WEBVTT - How Money Became A Form Of Social Media

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd LODs podcast.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wasn't Thal, and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, It's

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>time for another episode about one of our favorite topics. Money.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's gotta be money, It's gotta be money. It's always money,

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all of our inner sense. I guess all

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes are money. But how could you talk

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>about things about money if you don't even know what

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>money is or where it comes from? I agree that

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>all of our episodes are money in that what was

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that film you suppord money n Swan where people were going,

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you're so money swingers, Yeah, swingers that one. Our episodes

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 1>are money in that sense, but they're also about money.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They are. And of course there's one of our favorite topics,

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and today we have um. I think we're going to

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>explored with a slightly different angle than we sometimes do.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So we sometimes talk about the origins of money? Does

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>money come from the state? Is money inherently credit based?

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>What are the different kinds of things that we call money?

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna attack the question from a slightly

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>different angle than we normally do. Yeah, I think this

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a really interesting episode because it's

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>actually going to bring together a lot of the different

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>discussions we've been having about specific types of money, so

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>cash versus cryptocurrency, or different types of cryptocurrency like bitcoin

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>versus something like libra, uh, the currency that Facebook is

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>currently working on, and what the different use cases are

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for each of those, but also what the different sort

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of I guess societies that they create actually are, if

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Yeah, I like the way you put

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that society is that they create. And of course, like

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>money is just like really interesting because obviously people pay

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pay for things with money, but you know, people do

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>new things with money that they hadn't always done. So

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like people paying venmo to their friends and they

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>leave funny messages along with their venmos, Like that's a

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>new thing that wasn't always the case. So within this

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>thing like payments or money, how we use it, what

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>its role in society is, how it connects us. It's

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>always evolving. Yeah, absolutely, And there's a big inclusion discussion

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to be had there as well, So who has access

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to different types of money, So I'm interested in touching

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on that as well. So today I'm really excited once

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>again we have a past guest we had. I think

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it was probably a couple of years ago now, but

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we have her back. I'm very excited we're gonna be

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking with a Lanta Swords. She's the professor of Media

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Studies at the University of Virginia. She's also a fellow

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Burguing Institute, and she is the author of

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a recent book called New Money, How Money Became Social Media.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 1>So it will be interesting a different angle than we've

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>typically had. But a Lana, thank you so much for

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Thanks for having me. It's good to be back,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. So, like we said this, we like this

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>topic what is money money? But there is some question

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that arises sometimes, I think, which is why bother, like

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>why do we talk about this question? Like why is

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it interesting or why is it important? From your perspective,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>tackling this question from a different angle, and we'll get

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to this the content of your book about money as

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>social media? Why is it even a thing we're studying

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the first place? In your view? Well, I know

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for me, so I started my PhD program um right

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the aftermath of the last global financial crisis.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So I was really in this moment of like I

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was entering into a moment of scholarly study when it

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like the whole world was asking that question, you know,

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what is money? Why is money? Why do governments and

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>traditional financial institutions have like the say over what gets

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to be money? And that kind of like post two

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight moment was when we saw, I would say, like, really,

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of what we now call fintech, what we

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>now call the sharing a con to me, what we

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>i'll call um, you know, the gig economy, like all

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>these different ways of doing money differently, of course, the

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto space, and so it suddenly seemed like like everybody

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was asking that kind of question, and so I became

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>really interested in it at a time where I could

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>also study people who were really interested in kind of

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>questions of money nous um and at a time when

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>people were starting to build new infrastructures to do money

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and do the economy differently. Um. And of course, my

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, I'm an assistant professor of media studies,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and my background is in thinking about communication media technologies.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So I, prior to that point, had been, prior to

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of turning to money, had been looking at the

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>emergence of social media. UM, you know, what do cell phones?

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>What do social media networks? Um? Mean for any number

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of different social questions. And I realized that there was

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>almost no one inside the economy, inside academia, inside kind

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of this field of media studies looking at that communication

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and technological infrastructures that make money happen, and we're they

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>were undergoing this like kind of tremendous moment of transformation.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So for me, as someone who studies technologies that move

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>information around and um, the kinds of social and cultural

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>dimensions of those technologies, UM, I think it's important and

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting to study money because typically when we talk about money,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked about kind of the politics or cultural meaning

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of money. It has to do with questions of like

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>who has money, who doesn't have money, who's doesn't have

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>enough money, who has too much money? But we don't

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>usually think about the infrastructures that actually move money around

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and how those infrastructures themselves have meaning and have power,

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and how they're changing. So talk to us a little

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>bit more about that point. What exactly is the overlap

