WEBVTT - The World Isn’t Ready For The Next Global Virus Outbreak (Podcast)

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast on Paul Swing You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmas, each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. As we sit here and we track

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the spread of the coronavirus, there is a realization that

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>even if developed nations are cracking down on trade, the

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>world is still getting more global, at least when it

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>comes to people and viruses moving around, and there's a

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>growing concern that we are ill equipped to handle another pandemic.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is Robert Langrith, healthcare reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>who are an incredibly interesting and frightening, frankly story for

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week about a potential pandemic. I just want

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to start with this quote from the World Health Organization.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Epidemics in the century are spreading faster and farther than ever.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Outbreaks that were previously localized can now become global very rapidly. Robert,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>why is that well? That's absolutely true. We just have

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a world with much more population, is much more interconnected

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. And even that, you may remember, one

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the first scary emerging viruses, Stars, one of the

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>last ones to come out of China, killed killed about

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred people in two thousand three. Uh And now

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>UH dis coronavirus is the next emerging virus to come

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>out of China, and the differences that's spreading you know,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>much faster because even since two thousand and three, there's

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just so many more uh discount plane flights and so

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>many more high speed trains, so people just from all

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>over China and Southeast Asia travels so much more than

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they used to. So a virus that emerges, you know,

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>somewhere out in the world just gets all around the world,

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, much more quickly than it that it used to.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And it probably is the case that you know, years

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and decades ago, we had a lot of you know,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>emerging viruses that hit some obscure city out out in

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the developing world somewhere and just didn't spread that far

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of died out before we even kind of

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>heard of it. Now, these things that spread every around

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the world, Robert just you know, given I know we're

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>early days of this coronavirus, but kind of what's the

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>um thought out there in the health community about the

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>China's response to this coronavirus. Well, the problem is, I mean,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>obviously China is doing very aggressive response now and it's

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>basically locked down the whole city, the whole province of

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty million people. Uh, you know, it's sort of an

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented quarantine or there. The problem is that in the

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of key early weeks of the virus spreading, you know,

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it didn't it didn't really communicate much what was going on,

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, internally, and and the big response that didn't

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>begin until like several weeks into it because apparently because

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, local officials are waiting for the top level

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>communist parties for what to do and what they could say,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and so that basically allowed it to spread, you know,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>before people really knew what a big deal what it

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was for you know, two or three weeks before like

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a heavy, heavy response. And that's the sort of that's

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the key period in sort of are you

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to slow these things down right away and

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>nipped them in the bud. And when that doesn't happen

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that allows them to escape the headline of the of

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the piece that you're over the magazine man versus microbe.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not ready for the next global virus outbreak, and

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering whether we can glean any insights from the

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>spread of the coronavirus and extrap played out Why is

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this the case? Why are we unprepared well? One of

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the problems that happens is that, you know, we have

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of scientific smarts, and there has been real progress

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and better better testing and drug development, uh and you know,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>new gene sequencing technology, so we know exactly what's in

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this coronavirus very quickly. But kind of what's missing really

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is a long term focus. You know, every time you know,

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they call it the cycle of panic and neglect.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, every time there's a new outbreak is global panic,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's momentary resolved and then kind of that a

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>few years later, we kind of forget about it fades away,

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of gives away to kind of in action.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is we're only uh as as prepared

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as our weakest lengths. So it doesn't matter. The CDC

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is a great job inside the United States if we

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't provided support to developing countries so they have some

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>first responders that can identify emerging outbreaks right away. What

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be prepared? Is it just the

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the sanitary equipment and testing kids? How

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>can you be prepared for something if you don't even

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>know what the virus is. Well, there's like two different

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>things here, you know. One one is that well, i'll

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>give you an example of the Ebola outbreak in West

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Africa and two fourteen or so that killed more than

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 1>eleven thousand people. But it's not that Ebola was an

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>unknown virus. What happened there was it took literally the

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>thing was brewing in Guinea for three full months and

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>expanding before the wider world knew uh. And that allowed

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it a chance to reach cities. So if there had

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>been some you know, first responders, some some better little

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of better infrastructure there not a lot, but just

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to recognize and do tests right away, we could

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have nipped that in the bottom. That wouldn't have killed

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near you as many people. So that's the one thing.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Another thing is that you know, that's a real problem,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and people think that one of the places where this

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus originated or spread to people, isn't uh one of

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these uh These food markets in China and Southeast Asia

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>called wet markets, and that's where live animals and freshly soltered,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>unrated beat kind of commingle with lots of shoppers and

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and the and they've live animals there, and cages often

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>stacked and top each other, different types of live animals,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're very unsanitary of their team with germs. Are

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>these perfect breeding grounds are deadly pathogens And a lot

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the health experts we talked to said, these really

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>need to be shut down. That's just not safe, not

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in the not in the new interconnected world, and that

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just provides too much opportunity for the emerging virus that

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of mixed around the different animals and then spread

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>onto people. And that's what we think probably happened with

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the virus from Uhan. So, Robert, one of the areas

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of focus has been on kind of the healthcare industry,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>big pharma, the ability to come up with maybe antidotes

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or just vaccines or something like that for something that

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pops up. Is that a fair criticism? Do you think

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>big pharma should respond better or more quickly. Well, the

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>problem is, you know, for emerging virus, they're they're kind

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, is not it's not a regular market.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>There is an a regular market for you know, disease

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't exist yet, or a vaccine like this, where

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we just you know, don't know what the market could.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But we don't know is this is going to be

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>doing a year from now, whether it's going to disappear entirely,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's still going to be here with us but

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's contained in China, whether it's going to be something

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's endemic in the population, and we need

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to like vaccinevaccidate, like influenzo. So that means it's just

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of not a regular market for drug companies to

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>go after. And and people, you know, top thinkers like

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates says, we need to treat this possibility pandemics,

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, more likely prepare for war kind of as

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a national security threat. And we don't really do that

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we need because Robert just real quickly here, I'm wondering

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese doctor who initially was sanctioned for warning

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>about the deadly Wuhan coronivor virus outbreak and that was

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in December, and there is a concern that perhaps this

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was spreading for a lot longer within China and there

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was a political incentive not to really disclose it because

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the ongoing trade negotiations. Have you heard any discussion

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to that effect or is that just a conspiracy theory

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and rumor at this point, Well, I don't know what

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the link to the trade negotiations in particularly, I don't

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>know that, but certainly there is a concern that for

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, the Chinese of provision provincial officials were trying

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep talking about this down, you know, not not

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>say a lot about this, you know, they didn't they

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it certainly seems like I think that, you know,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they didn't announce there was definite human to human transmission

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>until just one or two or a few days before

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they kind of locked down the whole city. And it

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems like looking back at it, there's pretty clear

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>evidence and they should have known well before that there

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>was human to human transmission. So so certainly there does

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>appear to be been an effort to underplay this or

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at least minimize this, uh, for you know, several weeks,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's just not clear was that because officials and

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the province were timid and they kind of wait for

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Beijing to tell them what to do. It's really not

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>clear what was going on there. The information coming out

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of China now is so kind of murky and confusing

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and hard to know. You know what's true and you

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>know what's not true. Even with the death of this doctor,

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, first we heard it was dead, then they

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>started to retract it there talking and we're gonna have

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there. Thank you so much for that.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert lang Greth, healthcare reporter for Bloomberg News. With this

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>latest it's actually a Bloomberg Business Week cover story, man

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>versus micro very timely look at pathogens and the disease

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the Corona virus. This is Bloomberg

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to check in with Bloomberg Opinion returned by opinion

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>columnists A. Lisa Mark Tinouzi. She covers all things finance

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion based in London, Alsa, thanks so much

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for joining us boys. Some more news at Credit Swiss

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>t gent Tim ousted as CEO. What happened? Well, it's

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>been um a long time coming in that you've had,

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bank that has been tarred by a

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>series of embarrassing league for the last four or five

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>months or so um starting with the revelation that one

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of their former employees who had just jumped trip to

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to rival ubs, had been tailed by a contractor for

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the bank, and that that triggered a sequence of events.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>There was an internal probe that found that the CEO

