thing that most people say. Right,

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that's that's the So you're going to get either the

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 3>statistically average version of who you used to be or

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 3>the statistically average version of who every one is. There

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 3>is something intrinsically and inseparably conservative about the project of

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 3>making the future look like the past. Now I want

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 3>to mention something that again I learned from Brian's very

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 3>excellent book Blood in the Machine, which is that Frankenstein

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 3>was a ludite novel and was widely understood as a

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 3>ludite novel. It's a cautionary tale about what happens when

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 3>an entrepreneur gets to build a machine without talking to

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 3>his neighbors about what it should do, and it was

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 3>really widely understood as this. And the irony here, and

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I say this as a fully paid up member of the

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Science Fiction Writers of America and science fiction novelist. The

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 3>irony here is how many of these torment nexus building

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 3>weirdos read cyberpunk as a suggestion instead of a warning,

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 3>and defend what they're doing as carrying on the visionary

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 3>tradition of science fiction. The first science fiction novel ever

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 3>was Frankenstein, and it was a novel about why you

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't just build whatever goddamn machine you feel like? Bill?

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 2>What I like about The Ready Player one one? First

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.919
<v Speaker 2>of all, one of the worst books ever written.

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 3>In mind, it would be nice to Ernie. I think

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 3>that book. It's very fun.

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I believe it is that we are not going to

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 2>turn this into a debate on that book in so

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 2>much trouble.

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 3>But my problem. I like your book, Ernie, come on

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 3>the show, You'll kill me.

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is with that is that book is

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 2>not a positive book. No, nothing about that story feels good.

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 2>But also the central plot is this shanty town this

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 2>child escapes from every day and then using his distractions

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 2>from his terrible life, he is able to decode the

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 2>thoughts of a deeply troubled, mentally unwell man as he

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.720
<v Speaker 2>is chased by greedy people who don't really care about

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 2>any of it, and all of them are obsessed with

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 2>not the interest in the stuff, but the existence of

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the stuff. And Mark Zucker books that's actually the single

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 2>best I'm going to build.

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>That's this is just what Corey was just talking about,

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>right is. It speaks to the conservatism of the a

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of these the detection once they've built a company

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's big enough to where you know, you're casting around

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for your next thing because you don't actually want to

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do any you know, real innovating yourself.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 3>You you you outsource it to a sci fi novel.

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That's why we've seen this this sort of generation of

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of sort of wish lists from cyberpunk from the metaverse.

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean that was just Mark Zuckerberg saying, hey, uh yeah,

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let my next My next thing is the metaverse.

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Then that comes from your your future is being a legless, sexless,

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 3>low polygon heavily surveyed cartoon character in a virtual world.

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I stole from a twenty five year old ystopian cyberpunk novel.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Exactly Elon Musk, the cyber truck that's from Blade Runner.

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, it's from a blade Runner which is

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Epegen based or oh now open Ai, which says, oh,

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's gonna be like Her, the movie Her.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.240
<v Speaker 1>They're just saying like that, like right, like that. That's

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the extent of the imagination at work here.

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that that is like an inherently

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of conservative and restrictive way to operate, and it's,

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were seeing the limits of it now.

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if they actually want to build

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>these products or if they just want to win a

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle and sort of get it's a way that

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>they can get people to talk about it.

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 3>I just want to call out that ads Elon Mosk

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 3>is early similar to FW to Clark.

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you're a legless fullness creature. You feel your

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 2>life's restricted, perhaps you could check out one of the

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:36.439
<v Speaker 2>following products, and I guarantee you the following products will

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 2>not in any way embarrass me have some kind of

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 2>almost ironic connotation with what they run. So please enjoy

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 2>the following ad and we're back. So I think it's

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 2>funny you brought that up, Brian, where it's like, it's

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 2>not even obvious that they can about what they're building.

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not even about the stuff anymore. And when I

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 2>look at a company like Google or Microsoft, what do

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>they do? Like if you really sit down and say

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 2>what does Google do? What does Microsoft? Or you can

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 2>look at Apple and say they make consumer electronics.

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 3>That's fairly that.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's a fair thing. They make laptops

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.959
<v Speaker 2>to make phones, you use them, and sometimes they force

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 2>you into an abusive system called the app Store, But

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 2>nevertheless you can tell what they do. Google and Microsoft

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 2>are like holding companies. They're they're private equity firms that

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 2>have no.

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Like formal shape.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Because this whole week I've been sitting down and reading

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 2>about something we will get to in a minute, which

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 2>is how open a I can can compete with Google Search,

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, they cannot. It's impossible. It's actually impossible.

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 2>It just feels that it's not that they don't have focus,

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 2>is that they can't have focus. That there's simply nothing.

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 2>They can't make anything anymore. They can make more similar stuff,

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 2>But when was the last time Google up with something

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 2>truly innovative.

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's it's you can kind of tunnel

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>by the rush and it's desperation to sort of like

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>build some sort of an AI product that can work

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or that can at least capture some attention, because it's

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not I mean, it's not this this overview AI thing

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that they rushed out the door and were just ruthlessly

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and widely and deservedly mocked for making it. You know,

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not even clear I think to anybody how that

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>serves Google's bottom line. If anything its them, it loses

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the money because they have ostensibly this remarkably potent revenue

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>generator in terms of Google Search. I mean, that's the

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>only real answer to your question. I think that is

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>what does Google do? It runs a search engine that

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it has gotten tired of running, and it's or it's

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>backers and partners have gotten tired of running, or people

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>are convinced that it's no longer the future and that

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be useful to anybody. But I mean,

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to me, the search engine is still far superior to

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and to using a chat, GPT or any generative AI

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>product that I've come across yet. And it's you know,

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the talent as I understand it, from Google, has

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>has been shifted away from running the search operation, the

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.320
<v Speaker 1>search department. Now it's all on on Ai, which is

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the again, this nebulous form that I don't even think

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not like Google. I mean, Google sounded that famously,

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this red alert that said all hands like we got

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to catch up to open aid, we gotta we gotta

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to make this happen. And we

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:35.240
<v Speaker 1>just see this sputtering, all these little false starts and

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and turds rolled off into the Internet that are that

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>are more mocked than us and certainly not profitable.

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 3>I want to I want to try and make the

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 3>heroic case for Google, okay, which is a tough case

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 3>to make, but I'm gonna make it so Google, I

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 3>think you said, what was the last time Google made

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 3>something truly innovative. I think it was twenty five years ago.

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 3>Google has not made a successful products in search. They've

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:58.439
<v Speaker 3>brought a lot of successful products, right. They bought their

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 3>mobile stack, they bought their ad text, they bought video.

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 2>You could like go for example, it wasn't go fairly

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 2>recent that the coding language.

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Their programming lange. Yeah, sure, I'm getting I'm getting to that. Yes,

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 3>they bought YouTube, right, yeah, they bought They bought YouTube.

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>They bought YouTube after Google Videos failed, so they made

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 3>a video platform that didn't work and they bought one

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 3>that did great. Right. They they bought their ad tex Stact.

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 3>They bought their customer service. They bought dogs, they bought collaboration,

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 3>they bought maps, they bought all of it, transition. Where

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 3>did they buy dogs from? Who's Who's they forget it

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 3>was that company?

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 2>That's that's something like I feel like I'm fairly well versed.

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Intent was the start I thought they built.

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 3>No, No, they didn't build they so like first depending

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 3>on how on how you want to purse it, right,

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 3>because you have things like their hotmail clone, which was

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 3>very successful. Uh you know Gmail, Yeah, right, but it's

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 3>it's a they made that in house. They didn't buy

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 3>that from someone however, it's a clone of hotmail, right, sure.

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 3>And so they have these these products. But what they

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:01.359
<v Speaker 3>did for these products, and and this is the heroic part,

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the part where I'm going to be bend over backwards

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to be fair to there, is they know they scaled

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 3>them and they made them reliable. Right, that's crazy. And look,

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the things that we critique capitalism for is

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 3>that it is underinvest in maintenance, It underinvests in infrastructure,

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 3>it underinvests in what we could broadly call care work.

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 3>And at its best, what Google did was, in a

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of patrician way, became a serial acquirer of nascent

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 3>competitors that didn't necessarily extinguish those competitors, although they did

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 3>in some cases. But what primarily they did was they

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 3>scaled them up to utility scale, and then they maintained

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 3>them to a very high degree of reliability. Now, I

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 3>think that if you want to understand Google's internal culture,

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 3>and I think you did a good job talking about

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 3>it when we wrote that the man who killed Google

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 3>is that it's a distinction between people who want to

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 3>do care work and people who want to do rent seeking, right,

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, there's a version of even keyword

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 3>advertising that I think we can tell a heroic story about. Right,

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 3>if you are a novelist and you've written a science

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 3>fiction novel and it's like a novel by someone else, right,

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 3>it's a comparable to it, then you could buy the

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 3>adword and you could say, when someone searches for Neil

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Stevenson launched this guy's career by saying at the top,

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 3>having one little ad slot that's like, have you read so?

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And so it's the foundation of the like the good

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>bits of capitalism, if you can call it, like the

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 2>honest marketing, like we like this, you might you like this,

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 2>you might like this.

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, it's it's and so there's a lot you know,

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 3>being able to reach into these niches. This is also

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 3>a thing that Facebook has done quite well. And and

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 3>you know when Facebook has defenders, they are often small

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:48.959
<v Speaker 3>business people who could not address a market without fine

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 3>grained targeting. Me right now, that fine grained targeting needn't

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 3>be behavioral. It could be it could be content based. Right,

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 3>you could target if you want to target plus sized cheerleaders,

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 3>you could find the Facebook group for plus sized cheerleaders

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 3>and sell your uniforms to them. And I'm sure that

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 3>there are a bunch of people who are plus sized

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 3>cheerleaders who are really pissed that the uniforms for plus

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 3>cheerleaders suck, and who'd be really great to see those ads. Right.

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to spy on them, you don't have

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 3>to follow them into the back. I don't need to

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 3>know who they are. Yeah, but that's what they've done

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 3>at their best, right, And the rent seekers just want

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 3>to make money by providing as little to everyone else

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 3>as they can and taking as much in as they can.

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 3>They want to own a factor of production and they

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:34.879
<v Speaker 3>want to be insulated from the risk because other people

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 3>who produce useful things will have to license or buy

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 3>that factor of production from them in order to do

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the useful thing. But whether or not they do the

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 3>useful thing or not, Like think of Nvidia right in

0:50:45.040 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 3>videos selling video cards to people who are going to

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 3>go out of business. That doesn't matter to Invidio and

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:52.919
<v Speaker 3>they already sold them gets a stake in Think about

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Unity right, who said, oh, we're going to take not

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:57.760
<v Speaker 3>We're not just going to sell you the dev tools

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 3>to make your video game. If your video games succeeds.

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get a royalty for every game you share, right,

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 3>And they called it shared success. Now, note that this

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 3>rhetoric of like shared success is not the rhetoric of

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 3>shared risk.

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Kind of like a parasite shares your success.

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, shared risk, right, shared risk, shared reward

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 3>makes a certain degree of sense. If they're saying, okay, well,

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 3>i'll tell you what. We've got a deal where we

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 3>will give you discounted or free tools and development money

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 3>and whatever. We'll invest in your company, right, and as

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 3>a form of shared success, and we will also take

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a shared risk in your failure. That's a very different matter.

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because shared risk is inherent to actual shared success.

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:42.359
<v Speaker 3>We are taking a risk.

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 2>But it's almost I think this keeps coming back to

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 2>basic evolution Darwinism, probably two different things. Now, I said

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 2>I did not do well in size. But nevertheless, I'll

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:55.440
<v Speaker 2>get round to this. There are no predators for these

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 2>people anymore.

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing they're afraid of, no discipline, Like there's the

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 3>cattail thing is they don't want they want everyone to

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:03.879
<v Speaker 3>stay the same, so they know who they're looking at

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>every day.

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 2>We can bark, bark anyone out of the area. If

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 2>we don't like them, we can make growing difficult. We

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 2>know the venture capitalists, we know the commercial real estate owners,

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 2>we know the people in government office. We can make

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>this really difficult and really easy for us. But also

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 2>it feels like we need predators in the tech industry

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and not the kind who worked at Google like Andy Rubin,

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think the.

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, and as long as you have a company I mean,

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that has any you know, degree of success

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.439
<v Speaker 1>or that becomes as big as Google does, I think

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.799
<v Speaker 1>just like the base logics of capitalism are going to

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:44.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that you do you grow the number of people

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 1>who are the rent seekers and who are interested in

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>protecting those revenue streams at any cost. And you know

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that the halo of a company like Google may dim,

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still kind of extent.

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I just wrote this this art about a former Google

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>privacy engineer named Tim Leibert, who was a big security

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and privacy guy in the academic field. He went to

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 1>pen he did a time at Oxford, and he was

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Carnegie and he really, you know, was

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really a big critic of Google. And then Google hired

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>him and he agreed to go because he thought this, well,

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>all the things that I'm talking about, all the things

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that I want to fix, Google is the largest purveyor

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of these issues of privacy. He looks at cookies and

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that Google tracks your data. So he figured,

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I'm going to have a shot at

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>fixing this, I'm just going to go into the mothership.

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And sure enough, the way that he describes it to

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>me is his job was split between two basic tasks. One,

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he's talking to other younger hires who still kind of

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>believe in the idea of a technology and a service

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that can really help and serve people, and who want

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to make sure that Google, you know, meets

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>its privacy commitments and is in line with the law.

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And then he would go into the meetings with the

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 1>executives and management and they would spend the most of

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the time telling him why they couldn't do all the

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>things that he and all of the people who are

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 1>actually working in the trenches at Google wanted to do.

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And it just became this two year long clash of well,

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this privacy law. Don't we we have the tools

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and the capabilities to fix it. Don't we want to

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>do it and then butting up against management.

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Why would we do why would we do that? That would

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 3>it's would we could?

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It would be easier just to like pay the fines

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>as they come than to actually finds a price, and.

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 3>They need to.

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they really need to change the finds

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 2>so they scale sure or here's my other there and

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 2>they're on a Smoglu said this as well, I'm then

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 2>take it step well laterally put them in jail. And

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm only kind of kidding. I mean, if, for example,

0:54:53.920 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the CrowdStrike situation. I brought this up on the Lost

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Battle Off Live as well, such an Adella should be

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at potential jail time or the cuts see of

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 2>CrowdStrike should be jail time or personal liability. If you

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 2>work for a public company with excess revenue blah blah,

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and you make it so that they can't just do

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:13.399
<v Speaker 2>stock splits or some weird shit so they get away

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 2>with him including stock revenue, you should potentially forfeit like

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:19.280
<v Speaker 2>tens percent.

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny that you say this because the

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>other part of the story is, so is Tim built

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>this this this system called web x ray that can

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>search for every privacy violation that a company is committing

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on the web and the ideas to make it into

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:34.879
<v Speaker 1>like a sort of an assembly line for class action

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits and for lawsuits. So you can say, okay, you know,

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:41.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe Google, maybe people emailing Google and saying, hey, you're

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in violation of the Germany's new privacy law. May can

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you please address this isn't really but if you can say, okay, boom,

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>here's here's a search engine can show you exactly how

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>many times a minute or an hour it's violating these

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 1>laws regularly.

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 3>Kind of logne that have costs you know, attached to them.

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Then and maybe you can sort of so there are

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:03.359
<v Speaker 1>people sort of like fighting against this.

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 3>This is maybe a good time to talk about the

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 3>structure of regulation or what regulations work and which ones

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 3>don't and why and so on. So one of the

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:17.800
<v Speaker 3>key things to understand about regulation is that a regulation

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 3>that's hard to administer will be administered less. Right, So

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 3>if you make a rule, for example, that says, if

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 3>you're a platform that competes with the platform users, so

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:30.239
<v Speaker 3>your Amazon, you sell your own goods, but you also

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 3>sell goods by your competitors. As a fairness requirement, you

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 3>must put the best match for the user's search at

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the top and not just your own products. So this

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 3>is what's called a ban on self preferencing. The problem

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is to administer that, you have to be able to

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of peer into the mind of the Amazon executive

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 3>who decided to put the Amazon product at the top

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:57.120
<v Speaker 3>of the search, because if they believe that they made

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the best product, then they haven't violated the rule.

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 2>And I was going to say, it feels like the

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 2>word best is the problem then.

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, So it's a very difficult thing to discover. Moreover,

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 3>if you have a sincere but incorrect belief about what's best,

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 3>because we're really good at talking ourselves into thinking that,

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, with the stuff we make is good.

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 2>And being empathetic, maybe you truly have seen more of

0:57:19.160 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 2>this thing being built, like yeah, loss is what they'd say.

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So you might have a good reason to do it,

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and you still might be wrong. So as an administrative matter,

0:57:28.520 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 3>figuring out whether or not someone is self preferencing is

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 3>really hard. Now, this isn't the first time this has

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 3>come up. When the Sherman Act was passed in eighteen ninety,

0:57:35.680 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the first anti trust law in the United States, self

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 3>preferencing was a huge problem because you had railroads that

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 3>owned freight companies and they competed with the freight that

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 3>they shipped. Right. You had banks that hadn't been split

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:50.800
<v Speaker 3>where you had retail and investment, so you had banks

0:57:50.840 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 3>that loaned money to local businesses and owned local businesses

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 3>that competed with their debtors. Right. And so we didn't

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 3>create a rule that says, Okay, you must treat everyone fairly,

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 3>because determining the fairness was too hard. What we said

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 3>is you have to be structurally separated. You either are

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 3>a bank or you're an investor, but you can't be

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 3>in a bank that invests. You are either a railroad

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 3>or you're a freight company, but you can't be a

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:22.360
<v Speaker 3>railroad that owns a freight company. This is called structural separation.

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 3>And the thing is you do lose some efficiencies. Maybe

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 3>there's some cool things you can do with vertical integration,

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 3>but what you get is administratable rule. Because I can

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 3>tell really easily whether a railroad owns a free company.

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell whether they're dealing with it fairly. But

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 3>it's really you can from orbit. You can figure out

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 3>whether a Railroad owns a freight company.

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 2>So just imagine you're a dumbos look at mey you

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:49.919
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty easy. Yeah, just why has this not been

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 2>done with I don't know, Microsoft and open Ai for example.

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 3>This is very interesting. So think about the ad tech

0:58:57.160 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 3>platforms ad tech. It's it's into three pieces. You have

0:59:01.160 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 3>a demand side platform, a sell side platform in a marketplace.

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 3>So the demand side platform represents advertisers, the cell side

0:59:06.880 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 3>platform represents publishers who have places where the advertisers can place,

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and out in the marketplaces where the agents for them

0:59:12.880 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 3>gather together to bid. And so you land on a

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 3>web page that lag before it loads. That surveillance lag

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 3>is all of these little auctions taking place where someone says,

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, I have an eighteen to thirty four year

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 3>old manchild from Queens who has been recently searching for

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 3>gonorrhea and owns an Xbox, who will pay to advertise

0:59:29.400 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to them? And how much will you pay? Right? Love them?

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:37.040
<v Speaker 3>And so there's this little thing going on in the background, right, Okay,

0:59:37.120 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 3>So Google and Facebook each own a demand side platform,

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 3>a sell side platform, and a marketplace. And moreover, they

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 3>have rigged the game so that if you use one

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 3>part of it, you pretty much have to use the

0:59:46.440 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 3>other parts. And they're both publishers and they're both advertisers. Now,

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:56.240
<v Speaker 3>so fifty one percent of every advertising dollar goes into

0:59:56.520 --> 1:00:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Google and Facebook SIG. The historic share for all intermediaries

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and advertising supported media was fifteen percent, so they've tripled

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the share for intermediaries in this. So this is like

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:10.960
<v Speaker 3>if you and your partner were getting divorced and you

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:12.600
<v Speaker 3>showed up and you realized you both had the same

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 3>lawyer who was also the judge, who was also trying

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 3>to match with both of you on Tinder, and then

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 3>after the divorce was settled, you discovered that you didn't

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 3>get the house. Your partner didn't get the house. The

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:24.560
<v Speaker 3>lawyer got the house. Right, This is the thing. So

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 3>last year we had a bill introduced in Congress called

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>the America Act. And one of the great tragedies of

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 3>American politics is our brightest political science graduates go to

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>work in the Senate where all they do is come

1:00:35.360 --> 1:00:38.960
<v Speaker 3>up with acronyms for acts. So you know, the America

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>accents for some of the ess A is for America, the

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>country that I love. M is for motherhood, the value

1:00:46.040 --> 1:00:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I admire. So the America Act says to the ad

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 3>tech platforms, you have to split, you have to be

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>structurally separated. You can represent sellers, you can represent buyers,

1:00:54.800 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>you can be a marketplace, but you can't be all three.

1:00:57.400 --> 1:00:59.919
<v Speaker 3>And the two main co sponsors of the America Act

1:01:00.080 --> 1:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>were Elizabeth Warren and Ted Cruz. Right, wow, that is

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:08.720
<v Speaker 3>a pretty bipartisan pill because even someone as terrible as

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Ted Cruz can look at an arrangement in which someone

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 3>represents the buyer the seller and is the marketplace and

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>is capturing three hundred percent of the traditional share for

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:22.920
<v Speaker 3>representatives who perform this function and say, this market cannot

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>be fixed with a code of conduct. This market can

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>only be fixed structurally.

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Or at least recognizes the politics of taking on big tech,

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>right as something that is applicable to his constituents, Right,

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think, you know, I don't know that most

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of his most Texans might necessarily care about all that,

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but they do care about fairness. They do care about

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that big tech has gotten so powerful.

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>It is really interesting we've come to the place where

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:54.720
<v Speaker 3>it has been become a truly bipartisan code. Ben It's look,

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>nothing moved out of the Senate last year.

1:01:56.680 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So the abyss do we move this shit forward, like

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>to the to the real meat of it?

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>What do we do? How do like?

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's not us and my editor Matt Hughes, he

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>suggested an idea. I can't do this because it make

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>me morally corrupt. But I'm just saying American software pants, right,

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>they're extremely and Matt, this is Matt's idea. You can

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of patents you can file pants

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 2>for anything.

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying you do this.

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I know a lot of my listeners right

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>now you're holding up a drug store, you're working on

1:02:29.960 --> 1:02:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a new kind of tasteless poison, and you're or just

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>regular stealing. It's a Friday, It's an easy day for you.

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Here's an idea. Surely someone could just anticipate the things

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the Open Eye was going to do in the future

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and just start filing patterns and then use those pans

1:02:46.280 --> 1:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to mire them in endless lawsuits bullshit lawsuits. Not saying

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:53.960
<v Speaker 2>they should do that. But if you're not doing that,

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>how do we actually break these people up? Is there

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>a way for regular people to contribute towards this actual change?

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Because it feels like relying on the governments is the problem.

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me tell yes, sorry, let me tell you

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>a story.

1:03:07.920 --> 1:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean that in like the by the way,

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the anal kick like we can't rely on the government

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>just it doesn't seem like the weapons of government.

1:03:13.760 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Let me tell a story about as yeah, yeah, about

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a man who was in the wilderness, a man who

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 3>had ideas that everybody thought were crazy, a man called

1:03:21.720 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Milton Friedman, right, oh, Christ. In the nineteen sixties, Milton

1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Friedman had this idea that all of the gains of

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the Great Society and the New Deal should be rolled back.

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>So there are problems with the New Deal in the

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Great Society. They excluded black people, they excluded gay people,

1:03:34.720 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>they excluded women to a large extent, and so on.

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>That wasn't Milton Friedman's problem with it. Problem with it

1:03:40.080 --> 1:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>was who had included, not who had excluded. And he

1:03:42.680 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>was like, we need more forelock tugging plubs, right, like,

1:03:45.880 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>you shouldn't expect to have a dignified retirement. You shouldn't

1:03:48.840 --> 1:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>expect that your children will go to school for free,

1:03:50.880 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 3>and so on. And people would say, Milton, people like that, shit,

1:03:54.760 --> 1:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>how are you going to make that shit happen. And

1:03:56.440 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>he would say that in times of crisis, ideas can

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:02.840
<v Speaker 3>move from the periphery to the center. So our job

1:04:03.240 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>is to keep ideas lying around so that when the

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>crisis arises, we can move them into the center. And

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:11.360
<v Speaker 3>that crisis was the oil crisis of the nineteen seventies.

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>So I like to quote Milton Friedman because I like

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>to imagine that he looks up from that spit that's

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>protruding from his mouth and gargles a curse as he

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 3>hears his words. Him and Jack Welch, and you know,

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>the demons laugh and they throw more molten shit on

1:04:25.800 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>his naked body. But you know, if there's one thing

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that Milton Friedman has bequeathed us besides this theory change,

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>it's an abundance of crises. Right. We have so many

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 3>foreseeable crises on our horizon, crises of technology, climate crises,

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>economic crises, legitimacy crises for the Supreme Court, and so on,

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 3>and having these ideas lying around like being part of

1:04:51.680 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 3>a group of people who say, look, right now, this

1:04:54.400 --> 1:04:57.040
<v Speaker 3>is impossible, but this is like just because it's just

1:04:57.080 --> 1:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>because it's hard, it doesn't mean that we should do

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:01.200
<v Speaker 3>something easier. If it won't work, you don't look for

1:05:01.240 --> 1:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>your keys under the lamp post. I get it. If

1:05:03.480 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to get there, I wouldn't start from here.

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>But this is the thing we have to do. And

1:05:07.400 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>if we keep talking about the thing we have to do,

1:05:10.200 --> 1:05:12.439
<v Speaker 3>then when the crisis comes and someone says, Jesus Christ,

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>we've got to do something here, we can say, here's

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the thing we have to do.

1:05:16.000 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So it starts with breaking them up, then, I mean,

1:05:18.520 --> 1:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's well, you know, I think both

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Corey and I would probably agree that that's pretty high

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on the priority list. It makes a lot of things easier,

1:05:25.680 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and it would make a lot of things better. And

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's also within sort of the realm of

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>possibility for a lot of reasons. Again, that's sort of

1:05:33.000 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it might be a flimsy bipartisanship right now,

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but it is a bipartisanship nominally, and so it's it's

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's actually sort of more imaginable than a

1:05:42.520 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of other happen It's happened before Bell systems. Yeah,

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think there's a lot that you

1:05:48.480 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>can do. I think there's you know, as we've seen

1:05:52.240 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry sort of you know, it is wealth

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>concentrate and it's sort of calcify, and each of those

1:05:57.920 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>things that that Corey mentioned earlier on gets sealed off

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to most people. Well, you see more anger, and you

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>see an industry that doesn't historically have a lot of

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting in organizing or in sort of activism becoming much

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>more so. So I think that is another area that's

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>ripe for action. You probably have a lot of listeners

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>who are in the tech industry or related to the

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>tech industry, and startingly underneath cause outside Google, that's the mechanics,

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>might all might might be the mechanics, right, Yeah, they

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>might already be unionized, but they should.

1:06:31.720 --> 1:06:33.360
<v Speaker 3>But organizing, I think is a.

1:06:33.280 --> 1:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Really really ripe area where you can really start to

1:06:38.160 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>move the needle and how.

1:06:39.320 --> 1:06:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Software developers actually unionize, Yeah they can.

1:06:43.320 --> 1:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So when I one of my organizing efforts, I was

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>at Medium and I and and Medium was at the time.

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>They've since jettisoned all of their editorial employees.

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Like me, So there's no none, none of those like

1:06:54.760 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>three times as well, yeah, I was I think the last.

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:01.919
<v Speaker 3>Time the third wave Choral bleaching. Yeah, they just launch

1:07:02.000 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 3>them out of a cannon everything once in a while.

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>But it was it was half editorial and half tech,

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and there was genuine and uh you know, really sort

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of animated interest in organizing, and we got so close,

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we got within one one vote, and it wasn't you know,

1:07:18.760 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for them, it wasn't about you know, I'm sure they

1:07:22.560 --> 1:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted their their salaries to be a little bit higher

1:07:25.360 --> 1:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but that wasn't the driving, uh, motivating factor.