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 1>between media and money? Because I think to most people

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be immediately apparent Oftentimes when I say,

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, my book is called How Payment Became Social Media, Um,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>people immediately go to Venmo. And of course that's true,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>like Venmo, such a cliche, such a cliche, immediately wondering,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and lots of Venmo in the book. So and I

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>think Vemo is really fascinating. But you know, Venmo is

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>overtly designed to be social media. You know, I've one

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of my students mentioned once and I think that's even

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>made it to the book. It's like literally Facebook Blue,

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a social stream that you know, turns

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>money into into a form of kind of media. But

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if we go back and we think about, you know,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the the technologies of money, they have always kind of

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>tracked alongside the money the technologies of communication and media

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>more broadly. Um, so we could go back to thinking about,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way coins, the way tally sticks, um,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the way any number, whether you know big rocks that

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you you know, keep an oral history of of who

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>owns it in the case of the TIV and the well,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the isle of Yap. You know, those are all kind

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of information systems. And however we kind of keep track

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of information, whether it's through bits of shell or just

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of oral history is kind of the remit of

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what media and communication study scholars are interested in. But

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>if we think a little bit more more recent so,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>paper currency does many of the same things that scholars

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in my field talk about paper UM culture print culture

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>more generally doing so, you know, Benedict Anderson, who is

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a UM scholar of the printing press, talked about how

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the print and newspapers created an imagined community. It's his term,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like the skies and scale of the nation state. So

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we kind of learned to think about ourselves as members

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of nations through the consumption of printed media. And similarly,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.559
<v Speaker 1>print currency is covered with iconography of the nation state.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It tells us an efficiently sanctioned past, and it allows

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>us to project into kind of a shared future UM

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a community of shared faith. If we

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>then you know, think about okay, like move forward into

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>what you know, the technologies of money have been and

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the telegraph, you know, we think about

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Western Union is being primarily a money transfer service these days,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's also you know, one of the most important

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, communication systems. More broadly, moving forward into the

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty later in the twentieth century, the very same computers

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases some of the same engineers who

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>built the early Internet. We're also um building the Visa

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>master Card network, which is this kind of you know,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>global communication system. So and you can still hear in

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>some like I haven't been to a bar in a

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>really long time, but um, but you can still hear

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>from the back and like the back a t M

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of some sketchy bar like modem noises coming out of

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a t M s And it kind of reminds us that,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is an Internet of sorts. You know,

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm old enough to remember that you couldn't you know,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't swipe a credit card or my mom couldn't

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>swipe a credit card when someone was on the phone

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>at the store in the eighties and nineties. And so

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>now when we talk about new payment systems, we're looking

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at mobile, we're looking at the Internet. We're thinking about crypto,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>which is like in many ways, there's a reason why

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we call it. You know, people jokingly call it magic

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Internet currency and that sort of thing. So I try

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, all right, let's rethink money as communication, you know,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think about transactions as literal like transactions moving across from

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one account to another UM and then look at the

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>systems that power that communication, whether they are tally stick paper,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, UM, telegraph, Internet, whatever the case may be,

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, all right, you know what are the politics

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of those systems? Who manages them? How do we use

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>them to create meaning in our everyday lives. It's interesting.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You may not know this, but on a recent episode,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so Tracy after years and years of skepticism or recent

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>episode turned her into a bitcoin bowl. She she converted anyway,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting thinking about, like you mentioned, imagined communities

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and Benedict Anderson in the printing press sort of reifying

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the state because obviously you look at physical currency, icons

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of the state, founding fathers, other symbols that sort of

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>emphasize this. It's interesting to think of like sort of

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin and crypto, is this sort of like post

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>nation state currency which fits with the Internet. Is this

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like you know, post newspapers posts, sort of

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like post post print communities. I guess yeah, And you know,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I I will say I'm not, you know, hugely bullish

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on crypto myself. I've been I've written some academic articles

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about UM, bitcoin and blockchain going back many years now,

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm old in bitcoin time, I guess, and I do

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think that a huge part of what UM appeals about

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin or about crypto is the kind of community aspect.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So this like sense of being part of a shared

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>future that looks a particular way. UM. You know, I

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have said, I've written that, you know, all money is

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a stake. UM. It allows you to stake your claim

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in a particular future. Like all money is kind of

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a prediction market in some ways, because if you're willing

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to accept and hold money, you're kind of betting on

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a particular set of outcome. So if you do believe

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future that is as folks talked about in

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, like homesteading on the electronic frontier UM, and

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're the pioneer UM, then why wouldn't you kind

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of put your money where your mouth is, so to speak,

