WEBVTT - Preet Bharara Explains It All 

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey Brian, Hi Katie. Well, it was great to be

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with you in Los Angeles last week. It was so

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>fun for me to see Eliza, who's gotten so big

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and really seems to like cheese. Well, we keep feeding

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>her so she keeps growing, and she she loved, she loved,

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning Katie. She's heard a lot about you. She told

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>me afterwards that you're not nearly as bad as I said,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think you got a new thing. Thankful lot, Brian.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I have seen her since she was an itty bitty baby,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's just amazing she's how old now, Brian, she's

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>almost two, and you should come to l A more

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>often and hang out girls chat with She was adorable

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course Brian has a wonderful wife, Claire, and

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I always love seeing Claire as well. So we also

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>did something we don't normally do, and that is we

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>had a photo shoot. We were ready for our close

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>ups because we're taking some new pictures for the podcast.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>We want a fresh and up the look and of

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>course includes your beautiful mug and more of the photos. So, um,

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think you have a future male

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>modeling Brian. Oh yeah, and if you believe that I've

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>got a Trump University dude you to give you anyway. Uh,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I handed the photographer a twenty for some air brushing,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully that works. Yeah. Sure. Anyway, it was a

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun and it was fun to see you,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>and as I said, it was great fun to see

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Eliza and Claire. Meanwhile, I'm back in New York. I'm

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not traveling for an entire month. I'm not going to

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>get on an airplane because my life has been insane

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of travel the beginning of the summer.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So now I'm just keeping my feet firmly planted on

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the ground and I'm here in our New York studio. Brian,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you're still in l A. And we just had a conversation,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting one with former U S attorney Pre Barrara.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>He was a wonderful source of information and insight about

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>everything that's going on with the Trump investigation. I think

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy in the day to day of the

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>coverage to lose perspective um and to really understand what's

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>going on, and so I think he was terrific at

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>stepping back and giving us, in a sort of Joe Friday,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just the facts ma'am style, and maybe I'm dating myself

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>with that reference, a sense of what matters here, what

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the stakes are, and really to help us understand the

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump investigation and how it's going and really Trump investigations,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>because he talked about the different jurisdictions or auspices under

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which these investigations are taking. Is that that the right

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>legal way to say, Brian. With the Russian investigation being conducted,

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of course by Robert Muller, and the investigation into Michael

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Cohen's activities being investigated by the U. S. Attorney for

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the Southern District of New York, which is Prett's old office,

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and folks, if you're unfamiliar, being a U. S. Attorney

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is essentially the top federal prosecutor in a particular location,

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Southern District of New York is probably the

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>most important office in the country because it covers Manhattan,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so Wall Street is under its jurisdiction. A lot of

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>New York political corruption cases are under its jurisdiction, and

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>very relevant here, uh, the home and business of the

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States are under its jurisdiction. By

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, everyone, this is a crossover show, and that

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>means our conversation will be broadcast on pres terrific podcast

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>try to say that ten times fast, called Stay Tuned

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with pret and it will be broadcasts on our terrific

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast called Katie Curic. And we're trying to come up

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with a new name, so we'll take any suggestions. Everyone,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just keep Brian's name out of it. Just I'm totally kidding.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we're hoping that people who are listening to

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Preach show may find ours worth downloading or subscribing to.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And conversely, we're hoping that you all will check out

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Stay Tuned with pret because he's absolutely terrific and has

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of incredibly smart insights to share. And if

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a longtime listener of our show, tell your friends,

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tell your family, tell your mail carrier, tell your hairdresser.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not proud, just tell everyone please. Meanwhile, we had

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a great conversation, as Brian said, with Prett, who gave

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>us really some much needed perspective, and we began by

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>talking to him about his short lived friendship with Donald

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the events leading up to his vacating the premises.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people outside New York know you as

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the U S attorney in Manhattan who was fired by

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. And you've told the story a million times,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, but can you tell our listeners as well

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>as some people who haven't heard the first episode of

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>your show, what happened and why it got so much attention? Um? Well,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks again for having me. It's very exciting to be

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>here on Stay Tuned with Katie and Brian. You're looking

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>for a new name, we are. I got some very

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>twitter suggestions. I think I think you like Stay Tuned.

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>My lawyers will not go after you if you if

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you name it Stay Tuned with Katie and Brunn. Oh wait, pretty,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>did you not get the memo we're actually replacing you

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on your show? This is very awkward. Actually, I thought

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he had been told Katie like the worst political junkie ever.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you're starting off the interview with your

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>fired because you know that happened to me last year,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>which was I think the question. We've come full circles,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>see how I feel, abuster. Look, So, so, I was

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the U S Attorney for a number of years. It

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was appointed by President Obama, confirmed by the Senate, and

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>then it ordinarily happens when a new president comes in

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly one of the other party. All the US attorneys,

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all the ambassadors, they all know that the new president

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>and the administration deserves its own people. And that's totally normal.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Happens every time, and I expected that to be true

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for me also in November when when Donald Trump won

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and in fact I had no job security, uh that

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I could have expected even if Hillary Clinton had one,

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's a new president. But about eight days after

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the election, the President elect Trump called the Senator for

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>whom I used to work, Chuck Schumer, and said, among

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>other things, do you think pre would stay in his

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>job and stay on for another term? And claimed to

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>be a big fan of mine, said I was doing

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a great job. I thought about it. I had expected

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to go do other things. I've been in public service

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for over seventeen years at that point, so I thought

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>about it. And the best job I've ever had that

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I will ever have. It's an independent job. We did,

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you know the job a politically, we don't think about

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>someone being a Democrat and a Republican. We just bring

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>our cases independently, which is the reputation of the office.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And so then I was asked to meet with the

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>President elect before the formal offer, I guess would happen.

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So I went to Trump Tower November. His desk with

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all the magazines piled up, there's a lot of Trump paraphernalia. Well,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>every magazine cover that he's been on the cover of

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is on his desk, and they're probably six deep. Was

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it still the case? I saw that, But I also

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>saw in the hallway leading to his office there's all

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of Trump paraphernalia, the pictures and photographs and you know,

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>knickknacks and all sorts of things. But before I even

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>got up there in the lobby, remember at the time

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>during transition, there were all sorts of reporters hanging out

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of penned in behind the velvet rope um, you know,

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing who was coming and going, and so you know,

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people recognize me when I when I went by, and

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some reporter while I was waiting for the elevator to come,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this he held out, you know, Mr Brara, are you

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>here to serve a subpoena? I wasn't at that moment um,

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so I know the older takes a long time. It's

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a goal plate elevator. You go upstairs. The president was running.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>President elect was running a little bit late, so I

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shot the breeze with Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon, who

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was wearing only one shirt at the time. Uh in

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>his office, waited for the President elect to come in.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The president was very uh, you know, lovely. We talked

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about the office. Nothing inappropriate was said. He said I

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was doing a great job, he said, and I'm sure

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a lot offers to go into private practice.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope you would consider staying, and I said I would.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>The only odd thing that happened in the meeting was

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he pushed, you know, a yellow pad of post it's

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>towards me and asked me for my phone number, my

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>phone numbers. So it was odd that the President elect

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of the United States of America was asking me from

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>my digits, and presumably they already had them somewhere, because

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how I came to be at the meeting in

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the first place. So I didn't really understand, although Jared

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and Steve didn't seem to think it was out at all,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, that the next leader of the free

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>world was asking someone first phone numbers, didn't think anything

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. Um I was asked to call Jeff Sessions,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the incoming Attorney general, from the elevator bank outside. Everyone

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>said they were excited to work with me, and so

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that was nice. Jeff Sessions. I did from the elevator

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>bank outside the elevator bank on the I think the

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>floor tower. They wanted to make sure that, you know,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they had checked the box. You know, he's going to

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>be the Attorney general. I'm gonna be the US attorney

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>who puatively works for the Attorney General. I just wanted

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that he was looped in. And it

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just the you know, the president and his staff

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>deciding on their own. It was a sort of a

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>consultation with the cabinet official. Who's the most relevant one

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>for my purposes and also the right thing to do.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So he said, yeah, nothing if not good for him,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh suggestions. Who I knew a little bit when I

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>used to work for Senator Schumer. He was the ranking

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>member on the subcommittee for which I worked, so I

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>knew him a little bit. He said, looking forward to

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>working with you. Then I went downstairs and I had

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I had asked President elect Trump if they were going

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to be making an announcement, and he said, well, was

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>there press when you came in, I said, yes, there was.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Well did they recognize you? And I said yes they did.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell them the subpoena things I thought he

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>might appreciate. How funny would that be? Now it's a

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>little funnier and more relevant now. But um, he said,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>why don't you go back out and just tell the

0:09:58.480 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>press that I've asked you to stay? I think you're

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pick and I've asked you to stay. And so I did.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And that was the last meeting I had with the

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>president elect. But then, Um, as I've said publicly before,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he would call me from time to time, which is

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>an odd thing for a sitting president elect to be calling,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>even though we had no prior relationship. Um. And it

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't you know, a matter of business with the Justice Department.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>He called me in December. Then he called me again

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>two days before the inauguration. What did he call you about?

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Seemingly just to chat and make nice. It was just

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>small talk, and it seemed odd to me at the time.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Now we know he does that from time to time.

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>He cultivates people. We know from Jim Comey's testimony that

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>from time to time the president would call him. Um,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>He never asked me to do anything inappropriate and never

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>has asked me to do anything untoward. But it's all

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>odd for someone who has, you know, about to have

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest job in the world to have time to call,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the local U. S attorney in Manhattan, who

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I will note, has technical jurisdiction over, among other things,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that person's businesses, that person's residence, that person's associates. Were

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you conducting any investigations at the time into anything Trump related.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna answer that broad question, but i will

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>say that at the time, publicly, there were calls from

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>my office to look at all sorts of things, including

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the monuments clause that people have heard things about. So

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to the time. So when I got those

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>calls from the President elect, I let the head of

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>transition know, and I made sure that people in my

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>staff knew, and we decided it was okay to return

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the calls because he was not yet the president of

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States and there was no there was no

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>actual Attorney general at the time. He didn't say anything

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that he was not supposed to say, but it was

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just it was just a weird Well, I'm just curious

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>when you say small talk like that mean, do you

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>play golf? I mean? What was that? When he called

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.119
<v Speaker 1>me before the inauguration a day or two before the inauguration,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest day of his life in some way, like,

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>don't you have a speech to write? I asked him

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>about this speech? I said, I said, sir, how's the

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>speech coming? And he said, which you may find interesting,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going really well. I'm writing it all myself, and

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's about it's about hope, neither of which things I

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>believe to be true. Carnage. Maybe maybe the Wordsmith's got

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to him between like the Wednesday and the Friday. I

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think Steve Bannon got to him. He may he may have.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>He asked me if I was doing all right. He

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>told me some stories about He told me how lots

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of people are coming to see him. He was very

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>impressed that, you know, governors all around the country had

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>their hands out and wanted government handouts. It was basically

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like he was trying to be your buddy. Am I right? Yeah?

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>My My view is now based on other things that happened,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on calls he made to Jim Comey, and the way

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he conducts himself and the way he sort of violence,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the protocols and norms of the Justice Department Independent Investigation

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that in the way he conducted his business previously, that

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't see walls between law enforcement and politics, and

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's good for him to cultivate a relationship and

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be buddies with people if at such time you want

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a favor or and again there's this speculation on my part,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's quite educated speculation. If it's sometime you need

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>someone to do you a favor, or to lay off somebody,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>or to show loyalty, it's better to have had a

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>friendly relationship with that person. We'll never know, because a

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of months into the presidency, Donald Trump called me again.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Now he's a sitting president, and now it seems highly

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate that it wasn't coming through the channel of the

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General or the deputy Attorney General. There's no warning

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. I didn't know what the call was about. Um.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>There are protocols that are very sort of serious that

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House has put out because of prior scandals,

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that make it clear that nobody is supposed to talk

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to a law enforcement official at a certain level about

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>an enforcement Actionally, I didn't know if he was gonna

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>be calling me about enforcement action. But I thought it

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>was odd, uh, And I kept thinking about and I

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>called my deputy into discuss whether or not I should

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>return the coin that seems bizarre to people. Your boss

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>calls you, you call him back. You know, the president

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really isn't your boss. If you were a local United

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>States attorney, you serve the people, You serve your oath,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you serve the Constitution. In some measures, you serve the

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General. But we in the in the what we

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have called over time, the Sovereign District of New York,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes don't even think we serve of the Attorney General.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't know what the nature of the call

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was going to be. And one of the things we

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thought about was, well, how's this going to work if

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>he says something inappropriate and cross some line, which was possible,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and now we know, you know, after the fact, that

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>he's done things like that. I believe, who's gonna believe

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>my side of the throat? We actually contemplated, and this

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is interesting in later we had a discussion about whether

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or not we should tape the president of the United States.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We decided against that because we, unlike Michael Cohen, his

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>own lawyer. I thought it was kind of uncool to

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>take the president of the United States. Then we thought

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>about having a witness to the call. But it just

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>shows you, even early on, before a lot of the

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>new information has come out, that there were lots and

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of people, including the president's own lawyer, who believed

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that when you have a conversation with Donald Trump, you

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>want to have proof of what the conversation was because

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>there might be a dispute about the content of it later.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I kept thinking about was something

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump said over and over and over again

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>during the campaign. He kept casting aspersions on Loretta Lynch

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for having that now famous meeting at the tarmac with

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>former President Bill Clinton, whose wife Hilly Clinton, was under investigation.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And that was just a nice chit chat, the participants claim.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that to be true because I trust

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Luretta Lynch. I think she's an honorable person who wouldn't

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>violate her oath. But Donald Trump himself got to say,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again, what do you think

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about. I'm sure they were talking about

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the case. And I'm thinking to myself, even if the

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>president of United States sought to have an innocent conversation

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with me, which I don't know how he has time

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation with me given everything else going

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on in the world. Who's going to believe that. If

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>later it looks like we chose not to investigate something,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or we were investigating something and chose not to bring

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a charge against an associate, it has all the makings

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of an accusation that we had some side deal. I

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>went to Trump Tower, I kissed the ring uh. He

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he asked me to stay. I agreed to stay. There

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was some deal of of friendship or loyalty, and no

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>good could come of returning the call. So I called

