WEBVTT - An A&G Book Review:  Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Because four hours. Simply enough, this is Armstrong and Getty

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>extra large. Do we have a name for this thing?

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Book review stopped using the word club book review, damn it,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a club. We're not middle aged ladies with

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>our pinkies in the air. That's the perfect start right there.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's what we're talking about, this here book

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that we read. So are we doing this? We are?

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>We're doing and some they should have let me know.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So we uh, we read a book? Who's we? Um

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty and then

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>two other people, Craig got Walls, the healthcare guru, public

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>intellectual fan favorite, and Tim Sander for vice president for

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>litigation for the gold Water Foundation, and uh, famousist Tim Lawyer. Um, Tim,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>how are you? I'm great? Craig is here as well.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want to be when I grew up

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>as a public intellectual. I know it's holding me back,

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>though I'm pretty certain of it. Height. You need to

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>cultivate your accent to what you need. You need some

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>some sort of vaguely European but hard to pin down.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So we set out to read a book, have and

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a plan to discuss it than The book is Stephen

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Pinker's Enlightenment, now suggested by Tim subtitled The Case for

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Reasons Science, Humanism and Progress. It's a very large book, oppressive,

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say, um. And my question is lots of

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>pictures though you know what, Yes, on the plus side,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>big fan of the pictures. Uh. My question is do

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to go in depth on the big ideas

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or do we want to go shallow on the many

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>different ideas or both are neither. I will vote for

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the latter. And here's why I as you will remember,

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>when I recommended this book, I specifically said that you

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>could cut off the last two hundred pages and not

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>read those. How about the first hundred and seventy those

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>are where the pictures are? And what the reason why

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I suggested the book is because I love the this

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this depth of detail he gets into about how much

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>better life is today than it has ever been in

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the history of the world. And you know, it's so

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>easy to get feeling depressed and down and pessimistic about

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the future, and page after page of this book makes

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>clear why we have it better than any human beings

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>ever have had it in almost any dimension you care

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to mention. And that's why I loved this book so

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>much and enjoyed going through that beginning part. I agree

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with all this stuff in the end when he gets

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>into the more philosophical details, but I didn't even think

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that was really necessary. Just nothing lifts your spirits more

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>than some of these statistics in here about how good

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>life is today. Yeah, I believe when we were first

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>when this book first came out, we were texting or

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>emailing about it. And it's just it's it is easy

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to get caught up in the day today, the world's

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>going to hell in a handbasket. This book points out

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the progress that his main been made by human beings,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly with the help of the Enlightenment, and some of

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the statistics about this is when we talk about regularly

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Armstrong and Getty Show, is the for most

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of human history, you are going to have one or

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>more of your kids die. That was just part of life.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way it worked. Now it is a

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>rare occurrence and and seen as just a tragedy beyond

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>tragedies to have to endure. Um. I mean, that's a

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>major change life expectancy and the ability to get out

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of childhood and everything like that, that a loan is

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>just incredible. And and you know, we often when we

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the olden days with with the high child

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>mortality rate, people sometimes think, oh, well, they were neared

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to it, they were so accustomed to that that they

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>weren't as affected as we we are today by the

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>loss of a child. And we know that that is

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not true. In part if you look at graveyards, If

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at old graveyards, especially around the Victorian Age,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and people started to be able to afford tombstones, they

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 1>built these elaborate, heart wrenching, beautifully carved headstones for their

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>kids because they were just as effected as we are today.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like they were calloused or anything. The

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>loss of a child a hundred or two hundred years

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ago was a as just as heart wrenching as it

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is to us today. And we are very fortunate that

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we so rarely experience something. Yeah, if you've ever read

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any of the Lincoln stuff, you up, yeah, yeah, crippling

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>grief both he and his wife, who admittedly was already

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a little crazy. But hey, before we get into more specifics,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the two general things that I found most interesting about

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the book or Pinker's discussion of the natural human tendency,

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the psychological anthropological tendency to see problems more vividly than

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. And and it's I thought it was interesting,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly as observers of the modern world and news and

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it, to say, you know what, you're right,

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the crow happy is a very difficult thing

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to resist. And we can talk about that. But the

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>other thing, and this is the point of the book,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>so the very idea that you have to in the

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Western world defend the enlightenment, defend science, defend logic, defend

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>pushing aside superstition um in the face of some of

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the modern the forces, particularly on university campuses. I mean,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's shocking that you even have to do it,

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Yeah, I personally I think that it's this

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really frightening. The hostility toward what they call the

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bourgeois virtues or bourgeois life. And there's this this romanticism

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>toward the idea that that life should be more meaningful

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>or more profound than enjoying a barbecue with your with

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>your family. We, in fact, we just had so we

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>just went through Veterans Day, right, and every year there's

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody out there who says something sarcastic or or dark

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about how you know, people should be. They're out there

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just shopping, getting at the sales at the mall, or

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just hanging out and having barbecues instead of thinking

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>about what this day really means and all that, which

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>has always really driven me crazy, because especially Veterans Day,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what these men fought and died for was for our

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to just enjoy a nice holiday with their fami.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what they wanted when they went off to war,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and we do them on honor by just celebrating with

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>our families. And I think the hostility to the Enlightenment

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>is largely rooted in this idea that there's something you know,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lax or unimportant, or insignificant or vulgar about the life

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>of comfort and happiness with with that we enjoy today

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with our technological advancement. That's a real problem. That's that

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>generates this sort of attitude that what we should be

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>out there crusading for national greatness or something like that

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of instead of living lives of peace and happiness.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe's comment at the beginning prior to Tim's there about

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the two of overarching themes I think on Joe's earst theme,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>UM are aren't psychological need for the negative? That's the old.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I just think of that of the is the old.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>If it bleeds it leads, right, I mean, if it's

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>shocking and negative, it's it's something people want to talk about. Um.

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>The latter point that Tim was just expounding on the

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have to defend the Enlightenment is to

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>me that just dovetails so nicely into what postmodernism is

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and this attack on facts in general, and that there

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are no facts and that there is no right answer,

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and that everything is is so dour and negative and

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and and saturated in horror basically, and then that that's

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a common assault we see now across our whole university

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>system in in all of the developed nations. Well, I

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>know Tim absolutely has spent his life researching this sort

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of thing, and Jack's been talking on the Armstrong and

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Getty show lately about UM, the whole critical race theory

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and and the intersectional horror that I like to bring

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>up somebody, anybody, why would any organized group of thinkers

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>or political radicals or whatever, why they want to undermine

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there is objective truth. What's the goal?

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I have an answer to that. I think this is

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>what I think happened. And this actually can relates to

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the book that I just published, the Life of Jacob Knowski,

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>because he was part of this post World War two generation,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because that humble brag. Yeah, so you can buy that

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon dot com. Uh, there was this post World

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>War two generation that that sought to prevent anything like

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that from ever happening again. And they thought the answer

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was to find a universal human morality and a universal

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>philosophy that would apply across cultures that was focused on

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>material progress and that's just the Enlightenment all over again.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But there were other people who took a different view,

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and they thought that what had led to World War

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Two or to other wars was cultural conflict, and that

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the solution to that was cultural relativism. If we don't

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>make pass judgments on other cultures, then we're not going

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to war with other cultures. And so if

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we just learned to get along and not criticize each other,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>then that's fine. Then we we'll all be happy. Except

0:08:58.280 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that is that there are things you

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>ought to criticize people and cultures for, and the that

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that metastasized into a war on objective truth because people

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>started thinking, well, objective truth means you're going to tell

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>me how to run my life, and that so therefore

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>objective truth leads to totalitarian is m, which is crazy.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's a large part of it. Tim,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Tim ascribes, Uh, I think, honestly, the most optimistic view

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of critical race theory that I've heard, I think that's

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the most optimistic defense. Yeah, I I

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Jack or Jell, any either of you guys want to.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jack and I've spent a lot of time

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>watching these YouTube videos that they are there are hours

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>long and nobody should probably ever really spend time doing.

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you want to take a staff at that, Jack,

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that would be It's a whole own topic.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I would end up spending an hour on critical race

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>theory on But what's behind it? Why? What's the why?

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>The why? The why? I don't know. The why is

0:09:55.559 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that if there is no universal truth, including reason and

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>science and the other stuff of the Enlightenment, which we

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can get into in a while, is those with power

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>can determine what's the truth, and the only truth is

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what they say is the truth. And that's that's the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>mark of maoist regimes and similar stuff all over the world.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Any questioning of the Great Leader's doctrine means instant death.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's especially easy to enforce that if there's nothing

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to. If I'm constantly trying to make the

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>other feel bad and they accept it, yeah, I have

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot a lot easier time ruling, leading, doing what

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to do, making my personal desires manifest. This

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>book that we read in Enlightenment now, it goes through

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a number of different ways in which humankind is better

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>now than it was, you know, throughout the history of

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of mankind. And we mentioned, uh, life expectancy and infant

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>mortality and that sort of thing. But wealth is absolutely amazing.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that many years ago that practically everybody on

0:10:55.720 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the planet lived in poverty. Fairly recently, now very few

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>people live in what did the worldwide standard for poverty is?

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know that can't be glossed over at all.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean what a change that is so few in fact,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that they spend a lot of time trying to figure

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out how to measure poverty. But right, so, yeah, yeah,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>well that's why in the United States we had to

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with this whole what do they call it,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>um uh instead of hunger, food insecurity, because you have

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to go with some sort of you might experience insecurity

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of food in the next year because you can't make

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sure hunger because there's not enough of it. But for

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the for the vast history of human kind of the

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>only thing you did every single day was where am

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I going to find something to eat? The fact that

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about that anymore is such

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>an amazing change. Yeah, that obesity is a made of

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a larger health problem in the United States than starvation.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Surely we're the first civilization ever to have that unwealth

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and food. I do want to share this is this

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>touches upon two specific statistics in the books that were

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>two of my favorites. On food but seen nineteen sixty

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>one and two thousand nine. Um, we use twelve percent

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>more land now, but we produce three percent more food.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And on wealth, if we look back at by two

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, all persons on the planet had an average

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>income equal to that of Western Europe, in nineteen sixty four.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I love about this book

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is how he shows He shows these statistics in very

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>unusual ways that you would never think of asking to

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>begin with. So I love how he shows, for instance,

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're not just richer than our great grandparents were,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but the poorest people today are richer than the richest

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>people were only fifty years ago our parents were. Well.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And one of the most powerful points I think he

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>may think he makes, and I wish I had the

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>graph in front of me right now. Um, maybe I'll

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>flip to it at some point, is that the the

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>average income or the you know, the way people live

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>all over the world has increased enormously from widespread infant mortality, disease, misery,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>all of it, it's increased to this really pretty damn

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>good state, even as we've added in last is it

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, five billion people to the globe. So we've

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>accomplished the growth and standards of living while growing the

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>population and living that way, we we went from roughly

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago spending sixty hours a week on housework

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to today we spend on average, the average household spends

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hours a week on housework technology unless light just light.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite physics in the Boston is with

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the cost of light over time, where it's it's so

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>small today to to measure the cost of lighting a

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>room for an hour that you really can't accurately measure it.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It's so cheap as compared to how much it costs

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for a candle a hundred years ago or something like that.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's amazing. Tim You're in Arizona, where light is

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>still cheap. Things are changing dramatically in Californi, and we're

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>resorting the whale oil as I run gasoline and generators

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>in my backyard to make sure I can work at night.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I hate to see and everything it did, So listen

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>before we get into more specific measures like light and whatever.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>The whole idea of the Enlightenment reason and science and

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>UH and humanism, which is can we say natural rights

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for now? That that idea, UM, that's what and the

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that we can make progress is the keys to

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding the Enlightenment what it was, and just life expectancy.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>This is perhaps my favorite UH graph in the book.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And and he mentioned that you could go way way

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>way back to ancient times your stone age, your bronze age, whatever,

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and life expectancy was the same, the same, the same,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the same, the same. It was flat for thousands and

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years, and then starting in seventeen sixty it's

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>still flat. I mean, it raises a little bit in

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the America's in Europe just but when the age of

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>science and reason really took hold in the mid eighteen

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and then the late eighteen hundreds, it exploads all

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>over the world science, reason, objective truth. It raised the

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>world life expectancy from about twenty nine years old to

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy in the space of a hundred and thirty fifty years.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And all those graphs are as stark as that one.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>The wealth, the life expectancy, the education, they're all as

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as straight up at some points, mistake. It's no accident

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that capitalism comes around around the same time, right, Wealth

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of Antients published in seventeen seventy six. And I think

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the reason for the hostility toward science, humanism, progress,

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and objective truth, I think a lot of that is

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>basically rooted in the hostility to capitalism. Because we're talking

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about these great statistics, and I keep thinking about you know,

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, I live in Arizona. About a quarter

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the state of Arizona is Indian reservations. And if

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you go to these reservations, the statistics there are almost

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the reverse of what we've been talking about. The average

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>annual income on the Navajo reservation, which is about the

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>size of New England, it's two and a half times

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the size of Massachusetts, the average annual income on Navajo

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is about seventy dollars per year, and the average average

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>annual income on Apache south of their uh is about

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>four thousand dollars a year. Something like ninety or of

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the populations on these reservations are employed by in some

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>way or another, the tribal government. And the statistics on

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the of of reservation poverty are abominable. Like we're talking

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like a quarter of the residences don't have running water

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or electricity or telephone service. And and there are people

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>who are living on these in these places who are

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>just normal people like you and me, who are living

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a life that we cannot possibly imagine, and like that

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>really is a demonstration of how this escape from poverty,

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the great escape you were described being, is the consequence

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of social and cultural variables, which are we We've said

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>our objectivity reasons science, free markets, and exchange and people.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are object to those because they say, well,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>those are those would be dangerous to our culture, that

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would undermine our the survival of our cultural traditions, and

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever you might think of that, It's just not true

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at us. Groups like the Italian Americans.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Italian Americans have been able to keep their culture thriving

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and alive in the United States with hardly any serious

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>threat of diminishment. Why because they've participated in the capitalist

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>process that America makes possible. The same with just about

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>any other ethnic group you choose to name. But insular

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>groups that wall out those those traditions of of free

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>markets and individualism and exchange and capitalism, they suffer terribly

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and then point fingers, often at other people as if

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's their fault. Well, this is a dangerous conversation to

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>jump into and will probably end my career. Which is fine, um,

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>But there are aspects of some culture, the cultures that

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>are simply what we used to do or what we

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>have done. I mean, part of my sacred culture is

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that I smoked too much pot. I mean now, is

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that a cultural norm that I should hang onto just

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>because in college for a while I smoked too much pot?

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Or is that just one of the things I did

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for a while. And how horrible to have a situation

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>that encourages bad habits like that to become thought of

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as part of your culture. Then that's what romanticism does.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's Romanticism is the opposite of the Enlightenment.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It's this idea that there's some super emotional force, some

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>forces of history or supernaturalism or something that collects us

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>together as cultures, and is this important bond and is

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so beautiful and more important than human needs and human

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>life and everything, and you know all that all that

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff you see in Disney movies that people really just

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>do have in their brains. And as a result of

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that romanticism, they think of bad ideas as as just

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>part of who they are a lot of the time.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's really it's it's a travesty to them, and

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a travesty to their culture, and it holds them

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>back terrible well when it's at the basis of sending

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wave after wave after wave of soldiers to their deaths

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in the name of some imaginary national pride or something

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>like that. So and there are you know, all sorts

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of examples through history, you know, the slaughtering, torturing people

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>over you know, variations in Christianity through the Confederacy is

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a great example, right, The Southern Confederacy was built on

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this vision of national Southern nationalism that said, oppressing black

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>people is just part of our culture. The Southern way

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of life consisted of doing these horrible things. That's what

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that was what the pre Civil War Southern intellectual leaders

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>tried to say. That's a pretty good example because in

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of letting go of the bad part or dumb part,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>or unproductive part or a legal part of your culture

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and hanging onto you know, you can keep Nascar and

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sweet tea, you just can't place He's can't have slavery.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Change is very very hard for many people. Uh yeah, yeah,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a follow up on that. Ad will pop

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>into my head eventually as we're thinking about the book globally,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>one more kind of global question. I mean, we're not

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>going to recount every graph for the podcast here, but basically,

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for every single aspect of tangible, measurable life, with very

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>few exceptions, is getting better. We're getting we're getting healthier,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we live longer, we have more food, we have a

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>better environment, we have all these things right, And but

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is there anything in the book that statistically, just factually

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys think, Boy, I don't know if that's true.

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there is Do we want to just sort of

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>accept everything in here is accurate, or do we want

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, boy, there's that may not be accurate to me? Well,

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Pinka wrote the book in part because he was kind

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of criticized for his previous book where he had said

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that there was a reduction in the international violence and

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>war and he which one of the fascinating aspects of

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this book is that he attributes that he argues that

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>would actually have essentially outlawed war, which is a really

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting and intriguing suggestion. But he was criticized for saying

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that the world is more peaceful today than it was

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and he quantitatively shows some of that

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>with his charts on war and his charts on genocide, etcetera.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, is there anything in the book that

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.239
<v Speaker 1>any of you guys saw or thought, I'm just not

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>sure that's accurate. I mean, in other words, do we

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>want to accept his facts as given as we proceed.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>He I, UM, I have seen him speak a couple

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of times on this, because he he made the rounds

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to a bunch of different universities and shows and everything

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. And uh, and that's where I first became

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>aware of this book on book TV. But because we've

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>had a rise in suicides, he he says, no, that's

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>not true. I don't know where his statistics are different

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>than the statistics that that that are coming to us

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>through you know, major newspapers. Well, and this was gonna

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be one of my major gripes with the book, when

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he gets into the recent rise of social media and

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>suicides and stuff like that. I think he does an

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fabulous job of tracking historical data in all the

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>things we've been talking about, from infant mortality to calories

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>per worker two hours spent working to just all of

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes that make human life either livable or miserable.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Does an absolutely fabulous job on that. I think there

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>are times, and this is one of them, when historical

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>statistics are not terribly useful when you have enormous change

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>happening at blinding speed, particularly in terms of social media

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and and adolescence and as a as a dad, and

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to, you know, claim, you know, special

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>expertise over anybody else chatting here, but as not only

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a dad, but a coach and a volunteer and the

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. I've seen shocking changes in the emotional

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>health of our young people. And I think it might

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>be the classic hockey stick graph where they're they're every

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>statistic he he tracks. He points out that there are

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>wobbles up and down through history. There's a war here

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and a famine there, and but the overall trend is acts,

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is absolutely legitimate unless we're dealing

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>with a sudden and a huge change in the way

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>human beings relate to each other and and and social

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sickness being on the rise. Now. One of the other

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>points he made is as long as you hang with

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the enlightenment, you will recognize these problems and find ways

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to cure them, because every development has downsides. And I

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>found that kind of reassuring, reassuring. But I think he

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dismissed the whole suicide, misery, lack of connection thing too easily.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He did. I that's one of the things I was

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about and asking this question because as we look

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at the graphs he and I watched him give a

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>talk as well on this where he said, globally, suicides

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are down, and he this is a talk he just

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>gave in the last handful of months. He said, globally

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>suicides are down, but that's not true for the United States.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at his graph in the book,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States graph is droped topp drop thing. It

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>just pops up at the very end. Suicide's up. But

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>what I found so interesting was he said he's looked

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>at that and he said, look, yeah, teenage girls go

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>through a period where suicides are more likely, but that's normal,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's always been normal. He said, this uptick is

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>not teens. He said, it's disenfranchised boomers that are retiring.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>It's the old white boomers that are retiring and committing suicide.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And he backs on that point. Up too, was showing

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that that baby boomers drug use has is steady as

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>compared to other generations. We tend to blend all these

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>generations together instead of saying the people who were using

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>drugs in nineteen eight are still using drugs today, whereas

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the kids who were born in nineteen eighty are using

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>drugs at a lower level than their peers were twenty

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Things like that, which it's an interesting now

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>here's here's a twist on this. So one of the

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>things that I really kept thinking about reading the book

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is how much of the downside is attributable to the upside.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, people often say, well, capitalism causes misery,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>and there is a truth to that, and that is

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that two or three hundred years ago, if there was

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a crop block that wiped out your potato crop, you

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>were just gonna die and that was it, and you

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>will then no longer. You would then no longer be unhappy,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>whereas in today's world, if you have a crop blight,

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll be fine, and you'll survive twenty more years in

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>that's twenty more years in which to be unhappy, to

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>be measured, as by a pholster, as miserable when you're dead.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>The overall amount of unhappiness does increase, precisely because capitalism

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>makes us happier. And then this brings to mind the

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of his book when he's talking about anti Enlightenment thinking,

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and he particularly blames Friedrich Nietzsche for this and Nietzsche

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>wrote this little passage in one of his books where

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he says, well, imagine what the end process of worldwide capitalism,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and he imagined what he called the last man. The

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>lad asked man is a couch potato who is so

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wealthy and so happy that he does nothing with his life.

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>He just sits there and he's just happy, and that's

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>going on right, And he thinks this is a horrible idea.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>This is so horrible. He thinks that way that this

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>will be the destruction of everything we know to be human.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is going back to what I was saying

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>earlier about people who think that there's something wrong with

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>being happy, but they want a more romantic, bold, visionary

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of some kind of uber humanity or whatever. And

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the reason for the rise in suicides is that,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's easier now because we have more

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>access to the tools necessary to kill ourselves. And horrifyingly,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what if the end result is we have so much

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 1>wealth and we solve so many problems that there's nothing

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>left to do but turn ourselves off. I think that's

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>very possible. I think that's very possible. You earlier, when

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>we started this podcast and when you were talking about,

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>like there's something wrong with people just to you know,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>sitting around enjoying their lives. Um, the super motivated people

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>like yourself, Tim or people who are gonna, you know,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>write a book or study something new, they'll probably survive.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think the average human is just gonna sit

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in front of a TV and get fatter until their

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>heart explodes. It's it's one of It's one of Getty's

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite books. Hu. Well, yeah, yeah, yeah, I just and

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that was my other gripe with the whole hockey stick

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of the modern world thing. The the rapidity of change

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of decades is that, um, we

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have never not had a purpose um as human beings,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean and and a real purpose and not you know,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>delivering lectures to people about the constitution or entertaining them

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on a radio show. I'm talking about not being dead.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>And if if you remove virtually all purpose from people's lives,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think Pinker is way too dismissive of the

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>change from person in person contact to online contact, those

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>two things will deny the common people the purpose that

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>animates them. Possibly although you know we we in this

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Craig you earlier said that that pinker goes through all

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the material measures of wealth. He does have a whole

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>chapter on happiness and measuring how how people report self

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>report greater degrees of happiness. Again, there is a little

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>downtick in America in recent years, but even that is

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>seems to be confined to the white population. He shows

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that black population reports of self reports of happiness are

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>still on the rise. So it seems to be more

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of a social anxiety, which I would blame the media

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for largely, which keeps time. Yeah, and I blame the media,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>blame blamers, but I you know, we we we shouldn't

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>over exaggerate the degree of unhappiness. I think there's there

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is a minor tick, and we should keep an eye

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on that and make sure that that it's not continuing

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that trend. But he couldn't be right or he wrote

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the book exactly before it all went the hell, he

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't That's what happens, That's what I thought, Jack. I mean,

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know because you know, his his talks and

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>his the stuff he's been saying about the book has

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>all been in the last year. And that's why I

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>think Joe's point is so valid. Um the hockey stick

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>may not be relevant or you may not be capturing

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the hockey stick when you when you look at suicides

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>amongst teen girls that have occurred just in the last

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten years, and how that's just skyrocketing by

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>other standards and other data sources we've looked at. But

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>according to Pinker, that's not the issue. The issue is

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>old white men, which I just found really interesting. Oh yeah,

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as far as number of suicides up, as far as

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>number of suicide I I get that, I get his

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>reasoning and everything. But I'm telling you, when you rearrange

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>something as fundamental as human contact, I couldn't agree more. Joe,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 1>You're not agree You're messing with stuff at a very

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>very basic level. I'm what I'm saying in a long

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>winded way as I agree with you. I think this

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is a weakness in the book because and it's a weakness,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you could say, some people think it's a we this

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Enlightenment itself, you know, one of the one

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the things when the Island was first happening the

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, one of the things that its leaders realized

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that they were lacking was a substitute for church, and

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that was actually the reason why organizations like the Freemasons

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>were started. They were they're supposed to be secular alternatives

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to church, and the Gulf still continues to be that,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess, But you know there are there is this

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>weakness that we, we humanists, don't really have an alternative

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to churches, to to have a place to go every

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>week where you meet your neighbors and friends and so forth,

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and all online, like you said, Joe, online just as

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>not substitute for that, and that could be a real

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>serious problem, I think for the Enlightenment for most people.

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Not for me, because I'm a misanthrope and I'm perfectly

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>happy sitting in my office with my books and my

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>cat all day. But there are lots of people out

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there who really want a place to go every week. Guys,

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we gotta hit. So far, we have not hit what

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is my favorite in the best part of

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the book, and it's a principle that we have not

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>heard in the media we have. I don't think any

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of us have done a good job expressing this principle.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So I want to hit it really quick and get

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>each of your thoughts on it. Page one oh one

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the hardback edition. Okay, a study of two thousand

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people in sixty eight countries done by Kelly and Evans.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna read this quote because I think it's

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so powerful. The theory that inequality causes unhappiness comes to

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>shipwreck on the rocks of facts in developing countries, inequality

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is not dispiriting but heartening. People in more unequal societies

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>are happier. The authors suggests that whatever envy, status, anxiety,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or relative deprivation people may feel in poor, unequal countries

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is swamped by hope. Inequality is seen as the harbinger

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity. Why don't we do a better job of

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>expressing that in the face of what we see in

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>modern America. I just wonder if it's just if that

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is only true up to a point. Once everybody gets

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>above a level of I've got I've got food, I

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.959
<v Speaker 1>got a big screen TV, I got a car, I like,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I got the cool clothes, I like, I don't have

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as much stuff as I want, then they're miserable. I mean,

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just the country. If you're talking about the poor countries,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they're the people the bottom are still in the I'm

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just happy, I'm alive. And got food. Now I'm not

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna bitch that I don't have as nice house. We

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>can stipulate this is to the developing world. Yeah, not

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to the developed world, the modern world. Not not not

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the starving country. Because there's an old saying that one

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the great things about America is if you're a

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>working class person you see somebody drive by in a

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Cadillac Um instead of saying, you know, I hate the rich,

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>or damn that person cheated me, or whatever you think

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be that someday, is that still true? I

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I sure hope so if it, if it

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ever ceases to be true, America will have really lost

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>its heart. That that is the heart of America. And

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it really just really disappoints me to see how many political,

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>politically prominent figures, including people running for office today, take

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the view of we shouldn't have billionaires. I mean that,

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what is that but pure envy and hatred for those

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>who have achieved more than you. That's so horrifle right.

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And we need to get to the bedroom defensive of

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the free markets in a moment or two. But is

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it possible, in your opinions, to indoctrinate a society to

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>drop aspiration and adopt envy. You go from wanting to

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be the guy with the cadillac to hating the guy

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with the cadillac. Do you think because Pinker, I mean,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he really risks a lot of his arguments on that

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this is how human beings are and you can document

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it and it's easily observed. Blah blah blah. Can cultural

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>norms become sick? I think when the floor gets raised,

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>That's my point. I think when the floor gets raised

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.479
<v Speaker 1>high enough, I think he do lose that people just

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>get into envy, And according to this study, you do.

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean they even go through in this In this

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>lengthy study that Kelly and Evans did, they say, look,

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this held true across sixty eight countries. The only place

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it didn't hold true was in the former Soviet Block.

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you were born in bread among you know,

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>amongst believing equality is the final answer for everything, then

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it didn't hold true. But it held true for everybody else.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Historic they speaking, historically speaking, civilizations in human history have

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>been organized around envy vastly more often than they've been

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>organized around aspiration. I just you look at every other

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 1>society in in the history of the race, and it's

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>just human beings have been far more likely to go

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to envy than to say I'm gonna build something a

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>great Well, it's amazing we've pulled it off culturally because

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>human nature, at least looking at children, maybe you grow

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>out of it, but looking at kids, my kids can

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly happy with something until until they see some

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody with something better than All of a sudden they

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>have sucks. Well, the fabulous study with the monkeys with

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the slices of cucumber. Then the one monkey gets a grape,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the other monkey goes crazy. I mean, all of Stephen

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Pinker's graphs in the world can't talk that money out

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of that monkey out of envy. But don't understand human

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but Hollywood can. Right talking about the media blamers, this

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is what a role that Hollywood has so long played.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You look at the Disney movies of decades past and

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>put aside the romanticism I complain and earlier about, but

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is teaching the generations that that

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming next, look as aspire, be great, sees your dreams,

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>make something beautiful of the world. That's an important role

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for Hollywood to play, and Disney is one of the

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>few remaining who still even tries to do this. I

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>turn on the television and it's just constantly anti heroes

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and and mobsters stories, and there's where are the stories

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about dreaming big and making it great in the world today.

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>It's there's a difference between envy and equality here, and

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that what I mean is if just because I envy

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody having more than me doesn't mean I truly want

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>an equal society. It just means I want to be

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the guy moving up the ladder. And if if I

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>really ultimately believe there's no way for me to get

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead and everything is just going to be equal forced equality,

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you end up with the malaise of Soviet communism. Question, well,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there has to be inequality to have something to aspire to.

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I just love the idea that inequality augments happiness, and nobody, no,

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>no politician has the nads to make that argument today.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, but at the same time, we

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>should mention that Pinker has a whole chapter here about

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>equality and how in a great many different ways inequality

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is on is on, the reductive is reducing over time,

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that which again we're not hearing in the mainstream. That's right. Well,

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Tim on that thought, here's a passage that

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed. Progress in equal rights may be seen not

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>just in political milestones and opinion Bell Weathers, but in

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>data on people's lives. Among African Americans, the poverty rate

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>fell from fifty percent in nineteen sixty the twenty seven

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>point six percent in two thousand eleven. Life expectancy rose

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>from thirty three in nineteen hundred, which was seventeen and

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a half years below that of whites, the seventy five

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>point six years in twenty fifteen, less than three years

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>below whites. African Americans who make it to sixty five

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have longer lives ahead of them than white Americans of

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the same age. The rate of illiteracy fell among African

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Americans from in nine two effectively zero today. Good luck

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with getting elected with that, messaged him, well, exactly, exactly,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>God yeah. Um. The difficulty I think with that argument

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, most people, most voters have you know,

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>barely a grasp on a lot of the stuff. And

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can point to the ultra rich gaming the system,

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>which is undeniably true, I mean they write the laws,

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and those laws benefit themselves and they grow fabulously, fabulously wealthy.

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think people's outrage over that is absolutely legitimate.

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>They always resort to the wrong solution, which is bigger

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and more powerful government, to my chagrin, and it'll it

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>will actually cause me an early death, ironically, Mr Pinker. Um,

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 1>So that's it's a difficult argument to make. But I

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>wish we could hammer something as simple as the great

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>defensive capitalism, which is that Bernie and his crowd um

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.240
<v Speaker 1>are are sessed with slicing up the piere or Jerry

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Brown's infamous horrific quote about those who have extracted disproportionately

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>from the public wealth, the idea of dividing the pie

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to growing the pie. And and Pinker makes

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the point that we have just to cite the United States,

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in terms of the wealth and standard of

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>living of the common man, we've gone from dividing up

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a tiny little cupcake to a pie the size of

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a football field. I mean, yeah, there are people who

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have large chunks of it, um, but everybody has so

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much more pie thanks to the free market. And I've

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I've distracted Jack, but I think we're all propied here,

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, right now, so much so that he

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>makes the point, which I think dovetails quite nicely on

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that that if you were to go ahead and add

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 1>in what we all pay for our healthcare and our

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>retirement and our benefits as part of our paycheck at work,

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>If you add that in with all of the other

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>social programs available to Americans, the United States now has

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the second largest benefit welfare state on the planet. To France.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Did not know that page one O nine in the book,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I could. Unfortunately, we put it all on the credit card. Yeah,

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>we owe it to China, but we have it. You know.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It was rowing the pie. There was one thing I

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted I forgot. I wanted to get back to that

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that we mentioned earlier, and that is this thing about

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>community and how how people have this need for community,

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and that in our progress that has been in some

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ways neglected. It also should be emphasized that new forms

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of community have been made possible now, whether they're adequate

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>or not is something that we can only figure out

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>years from now when we look back in retrospect. But

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we have not only more avenues for community, but and

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and but more different ways to access those communities. And

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>used to be two hundred years ago, if I was

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the only guy around who was interested in, let's say, parrots,

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's nobody else in town care is about parrots,

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>knows anything about parrots. They might know Tim, he's that

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>quirky guy who likes parrots, and that's that right. Nowadays,

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I can go on Google and I can find the

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>parrot lovers community, and I can follow pictures of parrots

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, and I can email people on the other

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>side of the world about their parrots, and and post

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>angrily on a forum about your opinions, host a podcast

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 1>with three of my closest friends about parrots. And so

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there are new ways of accessing community that he in

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>substitute now. Whether they're as good as the olden days,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you even really go about measuring that.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:40.720
<v Speaker 1>But we do have community that previous generations did not have. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>A couple of the things that will really be will

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll all have to be on the watch for over

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the coming decades and centuries in terms of the enlightening,

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment continuing to flourish, will be you know, this automation

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of purpose communication, all this sort of stuff. Do

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we have enough interactions with other human beings that are fulfilling?

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>As Tim was just talking about it, do we have

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>any sense of purpose when automation, you know, starts to

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of job. When I'm away from home

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and I text message my sex robot and ask her

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>how she's doing, do I feel fulfilled? Does your wife

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.399
<v Speaker 1>get jealous? Exactly? Your robot doesn't answer because it's having

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sex with a different sex robot be jealous? I don't know.

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to my online encounter group and ask

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the other robot efforts. I'm a visionary. There are so

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>many different topics in this book, as I mentioned at

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, you could do a whole podcast on

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all of them. The little stuff on crime and punishment,

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>how that has changed with the enlightenment over the over

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the years, and to where we start to look at

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>crime and punishment UMU or incarcerating people are penalizing people

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>as a way to try to get less bad things

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to happen in society only as opposed to some sort

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of weird cosmic balancing of the social scales where you

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like you gotta you know, you gotta cut off

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a hand, or they have to be executed, or they

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be beaten or whatever. Um, those advances are

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>just amazing, with the with the advancement of well science

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and reason and all that. And you know that brings

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to mind there are several passages of this book that

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.359
<v Speaker 1>made me feel a little uncomfortable in the sense that

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>they challenged my priors, as they say, because there are

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>some measures of progress that he shows that could at

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>least arguably say that what I think is good for

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>society is not necessarily like that. Do you mentioned the

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>welfare state earlier? You know that maybe the great progress

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we've made possible also validates wealth re distribution in ways

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that I personally disagree with. Now now my answer to that,

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, is I actually think that we would end

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>up with everybody better off if we had less of

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that redistribution going on. So I think I don't think

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it really overrules my views, but I we should mention

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't some kind of you know, the libertarians

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>all reading each other's books that Pinker is by means

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a libertarian, and what he says challenges libertarian views in

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 1>some important way. You know, this gets I have got

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to air out what I think is the biggest problem

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in the book. I was texting you guys vehemently about

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this at one point weeks ago. Um the chapter on

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.320
<v Speaker 1>equal rights, starting on about page to twenty four in

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the hardback edition, he lays out emancipated values, and he

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>goes he very elaborately lays out that look emancipated values

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you can think of as liberty or libertarianism. It has

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with the political left and right today

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in America. And he and he's wanting to show that

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>over time, and he's showing it with an individual person

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>as well as a fifty year old today, as a

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty year old fifty years ago, that we all across

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 1>countries and in our own lives. It's showing that people

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>value more freedom and more liberty over time. Okay. And

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he sets that up beautifully it Okay. Then he's got

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of graphs that support it, and I'm like great.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But then he says things in the text of the

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>book that I find very tough to take. He it's

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>almost as if he he disregards his own set up,

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and he he goes on to say things like two

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.399
<v Speaker 1>or three pages later, like, hey, and it's not like

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>these conservatives are gonna regress back into conservatism. As he starts,

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as he's talking about our our enjoyment of more rights

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and more liberties, and he clearly, he clearly does make

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the same mistake that he said he wouldn't make three

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>pages earlier, and he starts to say, well, you know,

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not like these these nasty conservatives are regressing and

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>carrying our society back and angry white men. He actually

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 1>uses the term angry white men getting more angry about

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the freedoms that are growing, as if to as if

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to say that people who might be more conservative on

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the political spectrum don't, for example, like the right to

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a small government, like the right to keep more of

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>their paycheck, like the right to bear arms. I just,

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I found that so true, bubbling from a

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>logic gap standpoint in that chapter that to me, it

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.879
<v Speaker 1>was it was the worst part of the book. Yeah,

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember you texting about it at the time. It

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was that he kept changing the way he was using terms. Yeah,

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he says, he first off, he sets up emancipative values,

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and he does a great job of explaining it. But

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>then he starts calling them liberal values. Now at the beginning,

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he says, now, I don't mean liberal like left and right.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>He says, I mean liberal like liberty, freedom, libertarian, And

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, okay, I'm good with that. But then later on,

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>as you read what he writes, he writes things like, um,

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for all of the talk about right wing backlashes and

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>angry white men, the values of Western countries have been

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>getting steadily more liberal, which we will see in the

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the reason is the reason these white men are

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so angry. Well, he doesn't mean liberal in the left

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>right since here he means freedom, so he he makes

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like this wasn't edited properly. I just don't.

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I got so frustrated reading this because his

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>graphics are right, his set up is right, and then

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he regresses into like relapsing into basically saying, yeah, liberal

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is good, conservative is bad. Right, Yeah, I remember that

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>being pretty sloppy, and actually from your text several weeks ago. Um,

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>he refers to Muslims in the Middle East as the

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>world's most conservative culture, but then talking about American conservatives,

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>and as Craig said, it's incredibly misleading when you think

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of what conservatism means in America at this point, conserving

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the right to bear arms, conserving land ownership, conserving the

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>right to low taxes and limited government, etcetera. And a

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>simple footnote would have cleared that up if he had said,

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, by in America, the term conservative is a

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>little odd because it means conserving liberal values from the

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment in the Constitution of the Declaration of Impendance against

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the progressive movement or something like that, right right. It

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>really it really irked me, I mean because because he

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was so sloppy with it on the pages to twenty

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>five to six to seven. What he did it right

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on page to twenty four, And I'm like, lord, I

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just tim would have never made a mist ache like that,

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and well I would never use the word conservative because yeah,

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that good point, you know, that good point. Just another quibble.

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It bothered me. Sometimes he seemed kind of cavalier and

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Harvard economisty Ivory Towery, dismissing certain populist type political movements

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>as just people being dumb, and obviously that's an unfair characterization.

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.919
<v Speaker 1>He does that to libertarians too. There's a passage where

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>he says, you know, the libertarian fantasy blah blah blah.

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know how, I'm so used to that I

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>hardly even notice it. That is right. How About if

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to write a book covering the last two

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:39.399
<v Speaker 1>d and fifty years and defending the Enlightenment and making

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a timeless piece of art that's gonna sit on the

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>shelf and we can look at forever. How about you

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 1>don't go to the orange guy and use the T word. Yeah,

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, that's another just huge problem in

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the book. He just can't help himself well. And I

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>just getting back to the whole Ivory Tower Harvard economist thing.

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I just found him a little dismissive at times, even

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>as he made the point Beauty Flee, that positive change

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>often causes momentary or or overcome able negative results, and

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that that's part of the process and it's okay. Um,

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like he didn't recognize that that the common

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>man sometimes has a pretty decent sense for those at

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the top of the ladder are getting really good at

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>gaming the system, and they're claiming to me that this

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is good for me. But I can feel in my

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gut that I'm being used, I'm being jobbed and I

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think popular outrage has been an incredibly well, not always

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but often, been an incredibly positive tool for holding the

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>powerful to account when you know, globalization is a much

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>more complicated thing than people um give it credit for

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the idea that well, yeah, globalization is unquestionably added to

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 1>the total wealth, and it's a much bigger pie to

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>divide center center, but it's incredibly disruptive to entire parts

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of the planet, often for people's entire your lives, and

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not wrong to resent it just because globally speaking,

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>standards of living have risen and and you're not saying it.

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>This is getting complicated. Maybe it's time to reapproach your

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned about the welfare state him and understand that, well, okay,

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna have a society that's not riven by revolution,

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we ought to look out for the people who are

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being um victimized in quotes by positive developments like hey,

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we can get cars manufactured much more cheaply in North Korea.

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. That's a twist. I didn't

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>expect you to add I I I've been hearing that

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for what five years now about how we you know,

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been Uh, we haven't been feeling the pain

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>enough of the of the rust belt working class, and

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:50.799
<v Speaker 1>we need to listen to them more now. They need

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to bucket up more. That that's that. It's it's as

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>simple as that, and I need to be pandered to less. Yeah,

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>well that is certainly true. But he you know, on

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 1>what you said earlier about how the common people are

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>at check against the intellectuals is a very important point,

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, because we're talking earlier about envy versus a aspiration.

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>The American people as a whole, I think, have still

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>never really absorbed the envy that motivates the most of

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the intellectual class in this country and has motivated most

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>of the intellectual class since about the time of the

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>French Revolution. The common, average, ordinary Americans still believes in

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>America as a land of opportunity through hard work and

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and that I can be the boss someday. And so

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that still is has a firm hold on the average

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 1>American person, I think, and thank goodness for that, and

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that has to never change. Unfortunately, they're being preached to

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and have been for generations by intellectuals who are very

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>much of the envy school. I was thinking this on

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the way over to the studios, I was thinking about,

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>how you know, it's often been said that Americans don't really,

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in their hearts of hearts, don't really believe in evil.

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't really comprehend evil, and they don't actually believe

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that it exists fundamentally as an important, significant force in

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And that is true. I myself find I

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 1>have to remind myself sometimes that evil actually exists and

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is out there, because it's so alien to my conception

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world. And I don't think that is true

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of other cultures. In Well, it's really interesting. It's really

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>easy for it to be true for those of us

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>born after nineteen seventy in the United States, too, right,

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have soft times, he's good time. Comparatively,

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we have no real evil to look at it. Yeah,

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say, when the militia comes through your village

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and slaughters everybody except the young boys, which it grabs

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:39.959
<v Speaker 1>up to be child soldiers, you have a pretty easy

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:42.839
<v Speaker 1>idea of yeah, or you have a pretty easy time

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>picturing evil. Well, I hope we don't get a chance

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 1>for that lesson anytime soon. No, indeed, how about it?

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>In books, continue to live in ignorance of that I did,

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it made me feel like a bad person

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that some of these global statistics. I thought, yeah,

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I should I shouldn't care for rest.

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't care that things are getting better for the

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. It's only it's only the numbers

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in my country and maybe even particularly in my orbit,

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that I cared about that. You speaking to some of

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the suicide stuff. The fact that people are committing suicide

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>less around the world, that's good. But if it's rising

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>among my culture in my country, you know, I'm bothered

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:21.919
<v Speaker 1>by that. Maybe what what Jack is saying is that

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that that graph twelve point eighteen availability of pie in

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the third world just did not do it, just ran

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it by the time it gets here. I do. I do,

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 1>intellectually speaking want the whole world to get better, but

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but emotionally, politically, I only care about my own. So

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe that makes me a bad person. But that that

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>makes you the of your town and and somebody who

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>works hard at it, which is absolutely as honorable and

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>aspiration as being the president of the u N or

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever the hell the Grand pubas called there at the

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>u N. Well, in that vein and in the in

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of the defense, like Tim had said earlier, in

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the way he uses peculiar statistics to to make points.

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I love I love the statistic because it really hits

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:05.320
<v Speaker 1>upon the first world, the third World, and free trade policy,

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:08.760
<v Speaker 1>where he says every cell phone added in the first

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>world adds three thousand dollars of g d P to

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a developing country. I thought, well, that's just a beautiful statistic,

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. It helps and I'm more than us I'm

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.720
<v Speaker 1>glad you mentioned the cell phone thing because, as you remember,

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>several months ago now, Tucker Carlson did this rant on

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Fox that got a lot of publicity in the conservative

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 1>world about how stupid capitalism is because all people do

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>with it is by iPhones that they don't need. This

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this section really is a beautiful refutation of that. I

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you saw some months ago there was

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>circulating around on Twitter, Um, some guys in Africa used

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>their iPhones to make a science fiction film with a

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>green screen effects and everything that they made on a

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:54.240
<v Speaker 1>blanket hanging on a stick in there in an alley

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in their town. I mean, it's just what an incredible thing.

0:53:58.080 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you talk about something that can help but

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>make you feel good about the world. That is incredible,

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Tucker Carlson's and the anti capitalist reactionaries whom

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Pinker refers to as conservatives in this world turn their

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>noses up out of it at it, either out of

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ignorance or even or out of worse motives, when they

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just they just don't care, and they they regard material prosperity,

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is to say, human happiness as a trivial

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>concern relative to some sort of romanticist vision of what

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>human greatness really is. My favorite example of that sort

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of thing from the book was the discussion of I

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think it was it may have been African, doesn't really

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:38.879
<v Speaker 1>matter fisherman who would use their smartphones after they had

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>their catch to ping all the villages in the region

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what the fish prices were. To avoid,

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as he describes um, showing up to a village that's

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>already glutted with fish and having all your time wasted

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>making no money, when just down the coast there was

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a village that's like where the damn fisherman, which is

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>all of history has been. That way, you get along

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the coast of people are starving here, and they got

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fisher rotting in the sun here right there. There's community

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for you. There's some community for you well. And the

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to become an informed uh participant in the free market,

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and the glut of information that you know make kill

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>usen drives all the suicide. But um, how it's upsides

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do it too, But how incredibly valuable valuable it is? Hey,

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw in one thing apropos nothing, just

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>because I thought it was so great. And and if

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know me, or if you listen to the radio

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:32.359
<v Speaker 1>show at all, you know that the indoctrination of young

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:36.239
<v Speaker 1>people in schools and universities makes me insane um. And

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to spend the rest of my life fighting it, um,

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 1>just because it presents such a perverse and upside down

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 1>view of of history in the United States and what

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>makes for a successful culture. But I absolutely love this

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 1>um Pinker's talking about actually is quoting uh Max Roser,

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and I believe it's from the period of I don't

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get hung up on this, oh, in nineteen

0:56:00.600 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy if you're going to write a headline, and this

0:56:05.640 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>comes from his his talking about the human tendency toward

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 1>negativity and finding small problems in bitching all the time,

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:13.879
<v Speaker 1>which is I suffered from it myself. But if he said,

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>if you only published a newspaper once every twenty five

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>years or every fifty years, you'd have to write about

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the big stuff. It wouldn't be the momentary crap. It

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:26.400
<v Speaker 1>would be the big stories, the big progress. And he said, um,

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if you published a newspaper once describing nineteen seventy to fifteen,

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>your headline would be number of people in extreme poverty

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 1>fell by a hundred and thirty seven thousand since yesterday

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>every day for the last twenty five years. That's a hell.

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:46.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a hell of a stretch man. Seven thousand a

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>day every day for twenty five years. And the number

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of people in extreme proty if I remember correctly, correct

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:54.359
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm wrong. I believe they settled on using

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a dollar ninety per day in twenty dollars U S

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars at this and they used for that that that

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>number is astounding to me. I don't know how I

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>know they have a different lifestyle. I mean, they must

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not have Netflix, because I don't know how how are

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>they going to afford the New Disney exactly. Yeah. You know,

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I've often said that the great thing about knowing history

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:17.919
<v Speaker 1>is that it makes you feel better about your own

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:20.439
<v Speaker 1>time because you hear on the news some idiots saying

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 1>something like, oh, America today is the worst polarization ever

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump is the worst president of all time,

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and all this sort of thing. And if it's the

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 1>worst economy for a young person graduated from college to

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:36.120
<v Speaker 1>ever go out into every year of my entire life,

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll just look back at the Civil War,

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, or or or ninety eight, and you know,

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we have things so good. And that's what I love

0:57:44.200 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>about this book is stuff like that that really gets

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you to stop and think, now, we we have things

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn good. I was looking over my notes from

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the book that I wanted to touch on just I

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>just really like the phrase hedonic treadmill. The theory of

0:57:56.320 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the hedonic treadmill. People adapt to changes in their fortunes,

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like eyes adapting to light or darkness, and quickly returned

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to a genetically determined base line of happiness. So you

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 1>know that about myself, I know that I have myself.

0:58:09.400 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>There was a time song ago when I was perfectly

0:58:12.400 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 1>happy in my little one room house that I had,

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that right after I got out of law school.

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, my friends called it the unibomber shack because

0:58:19.960 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it was just literally an uninsulated house in in Placidville, California.

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And now nowadays, I mean, I could go back to

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it if I really had to, I think, But nowadays

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I get annoyed if my car makes it a kind

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit of rattling noise because of the

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>coins in the coin rentainer. You know, so it does happen.

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:40.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, hedonic treadmill would be a great name

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>for your band to compete with postmodern shot back. Oh yeah,

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 1>well I've actually, since I've been working out on the

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 1>hedonic treadmill, I've lost fifteen pounds. I'm like, you're happier.

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>You're happier, which is happydonic treadmill. My wife is happier though.

0:58:54.080 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a treadmill that it feeds you pie while you're

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on Oh my god, where do I buy it? Uh?

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.280
<v Speaker 1>You know what's interesting though, in one of the points

0:59:00.360 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he makes is um that that's fine, and it's true,

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but all those you know, levels of happiness that you've

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>passed upward, you can't discount those and act them like

0:59:14.560 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and act like they didn't happen. My babies didn't die.

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't die of a tooth infection at age thirty.

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have medicine, I have education. Serious, my

0:59:25.400 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>baseline happiness is the same. But I should recognize that, right, Yeah,

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 1>count your blessings, you know. But like you said, it's

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:35.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to get elected on that platform, no doubt, right, right,

0:59:36.120 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true. Here's here's my favorite statistic. I loved the

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>passage on page one seven, by the way, the pages

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>are the same in the hardback in the paperback, and

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that he could afford the hard back because he was

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the one person he bought goddamnit, he bought

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it on Amazon because of our fabulous internet wealth creating machine. Anyway,

0:59:54.800 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the passage Ray is talking about the dangers of traffic,

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic to danger to pedestrians. He's about how dangerous it

1:00:02.720 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was to be a pedestrian in past ages, and he

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>compares it to the dangers presented by horse drawn travel.

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And I just that's just a marvelous passage where he

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>talks about the the how dangerous it was to be

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a pedestrian years ago there's a passenger where he says, here, uh,

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it takes more skilled across broad What he's talking about,

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he's quoting a guy from the nineteen hundreds. It takes

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>more skilled across Broadway than to cross the Atlantic and

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a plant of the Atlantic and a clam boat. The

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>engine of the city, Mayhem, is the horse. Underfed and nervous.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>This vital brute was often flogged to exhaustion by pitiless

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>drivers who exulted in pushing ahead with utmost fury, defying

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the law, and delighting and destruction runways were common. The

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>havoc killed thousands of people. According to the National Safety Council,

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the horse associated fatality rate was ten times the car

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>associated rate of modern times. And he says this was

1:00:56.360 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>written in nineteen four, which is more than double the

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>per capita rate today. Finally, somebody mentioning the h a

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>f T the horse associated fidelity. Right, Oh, there's an

1:01:06.040 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>R at the end. Sorry, nobody ever talked you about

1:01:08.760 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. Damn horses a different book. But I remember

1:01:11.600 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the stat because it stood up to me that in

1:01:13.520 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the late eighteen hundreds in Chicago they averaged four deaths

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a day from fire. Yeah, yeah, would would you just

1:01:19.920 --> 1:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that'd be the lead story in the news

1:01:21.560 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in any city when people wouldn't that many people die

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in a fire now, whereas today fire is so rare

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that the San Francisco Fire Department now has fewer firemen

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on it than it did in nineteen o six when

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the earthquake occurred, and firemen are more often dispatched alongside

1:01:36.640 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the ambulance just in order to have something to do. Wow. Wow.

1:01:41.360 --> 1:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So we want to go on to final thoughts on

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Pinker's Enlightenment now the Case for Reason, Science and

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Humanism in Progress UM alphabetical order by age. Wait one

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>last thing before I love that he I love that.

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He threw back to our first book, UM, which was

1:02:00.600 --> 1:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>helped me out here, Oh Heaven on Earth, Heaven on Earth,

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Bid Joshua Murkovich, which was which was about socialism. Another

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>fun fact from Pinker's book, Page one oh three, UM,

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Marks and Angles were wrong in their their communistic theory

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of primitive cultures. It turns out that sharing was not

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>universal in communistic and primitive cultures. In hunting cultures, where

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your success was determined by luck, whether

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>or not you came across animals, sharing was fairly common

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>as as practiced. However, in the farming cultures, sharing was

1:02:35.320 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>not common because they knew it would increase laziness and

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>laziness and lethargy amongst the population. I thought that was

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>great that he pointed that out. This is news to

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a Harvard professor in two thousand ninety. Yeah, exactly. I

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find a link to our first book. Um,

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know, I'll kick it off because that

1:02:56.320 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that leads beautifully to just my overall my head size, yes,

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from the enormous oh great, well, um, the need to

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>defend things like the liberty and the free market, um,

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and and the enlightenment indeed, reason, scientific progress, the rest

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. It's it's like, you know what it's like.

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's exactly like this. Maybe you're about to go

1:03:30.840 --> 1:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to bed, Maybe you're a couple of cocktails in and

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and you drop a glass and you realize the next

1:03:39.480 --> 1:03:42.479
<v Speaker 1>forty minutes of my life are going to be spent

1:03:42.960 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>cleaning up this mess. Or it reminds me when onyxed

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>my old dog got sprayed by a skunk like ten

1:03:47.320 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty at night. This this terrible feeling of this shouldn't

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be happening. I shouldn't have to do this. Why am I?

1:03:52.840 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Why is this weight been thrown upon me? It's it's

1:03:55.480 --> 1:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>idiotic and astounding and shocking and sickening to me that

1:03:58.800 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to now, especially to young people who are

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at universities that are supposed to be accomplishing the opposite.

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You have to defend the idea of reason to them.

1:04:08.640 --> 1:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But it has to be done. And I just I

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think this book is a terrific tool, A primer or

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>do you say primer and a read a chapter now,

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>chapter later. You don't have that plow through the whole

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>thing it was. I think it's a great set of

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>tools to defend um that which is elevated humanity from

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>horror and starvation to affluence and health. So it's a

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>would recommend from Joe absolutely, Yeah, yeah, I think I

1:04:38.640 --> 1:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>can dovetail on that and just say I would recommend

1:04:41.160 --> 1:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this book to everything Joe said, I fully agree with.

1:04:44.520 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a I think it's a very useful

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>set of facts and objective data to point to the

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that things are not getting worse, things are getting better,

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>demonstrably show Now, I there are some parts with the

1:04:57.760 --> 1:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>book that we may quibble with. There's some parts that

1:04:59.720 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think are fairly lean, but overall, I would definitely

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:05.439
<v Speaker 1>recommend this book. I would read this book. There's far

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>more good than bad in this book, and I think

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's it's worth consuming for, even if

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you agree with the principles in here, to be familiar

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with some of the facts, because you're going to be

1:05:15.360 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>confronted with them as you deal with the mainstream public

1:05:19.280 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years. We see this the real

1:05:21.600 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the refutation of facts, the idea that um science is

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>bad because it was all created by white men. I mean,

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we have to get back to some basic truths here,

1:05:30.560 --> 1:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and we have to be able to point to something

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like this book. And I think I think it's really

1:05:34.680 --> 1:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>helpful that the author of this book is as an

1:05:37.800 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>atheist liberal frankly. I mean, you know, I wouldn't say libertarian.

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say he is a more liberal leaning human being,

1:05:43.840 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's very helpful with a book like this.

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll let Tim goless since he chose the book, and

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll be short um if nothing else, because the book

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>stands out, uh for not being negative. I mean, we're

1:05:56.360 --> 1:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just we're just awash in nonfiction books about how awful

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>things are. As A Jonah Goldberg said the other day,

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's ever been a time in

1:06:05.360 --> 1:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>US history where every group felt aggrieved. Every single group

1:06:09.920 --> 1:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>feels like now is a bad time for them. And

1:06:12.320 --> 1:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you can pick any color, any gender, any age, anything.

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And to have a book out there to to to

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>explain the overall arc of things right now is uh,

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need that, ladies and gentlemen. Old simple

1:06:24.800 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack beautifully said, I I keep My grandfather was a

1:06:31.440 --> 1:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>lumber deliveryman, and uh, you know, grew up in poverty

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in picking cotton in and pecans in West Texas. And

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>when I think about the progress that occurred between his

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>life and mine and the success that I've had in

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>my life, it brings to mind that we are so fortunate.

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>If you take seriously the idea that with great fortune

1:06:56.720 --> 1:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>comes a great responsibility, or if you take seriously the

1:06:59.640 --> 1:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>idea we owe it to future generations to leave the

1:07:02.280 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>world no worse off than we found it, then a

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>book like this that makes you feel and really see

1:07:08.640 --> 1:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>how marvelously successful and happy we are today and how

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>much we've accomplished and even though there are still a

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>long ways to go. It really I think it reinforces

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we have an obligation to make the

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>best of our lives that we possibly can on an

1:07:25.040 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>individual basis, and and as as a society to try

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and and say we have come so far. It would

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>really be a shame if we were to abandon it

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and walk away from it or denigrate the efforts of

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>previous generations that got us this this far. Well, I

1:07:43.320 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>had to. I hate to add length to this thing,

1:07:45.240 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think one of the biggest threats to enlightenment,

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as we touched on, might just be comfort. Just what

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>do human beings do when they don't have threat of

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>war or starvation? What do we do? Do We just

1:07:59.720 --> 1:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>sit around and dietable obesity? Here and here's my my

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>suggestion is the first thing that we should all do

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is reflect on how fortunate we are. And since it's

1:08:10.280 --> 1:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving season, perhaps it's appropriate for us to say the

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>first answer to that question is think about how lucky

1:08:17.200 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we Remember that that Dr. Seuss book, I Did I

1:08:19.920 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ever tell you how lucky you are? This is the

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>grown up version of that. So take a moment for

1:08:24.360 --> 1:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving to look at this book and consider how fortunate

1:08:28.320 --> 1:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we as a society and as a as a world.

1:08:31.439 --> 1:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I really are well right, and it is an answer

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:37.599
<v Speaker 1>to the intersectional nonsense in that it is a global

1:08:37.640 --> 1:08:41.639
<v Speaker 1>truly global. As Jack indicated, every every group and subgroup

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world can use this book as a gratitude exercise.

1:08:46.400 --> 1:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>As you know you're suggesting Tim and understand how far

1:08:49.160 --> 1:08:52.599
<v Speaker 1>we've come. Gentlemen, Tim and I have each selected a book.

1:08:53.479 --> 1:08:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Do either of you have our next book ready to

1:08:55.600 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>go yet? I'm gonna nominate Jack. You Jack here into

1:08:58.120 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the book learning. You got a book you want to suggest?

1:09:02.400 --> 1:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>You know we should do Dick, just because you keep

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>saying him. Because I love that book it three times already,

1:09:10.240 --> 1:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, all the way through. I absolutely love.

1:09:13.880 --> 1:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Surely when you reread it though you skip all the

1:09:17.920 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>whale nonsense. No are you kidding me? All the particulars

1:09:22.200 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of the whales. The chapter the Whiteness of the Whale

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best of the whole book. Why

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about why the color white is so terrifying? Man, Marvel,

1:09:33.360 --> 1:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding intersectionality here is this a college social class?

1:09:37.920 --> 1:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>To be the next book we'll we'll come up with

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a book. Yeah, yeah, we'll come up with tweeted Jack

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and Gel if you have suggestions for us. Yeah, that's

1:09:45.240 --> 1:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a that's a pretty decent idea. Alright, thanks Fellows, well done.

1:09:50.479 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Extra large