WEBVTT - Iran Tensions Firm Up Bullish Picture For Crude

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Looking at oil here today, Brent

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>crude and w t I down just about one percent today.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>They certainly rallied a little bit off of the geopolitical

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty over the last several days, but perhaps not as

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>much as traders initially would have thought. We're gonna get

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the latest from Wells Fitzpatrick Wells as a managing director

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>equity Research covering all things UH expiration and production for

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>sun Trust Robinson Humphreys based in Houston, Texas. Well, thanks

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us, so give us a sense

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>of how your stocks, the E n P stocks kind

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>of have been reacting over the last several days to

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be a little bit more volatile energy space. Yeah,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks thanks for having me on um. As you said,

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>prices of jump, but only about two bucks um. You know,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a relatively modest move that tells you

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that the market isn't pricing in any sort of crisis

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>related outages. And you know, of course without those crisis

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>related outages, we're going to be in this kind of

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty five to sixty five range. That being said, what

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the heightened tension does is it firms us up at

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the top end of that range, which is is massively

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>important for the group. I mean, the difference between fifty

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>five dollars and sixty five dollars on w T I

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>is a difference between two times that to EVA don

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, or the difference between being free

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>cash flow neutral and having a seven percent free cash

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>flow yield for the group. So, even though we haven't

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>seen a big move UH from the recent escalation, it's

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>good to have us firm up in in the upper

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>end of that range, and that should be able to

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>carry on to a pretty positive the names. One interesting

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>development over the past week or so has been the

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>dramatic outperformance of shale companies versus the major oil producers,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering whether they are taking advantage of this

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>pop in oil prices to extend their credit lines with

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>banks to borrow more money, basically to push out any

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of financing gaps in order to prevent or immunize

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves against a drop in the value of oil. Yeah, no,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that that that that's a great question, um, and and

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>will certainly see it help them in revolver redeterminations in

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter here. Uh, for a lot of these guys.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be very important. You bring up a

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>good point because some of the uh, the higher debt

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>load gods, I'd point to maybe an extraction, maybe a

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>whiting that move from fifty five to or from sixty

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>five to sixty five excuse me, takes them from three

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>times to two times debt. So it's really it's it's

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a lifeline, um for these guys. Uh.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, as far as refinancing and the bond market

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>still seems a little bit cold on the names. But um,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course that can turn pretty quickly if

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>if we stay up in this range and companies throw

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>off the metrics that should allow them to well. If

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>if oil does stay up in this higher range and

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that that helps the balance sheets. Do you expect to

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>see a pickup in consolidation activity in your space, or

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think a lot of the bigger players might

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sit on the sidelines. It really depends on how the

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>stocks respond. Um. I think that given what we've seen

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>of consolidation, it's more often I don't want to stay force,

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know the company is being consolidated. Don't always

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have the strongest hand. And in so much as a

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>higher oil price will strengthen these companies, I mean, just

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the forty five companies that we follow, it

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>adds over ten billion dollars in in Eva da UM so,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so they'll have stronger hands and they'll be able to

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to maybe defend against that a little bit better to

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>go and a loan strategy will look a little bit better.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, I I wouldn't expect it to to accelerate,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that trend with the major's coming in. And the

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>other thing worth pointing out is at this point, the

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>majors have a heck a lot of shale, especially in

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Permium basin, which, as y'all know, is is the

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite basin right now. So there's not necessarily a burning

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>desire for them to get anything unless it is quasi

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>distress and of course this this turns out around a

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I'm wondering if you could zoom out and

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of how long lasting you think

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this popping oil prices uh is and whether we has

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>more legs in terms of upside. I mean, do you

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think that, barring some further escalation, oil prices can stay

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>where they are? Do you think that the pressure is lower? Frankly,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they could stay where they are, and I

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think that they can go higher. I mean, you know,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand that it's been three or four days since

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>since the attack, and and so it seems as though

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a calm. But what's worth remembering is that the

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Leader declared three days of mourning and the likelihood

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>of them attacking during that three days was pretty small.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Now that three days is coming to an end, so

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the next hours are going to be very important for

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the oil markets. Um And and you know, Lauran has

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>made it very clear that the military option is still

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on the table. Really, the first time that that would

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have come to fruition is today, So it's worth keeping

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a close eye on if if you want to look

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>at it from sort of short, medium and long term

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>effects from a short term. We obviously we got the

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>popping crewed. Another thing that we got about that people

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>don't talk quite as much about is we got a

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>premium in the US contract, So the US gained about

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>two bucks in the media and aftermath of the attack

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>versus Arab light um. And then of course Iran abandoned

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear deal, so more international pressure could take another

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand barrels out of their exports, which would

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>take it to zero. And most importantly, most importantly, and

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think some people miss this, is that the other

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that this does is that if a democrat wins,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.559
<v Speaker 1>this makes it so much harder to uh to find

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it to taunt with with Iran. And that was the

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>nightmare scenario, was that in one you have at the

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>tont and one to two million barrels of Iranian crewed

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>come back into the market. This makes that vanishing lee

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>small chance of happening, and of course underpins a more

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>bullish longer term viewing group. Hey, wells, what are the

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>companies that you cover doing in terms of production as

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you look forward to they taking advantage of some some higher

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>prices here? Well, actually, it's it's it's it's been a

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a shift um. As you know, the

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>sectors touch out of favor to say it, to say

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it nicely, UM, And and the company's have been moving

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>towards free cash flow buy backs, etcetera. Which is why

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you know that range of fifty to sixty five. It's

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>so important to be in the top end of that

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>range when you're throwing off high single digit free cash

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>flow yields and you can actually deliver. Uh, you can

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>actually deliver on that. But in general, the growth rate

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US has really really slowed. UM. I mean

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>oil or gas for example. Uh, the e I A

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>predicts that gas production will be flat December to December,

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>which is is really remarkable coming off the growth that

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. Oil will be up, but it'll be up

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more modestly. I mean, you're talking December to

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>December of something like four dred thousand verses. You know,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>prior years you're north of a million, So you have

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty dramatic pullback. And I think that the incremental

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>cash that will come in the door from this higher

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>price will likely be used to fuel those those buybacks

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>as debt repurchases, um, etcetera. To to really fix the

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>financial situation versus putting more holes in the ground. Well,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fitzpatrick, thank you so much for being with us.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Well As Fitzpatrick Managing director focused on energy and research

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and e m P sector generally at sun Trust Robinson Humphrey.

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is David Wayner of Bloomberg News. David,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what was the biggest takeaway that you got from this

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>press conference? Yeah? I think I think exactly that he's

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>responding to this sort of wingering question that many people have.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the U S strategy in the Middle East?

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>What is the U S strategy and Iran specifically? And

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think what he's trying to say is this, you know,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this is tethered to a strategy. This is part of

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>business as usual for US. You know, we have a

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy in Iran which is a maximum pressure campaign, UH

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to put you know, maximum pressure economically on Iran with

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sanctions to respond to any threats that they have against

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>US troops or US assets. UM. And that's what we

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>did when we took out Solemney. So I think he's

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of trying to um to really show that the

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that there is this sort of holistic approach. Interesting, David

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is there any sense within Washington d C the extent

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to which this administration will go uh, if there is

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact the next step a retterritory step for the

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>U S. If in fact Iran UH does retaliate. Yeah,

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're being a lot of different uh,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of different signals here. And that's

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely sort of a billion dollar question here. You know,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what what would the US do if Iran took action?