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>actually Jeff Sessions, chiefest staff, and said I got this

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>phone call, and he agreed with me that I shouldn't

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>return the call. Knowing that, you know, knowing what we

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>know about the President's personality, he would be what's the

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>technical term, piste off. So I called the secretary at

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House back on March nine, two thou and

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen as that I consulted with the Justice Department for

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a variety of reasons. I don't think it's appropriate for

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>me to have a conversation directly with the President, no offense,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>um and and twenty hours later I was asking my resignation. Now,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I cannot prove that those things are connected, and everyone

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>else who was a holdover was also asked to resign.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But it seems odd to me that those things would

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>be so closely connected in time unless they were at

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>least a little bit related. So pretty you won't answer

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the question about whether there was any Trump related investigation.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna ask me something anyway, aren't you. Well, I'm

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask you saying a little bit connected to that,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>which is is there any evidence of Trump similarly reaching

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>out to any other U. S. Attorney around the country. No,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not. I mean I presumably, uh, hypothetically it could

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>have happened. And the other thing to be aware of

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he then the president. My understanding is from the reporting

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>personally interviewed certain um, you know, appointments to U. S. Attorney,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>including the one in New York, the one in Washington,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>D C. And I think one in Florida, all who incidentally,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the nineties, three offices have technical jurisdiction over

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the person and property of the President and his associates.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So you think he would have learned from that interaction,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like he didn't. Again, which is not

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to say that any one did anything wrong or inappropriate,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but there is there is a you know, definitely an

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>m O on the part of this president to develop

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>relationships with people, whether they're in law enforcement or otherwise,

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>when the norm has always been different. And and have

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you run into anybody since have you been able to

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ascertain if in fact those things might have been connected

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that you weren't going to play ball? And so I've

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>not I've not made any accusation along those lines, but

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I've lived long enough to know you have to wait

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and see what the historical record is. And then you know,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when when I was asked to resign, I didn't. And

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>initially I wasn't trying to be a prima donna. I

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>just was confused because I was the only person from

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the prior administration who had had a personal meeting with

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the president, shook his hand and was asked to stay. So,

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, given the level of incompetence that this administration

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>has often shown, I think that's not even not even

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a partisan point, It's just a fact. When they rolled

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>out the travel band, They rolled out all sorts of

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>other things. Maybe it didn't occur to them. Well, some

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>people stand in a different position. So I was just

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the answer. How did they let you

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>know that you're the acting deputy general? Danna bent A

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>called me a two thirty on on the afternoon of

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>March tenth, it was of Friday, and asked me to

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>my letter of resonation. I said to him again, I

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't trying to be difficult because I served at the

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pleasure of the president. Are you sure it applies to me?

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Because you know I had that thing at the Trump Tower.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Bannon was there. President he asked me to stay. So

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously didn't apply to everyone, because two of

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the sitting US attorneys at the time, one was Rod Rosenstein,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously he wasn't being asked to resign, didn't want him

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to go, and the others Danna bent To himself. Ah,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So it was unclear to me if they meant for

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>me to be asked to let go, to be like

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>O or not. And then again, because I lived a

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>long time, I thought it just needed to be clear

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that this was the wish of the president. If it was,

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and it took twenty four hours to learn that. You know,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I walked out into into the open air as a

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>free civilian man, but I didn't want it to be

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, suggested if in fact there was some nefarious

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>thing going on. I'm not saying their watch, but if

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact there was something nefarious going on, and people

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are trying to avoid an investigation of some sort, that

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it should just be clear that this was the wish

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of the president and not some functionary who was in

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>an acting capacity at the Justice Department. Why was that

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>important because so later on if you have to find

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>out why people did what they did, people don't have

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>plausible deniability. If I if I had never had the meeting, again,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as I said, the outset and people conflate these things,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I had no expectation of staying. There's actually not even

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a tradition of the next president keeping someone before. Now

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it happens. Rod Rosenstein served under George W. Bush

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and then was was kept on by Barack Obama and

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>kept on again by Nald Trump. So there are exceptions

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed by one president and kept

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>on by the following president. So it's a small minority

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of people I didn't expect to be in that position,

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but once someone asks you to stay in with a

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of fanfare, you know, I was asked to stand

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for another term before he appointed in a pretty public way,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>very public way. And then when you see other things

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that happened, and you see you begin to see the

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>ways in which the president thinks about law enforcement and

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>thinks about personal loyalty, and thinks about how you interfere

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with things. You know, issues pardons without going through the process,

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>asks Jeff Sessions, as we found out later, and I

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>believe this, you know, can you can the department do

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>something to back off on jour Pyle asked Jim call

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>me and I believe this also, can you back off

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on Michael Flynn? These are the kinds of conversations that

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the president thinks are appropriate that that puts into a

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>different light the nature of the cause he was making

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to me, And as somebody who's been in the legal

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.719
<v Speaker 1>system for so long, why is that such a dangerous

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>m o pre Because because the law is the law,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's supposed to be independently enforced, and no one

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>gets special privileges, that law applies equally to everybody, even

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>though we have seen examples of this. These are I

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think transgressions of norms and very important norms in this country.

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Unlike a Banana Republic, elected leaders don't get to decide

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>because they have enemies or they have friends, Um who

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>gets prosecuted who doesn't based on their level of friendship

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with you or based on their level of adversari, noess

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>towards you. That's how it's supposed to be. And and

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>scale look at the scandals have been avoided because they

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have these protocols in place. That the reason you have

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>these guidelines that make clear that a political official in

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the White House is not supposed to call a you know,

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a lower level Department of Justice official to say, hey,

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going on without investigation of my former business colleague?

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Or hey, can you take a look at investigating uh,

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this political adversary I had. That's not That's

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>not a kind of country I think that we're supposed

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to live in. I'm just curious that Brian's gonna have

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a million questions that Brian, just because there's an opening here,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>does it concern you? Does the nomination of Brett Avanaugh

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>concern you? For that reason that he seems to have

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a particular view about the power of the presidency. So

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's reason to be concerned that Brett Kavanaugh

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>has a view a little bit conveniently adopted after he

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>had a different view as a policy matter. As people

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>may know, Brett Kavanaugh, one of the first things he

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>did as a as a lawyer was working on the

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Star investigation of a sitting president and appears to have

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>had a quite different view of what you can subject

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to sitting president too. And later he had he has

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>had a slightly different view, had an epiphany somehow you look,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it can be working in the White House. I mean,

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>this was not a crazy story that that experiencing the

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>incoming that you see actually working inside the White House,

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>which he did under the George W. Bush administration. He

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>changed his mind and he acknowledged that it was a

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, different position. It looks I credit his you

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>know statement that he changed his mind more than I

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>credit what I've seen Rudy Giuliani do massold Rudy Giuliani

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the I'm TV recently saying that a president does not

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>have to obey a subpoena for testimony, when at the

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>same time I'm forgetting who it was on cable television

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>showing him a video of himself saying the exact opposite.

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And rather than say I had a change of heart

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>or I changed my mind, he said I never said

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>those things. So Grigiliani, uniquely in public life and American law,

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>can have two opposite ideas in his head at the

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>same time and claim them both to be correct. Well,

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the difference is one president's a Democrat and the others

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a Republican. And do you think that Brett Kavanaugh's nomination

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was more appealing because of his change of heart? I'm

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:49.239
<v Speaker 1>prepared to believe that, Like what I think is clear. Uh, No,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>matter what you think about the president is that he

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do a lot of homework. Um, I doubt, in

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>fact not. I wouldn't would bet everything I have that

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't read a number of opinions by brit have

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'd be shocked if you read even one. I'd

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be shocked if you read the briefing materials that were

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>put together and we prepared senators for confirmation hearings and

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what our views would be on particular

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>people who might be nominated. Those briefing materials go to many, many,

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>many many, many pages and hundreds of pages. So I'm

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>prepared to believe that Donald Trump you took advice from,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>as everyone knows, um the Federal Society and the Heritage

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Foundation to come up with his list of first twenty

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think then Brett Caabnot was added later to

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that list people who the conservative community of a particular

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>stripe I thought were good and people on the conservative

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>side of politics would support. And then in getting briefed

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>orally casually, you know, some of the bullet points that

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>must have been suggested to the president would have included

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea that Brett Kavanaugh has been putting forward that

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the president can do, you know, exercise his power in

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a very broad way. And I'm sure that was a

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit music to his ears. I don't know if

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that was the the basis. I think other presidents who

0:25:58.359 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are not in the legal jeopardy that the President Trump

0:25:59.920 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is in might have also appointed Brett Kavin. I think

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of Jeb bushould become the president, Brett Kavina would have

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>been at the absolute top of the list. But I

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if it was a little bit of

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>icing on the cake. What is striking that In his

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>first public statement as President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Brett Kavanaugh said no president has conducted a more thorough

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>or comprehensive process to pick a nominee than President Trump has,

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of an extraordinary states that it's one

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the most bizarre and demonstrably false statements ever made,

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>which is saying a lot from how do you know

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's follow how do you know it's demonstrably false? Because

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the historical record shows that multiple presidents, not sometimes presidents

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>don't consult that much, the multiple multiple presidents have consulted

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>extensively with the other party. There are books on how

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton and you might not like his nominees if

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>you're a conservative, how he reached out across the aisle,

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>talked to Orange Hatch and other folks. Um who I

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>think during one of these periods was high ranking or

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the chair of the leader of the Republicans and the

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee to vet the possibility of people he would

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>be nominating. On the other hand, the documentary evidence and

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the testimonial evidence, if you interview people on what Donald

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump did was merely some people say, outsourced the decision

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of who to put on the list, to the Heritage Foundation,

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>UM and to the Federal Society, there was no one

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>has come forward with any plausible suggestion of any sort

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>by anyone the president. Donald Trump consulted with any member

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the other party, and other presidents have, you know,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kept this sort of internal as well. But to say

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that he consulted more widely than anyone else, ever, I

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's demonstrably untrue. It's time to take a quick break.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>When we're back with pre Perar, we're going to dig

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into much more from whether Michael Cohen has flipped to

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>what advice pret would give to Donald Trump if he

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were his lawyer? And now back to our conversation with

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>pre Berr. How do you assess the extent to which

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is in legal jeopardy? If here were your

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>client as a lawyer, how would you describe the overall

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of this problem to him? But those are those

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are different questions. How do you assess? I think it's

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult to us as you just know what's in the

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>public record. You know that Bob Mueller and his team

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are full of super professional, smart heads down kinds of

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>lawyers who will bring a case if there's a case

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to be brought, won't bring one if there's not one

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to be brought. And when you're talking about legal jeopardy

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and the way normal people understand it, whether or not

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>someone is subject to being arrested, I think the president

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is not in any legal jeopardy really, because I believe

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that that especially Counsel Mueller will take the view that

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the Office of Legal Counsel to Justice Department has taken

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for a long time now. Not everyone agrees with it,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's the prevailing view that a sitting pret no

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>with not just Brett Kavana's view that a sitting president

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot be indicted. So in that regard, he doesn't have

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sort of imminent legal jeopardy in the

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>way that some lawyers have to counsel with their clients

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a bag packed and a toothbrush, you know,

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in their overnight bag, and take care of their affairs,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>take care of their affairs. You know, some some players

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>tell their clients when they think they're about to be arrested,

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to avoid you know, being arrested in front of their

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>family and children. At six o'clock in the morning, they

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>check into a hotel, you know, under an alias so

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that when the FBI finally comes, you know that the defendant,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the target can surrender on his own terms later to

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement. So I don't think the president is any

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is in any jeopardy like that. On the other hand,

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>there are people who around him who are and I

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see additional arrests, including my presumption is

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those people being his former personal lawyer Michael Cohen.

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's impossible to gauge separate apart from his inability

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to be indicted, how were he not the president? How

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>much evidence is there that he engaged in some kind

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy if there was knowledge on his part in

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what people say cocluding, But coluding is not really a crime,

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but conspiring with a foreign power to interfere with the election,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>or violent campaign finance laws, or engage in obstruction. So

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the jeopardy he's in is what Congress will do. Part

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of that depends on what the nature of Congress is

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>part of Part of that depends on what happens with

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats in the fall. It also depends on what

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the priorities of the Democrats and others are. Not everyone

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is in favor of taking a legal action against the president.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that the second party of question is what I

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>would do or say if I were representing the president

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>who had this level of legal jeopardy as to keep

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>my mouth shut, I would be more a loot, more

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like Emmett Flood, who nobody knows, although he's representing the

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States as well. We just see

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the pr offensive that's not particularly helpful to the president

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>by Rudy Giuliani on TV, and before that we saw

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the same from John Dowd and from Jay Seculo. Generally speaking,

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>when your client, even if it's a higher file person

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like a politician or a celebrity or a billionaire, you

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>keep your mouth shut and you do your work behind

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. Like the principal thing that you want to

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do is explain in a in a sober minded, respectful,

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>rigorous way to the prosecutors who potentially are going to

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>charge your client is why they have it wrong, And

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>not blast them in public, and not proclaim facts about

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>your client's knowledge that turned out to be untrue a

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>short time thereafter. Not to make a proclamation about a

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>potential witness against your client. In this case, Michael Cohen

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one day saying he's an honest and honorable man, the

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>next day saying he's a pathological liar and his lied

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>his whole life. And part of the reason you don't

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>do that is you look First of all, you look

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like a fool. Second of all, you don't serve your

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>client well. And in particularly the reason you don't serve

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>your client well is you don't have credibility. This discussion

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not the president is going to sit

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down with a special counsel and on what terms. Those

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are human beings who are dealing with each other, you know,

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani or at Flood or whoever else is sitting down,

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not with robots, are seeing that with other people, and

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.239
<v Speaker 1>they're making representations about what the president you know, will

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>agree to or not agree to, or they're making representations

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about what the law is and why the Special Council

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>has it wrong, barking up the wrong tree. A lot

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of those arguments, as they are in life, generally, are

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>persuasive or not persuasive if the person making them has

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>personal credibility. And when Rudy and others go out there

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and say idiotic things that are proven false and flip

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>flop day to day when a person like that, and

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we've had people like that are not as famous as

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Juliani. When a person like that does that in

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>public and then comes into my office when I was

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the US Attorney and tries to make an argument to me,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't credit it, And that's a failure of lawyering

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on the part of those guys. But do you think

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they're doing that for the for public consumption? There are

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>two different audiences they're appealing to. And do you think

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a method to their madness that that people

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are so confused at this point they can't make head

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>nor tails of anything, right. I'm always careful not to

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a tribute too much cleverness and strategic thinking on the

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>part of people who look like they're saying silly, self

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>contradictory things. It's possible, and that's obviously how folks are

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>going to spend it. But I don't know anyone, even

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>supporters of the president, who actually think that the constantly

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>changing statements of Prudi Giuliani are helpful. In fact, I

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think I saw in the last couple of days a

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>former lawyer to the president in other matters. I think

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the former divorced lawyer, who it seems remains loyal towards

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the president and infection about the president, said that ry

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Giliani's representation is a disaster. That said, maybe what Juliani

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is doing is acclimating the public to the idea of collusion,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so that if and when Mueller proves it, you know,

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the reaction is, oh, of course, we knew there was collusion,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.719
<v Speaker 1>just like when Ken Starr proves that Bill Clinton had

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the affair with Monica Lewinsky's moving the gold post, right,

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So people will be less shocked and more in nord

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to this whole notion. Look, it's possible, anything as possible.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But I do think though, that really smart people like

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys and other folks in the public who are

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>commentators because they're smart and rigorous, like to impose, you know,

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of strategic thinking on the part of people

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>who may just be incompetent. Can we ask you about

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen's case, because your old office is investigating. I

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>have no personal knowledge of everything relating to that case.

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But what you've read, what you've seen in the public,

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>so clearly he's flipped, right. I wouldn't say clearly, U,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>because remember, two things have to be necessary. Right. First,

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy who is in trouble in this case, Michael Cohen,

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>has to make the decision that he wants to cooperate

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>with the government, and that seems fairly clear, as your

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>question and your smile indicates to me. But a second

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>thing also has to be true. The government has to

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>want your cooperation. The government has to believe the prosecutors

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.919
<v Speaker 1>have to believe that this potential target it in this case,

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen has substantial assistance to offer. Now everyone has

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>been assuming I think it's not a terrible assumption that

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen knows what a lot of the bodies are buried,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>can cooperate with respect to a lot of folks, perhaps

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>even the President of the United States, and then he

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>has stuff to give. But then there's another sort of

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>third issue as well. Let's say the first two conditions

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are met. Guys in trouble. Guy wants to co operate

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>with the government, and government wants him. Government wants him,

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>government thinks that person has information of criminality, and the

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>party of other folks. The government also has to believe

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that the witness is going to be truthful going forward,

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>also has to believe that the witness is going to

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>be effective. I'm not saying this is true of Michael Cohen,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's got a lot of baggage. Yeah. I think

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Giuliani's second assessment of Michael Cohen is the more correct one,

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's lined his whole life and presumably on behalf

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump, that the first assessment of his being

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>honorable and honest was not true. You know, prosecutors put

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on people who have told lies before and who have

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>killed people and have committed fraud. We put them on

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the stand to prosecute other people, but you have to

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>go through a real serious assessment of how that's going

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to look, of whether or not they really turned the page,

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's being fully honest with you. There are people

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 1>who I'm not saying this is true of Michael Colin,

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but just remember that these other things. His mere willingness

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to flip against somebody, including maybe his former client, is

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily sufficient. And it is true that some cases

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>never get made because the witness is so flawed and

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so unable to come to terms with the whole truth

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're not usable. Do these tape conversations change any

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. It would be one thing if there were

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>no tapes. Right if you list the tapes, look so

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the last, the one tape that's been released looks like

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it was suddenly in abruptly shut off. And you know,

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you do have to worry him. Had people who claimed

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that things were said, but they selectively tape. Um, all

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>these things I'm about to say are hypothetical. We don't

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>know if Michael Cohen, for example, has three other tapes

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>in which he looks terrible and he destroyed them. Let's

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>say there's an email about that. Um, you know, let's

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>say there are times when he was on tape, you know,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>spin a false story, so he would have something that

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>looked like it was credible and tape recorded, but was

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>really not true. That would then cast into doubt things

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on other tapes where he was telling the truth. I

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 1>just don't know the extent of this. And I will

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>tell you also that prosecutors all the time put on

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>unsavory witnesses on the stand because that's the nature of it. Right,

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're a bad guy and you committy crimes with

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the mob, you're going to have the information about other

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>guys in the mob. But there is a meter of

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>unsavory nous that we look at, and the idea that

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy was recording his own client does not sit

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>well with prosecutors who are by definition lawyers as well.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>And it may be okay, but you know, I think

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna have to think long and hard but

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to use a person like that. And

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, on top of all that, the other

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>thing prosecutors don't like this is a guy who has

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>another lawyer, Landie Davis, who's trying to one up Rudy Giuliani.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutors don't want people to come into their office. We're

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna be witnesses and then worried that the next day

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go right on television, whether the lawyers gonna

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 1>go right on television and say, here's what the prosecutors

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about, here's what I got asked, here's what

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>my guy is gonna do. We hate that. It's terrible,

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it's awful. So they're all sorts of um, you know,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>thorny issues when you're dealing with what it seems like

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat not controllable witness like Michael Cohen, who also

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's lied a lot. And I know you

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>can't get inside their heads. But what do you think

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani and Lannie Davis are thinking when they say

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>yes to do all these TV shows. That's a great

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. Look, each of them has sort

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the the you know, the big mouth lawyer who's

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>going on television. Maybe it's a you know, it's a

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>split strategy. But each of them also has a very

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>well respected, quiet, behind the scenes lawyer. In Michael Cohen's case,

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Guy Petrolo, who I worked for in private practice

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and who worked for me as the chief of my

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>criminal division when I first became the OS attorney. He's

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as solid and competent and as ethical as they come.

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe it's the decision that some high profile

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, subjects and targets make. It's like, you

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, I am my legal strategy, and I got

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>my brainiac nerd lawyer, uh Emmett Flood, Guy Petrilla to

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 1>do that, who have great credibility with the special counsel,

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and they do that negotiating and then I have my

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>blow hard guy, and my blow hard guy goes out

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>on television MUCKs things up, look strong and you know

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sates the President's need to have someone go on TV

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>defend him, and I guess that's totally possible. It's not

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the way, It's not the way I would do it

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or you guys would do it, but maybe that's the

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>way it's done these days. I have one more question

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about Michael Cohen, and we can take it out if

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's super stupid, but he's being investigated for I mean,

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is Michael Cohen being investigated for the collusion stuff, for

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Stormy Daniel stuff or is there overlap? There's a

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>stupid question all I think it's a smart question, And

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>again I don't know. But the following things we know

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to be true. One is that Bob Mueller has an

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>investigation that's focused on Russian interfering, meddling attack on our election,

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and then related to that, whether or not anyone on

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign UH knowingly help them write what people

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>refer to informally as collusion. And third, whether or not

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been any obstruction and that so we know that

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to be true. The second thing we know to be

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>true is that rather than retain whatever investigation or whatever

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>bad things the mother folks found about Michael Cohen, they decided,

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>in combination with Rod Rosenstein to separate that part out

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and give it to my old office, the Southern District,

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>New York, which suggests that the things and the lawyers

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 1>have made this point in a smart point and better

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for the president, which makes it appear that the things

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that are being looked at on the part of Michael

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Cohen by the Southern District are broader scope, separate from

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the president and have nothing to do with Russia. Now.

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.959
<v Speaker 1>The way the way, so that appears to be true

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on the surface, but the way the world works otherwise is,

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are humans who have multiple things going

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:00.879
<v Speaker 1>on in their head, and so may be true when

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>this happens all the time that you take a look

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>at one cooperating witness and then they flip. They don't

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just flip as to the you know, the taxi medallion issue,

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>which is reportedly something that people are looking at, or

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a particularly uh, you know, compartmentalized money laundering

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>issue or some other fraud. You say to that person,

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what other bad things have you done? What other things

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>do you know? And my presumption is if they end

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>up flipping Michael Cohen and they find evidence of a crime,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to ask him to plead guilty to

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>with respect to his own business dealings, he will also

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>be asked the question, we'll tell us about Donald Trump,

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the Trump organization, tell us about these

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>payments to these women, whether or not they were related

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to the election, and that was the subject of this

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>phone call. And if he has information about that stuff

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>or dealings with the Russians, then that information is almost

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly going to be shared with Bob Mueller. So it's

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not completely compartmentalized, because the information in this human's head

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Cohen's head is not compartmentalized that way. So

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>does Bob Mueller's team have access to all the material

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that was what would you say that was seized from

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen's office. So my guess is, I don't know

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what arrangement they've worked out, because you have competing jurisdictions

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>all the time. My guess is that in assigning this

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>portion of the case of the Southern District, it was

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>made clear that if appropriate and as necessary, we need

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>access to information to do our own job, then you

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 1>will share that with us, and you will keep us

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the loop in pushing that part of the case

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>over to the Southern District. Do you think Muller is

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in any way preparing for the day that he's fired,

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or at least creating a contingency plan if Rosenstein is

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>impeached or fired. Um, if he gets pushed out or

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>neutered in some way, is he trying to create a

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a living will for his investigations. I haven't

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>heard it put that way. Let's go away putting it.

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's his primary considered. Ryan went

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to law school, strated lawyer here, met too. Look at

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>us doing podcasts now, Live in the Dream, Live in

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the Dream, you're not even in the studious managed to

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>mailing it in from somewhere. Um. Look, I don't know

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's the primary motivation for why he's doing what

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. I think I think Mueller's primary motivation is

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>to follow the facts and see what the truth is

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>related to. That is to make sure as much as

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 1>possible and consistent with his oath UM, that his investigation

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's coloring within the lines and staying within

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the lanes, and doesn't look like it's getting too far afield,

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>so it has maximum legitimacy and credibility and so if

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>they found something that seemed, you know, a little bit

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 1>out of left field with Michael Cohen, I think it's

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>more likely they were just trying to show when when

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>later eyes are going to be looking at all this

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, that they didn't agglomerate to themselves every possible

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy thing that anyone associate with Trump has ever done

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and sent it to the Southern District. It's probably nice, um,

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, benefit on the side for there to be

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>multiple investigations going on in different places. So it's a

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of an incidental living Will you know that that

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>case against the twelve military intelligence officials in Russia, the

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>g r U, that's no longer with Mueller principally either.

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>That was transferred to the National Security Division. So it

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is true what you're pointing out. I think it's a

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>smart observation that things that have begun in the Mueller

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, um crucible, some of them are being parceled

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>out to other places. It just makes it a lot

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>harder to unring the bell. It's so gratifying to hear

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are so many interesting cases involving the president

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that can go on simultaneously. Well, when you make it

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a habit when you make it a habit of surrounding

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>yourself with shady people who you who you know boastfully

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>referred to as your fixer Um and boastfully you know,

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>referred to as kings of dirty tricks with ether At,

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Roger Stone or Paul Manafort or Michael Cohen. It's not

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>shocking that there's evidence of criminality in all those cases.

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you know Bob Muller and tell us about him

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and how you think he's handling himself in the case.

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So far so Bob Mueller. Anybody who's ever worked with

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>him respects him, admires him. He's a guy before he

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>became known to us here, served his country. He volunteered

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to go to Vietnam. You know, he had a privileged upbringing.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>He went to Princeton, he was a lacrosse star. And

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>when when one of his lacrosse teammates after graduate of

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Princeton died in Vietnam, unlike some people you know home

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>referring to he volunteered for service. Um was wounded in

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>battle and spent basically his whole life in public service.

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Every time he was he's been offered something to do

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in public service, whether it's that's use attorney or chief

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Criminal Division or FBI director. He says, yes,

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he does it. He is at need all these jobs anymore.

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And but people forget you know, now you can swift

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and anybody, I guess you can take somebody who served

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 1>his country, who is a Republican who has never been

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>mismerged in anyway like this before, about whom new Gingrid

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.959
<v Speaker 1>said at the time of his appointment. Everyone can relax

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because Bob Mueller is a professional. You know, this is

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a guy who started serving as FBI director right before

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, and when the ten year term expired, there

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>are but three million people in the country. Rather than

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:29.439
<v Speaker 1>find someone who could then replace him, Barack Obama, who

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was of a different party than the president that appointed

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Bob Mueller in the first place, and the Congress got

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>together and with a unanimous vote, rather than find some

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:41.240
<v Speaker 1>other person to replace Bob Mueller, they changed the law

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a hundred zero and extended his term for two years.

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>So here's a person. No one's a god, and no

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one should be put on a pedestal unduly. But of

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the country who is in law enforcement, there's

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 1>no one w had a better reputation than Bob Mueller. Now,

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>how's he conducting myself himself? I think he's doing what

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he's always done. And in my observations of him, both

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as the United Attorney work with him as f BI Director,

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and then observing him separately, he doesn't talk to the press.

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He keeps his head down, he does his work. He's

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not afraid of anything, and he's not afraid of anyone,

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and he believes in public serving. Here's a guy who

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is back in private practice, who's know, not young in years,

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>who accepted this task knowing the no matter what he

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>did or decided or didn't do, that a large pertion

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the population, you know, is going to cast dispersions

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on him. And I wrote a piece about him for

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Time magazine some weeks ago, and the bottom line is,

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's a person that that a lot of

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>people like to pour their hopes and fears into. You know,

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>he's either a savior for the progressive left or he's

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a villain to the Trump supporters. He's neither one of

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>those things. He's I think, just to buy the book

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lawman who's trying to do a difficult job that he

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>was given. I'm prepared to believe that he's going to

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have it, you know, a scathing report. I'm also prepared

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to believe that he will find something different. And my

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hope is that everyone accepts, no matter what side the

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>aisle you're on, accepts whatever his findings and proposals are.

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Before we move on from the Trump administration or from

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Trump investigation, I want to ask you one other question,

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>which is you said earlier that collusion in and of

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>itself is not necessarily a crime. Giuliani said something similar

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this morning on CNN. It's July, we're recording this, and

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>then he had to call into Fox later today to

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>clarify that statement, and he said, the President didn't do it,

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but even if he did, it wouldn't be a crime.

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain that concept of collusion not being a crime.

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.359
<v Speaker 1>And if collusion isn't a crime, what are we all

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>doing here? So? I don't know where the word collusion

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>came from. Initially, I think there are words in the

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>English language. Is it a legal term? So it's not so,

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's the point I was about to make. There

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are certain terms that have both specialized legal meaning and

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>also cloquial meaning. Right, um and collusion is not one

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that you see in the statute, you know, the statue

0:48:56.840 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about conspiracy, that talk about aiding in a beading,

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about acting in concert, but there's not one

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that that says collusion. It's a word that's sort of

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>easy for people to understand that has a I think

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you think of colluding with the enemy. Yeah, and it

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>has a connotation of dastardliness about it. But it's Natasha

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>appropriate example, Kate, exactly who I think I've been indicted

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>under seal I'm prepared to predict that. Um. So it's

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a shorthand way of talking about things that people

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the time. In the same way you

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>say you know someone's a bad guy. That that doesn't

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>mean as at mean that people are either subjects, targets

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>or defendants, some bad guys and good guys. So it's

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a shorthand that people in the press use. The President

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is seized upon it to say that there is none

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>of that which is neither here nor there. And now,

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's a shorthand term that has come into popular use, um,

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.879
<v Speaker 1>it's convenient for people to say it's not even there's

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>no such thing which is why people like me like

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to say it doesn't have any specialized legal meaning. Um,

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 1>but things that might constitute in ordinary parlance collusion can

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>also constitute a crime. Right. So if you, for example,

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if it if it is true that these Russian gru

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>operatives engaged in this hacking with the assistance of, and

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge of and or that maybe the direction of

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>um people in America who are on the Trump campaign,

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Roger Stone, who's meant who has alluded to in

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the indict but not charged yet, then that is both

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>collusion in this sort of lay person's sense, and it's

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:36.879
<v Speaker 1>also potentially conspiracy. So you know, again, I don't think

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we make too much of this idea that collusion is

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not in the statute, you know, but they're they're conspiracy

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>statutes that don't have the word collusion. That doesn't mean

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that things that would ordinarily constant collusion are not a crime. Yes, yes, yes,

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's really semantics we're talking about. And and a

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people ask, what is taking Robert Muller so

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Long's it takes a long look? But people understand is

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it takes a long time to investigate things, in particular

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>white color matters. These things take a few years. And

0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it also depends on the scope. I mean, you've have

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple indictments, multiple guilty please, you have multiple charges against

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>people in other countries, namely Russia that required not only investigation,

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 1>getting information, but but the acquiring of classified information. You

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>know that that last indictment against the g r U

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve is chock full of stuff that most surely very

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>recently was classified. And there's a back and forth that

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>has to happen with the intelligence community on sources and

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>methods to see what you declassify for purposes of making

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>an adequate indictment, and also to maybe send a message

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to their intel counterparts in Russia. When you investigate a

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:51.319
<v Speaker 1>financial crime, and presumably financial things are being investigated as well,

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>sometimes evidence is in other countries. Sometimes evidence is at

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one bank and you get a subpoena return from that

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one bank, and you see the flow of money into

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>an ad has happened all the time in cases that

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 1>we investigated, and it takes a couple of months to

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>get the subpoena return from the one bank account, and

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then you look and see, well what money was coming

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>into that bank account, and then you got a subpoena.

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Those banks. So it's pains taking, painstaking, and especially when

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to conceal their crimes, crimes of money

0:52:17.040 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>laundering in particular. That's all about having shell companies and

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>having payments go from one entity to another. It takes

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a while to peal the the onion. How bizarre was

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it when you heard that Putin was inviting investigators to

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>work with It was bizarre and scary. Although more scary

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and bizarre is that the President seemed to say, Hey,

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it sounds sounds like a great art, like a great idea,

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>along with like the cyber force thing that they were

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do together. It was going to be impenetrable, though, prate,

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.839
<v Speaker 1>how could you object to that? Let's listen to this

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>voice mail from a listener who is nice enough to

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>send in a question. My name is Marian Demot. I

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:58.000
<v Speaker 1>live in Spring, Texas. If the results of Robert Miller's

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>investigation shows that Trump illegally became president of the United States,

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>what happens to all of the long he's done to

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>us as a country and as a people. What happens

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to Hillary Clinton, who officially won the election? Thank you

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so thanks? Should I answered so thanks for the question,

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate the sentiment. I don't believe that the

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:25.879
<v Speaker 1>presidency operates like um the Miss American pageant. If there

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was fraud on the part of the president in becoming

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the president, and that causes him to be removed from office,

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>then it goes to Mike, goes to Mike Pence, And

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the broader answer the question is, then I

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think it will remain for a lot of good people

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the country to come together, get past it, to

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>try to remedy a lot of bad things that may

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have been done. But it doesn't go to Hillary. Sorry.

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I recently interviewed James Comey. I know he's a friend

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and former colleague of yours. He would not give an inch.

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping we could break some news and AskMen

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about his actions during the two thousand sixteen campaign, including

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the letter he sent eleven days before the election. Do

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you think he has a fair argument and despite your friendship,

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think he should just say I screwed up? Look,

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know he's a smart guy, and I worked for him,

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and I worked alongside him when he was the Deputy

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Trained General, and I worked in the Senate. Friendship aside, No, no,

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 1>So he can say what he wants to say. Um,

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have done it differently. And if he believes

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that what he did was right, then he has a

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>right to say that and right to defend himself. What

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>would you have done? I wouldn't have sent that letter.

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought the letter was a mistake, and I think

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of I think most people think the letter

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake. UM, I understand. I mean the best

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I can do when talking about other people's errors. Who

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we're operating in good faith. I don't think

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to sway the election. I don't think

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:56.839
<v Speaker 1>he was acting out of partisan interests. I don't think

0:54:56.880 --> 0:55:00.359
<v Speaker 1>he had an ax to grind with anybody. He looked at,

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a difficult decision tree, and as he keeps saying,

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was that the two doors, And I mean,

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I fully buy that, but but

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what I do believe is that he was trying to

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>make the best decision that he could make. I think

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it was the wrong decision. And I think you can

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>judge people based on their decision making, both on um,

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the wisdom of the decision, but also on the intent

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:24.760
<v Speaker 1>behind the decision. And sometimes people make a mistake of judgment,

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 1>which I think this was uh and some of the

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>people can make a mistake both of judgment and of

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and of good faith, or doing something for nefarious purpose.

0:55:32.480 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he was trying very hard to save the

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>reputation of the FBI or defend the reputation of the FBI.

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in the longer run, it's arguable that he

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 1>did it more harm than good. And I think the

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>problem with that letter h is that it was on

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the eve of the election. Yes, and you know, I

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 1>remember I was a little bit of a unique position

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to know before the world did, what the consequence of

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the letter would be, insofar as the laptop was in

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the custody of you know, my folks, the FBI, as

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we were working with the Anthony Weiner laptop, because we

0:56:09.440 --> 0:56:13.279
<v Speaker 1>were investigating Anthony Winer for these other you know, sex

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>abuse related CRIMEO, sexual enticement, crimes of a minor, and

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so we knew among a small group of people that

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody yet was aware of what was on the laptop.

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So the sending of the letter indicated a legitimately and

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 1>naturally to a lot of people, including political opponents of

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton, that there must be something damaging, because why

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>would you otherwise sort of a vicious circle. The fact

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that you wish with the letter must indicate that there's

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>something very damning on the laptop. And I don't think

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:44.360
<v Speaker 1>people appreciated when they saw the letter, and and for

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:45.959
<v Speaker 1>their own political reason, I think a lot of people

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>acted badly after they got the letter, um, because it

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was in their political interest to make hay of it.

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think one should have anticipated that that was

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, and it might have been the better

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.880
<v Speaker 1>course to wait and see if the stuff in the

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>laptop was redundant, irrelevant, um, you know, unnecessary, you know,

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to affect the investigation, all of which turned out to

0:57:09.560 --> 0:57:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be so. And why couldn't he have put as many

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:15.759
<v Speaker 1>agents as possible on that to comb through those emails

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and to do nothing until he had the information he

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to move ahead or not. I don't know. I

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know did have the power to do that, right?

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think everything relating to how the information on the

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 1>laptop was exploited, a lot of things relating to that, um,

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not wonderful. I'm looking at this a

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>very long Inspector General report on the issue of what

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>happened with that laptop and how much time it took

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask for the information on the laptop? Right right,

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>my office is in the I report to the extent

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we were staying in our lane and

0:57:55.600 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the Anthony Weiner, you know, potential criminal case,

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're a little bit surprised that nobody was doing

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:05.480
<v Speaker 1>anything more quickly to exploit and look at the emails

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the laptop. A lot of people have asked for

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>would you run for office? Are you asking? Is that

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a statement? Now? It's a statement and then it's a quizzical. Look.

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So I thought about running for a train general and

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I've announced on the podcasts this week that I'm not

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 1>h there's an open seat, and you know they're they're

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>good people who are running for that position. Look, I

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:31.440
<v Speaker 1>think I think public office is important. Um. I enjoyed

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>having the appointed position that I had. I think there's

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good that can be done, you know,

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think doing things from the outside which I'm learning about.

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:41.959
<v Speaker 1>And I have this great task force with Governor Chrissy

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd Whitman and the Brennan Center, which hopes to restore

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>institutions of democracy and I have other things planned. The

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>question about serving in office requires first a stomach for

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 1>an appetite four and a thick enough skin for um,

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what it takes to get to office, which is campaigning,

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:04.840
<v Speaker 1>which also requires depending on the jurisdiction you're in, a

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of I think fundraising and some people can do it,

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and some people like it less. I tend to like

0:59:11.640 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it less. I think there are ways to do it.

0:59:13.080 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll think about that for the future. So you haven't

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 1>closed the door on the As what I've said often, UM,

0:59:20.560 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is it politics is not my cup of tea. Uh,

0:59:23.120 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, being a judge is not my cup of tea. Um.

0:59:25.080 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>What I like doing more than anything else was being

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>aligned prosecutor and being the U. S. Attorney for the

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Southern District of New York, which I think is one

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of the purest forms of public service. Um. You could

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>remain independent. You didn't know anything to anybody, you didn't

0:59:37.880 --> 0:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have to ask anybody for nicol, and you got to

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>get up every morning and do the right thing. Some

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of these other jobs are not like that, and certainly

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the path to these other jobs is not like that.

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Which is not that I have great faith in respect

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for people who throw their hat in the ring, and

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I've supported some of those people. There are people who

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>worked for me who running for office and who worked

0:59:54.360 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 1>alongside me who running for office, and I've supported them

0:59:56.960 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and gone to fundraisers for them. At this moment, it

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't seem to be for me. I'm getting frantic

1:00:03.640 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>messages on my computers. Pre needs to leave, and uh, Pre,

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>will you come back and to us anytime? It's really

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a real pleasure, and I think you should reconsider

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>your decision not to run for office because we need smart,

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>engage people like you. And you know, I think it's

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>now more than ever we have to have people who

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have the courage to to be the men and women

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the arena, as Teddy Roosevelt would say. Pleasure being

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on stay tuned with Katie and Brown. Thank you, Brian,

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>now that we've made Pre late for his next appointment.

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was so much speculation about his running

1:00:47.000 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for office when he left the U. S. Attorney's Office.

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you surprised that he decided met not for me?

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>A little bit? Either? The natural job for him would

1:00:57.120 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have been Attorney General of New York and it's an

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and seat and there are a number of people running.

1:01:02.240 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He would have had as good a shot as anyone.

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I'd take him at his word that he

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>decided he didn't want to go through the rigors of

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>running for office. And and this is really kind of

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a sad thing, isn't it, Because so many people are

1:01:15.000 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>being kept from public service because of how nasty politics

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have become. Well, you know, and this is gonna be

1:01:22.480 --> 1:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a weird thing for me to say, but blame the voters. Um,

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten really hard because you know, if you can

1:01:29.720 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>dig up dirt on your opponent, if you can catch

1:01:33.240 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a politician in an embarrassing moment, the voters

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>respond to that, and therefore the incentive is to to

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>do it. And and politics has gotten really ugly and

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good people aren't running for office as

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a result. The other the other factor is of course fundraising. Well,

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's obviously doesn't have a stomach for that either. Well,

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of members of Congress spend more than half

1:01:54.680 --> 1:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>their time raising money dialing for dollars instead of studying

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the issue US and meeting with constituents and all the rest,

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>which only shows how important campaign finance reform is right

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I agree with you, but I don't think

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>there's any appetite right now to do serious campaign finance reform.

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And I hate to end the show on such a

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>low note, but I think that's the truth. Well that

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>does it for us, everyone. A big thank you to

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>our producer Gianna Palmer, our assistant producer Nora Richie, and

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>our audio engineer in New York, Jared O'Connell. Thanks also

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to Jordan Duffy for engineering my part of the conversation

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from l A today. A big thanks to my assistant,

1:02:35.840 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the incomparable Beth Demas. You can only imagine what she

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>has to put up with in folks, join me and

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Brian and our whole team, and wishing a big thank

1:02:46.080 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you and fond farewell to our social media maybn Alison Bresnik.

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>She is on to new adventures in La La Lands.

1:02:53.880 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So Brian, you'll have to meet up with Alison as

1:02:58.400 --> 1:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>she starts her new life on the Left coast as

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they say, Yeah, we're gonna be going to a sprays

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>handing salon tomorrow together, so it's very exciting for us both.

1:03:08.800 --> 1:03:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you guys can schedule a mutual waxing. Oh Wow,

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't even thought of that great idea, Katie. Anyway,

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for better or worse, we are the show's executive producers.

1:03:19.560 --> 1:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark Phillips wrote our theme music. I'm sorry I thought

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that was funny. And a word of warning for the

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of August will be on a summer breaks. You're

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss this witty rep our day I do. Everyone.

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>This means we won't be releasing new episodes, but we

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to revisit some of our favorite conversations. We

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>might even throw in a surprise or two, so don't worry.

1:03:43.720 --> 1:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You won't have to miss us too much. And as

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>NBC used to say when they would do summer reruns,

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't seen it, it's new to you, so

1:03:54.040 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully check out some of the podcasts that you might

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have missed. They're all oldies, bud goodies, everyone kind of

1:04:01.120 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like me anyway. As always, thank you so much for

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:06.919
<v Speaker 1>listening everyone, and enjoy the rest of your summer. Talk

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to you soon. Bye bye.