WEBVTT - How to Think Like a Child

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas. Now Julie.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Normally we don't we don't do a lot of readings

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Bible on this podcast, but I've got a

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>couple here I want to hit everyone with because of

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Ravens what we're talking about. Both of these are from

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Matthew, the New Testament and the first

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>one Matthew eleven. At that time, Jesus explained, I give

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>praise for you, Father, Lord of Heaven and Earth, for

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>although you have hidden these things from the wise and

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the learning, you have revealed them to the little ones.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>The little ones, little being the children. And then there's

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>another one where he says, I tell you the truth.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Unless you change and become like little children, you will

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>never enter the Kingdom of Heaven. And I think there's

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a little more there about needles and rich people. But

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>needles and rich people, yeah, yeah, Like it's easier for

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a camel to go through the eyeban needle than for

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a rich man. And can all you know, lots of

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, New testament wisdom that Jesus is spouting

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and in this book. But these two passages in particular

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting because they both talk about the this childhood nature,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>this there's something special about children that enables them to

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>see the world as it really is, to to see

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>through the grown up bs and and get at the

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>truth of the matter. And it's something you see, I

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>mean throughout the human history. I mean you see it

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot in fiction Chronicles of Narnia, Susan becomes too sophisticated, well,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>too grown up for Narnia, can't go there anymore. Puff

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the magic Dragon, as you remember a little Jackie Paper

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Paper reaches the point where you can't see Narnia the

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>children and Stephen King's it you too. In order to

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>defeat this evil clown shifting monster, you have to have

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this spirit of a child. Yeah. And my neighbor Totoro,

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the farest spirits, adorable as they are, he's got to

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be a child to see them. And and so then

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there's of course this longstanding thing like that. There's the

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>whole kids say that darned as things right, where like

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cosby show, wasn't it it was? Yeah? And I

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>think it was. It was an older show even before

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Cosby took it over, but he's the one most remembered

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for it. But the idea being that you bring a

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>kid on and you just let them talk, and they're

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna drop truth bombs on you because they

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know any better. Though, I found it interesting that

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cosby is also quoted as saying it's saying quote,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a person with no children says, well, I just love children.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And you say why, and they say, because the child

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is so truthful, and that's what I love about them.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They tell the truth. And Cosby goes on to say,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's a lie. I've got five of them and

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the only time they tell the truth is when they're

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>having pain. Even that sometimes can be a lie, as

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I have discovered. Yeah, you're you're a mom. What's your

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>take on the the innocence and the truth bombs of children?

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The truth bombs? Um, Well, I mean I think everything

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is is new to them, right, so immediately kids see

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>things an entirely different way because they're piecing together context

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and being able to see things, um from an entirely

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>new perspective, as we know, is a completely liberating thing.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And there's a power to that, and we've talked about

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that before that as we age, we tend to let

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>some of that uh slaw off of us, right, because

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we're so used to sort of establishing a pattern, going

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>with that and then moving forward. But to paraphrase Picasso,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he said he took his whole life to think like

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a child artistically to reach that place where he could

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>once again delve into novel ideas or novel representations of

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the human experience. And in fact, I am looking at

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Picasso right now because in our podcast Booth. I don't

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know if we've ever mentioned this before. I don't think

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you have not in the podcast. Uh well, we have

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of photos in the podcast Booth, and the

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>one that I get to stare at is Picasso in

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>his underwear. So I think about this idea a lot,

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so that I don't think about Picasso in his underwear

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with a bat for a while. But then then someone

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>moved it. Yeah I did. I covered up his private

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>parts in this one. They did. Um, But there is

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this I think he puts a you well that you

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>know it takes a lot of effort to try to

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>bust out of these constraints that we because we have

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to we placed in our lives, um, and to be

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>able to think in a way that is completely mind

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>blowing a new Yeah. I mean there is something about

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the creativity alone of a child. UM. I think I've

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this before. There's a in Atlanta. There's a there's

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>an improv company called Dad's Garage and they do if

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>you go at night, you've often get a lot of

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>very blue material from these improv actors. They're getting up there.

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>They're blooming dirty dirty. Yeah, they're doing free association and

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's and all sorts of outlandish things are coming up

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that I couldn't even mention on the podcast, but they

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>would all. They also do a show and I think

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they still do it called Uncle Grahampa's Hoodaily story Time.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And in this show, it's the same improv actors, these

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 1>same same guys and gals that are just really tearing

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it up at night with ranching material. But now they're

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in the a m and they have they're performing to

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>an audience of mostly children, but they're also doing improv

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're getting tips from the audience, so they'll they'll

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ask the kids in the audience, Hey, what should the

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>name of this princess be and what should the story

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that we tell be called? And uh, I've been to

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it a couple of times, and there it is always

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>amazing because from these children, they're able to come up

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with the craziest ideas, like stuff that these these these

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>experienced and highly creative improv actors would never be able

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to pull out. Like like I remember one when when

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>they asked what should the princess be called, the little

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>girl said that the princess name should be quote Batman

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the Girl, which is incredible. You know, it's like that

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of like strange, free association that you're just not

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to get from an adult. Well, yeah, I remember

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing this Ted talk and uh, I'll show this up

