WEBVTT - Week 9 Bloodbath

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>advice now leagues dot com. Youre's your host, Paul Charge.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. My name is Paul Giarchi,

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and my co host today are Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. Hello, guys,

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello charch in a closet. How are you way down

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in a well somewhere? I am, I am um. I've

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>got my all time best built in excuse for terrible

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>fantasy advice. Let's a week of COVID. Oh no, I've

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 1>not missed the show in twenty seven years, and I'm

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not letting COVID take my streak. I've got it. I'm

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 1>quarantined at home. My audio does not sound good. Hopefully

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>my fantasy advice will I sound like him in the closet.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I sound like him, nasal Uh. You may hear occasional

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>flegm over the course of the next two hours, but

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy season motors on, and so do we, guys.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>We are not missing the opportunity to pass along salient

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football advice. Absolutely and don't omit the very important

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that you are vaccinated and both both. Aaron Rodgers

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has informed me I am I am also immunized. Little

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>did I know until now. Isn't that? That is fantastic news, wonderful? Yeah, um,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>before we dive into all of our matchups, and of

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>course we've got three tough questions as normal, we've got

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation at the end of the show that we'll

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>get to where we give you guys to pick up

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this week that we think will be high value targets.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Next week we've got to take a chance on me.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But I want to spend a minute on Odell Beckham.

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Next Monday, Waivers will run for the NFL and in

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>all probability, although not necessarily, Odell Beckham will have a

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>new team. Tell me your thoughts about the value for

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. Should he be held, should he be dropped,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and if you think there's a chance he can resurrect

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>his career, well, personally, I'm still holding, and I'll hold

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>through the weekends. He where he ends up, and he

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>likely would only go to a real life contender, one

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>would think. Personally, I would love to see him go

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to Detroit and just soak up garbage time on the

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>waiver priority list, right they are The Saints is an

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>intriguing landing spot now that Michael Thomas has pretty much

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>done for the year. But the quarterback situation not too

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>nice in New Orleans. And I don't know the packers,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>those seem kind of like the top three. I don't

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think Detroit will get him. But that's that's my ideal

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>landing spot for Odell Beckham, believe it or not. And

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, last week on the show, I said that

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it was probably a good idea to see what O'Dell

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>does last week and then maybe sabotage drop him. Well,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Browns listen to me, there we go brown It

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is obviously listening to the show. Kevin Stefanski big fan, Yeah,

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>big fan of the show, no doubt um. And you

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>know there's I think there's a we we want to

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that there's a scenario he finds himself on a contender.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a bottom feeder is gonna want anything

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with this. The part that's gonna make this

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>money is reputationally where Odell Beckham is is in a

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>very very bad spot and these and teams talk to

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>each other all the time. You know, there are friends

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>across teams and they everybody knows what Odell Beckham has

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>put that Brown's franchise through, and I think there's a

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>chance he doesn't clear that. No team, no team takes

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>him in waivers at all, clears waivers, and then maybe

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Beckham can find his way to a team he wants

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be on bias some other route on a really

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>low end contract. So it'll be fascinating to see. But

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's a chance that Odell Beckham doesn't play. Yeah,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>there is an outside chance of that, but like you said,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>there's probably just enough talent there that people are gonna

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>want to take a little bit of a chance on Odell.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Detroit is such. Is there the fire already? They gotta

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sell tickets. This is the perfect perfect marriage in my mind,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Detroit signed O d B. Yeah, I think

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you want that to happen more than that's going to happen,

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It's true. Let's jump into our matchups, beginning with the

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Broncos taking on the Cowboys. Matt Um this is a

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Broncos offense that has been inconsistent at late and Teddy

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater really not playing it really for the last month,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>not playing at a particularly high level. And he's they've

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>got to face a a surging Cowboys defense. Yeah. I

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I only gave Bridgewater a C and it's a low ce.

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh He's startable only because the matchup the Cowboys allowing

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>two or ninety three yards per game in almost two

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns per game, has this full compliment to wide

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>receivers back for this one, and I kind of like that.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It's worth noting that Trevon Diggs has allowed the most

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>yardage in his coverage this year, and Anthony Round who's

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, has allowed the fourth most yardage

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, but the worst corner of them all,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>according to Pro Football, focuses Jordan Lewis, who covers the slot,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and that will be Jerry Judy spot and it could

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>be a shootout or at least a game script that

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>favors the past. So I'll give Judy a B. I'll

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>give Sutton a B. I'll even give a C grade

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>to Tim Patrick on the hopes that he can get going. UH.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Noah offense currently on the COVID reserve list after a

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>positive test on Tuesday, although they're saying there's a slim

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>chance he could play, it's not likely and his backup

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Albert Agabnam I can never get that right. Albert, Oh

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just al he's questionable with a knee. There's no tight

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>end angle here. So let's talk about the runners, Melvin

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Gordon and Javante Williams. The touch totals are still virtually

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>deadlocked between the two runners. Gordon's getting more looks in

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the red zone, though He's had seven touches inside the

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty in the last two weeks, compared to one for Javante,

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and outside of Damien Harris having a nice day against

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the cow Cowboys, they've bottled up every other runner, including

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook, who is limited to only seventy eight yards

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.119
<v Speaker 1>on eighteen carries last week. Gordon gets the C grade

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the red zone. I'm gonna leave Javonte Williams

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, but hope he breaks out soon. On

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys side, Dac is back, but it's a difficult

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>matchup this week in Denver. I'll give Dak a B

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>grade in this one. Only two quarterbacks have topped the

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>two seventy yard mark on Denver this year, and only

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks have reached two touchdown passes against the Broncos.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has reached the three touchdown pass mark against Denver

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>since Week nine of last year. Also, his left tackle,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Tyrn Smith is out this week, but Von Miller, a

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Bronco pass rusher of note, is now a RAM and

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>so that kind of evens out a few things on

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the pass rush standpoint. Amari Cooper and Ceedee Lamb. I'm

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>giving twin B grades to Cooper and Lamb have been

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>dealing with some injuries this week. Cooper has a hamstring,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamb as a sore ankle. Both are slated to play,

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>though only four wide receiver have topped the seventy yard

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>mark against Denver this year, as the trio of Denver

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>corners has been one of the best in the league.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But Ceedee Lamb will often get the most get the

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>best matchup against Ronald Darby, who's allowed hundred and thirteen

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and a score just a few weeks ago to

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the combo of Brian Edwards and Henry Ruggs Dalton Schultz.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He gets a B grade. Jarwin is out this week then,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh Dalton Schultz was already seventh in targets amongst

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. That's with a bye week for total targets,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so Denver hasn't allowed a tight end touchdown this season,

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but they did give up some decent days to Mark

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Andrews and Darren Waller earlier this year. Finally, the runners,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Zeke gets a B. Pollard is the lowest C grade

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I can give, if that's possible. Denver is the most

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>neutral running back matchup in the league. They rank fifteen, sixteenth,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or seventeen in basically every defensive category against opposing runners

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>except four receptions. They're very good against receiving backs, which

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hurts Pollard and Zeke, but Pollered a little bit more

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>since about two of his touches are through the air.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Both of these guys are getting worked though a Zeke

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>averaging twenty one rushing attempts plus targets per game. Zeke

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>has converted his ten rushing attempts inside the ten to

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns this year. So I like Zeke quite a

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>bit better. And that's all I got charge alright, Not

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bad um, that's a There's a lot of moving parts

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>with that one. Well done, O'Brien. Let's go to the

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots taking on the Panthers and for the Patriot side

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of this. Damien Harris is turning into a sledge hammer

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>back and I'm fascinated to find out what you think

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be able to do against the Panther's run

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>defense that has been a lot more porous lately than

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year they have been. I'm

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>still a little cautious. I'm gonna be a little cautious

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with Damien Harris this week, just to see borderline b grave.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with the Sea only played in the snaps

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>last week, but he saw twenty three touches, is most

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>since Week one. He's clearly the lead back in New England.

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>But on paper, for the most part, is a tough

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>match up. The Panthers are allowing less than one hundred

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>convoy yards per game to the position and just three

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>total touchdowns all season. Brandon Bold and romand Romandre Stephenson,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna factor in for passing work. So it's got

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a safe se on Harris this week. It's a It's

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a much easier matchup for wide receivers against the Panthers,

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give Jacoby Myers a b averaging five or

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half targets this year in a good spot,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Carolina has allowed four wide receiver touchdowns over the last

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. So is this are you calling it right here? Sure?

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Why not? I'll put it out there in the universe.

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Jacobe Myers scores his first career NFL touchdown on Sunday.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I've called that about four times this year already.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work yet, but I'm gonna throw a couple

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of sea darts at Kendrick Born and Nelson Agila. During

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that same three weeks span where the Panthers have allowed

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver touchdowns, are also allowing seventeen catches and

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one eight yards per game to the position. So if

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you're in desperate need, you can throw a dart at

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Borne or Nelson Agil. I like Born a little

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>more between the two. Uh, No dart for Hunter Henry,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Just gonna give him a solid See been running hot

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>lately with touchdowns, and four of his last five games

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he's basically doubled up on the pass routes run Compared

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to John who Smith. The Panthers haven't surrendered a lot

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to opposing tight ends, but they have yielded the sixth

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>most targets of the position, so Henry will have opportunities

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to produce a safe c for him. But Mac Jones,

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta put him on the bench this week. I

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know he gave most of his past catchers a starting grade,

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean they all come through. It just

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>means each one has the potential to The Panthers are

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>allowing just two passing yards and one and a half

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns for pery game, So I got Mac on

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the bench in this one. Over to the Carolina side

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>where it gets real messy, And of course we're gonna

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>start with Christian McCaffrey, who might make his return from

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the hamstring injury shaping up to be a game time decision.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll go under the assumption he goes, and if he plays,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be in limited fashion. He's not gonna be

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be a bell cow by any means. It's almost better

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>off for fantasy purposes if he doesn't play. It's a

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>good matchup on paper for the Panthers backs. The Patriots

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are allowing the ninth most rushing yards, seventh most receptions,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and fifth most receiving yards per game to the position.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Five different backs have posted at least five receptions over

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the last four games. Uh, the Patriots last four games.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>That is, so if McCaffrey plays, I will give him

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in Cuba Hubbard to see. I think they split the work. Uh.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If McCaffrey is out, I'll bump Cuba Hubbard up to

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a B based on volume alone. Willis have to see

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens on Sunday with that. Uh to the wide

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>receivers starting with d J. Moore, and basically we're gonna

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>end end with d J Moore two. But I'm gonna

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>give d J. Moore a B. New England is allowing

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>one yards per game to wide receivers over the past

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>five games, which is the ninth most, and they have

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>surrendered multiple touchdowns to wide receivers and three of their

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>past four games by making main main concern is a

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>game plan to stop d J. Moore if Christian McCaffrey

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is out, because he's clearly the most dangerous weapon on Carolina.

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So just a B grade for more, not an A.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And Robby Anderson got to put him on the bench

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>just one target last week. Zero catches twenty targets across

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>his two games prior, but turned those into just six

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>catches for twenty five yards. We gotta see more from

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Robbie before we contemplate starting him. He's on the bench. Obviously,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina that tight ends are on the bench because

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't have Dan Arnold anymore. And lastly, Sam Donald,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>also pretty much a game time decision, got knocked out

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>last week with the concussion. But either way, he's on

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the bench even if he's clearly on the bench if

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't play, but if you play, is I got

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench? Hasn't throw him for multiple scores

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or hasn't even topped ten passing yards since Week four? Wolf,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm done, no doubt. That is a That is a

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>tough spot for sure. Um That passing offense is just

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>not the same as it used to be at all.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>What is the same is we're still creating new guillotine leagues.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>At guillotine leagues dot Com, there's still half a season

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>left to play, and if you've been a drink by

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the format, you've only got a couple more weeks to

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>get in on the action. Guillotine leagues dot Com the

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>freshest new way to play to see sports. When we

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>come back, take a chance on me not nine players

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not normally in your starting line up. Many of them

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>are startable this week. We'll tell you who they are

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. It's take

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Fantasy Football Weekly's opportunity to help

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>you find nine players that you would not normally start,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but you can this week. Many of these guys are

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>available on the waiver wire. We can get at the

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position, and Matt Harrison Daniel Jones is my Uh,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on the quarterback. It's always a bit

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>over racking starting Dan Dimes, but the Raiders tend to

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>play towards his strengths. They've allowed multiple touchdown passes and

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>three of the last four. The only one who couldn't

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>accomplish that was justin fields and he doesn't do that anyway. Plus,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones is a runner. He's averaging thirty yards per game

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on the ground on six attempts per game, and the

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have allowed the third most quarterback rushing attempts and

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the sixth most rushing yards to opposing quarterbacks. So fire

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>up Danny Dimes. All right, Brian, you're take a chance

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at me quarterback. I got to Rod, don't call me Tyrod. Taylor,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>even though Trod doesn't really care what you call him,

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but I call him to Rod. But he's making his return.

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>He'll be at Miami this week. Uh, he'll get the

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>start coming back from the hamstring injury. To Rod. Looked

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really good to start the season before he went down,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully can make it through this game because it's

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup for him. The Dolphins are allowing more

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>than three passing yards and two passing touchdowns per game

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. Just has to be running on fumes right

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>now after for going thereby following the London game if

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you school, which is kind of weird. They're they're they're exhausted.

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So I like to rout this week. I do too.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a sneaky play. Um, I'll be honest.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I originally had Taysom Hill in this spot under the

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>assumption that he was gonna be the quarterback of choice

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>over Trevor Simeon, which I did not see coming. And

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want a DFS flyer, you could

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>still try Taysom Hill under the assumption that he ends

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>up getting some time in this one. But instead I'm

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna pivot to Jordan's love. We don't have a lot

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of data points on Love except he looked good in

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. But what we do know is that Love's

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>first start comes at a great time. He gets back

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, al Lazard, Marcus Velda Scantling, and Kansas City's

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>got problems all over the field, especially the cornerbacks struggling,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Lugarious Snead, Mike Hughes to our various ward all of

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>them having trouble. Snead is a lot of the tenth

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>most yards in his coverage, and then when they go deep,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they get to face Daniel Sorenson, the safety is allowed

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>more yards than any player at his position and a

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect assle rating in his coverage. Jordan's Love. You know,

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the Packers find ways that make good things happen for themselves.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if he comes out with a

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>solid game here. Let's go to the running back position.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt I kind of copped out on this one and

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>took all of the Philly running backs. Yeah, so Jordan Howard.

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he's not currently on Philly's fifty three

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>man roster. He's a practice squad player. But there's this

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>weird rule in the NFL, where you can protect a

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>few practice squad players and then even elevate them to

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the game day roster, but you can only do it twice.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So this will be Howard's last game on the Eagles

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>unless they signed him to the roster. Now, last week

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he did play. That was his first game of the year,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and he ended with twelve carries fifty seven yards and

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>two scores. Boston Scott had twelve carries sixty yards and

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>two scores, and Kenneth Gainwell had thirteam carries twenty seven

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>yards and no scores. Not one of them was targeted

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>once in the passing game though, So six different running

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>backs have scored against the chart argers in the last

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. That's right, six different running backs have scored

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>against the charges in the last three weeks now the trend,

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all of which were bigger dudes. DeVonta Freeman, who has

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred six pounds, was the only one under two

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty pounds. Now Jordan Howard, he's weighing in at

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two twenty. Boston Scott's tiny, he's five s Kenny gainwells,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's yolo time for Jordan Howard. I'll use him

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as might take a chance of me runner, but I'll

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>give all three Philly backs sea grades in this one. Okay, um, Brian,

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>who's your taken chance at me running back? And hopefully

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not as not as much of a cop out? Uh

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>not really, you're quite virtually taking a chance every time

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you start Miles Gaskin, so I'm gonna go with him

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>at home against the Texans. Malcolm Brown is now on

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I R. But we did see Gaskin lose some touches

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to Salvin Akhmed and Patrick Laird last week. That said,

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Gaskin is still the lead back. Houston's run defense pretty whack.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>They're allowing five point to yards per carry in one

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>fifth plus combo yards per game to running back, So

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Miles gas canna take a chance on you guy with

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a upside in this matchup. Jeremy McNichols

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is the forgotten man now that Dadrian Peterson's in Tennessee.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Peterson probably only good for what do you think, maybe

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ten twelve, fourteen total touches in this game, and McNichols

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>gets the rest, and a lot of it will be

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>through the air. And the Rams are a good run defense,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>but not so good against past catching runners. They've surrendered

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the ninth most receptions, the eighth most receiving yards to

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>opposing runners. And McNichols. If you think that Tennessee is

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna get blown up by Matthew Stafford in the Rams

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna be behind in losses, Jeremy McNichols is

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>averaging eight targets per game. So you know, if you're

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like me and you think the Rams are probably gonna

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lead throughout a lot of this game without Derrick Henry Um,

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>then Jeremy m McNichols a nice PPR play. Let's go

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to the wide receiver position. Matt I got Van Jefferson

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Titans, and it's very easy to

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>pick on the Titans. But here's the deal. The third

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers are getting targeted a ton against Tennessee. Here's

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the third wide receiver over the last few weeks that

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have faced the Titans. Zach Pascal had eight targets, Byron

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Pringle had nine. Let's call it Emmanuel Sanders for the Bills,

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>who had eight, but if you want to make it

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Cold Beasley that's nine. And Jamal agg Knew for the

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars had eight. So Van Jefferson's gonna get eight targets

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in this one. He's had six career games where he

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>had he's had six or more targets and he scored

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in three of them. So that's a coin flips chance

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that a touchdown too. So I like Van Jefferson in

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this one. All right, Brian, you take a chance of

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the receiver. It has come to this for Allen Robinson,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>he's now take com material h Alan Robinson of the Bears.

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, at Pittsburgh, this is basically just a gut call.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>The Bears likely to get smoked against the Steelers, who

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are very tough to run on. I see a lot

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of garbage time in this game. Opposing wide receivers are

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging one seventy yards and one point three touchdowns per

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>game against Pittsburgh, and uh again, I'm just trying to

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>will a good game into the universe. For Allen Robinson,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>he's way overdue. So Allan Robbinson come on one time

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>he does. He is overdue, and we'll take it. I'd

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>love to see it for him. Brandon Ayuk might be

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your number one receiving option for San Francisco. Deebo Samuel

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>trending towards out au has two paws out of the doghouse.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Last week he saw seven targets, he played cent of

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the offensive snaps. Those are season highs. And over the

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>past three games, Arizona ranks bottom ten in yards allowed

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to receivers, despite the fact that they faced and injured

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield and Davis Mills over those three games. And

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so are you trending the right direction? Cornerbacks Marco Wilson

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and Byron Murphy have allowed seven touchdowns combined in their coverage.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an opportunity for a here. He scored

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>last week. He could do it two times in a row.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to uh some matchups beginning with the Vikings

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Ravens and normally Dalvin cooks in a

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>but this is a tricky matchup and I've only got

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to be grade on him. Baltimore allowing the eighth fewest

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards on the seventh fewest attempts per game. No

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>runner has top sixty yards on the ground against the Ravens,

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>um although none have seen more than fifteen carries, and

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Cook always is good for more than fifteen carries as

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>soon as he assuming he starts and finishes a game.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Um Baltimore has missed the most tackles in the league,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so Cook could end up breaking a long one in

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this one, and he's still a B grade. Let's go

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game. Kirk Cousins just a C grade.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Offensive coordinator Clint Kobyak is strangling the life out of

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings offense despite having one of the best deep

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>ball passers and Cousins. He's got Cousins throwing the second

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>shortest average pass, just six point six yards. I'd like

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that that could change this week, but

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Kobe is gonna get spooked by Justin Houston

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and Clay's Campbell and worries about Kirk potentially getting sacked.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's still gonna be a lot of

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>underneath passing here and Becausin's just can't dink and dunk

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>his way to fantasy relevancy. So just to see on

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Kirk and bees on his two main receivers, Justin Jefferson

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Feeling. Over the past three games, Baltimore has

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed the six most yards to receivers two hundred three

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>per game, which is a ton um starting quarterbacks Marlon

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to Humphrey and Anthony Averett have combined to allot five touchdowns,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>which isn't all bad. And despite his reputation as a

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>shutdown corner, Humphrey discot roasted by Jamar Chase for six

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>five yards, So you know, big, good receivers can get

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it done against him. So I think that Jefferson and

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Feeland can get a little something done. They might have

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot of it after yards after catch um.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>In a different matchup, they'd be better. They'd be maybe

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a place here, but I'm worried about too much dump

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>off stuff from Minnesota. Tyler Conklin is a fascinating option

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>for you, and I've got to see grade on him.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>If you're in a pinch. The Ravens are allowing the

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to tight ends. In only seven games,

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens have allowed three different tight ends to top

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety yards and they've given up six touchdowns to the position.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>So if you're in a you're in a spot for

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>during a bye week, you need a tight end. Maybe

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Conklin's a guy you could you could go with.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Baltimore. Lamar Jackson is an obvious A

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and Marcus Brown also an A. I'll

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>note if you don't know that Minnesota's elite edge rusher

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Hunter is out for the year and his replacement,

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>DJ Wantam is a major step down. That means Jackson

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have a lot of time to throw and

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>his receivers will probably be open against a secondary missing

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson. Marcus Brown is an obvious A here. He

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>scored four times in the four games before the bye

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>week and averaged eighty three yards during that stretch. Backup

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Cameron Danceler is playing the wrong side of of

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the field and got targeted copiously last week. Ten targets

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at him last week. Marky's Brown will face him through

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>much of this game. Rashand Bateman potentially a breakout for

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all the same reasons. I've gotta be grade on him.

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>He is commonly runs on the right side of the field,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where he's gonna face Bashad brick Breyland Pro Football focuses

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>eight seven rank cornerback. He's surrendered four scores and a

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>passer rating of one nineteen in his coverage. I think

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Bateman could have his first really good game and his

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>first trip to the end zone. In this one, Mark

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Andrews drops down to a C, which might sound counterintuitive

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>given everything else we've said, But the Vikings have been

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>great against tight ends. They're giving up just twenty They've

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>given up just twenty four receptions all year to the

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>position and no touchdowns. Um. They've got star linebacker Eric

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Kendricks who's doing a great job and Anthony Barr as

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>well shutting down opposing tight ends. So Andrews have been

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>very good this year. Um, but I think this is

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup and I've only got the C grade

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on him here. Otavias Murray doesn't look like he's gonna go,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and that means we're gonna get some blend of Levy

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on Bell, DeVante Freeman, Tyson Williams. In this game. The

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are allowing the eighth most rushing yards per game.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>We'll posing backs there and they will almost certainly be

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>without run stuffing lineman Michael Pierce again. But this is

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a really tricky that's tricky you know which of the

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>three might get any kind of work and in what role,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I've got I've got bench grades on all

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of them because you just can't know if it's gonna

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be Bell, Freeman or Williams, that's going to get most

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of the work. If I had to pick one and

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>put a C grade on one, it would be Freeman

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>based on the usage we saw before the by final

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup of this segment, Matt, it's Bills taking on the Jaguars,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and which should be a smashed spot for a lot

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bills. Yeah, this one's pretty easy. Josh Allen a grade,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so is Steph Diggs, H Cole Beasley. I'm giving a B.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders a sea. The Jags are allowing almost two

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>passing yards per game, with an average of one going

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers. Beasley had twenty two targets over his

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>last two games, and Sanders had four targets last week

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>against Miami but didn't come up with a catch. That

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty weird. But he's seen five, six and eight

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>targets in the prior three weeks and is a red

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>zone favorite of Alan's, so he's still startable, especially with

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox who's out again with a hand in dree

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not flexing to Tommy Sweeney just yet, though, so

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to the runners for the Bills, Zack

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Moss gets a B. I'm leaving Devin Singletary on the bench,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>though we highlighted it last week that the split was

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>almost even for these two. Well, eight carries for Moss

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>last week seven carries for Singletary, but six catches for

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Moss to only one for Singletary, and that might mean something.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Plus Moss is getting twice as many touches in the

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.239
<v Speaker 1>red zone, so he's your guy this week on the

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>running side. On the jag side, James Robinson was limited

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in Friday's practice, which is a positive step as no

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 1>one really thought he would go this week. If he

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>does go, I'm still leaving him on the bench. I'm

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>leaving all the Jaguars runners on the bench. The Bills

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are only allowing twenty running back touches per game on average.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the fewest in the league by far, And you know, Matt,

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I think part of that is because they've got the

0:26:55.440 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>league's best point differential their plus one twenty points, so

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they're always playing with the lead and usually a sizeable one,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and teams just can't run. Yeah, they're They're awesome. They're

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>top three in rushing yards and touchdowns allowed to running backs.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They've also allowed the fewest receptions to opposing backs, which

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>seems counterintuitive with those negative game scripts that these runners see. Uh.

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And even if James Robinson does go, you'll probably see

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a healthy dose of Carlos Hide anyway, so I will

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>keep him on the bench. Now, the Jags passing game

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is all on the bench except for one player. That's right, Brian,

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Dan Arnold. Oh, he comes in with a C

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>grade on Arnold. He's running eighty point five percent of

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>his routes as a slot wide receiver. Only Mike Gisicki

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Pitts had more great stead I found uh

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>from some some guy named Brian Johnson who sent that

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>one to me. He's seen twenty three targets over the

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>last three games, which averages out to eight targets per week.

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Only t J Hockenson and Travis Kelsey see more than

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>eight targets per game. So Dan Arnold on pace to

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be one of the best tight ends in the league.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't know. Half of the tight ends who

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have seen four or more targets against the Bills have

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>scored this year. So if Arnold gets eight targets, that

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>means he's a shoe in for a touchdown. I'm gonna

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>call it dan Arnold touchdown? What do you think? I

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>love it. As far as the rest of the passing game,

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they're all on the bench. The Bills allow the fewest completions,

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, passing touchdowns to oppose two opponents. Lawrence is

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>only averaging a score per game, and it's going to

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Arnold. So yeah, that's it. You don't need anything

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>else from the Jaguars. Back to the Bill. The Bills

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>tight end Tom Sweeney. How many of his friends and

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>family you think? You call him? Sweeney com No musical fans, Yeah,

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of musical fans listening to Fantasy football weekly right now?

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>You know what. There are no lavish all fans left,

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, And it's turned out of such a promising

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>season that I thought would be so much better fort

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Laviska Chanel, but honestly not even really rosterable in most

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>leagues at this point. Unfortunately, when we come back, we'll

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>continue motoring through more matchups, including Packers and Chiefs. Patrick

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes his struggles. Is he a sure starter for your

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>fantasy team? Find out when we come back to Fantasy

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson with you. I am

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at home remote style, so apologize for the audio, but

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we're here to give you all the information you need

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to dominate Week number nine tricky bye week. Lots and

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of injuries. We will help you sort it out

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>over the course of this show. Next up, Brian, it's

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Texans taking on the Dolphins. You already told us

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you like Tarrod Taylor. What do you think of his receivers?

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know the guy I'm really interested in his

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna give us starting grade to Nico Collins?

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this gonna be his first ever starting grade? I'm

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. It is uh real quick. Like you

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>said to Rod Taylor, was gonna take a chance. I'man quarterback.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I like three of his past catchers in this game.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Will start with Nico Collins. Gonna give him a see.

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>He was second and catches among wide receivers last week

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Texans in his second game of his career,

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and I only expect that usage to ramp up in

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>his third game. I'm a little worried this is his

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>first game with Taylor at quarterback, but the matchup is

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>just too good for Nicos, so he gets to see

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup obviously good for Brandon Cooks as well, going to

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>give him a be He posted big numbers with Taylor

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to start the season, so I'm not too worried about

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the change back at quarterback to Taylor with Cooks. The

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins allowing nearly two hundred yards per game too wide

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>receivers and one and a half touchdowns per game to

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the position. So like Cooks and Collins this week, I

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.239
<v Speaker 1>also like tight end Jordan's Aikin is gonna give him

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a scene. The Dolphins have allowed these second most yards

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends, and Aikin saw a season high and

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week and also caught five passes for fifty

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>three yards, So double digit PPR points is possible here

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>for Aikins, giving him the sea Now. I am not

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>giving a starting grade to David Johnson, Philip Lindsay, Rex Burkhead,

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Phillips. I think Scottie Pippen might even be playing

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>running back for the Texans right now. They're all on

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the bench. That's an easy call. You don't want to

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>touch that game of Russian roulette with a ten foot

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>poll over to the Dolphins side. Miles Gascumes might take

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me running back, A great matchup for him.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Also a great matchup for wide receiver Jalen Waddle. He

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>gets a buh. Houston has allowed the sixth most yards

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>too wide receivers and they are also top five and

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets and red zone touches yielded to opposing

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, So a B for Waddle and I was

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>all set to give Davante Parker a B two, but

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he's just been placed on I R with a shoulder injury.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Parker man he is glass one full season his career.

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>In his career, I just checked, so we're gonna bump

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>up Preston Williams with a C. He was benched for

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>disciplinary reasons last week. Hopefully he's been a good boy

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this week because it's a good matchup for him if

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he plays. If he does, it's a C for him

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and a good matchup for Mike Kasiki. Matt mentioned in

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the last Segmentsicki has taken of his snaps from the

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>slot or outside that's most among qualifying tight ends. Those

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers were dumbed down a little with the return of

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Davante Parker, but again he's on I r so kausiki

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>basically back to a wide receiver now and again a

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>great matchup for wide receivers, but it's also a great

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>matchup for tight ends if we really want to go there. Uh.

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>The Texans have allowed a tight end touchdown in four

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>straight games, for a total of five to the position

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>during that span, So tight ends are lighting it up.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You gotta love Gisicki this week, and of course he

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta like to. Ah Canna give him a B borderline

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>A grade for me. Until Davante Parker was ruled out. Um,

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the Texans are allowing nearly two D seventy passing yards

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and two passing touchdowns per game. Opposing quarterbacks are also

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>averaging more than eighty rushing yards against Houston, who has

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>also allowed the third most rushing touchdowns to the position.

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So fire up to with confidence. Yeah and not the

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Toa is hyper mobile, but he can move a little.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you know, I take twenty rushing yards from

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>two if he can, If he can manage that, that'd

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>be great. Packers take on the Chiefs in a in

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a game in which Jordan's Love will be making his

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>first ever start. And and guys, if you're Jordan's Love

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and he was might take a chance, I mean quarterback

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier and he comes in here with a c. Great.

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're back to pass make your first ever start,

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you are looking scanning the field, who are you gonna

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball too? Davante Adams over and over again,

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, exactly so he maintains an A

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>grade here. I am not moving him down at all.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>This is still a bew eleait start against with an

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.959
<v Speaker 1>elite receiver against a really bad secondary. So we're not

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>giving this any second thoughts. We're keeping Davante Adams in

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>our starting lineup. If you're really in a pinch, you

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.479
<v Speaker 1>could go to Marques Velde's Scantling, who should return from

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>his hamstring injury. Per pre injury, he was four targets

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a game, which wasn't great. But the whole deal in

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>him is he's always all about the long ball. And

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's such a bad secondary of giving up so many

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>long passes that you could use Marques Veldez Scantling in

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a pinch if you just want to try an all

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or nothing play I'm putting Ellen Lazard on the bench

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>because even though he had scored in the games prior

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to his COVID designation, but those games are without MVS,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and in the MBS games, Lazard average one catch per game.

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So with MBS back, I don't think Lazard's nearly savable.

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And then Randall. Randall coms same thing. He was fine

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>when everybody else was hurt, but you know he was

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>getting virtually no playing time or looks when the other

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>receivers were healthy. So he's on the bench too. Not

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna chase last week's touchdowns. So now let's go to

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the running game with Jordan Love. You've gotta figure that

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones is gonna get a lot of work, both

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>as a runner and as a dump off option, the

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>game plan shifts towards Jones. Here in Kansas City has

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>given up at least one hundred combo yards to a

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>lead back in each of the last three weeks. Their

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football focus is lowest graded run defense, so even

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>though they know Aaron Jones is gonna get a lot

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of work, they can't do anything about it. They have

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed six touchdowns to running backs um, which is middle

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a middle of the pack number. Jones is third though

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>in red zone touches with thirty six already, so I

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>do like a touchdown here and an A grade on Jones.

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So A j. Dillon is is fascinating because last week

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>he gets he got a season high and snaps carries

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and in yard seventy eight yards. But he's one game

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>removed from a four touch eight yard game. I still

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's startable, and I'm giving him a C grade

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.919
<v Speaker 1>because again, with Love under center, I think there will

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be more opportunities to run the ball, and they can't

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>give him all to Aaron Jones. So I think Dylan's

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get get enough work here to perhaps get you

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to the fifty yard mark in total yards, and maybe

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>it gets like you for a touchdown, but we won't

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>bank on it, and we'll give him a secret. So

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>let's go over to Kansas City, where things have suddenly

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot more interesting. I've been coasting on the

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>old Patrick Mahomes, Terry Hill and Travis Kelsey there auto

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>A's I don't even have to talk about those guys.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much every week for two years now. Suddenly

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I got to defend my my positions on these guys.

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with Mahomes, who's just to be great.

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>For all of his problems, he's still throwing multiple touchdowns

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in seven of eight games, so from a fantasy standpoint,

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>he's still been very bankable. He faces a Green Bay

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>defense though, that can generate a lot of pressure from

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>its base package with Rashaan Gary, Kenny Clark, Za Darius Smith,

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and that allows the Packers to keep seven defenders in coverage.

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's the exact scenario that's created all this trouble

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>from Homes. Based on his play of late, Mahomes really

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>probably ought to be a C. But because it's Patrick

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and he's still got Hill and Kelsey, I'm gonna

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>give him a B here. But it's not a certainty

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's a starter in your lineup. And you may

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have other players like Brian if you had Toua or

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, who would you start the year? Has been

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy enough? Let's his role with ta I don't know.

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's almost a coin foot go on,

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you can't ask me that off the top of my head.

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That's like, that's a tough question. Sadly, sadly, for the

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>moment coming on, maybe it'll turn into four. I'll put

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you on the spot for that answer next segment. Tyreek

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Hills stays as an obvious Ay. Even with mahomes struggles,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>he has remained mostly productive. But we have seen a

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of dud games. Um, But nevertheless, he's still Tyreek Hill.

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>And if they're gonna get anything done and they're gonna

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>have to play catch up for a lot of this

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>game quite possibly, well maybe then I still need Tyreek

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Hills a safe A grade. Travis Kelsey, though, drops down

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to a B. He's been most impacted by mahomes declining play,

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>with diminishing catches, yards and zero scores in three straight games.

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't seen one hundred yards since week three, and

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Packers haven't allowed a tight end to top fifty

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one yard since week three, and they haven't given up

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown to a tight end since week two. Still,

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>he's Travis Kelsey, so he gets the B grade here,

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>but I don't I don't feel great about it. Let's

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>go over to Daryl Williams. Um. He's filled in okay

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 1>for Clyde Edwards Hilaire, averaging eighties six total yards and

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>he's seeing about two thirds of the snaps. He will

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>have his toughest tests against a Packer run defense that's

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really improved this year, allowing only one hundred eleven total

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to opposing running backs. That's eight fewest

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and no running backs hit the one hundred yard mark.

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>And then you got a factor in the emergence a

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Derek Gore on Monday, which is a

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>complicating factor potentially. So I've just got the seed great

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on Darryl Williams. As for Gore himself, UM, if this

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>matchup are easier, maybe I throw a dart here, But

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really don't know what's going on with

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>his usage whatsoever. So we're gonna keep Derek Gore on

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the bench and we'll talk a little bit more about

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys in a later segment of the show.

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Final matchup for the segment is the Raiders taking on

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Matt, this is um, this is a Raiders

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>team that's got it got to overcome not only the

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>loss of a key player, but maybe some of the

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>ramifications that go with it. You just you wonder about

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>things that we don't normally talk about, like you know,

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>what is Derek Carr's mindset coming into this game. Yeah,

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of adversity that they've gone through this year. Um,

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>let's start with Derek Carr. I mean, if you like

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>two passing touchdowns, you probably like Derek Carr, Who's thrown

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly two passing scores and six of seven contests this year.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He's also top the three yard mark in five of seven,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's really good. But obviously he lost Henry Ugs.

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>He's no longer a part of the team, so that

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>does hurt Car in some small way. But he should

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 1>get Darren Waller back from an ankle injury post bye week.

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The Giants allow an average of two passing scores per

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>game in about two or fifty six yards. Add that

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all up in a B grade. Seems very fair for

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr and this one. Let's talk about Derek Darren

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Waller now, who after a nineteen target, ten catch, one

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>five yard game in Week one, since then, he's averaging

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>seven targets, five receptions in fifty five yards per game.

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Plus he's only scored once since Week one. Now, those

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>numbers still make him a top five tight end, but

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not ranking better than Dawson Knox, c j Uzoma,

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Gisicki, Hunter Henry. On a per game basis, he's

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:51.399
<v Speaker 1>right in line with those guys. Now. The Giants gave

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up a tight end score in each of the first

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>four weeks of the season, but have not allowed one

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last four weeks. The names that they faced

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last four weeks include Travis Kelsey, Dalton Schultz,

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Higbee. All in all, it's a B grade

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for Darren Waller in this one. Now, the wide receivers,

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>even with rugs, Hunter Renfro was leading the team in

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.760
<v Speaker 1>targets and receptions, and his role as a slot receiver

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>seems very stable, although we may see him flex out

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to out wide a little bit more in the two

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver sets. As his average snap count was hovering

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the high fifties to low sixties in percentage wise,

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I expect that to go up now. I think he's

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver to have on that team. An upteck

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and target should go to Edwards, who was already leading

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the team in wide receiver snaps in six of their

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>seven games. Za Jones should see his usage go up

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too. Renfrow gets a B in this one,

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as he has the best matchup against Giants slot corner

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Darnay Holmes, whose Pro Football focuses one fourth ranked corner.

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to wait a little bit on Edwards and

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Jones to see what happens in The Giants corners on

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the outside have actually been fairly okay this year. Let's

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>just see how this one plays out for a week.

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep those two guys on the bench. Josh

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs left the Week seven game early with a chest bruise.

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It was more of a precautionary thing as it was

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>only a couple quarters prior to their bye week and

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the game was already in hand. He's not even on

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the injury report this week. The Giants are allowing four

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>point five yards per carry. That's the sixth highest in

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the league, the fifth most rushing yards at a hundred

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and eight per game, so I'll give Jacobs a solid B.

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It would be slightly higher, but I'm a little nervous

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that uh that if the chess bruises bothering him, we

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>could see him taken out in favor of Kenyan Drake.

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>On the Giant side, Daniel Jones was might take a

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Quarterback se Kwan Barkley. He was on

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the COVID list. He's now off the COVID list, but

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he's still out with an ankle injury. So Davante Booker

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is in getting a C grade. He's averaging about He's

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>averaging about fifteen touches. The Raiders are allowing four point

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>five yards per carry, which is bottomed as far as defenses.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But Booker just isn't that good. So I'm going to

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>give him a C grade in this one. I don't know.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he looks okay and he's gonna get a

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of work in this game. I I I kind

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of like him, all right. Uh, Sterling Shepherd, he's out

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:18.280
<v Speaker 1>with a quad. Kenny Golladay is always questionable with a knee.

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>He's game time decision. Ka Darius Tony has questionable tweets

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and he's also dealing with the thumb injury, but he

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is expected to play in this one. Uh. Dante pettis

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna go with a shoulder injury. That leaves Tony,

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slayton, and John Ross. I'm gonna leave all of

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>them on the bench. The Raiders have been great against

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers allowing the third fewest receiving yards and touchdowns

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>to the wide receiver position. And finally, Evan Ingram. He

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>did not get traded, neither did Kyle Rudolph. Both scored

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Chiefs. Angram is startable with the

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>C grade if you're desperate. The Raiders are at bottom

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>ten defense against the tight end position in receptions and

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>yards allowed, so you can fire up Evan Angram a

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit. All right, sounds great? You know what else

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>sounds great? Joining a Guilloteam league. It's the freshest new

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>way to play fantasy sports. Instead of head to head

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>every week, the low scoring team gets chopped. All their

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>players go to the waiver wire where the rest of

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>us build a superstar lineup for the rest of the season.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>All you have to do is not finished last, and

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the last team standing wins the whole thing. Guilloteam Leagues

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. We'll be back for our number two Fantasy

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. In moments, our number two Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul jar Chian, as I explained at the outset,

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not gonna spend a lot of time on it.

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I am quarantined at home with COVID. But I haven't

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>missed a show in twenty seven years, and I'm not

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it now. So we continue. Aren't you miss one?

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Did I? You missed one? It was the first one

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and Eric Nordquist filled in for you.

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>This was to three years ago. You're right. What happened

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that week? I think it was a funeral? Actually, oh,

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a funeral. You're exactly right. You're exactly right.

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It was an excused absence for you're not quite cal ripken.

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you're right in many ways, especially bankroll you.

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You're the conspiracy theory. How they there was like a

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>power outage one night at Camden Yards and that was

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>too try to get him out of the keep note

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to keep his streak alive because he was gonna be

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.760
<v Speaker 1>able to play. So they basically like forced to cancel, cancel.

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting. I haven't heard that. That's a good guy.

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Though. This is a segment we call

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>three Tough Questions. I'll pepper my co host, with three

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>tough questions. You can play along see if you can

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>go three and oh. We begin with this tough question

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 1>number one. Clyde Edwards, a Laire could be back as

0:45:54.920 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>early as next week. Upon his return, what grade, well,

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly most often give him an A, B,

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>A C, or a bench grade. We begin with Matt Harrison,

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's say he does come back next week against

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. UM, I'll probably want to wait and see there,

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>just to see what happens, how how they work him in.

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna be a bench grade for me. Next

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>week the Cowboys a bye, and then the Broncos the

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>following three weeks. Those are all bad and he's probably

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>on my bench there, especially in the bye week. The

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and Chargers in weeks fourteen fifteen are probably B

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>C kind of starts if he retakes the touch lead,

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big if at this point. As this

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 1>week seventeen against since a week sixteen against the Steelers

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is a bench grade as well, So I've got four

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bench grades and three maybe start grades, so I think

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a bench grade more the rest of the way. Okay,

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Brian is Clyde Edwards Hilaire. Upon his return to most

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>most often get an A, B C or bench grade. Yeah,

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt covered it pretty well. I got a a majority

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of bench grades moving forward, for c e H. Basically,

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the dude just is not that good. Seven total touchdowns

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen career games, has topped one d rushing yards

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just four times, even when he was healthy healthy earlier

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the year, Daryl Williams was soaking up more of

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the past work and this Derek Gore kid looks good.

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's mainly bench time for us EH for

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year. For me, it's easy to

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 1>be cynical about Clyde Edwards despair, but let's remember he

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>was coming up back to back when hunt back to

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>back one hundred yard rushing performances before his knee injury,

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and on the season he's averaging a healthy four point

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry, and over those two games that

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was almost seven yards per carry. Darryl Williams just isn't

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that good. He's averaging three and a half yards per carry,

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and his rushing yards over expectation our fourth from last

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.879
<v Speaker 1>in the entire league at a negative point eight. Daryll

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams isn't good and it's too soon to be spooked

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>by the emergence of Derek Gore, who Andy Reid didn't

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like enough to give to a carry until last week now,

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Layer is never gonna get an A because

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>you can never you can never say he's going to

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>score in a game, and if you can't get a touchdown,

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much can't get an A grade. His remaining

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>schedule to me is scattered between mostly bs and seas

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and one bench grade. But if he comes back next week,

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets a strongly positive matchup with Las Vegas if

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he can hit that hit the ground running in that one,

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've got one more B grade than I've got

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:33.439
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Clyde Edwards a layer. Tough question number two, Well,

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson most often receive an A, B, C or

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.399
<v Speaker 1>bench grade. Your new Titans running back, Brian, let's begin

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with you. Well, Tennessee says they're not going to change

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.919
<v Speaker 1>their high level offensive scheme without Derry Henry, meaning they're

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and stay run heavy with Peterson. We'll see

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>how well that goes. Um Tennessee tough schedule moving forward.

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros has them with the third hardest strength of

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule remaining strength of schedule for running backs. And we

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:04.240
<v Speaker 1>all know Adrian Peterson not going to contribute a lot

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game. That's still gonna go to Jeremy

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy McNichols most likely, But I still think outside of

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, we gotta see what happens with moving forward.

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>If he stays healthy, we're gonna see thirteen fourteen fifteen

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>carries minimum for Peterson, which is a C regardless of matchup,

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>really based on volume. So I'm just gonna play it

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 1>safe and go with the C grade for the most

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 1>part for Peterson. Okay, Matt will Adrian Peterson most often

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>receive an A, B, C or bench grade. Spoiler alert.

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I benched him this week against the Rams as well

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I next week in his revenge game against the Saints.

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson's got a few revenge games coming up played

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Cardinals. I was like, you remember that the

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 1>sat exactly. Uh. It looks like he's startable in Week

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>eleven against the Texans and maybe Week seventeen against the Dolphins.

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.879
<v Speaker 1>But unless he takes over the Derrick Henry workload at

0:49:56.920 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like a seventy eight percent clip and he looks really good,

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the schedule does not favor him. So I think he

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>sees more bench grades than anything. Yeah, you guys are

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>way off the mark on this um Peterson is Obviously

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a shell of what he was before, but you know,

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we're only one season removed from him getting six hundred

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards in a split backfield with DeAndre Swift. He

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>can be effective here. They don't have anybody else to

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be an inside runner, and this is still a run

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>heavy offense, and he's going to get a lot of opportunity.

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And that counts for more than anything else in fantasy

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>football is opportunity. He will get the ball at the stripe.

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>He's always been an effective touchdown runner, and this team

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to run the ball at the stripe. They'll continue

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to do that and Peterson will get touchdowns. I see

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 1>looking through the schedule season bees, and the only the

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 1>only ones that that are to me potentially season benches

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are New Orleans and Pittsburgh. The rest of the way,

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans is coming up next week. Every other

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:57.360
<v Speaker 1>game to me is to be including this week. I

0:50:57.400 --> 0:51:00.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta be great out him this week. He's going to

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be startable and you're going to have opportunities to put

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson into your lineup. And by the way, Houston twice, Jacksonville,

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and Miami are all spots where he could even if

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it turns out he runs well, he could give me

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a grades against those defenses. Jacksonville is a sneaky good

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>run defense, though they are actually a sneeze. And hey,

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, see, at least that wasn't that far off.

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess what are you saying? I'll be way far off.

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Correct answers tough question number three. What is the appropriate

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 1>level of concern for Justin air Bear? Oh no, not

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a bear some or a bowel loosening level of existential dread.

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We begin with Matt. I was actually shocked that you

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 1>asked this question. Uh, He's had two below average starts

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that weren't even completely disastrous from a fantasy standpoint, and

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we're just three is removed from three yards and four

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:05.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns against the good Browns defense. Air Bear is currently

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>ranked eleventh in fantasy points after facing the Football Outsiders

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 1>fifth most difficult d v O A schedule so far,

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and now the schedule is a little bit tricky, coming

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up with four top ten passing defenses in a row

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>starting this week, but they will include a Vikings team

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>without Daniel Hunter and a Broncos team without Von Miller.

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:30.799
<v Speaker 1>But after that it's the Bengals, who are okay, Giants, Chiefs, Texans,

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Von Miller list Broncos again in your fantasy Championship. I'm

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not concerned at all, and I'm interested to hear why

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>charge has given some pause on yield air Bear, Old Brian,

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what is the appropriate level of concern for justin air Bear? None?

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Some or blowed like, blowed your nose like. But I'm

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of over here, and trust me, there's

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that happening. The level of concern for

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>me is none. Still multiple touchdowns and four of his

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>last five games fourteen passing touchdowns during that span. That

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that game at Baltimore was a disaster, but that was

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>an early start for a West Coast team. I'll give

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>him a bit of a break there. And last week

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots just two dree Um passing yards. He

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't have two touchdowns. Last year he threw a touchdown

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at least one touchdown in every game except four against

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. We only two hundred nine yards and zero touchdowns.

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:29.879
<v Speaker 1>So apparently you never want to play him against the Patriots. Really,

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>But outside of that, I got no concern for air Bear.

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a little bit of a sophomore slump going on,

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but it'll break out of it. Yeah, two straight bad games. Um,

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore game he looked bad in, uh, straight up bad,

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and then he looked bad last week too, and so

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a bye week in between there. And so

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe because it's been four weeks since we've seen him

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>play well when he got into that shootout with Cleveland

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in which he was basically very good in that game,

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>almost four hundred yards passing, um that I think some

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>people could have a a reasonable level of concern for

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Justin air Bear. But he's really good and I love

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the weapons around him. Um. There are some tricky games.

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles game and the Steelers games worry me, but

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the rest of don't. And he's got a

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>terrific December shaping up Cincinnati, the Giants, Chiefs, Houston his December.

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He is gonna power teams through the playoffs. I have

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>no concern for Justin Air Bear. All right, let's move

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>back to our matchups. The next matchup up is the

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals taking on the forty Niners and Brian the Cardinals

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 1>might just pack it into this one and basically wave

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the white flag. They're gonna be missing potentially a lot

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of key starters for this one. Yes, sold the Diners,

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but not not as many as the Cardinals. So Kyler

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Murray and DeAndre Hopkins both gonna be game time decisions.

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>We're just gonna go under the notion that that they're

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>not going to play though in this one, So I'm

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna dive too deep into it. Sounds like they're

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 1>going to. And yeah, the Cardinals be better off just

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to win this game. With Colt McCoy at quarterback.

0:54:57.000 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>They're still they're still seven and one that are pretty

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>much in cruise control in that divisional and not in

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:04.399
<v Speaker 1>cruise control. The Rams are pretty good team too. But anyway, Uh,

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Murray on the bench, even if he plays, I don't

0:55:06.360 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 1>trust him to finish the game. DeAndre Hopkins the same,

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>even if he suits up, he's gonna be a decoy

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at best. So both of them on the bench for me,

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they're unlikely to to go anyway. A J. Green not

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna play either. He has COVID. You weren't hanging out

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with A J. Green this week? Were you? Charge? Um? Well?

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>A J. Green and I are tight, um, he texts

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 1>constantly middle of the night. Whatever Um, you know also, um,

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's uh, I think he's trying to make a move

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.279
<v Speaker 1>on my way. Really, that's a whole that's a whole,

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>separate conversation. Well, who hasn't been making too many moves

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on the field as Andy is Abella, but he might

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.479
<v Speaker 1>see some significant rong. We got Christian Current, we got

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Ron Dale more of course, but they're all on the bench.

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>If Colton McCoy, even undrafted free agent Antoine Wesley might

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>see some significant snaps here, but they're all all on

0:55:56.680 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the bench with Colton McCoy quarterback. I will give Zach's see.

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Even though since Week one, when t J. Hockenson racked

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>up loads of garbage time yards against the forty Niners,

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco hasn't allowed a tight end to top thirty

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:11.720
<v Speaker 1>eight yards. But Arts is probably the most trusted pass

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>catcher out of the bunch, and uh, the forty Niners

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>have yielded the seventh most red zone targets at tight end,

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:20.279
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully McCoy looks Urt's his way in the red

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 1>zone because a J. Green doesn't look the right way

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:25.280
<v Speaker 1>when in the red zone, so it's probably the primary

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 1>target in scoring range. Gonna give him a C and

0:56:28.120 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmunds gonna give him a C. Tough matchup for him,

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 1>san Francisco only allowing on fifteen combo yards per game

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. Edmonds should see most of that work

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 1>between the twenties, so I think he gets a double

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>digit PPR points. Not gonna score because either James Conner

0:56:44.239 --> 0:56:47.879
<v Speaker 1>volters the touchdown or just the fact that UM San

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Francisco has allowed just five rushing touchdowns to running back.

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So I got James Conner on the bench. I don't

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>like his chance of vulturing a touchdown in this one.

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Over to the San Francisco side, it's a little less

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 1>sloppy over here. I will start with George Kittle, likely

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:04.839
<v Speaker 1>to make his return if he does. Just gonna give

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:07.400
<v Speaker 1>him a CEE though over the past three years he

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 1>has average with thin six and a half targets and

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards per game against the Cardinals. But unfortunately for Kiddle,

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals are really good against tight ends this year,

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>uh posing tight ends averaging just while they're averaging less

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>than four catches and thirty yards per game to the position.

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Arizona has not allowed a tight end touchdown all year either.

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>The best performance from an imposing tight end came from

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Robert touny In, who total just three catches for forty

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 1>nine yards, and that was when all three Bays wide

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>receivers were out of the picture. Basically Davante Adams wasn't

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:40.640
<v Speaker 1>playing out in Lazard was out scandaling, so was basically

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Tony and he only had three catches for forty nine

0:57:42.840 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>yards or just to see for Kiddle if he suits up. Unfortunately,

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like Deebo Samuel will not suit up for

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this game with the calf injury. So even if he goes,

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really nervous about him. I'll give him a CEE

0:57:55.840 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if he plays, but he could be a decoy here.

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 1>We're just gonna assume he's on the bench. So if

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he's out, that opens up a lot of opportunities for

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Ayuk, who is your to take a chance on

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver charge? I like that And if no,

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 1>m no Deebo Samuel, we're looking at Mohammed san new

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is basically next the dad or the baby Mohammedan's. They

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>might bring the baby in for this one. Who knows. Uh.

0:58:20.520 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was Trent shirt Field too, but it's really,

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Jawan Jennings has seen more targets than Trent shirt Field

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>over the last few weeks. Uh, just a total disaster

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:31.959
<v Speaker 1>basically throughout this whole game. Jimmy Garoppolo on the bench

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for this one. Uh, these teams didn't meet in Week five.

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But basically none of the same players are gonna be

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>playing in this game. Trey Lance started that game for

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, so I got I got Garoppolo on the bench,

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 1>especially with no Deebo Samuel most likely. But lastly, I

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:47.320
<v Speaker 1>will keep Elijah Mitchell and starting lineups can give him

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a B based on volume alone. If they're facing a

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Colt McCoy led Cardinals team. Uh, the Niners are likely

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:56.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to control the clock for the most part. It

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is a tough matchup, though only one opposing running back

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>has topped one yards against Arizona. That was Dalvin Cook,

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals have allowed just to total running back

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns all season long. So I I bumped that down

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to a sea Actually I've changed my mind after reading

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 1>my own notes just to see for Elijah Mitchell that's

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>happens sometimes, And that was arguably arguably the worst matchup

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I've ever done. In my career, it was just brutal,

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 1>brutal stuff, so much stuff for four yards in this

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one that would make sense. Sadly, in this crazy season.

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, right, Mike Wide, you know who's to say, right, Uh,

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Falcons and Saints first. I we

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:42.080
<v Speaker 1>just want to editorialize for a moment. So many fantasy

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I've seen so many fantasy analysts say, oh, it's Calvin

0:59:47.040 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Ridley out, that's gonna make Kyle Pitts better, or that's

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna make Cordarryl Patterson better. Nobody gets better because the

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 1>best receiver on the team is out. Nobody gets better.

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And you'll see that reflected in the grades here, beginning

0:59:58.280 --> 1:00:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Ryan. He's without his best weapon. Obviously, Saints

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>secondary looks great until you look at the quarterbacks they

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>faced um after the Aaron Rodgers game in Week one.

1:00:07.200 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>They faced Sam Donald, mac Jones, Daniel Jones, Taylor Heineke,

1:00:11.040 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and Gino Smith. It's got to be the easiest run

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of quarterbacks in the league. When they finally faced a

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>good pass or last week Tom Brady, the Saints promptly

1:00:19.680 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>gave up three seventy five yards and four touchdowns. So

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ryan is not in the Donald Heineke Gino

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith Grange, He's not in the Tom Brady range. He's

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the middle. So I've got a C grade

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on Ryan, who probably cobbles together I don't know, maybe

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like two fifty and one of the two path touchdown

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>passes in this game. Cordelle Patterson gets a C grade

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because this is a tough matchup. Now on the ground,

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging a poultry four yards per carry since he's

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>become the quote lead runner. Um. He scored touchdowns in

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth seven, which helps, and New Orleans has allowed at

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>least one score to other dual threat runners like Christian

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>McAffrey and sae Quon Barkley and Antonio Gibson. But I

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Cordell is really quite that guy um.

1:01:02.840 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans allows the second fewest yards per game to runners,

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and so Patterson is going to have to help you

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>through the air, which is a better opportunity for Patterson

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and why he still gets a C grade. But I

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's going to help you on the ground

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>really here at all. Now, the the desperation fill in guys,

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>taj a sharp last week, even with Russell Gates back,

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Sharp tied for a team high six targets, and he

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>accounted for of Atlanta's passing yards, and he led all

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the receivers and snaps. New Orleans secondary is a lot

1:01:35.040 --> 1:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of receiver to post at least ninety six yards and

1:01:37.360 --> 1:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>four of the past five games they've given up six

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>scores to receivers over the past five games. If you

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>need an emergency dart throw, you could try dot Taj Sharpened,

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>play him over Russell Gage, who was on the bench,

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis, it's over. It's a brutal season, it really is.

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>The Saints run defense is the opposite of a slump buster.

1:01:55.840 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>What is the opposite of a slumpbuster? By the way,

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is it a slump enhancer? A slump solidifiancement is not

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. The slump enhancement doesn't sound good, does it. Um,

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you can take a pill for that. Is there a

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>slump slump here? I don't know. That's what Mike Davis is.

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over. There's not a lot to talk about

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on the New Orleans side of this. Alvin Kamara is

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>an obvious a well relieved the Trevor Simeon and not

1:02:18.040 --> 1:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Taysom Hill. Is that at the helm because Taysom Hill

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was killing Alvin kmaron those four starts last year. But

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with Trevor Simeon at the helm, Camara's fine and Simeon

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and all his receivers are on the bench. Simeon is

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a barely functional pastor with career averages of two D,

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>seventeen yards and one touchdown per game, and he didn't

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>even give you that last week. The Falcon secondary is

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing special, but neither of the Saints receivers. If you're

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking about mark Ingram, he got eight touches last week,

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't. I don't see a scenari where

1:02:46.880 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he gets enough touches here and where he can be

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody you can rely upon. And he won't catch passes either,

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so he's on the bench. When we come back to

1:02:56.920 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, let's talk through some of the remaining matchups,

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>including Justin air Bear as it takes on the Eagles.

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a tricky matchup. Eagle secondary has been very good.

1:03:10.240 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out if Matt Harrison is at all swede

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and has any concern for just An air Bear and

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>his receivers when we come back to Fantasy Football, Whitney,

1:03:36.200 --> 1:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly on Paul Charchi and

1:03:38.640 --> 1:03:41.959
<v Speaker 1>my co host today are Brian Johnson. You can follow

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter at b t x J and Matt

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Harrison on Twitter at Explosive Output. Matt Paul charchy And

1:03:51.120 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to figure out how to spell it, deal

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:57.919
<v Speaker 1>with it. I can't. Yeah, you know, you'd think you'd

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>think Chargers take on the Eagles, Matt earlier in this show.

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, just last segment, you basically showed no concern

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever for the faltering ways of Justin air Barrel over

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks. Now he travels to Philadelphia

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for a tough matchup against what's been a pretty good

1:04:17.320 --> 1:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but a little inconsistent past defense. What do you think, Yeah,

1:04:21.440 --> 1:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not going to give him the the A.

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I will give him a be though. He's had those

1:04:26.320 --> 1:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of rough weeks, including one against Baltimore two and

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>two against New England, but prior to that, he topped

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards or thrown for three or more touchdowns

1:04:35.440 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in every other game this season. So Philly has been

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a break but don't bend defense allowing almost two touchdown

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>passes per game, but only two hundred thirty six passing yards.

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Much of that is skewed, though, by who they've played.

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>They held Matt Ryan in Week one, Sam Donald, Jimmy

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>g and Jared Goff two very poor days, while Dak Mahomes,

1:04:57.600 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Derek Carr all had very good as and

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>air bears in that ladder group, So I'm not too

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>afraid of this one. Keenan Allen and Mike Williams, it's

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>solely about volume for them in this one, because players

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who get to double digit targets against the Eagles have

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>had awesome days, but there's only been two of them

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, Tyreek Hill and Antonio Brown. Through seven games.

1:05:19.280 --> 1:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams has three double digit target games while Keenan

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen has four. I'll give both of them bees in

1:05:25.080 --> 1:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this one. Allen has an easier overall matchup going against

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>slot corner Avante Maddox and Mike Williams. He moves around

1:05:31.200 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the field, so he'll see an equal dose of Darius

1:05:34.120 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Slay who's been good but beat able, and Stephen Nelson,

1:05:37.400 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>who is easily roastable. He's allowing a passerrating of one

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>oh five in his coverage. But Williams has been basically

1:05:45.680 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>done nothing now for almost a month. This is a

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's quite as obvious as you make

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it sound. Well, let's just wait and see. How about

1:05:55.720 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that chart? Okay, Jared Cook, he might be a sailor

1:06:01.320 --> 1:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's seaworthy in this one. Yeah, I did it.

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>There we go. He's seen twelve targets in his past

1:06:08.480 --> 1:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>two games. He's clearly above Donald Parham and Steven Anderson

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the pecking order. The Eagles have allowed the most

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>receptions on the season two tight ends at seven per game,

1:06:17.480 --> 1:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and have allowed six touchdowns to the position over their

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>eight contests. So he's he's getting a C grade in

1:06:23.000 --> 1:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this one. Austin Ekeler he gets the A though. The

1:06:25.120 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are bottom ten in rushing yards allowed, rushing touchdowns,

1:06:29.320 --> 1:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>receptions to running backs, receiving yards, and total touches per

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>game to the running back position. By the way, opposing

1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>backs are averaging thirty one touches per game against Philly,

1:06:40.480 --> 1:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so Ackler is a cinch for at least twenty in

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this contest. The running back situation on the Philly side

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was all of might take a chance on me. Now,

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't get older points put together. You don't if

1:06:54.880 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't know he got it, he got it right.

1:06:58.960 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So uh, Jalen Reagor he's questionable with an ankle injury. Uh.

1:07:03.520 --> 1:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Leaving Davonte Smith and Quez Watkins is the other wide receivers,

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but they're all on the bench. Asante Samuel and Michael

1:07:10.160 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis are the chargers two starting corners. It's been a

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>little thorny though, because they're both on the injury report

1:07:15.560 --> 1:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this week and there's a chance one or both might

1:07:17.640 --> 1:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not go. But their backups have been quite good as well.

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Harris and to Van Campbell have each seen extended

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>playing time this year. Neither has allowed to touchdown in

1:07:26.560 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>their coverage. The Chargers are the toughest matchup in the

1:07:29.280 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>league for wide receivers, allowing the fewest receptions in yards

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to the position. They've only allowed three total touchdowns to

1:07:35.520 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers through seven games, and with her sketchy throwing ability,

1:07:39.400 --> 1:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving all the wide receivers on the bench. I

1:07:42.000 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>will give a B grade to Dallas Goddard. It was

1:07:45.000 --> 1:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>highlighted last week without zach Ertz he's averaging about seventy

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, and last week he had six catches

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and seventy two yards. The Chargers are almost as week

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>against the tight end as they are strong against the

1:07:58.000 --> 1:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. They've allowed the fifth most receiving yards and

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the sixth most touchdowns to the tight end position. So

1:08:05.240 --> 1:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts he gets a B grade in this. Much

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of what Hurts does is on the ground, So here's

1:08:09.720 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>how running quarterbacks have faced fared against the Chargers DC.

1:08:13.640 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He did not have one rushing attempt, but that was

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Week two and he's not a running quarterback anymore and

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>probably built the rebuilt ankle. That's right if you consider

1:08:22.400 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes to be mobile, which I do. He had

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>four forty five on the ground and to sixty and

1:08:28.000 --> 1:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>three through the air. Lamar had eight carries for fifty

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one yards. Didn't do too much through the air. But

1:08:33.320 --> 1:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens blew out the Chargers so quickly in that one,

1:08:36.520 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>so there's gonna be room to run, and I think

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts gets a lot of garbage time here. I

1:08:40.360 --> 1:08:43.599
<v Speaker 1>probably put Hurts on under two yards passing, but I

1:08:43.600 --> 1:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>think he'll do really well on the ground to make

1:08:45.800 --> 1:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>up for that. I don't you know what I'm i

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sniffing a dud here. I agree with you on

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the passing he's not going to get. He's not going

1:08:52.840 --> 1:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the passing he won't and now you he

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>has to run for fantasy points and that makes me nervous.

1:09:00.000 --> 1:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I I hope I'm wrong, but I'm worried there's a

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario where he fails of Boat. I mean, if you

1:09:05.760 --> 1:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>consider Hurts the fourth running back on the Eagles, I

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>also get him and take a chance on me too.

1:09:12.640 --> 1:09:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Bears take on the Steelers, Brian, this has been an

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>inept to Bears offense. Khalil Herbert ground Bear has been

1:09:22.240 --> 1:09:25.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty reliable, but things are getting maybe a little muddier

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:27.759
<v Speaker 1>there too. What do you think of this offense against

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. Yeah, brutal matchup for Khalil. I will mention

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery has been designated to return from my R,

1:09:33.920 --> 1:09:35.519
<v Speaker 1>but it's unlikely we see him this week. It's not

1:09:35.560 --> 1:09:37.639
<v Speaker 1>a good spot to bring him back on the road

1:09:37.760 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>against Pittsburgh, and it's really not a good spot for Herbert.

1:09:40.600 --> 1:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But I will still give him a see based on volume.

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But a brutal matchup against a tough run defense and

1:09:45.439 --> 1:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a likely negative game script for the Bears. Pittsburgh has

1:09:48.400 --> 1:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed the ninth viewest fantasy points to running back so

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just to see for Khalil air Bear, I mean ground bear,

1:09:54.400 --> 1:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>my bad. Alan Robinson took a. It's sad to say

1:09:57.920 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he took a. He's a deep dart through. Might take

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a chance of me wide receiver. Come on, Allen Robinson

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>one time, you can do it. I'm also gonna give

1:10:04.600 --> 1:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Darnell Mooney a sea. Opposing wide receivers are averaging one

1:10:08.320 --> 1:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and seventy yards at one point three touchdowns per game

1:10:11.280 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers, and I just see the Bears in

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of garbage time here, so I give a

1:10:15.360 --> 1:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Mooney to see. He is questionable, but I think he

1:10:17.760 --> 1:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>will play uh in this one. Col Comet, I got

1:10:20.439 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench. The Steelers are top twelve in

1:10:23.120 --> 1:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the fewest catches and yards allowed to opposing tight ends

1:10:26.439 --> 1:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and justin fields. He's on the bench as well. Showed

1:10:30.000 --> 1:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>some flashes last week, but this is a brutal matchup

1:10:32.320 --> 1:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>for the rookie on the road, and Matt Naggy will

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>be back on the sidelines. He's basically kryptonite to success.

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So h fields on the bench for this one. Over

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Steelers side. Not many players on the bench here,

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:46.519
<v Speaker 1>especially not Naji Harris. Gonna give him an a likely

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>no Khalil Mac for the Bears on this one, who

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>are allowing one thirteen rushing yards per game to opposing

1:10:51.880 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Running backs should be a positive game strip

1:10:55.640 --> 1:10:57.479
<v Speaker 1>for Naji, So we'll love him this week and give

1:10:57.560 --> 1:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>him an a. UH. Deonte Johnson close to in a

1:11:01.000 --> 1:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but just gonna give him a B here. Chicago's defense

1:11:03.360 --> 1:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is a mess. They might also be missing safety Eddie

1:11:06.200 --> 1:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Jackson in this game. The Bears have surrender. Yeah, the

1:11:09.800 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Bears have surrendered five wide receiver touchdowns and a one

1:11:13.400 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>yard receiver over the last three games alone. Uh and

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson will likely see a lot of cornerback Kindle Vildor,

1:11:20.920 --> 1:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>who owns a pathetic one and thirty nine passer raiding

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage and his Pro Football focuses. Nineties ranked

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Chase Claypool draws the tough matchup here with Jalen Johnson,

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna give him a c um pat firemouth.

1:11:36.200 --> 1:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>He is on the bench. Only one tight end has

1:11:38.320 --> 1:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>scored against Chicago. Darren Waller and t J. Hogginson were

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>held to four catches and forty something scoreless yards against

1:11:44.960 --> 1:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. And lastly, I will give Ben Roethlisberger a

1:11:48.040 --> 1:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>C because that's just the best Ben is ever going

1:11:50.920 --> 1:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to get for the rest of his career. Bears. Be

1:11:55.400 --> 1:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty passing or two passing touchdowns, that's what you'll hope

1:11:57.760 --> 1:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to get out of Ben in this one. Ben with

1:12:00.640 --> 1:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown in every game, but one at one. That's

1:12:04.760 --> 1:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it from Ben. I don't know that maybe this I

1:12:08.280 --> 1:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>think you might maybe gets to two here, but I'm

1:12:10.320 --> 1:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>with you on the sea grade for Ben. When we

1:12:12.320 --> 1:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>come back, Browns take on the Bengals. Will tell you

1:12:15.400 --> 1:12:18.799
<v Speaker 1>what to expect from Nick Chubb and the rushing attack

1:12:18.920 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns in a matchup with Cincinnati in their division.

1:12:22.640 --> 1:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>And Premature Speculation will give you three players that you

1:12:25.439 --> 1:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can pick up now that it real to be trying

1:12:28.400 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to pick up next week. Find out who they are

1:12:30.439 --> 1:12:51.479
<v Speaker 1>when we return the Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back, final

1:12:51.520 --> 1:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. As we always do, we

1:12:55.680 --> 1:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>start this segment with premature speculation, so players you want

1:13:00.760 --> 1:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to pick up now before everybody else is scrambling to

1:13:03.479 --> 1:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>pick up these players next week, and we begin with

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson. I'm gonna go with Bill's wide receiver, Gabriel Davis,

1:13:11.840 --> 1:13:14.599
<v Speaker 1>who this this time last year got really hot and

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>carried a lot of teams to some fantasy championships. Now

1:13:17.720 --> 1:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't really done a whole lot in the first

1:13:19.240 --> 1:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>half of the season, but last week he out targeted

1:13:21.880 --> 1:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders, who did not catch a pass. Davis did.

1:13:25.200 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>He caught four of his five targets, caught a touchdown.

1:13:27.960 --> 1:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know something happens to Stefon Digs or Emmanuel Sanders.

1:13:31.400 --> 1:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you get outright take his job back from

1:13:33.400 --> 1:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders. But in that electric offense, if I've got

1:13:36.400 --> 1:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>an open spot on my bench, I'll stash Davis for

1:13:38.840 --> 1:13:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a while and see if he blooms into something beautiful

1:13:43.439 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like a gentle flower. Yes, exactly, That's what I want

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:48.519
<v Speaker 1>on my team. Is I want to be stacked with

1:13:48.640 --> 1:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>gentle flowers on my squad. Matt, who is your premature

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>speculation player. I got a gentle flower for your eight here.

1:13:55.920 --> 1:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>His name is Michael Gallup. Remember him. Uh. He did

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>return to limited practice this week. For the Cowboys, although

1:14:02.439 --> 1:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems unlikely he's gonna go uh for the Broncos

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this week. He's been sidelined since Week one with a

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>calf injury. And remember he averaged over seven targets per

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>game over the last two seasons, including last year with

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb on the field, and in Week one he

1:14:18.040 --> 1:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>saw seven targets before going out with an injury. The

1:14:21.320 --> 1:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys have Atlanta, Kansas City two dates with Washington and

1:14:25.720 --> 1:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the Giants still on the schedule. He's gonna see a

1:14:27.920 --> 1:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of starting grades coming down the pipe, So go

1:14:30.720 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>get Michael Gallup. Alright. My premature speculation player is Donovan

1:14:36.160 --> 1:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>People's Jones. Much has been made about oh b j

1:14:39.040 --> 1:14:41.599
<v Speaker 1>leaving the Browns, not enough people talking about who's gonna

1:14:41.600 --> 1:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fill that void. He leaves behind forty eight snaps per game,

1:14:45.800 --> 1:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and Donovan People's Jones was playing really well in weeks

1:14:49.400 --> 1:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>five and six. He combined for one hundred seventy yards

1:14:53.920 --> 1:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and two scores. Then he probably got hurt and missed

1:14:56.240 --> 1:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>two games. Now he's back, He's going to be starting,

1:14:59.120 --> 1:15:03.559
<v Speaker 1>and he's Cleveland's best outside receiver and they need somebody

1:15:03.600 --> 1:15:06.559
<v Speaker 1>besides Jarvis Landry can catch a damn pass. So we'll

1:15:06.560 --> 1:15:11.519
<v Speaker 1>try d p J to spark what was And by

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, as a reminder end of last year, he

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was starting to be an impact player in December and

1:15:16.080 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs last year, Donovan People's Jones, I think

1:15:19.200 --> 1:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this is where we see the the the tilt up

1:15:22.600 --> 1:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in his career right here. Let's hope that's the case anyway,

1:15:26.439 --> 1:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because we're optimius on this show. I mean, he's a

1:15:28.160 --> 1:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>beautiful flower too. Yeah, And it's a perfect segue to

1:15:32.200 --> 1:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>my final matchup of this show, which involves the Browns

1:15:35.320 --> 1:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Bengals, And as you can imagine, I've got

1:15:37.280 --> 1:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a starting grade on Donovan People's Jones, who will face

1:15:39.840 --> 1:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the very burnable Eli Apple most often. The Mengels did

1:15:44.040 --> 1:15:46.679
<v Speaker 1>no intention of starting Apple this year, but Trey Waynes

1:15:46.760 --> 1:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>can't stay on the field. Apple ranks his Pro Football

1:15:49.400 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>focuses one hundred seventh cornerback, and dpj's playing well. As

1:15:55.000 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I had mentioned he had for prior to getting hurt,

1:15:57.760 --> 1:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he had been a very viable fantasy receiver. So he

1:16:00.360 --> 1:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>comes back with a C grade in this game. But

1:16:03.479 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I've only got a bench grade on Baker Mayfield. Um. Yes,

1:16:07.560 --> 1:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike White just destroyed the Bengal secondary. But on the

1:16:09.880 --> 1:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>whole they've been pretty good, giving up two hundred sixty

1:16:12.080 --> 1:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>yards in one touchdown per game. And Baker Mayfield just,

1:16:15.520 --> 1:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the shoulder just isn't right and he doesn't

1:16:18.040 --> 1:16:21.719
<v Speaker 1>look right. He's averaging less than one touchdown pass per game.

1:16:22.720 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he gets better with Odell Beckham off the field,

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>which I mean that could be a that that kind

1:16:27.360 --> 1:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of drama could be ruining things and getting him off

1:16:30.040 --> 1:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the field might actually be helpful. And he did throw

1:16:33.960 --> 1:16:37.519
<v Speaker 1>seven touchdowns against Cincinnati last year. Maybe I'll move Baker

1:16:37.560 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield to a C grade after all, I don't charge

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike White had two arms when he played against the

1:16:43.320 --> 1:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Bengals last point and Baker's got like one point three. Yeah,

1:16:47.240 --> 1:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so there's that. Jarvis Landry has seen eighteen targets in

1:16:50.920 --> 1:16:53.759
<v Speaker 1>his two games since coming back from injury. He played

1:16:54.520 --> 1:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps last week, and he's the most bankable

1:16:58.120 --> 1:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Browns receivers. He runs from the lot. That

1:17:00.320 --> 1:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>puts him up against Mike Hilton, a solid cornerback. Hilton

1:17:03.920 --> 1:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of touchdown hasn't allowed a touchdown since

1:17:06.479 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the opener, is giving up just seventeen yards per game

1:17:08.880 --> 1:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and coverage. So just the C grade for Jarvis Landry

1:17:12.400 --> 1:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. Let's talk about the running backs for the Browns,

1:17:16.920 --> 1:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for Nick Chubb, and we told you this last week, Peacock.

1:17:21.040 --> 1:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb is not gonna suddenly turn into a nine workhorse.

1:17:25.400 --> 1:17:27.519
<v Speaker 1>We knew we were gonna see. He's gonna stay doing

1:17:27.560 --> 1:17:29.559
<v Speaker 1>what he had been doing, and that's you know, it's

1:17:29.560 --> 1:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what we got from him. It's still

1:17:31.080 --> 1:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a timeshare now with the Ernest Johnson, who will talk

1:17:33.479 --> 1:17:36.559
<v Speaker 1>about in a second. Chubb faces a difficult matchup against

1:17:36.560 --> 1:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals team that's shockingly improved against the run, giving

1:17:40.280 --> 1:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>up the fifth fewest rushing yards, only sixty eight per

1:17:43.720 --> 1:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing running backs and just three point seven

1:17:46.880 --> 1:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry that is sixth fewest. The best way

1:17:51.160 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for running backs to beat Cincinnati is through the air,

1:17:54.720 --> 1:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>but that's not Chubb's game. He hasn't seen more than

1:17:57.280 --> 1:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>two targets in any game this year. So I've just

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>got a B grade on Nick Chubb. He's obviously an

1:18:02.960 --> 1:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>elite level back, but this is a very tough matchup.

1:18:05.920 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>D Ernest Johnson's snapshare last week was one third of

1:18:10.400 --> 1:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the plays, and this is a tricky matchup. As I said,

1:18:13.800 --> 1:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna get a lot done on

1:18:15.680 --> 1:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the ground, but he can chip in through the air

1:18:17.800 --> 1:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>because Chubb doesn't catch and Johnson can catch. Some Bengals

1:18:21.160 --> 1:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>allowing the most receptions and the third most receiving yards

1:18:25.320 --> 1:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to the position. So I've got the ernest Johnson is

1:18:27.960 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on the prospect of him getting four

1:18:30.280 --> 1:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>or five receptions in this game. Let's go to the

1:18:34.960 --> 1:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Bengals side of this one and we'll we'll start with

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Joe Burrow gets to be He's the

1:18:40.439 --> 1:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>only quarterback with multiple touchdowns in every game. Cleveland's defense,

1:18:44.439 --> 1:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>while definitely improved from last year, still gets beaten by

1:18:47.439 --> 1:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>good quarterbacks, and Joe Burrow belongs to that category. He's

1:18:51.520 --> 1:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback. Patrick Mahomes justin air bear Kyler Murray

1:18:56.479 --> 1:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>averaging a whopping three hundred twenty one yards and three

1:19:00.400 --> 1:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half touchdown passes against Cleveland. Everybody else is

1:19:05.479 --> 1:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>only a hundred ninety yards in one touchdown. So it's

1:19:08.160 --> 1:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all or nothing against the against Cleveland, and I

1:19:12.400 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think Joe Burrows earned the all, not the nothing here

1:19:15.720 --> 1:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and Obviously, Jamaar Chase is great and you're as you're

1:19:18.320 --> 1:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear in a minute. I do like some of

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>his receiver matchups, so let's go to Jamaar Chase. Um

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:26.559
<v Speaker 1>obvious a grade in my mind. In the in a nutshell,

1:19:26.680 --> 1:19:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland has been a good secondary, but good receivers find

1:19:29.560 --> 1:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>their way to good games against them anyway. Um Chase

1:19:33.280 --> 1:19:35.599
<v Speaker 1>should farewell on the outside against Denzil a Ward, who

1:19:35.600 --> 1:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>has surrendered a one percent catch rate and a touchdown

1:19:39.120 --> 1:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in the last two games. T Higgins interesting. In the

1:19:43.920 --> 1:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>six games of which he's been active, he's actually out

1:19:46.479 --> 1:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>targeted Jamaar Chase. He's notched at least sixty yards and

1:19:51.520 --> 1:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>three of the last five games, culminating in a season

1:19:54.000 --> 1:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>high nineties seven yards last week for T Higgins, But

1:19:57.160 --> 1:19:59.519
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get the explosive plays that all that stuff

1:19:59.560 --> 1:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>goes to Chase. Still, he's got a slightly positive matchup

1:20:02.840 --> 1:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on the outside against solid rookie cornerback Greg Newsome, and

1:20:05.960 --> 1:20:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I've got a B grade on T Higgins. How about

1:20:09.520 --> 1:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>c jo Zuma. Shockingly good over the last five games,

1:20:12.880 --> 1:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but his volume is super low. He's two and three

1:20:15.080 --> 1:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>catches a game and he needs touchdowns for fantasy relevancy.

1:20:19.960 --> 1:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>The Browns got slacked by Travis Kelsey in Week one,

1:20:23.920 --> 1:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but since then they've only given up one touchdown the

1:20:27.400 --> 1:20:29.759
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way, and they're only averaging three catches

1:20:29.800 --> 1:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for thirty one yards to tight ends. So I've got

1:20:32.120 --> 1:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a wobbly C grade on c jo Zuma and just

1:20:35.080 --> 1:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>know that if he doesn't score, he probably hurts your team.

1:20:38.160 --> 1:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd is on the bench. He's been better lately,

1:20:40.240 --> 1:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but I don't like his matchup in the slot against

1:20:42.200 --> 1:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Troy Hill, who has only allowed one touchdown all year

1:20:45.160 --> 1:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and gives up an average of two catches for twenty

1:20:47.240 --> 1:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>six yards and his coverage, so he goes back to

1:20:50.080 --> 1:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Joe Mixons is a tricky one and I

1:20:53.280 --> 1:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>really struggled with where to put him. Guys, his rushing

1:20:57.120 --> 1:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>yards and yards per carry a decreased in three secutive games,

1:21:01.600 --> 1:21:04.559
<v Speaker 1>bottoming out at two point four yards per carry against

1:21:04.560 --> 1:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jets last week. How did you shockingly bad? Fortunately,

1:21:09.479 --> 1:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he's getting more receiving work lately, but he might struggle

1:21:12.320 --> 1:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in both areas against the Browns team allowing the sixth

1:21:15.160 --> 1:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>fewest rushing yards and the fifth fewest receiving yards per

1:21:18.800 --> 1:21:22.559
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing backs. That's only total yards per game,

1:21:22.680 --> 1:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>third fewest in the league. And I don't know, I'm

1:21:26.120 --> 1:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>nervous about Mixing in this one. I'm giving him a

1:21:28.000 --> 1:21:30.519
<v Speaker 1>C grade here. Uh, this is a very tough matchup

1:21:30.520 --> 1:21:32.559
<v Speaker 1>and he hasn't been running well lately, so I do

1:21:32.640 --> 1:21:36.519
<v Speaker 1>have some concern for Joe Mixing and just the C

1:21:36.760 --> 1:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>grade an unusually low rank for him. Alright, our final

1:21:41.320 --> 1:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup of this show is Titans taking on the Rams,

1:21:44.439 --> 1:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of new variables for this Titans offense. Matt, Yeah,

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this one's gross. And they play Sunday night, so the

1:21:52.200 --> 1:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>pivot players are going to be super weird. And with

1:21:56.040 --> 1:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh and Chicago playing on Monday night, there's not a

1:21:58.640 --> 1:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of great moves can make if some of these

1:22:01.120 --> 1:22:03.719
<v Speaker 1>guys don't make it. Well, let's start with the running

1:22:03.760 --> 1:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>game on the Titan side. Derrick Henry obviously had the

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>big injury, probably done for the season. Darrenton Evan Darrnton

1:22:11.439 --> 1:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Evans is also on i R, so we get Jeremy

1:22:13.479 --> 1:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Nichols and Adrian Peterson likely for the rest of the year.

1:22:16.640 --> 1:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Charch Use McNichols is just take a chance on me

1:22:18.760 --> 1:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>player Peterson, I'm not going to recommend the starting this week,

1:22:22.160 --> 1:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>although Charch said he had a B grade on him.

1:22:26.320 --> 1:22:29.519
<v Speaker 1>RAMS are only allowing eighty rushing yards per game to

1:22:29.600 --> 1:22:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the position. All of aps yards will likely be on

1:22:32.640 --> 1:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and I think he's splitting a little bit

1:22:34.360 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of that with McNichols, who knows the playbook a little

1:22:36.439 --> 1:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>bit better and should certainly be in in passing situations.

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm gonna keep Peterson on the bench if

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's me. But if you believe in Charch in that way,

1:22:46.800 --> 1:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Charge says, it's more like Adrian Baterson. Oh, I don't

1:22:51.720 --> 1:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm going to accommodate you, and I'm going

1:22:58.040 --> 1:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to move into a secret. Okay, there we go. You've

1:23:00.400 --> 1:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>talked me to him. So let's move on to the

1:23:02.600 --> 1:23:06.479
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver position. I'm gonna start with Julio quote limited

1:23:06.520 --> 1:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with a hamstring injury. Jones, who was back as a

1:23:10.040 --> 1:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>full going practice obviously, but then A J. Brown missed

1:23:14.160 --> 1:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>practice on Friday, and we don't know why as of yet.

1:23:18.439 --> 1:23:21.599
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of mysterious because he was a full

1:23:21.640 --> 1:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>go on Wednesday and Thursday, and he comes up with

1:23:24.479 --> 1:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a miss practice on Friday, and this is a late game,

1:23:27.520 --> 1:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is a huge This is a huge problem

1:23:30.000 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy owners to try to figure this out with

1:23:32.200 --> 1:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown. You said pivot plays, you got Allen

1:23:35.080 --> 1:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Robinson played Monday Night. Robinson, you can get him on

1:23:40.040 --> 1:23:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the cheap um. A. J. Brown has been on fire

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>lately and if he's healthy, he should see an uptick

1:23:46.439 --> 1:23:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and work with the loss of Derrick Henry. The question

1:23:48.920 --> 1:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is will he see shadow coverage from Jalen Ramsey. Now

1:23:52.280 --> 1:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not full time. He'll see Ramsey on probably

1:23:55.960 --> 1:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>half his snaps. Ramsey has not been a shadow cover

1:23:58.840 --> 1:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>corner for most of the year. When he's not on Ramsey,

1:24:02.200 --> 1:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll face Dante Dion, who is five ft nine and

1:24:07.080 --> 1:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty nine pounds. I could dominate that guy,

1:24:12.360 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>he's so tiny. And then David Long is the other

1:24:15.920 --> 1:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>corner he'd face, and he's given up a passerrating of

1:24:18.400 --> 1:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred in two straight games and that was

1:24:20.960 --> 1:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions wide receivers and the Texans wide receivers.

1:24:25.040 --> 1:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So if Julio goes, and I think Julio is gonna go,

1:24:28.800 --> 1:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a bee. And if Brown goes, he

1:24:31.560 --> 1:24:34.759
<v Speaker 1>also gets a bee simply because he will get about

1:24:34.800 --> 1:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>half of his snaps on Jalen Ramsey. I think solid

1:24:37.560 --> 1:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>rudy refference there by the way, with the he's so tiny,

1:24:43.760 --> 1:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>how's then? Or is he so little? Never mind? Uh,

1:24:48.479 --> 1:24:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill, he's larger. I think the Titans offense is

1:24:52.600 --> 1:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have to reinvent itself on the fly, and

1:24:54.800 --> 1:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, that means the balls in Tannehill's hands much

1:24:57.040 --> 1:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>more often. The Rams sound tough, but they allowed the

1:25:00.560 --> 1:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>third most passing attempts and the third most passing completions

1:25:05.040 --> 1:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth most passing yards so far this season.

1:25:07.920 --> 1:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think Tannehill is in a good spot here. Actually,

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give him a B grade. Um Cooper

1:25:13.320 --> 1:25:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Cup is my fantasy ard Vark this week going up

1:25:17.560 --> 1:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans, and Matthew Stafford's in obvious A grade.

1:25:21.200 --> 1:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods is an A grade two, and Van Jefferson

1:25:23.840 --> 1:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on me wide receiver. I'll

1:25:25.760 --> 1:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just note that the Titans are allowing sixteen and a

1:25:28.680 --> 1:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>half receptions, two hundred sixteen yards and a touchdown and

1:25:33.000 --> 1:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a half per game to the wide receiver position, all

1:25:35.840 --> 1:25:38.799
<v Speaker 1>of which are either the worst or almost the worst

1:25:38.840 --> 1:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Tyler Higbee, he's on the bench, though

1:25:42.000 --> 1:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he's very touchdown dependent and the game script probably won't

1:25:44.800 --> 1:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>favor him needing to run routes in this one for

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>very long. Plus, Tennessee weirdly good against the tight end position.

1:25:51.720 --> 1:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They mostly held Travis Kelsey in check and the only

1:25:55.120 --> 1:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>three scores that have come against them have been no

1:25:57.960 --> 1:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>name tight ends getting goal line passes like literally like

1:26:01.360 --> 1:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>one catch, one yard, one touchdown passes against Tennessee. Darryl

1:26:06.400 --> 1:26:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Henderson is the last guy I'll mention. I'm giving him

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a B grade in this one. It's been very easy

1:26:12.240 --> 1:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to pass against the Titans, so teams haven't run very

1:26:16.080 --> 1:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>much against them, but they are allowing a robust four

1:26:20.120 --> 1:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>point six yards per carry, and without Derrick Henry in

1:26:23.200 --> 1:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this game, this could turn out to be a run

1:26:26.040 --> 1:26:28.519
<v Speaker 1>out the clock scenario for the Rams in the second half.

1:26:28.520 --> 1:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of garbage time in this one, so it

1:26:30.360 --> 1:26:33.839
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me of Darryl Henderson's getting some extra touches

1:26:33.840 --> 1:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of this game, but not Sony Michelle,

1:26:37.600 --> 1:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not Sony walk No, We're not going that far. It's

1:26:41.240 --> 1:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy god who dodged bull with that? Yeah? Uh, guys,

1:26:47.840 --> 1:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we got a couple of minutes here at the end

1:26:49.120 --> 1:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Does it go without saying, there's nobody

1:26:53.040 --> 1:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you would trade one for one, which for Jonathan Taylor.

1:26:57.320 --> 1:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You have Jonathan Taylor. There's no offer that's gonna make

1:27:00.040 --> 1:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you move Jonathan Taylor, including Cooper Cup. Yeah. I was

1:27:04.640 --> 1:27:07.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it would either be Cooper Cup or maybe

1:27:07.680 --> 1:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara kind of the last standing stud running back

1:27:11.439 --> 1:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>out there. But me thinks Jonathan Taylor is gonna be

1:27:14.680 --> 1:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of championship winning rosters come late December

1:27:18.479 --> 1:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>January and fantasy football. Yeah, I feel Taylor's the guy.

1:27:22.240 --> 1:27:24.479
<v Speaker 1>The only other guy I think that I might consider

1:27:24.560 --> 1:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is maybe Tyreek hill Um, just because his target load

1:27:28.280 --> 1:27:30.839
<v Speaker 1>is so heavy there and it's still the Chief's offense.

1:27:31.560 --> 1:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Jamaar Chase is up there too, just because of the explosiveness,

1:27:34.960 --> 1:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think that if you're the Jamaar Chase owner,

1:27:37.520 --> 1:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe you dangle Jamar Chase out there and see if

1:27:40.920 --> 1:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get Jonathan Taylor right now after that game,

1:27:45.400 --> 1:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be really tough. Is a tough moment, isn't

1:27:47.800 --> 1:27:50.479
<v Speaker 1>it a trade for Jonathan Taylor too for two at

1:27:50.520 --> 1:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that point. Sticking with that game, what do you see

1:27:54.200 --> 1:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>for Michael Pittman's dynasty or empire outlook as you look

1:27:57.720 --> 1:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead even future seasons? Is he moving into the conversation,

1:28:02.840 --> 1:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is maybe a top ten dynasty asset at receiver. It's

1:28:07.840 --> 1:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>starting to look that way. I still might lean towards

1:28:10.640 --> 1:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the older guys. It's a good three or

1:28:12.840 --> 1:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>four years left, but top fifteen, top twenty for sure.

1:28:15.800 --> 1:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Pittman's looked amazing so far this year. It really has.

1:28:18.720 --> 1:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget Carson one is still pretty young, and

1:28:20.680 --> 1:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the way he's playing, which is by and large been

1:28:22.720 --> 1:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. It looks like there's gonna be a connection

1:28:26.000 --> 1:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there for years to come. Well, and the and the

1:28:28.000 --> 1:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>best part about Pittman is he doesn't have to deal

1:28:30.120 --> 1:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>with Carson Wentz is stupid throws that he makes. He

1:28:32.600 --> 1:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>just the good ones. If you mesic any part of

1:28:36.360 --> 1:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the show, if you're listening over the ar checkout the podcast.

1:28:38.360 --> 1:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to the podcast, listen for us on

1:28:40.680 --> 1:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite sports talk radio station in a market near you.

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:46.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week for more Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Best of luck to everybody in Week nine by bye.

1:28:57.760 --> 1:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I heart Radio.

1:29:01.080 --> 1:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i

1:29:03.360 --> 1:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:29:06.520 --> 1:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.