WEBVTT - Karmelo Anthony DENIED A New Trial

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that folks. It is Sunday, August twenty third. Carmelo

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Anthony has been denied his request for a new trial

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and a decision that came down late. And with that,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ. Rookes didn't

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>expect it when we got it, had two days of

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 1>hearings Carmelo Anthony. People know this story by now. This

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>was a really really big deal. As of now his

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>conviction stands.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it was sur It was surprising to me

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the decision itself, and it was also surprising the timing

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>of when it came out. It's very rare that you

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>get a late Saturday ruling from a judge and one

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that had been closely watched, because Thursday and Friday of

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>last week were just jaw dropping in terms of what

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>we learned that we didn't know and what George didn't

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>know going into the trial.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>M man and we thought it was nasty before whoooo u.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, this young man at the age of seventeen

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at a track meet with another seventeen year old and

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>an opposing team and a different school. You know this

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>by now. A lot of folks. There was a confrontation

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 1>between the two Carmelo. Anthony is black, Austin Metcalf is white.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Whatever confrontation that did happen, Carmelo pulls out a knife,

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>stabs the young man in the chest. He dies, now robes.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>That gets us to what was really an awful several

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>months of back and forth leading up to that trial

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>because race became such a part of the dynamic.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then it was even worse. I think once

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>the verdict came down, then both sides polarized even more,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>if that was possible. But then we started hearing from

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Austin Metcalf's dad, who was obviously in pain and just

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>started going on podcast and took things to another level.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Was it watermelon? Mellow watermelon? He called them something along

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>those lines, nothing short of absolutely atrocious racist language. There's

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>some stuff you'd give somebody a pass on. Being angry

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and upset and yelling and screaming. This was something else.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>This was racist.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>He had every right to feel anger, as I would

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>think anyone who has lost a child to violence. When

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>you are talking about the person who took your son

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>from you, who killed your son, we all understand, well,

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 2>we can imagine I'll take the back. We don't understand,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>but we can imagine how gutting an awful and angry

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 2>and frustrated you would be. But that doesn't excuse racist,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>vile terms than being hurled at someone, which, of course

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 2>then in sight an entire community and raise the stakes

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and have everyone going to their corners and create just

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 2>this ugliness on top of something that was already brutal

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and ugly. You've made things significantly worse.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And things are unfortunately, at least the language JH has

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten significantly worse after what we saw at this mini hearing,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess you will. It was a mini trial, I

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>should say, but it was a hearing on a motion

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to get him a new trial. Robes, it was watermelon felon.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, oh god, is what he called carmelo

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>anthony after the trial watermelon felon. So, Robes, do you

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>hear that? And like, wow, where did that? Is not

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>normal to speak like that. We might have an indication

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of where that came from or who it passed to,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>who it passed to? There it is, but at least

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>getting into what happened here. The ruling from the judge

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>he said this, and it was short and sweetened to

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the point upon reviewing the motion, the record and the

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence and argument that briefs, and the relevant case law,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the court has determined that the motion should be denied,

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>period point blank. He is not getting, at least at

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this point a new trial robes the centerpiece of this motion.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>For them trying to get a new trial had to do.

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how this is legally allowed. A

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>gentleman's agreement that was made in the first trial in

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>his trial between the prosecutors and the defense rope to

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>keep certain character evidence out of the trial.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this feels like, I don't know, old days, old times,

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>something that happened before we had the legal system in

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>place that we do today. It does seem icky and

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it shouldn't be legal. It feels like to me, this

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>should be something a judge should have decided, And that's

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>how we typically see these arrangements made. Obviously, in plenty

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of cases, a judge rules what's admissible and what's not,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and whether or not past acts or past behavior should

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>be allowed to be considered by jurors. But the point

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>being a judge makes that decision, and both sides make

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 2>their arguments to that judge outside of the jury to

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>hear that that's not how this agreement came about. Is

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>deeply concerning.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Folks, to be clear here, in that first trial, and

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.239
<v Speaker 1>this is something we did not know about as the public,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor, and the defense essentially shook hands and say, hey,

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to say the bad stuff about Carmelo's

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>past if you don't say the bad stuff about Austin

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf's past. That was the agreement to keep character stuff

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>out to where all we're going to talk about in

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this trial is what happened on that day, Robes. Why

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>would both sides agree to this? It seems like they

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>thought it was beneficial in some way to both sides

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to do this.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but should it be their decision and not a

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 2>judge's about what's relevant and what's not because clearly to

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>say it's only about what happened in that small window

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 2>of time that led to Carmelo Anthony's stabbing Austin Metcalf

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in the heart essentially, But wouldn't we need to know

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>what led to that moment, what each person Austin Metcalf,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Carmelo Anthony was thinking and feeling leading up to that horrific,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 2>tragic moment I would say yes because it would It

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 2>would absolutely, I think help the defense because wouldn't we

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>need to know state of mind and frame of reference

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>and any reputation that Austin Metcalf might bring to the

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>confrontation in addition to his size, Like, shouldn't I can't imagine.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I know, obviously, what were we learned about Carmelo Anthony

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>wasn't great and absolutely would have been used against him.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, But at the same time, what we didn't

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 2>know about Austin Metcalf could absolutely have influenced a jury

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 2>to think, you know what, he had every right to

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>think his life was being threatened.

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And then the other side would make the argument is that, look,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Carmelo Anthony came and he owed up already as a

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>violent person, as a person who had what on the

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>verge was a text that he's saying, we're gonna get

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>through that stuff here in a second. If you haven't

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>heard it, it is remarkable Robes that the backgrounds of

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>these two young men were not known by the jury.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Now does that matter? Should it matter? That's not for

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>me to say, it's for them. The jury didn't get

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance to decide this because a couple of attorneys

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>shook hands in a back room.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I look at it from being a potential jurors perspective,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and as a juror, just ask yourself, would you rather

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>know as much information as possible to make the best

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>decision possible? And look, I don't believe, I don't think

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I could be wrong, but I think a lot of

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>folks think it would have still been a very tough

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>hill for Carmelo Anthony's defense team to climb given what

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>we know about what happened that day. But I would

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>think that the sentencing would have been deeply impacted by

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>some of this information, or there would be a better

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>understanding about Carmelo's Carmelo Anthony's state of mind in those moments.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>And just as a juror, wouldn't we all prefer to

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 2>have as much information as possible to make the best

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>decision possible? Because maybe he would have gotten there were

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>several murder charges available. Correct, it didn't have to be

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>first degree, It could be second degree, There could have

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and all of those other factors could have absolutely played

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.239
<v Speaker 2>a role in what they found, which charges they found

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Carmelo Anthony guilty of.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh, all of that makes sense. I am kind of

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>blown away by this by two guys in a back.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>The judge had nothing to do with it. It seems

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like malpractices. It seems like it shouldn't be like And again,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is some common thing that happens that we

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't hear about it distance happened to be a high

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>profile case. But whatever the case, the new judge, and

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>again we should remind you this was a new judge

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, because the defense did want a new judge

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear this. Because the other guy was out there

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>popping off at the mouth. It made it.

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Sound like the jury got it right.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we kind of do its side he was on,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but they did get a new judge. Now, Carmelo Anthony's

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>attorneys will share the statement that they did put out

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in road. Just so far, it sounds like this is

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>only the first step in this fight.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they absolutely made it clear that they were not

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be just saying okay, well we're done, that

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.239
<v Speaker 2>this was just the first step, and they did realize

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that there would be more to come. This was their

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>official statement. We are disappointed that the court denied our

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 2>motion for a new trial. We respectfully disagree with the ruling.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 2>And remain firmly committed to protecting our client's rights. We

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 2>believe the issues raised in our motion are substantial and

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>deserve meaningful appellate review. The denial of our motion does

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 2>not end this case. We will continue the appeal in

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the Fifth Court of Appeals and pursue every legal remedy

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>available to our client. Our commitment to our client has

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>not changed. We will continue to advocate vigorously on his

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>behalf through every lawful avenue available.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>So then the next avenue is going to be Court

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals. What they've already said they are going to

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>be going forward with. I thought this was just interesting.

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a group out there stand with Carmelo Coalition, and

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they do. They put up a website and they follow

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this case, and it's pretty substantial group growth. They are

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They have been following this and giving significant updates. They

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>put out a pretty long statement, but some of the

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>relevant parts here are kind of underlining That jumped out

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to me. Robes is the defense made consequential decisions throughout

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the trial and reliance upon an agreement with the state

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>concerning the evidence that would and would not be introduced,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>only to have the state change his position at a

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>critical point in the proceedings. They explained in a very

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>succinct way, but Robes that is the point they're saying

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the state changed and therefore, when they did,

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the defense was not comfortable putting Carmelo Anthony on the

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>stand in his own defense. That's a significant argument that

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get a chance to speak at his own

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>trial because of this deal that was made. Now, obviously

0:10:58.240 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you could take the stand if you want to, you

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have the right, but how is the deal then valid

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't officially on the record.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 2>It's so bizarre and it's such a legal gray area

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>given how they did it. It seems so strange. If

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 2>this had been done in front of a judge, this

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 2>would be verifiable and you'd be able to look at

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the records. And so that's why this kind of thing

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be legal, because now it's just murky and confusing.

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, I'm curious too, because, yes, the defense

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>has said the reason why Anthony Carmelo Anthony didn't take

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the stand was because they didn't feel comfortable anymore with

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 2>this deal. Did they get specific as to what the

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>prosecution did or did not do that made them start

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to question that they were holding up their end of

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the bargain or that they would hold up their end

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of the barblet.

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>There was one and I guess we were more familiar

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>with this on legal shows and whatnot. But he well, no,

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we watch a lot of actual courtrooms. But that moment

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>when one thing is said in the opposing side will say, well,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they opened the door. There was something that was testified

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to in court that they felt the state at least

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they opened the door to it. Now we can go

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to honor this deal. That was the feeling.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course the defense didn't agree. But Roes, how can

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to court and argue that the state violated

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>an agreement? What agreement?

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 2>Exactly?

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Where is it? What a judge could admonish the state

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>if he had told them to do a certain thing

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they didn't do it. That's not the case.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>This is like a contract. Robes, How is somebody gonna

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>come sue us because we said one time in a

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>subway that we were going to hire them for something

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and then we didn't.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>They looked us in the eyes, they shook our hands.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't hold up in courts.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not how this works. The district attorney also put

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>out a statement saying they respect the decision, but they

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>also say they expected it. Robes, this is what we

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>expected to happen, and they stand by ready and waiting

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for whatever next thing that might happen. But stay here,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have not heard, the centerpiece of this whole

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>motion for them to try to get a new trial

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with the character information that

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we have now just learned about Austin Metcalf and Carmelo Anthony.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It is ugly and a lot of it is some

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>racist and violent stuff. Stay here, all right, we continue

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>here on this Sunday, August twenty third, is getting worded

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>late yesterday that Carmelo Anthony will not be getting a

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>new trial, but they will continue with their appeals and

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>options that they do have ropes. They kept the character

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>information about these two young men out of the first

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>trial because of this deal we're talking about. Holy hell,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it looks I don't know what these things have canceled

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>each other out because so much of this stuff is

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>jaw dropping. When you're talking about seventeen year olds in rows,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about a violent confrontation that ended in violence.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, that ended in the death. The two characters

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>here robes are the exact last two people who should

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have been in a confrontation.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>It's so true and it's so tragic when you start

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to see what they both brought to that moment that

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.599
<v Speaker 2>we were all unaware of. And yes, I don't know

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 2>if it would have canceled each other. I don't know,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>But isn't that the point? Shouldn't a jury have been

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>able to make that determination. That's what seems frustrating about

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>it all. But yes, we learned. We can start with

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Austin metcap the victim in this. But yeah, the defense

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 2>was able to provide documents that showed both Austin and

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>his twin brother Hunter got twelve months of probation for

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a racist graffiti incident where yeah, the racist language they

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>were spray painting or graffiti ing included KKK, kill all blacks,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the N word, hyl hitler. I mean, so they and

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 2>obviously people knew about this and what these two had done.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>And so yes, that would have gone absolutely in Carmelo

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Anthony's defense, and that he's now being confronted by this

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>larger Austin Metcalf with his twin brother right there, who

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 2>are known to have proudly spray painted horrific racist, threatening

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>language on a wall recently.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's fine. Somebody could hear that and go, okay,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>stupid kid whatever. That doesn't mean he was violent, or

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he was angry, or even that he hates black people. Robes,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes on and on and on. The

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>defense kept presenting incidents robes over the past several years

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of these young men, both of whom are seventeen, both men.

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>If you don't realize Austin Metcalf has a twin brother, Hunter,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>these two ropes, some of these incidents go back twenty

0:15:55.800 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, twenty four and whatnotes, weren't they fourteen fifteen

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>year old kids at the time.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there were documented cases of Austin bullying a

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 2>black student. A teacher even sent an email reporting Austin

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>for using racist language and bullying this black student, and

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 2>then his twin brother, Hunter threatened to strike cheerleaders. Parents

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>even reported that the girls were scared of both Austin

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and Hunter. That Hunter, I believe told the cheerleaders that

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>his hands are bisexual, meaning he'll hit either gender. Another

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>female student says the twins assaulted her in twenty twenty four. Austin,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>by the way, this was significant, has been suspended seven

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>times for disciplinary issues, including cursing at teachers. He was

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>suspended once after he discussed bringing a gun to school.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Hunter has six document documented instances of telling a teacher

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>to shut up. There's video from Austin's phone showing him

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>laughing at a black sat student. The student tells him

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>to stop, and he hits him in the face. Another

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 2>video on his phone showing a black student eating a banana,

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and he's obviously making all of the imaginable racist comparisons

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 2>that you can think of, and then cheering on a

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 2>friend who's chasing a black kid and yelling racial slurs

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>at him. This sounds like the most racially motivated menace

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>and maybe even gender motivated menace that you could imagine,

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>starting at a very young age. At your point, so

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to your point, so I would want to know all

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>of these things. And it doesn't mean he deserved to die,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't mean that he deserved to be.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>A murder victor.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 2>But when you bring all of that energy and all

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of that history and all of that known violent racist

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>behavior to a situation that I don't know. I guess

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the big smoking gun would be if Carmelo Anthony and

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 2>his friends and the community were all very aware of

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 2>this in that moment or at least some of those instances.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>According to the defense, Carmelo Anthony did at least on

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one occasion was aware of these boys from some other incident.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was out a basketball game. So they

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>tried to make an argue. It wasn't that solid of one.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>He didn't know them or know them well, but they

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to suggest at least he's seen these young men

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in action, which again goes to some level of fear.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It also goes to robes would that speak to a

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>juror They go, okay, little, this smaller black kid is

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>in there with these two guys who it's reasonable now

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>to understand how they might react to him being in

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>their tent exactly.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And so we kind of got this feeling that they

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 2>were just trying to do due diligence and following their

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 2>coaches orders and keeping the tent clear, and they were

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 2>just trying. Now that we know this background, what were

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>they saying And I'm not again I am not saying

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>he deserved to be murdered.

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He didn't.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 2>But escalating the situation, what was he saying? What was

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 2>he doing? None of that at all seemed like it

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 2>was inappropriate what Austin was doing, And so it was

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of strange seeming and very unreasonable to think that

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Carmelo Anthony escalated it in the way he did. None

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>of it really made sense. But hearing all of this now,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you're getting a different view. And look, you asked

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>if a juror, if what this would mean to a juror.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>There were no black jurors in that jury.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So might not mean eithing exactly, might not mean the thing.

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So with this stuff, though, on the other side, would

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this have been relevant to a jury to hear that

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Carmelo Anthony actually sent a text message that day at

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>one am to someone saying I'm low key on the verge.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>That was supposed to be some suggestion that maybe he

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was already wired for the day. That same day, his

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend allegedly reported to an assistant principle of his stalking behavior.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Also another text message they pointed out, in which it

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>seems he was texting someone and it seemed to confirm

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that he had hit a girl in the face at

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some point. There are more here in which they pointed out,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I will shoot up the school tomorrow than he followed

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up saying I'm kidding, I would never actually do that.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Another text thing I like punching people. Another one saying

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>when I get mad, I can't control myself. Text to

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>his girlfriends saying I'm gonna get you. Quote how many

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>bullets you want? Quote when I stab somebody, I'm gonna

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lick the blade off the table, off the blade.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Ropes.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff is not something I understand that a's fifteen, sixteen,

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year old kids should be saying. Why they're saying it.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty damning as well, Robes. And that would have

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly had an impact on a juror jury that does

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not include any black people, and a jury that might

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>think that what they think of black people and black

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>men and young black men. All of that reads like,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, that might have hurt him even worse. And

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some suggestion Robe, you sure you want a new

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>trial because what if he gets sixty years next time? Well,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because what do you go, Ropes, This is awful Star,

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, babe. It's just that the juror should

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>have had the option exactly. But then the other part

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of that robes is there is context in these two

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>things that you need maybe a black person to be

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the room to understory.

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think, to me, just hearing all of this,

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and yes, when I stab somebody, I'm gonna lick their

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 2>blood off the blade, that that's a really hard thing

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>given what happened on the bleachers in that Texas track meet.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 2>So yes, that that to me was the most damning

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of them all. But I do think that one of

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 2>the biggest issues, and this was this brought up. I

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>don't remember this being a thing about there being no

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 2>black jurors.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>In this back and forth. You don't have a right

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to it necessarily, right.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Your peers, because I do think that is that is

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to me, that was the biggest travesty. I have said

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>this a lot of folks listening here who are white,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>just imagine you are a white person, you killed a

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>black person, and they're kind of being hailed a wonderful

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 2>human being who was looking forward to college. So you're white,

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>you've killed a black person, and now you're on a

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>jury and there's not one white person on that jury.

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Immediately your chest titans. You feel like you can't win.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Like whether or not you deserve to be punished and

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 2>whether or not you deserve to be found guilty, it

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>still feels like you're not going to get a reasonable

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 2>understanding of what possibly was going through your mind or why,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the why, the how all of that. The idea of

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 2>that would be unthinkable to most white people. And yet

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what happened to Carmelo Anthony.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Just so you could take this holes and just reverse

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>it all. This is a predominantly white area, yes, first

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of all, and so you have these two black kid

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>white kid like reverse at all. Let's say this is

0:22:55.800 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a predominantly black area, a white kid, like you said,

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>kills a black kid. You go in there, Robes and

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine a white defendant looking at all black jurors.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>A black judge.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Wow, y'all, really they are really gonna get me.

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what you would think.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I killed one of theirs. I don't have a shot here.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>They don't care why, they don't care what happened leading

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>up to it.

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and what would you say in that scenario, Robes,

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>is they if black folks came to you and said,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the problem here. What are you saying

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>black people can't be a fair and impartial jury. That's

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the arguments that we're used. This is so different.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I can understand why Carmelo Anthony was scared out of

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>his mind if this is what he was confronted with.

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>If and we don't know because the only witness there

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not a friend of Austin Metcalfs is Carmelo Anthony

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't get a chance to tell his story

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on the stand. Why and if it's legally relevant to

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>get him a new DRIW I don't no, but Robes,

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this just doesn't seem fair.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Agreed to your side.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm not not some fullhearted defense. Some

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff he said is just it's wild. Next

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>step don't know when it's going to be happening, but

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they are taking it to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to give you this update and it came

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>late yesterday as Carmelo Anthony, not as of now getting

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a new trial. And with that, we appreciate you being here.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm TJ. That's Robes. We'll talk soon.