Speaker 1: All right, it's debate day in America. Thanks Scott Shannon,
Speaker 1: twelve days. You are the ultimajority. The states could not
Speaker 1: be any higher. Law order, safety, security on the ballot.
Speaker 1: Open borders, amnesty, United Sanctuary States of America on the ballot,
Speaker 1: The New Green Deal madness, the pledge to spend trillions
Speaker 1: of dollars eliminate all fossil fuels that is on the ballot.
Speaker 1: The false promise that everything will be free, free, free, free,
Speaker 1: free is on the ballot. Free education pre k through college,
Speaker 1: student loan forgiveness, free government guaranteed job at a government
Speaker 1: guaranteed wage, with government guaranteed vacations, and government guaranteed healthy
Speaker 1: food and healthcare and retirement all None of these promises
Speaker 1: will ever be fulfilled. You just need look at any
Speaker 1: democratic run city or state, any blue state. How are
Speaker 1: they doing with law and order and safety and security?
Speaker 1: How are they doing with their most fundamental job keeping
Speaker 1: people safe? How are these blue states or these blue
Speaker 1: cities with these liberal activists mayors? How are they doing
Speaker 1: educating our kids when we spend more capita than any
Speaker 1: other country in the world. Lousy, absolutely, atrocious, massive failure.
Speaker 1: How did Obamacare work out, keep your doctor, keep your plans,
Speaker 1: save on average family twenty five dollars year. Millions lose doctors,
Speaker 1: Millions lose their plan. We're paying on average two hundred
Speaker 1: percent more. And there's almost forty percent of the country
Speaker 1: that one Biden Obama Care exchange option. It's on the ballot,
Speaker 1: packing the courts on the ballot, ending the filibuster on
Speaker 1: the ballot, Amnesty in the hopes that, of course people
Speaker 1: will will take something of great value and forever vote
Speaker 1: Democrats for fifteen million people on the ballot, statehood for DC.
Speaker 1: Elsewhere on the ballot. They want a Democratic Senate majority
Speaker 1: and perpetuity corruption. Obviously that's on the ballot too. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's I've never seen anything like this. Now something is happening.
Speaker 1: We had the head of the Trafalgar Group on yesterday
Speaker 1: going through all the swing state. This is every swing state.
Speaker 1: This is as winnable a race for Donald Trump, more
Speaker 1: so on paper than it was at this point in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. Does that mean that Donald Trump is gonna win? No.
Speaker 1: You know, he won Michigan by a little over ten
Speaker 1: thousand and seven hundred votes, Pennsylvania by forty four thousand
Speaker 1: votes not a lot in Wisconsin. I think the point
Speaker 1: seven percent. He was able to squeak out Wisconsin. One
Speaker 1: of the biggest surprises in that Pollock pointed out yesterday
Speaker 1: it was forty six. Forty six in Minnesota. Now it's
Speaker 1: Arizona looks very tight. That's a very That is a
Speaker 1: critical state for Donald Trump to win. North Carolina another
Speaker 1: critical state, Florida, Ohio, They're always critical. Georgia is always critical.
Speaker 1: And then all of these, you know, the Wisconsins, the Michigan's,
Speaker 1: the Minnesota's, the Pennsylvania's, you know, they all matter. We're
Speaker 1: now well anyway, brass Muson has the president's approval rating
Speaker 1: now up at fifty two percent. I gotta give the
Speaker 1: president credit off. We'll get into this later in the program.
Speaker 1: I mean, I watched this sixty minute interview that he
Speaker 1: dumped the whole thing. Now sixty minutes, Linda, Remember Leslie
Speaker 1: Stall was calling everybody I know, even talking to friends
Speaker 1: of mine that worked in the White House. Can you
Speaker 1: please tell Sean Hannity to do sixty minutes with me?
Speaker 1: And I'm like, I'm not doing sixty minutes, because what
Speaker 1: they will? You get as much time as you give them.
Speaker 1: They will then cut it, slice it, dice it, tear
Speaker 1: it up, build a narrative around it, and by the
Speaker 1: time I'll be unrecognizable by the time that interview ever airs.
Speaker 1: They are happened to you once? Who did not happen
Speaker 1: with the last time? That was Ted Coppele. I give,
Speaker 1: by the way, I shouldn't say this now. I did
Speaker 1: have a copy of it, but I I should have
Speaker 1: released it. Yes, you should have. We all told you
Speaker 1: to do it, but you're like, no, that's not nice.
Speaker 1: I don't want to do that, YadA YadA. I'm just stupid.
Speaker 1: That was That was stupid on my part. But the
Speaker 1: President rightly released it, and then CIA, this is unprecedented,
Speaker 1: This is unfair. Where are the premier news Well, now
Speaker 1: they don't get to go into the edit room, cut, slice,
Speaker 1: dice and build a narrative around an interview to make
Speaker 1: it look like something it absolutely wasn't. The President sat
Speaker 1: with Leslie's Stall. By the way, I could not believe it.
Speaker 1: Leslie's Stall is so clueless. She's arguing with the President
Speaker 1: over whether, in fact that the Trump campaign. This is
Speaker 1: now irrefutable, incontrovertible evidence. No, no, baysa application without Hillary's
Speaker 1: bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier. It doesn't
Speaker 1: exist and she doesn't even know about it. And I
Speaker 1: might man. These media people with their little blue checks
Speaker 1: on Twitter that talk in their bubble to each other,
Speaker 1: they're just absolutely clueless. Humpty Dumpty got his ass handed
Speaker 1: to him in a debate that he was in defending
Speaker 1: the Trump Russia collusion hoax narrative that they pedaled over
Speaker 1: at fake news CNN for all these years, no wonder
Speaker 1: nobody wanted to buy a stupid book. Unbelievable, but anyway,
Speaker 1: so the President gave the whole thing. And by the way,
Speaker 1: he was spectacular with her. And she's just a great
Speaker 1: and wrong on facts and absolutely has no knowledge of
Speaker 1: anything beyond that which her media mob cohorts and friends
Speaker 1: talk about. And they see. That's where I disagree with you.
Speaker 1: I think she knows everything. I think she's been told
Speaker 1: to shut up, and she's doing it because she wants
Speaker 1: to be like. Well, they all want to be like.
Speaker 1: They all want to go to the White House correspondence dinner.
Speaker 1: They all want to be I was tougher on Trump
Speaker 1: than you were tougher on Trump, can you would be
Speaker 1: tough on Trump? Hating Trump is like, no, I hate him.
Speaker 1: I don't like the viral moment. They don't care about
Speaker 1: honest journalism. They don't care about it. No, they got
Speaker 1: it wrong. They lied to this country for four straight years.
Speaker 1: You know, how do you have impeachment with Ukraine and
Speaker 1: ignored Joe bragging on tape. You're not getting a billion
Speaker 1: dollars until you fire or a Ukrainian prosecutor. Think how
Speaker 1: stupid that is? You fire vice president of the United
Speaker 1: States leveraging our money to demand the firing of a
Speaker 1: prosecutor in Ukraine? Why why did he do it when
Speaker 1: we now know because zero experience, Hunter was paid millions
Speaker 1: and it's only the tip of the iceberg. What is
Speaker 1: so fascinating in And we'll talk to Peter Schweitzer later
Speaker 1: in the program today and we'll get into, you know,
Speaker 1: all of this in great, great detail. There there now
Speaker 1: is more evidence coming up. We now have three whistleblowers
Speaker 1: that have come out that one guy's name is Bevin Cooney.
Speaker 1: Now Bevin Cooney is as joined forces with Peter Schweitzer.
Speaker 1: He's given Peter, he's in jail. It's Hunter Biden's business
Speaker 1: associate in jail, convicted Devin Archer, whose name you've probably
Speaker 1: heard more often. He's just been convicted and awaiting sentencing.
Speaker 1: And now we hear from this new guy, Tony Baba Lensky,
Speaker 1: a former Hunter Biden partner, confirming and corroborating the legitimacy
Speaker 1: of all of this, this reporting that Joe Biden stood
Speaker 1: to rake in millions in this one particular case from
Speaker 1: Chinese businessmen through his son Hunter serving as a conduit. Anyway,
Speaker 1: so Bob Olenski, the former Biden partner, confirmed that he
Speaker 1: was the recipient of an email published by The New
Speaker 1: York Post last week. In other words, we've corroborated that
Speaker 1: dated May thirteen, twenty seventeen, showing Hunter Biden was offered
Speaker 1: a contract where three million dollars a year for quote
Speaker 1: introductions alone. Well, what does introductions alone mean? That means
Speaker 1: influence pedaling, That means selling access to your vice president father.
Speaker 1: That means that Joe is then therefore compromised in and
Speaker 1: of hisself. And he also was able to confirm this
Speaker 1: one email. Hunter Biden called his dad the big guy.
Speaker 1: In other words, when they talked earlier, we discussed this
Speaker 1: week that email and said, okay, well, twenty percent is
Speaker 1: going to go to h. Hunter. And now he's confirming
Speaker 1: and he will hold ten percent for the big guy.
Speaker 1: The big guy, this guy, Bob Olynski is saying, was
Speaker 1: in fact Joe Biden. And he's saying that everybody knew
Speaker 1: that that was the case. Now Joe Biden every time.
Speaker 1: Now we've got the Grassley and the Johnson report eighty
Speaker 1: seven pages. Now Ukraine is just the tip of the
Speaker 1: iceberg Barissma. You'd think it's bad enough, a billion five
Speaker 1: deal with the Bank of China with no experiences, like
Speaker 1: no experience in oil, gas energy of Ukraine. Then the
Speaker 1: three and a half million dollar wire transfer from the
Speaker 1: First Lady of Moscow, a Russian oligarch, no experience in
Speaker 1: Russia either. Then you got this picture, even Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: in the picture with this Kazakh oligarch. Another wire transferred
Speaker 1: to Hunter Biden's company. And then if you ask any
Speaker 1: Democrat about it, I have a fit like you just
Speaker 1: we can't talk about this. This is not true. What
Speaker 1: do you mean it's not true? Anci Pelosi told reporters
Speaker 1: today She's not going to answer questions about Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: emails with his business deals. When it's Hunter Biden's father
Speaker 1: that is allowing the sale of access, well what does
Speaker 1: that mean? That means that Joe Biden, as vice president,
Speaker 1: was selling access to his office, which then compromises his
Speaker 1: ability to do the job not only as president but
Speaker 1: as vice president. And if the last name I promise
Speaker 1: you was Trump would be a lot different. Now back
Speaker 1: to this guy, Tony Bobo Lynsky releasing this devastating memo
Speaker 1: last night confirming Joe Biden was in on the family's
Speaker 1: corruption and influence pedaling and selling of access. Also is
Speaker 1: pointing out that at May twenty seventeen, text message that
Speaker 1: has now been obtained by Fox News reveals Bobo lens
Speaker 1: was warned by his former business partner, James Gilliard not
Speaker 1: to mention Joe Biden was involved. Don't mention Joe being involved.