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Around is carefully signaling and uh and making it very

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>clear that they plan to to retaliate, but within some

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of um, you know, within some sort of confines

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of what they call international rules. Right, Um, So we'll

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have to see. But I don't think we have a

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>clear signal of what the U S would do. David

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Winner stick with us. We want to bring into the

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation Ariel Cohen. He's senior fellow at the Atlantic Council

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and founding principle of International market analysis. Ariel, can you

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of whether we are getting a

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>clear picture of what the US has planned and how

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>far it is willing to go in response to any

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>retaliatory measures taken by the Iranian government. Well, I think uh,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump is articulating a very strong stance, probably went

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>too far referring to cultural sites, as we witnessed at

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this press conference and from the statement of many American politicians, experts,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. People are very uncomfortable with US um committing

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>any kind of war crimes, and justifiably so we shouldn't.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of Mr. Crump being Mr Trump and

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>missing with Iran's Iranians heads UM, I think he probably

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>did it, not fully, not being fully cognizant what he's

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>getting into. In terms of the actual fight, UH, Iran

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is no match to the United States extentionally and of

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>course not unconventional. They don't have nuclear weapons as far

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as we know. But in terms of this indirect warfare,

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the they excel in UM terrorist attacks, UH, subversion, weaponizing

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Shia minorities throughout the Middle East, UH, the creation of

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the so called Iranian Crescent from the Mediterranean to the

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Holy City of Comb in Iran. They're doing all that.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>They are now less one um quarterback, and that was

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Mr Sulimani. General Sulimani UH. He was not a regular

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>military He was a paramilitary leader who was engaged deeply

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>for decades in terrorist activity and in that respect his

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>elimination was justified. So Ariel wanted to get your thoughts

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on a Secretary Pompeio said that Iran's nuclear program is

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>more diminished than it was under the j c p

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>o A deal that President Trump pulled out of. Is

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that in fact the case from your understanding, I'm not sure,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and these things are very nicole and you need a

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of classified information to really analyze it. If Mr Pompere,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>who has better access to a classified information than I do,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>says so, uh, it would be m a challenge to

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all of us to prove him wrong. Uh. The question

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is how many centri futures they have running now, and

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're already the Iranians already made a

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>classic Iranian move, we killed soley money. They're moving on

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a different chessboard, and on the nuclear chess board, they're

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>saying there are no limitations anymore, uh, in terms of enrichment.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>So that means they can go to enriching all the

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>way up to nine that they need of uranium enriched

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>in order to produce nuclear weapons. The other question I'm

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>asking myself to what extent countries with nuclear expertise who

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>are engaged in a strategic competition with US, Russia and

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>China are going to help Iran now to develop their

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>nuclear the potential nuclear um web and especially the means

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of delivering the rockets in the warheads. I think the

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>war warnts are absolutely key. Yes, well, and actually David

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that that brings me to a question that I have,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>which is what is the international response, both from allies

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as UH non allies of the United States

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to its actions with respect to Iran. I think you

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>know what you're hearing from, you know everyone, both allies

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and U S ravals. There's you know, calls to the

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>escalate There's some lot of sort of behind the scenes

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>UH discussion going on. A Reef has already said, UH

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>confirmed that he's going to be at Davos, although he

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't get his visa so far to come to New York.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He was supposed to be at the United Nations on

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Thursday for a Security Council meeting. So there's a lot

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of back channeling going on, a lot of calls for

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the escalation UM even the sort of you know, the

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>regional U S allies such as Israel, Saudi Arabia and

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the U A E. Uh, they're not interested in an

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>escalation here. Israel has been relatively quiet. Um. I mean

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they praised the US action, but they're distancing themselves from

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>specific strike on Sulamani. So UM, you know, I think

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of uh you know, quite

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a quite a significant attempt to reduce tensions here. And

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I would also note that you know, Iran has generally

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>responded this way when something like this happened, rhetorically speaking,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of action, Uh, they're going to be

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>very careful and calibrated. And I you know, if you

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look back to the last time someone really

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>senior uh in this apparatus was thinking was was killed

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Imad Mougnia Hasbalah, but he was very close. Uh. It

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>actually took maybe you know, a decade. Uh, it took

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>years until you saw a reaction. Um. And so it's

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna take some time for us to see the repercussions

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of this Aria. What do you think Iran will do

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of retaliation? What are their capabilities? Well, Iran

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated a totally chilling capability when it knocked out half

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi oil producing UM infrastructure, including the Abu Kaiks facility,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely crucial. I war gamed a strike on

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Abu Kaik and the Saudi facilities about ten years ago.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The results were much worse, much more catastrophic that than

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>what we found today. Why because of the massive US

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>oil producing capacity UH from shale so uh, the Iranians

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are capable of doing a lot of damage to the

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Saudi oil capacity and that may tip the global oil market,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>throwing the prices into a much higher rage. On the

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>other hand, people ask me if I think they would

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>block uh blockade the strait of hormones, the bottleneck through

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>which global oil is moving out of the Persian Gulf

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to the global markets, and I said no, because this

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>will be Iran shooting itself, not in the food, but

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the head, because that would stop Iranian exports. And

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>also on the table as the US warning, not the

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty two cultural site, but very uh important, very vital

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to Iran um Hard Island Oil terminal that is responsible

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for the majority of Iranian oil exports. If they make

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a big move uh, they're Hard Island Oil Terminal will

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>be UH in play and potentially devastated by the US Airport.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Harry'll Cohen, thank you so much for being with us

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Aero Cone, Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and founding

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>principle of international market Analysis. Also our thanks to David

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Wayner and Bloomberg International Government Reporter, both commenting on that

0:16:46.760 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>press conference and the US strategy with Iran. Time to

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>check in with Bloomberg Opinion, we welcome Jim Bianco, President,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>founder Bianco Research. Uh. He is based in Chicago. Interesting, Uh,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Jim just wanted to get your thoughts just kind of

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on the last few days the the re emergence, if

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you will, of geopolitical risk coming out of the Mid East.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>How does that kind of fit into kind of how

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about the markets for you know, the thing

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about it is everybody's wondering when is the next recession

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>going to occur? Because it's been eleven years since we've

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>had one, and it's the longest period that we've ever had.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And I've been arguing that the natural state of an

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>economy is to expand it will expand forever and ever,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but it never does because something comes along and breaks it.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>In the leading cause over the last many decades of

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>breaking an economy in the recession has been a spike

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>in energy prices. So when you get these events that

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you've had in the Middle East over the last week

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or so, you start to wonder if history is going

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to repeat itself again. Are we going to have a

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>spike in energy prices and will that bring down the

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>economy like it has so many times before. And I'll

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>remind you that in two thousand eight, we did get

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred and forty seven dollars on West Texas

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Intermediate by June of two thou eight, so there was

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 1>spike of energy prices then as well too. A lot

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of people are expecting that the next move for the

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve will be lower than the Federal cut once

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>more this year. That's what's being priced into the rates market.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, do you think that that is required in

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>order to keep the economy going or do you think

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that the FED should cut more or not cut at all?

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do lean towards the FED cutting um.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that they will cut one more time. And

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>if I had to uh put a bias on that,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that the bias would be that they would

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>more than once uh. And I think they would probably

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>do it in the first half of the year. They

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>will definitely once we get into the second half of

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the year, try and sit on their hands because of

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the election. But history shows sometimes they're forced to move

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on election right before elections. Remember two thousand and eight

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>when they did some of the most extraordinary things they've

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>done in their history literally days before the election. I

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>do think though, that if you look at the shape

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of the yield curve, it is back positive, but at

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>only twenty six basis points, it is well below its

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>long term average, which should be about a hundred and

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty basis points, and it is telling us I've always

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>looked at the yield curve is being something very simple,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>is that when the yolk curve is inverted, are very flat,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a market signal that maybe the funds rate or

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the policy rate is too high, especially when it's inverted,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and even when it's very flat. And I would call

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty basis points where we are now flat. So I

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>think that there's gonna be downward pressure on interest rates

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and the lack of inflation. The thing that the FETE

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>has been scratching their head about should be embraced by

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>them and say, look, there isn't any there's room for

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>us to lower interest rates, and I think they'll eventually

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>come to their view. Jim, do we still need to

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>worry about that short end of the curve the repo

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>market that was obviously much in the news several months ago,

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less so today. Yeah, No, I definitely

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think we should worry about it. Um it is. It

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>has been drugged into submission by the FETE. They've just

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>buried it with with supply. They've supplied m repubs to

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the tunes of hundreds of billions of dollars and brought

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>another hundreds of billions of dollars of bills to keep

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the market quiet. All Right, it's quiet. It's not a problem.

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not an immediate worry today, tomorrow, next week. But

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what is most concerning is I don't hear a plan

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from them on how to fix this. I don't hear

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a plan for them on how to get out of this.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Other than that they just keep throwing the junkie a

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>dime bag every week and saying here, we'll get you

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the next week. We'll get you the next week. That

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>being just more repose supply every week. That's not a

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>long term fix. It's been four months. It's time for

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>them to kind of step up to the plate and say, Okay,

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>here's how we're going to fix this problem. I might

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>add I think I know why. I think they know that.

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>The reason is that they've overregulated the short end of

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve. It has not been able to come

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>to come to grips with that regulation. They need to

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>back off that regulation. But they've been getting pressure from

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>no less than Liz warrened Sheila Bear former FDI c

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>had Alan Bleer, former Flights chairman the FED saying don't

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>back off on the regulations. Okay. If you don't do that,

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to fix this problem. And that's why

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're kind of stuck right now. You've got

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>away with words. Jim Bianco throwing the Junkia dime bag.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I love speaking with you, and Jim Bianco always a pleasure,

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>President and founder of Bianco Research and a Bloomberg Opinion contributor.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Joining us from Chicago and actually interesting, uh to see

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that today the REPO operation operated by the New York

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve was oversubscribed for the first time, and a

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of the operations, So showing ongoing demand for this

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>liquidity at a time when there are a lot of

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>questions about the REPO operations. Well, the fourth most read

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>story on the Bloomberg terminal uh this today is about

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the credit card business and gas stations. Apparently the gas

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>stations are not prepared to accept the chip reader credit

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>cards and apparently that's going to be a big problem.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting story here. Jenny Seraine, the reporter on that story,

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter for Bloomberg News, joins us here on o

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Jenny, I didn't even know this

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was a thing. Scope it out force. What's going on? Um? Yeah,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people maybe haven't been um,

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like it's not some thing a lot

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of people pay attention to. But basically five years ago

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, we started making this transition to

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.239
<v Speaker 1>chip cards, um, and so people should be seeing that,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, at your regular Bodego, your regular grocery store

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of swiping we now dip UM and gas stations

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>have been a little bit behind. They were given a

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer of a deadline to make that upgrade

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>because um, you actually have to rip out the pump

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>from the concrete and you know, replace it there. And

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a very big expense. Um. And so the industry

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of recognized that, um. And so that deadline is

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>actually replaced the whole pump as opposed to just some

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>little thing that accepts the corder card. Yes, so the

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hardware for this is just a very unusual beast um.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, these gas station operators actually have to

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>rip out from the concrete. Yeah. Well that's actually interestingly

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this story. I gotta say, I noticed that the people

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>who were quoted where people who are involved in the

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>installation of some of these events saying they're woefully behind.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>They gotta get on this. I mean, how big of

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a push is uh their ports on their part. I

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>think everyone realizes that the deadline is coming. Um. And

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so what that deadline basically means is that after October,

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if a gas station hasn't upgraded its systems, it will

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>suddenly face all liability for any card fraud that happens

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>at the station. And so it's a big expense that's

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>coming for these station operators. UM. But yeah, the industry

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just says it's going to be really tough to make

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it on the credit card side. How much more secure

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is the chip versus the swipe And by the way,

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I really I want to incorporate that into my lexicon

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of swiping we now did okay? Carry on? Um? Yeah,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>well it's uh. So the chip was basically designed to

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>head off counterfeit card fraud. So that's uh. You know,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a few years ago the real risk was

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>hackers would attach skimming devices onto the point of sale um,

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and so when you swiped your card, they were able

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to get all of the card data and then basically

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>go and make a counterfeit card and use that wherever

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to. So the chip basically heads that off

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>by each time you dip your card, it creates a

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>unique number, and so even if the hacker has infiltrated

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that point of sale device, they can't go and make

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>copies of that card and use it wherever they want.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of fraud is what this is really addressing,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and it is a lot safer. You know, we've seen

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>uh counterfeit fraud dollars fall by you know, more than

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.239
<v Speaker 1>fifty since the deadline, and so it has addressed that.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Now hackers don't just go away because you've taken away

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>one form. So we've seen a subsequent increase in other

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>types of card fraud that the industry is now trying

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to address. But UM, at least for counterfeit card fraud,

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the chip did do what it was supposed to. Different

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>When I'm over in London for business, I noticed people

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of tapping their card and so when I

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>walk up to get us pay for a sandwich, the

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>person going to counter just like size because now they

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have to dip it and do it exactly signed something.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>What's that technology? Why don't you have that? It's it's coming.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So the US is woefully behind the rest of the

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>world in terms of adoption of tap to pay UM

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and but it's coming. So you've seen it so far.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The m t A has started to install these readers

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 1>on the subway, so you should start to see that

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more and more. And I think retailers kind of UM

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of ways follow transit. So when you

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>see these big transit operators adopting that technology, you should

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>start to see other retailers. But yeah, it's this one

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>area of finance where you know, the US has long

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>been a leader, and so many things within the credit

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>card industry. But this is where we really fall behind. Well,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>going back to gas stations. If they're spending all this

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>money to implement entirely new pumps to dip rather than swipe,

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna have to do it again so that

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we can tap? So it should be one upgrade. Um,

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what you've seen with a lot of the other

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>retailers who had the deadline. Um, so it should be

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>one upgrade. Now, just because a retailer adopts the dipping

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>does not mean they have to adopt tapping. So some

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>retailers have said they don't want to. Um. There's a

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of different reasons for that. Um. You know, a

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of retailers are starting to come up with their

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>own forms of mobile payments, so they maybe don't want

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone walking in and using Apple Bay. So

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a little bit of kind of differentiation. It's

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>another area for retailers to kind of catch up. You know,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot of catching up. I have to say,

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I can just imagine someone coming up to one of

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>those things and just like taking their card, just like

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 1>snacking it and then dipping it and sliding it. I mean, honestly,

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at a little confused after a while. Jenny, do carry cash?

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I am a weird millennial that does carry cash. Yes,

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you are a weird okay, because this kind of goes

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to the issue of kind of the cashless society. And

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you actually see some stores as a restaurant, I guess

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>they're right here on election to navtu you know, sign

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>out front and we do not accept cash. Yeah, but

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a gimmick, isn't it. I don't know,

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's actually a big debate. Um. Folks

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>actually are now saying that going cashless might improper, you know,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of poor people who only carry cash and

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have access to financial services. I carry cash. I

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>always carry cash, carry cash. No it asks, but I do.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>But not that anyone should really back. How much does

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it cost? It sounds like a lot um, so it

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can vary. The averages are right now about thirty dollars

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>per store um to upgrade all of your pumps. And

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's really hard for an industry where profit

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>margins are less than two percent, So it's a really

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>big outlay at any point in time that these gas

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>station operators are gonna have to make swipe, dip, tap, swipe, dip,

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>tap and swing. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Serena, I'm gonna get I'm gonna get absolutely pummeled

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for saying that Jenny Serena is a Bloomberg Finance reporter

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>training us here in our eleven three oh studies or

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Proker Studios. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney,

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram woids

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram Woyds one. Before the podcast,

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio