WEBVTT - There's an Easier Way to Change Careers

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's face it, robots are going to take your job,

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that is, if they haven't already. Automation is taking over

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of different fields. We know this, but what exactly

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are we supposed to do about it? This is game plan. Hi.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Francesco Leavie and I'm Rebecca Greenfield, and this week

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about what it takes to do

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>another job well with the skills you have. So we

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hear all the time about what what is it exactly

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that's threatening American jobs? This is something that's in the

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>news a lot um. It's sort of a political football,

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but we know that a big factor in people losing

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs is automation. Robots can do a lot of things

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that they couldn't do before. And that's not just factory work.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's jobs even like yours and my Inbecca. Yes, they're

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are robots that can write news stories. And we even

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>did a show on this back in December while you're

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>out on leave and kind of talked about the state

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of automation now because as you said, there was a

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of scary talk about it. And I think there

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 1>are two interesting statistics. So that one, there's this widely

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>cited paper that says almost half of jobs can be automatable,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and there's some debate if that's like parts of jobs

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>or if that's actual jobs. But there are jobs that

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't expect being automated away now. It's not just manufacturing.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's things like paralegals or even financial analysts and yes,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>even journalists. Um. And then another part of the episode,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the jobs that are the most popular

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>right now are the fastest scrowing jobs are jobs that

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are the least automatable. So it's things that have a

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of social skills and things that robots aren't very

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>good at right now. Yes, so for those people who

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have had long careers doing something that now a robot

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>can do, like certain types of manufacturing, say, I think

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people talk about job retraining as this

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>like catch all solution. Basically just send all those you know,

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>coal miners or steel workers to coding boot camp and

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll figure it out. And I feel like that's an

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>oversimplified solution. Yeah, I think it's one if you're in

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the middle of your career getting your head around this

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of learning a whole new skill for maybe not

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that many more years of your working life. Yeah, it's hard. Yeah,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you have to change careers, that often goes

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>along with doing retraining like what we just talked about,

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and probably taking a pay cut and just basically like

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>taking a few steps back down the career ladder to

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>get started again. So I think that there's another way

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it, which is not what other job

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or what other field could I enter that is kind

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of like the one I'm in now, But what other

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>job could I do, even if it's nothing like the

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>one I have now that requires the same skills I'm

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>using for my current job, or the skills that I'm

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>good at. And so the New York Times just did

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into this. They built this really cool

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>graphic where they took every skill that's required for every

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>job according to the Department of Labor and mapped it

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on the scatter plot so that you can actually see

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what skills go to what jobs and see how close

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>your job might be to another job that you don't

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>even expect. So, like, my job editor is pretty close

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to elementary school teacher in terms of how the skills

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>for that job line up. How do you feel about

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that career change? I would love to be an elementary teacher.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean you get summers off and kids are cute. Yeah,

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely you should go to the job and think about

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the times you won't be working. I think it would

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be fun to be aroun kids all day. Would probably

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 1>be really stressful, but so as being an editor. Yeah,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you're basically around children all day. They also excellent writers, yea.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>They also used the same data to build a fun

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>little tool that tells you what your opposite job is. Yeah.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw this going around on Twitter, and the popular

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>one was your opposite job model. Model is the opposite

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of editor. But which I don't I disagree? Okay, I

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's not mutually exclusive. I bet there are some

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>editors who are models. I'd be surprised. But it's not

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to say that models don't have skills that couldn't necessarily

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>transfer to other jobs. They might just not be using

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>them and modeling. Or you're an editor, it doesn't mean

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't be a model. It's not like the skills

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to be an editor don't exclude you from modeling. Right.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>That's an important thing to think about when you're looking

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at charts like this, like it's going to tell you

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what other jobs have skills where they are like the

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>skills you're currently using in your job. But that doesn't

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that you don't have other skills you're not using

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in your job, or you couldn't be good at other

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>things that you're just like not doing every day right now,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right, I'm multitalented. Yeah, you could. You could probably

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be anything if you put your mind to Secca. That's right.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what they told us millennials, and we're growing up.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>You can do anything you want. Well, to get a

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit more into what you actually can and should

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>do if you want to change your career, I talked

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to the co author of that article, Claire Kane. Miller

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is a reporter for The Upshot at the New York Times,

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>where she covers gender and work. Thanks for joining us, Claire,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be here. So you recently wrote a

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>piece looking at the skills that you need for different jobs,

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and you wrote that many of the skills needed to

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>do fading jobs are applicable to growing jobs. Can you

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of explain what you mean by that? Sure, So

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>there's this notion that if you lose your job, particularly

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in certain industries like those that require a lot of

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>manual labor, but really across industries that it can be

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>really really hard to find a new one, especially if

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason you lost your job is because that occupation

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is just shrinking because machines are doing more of the

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>work there, UM, and they're just aren't as many jobs available,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of people who are just

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>stuck and they're unemployed, and they feel like there's nowhere

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they can turn. And there's been a lot of talk

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>about this. UM. The Trump administration has been talking about

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it a lot lately, and they've been calling it the

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>skills gap and saying that they hear from c e

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>o s that they have a ton of jobs available

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're empty, and the problem is that nobody, um,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>none of the employees who are looking for jobs have

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the right skills, the skills that the CEOs need. And

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we we took another look at it, and we found

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that sure, that's the case some of the time, UM,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's also true that a lot of unemployed people

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>do have a lot of skills that are applicable to

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>other careers. But for a ton of different reasons, UM,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>related to the way that our labor force is set up.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's very very hard for them to switch careers, to

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>even know that their skills are applicable to other jobs,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and for hiring managers or CEOs um to be able

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to see their potential. Yeah, you created this really cool

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tool that lets you look at the skills that you

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have for your current job and what other jobs might

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be similar are different. Um, And before we get into that,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just tell me a little bit about the research that

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you did and where you got the data, what you

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>were kind of looking to find. So the Labor Department

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps this database called oh net and it breaks every

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>single job that you can imagine down into the exact

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>skills that are needed to do that job. And UM,

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so it is stuff like, um, I'm looking, for example

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, at museum curator. So a museum curator, you know,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>needs skills like history and knowledge of history and needs

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to manage material resources, but also needs to be good

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at communicating with other people and scheduling work and activities.

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's like a whole host of of different skills

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and own it um breaks jobs down into those skills.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we looked at that to try to answer

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the question is there really more skill overlap between jobs

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>than we realize and what did you find. We found

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that there absolutely is there is a certain segment of jobs,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and the are the jobs that are either very physical

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and very routine, like working in a warehouse or working

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in a factory. Those kind of jobs have been automated

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and there is not, in a lot of cases a

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of similarity UM to other jobs that are available

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. That is sort of the biggest gap in

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the labor market. So I'm not trying to say that

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>there's not a group of people who really are suffering

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and whose occupations have gone away and they don't necessarily

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of skills that are easily applicable. But

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>even for them, and especially for other UM kinds of workers,

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>there really is a lot more overlap. For example, our

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>chart found that UM lawyers and clergy members do a

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same things. Kindergarten teachers, elementary school teachers,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and editors do a lot of the same things. UM

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>cooks and restaurants, and UM cashiers or ushers do a

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same things. So UM, there is you know,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there is more overlap than people realize, and the problem

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>comes down to how people actually search for jobs and

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>how people hire for jobs. Yeah, how do you sort

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of find out what skills you have? Like I think

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>most people have a general idea, but how do you

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>start to map yourself to these skills that the Labor

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Department keeps track of. So oh net made by the

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Labor Department is supposed to be used by you know,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not just data journalists but also uh, you know, average

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking up to find information about their

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>career paths. So you can go there, but it's not

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the easiest thing to use, and frankly, the United States

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a ton of great resources for job seekers.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>There are some new nonprofits that are working on this.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>One is called Opportunity at Work and another is called

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Skillful And what they're doing is basically trying to take

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>people and say, here are your skills. Here are the

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>skills that you have learned to do. And maybe you

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>learn to do that in college, maybe you learn to

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>do that as a volunteer. Maybe you worked in the

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mail room, but you worked they're long enough at the

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>company that you learned and had to do other skills

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that might not show up on your resume. When someone

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>just sees that you worked in the mail room, you

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>know you learned. You could have learned these in a

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of different places, but here are your skills and

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>will help coach you um to find a new job. Now.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that kind of personal coaching that these nonprofits

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>offer is great, and it's not necessarily accessible for everyone.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And so another fix that people say needs to happen

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is for employers to think really hard about how they hire. Now.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of hiring has to do with credentials on

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a resume. As you know, a lot of resumes are

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just scanned now by software to weed out the ones

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that are not applicable, and so things people are looking

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for are a college degree. Definitely need a four year degree.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes even where did you go to college? If it's

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>not one of these twenty five schools, We're not even

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>going to look at that resume those kind of things.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And and the argument is, these are things from your

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>past that you can't change. If you didn't go to college,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you are forty years old with a

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>mortgage and two kids, you might not be able to

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>afford to go to college now, but you might have

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>built up skills that would make you UM talented to

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>do a certain job even if you didn't have that degree.

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is if hiring managers could change the

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>way that they look at people and look at resumes

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>um to test for skills as opposed to credentials. Of course,

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>that that's a big problem to solving a big change

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in the way a lot of people hire. Yeah, it

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that even if you do have a

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>college degree, you can find another field that you might

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>have really good skills for. But getting an employer, getting

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a hiring manager to take a risk on you, you know,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>hiring somebody who does a completely different type of job,

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a whole other can of worms, Like,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is there any is there any way people can help

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of sell themselves to employers once they find out

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>like I'd be really good at being a clergy you know,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a lawyer and I'd be really good at being

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>a clergyman or whatever the example was you gave, Right,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's coming on employees obviously to try to sell

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>themselves to think, you know, just to think outside the

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>box in the first place about what other jobs that

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they might be um eligible for, qualified for, and then

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to convince employers. But I think the burden is often

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>really unemployers. So one thing that employers can do is

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>skills based interviews where instead of you know, screening resumes

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for credentials, they're actually asking people to come in and

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>do part of the job. For an editor, it might

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be you know, doing an editing a story. Um that

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that is an actual part of the job, and then

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you can see if the person has those skills. So

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of those kind of um skills based

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>interviews that people say takes a lot of bias out

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>bias about your past credentials, and maybe other kinds of

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>bias that might come in to the interview process. Another

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>issue is, as you mentioned, employers have very little incentive

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to train people right now and to take risks on people.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you think back, you know, fifty seventy five

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>years bill joined a company and then they stayed there

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of their career, So there was loyalty

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>from both sides, and both sides has had a lot

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of incentive to invest in the other. But now a

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>company doesn't know if an employee is going to take

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the skills they learned on the job and just go

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to the competitor down the street. And at the same time,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>an employee doesn't know if they you know, go and

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in new skills or some sort of retraining, is

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the company just going to lay them off next year

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and that investment won't have been worthwhile. So um, there's

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not that same loyalty and people don't have the same

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>incentive one. So one solution to that is apprenticeships, which

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is um something that Trump administration has talked about, as

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>did the Obama administration. It's really a bipartisan approach and

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea of learning on the job. So someone

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is getting paid and they are doing the job UM

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>while they're also you know, testing out their skills and

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>learning um learning new skills. So so in that's in

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that sense the employer doesn't have to depend on a

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>school UM to teach these skills. I can actually keep

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to these skills. But at the same time, it's getting

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>work out of the person and the person is getting

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>paid UM, so that the incentives are more aligned on

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides. Do you think people shut themselves off from

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>career possibilities because they aren't aware of how their skills

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>might transfer, like could a tool like this help them

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>with that? They absolutely shut themselves off from other curse

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're not aware. I mean, I think when people

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, what's interesting to me about own itt is

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it includes these skills like communicating with people outside your company.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That is an extremely valuable skill that not everyone is

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>good at. If you're good at it, that could apply

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to a ton of different jobs. But my guess is

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that when you ask people about what they do day

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to day, they might say, you know, oh, I do

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>these spreadsheets and I have these meetings, But they don't

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think I'm a really good communicator and that is

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a skill I have that is essential to my job

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and could be essential, um in a in a completely

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>different career. So in that sense, I think these kind

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of tools that own it offers UM I hope that

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>our chart offers, and also that these these nonprofits like

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Skillful and Opportunity at Work offer is being able to

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>think of yourself a little bit differently. But it's also

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a challenge. One economist that I talked to, whose name

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is Lawrence Cats at Harvard, is a labor economist. He

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>says it's often not a skills mismatch, but an identity mismatch.