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't aware that it was actually the c O who

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>had you know, orchestrated this um and and then subsequently

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>another another incidence of corporate um um surveillance of one

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of the employees, and you know, and you know, continuing

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>um to be followed by news about you know, internal warfares, etcetera, etcetera,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And and this came to a head really in the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>last week where it appeared, you know, it was reported

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that the chairman was about to ounced the CEO. Investors

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>weighed in backing the CEO, and it's you know, today's

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of that boardroom battle sees T and TM

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>leave to be succeeded by the first Swiss born CEO

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in almost twenty years, atop the Swiss farm initially shares

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of credits we traded in Switzerland down UH they still

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>are down, but much less than they were initially, now

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>down just for tense of a percent. Do we have

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>any sense of the new path forward? Was this an

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>issue with t gent TM strategy or a culture clash

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps something personal? Well, I think, you know, you've

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>had a strategy that he put in place, and this

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>this structuring which basically saw the bank shrink and and

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>shift more of the business towards wealth management and away

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>from UM invest and banking and volatile trading, that hasn't

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>really yet delivered as much of of the fruits as

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>t and would have liked. By now that was starting

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to come through, and I think we'll see some strong

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>numbers on the fourth quarter when their report next week. UM.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So you had a you know, some questions over strategy

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just because it's taken so long for that to translate

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>into better shareholder returns. UM. On the other hand, yes,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you've had this huge damage to the bank's franchise and

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>reputation UM over what appears to be you know, quite

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a bitter internal UM internal warfare and and and certainly

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's put a spotlight on on the culture but also

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on the governance of the bank. UM. You know, the

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>CEO claiming not to know about what his CEO was

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>up to, and the board equally being in the dark

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about what its leadership was up to. It all points to,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, certain concerns of controls and governance right across

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the farm. Well. Attentioning to me a Lisa about this

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>whole saga was that some just recently in the less

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>several days, some big shareholders of Credit Source came out

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in support of the austed CEO TM yet the board

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>still moved to ausked him from the company. What's the

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>situation there? But of course, you know, these were three

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>large shareholders, but they're not the only shareholders. You know,

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is reporting that other investor does, including the Guitars.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We're backing the chairman on this. Um. I think, um,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you see, you have to you have to bear in

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>mind that what we're seeing is not, you know, necessarily

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>everything that's going on behind the scenes. Um. But I

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think what's what's significant is really that from what I'm

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>picking up and what I'm reading and from one of

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>what we're hearing, is that this doesn't necessarily bring closure

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to this chapter. There's still an investigation on going by

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the local regulator. Into governance and controls. And you have

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a CEO now who will take over from t J

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and t M um who who's you know, whose remate

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit unclear because in a year's time

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the chairman will definitely go. He's confirmed that he's only

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>going to serve out maximum another year. Um. And that

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>leads to potential questions as to whether this is really

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a permanent CEO succession or whether it's you know, an

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>interim step towards you know, further strate teacher reviews further

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>down the line, and perhaps a new management at least.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just wondering, what do you think that Credit

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Suite needs to do in order to bolst their profitability. Well,

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll learn a little bit more, um, you

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>know this coming um, these coming elearnings next week. In

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of how how successful that restructuring has been. I

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>think there's been a very strong shift towards UM lending

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in particularly in the wealth management business and particularly in Asia.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course we've we've seen, um, you know, what's

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>been happening in Hong Kong and the repercussions in the

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>economy from from the coronavirus both you know, in China

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and Hong Kong. There are some questions as to whether this,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, very excessive growth in Asia driven really by

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>top line targets is going to um you know, it's

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>going to lead to potential more difficulty in delivering those

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>shareholder returns. A Lisa Martin News thank you so much

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. A Lisa Martin News is a

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>columnist covering finance for Bloomberg Opinion. Joining us from London.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You could read our columns Bloomberg dot com, Slash Opinion

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or O P I and go on the Bloomberg. Interesting

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to see the market response to the credit suit. Snoo

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is t G and TM after joining the bank as

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer in two thousand and fifteen to parting