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and and start thinking about what kind of monetary systems

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>would that would entail. So my time frame might be

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>slightly off here because I haven't lived in the States

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while now, but from what I remember, like

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>even five years ago or so, it was kind of

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>difficult to send money very quickly to just a random person. Um.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you could do a wire transfer, you could

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>do a money order, right, a check, things like venmo

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or um other sort of instantaneous payment methods, maybe sending

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin over the internet something like that. They weren't really

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>around yet. Why was that the case? Like, what is

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the justification for making money transfers that slow for so long? Yeah,

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>whenever I speak to, you know, talk with folks in

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world, they're always like, they don't

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>really quite get venmo, because, um, it doesn't quite make

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>sense that we haven't yet had a good way to

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>send friends um money quickly and easily. And the United

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>States has kind of historically been behind in P two

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>P payments. And I I think there's kind of a

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>couple of different answers to that, for you know, in

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of the reason why, um, you know, one is,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, just general lack of public investment UM

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>or general lack of of you know, infrastructural investment that

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would enable something like that. In a lot of places

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, there is just they're more public options for

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>peer to peer payment UM. But also I think one

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of the things I write about the book is that

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the Visa master card network was developed at a time

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that imagined a much more um kind of dietic economy.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So like there were consumers which were people, and there

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>were merchants that were businesses, and there were there wasn't

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really away for a person to be a merchant um

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or and therefore a person to kind of accept payments. Um.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And so we have as you may know, and I

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>could really geek out about this for a very long time,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but people tell me, um that not everyone is like

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Super in the credit card acquiring value change. So with

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>credit cards, um, every everyone has a bank that represents themselves,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that represents them as they enter the kind of credit

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>card network. So people have a bank that's their issuing

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bank that issues them a credit card. UM. Let's say

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a Chase UM Sapphire Cards, so chases my issuer.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And then if I am a merchant, UM, I have

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>an acquiring bank who you know, maybe let's say oftentimes

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's also Chase, but um, you know, it could be

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Merchant Services, and that acquiring bank, you know,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>acquires payments on my behalf but also kind of holds

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the risk for me. And what that means is that

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if a customer wants their money back UM, then they

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>will UM ask for chargeback through their issuer, who will

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then go through the network and then go to the acquirer,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and the acquirer, under the rules of the network, typically

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is mostly obliged to just give them their money back,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so UM, so the acquirer essentially pays the issuer and

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the issuer then issues a refund to the customer. So

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>then the acquirer has to then go to the merchant

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, I've issued this chargeback, I need money

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>from you. And if the which happens all the time,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not usually that big a deal. UM. But if

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, the merchant faces a ton and a

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of chargebacks, or the merchant goes out of business,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>or the merchant was a scammer, the acquirer is left

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>holding the bag for all of that risk. So acquiring

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>services are priced according to risk. So if you're an acquirer,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways you make money is by um

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>doing higher risk payments. UM. So anyone who, for the

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>most part, who's an issue, who's a merchant, can find

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>an acquirer who like matches their risk appetite. But historically

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that has not been so there's no has not been

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>any real way for individuals to have their risk assessed

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>by an acquirer. And there has never been a kind

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of acquirer for people. Um So, there has never been

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a way for people to accept payments through the Visa

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>master Card network. And then you know, the big innovation

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in that space was PayPal in the nineties. Um And

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of course PayPal rides the rails not primarily of the

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Visa master Card network, but of the A C H network.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>UM So that's why you know, PayPal prefers it when

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>folks use their checking account rather than like having to

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>access and having to pay fees to access the network

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Visa master Card network. So it we never it

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was built in a time. The Visa master Card network

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was built in a time in the you know, nineteen

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>seventies when we didn't have as much of a peer

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to peer economy, didn't have as much as a person

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to person, we didn't have as much of a press

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>person imagination for how the economy would work. And I

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>think that that has a lot to do with our

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>media infrastructure. So I mean the Internet in many ways,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like allows us to imagine ourselves as economic actors um

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>as people, and so the internet kind of had to

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to allow us to get paid

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and to pay so and I'm just wondering. So, you know,

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>when Facebook launched Libra, which is sort of like the

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>next iteration of a lot of what we're talking about,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of cynics out there who were saying, well,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this is just a way for Facebook to get additional

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>data on its users. I'm curious, like how much of

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>these new payment systems are about learning more about the

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>individual to your point, versus you know, just dealing with

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the merchant. Yeah, I mean absolutely, UM. I think that

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that like anything else coming out of the tech industry,

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is a data imperative, there's a data

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>play UM. Merchants, as I mentioned, pay to receive payments