Speaker 1: It's only when you are face to face. I know
Speaker 1: you know, but know this. But they are paranoid. What
Speaker 1: are they paranoid? If you're doing everything right, you wouldn't
Speaker 1: have to be paranoid. And Hunter Biden's business partner corroborates
Speaker 1: the claim that Joe Biden was the Big Guy, Bubba
Speaker 1: Lensky said confirmed in the email that in fact, yes,
Speaker 1: the email is genuine and yes, then he provided more
Speaker 1: information of Fox News regarding the Biden's role in the deal.
Speaker 1: The email that's the one that notes Hunter has some
Speaker 1: office expectations he will elaborate a proposed equity split. References
Speaker 1: quote twenty four H that would be Hunter and quote
Speaker 1: ten held for by H for the Big Guy. No
Speaker 1: further details. The references to the Big Guy in as
Speaker 1: much published email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: and Bob o Lynsky said in a statement. He explained
Speaker 1: there was a partnership between the Chinese operating through the
Speaker 1: SEFC chairman and the Biden family, and he said he
Speaker 1: was brought on by Hunter, Biden and James Gillier, who
Speaker 1: was listed on the center of the email, and Bob
Speaker 1: o Lynsky went on to say that he does not
Speaker 1: believe Joe Biden's past claim that he and Hunter did
Speaker 1: not discuss Hunter's businesses, claiming that Hunter frequently referenced asking
Speaker 1: him for sign off on advice and various potential deals.
Speaker 1: I've seen the Vice president saying he never talked to
Speaker 1: Hunter about his business. I've seen firsthand that that is
Speaker 1: not true, because it wasn't just Hunter's business. They said
Speaker 1: that they were putting the Biden family name and legacy
Speaker 1: on the line. The Biden family aggressively leveraged the Biden
Speaker 1: family name to make billions of dollars from foreign and
Speaker 1: of these even though somewhere from communist controlled China. He
Speaker 1: also said he believed the Chinese involvement in the deal
Speaker 1: was political or influence investment. On their course, it was well,
Speaker 1: if Hunter has no experience, why what are they paying for?
Speaker 1: Why pay millions? What are you expecting in return? Buying access,
Speaker 1: influence pedaling. I need you to do me a favor.
Speaker 1: I need you to step in. Can you mention it
Speaker 1: to this person and that person? Well, that means you're compromised.
Speaker 1: You've been bought off. Unbelievable influence pedaling, selling access. Joe
Speaker 1: knew the mob, the media are trying to run out
Speaker 1: the clock. Now. I've been bringing up this point and
Speaker 1: I can't emphasize this enough. If you want to be
Speaker 1: President of the United States of America, usually campaign Joe
Speaker 1: Biden has spent almost the entire spring and summer in
Speaker 1: hiding his basement bunker. Podcasts whatever you want to call webcasts,
Speaker 1: have been unmitigated disasters. Few have gone off. Well, it's
Speaker 1: like amateur hour. Now they do have slick campaign ads
Speaker 1: that are just full of lies. Now we get to
Speaker 1: September and almost half the month of September. You know,
Speaker 1: after Labor Day, campaigns usually gear up. He's calling a
Speaker 1: lid on any campaign activity at nine, nine thirty ten
Speaker 1: am in the morning, meaning you're not going to hear
Speaker 1: from us for the rest of the day. Now you've
Speaker 1: got a guy again. We're twelve days out of the election.
Speaker 1: Took off Saturday, one events Sunday, not answering anybody's questions.
Speaker 1: He's off Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday. Now you have to
Speaker 1: dig an inch deep year. Ask yourself a question. Why
Speaker 1: would any campaign decide that it is better for his
Speaker 1: chances of winning if we don't allow him to leave
Speaker 1: his basement bunker. Something is radically wrong. They're hiding something.
Speaker 1: I have my suspicions, but they're hiding something. Now. Can
Speaker 1: Joe pull it together for ninety minutes tonight? Yeah? Probably.
Speaker 1: He's been doing nothing but been on vacation for the
Speaker 1: last week. Twenty five to the top of the hour, lying,
Speaker 1: hiding and corrupt Joe Biden. The evidence is now becoming
Speaker 1: so overwhelming, so incontrovertible. This is at a level that
Speaker 1: you can hardly even imagine. We're gonna get back to
Speaker 1: that in a second. One thing I've had in my career,
Speaker 1: I've been very, very blust' I've always stayed friendly with
Speaker 1: the people that gave me opportunities in my career. Bill
Speaker 1: Dunovan as a friend of mine. He hired me in Huntsvill, Alabama,
Speaker 1: back in nineteen ninety. I'd started radio nineteen eighty seven.
Speaker 1: Then I got a couple of years after that, Neil Boorts,
Speaker 1: my buddy who's now on the Borts bus somewhere traveling
Speaker 1: America and sending me very very very funny memes every day.
Speaker 1: But anyway, he left one station in Atlanta to go
Speaker 1: to another station, which opened up an opportunity for a
Speaker 1: host job there, and I went in an audition for
Speaker 1: two days. And I remained friends with everybody that's ever
Speaker 1: hired me, and one of such persons on my newsmaker
Speaker 1: line right now, interrupting the second half of my monologue
Speaker 1: this hour, if we call him, sluggo Eric Sidell. Now,
Speaker 1: the interesting thing, once you work for Eric Sidell and
Speaker 1: he's your program director, he thinks that means that he
Speaker 1: is your program director for life. And if he hears
Speaker 1: something he does not like on this radio grab same
Speaker 1: with Scott. Scott Shannon has no problem calling Annity Shannon
Speaker 1: you need to shut up, you need to stop. I
Speaker 1: heard that part already. Whatever, Uh, sluggo. How are you?
Speaker 1: I'm well and how are you? And by the way,
Speaker 1: I actually had the great honor of doing your induction
Speaker 1: into the Georgia Radio Hall of Fame, and it was
Speaker 1: my great It was a proud moment for me in
Speaker 1: my life, and I didn't know for you, and I
Speaker 1: meant it meant the world to me to be there. Well,
Speaker 1: it was a bigger honor for me. And I wanted
Speaker 1: to talk to you today, Sean, because I'm really worried
Speaker 1: and uh. And we've known each other for nearly thirty
Speaker 1: years now, and we come from two different sides of
Speaker 1: the editorial spectrum. I grew up through news and you
Speaker 1: grew up through talk. Um. We in working together, I
Speaker 1: think we learned each other's styles and you saw my
Speaker 1: management style and one of those things I insisted on
Speaker 1: when you worked here was part me to say, Paul Harvey,
Speaker 1: you talked to not ladies and gentlemen, say you we
Speaker 1: the people, Yes, go ahead. Well the firewall that I
Speaker 1: built between the news and department and talk programming, and
Speaker 1: everybody lived with that very comfortably. The worst call we
Speaker 1: could have received in news was saying we were inaccurate,
Speaker 1: or that we avoided an angle of our story or
Speaker 1: we ignored it completely. Those calls rarely, if ever came,
Speaker 1: But the typical call was a list who misheard something
Speaker 1: and we filled them in, or they didn't like a story,
Speaker 1: not because it was inaccurate, but because they just didn't
Speaker 1: like hearing the story. So those calls you could put
Speaker 1: up with. The news people I worked with from my
Speaker 1: career more than thirty years in broadcast news, the ones
Speaker 1: who I've worked with, the ones who've worked for me,
Speaker 1: all took incredible pride in their efforts to be fair
Speaker 1: and objective, and they always wanted to be correct in
Speaker 1: their reporting. They had also one hundred percent input in
Speaker 1: our editorial decisions. After all, they were the eyes and
Speaker 1: ears in the community. We didn't I was indoors most
Speaker 1: of the time they were out, they could bring story
Speaker 1: ideas to us we wouldn't have otherwise known about. And
Speaker 1: they would have been offended by any attempt inside that
Speaker 1: station by me or anybody else to censor a story
Speaker 1: just because we didn't like it or we found it
Speaker 1: objective for some reason. Unfortunately, Sean, and now you know
Speaker 1: this today, many of the largest and most influential news
Speaker 1: organizations in America, print and broadcast, are practicing unadulterated censorship,
Speaker 1: either by completely ignoring certain stories, are presenting them in
Speaker 1: a very biased way, all because they prefer one candidate
Speaker 1: or party over the other. Now, this is happening on
Speaker 1: one side. It can only flip sides at some point
Speaker 1: in this country. And I remember Cheryl Atkinson, who is
Speaker 1: a brilliant investigative reporter, finally leaving CBS News because they
Speaker 1: were spiking stories she was doing on the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: They never got on the air. She did the same
Speaker 1: thing on the Bush administration prior to Obama, those got
Speaker 1: on the air. Sluggo I said, I have been saying
Speaker 1: since oh seven, journalism is dead. It's not only dead,
Speaker 1: it's and I call it, I say the medium mob
Speaker 1: because they have a mob mindset, you know, Leslie Stall
Speaker 1: and I'm going to play it later in the program,
Speaker 1: just comes off as as ignorant of anything involving the
Speaker 1: dirty Russian dossier. She acts like she'd never heard it before,
Speaker 1: and spying on a president, which was the bulk of
Speaker 1: information for the faisan applications. You know. It's it is
Speaker 1: sad when when a talk show host, which is what
Speaker 1: I am, does more news breaking than these idiots that
Speaker 1: think so highly of themselves. There is a perversion of
Speaker 1: America and our democracy going on, and it's turning us
Speaker 1: toward the information dissemination practices of the former USSR, today's Russia,
Speaker 1: North Korea and irand and some others. And I believe
Speaker 1: there are those working with it is. This is the
Speaker 1: point I really want to make with you. There are
Speaker 1: those working within these American news organizations, I believe, who
Speaker 1: are as large as alarmed as you and I and
Speaker 1: offended by the censorship being practiced, but are either or
Speaker 1: afraid or unsure of how to take action. I disagree.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you why, because there's nothing stopping them
Speaker 1: from speaking out and speaking the truth. Look, sluggo, not
Speaker 1: a single Democrat, hardly anybody in the media mob. I
Speaker 1: once counted the names of our ensemblecast on radio TV,
Speaker 1: you know, people that work on my radio TV show,
Speaker 1: and the few in Congress. There wasn't many of us
Speaker 1: that discovered a dirty bought and paid for Russian misinformation. Dacier,
Speaker 1: you know, with funneled money through a law firm to
Speaker 1: an op research firm, to Christopher Steele, whose source it
Speaker 1: now turns out to be a known to the FBI
Speaker 1: as a Russian operative for ten years. That was the
Speaker 1: basis to spy on a candidate, a transition team, and
Speaker 1: a president. Now my point, if they won't acknowledge that
Speaker 1: this cannot happen in the United States of America because
Speaker 1: of their political bias and agenda, we've lost. This is
Speaker 1: all state run media. I had no idea in two
Speaker 1: thousand and seven how right I was when I said
Speaker 1: journalism is dead, and they have now gone all in
Speaker 1: radical democratic, socialist and protecting Joe Biden. What a candidates
Speaker 1: slugo takes off five out of six days with less
Speaker 1: than two weeks to go in a campaign. Why do
Speaker 1: you think that is? Well, the politics is your area, Okay,
Speaker 1: I just I wanted to talk to you about principle
Speaker 1: here and news values. I do believe. I remember a
Speaker 1: guy coming out of CNN and telling us what was
Speaker 1: really going on behind the scenes. That was unusual, but
Speaker 1: it was refreshing. I believe there may be others in
Speaker 1: these organizations who feel the same way, and they're scared.
