WEBVTT - China Sell-Off Is Buying Opportunity: KraneShares CIO

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, Chinese markets are open for

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>trading once against Shanghai, which hadn't traded since the holidays

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>began in January, UH tumbled seven point seven percent, the

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>most since two thousand and fifteen, as the economy virtually

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is shut down because of the coronavirus. To give us

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of how to navigate UH those waters,

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we welcome Brendan A. Hearn, chief investment officer for Crane

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Scharity's based in New York City. Brandan, thanks so much

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. What do you tell clients here as

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it relates to China to Asia in terms of allocating

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>capital there? We saw again a virus, a violent turned

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>down in the Asian markets today, certainly for long term investors,

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we believe obviously the coronavirus is having a very tragic

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>toll from our human on claiming lives. Um. It's going

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a economic impact. UM. That could be in

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the know over the next quarter or so. But but

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we believe it is an opportunity UM that for long

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>term investors, there is an opportunity today. I think they

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>need to be a little careful and where they allocate

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>those investments. But again I think it is an opportunity

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>for those long run investors. All right, So it's an

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for long run investors. Is this a bed on

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>central bank stimulus by the PBOC? No, I mean, I

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>mean certainly the you know, like as we saw during

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the trade war, Uh, China policymakers are going to do

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever they can to support the economy. Increasingly, China's economy

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is a um, a consumer driven economy. So I think,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as we saw last year around the trade war, we're

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot of stimulus to help that

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that side of the economy during this this kind of

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>economic shutdown due to the coronavirus so Brendan, we had

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.639
<v Speaker 1>some news today on that front. Chinese officials are hoping

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that the US will agree to some flexibility on pledges

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>in their Phase one trade deal. Does that suggest to

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you that the virus may be worse than maybe currently

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>being discussed by the government. I think you know, certainly, UM,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the the virus, I mean, I mean people are scared.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean from talking to brokers and and even colleagues

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in both China and Hong Kong, people are are very scared,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>UM and and so there there there is going to

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be an impact. You're just going to limit you know,

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>say you know, we saw it, you know leading up

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Chinese New Year around tourism. You know that

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>big big sites or even movie theaters, you know, if

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Disneyland in Shanghai, you know, people don't want to

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>congregate in big groups. And and that that is going

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a downstream effects because of the China's role

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in in in the global supply chain. Brendan I asked

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this question of Damian Sasaur earlier. There is suspicion that

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the UH, the the government of China basically encouraged national

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>investors UH, particularly those that are beholden to their wishes

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>UM to go in and buy stocks to perhaps save

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the declines that we saw on the initial

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>day of trading. After reopening, uh, in the wake of

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a closure due to the coronavirus? Is that true? How

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>much state sponsored encouraged buying was there? It's difficult to know,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, the the Chinese regulator takes almost

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a paternalistic role in the mainland market due to the

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>high participation rate from individual investors. UM. I do think

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there was activity uh from the quote unquote national team.

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>These are you know, big social security pension plans. The

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>end reality is when the last time we saw the

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>national field basically come come into the market was in

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the summer of when when everything everyone was selling, they

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bought and that ended up being a very profitable trade.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, I don't know. I don't

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna happen tomorrow or in a week, but

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in the it could be in the next month or

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the next quarter. I think those purchases done today and

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably see it again tomorrow. I think there's a

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>very profitable trade. This is you know, bylow cell high

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so Brendan what you know, what do you think the

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>impact the coronavirus will be on GDP for China this

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>year and maybe even into next How does this how

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think this will play out. So Hobey providence

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>plays a very minor role. Uh but but China is

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is taking a very very serious approach. So so it

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to affect it. You know, the cell side

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>analysts are going to start dialing down expectations. It's it's

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>even hard for them because we don't know when the

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus will take it, when things will start to peter out.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>You know. You know, the markets tended to come back

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>during stars uh once once the number of people infected stopped. Um,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're not there yet, so so it's hard to know.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think things stay in a lockdown mode

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>until we see the virus contain and as that becomes

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>stays become potentially weeks, the feasibility of that being months.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to have an economic impact, without question, Brendan,

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Does it worry you at all that we're seeing the

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>U N lose value versus the dollar now exceeding seven

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>u N per dollar? No? Not not. I mean, you know,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the U one you know, post trade deal came down

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>from six twenty down into the six eighties. So um,

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think you know, certainly to me, I

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>personally believe uh interest rate differentials as well as economic

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>conditions determined effects rates. Um. You know, certainly Chinese bond market,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>what a rally yet that had overnight, I mean mass

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>effensive as much as equities were down huge rally in

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the onshore bond market. And then then combine that with

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a weakening in the short run in

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>China's common That explains the weaker you on. Thank you

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so much being with us Brendan and her and chief

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>investment officer of Crane Shares in New York. Well, there

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>is increasing focus on Amazon dot Com as the dominant

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>commerce site, and there's a question about their crackdown or

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>lack thereof on counterfeit items. Joining us now, as Ronnie

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I said Home, managing partner at sat Home Law Group

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in our Interactive Broker Studios, Ronnie, let's just talk first

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>about why you decided to look at this in particular,

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>how big of a problem is it for counterfeit goods

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to be sold on the Amazon dot com platform. First

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>of all, thank you for having me here. I'm looking

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>at it because it's an endemic issue on Amazon dot

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Com and it's sometimes it's quite subtle because the the

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar amount that you're paying for this counterfeit merchandise is

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>similar by maybe five to what you would pay for

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the genuine merchandise. Other times it's not so subtle, but

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>either way, most people are being duped. So is this

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>all products on online market places or is it primarily

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>luxury the high price luxury items. What kind of products

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>are typically susceptible to counterfeiting? Well, I'm very sorry to

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have to announce this on the radio, but it's all

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>products at all price points, from toothpaste to rames items.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>What's Amazon dot COM's role in policing this, because ultimately,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is it their responsibility? Is it the perpetrators responsibility On

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the other side, I think that's a great, great question.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>If you buy something that ends up being counterfeit from Sacks,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Avenue or CBS, you can go back into that

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>store and return it and have a conversation with someone

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>who may be able to assess the product um when

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you return it and give you a refund. Here, no

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>one is really there to help you, and some sellers

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>do not allow you to return items. But in fairness,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot Com is not trying to be a curator

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of retail items. They're trying to be or they aspire.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The sense that I get is they aspire to be

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>UH an online marketplace for many different retailers and sort

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of a common h a common area. So does that

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>change their role? Kind of? Does it make it not

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a good analogy necessarily to say sex with having no

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it really changes my position because if

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>you're in a mall, we have them all right, we

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have them all on Hudson Yards, we have them on

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan Mall's great and New Jersey too. There are malls everywhere.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But by analogy, when you want to rent space to

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>sell your merchandise, there's some kind of vetting process. Provide

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>me with your p n L. Let me see if

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you're incorporated. Someone is caring about who that merchant is.

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Online it's very anonymous. I have no idea who you are.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I can't tell where things are being shipped from

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where they're being manufactured. And Amazon is extremely convenient. You

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just sit or stand, press a button, and voila. Your

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>item is here within a day, sometimes even less. Okay,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a consumer. I realized that the package that

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was just delivered to me is a counterfeit. What are

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>my legal rights. Amazon doesn't have a program that allows

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you to return merchandise, but sometimes those refunds don't come

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. Sometimes people get lazy. I mean,

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying lipstick for twelve dollars, you may not,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, make an attempt to return it. You'll say, oh,

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not worth it. And that happens all the time.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So Amazon, though, they will if you say it's a

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>counterfeit and they agree with you, they will refund your money, right.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not like Amazon's out there to to

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>screw their users, are they. I mean, I can't speak

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for Jeff Bezos. However, I can tell you that their

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that uses Amazon's Choice does lead consumers to buy

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>counterfeit goods. Try it at home today, type in I

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know, uh luxury iPhone case and see what pops up.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a sort of a bigger question underlying a lot

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of what you're saying, which is what is the role

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon dot Com and are they absconding it in

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of being responsible stewards of the modern marketplace? And

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this has been an issue with respect to how they

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>do their own product placement versus others their algorithm that way,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been an issue in terms of how they have

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pushed some competitors out of the market. How does this

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>piece fit into that larger debate. I think it's all

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>part and parcel, uh the same. Amazon is trying to

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>maximize its profits. No one can blame them for that.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the purpose of a for profit company. However, there

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>are many ways you can do so, and one way

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>is educating the consumer. There is consumer loyalty. People may

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's disappeared, but it's there. Amazon is a great,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, example of that. I want to go shopping.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>I think of Amazon consumer loyalty. Get more of it.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Educate your consumers. Tell them this is the usual m

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>s r P of your item. So if you're paying,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll just go back to you know, cosmetics. If you

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>know that that Armani lipstick is supposed to be thirty

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars, don't buy it for twenty dollars here it

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>may not be real. If you want to buy it,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>then you may, but you should at least know what

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you're getting into when you're purchasing the product. Also tell

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>us has this color been discontinued? Perhaps that's why it's

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on sale. I don't know if it would get to twenty.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>It might actually go up to However, educate consumers. Not

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows how much every single item is supposed to cost.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie has set Home, Thanks so much for joining us.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your thoughts there. Ronnie is a managing

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>partner set Home Law Group, joining us here in our

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio giving us something. It's about buying onlines,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>not just Amazon dot Com buying a line in general.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Time to check in with Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined by

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>opinion columnist Noah Feldman was a professor of law at

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Harvard University and also a Bloomberg Opinion columnists based in Boston.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>No thanks so much for joining us. You know, it

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 1>looks like again, as Lisa was suggesting earlier, that this thing,

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this impeaching trial, is pretty much done and dusted. Here,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>let's take the step back and take a thirty thousand

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>foot view. What do you think are some of the

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture takeaways from this whole process. There's a kind

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of glass half full, glass half empty, set of ways

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. You know, the glass half full

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>side is that the president engaged in conduct that's certainly

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the majority of Democrats in the House of Representatives thought

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rose to the the level of impeachment, and they did what

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they were supposed to do. They exercised their constitutional already,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>they impeached him. So that's the good news. The system

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>worked in that in that way. The glass have full side, though,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit outweighed at the moment by the

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>glass half empty perception, which is that many Republicans in

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Senate seemed to be taking the view that even

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if Trump did these things, it nevertheless doesn't count as

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>impeachable under the Constitution. And you know, it's hard to

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>say if they really believe that or if they're just

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that to cover up their desire to, you know,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not to do anything politically bad to Trump. But either way,

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not a great thing for them to be saying,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>because it implies that this kind of conduct, you know,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>cheating in an election, is just okay under our constitutional system,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's not going to bode well for the future.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Professor Veldman, given your work at Harvard when you are

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>clerking for a Supreme Court Justice David's suitor, and beyond

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>how much of a precedent, does this said for future

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>proceedings in terms of what is or in this case

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is not a truly impeachable offense. There's two kinds of president.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about impeachment. There's not a court that

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>can be bound by an earlier decision. So when we

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about president, we're talking about two things. One, we're

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about the kinds of legal arguments that will be

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>made in any future impeachment proceeding. And for sure, if

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump is cleared, whoever's defending a president in future impeachment

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>proceedings will say, look, the Trump impeachment stands for the

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that you can't impeach someone unless there's some kind

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of an actual statutory crime. And then other people who

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>will be able to say, well, says you, but that's

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not really what happened. The other kind of president is

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>will any future House of Representatives even bother to impeach

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a president who's done something that really breaks the constitutional

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>system but doesn't count as a statutory crime. That's the

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of real world political calculus type of precedent. And

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>there it's you know, it's too soon to say, but

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think that any future House of representatives is

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be very, very very cautious about entering into

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>an impeachment under those conditions unless they're prepared to lose,

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>which I suppose the Democrats were in this case. So

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>were you surprised at all of that at the Republicans

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>stood so uniformally behind the president or it was this

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like many people were concerned, kind of preordained. I'm sorry

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that I'm not surprised by it. Um that said,

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I am surprised to see senators saying that this conduct

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't rise to the the level of impeachment. That seems

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to me to be one of the more doubtful things

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're saying. I actually expected them to say, well,

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on the evidence, you know, maybe we just can't prove this,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and anyway, the president denies that. I expected a more

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fact based defense. Even even again, even if it was hypocritical,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that just sounded more plausible to me than saying, well,

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't rise the level of impeachment. And it also,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the saying that it doesn't rise to the

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>level of impeachment has a much worse effect in the

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>long run, because it implies that they think this kind

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of conduct is fine. Can you de grade Justice roberts

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>performance in this I think he did excellently. Um. You know,

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>his predecessor, Chief Justice Rank Whist, who actually, interestingly Roberts

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>also was a law clerk for many years ago, famously

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>said after the Continent impeachment trial, I did nothing in particular,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and I did it very well. And I think that's

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what Roberts was aiming for. And I would give him

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>an a for doing nothing in particular and doing it

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>very well. So very well. Um. So the Constitution as

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it relates to impeachment, has that been kind of neutered

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it to some extent? I would say yes, you know,

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think if the vote goes the way

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we expected to, that really weakens the idea that the

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>impeachment is there to help protect us against the president

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>who does things to cheat in an election that don't

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily count a statutory crimes. And I would expect that

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>future presidents are likely to be willing to take that risk.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hope it's not that way. I hope

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>future presidents say, well, you know, look, I mean Donald

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump got impeached and that goes on his historical record,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and it looked bad and a lot of that, to

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be blunt, is going to depend on what happens in

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the next election. If Trump is re elected, people I

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>think will feel very few qualms in the future about

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and what he did. If he's not re elected, there

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>might be some second thoughts. Professor Feldman, thank you so

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.719
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Noah Feldman, Professor of Law

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard University, also a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. Uh tons

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of experience both in the legal and beyond worlds, having

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>clerked for Justice suitor joining us from Boston, Massachusetts. Well

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>coming into if you can rewind all the way back

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to January nine, it was going to be the year

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Big Unicorn I p O lift Uber we

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>work it didn't quite turn out that successfully for public

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>equity investors. To get a sense of kind of what

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we should be learning from some of those lessons, we

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome Vincent w R. He has a global macro strategist

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for I N T l F C Stone based in

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, but joining us here on a Bloomberg and

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Director Brooker Studio. So Vincent, thanks so much for joining

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>us again. As we think back, put our rear view mirror,

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>take look at the rear view mirror. We see uber,

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we see lift, we see smile direct. A lot of

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>these companies raised a lot of money at a certain valuation.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>They come to the public markets, they don't get that valuation.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the takeaways that that that you've

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>seen in your work? Well, I mean it's almost a

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>mirror opposite of what happened in two thousand when you

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>know you had these exuberant public markets. Today it seems

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to me that the the exuberances on the private markets

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and the public markets are bringing some form of discipline.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was reading about Gasper trying to ip

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you and a lot of these companies cannot get the

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>valuations that they got in in private markets. And the

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>effect that this has had is that, um, there's no exit. Um.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So now you you have this backlog of unicorns that

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are burning gachet of the high rates, and the big exit,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, a big stuff bank cash infusion

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>or a big I p O is is no longer

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>going going to happen. So you have this idea that

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>actually the bust of these unicorns, the myth of the unicorns,

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be reflationary. Can you explain the connection there,

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>especially on a day what I should just know, we

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>just gotta headline on the w t I prices fell

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>below fifty barrel UH for the first time in more

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>than a year, so we have that kind of pressure

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, right, Um, So I think first we need

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand how it was deflationary in the first place.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, following the away crisis you had, this UH

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand was a genuinely deflationary shock yelks flattened rates

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>when negative or the world. And what it did is

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that it directed a flood of money into venture capital

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and private equity, which certainly became seen as a silver

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>bullet that would allow endowment institutions to achieve the return targets.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And it was a very small asset class with not

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that many great ideas, but the money got invested with

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the mandate to achieve growth at any cost, kind of

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon model. Right. Amazon never turned the profit in

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the first nine years of its existence. So the way

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>most of these many of these companies did that was

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>by by sending your dollar for ninety cents um and

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the consumer oriented unicorns were built on

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that model. Let me achieve scale and then I'll worry

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>about profits later. So effectively, all these companies were subsidizing customers.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the example, of course, is we work lift uber

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and UM. The more they grew, the more money they lost.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and as long as the money kept going in

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the loop would keep going. But without this constant in

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>flats of money, I mean, you will have to raise prices.

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've taken an uber lately, but

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll notice that the prices have gone up significantly from

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>last year. And you've seen certainly a lot of a

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of these unicorns come back and say, well it

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>will be profitable at will be profitable, while how A

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You're going to achieve that by raising prices. So the

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>reflation trade, which is one of the trades we certainly

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>heard about when people strategies are talking about opportunities and

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, reflation trade small caps, we're obviously we're not

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>saying Lisa mentioned you know you've got oil uh w

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>t I dip below fifty dollars or barrel just a

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>few minutes ago. First time in a year, we've got

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>an inverted yield curve. What do you think are the

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>conditions that need to develop for that reflation trade to

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>really start to develop. What I think it was trying

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen between you know, November December, you had a

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>good strength and copper prices you so value do well

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. It was all the trade, he hoped. I

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>think we had this perfect setup for it, and then

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of course the coronavirus has thrown a big wrench into it.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, obviously I'm not a I can't really talking

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>too intently about the coronavirus. But maybe let's let's step

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit and think of what it means.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, either if it's really I think if if

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it turns off, we'll go back to where we were before,

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>where you know, kind of global synchronized, we cover trade peace.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And if it's bad, I mean, you end up basically,

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, shutting down the factory of the world. I mean,

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to me down the line, that will be an inflationary event. Uh.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And and the last part I would say that people

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>probably should think about is how is that going to

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>change a policy response in China. In part of the

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>issue with the reflasion trade was a lack of Chinese stimulus.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe that is in a weird way that that

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the trigger for that. You know, there there's

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a question is it going to be reflationary in a

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>positive sense where you end up with more growth that

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>defend has been trying for and failing to get. Or

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be stagflationary with prices being raised

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>at the time when higher bond prices might mean a

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>collapse in the stock market, etcetera, etcetera. Play out your

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenario. So which is it could be more likely? Well,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I think at the beginning of the market

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>would obviously welcome some inflation, especially in the regions like

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe in Japan, But eventually my thesis was a lot

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we treated we mistook, and uh,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>there is no productivity improvement in the uniquorn segment of

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. So that would be more actually inflation story

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stack flation ry than it would be a positive shock

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>over the long term. One of the interesting things just

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Davos was the I don't know, listen,

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>who was the person that the boom bust cycle is over?

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Bob Princes, Yeah, Bridge Water, I know you brought up

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>many times. It's interesting do you think that has values?

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Has the FED taken that dynamic out of the marketplace.

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think again, as long as you don't have

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>inflation and the bab Princes comment makes sense, right. I

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>mean if the FED is, if central banks are freed

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>from their price stability mandate, they can pursue other mandates

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like you know, rising asset prices or the ripple market

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that suddenly their hands become free to do anything, any

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>anything that they want. If you get inflasion back, which

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>is my case, then know the boom bust cycle. It's

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not over, it's just been postponed. Vincent Louire, thank you

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us, global macro strategist of

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I N T L F C Stone based in San Francisco,

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>but joining us here in our interactive broker studios. We

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you being with us. Thanks for listening to

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa abram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramo

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio,