WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2019: Hicks Has Torn UCL, Trade Tuesday | Fantasy BFFs, Ep. 453

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Yeah right now,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's welcome you bab Hap your host by Babe from

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Fie god brob say, Francis Pranice, start a ball, ladies

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, your BF and with that we will get

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you inside Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. That

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is Frank Stamford. I am Greg Sousman. Frank Gregy. Happy Tuesday,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>man Um, big day. I gotta find out what happened

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in kickball last night for you, Greg. But first, how

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>did you sleep? I slept well, I had Uh. It

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>was very tired. It's very tired. I woke up this morning.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I woke up to the big thunder story I was

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>going on outside. I didn't hear anything, and uh, I

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Very tired this morning for some reason. Yeah,

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's because you played your heart out on the on

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the kickball field. I didn't play my heart at we

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>one our opening opener last night. Look at this guy.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>We won nine nothing, so it was nice. Um, I was,

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was playing hard obviously, bunch of got

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on immediately to lead off the game. I went first

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the third on a single slid in the third, then

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>slid in a home a little bit later after that,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>so it was well. I played well. I had wins

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>last night. Do you play on an actual baseball field,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>so that's why you're out there sliding? Do you wear

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>baseball pants to play kickball? Short slide with shorts? It

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't playing on sliding, but the play called first slide.

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope you at least wear like no leggings or

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>long socks or something. Swore shorts. Might My NY's a

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>little bruised up right now. If you slide correctly in shorts,

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>your legs should be destroyed right now. Yeah, it doesn't

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>look too good. Yeah, I mean I wasn't, but I

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>would imagine it's even worse than that. If you're if

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the correct list. There's head first slide listen.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't say anybody else really slot really slid last night.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>But I honestly, your instincts just take over, you know

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, That's what it was. My instinct took over.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I needed to beat a beat a play. The ball

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>was coming in from left field. I was coming to

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the third base and I slid. The guy stepped on

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the base and he's like, you're out? Do you know

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the rules? He kidding me. So you're probably regarded as

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like the go hard guy. Yeah, well, if I played

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>against you, i'd probably hate No, no, no, no no, I'm

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not that guy. Okay, that's Jeff. Oh all right, now

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably hate him. Oh you it's despising I played

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>against him. That's Jeff. All right. Oh well, there's a

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on in a fancy baseball last night,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>even though we only had seven games or whatever. Yeah, Bud,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you happened last night. A bunch of bud you happened

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>last night. So let's get into it, and let's actually

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>start with what we spent a lot of time on yesterday,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was the fact that Jordan Hicks is hitting

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the I l and now we know it's toward UCL

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so he is out for the years. He's gonna have

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John Serge, who we expect. But the question that

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we had yesterday was who is going to be the closer.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's the guy that you have to make sure you

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>go and pick up well. John Masiliak and Jim Boonen

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about this in Serious Sex It will Be Network

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and Mosiliak said this old last night and this

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>morning was that he could have kept pitching, but given

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's, you know, an elite young athlete

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that does something that is very rare, as hard as

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>he throws, It's just something that they felt like was

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a precautionary and smart move. But I was also when

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to our trainer this morning, he told

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>me that he would like to at least see how

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>he feels today before looking at what the week might hold.

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>In terms of Mr Gatt, you know right now, I mean,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he's been probably our biggest asset in the bullpen, so

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>moving him into the rotation, I think I'd have to

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>twist a lot of arms to get anybody even listen,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure they'd be all that open minded

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to it. But you know, clearly a talented young man,

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>honestly probably one of the best athletes on our team,

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and for a pitching standpoint, he's just very aggressive and

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>making the most of it. Does he slide into that

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Hicks role? Until you have more information on Hicks, Oh,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I would think so. Yeah. I mean he's he's finished

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>stamps for us in the past and we have a

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of confidence in all right, So there you go.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That was once again from ELK Radio, Jim Bowden talking

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to John Aziliak, the general manager or the St. Louis Cardinals.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>They talked about John gamp moving into the rotation and

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>talk to him about maybe going in the closing role.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we know when we'll have this with the Mets

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in the second about how the general manager and the

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>baseball os department has influence over what used to be

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the manager's decisions, and the confidence brimming from Aziliak saying that,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, he's gonna slide into the Hicks role. Very interesting. Yeah,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's pretty much what we were saying yesterday. Greg.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you speculated with Carlos Martinez. I think it's

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>still fair to speculate. Carlos Martinez because last year with

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Schield as the manager of the St. Louis Cardinals,

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>we saw Carlos Martinez take over as the closer late

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the season. But you hear it from the mouth

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the general manager himself, and it sounds like John

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Gant is the guy. So that's what I tweeted out yesterday.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he should be must own right now.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Cardinals are still right in the

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>thick of things in the National League Central so maybe

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>they go out and make a trade for someone Ken

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Giles or you know, someone like that, and Alex column

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>A perhaps, but um, as of now, it's like it's

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be John Gann maybe the you know, working and

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Miller with matchups or whatever. I will say this

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>last night, and this is Laurie I was leaning. Was

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Rick Hommeil was post dispatch says he expects Carlos Martinez

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy. Now. That wasn't Sean Moziliak talking

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Shilt the manager talking. That was a beat reporter.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see in the first closing opportunity, hopefully tonight

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for St. Louis, who comes in in that ninth inning

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>could be mixing matching, but as of now, it's gonna

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be one of these two guys. I think, yeah, I

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>would again, I would lean with I would leave with Gan.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the guy, all right. So John Gant

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is the guy for now in St. Louis. I was

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>last night, Frank, But I do you want to make

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>an aspect. I'm excited about it. George Springer, who's missed

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.559
<v Speaker 1>about a monk with a severe hamstring strain. He's back

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>activated off the i L this morning. He will be

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the starting lineup for Houston tonight as the Astros

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to get healthy. Colin m Q was also activated

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>off of the i L earlier this morning, and he

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>hasn't seen To get Springer back into your lineup, no,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they they kept him out for a long time.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I think of you know, they were they were really

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>safe about how they played this with George Springer. Look,

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>if he's active, he's in my lineup. Uh the Astros

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't play last night. So if you play in weekly

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>leagues where you can adjust them up until that team plays,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I would get George Springer in my weekly lineup. I

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>would obviously get him in my uh my daily lineup

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. Greg, what does this mean for the rest

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Houston Astros. I think it means, you know,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker's still not coming anytime soon for people that

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are stashing him, But that probably means less playing time

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for like, I guess those fringey guys, right, Ny Camp,

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Jake mri is that guys like that correct? Because you

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>know every day Michael Branlely is gonna play. You know

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>every day You're Sprcker is gonna play, and you know,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, John Redick shouldna play, um and

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you're also gonna have your on Albros DH every day.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's who's left, right Like that ultimately becomes the

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>question what playing time do you have for the Marisnicks

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world, for the Tony Camps, for the Josh

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Reddick potentially, Springer's gonna play every day, Branley is gonna

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>play every day. Wait's hitting, You're done, You're done. Alvarez

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna play every day. So it's what's left scrap heat,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But you're you surprised that they haven't called up Kyle Tucker,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>especially with Springer being out as long as he was.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're still playing Tyler White at first base.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>And I know he hit a grand Slam against the

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Yankees on Sunday, but for the most part, he has

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>not been good this year. Me personally, I I feel

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>like they should either use your Don Alvarez at first

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>base or maybe even a Reddick or you know, try

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and get Kyle Tucker up into their lineup. I just

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>find it weird that they haven't really given him an opportunity,

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>unless you think that they're holding out for potential trade

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>at the deadline, right like if they need another arm

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>as Kyle Tucker part of that move something like that. Well,

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's something them calling him up because

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to showcase him potentially in the major leagues. Um,

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but I thought that. I just think there wasn't enough

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>spot a spot for him, Not that you can't create

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a spot, but like they like guys like Tony Camp,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Jake more Is, it has been on this team forever.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So I know as fantasy owners, we want to disregard

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>these team oriented guys, these fringe guys. The Astros did it,

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and you're Alan Alvarez forced his way into the lineup

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and all he's done his hit Kyle Tucker had the

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>same shot. Don't forget that that you were not Alvarez

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>at last year he didn't perform. And I know they're

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>not writing Kyle Tucker off after a month's worth of games,

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but that that kind of needs the truth. So I

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know that Kyle Tucker's coming up any times soon.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know either. I don't know because

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's I thought they would have done it.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, with the George Springer injury going down, we're

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>speculating that at the time. I don't know what's gonna

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>happen here. I guess you know they're not. They're not

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>rushing to get back up. You're right. I mean, they

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gave him a chance. Last year. He played twenty games

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the majors. Obviously, you know, twenty games of super

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>small sample size. This isn't completely indicative of the player

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be at the major league level. But he

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>only hit one forty one with a four thirty nine

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>OPS last year in those twenty eight games. But you know,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker got off to the slow start. This year,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he has he has righted the ship. He's sitting two

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>eighty one at triple A with twenty three home runs

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen stolen bases. So he's he's absolutely turned it

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on in the month, in the months of May and June,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I just find it really really surprising that the Astroids

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't given him a shot. Absolutely, and Kyle Tucker not

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up, I believe anytime soon. Imagine the Mets and

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned their issues off the field. Right after getting

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>away from the controversy with the press, it comes out

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that Broodie van Wagon and thought there was a hip

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>issue with Jacob Degram and basically called into the cubhouse

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when they were in Arizona, saying pull Jacob Degram right now,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and he Callaway said okay, and he did. The Mets,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>as they tend to be every June or so, a

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a dumpster fire, the New York mess that

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>many many New York teams, But right now it's the Mets,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's one thing after another. I'm actually very surprised

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that he still has a job, Mickey Callaway in all honesty,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and that really surprises me. Um, but he does. And

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Mets once again last night. Joe Girardi, Joe Girardi

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>is a lock to the Mets. Isn't that great? No,

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna happen. No way. Where do you think

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe Girardi ends up next Hubs? Cubs? So you don't

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>think they're bringing back to Madden after this contract which

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ends at the end of the season. I do not

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>think so. I mean, Joe Madden is gonna get a

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>job somewhere if he wants it. He wants it. You

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think you want you don't you think he's done

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I think you can see Joe Madden

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>want to just like Joe Maddens Corps used to say,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it is about Joe Maddie. He loves to hear himself talk.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>He just goes and hears himself talk commentary somewhere broadcasting career. Yeah,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>if if he doesn't want it, Like to me, Joe

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Girardi could have had the Nationals job. I think he

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>could have had a Hardinal's job. And I think that

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he What else would he be

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>waiting for because those are two pretty good jobs, you think?

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So to me, the Mets are out there and the

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Giants are out there. Do you want to go to

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco? I don't think so he's a more a

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Midwest guy. He's a comes guy man. Like to me,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a match made in heaven. Maybe he's a couple

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of manager next year. All right, well we'll see what happens. Yeah,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I look, I can't disagree with you when it comes

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Mets. It's just we're here in New York,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so we we see it a lot more. We hear

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it a lot more. We see it in the tabloids too.

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just they can't get out of their own way

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's like it's one step forward, two steps

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>back for the Mets. And you know, it doesn't help

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that obviously they're losing games. We know that, like a

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of organizations are now run by like their front office,

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>their their baseball operations. I mean, we joke about it

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the year that, uh, Aaron Boone isn't

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the one making the line up for the Yankees, that

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's coming from above him, Brian Cashman. So that was

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>one of them, and that was one of the reasons.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember that the Yankees moved on because they wanted a

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>major influence over the manager, over the lineups. Over overall, thet.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Girardi was not leting that happen and they complain whatever

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. And part of that blame came on his

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Gary Sanchez and the way he treated Gary

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Sanchez and some of these other younger players that he

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't relate to them as well as some of the

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>older players. And there is something to be said that

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you needed a new voice, that that voice has been

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Yankees organization for ten years. It was just

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>time for something new. And I think Girardi needs to

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere where he is that new voice, where his

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>old school he ways will work for a lot of

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>these teams going with younger managers, first time managers that

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>want the influence or that will get the influence from

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the front office. The Dodgers, the Rays, the Phillies come

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to mind. They can't hire Joe Girardi anymore. Joe Girardi

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is I don't want to say a dying breed, but

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he's old school and not every organization wants an old

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>school type manager. But he does have some analytics in

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that binder of his creed. We know that whatever you

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>wanna call that. Yeah, I mean he'd probably fit in

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>well with the Cubs. I mean a lot of those

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>guys are you know, veteran esque players. They've been around

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for a while. So we'll see what happens. It's all speculation.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens with Joe Girardi if he even

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to manage again. He's doing a pretty good job

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on the MLB network, you see him there all the time.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, well we'll see what happens. And I think,

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the for the Mets, Greg do you think,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why does if Brodie van Wagen even did that, right,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>why does he do that? Is because like they signed

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacob de Graham to the extension, like they don't want

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>him to hurt himself. All those things come to mind,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but to me, to me, it also says you just

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>don't trust your manager, which is another issue entirely exactly.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>The Mets manager last night let his team to a

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>defeat at the hands of Philadelphia Phillies. They lost thirteen

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and seven. It was bombs away last night in Philadelphia.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Maths and Zach Ethlyn were just allowing home run

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>after home run and double after double. That's allowed seven

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>runs in over four innings of work, ten hits or

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he walks in a strike amp. Zach Ethlyn allowed actually

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>more hits eleven hits in his five things x runs

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and four strikers also left three home runs six home

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>runs combine between the two starters. I watched a lot

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of this game, and it was disgusting, disgusting affair. Ultimately,

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Phillies put up thirteen runs to mentionally put up seven.

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>They fell out a thirty seven. Two Phillies approved to

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>forty and thirty eight. Yeah, I mean it wasn't a

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>disgusting affair. If you had the over in this game, great,

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that looks really good right now. But yeah, Stephen Matts,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he's droppable in twelve team leagues. Maybe you

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hold on to him in deeper formats. You can stream

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>him in the right spot. But he walks too many guys.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't get enough swinging strikes to mitigate that. Uh,

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he's giving up a ton of home runs this yere.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>His home runs per nine are up over two so

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>far this season, which is like the third highest among

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers. Zack Flynn. Look, I spoke about him last

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>week or two weeks ago as a potential sell high

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>candidate because I think some regression is coming. I think

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see some of that regression right now.

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Five innings, eleven hits, six earned runs. Last night for

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>zach Eflyn, I didn't want to talk about some of

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>these Phillies hitters. Greg, your boys he's are Hernandez. I

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hope you kept them around. I did, because multi hit

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>games in four straight now with the batting average up

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to two eighty. Uh. And if you remember last week

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>when you asked me him or come on Visio, I said,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>let's keep sees her nand Is around for a few

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>more days. See if you could turn around if he doesn't,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you can look into dropping him. So good thing.

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Good bye you for not dropping sees on her Nas.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that makes a lot of sense for

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone else out there who plays, uh you know, end

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Points Seas or O B p Leagues, because that's where

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>she's our her name is is at his best, great Gett,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they're stolen basement cays over last night his fifth of

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the year. Scott Kingary still his fourth of the year.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So many home runs were hit. Reese Hoskin has made

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a seventeen that's actually infuriated. We flew out like the

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>warning track. Uh. Later on in the day. Jay Bruce

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>has been great, Jean Sigura as well. Over to the Mets,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd Fraser has been very, very hot. I know you've

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>spoken about that before, and we actually picked up Todd Fraser.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>We dropped Todd Frasier. But the average off to seventy

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>one now for Fraser, O BP is three fifty eight.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He's got two hits in each of his last three games.

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got a home run and three out of his

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>last five. He's hot, Yeah, he is. He's actually sacrificing

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the power this year in order

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to make more contact. That's why you see the batting

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>average up to two seven one on the year. Shout

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>out to Matt Modiki yesterday he said pay attended to

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Todd Fraser, who was hot. Adimo right on the head

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Todd Fraser ding ding last night. We'll take a break.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. We hit up the other New

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>York teams New York Yankees who home over the seven

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>consecutive game last night. Break that down. Give me the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>call from John Sterling. Next Daily Rodo dot Com learned

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimized

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>heer in minutes, build an optimized line up for cash

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>games and tourneys learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Joined Daily Roado dot Com Fantasy Sports Today with Craig Mish.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Dickerson had some pop and some speed when he was

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with San Diego. Would never really worked out, really worked

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>out with him with the Giants. I don't know, but

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Dubber was just so poor. He was not playing well

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. That was one of my sleepers going into

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the year. I thought, this is twenty steals to fifty,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>not even coming close, and doesn't look like a major

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>league player either. So maybe takers and takes the ball

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and runs with it. Week days noon to two pm. E.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Stern on the f A T. S Y Sports networking

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on your popular podcast Providers Money Now one hundred is

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>not a lender, broker or agent of any lender or

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor. We do not make loans or credit decisions.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You must be eighteen years or older and a US

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>resident to qualified. This is not an offer or solicitation

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to lend. I went to money Now one hundred dot

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>com and got the five thousand dollars I needed deposited

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in my account the next business day. If you need

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>money for any reason, help is here. Got the money

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred dot com and get the money you need.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Need to pay off credit card debt, go to money

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred dot com. Need your car repair, need

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>home improvement? Money? Visit money now one hundred dot com.

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>If you need fast cash for any reason, go to

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>money Now one hundred dot com. Good, bad, or no

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>credit at all. Go to money Now one hundred dot com.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>You could get up to five thousand dollars as soon

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as the next business day. Go to money Now one

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com on your phone, tablet, or computer. Type

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in the address bar money now one hundred dot com.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>That's money Now the number one hundred dot com. COO.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Moving on here on the BFFs. I wanted to do

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>actually before we continued on Bryce Harper last night when

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>two or five had a couple of doubles, I believe

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>or the yeah, a couple of doubles. That's right, I

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>so long they're really really far hit Gee Scarrow went

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>four for six with color unscored in a couple of

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>rv is. Both these players Franks need to be heating up. Yeah,

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I did just want to mention these guys real quick.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean Bryce Harper so far to see, he's in

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike rate is a career worst fifteen point

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one percent. His strikeout rate is a career worst twenty

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>seven point six percent. If he gets those down to

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>his career marks, guess that strike out right down to

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>his career you two percent? Then you know, right now

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he's hovering around a two fifty batting average. But I

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think that would climb up to, you know, the two

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight range if you if you cut your strikeout

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>rate by six seven percent, it can actually influence your

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>batting average that much. So if you could still buy

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>low on Bryce Harper, I don't know if you can,

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>because he started to heat up a little bit in June. Uh,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I would look into doing. And then

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for Jean Sigura, Greggy four hits last night, as you mentioned,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>batting averages up to two seventy seven, the babbit is

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>two nineties six. Yet over the past three seasons that

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the lowest his bab was throughout that stretch was three.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>The lowest batting average was during that stretch was three hundred.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, you know, Jean Siagara another one

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. I think a lot of these Phillies

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are gonna start to come around as the weather continues

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to heat up. It's gonna be very very hot this

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>week here in the Northeast as well, So I think

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're starting to see some of these balls

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>flying out even more than they were before. I mean,

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so many home runs hit last night, so many runs

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>scored in that Phillies Mets game. Uh and and with

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Jean Siagura, you know, kind of somewhat struggling to start

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the year, still on pace for sixteen home runs, runs scored,

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>uh sixties, seven RBI, ten stolen basis. So for anyone

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>who out out there who was questioning the stolen basis

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Gregg and the Gave Kapitler philosophy and the Philadelphia Phillies,

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you might have hit this one on the head.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Jean Segura is gonna steal many

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>more basis this year, but the fact that he's been

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>batting anywhere from like two to five in the lineup,

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you might see an increase in the county stats and

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>runs in RBI, so hopefully he can make up for that.

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, admittedly I was hoping that he could

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere from like fifteen home runs twenty stolen basis.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>It's looking doubtful that he gets a twenty stolen basis

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>greg which sport was part of his value here of

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>course during draft season was those twenty stone based expectations.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>It does not look like Jesusur was going to get there,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>at least with this philosophy here, with gave Kavler and

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the run that he seems to be on. I mentioned

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>going in the Yankees last night. Uh, they defeated the

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Grogo Blue Jays by the score was tending to eight.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>It was much closer. That score was much closer than

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the game probably was. Johnathan Holder allowed of five runs

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in the eighth or all this. Chapman allowed one of

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the night. But the Yankees homer for the twenty seventh

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>consecutive game that he's tied for the MLB records of

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the most with the two thousand and two Texas Rangers,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and their first blast was a no doubter by Arrant

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Hicks for the fifth homer of the year. I was

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>shot to the abatting third and he came through with

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that massive blast. The second one was also massive, three

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>run shot. It was Jean Carlos Stanton's first of the

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>season and that sounded like this, well, Greg, I thank you,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hit of the year in the left center and hit

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>us high, hit us far is god, Oh what a

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>home run over the loading dog end of the crowd.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Jean Carlo hits his first home run of the year.

0:22:54.200 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Gian Carlo and luci Poscarlow, here's a three year run

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>home run. And that of course courtesy John Sterling is

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>calling Yankees Radio Network. Now. CC Sabathia for the Yankee

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>six and six hits two runs, sure got nine here

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>walking to so now that he's never gonna go super

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>deep into games, you know you're only gonna get five

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or six innings. But the r A for Sabathias sits

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at four point zero four. In the American League, pitching

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is always tough to come by. What do you think

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about ccs Bathia from a fantasy baseball perspective, I think

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of smoking mirrors. But to be fair.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Over the past three seasons, he's been able to out

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>pitch his peripherals. He's doing his best Marco Estrada impersonation.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>That seems to always be the guy that I go

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to for someone that can sustain pitching much better than

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>their e r A indicators for a long period of time. Again,

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>each of the past three years, heading into this season,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>see Sabathia had a three point nine one e r

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>A or less. Last year he had at three point

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>six five e r A over a hundred and fifty

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>three innings. That's very useful actually for fantasy baseball. Although

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>his you know, his EXFIT was four point three zero,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>his SIERRA was four point two four. So a lot

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of the r A indicators say that he is pitching

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot better than than he actually should be. And

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the case so far this year as well.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he gets the r A down to four

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>point zero four. It is his final season. Um, he's

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>getting more strikeouts this year. You know, he uses a

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of those breaking pitches, more of the cutter, the slider.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you can use him in the right spot.

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he probably should be owning fifteen team leagues

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you pick him up in a twelve

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>team league for for a two start week something like that.

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But most of the time, I'm not gonna feel great

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>about CC Sabatia because again, Greg, like you said, he's

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna go deep into games. It's hard, contact is

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really high, and the ERA A indicators say that he's

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>pitching over his head. So um me, personally, I would

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>probably try and go in a different direction. You know,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I probably still use him over a guy like Stephen Matts,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Matt has been really bad. Like if I'm just

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>choosing between those two. So you probably owned Sabathia end

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>paper leagues A only obviously, but twelve teamers, he probably

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be owned, Greg, Right, So ccs Matthy in a

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve teamer we're gonna leave him out there. We're gonna

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>leave him on the bench or on the waiver wire

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>around the Chapman picked up his twenty second save on

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the season. Um Aaron Sanchez seven runs aloud, he could

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>He's certainly come back down to Earth's very propable. Absolutely

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with that. Lotus Garielle tenth homer of the year.

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Galvis his twelfth as long let's go along with

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>his third stolen base. I saw Scott Pianski twee abt

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Eric Sogard today, so Gard had his sixth steel of

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the season. That an't leadoff. He's bet even three or

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>six with a three seventy six on base percentage. But

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's Eric Sogard, much like earlier in the season

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>where it was Tommy Lostella something like that, nobody wants

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>them myself very much included. Am I making a mistake?

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He should be owning deeper leagues? And I don't know

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's a must owned player in twelve team league

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>because again you know there is some speculation skepticism here

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Eric Sogard. I mean, this is

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the thirty three year old journeyman who has been like

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>our utility infielder for most of his career, and all

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, he has eight home runs, six stolen bases,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>he's banning three oh six, He's got an eight seventy

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>nine o p s. His previous career high for an

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>entire season was seven seventy back in seventeen. So I

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>understand it's the juice ball this year, which can make

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>almost anyone look good. Um, and he's doing some nice things.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the hard contact raid is up this year,

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting more fly balls, and he's leading off for

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a solid Toronto Blue Jay's lineup. So you know, in

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues, anything deeper than twelve teams, again, Greg, you know,

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>even if you start a middle infielder, you know, a

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>corner infielder, he has positional versatility. I still would imagine

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's someone better out there on waivers. So personally,

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he should be owning twelve teamers. But

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in anything deeper than that, like a fifteen team mix

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>or or only, then yeah, for sure he should be

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>owned a right. So as long as he's playing, as

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 1>long as he's playing every single day, you gotta make

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>sure Eric Sogard he's in a lot of he has

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>been right like he has been in there, which means

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>he's probably worth the pickup. Don't ignore the old um,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the old veterans that you don't expect. I think you

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>could put Freddy Gallvis in that category. Yes, absolutely. I

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>picked him up in the main event and look what

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I got last night. I got a Grand Slam in

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a stolen base. That's I mean, that makes him for

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole week. I you know, if Freddy Galvis didn't

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>do anything for the rest of the week, the fact

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that he gave me a grand slam in a stolen

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>base in the same game, that that's awesome. And again,

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know it's you lose Trevor's story. You lose some

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>middle infielders, and and and you know, in these deeper

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>leagues you find a soguard of Freddy Galvis. They're performing

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>well right now. He's probably keeping shortstop hot for you know,

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Bobachette later on in the season. I would imagine, you know,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year, we probably see Bobachette once

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>he's completely healthy. He's still kind of working his way

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>back from that broken hand injury. The power hasn't necessarily

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>come around yet again for Bobashette, but he's been hitting

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>well in the minors. Have been paying attention to him,

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>stashing him in I believe, to leagues right now. So

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I got my eye on Bobichette for the future. But

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>as of now, again, hitting in the middle of that lineup,

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>or in Eric Sogard's case, the top of that lineup,

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you lose some middle infielders. I think these guys are serviceable,

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>at least in deeper leagues. Alright, so the old ugly

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>guys serviceable. That's the best way to describe it. That's fair,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Perfect. All right, Let's continue on here, and

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>let's get to Cleveland. Who screwed up my best bet

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>last night against Lucas Giolito? As Greg Boston wanted to

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Boston rather Red the whole thing. Whatever, Boston screwed up

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>my best fat against Lucas? Did you ever did you

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ever mix up teams? Greg, because of the colors being

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>too similar? For me? When I was doing it was

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>always would always mix up the Brewers and the Padres. Right,

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's like the early to mid two thousand's, they

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>both just wore like navy blue with like a hint

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of gold like some silver. Like these two teams logos

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are way too similar. I always used to mix up

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers. I never I never really did that. When

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you say those colors, that reminds me of the Jeremy Burnitz,

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Jeremy Burnitz reason why. But anyway, the Red Sox

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>defeat of the White Sox six to five ISA where

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Rodrigez against Lucas Giolito, uh Rodriguez six of the third,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>five urned runs, allowed six hits, four ks, Gilto just

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>misses out in the quality start. He did walk four

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>batters yesterday, though Frank three runs, allowed six hits seven kis.

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>On the evening, it was the bullpen for the White

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Sox that blew it as Kevin Herrera and Jace Fry

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like down Brendan Workman and proved three seven and one

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on the year, getting just one out via the strike

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at five pitches and for a win that will work

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>out just fine. Home runs by Mookie Betts Jackie Bradley Jr.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>On the Red Sox side. It was bets His thirteen

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>whole run over the year. For jb J He's eighth.

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Jose Bree went deep for the

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth time this year, while you on Muncata went deep

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the thirteenth the time this season. Grey, I really

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hit on the pitching here. I'm gonna start

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with Lucas Gilito first. He went on a eight starts

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:05.239
<v Speaker 1>stretch from May second to June eighth, where he had

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a ten point five four k per nine at one

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>point nine two walks per nine zero point three to

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>home runs per nine, and that was really that stretch

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that really opened everyone's eyes when it came to Lucas Gilito.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Over his past three starts, Greg, mind you, he's faced

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox, Cubs, and Yankees. He's got a twelve

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>point three eight k per nine, So the strike outs

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>are up, the walks are way up. So I did

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>want to address this right so again that eight starts stretch,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the walks were one point nine walks per nine. Over

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>his last three starts, it's six point one nine walks

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>per nine, four Gilta with two point eight one home

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>runs per nine. But I think it's worth mentioning that

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox, Cubs, and Yankees are all three of

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the top four teams in terms of walk percentage against

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>right handed pitchers this year. So I understand you. You

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we we kind of wanted to elevate Gelito into that

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>start him against anyone tier. And I still do like

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Glito a lot, still getting a ton of swinging

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>strikes and getting a ton of strikeouts, but I think

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that he's gone up against three of

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the best offenses in baseball in terms of plate discipline.

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And the ability to hit home runs. And I think

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why you see some of the struggles here. If

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone in your league is freaking out about Lucas Gilito,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>please please take advantage. Give me all the Lucas Gilito

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that you could possibly get. He basically just PHAs three

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the toughest offenses in baseball. So not as worried

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>as on the other side, Greg, when it comes to

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Eduardo Rodriguez, and I tweeted this out last night, Greg Drink,

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I always thought that I would lose my sanity because

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Knicks, Craig, But I think it's

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna be at Wardo Rodriguez because he's he's so frustrating,

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and part of it is the way the Red Sox

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>handled him last night through six innings. You know it

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was a tie game. It was three to three, six innings,

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>three earned runs, was like five strikeouts for Edwardo Rodriguez,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine pitches take him out of the game. You

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have to push at Wardo Rodriguez. You should know

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>by now that you can't really press your luck when

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to word Ward Rodriguez. Alex Cora in the

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox coaching staff of your home watching or listening

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to this on demand, which you're probably not, but maybe

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll tweet it at you anyway. Um, but like, why

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>are you pressing your luck? And then the next and

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.239
<v Speaker 1>he starts, he walks someone, he intentionally walks someone. Then

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen comes in and they give up both runs

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that were on base, so those get charged to DWARDA.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez And the next thing you know, he has this

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>line that's five earned runs when it wasn't even really

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>his fault. Yes, he walked the guys, but it was

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen that led him down. And they shouldn't have

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>been pressing their luck anyway. And Gregor, I looked into him.

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>The swinging strikes are up this year, the walks are down,

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the it's it seems like he should be pitching much

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>better than he is. I can't really make excuses for

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy, because if I hold John Gray accountable for

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, he should be pitching better than he is,

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to John Grady later on too, then

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to hold Edward Rodriguez accountable as well. I mean,

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just he's he's really frustrating the all that you're

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>right in caters say that he should be better than

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>he is. I would still expect him to be better.

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I looked into his his fastball and his

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>cutter usage this year. Last year a two thirty two

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>average for his fastball and to sixteen average for his cutter.

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>This year, those numbers go up to three to seventy three, respectively.

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's getting hit. He's getting hit more. The ops

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>against those against those pitches is higher as well, so um,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he's he's just getting hit more and he's getting hit harder.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's just frustrating because the strikeouts are up and

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the walks are down, So it seems like those two

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>things should correlate into him being better, but it hasn't

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>worked out that way. I put out a poll before

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the show, like to talk about trades on a Tuesday here,

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and I asked people, you know, which middling starting pitcher

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that we like coming into the year, are you most

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to buy? Joe Musgrove and Ward Rodriguez, You, Darvish

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and Andrew Heeney Right nowtcent of the vote goes to

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrove, which actually surprises me that I wouldn't have either.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have guessed people, and that was my vote

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>because you Darvis says, actually pitched much better over like

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>his last eight starts. It actually since since that six

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>game against the Marlins. Greg, looking to this four point

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to five year a not great for Darvish, but three

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>point seven one exfit almost ten case per nine the

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>wolfzper nine er downs two point five. I mean that's

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>huge for Darvish. I mean that's even better than when

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>he was in his prime. So I really really think

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's coming very very soon for you, Darvish. Um

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I would rather personally, I would rather trade for him.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>If I'm ranking these guys out, I would rank it Darvish, Yes,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>EDWARDO Rodriguez, must Grove and the Andrew Heeney last on

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that list, Greg, who would you rather have most? I

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>stand by Darvish, like I said, that's that's who I

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would have voted for, probably and after that probably must Grove.

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess y, Yeah, I mean you could probably like

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>flip Flop Musgrove and Eduardo on my list, they're close. Yeah,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>he needs probably last. And I know Florio has talked

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, right, It's like the Pirates organizational philosophy is

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>like they just throw fastball so much. And I was

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>looking into must Grove and it's like his pitch value

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for his forcing fastball this year is god awful, like

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>negative five, and his pitch value for his slider, according

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to fan graphs, is like five. So it's actually like

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a really really good pitch, like much higher than like

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>league average slider. But for whatever reason, it's it's the

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Pirate's philosophy. So they're kind of ruining Musco right now.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's very frustrating. I mentioned the Cleanland Indians before we

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>give you their score here quickly. They beat the Royals

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>last night three to two. Adam blueco just four days. Man,

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what the hell is this about? Well, because there was

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a huge rain delay and they took him out. That's

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>an issue. Same thing for Brad Killer. He's pitching well

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>two On the other side, like you liked him too.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Phenal A. J Cole came in this job deal the

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Indians ulto. We get the win on a Jason Kittness

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>walk off home run, which allowed Frank to when money

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>last night, which is always exciting. Yeah, Jason Kittness and

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the fan to will line up. He was super cheap

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't want to mention Jason Kittness. He's been

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>playing much better in the month of June Greggy two

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>eight six batting p s and the month of June

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>four home runs the hard contact up to in the

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>month of June twenty four point six percent line drive rate.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>So I think this guy fits the Great Sussman theory

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to a t. You ride them while he's hot. The

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>wheels will probably come off at some point because he's

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in super injury prone and he's getting up there in age.

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Still struggles against left handed pitching. Two. But if you

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>need a second basement or middle infielder, Jason Kittness is

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the hotter ones right now in baseball, Greag Yeah,

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kittness. Would you rather have Jason kittens or Chris Taller?

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Because this is a decision I had to make um

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in the pit ley this morning. Who'd try to have? Yeah?

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I would much rather have Chris Taylor. Okay, yeah, because

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I at least I expect him to play every single

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>day while Corey Seeger is out, which is probably at

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>least through the All Star Break and maybe even a

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks after that too. Better lineup. I saw

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a quote there's a rod Corey seeger how he started running?

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That was the headline, like whore see starts running? Oh nice?

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So then the quote was it's great I could walk

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>without feeling my massive pain in my hair. Shame. Now,

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Roald just find these guys that they just they just

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>love to attack. That's why I've wrote an all right,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll take great, We'll come back. Frank, you lost your

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>best bet thanks to nobody's scoring San Francisco, I said,

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>David Donald, So what's up about that? Getting to John Lester,

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>we come back on the other side here, I had

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>great results. I lost seventy pounds my way to sixty

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>five and went down to my doctor. Told me, if

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>it works for you, then do it. But a lot

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of people say to me, how would you lose the weight?

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, I take Andrew four hundred everything. I'm gonna

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>take it forever. That was Walt talking about Andrew four hundred.

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Now listen to what Bob has to say. When you

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to your radio commercials, you say that's not possible.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>But since I've experienced it, your commercials aren't strong enough.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I am seventy and I've had a belly for way

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>too long, my whole body is shrinking, my energy level

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 1>has gone up, and don't think differences. And four it's

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. I tried other products and nothing happened. Guys,

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>if you'd like to lose dubborn belly fat, gain energy,

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and feel years younger, try Andro four hundred, the safe,

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>natural and affordable way to boost your testosterone. Go to

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Androw four hundred dot com or call eight eight eight

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>four hundred zero four three five eight eight eight four

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred zero four three five Androw four hundred dot com.

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Lit Daily rodo dot Com guide you to victory as

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you swing for the fences playing Daily Fantasy Baseball, become

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the eighth Daily Rodo lineup. Optimize it will win one

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a fan Duela Draft Kings tournament, or

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>become part of the growing community who have won thousands

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. If you're playing MLB dfs and not using

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodo dot com, you're doing it wrong. Enter promo

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.479
<v Speaker 1>code f n t s Y for a ten percent

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>discount the two thousand and nineteen MLB Daily Rodo Premium

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>package at daily rodo dot com. Use a promo code

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>f n t s Y and get your ten percent discount.

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Today you can't get enough fantasy football. Rhodo Experts has

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>launched their NFL three five Fantasy Football package, which includes

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the best math based seasonal bridge actions and rankings available

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on the internet. Davis Madigan the Roto Experts are

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 1>providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>content every day of the year to give you an

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Say Tember cent at Roto Experts dot com with the

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>promo code Evan t s Y, it's the NFL three

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football package only at Rhoto Experts dot com. Well,

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly what I was thinking of. Two. Is this

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the actually all right? Yeah? It's like, yeah, it sounds

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>exactly like it when you watch were you watch all

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of it? So you know, admittedly I probably shouldn't have

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>been most spoilers, you kidding? Need it shows twenty years old? Yeah,

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not really fair. Look, we're not gonna spoil anything,

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I swear. Why can't I spoil its? Do you not

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>know what happened to the end. It's something to do

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>with it dinner. I know that. I just don't ruin

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it from Greggy please because I would feel bad if

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that actually happens. But yeah, I actually saw a lot

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of it like when I was a kid, which I

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't have. I would like to go back and

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>watch it though I know, like I I have not

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>watched it like in my older adults life from beginning

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to end, which I would like to do. Gregs brought

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who that is. Proud of Tony's daughter.

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh the daughter, Yeah, let me look at Jimmie Lynn

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Siegler is her name. She once stated Turtle both in

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>rage and in real life, that Turtle's marry with the kid.

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>She's She's an attractive one, all right. Getting the game

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with Draft Kings sports Book where listeners of the show

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and get a risk free bet with the five hundred bucks.

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's how it goes. Create a Drafting sports book account.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Make it depositive like you first bet. She's pretty easy.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings will match it out to five hundred dollars.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Just gonna sports grade dot com slash dk to play

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that sports grade dot com slash d k at quickly.

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>This offer won't be around forever. The way you have

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>gambling from going on Drew Gambler it's went and over

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it and only restrictions plas you did. Great Craig, Thanks

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job. Thanks funny suppos, great dot com

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>slash dcay. Last night San Francisco was at home against

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Colorado Rockies, and why did you know it, Johnny,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg but six shout out innings. Yeah he did, Greg,

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, John Gray is actually coming around a little bit,

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I was. I love the part of

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the season where John Grady comes around and he just

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>obliterates Frank. Yeah, but don't worry. In a month from now,

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll be able to tell everyone how wrong they were

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>about John Gray again. But it's worth mentioning Greg. So

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>far in the season, the splits three point four seven

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>e r A at home in corps Field, but at

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.399
<v Speaker 1>four point two zero e r A on the road.

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Mind you. Last night was against the San Francisco Giants,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the thirty three and forty four Giants who had Mike

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Yastremsky leading off and Alex Dickerson batting second. This is

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not a good lineup, so he did we were supposed

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. Shout out to John Gray. One point zero

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>zero whip exactly from last night. Four hits and two

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>walks in six innings, zero runs, six strikeouts. He's pitching

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot better in the month of In the month

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of June, John Gray had a two point six four

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 1>e r A. In May he had a five point

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>six five ear A. So that's basically what you're gonna

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>get with John Grady. He's gonna go on these stretches

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>where he pitches really well. He's also gonna go on

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>stretches where he gets rocked if he has a couple

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of home starts in a row. You just like her

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Man Marquez. Marquez is a better pitcher than John Gray.

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we can confidently say that. But you have

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to really pick and choose your spots well when it

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to these guys, like maybe you start them at

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>home in the right matchup against like the Giants or

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>another like down offense that we don't really like. Uh,

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously, when he's on the road, you can

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you can feel a lot more confident starting him regularly there.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>But you just have to pick and choose your spots

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Rockies pitching staff. But shout

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out to John Gray, he's pitching well. You shout out

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>last night as well. Yeah, I mean eleven strikeoutsn Greg

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 1>in five innings too, he still had a six point

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>seven nine e r A, which is why it took

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the over in that game. Greg, you know, I thought

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>there was gonna be some run scored here. But yeah,

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Drew Palmer has eleving strikeouts. Um, I will

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I will not be advocating for anyone to pick him

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>up anywhere. Greg, maybe you know, only because he has

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a job for now, he might not have a job

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 1>next time. For NOWTS we hope, we hope, indeed, David

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Doal home for the second second of game ninth home

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>run of the year for Dallas was cool coming in

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.919
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. U left lefty left on lefty whatever four

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>two RB I three A t vases another lefty to

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>night in a Madison bumgata. Yeah. I mean, look, David

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Dal has has been really good this year. I think

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we're expecting more power. Hopefully that can come, especially here

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>where everyone's hitting for power, and you know, I know,

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the second half of the season they're

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>expected to have more home games than they do road games,

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so that should bode well for David dal The batting

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>average has been awesome, admittedly three eighteen batting average ps,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but and we get more power, David dal That's that's

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking for here. So hopefully that comes around. Greg,

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it should. You know, the summer

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 1>summer months are coming there here, it's officially summer more

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>games in courts Field in the second half of the season.

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It should happen because Glemma I have here, so I

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 1>U my home league, right the other transaction league George

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Spergrack goes back tonight, so I activated him off the ill,

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and now I have three bench hitters they don't like

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know who to play all right, so speaking,

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm stuck. So here are my options, and you can.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>You can have a bench three eyes, and I don't

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>want to should use off the xaus. I don't want

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>my hotel. No one cares, Yeah, no one cares. A right, fine,

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just tough, just I mean a tough spot, and

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I I need to talk about somebody. Yeah, I agree

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with you though, Like typically in UM in the daily leagues,

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I like to have spots available on the bench for

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>streaming pitchers exactly. But in the pit league right now,

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like the two hitters, I have on the bench are

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 1>really good, like Garrett Cooper and someone else. And then

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the three hitters have three pitchers I have on the

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bench are like and Warner Rodriguez, who I just told

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>people to try and buy. So I don't want to

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>drop them these things. And I picked up Joe must

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Grove because he was dropped in. Yeah, I don't. I

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think those guys are are are droppable in terms

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of for a streaming spot, so I gotta keep him around. Yeah,

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>so my gut. My hitters on the bench right now

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>are or Boom Boom Man Cen right the second he

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>has been really hot as uh, you know, home run

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on his last game. Willie Calhoun's on my bench right now.

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 1>He's been pretty good as of late. Yeah, you got

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to own those guys. And right now my

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>have my third hitter on thevenrs I don't even like

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is David Doggs, Jason Bumgarner and left like I don't know. Yeah,

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that might be the call, especially because it's in an

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Oracle Park too. As I've said, Greg, I mean you

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta expand the rosters. Yeah, I joke with you for

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>playing in you know, eight team leagues. You only start

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>five players. But that's why you need like bring it

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>up to four outfields and need a utility spot middle

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>infield in a corner because you end up in this position.

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And this actually happened when I put in a ten

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>team dynasty fantasy football league, greg I had to want

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I had to leave the league because I just couldn't

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>devote as much time to a to a dynasty league

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>as I should have. But the decision making in a

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ten team football league every single week, you're going to

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>rip your hair out. I mean, everyone's team is stacked. Sure,

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of points scored. And everyone

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:12.359
<v Speaker 1>says the decision making is what makes fantasy so fun. Well,

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'd rather be deciding, uh, in a

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve team league from like my third wide receiver or

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>second utility spot with like a fringe e player, not like, oh,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know I have to bench one of Odell Beckham,

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins or like Davante Adams. That's not what fantasy

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 1>should be about. So that's why you don't play in

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.919
<v Speaker 1>eight team ten team leagues, you know, playing twelve team

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>leaguere wide receivers to you know, two utilities, a super

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>flex uh, something like that. It's just that's my little

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football tangents. As we get closer to July here, Greg,

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:44.839
<v Speaker 1>but I really really hate the ten team football leagues.

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I agree, it's very hard. We gotta you know, let's

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>let's lead them out those two quarterbacks some IDPs in

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there something. You know what position that I am because

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Malex Smith is So you know what, Greg, I just

0:46:58.040 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>admitted something to you during the break that you're right

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 1>about there, and that was Jimmy Nelson. So I will

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>give you credit. You're right abou Jimmy Nelson, who's now

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 1>in the bullpens. Yes, Frank, and I will then take

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity. Now Nelson let me down. But Malex Smith, Mom,

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>your man, Malex Smith has been really, really good. Um.

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I know he's still batting two thirty four twenty one

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>steals on the year. But the two thirty four, I

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>mean where he was you put if it's relative to

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if I look up what it's been since he's come back, Greg,

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's close to three. So I'll give

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you in the month of June, he's been up for

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.800
<v Speaker 1>all of June. In the month of June to ninety

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>six batting average yeah, close six batting average with seven

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>steals in the month of June. Uh, you know, a

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and hundred seven plate appearances in May only forty

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>eight appearances. And he's old six paces. I mean he's

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been he's been a fun man, specifically since May sixteen,

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>since he's been called back up. Greg to eighty two

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>batting average, three forty two o b P lowered that

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.439
<v Speaker 1>trick out right to like I said he would, three

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty babbit like I said he would, thirteen thirteen stolen

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>basis and has been back. I'm always right about everything

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that I never get no, I know, I just like

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to mock other people that that do that. Greg. You

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>can listen to other Fantasy Radio shows. You know. You

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>can listen to Craig Miss right now and once we

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>get off the air too, you can listen to him

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for the second hour live on Fantasy Radio. And I

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>will give Craig Miss credit because one of the first

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>things he said on I believe either his first or

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>second show, is when I get something right, I'm gonna

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you when I get something wrong, I'm also going

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that too. So I give him credit

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>for that because That's what we like to do here

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 1>on the BFS as well. We hold ourselves accountable. Well,

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we get things right, we'll tell you

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. Alex Smith, of course, but hey, I got

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Nelson wrong. I'll tell you I got that wrong too.

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So we gotta hold ourselves accountable for right and wrong.

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I tend to do with Alex

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Smith and in this in this kind of ladder that

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I have, I hope that he gets like a whole

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis earlier in the week, and I mentioned later

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when I think I won that category. Yeah, um, so

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>says help me out last night? Were they stolen basis? Okay,

0:48:57.160 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>let's get into last night's John Lester performance against the

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>at of Braves, Mike Folton avaged by the way option

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>into the bullpen, and Bryce Wilson getting the call today

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to start today or later in the week. I know

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Wilson's getting called back up to take uh the

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>rotations about for now Mike Folton keviage, but Lester last

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>night against these braves went six innings allow of zero

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>earned runs just two non unearn runs. I should say

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in that six five hits shrug got seven, didn't walk

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody's for his best starting a long time. Who tear

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Roun allowed seven runs in four innings of work. Also,

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they almost got into a brawl Wilson co and Treiris

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Flowers, which kind of weird. Um how Everybias

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>still listed face of the year. Ronnie Acunia stole his

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>tenth base of the year. Hayward went deep for the

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>eleventh time. Could Rairis the sixteenth Danzery Swans in the

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen home run of the season. Yeah, Greg John Lester,

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>your boy, my boy, Well, I mean, really really good

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>start here against a tough Atlanta Brave team that you know,

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the hottes hitting teams in the month of June.

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned it's six innings, two runs, they were both unearned,

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so didn't hurt your e r A there. Zero walks,

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the huge key for job. Zero walks

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to seven strikeouts. He had thirteen swinging strikes again against

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a really really good Atlanta Braves team, but one that

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:11.280
<v Speaker 1>could be prone to striking out at times. Obviously, Austin

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Riley about to talk about this at some point to Greg.

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Three more strikeout Auston Riley uh, the batting average down

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to to seventy nine. Stills he's gonna hit for power,

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't walk a lot and he strikes out

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So not really the best combination. And I

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think we can expect some some peaks and valleys here

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>for for someone like Austin Riley who strikes out that

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>much and in turn does not walk all that much.

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But really good performance for John Lester. Greg lowers the

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>e r A to three point eight three. I don't

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>really think he's out there in any leagues, but like,

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:44.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're deciding between someone drop again, I'd rather own

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.439
<v Speaker 1>him than like Sabathia, who we've talked about on the show,

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>than a Stephen Matts who we've talked about here today

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>on the show too. Um, John Lester, you know, I

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>think he's probably gonna live in that like high three

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>e r A range, But because he has the Cubs

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>line up behind him, he's he's probably gonna be put

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in position to to get a lot of wins so

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>far this year. So you kind of gotta take the

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>take to get with the bat and hope that he

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 1>uh hope that he gets you some wins. He already

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he's already up to seven wins on the year, so

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good. Anything else with this game you want

0:51:10.760 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to mention because I do you want to get to

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the other game before we sign off here? Um no,

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, you know you mentioned the hitting performances,

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it is, you know, status quo.

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna say about them? Rizzo bias, conferras.

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>They've all been awesome, So yeah, I think it's, you know,

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty status quo. Here. Only other game on the night

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 1>was the Dodgers and the d Backs. The Backs win

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this one eight to five. Great Holland got one out,

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>one strikeout four the save here, he's eleventh of the year.

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Grinky six inning, seven hits, four runs, struck out six.

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Kershaw well the same exact line, six hitting, seven hits,

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>four runs, one walk allowed for Kershaw as well. Rush stripling,

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:49.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, getting the spot in the rotation right now,

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>given the injuries that the Dodgers have had, it's stripling

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>going into the rotation for rich Hill right now? Is

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that grid He hit his third home run of the

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.920
<v Speaker 1>year last night, Christian Walka. It is fourteen home run

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Yeah, I just did want to mention

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker. He's really bounced back in a big way

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in the month of June. The strikeout right down to

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty point seven percent in June, whereas in the first

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>two months of the season that was up over thirty percent.

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh fifty one point one percent hard contact rate for

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the seven season, that's seventh best in all of baseball

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>amongst qualified hitters. So Christian Walker, I know, you know,

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>he went through that lull in May where the batting

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 1>average was like hovering around two hundred. He was really

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>hot in April, but now bouncing back again in June.

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We had some question marks about him, you know, when

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Crone came up. Kevin Crone since has been optioned

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>back to Triple A and Christian Walker performing really well.

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of people considered him a Quad

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>A player. So I'm happy that he's getting the opportunity

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to play every day and he is making the most

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. Greg. When it comes to Cranky and Kershaw,

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>here pretty identical lines. You know. I actually wrote over

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, Greg Um, well my top twelve starting pitchers

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>our rest of season. It was right after that Walker

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Bueller performance on Friday. I wanted to dive into that.

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bueler has just been like over the past two

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>months of the season, and I have him ranked ahead

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of Blake's now now the rest of season. And I

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.479
<v Speaker 1>also had Kershall ranked just barely inside my top twelve

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>pitchers rest of season, Greg, what do you think about that?

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that warranted? Is that fair? I think it's reasonable.

0:53:20.360 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Clayton k I think we're thinking about it last week

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and he did a discussion. Man to be in that

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>top twelve, I think it makes sense. Tenden's well, absolutely,

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had one of the just misses here

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as uh As Zach Granky also had Lucas Gilio as

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 1>one of those just misses too. I think that's fair. Yeah,

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree. And with that, we're gonna say goodbye to

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube for today. John Gaston Makia He's up next with

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>out the window. Make sure you catch that as he

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:48.879
<v Speaker 1>begins his NFL team previews. Shastamakia at the window is next.

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>With that, we move on to our best bets we

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 1>would owe in two last night. Rank you we gotta

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>get back on the wagon. Yeah, let's let's figure this

0:53:57.040 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one out. Greg. I think they're talking out here. I

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be some rain here in the Northeast

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>tonight too, which which could influence ratings. Get right now,

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I checked the weather before I left the house, and

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that there is some rain in the forecast,

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we'll have to pay attention to that.

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>And I'm questioning myself on this one. Greggy reminds me

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of saying that that Gabe likes to say on his

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>shows a day late and a dollar short. But I'm

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the over tonight for the Phillies and the Mets,

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and obviously I'm influenced by what they did last night.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They just put up a ton of runs on the board.

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The total tonight is ten and a half. But it's

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Walker Lockett, who if you can tell me anything

0:54:36.600 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>about Walt Walter, Walter, Walker Lockett, Walter, if you can

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me anything about him, Greg, then congratulations. And then

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Jake Ariett on the other side. And in totals

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half, so I think this game could

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>go over the number. That was one that really stood

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The other one was the Mariners against

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers. Greg. This game is in Milwaukee Miller Park.

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>More so regarded as a hitter's ballpark. Um oh wow,

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this this has since changed. He takes the Manners over

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>every game. Because this was ten when I looked at

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it before the show. It's now up to ten and

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a half, and I think rightfully. So it's Zach Davies,

0:55:09.800 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>who has an e ar A over five in the

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 1>month of June. Uh and Marco Gonzalez, who has not

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:16.959
<v Speaker 1>been good this year in the r A hovering around five.

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So you have two questionable pictures and two pretty good

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>offenses in a total ten and a half. So I'm

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 1>going over in both of those games. Tonight, it's the Brewers,

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners, the Mets, and the Phillies over in both. Greig, Yeah,

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I like the Mariners over. I'm also gonna go with

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the total tonight. There's no line that's screaming for me

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 1>here tonight, so I'm also gonna go with the over.

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Um in a in a game he totally going over.

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Only at the Braves and the Cubs. It's two young

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>pitchers in Max Freed and as a leg getting his

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>first start. But the over under at twelve, which seems

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like a really really big number. I know how good

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 1>these offenses are. It's a lot, I know, but a

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>scored what eleven last nights. This strikes me as a

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>sports book knows something. So I think the win might

0:55:58.120 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 1>people blowing out tonight, Greg, or at least that's what's

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Prett rejected for the forecast. And normally when you see

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 1>when you see the line this high grag, it's for

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a reason, and it's kind of like a sucker bet.

0:56:08.239 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It means again, I might want to save you from

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this one, Greg, save you from yourself. I was actually

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Cubs money line. I know it's as

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Lad's first start and the Braves have been hot, but

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Max fred has struggled in June, and the Cubs offense

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and turn has been really good too. Sure, so I

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was kind of leaning the Cubs here. I I didn't

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>trust it enough, so that's why I didn't take it.

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But I get what you're saying, but I think I

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>think the oddsmakers are are set in this line at

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:33.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve for a reason. Greg. So I just got caught

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, and I look, if you if you wanted

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to be one of your best bet, it's my best bet, man,

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna take it away now. I like I

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:41.239
<v Speaker 1>like the overten at a half. I like your bet better.

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the bruise Mariners. But maybe announcement man, I'm

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going over. I maybe I'm going I'm going under. Maybe

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm the sucker Cubs, Braves. But twelve is a big,

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>big number. It is a big number. We're gonna have

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to find out tonight. Right there we go. There you

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>have it. We're done. We're gonna back tomorrow. I'm next

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 1>at the window was Shawn Guastamka. I have a fantastic evening,

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the baseball and stay dry for Frank Stample. I'm

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a Greg Sousman. Have a wonderful night. We'll do it

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>all again tomorrow. We hope couldn't catch the live show.

0:57:19.200 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Make sure to download our podcast at the v n

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>T S Y Sports Network Audio Boom channel oh So