Speaker 1: They've been traumatized. I think it's even worse. I think
Speaker 1: there's a group think. If you go on any social
Speaker 1: media and you look at the blue check so called
Speaker 1: journalists that you know thumb there knows that people like
Speaker 1: me or that do what I do for a living,
Speaker 1: and they just think that they're right. The ends justifies
Speaker 1: the means once you buy into the sick twisted socialist ideology,
Speaker 1: propaganda and advancing the goal comes more important. Destroying Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is a single driving force that they all have
Speaker 1: in common, even if it means you tilting an election
Speaker 1: with big tech companies and big media companies that are
Speaker 1: in the tank for Joe Biden. President was right with
Speaker 1: Leslie Stall. They'll never ask Joe Biden the questions he
Speaker 1: needs to be asked. Ever, they're not going to do it.
Speaker 1: But see you're talking about the headline people too, the
Speaker 1: people out front the people in public. I believe there
Speaker 1: are people behind the scenes. There may not be many,
Speaker 1: but who are could come out. This is comparable to
Speaker 1: a whistleblower in government coming forward. That's in my mind.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's completely anonymous, right down to the
Speaker 1: very smallest person in every news organization. This cannot be
Speaker 1: the America that you, anyone listening right now, that you
Speaker 1: want for yourself, your children, your grandchildren, and the generations
Speaker 1: who follow them. It can't be. This is too dangerous, sluggo.
Speaker 1: We are in the middle of an informational crisis in
Speaker 1: the country. And let me add one point to this.
Speaker 1: And you know this because you know we've stayed friends.
Speaker 1: You know the amount of scrutiny in the amount of
Speaker 1: money that is being spent to drive people like me
Speaker 1: and Rush and Mark and all these great conservative radio
Speaker 1: hosts around the country and a few of us on
Speaker 1: Fox News that have a different viewpoint. They want us done,
Speaker 1: They want us off the air, they want us silence.
Speaker 1: There's millions of dollars that have been spent propping up
Speaker 1: organizations that all day long, twenty four to seven, three
Speaker 1: sixty five, they tape every word, every sentence, every phrase
Speaker 1: in the hopes that we might say one thing that
Speaker 1: they could use to bludgeon us and silence our voices.
Speaker 1: It's real, this is the United States, Slugo. I know
Speaker 1: what's going on. I agree with you. I know what's
Speaker 1: going on, and it just scares me to death that
Speaker 1: that is, if this is allowed to continue and nobody
Speaker 1: speaks up, we are in deep, deep trouble. Slugo, We're
Speaker 1: in deep, deep, deep trouble. I can confirm that. Um listen,
Speaker 1: I could talk to you all day. I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: back to the news. Uh. You're a great boss, except
Speaker 1: you tried to hide information from me, which was really
Speaker 1: mean of you. It was awful. You know you do
Speaker 1: They do these perceptual studies on the host and the
Speaker 1: listeners way in on whether what they like or don't
Speaker 1: like about a host, and you wouldn't share the information.
Speaker 1: So I had to borrow the book. No borrow, you
Speaker 1: broke into an office I did. I didn't steal it.
Speaker 1: I put it back when I was done after I
Speaker 1: read it, because you aren't going to share it with me.
Speaker 1: By the way, it was very enlightening. In the end,
Speaker 1: I realized how I can be a better host because
Speaker 1: I learned you finally understood what I was trying to
Speaker 1: tell you all along, not exactly, but all right, Well
Speaker 1: you can't spend it anyway you want, all right, Eric
Speaker 1: sidell slugo, Thank you, my friend, God bless you. Documents
Speaker 1: provided by Hunter, Biden's business partner have now blown this
Speaker 1: whole scandal wide open. This guy, Tony Bubba Lensky, Now
Speaker 1: it's gone to the US Senate Investigators, the Senate Homeland
Speaker 1: Security Committee, the Senate Finance committees, and he has the
Speaker 1: text messages detailing and negotiations between Chinese nationals and the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family, which is what I'm referring to it
Speaker 1: as selling access family, and text messages reveal the details
Speaker 1: of the negotiations. How is it that all these business
Speaker 1: partners end up in jail? Another Hunter business partner has
Speaker 1: been moved from a federal prison cell. This guy, Bevin Cooney,
Speaker 1: who has been working with Peter Schweitzer, will join us
Speaker 1: in the next hour. He's now flipped on the Biden family,
Speaker 1: sharing all of the emails that corroborate everything we've believed.
Speaker 1: In more, the FBI now sought Hunter's laptop to probe
Speaker 1: money laundering. We're able to break this. On Hannity last night,
Speaker 1: we obtained the documents indicating that when the FBI sees
Speaker 1: Hunter's laptop from Hell, that they were actually investigating money
Speaker 1: laundering of real investigation. One document designated as as an
Speaker 1: FBI receipt of property and the document had a case
Speaker 1: ID filled with a handwritten number two seven two. The
Speaker 1: number two seven two is the Bureau's classification for money laundering.
Speaker 1: Why didn't Director Ray tell us earlier he had this?
Speaker 1: In December twenty nineteen, Hunter Biden's business associate told, don't
Speaker 1: mention Joe being involved. Only do it when we're face
Speaker 1: to face. I know, I know that, but they're paranoid.
Speaker 1: Ron Johnson has rightly urged the DJ Inspector General to
Speaker 1: investigate positible FI cover up. They've had this since December
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. December twenty nineteen, now you got the business
Speaker 1: partner of Zero Experience Hunter confirming the emails detailing Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's pushed to make millions. That's influenced pedaling, that's cashing
Speaker 1: in on your office. Hunter Biden's associates viewed his name
Speaker 1: as currency. They bragged about a pipeline to the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: The CEO of the Hunter Biden Tied firm agrees now
Speaker 1: to provide all of these documents. This is a big deal.
Speaker 1: It's only twelve days out. You know. The sad part
Speaker 1: is is we already knew it. You're not getting a
Speaker 1: billion dollars unless you fire a Ukrainian prosecutor. What vice
Speaker 1: president would ever threaten a country with our tax dollars
Speaker 1: to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor. Victor Shogun's his name. Why
Speaker 1: did he Why did he say, and you'll have six
Speaker 1: hours or you're not getting the money. Son of a bee.
Speaker 1: They fired him. Hunter Biden admits no experience billion five
Speaker 1: with the Bank of China, three and a half million
Speaker 1: from the Russian oligarch, the first Lady of Moscow, wire
Speaker 1: transfers with a Kazakh oligarch, shopping sprees with a Chinese national.
Speaker 1: You can't make this up. It's sad. And the mob,
Speaker 1: the media which we were just talking about, they don't know,
Speaker 1: no interest in the truth. All they know is they
Speaker 1: hate Donald Trump. It's been four years, every second, every minute,
Speaker 1: every hour of every day. Now they're the biggest contributors
Speaker 1: to the Biden socialist agenda, as is big tech companies
Speaker 1: that are censoring conservative articles. Sean Hannity Show. We are
Speaker 1: just now less than five hours away from the third
Speaker 1: the final debate between Biden and President Trump. The President
Speaker 1: now planning to bring Hunter Biden associate Tony Baba Lensky
Speaker 1: as a guest. He is the one now that is
Speaker 1: confirmed at Yeah the in an email that this was
Speaker 1: a push of influence pedaling at a high level, involving
Speaker 1: millions of dollars, and that's what the Chinese were expecting
Speaker 1: and exchange for doing business with zero experience Hunter and Company.
Speaker 1: We'll get back to that in a second. Some shenanigans
Speaker 1: earlier today, Judge Amy Coney Barrett voted out of committee unanimously.