1:07:29.960 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It was they didn't like a lot of the direction

1:07:33.000 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that medium was going. They didn't like a lot of

1:07:34.840 --> 1:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the policies that medium had, they didn't like a lot

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of uh, you know what the founder the power of

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the that the founder had to wield over the entire platform,

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and organizing is one way to sort of claw back

1:07:46.720 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that power. I mean, in some cases, it's

1:07:49.280 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like when you have a weird situation like Meta

1:07:52.160 --> 1:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>with Zuckerberg at top, as like the boy king who

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is just going to rule that forever barring.

1:07:57.400 --> 1:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Some fireable right exactly.

1:07:59.680 --> 1:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But well, most tech companies are not like that, and

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you can begin to you know, sort of wield more

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>influence internally if you join some of those efforts. There's

1:08:07.240 --> 1:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great unions and organizers working in that

1:08:10.800 --> 1:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>space right now. So that's just one thing that you

1:08:12.840 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>can that you can start to get involved in.

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>You yeah, let me say, you know, you said can

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:19.320
<v Speaker 3>we do this? And you said we have to break

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 3>them up. Well, like the thing that stops us from

1:08:21.040 --> 1:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>unionizing is also the thing that stops us from breaking

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>them up, which is that they're powerful. Right, And so

1:08:24.880 --> 1:08:27.599
<v Speaker 3>the reason that we practiced anti trust law the way

1:08:27.600 --> 1:08:30.400
<v Speaker 3>we did until the Carter administration was not just because

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:32.920
<v Speaker 3>we wanted to preserve choice or competition. It was because

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:35.479
<v Speaker 3>when companies get too big to fail, they become too

1:08:35.479 --> 1:08:37.479
<v Speaker 3>big to jail. Right. Once a company's more powerful than

1:08:37.520 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the government. IBM, you know, was suit for anti trust

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 3>violations from nineteen seventy to nineteen eighty two, and every

1:08:43.560 --> 1:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>year for twelve consecutive years, they spent more on lawyers

1:08:46.120 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 3>to fight the DOJ Anti Trust Division than all of

1:08:48.280 --> 1:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the lawyers at the DOJ Anti Trust Division costs combined

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:55.439
<v Speaker 3>for all anti trust cases in America for twelve consecutive years.

1:08:55.439 --> 1:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>There's no way to limit their ability to fight back

1:08:57.880 --> 1:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>as well, because that'd be undemocrats.

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:01.880
<v Speaker 3>So once they're once they're a monopoly, right then you know,

1:09:01.920 --> 1:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>like the best time to stall monopoly forming is is

1:09:05.040 --> 1:09:08.360
<v Speaker 3>But look, before there is a law, there must be

1:09:08.439 --> 1:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>a crime, you know. Lenny Bruce points out that if

1:09:11.040 --> 1:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>we have a law against fucking chicken, someone must have

1:09:13.040 --> 1:09:15.680
<v Speaker 3>fucked a chicken at some point. Right. So before we

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:21.040
<v Speaker 3>had antis, before we had anti trust law, we had

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>monopolists right right, that's where we got the anti trust

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>law from. And specifically we had monopolists like John D. Rockefeller,

1:09:27.920 --> 1:09:30.000
<v Speaker 3>who is still the richest man that ever lived, the

1:09:30.040 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 3>most powerful, the most ruthless, terrible piece of shit, and

1:09:34.360 --> 1:09:36.640
<v Speaker 3>we brought him low. And like the way that we

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>did it, it happened in living memories, like nineteen twelve.

1:09:39.200 --> 1:09:41.519
<v Speaker 3>So there's people alive today who were mentored by the

1:09:41.560 --> 1:09:43.960
<v Speaker 3>people who did it right, and then there's people alive

1:09:43.960 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>today who are those people's mentors, who are still working

1:09:46.680 --> 1:09:49.959
<v Speaker 3>and still on the job. Right, it's not like embalming pharaohs.

1:09:49.960 --> 1:09:52.559
<v Speaker 3>It's not a lost art from a fallen civilization. The

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 3>thing we know how to do.

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:56.959
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, like breaking up for me, bring him low though.

1:09:57.120 --> 1:10:00.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a great story. So woman called Ida Tarbell was

1:10:00.160 --> 1:10:02.599
<v Speaker 3>the first woman in America get an undergraduate science degree.

1:10:02.640 --> 1:10:04.720
<v Speaker 3>She was trained as a biologist sick. She was the

1:10:04.840 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 3>daughter of a Pennsylvania oil man who was destroyed by

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:10.519
<v Speaker 3>the Standard Oil Trust Wow, and she went to work

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:14.160
<v Speaker 3>for Colliers, which was the biggest magazine in America at

1:10:14.160 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the time. Were one of the biggest, and she serialized

1:10:16.840 --> 1:10:22.000
<v Speaker 3>a two volume muckraking history that pitilessly laid out exactly

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>how the John D. Rockefeller scam worked. It had a

1:10:25.160 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 3>very good title, she called it the History of the

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Standard Oil Company, Volumes one and two. It was super viral,

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:33.679
<v Speaker 3>and at the end of it, the Incoe political will

1:10:33.720 --> 1:10:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that we'd had that said, like something is really wrong

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:39.400
<v Speaker 3>turned into a very sharp political will that said, we

1:10:39.479 --> 1:10:41.639
<v Speaker 3>know how the scam works, and we demand that something

1:10:41.640 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 3>to be done about it. And the Sherman Act, which

1:10:43.280 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>had been hanging around for twenty years, finally was taken

1:10:46.040 --> 1:10:48.920
<v Speaker 3>off the shelf and mobilized against John D. Rockefeller, and

1:10:48.960 --> 1:10:49.639
<v Speaker 3>we brought him low.

1:10:49.920 --> 1:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>So this is I'm so glad you brought up the

1:10:51.600 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>story which I just learned. First of all, I'm gonna

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>look at cool people who did cool stuff. If Maggie's

1:10:57.360 --> 1:10:59.080
<v Speaker 2>not done that, she needs to hear this, that is.

1:10:59.120 --> 1:11:02.160
<v Speaker 3>And she then became a leading suffragist and was one

1:11:02.160 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of the greatest orators of American history.

1:11:04.680 --> 1:11:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Just first of all, go eu to Tarbell original poster. Yeah,

1:11:08.960 --> 1:11:13.360
<v Speaker 2>like the like, genuinely like amazing. But also I think

1:11:13.439 --> 1:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>this speaks to something. I'm speaking to anyone who is

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:19.439
<v Speaker 2>a reporter, who's listening to this right now, there is

1:11:19.479 --> 1:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>this common sense that why are we doing this, Why

1:11:22.320 --> 1:11:24.439
<v Speaker 2>are we cataloging this? They're still gonna do these things?

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Why bother? And the answer is that fucking story Hindenberg Research.

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I agree with all their methods,

1:11:32.320 --> 1:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>but the fact is we need more people out there.

1:11:34.720 --> 1:11:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And I do this too. Well.

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>You don't necessarily write these fuckers are bad, they are right?

1:11:39.360 --> 1:11:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Why and write in detail because it sounds like historically

1:11:43.479 --> 1:11:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that actually eventually works.

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:46.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, there is a there's a phrase out of

1:11:46.920 --> 1:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the finance sector called migo. It stands from my eyes

1:11:49.360 --> 1:11:51.280
<v Speaker 3>glaze over, And it's the idea that if you make

1:11:51.320 --> 1:11:53.559
<v Speaker 3>the prospectus thick enough, people will just assume that it's

1:11:53.600 --> 1:11:55.840
<v Speaker 3>good because they can't possibly read it like the pile

1:11:57.000 --> 1:12:03.160
<v Speaker 3>pony under it right, un unraveling migo, whether that's you know, Marco,

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Robbie and a Bathtub explaining synthetic collateralized at obligations, or

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:09.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, my last couple of novels, the Bazil and

1:12:09.479 --> 1:12:12.799
<v Speaker 3>Red Team Blues are about explaining how real world private

1:12:12.800 --> 1:12:15.599
<v Speaker 3>equity scams, cryptocurrency hustles and so on, how they work.

1:12:17.360 --> 1:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Is I think the first step on the path to

1:12:20.080 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 3>making people feel like they can see where the weak

1:12:23.120 --> 1:12:26.479
<v Speaker 3>points are in this in this very large but very

1:12:26.520 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 3>brittle edifice, and they can start go kicking at the

1:12:29.080 --> 1:12:29.519
<v Speaker 3>week point.

1:12:29.560 --> 1:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Because I think that something Google is very powerful. They

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 2>have tens of billions of dollars in like sixteen billion

1:12:35.520 --> 1:12:39.519
<v Speaker 2>dollars a profit every quarter. They are unbreakable by traditional means. However,

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>they are also culturally weak. They are a patchwork of

1:12:43.760 --> 1:12:46.639
<v Speaker 2>people who've been there two minutes and twenty years. They

1:12:46.840 --> 1:12:49.599
<v Speaker 2>don't fire some Ben Gomes, the gouy around Google search

1:12:49.600 --> 1:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Board provate God took over. They put them in the

1:12:51.439 --> 1:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>corner in SVP of education because they know if Ben left,

1:12:55.920 --> 1:12:59.440
<v Speaker 2>he could very easily at least raise money to completely

1:12:59.680 --> 1:13:04.360
<v Speaker 2>a real Google competitor. But the thing is, the asshole

1:13:04.400 --> 1:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't talk to the mouth or the elbow. Nothing, there

1:13:07.439 --> 1:13:10.080
<v Speaker 2>is no form. But as they get bigger, they are

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:12.760
<v Speaker 2>weaker on some levels. And I think it's just something

1:13:12.800 --> 1:13:14.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing with the show. And actually both of you

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>had done amazingly with your work is breaking down these

1:13:17.920 --> 1:13:20.120
<v Speaker 2>weak points, these pain points. Brian, you did the great

1:13:20.120 --> 1:13:23.080
<v Speaker 2>thing about the mechanical turk for example, how it's very

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>similar to how generative AI works. And it's just I

1:13:26.960 --> 1:13:29.439
<v Speaker 2>think it's strange. I've heard and I won't name names,

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>but I've heard people kind of make the suggestion that well,

1:13:32.120 --> 1:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>why why should we bother?

1:13:34.040 --> 1:13:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Why, Well, they're so.

1:13:35.240 --> 1:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Powerful, And the answer is they're actually terrified of this.

1:13:38.960 --> 1:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>They do not want this. This is scary. Do it

1:13:42.040 --> 1:13:42.719
<v Speaker 2>every day?

1:13:43.200 --> 1:13:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1:13:43.520 --> 1:13:45.519
<v Speaker 1>Look at I mean again, we mentioned this earlier, but

1:13:45.520 --> 1:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>look look how Google reacted when a single credible.

1:13:50.640 --> 1:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Competitor entered the field.

1:13:51.960 --> 1:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh but they ran around like chickens with their heads

1:13:55.200 --> 1:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>cut off and they scrambled to find a product.

1:13:58.200 --> 1:13:59.600
<v Speaker 3>It was internal turmoil.

1:13:59.680 --> 1:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It is. If anything, it wasn't the reaction of a

1:14:04.080 --> 1:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>company that is convinced of the power and security of

1:14:09.400 --> 1:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>its products and its placement in the marketplace.

1:14:12.960 --> 1:14:13.439
<v Speaker 3>This was.

1:14:13.640 --> 1:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>This was a company that is like, as you were saying,

1:14:16.280 --> 1:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty profoundly insecure and reliant on all these deals in

1:14:21.120 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 1>order to maintain its position where it's paying out a

1:14:24.520 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>great deal of money.

1:14:25.280 --> 1:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean this, it's it seems to me more.

1:14:28.120 --> 1:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Like a house of cards that that could collapse if

1:14:30.160 --> 1:14:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the right one is pulled out. And to to add

1:14:33.720 --> 1:14:37.759
<v Speaker 1>on too, what Corey was saying, Uh, you know another

1:14:38.080 --> 1:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>work that that I that that I read while I

1:14:40.160 --> 1:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was researching the Luddite Book, which was one of the

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:45.639
<v Speaker 1>first efforts to sort of quote rescue the Lutdites from

1:14:45.840 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>from from condescension, was E. P. Thompson's The Making of

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:51.519
<v Speaker 1>the English Working Class, and it tries to tell the

1:14:51.600 --> 1:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>story of like, how did the how did we get

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to the point where workers came together and said, wait

1:14:57.400 --> 1:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a minute, we have enough power to actually I have

1:15:00.320 --> 1:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>some change.

1:15:01.400 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>How did that?

1:15:02.120 --> 1:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>How did it because it didn't exist before? How did

1:15:04.439 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>workers start to see themselves as part of a class

1:15:07.439 --> 1:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>or have solidarity? And it's just filled with all these examples,

1:15:12.280 --> 1:15:15.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, of little fights that you know have otherwise

1:15:15.560 --> 1:15:18.479
<v Speaker 1>been completely lost to history, where people stood up for

1:15:18.560 --> 1:15:22.759
<v Speaker 1>something and you know, were crushed and then everybody forgot

1:15:22.760 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about it.

1:15:23.160 --> 1:15:23.960
<v Speaker 3>By and large.

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But the neighbors didn't forget, the local newspaper men didn't forget,

1:15:28.680 --> 1:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the families didn't forget. They're recorded in oral histories. They

1:15:32.040 --> 1:15:35.559
<v Speaker 1>formed this tapestry. So I feel like it's it's always

1:15:35.560 --> 1:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea to feel like nothing that we're doing

1:15:38.360 --> 1:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>matters or registers, because it is, and it can reverberate,

1:15:42.120 --> 1:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and it can echo, and it can coalesce, and it

1:15:43.920 --> 1:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>can snowball really quickly.

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>And if things aren't really working out for you right now,

1:15:48.920 --> 1:15:52.320
<v Speaker 2>if the crowball won't get the ATM open, if even

1:15:52.439 --> 1:15:54.320
<v Speaker 2>driving a car doesn't get into it, but you still

1:15:54.360 --> 1:15:56.519
<v Speaker 2>have some left open money, perhaps you could check out

1:15:56.520 --> 1:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the following products. I think that this will

1:15:58.960 --> 1:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>solve probably every problem you've ever had.

1:16:01.680 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I hope it's SCRIPTO. So I want to bring up

1:16:17.200 --> 1:16:19.719
<v Speaker 3>one way in which Google is unexpectedly weak, in which

1:16:19.720 --> 1:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>its strength strength is a weakness. And this is a

1:16:23.120 --> 1:16:25.040
<v Speaker 3>characteristic of all the big tech companies, which is that

1:16:25.080 --> 1:16:28.280
<v Speaker 3>they do the same shitty thing everywhere, which means that

1:16:28.360 --> 1:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>if there's a case built against a tech company by

1:16:30.720 --> 1:16:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a regulator, and are a big, powerful country like the

1:16:33.320 --> 1:16:36.960
<v Speaker 3>United States, all of those facts will be almost identical

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:40.160
<v Speaker 3>in much smaller countries like South Korea. We've actually seen

1:16:40.200 --> 1:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>this where cases against Apple for antitrust have been effectively

1:16:45.080 --> 1:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>recycled in South Korea Japan and successfully so. Right, so,

1:16:50.920 --> 1:16:54.920
<v Speaker 3>all of the world's governments are facing the same adversary.

1:16:55.000 --> 1:16:57.439
<v Speaker 3>So even if these companies are bigger than most countries,

1:16:57.439 --> 1:16:58.639
<v Speaker 3>they're not bigger than all many countries.

1:16:58.640 --> 1:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>When you say a shitty thing, what do you mean, Oh,

1:17:01.040 --> 1:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, like specific Apple.

1:17:02.320 --> 1:17:05.559
<v Speaker 3>Apple has this Danegeld system where they take thirty cents

1:17:05.560 --> 1:17:07.400
<v Speaker 3>out of every dollar you spend on an app, and

1:17:07.400 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 3>it's super anti competitive, and they have all these ways

1:17:09.439 --> 1:17:12.479
<v Speaker 3>that they block people from trying to circumvent it, and

1:17:12.520 --> 1:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>it lets them control certain markets, and it's just it's

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:20.719
<v Speaker 3>it's illegal under most countries systems of law. Here's here's

1:17:20.720 --> 1:17:22.479
<v Speaker 3>a fun fact for you. After World War Two, the

1:17:22.520 --> 1:17:25.200
<v Speaker 3>American technocrats who went around and rebuilt the legal systems

1:17:25.200 --> 1:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of Europe and Japan just basically copypasted American anti trust laws.

1:17:29.960 --> 1:17:33.559
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, so, and here's another funny thing. They were

1:17:33.640 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 3>keenly aware of how important monopolies were to the rise

1:17:36.880 --> 1:17:39.479
<v Speaker 3>of fascism and the access powers, and so one of

1:17:39.479 --> 1:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>the things they did when they got to Germany and

1:17:41.360 --> 1:17:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Japan and Italy was smashed their monopolies because they said

1:17:46.120 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 3>monopolies lead to fascism.

1:17:48.720 --> 1:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is as well is monopolies are bad

1:17:52.120 --> 1:17:52.759
<v Speaker 2>for everyone.

1:17:52.840 --> 1:17:54.519
<v Speaker 3>It is a bipartisan issue.

1:17:54.600 --> 1:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Roger mcnammey, who I mentioned Elie Facebook and bested though, Yeah,

1:17:57.320 --> 1:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>really good friend mine.

1:17:58.080 --> 1:17:58.719
<v Speaker 3>He's wonderful.

1:17:59.120 --> 1:18:01.120
<v Speaker 2>He really was, Like I was talking to about something

1:18:01.120 --> 1:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I was writing, and I within shitification. I did the

1:18:05.040 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>raw economy, which is very similar, but I know my

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:09.840
<v Speaker 2>central failing in it. And it was these monopolies. And

1:18:10.560 --> 1:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>it's just this sense where you get these Sam Wulton

1:18:13.040 --> 1:18:15.120
<v Speaker 2>types who want the monopolies. You get these and recent

1:18:15.160 --> 1:18:17.880
<v Speaker 2>types want to invest in monopolies for the money, but

1:18:18.600 --> 1:18:22.640
<v Speaker 2>they're shitty businesses. Monopolies are like Google is probably is

1:18:22.640 --> 1:18:27.160
<v Speaker 2>an incredible business, but inevitably must die, like it's going

1:18:27.200 --> 1:18:31.360
<v Speaker 2>to die eventually, and fast or slow it must because

1:18:32.280 --> 1:18:33.719
<v Speaker 2>eventually you run out of humans.

1:18:34.520 --> 1:18:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is the problem Amazon is facing, right. They

1:18:37.240 --> 1:18:39.360
<v Speaker 3>keep looking at the rate at which they're burning out

1:18:40.000 --> 1:18:43.759
<v Speaker 3>warehouse workers and saying, well, all available semi skilled workers

1:18:43.800 --> 1:18:46.040
<v Speaker 3>will have worked at an Amazon warehouse and no longer

1:18:46.080 --> 1:18:49.599
<v Speaker 3>want to do so or have been permanently maimed by whatever.

1:18:49.680 --> 1:18:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Originally it was twenty twenty four was their initial projection.

1:18:52.160 --> 1:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>That was their clarion call that made them start investing

1:18:55.040 --> 1:18:57.400
<v Speaker 3>more heavily in automation. Not in treating work I bake,

1:18:57.600 --> 1:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>not in making it better to work there. Yeah no, no, no,

1:19:00.120 --> 1:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>not not in the slightest no, just in in adding

1:19:03.040 --> 1:19:05.200
<v Speaker 3>more of that. Now. I have a lot of lefty

1:19:06.000 --> 1:19:10.439
<v Speaker 3>comrades who are skeptical of this anti monopoly stuff, and

1:19:10.479 --> 1:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>they say, look, I don't want a million choices. I

1:19:13.080 --> 1:19:14.920
<v Speaker 3>don't want to go to Amazon looking for a light

1:19:14.920 --> 1:19:18.439
<v Speaker 3>bulb and find ten million light bulbs. You already do right, well,

1:19:18.479 --> 1:19:21.519
<v Speaker 3>you do right, exactly right. I want to go and like,

1:19:21.560 --> 1:19:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to live in an orderly regulated world where

1:19:23.960 --> 1:19:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't have to use the magic of the market

1:19:26.000 --> 1:19:28.160
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that like my water isn't poison or

1:19:28.160 --> 1:19:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that things aren't bad and so on. And there's something

1:19:30.160 --> 1:19:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to that. I don't know. Everything has to be. We

1:19:33.160 --> 1:19:36.000
<v Speaker 3>can have regulated monopolies, we can have state we can

1:19:36.040 --> 1:19:36.519
<v Speaker 3>have state.

1:19:36.560 --> 1:19:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Things like healthcare. Ye competition, but the.

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Thing that that competition gets you is not merely choice.

1:19:45.760 --> 1:19:50.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a weak corporate sector. People really fail to understand

1:19:50.240 --> 1:19:54.800
<v Speaker 3>this at their peril because although these companies appear to

1:19:54.840 --> 1:19:57.759
<v Speaker 3>be at one another's throats, when you look more closely

1:19:57.800 --> 1:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>at it, they're really quite chummy. We've surface around us

1:20:00.800 --> 1:20:04.000
<v Speaker 3>several times. Yeah, so you know, Apple says, oh, we're

1:20:04.040 --> 1:20:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the non surveilling company, and Google and Facebook are the

1:20:07.439 --> 1:20:10.040
<v Speaker 3>bad ones. They surveil and we're so different from them.

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:13.679
<v Speaker 3>But Apple like puts a surveillance tap in the pocket

1:20:13.680 --> 1:20:16.679
<v Speaker 3>of every iPhone owner by defaulting to Google. I mean,

1:20:16.960 --> 1:20:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Apple wants to block surveillance unless they're getting paid for it,

1:20:20.120 --> 1:20:21.040
<v Speaker 3>so they block Faceto and.

1:20:21.040 --> 1:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>They don't do unless it's their and they.

1:20:24.040 --> 1:20:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Do their own surveillance. Right. Google and Facebook allegedly are

1:20:28.120 --> 1:20:30.559
<v Speaker 3>our great adversaries in the ad tech sector, except they

1:20:30.600 --> 1:20:33.160
<v Speaker 3>have this illegal collusive arrangement where they divided up ad

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:35.360
<v Speaker 3>tech like the pope dividing up the new world called

1:20:35.439 --> 1:20:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Jedi Blue. Right, you have Cheryl Sandberg moving from one

1:20:41.439 --> 1:20:43.240
<v Speaker 3>firm to the other. Right, she was a Googler before

1:20:43.280 --> 1:20:44.360
<v Speaker 3>she was at Facebook, and.

1:20:44.320 --> 1:20:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Before that Mackenzine before that Larry Summ's Department's treasury.

1:20:47.280 --> 1:20:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Facebook is stuffed with ex Apple people, and

1:20:50.160 --> 1:20:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Apple is stuff with x Facebook people. That the way

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>that you ascend through the ranks of a highly concentrated

1:20:56.680 --> 1:21:00.879
<v Speaker 3>sector is through lateral moves because we within the firms,

1:21:01.040 --> 1:21:03.160
<v Speaker 3>there are no boxes on the org chart for you

1:21:03.280 --> 1:21:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to rise up to. Either someone has to die or

1:21:05.000 --> 1:21:08.679
<v Speaker 3>become disgraced, right, and so it's only when a firm

1:21:08.920 --> 1:21:12.360
<v Speaker 3>seeks someone from outside that you can actually jump up

1:21:12.360 --> 1:21:14.439
<v Speaker 3>the rank, which is why you see, for example, people

1:21:14.439 --> 1:21:17.719
<v Speaker 3>from Disney jumping to Universal and people from Universal jumping

1:21:17.720 --> 1:21:18.880
<v Speaker 3>from Disney to ascend the right.

1:21:18.960 --> 1:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Just to push back a little bit, isn't some of

1:21:20.880 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 2>this just domain expertise though.

1:21:23.320 --> 1:21:25.639
<v Speaker 3>In the sense that that's why they're doing it. Sure,

1:21:26.000 --> 1:21:28.200
<v Speaker 3>But and you know, this is another problem with regulation,

1:21:28.439 --> 1:21:31.160
<v Speaker 3>is that when a sector becomes highly concentrated, the domain

1:21:31.200 --> 1:21:34.599
<v Speaker 3>expertise is siloed within the firms that you're hoping to regulate.

1:21:34.880 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>And you know, there's a there's a not wrong point

1:21:38.320 --> 1:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that people make about the revolving door, which is that

1:21:41.240 --> 1:21:43.439
<v Speaker 3>if a sector consists of five companies, then everyone who

1:21:43.520 --> 1:21:45.880
<v Speaker 3>understands those companies works for one of them. So where

1:21:45.880 --> 1:21:47.920
<v Speaker 3>else are you going to get a regulator? Right? Of course,

1:21:47.960 --> 1:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>they hire ex Googlers.

1:21:49.200 --> 1:21:51.719
<v Speaker 2>And at this point you have people where you only

1:21:51.760 --> 1:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>really hire if they've worked at a big tech firm. Sure,

1:21:54.320 --> 1:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the only way you will know how to work

1:21:56.439 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>very similar machines.

1:21:57.280 --> 1:21:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Although I'm speaking of regulators, so sorry. The reason the

1:21:59.840 --> 1:22:03.000
<v Speaker 3>f SEE is hiring x Comcast people, supposedly is that, like,

1:22:03.120 --> 1:22:05.880
<v Speaker 3>who understands how the cable networks work except for people

1:22:05.880 --> 1:22:07.120
<v Speaker 3>who work for one of the two or three big

1:22:07.160 --> 1:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>cable operators. Right, So there's a grain of truth to this.

1:22:11.040 --> 1:22:13.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not entirely true, but there's a grain of truth

1:22:13.120 --> 1:22:16.880
<v Speaker 3>to it. And the fix for it is not to

1:22:17.000 --> 1:22:19.880
<v Speaker 3>let cable companies mark their own homework by parachuting their

1:22:19.880 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 3>own people into the regulators. The fix is to make

1:22:22.640 --> 1:22:27.120
<v Speaker 3>them small enough to be comprehensible, right, to make them

1:22:27.280 --> 1:22:30.880
<v Speaker 3>small enough that outside parties can see what they're doing.

1:22:30.640 --> 1:22:33.599
<v Speaker 2>But also a marketplace with tons of choices. It makes

1:22:33.640 --> 1:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>for a weaker corporate sector, but stronger companies, I would argue,

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>because if you make a good fucking product, you can

1:22:39.840 --> 1:22:42.320
<v Speaker 2>win a market. And I realize that this is not

1:22:42.400 --> 1:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>a perfect system at all, and that doesn't always happen,

1:22:45.360 --> 1:22:49.040
<v Speaker 2>but at least to some extent, Apple has dominated because

1:22:49.080 --> 1:22:52.400
<v Speaker 2>they aren't imperfect. And I know, listeners, I know you

1:22:52.479 --> 1:22:54.880
<v Speaker 2>always am not hard enough about Apple. I'm doing an

1:22:54.880 --> 1:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>app Store episode. It's so hard to write, you want

1:22:56.760 --> 1:22:59.559
<v Speaker 2>to write five thousand words. Jesus fucking But the things

1:22:59.600 --> 1:23:03.559
<v Speaker 2>of Apple, they've done pretty well because they make good phone, phone,

1:23:03.600 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 2>good laptop great, Like the laptops are great. These are

1:23:06.920 --> 1:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>good pieces of tech that do the job well. And

1:23:09.320 --> 1:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>yes they use monopolistic forces to keep where they are,

1:23:12.960 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>but it also feels like a Google's phone division. They're like,

1:23:15.280 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 2>why does this never work? And it's because it kind

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of like Android phones are good, but they've really why

1:23:20.840 --> 1:23:23.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't Google try and pay for my message? Well they shouldn't.