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and if and for the most part, we don't you know,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>people don't pay to be paid, nor do we UM,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>nor are we willing to really pay to pay UM.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So there has to be some way that like this

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is being monetized UM. And so for the most part

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that has been you know, imagined like everything else as

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of when I say how payment became

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>social media, A big part of what I mean, is

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like social the Silicon Valley, since the term which means

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that there is a social data component um. And you know,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, folks in this kind of like

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>new payment space talked about like mobile payments as kind

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of the holy grail of social data sets, because there

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was this kind of dream that if you could actually finally,

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>um you know, close the loop between targeted message to

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>actual purchase in real space and time, UM, then you

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>would um you know, do something you know, no advertiser

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>has ever done before. I think that some of the

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>business models have moved away, um to some extent, from

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the kind of like direct advertising type of targeted advertising

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>type of business model to thinking about things like developing

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>new systems of risk analytics, UM, you know, just kind

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of applying data to whatever data can be used for.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And and in some cases I've been somewhat convinced by

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Tim Wong's new book that that basically are argues that

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that we don't we can't actually get as

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>much value out of all of these um data sets

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as we may hope, and then we may see something

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>we may be in the middle of a data bubble.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>But nevertheless, the kind of Quest for Data, which you

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>guys should have him on the podcast. He's really interesting.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>We should. I was just thinking, what's the name of

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>his book is called I Can see it? Sub Prime

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>attention crisis advertising and the time bomb at the heart

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet. Sounds good? Is this like how I buy?

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Like I bought like a new Dutch oven the other

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>day and then now all I get is ads for

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Dutch as if you were a Dutch oven collector. Wait,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>if we collector, it might make sense. But if it were,

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like if it were some theoretically efficient market for data,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>someone's getting screwed. Like someone's buying a lot of impressions

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that probably they wish they weren't, you know, as all

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the right exactly, and as all of the almost

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>every major social media company has tried to do payment

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's over the last ten years, um, with varying degrees

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of success, and they've all applied kind of their standard

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>m o um too the what they think they're going

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. So you know, Google has imagined

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that they will sell like AdWords type of thing as

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it relates to payments. Facebook has imagined that they would

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of hoard it and figure out what they were

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going to do with it. Venmo is kind of interesting

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because Veno has a public api. Um, it's quite easy

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to browse Venmo data. There's a lot of interesting art

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>projects that UM kind of ticket exploit this so um

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that one of my favorites is called public by Default,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and that is by an artist called UM but named

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>hand the Duke, and she basically um downloaded all Venmo

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>transactions from the year seen and used it to create

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>portraits of individual people. She calls them the humans of Venmo,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and she profiles like young lovers obviously getting into an

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>argument and then making up and breaking up, and this

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>one woman who's seems to spend an inordinate amount of

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>money on junk food, and someone who is almost definitely

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>a weed dealer. UM, and she kind of and she

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of uses it to to say, like, you know,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>which the reason why I think this is so interesting

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is that, yes, she's using it to say we should

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>probably be making this private. But it also shows, you know,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>really how like poignant the stories are money tells are

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and how these are like lived experiences. Yeah. So I know,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you say, like it's a cliche and everyone goes to Venmo,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>but there's obviously a reason for this because it's just

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 1>so obvious and like I use Venmo, but you know,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like I don't put like clever things in my messages.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I just like say straight up if I like, if

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm splitting lunch, I'm splitting lunch. But obviously people do,

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and they like use emojis or you know, tongue in

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>cheek jokes. Why like why is and you see, like

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of weird that it's people are default public

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or that they let themselves, especially when you can then

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>reverse engineer you can figure. You know, there was some

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>site that I saw it was basically just like every

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like trains, yeah, vice mobized yeah Vice. So like why

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and when when you when people research this, what is

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it about the desire to make it fun their transactions,

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>or to make it public, or to even reveal a

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>legal activity that people are so comfortable doing. Yeah, I

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mean I do think that the I do think that

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>money is fundamentally social, Our transactions are, and I think

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that for a long time, I think that people are

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable admitting it, um and uncomfortable. Uh, and that's true

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for scholars, like you know, whether we fall onto the

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>side of being like economists who think like money is

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>pursuing you know, some sort of rational economic interests, or

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we fall under the camp of being Marxists who thinks

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that um, all money reduces all the quality in the

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>world two mere quantities UM. Historically, scholars have given money

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of short shrift, like it's insufficiently social um and

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and that or that money sociality is an aberration from

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>how it's supposed to act UM. And I think in

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>everyday life we tend to think about money is something

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't talk about UM or something that is we

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>really feel the need to set apart from our social lives,

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>our friendships, and Venmo kind of reveals how deeply social

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it is and how kind of fun it can be.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You're meaningful it can be UM. But I do think

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that that sociality isn't so straightforward as like these mirror

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like I will put a joke that makes perfect sense

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>with the transaction that I'm I'm doing UM. And what

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is when when I talk to

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>young people who are big users of Venmo, they describe

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the kind of public performance element as usually indeed quite performative.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So you're paying your rent to your roommate, but you're talking,

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>You're putting Margarita emojis to ensure that everyone has a

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 1>sense that your social life is more interesting than it is,

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. And so I do think that that anyone

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>who goes to Venmo data hoping to find some truth

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>um that is very straightforward, is probably going to have

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to really dig to find these kind of like clear

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>cut stories. But I do think that what makes the

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>data interesting to advertisers or to you know, the FBI

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is the um kind of social network, that kind of

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>social graph inaggregate, So it doesn't really matter what I'm

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>saying to you, Um, it's so more so that we

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can kind of trace the transactions of the kind of

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 1>flow of money. So yeah, I mean, I do think

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think an interesting part of that data set is

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that it is so available, but it is definitely one

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that we I don't think anyone who has really figured

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>out quite yet how um, it should be wielded or

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>how it can be best wielded. Oh. The other thing

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll say about Venmo is that they've tried to sell

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves as an advertising, um, a side of advertising more recently.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So they there's like an ad on the Vemo side

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as of a couple of weeks ago that shows like

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to just some guys having a conversation about some pants

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>they bought. So it's like, you know, oh, sweet khakis, bro,

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and the other guys like, yeah, they fit pretty well,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's like the most artificial conversation you can imagine.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But the the advertising copy is, you know, you know,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>puts your brand at the center of real authentic conversations

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>between friends. And when the young people that I interview

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.719
<v Speaker 1>or my students UM at University of Virginia look at this,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they just kind of think it's it's a joke. So

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very social, but it might not be um

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>social in the way that people who, you know, the

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>folks who want to make money off of it, hope

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that it is. Um There's something that we briefly touched

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>upon that I wanted to go back to and talk

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to in further detail, and that was the idea that

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>money has historically always been wrapped up in notions of

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the nation state, and now we're sort of seeing that disrupted.

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think you use in your book this analogy

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's sort of like new media disrupting the old

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>media and the old media would be the state in

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>this particular case. And you dig into that a little

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more, and what does it actually mean for society

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>if money starts being divorced from the covernment? Mm hmm. Yeah.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So in some ways this goes back to the home

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>setting on the electronic frontier analogy. So, UM, you know,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I hear people, I've long heard people tell me that

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin is like the Internet in UM. So it's this,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fresh new thing that's open for you know, um,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>reimagining all aspects of society. UM. And so I do

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think that many people who come to designing new money

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>systems UM, specifically new currency systems, are overtly trying to

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like accelerate the process of the kind of decoupling of

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>money from the nation state. I mean, if you go

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>back and read some of the memoirs of the folks

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>UM involved in the early days of PayPal. Even PayPal,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>which was not bitcoin, you know, did not have the

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>same kind of aspirations that bit going does was imagic

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a libertarian project that would allow money

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to move around the world very quickly, UM, that would

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>disrupt some of the traditional state and traditional financial intermediaries, etcetera. UM,

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that clearly isn't exactly what it became. And even before that,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>UM de Hawk, who is the kind of like unsung

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>visionary behind Visa. So he was the CEO UM and

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>founder of Visa. He's a really fascinating person. But in

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>he right he wrote in the seventies that you know,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>money now is nothing more than alphanumeric information inscribed on

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a magnetic strip. And therefore, in very soon, UM, traditional

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>governments and traditional financial institutions will no longer UM have

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly on the kind of issue and movement of money. UM.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of like re envisioning what society would

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be and kind of disrupting state issued currency has sort

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of been at the heart of financial innovation for a

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>very very long time, and sometimes quite overtly, sometimes less.

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But then, you know, thinking back to this idea that

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:09.719
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is the Internet, um in I think that you know,

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we we kind of have to follow what actually happened

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>with the Internet. I mean, the Internet is not a

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>anarcho capitalist utopia or dystopia as the case maybe. You know,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the Internet has primarily been carved up by platforms and

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>corporate behemoths, and I don't think there's necessarily any reason

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that we would anticipate that the same wouldn't happen for

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of issue of extra national non state currency. Um.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why we're imagining. We we so often

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine a future, but I mean it's cool that they're trying. Yeah,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the thing. It's like, you know, there's

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like hand like it's you know, it's

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the Internet. I think maybe it's because you know,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm older, but you know, ten years ago, I thought

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was more fun when it wasn't just like

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter and Google and people had individual websites

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and dogs and all that stuff. And then the Internet

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>gutless cool when those things went away. So it's cool

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that people are trying, right, Absolutely, I mean it's something

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not owned by a Silicon Valley trillion dollar unicorn. Absolutely.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think the question is why did that happen? Um?

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what did over focusing on say I will

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get too into the question of regulation,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but are there ways in which the I that kind

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy that the Internet should be divorced from going

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>back to again speak, Um, you know, the like meat

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>space governments, and that the Internet was truly going to

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be this like heterotopia that existed in cyberspace that was

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like somewhere else and we should be really hands off

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um. Did that allow those platforms to kind

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of come in and carve it up? Um? So another question,

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess, you know, another way to put that would be,

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>having learned that lesson, how can we protect, um, the

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of future of the Internet and into the future

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of the kinds of you know, when it comes to money.

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So if we're if we're really imagining a future where

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>money is primarily so, I actually don't think state issue

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>currency is going anywhere, but I do think that it

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>will probably live alongside a variety of other currency forms.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't necessarily believe that those currency forms will

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 1>all be you know, an archo capitalist or libertarian or

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or however inflected with any kind of values. Alternative money forms.

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that we have every reason to believe that

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they might be corporate moneys, and maybe we don't want that.

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody joked a couple of years I guess

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it was about a year ago now, maybe more than that. UM,

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>when Howard Schultz you know CEO, former CEO and uh

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of of Starbucks. But this was some time before he

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>launched his presidential campaign. Um was saying he does think

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a future of of non state

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>money forms that are based on block chains, but he

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think that they will be bitcoin or cryptocurrencies like bitcoin. Rather,

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they will be issued by a few, as he put it,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like trusted brands. Um that would you know,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>steward these money forms. And everyone kind of laughed at him.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It was like a funny little moment of like Twitter

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>schadenfreud for like somebody said something that sounded really stupid.

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it, Starbucks has probably the

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>most ubiquitous, most still most widely used mobile payment system

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Um, we you know, we've Venmo

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and other payment companies would have been trying for a

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>very long time to get an app on people's phones,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and really before Venmo, the only one that was on

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody's phones was a Starbucks app. Um. They have greater

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>geographic breadth and depth than the US Postal Service. So

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>if we compare them to postal banking in terms of

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like what a branch network might look like, they're doing

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. They are truly global. They do have something

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like they're you know, loyalty points and all of that

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that people really do care about. When you get to

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>talking to people about their Starbucks stars, they get, um,

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 1>really passionate about it. So I can imagine a future

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>where many of our kind of plural currencies are issued

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>by brands are corporate and you know, we can't stay

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>too focused on the kind of um sci fi vision

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of the future and instead kind of think about what

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, various forms of utopian dystopia will look like.

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And historically, I say, we fight for the sci fi version.

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it'll happen eventually, I mean you could, but let's

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not accept it. Yeah, let's not just let's not preemptively surrender. Well,

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, historically, I mean Tracy mentioned that, you know,

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>money has we're moving away from money, as you know,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>being tied the nation state, but historically, and in many

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>places in the world, more often than not, money has

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>been quite plural. Um. So you know, of course the

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>free banking era. But um, you know, one of my

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite books on this is a book called City Reading

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>by David Hankin, who's a historian, where he writes about

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>how in before the Civil War, when people moved to

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>New York City, they had to negotiate all different kinds

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of monetary media, you know, um, bank notes issued by

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>countless different banks, but also bank notes that were issued

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>by banks that had gone bust, counterfeits real ones, but

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know. So it's like, is your bank good?

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And is like the money? Is the bank good? And

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is the money good? And like and is this money

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be even if it is a real bank?

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it something that someone will take in the city

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that I live in, Like, maybe they'll take it in Philadelphia,

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but they won't take it New York. Um. And And

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to be to be a city liver, the city dweller

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in um antebellum New York, you had to really know

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.959
<v Speaker 1>how to add a glance, like decide if you're going

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a form of money, if you could use

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a form of money, um. And it was really complicated.

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>People live very complicated monetary lives. And I think so

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that more we're going to have to learn

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with living in a kind of cacophonous monetary media ecosystem,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways we already are. If we think

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>about things like Starbucks cards, or you know, my Chase

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Sapphire reserve confers all kinds of uh um benefits upon

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>me um. If I use an E B T card,

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I can only I can't buy hot rotisserie chicken, but

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I can buy because that's prepared food and it is disallowed.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>But I can buy chick rotisserie chicken that has been

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>taken out of the hot case and chilled, making it

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer hot food. UM. So I am really interested

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in the question of, like what is monetary mass media

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when we move to monetary social media,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which is like, you know, all of these new kinds

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of systems, but in many cases we're already living in

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a world where mass media when it comes to money

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a myth um, where money is really

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>complicated for people, and we need to kind of pay

0:34:50.960 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>attention to that. So that Antebella, New York example reminded

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>me of something else that I wanted to ask you,

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>which is, if we're talking about money as a societal thing, well,

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>societies are about inclusion, but that also means excluding some people. Right.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't have a group of people without sort of

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>creating an opposite group that you compare and contrast yourself

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>against and I can see like in New York, making

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the money system as complicated as possible was probably a

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>very good way of distinguishing New Yorkers from you know,

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the routs who are coming in from the country or whatever.

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What sort of barriers are being built into new systems

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of money and what does that mean for the future.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>There are questions of inclusion exclusion. So for example, you know,

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of a soft soft war with this very

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>expensive smoothie store UM here in my town because they

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>refused to take cash UM. And you know, they're like,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>here's that lady who's coming around again, who wants to

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about how we're excluding poor people from

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>our smoothies. But it's kind of true. You know, the

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>kinds of money that we take create various kinds of

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>inclusion exclusion. But I also like to think about the

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>term predatory inclusion. So you can almost always find a

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>way to pay for something, but what are the terms

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of that inclusion? So if you think about um, you know,

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>most prepaid cards have tremendous fees attached to them. Um.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have a fee to every time you

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>swipe the card. You have a fee every time you

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>put money on it. You have a fee if you

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>need to cancel it, you have a monthly maintenance fee, etcetera, etcetera.

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So whereas someone like me with my credit score is

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>getting paid every time I pay with my Chase aff

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I reserve, somebody else is actually paying you know they're

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>they're in fact not their payment is not at all

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>clearing up par um. So I think that we do

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>need to look at questions of of inclusion, like can

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you be involved in the economy, but really like what

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are the terms of that include as you enter the economy? Um?

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And how how are they you know, how are these

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>systems being monetized? So before we go and we have

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up, I mean, obviously there are some sort

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of very blatant examples of money as social media. We

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about venmo very easy to understand. Our cryptocurrencies are

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>social libra, the memo on checks are social. The old

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Western Union and the telegraph. What's in your book what's

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the most sort of surprising social money that you discovered

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or what's the most sort of like weird thing that

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe people haven't heard of as much. One thing that

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is very interesting. UM is you know, everyone

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>knows about Chase Fire Reserve, and I mean your audience

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>probably does. And how um when it first came out,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there was some and you know, various premium cards. There's

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>always like drama over if it increases access to premium

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>lounges and kind of opens up space to people who

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>might not you know, there was a complaint I think

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times that was, like the premium

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>lounges have become a zoo now that everyone with with

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a particular credit card can get in. But there are

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>other cards and other loyalty systems that kind of open

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>up access to these like previously hidden or rarefied realms.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ones that I think is really

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting are UM on their credit cards designed for owner

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>operators of trucks, so like truckers, long haul truck drivers

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>UM and they and like lots of loyalty geared at

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>truck drivers who do in fact ring up quite a

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of interchange, which is what pays for the rewards,

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>because they're on the road and spending a lot of

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>money and swepping their cards many times UM and so

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than there being these kind of like premium airport lounges.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>There are premium truck stop gas areas, so if you

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.919
<v Speaker 1>are a have status as a truck driver, you can

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>enter certain areas of truck stops that you or I

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>don't even know existest that allows you to get gas

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of more quickly. Yeah, get access to showers, that

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Yeah, I know, I really want one

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of those cards. Yeah. Well, I think the they're like

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the kind of gas pumps that are geared for like,

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, semi trucks. So I don't think that even

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like work with with normal cars. Um, So they're definitely

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>not geared for us. And I don't think you want

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to take a shower at a truck stop, um, although

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you might if we're all driving now that we're not

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>flying as much anymore, because I show um. And of course,

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because these are business cards, um, because these folks are

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>owner operators, they're not as um, they're not, they don't

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>face they're not as regulated as heavily as consumer cards,

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so they they do have perhaps higher credit lines than

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>someone might qualify for as an individual, they're higher interest rates.

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>They can be kind of part of this kind of

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>predatory inclusion if people aren't very careful about how they

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>manage them. But I did you know, I write about

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an account of a trucker who talks about, you know,

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the kind of loyalty rewards from these trucker cards as

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote like food stamps for truckers, because they allow

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>truckers to access um a shower access and meal access,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like a rest stop when they need to, even if

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they at the moment don't have the funds. All Right,

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that was awesome, Laana Sports, thanks so much for coming

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>back on oudlock. Yeah, thank you, Thanks Launa. I really

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like talking to Lana. I find this like an endlessly

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fascinating subject. I love them. I love the reference to

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Benedict Anderson. I don't know if you've ever read that book,

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but this idea of like print forming the sort of

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>conception of like community and nationhood and then thinking about

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>what like post print culture and post print money looks

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like it's just sort of a super fascinating thing with

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>what I think is probably a lot of implication, many

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>significant implications to that. Yeah, I think the idea of

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>money being sort of wrapped up in communication, which means

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that it's inevitably wrapped up in communication technology, and it

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of changes along with those new technologies as they're developed.

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes a lot of sense. I also

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>really liked her idea of the price of financial inclusion,

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think we do think a lot about people

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 1>just being locked out of new payment systems, or even

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't able to get bank accounts and things

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, and we don't often think about the flip

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>side of that, which is, you know, when they are included,

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 1>what are the terms of that inclusion, And once they're

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of embedded in a particular payment system because of

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the data aspects that we were talking about, does that

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>mean that they're locked into it basically forever? Like are

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>you always going to be tagged as a person who

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 1>has this particular credit score or a person who lives

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in a particular way, And you know, therefore, for the

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of eternity you're going to be getting advertisements for

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Dutch ovens to your example. But you know, if you're

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a poor person, maybe for the rest of your life,

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be getting pushed loans and financial products

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>with a higher interest rate than you would otherwise. Yeah,

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And I thought the question that you asked was I

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 1>had never thought about her answer before about why our

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>system is so clunky when it comes to two way money,

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and so why is it, you know, and this idea

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that there is like at one point it was like

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like fundamental difference between a merchant and

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in a buyer and a purchaser, and that they have

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.760
<v Speaker 1>different need and that different types of merchants run different

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>levels of chargeback risks. So presumably there are things there

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>there merchants for whom are always dealing with customers trying

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to scam them and trying to get their money back,

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and others for whom not so much, And that that

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like gradation of risk is a very sort

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of like alien concept to the individual. I thought that

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>was super interesting and then sort of like helps to

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>like sort of re contextualize all these different average by

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like social media companies who like knows so much about

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>us to turn us all into both payers and recipients

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of money. Yeah, And I guess the big question is

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 1>whether or not individuals do you start getting risk profiles

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in that sense sort of like that you know that

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Black Mirror episode where everything is determined by like your

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Instagram profile? Do you remember that? Oh? I don't think

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I ever watched that. You know what, can I just

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>say I saw the first episode of Black Mirror and

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I got too freaked out by it, and I've never

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.919
<v Speaker 1>watched them Alright, this one would freak you out because

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>this one I could see actually happening. Um. But this

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>idea that maybe like your social media profile or your

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>online profile is eventually going to feed in how you

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are perceived as a financial risk or financial credit, I think,

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think to some extent we're already on

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the way to that. Yeah. Well, and also reason the question,

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like if you ever read a stuff J. W. Mason,

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.479
<v Speaker 1>he's like an economist at John J Here in the City.

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>He makes this really interesting point in some of his writing,

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which is that like our bank account, in this weird way,

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like if you like look at your bank account, you

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have x amount of money in some sort of like

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>abstract sense, it's supposed to be some representation of all

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of your historical decisions, right. It's it's this sort of

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>number that represents every purchase and every income you've made,

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one minus the other. And so in a way like

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>money is all is on some level, this sort of

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like measure of our past selves and then thinking about

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of like explicitly measuring our social media

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>or monitoring our social media is almost like making been

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>more explicit what money is attempted to do. I don't

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>know if that makes any sense, but no, it does.

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Money is a source of identity. Yeah, yeah, it's it's

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a it's a great subject and even um, there's a

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>reason we always like to talk about it. Yeah, there

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely is. I'm definitely going to read Lana's book now,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>which is also an audiobook, so maybe I'll be listening

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to it. Okay, should we leave it there? All right,

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>let's leave it there. This has been another episode of

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the ad Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Why

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Isn't Though? You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart,

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And you should follow our guest on Twitter, Lana Swartz.

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:42.439
<v Speaker 1>She's at Lana, Lana and Chug out her new book

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>New Money, How Money Became Social Media, and be sure

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson.

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Today and check out all of our podcasts under the

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening to