WEBVTT - Surveillance: Money Will Go Back To EM, Dennis Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg here

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York. I'm really pleased to say that joining

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>us now is Jeff Dennis Ubs, head of Global Emerging

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Markets equity strategist, and he joins us on the phone. Jeff,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up with you, sir. Some confidence and

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some optimism that you have in em Tell me how

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you convince the investor right now who has shifting investments

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>towards the United States to shift back international. I think

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple there's a couple of things that really

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>highlight this. First of all, um our view is that

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>apart from one or two countries, actually three countries were Turkey,

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>South Africa and Brazil, you have not really seen a

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>deterioration in a key deterioration e M. Fundamentals during the

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>course of this year. Those three countries you have seen

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that deterioration, and that means once you get to see

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>global financial markets settled down, and for us that means

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the dollar stops going up and starts to go down again.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think money will come back into the emerging markets.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a mixture of reasonably sound fundamentals and in

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>most of the emerging market countries combined with our view

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollars going lower of the course of the rest

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of this year and into two thousand and nineteen, and

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what that will do is pull money back towards the

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. Jeff, is dollar witness a prerequisite for EM

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>equity to start performing again? That is that is my view.

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>For sure, we do. I mean, at the very least

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you need dollar stability. But you you pose the question

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning by saying what gets people to

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>move out of the US and look for emerging markets?

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the weaker dollar is part of that. And

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>if I was sitting here in the house view was

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the dollar was going a lot stronger, it would be

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just very hard to be optimistic about a EM. So

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in my view, yes, it is absolutely critical to our

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to the view that you'll get some gains in them

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>over the rest of you. I think it's going to

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be a blowout or anything like that, but we expect

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>marks to be hired by the end of the buy

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>around seven from current levels dollars. Key to that from

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a thirty five thousand feet view, the regional shift has

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>been quite remarkable over the last six months away from

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>international into the United States. If you are thinking about

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>shaping things to pivot back, Jeff, there's some countries out

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there that have aggressively high interest rates, including countries like

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Turkey and Argentina. Let's break em down a little bit more.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Where are you looking well? As I say, I think

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that for example, if you if we look at Turkey,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Turkey has done some dramatic things on interest rates recently,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>although it was obviously very much delayed, and they've still

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>got very large fundamental issues, which is a huge current

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>account deficit, which makes them vulnerable to any any hiccup

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of global financial conditions, we think you should

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be more looking at the countries that have responded well

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of monetary policy to the pressures of recent months,

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>where we think in a week of dollar environment you

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>will get some some flows coming back in. A very

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>good example of that is Indonesia, which has been hit

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>very badly this year. We think the fundamentals are frankly

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>perfectly okay, Okay, They've got a modest current account deficit,

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but in a week of dollar environment, I think that

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>goes away as a concern. So Indonesia is a place

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we look. We look at career, which is a very

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>cheap market. Once again, of course there I guess the

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>risk and careers people being concerned about what the trade war,

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>which I guess is what we have to call up

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>between the U S and China, what that could do

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for Chinese growth, and therefore a follow one for Korean exports.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But the market is very cheap, and I'll give you one.

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>In Latin America, we like Mexico a lot. We think

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the currency is very oversold. Still we think that then

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>after whatever we're gonna call it in future is going

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to get redone and the economy continues to tick along,

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, not very strong, but some perfectly okay. So

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>those are some examples of markets we take a look at.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Markets are their banking and their finance. Is that the

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to buy the established banks. We do have to

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>be overweight financials, and we do think that is a

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>good way to to go back into these markets for

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the for the medium to long term um. Your listeners

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>may not be aware, but basically fifty of the ms

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>c I Emerging Market Index now is technology and banks.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The text a bit banks are a bit less than

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so you've got to go one one to the other.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We're not pushing technology dramatically, although you know we we

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be underweight text shares at this point in the end,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but we think the better way to play it is

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.119
<v Speaker 1>through financials, and there's reasons for that. You're getting credit

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>cycles in certain economies, but you are seeing a bit

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of margin improvement as interest rates have gone up around

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. And frankly, our analysts four e M banks

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>also things. A lot of banks in EM and everything

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>different plays as well. But Jeff, you've been doing this

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>since time began. And where John it used to be

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like an act of God. You put ten percent of

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>your money and e M and never more because it

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>was too risky. How much do you put in EM

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>within a blended portfolio? Is U b s saying that

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the developed country and particularly the United States market is

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so rich that you load the boat on e M.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you grade that? Definitely, No, you don't load

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the boat on the M because unfortunately, so much of

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>how EM behaves will be determined not by what e

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>M itself is doing, but by what global financial markets

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>overall are doing. And that of course means fair bond deals,

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>UM and the dollar itself. So if we could time

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this right, we'd all be very much richer than we are.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The problem is timing it is difficult, and so e

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>M is about now of the of the global benchmark,

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and and I don't think it makes a lot of

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>sense for investors to be putting much more than that

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>amount of money into EM unless they're smarter than me

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying to time it. I think we

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we still like the U S market. Are u S

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>strategies put out of note yesterday. We think that the

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>high trade war could give you a short term pullback,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but we're still looking at SMP at the end of

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the year. So actually, I think the US will be

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a competitive place to put money of four

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets over the rest of the year. So I'm

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure you're going to see huge out performance, but

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think the time when you want to be

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>major underway. Tom which of course would have been the

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>call for the first nine months of this year. I

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>think that that time is probably beginning to come to

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>an end now, Jeff, I just want to get to

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>find a word and what's coming out of China at

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the moment. They've promised this morning not to weaponize the currency,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but the data in the last tie y four hours

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>showing their trimming their treasury holdings, now there's going to

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>be some big conspiracy theories out there, so please dismiss

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>them if you can give us the reality check what's

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>happening with China. We certainly think they're not going to

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>use the devaluation of the currency too as a response.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>On the trade side, we also don't think they're going

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to shared if you like their um their treasury holdings.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a question of stocks versus flows.

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>We think what is quite lightly as China will not

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>buy as much you stebt at the margin going forward,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so I buy as much as they've done in the past, um,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but when we don't believe they're going to sell less

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>stock of debt they've already got, so I think Chinese

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>demanded the margin may come down, but you know, for

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>them to actually start selling aggressively what they own will

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just make things worse for themselves because they'll they'll have

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to sell into a falling market. So weaponizing either bonds

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or the dollar is still or the currency, I should say,

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is still very unlikely. We think what China is still

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is to be constructive as much as possible,

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>um considered responses to what's going on in the US

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and see how this plays out. Because at the end

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of the day, a major, major breakdown of economic relationships

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>between China and the US is dangerous for China because

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it puts the economy under more pressures. So I think cautious,

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>considered responses by the Chinese will continue to be the

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>most likely thing to expect. Here's Jeff Dners, thank you

0:07:55.800 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so much with us Life from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm really pleased to say the former GE vice chair

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>has dropped by Beth Comstock, author now of Imagine It Forward, Courage, Creativity,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Power of Change. Beth, good morning to you,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Thanks for having me. Can we just start

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>by talking about the time when you you turned down

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs. It gets on the phone and gives you

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a call out of nowhere and you say no. Eventually,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>how does that work. Yeah, well, I was at NBC

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time, leading did the digital in the Digital Future,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was a tough assignment. And I got to

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>work with Apple and they'd reached out to me about

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a job. At first it was in the iTunes area

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and I get a call one day and it's like

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs sort of lobbying. Hey, I'd like just want

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, we'd love to have you here, and he

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>said something uh with the iPhone hadn't been introduced, and

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he said things are going to get really big here

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And it just didn't seem like the right

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>job for me at the time, so I said no. Um.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And then he came back a couple of months later,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>he was looking for something a new sort of innovation role,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly around clean tech, and I said no again. And

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I did regret it for for a while for a

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons. I mean one, I remember sitting at

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen table with my husband. We were going through

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the financials, going how big could this stock ever be? Really?

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean really, um, So clearly I didn't imagine that

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>forward um and UM. And I think I partly it

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>was I didn't want I didn't I saw them as

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a technology company. I was in media, wanted to do content,

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>so I had a clear strategic reason for not wanting

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it. But sure I regretted it. Apple went

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>on to become this amazing jug or not. I think

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I could have learned to be better. I think jobs

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and that team would have pushed me to be better.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I regretted that, and maybe there was a bit of

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fear and not taking it, and I sort of regretted that.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, I was very loyal to my company.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I had good reasons for not wanting to move my

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>family and taking that on a lot of people. David

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Brooks has been great about this. The smooth people and

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and and Masters of Business Administration NBA. People always have

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a zeitgeist of the moment, the present MBA zeitgeist. What

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>do they get wrong about the realities of managing? Yeah?

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that question, I I yeah, No, it's around.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You're good. I m I Phara. I recruited at Gee.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I would recruit up too hundred and fifty nbas every

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>year for about a decade. So I got to work.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go to business school. You've heard every line

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I've and why we recruited them and why I was

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>attracted to NBA's as they come with an amazing toolkit.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>What NBA's are not trained to do is to be

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial or encouraged to be entrepreneurial and put in those

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>situations of figuring it out. And the argument I'm making

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in my book is that we're just in such a

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>time of such disruptive change that there is no tool

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>kit for that. And what's great John about her book

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as they fight like cats and dogs. I mean she's

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, like page two, there's four people in the

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>room screaming at everybody. Here's a big question that would

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>never happen on surveillance. Now that that happens in a

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>commercial breaks like pretty, I'm pretty sure our audience can

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>work that out for themselves best. This year, two big

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate stories, perhaps defined by mismanagement, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Tesla

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk with a big question that I know that

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you can answer. Can you be an entrepreneur in a

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>company as big as Facebook, as big as Tesla? I were?

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, I I wonder. I think this is a

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge for every company and investors to think about. We

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>have these few amazing leaders who seemingly do it. But

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>there is also a time when you need, maybe need

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to change out the leadership from a and have them

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>have a different kind of role. I'm not suggesting Mark

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>zucker Book should should step aside, but does he have

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>enough people around him that can help him think through Really?

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>In this case, to me, Facebook was and imagine it

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>forward challenge, right? Were they thinking ahead of those unintended

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>consequences that could have happened? I would say maybe there

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>would be a need for more strategic thinking there. Elon

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk seems to me to be a good case of

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>needing a great to old culture and a great team.

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And you can't expect the leader to do everything, and

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's signed up to do more than he should.

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>How difficult is it, though, to change a culture when

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the culture is defined by the entrepreneur who found at

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the company. Yeah, well, I think that is the big challenge.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>We expect them to be superhuman, these these business gods,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and they are not. Well, then the business gods is

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>They've got to delegate at some point, and so much

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of it is succession, so much of it is just

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the day to day grind of delegating. How do you

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>delegate constructively and do it with courage, creativity and truly

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have power to change. I mean that's the issue, isn't it. Yeah,

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll look at look at Musk and Tesla. I mean,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I only know what I read, but a lot of

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>people have left in the past six months. Obviously it's

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a stressful situation. But if you put the investment into

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the team and delegating and things, I don't know. He

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to say, I don't have all the answers. I

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>need you to figure it out. Here's where we're going.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You help us. I gotta squeeze in this question because

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>John's only working like a thirty eight hour week with

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>his four properties. Are we working too long of weeks?

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Our parent didn't do this, did they? Well, I would say,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think we're working maybe on the

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong things too long. I'm big on getting out and discovering,

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>get out and seeing where trends are. And I think

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>we're in the Yeah. That are you in the same

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>leadings too often having the same discussions? You probably shouldn't

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>do that. No, but just the whole you got twenty

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of the population working, and do they are they working? Smart?

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the question. Maybe if it's seventy hours

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and ten percent of it's out and discovering trends in

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the future, I'd say that's worth it. Beth Conto, thank

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. The book has imagined it forward, courage,

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>creativity and the power of change. And what's glorious about it,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll be direct, is all of you that are fed

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>up with thought leaders. This is the anti thought leader

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>book that sounds like it is. I'm so sick I

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>thought leadership. What does that even mean? It doesn't mean anything.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's a lot of yelling and screaming

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and people or you know, they try to come to

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>decisions that are constructive, like her brilliant decision not to

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>load the boat on it will stock it fourth not alone.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. So it's always good to speak to a

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>gentleman of the legislative branch, but even better to speak

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to someone who actually understands executive capabilities more important than anything.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a former mayor of Dayton, Ohio, holding court in

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the tenth district of Ohio South. I'm gonna call it

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Southwest of Columbus. Uh. Michael Turner joins us this morning Congressman,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilled to have you with us. What did you learn,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Congressman about the special election to your northeast, the twelfth

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Congressional district. How do you guys get Republican turnout for

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the mid term election? Well, thank you, appreciate you have

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>me this morning, and UM for you know, focusing on Ohio.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue probably for most people is is

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>getting out to vote coming up this this November. I

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think that if you look across the country, people see

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is proving. They see that UM, the

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>outlook is bright. You know, Ohio frequently UM leads in

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>recession and lags in recovery. Right now, OHI always strong.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Do we know that the economy is strong? Um? You know,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>special elections always have different turnouts in general elections because

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they're scheduled at irregular times, which is what the Kurd

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in Columbus um for the best congressional race. I think

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everyone knows that the election is coming up

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in November is the one that's important that they need

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to turn out for. And I think that's the one

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that UM where people are going to voice their opinion

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is strong. UM, we need to continue

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the direction we're going to build jobs. It's just one

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>more question in the politics before we get to a

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>year important abilities and armed services and intelligence and that

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is and I don't mean you and the tenth district,

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>but as a general statement, do you want the president

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to show up? I mean is he helping mainstream Republicans

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like you right now? Well? You know, um, I think

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the president in in focusing on the economy is probably

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the best place that we need him to be UM.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's where um he's he's making headway. We can

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>see it with the renegotiated NaSTA with Mexico. We can

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>see it with the job reports. I think he's focused there.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably the one that resonates with the people, um,

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at their kitchen tables and what's happening in

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>their household. And that's where his voice is probably most important.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your abilities coming as out of mayor

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of dating of course with Roy Patterson there, you've always

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>looked at armed services and protecting protection of our air

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>force assets. Right now, there is a dialogue with Russia.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Do we risk with all the back and forth of

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the Russia probe and all that, do we risk giving

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>up intelligence secrets, you know, I this is this is

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>important debate I think with respect to overall our democracy

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and is there you know, three real important issues for

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>us to address here. One obviously is Russian meddling. Um.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>We need to make certainly identify the ways in which

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>they're attempting to do that. They've done it in Europe,

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They've done it, you know in the Baltics. Um specifically,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they're they're trying to interstere there in the politics. We

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>saw even a mccrone's election at France. Getting an understanding

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of what they have undertaken to try to affect public

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>opinion and democracies and dabble in our democracies and elections

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly important. The second, of course, is the the

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>issue with respect to the presidents himself and his campaign

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think Hillary Clinton's campaign and the and the

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and the give a Credit National Committee. That's an important

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>dialogue to have, um. And you know what occurred there,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that Hillary Clinton's campaign, the Democratic

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>National Committee, funded a former British spy to go to

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the Russians define dirt on their opponents is certainly I

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think equally as important of an issue's review. And then

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>then thirdly this this issue of what was happening in

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice in our intelligence community. It clearly

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>appears that there were abuses. There are certainly in the

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>baser courts where um, politically funded opposition materials were used

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and as evidence in a court for the purposes of

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>getting surveillance on a presidential campaign. Um, you know, all

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of those things I think are incredibly important for us

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to get within the day to day grind of you

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 1>doing this in the legislative offices? Are we naive about

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the Russians? To me that whatever the Republican or Democrats,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Clinton, President Trump, whatever the dirt is of the moment,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>are we just naive about the Russia impulse into our

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>domestic affairs? Well? I think, Um, I think perhaps the

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>whole West is, including United States and our European allies,

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>because we we you know, we saw even after the

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Berlin Waltz fell, a sense of you know, there are

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>partner NATO declaring that we don't even have Russia as

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>an adversary. Um, you know, adversary self select and Russia

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly has self selected that they see both in meddling

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in our democracies and their aggressive invasion of Georgia Ukraine,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>their military build up, their monorization of the nuclear weapons,

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>their self declaration of what their trigger is using nuclear weapons.

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>They are our adversary, Carson, in the time that we've

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>got left, I really want to turn back to something

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Americans are remarkably naive about, and that we

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the Wright Brothers is being down in the

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolinas in the iconic photo of the plane and the beach,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and yet your district is the heart of our original

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>aviation at district, you're no doubt a supporter of Right Patterson,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>which was the Wilbur right Field of the nineteen twenties,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and all that tell us about the need that we

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have to husband our air force assets in a time

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of peace. It always slips away, doesn't it. And what

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is right Paterson Air Force based doing to keep that

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>energy going? And particularly I look at the air base wing.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>What's the forward motion in a time of peace? And

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great point. And I appreciate that

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, with the Right Brothers and our innovation,

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know where they uh built and did all their

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>their research in data Ohio and as you mentioned in

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>What's North Carolina achieved the first flight came back to

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the right path from that point through stealth. Our engineers

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and scientists have tried to advance us with ingenuity. What

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>happens frequently is we cut our budgets and we stopped

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that that learning, that that advancement of ingenuity until we

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have an adversary who goes past us. And we're staying

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that with China with what they've done and dealing our

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>technology for the U thirty five, but we're now looking

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to modernize the five instead of us challenging our engineer

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and scientists and saying, let's know, let's reach as far

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as we can, but we always say, well, let's just

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>reach just a you know, smidgen past where our advastaries

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>are doing. And that created So I'm at a rotary

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>outside Washington Crossing and I'm listening to you go on

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about this. I'm like, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, what about

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the wrench the costs of thousand dollars? Are we anywhere

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>near better efficiency of budgets for the Pentagon? Absolutely? Um.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>We We've we've instituted um auditing. We've also in studed

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>perform in acquisition and I think we're doing probably the

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>probably the most important thing, and that is we're reaching

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>past are large uh industrial defense industrial base too small

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that have innovation and being able to pull that forward.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>The ability for them to be able to work with

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, with the Department of Defense and bring

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that ingenuity to the table is probably where we've not

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>only see savings, but advancement and technology. Oh, Congress, and

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>let's save their Michael Turner loved to talk to you

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>always out of Dayton, Ohio, the former mayor of Dayton,

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, representing the tenth Congressional district. I said this yesterday, folks,

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and I really mean it, and that all the years

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg, this is maybe the best one hour interview

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen. It is with a gentleman who is misunderstood

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in a great mystery to so many within investment finance

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>economics of America and within our corporate experiment. And that

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>would be Jeffrey Bezos of Amazon. That must mean and

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>always mean David Rubinstein, The David Rubinstein Show. Peer to

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>peer conversations of course, uh an our conversation between Mr

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Rubinstein and Jeff Bezos and David Rubinstein joins us. Now, David,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a kid out of New Mexico, goes to Princeton, just

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely excels and achieves, and it's remarkable. In your conversation,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Nation is the set of many failures he had on

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the path to success. Congratulations on what I would suggest

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>is the interview of the year. Well, thank you, m Jeff.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>There's somebody I've known for quite a while, and in fact,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>when he was getting company started, UH, one of my companies,

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle was was involved a little bit. We got some stock,

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't think it would be that successful, so

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we sold it too soon. It's probably worth five billion

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day or so. Today. I pointed it out

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to him. Jeff is an extremely smart person who doesn't

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>really want to be called the richest man in the world,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>which is what he now is. But because Amazon has

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>done so well this year, the stock is up. He

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is now by far the richest man the world, with

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a net worth of a hundred and sixty billion dollars

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>or so. On the day that I interviewed him, in

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>front of about two thousand people from the Washington business community, UM,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>he announced a two billion dollar gift UH part of

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a philanthropy effort that he's beginning, but his main focus

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in philanthropy has really been his Blue Origin, which he

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>regards as a philanthropic effort to kind of improve our

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to travel on outer space. The company has been

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>done spectacularly well over the years, but he has been private.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Among the movers and shakers, David I would suggest he's

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the one that we, as in a collective America, know

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the least about. What is the management method of Jeff Bezos?

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>What's the day to day method that he uses well?

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>He would say that his style is somewhat different than others.

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't like to have meetings before ten am. Um.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He likes to get eight hours of sleep, and most

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>macho CEOs don't want to admit they need eight hours

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of sleep or want to get eight hours of sleep. Um.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't like power point presentations in his band them.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>He likes memos instead of power point presentations. He likes

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>to spend a lot of time with his family and

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>his kids. But also he is a person who says

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he makes most of his good decisions by intuition, not

0:24:56.000 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>by detailed analysis and strategic kind of memos. He intuition

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what he said. It really has helped him. He

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>said his best decisions are made by intuition. I asked

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>him what his intuition wasn't where he was going to

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>place the second headquarters, and he was laughed. He has

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a very famous laugh. But he demured and said that

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't make that announcement until the end of the year,

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and no one really knows what he's going to do

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is outside the company. You know, one thing that I'm

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>struck by with the two billion dollar philanthropy announcement that

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he made was how long it took for him to

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>make this move and just the scope of what he

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>could potentially do with his riches. Did you get a

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of why he waited so long and whether he's

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about to unleash the floodgates of his cash or whether

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>this is just basically the final act here. Well, remember,

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the wealth has coming this in the

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>last year or so. The stock is up so much

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>this year that it's not nearly it's nearly doubled his

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>net worth in the last that's a year and a

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>half or so. So he's always wealthy in the last

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. But now that the money is staggering. A second,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>he has been unlike many people who built these great companies. Um,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.239
<v Speaker 1>he's still the CEO. Many people who are very, very

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 1>wealthy at this level stepped down by the time they

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>reach his age. But he's still focused on running the company.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's taken a lot of his time and energy.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And Third, he regards his Blue Origin effort as philanthropy. Um.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>He puts in over a billion dollars a year in it,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and he would regard that as philanthropy. But I sense

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to spend more and more time on

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>philanthropic efforts. He made a two billion dollar announcement and

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it got a fair amount of attention. But you know,

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, two billion dollars philanthropic gift would

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>be staggering. Today it's not seen as his staggering when

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you consider the kind of wealth that has been given

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>away by Bill Gates or Warren Buffett. But I do

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think that he will be increasing his efforts there. I'm

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>afraid to ask when an all hands on meeting is

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like at Carlyle, have you ever done that? David? Have

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you ever gotten so upset that you walked out on

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the floor and said Hey, all you smart guys, get

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>over here. We are now having have you ever done

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in all hands meeting? Uh? Well, we have people all

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>over the world, hard to do all together. But we

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>just had our annual investor conference and we had got

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hundred people from our firm here. But look,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos is obviously in a different level than I

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>am in terms of his intellect, his ability to build

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a company and to build something that's gonna last forever.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I think my company is very, very good. Jeff has

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>built something that is obviously the most global phenomenon we've

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, and he's really reshaped so many different businesses.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the interview is really well, we're all worth watching.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And normally our show is about a half hour, but

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because it was so many good things in it, it's

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a full hour show on Bloomberg. Well

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was saying, let's listen to Jeffrey Bezos on the all

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>hands meeting. Your stunk is actually up seventy this year. Um,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is there one thing that you think is responsible for

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that is several things? Because is pretty good? Now I

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>am it's a you know, Uh, I have been lecturing

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we have all hands meetings at Amazon, and for twenty years,

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ever since we've been twenty one years now, um, every

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at almost every all hands meeting, I said, look, when

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the stock is up in a month, don't feel smarter,

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because when the stock is down in a month, it's

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to feel so good to feel dumber. And

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens. Never spend any time thinking about the

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>daily stock price. I don't Jeff Bezos, Lisa Brand was

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>just interesting. Why don't you pick it up with Mr Rubenstein?

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Mr Rubenstein, One thing that I'm struck by is what

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you said, which is most people of his wealth and

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>his point in life would step down as CEO. How

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>integral is Jeff Bezos to the whole zeitgeist of Amazon,

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole future, the dynamism of this behemoth. Well, uh,

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's pretty important to it because I don't

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>know that there's somebody that couldmorrow could easily replace him.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, as cemeteries are filled with indispensable people,

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, but in the end, Jeff so central to

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that company. I don't think he's playing a step down

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. In earlier interviews I've kind of into I

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>got the sense from him that he intended to do

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this for another eight to ten years. So I'm wondering

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>what was the one thing that stuck out to you

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about him and about sort of what drives him and

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what allowed him to create such an incredible company. He's

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>very smart, very driven. Um. He doesn't pay attention to

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what other people are saying sometimes, and you may remember

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>stock analysts kept saying you don't have any profit, you're

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>not worrying about profit, And of course all those people

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are now um, regretting that they didn't recognize how great

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the company was going to be. He was focused on

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>building customers. He's very focused on customers being the most

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>important thing in his company, and he puts customers first.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Unlike some extremely wealthy people. He doesn't show arrogance in

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>my view at least I certainly haven't seen it. Uh.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>He's very modest relative to what his accomplishments are. And

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, most people that we know who built something

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like that not be able to be so modest about

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what he's thought it or have such a good sense

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of humor about himself. David, thank you so much in congratulations.

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just a tour to force this. Of course, is

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that David Rubinston Show Peer to Peer Conversations, an hour

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>long conversation with Mr Bezos of Amazon. Thanks for listening

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio