WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Trump Has Two Options For Iran: Escalate… Or Capitulate + The End Of Eric Swalwell

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by Ethos and what Ethos does is it helps you

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>find life insurance. Let me tell you why life insurance

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bailed me out. My father died when I was sixteen.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a lot of money when it happened,

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were in a pretty tough financial spot after

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. I'm an only child. Suddenly my mother's single,

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>single mother. She had a job, suddenly lost a job,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for another job, and we were struggling. You know,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad didn't leave us in the best financial situation,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but he did make one purchase. He bought a life

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy. Wasn't a huge chunk of change, but it

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was enough when we found it. And when I say

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we found it, meaning we went through his desk and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we found, oh, look at this, let's see if there's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>anything here. And it helped us out at a time

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we really needed it. And that's why I think

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>it's important that if you can, especially if you have

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>young children, if you can get life insurance, you should

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get it. Life is full of unexpected emergencies, unexpected things happen.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It is an extra bit of security, something you can

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>leave and help out at a time when you're not

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not there to help. So what does Ethos do well?

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy, and it's

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. You can get a quote in seconds,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you can apply in minutes, and you can get same

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>day coverage. They will find you the right fit. There's

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no medical exam. You just answer a few simple health

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>questions online. You can get up to three million dollars

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and some policies are as low as thirty

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, and you'll get your lowest rate from

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their network of trusted carriers. So take ten minutes to

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>free quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. That is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>e Thos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and rates may vary.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Happy Monday, and welcome to another episode of

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Check podcast.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I will be honest with you.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I sort of have a I have like seventeen thousand topics.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I should share a few a few

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>quick takes for you on or a few different ways

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking about it, or at least share with

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you how I how I'm thinking about it and see

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>how much that informs you. That's one thing I try

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not to do is I'm not trying to tell you

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 1>what you think. I'm trying to sort of lay out,

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lay out a structure to understand why whatever the situation

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is we're in. Look, there were two dominant stories that

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to spend a lot of time on. Obviously,

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest one is Iran. Iran sort of is everything

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>because of its massive impact on the global economy, which

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of course means our economy, which of course means Campaign

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. But the Eric Swawell implosion out in

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>California also is a really really b FD, as Joe

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden might whisper in the ear of Barack Obama, and

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we need to spend a lot of

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>time on because it's actually two stories.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>One, it's going to trigger a bunch of show votes

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in cong VERUS, so Congress can make itself feel better

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>by kicking out men behaving badly. But the other shakeup

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is what's going to happen in California. I think what

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we will we know for sure, and I think this

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>has now been more likely than we You know. I

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>just think now that the swallow thing trigger it. Here's

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. There's going to be another election for

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>California governor before twenty thirty. That I promise you. I

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do not believe whoever wins this governor's race will be

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>able to survive the inevitable recall effort that is coming.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>We are slip sliding into one of those Californy governor's races.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It's going to look a lot like two thousand and

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>two Gray Avis versus Bill Simon, where everybody hates their choices.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>So those are the two dominant stories.

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of other stuff, Perkolating not going to leave

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it on the cutting room floor. I want to want

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to get to a bunch of it. But let's get

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to Iran. So the ceasefire is, I guess, kind of intact,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but make no mistake, a naval blockade, which President Trump

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>ordered on Sunday is an act of war. That's you know,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that is what it is. Now we are still at

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>war with Iran. I think Iran still at war with us.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The question is does either country break the ceasefire? Is

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this considered breaking of the ceasefire? Will the Iranians respond or,

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is this just part of a stalemate until we hit

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the two weeks or until we see

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiations pick up, because one thing that it is important.

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Neither JD Evans for the American side nor the Iranians

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>indicated that they both behaved as if they knew there

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>would be another round of talks. They didn't say another

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>round was coming, but you get the impression another.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Round is coming.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Still, no deal, no framework, and no actual next step

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>just yet. But in some ways the blockade isn't It

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is an acknowledgment by President Trump that the United States

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>has less leverage in this deal than we want to admit. Certainly,

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the President doesn'tant tomit it. He keeps declaring victory.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's a huge problem. If you've won, then why

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are you negotiating? If you've won, why are you potentially

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>floating the idea of a joint venture with Iran to

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>patrol and maybe even collect tolls for the straight of

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>horn moves and the tolls being used as reparations. Right, So,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>this is why his rhetoric is not harmless. The stupid

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric he makes un truth social, the dumb rhetoric where

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he beats his checks, declares victory, or sort of the

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>secretary of the Fence who constantly loves to beat his

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>chest and you know, I guess probably you know, choose

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on too much creatine before he does any of his

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>press briefings and declares these capital v victories.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, then why are we negotiating? Right? So the bottom

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 2>line is we don't have leverage. They do.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>They came out of this ceasefire with the single most

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>important piece of leverage, control of the Strait of hormones,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>control of the global economy, and essentially control right now

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump presidency. So that's why Trump in some

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ways had no choice but to do this.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 2>With the straight of hormones.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got to find and see if he can.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>Get some leverage to force the Iranians to back off

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. So the question is is there a

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>next step? Right? I think it.

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>The blockade is intended to get around back to the

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>table and to start having a conversation about the Strait

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and about the nuclear deal. If there is no The

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>question though, is will the president escalate further if this

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>does not get the deal he's looking for? Does he

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>then send in ground troops? To didn't try to militarily

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>take control of the Straight and essentially operate the Straight

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in behalf of the world. Now there's all sort of

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>look there to Monday morning morning quarterback this war. Obviously, the.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>The total.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Misunderstanding of the power of the Strait that the Iranians

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>would have is the initial blunder of this war. This

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is the I swear to you, there's WMDs right this.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to say, if there was any like,

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the failure of this administration for going into war?

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>It is underplaying and under realizing the leverage the Iranians

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>had with the Strait. And had they understood it from

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the beginning and they chose to do this, my guess

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is they would have immediately tried to get control of

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Straight first. Then you start worrying about everything else.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But again, the problem here is the president surrounded himself

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with sycophants, and even though we have learned that these

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>folks did not want to endorse his strategy here they

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>were afraid of telling him the truth. They were afraid

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of telling They just danced around the edges of the

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>issues and allowed him to hear what he wanted. And

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>now we're in this potentially intractable situation that we're.

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>In where we may have no choice but escalate.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Because of the initial blunder at the beginning, or you're

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to cut a deal with the Iranians that

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>leaves the regime in power, legitimizes the regime, gives them

0:08:53.400 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges their control over the Strait, and essentially makes.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>The hardliners like John Bolton are gonna wish they.

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Had the Rand nuclear deal because the best thing that

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump can get now is essentially naftaizing the Iran nuclear deal.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And what do I mean by that by naftaizing?

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>He said he hated NAFTA, so he ripped it up,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>renegotiated the same deal with the Mexicans and the Canadians

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and called it USMCA the United States, Mexican Canadian right accord.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Whatever.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>See, there's there's no NAFTA. That's what's coming here. He's

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna hope he can get the Obama nuclear deal. If

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he's lucky, he can get.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>The Obama Obama nuclear deal.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's if this this is the best, the best

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>version of this, you know. And again we can sit

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>here and talk about all the all the problems going

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>into this thing, right, it was a mistake, and everybody

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>advised him. It was most people around him advised him

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake, outside of John Bolton and the

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Gulf States and Israel. And this is a case where

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the president consistently listens to outside voices rather than his

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>own military advisors and his own intelligence. He did it

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all the time in his first term, and he's doing

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it again in his second term. And that is an

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>issue that does not get enough attention. He trusts the

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Israeli intelligence more than he trusts the US intelligence. The

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Israeli said this was going to be easy regime James

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen and the people were going to

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>rise up, And the CIA said that was bullshit. And

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the CIA is fronted by somebody who is a Trumper,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>John Ratcliffe, who wants to tell Trump what he wants

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear, but can't bring himself to tell him bullshit.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 2>But the President refuses to listen to his own, his

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>own folks on that front.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So the next look that I expect the markets to

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>panic a bit.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean I.

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Kind of think they've been under panicking. I'm a bit

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hopeful that somehow you know, the resilience of the markets

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in the past, well, it was like they were during

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, just like they have been during the Russia

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine War.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 2>That it's going to happen again. But the lack of

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 2>a clear resolution it is, you know, here's what we

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 2>do now.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>President does not want to restart the war. There's no

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.599
<v Speaker 1>doubt he probably regrets ever starting it, and considering the

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>situation he's in, you know, he could have you know,

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, right, should he have tried to squeeze him more,

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>should he have tried to find more ways to isolate Iran,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>do more to it, to increase the stranglehold so that

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the people would rise up and be angry at their leaders,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and instead, in a weird way, he's even united.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 2>If you guys have.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Started following my friend, my Suzanne Kanpoor, She's her reporting

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is indicated that they're you know, even those that don't

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like this regime, uh now feel as if that it's

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody versus America, which is a very dangerous place to

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be and it's you really got to bungle this as

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>badly as this administration's bungled this to put put ourselves

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>in this situation or we're basically begging around to come

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to give us some deal so Trump can save face

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and the and that's the thing. The Iranians know it.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>They know they know it.

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>They know he can't handle the economic fallout from this.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>They know it's politically beyond painful for him. They know

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it screws up his trade negotiations with China next month,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It messes up all sorts of aspects of him. And look,

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians, they will negotiate, negotiate, negotiate, negotiate, and they're

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>going to keep dragging this out. So the end of

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the day he had to find some leverage. We'll see

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 1>if doing a blockade of the Strait does that. But

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it is going to have you know, this is it's

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be. It's probably going to be an ugly

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>day in the markets because now, whether we're questions, is

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>the straight open or not or now it's we know

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>it's not open, right, it is definitely closed. But I

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>go back to something right, the problem, Right, the president

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has already declared victory and he continues to try to

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>declare victory. So if we've already won, why do we

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have to keep doing all of these things? And This

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is the position he's put himself in. Right, when you

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>define victory early then compromise later, starts to look like retreat.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>And right now the Iranians know it. They see it.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like retreat because it is retreat. The president

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>can't afford to do this.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 2>We didn't have we don't.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>He can't political He does not have the political capital

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to get even his own party to give him time

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to put in ground troops to get control of the

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>straight and you know, he's just you know, and then

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>there's who he is, right, he doesn't have the patience

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to do things methodic. He's always looking for a shortcut.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>It's been it's defined his career. And the thing is

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is that he's had so much success with shortcuts that

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he forgets the failures with shortcuts. That also, right, he

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was able to become a star because of shortcuts, but bankruptcy.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He was still the only one of the few casino

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>operators to find a way to go bankrupt, oning the

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>casino because he was taking a shortcut on.

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Competition and try to buy up all his competitors.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he shortcuted his way into politics, but he

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't really build a coalition.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>In order to support him and use his political capital.

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you take all these shortcuts, right, he's trying

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to shortcut his way into getting an Iranian victory. He's

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to shortcut his way and trying to get a

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelan victory. But he's no longer promoting democracy anymore. And

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>America is not on the side of democratic freedom. We

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are not on the side of democratic freedom in Venezuela

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, and we're doing a poor job of being

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on the side of freedom, democratic freedom and Iran. But

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately that's what you have to remember here. In conflicts

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>like this, the side that understands the other side better

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>usually has the advantage. President Trump does not understand this

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Iranian regime. He thinks they're all just as transactional as

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>he is. He sees everybody through the himself. He assumes

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody behaves the way that everybody's motivation is, what his

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>motivation is, power.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Money, etc.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And he just assumes those same motivations, and certainly loosely

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the motivations are similar, and they may rhyme, but he

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>did not and does not. And you know, again, he

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't bother to study, right, you know, he doesn't listen

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to the experts who have studied the Iranians for decades,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not just weeks, months, or even years.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't listen to those experts. But here we are

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in some ways, this is.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>This is why Irana starts to look like our failed

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>military expeditions. Vietnam second Iraq war are the most are

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the two biggest ones, and now this one because we

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>succeeded militarily right sort of, but we didn't get our

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>strategic end goal. And even with Iraq we kind of

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>ended up with I guess what we wanted. There is

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>no Iraq with a nuclear program, so that's good. There's

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>no a rock with Saddam Hussein. But boy, was the

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>cost worth it?

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Right? And I think to this day we're not even

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>sure that the cost was worth it. So bottom line is.

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>The good news is the talks are going to There's

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be another round of talks. Both sides did

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not indicate that there was no room for more talks.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>This was the first meeting was always inevitably going to

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>be a feeling out meeting. But I think the one

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that that President Trump ought to take away as

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an understanding, and I think again his move to try

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to blockade the Straight is in some ways any acknowledgment

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of this, which is he didn't have enough leverage destroy

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and you know right now, the Iranians

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>care about one thing, control of that Straight. So Trump

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>is right to try to go after the one thing

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they care about in order to see if he can

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>regain some leverage here. But you know, the most likely

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>endgame here is not a restart of the war. It

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is not a sending ground troops in to get control

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>of the Straight. The most likely endgame here is the

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Iran nuclear deal two point zero. Donald Trump will call

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it then, you know USMCA of Nuclear Deals brand new.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>It won't do this, won't do that, but it'll give

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>them some money. And remember, you know why Iran doesn't

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>want to give up the idea that it may never

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>pursue a nuclear weapon. Libya, right, the Libya example is

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>always the reason Libya gave up its nuclear ambition and

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>regime change happened. North Korea has not given up his

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>nuclear ambition. And that Kim Jong n family, he just

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>named his daughter the latest air parent. If something happens

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to him, and we may end up with a fourth

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>generation of North Korean leaders all because they have.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 2>A nuclear weapon. So it's not irrational how the Iranians

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>are thinking.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, this is a case, and there's no doubt the

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>United States the North Korea is a reason why to

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>do whatever it takes to not let Iran get there

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>carrots and sticks. Trump has been all stick. He's going

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to have to now have to give some and he

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna like it, and he's gonna find out. Remember,

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't trust them and they don't trust us. And

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in situations like this, whatever agreement you come into is

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a leap of faith. You're going to have to trust

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody you don't trust. That's why you put in verifications

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and all sorts of things in there. But it is

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in if you want a deal, it's inevitable you're going

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to get one where you have to give up something

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't like. And in that sense, Donald Trump, this

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is where he is a terrible deal maker.

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>He has never been.

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>He does not believe in win win. He wants to

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>get the best of somebody, and he thinks caving into

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>any demand of the other side makes him look weak.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what makes him look weak.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Presiding over this economy. That's deteriorating by the hour. That's

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>something that makes you look weak. And in case you're

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wondering the economic hit, it's already happening. Consumer confidence is

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>now lower, lower than it was during the pandemic. We

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are now in this We're lowest in the Michigan Index.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>We're talking as bad as the seventies were. And remember

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we now have a fertilizer issue, we've got food transport issues,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and we got supply chain issues.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>So this is.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Not going to get better anytime soon. This is and

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we have not felt the worst parts of this. Every

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>expert said, come about mid April, then all of a sudden,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to feel like things went off a cliff. Well,

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the week where we hit mid April. Gas

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>prices biggest one month spike since the sixties. Hiring is slowing,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>wages are flattening. Uncertain economic future means companies start freezing.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Everything they're doing.

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You pull back on new investments, you hold off on

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>new high because you're not sure where this economy is going.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>And in this case, this is this is why the the.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>The the bad shoots that we're seeing on the economy,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and as opposed to green shoots, uh, it could accelerate

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>because of that situation. Before I leave the Iran issue here,

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I know Trump doesn't care about optics anymore, but I

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>thought Marco Rubio might as talks are deteriorating with the

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>war with Iran, which of course is going to probably

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>could probably trigger a global recession. I'm glad to know

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that the commander in chief and the Secretary of State

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>were hooping it up at a.

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>UFC match in Miami. Not the best look. I know.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>If I were a Republican on the ballot, I'd be like,

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>does the President take any of this seriously? I mean,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes is it? You know, he just, you know, the

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>celebrity parts of the presidency matter more to him than

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the actual job itself. And it's moments like Saturday night

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>where he's whooping it up at at a UFC match

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>while JD. Vance is negotiating in his behalf and having

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to walk away. And here's the thing, you know, Marco Rubio,

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know who would have been really critical

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of a secretary of State behaving this way, Senator Marco Rubio,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if John Kerry at all had done anything even close

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to this. Gone to a Bruce Springsteen concert while there

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was a negotiation.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 2>On the Iran nuclear right.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I promise you a Senator Marco Rubio would be beating

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>his chest about it.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 2>You have one job. All this stuff.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Deep down inside, he knows it's a bad look, you know,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And with Rubio, and I wonder, Look, some people think

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm too tough on Ruby, and some of you think I.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Give Rubio too much credit.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I've heard that too. Oh you keep thinking, you know,

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>when do you know? I just know he knows better,

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and everybody who knows him knows he knows better. And

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he's allowed himself to get caught up in this. And

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a little celebrity. Maybe it's the middle class

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>chip on his shoulder.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I get it. I have it. I have that chip.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, he he wasn't born on third base, and

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>then and handed everything. I wasn't born on third base.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So I get it. I get the chip.

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>But you got to have the character to sort of

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>understand how to how to draw some lines and how

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to compartmentalize. And you know, he seems to have gotten

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like he's more caught up on the celebrity

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>than I thought he would. It's just a disappointment. I

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>know that's not a new criticism for me, but I

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>know he knows better and that was a bad look.

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of those that you feel like, I know,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing matters, right, Trump can shoot somebody and put that

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>on and.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Blah blah blah.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But it just chips away again, chips away, chips away.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>You know this is serious stuff. I'm sorry they can't

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they am you know, nobody's saying don't watch the match,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>but you know, send a message to the country that

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about what's happening in their lives. You have

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>made decisions that have upended the lives of millions of Americans.

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm glad you're having a good time at.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>A UFC match. That's awesome. That's awesome. Well.

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>by Quints. This time of year always makes me rethink

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>what's in my closet. I'm trying to keep fewer things,

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>but better ones, pieces that are well made, easy to

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>wear all the time. Trust me, I am constantly on this.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I have given up ties. I'm looking for upscale, casual,

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>nice casual. Right, That's why I keep coming back to Quints.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>The fits are thoughtful, pricing actually makes sense. Dirty little secret.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of my birthday gifts came from members of my

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>family using the code and ordering from Quints, and I

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>love what I got. Quins makes some high quality every

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>day essentials. They use premium materials like one hundred percent

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>European linen, and they're insanely soft flow knit active wear fabric.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Their men's linen pants and shirts are lightweight, breathable, comfortable,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>basically the perfect layer for spring. I've got some of

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the linen shorts on right now. They're fantastic, trust me.

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>And the best part is that their prices are fifty

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to sixty percent less than similar brands.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>How well Quince.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Works directly with ethical factories, cuts out middlemen, so they're

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>paan for quality, not the markup of the brand. Everything

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>is designed to last and make getting dressed easy. This

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is one I wholeheartedly endorse. I wear the products.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 2>I really like it.

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I can find my comfort zone here literally what I'm

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>comfortable wearing and comfortable of peering in on air, so

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>refresher wardrobe with Quints. Go to quints dot com, slash

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>chuck c U hc K for free shipping and three

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five day returns now available in Canada too,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So go to q U I n CE dot com

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>slash chuck for free shipping three hundred and sixty five

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>day returns quints dot com slash chuck use that code.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of unseerious people, let's go talk about Eric Swallall

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of the fall of Eric Swalwell. You know,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those And I've seen some back

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and forth on this. There's shocked but not surprise, surprise

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but not shocked, whatever way you want to whatever however

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to use those two words interchangeably.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, we have this all the time.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>With Trump, he finds ways to surprise us, even if

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not shocked.

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 2>With that, he surprises us.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But with Swalwell, this is one of those things you're like, well,

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody kind of knew or thought they knew, but the

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>stakes were never high enough where you thought it was

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>important to report about it. All right, That's the best

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>explanation I can give you as a reporter. And you know,

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do you chase every rumor and every politician you hear about,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>because I promise you I've heard a rumor about every

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>single politician that's ever remotely thought about running for presidents?

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Why will run for president?

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure ninety percent of the rumors are unsubstantiate.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is there's always enough things that are true

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>that it makes you constantly in the back of your

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>head as a political reporter. You know, you file the

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>other accusations away. You're like and you start to like,

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, look for smoke. A lot of times there's

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>no smoke, so you don't keep going. And sometimes you know, look,

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I know you're if you're right now still defending Eric Swallow,

0:27:58.520 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you'll say, how come this is all coming out right

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's you know, the front runner. Well, a lot

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of times people have, you know, compartmentalized their bad experiences

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>with somebody until that person's back in the news or

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>until that person's about to get even more power, and

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>then they think, whoa if I don't speak out now

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>when you know, before while there's still a chance if

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they really believe this person is too irresponsible to have power.

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think you've got to be careful when you're

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>questioning the timing of accusations. In some ways, the political

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign season, the primary campaign, is exactly when we should

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be having these you know, conversations, we're we're trying to

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>find out who these people are. Do they have the

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>character to handle the job? Do they have the qualifications

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to handle the job? Do they have the knowledge to

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>handle the job. So, you know, in Swalwell's problem here

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is that he's only denying a crime.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I did not sexually assault it. But he's saying it's not.

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Denying that he had a wondering eye. And unfortunately for

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>those of us that have covered Washington for as long

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as we have, there are a lot of Eric Swabbles

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. And you can sit here and say, well,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the system that creates it. I think there's some

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>truth to that. These sitting senators and sitting members of

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>House have these enormous stabs that are just devoted to

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>keeping them happy, and it just can create a bubble

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or a filter or for the truly weak character. You know,

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it you know makes you think more of yourself. You

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think you're above it all, or you think you can

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>get away with anything, or you think you're just you

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think your personality is just that magnetic. Why else would

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>all these people not be so devoted to you? So

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you do, you know, if you've had. You know, it's

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things if you have a little bit

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of the narcissistic gene in you, the way getting elected

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to Congress in some ways can can amplify it, if

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that's possible. And when you look at some of of

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>his mo that the various allegations are out there, it right,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sadly familiar, right. He seems to be looking

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for those that look up to him, right, that's who

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he preyed upon, you know. And you could say whether

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it was consensual, and I'm sure in his mind it

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was consensual, but he you know, he's trying really hard

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to say I'm not Bill Cosby, I'm Bill Clinton. Well,

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>even that I don't think people accept anymore because there

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was still a power dynamic issue. So you did it,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not sneaking in date rape drugs, still doesn't mean

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you're qualified to be the next governor of California as

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>far as the American public or the California public is concerned. So,

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some ways, it's a very familiar story.

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So now let's talk about the follow up. I think

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be the first thing we're going to

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>see is we're going to see Congress. Right, you've got

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>two other members of Congress that have been whose behavior

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with women have been an issue, and there's been some

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>threats to expel them from Congress. Tony Gonzales, Republican from Texas,

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>who has since dropped out. He pulled out of that runoff,

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't he hasn't resigned from Congress. Corey Mills,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Republican from Florida. Then you have another member of Congress

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>who's accused of essentially stealing money from FEMA, and there

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>may be a vote to expel her. We may have

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like four expulsion votes. You need two thirds of a

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>vote to do this. And I'll just say I think

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, he's going to be political votes

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of convenience, right, Both parties just want to sweep their

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>bad apples under the rug. So you may see a vote.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it one vote? Is it two votes? Is it?

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Four votes? Right?

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Three of them are inappropriate behavior with women? Tony Gonzalez,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Corey Mills, and Eric Swalwell. The fourth, Sheila Sherphyllis McCormick,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is the one of where she's accused of basically stealing

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>COVID money and using it for her campaign. She hit

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the public trial with the Ethics Committee. So it is

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly politically convenient for both parties and for a Jeffreys

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and a Johnson to almost agree to this and just

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of saying, let the will of the House happen,

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever happens happens, and they clean it up.

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I will just say this, the law of unattended consequences.

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>One. If the votes fail, and they might there might

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be other members of Congress who think, there but for

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the grace of God go I and who may think

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and may think they're going to practice their own version

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Golden Rule, and they're going to do not

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>unto others, what they hope will be done unto them.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And if they fear that they've got something in their

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>paths that could come out, what precedent do they want

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to send?

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 2>So you could have some of that, you could have

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>some of.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It in the other way, where the news of Swawell

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and Gonzales and Mills triggers even more accusations and more

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>staffers decide, if we're going to hold these four accountable,

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>then we need to hold these other folks agount.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>So it's possible.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It's an important moment for Congress to sort of draw

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a line and to try to raise the bar, because,

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest, the quality of member of Congress has

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>been going downhill for some time. More and more of

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.479
<v Speaker 1>them are not role models. Now you could say, hey,

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they just are you know, a reflection of us, man,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>They're a perverted reflection of us, because these congressional districts

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't fairly reflective of the country. So it's a perverted version.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun house mirror version of us. And there's

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>always been a small part of me that we as

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>American citizens, you know, we've always punched, we've always punched

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>down in Congress. We want to believe that we're all

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>better than them, and this is only going to be

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>more proof of that. But I am you know, look,

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be it's probably going

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to be swift justice. But it's a version of sweeping

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 1>all this under the rug all at the same time,

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than maybe having a better.

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 2>To come to you know what moment.

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Where you say, you know, you know, how do we

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>demand a better quality of behavior, How do we draw

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>some better lines, and how do we root this stuff

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>out sooner? And how do we But it's sometimes it's

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>just the nature of the beast. And we know we've

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>lived with politicians like this for this long and part

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of it is are we going to hold Is Congress

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>going to hold individual members of Congress to a higher

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bar than they hold the President of the United States?

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the uncomfortable shadow that hangs over all of this, folks, right,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about it. Every single accusation against Mills,

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>against Gonzales, against Swawell, and against and even on the

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>funding stuff against Sherp Phyllis McCormick, all of it. There

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are accusations against Donald Trump for versions of this, whether

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially using government money, using power to enrich himself

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that's basically been the second term. Never mind the various

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>accusations for women, including a civil court that said he

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>was credibly accused of rape, of which he still not

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>paid the fine that a civil court.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Adjudicated against him.

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>So that's also a part of this. That's just, like

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said, just hovers over all of this. The

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>real question is does this have a I think this

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>ends up, you know, sort of if it's possible to

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lower the approval rating of Congress generically overall, it will

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is a pox on everybody who's running as

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>an incumbent, which is why they're going to want to

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 1>try to wash their hands, because there's also an Epstein

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>angle to this, right, they've done so little on the

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Epstein front. They better make sure they're willing to hold

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>accountable any one of their members at a minimum, because

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of their failure to do so when it came to

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>all things Epstein. So I think we know what's going

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to happen here to these four members. I do think

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>these votes are going to happen. My guess is they

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all do get expelled because of the desperation of the

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>members that are currently running to look a little less dirty.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, you know, the cynic in me says, hey,

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>this is this is this is small stuff, and maybe

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you could say, hey, a small improvement here of trying

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to raise the bar anywhere is better than not trying

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. I grant you that, But there are a

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of elephants in the room on these stories that

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>we're not touching, that are certainly having a little bit

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of impacked there. As for the dubernatorial follow in the

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously the primary is coming up. Democrats had been reluctantly

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>rallying around Swallwell. And this is all a reflection, by

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that I do think most California Democrats that

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are in some power have little interest in seeing Tom

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Steyer as their standard bearer. And it has been in

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody but Styre sort of mindset, right, And so this

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 1>is why you had a whole bunch of folks hoping

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that Kamala Harris would jump in, Alex Padilla would jump in,

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and I understand why both of them didn't. If you're

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not interested in the job.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Don't run.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think Kamala Aris wants one more bite at

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the apple of president.

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 2>That's been made clear and clear.

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Alex Padilla, he might have been able to win the governorship,

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but he'd be giving up a Senate seat for life. Essentially,

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no term limits on running for the Senate. There

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is term limits on running for governor, and maybe he

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to spend the next twenty years in the Senate.

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Ditto Adam Scheff. And then there's another uncomfortable aspect of

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I've been constantly trying to figure out why

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is this field, Excuse me, why is this California gubernatorial field?

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 2>So weak.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a whole bunch of people that don't

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.439
<v Speaker 1>want the job, that don't think the job is worth having.

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>In the first time after news now I've explained to

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you why I think some major Democrats were against. I

0:38:57.960 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>think another is that there's been sixteen straight years of

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>democratic governorship of rule of the governorship. There is going

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to inevitably be fatigue on Democrats. So the likelihood that

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the next governor was at best going to get one

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>term might not survive a recall, I think was quite

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>high and quite likely. So that may explain why some

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>people didn't want to do it. Then think about the reality,

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>right the next governor is going to be dealing with

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a very active presidential campaign of a former California governor,

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom, and he'll be high profile, and he'll be

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>running on what he believes is his record that will

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be questioned. It will be a constant sort of It

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>will make the pr side of running the state a

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit harder. If you want to hit Gavin for

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>not having an heir apparent, I think it's a fair hit.

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm now I know why he didn't.

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't like it when he sort of got pushed aside.

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think he his feeling was let let

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a thousand flowers bloom because he want he didn't like

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the way he was treated. He was sort of forced

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>await his turn them and he had a run for

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor and then and then the you know, the

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>sea's parted for him essentially, but he didn't he didn't

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>really have an air apparent. But now they've got a

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>real problem because Swawell obviously that candidacy is dead, whether

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>he sees the light and drops out or not. As

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>another story, everybody that was anybody has pulled their endorsement.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 2>There if Tom Steyer.

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I just look at all the money Tom's tyre has

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>spent to promote Tom Steyer, especially in the state of California.

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And when you look on the ROI of the amount

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of money he spent and the translation that money and

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>how much money that has translated to support for him,

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it is one of the worst investments you could ever have.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the amount of money he spent. He should

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>he's already been. They should be in first place up

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>by ten over anybody.

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Unless.

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 1>The dogs don't like the dog food. One of the

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>old axioms sometimes the dogs don't like the dog food.

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.399
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what the brand says. It doesn't matter

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.919
<v Speaker 1>how much money you spent on advertising. The dogs won't

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>eat your dog food if it ain't alpo or it

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 1>ain't whatever, right, And you got to ask yourself. Stier's

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>done all these he's just whether. I don't think he

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>comes across very likable.

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He's sort of the angry billionaire. Look without any charm. Right,

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump hads the angry billionaire. You know, he's the angry,

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fake billionaire who used the presidency to become a billionaire.

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But he's got a little charm and in politics you

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>need a little charm. That matter who you are, gotta

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>have a little charm, and Styr's missing the charm thing. Now,

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can just lean into being the a hole

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>billionaire I would if I were him. Don't try to

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be something you're not.

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Just try that.

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it works, maybe he gets there, But the point

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is he's pretty much alienated. He is not seen as

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's easy to work with, which is why they

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any major supporters that aren't supporting him without

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 1>being paid by him. Now, he's not the first billionaire

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>candidate to pay people to support him, pay influencers things

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's sort of now. There's a lot of

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>influencers that are getting paid by outside actors that don't

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>say who they are.

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not one of them.

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>In case you're wondering, I don't think anybody knows which

0:42:52.880 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>side could buy me off very well. But the point is,

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.320
<v Speaker 1>as I just I just look at you know, the

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>facts are the facts. Tyra spent all this money and

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it's never translated to anything. So then the question is,

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what does you know if you're Gavin news from Kamala Harris,

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff, Alex Padilla fore most prominent Democrats in the state,

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>do you all endorse the same person? Does that help

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or hurt them? I think in this unique race it

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would help them because, you know, because the last two

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Democrats that most of the party wants to see and

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that's in that slot or Tom Styren Katie Porter. So

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>if they want somebody else, maybe it's Matt Mahon. You know,

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten little, he had plenty of resources to get

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>into this thing.

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 2>He's not caught fire.

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's not well known enough, maybe he got into late.

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're just never going to be able to make

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of San Jose a statewide Okay, I don't know.

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>There was one candidate that I do think would have

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>would have been their best candidate, and it's the mayor

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco, Daniel Lurie. Now he is just there.

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little early, and it could be that some

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of these folks like Caruso, Lurie, maybe even Padilla, maybe Harris,

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they all said, you know what, I'm going to

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>run for governor in twenty thirty. I am not want

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to follow in this sixteenth Street, you know,

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>let me follow somebody that it's in debacle.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be governor.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, Gavin's running for president, right, there's a whole I

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>understand that line of things. But they have to avoid

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a debacle. They've got to find a viable candidate. And look,

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe they just say, fine, let'sty or have it.

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>At least he'll spend money on behalf of the ticket.

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think money is the problem though for the

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>California Democrats. So it'll be curious to see. I think

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>those four if they choose to sort of be their

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>own version of a of a of of of king

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and Queen makers here, but Shift Padilla, Harrison Newsome. If

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they care about the state party and try to strengthen,

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and if they want the eventual governor that gets elected

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to have some credibility when they get elected, they probably

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>ought to try to rally behind somebody in this primary.

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be Javier Bsara. I think if

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for the Biden baggage, maybe Besera.

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Would be the guy.

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a state ag you know, he's got the correct resume,

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but the Biden baggage is not unheavy. I think everybody

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>else looks like they're retreats for a Ricosa Katie Porter,

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>all these people that feel like they've been trying to

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of the also rants.

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, I go back.

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This feels a lot like nineteen ninety eight, two thousand

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and two California politics, where none of the big names

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>would run. No Diane Feinstein, she still wouldn't run for governor.

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>That was still the sort of the hope that some

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats had, no Barber Boxer running or anything like that,

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and the lesser known sort of nebbish at the time,

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not everybody was thrilled with it. Gray Davis sort of

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sneaks through because they didn't want they didn't want a

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>rich guy owning the party from on the outside.

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, Checki and for whatever reason, Jane.

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Harmon didn't take off, you know, I mean, I think

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Harmon and Checky beat each other up and it cleared.

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>The path for Davis a little bit. But I do

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 2>think this.

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the most likely new thing that has happened

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>here is no matter that we are likely to have

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 1>two unpopular figures running for governor by November, Steve Hilton

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and whoever the Democrat is. My guess is they'll both

0:46:57.160 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>be underwater, just like Gray Davis, Bill Simon twenty zho

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and whoever becomes governor is just swimming uphill. And it's

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>so easy to put a recall initiative on there. And

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>if things are south, you know, it's one of those

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.800
<v Speaker 1>things that will be well. It will only sort of

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>reinforce the likely weakness of whoever wins. But the other

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequence to this debacle could be that the Democrats

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Legislature decide to get rid of the all

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>party primary and try to put a put a referendum

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>back on the ballot to get rid of it.

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Personally, I hope not.

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think all party primaries long term are healthier for

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the system. But the two parties have viewed all party

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>primaries always through the lens of is it good for.

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Them or bad for them?

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And if they think it's bad for them, then they're

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>going to fight to get rid of them. And in

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this case, both parties think this all open primary is

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>actually bad for them. They've never liked it, and not

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>having this type of control over their nominee and over

0:47:56.040 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the process when you have a debacle like this, is

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>going to make a lot of California Democrats decide they

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want this all party primary anymore. So I hope

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that's not the unintended consequence one of them, but I

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>fear it could be. All Right, a few other quick

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>hitters of a whole bunch of stuff. These are just

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>literally things that I've pondering in the back of my head,

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and I thought I would share them with you. News

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that Roger Stone is who saved Tulsa Gabbard does not.

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say, if you're still deep in the Russia

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:35.879
<v Speaker 1>ties to Trump world story, well, two of the top

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>four or five people that have had some ties to

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that world. Two of them are Tulsa Gabbard and Rogerstone.

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying anything, but it's interesting to me that

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it took Roger Stone to tell Donald Trump not to

0:48:52.680 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fire Tulsa Gabbard. Roger Stone, who was mister wickily, who

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>seemed to know everything that was going on there, you

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>know it, Roger Anyway, put it this way, It's not

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the best look for this administration that somebody with all

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of Roger Stone's interest in questionable and intriguing ties to

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>overseaz oligarchs is the one telling Donald Trump not to

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>get rid of Tulsa Gabbard. All Right, the Wall Street

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Journal pardon story, the sweeping pardons, anybody to in free

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:36.439
<v Speaker 1>from the Oval office. Look, we knew this was likely

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that he would be thinking about this, and I'm sorry.

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>This is why those Joe Biden pardons, preemptive pardons, were

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>such a huge mistake, because it only gives him cover

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to do exactly this is what Trump going to do,

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>worse than what Biden did. Probably, and I know some

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of you are going to what are you both siding this?

0:49:54.920 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Because there is no reward for being less bad. I

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>only robbed half of your house. I didn't rob all

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>of your house. You're still a bat. You're still a robber.

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Be better. This is why this was a mistake. Here's

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 2>the good news.

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I hope this accelerates interest in the constitutional amendment to

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>create a congressional nullification on pardons if we've ever needed

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that in place asap. This story better be the trigger

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 2>And then finally.

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>There were I have to tell you, I want you know,

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>the tech world has a real problem because the most

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.760
<v Speaker 1>prominent people in the tech world.

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 2>They don't actor behave like the rest of us. And

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 2>when you read this.

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh Altmann biograph profile in New Yorker, and when you

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:58.320
<v Speaker 1>read the Lauren Bezos said Chez say Lauren Sanchez Bezos

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:04.760
<v Speaker 1>interview in the New York Times, Man, if you didn't

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>need more evidence that the pitchforks are coming and that

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when the look it's your own behavior and your own

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of borderline sort of compartmentalization of how ridiculous you

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>people look. You super wealthy people look, you power hungry

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>folks look. And then you're going to be angry when

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>government's coming at you. Well, government's made up of the people.

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So when the pitchforks come and you don't like the

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>level of regulation that's coming, Just remember only have yourselves

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>to blay. This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to you by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>bake from frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteasonal pastries,

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options,

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on your belly, little gut health there right, and richer

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts.

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>The Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>their variety box, they have a gluten free box, a

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>vegan box, and a new protein box. I will tell

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you I have done the gluten free box. I have

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:32.840
<v Speaker 1>done it a second time. I have also used the code,

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the todcast code. You use the promo code podcast at checkout,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions.

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 2>I really dig this.

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesian bakery in your

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wild Grain. I obviously highly recommend it. It

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:05.879
<v Speaker 1>is worth giving Wild Grain to try.

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Wildgrain is offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 1>box plus free croissants for life. Come on when you

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>go to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:19.840
<v Speaker 1>subscription today. That's thirty dollars off your first box and

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>free croissants for life when you visit wildgrain dot com

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast, or simply use the promo code Podcast at

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>check out. This is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>use that code.

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Podcast. Time Machine Time. So let me tell you I'm

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 2>not gonna lie to you.

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>This was not the easiest week to decide what was

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>worth your time doing a deep dive on. And I

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>say your time because that's how I try to look

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at these things. What is something that I think? What

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 1>are what's a topic that people you know, they know

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they know something, but they don't really know as much

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about it as they probably should. And that's kind of

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 1>how I try to choose it right in those terms,

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>which I won't go with the most obvious. And this week,

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll be honest, there was just a ton

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of anniversaries that hit this week. In history, I mean,

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:21.719
<v Speaker 1>April nineteenth, seventeen seventy five, the battles of Lexting and Concord, Right,

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that, you know, when protests becomes a revolution April fourteenth,

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:30.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln April nineteenth,

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:33.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety five, the Oklahoma City bombing and domestic terrorism.

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And in culture April fifteenth, nineteen forty seven, Jackie Robinson

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:41.760
<v Speaker 1>steps onto a baseball field for the Brooklyn Dodgers. April sixty,

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:44.479
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three. Michael Jordan steps off the court

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for the very.

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Last time as a Washington Wizard.

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he probably forgot, That's right, he did play for

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Wizards. I've never forgotten it, and I have

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the basketball cards in PSA ten holders to prove it. Okay,

0:54:57.480 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But I define, but I diverge.

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 2>And look.

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And while all of those could easily be worth its

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 1>own dime dive, and we could have tentacles of the impact,

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the long term impacts of all of them. It's a

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>group of exiles on a beach in Cuba that we're

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about to define the limits of American power that I

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:21.680
<v Speaker 1>want to focus on, because there's echoes here for the

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 1>current situation in Iran and of course what could be

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>coming next in Cuba. So let me start with that.

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 2>So we're doing the Bay of Pigs.

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 1>In case you're wondering, and it's the lung shadow of this.

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the invasion, we have to start

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with something a bit uncomfortable. The United States didn't just

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>lose Cuba, it misread it. For years, the US backed

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman by the name of Flujencio Batista until he

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:53.800
<v Speaker 1>became indefensible. So when Fedel Castro takes power in nineteen

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine, Washington doesn't immediately slam the door and working

0:55:57.200 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with Castro.

0:55:59.120 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 2>But it wasn't warmy.

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Castro comes and visits the United States, but Dwight Eisenhower

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>refuses to meet with him.

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:08.359
<v Speaker 2>He goes golfing.

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And Richard Nixon meets with him instead, the Vice president.

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And it tells you everything you need to know. This

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a clean break, but it also wasn't a real opening.

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 1>By the time Washington decides that Castro is a problem,

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the relationship is already slipping away. Now I have my

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>own little interesting history here a little bit. My grandfather

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I stumbled across some things he was building sugarcane help.

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 1>He was an engineer on sugarcane plants that they were

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>building in Cuba in the mid to late fifties. And

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the stories he says is he said he

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>would be visited by Cia folks every once in a

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>while to ask them about Castro because he was in

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the role part. So he met Castro. And in order

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for Castro's rebels to sort of leave your business alone,

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 1>if you agreed to just put a photo up in

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>your sort of trailer off us, if you can think

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about those trailer offices that are parts of these you

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>know sort of you know, his factories are being built,

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 1>right and things like that. And because I remember I

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>found this eight by ten glossy of my grandfather while

0:57:15.719 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we were cleaning some stuff up. Fidel Castro was like, Grandpa,

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what's this and he said it was basically it was

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>basically proof that you that you paid to get left alone.

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But that was the point he would make. He told

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>me that he would make to these CIA sort of

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call them, officers, people that were

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>just trying to find out information.

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 2>What could you tell us about Castro? And he'd say, Hey,

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not a good guy, so be careful.

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But there was a real back and forth. How much

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>should they be they were they were trying to see

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it was it worth sort of wrapping their arms around Castro?

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And it was a constant back and forth at that time.

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's zoom out, okay, because none of this is

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 1>happening in isolation. This is early nineteen sixty one, when

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bay of Pigs itself happens. It's a world that's

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>still rattled by Spotnik and shaped by the fear of

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a missile gap that the new young president John Kennedy

0:58:13.280 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>had run on. So Cold War tensions are super high.

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And just months after the Bay of Pigs August nineteen

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty one, that'd be construction of the actual Berlin Wall begins, right,

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So the Bay of Pigs happens just before that sort

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of iron curtain becomes permanent for a period of time. Ambiguity,

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:40.120
<v Speaker 1>fading sides hardening in Cuba, ninety miles from Florida, is

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>now part of that global equation.

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>One thing that people need to remember about the Bay

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of Pigs invasion is that it wasn't It wasn't Kennedy's plan.

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 1>This plan didn't begin with Kennedy. It begins with Dwight

0:58:55.800 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Eisenhower in March of nineteen sixty he's still president and

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he directs the CIA to develop a plan to remove Castro.

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So by the time John F. Kennedy takes office, this

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is already a presidential approved operation and the CIA, well,

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the CIA of today. This is the CIA

0:59:17.280 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of then, a much different CIA than we had now.

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It's coming off what appears to be a winning streak

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty three Iranian coup, something that the time

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Machine tackled a few weeks ago. Guatemala nineteen fifty four

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was a successful CIA inspired coup. Small operations, weak resistance,

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>quick wins, so it created a bit of a trap.

0:59:42.200 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Success becomes confidence for the CIA. Confidence becomes assumption, and

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>assumption becomes strategy. They think they've seen this before, Well

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't, and they were fighting the last war. So

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy walks in. He's the youngest elected president in American

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>history at the time, forty three, so he's new, he's unproven,

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's under pressure. And this plan, it was already moving.

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>The training camps were already happening, the exiles to participate,

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We're already recruited, the logistics were in place, so the

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>machinery is running. So here's the problem Kennedy's facing. It's

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>easier to approve something already in motion than to stop it.

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>This is what happened to Barack Obama and Bush at

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of his term decided not to approve an

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>increase in troops in Afghanistan and let it. Let it

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be a decision. The new president makes well, he wasn't

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy about it, but what was he going to do

1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stop it? It was too early in his presidency to

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do that.

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So what does he do. He ends up adding more

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>troops to it.

1:00:47.760 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is how a previous president can somehow tie

1:00:50.240 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the hands of an incoming president.

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And we've seen it.

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the This is arguably one of the first

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>times that this happens that you see it become a.

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Problem for that president.

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So it is easier to approve it, that something that's

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>already in motion than to stop it. So he doesn't

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>cancel it, but he does try to shape it, and

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this is where he makes a mistake. The plan depends

1:01:13.040 --> 1:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on air superiority. The CIA uses B twenty six bombers

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>pointed to painted to look like their Castro's plans. The

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>cover story that it's a mutiny, but the strikes on

1:01:25.240 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>April fifteen miss some key targets, Castro's air force survives,

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and the cover collapses. At the United Nations, Adelie Stevenson,

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the second defends the story that he doesn't know is false.

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>When he learns the truth, he's humiliated, and he reportedly

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>considered resigning. That's the cost of plausible deniability.

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>So now Kennedy has a choice, does he escalate or

1:01:49.880 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>pull back?

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, he cancels the second air strike, and that's the

1:01:54.760 --> 1:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>moment the operation dies. Now the entire planted on one

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>assumption that the Cuban people were going to rise up.

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't because by then many of the opponents had

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>already fled. The bombings ended up rallying support for Castro,

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and Castro moved fast. He arrests more than one hundred

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand suspected opponents, dissidence clergy, journalists, CIA networks.

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>He clamps down art.

1:02:26.080 --> 1:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>The invasion doesn't just fail to spark an uprising, it

1:02:28.880 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>does almost the opposite. It helps make one impossible. So

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>April seventeenth, Brigade twenty five oh six Lands includes fourteen

1:02:41.000 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred Cuban EXAs they believe they're going home at the

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Bay of Pigs. Bahia de Cochinos was actually named not

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for pigs, but likely for a local fish kind of

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>called a hogfish that shorthanded Debay of Pigs. History gave

1:02:58.360 --> 1:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it a better name, the Bay of Hogfish. By the way,

1:03:02.880 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bay of Pigs ended up giving me my favorite

1:03:05.440 --> 1:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>laugh line from the nineteen eighties. Being a Green Bay

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Packer fan, the great late Pede Axe Thelm then I

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>write a sportswriter for Newsweek Previews back then when Tampa

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Green Bay meant in football twice a year

1:03:17.440 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because they were both in the NFC Central, he started

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>referring to the matchup as the.

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Bay of Pigs. But I digress.

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So now we're back in nineteen sixty one. Within forty

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>eight hours, by April nineteenth, the mission is over defeated,

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>exiles captured, And it wasn't because of cowardice. It was

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:40.919
<v Speaker 1>because the assumptions were wrong from the start. The aftershocks

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we're still living with them. The consequences don't stop there.

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>The failure ends up strengthening Castro shapes. How Nikita Khrushchev

1:03:47.680 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sees Kennedy, that perception carries forward A year later, Soviet

1:03:52.240 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>missiles in Cuba. They test the young president again. The

1:03:55.480 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>most dangerous moment in the Cold War may not have

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ever happened, the Cuban missile crisis, if not for the

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion. So that was

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the first evidence that the Bay of Pigs didn't stay.

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen sixty one, more than eleven hundred members of

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Brigade twenty five oh six are captured. Eventually they're released

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for fifty three million dollars in food, in medicine.

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But the defining moment came after in Miami, before tens

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of Cuban exiles, Kennedy receives the brigade's flag.

1:04:25.960 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>He's not yet, they're not angry at Kennedy yet, and

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he makes a promise that it will be returned to

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a free Havana.

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>It never has.

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's when failure becomes memory. It got turned into

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a betrayal for Cuban exiles. This wasn't about just the

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>United States. This is about John F. Kennedy the belief.

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>He encouraged it, he launched it, and then he didn't

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>follow through. That's the way the Cuban exile community saw it,

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and that became a political identity, and it would stain

1:04:55.080 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats in the eyes of Cuban exiles for a lifetime. Now,

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it didn't happen right away. Cubans didn't automatically become Republican

1:05:05.760 --> 1:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>right away.

1:05:06.240 --> 1:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>It took time.

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>In the sixties, the Cuban American voters were still split.

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>The memories there, but it's not yet partisan.

1:05:12.960 --> 1:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>That changes.

1:05:13.480 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty Ronald Reagan wins roughly eighty percent of

1:05:16.720 --> 1:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Cuban American vote. He ends up carrying Florida decisively,

1:05:20.000 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as state Jimmy Carter carried in seventy six. He activates

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the identity, and from that point on Florida becomes something different,

1:05:26.120 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not just a southern state, but a Cold War state

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>shaped by exile, anti communism and memory, and that framework

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>expands and later with the waves of immigrants from Venezuela, Nicaragua,

1:05:39.200 --> 1:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>plug into really the same political model. And if you

1:05:43.280 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>want to see the impact, there's probably no better campaign

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>yere than the year two thousand. Florida's decided by five

1:05:50.560 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty seven votes, a state shaped in part

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>by the identity born in nineteen sixty one. So when

1:05:59.600 --> 1:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you think of this week in history, you think about revolutions, assassinations,

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>cultural breakthroughs. Right, the revolutions we just talked about, the

1:06:08.080 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>assassinations Lincoln, the cultural breakthroughs, Jackie Robinson, it was moments

1:06:14.840 --> 1:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>where individuals redefine what's possible. With the Bay of Pigs,

1:06:18.240 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's where a group of exiles revealed the limits of

1:06:20.360 --> 1:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>something else, American power and the power of political memory.

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Because every time a candidate steps onto a stage in

1:06:27.120 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Miami today, they're not just campaigning, they're still walking in

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the shadow.

1:06:33.360 --> 1:06:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Of that beach, the Cochinas, the Bay of Pigs.

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Ass Chuck, All right, it's some ass chuck time, So

1:06:49.320 --> 1:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>let's dig in. First one comes from David S. Colchester, Connecticut,

1:06:52.840 --> 1:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and he writes, Dear Chuck, thanks for the podcast. When

1:06:54.840 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>news breaks far too often these days. I appreciate your

1:06:57.520 --> 1:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>reason perspective.

1:06:58.480 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you.

1:06:58.920 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>My question is, when a US pren't it can launch

1:07:01.240 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>massive military actions that deplete our arsenal and potentially leaving

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our military vulnerable, will Congress realistically vote to prevent rebuilding?

1:07:07.960 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>If not, is the power of the person still a

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>viable check on the executive branch. You know, that's a

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>fair question, David, because I know if I were a

1:07:14.800 --> 1:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress and I didn't approve of this war,

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I probably would feel uncomfortable.

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Not replenishing the stockpiles in the Pentagon.

1:07:24.680 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And so you're absolutely right to sort of, you know,

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I would, you know, I'd like to think i'd be

1:07:30.800 --> 1:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a rational member.

1:07:32.360 --> 1:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it is it is.

1:07:36.800 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>This is I think the the difficulty in using your

1:07:40.880 --> 1:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>vote in Congress as a protest bihicle and it and

1:07:46.480 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it it is a way that sometimes presidents know how

1:07:50.760 --> 1:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to jam Congress with this. But this is a fair

1:07:57.880 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a fair observe there are no

1:08:02.160 --> 1:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>this proves to you there's no good options left on

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this right. Number one, you just you got to you

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta win the argument at the ballot box. Number two, Uh,

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got to figure out how to I think that

1:08:18.640 --> 1:08:22.599
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that even the war powers act as it stands,

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we're still got questions of whether it's constitutional or not

1:08:26.240 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's really not been fully litigated. That even that

1:08:33.520 --> 1:08:37.519
<v Speaker 1>gives too much leeway and takes away so much of

1:08:37.600 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress's authority when it comes to who makes war.

1:08:45.280 --> 1:08:48.879
<v Speaker 2>And this you know when I don't.

1:08:50.760 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>What I don't understand is why there's not even further

1:08:54.120 --> 1:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>attempts to restrict I mean, it goes back to why

1:08:58.120 --> 1:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>did the founder You know, if you if you care

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about founders intent, and there's a lot of my friends

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on the right care about founders intent, well, the founders

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>never you know, the whole point of this is they

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't want you know, they all had memories of what

1:09:11.080 --> 1:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>these monarchs in Europe did. Remember how I view monarchs.

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>They're just dictators with a nicer name. But they made

1:09:20.479 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They would decide willy nilly when to go to war,

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and they would never send their own folks to war.

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>They would send the their populations to war, and you'd

1:09:28.800 --> 1:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have to fight on behalf of some treaty that the

1:09:31.880 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>king or your queen signed with another king or queen,

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that treaty had to do with marriage, and

1:09:37.240 --> 1:09:39.519
<v Speaker 1>maybe that treaty had nothing to do with anything other

1:09:39.600 --> 1:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>than that, and you would end up going to war

1:09:42.400 --> 1:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because you had ties to the right family or wrong family,

1:09:45.479 --> 1:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>depending on the given time. The point is is that

1:09:48.040 --> 1:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the founders did not want an American president to be

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>able to do the same thing, and yet in theory

1:09:53.920 --> 1:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what we already have. So I think there needs

1:09:58.160 --> 1:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to be better clarification here. The War Powers Act doesn't

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>do it. In sixty days is probably too much. It

1:10:06.280 --> 1:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>probably needs to be I think a commander in chief

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to be able to respond in defense of the

1:10:11.400 --> 1:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>United States.

1:10:12.080 --> 1:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Hard stop.

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Was a run at all, in defense of the in

1:10:17.680 --> 1:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the immediate needs to defend the United States and the immediate.

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to come up with evidence that it is,

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:25.439
<v Speaker 2>but look, you.

1:10:27.439 --> 1:10:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Point out a real gap here in that, Yes, Congress

1:10:31.840 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 1>is the power of the purse, but basically they would

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have to they're cutting off their nose despite their faces.

1:10:37.880 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Essentially what you're pointing out if they decide not to

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>replenish our stockpiles, because then we're suddenly more vulnerable, and

1:10:44.800 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 1>that's also bad.

1:10:47.800 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the lose lose question there, David.

1:10:49.680 --> 1:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's an important thing you pointed out, and I'm

1:10:52.479 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>sorry I didn't sooner, So thank you. Zach has the

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:57.719
<v Speaker 1>next question here, Rits. Hey, Chuck, the Zach from Cleveland,

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:01.519
<v Speaker 1>your resident Buckeye. I have a lot of people who

1:11:01.560 --> 1:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>want to claim resident Buck guye act, just.

1:11:03.720 --> 1:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>So you know, but.

1:11:06.960 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you be a resident buck Guy. I'm not

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be like my buddy TK. You know, you

1:11:13.680 --> 1:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have to come up with very specific title names to

1:11:16.760 --> 1:11:18.759
<v Speaker 1>be the to be the resident Maybe you're the resident

1:11:18.760 --> 1:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>buck Guy from Cleveland, names act anyway, But I digress.

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>You believe this is your fourth time getting a question

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>on the show, and if so, congratulations. We will start looking.

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>We gotta we got to find some merch. We're gonna

1:11:34.840 --> 1:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>start working on that. But he said, just a quick

1:11:38.280 --> 1:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>one here for you. Why is the market not really

1:11:40.280 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>reacting to this war? I keep hearing it's probably the

1:11:42.160 --> 1:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>worst ever oil crisis, or it will be, But I

1:11:44.600 --> 1:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>thought the markets would fare worse even though gas is

1:11:46.800 --> 1:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>four dollars. Is because of market manipulations actually starting to

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>correct or is it just too early to tell?

1:11:51.439 --> 1:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Go guards?

1:11:56.600 --> 1:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that the accepted sort of shortening of the Guardian.

1:12:01.560 --> 1:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm I still struggle. I still say the

1:12:05.320 --> 1:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>eye word every once in a while.

1:12:08.640 --> 1:12:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Guards. I think we all agree.

1:12:10.920 --> 1:12:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Guardians, the fact that they're named after bridge statues guarding traffic.

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's a I know it's harder and

1:12:20.560 --> 1:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>harder to copyright nicknames than ever. I mean, trust me,

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I went through the process with my with GW and

1:12:26.040 --> 1:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the Revolutionaries, not exactly, I mean.

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Go REVS. We like that. It's a little close to REVS.

1:12:32.040 --> 1:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if everybody loves that, but you know,

1:12:35.520 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>it's it could have been worse, and I guess that's

1:12:38.560 --> 1:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>probably the way to.

1:12:39.200 --> 1:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Look at the Guardians. It could have been worse.

1:12:42.400 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me do it the question yourself, because I'd like

1:12:44.400 --> 1:12:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to think I dealt with a little bit of monologue.

1:12:45.920 --> 1:12:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I I think that there's I think there's a little

1:12:49.479 --> 1:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of AI. There's still a sort of an the

1:12:52.720 --> 1:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>AI bubble that sort of kept things up.

1:12:56.520 --> 1:12:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:12:56.800 --> 1:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It does take longer for the oil shocks to break

1:12:59.160 --> 1:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>through because a lot more countries have been smarter about

1:13:02.240 --> 1:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>keeping a stockpile and things like that, and there's still

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>some diversification and energy. But I do think, well, you know,

1:13:12.680 --> 1:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the market can make every predictor look like an idiot.

1:13:15.160 --> 1:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm taping this before the market's open this morning,

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but you may be listening to it after the markets.

1:13:21.120 --> 1:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But I have a feeling this is the week that

1:13:22.960 --> 1:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we start to see the to see the real negative

1:13:26.120 --> 1:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>impact start to start to hit. And then you know

1:13:29.280 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get You'll start to get the next

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that next round of quarterly earnings reports that come.

1:13:35.960 --> 1:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>That'll that'll be coming, you know, May and June and

1:13:38.479 --> 1:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all of that. That's you know, that's where you'll start

1:13:41.400 --> 1:13:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to see. I mean that Michigan consumer confidence number lowest

1:13:44.800 --> 1:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ever essentially since they started taking it.

1:13:48.320 --> 1:13:50.439
<v Speaker 2>It's coming. I hate the you know, so just.

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't get rid of the sandbags. You know, you

1:13:59.840 --> 1:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>may think that you know, you've been told to prepare

1:14:02.280 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>for a category five storm.

1:14:03.520 --> 1:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh the storm. Maybe it's not coming. Don't take down

1:14:06.960 --> 1:14:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the sandbags, don't take off the plywood.

1:14:11.160 --> 1:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from John and mil Milwaukee. Hey, you said,

1:14:13.800 --> 1:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrats responding to Republican redistricuting with similar tactics may not

1:14:16.680 --> 1:14:18.479
<v Speaker 1>be the right approach, But is there an argument for

1:14:18.600 --> 1:14:20.599
<v Speaker 1>using every available tool while they still have the power

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to do so more broadly. As political norms continue to

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be tested, do you think Congress will step in to

1:14:25.080 --> 1:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>assert its role as a check or are we moving

1:14:26.840 --> 1:14:29.759
<v Speaker 1>into a period where those guardrails are even weaker For contexts,

1:14:29.760 --> 1:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not coming at this from the far left. I

1:14:31.320 --> 1:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>vote a Republican from seventy six to eight. Just trying

1:14:33.840 --> 1:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand where things stand. John and Milwaukee. Well, can

1:14:37.240 --> 1:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I go back to another point on the redistricting thing.

1:14:41.800 --> 1:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that you have.

1:14:45.200 --> 1:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>A better mandate if you win, if you win space

1:14:53.080 --> 1:14:56.719
<v Speaker 1>with fair maps, if you have to rig the maps

1:14:56.760 --> 1:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to get control of Congress, is it going to be

1:14:58.640 --> 1:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a majority that is taped it that that is that

1:15:02.920 --> 1:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>has I mean, I think it has legitimacy in the

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes of the public. That's what I would fear, and

1:15:12.120 --> 1:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that should be a fear. And I go back, Look,

1:15:15.600 --> 1:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I get I'm specifically I specifically focus on this Virginia thing,

1:15:22.400 --> 1:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously because I live here. But it's it's a lot

1:15:26.040 --> 1:15:29.519
<v Speaker 1>of it's a lot of effort, it's a lot of

1:15:29.560 --> 1:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>political capital being spent for two districts. And if two

1:15:33.320 --> 1:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>districts are the difference between winning power and losing power,

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to have it is literally control the

1:15:38.040 --> 1:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>name only so you know it's it's a It's one

1:15:49.200 --> 1:15:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of those things that I just think if you're looking

1:15:52.920 --> 1:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to rep do you want to be the party that

1:15:54.920 --> 1:15:58.799
<v Speaker 1>can repair things or not? And if you're also if

1:15:59.160 --> 1:16:02.799
<v Speaker 1>it's all reaction, I just I don't think the public

1:16:02.960 --> 1:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to fully embrace that either. I understand that

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you got to look it's it's I think the real

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>lesson here is used power better when you have it right.

1:16:18.560 --> 1:16:21.559
<v Speaker 1>And Democrats have watched it the last couple of times

1:16:21.560 --> 1:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they've had it. I can't botch it this next time

1:16:25.520 --> 1:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they have when they get all three or it's just

1:16:31.840 --> 1:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>impossible to ever succeed when you have all three. It's

1:16:36.280 --> 1:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>not like any party can hold it for more than

1:16:38.439 --> 1:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>two years. The question is what do you get done

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>into you turn the corner? And I think sometimes we

1:16:45.800 --> 1:16:48.439
<v Speaker 1>look at and I think it's fair. I think some

1:16:49.080 --> 1:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>on the left look at the election of Trump and

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and think, well, it turns out Obama should have

1:16:53.720 --> 1:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>done more, should have pushed harder. It wouldn't have mattered

1:16:55.800 --> 1:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>if Trump was coming anyway, What would you have done

1:16:58.040 --> 1:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>if you knew that?

1:16:58.920 --> 1:16:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:17:01.240 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that that's going to be that's going

1:17:03.280 --> 1:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the arguments. But as for Congress,

1:17:07.120 --> 1:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a I think that's a guardrail. I

1:17:10.960 --> 1:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's so weak that it can't get weaker that

1:17:13.400 --> 1:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think you're going to have more and more

1:17:15.280 --> 1:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress getting elected hoping to stop imperial presidencies.

1:17:19.800 --> 1:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm maybe I'm being pollyannish here, but I you know.

1:17:25.840 --> 1:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>It is.

1:17:27.680 --> 1:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>We have we have when you go through as many,

1:17:30.439 --> 1:17:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the more one term presidents we have, the more we're

1:17:32.600 --> 1:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>going to look to strengthen the other elected institution, the

1:17:35.560 --> 1:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>legislative branch.

1:17:37.080 --> 1:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think that.

1:17:39.760 --> 1:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Even though the presidency keeps getting strengthened, one term presidencies

1:17:43.439 --> 1:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>or a sign of weakness of the president, so in theory,

1:17:46.160 --> 1:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Congress should have should be able to accumulate.

1:17:48.080 --> 1:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Its power back.

1:17:51.080 --> 1:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have a good I'm going to answer

1:17:52.840 --> 1:17:54.559
<v Speaker 1>for you, because I get it you have one side

1:17:54.560 --> 1:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that's willing to cheat. I just don't think and break

1:17:57.600 --> 1:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>norms and rules and all those things. And I just

1:18:00.560 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I believe that that the elections that the

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have succeeded in are because they've made the case

1:18:07.600 --> 1:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to this group of voters in the middle. They're not

1:18:09.920 --> 1:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in the middle because of they're ideologically. They're in the

1:18:12.160 --> 1:18:15.519
<v Speaker 1>middle because they should. They don't expect to get one

1:18:15.600 --> 1:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of what of everything. They understand that this

1:18:18.880 --> 1:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a compromise system, and they don't like the

1:18:23.800 --> 1:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>hardcore partisanship, and they keep voting against any party that

1:18:27.680 --> 1:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>behaves too partisanally. And there's a difference between partisanship and ideology,

1:18:34.280 --> 1:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>right you you know, Bertie Sanders is a good example

1:18:37.520 --> 1:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of this. He's super progressive, but he wasn't so progressive

1:18:41.120 --> 1:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that he said no to the to basically the Mitt

1:18:43.920 --> 1:18:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Romney Obama version of how you do healthcare. He doesn't

1:18:47.640 --> 1:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>believe in it, he doesn't think it's good. But he

1:18:50.479 --> 1:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't let the enemy the perfect be the enemy of

1:18:53.120 --> 1:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>an improvement. And that was what our founders. Look You

1:18:56.840 --> 1:19:00.519
<v Speaker 1>can come from far left to far right, but if

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you incrementally feel as if you're making incremental progress, do

1:19:04.120 --> 1:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you just stand on ceremony or do you try to

1:19:05.840 --> 1:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>help the majority function?

1:19:09.840 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's.

1:19:12.520 --> 1:19:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that's Democrats have had more success winning over

1:19:15.680 --> 1:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that voter because the Republicans have been behaving so parsonally

1:19:20.400 --> 1:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and when Democrats start behaving the same way as they

1:19:24.880 --> 1:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>did during the first two years of Biden's presidency, it's

1:19:28.080 --> 1:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>why there was such a revolt by the same group

1:19:31.040 --> 1:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of voters the other way. It's not that they liked

1:19:34.200 --> 1:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the policies of the right, they didn't like the hardcore

1:19:37.080 --> 1:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>partisanship on either side. Next one comes from Jane New York.

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He says, check love your weekly top five lists, especially

1:19:45.200 --> 1:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>when you revisit the year's most flippable Senate races. But

1:19:47.560 --> 1:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm beginning to wonder whether the top five might soon

1:19:50.000 --> 1:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be sentenced. Tone I am too, and am therefore more

1:19:53.080 --> 1:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>curious about the races that would make up slots six

1:19:55.200 --> 1:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>through ten. I like where you're thinking, and let's just

1:19:59.320 --> 1:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>say this is an idea that I might put into

1:20:01.080 --> 1:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>practice sooner than I realized. Anyway, if you were going

1:20:03.520 --> 1:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to compile a six through ten lists today, would you

1:20:05.840 --> 1:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be more inclined to include Democratic health seats like Georgia,

1:20:08.200 --> 1:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire and Michigan, Or might you be more inclined

1:20:10.680 --> 1:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to include Republican health seats like Texas, Iowa, and Florida.

1:20:13.800 --> 1:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>My opinion six or ten is where we will have

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>see the Senate mapp changing the most in real time.

1:20:18.200 --> 1:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That's an excellent observation, and I think you're right right.

1:20:24.800 --> 1:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think right now both Georgia and New Hampshire they're

1:20:27.320 --> 1:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>not in the in, you know, and there's no way

1:20:32.400 --> 1:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I would have them outside the top ten. I'm not

1:20:35.360 --> 1:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a If you know a race is going to be

1:20:36.840 --> 1:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>decided by less than ten points, it's probably in the

1:20:39.080 --> 1:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>top ten. Right when I start thinking about the less

1:20:41.240 --> 1:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>than ten point center races.

1:20:45.439 --> 1:20:49.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, by the way, I'm not one.

1:20:49.920 --> 1:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Hundred percent sure North Carolina stays single digits anymore. I

1:20:53.800 --> 1:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>think Cooper's got that big of the lead. I mean, look,

1:20:55.960 --> 1:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Waltley will spend money, and one will assume the partisan stuff.

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>This war keeps going as badly as it does, I

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>could easily see a Bob Casey like, not quite the

1:21:07.600 --> 1:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Bob Casey size of victory over Rick, a citting senator

1:21:10.640 --> 1:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in Rick Saintrum, but I could see I could see

1:21:13.040 --> 1:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a fifty six forty four race there. But going down

1:21:17.840 --> 1:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the Senate map sort of in order

1:21:19.880 --> 1:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>right now where my head is at right, the next

1:21:22.160 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one that's most likely to flip would be Maine. Right,

1:21:25.080 --> 1:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's too The next one for me is probably Ohio.

1:21:28.240 --> 1:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that's three. The next one after that, I would

1:21:30.280 --> 1:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and put Alaska at four, and then you know,

1:21:34.479 --> 1:21:36.599
<v Speaker 1>right then you then you sit there is at Michigan

1:21:36.680 --> 1:21:39.479
<v Speaker 1>because the Democratic primary is still so unstable or is

1:21:39.520 --> 1:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it Texas or the Republican primary is still unstable?

1:21:42.720 --> 1:21:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:21:43.320 --> 1:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would say if corn and wins, I

1:21:45.960 --> 1:21:50.559
<v Speaker 1>put Michigan there if but if si Ed else, I'll

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>do all si Ed wins, then I might put Michigan

1:21:52.960 --> 1:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>there too, right, so you have that. I'm not I

1:21:57.760 --> 1:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think Miss I am surprised. I did how little

1:22:01.400 --> 1:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>national the Washington Republicans are viewing, how little they're They're

1:22:07.720 --> 1:22:09.839
<v Speaker 1>spending more time in New Hampshire than they are Minnesota,

1:22:09.840 --> 1:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's just a mistake. I think they

1:22:12.040 --> 1:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have a better shot at flipping Minnesota than do New Hampshire.

1:22:15.160 --> 1:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Pappas. I think, especially if a more progressive

1:22:19.160 --> 1:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor who you know, the lieutenant governor, the Tim Walls,

1:22:23.600 --> 1:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>who's not very popular in Minnesota right now, and that's

1:22:26.720 --> 1:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>who Peggy Flana again, maybe I think Michelle Tafoya, Peggy Flanagan.

1:22:30.680 --> 1:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Republicans are a better shot of Tafoya upsetting

1:22:33.479 --> 1:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>flannagain than so New New upsetting.

1:22:37.560 --> 1:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Papas.

1:22:40.160 --> 1:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But I get that New Hampshire on a partisan scale

1:22:44.360 --> 1:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>looks slightly more, you know, has a higher floor for

1:22:49.240 --> 1:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and Minnesota does. But either way, I expect those

1:22:54.040 --> 1:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to be single digit raceist so they sit out there.

1:22:56.680 --> 1:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I do think Minnesota is the sort of

1:23:00.200 --> 1:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in any other year would probably be getting a little

1:23:02.160 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>more attention. But I am surprised and clobsh Are will

1:23:06.080 --> 1:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>probably guarantees that she'll cary everybody over the finish line

1:23:08.720 --> 1:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on the DEMB side. And then may be why they

1:23:12.040 --> 1:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>look and would rather have New Hampshire because you have

1:23:14.520 --> 1:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a Republican incumbent that's likely to win reelection in Kelly Ay.

1:23:18.200 --> 1:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Who remember in New Hampshire they run every two years,

1:23:20.560 --> 1:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and she'll be the top.

1:23:21.320 --> 1:23:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Of the ticket.

1:23:24.520 --> 1:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But you start looking around, right, Iowa looks like it's

1:23:26.680 --> 1:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a single digit race. Hey what about

1:23:30.240 --> 1:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Eugene Vinman down in Florida, Right, He's raised a ton

1:23:33.800 --> 1:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of money. I'm a bit skeptical, but could I see

1:23:39.000 --> 1:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>it become a single digit race?

1:23:40.560 --> 1:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I could. There's Nebraska, which looks like it's definitely.

1:23:47.040 --> 1:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more likely to be five points or

1:23:48.840 --> 1:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>less no matter what they're so, and we haven't gotten

1:23:51.680 --> 1:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to Kansas. We haven't seen that race mature yet. There's Montana.

1:23:56.760 --> 1:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So to sort of get at the heart of your question,

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you have made six through ten. That's a lot of

1:24:04.800 --> 1:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fun and I'm going to have to really sort of

1:24:08.560 --> 1:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't just spitball it because I sit here and

1:24:10.439 --> 1:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, you know, we got and some of

1:24:12.800 --> 1:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>this is still undeveloped, right, I want to see where

1:24:14.640 --> 1:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>it can. I still feel like we're not done yet

1:24:16.520 --> 1:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with Kansas, so we get there. But what a great

1:24:20.439 --> 1:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>idea and look for it, you know, sort of how

1:24:25.280 --> 1:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do we say that?

1:24:26.280 --> 1:24:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And for this week's top five, it's the next five?

1:24:29.160 --> 1:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Lauren and I will work on that,

1:24:31.840 --> 1:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>coming up with something for that, but it's a good idea.

1:24:34.080 --> 1:24:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Troy. He says, here's my idea

1:24:36.520 --> 1:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for the NBA. Eliminate conferences and divisions, move to a

1:24:39.320 --> 1:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>shorter home and away schedule, Take the top sixteen teams

1:24:42.040 --> 1:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for the playoffs, regardless of location. To make up for

1:24:44.680 --> 1:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>fewer games at a preseason single elimination tournament with semifinals

1:24:47.920 --> 1:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on Christmas to drive fan interest in revenue. It could

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>also create multiple championship opportunities each season tournament regular season playoffs, Troy,

1:24:54.920 --> 1:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like the Champions League a little bit in

1:24:58.000 --> 1:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe and all the very Suropean leagues. Look, this isn't

1:25:01.800 --> 1:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't I like what you're what you're thinking. The reason,

1:25:06.560 --> 1:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the biggest impediment in his owners make owners

1:25:11.160 --> 1:25:13.799
<v Speaker 1>get to pocket the money that takes place in their arenas.

1:25:13.840 --> 1:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So taking away opportunities in their own arenas is just

1:25:17.360 --> 1:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not on the table. So we all know they probably

1:25:19.200 --> 1:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>should shrink the regular season schedule, but they won't. And

1:25:23.080 --> 1:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're right to find other ways to replace it.

1:25:25.560 --> 1:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it tournaments? Maybe that doesn't. But you know, I

1:25:28.520 --> 1:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about something else about the NBA, and I

1:25:30.880 --> 1:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, you know, I was watching Jen Ram play

1:25:39.880 --> 1:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Masters, and I was like, he doesn't have

1:25:41.840 --> 1:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance. But you know, every everything he moves up right,

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there's other things you play for in the Masters. If

1:25:48.960 --> 1:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you win, you get into the certain I think if

1:25:51.840 --> 1:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's if you're in the top twenty, you automatically get

1:25:53.880 --> 1:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>an invite the next year. I think then there's certainly

1:25:57.400 --> 1:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you get there's different financial rewards depending on the place

1:26:01.479 --> 1:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you finish, And so it got me thinking, is there

1:26:04.000 --> 1:26:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a way to create a financial reward for players based

1:26:07.800 --> 1:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on their regular season? You know that that essentially, just

1:26:12.080 --> 1:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like with golf, if you finish thirty fifth, you make

1:26:15.080 --> 1:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more money than if you finish thirty six. So there's,

1:26:17.479 --> 1:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in theory, an incentive to keep playing hard. So if

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there is more money on the table, more bonus money,

1:26:24.920 --> 1:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>more this money, more that money, maybe it's maybe it's

1:26:27.760 --> 1:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the playoff TV revenue that players get, you know, maybe

1:26:31.320 --> 1:26:34.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a pool of it that all players get to

1:26:34.840 --> 1:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>get some of it depending on where their team finishes

1:26:40.439 --> 1:26:45.519
<v Speaker 1>in the overall standings of the league. But for if

1:26:45.560 --> 1:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you if you you know right now, it's the franchises

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that I've on the incentive and the players have no

1:26:49.960 --> 1:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game, right if they're you know, the

1:26:52.640 --> 1:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>players play hard, I've I don't. I don't sit here

1:26:55.880 --> 1:26:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and say the players aren't playing hard. They all are

1:26:57.560 --> 1:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>playing hard. It is the coaches being ordered by the

1:27:00.800 --> 1:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>GMS and the and the and the team presidents to

1:27:03.720 --> 1:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>not play certain players to keep them out, you know,

1:27:06.800 --> 1:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to bench them in the fourth quarter. Players would fight

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and push back harder if there were financial penalties for

1:27:14.479 --> 1:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>losing a more likely to lose a game. So you know,

1:27:18.560 --> 1:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is there something to borrow from golf that keeps people

1:27:22.120 --> 1:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>playing competitively even when.

1:27:23.800 --> 1:27:27.439
<v Speaker 2>They have no shot at winning the tournament? Just something

1:27:27.479 --> 1:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>to think about.

1:27:28.080 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But look, there's a million ideas to fix this. Hey,

1:27:31.400 --> 1:27:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Adam Silver, just pick.

1:27:32.400 --> 1:27:34.719
<v Speaker 2>One and do it. Thank you, buddy.

1:27:36.520 --> 1:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Last question, I love this. I'm going to call you

1:27:40.080 --> 1:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>John from Cincinnati because of the damn HBO show.

1:27:43.720 --> 1:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you don't like that. Maybe you do. Let

1:27:46.320 --> 1:27:46.519
<v Speaker 2>me know.

1:27:46.880 --> 1:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm still waiting for I didn't get

1:27:53.080 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>my lyrics. We didn't start the fire lyrics. One of

1:27:55.400 --> 1:27:57.479
<v Speaker 1>you still owes me we didn't. You're updated. We didn't

1:27:57.479 --> 1:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>start the fire lyrics. And I away that and so

1:28:01.000 --> 1:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>many people await that because they would like me to

1:28:02.840 --> 1:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>carry ok it. But anyway, last question, John from Cincinnati,

1:28:07.040 --> 1:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and he writes, I haven't heard of a single report

1:28:09.000 --> 1:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump going to Camp David in his second term.

1:28:11.840 --> 1:28:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Does anyone use it?

1:28:12.800 --> 1:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Since he doesn't, isn't loaned out to political donors or

1:28:15.640 --> 1:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly misused. I was never a big fan of the

1:28:17.800 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln Bedroom being used that way by presidents of any party.

1:28:20.280 --> 1:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to your show for about three months

1:28:22.080 --> 1:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and really enjoy it. Thanks and go Buck Guys and

1:28:24.080 --> 1:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Reds John in Cincinnati.

1:28:27.200 --> 1:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question.

1:28:28.400 --> 1:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, Look, we know why Trump doesn't like it.

1:28:31.479 --> 1:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>He likes the golf right, and he likes his set

1:28:36.120 --> 1:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>up any and he's actually not an introvert like Camp

1:28:39.160 --> 1:28:42.439
<v Speaker 1>David is for the president's you know, he's one of

1:28:42.479 --> 1:28:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the few people, you know, most celebrities I've ever gotten

1:28:45.600 --> 1:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to know, the last thing they want to do is

1:28:47.960 --> 1:28:49.599
<v Speaker 1>to be in public.

1:28:49.720 --> 1:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>That's not Donald Trump.

1:28:51.600 --> 1:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He loves to be around people. I've got my own theories.

1:28:57.160 --> 1:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a lot of personal friends, so there's

1:28:59.560 --> 1:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not really a group of people he wants to hang

1:29:01.240 --> 1:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>out with he doesn't have And if you don't have

1:29:03.640 --> 1:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>close friendships, a retreat like Camp David doesn't work for you, right,

1:29:08.240 --> 1:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, it's so funny about it. Presidents.

1:29:13.439 --> 1:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a good thing for a president to have,

1:29:17.400 --> 1:29:21.479
<v Speaker 1>but it is. I think what's made it less popular

1:29:21.600 --> 1:29:23.639
<v Speaker 1>with some presidents is the lack of a golf course

1:29:23.720 --> 1:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to be fully transparent, like Obama just would go to

1:29:28.800 --> 1:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>golf every weekend and Andrew's and then go back to

1:29:32.080 --> 1:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the White House. He's used Camp David a little, but

1:29:35.680 --> 1:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he didn't love it per se either. Look, it's on

1:29:38.760 --> 1:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>my bucket list of things that I've never gotten to

1:29:41.160 --> 1:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>see that I'd still like to see. So if there's

1:29:43.200 --> 1:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>any president that would like to invite me to use

1:29:45.400 --> 1:29:48.599
<v Speaker 1>Camp David, here's my pledge to you. If I ever

1:29:48.680 --> 1:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>get access to Camp David, John, I will try to

1:29:52.200 --> 1:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get you there and invite you as well as my

1:29:55.120 --> 1:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>plus one if that's possible. Don't tell missus Todd Knight,

1:29:59.200 --> 1:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but I got to get some other people in here.

1:30:01.800 --> 1:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It is one of these, like I've heard stories, I've

1:30:06.320 --> 1:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>had people tell me what it's like, right, but it is.

1:30:08.680 --> 1:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It is one of the few things we've seen no

1:30:10.880 --> 1:30:14.479
<v Speaker 1>pictures of, and perhaps those that run Camp David that

1:30:14.520 --> 1:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want people to know what it looks like, or

1:30:16.320 --> 1:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>glad Trump hasn't come, because the more Trump goes, the

1:30:20.880 --> 1:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>more likely it will come out. So you're right, I'm

1:30:23.800 --> 1:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>sure there are people using it that we don't know about,

1:30:28.479 --> 1:30:31.919
<v Speaker 1>but on the list of outrages to cover, it's probably

1:30:32.080 --> 1:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty seventh or fifty eighth on the list these days.

1:30:35.760 --> 1:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, with that, we're going to take my forty

1:30:39.760 --> 1:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>eight hour break. Unless you know, news happens and we

1:30:43.439 --> 1:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>insert something in there. I always reserve the right to

1:30:45.800 --> 1:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>see you on YouTube. I had a few things that

1:30:48.120 --> 1:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I did over the weekend that I want to tell

1:30:49.720 --> 1:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you more about, and I'm going to save it for

1:30:51.080 --> 1:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday's episode, including fascinating debate that I'm moderated between Chris

1:30:55.800 --> 1:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Christy and David French about sports gambling. We actually came

1:30:59.880 --> 1:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up with a potential compromise. I will share with it

1:31:02.560 --> 1:31:04.519
<v Speaker 1>with you on Wednesday. If you want to go take

1:31:04.520 --> 1:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a look at the debate, it's on YouTube under the

1:31:07.000 --> 1:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>University of Chicago. They hosted it and sponsored it. And

1:31:10.080 --> 1:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on Friday at the Illinois Local New Summer, Marada moderated

1:31:14.040 --> 1:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a panel of what I referred to as the venture

1:31:16.439 --> 1:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>capitalists of local news, the philanthropic organizations that have been

1:31:20.920 --> 1:31:24.519
<v Speaker 1>trying to fill the gap here. John Palfrey, who's president

1:31:24.640 --> 1:31:28.559
<v Speaker 1>MacArthur Foundation, Maybel Perez Wadsworth, whose presidency of the Knight Foundation,

1:31:29.320 --> 1:31:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and Julie Morita, who's presidency of the Joyce Foundation, which

1:31:32.760 --> 1:31:35.599
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more regional in the Chicago area

1:31:35.680 --> 1:31:38.519
<v Speaker 1>for the Great Lakes region, but all of them have

1:31:38.680 --> 1:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>been investing in trying to help local news startups get

1:31:42.360 --> 1:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. And yeah, I call them vcs because

1:31:46.200 --> 1:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they really are, except they're not trying to They don't

1:31:50.200 --> 1:31:52.599
<v Speaker 1>try to get their money back once they give the money,

1:31:53.400 --> 1:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but they are trying to be smart about putting money

1:31:56.240 --> 1:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in places that can be used to grow an organization

1:32:00.240 --> 1:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that can eventually be self sustaining, and that is I

1:32:03.320 --> 1:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>think the real challenge there. So a few things I

1:32:06.680 --> 1:32:08.519
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share with you on both of those topics,

1:32:08.760 --> 1:32:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and because I've.

1:32:09.479 --> 1:32:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Gone long here, we will share that with you on Wednesday.

1:32:13.160 --> 1:32:15.120
<v Speaker 2>So with that, I'll see in Porty. It outs