WEBVTT - Talking Recipes with a Master Chef

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Beltonis.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>We talked a lot about all the variety of etf

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that are out there, but we haven't talked about how

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to put all of things together. Yeah, I mean the

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>e t f s are like the ingredients. You throw

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>them together and you have a dish, and that's called

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio. And how do you do that? That's a

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>big open and question for a lot of people. I

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>love that we're already talking about food because really this

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>episode is gonna be a little bit about recipes. Oh god,

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, you can't eat yet, okay, but three hours

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to launche Let me have some food. But joining us

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>today is a guy named Dan Egan who works at Betterment. Betterment, Eric,

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot about this is a robot advisory.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So robo advisors they use ETFs to build portfolios. And

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>what they do is they get you know, they ask

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you a couple of questions, you fill it out, they

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>determine your risk tolerance, and boom, you're in a portfolio

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of say four to ten et fs. They charge you

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points, which is more than half as

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cheap as an average advisor. They do some rebalancing, some

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.839
<v Speaker 1>tax laws, harvesting, and there's no minimum, So robo advisors

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are very popular with millennials and people just getting started

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>who don't have other sort of life things and build

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>up of wealth that requires maybe more of a human touch,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>although Betterman starting to do that too. But the thing

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about Dan is he does that so he puts the

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>portfolios together, but he also does a lot with behavior

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and Betterman exclusively uses e t F. Yes, so Dan

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>part of his job and the and the company as

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole is to go through the e t F

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and decide which ones who want to use and in

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>what percentage to make this portfolio a K the dish.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this week Eric Me and our producer

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's went on the road down to Betterman's office, So

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna hear a little bit of an office vibe

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at this episode because of the show on the road.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's code for not great audio, so enjoy Anyway. This

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>week con Trillions meet a master chef. So we're here

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at Betterment with Dannygand who are you? So? I am

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the director of behavioral Finance and investing in Betterment. Betterment

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is a what we're called a robo advisor, so we're

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>predominantly online financial advisor and investment manager. We were the

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>original so we started taking client money back in two

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten. So yeah, we're actually getting to be

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>old and tenured. So a lot of times people will

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>associate robo advisors as a disruptor. What are you disrupting?

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the traditional advisor and how you're different

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and why this is catching on. A lot of the time,

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the seeds of our our own destruction in businesses are

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>seven by choices that we make or choose to not make.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you go back to when Betterment

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>was founded, it was right after the financial crisis, and

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of lack of faith about their

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>being good financial advice being distributed. It was high cost,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that a lot of it was pretty

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>consistent and systematizeable. People had gotten comfortable with the Internet.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think if you if you went back in time,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you could say, actually, a lot of the established players

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>very much could have dumbness themselves, but it would have

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>meant cannibalizing revenues um and a really big I T investment.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about that. User experience. So when someone

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Betterman dot com website, where do you

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>go from that? So I think the first most important

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is that we need to make it easy for

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of people to get to the point

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>where they understand what Betterment is doing for them. And

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that involves allowing the client to both see how we

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>believe we have value, so focusing them on we're going

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to build you a diversified portfolio. We're going to recommend

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>risk level and allow you to have multiple portfolios depending

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>upon the goal that you're investing for. And we're gonna

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about the value to you in terms of tax

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>efficiency or getting your time back or get a better

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>financial plan to set up for yourself. That experience is

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>really dependent upon the customer and how they choose to

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>interact with us. So we sometimes have what's interesting is

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>um how much selling we really don't do on the website.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's some very large percentage of our

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>clients show up, spend no time on any of our

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>marketing pages. They've heard about us through a friend or

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>through some other um sort of medium where the site

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm in and they you know, they hit our website,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>they open an account and all of a sudden, there's

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand dollars coming in in the next week,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So why use a robot solution out? Yeah, and let

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>me jump in on that, because I think a real

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>advisor at this point and say, that's great, you're doing

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>as allocation for me, But what about some of the

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>more human things that I provide. Yeah, it always sounds

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>so much like somebody trying to convince themselves as much

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as anything, or a little bit of fear in their voice.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So I worked in wealth management with high night Re

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>financial advisors before, and the thing that kept striking me

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>was what percentage of what they do could be done

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>systematically by a computer? And if you think about inputs

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in my background and behavioral thing, I look at people

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>and I say, we have this this brain, this little

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>chunk of meat between our ears, and it takes inputs

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>from our eyes and from our ears, and then it

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>runs little algorithms, then it decides what to do, which

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are its outputs. You can do a lot of that

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of mimicry of saying I'm going to talk to

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a financial planner and I'm gonna say somebody wants to

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>open an I RA, what do you need to know

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to give them good advice about that? What

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>questions do you ask? How do you use that information?

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And what's the output? And I would say, like version

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>one point of rogue advising is just the picking off

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>of whatever is the lowest hanging fruit that is easiest

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to do. The advisors do like say, you know, should

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I use a wall for a traditional ira A? How

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>much should I contribute to my four O one kit?

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>These are things that is very apparent how you would

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>make this decision and how you give this advice. And

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I think as that people confuse the advice from the

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>distribution mechanism. I think that take good advice and you

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>can think about like did the advisor send it over

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>email or did they use and excel? You know, there

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are these things that are like the medium through which

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you give the advice. We effectively just said we are

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>going to do this through medium where we can give

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it to everybody through a website, and we're gonna invest

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>heavily in writing the algorithms correctly knowing what questions we

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>should ask, and then it's simply a matter of you know,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>scaling it up very quickly. So let's talk about I've

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just put a hundred dozen dollars because hey, let's make

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>up a number. Right, you're gonna put me. You're gonna

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>basically do ask that allocation for me, and you're gonna

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do that based on of series of questions that I

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>basically answer, Right, are all those solutions and those portfolios

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>straight out the shelf or are their custom options as well?

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting, Uh there, I forget what the number is.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>There are literally thousands of different end states that you

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>can end up in. The First thing we do is

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I like to think about we talk about your circumstances

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and your goals where you want to be in the future.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So there are facts about you. Um, let's use, for

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>example of the fact that we're in New York City. Now,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>if you live in New York City and you're making

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty serious income, you're gonna pay both federal high

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>federal tax rates and high state and limberal taxes. So

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an interesting piece of tax information in terms of

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>how you learn and how much you learn that actually

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>feeds through into the investment process, which is that if

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you're using a taxable account with us, you're probably going

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to push you towards using New York State municipal bonds

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much tax savings in it for you.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So one element is who you are, your circumstances. The

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>other element is um your future. You know, are we

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about opening up a roth IRA, a traditional ira,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a taxable account? How much risk should we take? How

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>long should we be investing for? How are you going

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw that money? So strangely that like the foundation

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on which the allocation and the advice is built isn't

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>about investments. It's about the investor, and from there we

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about how we can match and tailor the

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>investments to serve the investor. So in this case, you

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>might say, I'm looking to put my kids through college

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York State in a few years. I've already

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>done the five twenty nine, I want to do things.

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to save some more. We would put you

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>into a portfolio that had less risk because it's a

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>short time horizon, and also there would be a higher

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>weighting towards New York State municipal bonds. So that's not

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like a very specific example, but just how do you

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>think about asset allocation in general? On a more metal level.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So we kind of simplify things down to generally speaking

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the stock versus bond allocation. So if you are in

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>our bond allocation, we basically think that means a fine site,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no risks. In that case, you are a hundred percent

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in sh V, which is a ultra short treasury. That's

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like putting your money magic exactly right. It is is

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is close as you gonna get to a money market

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>fund in the e t F world, Which leads to

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>another question, which is is everything you guys do E

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>t F it is to pick up and keep talking

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>about it with this basic poor close and how do

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>you pay? So in every case we are looking at

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>maximizing the customer's takeover trends. So we generally think that

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it is unlikely that any fund that is actively manage

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and that includes active in disease is going to outperform

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>or at least there's a really significant headwind, and so

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we tend to look at funds that have very low

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>expense ratios, that are large hand liquid so that we

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>can buy them and sell them there's a lot of

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>outstanding interest without the customer paying significant transaction costs. Also,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>where if there is a big move, We as a

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of trader are not going to have a lot

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of impact on those markets because there are so many

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>other people trading. So all of it comes down to cost,

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>either the expense ratio of the fund, the bid ask

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>spread of the fund, the depth of market of the fund,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>just trying to keep all of those costs, both sort

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of ongoing and liquidity related as low as possible. And

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for the any international section of the portfolio, what what

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>do you use for that view? Do you know, is

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it something that is uh international developed or something that's

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>total international or do you ever do single countries? Great questions,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So we do on the stock side. We use our

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>primary ticker, and I'll get back to what I mean

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.599
<v Speaker 1>by that is v A, which is the Vanguard International

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Developed Fund. Believe it costs something like eight basis points.

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we also have the International Merchant Market Fund

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>VWO and the key there it's really interesting in the

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>field that it is sometimes cheaper to use more funds

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>than to use just one fund um. So our portfolio

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>as a whole cost I believe about nine or ten

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>basis points once you take into account all of these

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>fund costs. If you were to use the all Country

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>World Index et F, which is provided by black Rock.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe it costs thirty three basis points and they

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have asset allocation funds UM that can do someone I finast.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard has bt BT that's the whole lenge, a lot

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of it, that's twelves. Yeah, it's interesting. Yes, you've got

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>cheaper using a couple of products instead of the whole

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>lenge a lot of one exactly, even if it's even

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>And it's Vanguard to boot, which is interesting exactly. And

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it also allows us to manage risk at different levels.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So imagine that you're a customer who comes in with

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time horizon. We give you a knight fetures

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in stock portfolio. But then as your time arts and

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>gets shorter and shuter, you get closer and closer to

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>needing to spend the money. We want to decrease the risk.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.599
<v Speaker 1>We want to be able to change the proportion that

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>vw A emerging markets makes odds. We don't want to

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be stuck into one just one allocation. So there's a

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>level of granularity that allows us to take on more

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>emerging market risk, more small cap value risk at the

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>high end, and we want to be able to tourne

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that down at the low end. So by having these slices,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't go much simpler. But by having these slices,

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's actually less expensive to clients and it gives us

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>more control. The more granular you cut something, the more

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you can tax lost honest and so we actually wanted

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to have things that were sufficiently unlike each other that

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we would maximize tax lost honesting opportunities. And of course

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this question we talked about, you know, you talked about VW.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the being guard emerging markets. Now there is a

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>cheaper one in schwab, you don't always go for the

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>one that's the cheapest, because you could have a new

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>issuer come out and be say zero fees, but you

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>would necessarily go for that. So is there a liquidity

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>threshold you look at like how many what's the volume

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have to look like for you to buy it? But

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>so I love Mexican food, So we use a measure

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>called the tact the total annual cost of ownership, which

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>includes both the expense ratio that the fund charges but

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>also the cost of getting in and out of the fund. Right,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little bit like my parents live on

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a barren island and their house might be really cheap,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to cost you a pretty big toll

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to get onto that island. And the toll in this

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>case is the bitest spread, right, the okay, And that's

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you just put that into percentage terms and it's usually

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you put that into the taco because tacobou

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's healthy and delicious. Um. So yeah, that that measure

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>guides us. And in a lot of cases, Uh, a

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>new fund will come out that doesn't have a lot

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of existing people training it. Um, it doesn't have very

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>m good spreads, and so we'll watch it. This is

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>actually a big part of what we do. We actually

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>revisit what funds we purchased on behalf of clients every

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter and so every quarter we can say, oh, there's

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a new fund out here. Um, it has a really

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>good sort of prospective. It's not ready for showtime yet.

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that a taco party? Yes? It is. So you

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>also have this really unique background because you have an

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>expert decent behavioral science. Talk about that. How did you

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>acquire that by being decisive? So quick step back? What

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is behavioral science I mean? And how does it plan

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>to investing was what is that? So a lot of

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the economics and finance profession, when when it was really

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>starting out and starting to get very rigorous and empirical,

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you need to make assumptions about how people behave, and

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the math is a heck of a lot easier if

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you assume people are rational and make good decisions and

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have biases. So for years a lot of models

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>were built up on the idea that on average, you know,

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>people are kind of smart, or they figure things out

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're not making systematic mistakes. I remember, so I

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was a sophomore in college and underground and starting to

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>read some papers about how people made systematic errors and

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>probability or in investing, or how they thought about money,

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and thinking, you know what, this is really interesting. I

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think I could like have a career as an academic

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in it. And then I continue to read and realize

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that like all of my ideas had already been done

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seven years of academics. Um So I realized, actually,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to have some kind of a

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>different career and the idea of actually applying it in

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the real world and saying, okay, people think about money

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>differently than economists. Do they make specific errors? What are that?

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And as there an opportunity to help people have better

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>outcomes if we work with them as real human beings

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than is perfectly rational agents. So that's a large

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>part of it is saying like, how do people actually

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>make decisions if they knew better, how would they make decisions?

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do we close the gap between those? So

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>can I go to an example of this? So and

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody's wondering about this when the next market downturn happens, right,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>or a correction or a bear market, talk about what

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you would do for clients who are scared and want

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to sell everything. I tend to think that a vaccine

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is way better than are here. Um, this is tough.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of the toughest things we've strung with.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Generally speaking, we are boring. We are not here to

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>help you out perform. When we talk to you about things.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We talked to you about goals and whether or not

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you're on track to hit goals and how are you

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>situated today for what you need to achieve in the future.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>If you log onto your betterment account, we don't talk

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about what the market did yesterday. Or the past month,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or really at all. We talked to you about are

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you on track to hit your goals? And where does

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it look like you're going to be in five years?

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And is your portfolio drifted and what should you do

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about that? So the experience of being a Betterment customer

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is very different than going to an online worker site.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that shift of focus from what happened

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>recently to what I need to know about the future

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and what can I change it's a dramatic driver of

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>differences in behavior. So when we use red and green

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on our site, it has nothing to do with what

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the market did and has to do with whether or

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>not you're on track for the future green, or whether

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or not there you need to make some actions to

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>get back on track. I think part of it is

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that we get very smart clients to UM. There's been

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of different pieces of research I've been involved

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with or other people have that clients very strongly self

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>select to something that they that is what they want.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you want gambling and get rich quick, you're

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in some kind of an easy, low cost

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>direct brokerage where you get to come in and buy

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>your apple and sell it and shorten and do all

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.239
<v Speaker 1>these cilienings. Our customers, we don't. We don't have UM.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You you come in and we talked to you about

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>goals and plans and taxes and finance, UM, and we

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>never talked about single stocks. We don't. We don't have

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>anything that shows you in a single stock that you're

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>invested in. So we have customers who that works. We

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>have people who are interested in the long run and

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>planning and making smart decisions, not in short term market

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>timing anything. So I actually I think there's gonna be

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting sort of shift for you know, people

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>ask what's gonna happen to the instus Number one, I

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>don't need to do too much because the customers who

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are our customers are already heading the game. They're already smart,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they know what's going on. We're building interfaces and services

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in a way that helps reinforce that by helping them

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on the future and not the past. And finally,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>there is some elements we actually have been through. I

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think there was a draw down in early Every time

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we have these little I sort of think of them

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>as dress rehearsals for the big thing. We run small

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>experiments about how much do we you know, if we

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.239
<v Speaker 1>do this on our mobile phones, does that help? If

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we do this kind of intervention on the level, how

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>effective is it? You know, like should we use people

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>or should we make it be more anonymous. We're constantly

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>learning and really systematically learning about what works at scale

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for improving behavior. UM, and it works on our client base.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>When you think about that proactivity from your perspective, it's

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>also do in all disaster. I guess from a from

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>an investining same point for an investor, what's the single

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest investment think that people meant there? Oh, it's it's saving.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It is not saving enough and usually in the right way.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>So UM, if you're saving in a taxable cash account

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>before you're saving in your fraual on ky where your

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>employer notches, you're literally missing out on a hundred percent

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>returns immediately in a tax advantage of vehicle. Again, this

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is where I think what we do is incredibly sexy

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>because we help you avoid those mistakes that cost you

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the most money, making sure that you're hitting the company

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>match or that you're using the tax advantage vehicle and

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>which was et cetera. UM. On the other hand, so

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that saving and saving the right amount in

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the right way and for the right things, like, um,

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>how much do I wish that five years ago the

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>future Dan went to like pasted Dan and said, you're

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>going to have a kid. Like you are a married,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine year old guy, You're gonna have a kid.

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Start saving today. That kind of foresight is very valid.

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>People people's biggest mistake is not thinking about their saving

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>in the right way and making it effortful. People like,

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the more that you're not thinking about you're saving it,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it any way. The more good, the better

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be at it. So help me better understand

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>my own brain. And what games do you guys play

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to help me help myself? Sure, I love this because

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of a lot of jobs in life

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>where like when you do good at it, people know.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And actually, in my job, if I'm really good at

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>our clients have no idea that I've kind of like

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Jedi mind tricked now, which is gonna say, I mean tricky,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just that it's it's part and parcel of the experience.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So a good example is the use of color. It's

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not that we don't use color it's that when we

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>use color, we're gonna give you the impression of everything

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>being okay unless it isn't. And red is going to

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>draw your attention into something that you can fix. So

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>if you aren't saving enough, or if your portfolio is

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>drifted and it's something that you need to take care of,

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna show up red when you log in, and

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>our eyes naturally gravitated the contrast, you're gonna be pull

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to that you're gonna spend time and it's like, I've

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>seen this. It's really annoying to have a little red

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pop up on your thing and you want to resolve

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that you hit done with, And the resolution of that

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to be you know, body apple, it's going

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to be figure out how to say it. Twenty more

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>honors a month and you'll be fine. Other elements of

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of making things be interesting or move

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>or attention grabbing that again, you can control the outcome

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of rather than the past. So imagine if you are

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a weather app that kind of showed me what the

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>weather was the past week, you look at it and go,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the dumbest app in the world, And yeah,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what must investing in finance apps, They're like, it

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>used to be worth more, now it's worth less, and

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well thanks, that's not really useful information. So

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our apples focused on you know, we

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a crystal ball, but we're pretty sure this

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is what the future holds, and we're going to give

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you the kind of guidance that you might want to

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>change your route or aut on some more time to

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>your journey. And do you do you have anything to

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>appease somebody who just feels like I gotta sell something

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like is there I think I quality a conference one's

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about this where you get you let them do

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a little something to get out of their system. What's

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that like? Absolutely? So, the way I think about it

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is that you never stop a river. You can redirect it,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you can use a f irrigation, you can use it

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to generate electricity, but you're never gonna be able to

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>stop the river. Um, So you have to take whatever

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of momentum and real underlying emotional issue that they

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have and redirect or make them think about it slightly differently.

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So really a good example, here's an incredibly irrational thing.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>People market time in their taxable accounts more than they

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>do in their tax advantage accounts. So you look at

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>your retirement account and you're like, no, that's long term,

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to touch it. But I'm worried about

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the election. I think the market is going to go down,

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to market time in my taxible account.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>This is incredibly dull, you know, like the market is

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have an equal impact on both those accounts.

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you market time and you're taxable, you're definitely

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up owing taxes. So what we did is

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we bel a future called a tax Impact Preview, and

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what it does is just for taxable accounts, before you

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>go through with an allocation change, it says donal. We

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>find if you want to do this, but you're gonna

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>owe five dollars in taxes common at um. People don't

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>think about taxes when they're trading. It's hard for them

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to calculate it, and they hate them. People really hate taxes.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you throw up a there is a sticker

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>press of five dollars in tax if you go ahead

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>with this um. What we have found is that if

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if that number is more than fifty dollars, if they're

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more than fifty dollars in taxes. There's less

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>than one in ten ten chance that they're going to

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. So give them something else that they hate more.

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Where do they hate more than losing money? They hate

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>paying it to the government apparently. So to bring this

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the ETF, I want to ask you your

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>average customer, do they know that they're actually investing in ETS?

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I would this is the average one does. Yeah, I

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>would guess that they would have a hard time explaining

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to you what how an ETF was different than a

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund and why and so on. But I think

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they have a general understanding that ETS so liquid and

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>low costs and tracking disease, and that's the regular for

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>them to be a message, damn makes your time? Can

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>can we have a taco now? Yeah? I think it's

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>time for a taco? Now. You're making me hungry. It

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was the goal. By the way, they're a taco ETS.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a food and Beverage ETF with the ticker PBJ,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty good. But I don't there's probably some

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>taco company in their baggorite jigger I like Rhoda. I

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>will have to do J that bias. But okay, that's

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>bies he has to outside of that, Jay nug is

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>another j um. That's a good question, Jay Ugg. By

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's probably the most volatile eca from the

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>planet's triple ledgers junior gold miners. I think that's what

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you're using. You're after tax account. Yeah, exactly. Actually, is

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>there like that? Not better than it? Portfolio? What would

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good what would be like the antimatter

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to our portfolio? Yeah, it would be like a triple

0:24:53.240 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>leverage short bigger. Yes. Thanks for listening to Trillions. Until

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>next time. We can find us on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, and a bunch of other

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>places that probably haven't heard about yet. We'd love to

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Baltunas. Trillions is produced by Jordan Bell

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>with help from Magnus Henrickson. Francesca Levy is the head

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg podcast Bye.