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So even if you do have the skills to do

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>another job, it can be very hard to make that

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>leap and to think of yourself as something different. If

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you thought of yourself as a welder your whole life,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you could work in an automated factory

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>behind a computer, but you thought of yourself as a welder.

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Your identity is that you work with your hands, and

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea of, you know, working behind a computer is

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just not your identity. So you might have skills that apply, um,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but you also need to make that mental leap. That's

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Yeah, you had a couple of examples of

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>anecdotes in your story. One was a I think like

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a laid off oil rig worker who who was retrained

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to program machines for advanced manufacturing. And and you had

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a paralegal who who changed careers to become a duela UM.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if you talked to those people about

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>making that mental leap and whether they did it out

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of necessity or kind of what sparked them to do that.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So the oil rig worker did it purely out of necessity.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>He was unemployed, um, all the all all the mining

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>plants in the area had been shut down, and he

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't think that he could get another job. He lived

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in Appalachia. This is all he knew how to do,

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and the work that he was doing simply no longer existed.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And he found out about a training program to train

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>out of work miners to do sort of computerized factory

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>work essentially. And I talked to the person who runs

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that program, and she said, it's actually really similar skills.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's working with your hands, understanding how machinery works. But

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>these people didn't think of themselves that way. But he

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>signed up for the training program because he really had

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>no other choice. And he said, actually, it is pretty

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>similar to my old job in a lot of ways,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's different in some ways. And I learned those ways,

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>but I was able to apply my old skip my

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>old skills now. The parallegal I talked to, she decided

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to become a doula and then a midwife because she

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>decided she was interested in something else. She did not

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>quite realize how much those skills overlapped. But after being

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a paralegal for so many years and she became a midwife,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and she said, actually, there is so much overlap here,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so much more than I realized. For example, a lot

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of being a paralegal is you know, reading through a

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>ton of documents and then making notes and writing in

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a really clear, concise way so that other lawyers working

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on the case can understand what that pile of documents

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is about and not have to read it themselves. Being

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a midwife requires seeing a patient and writing and communicating

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in a really clear and concise way. You know where

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>they're at with their health and their pregnancy, so that

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>when a different midwife or a doctor comes in, or

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>when they show up at a hospital and delivery, someone

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>can look at their chart and understand exactly where they're at. So,

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a skill that you might not think of,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually essential to both jobs. Yeah, it's it's

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>super interesting, and it stands to reason that if you

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>are if you are interested in a career change, and

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you're passionate about doing something, even if it feels really different,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you might be drawn to it for a lot of

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the same reasons that you're drawn to your current career,

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Like those skills might line up because those are both

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, because those careers are both well suited to

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you exactly, and you know, it's a shame that there

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is not an easier way right now to both see

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>break down which skills you have and which skills might

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be accessible, and then you know, to convince employers that

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>actually I can do this job. And and that's why

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think it is part of the responsibility falls

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>on employers to think a little bit differently about how

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they hire and take risks on more people. Before I

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>let you go. There's just one more tool that you

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>guys created at the Upshot that I wanted to chat

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with you about out and I'm not sure if you

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>were directly involved in it, but it seems like it

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>came from the same data set, which is a tool

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that lets you plug in your current job and find

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what job is your exact opposite. Did you work on

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that or was that just from the same data This

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was from the same data set that I've worked on

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with my colleague um Quattron Booie, who is also on

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the Upshot. He's a graphics editor. And yeah, it's a

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a really cool graphic that tells you things, Like

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've been talking about job similarities and where

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>they overlap. This is this is the opposite what's most different,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>So like a kindergarten teachers opposite job as a physicist,

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and a writer's opposite job is a mobile home installer,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for example. Is there any way a job seecret or

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody just like looking to improve themselves in their career,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>uh could use that tool as something constructive and not

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a fun a fun curiosity. I think

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so absolutely, because what it really does is help you

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>focus on the nature of your job. You know, a

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of us go to work every day and we

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>do our job, and like I was saying earlier, we

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>don't really realize which skills were using. Or maybe we

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>realize the basic skills, but we don't understand the nitty

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>gritty skills. And I think this tool of the opposite

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>jobs tool helps you realize, um that your job is

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really broken down into a lot of different skills. And

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if you start thinking about it that way, and so

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>instead of thinking, well, I am a teacher, or I

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>am a librarian, or I am a physicist, you think, well,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I really have to do a lot of creative thinking

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of communicating, or you know, I really

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>need to have a lot of gross gross motor coordination

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and stamina or whatever it is that might help you

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think about future career paths. Differently. Well, Claire, this was

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>really really fascinating stuff. Thank you so much for taking

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the time to chat with me. Thanks for inviting me.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the kind of work that Claire did can

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>give people a lot of hope who are in a

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>position where they have to change careers and they just

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know where to start, like it can open up

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>possibilities that they didn't even know we're there. But it

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exactly solve the retraining question. If you wanted to

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be an elementary school teacher, you'd still have to start

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from square one and go back and get a teaching

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>certificate or a degree um which can still be a

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>daunting task. Right, I'm not going to walk into an

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>elementary school and tell the principle to hire me because

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm a really good journalist's New York Times that I

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>could do it, what's the problem. But it does show

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>me that that might be a career path that I'd

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be good at. So like, yes, you have to do

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the retraining. Even the people in Claire's article that she

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned had to do some kind of retraining, but that

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>retraining might not have been as hard as they would

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have expected because they had a lot of the skills

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't even realize it. So I think it's

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really always a great advice to take an inventory

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>of your own skills. And I even, you know, I

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was a career changer myself there. This advice can be

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 1>useful for people who just want to change careers, as

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>opposed to having to change careers because the economy has

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>forced them out of what they're doing. I used to

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>be a researcher and I changed into journalism, not because

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>my skills aligned so well, just because I really wanted

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a journalist, but looking back, like, of course,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the skills I had as a researcher are really applicable

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to journalism. I basically asked people questions and wrote down

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>what they said. And what's journalism journalism basically, And when

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the robots inevitably come for our journalism jobs, as they

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>already are starting to do, we gotta we should take

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a look at our own skills. Yeah, what are we

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? The ones we're using and the ones we

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>might have but aren't using right now, Like my modeling skills, Yeah,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>get on it. Robots are never gonna be really good models,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And now it's time for half bay takes,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>halfy fake takes. If you have a half big take

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to share with us, call our hotline at

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>two and to six one seven zero one six six.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>This week we have a listener half big take on

0:22:53.880 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that very resonant topic of taking photographs with your work friends. Hey, ladies,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this is Virginia from Maryland, UM, and I'm calling to

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>also tack onto the um picture half baked take. And

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say this is for all of

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the ladies out there. If you're taking a picture, a

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>group picture for work, don't lean over. Don't lean over.

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't see guys doing that. Do you know? It

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>makes you look weak, it looks it makes you look unprofessional.

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't do it. You can arrange yourselves that everyone can

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sit in the picture, So don't lean over. All right,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that's my halfday take. Thanks guys, Love you fine. So

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>do we think she means like, if you're on the

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>edge of the picture, you shouldn't you shouldn't kind of

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>angle your body so that you get into the frame.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>You should just sort of like make sure that you're

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>not on the end. I think that's more like don't

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>conform to the picture, right, make the picture work for you.

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It's reminds me of a story I wrote

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on power poses. Um, there is a big drama about

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>researcher behind power poses, and there's there was a research

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>argument that women are supposed to stand in certain ways

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to start themselves in the office. Like I've internalized that advice,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like you're supposed to sit with your arms away from

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.479
<v Speaker 1>your body or something. It turned out to be false

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or that was what the scandal was about. But yeah,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of like the power pose of taking

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>pictures with your coworkers. And ironically, uh, in this case,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the power pose is not leaning in, right, m ladies,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>at least now when you're taking pictures, Becca, what is

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>your brilliant thought that isn't quite brilliant enough to be

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>its own story? This week, so I was on vacation

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and mine is related to coming back from vacation. No,

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>we missed you, yea, I know. Um, it's about email

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>maintenance while on vacation. I have strong opinions about this.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I've even written about it. So I admit I half

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote my half baked take as a regular take. I'm sorry, um,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think we all stress about coming back to

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>our email after vacation. Yes, some people even say just

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>delete all your emails, don't read them, just start fresh, right,

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>which I do fall closer to that side of things.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think the key to happiness on the day

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you get back is if you can while you're on

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>vacation just scan your inbox every day, every other day

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and just star things that seem like they might be important.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You can even open them and scan them, and then

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>when you get back, you scroll through your inbox and

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you do ignore the things and just go to the

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>starred things. You might miss some stuff, but it's okay.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>People will email you back and then you can respond

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to those things and it's maybe like ten emails instead

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>of one. I love this. I totally agree with this

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>because I think people criticize you if you check email

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>while you're on vacation because it's like, oh, you don't

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have work life balance. But you know what, if I'm

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>on a two week vacation and I know in the

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>back of my mind that there are emails piling up

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and one of them might be something kind of important,

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and I might miss it because it's like buried at

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the pile. I'm just going to have

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>like low level work anxiety about that while I'm on vacation,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So like, what kind of work life balance is that

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>when I could be every couple of days just taking

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a look and being like, Okay, I can prioritize that

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>eymoe when I get back. Also, it doesn't it doesn't

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>take that much time. It's not very stressful because you're

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>not actually responding or even thinking about the thing it's about.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You're just looking at it and scanning and meaning like, oh,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that center or a subject line seems like maybe I

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>should look at it, but I'm not going to think

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>about it now. And it's, by the way, it's a

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>total myth that you can just like forget that you

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>have a job while you're on vacation. So let's just

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>get rid of that. You're going to remember that you

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>have a job you're going back to. So listen to

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 1>me anyway, Francesca, what is your really important idea that

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you need to share. I want to talk about wireless headsets.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>These This is the worst thing to happen to corporate

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>America since the Open office plan go on. So I

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>guess the convenience of a wireless headset is that you

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>don't have to deal with a piece of material connecting

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>your phone headset to your phone, and you can get

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>up and walk around and take phone calls. Let me

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you what this does. This annoys your co workers.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the wireless headset coupled with the open

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>office that's really bad, because if you had your own room,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you could just pay some walk around. However, I thought

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>about this. I thought about this. The only time a

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>wireless headset is not going to annoy other people because

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>random people are gonna hear your phone call is if

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you have your own office. But if you have your

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>own office, you don't need a wireless headset because you

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>could just put your call on speaker. So there's no

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>good reason to use some wireless headset. If you want

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to walk around and stretch your legs and improve your

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>blood circulation, or get your fitbit steps in or whatever,

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know, do it some other time. Do

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it on your own time. Don't bring your phone call

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>over to my desk. If it's if you're doing it

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>because the phone call was so personal that you didn't

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>want your coworkers to hear it, then imagine how people

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>who you don't even work with, who have no idea

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who you are or feel about it. Mandatory wired headsets

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. Yeah, let's chain ourselves to our desks so

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that we understand decorum. You heard it here and this

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>has been half big takes, half baked takes. Thank you

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening to this episode of Game Plan.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Francesca today and I'm at RZ

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Greenfield and you can call into our hotline and tell

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>us anything you want at two on to six seven

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>zero one six six. If you liked our show, please

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>go to Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen and rate us,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>review us. Take a minute just to give us a

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>shout out if you like us. The show is produced

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>by Liz Smith and Magnus Henrickson. The head of podcast

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is Alec McCabe and we will see you next week. Hi. Anyway, Francesca,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what is your really important idea that you need to share?

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't have one, good question, You don't have one. Sorry, sorry,