1:23:23.400 --> 1:23:25.960
<v Speaker 2>They should actually really push our cs much harder. But

1:23:25.960 --> 1:23:28.519
<v Speaker 2>they don't push it that hard. They could put a

1:23:28.560 --> 1:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of more money behind our ces, or try and

1:23:31.240 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 2>find a way to work without I know it's coming in,

1:23:33.479 --> 1:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's like, like, doesn't really give a shit about

1:23:36.000 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Android doing super well.

1:23:37.080 --> 1:23:37.880
<v Speaker 3>They just don't want.

1:23:37.760 --> 1:23:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Apple to have everything. I guess it's so strange.

1:23:40.560 --> 1:23:43.799
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to play criminology here, but I want to

1:23:43.840 --> 1:23:47.559
<v Speaker 3>say that while competition is obviously imperfect, yes that in

1:23:47.600 --> 1:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>tech we do have a kind of secret power. And

1:23:50.360 --> 1:23:52.719
<v Speaker 3>you ask. You started this conversation by asking what excites

1:23:52.800 --> 1:23:54.880
<v Speaker 3>us about tech. One of the things that excites me

1:23:54.920 --> 1:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>about tech is a kind of nerdy principle, which is

1:23:58.120 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 3>that all computers are We're in complete universal of onon

1:24:01.439 --> 1:24:04.719
<v Speaker 3>noion machines. They can all run every program, which means

1:24:04.720 --> 1:24:06.920
<v Speaker 3>that any program running on a computer that you have,

1:24:07.000 --> 1:24:09.720
<v Speaker 3>whether it's your pocket Destruction rectangle, your laptop, or your

1:24:09.760 --> 1:24:12.880
<v Speaker 3>game console, another program can run that modifies how it

1:24:12.920 --> 1:24:14.800
<v Speaker 3>works so that it works for you and not someone else.

1:24:15.200 --> 1:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Your printer can always take someone else's inc your car

1:24:18.080 --> 1:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>can always have its surveillance technology disabled, and so on.

1:24:22.160 --> 1:24:24.240
<v Speaker 3>And what that does is it means that with tech

1:24:24.800 --> 1:24:29.280
<v Speaker 3>you have this separate competitive capacity, which is the ability

1:24:29.320 --> 1:24:34.439
<v Speaker 3>to compete by modifying existing technology. Right Like Lexmark used

1:24:34.479 --> 1:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>to be IBM's printer division, right, and they made laser printers.

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>And there was a company out of not Malaysia, Taiwan

1:24:43.600 --> 1:24:47.360
<v Speaker 3>that made refill kits for their toner cartridges, and the

1:24:47.360 --> 1:24:49.840
<v Speaker 3>toner cartridge had a little crude microchip in it. This

1:24:49.880 --> 1:24:52.000
<v Speaker 3>is in the early two thousands, is when embedded systems

1:24:52.000 --> 1:24:55.000
<v Speaker 3>were expensive and very primitive. It had a sixty four

1:24:55.040 --> 1:24:57.519
<v Speaker 3>byte program and when you used up all the toner

1:24:57.520 --> 1:25:00.559
<v Speaker 3>and the cartridge, the sixty four by program would toggle

1:25:00.560 --> 1:25:02.640
<v Speaker 3>a switch that said, I'm now an empty cartridge, and

1:25:02.680 --> 1:25:05.519
<v Speaker 3>if you put more carbon powder in the cartridge, it

1:25:05.520 --> 1:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't work because the cartridge told the printer it was empty.

1:25:08.360 --> 1:25:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So Static reverse engineered this sixty four by program not

1:25:11.320 --> 1:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>very challenging. They made another chip and it reset it

1:25:15.320 --> 1:25:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to one. Right, I am a full cartridge. And when

1:25:20.000 --> 1:25:25.759
<v Speaker 3>that happened, Lexmark sued them, and they sued them, arguing

1:25:25.960 --> 1:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that they had violated their copyright, that they bypassed an

1:25:29.040 --> 1:25:31.679
<v Speaker 3>access control for a copyrighted work, which is prohibited under

1:25:31.680 --> 1:25:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the Digital Mining of Copyright Act. And the judge at

1:25:34.120 --> 1:25:37.160
<v Speaker 3>the time said, like, where is the copyrighted work. It's

1:25:37.200 --> 1:25:39.800
<v Speaker 3>not the carbon in the printer cartridge. They said, no,

1:25:39.840 --> 1:25:42.400
<v Speaker 3>it's the sixty four by program. They said, well, you know,

1:25:42.680 --> 1:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>like sixty four by programs software is like copyrightable, but

1:25:46.080 --> 1:25:48.519
<v Speaker 3>a sixty four by program isn't. It's not even a

1:25:48.560 --> 1:25:51.040
<v Speaker 3>high coup right, Like, it doesn't rise to the level

1:25:51.080 --> 1:25:53.559
<v Speaker 3>of complexity that attracts a new copyright. And so they

1:25:53.560 --> 1:25:57.000
<v Speaker 3>threw the case out punchline. Today, Lexmark is a division

1:25:57.000 --> 1:26:00.679
<v Speaker 3>of static controls, right, because they went for I'm refilling

1:26:00.680 --> 1:26:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the cartridges to buying the business. Ah. Right. So today,

1:26:06.080 --> 1:26:07.960
<v Speaker 3>if you were to try and make that argument about HP,

1:26:08.080 --> 1:26:11.360
<v Speaker 3>which has this disgusting habit of pushing at fake security

1:26:11.400 --> 1:26:14.639
<v Speaker 3>updates that break your printer's ability to use their party Inc.

1:26:14.720 --> 1:26:18.160
<v Speaker 3>It breaks on its own. Sorry that too. But if

1:26:18.200 --> 1:26:19.439
<v Speaker 3>you were to do this and you were to go

1:26:19.479 --> 1:26:22.160
<v Speaker 3>back to court and say the program in the chip

1:26:22.360 --> 1:26:24.559
<v Speaker 3>in the chip in the cartridge that stops you from

1:26:24.640 --> 1:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>using third party Inc. Doesn't rise to love a copyright ability.

1:26:27.280 --> 1:26:29.040
<v Speaker 3>That's like a twenty six cent system on a chip

1:26:29.040 --> 1:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>that's running a full Linux stack with like busy box

1:26:31.840 --> 1:26:33.839
<v Speaker 3>and a network stack. You could probably attach a monitor

1:26:33.880 --> 1:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>to it if you want it to write, and like,

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:40.679
<v Speaker 3>there's just no argument that that's not copyrightable. Now, with tech,

1:26:40.760 --> 1:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>if we could clear some of these rules that have

1:26:43.280 --> 1:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>been mobilized by big tech to block new market entry,

1:26:46.520 --> 1:26:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to block reverse engineering, to block all this other stuff,

1:26:49.439 --> 1:26:51.439
<v Speaker 3>we could do lots of things to compete, Like the

1:26:51.479 --> 1:26:54.040
<v Speaker 3>iPhone is a great platform for someone else to make

1:26:54.080 --> 1:26:55.599
<v Speaker 3>an app store, right.

1:26:55.600 --> 1:26:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Vidia I was one of the like I was really

1:26:58.160 --> 1:27:00.800
<v Speaker 2>into the homebrew community and iPhone. Yeah, and you know what,

1:27:00.920 --> 1:27:03.000
<v Speaker 2>some of it was broken as shit, but you could

1:27:03.000 --> 1:27:06.839
<v Speaker 2>do so many There were weird little things that connected

1:27:06.920 --> 1:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the systems, probably in ways that were extremely leaky, but

1:27:10.720 --> 1:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>they were drowned in the water. Now geohot makes weird

1:27:15.000 --> 1:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>autonomous car things that kind of work.

1:27:17.240 --> 1:27:19.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just yeah. But you know, if you remember in

1:27:19.600 --> 1:27:23.439
<v Speaker 3>the early two thousands, Apple was dying because Microsoft wouldn't

1:27:23.439 --> 1:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>make a functional version of Microsoft Office right. And the

1:27:25.800 --> 1:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>way Steve Jobs resolved that was not by begging Bill

1:27:29.080 --> 1:27:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Gates to fix Office. He just had technologists at Apple

1:27:32.720 --> 1:27:35.400
<v Speaker 3>reverse engineer Microsoft Office and make iWork pages, numbers, and

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:39.320
<v Speaker 3>keynote that perfectly run word, Excel and PowerPoint. Now. It

1:27:39.360 --> 1:27:42.799
<v Speaker 3>was janki at first, because Microsoft kept cycling the file formats, yes,

1:27:42.920 --> 1:27:45.720
<v Speaker 3>in order to break compatibility. But that hurt Microsoft more

1:27:45.800 --> 1:27:48.320
<v Speaker 3>than it hurt Apple because Apple had their own internal

1:27:48.360 --> 1:27:50.439
<v Speaker 3>file formats. Microsoft just had these file formats, and they

1:27:50.520 --> 1:27:53.000
<v Speaker 3>kept making them more obfuscated and complex, and then they

1:27:53.080 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 3>had to support them all. So eventually Microsoft sued for

1:27:55.400 --> 1:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>peace and they standardized those file formats. That's where we

1:27:58.080 --> 1:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>get doc x PPT x xls X. Those are the

1:28:01.280 --> 1:28:03.720
<v Speaker 3>XML versions. And the reason you can copy and past

1:28:03.760 --> 1:28:06.479
<v Speaker 3>style text into a browser and then into libre office,

1:28:06.520 --> 1:28:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and then into iWork and then back into office is

1:28:08.600 --> 1:28:12.960
<v Speaker 3>because they're all using this standard. If Apple could not

1:28:13.200 --> 1:28:16.400
<v Speaker 3>use the courts to shut down something like Sidia, uh

1:28:16.439 --> 1:28:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and if they were required to just have hand to

1:28:19.040 --> 1:28:24.559
<v Speaker 3>hand guerrilla warfare with Jay Freeman and his engineers, they

1:28:24.560 --> 1:28:29.160
<v Speaker 3>would eventually sueer piece because they they are fighting an

1:28:29.200 --> 1:28:33.280
<v Speaker 3>asymmetric battle where they have to make no mistakes in

1:28:33.320 --> 1:28:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the iPhone, and Jay and Johatt just have to find

1:28:36.800 --> 1:28:39.400
<v Speaker 3>one mistake they've made, and every time they do that,

1:28:39.400 --> 1:28:40.840
<v Speaker 3>they have to go back to the drum. Alright.

1:28:40.960 --> 1:28:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Talking to Margaret Thatcha, you need we only need to

1:28:43.760 --> 1:28:44.439
<v Speaker 2>be lucky ones.

1:28:44.680 --> 1:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And and you should be pointed out that I

1:28:47.360 --> 1:28:50.519
<v Speaker 1>think that Apple's in house design were watching what they

1:28:50.520 --> 1:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>were doing in the in those jail broken sists, and

1:28:53.200 --> 1:28:55.559
<v Speaker 1>they were, and they a lot of the things that

1:28:55.680 --> 1:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>were really popular. They poured it into the into iOS

1:28:59.240 --> 1:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and future design. You know, obviously not the interoperability or

1:29:03.360 --> 1:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the things that would be more radical, but just like

1:29:05.880 --> 1:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>design flourishes and features, like they were watching that community

1:29:09.040 --> 1:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and taking notes from it.

1:29:09.960 --> 1:29:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Every good designer starts by paving the desire path.

1:29:12.640 --> 1:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>And I mean one of my favorite examples of this

1:29:14.439 --> 1:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>where yeah, the courts would I don't know how the

1:29:16.120 --> 1:29:17.759
<v Speaker 2>courts would have gone in because this is video games,

1:29:17.800 --> 1:29:21.400
<v Speaker 2>but the originals of the World of Warcraft were from

1:29:22.000 --> 1:29:24.559
<v Speaker 2>numerous forums, from numerous guilds. In EverQuest, there's a big

1:29:24.560 --> 1:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>thing with the plane of time, with the shadows lukelan expansion.

1:29:27.400 --> 1:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Anyone who knows this story, by the way, email me.

1:29:29.880 --> 1:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I love you, easy Better off line dot com. But

1:29:32.320 --> 1:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>long story short, there was a massive bug with the

1:29:34.880 --> 1:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>final rate, and a bunch of people, for all being

1:29:37.120 --> 1:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>one of them said I'm fucking done with this game.

1:29:39.080 --> 1:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>This company doesn't give a shit. They can't even finish

1:29:41.000 --> 1:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>their goddamn work. It's disgusting. And Blizzard, who are now

1:29:45.280 --> 1:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of horrible thanks to Activision, Kotic and all them,

1:29:48.280 --> 1:29:51.360
<v Speaker 2>said huh, well, if we just got all these high

1:29:51.439 --> 1:29:55.679
<v Speaker 2>level players and ask them, how would you like EverQuest

1:29:55.680 --> 1:29:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to be better? What would a better MMO look like?

1:29:57.920 --> 1:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>World of Warcraft was an amazing m I genuinely love

1:30:01.760 --> 1:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Wow at the beginning, and to this day, I'm sure

1:30:03.720 --> 1:30:06.400
<v Speaker 2>ever picked up. And it does that because this crazy

1:30:06.439 --> 1:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>idea of we could really compete with pretty much the

1:30:08.960 --> 1:30:13.760
<v Speaker 2>only successful Western MMO with some exceptions, by taking the

1:30:13.760 --> 1:30:16.480
<v Speaker 2>things they like and doing better at them, by iterating

1:30:16.520 --> 1:30:19.200
<v Speaker 2>on their work and doing great things. If we could

1:30:19.200 --> 1:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>do that in tech. Even the small examples we have

1:30:22.240 --> 1:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>in tech of that working are so good. I mean

1:30:26.280 --> 1:30:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Anchor being my favorite one, Like they have gallium nitrie.

1:30:29.479 --> 1:30:31.679
<v Speaker 2>They've managed to make shit really powerful and really small,

1:30:32.040 --> 1:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, it's made every other battery manufacturer have to

1:30:34.800 --> 1:30:37.320
<v Speaker 2>fucking compete. I'm sure they didn't do it first, but

1:30:37.400 --> 1:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Anchor has made a successful business out of seeing other

1:30:40.080 --> 1:30:43.600
<v Speaker 2>people shit and going, what if this was good?

1:30:44.360 --> 1:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Let me make one more point about why user adaptability

1:30:48.360 --> 1:30:51.400
<v Speaker 3>is good. It's not merely because it lets firms discover

1:30:51.520 --> 1:30:55.519
<v Speaker 3>a new way so pleasing us, or because it lets

1:30:55.600 --> 1:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>us make our lives easier. It's because when our technology

1:31:00.000 --> 1:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't work for us, it is often because the circumstances

1:31:02.520 --> 1:31:04.680
<v Speaker 3>that we're in have changed for the worse. Okay, right,

1:31:04.760 --> 1:31:06.880
<v Speaker 3>your printer, you need to get one more page out

1:31:06.880 --> 1:31:08.719
<v Speaker 3>of your printer, and it's really desperate and it won't

1:31:08.720 --> 1:31:11.160
<v Speaker 3>print because it doesn't have any magenta in it, even

1:31:11.200 --> 1:31:12.720
<v Speaker 3>though you're printing a black and white document, and the

1:31:12.760 --> 1:31:14.559
<v Speaker 3>black and white document you're printing is the thing that

1:31:14.600 --> 1:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>you need to bring to the bail bondsmen because your

1:31:16.880 --> 1:31:20.519
<v Speaker 3>kid's just been arrested. Right The people who are finness

1:31:20.560 --> 1:31:24.160
<v Speaker 3>this again, the people who make the technology can never

1:31:24.240 --> 1:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>anticipate all the ways that the people who use the

1:31:26.600 --> 1:31:28.720
<v Speaker 3>technology are going to need to use it, not just

1:31:28.800 --> 1:31:31.519
<v Speaker 3>in the immediate future, but in the decades that will

1:31:31.600 --> 1:31:34.960
<v Speaker 3>come afterwards, because this technology lives in our stack forever

1:31:35.040 --> 1:31:37.599
<v Speaker 3>and ever. If you want to read an amazing document

1:31:37.640 --> 1:31:40.720
<v Speaker 3>about how technology ac creates, the British Librari's postmortem on

1:31:40.840 --> 1:31:43.240
<v Speaker 3>their ransomware attack, where they talk about how they were

1:31:43.280 --> 1:31:45.599
<v Speaker 3>early adopters and then they because they could never shut

1:31:45.680 --> 1:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>down the system, they just put more and more layers

1:31:47.920 --> 1:31:49.559
<v Speaker 3>on top of it. Each layer was a seam that

1:31:49.560 --> 1:31:51.439
<v Speaker 3>could be exploited by ransomware creeps. It's one of the

1:31:51.479 --> 1:31:55.240
<v Speaker 3>most important tech documents I've ever read. So you know

1:31:55.280 --> 1:31:58.720
<v Speaker 3>when things are broken, when people in the future are

1:31:58.720 --> 1:32:01.479
<v Speaker 3>trying to maintain or adapt the things that you've made.

1:32:02.160 --> 1:32:04.720
<v Speaker 3>When the climate emergency hits and the power goes out,

1:32:04.800 --> 1:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>or the internet is not available or not available continuously,

1:32:07.840 --> 1:32:09.720
<v Speaker 3>or a website that's supposed to be checked every time

1:32:09.720 --> 1:32:12.439
<v Speaker 3>you launch for a license key goes down because there's

1:32:12.520 --> 1:32:15.639
<v Speaker 3>been a big cyber attack or because CrowdStrike has gone down.

1:32:16.240 --> 1:32:18.920
<v Speaker 3>That is the moment where being able to change how

1:32:18.960 --> 1:32:22.479
<v Speaker 3>your technology works is going to be the difference between

1:32:23.040 --> 1:32:25.320
<v Speaker 3>success and failure, a good life and a bad life,

1:32:25.320 --> 1:32:29.600
<v Speaker 3>sometimes life and death by it. And the hubris of

1:32:29.640 --> 1:32:32.400
<v Speaker 3>thinking that you can anticipate all the ways that people

1:32:32.400 --> 1:32:34.280
<v Speaker 3>are going to use it, all the bodies they'll be in,

1:32:34.560 --> 1:32:40.160
<v Speaker 3>all the circumstances they'll live through, is so monumentally arrogant

1:32:40.240 --> 1:32:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and reckless, and ultimately, although you may not always make

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the best decision about how the technology around you should work,

1:32:48.479 --> 1:32:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that decision should still always vest with you.

1:32:51.760 --> 1:32:54.360
<v Speaker 2>So as we wrap up here, I want to finish

1:32:54.400 --> 1:32:59.439
<v Speaker 2>around the generative a Brian, do you see any value?

1:32:59.680 --> 1:33:02.160
<v Speaker 2>This is such an aweshole question to end on. I

1:33:02.240 --> 1:33:04.960
<v Speaker 2>realized we've got like tim but like, do you see

1:33:04.960 --> 1:33:06.479
<v Speaker 2>any value in this? I think this is a good

1:33:06.479 --> 1:33:07.480
<v Speaker 2>thing to wrap.

1:33:08.760 --> 1:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I think like a lot of the technologies that have

1:33:10.560 --> 1:33:13.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of surfaced or have become fixations of Silicon Valley

1:33:13.680 --> 1:33:16.559
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, as it's sort of cycled

1:33:16.760 --> 1:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>through the latest next big thing, as it's investors are

1:33:21.320 --> 1:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>desperate to find said big thing because it hasn't really had.

1:33:26.200 --> 1:33:26.960
<v Speaker 3>One in a while.

1:33:28.040 --> 1:33:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, Jennert of AI has found a

1:33:31.439 --> 1:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>few more use cases.

1:33:32.960 --> 1:33:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Than whatever the metaverse or web.

1:33:35.479 --> 1:33:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Three or crypto, So therefore it's been a little bit stickier.

1:33:41.280 --> 1:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as a technology it's itself, is there

1:33:45.240 --> 1:33:46.439
<v Speaker 1>is there something interesting there?

1:33:47.400 --> 1:33:50.600
<v Speaker 3>You know? Yeah, like I think that there's there.

1:33:50.360 --> 1:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We should be having researchers and developers looking into into

1:33:56.200 --> 1:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>large language models and how to make them better and

1:33:58.680 --> 1:34:00.559
<v Speaker 1>how to make them more interesting. Scene they can and

1:34:00.640 --> 1:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can't do by kicking the tires? Do we need every

1:34:04.720 --> 1:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>major tech company running massive data farms doing basically the

1:34:09.240 --> 1:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing as the cost of energy and compute skyrockets

1:34:13.040 --> 1:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and a game that and a company that made video

1:34:15.320 --> 1:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>game chips as of two or three years ago is

1:34:17.960 --> 1:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>now suddenly more valuable than Apple and the entire GDP

1:34:22.680 --> 1:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of or like the London Stock Exchange, I think I saw.

1:34:26.080 --> 1:34:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Something like that.

1:34:26.920 --> 1:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then you have then you have an issue. And

1:34:30.200 --> 1:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the problem with our current mode of technological development.

1:34:33.240 --> 1:34:36.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not just is technology? Is this technology and question good?

1:34:37.600 --> 1:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Is Is this in any way a sensible way to

1:34:41.360 --> 1:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>go about seeing how it's.

1:34:42.920 --> 1:34:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Useful or who it could be useful for, or what

1:34:45.320 --> 1:34:48.640
<v Speaker 3>use cases it might have? And I think absolutely not.

1:34:48.800 --> 1:34:50.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's so hard.

1:34:50.560 --> 1:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>To distinguish that question right now because it's gone from

1:34:55.479 --> 1:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>zero to one hundred and twenty and it's spinning out

1:34:58.320 --> 1:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in all directions, and it's so many bad decisions have

1:35:02.200 --> 1:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>been made in its rollout. It's it's been deeply non

1:35:06.840 --> 1:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>consensual to a lot of the parties whose work has

1:35:10.120 --> 1:35:12.559
<v Speaker 1>been harvested into this thing. So you have a bunch

1:35:12.600 --> 1:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of people who are furious at the way that the

1:35:14.920 --> 1:35:16.599
<v Speaker 1>models were trained in the first place.

1:35:17.000 --> 1:35:21.080
<v Speaker 3>It's being set against creative markets where people.

1:35:20.800 --> 1:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Are now worried about their jobs, so you have them angry.

1:35:23.920 --> 1:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, you have ordinary people who are

1:35:26.200 --> 1:35:28.519
<v Speaker 1>just worried about is this going to automate my job?

1:35:28.520 --> 1:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>How's it going to affect me? And so you have

1:35:30.800 --> 1:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this immense climate of not just fear but also of anger,

1:35:36.560 --> 1:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's really hard to pull out. You know, like, well,

1:35:39.080 --> 1:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is generative AI like a good technology in terms of

1:35:42.960 --> 1:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the use cases to which it is being put right now,

1:35:45.840 --> 1:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say absolutely not.

1:35:48.280 --> 1:35:48.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:35:48.560 --> 1:35:52.400
<v Speaker 2>It feels almost like the most egregious example of everything

1:35:52.400 --> 1:35:55.520
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about. When these companies have no natural predators,

1:35:55.640 --> 1:35:58.000
<v Speaker 2>when they have no one to go shit, you can't

1:35:58.040 --> 1:36:02.720
<v Speaker 2>do that. Customers will be mad because otherwise they'd say, so,

1:36:02.800 --> 1:36:05.600
<v Speaker 2>what is chet GPT exact? Why are we doing this

1:36:05.760 --> 1:36:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that just not more most stuff?

1:36:07.560 --> 1:36:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, again, I would say I would push back on

1:36:09.479 --> 1:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit because it did rack up organically,

1:36:12.960 --> 1:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, one hundred million users or whatever. So there

1:36:14.960 --> 1:36:16.760
<v Speaker 1>were some people who are like, this is a fun

1:36:16.800 --> 1:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>toy to play with, okay, but actually okay, well, but

1:36:19.960 --> 1:36:22.639
<v Speaker 1>but then we transition to like, well, that's not really

1:36:22.680 --> 1:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna make us any money, so how do we get

1:36:25.200 --> 1:36:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it to make any money? And then all of a

1:36:26.720 --> 1:36:28.919
<v Speaker 1>sudden it's like, oh, maybe we can just like automate

1:36:29.000 --> 1:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>some stuff. And it becomes an enterprise software that it's

1:36:31.920 --> 1:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>selling that it's being sold you know, to to consultancies,

1:36:35.760 --> 1:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to uh fintech firms, to anyone who any any anyone,

1:36:39.880 --> 1:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone who will who will listen to a to an

1:36:42.360 --> 1:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>open AI salesman's pitch, and that's how we wind up

1:36:45.120 --> 1:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>where we are today. Where you have hundreds of thousands

1:36:48.320 --> 1:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of these enterprise seats sold to a dubiously useful technology.

1:36:52.960 --> 1:36:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:36:53.240 --> 1:36:57.240
<v Speaker 1>People are are rightfully concerned that it's that it's you know,

1:36:57.280 --> 1:37:01.599
<v Speaker 1>that it's threatening their uh, their their, their livelihoods. Even

1:37:01.640 --> 1:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>though it doesn't do a good job.

1:37:02.880 --> 1:37:03.360
<v Speaker 3>It sucks.

1:37:03.360 --> 1:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a point that Coreya makes a lot, is

1:37:05.200 --> 1:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't actually often create a superior product. It

1:37:09.439 --> 1:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>almost never does. Yeah, it's just it's good enough for

1:37:12.720 --> 1:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a manager to say, all right, we'll take it.

1:37:14.320 --> 1:37:15.599
<v Speaker 3>It's cheaper. But I wanted to.

1:37:15.560 --> 1:37:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Push back on one thing. And I don't necessarily know

1:37:17.400 --> 1:37:20.360
<v Speaker 2>if you've disagree, But yeah, I don't know if chat

1:37:20.439 --> 1:37:23.360
<v Speaker 2>GPT grew organically. The reason I say that is this

1:37:24.000 --> 1:37:26.000
<v Speaker 2>when you have no hypergrowth markets, when you have no

1:37:26.120 --> 1:37:29.160
<v Speaker 2>big new thing, and you have what I would argue

1:37:29.200 --> 1:37:34.200
<v Speaker 2>is members of the media willfully engaging in a marketing campaign. Yeah,

1:37:34.280 --> 1:37:36.720
<v Speaker 2>run by and I would. By the way, like all

1:37:36.720 --> 1:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>evil systems, I don't know how much of this was conscious.

1:37:39.800 --> 1:37:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think people sat around and now we shall

1:37:42.280 --> 1:37:44.240
<v Speaker 2>all agree to write about chat GEPT.

1:37:44.520 --> 1:37:44.600
<v Speaker 3>No.

1:37:44.760 --> 1:37:48.479
<v Speaker 2>I think that just a desperation in the media for

1:37:48.520 --> 1:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>something new to write about, connected with the desperation in

1:37:51.200 --> 1:37:53.719
<v Speaker 2>venture capital, which connected with the desperation in the market.

1:37:53.960 --> 1:37:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Boom yeah.

1:37:54.520 --> 1:37:57.519
<v Speaker 1>And then into the vacuum comes this new apparently viable

1:37:57.600 --> 1:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>product about which any number of narratives can.

1:38:00.960 --> 1:38:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Unfold exactly, and you can probabilis telling me to leave

1:38:04.320 --> 1:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>my wife. Wow, you know, like Kevin Rose, the goat

1:38:07.120 --> 1:38:08.400
<v Speaker 2>of freaking out about the computer.

1:38:08.720 --> 1:38:12.680
<v Speaker 3>But you really, you really, you know whether or not.

1:38:12.800 --> 1:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that I would say in its corner

1:38:15.000 --> 1:38:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that that maybe some of that was is that is

1:38:18.520 --> 1:38:22.559
<v Speaker 1>that it hasn't claimed that user growth has increased much

1:38:22.600 --> 1:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>since then We're like a year later, they're still saying.

1:38:25.040 --> 1:38:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Like, well, we still got one hundred million years.

1:38:27.439 --> 1:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>So you'd think that if they were inflating that figure,

1:38:29.760 --> 1:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they would at least they would find some you know,

1:38:32.240 --> 1:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>metric to put together active paine. Now we've got two

1:38:34.960 --> 1:38:38.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred yeah, exactly, some muskie and you know, minutes viewed

1:38:38.760 --> 1:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>per syllable generally.

1:38:41.400 --> 1:38:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I think that, you know, maybe a useful

1:38:44.960 --> 1:38:48.760
<v Speaker 3>analogy here, although not a perfect one, is gamification. Right. So,

1:38:49.160 --> 1:38:51.639
<v Speaker 3>if you've read Jane mcgonagle's old work on this stuff,

1:38:51.680 --> 1:38:53.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, Jane was doing this incredible stuff where she

1:38:54.240 --> 1:38:56.719
<v Speaker 3>On the one hand, she she'd suffered a neurological industry

1:38:57.000 --> 1:39:00.080
<v Speaker 3>injury rather and she needed to do a lot of

1:39:00.400 --> 1:39:05.000
<v Speaker 3>very repetitive and difficult and generally low compliance rehabilitation for it.

1:39:05.040 --> 1:39:07.200
<v Speaker 3>People don't recover from those injuries because it's so hard

1:39:07.240 --> 1:39:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to do. And she made a game out of it, right,

1:39:09.240 --> 1:39:11.439
<v Speaker 3>and it really worked, and she started she's a game developer.

1:39:11.479 --> 1:39:13.479
<v Speaker 3>She started figuring out how to bring these out. So

1:39:13.560 --> 1:39:17.200
<v Speaker 3>there are some marketing crossings. I don't remember where she was,

1:39:17.240 --> 1:39:19.360
<v Speaker 3>but she you know, she she worked on I Love Bees,

1:39:19.400 --> 1:39:22.800
<v Speaker 3>which was the AI movie, and she worked on a

1:39:22.800 --> 1:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>bunch of other like really Texas Hold Them, Texas, Tombstone

1:39:26.160 --> 1:39:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Hold Them or whatever it was called Tombstone Hold Them.

1:39:28.320 --> 1:39:31.720
<v Speaker 3>People got married playing these games like they were really fun, right,

1:39:32.160 --> 1:39:34.280
<v Speaker 3>And then a bunch of people said, oh, well, we

1:39:34.280 --> 1:39:38.439
<v Speaker 3>could use these to get Amazon warehouse workers to uh

1:39:39.200 --> 1:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>gamify how long they can go without urinating so that

1:39:41.960 --> 1:39:45.080
<v Speaker 3>they can meet quota. Right. And we look at that

1:39:45.120 --> 1:39:47.400
<v Speaker 3>and we go, oh, this is horrific, But playing games

1:39:47.479 --> 1:39:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is not horrific, right, right, And I've been following people

1:39:51.160 --> 1:39:53.439
<v Speaker 3>doing weird, playful things with stuff we would now call

1:39:53.479 --> 1:39:55.479
<v Speaker 3>generative AI. For a really long time. This guy called

1:39:55.520 --> 1:39:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Shardcore is like a digital artist who's making weird videos

1:39:58.680 --> 1:40:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and stills forever, really cool fun stuff. You know, literally

1:40:02.400 --> 1:40:05.799
<v Speaker 3>a decade of this, which lends it self generative. Yeah,

1:40:05.840 --> 1:40:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and you know, today I look around and I see

1:40:07.760 --> 1:40:10.080
<v Speaker 3>people who like play a D and D game, and

1:40:10.120 --> 1:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>then at the end, the LM has generated a transcript

1:40:14.000 --> 1:40:18.120
<v Speaker 3>of the game. It generates a precie of the transcript,

1:40:18.200 --> 1:40:21.080
<v Speaker 3>It illustrates it with fun epic moments from it. It

1:40:21.080 --> 1:40:23.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter if the ORC has six fingers, right, And

1:40:23.960 --> 1:40:26.040
<v Speaker 3>everybody looks at that and they go, hahaha, that's great,

1:40:26.360 --> 1:40:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and then they fire the customer service reps for your insulin.

1:40:32.320 --> 1:40:34.720
<v Speaker 2>For the company that runs the thing that generates the

1:40:34.800 --> 1:40:35.400
<v Speaker 2>ORC pictures.

1:40:35.800 --> 1:40:38.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, No that for the people who supply you

1:40:38.360 --> 1:40:42.400
<v Speaker 3>with dialysis you sell, or who determine whether or not

1:40:42.439 --> 1:40:45.120
<v Speaker 3>you can legally get insulin on your insurance. And you

1:40:45.160 --> 1:40:47.960
<v Speaker 3>find yourself arguing with a chatbot about whether you're going

1:40:48.040 --> 1:40:50.679
<v Speaker 3>to get dialysis? Who live? And then you die? Right,

1:40:50.760 --> 1:40:55.040
<v Speaker 3>And that's not a problem with the existence of tools

1:40:55.040 --> 1:40:58.720
<v Speaker 3>that do weird shit, right, that is a problem. And

1:40:58.800 --> 1:41:03.160
<v Speaker 3>now the thing is that total addressable market of epic

1:41:03.439 --> 1:41:08.479
<v Speaker 3>illustrations from last night's D and D game is very small. Yes,

1:41:09.320 --> 1:41:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and it may be that some of the productive residue

1:41:12.800 --> 1:41:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of this bubble will be standalone models that run on

1:41:16.560 --> 1:41:20.680
<v Speaker 3>commodity hard Yeah. And in the same way that, like

1:41:20.720 --> 1:41:23.479
<v Speaker 3>the productive residue of the world Coom bubble was a

1:41:23.520 --> 1:41:25.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of dark fiber in the ground that's being lit

1:41:25.120 --> 1:41:27.640
<v Speaker 3>up now. The productive residue the dot com bubble was

1:41:27.760 --> 1:41:30.559
<v Speaker 3>a couple hundred million humanities undergrads who are coerced into

1:41:30.640 --> 1:41:33.720
<v Speaker 3>dropping out learning Python, Pearl and HTML and went on

1:41:33.760 --> 1:41:35.639
<v Speaker 3>to create a bunch of really playful things that turned

1:41:35.640 --> 1:41:37.960
<v Speaker 3>into Web two point zero. That might be a productive resue,

1:41:37.960 --> 1:41:39.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make the bubble good. Bubbles are always bad. They

1:41:39.800 --> 1:41:43.200
<v Speaker 3>steal from retail investors mom pops and leave them eating

1:41:43.200 --> 1:41:45.679
<v Speaker 3>dog food into their retirement or sleeping a cardboard box.

1:41:45.680 --> 1:41:48.719
<v Speaker 3>They're very bad, right. But en Ron was a bubble

1:41:48.720 --> 1:41:52.439
<v Speaker 3>that left nothing behind, right, NFTs left nothing behind, But

1:41:52.560 --> 1:41:55.479
<v Speaker 3>like shitty JPEGs and worse Austrian ex customs, the tank

1:41:55.640 --> 1:41:57.920
<v Speaker 3>was bad. Yeah, but this case, in this case, maybe

1:41:57.920 --> 1:41:58.880
<v Speaker 3>something good comes of it.

1:41:58.960 --> 1:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:41:59.120 --> 1:42:01.439
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't make the thing good, but maybe something good

1:42:01.479 --> 1:42:04.280
<v Speaker 3>comes up it maybe there's a productive residue, maybe not.

1:42:04.520 --> 1:42:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's so yeah.

1:42:06.000 --> 1:42:08.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean you've probably been watching the Olympics or at

1:42:08.600 --> 1:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>least read about like the I think one of the

1:42:10.360 --> 1:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really telling you. One of the telling things here is

1:42:13.320 --> 1:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you can look at how these companies are like trying

1:42:15.840 --> 1:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to advertise generative AI service. So when the first like Google,

1:42:21.520 --> 1:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Gemini or I forget what it was called it,

1:42:23.800 --> 1:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then maybe it was already overview, but it was like,

1:42:25.600 --> 1:42:27.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, embrace this techno and then you can you

1:42:27.600 --> 1:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can use it to scan all your photos and I'll

1:42:30.200 --> 1:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>tell you our new AI will tell you what your license.

1:42:33.280 --> 1:42:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Plate number is. Is this a problem anybody has? You

1:42:36.240 --> 1:42:37.479
<v Speaker 3>can't just go outside and.

1:42:37.439 --> 1:42:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Look at the So that one is the useful one.

1:42:40.800 --> 1:42:42.559
<v Speaker 2>But also I don't know if it's generally if AI,

1:42:42.880 --> 1:42:46.200
<v Speaker 2>because it's just that's not they've now started wrapping these

1:42:46.240 --> 1:42:48.040
<v Speaker 2>things in to try and sell the dog shit.

1:42:48.000 --> 1:42:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Or look at this one.

1:42:48.880 --> 1:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the did you see the ad for

1:42:50.880 --> 1:42:53.639
<v Speaker 1>for Meta's AI where it's like they're like walking through

1:42:53.840 --> 1:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a little Italy and going and and she's like she's like, Grandpa,

1:42:59.040 --> 1:43:01.599
<v Speaker 1>weren't you here when it was you know the beginning

1:43:01.640 --> 1:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of little Italy and she's like, meta, tell me what

1:43:05.360 --> 1:43:07.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, tell me what little Italy looks like. Now

1:43:07.479 --> 1:43:09.519
<v Speaker 1>we can see it, and it like produces like a

1:43:09.560 --> 1:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>slop picture of like a pretend little little when it's

1:43:13.200 --> 1:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>just like there are photos of little Italy.

1:43:16.040 --> 1:43:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Could you could like, yeah, you could? That are in

1:43:18.080 --> 1:43:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a public aren't they also look up woods.

1:43:20.360 --> 1:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Or the Google one where they were like, oh you

1:43:23.040 --> 1:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>can have your Does your daughter want to write a

1:43:25.240 --> 1:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>letter to an Olympic athlete?

1:43:26.960 --> 1:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Did you see this one? Yes?

1:43:28.240 --> 1:43:33.599
<v Speaker 1>And it was like, have Google Gemini generate and use

1:43:33.720 --> 1:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>generative AI to write the letter. And it's like, obviously

1:43:37.640 --> 1:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this has been roasted because it's the whole point of

1:43:41.240 --> 1:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>an activity like that is you get to you, you

1:43:43.920 --> 1:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>introduce your child to this, you know, to this this

1:43:47.080 --> 1:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>art of writing something down and engaging with this dream

1:43:51.120 --> 1:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, and you actually participating in an

1:43:54.080 --> 1:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>activity not just like a fuck it hit a button.

1:43:56.280 --> 1:43:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And you can imagine what it would be like to

1:43:57.640 --> 1:44:00.800
<v Speaker 3>be the athlete. After that video rounds, that's twenty million

1:44:00.840 --> 1:44:04.600
<v Speaker 3>AI slot letter. Where do I begin? So I have

1:44:04.640 --> 1:44:08.960
<v Speaker 3>a friend who's a professor who tells me that now

1:44:09.200 --> 1:44:10.439
<v Speaker 3>it used to be that if someone asked you to

1:44:10.439 --> 1:44:13.360
<v Speaker 3>write a letter of recommendation for a grand student, you'd

1:44:13.400 --> 1:44:16.320
<v Speaker 3>be very selective because you wouldn't want to just say

1:44:16.400 --> 1:44:18.240
<v Speaker 3>yes to everybody because it's a lot of work. And

1:44:18.240 --> 1:44:20.160
<v Speaker 3>then the people who got those letters really valued them

1:44:20.200 --> 1:44:22.320
<v Speaker 3>because they knew that you were very selective. But now

1:44:23.040 --> 1:44:26.040
<v Speaker 3>you take three bullet points about anyone who asks, and

1:44:26.080 --> 1:44:29.120
<v Speaker 3>it expands it into an AI slot recommendation letter, which

1:44:29.200 --> 1:44:31.600
<v Speaker 3>means that they're now getting so many recommendation letters that

1:44:31.640 --> 1:44:34.960
<v Speaker 3>they ask AI to summarize them back into three different

1:44:34.960 --> 1:44:38.120
<v Speaker 3>bullet points, three extremely losty bullet points, and the entire

1:44:38.160 --> 1:44:39.160
<v Speaker 3>system is broken down.

1:44:39.280 --> 1:44:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Hosting the ass hose in the mouth, it's it's my favorite.

1:44:43.360 --> 1:44:45.479
<v Speaker 2>One of these commercials, by the way, was the co

1:44:45.640 --> 1:44:49.040
<v Speaker 2>pilot ad for Microsoft on the Super Bowl where one

1:44:49.040 --> 1:44:52.439
<v Speaker 2>of the things eagle in listeners will hear this and say,

1:44:52.920 --> 1:44:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I just smashed the window, but I know this bit.

1:44:56.479 --> 1:44:58.519
<v Speaker 2>It said, there's a bit what you type and say

1:44:58.720 --> 1:45:00.360
<v Speaker 2>write the code for my three D game.

1:45:00.880 --> 1:45:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it doesn't do it. I did it.

1:45:03.120 --> 1:45:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It creates a document telling you how to make a

1:45:05.040 --> 1:45:07.680
<v Speaker 2>three D game. And I think that the point I'm

1:45:07.680 --> 1:45:10.000
<v Speaker 2>coming towards him glad you'd brought this up both you

1:45:10.160 --> 1:45:14.679
<v Speaker 2>is GPT really isn't the problem. Transformer based architecture cannot

1:45:14.680 --> 1:45:16.280
<v Speaker 2>do the things the saying it, But it isn't the problem.

1:45:16.320 --> 1:45:20.559
<v Speaker 2>The problem is the people building generative AI are actually

1:45:20.600 --> 1:45:24.200
<v Speaker 2>deeply uncreative because gory up, you're the person you cited

1:45:24.240 --> 1:45:26.760
<v Speaker 2>who makes the cool art. That's someone who's effectively like,

1:45:26.800 --> 1:45:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, this is a very messy way of

1:45:28.439 --> 1:45:30.800
<v Speaker 2>describing it, but getting a robot with sixty arms and

1:45:30.840 --> 1:45:33.160
<v Speaker 2>throwing pain to the wall to make something random, sure

1:45:33.200 --> 1:45:36.479
<v Speaker 2>that is art because you are operating the machine. But

1:45:36.560 --> 1:45:40.040
<v Speaker 2>generat ive AI, the way it's being pedled is depriving

1:45:40.040 --> 1:45:43.920
<v Speaker 2>people of actual operational expertise or any kind of domain

1:45:43.960 --> 1:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>ex police. It's you're not writing a letter that you

1:45:46.000 --> 1:45:47.719
<v Speaker 2>care about because you're not writing the letter.

1:45:47.960 --> 1:45:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I.

1:45:49.280 --> 1:45:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Mean that's I just I wrote a whole newsletter about

1:45:52.560 --> 1:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>this because it was bothering me so much. How many

1:45:54.720 --> 1:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>times they've heard it said, mostly by vcs and you

1:46:00.200 --> 1:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>know AI advocates saying well, it democratizes creativity. I mean

1:46:06.200 --> 1:46:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in in what in what what is art? What is

1:46:08.840 --> 1:46:13.240
<v Speaker 1>more democratic than just producing art? Already? This is not

1:46:13.360 --> 1:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>something that needs to be further democratized.

1:46:16.760 --> 1:46:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Actually democratizes creativity, access to the ants. It's time and

1:46:21.680 --> 1:46:25.080
<v Speaker 2>space to access the arts and contributing. The best way

1:46:25.120 --> 1:46:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I got better at writing was writing but also reading,

1:46:28.280 --> 1:46:30.840
<v Speaker 2>which was my privilege of my parents being able to

1:46:30.880 --> 1:46:34.320
<v Speaker 2>afford the internet, afford books. These are the actual ways.

1:46:34.320 --> 1:46:36.080
<v Speaker 2>But none of these people are creative to how the

1:46:36.080 --> 1:46:36.800
<v Speaker 2>fuck would that this is?

1:46:36.880 --> 1:46:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is my whole point is, if anything, it's

1:46:38.760 --> 1:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>doing the exact opposite. It's it's it's creating an automated

1:46:42.439 --> 1:46:44.679
<v Speaker 1>process by which you can pump out as much shit

1:46:44.760 --> 1:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as possible, thereby pitting people who create art for a

1:46:48.960 --> 1:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>living and hope to make a living off of it

1:46:51.120 --> 1:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>against a machine that can generate as much slop as

1:46:54.400 --> 1:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>as as as the client can handle. And it's just

1:46:57.080 --> 1:47:00.559
<v Speaker 1>pushing down wages. It's making it harder for art to

1:47:00.640 --> 1:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>make a living. It's it's it's doing anything but but democratizing.

1:47:04.600 --> 1:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's making extant relationships between like a publisher and

1:47:09.040 --> 1:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>an art and an artist, or a writer and a

1:47:12.200 --> 1:47:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and and somebody who's commissioning work much more important, thereby

1:47:16.720 --> 1:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>depriving people who are new to.

1:47:18.080 --> 1:47:20.880
<v Speaker 3>The field of opportunities. Uh, you know.

1:47:20.920 --> 1:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Ted Chang makes makes this point in his Great New

1:47:24.280 --> 1:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yorker essays about AI that it's just it's it's depriving.

1:47:28.040 --> 1:47:29.639
<v Speaker 3>It's it's kicking down that ladder.

1:47:29.800 --> 1:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Basically, it's like people who practice a craft by doing

1:47:33.040 --> 1:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's less than you know, authoring a novel that

1:47:36.960 --> 1:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know you're going to get a full, full rate for,

1:47:39.439 --> 1:47:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or it's you might still just be learning to apply

1:47:42.439 --> 1:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the trade by writing a you know, marketing copy. Well,

1:47:45.760 --> 1:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the generative AI is going to vacuum up all of

1:47:47.720 --> 1:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>those jobs and those opportunities. It's it's it's the anti

1:47:51.640 --> 1:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>democratizing force.

1:47:52.880 --> 1:47:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Really, I was just trying to look up a book,

1:47:54.520 --> 1:48:00.639
<v Speaker 3>but I failed. There's a wonderful artist, cartoonist, and novelist

1:48:00.680 --> 1:48:05.040
<v Speaker 3>named Linda Barry, and I co taught a workshop writing

1:48:05.040 --> 1:48:08.080
<v Speaker 3>workshop that she was also teaching at. And Barry is

1:48:08.120 --> 1:48:11.080
<v Speaker 3>a great believer in the idea that you can anyone

1:48:11.120 --> 1:48:14.760
<v Speaker 3>can draw, and that drawing is itself a gateway to

1:48:14.800 --> 1:48:18.320
<v Speaker 3>a kind of creative understanding of yourself in the world

1:48:18.760 --> 1:48:23.040
<v Speaker 3>that is uniquely powerful. And as someone who doesn't draw,

1:48:23.560 --> 1:48:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I was skeptical of this claim. She's written a couple

1:48:25.760 --> 1:48:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of very good books about this, and she's also won

1:48:27.920 --> 1:48:30.960
<v Speaker 3>a MacArthur Prize. And I came in and I looked

1:48:30.960 --> 1:48:33.160
<v Speaker 3>at what my writing students had done after spending a

1:48:33.160 --> 1:48:36.479
<v Speaker 3>week drawing with Linda Barry. They were not there to

1:48:36.560 --> 1:48:38.120
<v Speaker 3>learn to draw. They were there to learn to write,

1:48:38.720 --> 1:48:42.120
<v Speaker 3>and they were remarkably like they had a free and

1:48:42.200 --> 1:48:45.360
<v Speaker 3>loose arm and in a way that you know a

1:48:45.360 --> 1:48:47.599
<v Speaker 3>lot of writers. This is a very intensive writing workshop

1:48:47.600 --> 1:48:50.000
<v Speaker 3>called the Clarion Workshop. It's for science fiction writers at

1:48:50.160 --> 1:48:52.760
<v Speaker 3>UCSD and I'm a graduate of it and a board

1:48:52.760 --> 1:48:57.759
<v Speaker 3>member of it and in instructor. And it's often characterized

1:48:57.760 --> 1:48:59.840
<v Speaker 3>as a kind of boot camp, and usually you get

1:48:59.840 --> 1:49:01.479
<v Speaker 3>an it's a six week workshop, and I think I

1:49:01.479 --> 1:49:03.000
<v Speaker 3>was teaching week four and by week four of these

1:49:03.080 --> 1:49:05.760
<v Speaker 3>kids are zombies. These kids were not zombies, right, They

1:49:05.760 --> 1:49:11.559
<v Speaker 3>were really open and free and really thinking expansively. So,

1:49:12.160 --> 1:49:15.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think that like giving everyone a week

1:49:15.280 --> 1:49:18.200
<v Speaker 3>with Linda Berry democratize his art. And I think there's

1:49:18.320 --> 1:49:22.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, look, I think like typing prompts into an

1:49:22.920 --> 1:49:28.599
<v Speaker 3>LM is in its own way like being Jackson Pollock

1:49:28.640 --> 1:49:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and throwing pain at the wall. If that's why and

1:49:31.000 --> 1:49:34.200
<v Speaker 3>how you're doing it right, Like if you're fooling around, right,

1:49:34.280 --> 1:49:38.120
<v Speaker 3>if you're fooling around, you can you can get to

1:49:38.200 --> 1:49:40.000
<v Speaker 3>somewhere that you can't get to if you're trying to

1:49:40.000 --> 1:49:43.519
<v Speaker 3>get their own purpose. And I just don't think that

1:49:43.560 --> 1:49:46.040
<v Speaker 3>we're being invited to fool around. Yeah, I think that

1:49:46.040 --> 1:49:46.720
<v Speaker 3>that's the whole thing.

1:49:46.760 --> 1:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think artists would not give a shit about jenerative

1:49:50.160 --> 1:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>AI if it wasn't being put in opposition to their livelihoods,

1:49:53.680 --> 1:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>as if it wasn't threatening.

1:49:54.760 --> 1:49:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Their economics security.

1:49:56.280 --> 1:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The people that are many people as they want can

1:49:58.920 --> 1:50:01.519
<v Speaker 1>go play around at home and and do and make

1:50:01.600 --> 1:50:04.599
<v Speaker 1>different variations and for their own personal enjoyment. I don't

1:50:04.600 --> 1:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>think anybody would would would begrudge them that if that

1:50:08.640 --> 1:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't simultaneously being used as a justification as a promotional

1:50:12.600 --> 1:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>material essentially by these companies who are then going to

1:50:16.760 --> 1:50:18.240
<v Speaker 1>go sell other firms.

1:50:18.240 --> 1:50:19.800
<v Speaker 3>And I know you're gagging to go to an abit.

1:50:19.800 --> 1:50:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to say one last thing. We've got to

1:50:22.040 --> 1:50:23.720
<v Speaker 3>rouse this bad bloup. So I want to say one

1:50:23.760 --> 1:50:26.080
<v Speaker 3>last thing here, which is that if you pouparize every

1:50:26.080 --> 1:50:31.000
<v Speaker 3>single commercial illustrator in the world without open AI, you

1:50:31.080 --> 1:50:33.960
<v Speaker 3>will pay the kombucha bill for fifteen minutes for their

1:50:34.040 --> 1:50:37.200
<v Speaker 3>senior engineers. That the only reason they're doing this, This

1:50:37.280 --> 1:50:39.400
<v Speaker 3>is a great tragedy. The reason they're doing this is

1:50:39.439 --> 1:50:42.520
<v Speaker 3>not because there is a huge market opportunity in popularizing

1:50:42.520 --> 1:50:47.360
<v Speaker 3>commercial illustrators. It's that it is an exemplary opportunity. It's

1:50:47.360 --> 1:50:49.280
<v Speaker 3>not that there's a it's not that the market will

1:50:49.320 --> 1:50:51.840
<v Speaker 3>then return their investment. It's that it will be a

1:50:51.960 --> 1:50:55.280
<v Speaker 3>very visible example of what you can do with open AI.

1:50:55.479 --> 1:50:56.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a convincer.

1:50:56.640 --> 1:50:59.439
<v Speaker 1>They are effected one of the few that actually works, Yes,

1:51:00.160 --> 1:51:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that can be dependably relied on to produce results that

1:51:03.280 --> 1:51:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you can point to and say, hey, look.

1:51:04.640 --> 1:51:05.840
<v Speaker 3>That kind of works. Yeah.

1:51:05.960 --> 1:51:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So guys, it's been so wonderful having you. I

1:51:09.280 --> 1:51:12.200
<v Speaker 2>could go another three hours, but that's just me Corey.

1:51:12.240 --> 1:51:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Where can people find you?

1:51:13.400 --> 1:51:13.479
<v Speaker 4>So?

1:51:13.720 --> 1:51:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm at pluralistic dot net and as I've mentioned a

1:51:17.080 --> 1:51:19.599
<v Speaker 3>few times, I write science fiction novels and other kinds

1:51:19.600 --> 1:51:23.080
<v Speaker 3>of books, mostly published by tor Books at McMillan. You

1:51:23.080 --> 1:51:24.920
<v Speaker 3>can get them wherever you get books.

1:51:26.520 --> 1:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian, Yeah, I write a newsletter called Blood in the Machine.

1:51:31.280 --> 1:51:34.679
<v Speaker 1>It's also the name of the book of the similar theme.

1:51:34.960 --> 1:51:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You can check either out.

1:51:36.479 --> 1:51:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah blood inthemachine dot com.

1:51:39.400 --> 1:51:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeahs so you and also hopefully I'll put all of

1:51:42.880 --> 1:51:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the links to this stuff in there.

1:51:44.120 --> 1:51:45.960
<v Speaker 3>But it's always good to hear out loud. Guys.

1:51:46.000 --> 1:51:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining me and listeners, thank

1:51:48.240 --> 1:51:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you so much for listening. When you get out of

1:51:51.840 --> 1:51:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the clink, you can email me at easy at Better

1:51:54.200 --> 1:51:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Offline dot com and net for my Canadian and UK

1:51:57.080 --> 1:51:59.080
<v Speaker 2>just that out Canadians say z as well.

1:51:59.080 --> 1:52:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Ez off line, You're like serial killers where everyone we

1:52:01.920 --> 1:52:03.600
<v Speaker 3>look just like everyone else and we say Z.

1:52:04.120 --> 1:52:07.120
<v Speaker 2>That's right, bellow Canadian, I've I just learned, I've met

1:52:07.120 --> 1:52:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a Canadians.

1:52:07.840 --> 1:52:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Wonderful.

1:52:08.320 --> 1:52:10.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, thank you so much for listening, and Corey Brian,

1:52:10.479 --> 1:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining me.

1:52:11.760 --> 1:52:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you, thank you for listening to Better Offline.

1:52:22.320 --> 1:52:24.760
<v Speaker 2>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

1:52:24.840 --> 1:52:27.479
<v Speaker 2>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

1:52:27.479 --> 1:52:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and audio projects at Mattasowski dot com, M A T

1:52:31.160 --> 1:52:35.600
<v Speaker 2>T O. S O W s KI dot com. You

1:52:35.640 --> 1:52:38.160
<v Speaker 2>can email me at easy at Better Offline dot com

1:52:38.240 --> 1:52:40.519
<v Speaker 2>or visit Better Offline dot com to find more podcast

1:52:40.600 --> 1:52:43.920
<v Speaker 2>links and of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend

1:52:43.960 --> 1:52:45.840
<v Speaker 2>you go to chat dot Where's your ed dot at

1:52:45.840 --> 1:52:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to visit the discord, and go to our slash Better

1:52:48.320 --> 1:52:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Offline to check out our reddit.

1:52:50.680 --> 1:52:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a

1:52:53.960 --> 1:52:57.040
<v Speaker 3>production of cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media,

1:52:57.160 --> 1:53:00.479
<v Speaker 3>visit our website cool zonemedia dot com. Check us out

1:53:00.560 --> 1:53:03.519
<v Speaker 3>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

1:53:03.520 --> 1:53:17.680
<v Speaker 3>your podcasts.