Speaker 1: Democrats boycotted the meeting, crybabies that they are, they didn't
Speaker 1: show up anyway. Elias Shapiro's with Us, author of the
Speaker 1: recently released book Supreme Disorder, Judicial Nominations and the Politics
Speaker 1: of the Highest Court. Carrie Severino, Chief Council Policy Director,
Speaker 1: Judicial Crisis Network, Jordan's Seculo Executive Director ACLJ, co host
Speaker 1: of Jay Seculo Live, author of the bestseller The Next
Speaker 1: Red Wave. Thank You, all, Kerry, I know you only
Speaker 1: have a limited time. Let me ask you, is there
Speaker 1: anything now? The vote is scheduled for next week, that
Speaker 1: is the twenty sixth in the United States the full Senate.
Speaker 1: Will Amy Coney Barrett get the votes needed and will
Speaker 1: she be on the Supreme Court. I think she absolutely
Speaker 1: has the votes, and I think she's going to do it.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of procedural gimmicks and roadblocks the Democrats
Speaker 1: are going to try to pull up. I don't think
Speaker 1: they're going to be successful. You know, we can't rule
Speaker 1: out that they're going to try some crazy last minute
Speaker 1: spear campaign like they did with Kavanaugh and Thomas. But
Speaker 1: barring something out of control like that, I think she
Speaker 1: absolutely has the votes. I think that's why they are
Speaker 1: so incense and crazy and already talking about things like
Speaker 1: packing the Supreme Court because they can't stand the idea
Speaker 1: we would have another judge in the court who doesn't
Speaker 1: want to do politics but just wants to read the
Speaker 1: law and the Constitution. If you think that's the problem
Speaker 1: with the Court, then you don't understand what the court
Speaker 1: is for. And I think that's what we're seeing here.
Speaker 1: They really rather see judges acting like politicians than acting
Speaker 1: like judges like Amy Coney Barrett does. Well. The interesting
Speaker 1: thing is they might still have a five four court
Speaker 1: based on how Chief Justice Roberts votes lately, which I
Speaker 1: find incredibly disappointing. But I have no doubt is there
Speaker 1: any procedural move now short of them getting some Republicans
Speaker 1: not to vote on it or disallowing the vote. But
Speaker 1: Lisa Murkowski said she she's going to let the vote
Speaker 1: go forward? Did she not? And Mitt Romney said he's
Speaker 1: going to vote to confirm Amy Coney Bett. Absolutely, yeah,
Speaker 1: And I think you like Murkowski wasn't even necessarily clear
Speaker 1: she would be willing to vote in favor of someone.
Speaker 1: I think after seeing the masterful performance that Barrett put
Speaker 1: on last week, it's very hard for anyone to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't think this woman is just beyond qualified to
Speaker 1: sit on the Supreme Court. Sure, and Schumer's trying stuff.
Speaker 1: He's trying to get them to put the Senate out
Speaker 1: of session, and you know, none of it's going to work.
Speaker 1: It's all gimmicks, kind of like the Senate Judiciary Committee members,
Speaker 1: the Democrats boycotting the session today. It's you know, it
Speaker 1: makes for fun TV for them. They've got to have
Speaker 1: a press conference instead of actually doing their job at
Speaker 1: going to the Judiciary Committee meeting. But it's not actually
Speaker 1: going to stop them from moving forward. But they're trying
Speaker 1: to do is pretend again at this process they I'm
Speaker 1: saying it's illegitimate, it's illegitimate. They're going to raise procedural
Speaker 1: excuses and say, oh, because you didn't follow this thing.
Speaker 1: If then the whole process of illegitimate. Now we have
Speaker 1: to pack the court. Look, is there any is there
Speaker 1: any Republican like, do we know what Susan Collins plans
Speaker 1: to do at this point? I don't think we know,
Speaker 1: I think, but I think she has is likely a vote,
Speaker 1: if not against the nominee at maybe at maybe a
Speaker 1: vote just present because she has been she has been
Speaker 1: kind of pretty clear from the get go that she
Speaker 1: wants to follow that same procedure that was done in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. I understand you know, her position on that.
Speaker 1: I think there's still clearly are obviously the votes to
Speaker 1: go forward, and so I think you're going to see
Speaker 1: those those fifty one votes and then some you might
Speaker 1: even see you know, once you get over that threshold,
Speaker 1: you may even see if you like Joe Manchin being
Speaker 1: willing to vote for he doesn't want to be the
Speaker 1: fiftieth vote. He's certainly not going to be the deciding vote.
Speaker 1: But I think it's going to be hard for people
Speaker 1: like that to go back to their districts and say, hey,
Speaker 1: here's the outstanding role model of a woman and I
Speaker 1: voted against her. I would hope that, you know, any
Speaker 1: other normal year, you would have seen that a unanimous
Speaker 1: confirmation like justice scale as what all right, carry thank
Speaker 1: you for being with us. A Chief Council Policy Director,
Speaker 1: Judicial Crisis Network, Ilia Shapiro. Your take on where the
Speaker 1: stands and what do you see going down on the
Speaker 1: twenty six? Is there anything Democrats can do to stop it?
Speaker 1: There are no more procedural roadblocks, And I trust miss McConnell.
Speaker 1: He's a master of Senate parliamentary procedure. So if he
Speaker 1: says he has the votes and there's going to be
Speaker 1: a vote on Monday, then that's what I would put
Speaker 1: my money on. Buying a truly black swan event like
Speaker 1: a majority of the Senate coming down with COVID and
Speaker 1: physically not being able to be in the chamber and Jordan,
Speaker 1: your take, I think it was a great day. First
Speaker 1: of all, depart the Democrats moving to boycott. They you
Speaker 1: got a unanimous vote, that's how be recorded in the
Speaker 1: history of the Judiciary Committee. And then that she was
Speaker 1: you know this, this favorable towards confirmation. And again I
Speaker 1: think that they can play politics with it all they want.
Speaker 1: I don't think what they wanted to see was the
Speaker 1: American people seeing them vote against her. And yet they're
Speaker 1: going to have to do that again come Monday before
Speaker 1: the election because she has become so popular nationwide. Now
Speaker 1: they have Romney in the camp of Amy Coney Barrett.
Speaker 1: He said he's on record saying he's going to vote
Speaker 1: to confirm her. Do we know what Lisa Murkowski and
Speaker 1: Susan Collins are going to do? From your perspective, is
Speaker 1: Murkowski wasn't going to allow it to proceed, but she
Speaker 1: said that does not does that does not mean that
Speaker 1: she won't vote now that there's going to be an
Speaker 1: up or down vote. I actually think, Sean, that there's
Speaker 1: a chance Leasa Murkowski does allow this vote to proceed,
Speaker 1: and I think it's almost one that either way she
Speaker 1: votes on that. So she's going to vote to confirm
Speaker 1: Judge Barrett. So I feel confident that at least she
Speaker 1: will vote to confirm, And I think that there's more
Speaker 1: room there than there is for Susan College for her
Speaker 1: to actually kind of change her position after it, because
Speaker 1: she met with Judge Barrett after the hearings. Actually she
Speaker 1: brought in Judge Barrett to her to her sited offices,
Speaker 1: and I thought that was a great sign to show
Speaker 1: that it wasn't just about voting for her, but maybe
Speaker 1: changing procedurally her position as well. So the President and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden debate tonight. The President, now it's been announced,
Speaker 1: is bringing Hunter Biden associate Tony bob Lynsky as a
Speaker 1: guest to the debate. He's the guy that confirmed the
Speaker 1: details of this push to make millions and millions of
Speaker 1: dollars from China. You know, when you put it together
Speaker 1: with you know what we are able to confirm from
Speaker 1: the hard drive and the Department of and we now
Speaker 1: even have the FBI acknowledging they have it that there's
Speaker 1: been a criminal investigation. But if you look at zero
Speaker 1: experience Hunter making millions in Ukraine and Joe Biden leveraging
Speaker 1: taxpayer dollars to get a prosecutor in Ukraine fired. Then
Speaker 1: you do look at the one point five billion dollars
Speaker 1: deal private Equity Bank of China, then a shopping spree
Speaker 1: for Hunter and his family with the Chinese national then
Speaker 1: three and a half million dollars a wire transfer from
Speaker 1: the former First Lady of Moscow, a Russian oligarch, and
Speaker 1: then a Kazakh oligarch transferring money as well to Biden's firm.
Speaker 1: Do you see, Well, I don't know what their proper
Speaker 1: termament is. Are we going to call it influence pedaling?
Speaker 1: Are we going to call in selling access? Does it
Speaker 1: not compromise national security? Is this not a kickback of
Speaker 1: some kind? Does this maybe explain why Joe Biden thought
Speaker 1: it was xenophobic to have the travel ban? Jordan will
Speaker 1: start with you, Yeah, No, I think that this is
Speaker 1: all of that. I mean, I think that the idea
Speaker 1: is that it wasn't just this wild sun trading on
Speaker 1: his dad's name, making promises. Maybe he couldn't actually you know,
Speaker 1: pull out, but saying hey, if you want access to
Speaker 1: my dad, the vice president, you've got to go through me,
Speaker 1: which is kind of the story. They've almost kind of
Speaker 1: played out as your hunters had a lot of trouble.
Speaker 1: He's got to lay a lot of this, so don't
Speaker 1: don't believe what you're reading. And then what the guests
Speaker 1: the President confirmed tonight is that you know he was
Speaker 1: part of one of these companies, and it absolutely was
Speaker 1: Joe Biden who was taking you ten percent off the
Speaker 1: top of all these deals, which now makes more sense
Speaker 1: about why he wants to deflect, is it if he was,
Speaker 1: It's certainly it's exactly what the State Department was raising.
Speaker 1: We had State Department officials study this is a problem
Speaker 1: for our national security. Your son, Hunter Biden is causing
Speaker 1: a problem for national security in our foreign policy as
Speaker 1: it relates to Ukraine at a time when tensions were
Speaker 1: extremely high in that region. You had Russia annexing part
Speaker 1: of Crimea, you had a war going on, and remember
Speaker 1: it ultimately ended up being the Obama Biden administration that
Speaker 1: decided not to send lethal aid to the Ukrainians trying
Speaker 1: to defend their territory from Russian advancement. So you have
Speaker 1: two of Hunter Biden's associates, Bevin Cooney now was working
Speaker 1: with Peter Schweitzer, who'll join us at the bottom of
Speaker 1: the hour. That is now a convicted felon spending. He's
Speaker 1: in jail. Devin Archer's now a convicted criminal awaiting sentencing.
