WEBVTT - Mehdi Hasan & Vanessa Williamson

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds, and seniors will be hit with a

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ten percent cost increase with Medicare Part B in twenty

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. We have such a great show for you today,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Ziteo's own Mehdi Hassan stops by to talk about Trump's

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>maneuvers to get around the release of the Epstein files.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk to Vanessa Williamson about her new book,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>The Price of Democracy, The Revolutionary Power of Taxation in

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>American History. But first the news, Smali.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>We are hot on the heels of the vote to

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>release the Epstein files in the House. One person voted

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>to not release it. One principled demand Clay Higgins.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Clay Higgins, you may remember him from you won't remember him,

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but he does exist.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>He's got a very memorable accent.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Molly, who's just in Congress. There are so many members

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of Congress, you eat is too many memors of Congress

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and thirty five, But only one voted no

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to release on the Epstein transparency list, which is I think,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's certainly worth thinking about this

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because it is kind of nuts. Right, here's an opportunity

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to do something that is wildly popular. Everyone wants the

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Ebstein files released. I don't know. Clay Higgins voted no.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I was at the press conference. I heard Marjorie Taylor Green.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Tell us about your new best friend. Woke Marjorie Tailer Green.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Woke Marjorie Taylor Green. Okay, So again, I am very

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>much of the belief that politicians do what is expedient

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for them. I think that Marjorie Taylor Green is doing

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the right thing, and I am glad that she is

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing. I also think that it's important

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to remember these people are in fact politicians and not philanthropists,

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or they are in fact political actors serving political political

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>passions and political ambitions.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe you just cast aspersions on her asparagus

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>like this.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, during the press conference, you had first Rocanna,

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then Thomas Massey, then Marjorie Taylor Green, and these survivors

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>got up and talked, and you could see that these

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>survivors really did feel And again, I'm not saying Marjorie

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green is not responsible for doing a lot of

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>bad stuff. I'm just saying you could tell that they

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>felt that she was fighting for them. They felt that

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>she cared about them, because you could tell because they

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>looked at her and they were crying. And so again,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I am in no way vouching for the character of

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Taylor Green, but I am telling you that these

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>women clearly felt that she was fighting for them. What

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>else I thought was very interesting was that there was

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a sense in which Marjorie Taylor Green, like you could

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>tell she was very upset that Donald Trump had called

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>her a trader, like she was truly emotional in a way,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>AOC said, And AOC is probably right that Marjorie Taylor

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Green is doing this because Trump didn't back her senate run.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>She wanted to run for senate, and certainly that is

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely possible. But I did get the sense that Marjorie

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green felt being called a trader was somehow next level,

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was some kind of demarcation, had crossed some kind of

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>demarcation line, and she's pretty upset. I want to say

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>two things about this. One is that these are politicians,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and you do yourself no favors when you ascribed to

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>them anything other than political motives. That said, these political

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>motives dovetail to enact the same thing, which is the

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>release of the Epstein files, which all of us want.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So now these files they passed the House, now there's

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure on the Senate to pass them.

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Rocanna and Massy both said that they want to avoid

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Foon adding something that would make it harder to get

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the information goes through the Senate, it will then go

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump's desk, where I think you will sign this.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he will reject it. I think he'll

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sign it. And then I think what will happen next.

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this DOJ will try to obfuscate and fight,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think eventually some some of this will get out.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they'll just be about Bill Clinton and Larry Summers

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 3>and that is it.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Okay, So while this vote was happening, we did

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>have a pretty disturbing press conference where Donald Trump was

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in the White House with MBS. And sometimes Trump says

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>dumb things. Sometimes Trump's haysn't distracted. Sometimes Trump is reckless

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 2>with his words. But I would say what happened with

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 2>him at ABC was really not good. That he did

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 2>not like a wne of questioning and he really lost

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 2>his shit.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the reporter asked Mary Bruce asked a question,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and he said it was fake news. And then he said,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not your question, I mind, it's your attitude. I

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>think you're a terrible reporter. You're a terrible person in

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a terror reporter. And then he's theorized that the leaders

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>at ABC News were psyching boosts up to ask Trump

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a leading question about Epstein. You know, Epstein is the

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>only case going on right now, so I mean it's

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>basically the only story. I mean, it's the biggest story

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 1>right now. And if you had a White House reporter

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>who gets a question, why would you not ask that question?

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Like it would be malpractice. You know, she doesn't work

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>for MAGA News one two three. She works for a

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>real newspaper, and when you work for a real newspaper,

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to ask real questions. I think Trump has

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten a little too comfortable with his sycophantic group of

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>fake reporters, and so he doesn't like real reporting.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the fact that he's been asked so infrequently

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>about his relationship with the MBS and what MBS did

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>to Jamal Kashogi really is a bad indictment of the

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>media and seeing this today was a great sign of

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 2>great work. But getting their broadcast twice and is threatened

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>not good.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Not good. And I think it's worth remembering that this

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is the first time MBS has been back since Koshogi

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>has been murdered in twenty eighteen, so like, this is

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 1>actually quite relevant and important, and so asking questions about

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that is not so unreasonable. In fact, it's really, you know,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the only thing in town. So yes, it just is

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling. Is stupid, this whole fucking thing.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>So my, we saw a funny thing.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And if this was the way everything got left to

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 2>stand that a judge's blocked the new Texas congressional maps

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>favoring the GOP at the jerrymandering that they're trying to

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>use to get ahead of the midterms.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>If for some reason this.