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>being pushed out ousted after a battle in the boardroom.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>We got the latest US jobs report out this morning.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a blowout number two thousand jobs added that

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was compared to estimates of economist survey by Bloomberg of

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty five. The market's response negative. It

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>took it as bad news. Joining us now to talk

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>about the actual underlying market and why there could be

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>such a negative response. Tom gimbal He his chief executive

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>officer of global staffing company LaSalle Network. Tom, can you

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense was there anything in this report

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that was anything other than positive? Well, I think people

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are always looking for there to be a bigger increase

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in wages. They're always looking to have a jump in

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>participation rate. UM. What I always call the chicken little

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>effect that that the better it gets, the more people

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are waiting for the sky to fall. And so there's

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>there's that situation. But you know, when you're when you're

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about the market and how they're seeing it, sometimes

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it is just serendipitous that the market goes down based

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on whatever the number is. Tom, I know that you

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>guys talked to a lot of companies out there. Are

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you finding are the companies out there finding It's really

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>hard to find talent and keep talent. It is extremely

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to find town when you're looking at a three

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>point five percent unemployment radio ticked up at tentsive a

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>point to three point six percent UM. It's really hard

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to find people. So what companies are doing is they're

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>hiring a lot more recent college graduates, they are transitioning people,

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>They're spending a lot more money on training and development

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is one of the leading areas that companies are investing in.

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And then also, um, you're getting people to move. But

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the act of people, even executives, leaving one job for another,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of hesitancy because they don't want

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the low man on the totem pole if

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the bottom does followut this is interesting because we're hearing

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the job gains are coming at the lower end of

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the totem poll when it comes to wages and skills

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in the jobs market. So if that's the case, and

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're seeing the additional jobs and the wage increases,

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why aren't we seeing them more at the top where

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>skills are are sort of more necessary. The people don't exist, right,

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So so the factory if you will, of producing people

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is always going to be in college graduates and unskilled

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>uh labor if you will call centers and customer service

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>uh people doing hospitality and service jobs. So when you

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have that, that's where it's going to be there there

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't just find a surplus at three point five

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment of DYR people. Which is the question again

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>about capital expenditure, about why we're not seeing a company

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>spend more on training people and getting up the skills

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>UH to fill these jobs. If there just aren't the people,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>why aren't we seeing more of that? Well, I think

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we are. It takes time. So you know, every Fortune

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred companies, different small the medium sized companies have

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>always been the engine for UH for growth in this

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>country and so, but they're not going to have full

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>huge UM training and development when you get the Fortune

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>five companies to implement something like that at the level

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of jobs that it needs to be there, there just isn't.

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>If you look at where the skills gap exists, the

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>majority of jobs that people that companies need on the

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>medium to bigger size companies are where there aren't people.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>You can't train somebody who's been a construction worker to

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be a data scientist. You can't take a salesperson turn

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>them into an accountant. So the aspect of training is

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>very different for UM training and acclimating them for a

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>job going up on a vertical level versus horizontal movement

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>into a totally different category. And if someone's brain isn't

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>programmed to be an engineer, you can't turn them into one.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Tom are you seeing any regional you know differences and

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>across the US in terms of job demand job creation

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>is it's still the you know, the sun Belt is

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of the growth area for example. No, I'm seeing

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of the coast springing in higher volume

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>jobs into the Midwest. Uh So, what we're seeing is

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the cost of living and the cost of

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>salaries on both coasts have gotten so high, and for

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for non technology driven jobs, non developer, non engineers, a

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of those jobs can be done from the Midwest.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>So you're starting to see uh, kind of not a

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>rebirth but for lack of a better phrase, in Chicago,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in St. Louis, I think it'll end up going into Detroit,

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and you're seeing more that Dallas continues to be

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a big, big hub of companies and then obviously the

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin of the second Silicon Valley s type of environment.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But you're gonna see a lot more in the Midwest

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and continue to see that flourish. Is that at the

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>expense of the workforce in the big cities on the coasts. No,

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>because the companies that are air still have huge hubs,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's San Francisco with with LinkedIn and Oracle and