Speaker 1: Now you have this this other business partner, Tony Baba
Speaker 1: Lynsky Elio, which is amazing of itself, is confirming that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was in the loop of all this. Do
Speaker 1: you see any crimes potentially for Joe Biden and Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden as well well, two weeks before less than two
Speaker 1: weeks before the election. I don't think anything's gonna come
Speaker 1: of it in terms of official prosecution by the Justice Department.
Speaker 1: But it goes to a larger point about the Iranians,
Speaker 1: the Chinese, the Russians. They're all trying to wreak havoc
Speaker 1: and so disinformation in our elections as they did four
Speaker 1: years ago, just to get Americans more at each other's throats.
Speaker 1: And I think the responsible thing for President Trump I
Speaker 1: hope he does tonight the debate is to talk about
Speaker 1: his successes and how that might be different under a
Speaker 1: Biden administration. All right, But Jordan, when you look at
Speaker 1: for example, Bobo Lensky confirming that the email is genuine
Speaker 1: and providing more information regarding Joe Biden's role in all
Speaker 1: of this, and in the email it says that that
Speaker 1: Hunter has some office expectations he'll elaborate a proposed equity split.
Speaker 1: References quote twenty four, quote H and quote ten held
Speaker 1: by H for the Big Guy and Bob O Lensky
Speaker 1: saying that the Big Guy was the way that Hunter
Speaker 1: would reference his father. That's what I think could matter tonight.
Speaker 1: So I agree in the sense that I don't think
Speaker 1: that President Trump's has been the whole debate on this,
Speaker 1: But I think instead of making it about Hunter, we
Speaker 1: now know this is not just allegations that was also
Speaker 1: about Joe, even though we all suspected Hunter was kind
Speaker 1: of the funneler of the Biden family trust fund, if
Speaker 1: you will, that was coming in internet actually, and that
Speaker 1: he was just kind of used to be that position.
Speaker 1: I think that instead the President can take it direct
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden, say, you know, you're a reference. I've
Speaker 1: got someone here in the audience who said, this was
Speaker 1: you taking the money from the Chinese, this is you
Speaker 1: taking the money from the Ukraine, this is you taking
Speaker 1: the money from the Russians. You always got a cut.
Speaker 1: Last time we debated you said all this was a lie.
Speaker 1: Tell the American people the truth, because I've got your
Speaker 1: former business partner here saying you always got a cut.
Speaker 1: But but the already the media ignored even during impeachment,
Speaker 1: they ignored You're not getting a billion unless you fire
Speaker 1: the prosecutor that's paying my zero experienced on millions. The
Speaker 1: media just ignored that, Jordan, They totally ignored it. That's
Speaker 1: why these debates and things like that are opportunities for
Speaker 1: the president to be able to present it to people
Speaker 1: because if they're not going to hear a lot of places,
Speaker 1: we're running at it, you know, running out of time.
Speaker 1: As we just said that, by the time an investigation
Speaker 1: would open up, that would be a post election. So
Speaker 1: this is about kind of I think, you know, you
Speaker 1: want to talk to big pictures as your last chance
Speaker 1: and in the debate about your how you want to
Speaker 1: govern in the future. But when he comes to this issue,
Speaker 1: hit Joe Biden directly, don't try to just hit his
Speaker 1: son and the people. Oh now, it's this partner is
Speaker 1: bringing it straight to Joe Biden. It's he knew. And
Speaker 1: by the way, we have the picture of the Kazakh
Speaker 1: oligarch in a picture with Joe Biden, I mean, which
Speaker 1: they denied he knew any of this. All right, Jordan's seculo,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Elias or Piero, thank you. Eight hundred nine
Speaker 1: for one, Sean is our number. We'll get to some
Speaker 1: of your calls. Peter Schweitzer takes this to the next level.
Speaker 1: He's been doing a new investigation about China and the Biden's.
Speaker 1: All right, Peter Schweitzer is gonna break down all this
Speaker 1: new information we have and pretty interesting what the president
Speaker 1: has planned for Joe Biden tonight. This guy Tony Bob
Speaker 1: Olynsky is gonna be there. We'll get more details from
Speaker 1: Peter Schweitzer. On the other side of the news. Frank
Speaker 1: in Kentucky. Frank, you're on the Sean Hannity Show. Hi, Hey, Hey, Sean.
Speaker 1: It's truly an honor to speak to you. Thank you
Speaker 1: for taking my call. Thank you. You are a true
Speaker 1: American hero for the work that you do. Now I listen,
Speaker 1: I'm blessed to do what I do. What's on your
Speaker 1: mind today? Hey, what seems like an insurmountable amount of
Speaker 1: evidence being stacked up against Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
Speaker 1: Do you feel like they are going to begin to
Speaker 1: be calls for him to essentially drop out of the race.
Speaker 1: Is that even a possibility? Has that ever happened before?
Speaker 1: I mean, there's been a lot of speculation that. You know, Look,
Speaker 1: I think the oddest thing in this campaign, and I'm
Speaker 1: answering your question a backdoorway is who would take off
Speaker 1: five out of six days with two weeks to go
Speaker 1: on a presidential campaign? Now for this too, of hath happened.
Speaker 1: His campaign has made a decision it is in their
Speaker 1: best interest not to see or hear from Joe, then
Speaker 1: to see and hear from Joe on a regular basis.
Speaker 1: And he's just you know, taking naps. I'm sure he's
Speaker 1: been doing debate prep as much as he can tolerate.
Speaker 1: M Do I think the mob and the media is
Speaker 1: going to try and protect him the whole way? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I do. They're corrupt, big tech companies, they're all corrupt.
Speaker 1: You know, they hate Donald Trump. Would he drop out?
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris? I don't know. I mean, I just I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. I think Democrats are cocky and
Speaker 1: confident they're gonna win. I wouldn't be so cocky if
Speaker 1: I was them, you get the last word. One more thing.
Speaker 1: I would love to see President trumpet. President Trump addressed
Speaker 1: that tonight, and then it would blow me away if
Speaker 1: he basically just said, I feel like you're an illegitimate
Speaker 1: candidate with all this corruption that's surrounding you, and I
Speaker 1: don't even and just walk out of it, walk out
Speaker 1: of the debate. Donald Trump is not going to walk
Speaker 1: out of the debate, you know. But I will tell
Speaker 1: you even the Debate Commission is corrupt. Got the meeting.
Speaker 1: You mob hates, some big tech hates some Democrats hate him,
Speaker 1: Rhino Republicans hate him. The only one that can change
Speaker 1: this or you we the people. You decide, you're the
Speaker 1: ultimate jury. All right, twenty five now till the top
Speaker 1: of the hour, eight hundred and nine four one sewn
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: So Secret Empires really got the ball rolling on the Biden.
Speaker 1: You know, family business, if you will, or the corrupt
Speaker 1: family business. And it told us a story about Barisma Holdings.
Speaker 1: It told us the millions that zero experience Hunter made.
Speaker 1: It told us about the one billion later at one
Speaker 1: point five billion dollars deal with the Bank of China
Speaker 1: after zero experience Hunter flies with Daddy to China. That
Speaker 1: was about ten days after that trip. Now that Johnson
Speaker 1: and Grassly report points out, it even goes deeper than
Speaker 1: we ever imagined, and that being well three and a
Speaker 1: half million from an oligarch, the first Lady of Moscow,
Speaker 1: Hazak oligarch wiring money to Hunter Biden in his firm.
Speaker 1: Then of course we have you know, Russian oligarchs, Kazakhstan oligarch's,
Speaker 1: Ukrainian oligarchs. I mean, this is unbelievable. And now the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden business associate corroborating the claim that Joe Biden, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's the big guy that Hunter's going to hold the
Speaker 1: money for. Unbelievable. Anyway, that we knew this when the
Speaker 1: whole issue of impeachment came up, it's breathtaking to me.
Speaker 1: You know, the phone call with Zelenski. All the witnesses
Speaker 1: in the impeachment case were either hearsay witnesses or opinion witnesses.
Speaker 1: There was only one fact witness. And when I asked,
Speaker 1: but what did what did Donald Trump want from Zelenski
Speaker 1: on the call? What did he ask for? Nothing? No
Speaker 1: quid pro quel. But Joe leverages a billion taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 1: You got six hours fire prosecutor that we now know
Speaker 1: Victor Show investigating his zero experience son Hunter being paid millions,
Speaker 1: and then Hunter does the dumbest thing I've ever seen
Speaker 1: a forty nine year old adult, due admits at all
Speaker 1: on Good Morning America. Let's take that this is crucial
Speaker 1: to understanding the corrupt Biden family practice business practices. Said
Speaker 1: I'm not going to We're not going to give you
Speaker 1: the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority, You're
Speaker 1: not the president, the president said, I said, calling them,
Speaker 1: I said, I'm telling you're not getting the billion dollars.
Speaker 1: I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: leaving here. And I think it was what six hours.
Speaker 1: I look, I said, leaving six hours. If the prosecutors
Speaker 1: not fired, you're not getting the money. Son of them
Speaker 1: got fired. Your father did shake hands with mister Lee
Speaker 1: though correct, in the lobby of that hotel. I don't remember,
Speaker 1: but probably yeah, I hope so I we did. It
Speaker 1: was my friend Jonathan Lee. Yeah, for almost thirteen years.
Speaker 1: He was friend and your business. I understand totally, Amy,
Speaker 1: whether I'm in New York or whether I'm in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1: A friend in the business associate is in the hotel
Speaker 1: and my dad's staying there. Is it inappropriate for me
Speaker 1: to have coffee with them? So that meeding anything, It
Speaker 1: was not a mistake. It was not in the list
Speaker 1: that you gave me of the reasons why you're on
Speaker 1: that board. You did not list the fact that you
Speaker 1: were the son of the Of course, Yeah, what role
Speaker 1: do you think that played. I think that it is
Speaker 1: impossible for me to be on any of the boards
Speaker 1: that I just mentioned without saying that I'm the son
Speaker 1: of the vice president of the United States. You were
Speaker 1: paid fifty thousand dollars a month for your position. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm a private citizen. One thing that I don't have
Speaker 1: to do is sit here and open my kimono as
Speaker 1: it relates to how much money I make or make
Speaker 1: or did or didn't. But it's all been reported. If
Speaker 1: your last name wasn't Biden, do you think you would
Speaker 1: have been asked to be on the board of Barisma.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know, probably not. I don't
Speaker 1: think that there's a lot of things that would have
Speaker 1: happened in my life that if my last name wasn't Biden.
Speaker 1: It's about selling access to the highest levels of our
Speaker 1: government and compromising national security in the process. Peter Schweitzer
Speaker 1: joins us he got this ball rolling with his book
Speaker 1: Secret Empires. Twenty eighteen. We did the first interview for
Speaker 1: this book. Shamus Bruner is with us, author of Compromised,
Speaker 1: How money and politics drive FBI corruption. All right, before
Speaker 1: we get to the Ron Johnson information, What you know
Speaker 1: about Bisma, what you know about China? You have a
Speaker 1: new bombshell that came out from these Cooney I guess
Speaker 1: his name is Bevin Cooney. He is the Hunter partner
Speaker 1: that is doing serving time in jail. The other partner,
Speaker 1: Devin Archer, is awaiting sentencing after he's been convicted. But
Speaker 1: you found documents revealing how Biden associates actually helped the
Speaker 1: Chinese military, a military contractor, acquire a Michigan dual use
Speaker 1: manufacturer and they're bragging about it. Tell us about it. Yeah, Sean,
Speaker 1: we've talked about this on your show before. This was
Speaker 1: the Chinese military acquiring Hennekas, a Michigan based dual use
Speaker 1: technology company. Shamus has been going to the Bevancoon emails,
Speaker 1: So I'm going to let him go into detail of
Speaker 1: what we found, but essentially what we found is that
Speaker 1: they helped grease the way for this Chinese military contractor
Speaker 1: to hide the fact of their ownership of the entity
Speaker 1: that was going to be buying it and help secure
Speaker 1: the deal. So I'm gonna let Shamus describe that. Shamus, right, yes, sir.
Speaker 1: So the emails, I mean, right the moment that the
Speaker 1: deal is announced as being approved by the Obama Biden
Speaker 1: Sipius Committee, they start sending emails. These are Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: associates celebrating the deal. Congratulations, this is huge. They call
Speaker 1: it a proof of concept for their future deals, which
Speaker 1: means what they're saying with that is, we can get
Speaker 1: more deals like this done, help the Chinese acquire more
Speaker 1: American companies. They use a little euphemism called cross border investments.
Speaker 1: In reality, this was a takeover and they're celebrating it.
Speaker 1: Right as it finishes. They say, I'm going to get
Speaker 1: Devin Archer says, I'm going to get on a letter,
Speaker 1: type up a letter to Ambassador Bacchus, who was a
Speaker 1: close friend of the Biden family. He's the ambassador to
Speaker 1: China at the time, and they invite Max Bauchus to
Speaker 1: this banquet celebration, and it's going to be attended by
Speaker 1: all their strategic partners and investors. These are all state
Speaker 1: owned entities Chinese, you know, very close to the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party, some of the biggest companies in China, and
Speaker 1: they kind of just you know, pop champagne that they
Speaker 1: just took over an American manufacturer from Michigan. Let me
Speaker 1: go to this other big bombshell. There's been several smoking
Speaker 1: gun witnesses and obviously this business partner allowing both of
Speaker 1: you access to his emails, some twenty six thousand of them,
Speaker 1: if I recall Peter Schweitzer. But now we're discovering even
Speaker 1: more every day as it relates to the evidence that
Speaker 1: is available. Now. Tony Bob o Lynsky, who is listed
Speaker 1: as a recipient of an email found on Hunter's laptop
Speaker 1: which detailed this business arrangement involving the Chinese company and
Speaker 1: the Biden family, confirming that the email is a genuine
Speaker 1: and giving more information, and it notes that Hunter had
Speaker 1: some office expectations he'll elaborate a proposed equity split, referencing
Speaker 1: twenty four H meaning Hunter ten for help by H
Speaker 1: for the Big Guy with no further details. The reference
Speaker 1: to the big Guy, which has been much published now
Speaker 1: as a reference to Joe Biden, and he confirmed as
Speaker 1: much that Joe Biden knew. So now this gets to
Speaker 1: the vice president of the United States, you know, selling, access, influence, pedaling,
Speaker 1: whatever words you want to use, Peter, but this is
Speaker 1: devastating evidence. Yeah, you're exactly right, Sean. And to be
Speaker 1: clear for the audience, there are actually two whistleblowers we
Speaker 1: are working with. One is Bevin Cooney, a former business
Speaker 1: partner of the Bidens that has given us access to
Speaker 1: twenty six thousand of his emails. He is currently in prison.
Speaker 1: The other one that we have talked to and then
Speaker 1: communicating with is Tony Bobolynski. He's a former naval officer
Speaker 1: who went into private equity. I met with him back
Speaker 1: on September twenty ninth at a airport hotel in Atlanta,
Speaker 1: spent four and a half hours together and he laid
Speaker 1: out a series of communications. By that I mean hundreds
Speaker 1: of communications that he had with the Biden family. And
Speaker 1: what stands out in his communications this was for a
Speaker 1: deal involving a Chinese energy company called CEFC which is
Speaker 1: linked to the Chinese military, is that the Chinese were
Speaker 1: doing a deal not with Hunter Biden. They were doing
Speaker 1: a deal with the Biden family. And that puts Joe
Speaker 1: front and center and the communication where they're going to
Speaker 1: be putting ten percent ownership for the big guy. The
Speaker 1: big guy is Joe Biden. And what's important here, also, Sean,
Speaker 1: is the maturity of the Tony's provided is these were
Speaker 1: discussions that began in twenty fifteen. Let me just read
Speaker 1: briefly from one of the messages that Tony shares. This
Speaker 1: is with James Gilliar, who is working for the Bidens,
Speaker 1: and this is a communication on Christmas Eve twenty fifteen.
Speaker 1: There will be a deal between one of the most
Speaker 1: prominent families from the US, the Bidens, constructed by me
Speaker 1: and I think then this will be a great addition
Speaker 1: to their portfolios. He's discussing the groundwork that's being laid
Speaker 1: for a deal with the Chinese. In twenty fifteen, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is still Vice president. When you look at the
Speaker 1: other communications they're coming out, the Senate has them. You
Speaker 1: see people going through the collections that have been released
Speaker 1: on Twitter. The communications are always referring to the Bidens family.
Speaker 1: The Chinese are doing a deal with the Biden family,
Speaker 1: not just with Hunter, and that puts the vice president
Speaker 1: of the United States front and center in a deal
Speaker 1: with the Chinese. So obviously Joe Biden is up to
Speaker 1: his eyeballs and all of this. But you know, I
Speaker 1: guess knowing that the media mob is so corrupt, and
Speaker 1: we know big tech companies, you know, like Facebook and Twitter,
Speaker 1: they all have their agenda which is to help all
Speaker 1: things democratic, socialist in Biden. But the reality is is
Speaker 1: during impeachment, Joe is on tape saying I leverage a
Speaker 1: billion dollars. You're not getting it unless you fire a
Speaker 1: Ukrainian prosecutor. Then of course we know that he had
Speaker 1: no experience in oil, gas, energy or in Ukraine. The
Speaker 1: media ignored all of that. Now it extends into the
Speaker 1: Chinese deals that you're describing. Then it extends into Russian oligarchs,
Speaker 1: in Kazakhstan oligarchs, and Ukrainian oligarchs, and now it's going
Speaker 1: right into Joe Biden's office himself. Now the question is,
Speaker 1: with twelve days out of an election, does the country
Speaker 1: is the country capable of absorbing the magnitude of the
Speaker 1: selling of ones of access to enrich an entire family
Speaker 1: that had no experience in any of these endeavors. Peter,
Speaker 1: look the damage that the media has done by ignoring
Speaker 1: these stories, by ignoring the Biden corruption, you know, going
Speaker 1: back two years. You and I talked about this in
Speaker 1: January of twenty eighteen, and they have ignored this story.
Speaker 1: The damage they have done to their reputation cannot be underestimated.
Speaker 1: Are there some good reporters out there, Absolutely, but the
Speaker 1: media has put their thumb on the scale and they're
Speaker 1: not covering things. And I think what most people want
Speaker 1: is for them to cover things equally, and they're not
Speaker 1: doing that. I do think that people understand what's going on.
Speaker 1: I do think the fact that Joe Biden has so
Speaker 1: strenuously said I've had no communications with my son or
Speaker 1: my family about their business dealings has been shown to
Speaker 1: be completely totally false, to be a lie, and that
Speaker 1: is a reflection because people have been wonder if you're
Speaker 1: going to lie that blatantly about something, what are you hiding.
Speaker 1: So I do think that people care about corruption. I
Speaker 1: do think that people want answers to these questions. And then,
Speaker 1: of course the question becomes in the debate tonight or
Speaker 1: in the days that follow. When Joe Biden does go
Speaker 1: out in public and he does have interactions with the
Speaker 1: media which are minimal, are they going to ask him
Speaker 1: very basic questions about this. I doubt it happens tonight.
Speaker 1: The only person that'll bring it up as the president
Speaker 1: of himself. It was the only one that'll do it.
Speaker 1: Let's just get a minute each conclusions. What are we
Speaker 1: now to conclude about the Biden family? The Biden family, business, influence, peddling,
Speaker 1: selling access. It all happened. Now. The question is will
Speaker 1: America absorb that? Shamus? Yes, anyone who does not is
Speaker 1: not shocked by these new allegations and frankly the previous
Speaker 1: allegations from Schwitzer's books. It just isn't paying attention. I mean,
Speaker 1: the Biden whether they like it or not, the Biden
Speaker 1: kimono has been opened. There are billions of dollars we're
Speaker 1: talking about here in all these many deals. It's China.
Speaker 1: It's Chinese military contractors right in bed with the Biden's family,
Speaker 1: and it's really shocking stuff. There's more to come, and
Speaker 1: you get the last word, Peter Schweitzer. Yeah, I would add,
Speaker 1: this is not rank and file corruption. This is not
Speaker 1: somebody trying to get a paving contract for their nephew
Speaker 1: for some county road. We're talking about foreign governments and
Speaker 1: oligarchs that don't want good things for the United States.
Speaker 1: And these are the commercial partners that the Bidens have
Speaker 1: decided to get into business with, and it compromises national security.
Speaker 1: At what point do we recognize that Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: bought and paid for by these companies because the family
Speaker 1: is making all this money. Maybe that's why he didn't
Speaker 1: want to criticize China on the virus. Maybe that's why
Speaker 1: it was against the travel band calling a xenophobic who
Speaker 1: knows at this point, maybe wanted another billion five deal
Speaker 1: for zero experience hunter there. It'll be interesting. All right, Peter,
Speaker 1: thank you, Shamus, thank you. Eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one sewn Tolfree telephone number Hannity tonight right after the debate,
Speaker 1: eleven o'clock Fox News. Hope you'll join us. We'll take
Speaker 1: a quick break, we'll come back and also your calls
Speaker 1: in the next hour straight ahead, all right, Dud's round
Speaker 1: up information overload hour. Glad you're with us. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one sewn. You want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program twelve days you are the ultimate jury.
Speaker 1: I think one of the greatest jiu jitsu moves ever
Speaker 1: made against the media mob, the abusively biased, corrupt, agenda
Speaker 1: driven media is the President has a very hostile interviews,
Speaker 1: as if we'd expect anything other with Leslie Stall sixty minutes.
Speaker 1: It'll be interesting to compare and contrast the way that
Speaker 1: Joe and I'm sure as giving kid gloves here and
Speaker 1: the President says, fine, I'm going to release the whole tape.
Speaker 1: The problem with sixty minutes that many people don't know
Speaker 1: is that they edit and they cut, and they slice
Speaker 1: and they dice, and they build their narrative around whatever
Speaker 1: agenda that they have. Look in the last year, Leslie
Speaker 1: Stall went to every single solitary person that knows me
Speaker 1: and wanted me to go on sixty minutes, and I said, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not going on sixty minutes. Frankly, my audience is
Speaker 1: bigger than your audience. Why waste my time, you know,
Speaker 1: because they'll spend two three as much time as you'll
Speaker 1: give him four hours, and it becomes a twenty minute
Speaker 1: segment and they edit it anyway they like, and that's
Speaker 1: what the president was facing. Brilliantly, he had his own
Speaker 1: camera in the room and recorded the whole thing. It's released,
Speaker 1: the whole interview. Oh all right, let's listen to parts
Speaker 1: of it. Are you gonna say that he didn't say
Speaker 1: this because I saw you say good. Oh, you're only
Speaker 1: trying to. I wish you. I wish you would interview
Speaker 1: Joe Biden like you interview me. It would be so good.
Speaker 1: You know what you thought? I thought, I don't mind.
Speaker 1: I don't mind. When I watch him walk out of
Speaker 1: a store. He's in the midst of a scandal. His
Speaker 1: family is corrupt. Okay, he's corrupt. He's a corrupt politician,
Speaker 1: and he's walking with the ice cream and the question
Speaker 1: the media asked him what kind of ice cream would
Speaker 1: flavor as a good cutter, And he's in the midst
Speaker 1: of a scandal, and he's thinking, of course he is.
Speaker 1: Last week, of course he is. Say so you're like,
Speaker 1: you're like, you're like big tech, you're protecting him, You're
Speaker 1: you're taking something that was investing. Lest you think it's
Speaker 1: okay for the mayor of Moscow's wife to give him
Speaker 1: millions and millions of dollars three and a half million
Speaker 1: dollars to give his family three air Do you think
Speaker 1: it's okay for under Biden say to say that we're
Speaker 1: giving we're giving the big guy ten percent of this
Speaker 1: massive amount of money they're taken in. Do you think
Speaker 1: it's okay for all of these horrible things that you've
Speaker 1: seen where they're getting hundreds of thousands and billions of dollars,
Speaker 1: where China gives them a billion and a half dollars
Speaker 1: to manage the family a billion and a half dollars,
Speaker 1: and then he's supposed to negotiate. Let me take it's
Speaker 1: the biggest second, biggest candal. The biggest scandal was when
Speaker 1: they spied on my campaign. They spied on my campaigns.
Speaker 1: Of course there is a twelve of the place, Leslie.
Speaker 1: They spied on my campaign and they got called say something.
Speaker 1: You know, this is sixty rules and we can't put
Speaker 1: on things. We can't. You won't put it on because
Speaker 1: it's bad for Biden. Can't we can't, leslie. They spied
Speaker 1: on my campaign. It's been totally verified. It's been just
Speaker 1: go down and get the papers. They spite of my campaign,
Speaker 1: they got caught and then they went much further than
Speaker 1: that and they got called. And you will see that, Leslie,
Speaker 1: and you know that, but you just don't want to
Speaker 1: put another as in effect, I don't know that, and
Speaker 1: you're out water, don't you? Getting back to your interview
Speaker 1: with Let's Go. It is breathtaking ignorance on Leslie Stall's part.
Speaker 1: And it just so I talk often about how there's
Speaker 1: this little cabal of media people that live in their
Speaker 1: little bubble and they all have their blue check marks
Speaker 1: on Twitter, and they retweet each other all day long
Speaker 1: and they pat each other on the back of how
Speaker 1: much they hate Trump and I hate Trump, Moore? How
Speaker 1: does she not know that Hillary's bought and paid for
Speaker 1: dirty misinformation Russian dacier that turned out to be total bunk, unverifiable.
Speaker 1: A subsource known to the FBI as an agent of
Speaker 1: Russia for ten years, was used as the bulk of
Speaker 1: information to get the FIS warrant, which did spy on
Speaker 1: Trump's campaign and transition team and deep into his presidency.
Speaker 1: How could she be that ignorant? It's oh, that's not true.
Speaker 1: It is breathtaking ignorant. Sixty minutes the so called prestigious
Speaker 1: news magazine show, Joe Concha commentator, opinion columnist The Hill,
Speaker 1: Miranda Divine columnist New York Post, our friend Mark Simone,
Speaker 1: host morning show our affiliate New York w R. I
Speaker 1: cannot believe that that's how deep inside the bubble she lives.
Speaker 1: It was sort of like Humpty Dumpty defending, you know,
Speaker 1: all of their phony Russia Trump collusion coverage in a
Speaker 1: debate that he had. He looked like a fool to me,
Speaker 1: Joe Concha. I think the key quote here that you
Speaker 1: just played from Leslie stall Sean was when she said, quote,
Speaker 1: this is sixty minutes, and we can't put things on
Speaker 1: that we can't there. Well, I'm ill enough to remember
Speaker 1: two thousand and four, about a couple of days before
Speaker 1: that election, when Dan Rather of sixty Minutes put on
Speaker 1: a story that he could not verify based on false
Speaker 1: documents around George W. Bush's National Guard Service. So let's
Speaker 1: stop pretending that sixty Minutes somehow doesn't go ahead with
Speaker 1: unverified information, and particularly all the reporting that they did
Speaker 1: on Russia collusion for two and a half years leading
Speaker 1: up to the Mulla Reports conclusion that there was no
Speaker 1: actual collusion between Trump officials and the Russians. I think
Speaker 1: kind of disproves that whole statement. Hey, Joe Sally Yates,
Speaker 1: you look at the FBI Deputy Director of the FBI McCabe,
Speaker 1: both admitting without the dirty dossier, which was unverifiable, there
Speaker 1: would be no FISA warrants. How does she not know that,
Speaker 1: Miranda Divine, how does she not know that? She doesn't
Speaker 1: know it because she refuses to know. I mean, our
Speaker 1: bombshell story today on the front page with more evidence
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden is involved in his family's cash for
Speaker 1: influenced scheme. This evidence is piling up. And if you
Speaker 1: only read seeing in CBS, you know, Wall Street Earth,
Speaker 1: or in not versions of that Washington Post, New York Times,
Speaker 1: you're not going to get that story because they are
Speaker 1: ignoring it. NPR it has today said the reason that
Speaker 1: you're not reading any Hunter Biden's stories on our website
Speaker 1: is because they're not verified. I mean, it's the evidence
Speaker 1: is there, Miranda. He got three and a half million
Speaker 1: from the Russian oligarc the first Lady of Moscow. He
Speaker 1: had a wire transfer from a Kazakh oligarch, Barisma paid
Speaker 1: him millions Joel leveraged and is bragging about leveraging a
Speaker 1: billion dollars to fire a prosecutor in six hours or
Speaker 1: they're not getting the money. That would be a quid
Speaker 1: and a pro and a quo where I grew up,
Speaker 1: Miranda Divine it sure is. And we have emails that
Speaker 1: show that the big guy was getting ten percent of
Speaker 1: these lucrative Chinese deals. We now have Hunter's ex business partner,
Speaker 1: Tony Bobolynski, saying that was the big guy. We now
Speaker 1: have emails that he has provided us which show that
Speaker 1: other partners are saying, please don't mention Joe's name because
Speaker 1: they're paranoid that someone will find out. I mean, what
Speaker 1: more do you need to know for these other news
Speaker 1: organizations to stop ignoring this story? And I'll tell you
Speaker 1: one other thing, Sean, that is disgusting. This morning, at
Speaker 1: five thirty I posted on Twitter a link to our
Speaker 1: front page story about Tony Bobolinsky, absolute bombshell. And I
Speaker 1: also posted a link to my column today about Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's email. Both of those before six am, Twitter had
Speaker 1: red flagged Oh, by the way, that's happened to me too. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let me bring in our friend Mark Simone, Mark, you
Speaker 1: can't get any more corrupt, I said in two thousand
Speaker 1: and seven, maybe one of the maybe being it is
Speaker 1: about as head of the curve as anybody. Journalism in
Speaker 1: America is dead, it is gone, it is buried now.