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or in a post. I don't remember the

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>name of the Ted talk right now, but they were

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>starting they were talking about accessing again this this childish thinking,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and they were talking about um an arts program in

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>which the kids were making different kinds of clay models,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and one of the kids came up with Bacon Boy

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it is so I've got to throw up an

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>image of this. It is awesome, you know, sort of

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a superpower figure. And again, these are not things that

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we as adults go around thinking like I'm going to

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sculpture Bacon Boy today and really start to think about

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this mythology of this character. But that's what kids do.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>And um, if you have ever taken a walk with

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>a toddler anywhere from two to when they started to

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>get preschool four five years of age, you know there

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>is no linear path. That this is going to take

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time because everything is going to be picked

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>up and inspected and stories where will begin to just

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>organically arise from their experience with with their environments. And

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we have talked about this before, but I thought it

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>would be good for us to mention that this is

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this idea that when we are adults, we have a

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>focus that is that's pretty laser focused, this flashlight focus

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that kids starting as infants grow into that flashlight focus,

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but they begin at the lantern of light experience where everything,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>uh is it has light cast upon it and they're

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>considering everything in their world. Yeah. Like, one thing that

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind when I think about this is the

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the Alan Rogue Grulay novel Jealousy, where the entire book

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is not going to really sell it well

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from most people, but the entire book is this guy

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>staring at a wall or occasionally staring at its has

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>banana plantation and trying to figure out whether his wife

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is having an affair with another band of plantation owner.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of it is him staring at

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at a sneer on the wall where he killed a

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>centipede and just obsessing and obsessing, obsessing. It's that laser focus,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that he's getting nothing done the whole

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>novel because he's just obsessed with one thing. And I

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>feel in his adults that we often do that it's

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not an actual smash centipede on the wall. Then it's

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>something like, you know, some you know guy starts losing

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>his hair, and then that's the thing they come back

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to over and over again. Oh my goodness, what's happening

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to me? Am I I'm getting older. I'm dying. You know,

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we end up obsessing over something, or we get obsessed

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>with with one particular material thing or another, or or

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we attached our ego to a sports team or something.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Whereas how many how many child children do you know

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>who are rabid sports fanatics, who are rabbid fans of

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a particular team, you know, how many reliduced fundamentalist children

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>do you know? How many neurotic children do you know

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>where they're obsessed with? Uh, I don't know if their

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>weight gain. Yeah, that's just not really something that you

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you commonly see until they get a little bit older, right,

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they get into grade school. The thing about this, and

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>psychologist Alison Gothnick has talked about this, is that when

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you're an adult, you have, uh, you know, certain neural

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>connections that have been pruned away because you don't use

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>them anymore. And so if you are that character in

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the book who is staring at the wall, well, you're

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be squirting a lot of neuro transmitters on that

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain to really keep it activated in focus.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you are an infant, your entire brain is

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>just steeped in neuro transmitters. It's marinating in it. And

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what she says results in this information rich world,

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>this lantern vision, trying to take every single thing in. Yeah.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>She mentions in her in her writing that in the

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>past it's been difficult for us to try and study

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's going on in the in the minds of

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>young children, and certainly in the minds of of unlanguaged

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>children and infants, and and even if you can get

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>them to talk, it's going to be a stream of

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>consciousness mumbo jumbo about I think her example is birthday

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>parties and horses, obviously for for girls and for for

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>little boys. Birthday parties. Uh, fire trucks and boogers. You know,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean to go across gender, across gender, fire trucks,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, um so. So I found that interesting because

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of her studies is about getting beyond that

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and really finding ways to not only look at what

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>children and infants are saying, well certainly not infants so much,

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but what beyond what children are say, and also look

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>at their actions and how they're interacting with the world

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>around them. And what she gets out a lot is

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of this plasticity, which we've talked about before,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability of our mind to change, the ability of

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>ourselves to to to roll with the punches, because when

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you were a a zero to three year old, you

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have to really be able to roll with the punches.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And so even in even in a very comfy environment,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>if you grow up in a very civilized environment, a

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>very safe environment, there's still a lot of a lot

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of trauma around you when you're that alert to the world,

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in in less advantageous environments, you've gotta be

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>really hardy to survive. Yeah, she alson. Gopnik actually has

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this great quote about what it's like to be an infant,

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and she said, and this is the kind of more

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>romanticized version of it, as opposed to just you know,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>having to deal with all the noise and the different stimuli.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>She says, it's like being in love and perish for

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the first time after you've had three double espressos. Yeah,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>so there is this idea you are being bombarded by

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>all the different elements out there. She also mentions the

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>study of Eastern European orphans who were adopted by parents

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and about how in in in most

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of the case it's not all but in most of

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>those cases, and these were kids that were they're growing

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>up in like extreme um situations of you know, they're

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>just not exposed to enough sensory information, enough personal interaction.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They're starved for all of this. But they're so but

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the child is so resilient zero to three that most

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of them were able to just really bounce back without

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>any kind of significant problems. And she says that this

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is because of this different consciousness that kids have that

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they grow out of again into the more flashlight focus.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But she's saying, and this is this is kind of

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>looping it back on how you can try to retain

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of this for yourself as as an adult.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>She's saying that the creative people are able to hold

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>onto this different consciousness to be able to inhabit this

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:03.599
<v Speaker 1>mind space where you can transfer your consciousness from flashlight

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to lantern and began to take more things in all

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>while being a reasonably um responsible adult. Of course, one

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes to mind here, and so we're comparing

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>adult artists with young children, one thing that instantly comes

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to mind here is children running around in the yard naked,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>and then artists inevitably running around in the yard naked,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>or like our friend Picasso here in the diaper um

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>because it does kind of his head where it does

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>look like a diaper, Because art, like childhood, is kind

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>of a judgment free zone. And as it turns out,

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that plays into this mind of a child, this creativity

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, and in fact, in kids and teenagers

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>frontal lobes the seat of judgment. Right, these are the

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>last pieces to be fully connected to the brain, okay,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>or be fully connected to parts of the brain that

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>deal with judgment, inhibition, self awareness, cause and effect, acknowledgement, um,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all the things that are sort of the bane of

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>our existence with with teenagers that we normally look at us. Ah, man,

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>they just they're crazy there, you know, look at their hair.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>What are they think? Yeah, yeah, they're just there's not

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a lick of sense. And that kid um, that actually

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>can be a real boon two kids because they lack

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>again this idea of this inner judgmental voice that can

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes stop us in our tracks when we're trying to

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do something novel um. So again, trying to silence that

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain is really important. And we have

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before, but surgeon and jazz musician Charles

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Limb wanted to look at this a little more carefully

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>to say, how how are musicians so adept at just

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>getting in there and improvising? What makes them able to

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>do that? And it turns out that musicians are really

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>good at turning off the part of the brain again

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this uh dorsal lateral prefrontal and lateral orbital regions, dimming

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that and instead bringing online the medial prefrontal cortex, which

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>else them to express themselves better. And so the frontal

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>lobes they dim a bit because they're like, yeah, you

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>know what, I don't need you right now. I really

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>need to kind of flex this part of my muscle.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So he saw that in all these m r I

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>scans of these musicians, which really pointed to this idea

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that certain things are play. In fact, neuroscientists, Rex Jung

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>also talks about how highly creative people usually have less

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>white matter integrity and less brain tissue in the frontal lobes. Okay,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that they're you know, less intelligent or

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that they lack something. It just means that the frontal

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>lobes again the seat of judgment, Uh, it's not nearly

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>as taxed with neural connections, these glial cells, white cells,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and therefore those people are a bit more unencumbered when

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to creating something new. All right, we are

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break, but when we come back,

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we are going to talk about the importance of play

0:14:52.640 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in this idea of uncertainty in our lives. All right,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're back. We're discussing again the minds of children. Uh,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this old idea that children see the world as it

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>really is, or they see it in in a unique way.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And if we as adults can simply recapture some of

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that childhood essence, and I mean not in a drain

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>essence from a child's skull in a like a skexy way,

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but in an actual let us let's change the way

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we perceive the world and how we interact with it too,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to improve our creative output. And and when I say creative,

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just talking about finger painting on the wall.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But as we'll discussed here, actual scientific achievement as well

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>falls under this category. Yeah, really engaging critical thinking skill.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>According to neuroscientists, Bolatto and he has that great Ted

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com talk, He says that uncertainty for adults is

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>really problematic. And this is particularly true in the context

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of evolution, where uncertainty, you know, not knowing if there's

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a saber tooth tiger in the weeds over there or

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's just the wind rustling through through the leaves,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>could result in death. For us, we need to be

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>certain about certain elements of life Yeah. That's the thing

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>about uncertainty is that, for the most part, most of

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>us tend to want to get away from uncertainty because

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty brings potential disaster. Uncertainty as you're walking down the

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>street means maybe I'll get run over by a car,

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll get mugged. Maybe again the saber through tiger

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>will jump out at me. But it's out of that

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty that so many amazing creative ideas arise. And the

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>way that we combat uncertainty, of course, is to sort

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of apply a script to the world, to cling to

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>certain world views that that bring order out of chaos.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So look at any particular world view and it may

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and generally it's about positioning yourself, your group at the center,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>creating a barrier between this group and outside groups. I

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we think like this, They think like that. These are

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the environment in which I live. These

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are the people who don't abide by those rules. These

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are the rules that apply to me. We we steadily organized,

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>We build a little fort of ideas in which we

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>feel safe against the chaos of the world. And that's

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that's certainty that we're talking about. That really helps us

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to predict how things will come out. But he's saying

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that for children, uncertainty is a game, and it is

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a necessary game because if you look at animals and humans,

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>all species play in some way. And we've talked about

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this before, um in terms of the amount of time

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it takes for a creature to mature. We've talked about

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the New Caledonian crow, which has a relatively long childhood

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as as a bird, and then we've talked about the say,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just you know, your run of the Milk chicken, and

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the consensus there was that the New Caldonian crow really

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>needed that time to mature because it's pretty sophisticated in

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of its tool use and where's the chicken so

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>much doesn't need a lot of time to play to

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a long childhood. And as we said, one

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>ended up in in a pot. The other one, the

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>New Caldonian Crow, ended up on the cover of Nature

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>magazine because it does have these very sophisticated tool using abilities.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at children and you get uncertainty,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it really is necessary for kids to throw away the

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>rules and to begin to like a scientist, approach their

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>environments and play with that environment. Yeah, it's easy to

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>look at children and play and and just sort of

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>discredited to say, oh, that's just children wasting time instead

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of doing chores, which they should be doing, or to

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>look at it in terms of all right, well that's

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>a that's a boy and he's playing with tools and

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>beating stuff with hammers. He's just he's just kind of

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>practicing for his life. Or oh, there's a little girl

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and she's playing with the baby doll. Well, that's just

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>her rehearsing. That's a little there's a kitten fighting another kitten.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>They're just rehearsing for their their lives. It's aggressive hunters,

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot more going on speci Typically, as

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a bow Latto points out, play be it whatever the

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>kittens doing, what the child is doing, or what an

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>adult artists or scientists is engaging in, boils down to

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>five different things. First, celebrating uncertainty. It's not you're not

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>entering the environment and saying saying, oh, there there might

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be something I'm unsure of outside of this fort of ideas.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's about venturing outside of that fort of ideas and

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing the world anew uh. It's about being acceptable to change,

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>engaging in this in this world, beyond the fortress of ideas,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and realizing that what you see may change you, It

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.959
<v Speaker 1>may change how you assemble your fortress of ideas when

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you return to it. You have to be open to possibility,

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>open to the possibility that you're gonna change, open to

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that your preconceived notions are going to fail.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You need to be cooperative, certainly if you're venturing outside

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of that fortress of ideas with other individuals, and finally,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>intrinsically motivated, you're doing it because you want to You

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>want to see beyond this fortress of ideas that you've

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>used to understand the world previously. Now, as um, you

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have probably witnessed before with kids that the rules can

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>change pretty quick, right, They can throw them out or

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just completely change them. One second the floor's lava,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>then it's then it's a never ending pit, and then

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>it's okay to walk on, which is great, right because

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of gets very good narrative consistency. No, nobody

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>gives them a certain amount of flexibility. And you have

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned like giving a girl a baby doll and giving

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a boy tools. Um, really, you give a kid a

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>stick and they are going to turn it into something

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>in which Tory, Yeah, to interrogate the world around them.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And I see this again and again with my daughter

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>making Pulley systems out of you know, um buckets, because

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the buckets are full of Pixie destin she needs to

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>skewer some pirate or something. Um. But I think it's

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>really interestinging that Lotto looked at this play, this uncertainty,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and then he sought out a group of children ages

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten because he wanted to know could they

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>approach an experiment or could they create their own experiment?

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And could we actually get something on the other end

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that we could use. Because again he's saying that those

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>those five circumstances that you talked about, this openness, this

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>um intrinsically motivated cooperation, and so on and so forth.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>He's saying that this is really the play of a scientist.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>This is what scientists do. Yeah. I mean again, it's

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>easier to make the initial comparison to creative work because

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like I think, if like, if I'm writing a story

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>or something, I'm entering it with an uncertain mind. I

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know where characters are gonna end up, or what's

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in maybe one rule or two that

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to stay too, and those rules may they

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>break by the time I finish it. I mean, I

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>can't think of the number of times that I've I've

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>started writing a story and when I end up getting

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is entirely different because I've because you've got to be

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>open to it to change. And then, certainly in science,

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>when you start looking at these these five things from

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a scientist per spective, imagine if a scientist goes out

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to figure out why something in the world works the

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>way it does, or something in the outer cosmos works

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the way it does. You're going to go in there

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with some preconceived notions, but you have to be able

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to to dispel them and ignore them. It need be

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for commisically and you have to celebrate uncertainty, it be

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>acceptable to change, open to possibility, cooperative, and intrinsically motivated. Well,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wanted to see if these codes could

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>see themselves differently through the process of being a scientist,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>because again, when you say let's let's do some science,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty weighted because people approach it and thinking that

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>science is something that is separate from them as opposed

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to well, it's actually science really plays to our strengths

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>as human beings. Yeah, this this comes into sort of

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the puff the magic dragon thing again. There's kind of

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>this false idea that when you're a child, it's all

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>interacting with imaginary creatures and engaging in this creativity. But

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>then you learn to be a grown up and you

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>learn science, and then you put all that crap behind you.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>But as as we're discussing here, being a scientist is

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as much about embracing that spirit of childhood as it

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is about growing up and becoming more mature. So a

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of worked with twenty five children in conjunction with

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>their headmaster, again ages eight to ten, and they studied

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>black wotton bees to see if these bees, again this

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is something that kids came up with, could solve problems

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in a similar way that humans do. And the kids

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>asked the questions and they actually devised the experiments. Um.

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>According to Biology Letters, which published the paper, the children's

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>findings show that bees are able to alter their foraging

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>behavior based on previously learned colors and pattern cues and

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a complex scene consisting of a local pattern within a

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>larger global pattern. This is pretty sophisticated for an insect

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>um and then in Biology letters that says, as there

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>has been little testing of bees learning color patterns at

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>small and large scales, the results contribute considerably to our

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>understanding of insect behavior. The kids managed to not only

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>published a paper, which we'll talk a little bit more

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about how they did that, but to to get a

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>novel understanding of an insect. And what I love about

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this is that the paper actually begins with once upon

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a Time, which largely written in kids speak, but the

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>methodology that they came up with, the observations, the hypothesis,

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>all of this is so solid that they, you know,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the people who actually ended up reviewing this and writing

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a commentary on this could not deny that they had

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.959
<v Speaker 1>found something that was very valuable. Well, it reminds me

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of your daughter's interaction with the trial bide and how

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>she granted she gave it, that she give it a name,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>called it Gonk, but then also created the story about

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>how it was going down to the water and eating plants,

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>if I remember correctly. So it wasn't living in a

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>fairy castle or anything. It was. She wasn't creating a

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a plausible story for that creature based on her knowledge

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world well and more importantly of her observations

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of the world, then she had a context for it,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and she of course subscribed emotions to it and all

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>this sort of stuff. But yeah, I mean, do you

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just give kids a couple of things and they will

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>run with us? And UH and began to see the

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>logic inherent in there. I wanted to also point out

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that the paper that they came up with actually had

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>hand drawn figures and tables in it as well. And

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>if you check out that TED talk um by a

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of you'll also see a presentation by Amy O'Toole, who,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time of a twelve year old student who

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>helped run one of the science experiments that it was

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>inspired by Bolto science approach and UH. At the age

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of ten, she became one of the youngest people ever

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to publish a peer of viewed science paper, and she

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>was also at the time the youngest person to give

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a TED talk or to help give a TED talk.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Since you get the second half, but that was really

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>motivating as well, because then it comes down to the

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that when you got these kids in the room,

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>you got him thinking about science they were already asking

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>questions that were significant to science. Yeah, I mean this

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty life changing for a lot of those kids,

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>because again a lot of wanted to see how they

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would see themselves after going through a scientific process and

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, help them to gell this idea that science

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is again a part of them and not apart, not

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of It's not something you learn, it's something

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you are from the earliest. If anything is we grow

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>older more many of us we forget science rather than

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have to learn it. Well, it just seems like something

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that we look through the window at, right. But Loto

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>said this, and I thought it was really interesting. He said,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the point is what science does for us. We normally

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>walk through life responding, but if we ever want to

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>do anything different, we have to step into uncertainty. That's

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what science offers us. It offers the possibility to step

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>into uncertainty through the process of play. Yeah. It reminds

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>me of a quote badly enough by Timothy Leary who

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about before he gets his childlike was childlike. Yeah,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was, you know, he was very free

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking dude. Um for some of the other faults aside,

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>but he has this great quote where he says to

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think for yourself, you must question an authority and learn

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open mindedness,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>chaotic confused vulnerability to inform yourself tune in. Yeah, and

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of course the thing is, you know, you need to

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>remind mrr Larry that ultimately don't need any pharmaceutical help

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to achieve that. In I mean, all you have to

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>do is either be a child or try and think

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like a child, and you can achieve that that level

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of of chaotic, confused vulnerability. Well, here's the thing about

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Larry is that he was a trained scientist, and so

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.959
<v Speaker 1>he had a background in the best ways to go

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about thinking critically but also thinking in a way that

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>could really open up the mind. And when I think

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>about ways in which you can look at probabilities and

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>try to predict the future in a new way or

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way, I think about Bayesian modeling. Yes. Now,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this is UH something that is named after the Reverend

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Reverend Thomas Bayes, an eighteenth century mathematician, and according to

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Alice and Gopnik, studies show that kids at least unconsciously

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are Asian UH masters themselves. Now here's the thing about

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Beiesian logic is you can really get into the weeds

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand what it is. Essentially, Baisian probability theory

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is a branch of mathematical theory that allows one to

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:18.239
<v Speaker 1>model uncertainty about the world and about the outcomes of

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>various aspects of that world by combining common sense knowledge

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with observational evidence. Okay, it sounds very mechanical and straightforar

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this because it is. It's actually figures into some of

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>our AI constructs that we're working on today. It's a

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>central part of trying to figure out how an intelligent

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>creature thinks. Yeah, it was actually going to mention that

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Bayesian modeling actually came online in I think the early nineties,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>around the same time that psychologists were beginning to look

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at kids and wondering if this Baisian modeling was inherent

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to them. And it's funny because AI, artificial intelligence and

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 1>kids really go hand in hand because people who are

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in AI are interested in looking at kids as

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the root model. In other words, if we're going to

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>build a computer that can think like us, act like us,

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 1>make decisions, then we want it to be based on

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this root material. A k a. Kids. And you know,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as we're moving forward to the future, we we inevitably

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>come back to this idea of of robots solving problems,

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>computers solving problems. We want to know the weather's doing

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in ten days through a computer model at it, right,

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's just gonna become more and more like that

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as we move forward. So it's it's fascinating to think

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that the ais that we're building today to solve the

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>problems of tomorrow, children are already born with that, with

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>those mechanics in their mind. If they get older and

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they become adults, it becomes clouded. So in a way,

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>adult humans are having to build robots that think like

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>children so they can solve the problems that they no

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>longer can. And one of the reasons that can because

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of preconceived notions. And these again, these these fortresses of

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas that we build because whether you're looking at questions

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of I want who's gonna win the election, I wonder,

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what choice I should make in my life

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>regarding my employment, uh, any number of questions that may

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>come up. We're we're handicapped against applying the Asian logic

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to them because we have these these world views in place,

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>these preconceived notions, this fortress of ideas that we have

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to somehow navigate, and it could because of all those

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>preconceived notions, they end up flowing the data. Yeah, it's true.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, kids can really be better problem

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>solvers when it comes to Bayesian logic, because, as you say,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things that as we get older, we

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have these priors, they get stronger and stronger, and they

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>actually need to in some ways to help us survive

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>our experience in the world. But we're already relying on

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that too heavily and less on new data, right, so

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we rely more on our past experiences, and these strong

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>priors are really actually very comforting to us. But Bayesian

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>inference inference, excuse me, it considers both uh, new evidence

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and prior probability of hypotheses, and this gives Baisian learning

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a character characteristic combination of stability and flexibility. So here's

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the key to it really working really well in science

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and with kids. In science. Uh, if if you have

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a really crappy hypothesis, you're gonna throw it out. Kids

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to do the same thing. They don't have

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>emotional investments or really strong priors. So this allows them

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to go through the information much better. Okay, so how

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>do we know that kids are better at some reasoning

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to to be Asian modeling, um than adults?

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it because they say the darniest things? It is

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Alson Gopnik again, who is pretty much the centerpiece for

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. She used something called a Blikic detector. This

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is a machine that lights up and plays music when

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>certain objects which are controlled by the experiment or are

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>placed on top of it, plays like a cube onto

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this little platform and lights up and it starts playing music. Right,

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you might have different shapes, you might have a star

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>or a cube, or different colors, and so the idea

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is that you begin to understand the relationship of what

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>makes the machine work. Well, what she did is she

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>asked both adults and children separately in separate experiments, to

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out these objects and how they would

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>make the machine work. I mean, essentially, she was saying,

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>go make this machine work. Well, the kids were a

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lot better at it, because what what the adults did

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is they observed what the experiment or did with the

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>blocks to make the machine work and there's a really

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>strong priors, and so they were holding onto the this

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of what happened in the past, whereas the kids

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>were able to take every single angle of the blocks

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the colors put together, you know, various points of data

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to best make this blicket machine work.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Another example of this is give an iPad to a

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>child and your grandparents and see who figures it out

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for Yeah, and in some not to say that's a

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>complete divide, because you're gonna have some older people that

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>really dive with new technology and again are really able

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.959
<v Speaker 1>to pass that booket test. Like my wife's grandmother in

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>her nineties use the Kindle all the time, which is awesome.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think kindles in the beginning like an early

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>early adopter of that technology. Well, and see there's again

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there's this idea of holding on see this bit of

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>your your childhood thinking or your childness, or this openness

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to new ideas and experiences and not saying up a

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>machine for a bug, give me my old books, Just

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>give me my paper, my paper, I just move with

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>my finger. Yeah, yeah, you can do the same thing

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with kindle. Um, all right, So there's this idea. Another

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>pcassa quote that everything you can imagine is real. Now

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I would add this, you just

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have to make it fit into that bay Asian model.

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So anything you dream of could be real as long

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as you can make it fit into the constructs of

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>our physical world. And that's where Okem's razor comes in. Yeah,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all comes razor. Is this idea that basically the simplest

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 1>answer is the one that is probably the most likely answer. Yeah,

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Akams raisers. It's interesting because the term first appears around

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty, two centuries after the death of the guy's

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>named after, who was a fourteenth century Franciscan friar by

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the name of William of Oakum. Uh. Really fascinating dude. Um.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever read the Name of the rose By

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and Burn of Eco, the main character in that, who's

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a Sherlock Holmes styled monk named William of Baskerville. He's

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>always talking about his friendship and camaraderie with Oakum's way

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of thinking, because despite being a Franciscan friar, he was

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you could you imagine, all right, what he's gonna be

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a really religious dude. He's gonna see the world through

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>religious goggles and to a certain extent you, as we've

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>discussed in a recent podcast on witchcraft, that's gonna be

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a part of the way you see the world. You

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>just can't help with us the world you're born into.

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But Oakum was a realist, and what we call a nominalist.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Nominalism is the theory that there are no universal soul,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>essences and reality. He argued that only individuals exist rather

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>than super individual universals, essences, and forms. So to break

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that down in a really sustinct way, I turned to

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Encyclopedia of all places. They have a really nice

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>paragraph and we're just gonna read this. They say, exaggerated

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>realism invents a world of reality, corresponding exactly to the

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 1>attributes of the world of thought. Nominalism, on the contrary,

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>models the concept on the external object, which it holds

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to be individual in particular. So it comes down to

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>how are you gonna understand the world around you? Are

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you gonna start with the ideas about the world and

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>work down to the world itself, or do you start

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>with the world and work out from there? And so

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a large part of Lum's Razer. Right there

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is is looking at this idea, this possible theory for

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, and then asking yourself which hypothesis conforms to

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the world that we observe and not the world that

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we think exists. This is the basis of the scientific method,

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and so when we talk about science and scientists and play,

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this is really essentially we're talking about because in a way,

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit of a thought experiment, although with

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the thought experiment you're just trying to kind of throw

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>everything out there. You're not really looking for for something

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going to stick. But it's the same idea that

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you you try to figure out every hypothesis you can

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you call out the ones that don't make

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>any sense or at least probable. Um. Now, this is

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>really an awesome game to play with kids because it

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fuels their imagination, but it also gives them the tools

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to sort through all the data that they have and

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>find a line of logic. And it's a particularly a

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>nice game to play when they're at that age where

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they're asking a bazilion questions about how the world works. Right, Yeah,

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like why is that? Why is the sky blue? Well,

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because it has to do with reflectional well, why is

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that the case? Then? Why is that the case? And

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and you can either give up like the lady I

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>observed at a zoo once when the child asked, Mommy,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.919
<v Speaker 1>why does the commode dragon? Why does he look like that?

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And she just responded because that's just the way God

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>made him, honey. Right there, there's a complete non answer,

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and not engaging with the child's curiosity about the world

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and instead saying, here's a big wall of the fortress

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of ideas, let me erect that in in the way

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>of the horizon. Say I'm going to say that that

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>parent probably had low blood sugar. So before you engage

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in augms phraser, make sure you eat something because you're

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna need that energy because kids will ask a million questions,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as you say, and it can get a little bit like, oh,

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like after fifteen million questions. But you know, obviously,

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 1>my daughter asked me a ton of questions every day

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>about everything, and um, one of the things that I

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>noticed was she's starting to enter into that territory where

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the unknown is frightening her. So she's really looking for answers,

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>she's looking for comfort, Like the skeleton thing you mentioned. Yeah,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>she's she's very frightened of skeletons, even though we've talked

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>about how they're inside our bodies. Um, you know, they

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>help us to walk, so on and so forth, a

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very practical things. She said, I don't care. I just

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.919
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see them outside of the skin, which

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>is a reasonable request. What are you know what you're

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna say to that. Um, But one of the things

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that drives her nuts, or has in the past, is

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>that we'll she'll hear things on the roof of our house. Well,

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I know it's magnolia pods. There's just falling and they're

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>huge and they're I mean, they do sound like someone's

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on the roof. Yeah, oh yeah, the squirrels. It's a

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>racetrack actually on our house, particularly this time of year

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the fall. But um, so if I hear allowed that,

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what I've done in the past is I've said, okay,

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's look out the window and see what's

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, and they will observe that there are

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 1>magnolia pods all over the yard. So then I can

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>ask my daughter, and I've done this before, which is, hey, okay,

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what else do you think could be causing that noise.

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So now we're entering into this idea of blackham threachers,

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to gather as many hypotheses as possible,

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and so she's come up with before you know, again,

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the skeleton is a skeleton. It's trying to come down

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the gym name get me um Or she has observed

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's construction in our neighborhood, and she said that

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a construction crane, and she thinks that it just

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>came down the street and crashed into our roof. Okay,

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but she's already going from from least believable hypothesis to

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a slightly more believable hypothesis. Yeah, because actually, if you

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>count the number of assumptions for all of the hypotheses,

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you will see that the Magnoli pod is one assumption

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it fell from the tree in Atlanta on the ground.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But a skeleton, well, that is requires the assumption that

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>even though it's dead, it doesn't have any flesh around

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it somehow alive, it somehow has a functioning brain. Those

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>three it can scale a roof and show me down

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a chimney that's for maybe even five um and then

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it has some business with us. It's got some some

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 1>reason for coming down the chimney and talking to us

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>about that too. Is it makes me think, well, to

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>make the skeleton down the chimney idea makes sense. You

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>really need a working um understanding of necromancy, which is

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>just say, you need a fortress of ideas that has

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>been carefully constructed by adults to make the unlikely seem plausible. Yeah,

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you need so, I say five assumptions there, but really,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to detail, there's probably about a hundred

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>different assumptions there. So then you get to the crane

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and now you have the crane down the street scenario

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that it can operate on its own. That's an assumption

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that it has somehow managed to make its way through

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>four houses and and and and still has momentum that

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it has bumped into the roof, and that somehow, even

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>though it's bunched in the roof, there's no damage done

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to our house. There's four assumptions. You're right, there's getting better. Yeah,

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>because if if the if the walking skeleton necromance, the

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of that is like it's like a cathedral of

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>ideas with flying buttresses and stuff. Whereas the claim moving

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 1>on its own. That's more like a decent um cabin

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in the woods, kind of fortress of ideas, modestly constructed

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but still constructed. Nice. Nice. I like that, Yes, flying

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>buttresses as opposed to like a modest cabin. So you

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>present all those which I've done with my daughter before,

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and she'll just laugh and say the magnolia pod because

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>then she's starting to understand that these are outrageous things.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But we've been able to talk about really cool different

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>ways that the world might work, which is the imagination

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>in the creativity part. But now she has something to

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>hold onto that is concrete, that is logical, that makes sense. Yeah,

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so she can imagine the flying buttresses and the crazy

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>cathedral of ideas. I mean, everyone wants to be able

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to imagine something that that rich and and and just engaging,

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of like uh, like say Dante's Inferno.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I love that that's the cathedral ideas that there ever

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was one. But when I actually think about how the

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>world works, I choose to go with a far more

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>modest construction of ideas um and certainly at times of

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the less the less building there on the horizon, the better,

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And you can actually see the world as it perhaps

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>really is now. Gothnick says that these cathedral of ideas,

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this is really the evolutionary juice of our species. We

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 1>have to have this imagine a because she said, you know,

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>think about every single thing around you right now. Think

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>about this microphone in front of us. This was once

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>an idea in someone's head and it was part of

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>their imagination, and they just used their available knowledge to

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>create this thing. Uh, you know, given a couple of

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 1>constructs of what is possible what is not possible. So

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's saying that if you are um, a

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>human fifty thou years ago, this is incredibly important as well,

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>because you're trying to imagine or predict really what the

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>year is going to look for you. So you start

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to really pay attention to seasons when some animals might

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>be migrating, right, and you start to sort of imagine

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 1>yourself participating in this future self or this future part

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of yourself. So again, just all of this is ah

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, an evolutionary boon to us, this stability to imagine, create,

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 1>play and essentially become scientists. All right, Well, on that note,

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>let's call over the robot and get some listener mail here.

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>The first one comes from a listener by the name

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of h. A. H A writes in and says, greetings

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Julie, regarding your mention of Bloody Mary in

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your recent podcast Light as a Feather Stiff as a Board.

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I've always, personally, i albeit humorously, believed that the Bloody

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Mary myth that she would appear of her name was

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>spoken a certain number of times in front of a

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>mirror was real, but that everybody that's tried it so

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>far had just gotten the number of times one has

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to say her name to invoke her wrong. I believe

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the correct number is three hundred and thirty three. No,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never tried it anyway. Thank you for the entertaining

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and informative podcast. We'll see there's a there's an interesting,

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>uh cathedral of ideas that only not a cathedral. But

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say there's a modest cabin of ideas, and our

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>listener here built a little extension. Well, yeah, what is

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 1>half of if you double three three, what is that? Well,

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be six D sixty six. Yeah, so curious

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to know why it would be half of the devil's numbers,

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and that their math is wrong, that the actually needs

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to be doubled up or I don't know, maybe maybe

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloody Mary is going to match that number on the

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>other side and then there then becomes complete. Well, it

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of pretty much every attempt to predict to

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the world, be at the rapture or

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>something else. Inevitably that comes a point where that where

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>someone says, well, the math was wrong. We need to

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>do the math a little more correctly to figure out

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>exactly when the world's gonna end. So I'm sure if

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if someone were to count up to thirty three, uh,

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there would be a need to revise our predictions speaking

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of when is the next end of the world, Oh

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 1>like now or something that the mind calendar. When what's

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>happening right now outside the door? Oh yeah, that's what

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that was. I just thought there was a lot of traffic.

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We also heard from a listener by the name of Kristen.

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Kristen writes and says, hey, guys, in the Maps episodes,

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you talked about how humans are just wired to respond

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to vertical and horizontal and diagonals and mess things up.

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It triggered a memory for me three summers ago, I

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>visited my friend in Colorado and we went to an

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>old West type town. They had a mystery house there.

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You went inside. It started out with the hallway floor

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>slanted at a slight angle, which was fine, and then

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it opened up into this huge room and the floor

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>there was at a forty five degree angle. I guess

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>my brain totally shut down because as soon as I

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>stepped into the room, I just fell down into the

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>wall and couldn't move or stop laughing. My friend's dad

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 1>had to help me out because I could not move.

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>L o l uh. It's my favorite memory. Thanks for

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the great podcast. That's because that draws us right into

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the episode we did on Haunted Houses to how if

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you screwed around with the shape of rooms and engage

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>more of that diagonal construction, then it throws us off.

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It throws throws off our ability to predict what's going

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen, our understanding where we are in a space.

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>That's right because we have many more neurons that are

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to the X Y access than the diagonal access.

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>So it makes sense that our brain would like this

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>very clean lines, and of course haunted houses like to

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 1>play with that idea, so that's fascinating. Thanks for writing

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>into us, Kristen and h A. We always love to

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hear from our our listeners and if you have anything

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to add on this podcast, let us know. And we

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know we have a lot of parents out there as

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>their listeners, and then many more who have children in

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>their lives, and many more still who are very talented artists,

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>uh and creative people. We'd love to hear from you

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>guys as well. How do how does the child inside

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you come out when you engage and creative act? Send

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>us an example of what you do to We'd love

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to share it on Facebook and let us know how

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the young lauarvel human in your life, How they seem

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to see the world around you, What kind of questions

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>are they asking, What unique inside are they bringing the

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>table when they construct their own fortress of ideas. You

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Facebook, you can find us on tumbler.

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>We are stuff to blow your mind on both of

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>those and on Twitter we go by the handle blow

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Mind and you can always drop us a line

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>at Blow the Mind at discovery dot com. For more

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how Stuff

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com.