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what Exist and Apple obviously, and Facebook and what's there.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>They have so many huge companies out there and on

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast with the financial services of Fidelity and

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Goldman and and what have you in financial services, that

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>those are still going to be there. But you know,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at uh it's not necessarily the Midwest,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but Salt Lake City is a huge hotbed for hiring

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, has been probably the last half decade. And

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Goldman SAX has a huge office in uh IN in

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Salt Lake City. Tom Gimble, thank you so much for

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Tom as a founder and CEO of LaSalle

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Network based in Chicago, helping us breakdown the jobs numbers today.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Five thousand jobs added in the latest month, wages up

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about three point one percent, So and uh it just

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>some continued strength in the job sector, driving continued strength

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the US consumer, driving continued strength in the US economy.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>That has been the story that continues to be the

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>story in the US. Looking at the markets here the

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>SMP down six, down down one seventy three, uh NASDAC

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>down six here to end the week. Looking at the

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>treasury market up fifteen thirty seconds, pushing a ten year

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>yield down to one point five eight percent. But we're

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the way through earning season, and

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we've heard a whole host of CEOs from a whole

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>host of industries talking about the impact of the coronavirus

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>on their businesses, and none more so than the global

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>travel business. To get a sense of what's going on

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with the US airlines, we welcome Mary Slangenstein. She's a

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>US airlines reporter for Bloomberg News, joining us on the

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>phone from our Dallas bureau. Mary, thanks so much for

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>joining us on. I want we want to get that

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Jet Blue story they're launching a new low cost airline,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but first I just want to get your thoughts kind

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of what you're seeing right here right now as it

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>relates to the US airlines and maybe how they're being

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>impacted by the coronavirus. Well, the US carriers UM that

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>fly to China have pretty much suspended their flights to

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mainland China. UM they've also suspended or are suspending Hong

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Kong routes, but on a little bit different time frame.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, American Airlines UM is only suspending DFW to

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong to February, and UM United is suspending Hong

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Kong also to February twenty so there that's a little

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:27.239
<v Speaker 1>bit shorter suspension of flights than to mainland China. UM.

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>They aren't really talking yet about monetary damages or monetary

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>losses related to the suspensions of flights, Mary, so we'll

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>keep watching to see whether there's any kind of financial impact.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>But interesting to see, UH, that they are suspending some

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of these flights. In the meantime, you wrote a story

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that got our attention because it seems like a time

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of consolidation in the airline industry, and yet the founder

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of Jet Blue is trying to launch a new airline.

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's on track to start flying this year, and it

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>will focus on routes that primarily don't have anyone currently

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>operating in them. Can you explain what this is sure, UM.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>David Neilman, who founded Jet Blue and has founded several

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>other airlines, including Ausul in Brazil, has decided he wants

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to get back into the US aviation market, and so

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he's founding UM an airline called Breeze Airways. And what

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Neilman says he's done is he's been able to go

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>through look at routes and pull out five hundred potential

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>city pairs, So that's you know, flying from city A

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to CITYB that don't have any NonStop competition, and those

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 1>are the routes that he wants to focus on with

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>this new airline, and he's planning to operate on midsize

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>cities that may be lost NonStop service as larger airlines

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>combined and then started to focus on building up there

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>already established hubs. Mary, I mean, I'm always fascinating when

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I see people getting into the airline business. It seems

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>like such a brtally tough business with competition and the

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>unions and jet fuel and all those type types of things.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Is a tough, tough business. What's his cost advantage going

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to be to, you know, go up against some of

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>these bigger players. Well, Newman claims that, you know, he's

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be excuse me, get a big cost advantage

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>from the size of the aircraft that he's gonna fly.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>He's smalling flying smaller planes. And also the fact that

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna fly, um every day of the week

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to every location, and there may even be times of

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the year where he doesn't fly. He's gonna fly only

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>on peak days periods of peak demand. Um that's a

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>very similar model to what Allegiant Airline flies and they've

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>been very successful with it. How much room is there

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>for another airline, um, you know, there's probably room for

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>another airline. UM. It's hard to tell from this, you know,

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 1>this date, at this point in time, how successful Neilman

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>will be. He's certainly been successful in the past with

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>um West Jet in Canada and then Jet Blue he

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>founded Jet Blue here in the United States, So he's

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>been able to work some magic in the past, and

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see if he's able to do that again.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, you know, I certainly have I'm aware that

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of midsized cities have lost a lot of

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity here, but I often think that it's because of

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Uniteds of the worlds are the Deltas of the

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>worlds have said it's just not economical to fly there,

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>given the load factors and whatnot. So is it really

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all about the fact that he's gonna fly different planes,

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe less union workforce? Is that kind of his business model? Yeah,

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>he's probably initially not going to have any unions working

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>at the airline as they get started, which was the

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>situation of Jet Blue for quite some time. But then

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>he also is saying that he's going to have a

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff linked to technology, so that people

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>will be able to do almost everything on an app. Right,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So maybe they won't have to have people standing at

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>counters in the in the airport, or you know, there'll

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be other ways that they can reduce the requirement for personnel. UM.

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's going to count on technology a lot.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>He's going to count on um. These new Airbus A

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>two twenty aircraft that he's ordered, Um, they're they're very

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>fuel efficient, they're very popular new aircraft. He's also flying

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>some used planes from his airline in Brazil. UM, but

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's saying he's going to be able to make good

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>use of those and even if he only has fifty

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>or sixty people on them, that they'll be able to

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be profitable. When I hear Mary fuel efficient, I think

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of a box with nothing else in it, and you're

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>basically foisted into the corner. It's and a little sardine

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in the corner. Because that seems to be where we're

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>heading in terms of economy travel. I'm wondering is there

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>any pushed back by consumers at this point with respect

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to the comfort of the seats that they have, or

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is it entirely a cost basis um. You know, for

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the people whose primary concern is the cost of flying, um,

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they will buy the basic economy seats, which

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always translate to less leg room. It's just less,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, addition all things that are included in the

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>fair UM, and people continue to fly on Spirit Air,

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which you know has a very little leg room. UM.

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It just depends on what you value when you fly,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and certainly if you value more leg room, that option

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is available for you on all the big carriers. You know,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>they have sections that have more leg room cost you more.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>But if that's what's important to you, then you know

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be having a lot of success with it.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Mary Schlangenstein lang in Stein, thank you so much for

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Mary s Langenstein, us airlines reporter for

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, joining us on the phone from Dallas. I

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>have to say I've flown Spirit and I will say, um, well,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to pay for for absolutely everything.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Everything's all a cart. Now, everything's all a cart, and

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you have to wonder whether at a certain point it

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all adds up to the same price yeah, absolutely, I'm

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at the airline stock sort of trailing

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, decidedly mixed again, United down ten percent, America

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>down on Delta up seven team. So it's just a

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>brutal business. There's kind of a double way I mean

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>though here going on, because on one hand you have

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>reduced travel because as the spread of the coronavirus. In

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, you have oil prices coming down, and

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that cap is actually a huge tail wind to the

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>airlines because this is one of the biggest expenses. So

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see how both of this will will affect

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry at a time when in general travel is

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>getting hit pretty hard. Meanwhile, and markets were looking at

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>losses of the really clawing back from earlier declines. We're

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing the NASTAC down less than two toenns of a

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>percent now, the SMPH down three tons of a percent,

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty three thirty six on the SNP, and we're looking

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at the NASTAC seven. Interesting to see how people are

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>interpreting the signs of whether the FED will cut or not.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>After they released this report saying they're worried about the coronavirus,

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>people now saying, oh, maybe they'll just cut rates a

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of times. Yeah. Absolutely, And you mentioned fuel as

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the airlines. Looking at w t I

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>crewd here fifty dollars sixty seven cents barrel. Here. We

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>broke below fifty a couple of days ago, So oil

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>down on lower global demand expectations. Yeah, and just a

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago it was treading above sixty three dollars

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a barrel at the beginning of the year, So down

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars so far this year. And Lisa bramwe's with Paul Sweeney.

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Markets. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>pen L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney,

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woyit's

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram woits one before the podcast.

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.