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Stood, it would be amazing.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 3>It really would be basic.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Remember Texas gave Trump five seats because Trump said he

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>wanted five seats and Abbott was like, you got it.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So now we have this bipartist. So now we have

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and that kicked off California doing this vote to give

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>five seats to Democrats, So here we are. This was

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a three judge panel, and one of the judges was

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a Trump appoint and they have thrown it back. Now again,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll remember that the highest court in the land works

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump, right, So we don't know ultimately how

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this ends, but I do think it's worth noting this

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>will be very ironic if this is what happens, very

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>very ironic.

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So in the opposite way, I don't think this is

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the best precedent, but Metas won a landmark antitrust case

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>over Instagram and WhatsApps acquisitions that a lot of people

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>say leaves a lot of room for the bigger tech

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>companies to trample smaller ones with acquisitions and really really

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>fucked up market manipulations. Because I'll shock you here, no

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 2>one is at the head of the FTC that cares

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're a friend of mister Trump's.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, we have a special coming up with Lena

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Khan and the Biden administration really tried to push back

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>against this kind of antitrust stuff because it's bad for

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved. You know, these companies Meta, they were donors

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to Trump in the inauguration. You had Mark Zuckerberg sitting

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there with Trump while they were swearing him in. They've

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>donated to the Trump Ballroom. This is how this administration works.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You make donations, you do the things that they want,

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you get regulatory approval. That's not how any

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of this is supposed to work, right, not how any

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of this is supposed to be working. So this is

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>just not business as usual, and it's really bad and

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really just Meddi Hassan is the founder of zteo

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and the host of Meddi Unfiltered. Welcome to Fast Politics, Maddie.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Great to be back, Mommy.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 5>How are you?

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm good. It's just amazing. I think this is

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the end of MAGA. What comes next could be worse.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>What could be next could be worse. It could be

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>MAGA but with real hardcore anti Semitism, which is what

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is percolating. But the mega coalition that we

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>once knew, the Marjorie Taylor Greens and the Lauren Boberts

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>discuss discuss.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's very First of all, all these

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 4>people are slightly deranged, so it's always hard to impose

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 4>rational thinking on all of them. You know, when it

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 4>comes to Marjorie Taylor Green, is it being driven by principle?

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 4>Is it being driven by self interest and self aggrandizement.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Do we think anything that any of these people do

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>is being driven by principle?

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 4>No, but I'm just getting the options of what it

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 4>could because she would say it's because I'm I want

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 4>transparents in Epstein and that's why I've gone against Trump

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 4>on this. Yes, Others like Alexandria Cossi Corteza suggested is

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 4>because Donald Trump spiked to Senate run by her. And

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 4>this is her, you know, this is a scorned woman

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 4>pissed off. Now she might run for president against JD. Vance.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 4>So who knows what's driving these people? Clearly something's going on,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 4>And what's so fascinating always is Trump always makes things

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 4>worse for himself, right, and he could easily win these

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 4>people back, they're part of her cult. Instead what does

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 4>he do. He goes and calls her a traitor. He

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 4>basically incites violence against her. We had a whole month

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 4>of Republican handringing after Charlie court Wisher. We need to

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 4>tone down the rhetoric. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is getting members

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 4>of his own party, not just MTG, but I believe

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 4>a state lawmaker in Indiana swatted at their homes after

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 4>he attacks him online. So I think if Maga is

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 4>breaking down, it's Trump doing the breaking of it. But

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 4>I would say, Molly, it is too soon to tell.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.359
<v Speaker 4>I've heard too many forecasts about the death of Maga,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 4>and it is a cult. So at the end of

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 4>the day, the vast Marya people still do blindly stick

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 4>with Trump through right and wrong. And I don't think

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump's going anywhere anytime soon. I think it's too

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 4>early to say stuff like, oh, he's now a lane

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 4>duck president. He's got violent armed rogue police raiding churches

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 4>in Charlotte, like he is not weep.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is he does have a He's the first

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>president of modern American political life to have his own militia. Yes,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's important not to underestimate that. And and I

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>do think like the one lesson that any of us

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>may have learned and I'm not. And again you'll notice

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>how I've coached, couched the language and may have Remember

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the anonymous senator who said, no one expects Donald Trump

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to overthrow the government. Yep, He's going to go play

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>some golf. I think about that guy.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's many of them. He symbolic of many of them.

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 4>But that's the problem.

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 4>There's always been this, basically on the Republican right, Molly,

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 4>there's been a complacency about guys calm down, take him seriously,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 4>not literally or literally, ill serious or whatever the.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Day of the week is, basically not mentally.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And then on the kind of liberal I want

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>to call it MSNBC wing, the Hashtage resistance side, it's

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 4>always the walls are closing in. Trump is nearly done for.

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think both extremes are a mistake. I think

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump is a great survivor. He's definitely done things

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 4>that many of us thought he wouldn't do. I didn't

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 4>think he would be back for you know, a second

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 4>term on January the seventh, twenty twenty one, like many others,

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 4>but he did come back. I didn't think he would

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 4>win the first time in twenty sixteen, and he did.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 4>So I am loath to write him off as he's

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 4>done for. Maga's gone. It's lame duck presidency. I think

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 4>they've got their plans. Obviously they're having some problems with

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 4>members of their party. But let's see how many other

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 4>people do an MTG. Yes, but don't you think some

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 4>of this is like a cloak. For like Donald Trump

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 4>said he was going to make things cheaper, he got

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 4>in office and immediately made everything more expensive. Yes, you know,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 4>he told Latino voters he was going to do you know,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 4>he was going to crack down on the worst of

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 4>the worst.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>What he meant was anyone who looked Latino. You know,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he made a lot of promises to a lot of

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>different people, was unable to keep any of them. And

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>now we're ten months in and people are starting to

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>get mad at him, as they do when you make

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>out to promises you can't keep. So like, is Epstein

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just a smoke screen for the underlying fractures that have

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with it one hundred percent?

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 4>And you saw that with Marjorie Taylor Green. In fact,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 4>she didn't just turn on him over Epstein. She turned

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 4>him over Gaza, which is another festering wound, but also

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 4>turned them over affordability. She went on CNN of all places,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 4>and talked about how Mike Johnson was wrong about the

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 4>shutdown and how Donald Trump was wrong about prices going

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 4>down when they're going up now again, are there others

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 4>who have the gut to do what MTG did? She

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 4>has an independent platform. She's very popular, she raises small donors. Yeah,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 4>she's wealthy and independently. Like, she's able to kind of

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 4>stave off, at least in the short term attacks from Trump.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 4>The average Republican backbench House member can't and won't, So

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure that we'll follow. You're right, the underlying

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 4>issues are the big thing here. Donald Trump made everything

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 4>worse at home and abroad, even though he goes around

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 4>claiming he solved eight wars, which he didn't obviously, and

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 4>on the inflation side, Molly, if you've seen all these

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 4>mega influences praising Trump for taking tariffs off of things,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 4>now he's like, he put them on there. You told

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 4>us they were fine, they wouldn't raise priss, and now

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 4>you want us to praise him for taking things off.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump is this classic thing where he often you

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 4>often find yourself and a Trump defender defending Trump after

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Trump has thrown you under the bus. So yeah, a

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 4>classic example is Troy Nil's the congress menage spent all

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 4>weekend saying we're not going to release the Epstein files

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 4>for no reason to and then Trump on Sunday said,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 4>release the Epstein files. And you're like, oh, the memo

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 4>didn't go out in time. And he does that often.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 4>People go out and defend Trump and then he would

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 4>do the exact opposite of what they just said. So

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be a running saw for them as well.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 4>The problem we have, Molly is I was talking to

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 4>a friend the other day and I see, no, we've

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 4>had I think it was last month, and I said,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.239
<v Speaker 4>we've had nine ten months of Trump. They went, what

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 4>what do you mean? I thought, it's been more than

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 4>a year, and no, it's only none or ten months.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 4>And there is his sense, and I think people quite

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 4>get that this guy is not even a year in.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 4>We're all the chaos and harm and incompetence and authoritarianism

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 4>and wars are broad when now maybe going to war

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 4>with Venezuela. All of that's happened in his first ten months.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 4>We still have more than three years left min minimum

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 4>of this guy.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Minimum.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't say that it's not nice. I'm already so stressed out. No,

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding, But I do think that's right. And

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about when Donald Trump said that he had

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>an MRI.

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh but no, he's not sure what four right.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is his he was second yearly doctor's visit

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had advanced imaging, and everyone was like, oh, advanced imaging,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Well that's odd. Also a doctor's visit once a year,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>except twice this year because it's And then he said, yeah,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I had an MRI and they said, dude, was it

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>your brain? And he said, I don't know.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 4>They're like they're like, they're like pushing him into that

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 4>circular what is it a little tube they put you? Yeah,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 4>and he's like, what's just for? I don't know, don't

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 4>worry about it that again. I know we played this horrific

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 4>game far too much, but can you imagine if Joe

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Biden was asked about an MRI that he had hidden

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 4>from the public and then he said about the MRI,

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I had the best MRI ever?

0:15:58.320 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>What was it for?

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know? Yeah, I mean some insane insane that

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 4>this guy can have two medical tests, two annual checks

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 4>as a president. He can have weird bruising on his

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 4>hands that he doesn't need to tell us about. He

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 4>can the ankles, he can disappear from public view or

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 4>not do any interviews for about five six days, or

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 4>allow him say why he can have an MRI and

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 4>we're not told why he gets shot in the ear,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 4>and we've never actually had any official medical records about it,

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 4>nor been able to speak to the doctors who treated him.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 4>And miraculously is ear heeled faster than my shaving cuts.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, no, now it is. It would make a

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>person a conspiracy theorist.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 4>I wrote. I write a Monday morning newsletter for Zeteo

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>called first Draft, and this morning, Monday Morning's email newsletter

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 4>is about how we're all Epstein conspiracy theorists. Now, how

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I spent my life resisting conspiracy theories on the left,

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 4>in Muslim communities, anti Semitic, nine to eleven, all of those.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I've spent years fighting back against those, and yet now

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty five, Donald Trump has made me into

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 4>a conspiracy theorist.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because there is no way to process this information.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't make sense, right, Like all of this stuff,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just huh.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh, there's just too many smoking guns. Jeffrey Epstein sends

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 4>an email to an unknown person in December twenty eighteen,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 4>saying I'm the only one who can bring him down.

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 4>Seven months later, he's arrested and detained by Trump's doj

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 4>A month after that, he dies in prison where the

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 4>cameras aren't working. Well, sorry, what a Netflix writer's room

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 4>would throw that out as being unrealistic and a little

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 4>bit too on the nose.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not good. It's not good.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 4>It's nothing about our current predicament is good.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk for a minute about this pivot.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So Trump World, he knew the discharged petition, Mike Johnson

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>shuts down the entire House of Representatives, sends everyone up

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there if he uses a seat an elected Democrat from Arizona. Right,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>do you remember what the numbers are it was? I

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was a third forty day shutdown. The House

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was in session for four days.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, something in saying not double digits.

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he sent them home because he did not want

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>them to sign the discharge petition or do any business

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>or get together and talk about Epstein. So now they

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know they're going to lose this discharge vote. And we

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>heard that it may be as many we had heard

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that it might have been as many as one hundred Republicans.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to vote on them vote against him. So

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he decides on Sunday night. You reference this, but I

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think we have to talk about a little more, decides

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night that he is going to just have

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>them release the files, yeah, or have a vote. I'm

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>releasing the file yes.

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 4>So to be clear, it's interesting how you phrased that,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>because let's be clear, the files are with the Department

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 4>of Justice. Pam Bundy famously went on Fox in February

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 4>and said they're on my desk ready to go, right,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 4>So when we talk about releasing the files, it doesn't

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 4>require a vote in Congress. Now Donald Trump wants to

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 4>rease the files, he can rease the files tomorrow money.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 4>It's not as if his DOJ is some independent entity.

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 4>We know that Pam Bundy is basically just to kind of,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, like a restaurant server at this point for

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump. She moves as soon as he tells her

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 4>to move. So if he wants, he can just put

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 4>out a truth social post. Think Pam put out all

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 4>the files tonight on a website. This whole vote for

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 4>it is just him trying to cover himself from an

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 4>embarrassing loss, as you said, or a defection of many

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 4>members of his party. Thomas Massey, who's gone to war

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 4>with aside from MTG, the Republican congressman who's been leading

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 4>the charge with Rocannor on the Epstein discharge. He's said

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 4>very eloquently that you know, Donald Trump will be gone.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure he will be gone. It may be

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 4>gone in four years, but you'll still be around and

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 4>people remember you as defenders of pedophiles. He said to

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 4>his colleagues, that's obviously had some traction that reminds Yeah.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And then he went after Massey for getting remarried too quickly.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 4>With Mary Massey, a widows wife died raight, he went

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 4>after him for getting married again. And Laura Luma, his

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 4>media ally questioned how Massey's wife died. I mean, there

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 4>is no bottom for this Republican party.

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>And it is also important to remember this is like

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, who's three wives in and has numerous allegations

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of infidelity.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Allegedly she did on his third wife just after she

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 4>gave birth.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Was a porn star.

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, so there, so there will be a vote. Now,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about this protocol for a minute. There'll be

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a vote now, and then it we'll go to the Senate.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 4>And do they even have the votes in the Senate

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 4>because Republican Senators there in a very different vote. They

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 4>were never on the whole Epstein train, right. It was

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 4>very much an MTG. Bobert, you know, a massy kind

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 4>of unhinged folks in the House.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 5>I mean.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 4>The great irony, as I point out in my newsletter

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 4>this morning, is these guys spent four years banging the

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 4>druma about Epstein, jumping on QAnon bandwagons about it being

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 4>a secret crazy the politicians covering up a child sex

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 4>trafficking ring. Turns out they may have been right, but

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 4>the ring and the cover up was on their side

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 4>of the aisle, right, correct. That's that's the problem they

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 4>have now is all of these people, not just the

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 4>members of Congress, but the Bune and the Cashpatel, the FBI,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 4>Derek to Devis, they all pushed this Epstein stuff and

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 4>now they're in a position to really make sure that

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 4>they're unable to go through with it. And we know

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the timeline Molly on the reporting. It's when they went

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 4>through the files. They devoted hundreds of members of the government,

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of members of the bureaucracy were diverted onto the

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 4>task of going through the files and just doing control.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 4>F Trump control f. Trump all the way through and

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 4>when you saw how many times his name appears, and

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Detail has put a searchable archive of all of the

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty thousand documents that were released by the House Oversight Committee.

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 4>You can look at zataio dot com. You can search

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 4>them for yourselves. You will see Donald Trump's name appears

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 4>more than anybody else is apart from Jeffrey Epstein. That's

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 4>when they decided we can't release this stuff. We have

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 4>to pretend all is fine, there's nothing to see here,

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 4>Move along, move along.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I just wonder where it goes, right, because so

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we know that Pambondi supposedly had in our desk. Again,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know because everybody's lying. I think it's

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>fair was to agree that pretty much everybody's lying here.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 4>My position on this administration is you assume it's alioned.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's proved to be the true too.

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But either way, we know there's a ton of information

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that did go to the DJ and it was videos

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and emails and depositions. I mean, that's the other thing

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that's worth's remembering is right now, all we've seen are

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the emails that they flooded us with from the Republicans

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the Oversight Committee emails, and then we've seen the emails

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg from Jason Leopold that he got from Floyd's.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>That is it. We haven't seen like I mean, I

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>guess that the House released some stuff like the Michael

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Wolf that long Michael Wolf article. Can we talk? Can

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>we do two seconds on Michael Wolf here? Because so

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who was like advising, writing, doing

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>pr for Friendly.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Jeffrey Epstein one of the most famous journalists of our time.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 4>He's super famous. A lot of people in this you

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 4>don't like it for good reason. I think these emails

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 4>show everything that's wrong with journalism in this country, the

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 4>worst parts of our kind of established journalism. And his

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 4>argument just to play devil's advocate. He's arguing that I

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 4>have to suck up to these people to get access.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 4>That's how I got an interview with Donald Trump. And

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 4>we know that's how it works with Trump. You suck

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 4>up to Trump. He invites you in, he gives you

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 4>an interview, then he doesn't like what you've written and

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 4>he attacks you. We know that that's what happened to Wolf.

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 4>He wrote these best selling books Fire and Fury, and

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>I think hold three or four books, I've lost track,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 4>and he did that by sucking up clearly with Epstein.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's harder for him to make that case

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 4>because it's very clear from the emails that we've seen

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 4>that they were friends, that he was advising him, that

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 4>he was trying to spin on his behalf and giving

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 4>him pr and media advice. It's kind of disgusting because

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 4>let's not forget Molly important point for the context for

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 4>all these emails. Whether it's Larry Summers, who's also in

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 4>the emails on how to how to move on a

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 4>allegedly on a Chinese academic whose father was a Communist

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Party official, whether it's Summers, whether it's Wolf, whether it's

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 4>God Helpers, Non Chomsky, whoever's in those emails. They all

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 4>knew at that point that this guy was convicted in

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and eight for child sex crimes or so listening.

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 4>At that point that the plea Dearly got was for

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 4>listening an under eighteen. But the point is they all

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 4>knew who he was, they all knew what was guilty.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It was set he was a registered sexis predator.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 4>At that point, he had been in prison, even if

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 4>it was a kind of soft prison that he got

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.239
<v Speaker 4>to you every day, and so there's no excuse for

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 4>any of these people to have been friendly with him,

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 4>hanging out with him, giving him advice. It's truly disgusting

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 4>and de prayed. There's a real reflection of what goes

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 4>on on fortune, and some of it really confirms for

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people go back to conspiracy theory stuff

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 4>about just how intertwined kind of the most deprayed elements

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 4>of our media and political establishments are.

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I also think that it speaks to a kind of world.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a world that doesn't necessarily exist anymore, right,

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>some of it? And thank God for that ready, Like

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would you?

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 4>But unfortunately some of these emails are from like twenty

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 4>eighteen and twenty nineteen, like this time right now, it's stuff,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 4>and these connections are still happening, pretty dark, and people

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 4>give it, oh well, Bill Clinton, I'm like, yeah, nobody

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:03.479
<v Speaker 4>cares right about freaking about.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>A nonpartisan exercise. You know, if and I know he's not,

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but if Barack Obama, who is like as close to

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a democratic deity as one could have if

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>he were in there, we want him out too. I mean,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this is not a partisan activity.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, his name is mentioned at different times in

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 4>the emails. But yeah, there's no evidence that Obama of

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 4>a partied with Epstein or went on his jet in

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 4>the way that Clinton and Trump did. Right, and again

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 4>no accusations of wrongdo we have to add in this

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 4>very ligitious climate, but it looks bad. And the fact

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 4>that he's tried to cover it up until Sunday night

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 4>when he said release it all. The fact that he

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 4>was willing to go to what would Marjorie Taylor Green,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 4>The fact that he announced that criminal investigation into only

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 4>democrats mentioned in the documents, how was I amazing? The fact,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean again with Trump, each and every one of

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 4>these things that we're talking about, for any other president

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 4>would be a multi week, multi month scandal. The fact

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 4>that dog Drum just casually on Sunday told his Aney general,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 4>I want you to investigate these democrats who are in

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 4>the far and she said sure, I'm an appointed attorney

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 4>right now, that in itself, Molly, you and I were

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 4>saying this last year. If we said this last thing,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 4>we were told it was Trump drangement syndrome, suggests that

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Trump would do stuff as brazenly as he's doing.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's so true. Thank you for making the

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>time for me. I always really enjoyed talking to you,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>despite the shit.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 4>I feel like when I told you and I told Earlie,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 4>whether it's on my podcast, it's like a therapy session.

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Vanessa Williamson is a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the Brookings Institute and the author of the Price of Democracy,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The Revolutionary Power of Taxation in American History. Welcome to

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Fast Politics, Vanessa.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh, thanks for having me.

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You are a scholar. You have written this book. It's

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a little counterintuitive, so talk us through this idea.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 5>So I think for far too long. You know, it's

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 5>a real conservative trope frankly that, oh, taxation is tyranny,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 5>But the reality is almost literally diametrically the opposite. That

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 5>is to say that taxes are things that free countries

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 5>do really well. Elected official are really good at raising

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 5>tax money, and tyrants hate taxes. They always have. So

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 5>the story in my book is the story of American democracy,

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 5>focusing on how fights over taxation are actually the fights

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 5>ober democracy. That's true now, and it's always been true.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Explain how it was true then, because this is like

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty bold statement.

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, let me start with just a story. You've probably

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 5>heard of the Boston Tea Party. You may recall this event, right,

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 5>So these mechanics and artisans in Boston seventeen seventy three,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 5>it's the middle of winter and they go down to

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Boston Harbor and they throw all this tea in the harbor.

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 4>What was that about?

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.959
<v Speaker 5>Almost anyone would tell you about taxes. People hate taxes.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 5>They were high taxes. They were complaining about taxes. Well,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 5>they were complaining about taxes. They were complaining about a

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 5>tax cut. The British government had decided to give an

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 5>enormous tax break to the East India Company, a corporation

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that was deemed too big to fail. And this was

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 5>going to be, as Sam Adams put it, introductive of monopolies. Right.

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 5>It was too big of a tax break for a corporation,

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 5>and that is what motivated the Sons of Liberty to

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 5>throw that tea in the harbor. Now, if the basic

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 5>American understanding of the Boston Tea Party is wrong, it

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 5>might be worth reconsidering more generally the role taxes have

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 5>played in our history. And it's important to remember that

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 5>taxes are two things. Right, They're the portion of our

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 5>labor that we contribute to the public good. That is

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 5>why people are so proud to be taxpayers. Right, We'll

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 5>always say that, oh, I'm a taxpayer, and why because

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 5>they're proud to have contributed. And if you think about

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 5>what the taxes go to, they are the revenue that

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.239
<v Speaker 5>empowers our democratic government. So if you're asking yourself, you know,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 5>if taxation is tyranny, why is Donald Trump destroying the irs?

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 5>The reason is because he wants private donations to pay

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 5>for things. He wants to extort things from particular companies.

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't want a real tax system because taxation is

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 5>something that comes in democratic societies. The freest countries on

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Earth are high tax countries. How do tariffs sort of

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 5>feature into this? Yeah, so it's important to know tariffs.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 5>When you relied on tariffs for decades and decades and

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 5>decades most of American history, tariffs are what funded the

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 5>federal government. But the tariffs that we have today are

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 5>not like those tariffs because they are not legislated. Right,

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the Congress is not choosing the tariff rates. You know,

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 5>you might think tariffs are bad policy. In fact, you

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 5>should think tariffs are bad policy. It's bad for the economy.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 5>But it would only be bad policy, It would not

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 5>be anti democratic, except that, actually our tariffrates are decided

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 5>by one guy, apparently through tweets, right, And that is

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 5>fundamentally anti democratic. And it has the effect of sort

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 5>of bringing corporations into line, right, And the point of

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 5>the tariffs and countries into line. The point is not

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 5>to raise revenue. It is to consolidate power. And that's

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 5>how you should be thinking about the terriff frights right now,

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 5>because on the one hand, we have the capacity of

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 5>our own legislature right to raise revenue. That is what

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 5>the founders fought for, right, the idea that the only

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 5>people who can tax are elected legislators. They want state

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 5>governments to or colonial governments at the time. But what

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 5>became our state governments to be the ones in charge

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 5>of raising money? And they didn't think a king could

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 5>do that. And now we're asking that question again. So

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 5>the important thing about tariffs is not whether they're good

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 5>policy or bad policies. When it comes to democracy, you

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 5>know they're bad policy. Sure, lots of popular things are

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 5>bad policy. Loads of unpopular things are bad policy. But

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 5>the thing that's dangerous for our democracy is putting the

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 5>power of taxation in the hands of a single person,

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 5>and we thought a revolution against that.

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>This all makes a lot of sense, but I wonder

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>if you could give us, like your fantasy of what

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>progressive taxation would look like America. I feel like it's

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>been at war withood itself about like, what are the

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tax structure that would look like, you know, more of

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of fair country.

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question. I have part of an answer

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 5>that I think most of your viewers will probably be

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 5>nodding right along with, and part of an answer that

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 5>might come as a surprise.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Good, especially with things like this when it can be counterintuitive.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm always happy to be surprised.

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 5>So the first part you might expect, a high progressive

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 5>taxation of wealth is really important for democracy at this point, Right,

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 5>we can't have some people have this amount of money

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 5>because money is power and it leads into our politics.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 5>It has for many decades, and it is now just

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 5>beyond anything that can be managed within the democratic society. Right.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 5>You might not know Thomas Pain, the guy who wrote

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Common Sense. Right, this is the guy who wrote the

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 5>pamphlet that convinced Americans not just to fight for independence,

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 5>but to fight to not have a monarchy. Thomas Pain

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 5>common sense. He also a few years later, in the

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Rights of Man, proposed a progressive income tax, a very

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 5>very novel idea at the time. It was a tax

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.479
<v Speaker 5>on the income from wealth. Progressivity was basically he had

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 5>to like do the math and a table in the

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 5>Rights of Man to explain this to people because it

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 5>was new. The top rate was one hundred percent. Now

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 5>it was really high brackets.

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, seems like too high.

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, so it's a marginal rate, remember, So it means

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 5>that it applies to all your money over a particular point,

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 5>you know. And he wrote his pounds and in seven

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, in seventeen ninety. So the amount he chose

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 5>is not what's important. If you update that to modern statistics,

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 5>it's about a billion dollars. So what Thomas Pain was

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 5>saying was that beyond a certain level of wealth, all

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 5>the additional income you're receiving, you shouldn't be allowed to

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 5>keep it, because what he said was it caused corruption

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 5>to elections.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, which turns out to be he is a genius.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yeah, he knew it was up there, guy, So

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 5>I think on the one side, there's what Thomas Pain said,

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 5>which is that there's a certain level of concentration of

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 5>wealth that's dangerous to a republic, and taxation is one

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 5>of the mechanisms. There are many mechanisms that you need.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 5>One of the mechanisms help restrain that. Right, it should

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 5>not be the only tool in the toolkit. Right. There

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 5>are all kinds of things about monopolies and all other

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 5>things you need to be doing, But one of the

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 5>mechanisms that's really important is limiting the consolidation of wealth.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 5>The other half of what I'm going to say is

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 5>maybe a little more surprising. I think it's really important

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 5>to have broad based taxation because it's broad based taxation

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 5>that in the long term, can fund a social safety

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 5>net that allows people to act as citizens. Right, you

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 5>have to not be afraid that you're going to lose

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 5>your apartment at the end of the month. If you

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 5>want to be able to take the time to read

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 5>the paper and go to the meetings and do all

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 5>the things that citizens are supposed to do, you can't

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 5>be worrying about where your next paycheck is coming from.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's not just important that we limit the top.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 5>We have to keep the bottom up too, and the

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 5>only way you're going to be able to do that

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 5>is with broad based taxation. I'll give you an example,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Social Security. That's not a particularly progressive tax. It's actually

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 5>a regressive tax. Fund social Security because it falls on

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 5>the money you earned by working, not the wealth you

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 5>learned by having it sit around and garner interest. Medicare too,

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 5>funded by the same payroll taxes. These are regressive taxes.

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Americans love them. They are the favorite tax of the

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 5>American people, right there with sales tax tax. People don't

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 5>mind paying their share if they think it's worthwhile. So

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 5>to me, you need both of these things. You need

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 5>both high progressive taxation. But you also need to recognize

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 5>that that's not where all the money is going to come from.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Because even when people are extremely rich like they are now,

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 5>there are very few of them. You can't be balancing

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 5>your whole tax system on that. You've got to have

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 5>everyone chipping in. And that's part of a democracy too, right.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 5>It's part of a democracy to have people paying their

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 5>share and having their say yes.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs are obviously a tax, and there's a lot of

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian stuff mixed in with trump ism mostly authoritarianism. So

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like that you're not seeing any of the sort of

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>good that one might get from tariffs. Now, Ueen Trump

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one point zero and Trump two point zero. Biden world

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>did keep some of those tariffs on Biden World the

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>complicated legacy, but some of the tariffing I think was smart.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>This is like a question that's like goes to a

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>particular hobbyhorse of mind, which is, for whatever reason, Republicans

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hate corporate taxes and loove tariffs. Corporate taxes and tariffs

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are the same thing. So I mean they're played by

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, but ultimately they're paid by the corporation. So

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is there a sort of way in here to tax

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>corporations through tariffs to confuse Republicans into raising the corporate tax? Right?

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 5>I love this sort of like indimentional chess aspect of it.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 5>I may tell you a little bit about tariffs. Right, So,

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 5>first of all, the kind of tariff that we're dealing

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 5>with now, which is where one random I guess not

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 5>very random, but one guy decides them. That is a

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 5>non starter for democracy. You cannot have it work that

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 5>way because it just consolidates power too much. But if

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 5>you're going to talk about a legislated system of tariffs,

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 5>then okay. Economists will have a lot to say about

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 5>whether it's good for the economy as a whole, right,

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 5>whether it produces growthably, It depends very much on what

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 5>the tariffs are. When we had very high teriff rates

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 5>in the United States in the late nineteenth century, those

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 5>tariffs were set upon intentionally to support monopolistic corporations. Right.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 5>They were preventing consumers and farmers in particular in the

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 5>United States from being able to afford raw materials and

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 5>machinery and things like this that were produced overseas. It

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 5>was a huge gift for US steel. So tariffs can

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 5>be set up in a way that are extremely monopolistic.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 5>But what's interesting, I think about that story is not

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 5>that we're having those kinds of teriff systems. Now we

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 5>have these very arbitrary, very limited revenue tariffs that are

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 5>dangerous for totally different reasons. But what's interesting to me

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 5>about the old tariff system is that consumers knew they

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 5>were paying, and they rallied for an income tax in

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 5>part because they believed in the income tax. It's very popular, right.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 5>Remember the Supreme Court bans the income tax. They say

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 5>that income tax is unconstitutional, even though we'd had one

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 5>during the Civil War. In eighteen ninety four, eight to

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 5>ninety five, the Supreme Court declares the income tax unconstitutional.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 5>So then we have to have a twenty year state

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 5>by state campaign to get our income tax back, and

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 5>they get it done. And part of the reason for

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 5>that is because people thought that wealthy people should be paying.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 5>But part of the reason is because they knew that

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 5>the tariffs that we had then were really raising prices

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 5>for consumers. And so I think that one of the

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 5>really interesting things to me is whether the costs of

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 5>the tariffs we have now are going to be something

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 5>that people come to recognize as expensive as a part

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 5>of the larger story about inflation and the other ways

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 5>that the cost of living is just going up. Hm.

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So interesting. So you wrote a book with a friend

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of the show. You know, you're on a nerdy podcast

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>when the friend of the show is Theedra Scotch Paul,

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who I love so much and think is the genius.

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But she is like the person who saw all of

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this coming from a mile away, and so did you.

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So cannot talk about this moment in American politics without

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Tea Party and that we are like

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>living there fever dream anything you can glean from that

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that you think is useful for now. A good example

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is I was on a panel yesterday with some very

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy right wingers and they were asking the normal people

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what the cutoff for abortion should be, right, which is

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>like a bullshit question you ask when you want to

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>get people going, when you want to have afa on them.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I said, well, let's ask the conservatives when

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they believe life begins. And you know what they all said, right, conception,

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>what sort of lessons do you see from the Tea

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Party or what kind of progress negative progress probably have

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you seen, and like what is surprising or whatever else

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so yeah, theta is one of my very very

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 5>favorite people and it was great fun to write a

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 5>book with her, and we traveled around and visited Tea

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 5>Party groups around the country and there were a couple

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 5>of things that were informative at the time. One of

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 5>them is that the primary issue motive bating Tea Party

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 5>activists was not taxes and spending, which is what sort

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 5>of elite conservative and Republican groups were saying. They were

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 5>motivated about immigration. And I will say it was at

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 5>a Tea Party event that I first heard this will

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 5>have a two thousand and nine or twenty ten that

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 5>I first heard Donald Trump floated as a potential presidential candidate.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 5>And you know, it was quite a surprise at the

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 5>time because this is a man who had a reality

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 5>TV show. But yeah, it was in many ways getting

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 5>to see into the future of the Republican Party. I

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 5>think there are some valuable lessons. I mean, first of all,

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 5>it's important to understand what was motivating the conservative base

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 5>in the Obama era, because it is critical to understanding

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 5>why Donald Trump was successful. But I think the lessons now,

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 5>right now that I think we've all had time to

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 5>digest what exactly was happening within the Republican Party. The

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 5>really important lesson I think looking forward is the way

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 5>that the Tea Party in opposition. Right we're going about

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the first years of the Obama administration. Obama comes in

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 5>with this huge approval and hope and change. He had

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 5>control of Congress for a moment, you know, not very

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 5>long and not very big margin, but he did and

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 5>people thought, you know, I remember him being on the cover.

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 5>I think it was Time magazine a picture looking like

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 5>FDR right, like this was going to be a monumental

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 5>change in our politics of the style of the new Deal,

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 5>and clearly it was not. But the thing that the

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 5>Tea Party did in opposition to the Obama administration was

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 5>unite three important forces in active grassroots. Now, Tea Party

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 5>activists were mostly older people, right, It was not just

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 5>a random swath of Americans by any stretch of the imagination,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 5>older middle class, upper middle class people, so they had

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 5>time to protest and to go to their local meetings

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 5>and so forth. But it brought together those grassroots activists

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 5>and allowed them to channel their cultural and racial concerns

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 5>into a very effective opposition to a popular president with

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 5>control of Congress because they were united with a active,

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 5>powerful right wing media infrastructure, and elites followed their lead.

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 5>M Right. It was base driven, yes, sang well, the

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:02.919
<v Speaker 5>elites drove the base enthusiasm straight into their own priorities, right,

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 5>They drove them that they drove that energy into sort

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 5>of traditional right wing stuff.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So they were able to capture the enthusiasm of the

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>base and then channel it into stuff they wanted.

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but what they did not do was distance themselves.

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, rank and file Republican legislators certainly did not

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 5>distance themselves from the Tea Party, even when you know,

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean the Tea Party activists were often wearing you know,

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:27.439
<v Speaker 5>kind of wild costumes and some of them were saying

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 5>pretty explicitly racist stuff. Oh yeah, But the Republican Party

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 5>did not walk away from that energy and channeled that energy,

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 5>right And I think that that's a lesson that could

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 5>be really valuable for the Democratic Party today to figure

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 5>out how to take an extremely enthused base, enthused in

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 5>opposition to the presidency, and channel that into wins. Now.

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 5>I think, you know, November the elections looked like a

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 5>little bit of that being underway. But what you'd want

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 5>to see, I think, is something that drives it into policy,

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 5>into an agenda. And also you'd want to see elected

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 5>officials celebrating the activity of their base and not trying

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 5>to walk away from it.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's pointed in humor now I'm just gidding,

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, so important. What you're saying, if you have

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the space energy, the only possible way to win with

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it is to channel it into the things you want, right.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think that it's really important to find

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 5>a way to mobilize people, not just to show up

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 5>for a particular rally, because the Tea Party, you know,

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 5>they had huge rallies, but there were at least reasonably

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 5>large rallies. But they had regular meetings, They attended local

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 5>city council meetings, they ran for local office, right And

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 5>it was the combination of those things that built a

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.919
<v Speaker 5>moment that created a wave election the following the following year.

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 5>So those are the aspects of the Tea Party. I

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 5>think that are forward looking if we're thinking about what

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 5>opposition to a presidency looks like. And I think also,

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, just recognizing the seeds of the moment that

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 5>we're in today, the sort of ice and the anti

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 5>immigration you know how recently that was added to the

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Republican Party. There's always been conservative opposition to immigration, sure,

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.800
<v Speaker 5>but the Republican Party had before Donald Trump, you know

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 5>a few people who would sign on to some version

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 5>of some sort of immigration reform. And that ended with Trump,

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 5>and that really marks, I think the moment where the

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 5>sort of Tea Party ethos, that anti immigration ethos came

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 5>to dominate in a way that has had atrocious horrifying

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 5>consequences for the country.

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So interesting. Thank you is thank you for joining us, Vanessa.

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh, thank you for having me.

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 4>This was fun.

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 3>A moment.

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Jesse Cannon MARII Project twenty twenty five. It foretold many things.

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I looked at one of my favorite websites today, the

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Project twenty twenty five tracker, and it seems we are

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 2>forty eight percent through the plans now. And here's a

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 2>big one. They've figured out how they're going to take

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 2>apart the Department of Education and split it into a

0:42:57.600 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of other departments.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I didn't see that coming, just kidding. We totally

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>saw that coming. And Trump even said he was going

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I mean that's the best part I mean,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and by best part, I mean worst part of this

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 1>whole story is that Trump even said he was going

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Like none of this should be a surprise,

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Like this is what Trump wanted to do. This is

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what he said he was going to do with these

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>guys had like dismantle the Department of Education sweatshirts. I mean,

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this is like this was always the plan. So when

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you see stuff like this happening, when you see like

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump World doing things like this. This is what it is.

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>This was always the plan. Will they be able to

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sue in court? Will Trump maybe lose? Maybe? But no

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one should be blindsided by any of this.

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Can I take us back to a time when I'm

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 2>on the debate stage? Rick Perry was asked which departments

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 2>he dismantled. He couldn't remember all of the ones he

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to dismantle. Well, now some of those departments are

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 2>getting the Department of Education.

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Rick Perry.

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Everyone really thought that was going to be a thing

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that happened, but it was just fetch.

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear the best

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>minds and politics make sense of all this chaos. If

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a friend

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and keep the conversation going. Thanks for listening.