WEBVTT - Justin Wolfers & David Daley

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds and one hundred and twenty eight Democrats

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>across the aisle to help Republicans block Al Green's bid

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to impeach Trump. We have such a great show for

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you today, the Think Like an Economists podcast. Justin Wolfers

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>joins us to talk about trade. Then we'll talk to

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Fair Votes David Daily about why rank choice voting is

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>actually amazing and should be everywhere.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>But first the news, Molly, I have to say, in

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>our years of dealing with politics, I don't think I've

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 2>ever seen New York City's elites with their bed like

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 2>they have today over zor on Mom Donnie getting the

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Democratic nomination era. It seems the business world and the

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Democratic establishment are well, really really overdoing the drama about

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 2>what this means.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It is unbelievably crazy how angry things people are.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Here's what's happening. A lot of people.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Are worried that he's going to raise taxes, and that

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is really what's happening. I think there are some people

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>who are worried he's not sufficiently pro Israel enough, but

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what the mayor of New York has

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with Israel particularly, but a well known investor

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>deleted an ex post suggesting mon Donnie's win was a

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>nightmare for billionaire investors, name checking Bloomberg, Ackman, and Low.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't me who did that, but it could have been. Look,

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very rich people are already saying they're

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>going to move to Florida.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>If I had a dollar for every.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Time wealthy people got mad and said they were going

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to move, I would have a lot of dollars.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>You'd have a lot because there was actually a study

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>on this one. The last time they said it when

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Bill de Bungler got elected and guess what, we got

0:01:58.840 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>even more of them here.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Now, I want to caution because you and I

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>both are Mom and Donnie curious.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little more than curious.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You're maybe a little less curious, but I'm very curious

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>about him, and I have a lot of optimism about this.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>That's all I say.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But we do want to note that being mayor is

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>really fucking hard.

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And you know, it's a lot of shit that you.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Have to do, and sometimes we get excited and then

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>people can't do it now. I don't think that's going

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to be the case here. But no one has ever

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>been mayor who has ever gone on to anything.

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just a fact.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>As you and I have discussed many times, it's not

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>a job you leave being popular as New York City mayor.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>It's just doesn't go so well for your approval.

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And in my mind, that's the scariest part about this win.

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But he obviously wants it, and he's quite a gifted politician.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>So we're just gonna all keep our fingers and toes crossed.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But Fox News, I just want everyone to be aware,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is now going to go full core press on New

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>York City being a houscape and anything they did to

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Eric Adams is going to be one hundred times worse

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to Zoran.

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>That's funny because Eric Adams was just on news Max

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.119
<v Speaker 2>because he knows which folks he's running for. So yes,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a very wild ride from here

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>to November.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be a terrible general election. Yeah.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I would really encourage a lot of people to, instead

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>of reading propaganda from campaigns, actually read some quotes that

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 2>some people say, because boy, have I never seen misinformation

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>fly like the last two days on Twitter.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And I would also suggest not reading the New York

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Post as much as we love page six. You know,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we have one local paper, it's a New York Post.

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>We have two, we have two. Come only news does exist?

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we have one local paper, it's the New York Post.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Look, I like the Daily News much more ideologically aligned

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with that. But you know, don't read it. Okay, just

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>read page six and throw the rest of the thing out.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm going to get us onto another subject.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to cut that out.

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>If one thing put.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>On, the listeners will be we be hearing that. Bali

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>jug Fast endorses page.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Six, indorses page six, but tells you to throw the

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>rest of the newspaper, and then you're opposed to out.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay. So Trump is going to limit sharing classified

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>info with Congress after the week on I Red's bombing

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 2>damage because he's very upset that everybody found out that

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>he bungled this.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>If you can't read the headline without laughing, then it's

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a Donald Trump headline. So I just want to point

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>out I know that there have been other things going on,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but let's just go through this again. Trump on Saturday decides, unprovoked,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to bomb a Rand's nuclear site.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he does it because he was watching Fox News.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he does it because Net and Yahoo makes him

0:04:58.279 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>want to do it.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Who even what lurks in the mind of Donald Trump.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But whatever he does, he decides to bomb the nuclear

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>sites in Iran.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 3>He tweets about it a lot.

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He decide they have numerous planes going over there, they

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have decoys. Now we don't know. Trump said he destroyed

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>all of the nukes and that he's the greatest president ever.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>He also said that he's six four and has a

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>full head of natural hair, and that gets that color

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>from the sun. Okay, so I'm gonna say a lot

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the reporting I've read shows that maybe they're back

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a few months.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they're not.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some of the nukes are in other places. Maybe

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Aran doesn't know where they are. I mean, this has

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not solved anyone's problems. It's made life a little more dangerous.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Then a Monday, Trump declared a ceasefire. Again, not entirely

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>clear if there is a ceasefire, because when you have

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a white house like this, you can't believe anything they say.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>But the point of all of this is Iran probably

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not very you know, probably would have been better just

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to have kept them in the nuclear deal like Obama did.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't make any sense. And also Trump now embarrassed

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and trying to cover for himself, and so he's trying

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to leak the information that's given to Congress in the

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>hopes that he will look better in the press. Again,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to point out, this is so fucked Okay,

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not how any of this is supposed to work.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>This is just a completely bad, bad, very dysfunctional way

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>to run a country.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Strongly, so we now have seen Nancy Pelosi backing a

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Democratic effort to limit Trump on Oran and going to war.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting to hear this bipartisan support for this,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 2>but don't know where it's going. What are you seeing?

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, it's very scary to think that someone

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as autocratic, curious Trump is very aggressive and very angry

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and hard to reason with. And this seems like a

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>very worrying turn of events. And bombing the nukes is

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this was an unprovoked assault on another country

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that was not run through Congress the way it's supposed

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. So Congress has so given up everything to

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>have this presidency. They have really just refused to hold

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump accountable. They did not do due diligence with his

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cabinet members. They did not, you know, at every point,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they just gave away their power. So anything that Congress

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>does to take back a little bit of power I

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think is very good. Congress should grow a spine. And

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the fact that there's only one person

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>who's really standing up to Trump on the Republican side,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Massey and Rand Paul. You know, you may not

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like them, you may not agree with them, but those

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>guys have done way more than Susan Collins.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sounds right. So Molly, you're going to be shocked

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to hear that there's some corrupt dealing inside the House

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>of the White House. This time it's Stephen Miller, who

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>turns out owns a quarter of a million dollars of

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Pollunteer stock. That's the high end estiment, I should say.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And Pollunteer, of course, is being contracted to do work

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>with Ice.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>No, no, it cannot be. Pollenteer is getting a lot

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of government contracts. We've had so many guests on this podcast,

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>who have told us about the many, many, many government

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>contracts that volunteer has gotten. Look the idea that you

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>could profit while serving your country. This is what Trump

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted in from one point zero and has perfected in

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump two point zero, which is this kind of low

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>level cryptocracy. Now that said Miller doesn't have a ton

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of palateer stock. He has somewhere between one hundred and

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>two one hundred and fifty thousand dollars worth of pounder stock.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is like the Elon musk Lesson.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>We know pollunteer data intelligence mining software. They're not the

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>good guys, okay, And just like with Elon, we're setting

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>ourselves up so that the government is going to be

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>dependent on a company that is at best nefarious. Justin

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Wolfers is the host of the Think Like an Economist

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast and a professor at the University of Michigan.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Fast Politics, Justin Wolfers.

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 4>He Molly, I thought we're going to rename it fast Economics.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We're in this such a fucked up moment in American life.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You came on a lot to talk about the trade wars.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>We've now won the trade wars, So that's over.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 5>That was the war the wolf, the trade fl is

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 5>who I'm going for those of us.

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Who have not been living and breathing Donald Trump ruining

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>our economy. Talk to us about where we are right now?

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Great question, because actually it's very, very hard to read.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 4>So what I want to do is draw a distinction

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 4>between what economists call hard data. These are the numbers

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 4>that come out of the government, and it's things like

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 4>how much we produce, how many people are employed, what

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 4>are they paid, what's rolling off the production line, versus

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 4>soft data when you go and ask people how they feel,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 4>and it could be as simple as like are you

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 4>optimistic about the future of the economy, But it could

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 4>also be asking a business like do you plan to

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 4>invest a lot? So soft data and hard data, it's

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 4>not a strong distinction, but it's it's important. It turns

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>out right now the soft data are incredibly weak, unbelievably weak.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 4>In a recession week, you ask people about their own finances,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 4>their families, finances, their expectations for their business, they're miserable.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 4>You'll sometimes see some headlines which is business confidence rose,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 4>but that's because it rose from like horrific to terrible.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 4>So remember, don't think about rise and fall, think about

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 4>where we are. So the soft data there is miserable.

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 4>The hard data is not. Now it's it's not ecstatic,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 4>but it's basically saying we're in a pretty good economy

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 4>where we were in a great position when Trump came

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 4>to power, and things have kept going. The unemployment rate

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 4>was low, it's still low. The number of people who

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 4>have jobs is still growing. The economy had a bit

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 4>of a blip, maybe not so much. Now here's the problem.

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a really deep problem. Tariffs screw everything up. And

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying they're bad for the economy. I'm saying

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>they make the economy hard to read.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Here's why.

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 4>In the first quarter of this year, everyone knew tariffs

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 4>were coming, so businesses all of a sudden started importing

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 4>all the inventory they could get from China, and as

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 4>a result, the trade balance blew out. But there was

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of spending. But what they're doing is they're

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 4>trying to get ahead of the tariffs. So that made

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 4>business spending and in fact, a lot of consumers that

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 4>you might have friends who bought a dishwasher or a

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 4>washing machine or a laptop in advance, So a lot

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>of spending occurred. Now that spending is not because the

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 4>economy is strong, it's because they're trying to get ahead. Now,

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of what they were buying is stuff they

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 4>would have bought in the second quarter, and so there's

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 4>an echo effect. Don't believe the first quarter numbers. They're

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 4>too strong. The second quarter is sort of going to

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 4>be too weak. Right, So that means we don't actually

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 4>know where the economy is going in the hard data.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 4>But it's actually even worse than that, because in the

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 4>middle of all of this, Trump kept messing around with

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 4>tariff some more. You might remember that lovely weekend where

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 4>on a Friday tariffs on the European Union were fifty

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 4>percent and by Monday they were back down to ten percent.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 4>I've also got to lie nine coming up, which is

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 4>the end of ninety and ninety days.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, And by the way, do we have ninety deals

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and ninety days?

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 4>I am not going to follow your add brain now.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 4>I am going to finish my store, but you do.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But we don't have ninety days and ninety deals and

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety days. I just want to point.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Still going to finish my story, all right, right? An

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 4>you tell me I'm getting boring.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm telling you I am completely completely tuned in

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on what you're saying. Go on, really going, I can

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>test you now, just keep going, God damn.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>The thing is the present keeps currying around with tariffs.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>So what could happen is people front run again, right,

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 4>and that'll screw up our economic data through this year.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 4>So we're here from Molly. I don't know.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not getting a clear picture of what the data

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>of what is happening.

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 4>So when someone says to you, oh, the hard data

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 4>is all good, you're like, it's distorted by tariff nonsense.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 4>So normally what we do in a moment like that

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 4>is we turn to the soft data. Right with the

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 4>soft data is it's so bad. It turns out some

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 4>people don't like Trump. It turns out that he's been

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 4>a polarizing figure. And so for the previous fifty years

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 4>in American life, when you ask someone what do you

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 4>think about the state of the economy, they would answer

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 4>that question by thinking about the state of the economy.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Now what they do is they think about who's present,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 4>whether they like that guy, and they answered that way.

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 4>So the soft data have become unreliable, which means we're

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 4>sailing through very, very thick fog. Anyone who tells you

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 4>they're certain it's good or bad is wrong.

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Can we trust the data we get from our government?

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I love that question, Thank you, MOLLI. I want

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 4>to put in astix. Okay, here's the asterisks. The official

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 4>data coming from the government, anything that comes from the

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Census Bureau, stuff produced by nerds is totally reliable. I'm

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 4>not saying it's perfect. I'm saying it's the best statistical

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>guess of things that are very hard to guess. Anything

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 4>coming out of the White House, which has a history

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 4>of stretching the truth, lying at best, bullshit and so on,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 4>and also in competence, so sometimes they put out falsehoods

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 4>because they don't know truths, is utterly unreliable. Now, often

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 4>the White House will be reporting on their understanding of

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 4>the official data. But I do think it's important. I

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 4>don't believe a word coming out of the Treasury Secretary,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the Commerce Secretary, the President, the White House Press secretary,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>or in fact, anyone who's spent more than fourteen minutes

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 4>contaminated on the White House grounds, but official government data

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 4>is okay. Second ASTERIXX. There is a little bit of

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 4>defunding of the government statistical nerds going on right now.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's why I am ask that question because that's

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what I had been told.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Right. It's really a bad idea, because it's really good

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 4>to know where the economy is.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Remember I just told you we're galling through fog. Wouldn't

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>it be good if the world were a little clearer.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 4>But the thing about that is that makes the statistics

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 4>less reliable, but it doesn't make them more trumpy. Right,

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 4>So if you're worried all this telling stories, this is nonsense,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 4>This is bullshit. No, And here's the thing I want

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 4>your listeners to understand. I'm not just a talking head

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 4>who's just saying a thing. I have so many friends

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 4>in these statistical agencies. They're PhD economists, they're super nerds,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 4>and I love them, and they're super committed to their

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 4>work and their craft. And I promise you if they

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 4>were being asked to distort for political reasons, there will

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 4>suddenly lots of anonymous Gmail messages appearing in my inbox,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and I will then call you, Molly and say, I

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>got to talk to your people. This has got to

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 4>get out there.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, because you are an academic, right I mean a nerd?

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And well I don't I as someone who's married to

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>an academic, I don't think of it as being a nerd.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So we can trust the data out of the government

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for now and tell us about the ninety deals in

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety days. Also, it's amazing to me, you know who

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>has completely disappeared from the conversation.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 4>You're going to have to tell me because I must

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>have forgotten who they are. Ron Vera, Well that is

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that is why don't you explain to the listeners?

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Because really deep, I'll let you explain to the listeners.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 4>So can I go back to the beginning of that story?

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Is quite lovely, which is, of course, we know the

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 4>President Trump hates trade, so he asked Jared Kushner very

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 4>early on. He said, find me a trade advisor who's

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.119
<v Speaker 4>also against trade. The problem is that nearly every economist

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 4>thinks that when you find ways to enrich the life

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 4>of others and they find ways to enrich your life,

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 4>that's a good thing. So you have to go shopping

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>to find someone who's on the other side of that.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 4>So Jared Kushner went to Amazon and found a fellow

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 4>who written a book that said how much he hated China.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 4>So that's great, you get racism for free with your

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 4>anti trade theories. That book was written by a fellow

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 4>by the name of Pete Navarro, who is now a

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 4>convicted felon, but at the time was a professor of Economa.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Just had bad ideas. Right.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Look, life is hard to some people. And some people

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 4>grow up thinking that they're going to be the smartest

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 4>kid in the room, and they are all the way

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 4>through high school, and then at a certain point they

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 4>top out and they become bitter, and they come to

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 4>believe that they and they alone hold the keys to

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 4>all truth. So this book that Jared Kushner bought. The

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 4>author of the book was written by Peter Navarro, who

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 4>throughout this book keeps writing about how an expert ron

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 4>Vara authenticates everything that he says. Now you'll notice if

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 4>you play a lot of scrabble, that ron Vara is

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 4>just a rearrangement of the letters of Peter Navarro. So

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 4>it is true. There are two economists in the world

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 4>who support what the president is doing. They just both

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 4>happen to be the same person. How did you get

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 4>me to start? I'm not bitch or can I'm a person.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 4>I like people.

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure, don't do that to me again, Molly baby? And

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>ninety days ago?

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 4>How many times we're going to say something nice about someone?

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Can we have a nice break?

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, say something nice about someone? Vasa Trump is very tall?

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 4>You know what? Okay, I'm going to say two nice things,

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 4>and I'm going to challenge your So the first one's easy,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 4>which is I admire J. Powell, who's getting called all

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 4>sorts of names.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 3>And then that guy that is a remarkable job. He

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 3>is having a tough, tough job. Yeah.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 4>And when I want to upset my liberal students, and

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.719
<v Speaker 4>I sometimes want to julp them a little bit, I

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 4>tell them that the most important economic policy prehaps of

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 4>my lifetime happened under and was caused by President Trump,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 4>and that was the invention of the vaccine. Without the vaccine,

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 4>we would not be out doing business, enjoying our lives

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 4>and so on. And so I want to tip my

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 4>hat to President Trump and Operation warp Speed.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 3>My eighty D is getting bored. Okay, you still.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Didn't say anything nice.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I said of uncle Trump is very tall.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 4>That is mostly true. Okay, deals very very tall.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that's not nothing.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Go and she and I share a and you share

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 4>a hair color.

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>That is sort of go on, continue ninety.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Deals in ninety days, We'll promise by Pinavara and the

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 4>President and the Treasury Secretary and the Commerce secretary, ninety

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 4>deals in ninety days. We're about seventy days in right now.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 4>We sort of kind of have a deal with the UK.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Last time I spoke with your audience. The deal we

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 4>had was a pre deal. It was a deal to

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 4>make a deal outline of a deal that subsequently became

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 4>a deal. Although in that deal the most important part

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of it for the British was letting British steal in

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 4>and that is still being negotiated, so even the deal

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 4>is still mid deal. So that means we've got eighty

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 4>nine other deals to go, and that ignores the other

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and two countries in the world. And then

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 4>today we had President Trump over at NATO where he's

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 4>upset at the Spanish threatening to put extra double tariffs

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 4>on Spain. So to be clear, he's upset about American

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 4>military spending, Sorry about Spanish military spending. So he's decided

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to impose taxes on Americans. Yes, it's not the most

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 4>direct way of doing foreign poves.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 3>No, it's pretty crazy.

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 4>So look, the deals aren't happening. It's clear they're not

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 4>going to happen. I think that if people were betting

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 4>on zero at the end, the White House will pull

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 4>something out. So it's basically not going to happen. But

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 4>there is this problem, which is on July ninth, if

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 4>you don't have a deal, something's going to happen. And

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 4>we don't. And remember July ninth is going back to

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 4>Liberation Day, which we all knew was a disaster. So

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 4>the problem with governing in ninety day pauses is time

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 4>keeps ticking and you actually still have to make a decision,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 4>and we have no indication so far of a coherent

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 4>decision being made.

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Right now, there are still tariffs in place, and they're

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like weird. So for example, I wonder if you could

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>just run us through where we are. We have tariffs

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on Mexico and Canada, but just ten percent right.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Even better than that, which is those guys actually ended

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 4>up our lowest tariff partners having started the trade war

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 4>by fighting them, they're actually now my best friends again,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 4>which is anything that meets the conditions of the old NAFTA,

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 4>which is now called USMCA.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, because like, oh but okay.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 4>So there's two ways in which tariffs work, and I

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 4>apologize to your audience for the confusion, but let me

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 4>just say I didn't design them. There's tariffs that are

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 4>going on countries, right, and then there are so think

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 4>about that as horizontal and their verticals, which is tariff's

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 4>on industries, okay, And so Canada still, I believe Canada

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 4>and Mexico, I believe is still getting steel and aluminum,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 4>order certain auto parts these industries. So in the words,

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 4>we've got pharmaceuticals coming and so on and so forth.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Those ones, by the way, rest on them much stronger

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 4>legal basis. Right then, country by country, We've got China

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 4>right now at thirty percent. We are charging Americans thirty

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 4>percent for everything they buy from China, and we've got

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the world at ten percent. And unless

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 4>anyone thinks that any of this is a low tariff raid,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I just want to remind you that this would put

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 4>tariffs at the highest rate in at least fifty years.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 3>It would put us in greater depression.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Right, it depends what day, because they literally are changing

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the tariff's day by day. Right, would put us four

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 4>or five times higher than any other industrialized country. So

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>this is not what grown ups do, Mollie. I have

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 4>a fun thing I want to bring to the conversation.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Mat plase, yes, and then I have another question about

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I won't have a question about steel tariffs.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.479
<v Speaker 4>Go on, Okay, this is better than steel tariffs. This

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 4>is Jdevans. So remember, way back when I think it

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 4>was two days ago, we ate a lot about Iran

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 4>in the Strait of Homors, which is this very little

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>narrow part where a lot of the oil tankers go through.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 4>So jd Vance said, this is a quote, and I

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 4>just want to get the quote out for people there.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 4>He's talking about Iran. Their entire economy runs through the

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Strait of Homos. If they want to destroy their own

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 4>economy and cause disruptions in the world, I think that

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 4>would be their decision. But why would they do that.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it makes any sense right now. He

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 4>was talking about Iran. But now just let's think about

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 4>how this speaks to the United States. So for us,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 4>much of our economy runs through our ports, just as

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 4>much of the Iranian economy runs through the Strait of Homos,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 4>And just as Iran can use its military to prevent

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 4>ships passing through the Strait of Homos, Trump has been

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 4>using tariffs to prevent ships coming into the LA ports

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 4>and retaliatory tariffs to prevent them from leaving. And so

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 4>much as those shipping restrictions would hurt the Iranian economy,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 4>this is hurting our own economy much as Vance said,

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 4>This is again is a quote. If they want to

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 4>destroy their own economy and cause disruptions in the world,

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that would be their decision. That's literally what

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Trump is doing with tariffs. And remember Vans and but

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 4>why would they do that? I don't think it makes

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>any sense. And I think that Evans has done a

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 4>terrific job in pointing out the aut incoherence of this

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 4>trade policy.

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, correct and also hilarious. Now talk to me about

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the steel tariffs, because there are steel tariffs that Trump

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is putting on and they actually are, weirdly one of

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the few things that Democrats agree with.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 3>So talk to us about that.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, then Democrats about make me a very very big mistake.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm just telling you, and that's my job here.

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 4>No, and I appreciate you. Molly. I was like, steel

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 4>sounds boring, but now I understand why it's important.

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And also the steel is paid with tariffs on

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 4>another metal. What is it, Molly, aluminum? Aluminium?

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes? Go on, go on, go on, go on, yest.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Little Australian American humanity.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Hilarious.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, here's why steal tariffs are a terrible, terrible, terrible idea.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But first explain why liberals, why some Democrats also support them.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You might do a better job on that than me, But.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, tell why they're bad, Say why they're bad.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what I can say is, you know, back in

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 4>the eighties, the particularly pro union parts of the labor

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 4>movement were quite protectionists. So Trump has taken a position

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 4>that was historically a very liberal position. When I began

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 4>my teaching career, my left wing students hated it when

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 4>I talked about trade. Now it's my right wing.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Students, right.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Really important point that Democrats used to be protectionist before Clinton,

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and then they shifted right.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 4>During was fighting Democrats to get it done right. So

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 4>I want to let me actually start with a bigger

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 4>picture point, which is when many people think about trade,

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 4>they think about like France sends us bottles of wine

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 4>and we send them cars, that we create the whole

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 4>damn car and send it over there, and they create

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 4>the whole damn bottle of wine and send it over here.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 4>That's not how it works in reality. We don't have

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 4>any rubber trees in America, so we don't make the

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 4>whole damn car. We got to get the rubber from

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 4>abroad to make the tires. And it's not just rubber

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 4>and rubber trees. It turns out that all the different

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 4>components of the car come from all computer chips might

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 4>come from Taiwan, and the seats might come from Canada,

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 4>and blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. The moment

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 4>you realize that, you realize that when you put tariffs

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 4>on something, you're not just putting tariffs on consumers. You're

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 4>putting tariffs on American businesses. So there's two things that

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 4>are really important about steel and aluminium. First of all,

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 4>stick they are very very important inputs into other parts

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 4>of manufacturing. So what that means is every factory around

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 4>the world can get access to steel without paying a

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 4>special up charge, except those in America. So what you're

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 4>doing is you are making American factories that you steal

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 4>less competitive than any other countries.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 3>They have to pay more because of the tariffs.

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh that reminds me. Let me make a second point

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 4>that is obvious to economists but needs to be Some

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 4>people say, oh, just buy American steel.

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 3>There is no American steel.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 4>There is American steel.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 4>But the problem is if you're an American steel manufacturer

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and your customer calls and says, I'd like to buy

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 4>some steel, you can say, well, you could either buy

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 4>from me or buy from those foreign guys. And if

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 4>you buy from those foreign guys, you have to pay

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a twenty percent tariff. Right, all of a sudden, now

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I realize I can jack up my price and you

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 4>don't have a better choiceh So when you say, oh,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 4>just buy American, sure you can buy American, but I

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 4>guarantee you because steel is traded internationally, it's all the

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 4>price is going to get equalized. And so as a result,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the price of American steel goes up almost one for

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 4>one with a tariff. So it's not just imports that

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 4>become more expensive. It's also American steel, it becomes more expensive.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that makes a lot of sense.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 4>It's called in economics, by the way, the lore of

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 4>one price. When something is traded internationally, we at one

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 4>price around the world. Okay, now I want to tell

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 4>you why steel is a really really bad place for

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 4>what tariffs.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>No, because we're almost out a time, and I want

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you to talk to us about how the Middle East

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to affect the economy.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 4>Ryan has been fascinating and we all became experts on

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 4>the Iranian economy and it's been a terrific couple of

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 4>days learning about it. And a lot of people have said, oh,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 4>that Trump is it's a master stroke in the Middle East,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 4>and in some sense it is. It hasn't turned into bushes.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 4>I raq nonsense.

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's been like four days, but yes, And.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 4>I just want to remind you that as of today's Tuesday, Wednesday,

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 4>whatever day it is, I.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Think it's Wednesday, we are now back.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 4>To exactly where we were seven days ago. The great

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 4>triumph is that he restored relations to where they had been.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 4>If that stays, then basically nothing changes right right?

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 4>If that doesn't and Iran's oil production goes down. That's

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 4>not a big deal, right, because Iran is only two

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 4>or three percent of global production. The reason we've all

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 4>learned how to pronounce the Strait of Homus is because

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 4>that's this tiny little alley where all of the oil,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 4>particular from Saudi Arabia goes through, but also the Emirates,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 4>and so twenty percent of global oil goes through that.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 4>So if Iran were to close that, that would be

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 4>a massive decline in the amount of oil available. Now,

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>realize the United States is basically is in fact energy independent,

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's not that we're going to lose a lot

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 4>of money. But remember what I said a moment ago

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 4>about the law of one price. It's going to become

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 4>more expensive for oil, including American oil, right, And so Americans,

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 4>even though we're mostly buying American oil, are going to

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 4>be paying more if the straight up Homewars closes. So

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 4>that's the real problem is if there's a shock to

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 4>global oil supply, it's not going to be a big

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 4>shock to our income because again, remember we actually produce

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 4>more than we use. But it would be a shock

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 4>to prices, and so it could potentially have further effects

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 4>on inflation. But right now I am hopeful that our

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 4>steady and stable foreign policy will continue to reap incredible rewards.

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, thank you, Justin for adding a

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of levity.

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>That wasn't liberty, that was the stable foreign policy. Jesus

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 3>fucking Christ, Thank you.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>David Daly is a senior fellow at Fair Vote and

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the author of rat Fucked, Why Your Vote Doesn't Count.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Fast Politics, David, Oh, it's good to

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 3>be here, Molly.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about rank choice voting. I still don't understand

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>how it works.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 3>That's the truth.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I saw the election of Mary Paroda in Alaska

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>congresswoman for Alaska's one congressional seat Democrat one through ranked

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>choice voting. I saw we got Eric Adams. Nobody wanted

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that through rank choice voting. But now we have mon Dannie,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who actually was leading in the polls and is reflective

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of I think the voting. And this was after the

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>first round. So talk us through how rank choice voting

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>works place.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Sure, Absolutely, rank choice voting really is an effective tool

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 5>to give voters more power anytime there's a race with

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 5>more than two candidates, whenever there's two candidates, it's all

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 5>pretty easy, right, you pick one or the other. Somebody

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 5>usually wins more than fifty percent of the vote, unless

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 5>there's a right end or you know, something silly. But

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 5>whenever you have more than two candidates, you have the

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.239
<v Speaker 5>possibility of a spoiler, You have the possibility of a

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 5>split field, you have the possibility of a non majority winner.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 5>And that is, you know, not a great thing. What

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 5>it does is it takes choice that voters want right.

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Voters want to have lots of candidates in a race.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 5>They want to be able to choose. But when you

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 5>can only pick one, it makes your life as a

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 5>voter exceptionally complicated. Look at New York City yesterday, where

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 5>you had a field of eleven mayoral candidates. If you

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 5>want to vote for somebody who your favorite candidate might

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 5>be fourth or fifth in the polls, So then you

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 5>have to decide, well, is it okay for me to

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 5>vote for this person who's fourth or fifth? By doing so,

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 5>am I really electing the person I like the least.

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 5>It's an impossible situation to be in, and you run

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 5>the risk of somebody winning with thirty five percent of

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 5>the vote or even less who everyone does not want.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 5>So with rank choice voting, what you get to do

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 5>is put your choices in order. Every race is a

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 5>little bit different. In New York yesterday, you were able

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 5>to select your top five and you're able to say, well,

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 5>I want this person first, this person second, this person third.

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 5>It's a pretty common intuitive thing for most of us.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 5>We can look at a race with lots of people

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 5>and you know, imagine how it would play out. Who

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 5>we like, who we don't like. And it works as

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 5>simple as this. If somebody wins more than fifty percent

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 5>in the round, they win, just like any other election.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 5>But if nobody wins fifty percent in the first round,

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 5>the bottom candidates are eliminated. And what happens then is

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 5>if your candidate is still alive, your vote stays with them.

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 5>If your candidate is knocked out, it moves to your second,

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 5>third choice, and so on. The runoff process continues until

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 5>there is a majority winner. Really, what OURCV does is

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.719
<v Speaker 5>it creates a majority winner from a huge field and

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 5>empowers voters to turn choice into something positive.

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I want you to explain this rank choice

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>voting is supposed to And I say this because I

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have really scrupulously avoided getting involved in the Democratic mayoral

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>primary for any number of reasons. But I'm curious ranked

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>choice voting it is advertised as electing the most centralized candidate.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Does that bear out from yesterday?

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't think that's right. I don't think RCV

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 5>does elect the most centrist candidate. I think it elects

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 5>the candidate with the broadest and widest support. And sometimes

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 5>that might be a centrist. But sometimes what we saw

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 5>in New York yesterday is it's a thirty three year

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 5>old Democratic socialist who has majority support. I mean, OURCV

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 5>has been used in Virginia to elect Glenn Youngkin. It

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 5>has been used in Alaska to elect everyone from Mary

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 5>Peltola to Nick Beggish to Lisa Murkowski. What RCV does

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 5>is it creates a majority winner, and it encourages candidates

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 5>to run more unifying campaigns. I would say that instead

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 5>of electing a centrist, really, what RCV does is it

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 5>elects somebody who goes out and talks to everyone. It

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 5>sets up different campaign incentives. If you can win a

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 5>race with thirty out of the vote, like you could

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 5>have in New York City prior to our CV, then

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 5>the kind of race that Andrew Cuomo ran makes a

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 5>lot more sense.

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 5>He avoided the press, he avoided the public, He didn't

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 5>show up at a lot of panels to talk to people,

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 5>and he thought that his name recognition and money would

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 5>muscle him through to thirty eight or forty percent in

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 5>a divided field, and then you would have had a

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 5>mayoral nominee that sixty percent of people voted against, but

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 5>you would be the choice. Nevertheless, Mom Donnie campaigned in

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 5>a very different way right. He built bridges amongst the

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 5>entire left in liberal universe. He camp in with the

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 5>other candidates. You saw candidates campaigning together. You saw Mom

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Donnie asking his supporters to help raise money for Adrian Adams.

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 5>You saw the alliances and the cross endorsements. When Mom

0:35:56.239 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 5>Donnie was at one percent in the polls back in March,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 5>the Working Families Party, instead of endorsing one candidate and

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 5>coorinating somebody right, they endorsed a slate of four and

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 5>they allowed the campaign to play out. If there had

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 5>not been ranked choice voting, what you probably see in

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 5>New York City is that there would have been pressure

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 5>amongst the left liberal candidates to drop out of the

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 5>race to coalesce around one person, so that nobody spoiled

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 5>it or produced a winner with thirty five percent. Instead,

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 5>we got an actual campaign about actual issues. Nobody was

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 5>telling anyone to drop out of the race, and when

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 5>the actual issues were discussed and debated, you saw the

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 5>candidate at one percent catch fire. And the result is,

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:44.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, a fairly seismic upset.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, that's a really good point, and I

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think I put that together. So what you're saying

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is that rank choice voting means that it's not the

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>same kind of high stakes situation. So, for example, one

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of the big problems we have in Congress, among other things,

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and we have a lot of problems in Congress, and

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I am here to tell you about them, but one

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 1>of the big problems we have in Congress is that

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the name recognition does in fact muscle people through.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking of Tom Taylis.

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.479
<v Speaker 1>That you can sort of go for your forty one

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>percent or you're thirty nine percent, thirty nine and a

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>half percent, and with Democrats because they're polite and they

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're if you have seniority, you kind

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of win because people you know. I mean, that's one

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I've really been critical about in

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats. So the thinking here is basically that because

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you are ranking, you can keep a bigger field.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 5>You can keep a bigger field, you give voters more choice.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 5>There's less pressure on candidates not to jump into a primary, right.

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, in a race like New York yesterday, people

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 5>would have been telling a candidate like Mom Dannie to

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 5>wait his turn. Instead, he's able to run without any

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 5>fear of being a spoil, spoiler tracting from other progressives

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 5>or liberals.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 3>In the race.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of really good uses for this, and

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 5>I think what you've identified in Congress is really right

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 5>on right. What we've seen in Congress is because so

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 5>many districts, as we've talked about on the show before,

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 5>have been gerrymandered so that one side or the other

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 5>wins in a lopsided fashion. The only competition for these

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 5>seats is in partisan primaries, and so what you often

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 5>get is a low turnout summer election that effectively determines

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 5>the race for everybody, because the winner of the primary

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 5>goes on guaranteed to November, and that is how you

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 5>end up with some of the most polarizing figures in Congress.

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Right a Marcherie Taylor Grand They.

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 5>Won primaries with thirty five thirty six percent of the vote,

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 5>and then, because the district was so wired one way

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 5>or the other, they are effectively locked into a race.

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 5>And then because of the power of incumbency and name recognition,

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 5>they can hold on to it forever. Ranked voice voting

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 5>is an especially useful tool in party primaries, you know,

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 5>as it is in general elections, but really truly in

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 5>party primaries where eleven or twelve people are seeking the

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 5>same seat and somebody can win with a tiny plurality

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 5>of the vote, it's better for parties and it's better

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 5>for voters to use our CV.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 3>So where is our CV in getting adapted? Too different?

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what, first of all, the pushback on it? It's interesting,

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So Virginia has our CV.

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Virginia Republicans have used our CV in their primaries. Wow,

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 5>that's wild, isn't it?

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all, why have Virginia Republicans used it in

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>their primaries? Because I don't think of Republicans as and

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>May also has it, and Alaska, So explain to us

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of how this gets adapted, and how this doesn't

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get adapted, and what this looks like now, and why

0:39:57.520 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>did Republicans pick it in Virginia.

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 5>Republic in Virginia picked it because they were looking at

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 5>a primary for governor in twenty twenty one that was

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 5>going to have four or five candidates in it, and

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 5>everybody was from a different ideological lane. Everybody was at

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 5>each other's throats, and they realized that OURCV would create

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 5>a different kind of race, that it would create a

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 5>race in which the candidate with the broadest and deepest

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 5>support one and it would be more unifying.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 4>You saw this in New York City yesterday.

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 5>As well, right that Andrew Cuomo conceded that race, you know,

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 5>on day one, and we will see if he runs

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 5>as an independent or not. But it doesn't look off

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 5>of his statements yesterday that he's inclined to do so.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 5>So you end up without the kind of nastiness and

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 5>bitterness that you have in a typical intra party primary.

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 5>What you would have had in Virginia in twenty twenty one,

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 5>what you would have had in New York over the

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 5>last couple of months, would have been candidates at each

0:40:56.320 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 5>other's throats, going deeply negative, essentially the other side talking

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 5>points or the fault to use against them, and just

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, in general bitterness and anger inside the party.

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, that that person took a nomination for right, but.

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't happen because you want to be ranked even

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're not the first choice.

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's really interesting.

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 5>You're less likely to go nuclear on the other folks, right.

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if New York City was using a traditional

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 5>old school runoff, what you would have seen is all

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 5>of the Liberals fighting to be the second person going

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 5>up against Cuomo. Instead of campaigning together and finding common

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 5>ground with each other and showing up after Brad Lander

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 5>is arrested, they would have been at each other's throats,

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 5>and the Left in New York City would not have

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 5>been unified at all heading into this campaign. Instead, it's

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 5>a completely different race. Virginia Republicans say the exact same thing,

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 5>that they were able to produce a nominee. Nobody could

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 5>argue it because there was much more than fifty percent,

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 5>and they headed into the fall and they beat Terry mccauliffe, right,

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 5>they pulled off an upset nobody imagine you can compare

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 5>that to what happened in New Jersey's governor primary a

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks ago, right in which you had Mickey

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Cheryl win that race, but with about thirty three thirty

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 5>four percent from a highly contested primary. Everybody went deeply

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 5>negative on each other for a weeks and weeks handed

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Republicans talking points for the fall. New Jersey to be

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 5>a pretty safe state for Democrats, but Republicans set some

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 5>blood in the water. There's a lot of money in there.

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.479
<v Speaker 5>Wouldn't it be better if for the Democrats if they

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 5>had come together around a nominee and they were using

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 5>these months to go after the other side rather than

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 5>try to heal those wounds internally.

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, why don't we do that?

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 5>I think we should, And I think what we're seeing

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 5>is more and more states and localities understand and the

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 5>benefits of this as more and more voters use it

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 5>and like it. There was a Common Cause pull back

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty one in New York that shows something

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 5>like ninety one percent of voters found it easy to

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 5>use and liked it. I think that voters are going

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 5>to say, why don't we get to use this as well?

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 5>And why can't we use it? In every campaign. We're

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 5>going to be heading towards right a twenty twenty eight

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 5>presidential primary season sooner than anybody realizes, right, and there

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 5>could be huge fields on both sides. You had twenty

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 5>five Democrats back in twenty twenty four, seventeen Republicans back

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 5>in twenty sixteen. Imagine what an open race on both

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 5>sides brings out. And we could again see you know,

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 5>non majority nominees coming out, the kinds of choices Americans

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 5>get end up being being weakened. And you know, I mean,

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 5>all you have to do is look back at twenty

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 5>twenty in the Democratic primary, right, all those candidates, all

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 5>of them fighting with each other, elbowing each other out.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Of providing for child that he is still using.

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 5>Right, right, when Harris goes after Biden on bussing in

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 5>the twenty twenty Democratic debates, that's still a moment that

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Republicans were using against her in the twenty for election.

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, a very good and salient point. Right now,

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 1>where is rank choice voting?

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Rank choice voting is being used right now in Maine,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 5>It's being used in Alaska, it is being used in

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 5>a number of cities nationwide. Whether it's New York, big

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 5>cities in Minnesota, big cities in California, Oakland, San Francisco.

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 5>But it is also being really widely used across Utah.

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 5>So it is happening in red states, it's happening in

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 5>blue states, it's happening in purple states. There is an

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 5>awful lot of momentum around this because voters recognize it

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 5>as a tool that delivers them something they really want,

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 5>more choice, but also ensures that that choice doesn't become complicated,

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 5>and it guarantees a majority winner. So it encourages bigger, broader,

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 5>more issue based campaigns. And what we see is everywhere

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 5>it's being used, voters like it, want to expand it,

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 5>and I think we're going to continue to see even

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 5>more of them.

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you, thank you, David, thank you, Molly.

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 3>A moment.

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Jesse Cannon Bally, a whistleblower, is alleging that Trump's DOJ

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 2>told lawyers to disobey court orders. And you'll be really

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 2>shocked to hear this about who was leading that charge,

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 2>amulbo Yes, well, Bali, could you catch the listeners up

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>For those who forget this fellow's name, war per ops

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 2>confuse him with like a guy with a creole restaurant

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 2>in New Orleans or something.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Thing Bove is bad, Bov is real bad.

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So, by the way, so Bob is up for a judgeship.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's why some of this is coming out. This

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower who was fired by both for refusing to do

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>some of this stuff he wanted. So the guy who

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>was fired was a career a justice partman lawyer who

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was fired fired after truthfully staying in court that the

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>administration had wrongfully removed Kilmar Albrego Garcia. You'll remember him

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>from earlier this season when he was deported to Seacott

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the Trump administration said they couldn't find him,

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they said they wouldn't bring him back, and

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>then they said, by the way, I just want to

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>point out they're spending so much money and time on

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>one person, like even just besides the moral and ethical

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>implications of just deporting people because they have they look

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like a race you're mad at. Even despite the moracle

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and ethical issues here, it's just a stupid fucking waste

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of time, right, I mean, this guy, it would it's

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>just I mean, it's you know, millions of dollars being

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>spent on this guy, and it's just insane anyway. So

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Bob Trump has nominated him for a seat on the

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. And now

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 1>we have this whistleblower who's coming out and saying that

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Bob said things like we might need to consider telling

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the courts to fuck you and ignore any court order.

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, we know this was going on behind

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, but it's certainly nice to have someone report it.

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Todd Blanche, She'll remember Todd Blanche. He's the deputy Attorney

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>general and he was also Donald Trump's criminal lawyer, because

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump only knows four people. The New York Times

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:56.439
<v Speaker 1>article describes falsehoods purportedly made by a disgruntled former employee

0:47:56.840 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and elite to the press in a violation of ethical obligations.

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Says Blanche, he actually wrote that on Twitter. Again. Obviously

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>both did this. Obviously Todd Blanche is lying. Has anyone

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>seen this White House? You know? If it's anything like

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one point, Oh, they're going to be a bazillion memoirs

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of people who tried to work in the White House

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and got traumatized by Trump. I mean, I can't believe

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we're still fucking covering this. That's it for this episode

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, and

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Saturday to hear the best minds and politics make sense

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of all this chaos. If you enjoy this podcast, please

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>send it to a friend and keep the conversation going.

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.