WEBVTT - Week 6 Waiver Wire, Adds, Drops, Holds

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences. Listen,

0:00:36.880 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>don yea, welcome your fie Babe from Man by God,

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Rob Say Francis Frantic. Standall ladies and gentlemen, your pffs,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wait that we will get you inside Studio thirty four.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This easy the BFFs His Frank Staffle. I am Greg

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>saucepan e Wise on a plane home from Bakersfield, California.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>What's happening, Frankie, Greggy? Very eventful Monday night football game

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>last night, which I'm not sure how much you actually

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>watched of or how much anybody actually watched it, because dude,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I watched none of it. There wasn't really much going

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on in that game outside of a ton of running

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>back production for the San Francisco forty Niners. It was

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a complete beat down, but our Yankees got the Bruins

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>baby sweep. There there was a lot going on last night,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just from a sports perspective. You had Zion's debut, NBA

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>preseason basketball, MLB playoffs actually a terrible football game. There's

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on last night. I'd just sleep not

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>long enough. I went to bed late last night. I

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>stayed up to watch the Yankees, and I I was

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I just wasn't gonna go to bad. I mean, it's like,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the playoffs, and this is when you stay off

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously for these games. And not that I kill announcers

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>often because it's like that's not worth it. John Smalls

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>was like brutal last night. Man, Like even like Alan

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Han was tweeting about it, and he was just like,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't get what this like, people like um Neil

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Keith and and Costos tweet about like, oh announced just

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>being a homer. But like John Smoltz got so annoyed

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>anytime the Egkees like did anything, oh man, things going

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eggies away again, Like wow, what are you talking about?

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>The old objective broadcasting it was. It was weird. It

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>was like this interesting. I did not like the announcer

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at all last night. I did like the outcome, though

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you knew Chapman and making interesting in the ninth because

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he is what he does. Becauabra Torres has lost into

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a star obviously before our eyes. And it's awesome. Man. Yeah,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he's move on. Hopefully Tampa Bay will get a win tonight.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go raise so if nothing else, Garrett Cole will

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>have to pitch on Thur's night. It should be awesome.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>What does this? What does the series start Saturday? By Saturday,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>which means Verlander would probably still be good to go

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>because he's pitching tonight, so three days will be three

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>days rast on Saturday. Yeah, I'd probably go grinky. They

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>probably go Grinky in Game one, Verlander in Game two.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>That's probably fine. Greggy didn't look great against Tampa Bay race.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>He's obviously have everybody lined up to go in as

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>as they want. Who knows what could happen. Carl Stone

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>stinks by the way, He's been so bad. He's bad played,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>he's bad in the field. What is his US? Put

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Mayban out there? He hit a run that had

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>uh the average I mean do more. He makes more

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>happy average balls like one eight, and he he can

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>steal basic at least he can play the field adequately enough.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Labor Man with the with the glove, DJ with the

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>glove last night, I judge with the glove last night.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Defense was phenomenal this year series long, everybot push the

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>right buttons, which is kind of crazy. I feel like

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to stop talking about baseball. I don't have

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to do anything we want. We do whatever we want. Um.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought like, though, it was nuts that he took

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>out of you after one batter. I thought out of

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you knows that I like murder him. That's not the

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>first time he's done that this series. No, it's not.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It was equally crazy the first time too. Is he

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>taking a page out of Joe Girardi's book? Huh, Finder,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>here's a problem. And any of the other relievers got bombed.

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>He was screwed. He didn't know when he left. And

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>cecilies are good lions left love those guys that less

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>off to the next series then Eric, Yeah, he's going

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>because of that. I really didn't watch anyone that night football,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and I got a text at mab Brito on that

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>bread is eighty three yard run. So and then I

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>turned to it, so, I mean his first runt of

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the games, and I saw Baker maybe'll get sacked a

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of times and were back the Yankees and the

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>board Niners of a million points. He's like, all right,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>don't watch this. Yeah, the Browns are a complete disaster

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. Outside of Nick Chubb, who still managed to

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>run for over five yards per carry against a very

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>good San Francisco forty Niners defense, Baker Mayfield, under pressure

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>all night long, was sacked four times. Joey Bosa all

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>up in his face. Biker loved the trash talk from

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Joey Bosa as well. But ultimately, this Brown's offense is

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>broken right now. Offensive line is not good, can't get

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the ball in the hands of his playmakers. Odell Beckham

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>another dud, two receptions twenty seven yards. Jarvis Landry really

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the only person who showed up in the past game

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>four catches for seventy five yards. But this Browns team

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is in disarray right now. Freddie Kitchens, man, you gotta

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>swallow your pride. You gotta handover play calling duties to

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Todd Monkein. Monka did a great job last year with

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Bucks. You know, with a team that

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really not all that talented either. You know,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he got the most out of Jameis Winston. That offensive

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>line for Tampa Bay was not a great one last

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>year either, but they can pass the freaking ball last year,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think the only chance that this

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Brown's offense has to kind of meet their potential is

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>turned the play calling duties over to Todd Monket. But frankly,

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that. I don't think that Freddy

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Kitchens is gonna be able to swallow his pride and

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>make that happen on the other side of the ball.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about this downstairs with a couple of guys.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>The San Francisco forty Niners actually have a recipe for

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>success right now. If you look at this team, their

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive line has played amazing so far this year. Entering

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this game, they were number one in of Football Outsiders

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>run blocking Analytical tools, which means, you know, obviously they

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>showed that off last night. Matt Brina Levin carries a

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred fourteen yards a touchdown. Tevin Coleman first game back,

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>throw this guy right back in the mix. Sixteen carries

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>nineties seven yards and another touchdown there as well. Matt

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Brina added a receiving touchdown. This team can run the football.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>They have a really strong defensive line, they're strong against

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the run. Their secondary, I think it's solid. They have

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that veteran anchor in Richard Sherman as well. This San

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niners team is a really, really dangerous team.

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And you have a quarterback that I believe can make

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>plays when asked to do so in Jimmy Garoppolo. You know,

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's not, you know, one of the best in

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the league. Sorry, venture I know you're downstairs, Gucci Garoppolo enough,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think that he can make enough plays where

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they need him to actually make a play.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not just one of these smash mouth football teams

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Jets, for example, from ten years ago, where

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know they needed Santis to make plays and ultimately

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't do it. There is a team that can

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>run the football, they can play good defense, and Jimmy

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo is an adequate, adequate quarterback, so very dangerous San

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niner team. Cleveland Browns gotta try and figure

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this out this weekend forty Niners and Los Angeles Rams. Good.

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.119
<v Speaker 1>We'll see that Cleveland Browns can get back on track.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break here. When do we come back?

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll dive into this week's waiver wire. It's fantasy BFFs

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>here on sports Trading. Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>premier advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot Com optimized

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, building optimized line up for cast games and

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.119
<v Speaker 1>turneys learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com. All right, Bay, let's jump into this

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>week's waiver wire. As we said yesterday, pretty barn, pretty

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>baron in general, Well, I guess before I do, I

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>do want to, you gotta do it a little bit.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Just a few moments ago he spent on Baker of

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>course in Cleveland, but San Francisco's running game. Just for

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a few moments here there was a four headed backfield

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that last night was three with Jeff Wilson Jr. Despite

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>being a fantastic goal line presence inactive last night. The

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>going into the game, the over under for yards for

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>each running back was like fifty, like forty five for Brita,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty five or Coleman for Moster. All three went over. Obviously,

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>most of Brida's yardage comes on that long run. How

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>do you see this backup playing out going forward? I

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think that Matt, Brita and Tevin Coleman are probably gonna

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>combine for eighty percent of their production, and then Raheem

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Moster will get mixed in a little bit. Maybe just

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>give these guys a break, maybe give him a series

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>here or there. But I do think that we're looking at,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably a pretty even split between Brita and Coleman.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Um let's say twelve to fourteen touches per game, and

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>then maybe a few mix in there for Rheemoster. I

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this out last night. Drink their usage from this game.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brida lad the team with twenty six snaps, eleven carries,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>had three or set fourteen total touches, obviously had the

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>two total touchdowns as well. Tevin Coleman snaps so just

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>one less snap than Brita had sixteen carries, so actually

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>touched the ball more than Matt Brita ninety seven yards

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown where he most are played seventeen offensive snaps,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so a little bit more than I probably would expect

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. But he only had seven carries for thirty

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>four yards. So I think we're looking at most of

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the time it's gonna be Brita and Coleman with you know,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe when these guys need a break, he moster is

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>mixing there. I think most are can probably be dropped

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in mostly. Was there any rhyme or reason to how

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>they deployed Britta and Coleman, Not that I saw, I

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>might have just it might have just been a drive,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, one drive for this guy, one drive for

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the other guy. I still feel like Coleman was used

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>more in the red zone, um, but I would have

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to I don't know if the red zone numbers from

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday came out yet for San Francisco, but it seemed

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to me like Keevin Coleman was used more in the

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>red zone, which is more of that Jeff Wilson role. Uh.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>And then Matt Brita did line up, you know on

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that receiving touchdown, which was inside the red zone, but

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>ultimately he ran a route out of the back he

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in there and run the football. Uh So maybe

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>they do view him as a better pass catcher of

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the two. Uh So, Ultimately it was on a third

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>down play and he caught it, receiving touchdown. Um. But

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's gonna be pretty even. Maybe Tevin Coleman,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>because he's the bigger body, gets more work in the

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>red zone. All right, So Tevin Coleman arrow probably pointing off,

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you have to choose one guy going forward? Would you

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>rather have Tevin Coleman? M I would take and that's

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a close one. I would go with Tevin Coleman. I'll

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>take Tevin Coleman because that offensive line of San Francisco

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is just much better than where the Los Angeles Chargers

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are at. The Charges have dealt with all offensive line issues. UM,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>injuries to their offensive line as well. Uh They've dealt

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with injuries everywhere. But ultimately, I think that once Melvin

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Gordon starts to get going, while Eckler is going to

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>see some work in the past game, he only had

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>what three carries this week, you know, and that's only

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>with Melvin Gordon's first game back. Uh, Tevin Coleman here,

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's gonna be in the mix for

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve to fifteen touch super game behind one

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of the best run blocking offensive lines in the NFL

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on a team that wants to run the football as well.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's close, but I'll take Tivin Coleman. I think Coleman, Brita,

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and Austin Ekela are all in that mixes like low

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>end RB two's high end flex options. Okay, so there

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you go. That's what you're looking at, a high end

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>flex option, a r B two. Let's look at some

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the waiver wire, Frank for some other

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>high end flex or widers or RB two's. Are there

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>any out there this week? Yeah, I mean, hold your nose.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not a great list, but ultimately, looking at Adrian

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Peterson and Kenyan Drake, it is disgusting. It is very

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bad out here. I've seen other people tweeting about this

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, how bad the waiver wire is this week.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to running backs. There's a few other

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>names that all mentioned, but ultimately we avoided big injuries

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this week outside of Wayne Gallman. Uh we don't know.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like he's gonna be good to play.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously he's in concussion protocol. Tay Kwon Barkley, it doesn't

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>look like he's gonna play either, So shout out to you, Greggy.

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You were right about that all long. You expected him

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to be back in week seven. He has ample amount

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of time to get ready. Uh and in a game

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>where they are nearly seventeen point underdogs. I don't know

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that it makes sense to russ a Kwon Barkley out there.

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we're not dealing with a lot of injuries,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>so we have to look at players who have really

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>good matchups who might be available on the waiver wire.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And yes, it is disgusting Adrian Peterson going up against

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins with their new interim head coach taking

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>over Bill Callahan. He's been an offensive line coach in

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>his career. I believe he was the assistant head coach

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and offensive line coach for Washington this year as well.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Has already come out and said we need to hashtag

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.599
<v Speaker 1>established the run exactly what we want to hear in

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the year two thousand and nineteen. But I think it

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>makes sense based on the quarterback play that they've had

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so far, from case Keenom to Colt McCoy to Dwayne Haskins.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense for them to maybe run Adrian Peterson

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Thompson more this week and ultimately. The Dolphins

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>have allowed nine total touchdowns to running backs this season,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>that is tied for the most in the NFL. They

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>had a bye week, they played one less game than

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>most of the teams in the NFL, and have still

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most total touchdowns to running back so far

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>this season. Again, that number is nine. They're allowing four

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>point seven seven yards per carry to opposing running backs

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>and that is the seventh most in the NFL. So

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that Adrian Peterson in a game where Washington

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>has favored, can actually see around fifteen carries and could

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have some success. Really, this is just a desperation play.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you have David Montgomery on to buy,

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>if you know Josh Jacob's on a bye and the

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>other one is Kenyan Drake on the other side of

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the field. Greg, I'm really hoping that Miami Dolphins figured

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>out during the buy that Calon Blage is a very

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bad player. We recreated him, you know, running around and

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>when a ball came his way, he ducked out of

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the way of the of said ball. So doesn't want

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to catch the ball. Not a good pass catcher. Averaging

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>under two yards per carry, Kenyan Drake has accounted for

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fiftent of the Dolphins targets so far this year. You know, uh,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging under four yards per carry as well, but

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know it's still better than one point five yards

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>per carry for callon Blage and Washington just allowed two

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven total yards, ten receptions, and to total touchdowns

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>so Patriots running backs a week ago. So I don't

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is a great defense. I think Kenyan Drake

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>could actually have some success here. Who would you rather

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>start this week? Adrian Peterson or Carlos Hyde. I haven't

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>done ranking. You see that Carlos Hide is going up

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs. Yeah, I'll take Carlos side, okay,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because I thought I thought it carries twenty carries a

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>week ago. The Kansas City Chiefs are obviously vulnerable against

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the run. I think the Houston Texans are gonna want

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep the Chiefs offense off the field. The way

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you do that is you run the football. We just

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>saw him all in. Mac has success and obviously just

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a much better offense overall for the Houston Texans in Washington,

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So I would take Carlo side. Speaking of the Kansas

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs, that's obviously a team that Carlos Hide played

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for briefly during the summer game, and one of the

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that he helped replace was Kareem Hunt. Creem Mollins

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>about own, he's not coming back till a round week

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ten or so. He's somebody that you're looking to add

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. Frank, how come because I think we're just

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>getting closer and closer we get to that week ten,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark Um, the more he's going to be added. And

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he's still owned in just fort of Yahoo leagues right now.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>He just needs to be added. If you are a

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb owner. I actually added him last week in

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a league where I was a Nick Chubb owner. You

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>just have to own him because if anything were to

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>happen to Chubb, Kareem Hunt instantly vaults up to high

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>end RB two territory, low end RB one territory. They

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a lot of quality depth on the roster.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's been Dontrelle Hilliard, de Ernest Johnson. Um.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We know that Kareem Hunt has the talent. He's been

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>successful at the NFL level already, and they took a

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>pr hit in order to sign Kareem Hunt, which means

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that he at least have a role on this team.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that he's gonna be a flex option

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>as long as Nick Chubb is healthy, but he's going

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the most valuable handcuffs in fantasy

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>football once he does return. I think now is the

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>time to Adam Gregg. I agree with that Nick cho

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>has been way too effective and way too good for

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this team that he's just gonna take a backseat. I

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think he does. Green Hunt is going to have

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a role like you mentioned, Frank, and maybe that's how

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they get this all offense going, Greg. You know, maybe

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's more running between both Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe they get Kareem Hunt involved more as

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a ask cancer. You know the way that other teams

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>are deploying to running backs on the field as once.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen Chicago Bears do that. Where David Montgomery is

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on the field, Three Cohen is also on the field

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and where they have a dual running back system where

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one guy can run the football, one guy can catch

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the football. So maybe they kind of, you know, get

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>creative with this Cleveland Browns offense, maybe the way that

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers were doing it a couple of weeks ago. Obviously,

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, you know, you draft this guy with the

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick, You're expecting more out of him,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and eventually we hope that he develops. It's not happening

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. But the way that the Pittsburgh Steelers used

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to running backs where they ransom wildcat and they got creative,

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the answer for the Cleveland Browns ultimately. You know,

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>even if Kareem han is only getting five to seven

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>touches per game, with Nick Chubb healthy, he will be

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the most valuable handcuffs in fantasy football. Now

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>other running backs that could be out there if you're desperate.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>John Hileman for the New York Giants. Obviously, it's a

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>tough spot for New England, their double digit underdogs in

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>New England on Thursday Night, But Stagon Bark is not

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna play win. Goland's not gonna I don't even know

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that John Hillman's in the next guy out like Elijah Penny.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the guy that gets the most carries you're absolutely desperate.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe one of those guys potentially. Um. I also think

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Benny Snell. We know Jalen Samuel's out for a month

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>due to a knee injury. There, so dye Benny Snell

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>takes on something that wild cabin that's not really his

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>game either. I think you'll just see more James Conner

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and then listen, Jase Edmons shouldn't be owen. David Johnson

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>has his back injury and he has not been cleared yet,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so Jas Edmonds the number one guy on this list. Yeah,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson not a model of health. You know, he's

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>had the risk injuries in the past as well. So yeah,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're a DJ owner, make sure you own Chase

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Edmonds as well. We'll continue on the waiver wire with

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>different positions and we'll do that next daily. Rhodo dot

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>just give you premier advice. We play every day, all

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry leading

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>DFS tools and custom projections and now Daily Rhodos dot

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Com optimize second minutes building, optimize line up for cash

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>games and turnings learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Joined Daily Roado dot Com get in the game with

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Kings sports book, where listeners in the show

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>can get a deposit of it's a five hundred dollars.

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Use how it works. Create a Draft Kings sports book account,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>make a depositive, place your first bet and Draft Kings

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>will match it with a fifty bonus above to five

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. This offers eligible to all users plus new

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>usually get a risk free bet, but the two hundred

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>bucks could a sportscreed dot com slash dk to play.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>That is sports screen dot Com slash d k to

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>play and if you have a gambling problem called a

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred gambler twenty one in over New Jersey only. Eligibility

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>restrictions apply to website for details. Chase Edmunds rank before

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we move on, He's gonna be everywhere. He's a monstrous

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>mistake if he's not Chase Edmonds. Yeah, I mean everything

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that's going on with David Johnson. He's dealing with this

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>back issue he we saw the wrist flare up earlier

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the season as well. You know, he got tackled

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the defensive lineman fell on top of him. Uh, it's

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a surgically repaired risk as well. And Chase Edmonds he

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had a long touchdown last week as well. He's explosive.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>And while the Arizona Cardinals offense is not a good one,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Gregg and their offensive line is certainly not great either.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>They run so many plays. They ran the fourth most

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>play offensive places so far this season, So just based

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>on volume alone, there would be huge value for Chase Edmonds.

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>If something were to happen to David Johnson. It's a

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>back injury for David Johnson. He was in and out

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of late later the game. He didn't play on the

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>last drive, so he was in there, but he has

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>not been cleared for this. Some day he has not.

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a It's definitely something to pay attention to play

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>attention to the practice reports and everything else that's going

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on with David Johnson. Did play his full compliment of

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>snaps though, so you know, maybe it was just like

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the adrenaline was going and then afterwards tightened up on

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit. But yeah, definitely pay attention to

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson because there is massive fantasy implications based on

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>his health. Obviously, will move on to Frank to the

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver position. I want to actually specifically go to

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the state of Florida where the question that fantasy owners

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>have this week Parker Preston Williams. Are you mocking me?

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Because I always try to talk about these Dolphins wide receivers.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately it's a good matchup. Again, Look, I understand

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's two terrible teams, Washington going up against Miami. Somebody's

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta win this game. They might both just be trying

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to lose. But ultimately, the last time we saw Devontae Parker,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he had a four for seventy and one touchdown line.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>With Josh Rosen as his quarterback. He's accounted for eighteen

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>percent of their targets, share thirty five percent of their

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>air yards, a twenty point three average depth of targets,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's being targeted down the field. He's seeing a

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of those you know, long pass play targets. He's

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a big body for first round pick finally getting an

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to play, and it's a really good matchup against

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>this Washington secondary it's a brutal defense, but specifically their

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>secondary has not showed up. Josh Norman is a ghost

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>of his former self. They're allowing the second most fantasy

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing wide receiver. Has just got ripped by

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman, just got ripped by Taylor Gabriel a couple

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago as well, gave up three touchdowns to him.

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>So if you are in a pinch where you have

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are on a buy where you've had Bills

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers or maybe an Allen Robinson, uh, and you

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>need someone to fill in, I think Devanta Parker and

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Preston Williams. Preston Williams over the last two games with

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen as the quarterback has nineteen targets and they

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>were backups together, and we talked about this a lot

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy football. When these guys are second string players together,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they develop a connection, a rapport, and we've seen even

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>going back to preseason games that Josh Rosen and Preston

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams do have that connection, uh, and we're seeing it

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of play out the past couple of weeks as well.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think Devantay Parker and Preston Williams are in play.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>As you know, low end wide receiver threes bye week

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>replacements in Week six. That's what most of these guys

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are this week on the waiver wire, probably besides one,

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe two of them. Um On on Tap we talked

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about a lot last week stepping in for John Ross

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>AJ Green. You have said repeatedly on our program, Frank,

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you do not expect John A. J. Green to ever

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>play another snap where the Cincinnati Bengals on Tap we

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>talked play on yesterday's show. He's somebody that I think

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>can help you long term. He's probably the number one

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>AD at the wide receiver position this week. Yeah, I

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's between Audent A and D. D. Westbrook. If

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>D D. Westbrook is available in your league. I believe

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>he's owned in fifty eight percent of YAHOO league, so

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I usually use sixty percent as the cut off for me.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you play in a ten team league or

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a shallower a twelve team league where D. D. Westbrook

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is available. He's actually been pretty consistent. He's had at

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>least five catches in every game but one this year.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Of the targets share is actually the same amount as

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>DJ Charks so D D. Westbrook not scoring the touchdowns

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like DJ Chark is, but still seeing the exact same

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of targets so far this season. And it's a

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>really really good matchup going up against p J. Williams

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the slot against the New Orleans Saints in Week six.

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So I like the way that targets have been trending

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for D. D. Westbrook, and I like the matchup overall

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. But Audentate might have more long term value. Again,

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a big body. He's been used in the red zone.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The targets have been there for him the past couple

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. It's basically just been Tyler Boyd and him

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the past game. This defense is not good, so

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they're likely playing from behind a lot. There were a

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of three wide receiver sets in the Zach Taylor offense.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think A. J. Green plays another game with

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals, and they're going up against the Baltimore

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Ravens in Week six as eleven point underdogs. The Ravens

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>secondary has not looked great the past couple of weeks.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They're beat up. Tony Jefferson, their starting safety just went

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>down for the season as well. So I think Audent

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Tate is a sneaky play for this week and probably

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>has more long term upside than D. D. Westbrook the

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season, as well as a starting wide

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver of the Cincinnati Bengals. I agree on Audate should

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be somebody that he went. You go out. How much

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would you spend? It depends how desperate you are for

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, Probably between eight and ten percent. If you

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>really need one, you can go over ten percent, you

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>get into the twelve percent range. Last week, I had

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>an NFC league where I spent over twenty percent of

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>my fab on Audent tape. But I really really needed him,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was desperate for a wide receiver a league where I

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>owned Dvante Adams. I knew I wasn't gonna have him,

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately it comes out to how desperate you really are.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm probably looking at you know that eight to

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent range, probably a little bit lower, more like

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>six to eight percent, I think, for I know it's

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the same thing to you. Last week, obviously he scored

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, but the matchup for Cincinnati was as good

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>as it gets last week against Arizona. I'd like to

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>see him against the better defense, which we will against Baltimore.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think who do you think has more long

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>term upside? Audentate or d. D. Westberk Because there is

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance that Nick Foles is healthy takes back over

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that starting quarterback job, and that's part of the reason

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>why we love d. D. Westbrook coming into the season. Yeah,

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a fair question. I think probably I

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>stand by what you said. Okay, other desperation plays this week.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I go back to Thursday Night football. Want to go

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the New York Giants, where Darius Layton is

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a big role for New York this week.

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Sterley Shepherd is not gonna play with a concussion. Evan

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Ingram may not play as well on Thursday Night. You're

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get stake on Barko, You're not gonna get

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Golan's or it's the next man up. Golden Tate's

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>going to have a take on all the responsibility that

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>he can. You know, it's a really tough match with

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>New England. But we've seen Darius Slayton have a rapport

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with Daniel Jones here. They've been talking about it since

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>training camp. He's gotten more snaps. That's gonna continue. He's

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not owned pretty much anywhere. I think he's take a

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>shot on Darius Slayton. Let's just get this straight first

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, Greig, Next man up. That's the Yankees motto.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the New York not in New York Channel, it's

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>literally every team in every sports modo. But it has

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>been the Yankees. I mean, based on everyone that they

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>lost this here, come on, it's every team and everything.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Next ban up. Now, get standing off the field. Let's

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get Cameron maybe on the field, but waiting on baseball again,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>because that is actually the model that they've been running,

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the motteo that every team ever has. Every year they

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>had a record for the most players placed on the

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>i L and MLB history. Sure, if any team can

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>use it, it's in But like any NFL team loses

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the billion players. Yeah, but it's relevant right now, It's

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>relevant every team. The Giants, entire team is hurt. Let's

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>go next man up. Here's here's the honest truth. You

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want the next man up when it comes to

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants. Because the New England Patriots are

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the best defense in football right now. They are allowing

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the fewest fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks, the fewest fantasy

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing wide receivers, the second fewest fantasy points

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs, and the second fewest fantasy points

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to opposing tight ends. I understand they haven't faced many

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>good teams so far. Well, guess what the Giants are.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>They're not a good team. I mean, they're sixteen and

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a half point underdogs in this game for a reason.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I understand. Darius Slayton just had a four for sixty

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>two and one line last week against the Minnesota Vikings,

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that what we said about Josh Rosen

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and Preston Williams is similar to Daniel Jones. Daniel Jones

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was working at as the backup, so was Darius Slayton.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Now they have a report we're seeing that come to

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>fruition on the field. But ultimately this is one of

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the best, if not the best secondaries in the entire NFL.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I am not starting anybody on the New York Giants

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>offense this week against the New England Patriots. That includes

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Golden take Gregg and the other wide receiver is worth

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Frank I did want to bring up and

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you can laugh at me if you want it. Greg.

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But Duke Williams, the Duke, former CFL star, Yeah, that's right,

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian Football League, big body, six ft three, And

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe the reason why the Buffalo Bills were okay

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>trading is a Jones last night to the Oakland Raiders

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for a fifth round pick is because they really liked

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this kid, Duke Williams. So he's a big body. Just

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown in the red zone this past week

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>against the Tennessee Titans, and I think coming out of

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the bye, he's gonna start on the outside alongside John

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown with Cole Beasley in the slot. There is more

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of a deeper league ad maybe four teen teams are deeper,

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>or if you're playing in NFFC format where there's eight

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>bench spots, deeper PPR leagues. I'm looking at Duke Williams.

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You do have to hold them because of the bye.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And then the other one is Byron Pringle. You know,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>once you pop, you can't stop. When it comes to

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Byron Pringle, but he is a darling of the NFL

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>scouting Twitter. I spoke about this a little bit yesterday.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Apparently really really good route runner, a lot to like

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about him, very athletic, good hands as well. We saw

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that all on Sunday Night football against the Indianapolis Colts.

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know as of now if Tyreek Hill

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be back, and we don't know what

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the status of Sammy Watkins is as well. So if

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you need help at the wide receiver position, if you

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>own Tyreek Hill, or if you or if you own

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins, and you just kind of want to cover yourself,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and Byron Pringle could be in the mix, because, as

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we've said before, when it comes to Mikole Hardman and

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>de Marcus Robinson, greg you just want as much exposure

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to this Kansas City Chiefs offense as you possibly can.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And they clearly like him because his first game where

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was kind of thrust into action, he

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>played more snaps than Mikole Hardman already, So it must

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>say that must mean they like him. That says something

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about Byron Pringles. So I think in deeper leagues, those

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are two names that you can look at. Pringle and

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Duke Williams. Yeah, I'm not doing the Duke Williams thing

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for me like this has I don't know much about

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>him and then it Dawson all over where people obsessed

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>over the metrics and don't realize as that the metrics

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't even great. I was looking at it downstairs Adventure.

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this guy's player profile like a four point

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>seven forty. He's just a really big body that can

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be used in reading in the red zone. But yeah,

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just more of a deeper league play. Yeah, I'm

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not interesting in the Duke Williams thing personally

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because the Jones wasn't doing anything. This guy's not gonna

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do anything either. You're probably right, man, I just thought

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I would throw it out there. Yeah, John Brown seeing

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the target chairs as is coldbas Okay,

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So we'll come back from the break. We gotta hit

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on quarterbacks, specifically, if you're missing a quarterback due to

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a bye this week, like Josh Allen super Flex, I

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know you're struggling. Good news for you, Kyle Alan Owners

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's me. Cam Newton already ruled out for this week

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Carolina goes to London they played Tampa Bay.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I would expect Cam Newton to return after the bye

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>after the London game. I think that makes a lot

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of sense. I saw today that Cam Newton actually showed

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up to practice without the walking boots, so he's clearly progressing. No,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen hasn't let the world on fire, but he's

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>done enough to help them win games. Both he and

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater are six and o combined for the past

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. Uh, you know, filling in for their respective starter.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But you're probably right. You got the London game this week,

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the bye next week. Ham Newton probably back after that. Honestly,

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if that's a good thing. We'll

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you some more quarterbacks that are available and starting

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this week hit on the tight ends to stick around.

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Yas wraps up right after this. Daily Rodo dot Com

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't just

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>give you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot Com

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>optimize that in minutes, building optimized line up for cast

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>games and turneys. Learned from the game's best DFS players

0:31:43.400 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>joined Daily Rodo dot Com. I thought I was crazy,

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>can't hear anything in my ear and I was just

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna let you go for as long as you possibly could.

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Right back here at the BFx, he's Frank,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm greg out of quarterbacks and tight ends to get

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to here, and we mentioned Kyle Allen's gonna get the

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>start once again, and this time in London against Tampa Bay.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>That was the game, remember against Tampa Bay on Thursday

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Football earlier this season that we realized how injured Cam

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Newton was and how bad that he was. But well,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton is still out. Doesn't mean all the quarterbacks

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that have been out aren't returning. Sam Donald officially making

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>his return or the New York Jets this week because

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>an angry Dallas team, Franky, I can Sam Donald wake

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>up the Jets? I think it can't be worse than

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Luke Fowk, or at least I'm hoping he can not,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>even for the sake of the Jets or being a

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>fan of the team, just for the sake of everybody's

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy value that is involved the New York Jets right now,

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>from Jamison Crowder to Robbie Anderson to Levian Bell and

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>now Chris Herndon as well, who we will talk about,

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not just talk about him, right now. Look, Chris Herndon

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>last year tight end fifteen overall as a rookie. You

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't normally see rookie tight ends show up that well,

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but he was ninth among tight ends in yards per catch.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>He was seventh in among tight ends in yards per

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>target as well. So he made plays. He's explosive, and

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they've had Ryan Griffin on the field a lot this

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>year running routes, and I think Chris Herndon just fits

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>into that seamlessly. On a team that is start for talent,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they need help on the offensive side of the football.

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They need help everywhere, but I think Chris Herndon could

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be a big boost for them. I don't know that

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it happens necessarily right away this week for Sam Donald,

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because I still do you know, I respect the Cowboys

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary while uh, you know, they haven't showed up as

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as much as we had hoped ultimately coming into the season.

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that the schedule softens up a

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>lot for the new for the New York Jets, and

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's gonna help. Saying Donald's gonna help all the

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>weapons involved here. Um So, if he was dropped in

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>your league, you need a second quarterback, or you're just

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for someone I can streaming good matchups moving forward.

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not this week, but actually that the schedule does

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>lighten up a lot for the New York Jets. Uh.

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Any other quarterbacks you want to talk about in terms

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of streaming, Like we we have Gardner Minshew on the

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>list you mentioned Kyle Allen. The Bucks have allowed over

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>three passing yards four straight weeks. It seems like, you know,

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>teams are starting to pick on their secondary once again.

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They've been really good against the run, but not great

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>against the past. So I do think you know Kyle

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Allen as a sneaky stream as well. But I do

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like Gardner Minshew and Kirk Cousins ahead of both Donald

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Allen this week. Yeah, I think so too.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I like I like Gardner Minshew, I like Kirk Cousins

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>both in the opportunity, both in spots to stream. I

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do want to mention the Super Flex League devln Hodges.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>How would you spend on this guy two Bucks? I

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how long he's going to be the quarterback.

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what to expect from him. He

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>went to Samford for college, not Stanford Stamford Uh, so,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what to expect from this offense. We

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>probably just see more James Conner overall. Maybe we see

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Benny Snell mixed in as well. Um, Hodges didn't look

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible last week. You know, he helped the Pittsburgh Steelers

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stay alive in that game, help them go to overtime

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Baltimore Ravens. But ultimately, and that is the

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night football game. So great for us we get

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to watch Devil and Hodges against the against the Los

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers should be a lot of fun. But you know,

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the only way I'm picking this guy up is in

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a super flex league where I had Mason Rudolph starting,

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>where I lost Ben Roethlisberger. You know, no more than

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>two bucks. But ultimately, if you need a stream, Gardner

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Minshew going up against the New Orleans Saints, um min.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>She has been really consistent so far this yere. I

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>know this was a stat from your boy Field Yates. Great,

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he told me about this QBS with sixteen plus Fantasy

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>points in every game this season. There's only three at

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my homes, Gardner Minshew and Kyler Murray, so pretty exclusive

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>company there. He's been consistent. Uh could get into a

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of shootout with the Saints and Kirk Cousins.

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna be able to run the

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>football as effectively against this Eagles defense allowing just two

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>point eight one yards per carried to opposing running backs,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and they could be had through the air. A lot

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of injuries to the secondary of the Philadelphia Eagles, and

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins coming off his best game of the season.

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think Cousins and Minshew are your clear streamers

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. If you have a quarterback on a buy,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go down to the tight end position. Frankie Evan

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Ingram may not play on Thursday night for the New

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>York Giants. And it's funny because they got a question

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier saying, Hey, these three tight ends are out there

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire for me, what do I do?

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett, Chris Herndon, and Hunter Henry. Well, those are

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the three tight ends that are out there, mostly if

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>people are interested in picking up Herndon, Henry and Gerald Everett.

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So I have to ask, how would you order these

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>guys and how much would you spend on them? Yeah,

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not often that we see tight end is the

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>best position on a week for the waiver wire. We're

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>constantly trying to find tight ends to stream or pick

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>up that have value moving forward, you know, long term value.

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think all three of these guys do. If

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm ranking them, it's weird because I would rank them

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>differently for this week as I would for long term

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>him for the season. So I have long term I

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>would still rank un Sir Henry the highest of the group,

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>then Chris Herndon, and then Gerald Everett. But for this week,

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going to rank them in the complete opposite order.

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>For this week. You know, Brandon Cooks still in concussion protocol.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett over the past couple of weeks really involved

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the game plan. He's been the tight end five

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and tight end one respectively. Over the past two weeks.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Targets have gone up as well, even with Tyler Higbee back.

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>There's more snaps being played for Gerald Everett, um more

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>routes being run for Gerald Everett as well. And remember

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we were excited about this guy when Sean McVeigh took over.

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He drafted him. We thought that this was gonna be

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>his Jordan read because if you remember Sean McVeigh came

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>over from Washington's offense where they used Jordan Read a lot.

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that is finally coming to fruition. So

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the usage for Generald Everett right now this

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>week and the fact that Brandon Cooks is in concussion protocol.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon, you know, maybe he doesn't see his full

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>compliment of snaps his first game back, but ultimately a

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty good matchup going up against the Dallas Cowboys. You know,

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham didn't do much, but we've and other tight

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.959
<v Speaker 1>ends have big games against the Cowboys so far this season,

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and Evan ram in Week one comes to mind. Chris

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Herndon could get right back into the mix, so I

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like him second most for this week. And then Hunter Henry.

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if he's gonna play yet. That's what

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to, so you gotta pay attention to that.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>They said there's still a chance he can play, but

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they're going to rushing back. I

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think they need him for the long term this season

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, so I would rank it Everett, Herndon, Hunter

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Henry for this week, but for the rest of the season,

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I would rank it the complete opposite way. Henry Herndon

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>still second and then Everett third of the group. And look,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you really need a tight end, I'm willing to

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>go as high as, you know, eight percent of my

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>fab budget on any of these guys. You know, maybe

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if you really need one long term, you could go

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent, maybe even more than that on a Hunter Henry.

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But um, yeah, this is a really good week for

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>tight end pickups in in fantasy football, and we don't

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>normally see that. Gerald Everett, Chris Herndon, Hunter Henry were

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>all viable. And I agree, Frank, Hunter Henry is the

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>one I want to own long term, But if desperate

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>this week, I think the one you have to go

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>with is Gerald Everett. He's been the one we've we've

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>seen on the field at least obviously, Hunter Henry has

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>played in a while. Chris Herndon no guarantees at Gordon

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gas. He's gonna be activated this week. Wh I

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>thought it was kind of weird, But Gerald e the

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Patriots have done the same thing. Like them, they caught him, yeah,

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>so you know he was eligible to return. Obviously, the

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Jets are not gonna cut Chris Herndon, But we do

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>see this at times where guys are eligible to return

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're not brought back right away. So it's an

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting situation want to pay attention to. But yeah, still

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>really do like Herndon, really really. Athletics showed that rapport

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch last year for Sam Donald when he

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>started to um yeah better as well throughout the course

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>last season. So I am interested in Chris Herndon for sure,

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but pay attention to make sure that he is actually

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be active this week. So you move on

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>from those three tight ends you wrote down on our

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>show sheet here Darren Fells his desperation. Yeah, he had

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>two targets last week, he had two receptions, both of

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>them went for touchdowns. And they're going up against the

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs in Week six. Could be the game

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of the year, honestly, could be a really really fun

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>game between Patrick Mahomes and DeShawn Watson. Uh, you know,

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Darren Fells and Jordan Aikins who are basically splitting

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>time right now. So it's a messy situation. But the

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have actually performed better against wide receivers this year

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>than we were expecting and to have struggled against tight ends.

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you are in desperation mode after all three

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of these tight ends, Darren Fells. You know, if you

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>were a Darren Waller owner and all three of these

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>guys are already owned, then the next man up that

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I would look at is Darren Fells. Basically because of

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the matchup against the Chiefs. Moving on to a streaming defense,

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you from our own perspective, Frankie, we owned Carolina,

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 1>we picked them up as a stream against Jacksonville last week.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Can we start them this week against Taba in London?

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that I would want to. I like

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>what the Carolina Panthers have done so far. This here,

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Brian Burns has looked really, really good, you know, coming

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>off the edge. They're getting a ton of sacks. I know,

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>heading into last week they were leading the league in sacks.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>They just had defensive touchdown against the Jacksonville Jaguars as well.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>They had a few forced fumbles. They've recovered those. Really

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.760
<v Speaker 1>good defense. But this Tampa Bay offense is a scary

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>one to go up against. Right now. Jamis Winston throwing

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for a ton of yards, been over three hundred yards

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>believe three weeks in a row now, Chris Godwin obviously

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 1>getting things done. He's top five wide receiver for fantasy football.

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans has been inconsistent, but we know the talent

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is there as well. Um So it's a tough situation. Man.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I want to get in front of

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Barry Now. I know that Jameis Winston could be

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>turnover prone at times. But if I own Carolina, I

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think I would be trying to add the Cowboys defense

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if they were available, just because they're going up against

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, and even with Donald back, this offensive line

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets is just dreadful. Collectiosemily is hurt. It

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>started a rookie third round pick last week and too

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 1>much adoga. They gave up ten sacks two defensive touchdowns

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Eagles last week. If the Cowboys are available,

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I would rather stream them than the Carolina Panthers. Yeah.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I tend to agree with the Cowboys are out there,

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the direction I would go in. Um same,

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald b Max certainly helps things from the New York Jets,

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but the offensive line, much like Cleveland's last night, not

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>something that worries me at all. Would you rather have

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Miami defense or Washington's defense this week? I would rather have. Man,

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tough because looking for streaming defenses this week,

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>there's really not a lot, So I would I think

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I would go with Washington and your Both defenses are

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not good, but I would expect the Miami Dolphins to

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be more mistake prone. I mean, as bad as Washington is,

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins are worse. I do truly believe that. I

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that's what the line says so far as well.

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Even with this game in Miami, Washington are three and

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites, So, uh, the Dolphins could fall

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>behind in this game. They're gonna have to throw. Offensive

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>line is not good. We could see some sacks, some

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.399
<v Speaker 1>turnovers as well. I would go with Washington. Don't really

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>love them. I'll throw it back your way, Greg. So

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we own the Carolina Panthers. I picked them up everywhere

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>last week. Are you scared enough of the Tampa Bay

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>offense that you are willing to drop the Carolina Panthers

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.359
<v Speaker 1>for a defense that's in that Washington in Miami game

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>or the Ravens who are going up against the Cincinnati Bank.

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I much prefer to dropping for the Ravens next week.

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>They see I wouldn't drop it for Washington m Aavy

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 1>because they both stink like I like you're We always

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>say they don't want necessarily play against a team that

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is doesn't score because they could wind up scoring. They

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't get enough turnovers, that kind of that. That whole thing.

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Neither the teams really turned the ball over. Um, the

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>defense has turned the ball over all that much. With Carolina,

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, you're gonna have to change defenses next

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>week because Carolina is gonna buy. So I don't mind

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>dropping Carolina. So one of these we on Carolina and

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Frankie I have I have the available defenses when run down,

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>run them down, and you let me know who you

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>do a dig. That's okay with you, all right? San

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Francisco look great last night they're facing the Rams. I

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to do it. Hitsburgh against the Chargers, Nope,

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you just look good. Green Bay against Detroit defense has

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>played better, but the Detroit offense has done well. Kenny

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Gallady and carry on Johnson, Nope, in our lead. By

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the way, they had nine points four to five weeks.

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Pretty defense pretty good solid Tampa against Carolina. I don't

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>want to have his defense New Orleans Jacksonville sounds like

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a winner, does it? Though Minshew has played well, they're

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>going to run it with Leonard Forday, yeah, last week,

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>min you play as well. Carolina's defense was good, that's true.

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>But the Carolina Panthers defense is just better than the Saints.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Next three weeks, New Orleans defense, Jacksonville, Chicago, Arizona. M Okay,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>so Minshew Minshew whiskey, Yeah, that could be nice. It's

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>not New Orleans Detroit against green Bay probably not. I

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 1>mean I need it. No, I don't want to do it. Man,

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones is running well. They still have Aaron Rodgers.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>We won't star Kansas City, we won't, do you think?

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would you use any of those teams over Carolina?

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I would use New Orleans over Carolina? Yeah, I sually, no,

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Yeah. I mean, look, if you're looking for

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it more long term, but the game is in Jacksonville.

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>We know the New Orleans Saints the past couple of

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks have been home and they play much better inside

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of a dome. Obviously against Tennessee, that one's interesting. I

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was looking at that as well. Returnovers finally, Yeah, but

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>they lost Bradley Chub Washington, Arizona, Arizona, Cincinnati, Miami. Yeah,

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Saints might be in the mixed. Green

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay's interesting just because they've played really well. I don't

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think getting a lot of sacks that passed for USh

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 1>is revamped. Pittsburgh's crazy is good. There's their defense has

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>played better. One more week from Melvin Gordon to get

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>more involved. Austin Ekeler is going to do his thing.

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry might be back. I will Pittsburgh has all

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>by next week as well. Yeah, I think the Saints

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers are the ones that I would consider

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 1>dropping the Carolina Panthers for. But hey, the Carolina Panthers

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are stilly, really really talented defense. Green Bay this week,

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>pleas is Detroit bases Oakland next week. Always after that

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the base case. Yeah, I don't think you want the

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers going up against the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Definitely dropped the Panthers for the Cowboys and the Ravens.

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>He's Frank Snaville, I'm Greg Salzman having awesome night. Wager

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>talks up next then out the window will see tomorrow.

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>We hope Daily Rhodo dot com learned from the game's

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We a every day all major sports, all year round.

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Roado dot com optimized it in

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>minutes building optimized line for cast games and turneys. Learned

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Roado dot com.

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So what did happen? What did happens? Here's what you

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>missed on the BFx. Off to the next series, then Eric, Yeah,

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going because of that. I really didn't watch anyone

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the night football, and I got a text at Matt

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Brida on Matt Rida's eighty three yard run. So and

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>then I turned to it on his first front of

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the game, Yes massive, and I saw Baker maybe'll get

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sacked a couple of times and were back in the

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Yankees and the boarders of a million points. It's like,

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm watching this. Yeah. The Browns are complete

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>disaster right now, outside of Nick Chub who still managed

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to run for over five yards per carry against a

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>very good San Francisco forty Niners defense. Baker Mayfield under

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>pressure all night long, was sacked four times. Joey Bosa

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>all up in his face. Biker loved the trash talk

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>from Joey Bosa as well. But ultimately, this Brown's offense

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is broken right now. Offensive line is not good, can't

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>get the ball in the hands of his playmakers. Odell

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Beckham another dud. Two receptions twenty seven yards. Jarvis Landry

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 1>really the only person who showed up in the past

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>game four catches for seventy five yards. But this Brown's

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>team is in disarray right now. Freddie Kitchens, man, you

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta swallow your pride. You gotta handover play calling duties

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to Todd Monkin. Monkey did a great job last year

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Tampa Bay Bucks. Uh, you know, with a

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>team that it was really not all that talented either.

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, he got the most out of Jamis Winston.

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That offensive line for Tampa Bay was not a great

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one last year either, but they can pass the freaking

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>ball last year, and you know, I think the only

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>chance that this Brown's offense has to kind of meet

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>their potential is in the play calling duties over to

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Todd Monkett. But Frankly, I just don't think that. I

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think that Freddy Kitchens is gonna be able to

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>swallow his pride and make that happen on the other

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. I was talking about this downstairs

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of guys. The San Francisco forty Niners

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>actually have a recipe for success right now. If you

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>look at this team, their offensive line has played amazing

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. Entering this game, they were number

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:28.479
<v Speaker 1>one in Football Outsiders run blocking analytical Tools, which means,

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously they showed that off last night. Matt

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Brina Levin carries a hundred fourteen yards, a touchdown. Tevin Coleman,

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>first game back throw this guy right back in the

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>mix sixteen carries nineties seven yards and another touchdown there

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. Matt Brina added a receiving touchdown. This team

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>can run the football. They have a really strong defensive line,

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they're strong against the run. Their secondary I think it's solid.

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 1>They have that veteran anchor in Richard Sherman as well.

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.479
<v Speaker 1>This San Francisco forty Niners team is a really, really

0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 1>dangerous team. And you have a quarterback that I believe

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>can make plays when assiduced. So in Jimmy Garoppolo, you know,

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's not, you know, one of the best in

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the league. Sorry adventure, I know you're downstairs, Gucci Garoppolo,

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think that he can make enough plays where,

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they need him to actually make a play.

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not just one of these smash mouth football teams

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Jets for example, from ten years ago, where

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know they needed Santis to make plays and ultimately

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't do it. There's a team that can run

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the football, they can play good defense, and Jimmy Garoppolo

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is an adequate, adequate quarterback, so very dangerous San Francisco

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>forty niner team Cleveland Brown has gotta try and figure

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>this out.