Speaker 1: They're just mere mouthpieces for all things democratic, radical socialist
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden. Well, you got to give Leslie Stall
Speaker 1: credit though, to be able to pull this off with
Speaker 1: a straight face. This is better acting than Meryl's Street.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine of us if we went on here
Speaker 1: something we haven't no? But is it acting or is
Speaker 1: she that ignorant and unaware of real news? I think
Speaker 1: it started as acting. And you know, when you tell
Speaker 1: a lie so long you start to believe it. I
Speaker 1: think they've convinced themselves and she forgets how sixty Minutes
Speaker 1: got started. It was not a popular show. It took
Speaker 1: ten years, but it game number one true. Mike Wallace,
Speaker 1: he used to go grab guys like these Ukrainians and
Speaker 1: say what was this payment for? You? Confront people about
Speaker 1: paying off pa peticians. That's what made sixty minutes. If
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was getting a dollar fifty for a no
Speaker 1: show job, that would be a story eighty three thousand
Speaker 1: a month and a three million dollar bonus for not
Speaker 1: showing up. Ever, and if they're still paying him five
Speaker 1: years later, clearly they were getting something for the money.
Speaker 1: Otherwise it would have stopped after six months. You know,
Speaker 1: these are incredible times that we live in. All of
Speaker 1: the money, Ron Johnson, Chuck Grassley, we now know who
Speaker 1: the big guy is all of these reports. It can't
Speaker 1: be anymore clear. Does this impact the race, Joe Concha?
Speaker 1: It depends on what happens tonight, Sean, because seventy million,
Speaker 1: seventy five million people will be watching. I think it
Speaker 1: was seventy four million watched the first debate, So here
Speaker 1: the president has to make his case, not just around
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. I don't know how much that changes the race,
Speaker 1: because it's still confusing to people outside of the people
Speaker 1: that are followed this stuff very closely every day. I
Speaker 1: don't say he doesn't bring it up and he doesn't
Speaker 1: try to hit Biden on it, But I know what
Speaker 1: Biden's going to do. He's gonna say, well, the media
Speaker 1: has proven that this all this information is a smear campaign,
Speaker 1: not verified, and they're just going to kind of box
Speaker 1: himself into a corner. The president has a good case
Speaker 1: to make as far as what he will do the
Speaker 1: next four years and what he has done. He could say,
Speaker 1: the economy, you either want it to contract or you
Speaker 1: want it to continue. This Nike swoosh of a recovery
Speaker 1: out of coronavirus. And if you think that expanding the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, or letting sixteen year olds vote, or abolishing
Speaker 1: the filibuster and just listening all the things that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden now supports that he didn't maybe in years past.
Speaker 1: Who knows. I think that's the way it's going to go.
Speaker 1: It comes down to the debate tonight. Sean. It's a big,
Speaker 1: big night for the president. I think it's a big
Speaker 1: night for the country. All right now. Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: off Saturday. Miranda and Joe Biden did one event on
Speaker 1: Sunday and he got one hard question and he got mad,
Speaker 1: And then he got another question what kind of shake
Speaker 1: a flavor he bought? Then he's been out of work Monday, Tuesday,
Speaker 1: Wednesday and today. Who does that with two weeks to go?
Speaker 1: To me? When a campaign makes a conscious decision that
Speaker 1: they're they're better off if they never let their candidate
Speaker 1: out of their basement bunker. They're hiding something. What are you?
Speaker 1: What are your thoughts? They definitely are They're hiding from
Speaker 1: time to Biden's story. They know that it's pretty lethal
Speaker 1: to his integrity, and you know, he's running as a
Speaker 1: good guy, so they don't want those questions. And they
Speaker 1: know that Joe's got a head, treat a temper and
Speaker 1: then he goes after people and that that would be
Speaker 1: negative for him. And it's extraordinary. We've never seen an
Speaker 1: election campaign anywhere in the world where the candidate hides
Speaker 1: in a bunker for the most of the time, and
Speaker 1: especially two weeks out. But I think in the end
Speaker 1: it's not going to make much difference. People have made
Speaker 1: up their minds already, a lot of them have already voted.
Speaker 1: And the bottom line is the most important thing in
Speaker 1: people's minds is the economy. And on the economy, even
Speaker 1: the published poles show that President Trump outpolls are Biden significantly.
Speaker 1: And as we continue with Joe Conscha, Miranda Divine and
Speaker 1: a great Mark Simone. You know, Mark, I can't imagine
Speaker 1: Donald Trump taking off of five out of six days
Speaker 1: and the lead up to a presidential election with less
Speaker 1: than two weeks to go. Could you know this is
Speaker 1: so identical to twenty sixteen. At this exact moment twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: all the fake polls had the Trump behind ten points,
Speaker 1: the same exact situation. The Democratic candidate was either coughing
Speaker 1: or mumbling or passing out. They both had medical problems.
Speaker 1: And it was the same thing with Hillary. She'd make
Speaker 1: a speed eventually have to go rest in bed for
Speaker 1: four days. We're seeing the same exact thing now. I
Speaker 1: guarantee you will see the same outcome. Obama campaign for
Speaker 1: Hillary everybody's ever campaigned for lost. He's campaigning for Biden
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, by the way, which shows paid with like
Speaker 1: five cars showing up and I don't even know what
Speaker 1: that was. All right, So prediction, you're predicting Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is going to win this win re election in twelve days?
Speaker 1: Is that your prediction? Mark Simone? Miranda, divine your prediction. Yes,
Speaker 1: I agree, I won't win the popular vote, but he'll
Speaker 1: uncomfortably win I think the electoral college simply because in
Speaker 1: those battleground states they care about you know, gun's First
Speaker 1: Amendment rights, any economy above all. And you get the
Speaker 1: final word. Joe Concha prediction. All right, I just want
Speaker 1: to see if Mark Simone is still sticking by the
Speaker 1: whole Trump is going to win New York thing that
Speaker 1: that's the question Mark. By the way, that is a
Speaker 1: fair question Mark. Are you you still sticking bike and
Speaker 1: win New York? All right? Will you give me partial
Speaker 1: credit if let's see the well in New York high
Speaker 1: any Republican. Oh, that's funny, then Razor thin Trump win
Speaker 1: and we won't know for weeks and weeks. That prediction,
Speaker 1: good grief. That means it's that it's going to be
Speaker 1: a nightmare. It means we don't rest, we don't get
Speaker 1: any sleep, we don't get any reprieve. Thank you all,
Speaker 1: Joe Consa, Miranda, Divine, Mark Simone, all three friends of
Speaker 1: the program, Thank all for being with us when we
Speaker 1: come back, Wide Open Phones, final half hour Hannity on
Speaker 1: Right after the Debate tonight on Fox eleven PM Eastern
Speaker 1: Quick Break, Right back, your calls are next Hi twenty
Speaker 1: five till the top of the hour. Right, gonna be interesting.
Speaker 1: The debate action tonight, By the way, it is so
Speaker 1: it is so pathetically predictable and sad that we have
Speaker 1: a media that is so corrupt a debate commission so corrupt,
Speaker 1: Where are unilaterally going to decide this next debate? We
Speaker 1: won't even talk to the doctors, medical professionals. We will
Speaker 1: make it a virtual zoom debate. They don't even ask
Speaker 1: the campaigns. Both both candidates on that night did dueling
Speaker 1: town halls. And by the way, final ratings showed, yeah,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump did have more viewers if you use the right,
Speaker 1: if you actually add the metrics together, then all of
Speaker 1: this about Joe. How is it? Do you imagine? Can
Speaker 1: you imagine for a second, a Republican presidential candidate disappearing
Speaker 1: with less than two weeks to go, taking off five
Speaker 1: out of six days, just disappearing, and the campaign has
Speaker 1: made a decision that it is in their best election
Speaker 1: interests to hide their candidate from we the people. Now
Speaker 1: they're obviously hiding something. When Joe does go out one day,
Speaker 1: two days, three days, it usually ends up with a
Speaker 1: series of, you know, brain farts on Joe's part. This
Speaker 1: is not your average tired candidate, you know, malaprop making
Speaker 1: a mistake, getting something wrong. He doesn't know what state
Speaker 1: he's in half the time, what office is running for,
Speaker 1: what day of the week, it is, and so they
Speaker 1: made a decision here and the media mob is perfectly
Speaker 1: fine with that. Now, of course, with more information, Senator
Speaker 1: Ron Johnson, Charles Grassley, Peter Schweitzer, all of it. Now,
Speaker 1: we've got business partners. You got Bevin Cooney, you got
Speaker 1: this new guy, Tony Bob o Lynsky is now speaking,
Speaker 1: a former Biden part partner, confirming that, yeah, the big
Speaker 1: guy was Joe Biden, meaning yeah, Hunter's gonna hold the
Speaker 1: ten percent for his dad, meaning that he's profiting off
Speaker 1: of the you know, influence, pedaling, the selling of access.
Speaker 1: Joe acts like it doesn't know anything. These pictures show
Speaker 1: up with Kazakh oligarchs, you know, could you imagine if
Speaker 1: there was a Trump kid that had you know, there
Speaker 1: was a sleep in a bed with a crack pipe
Speaker 1: in his mouth, and all the other allegations that you know,
Speaker 1: we haven't fully been able to vet yet, but it's coming.
Speaker 1: I've I've gotten briefed on all of it. I just
Speaker 1: I some of you you saying, well, well, you gotta
Speaker 1: tell us what you know. The reason that one of
Speaker 1: the things that is signature of this program as we
Speaker 1: don't rush to judgment. I can't tell you you now
Speaker 1: we broke more stories over the Trump Russia collusion hoax
Speaker 1: and the Ukrainian hoax. Then all the networks combined because
Speaker 1: they were in the tank obviously, and they're they're against
Speaker 1: all things Donald Trump. But you know, we talked about
Speaker 1: the dossier, when we talked about the Espionage Act, when
Speaker 1: we talked about the FISA applications, when we you know,
Speaker 1: breaking all of these stories, the umasking of General Flynn,
Speaker 1: for example, and when we finally dug down deep and
Speaker 1: got to the subsource of Clinton's Russian disinformation dirty dossier,
Speaker 1: and we wait till we have all the facts. Even
Speaker 1: when we have them, and even when we double source it,
Speaker 1: sometimes we go back even further. Now, just because I've
Speaker 1: been briefed and I know I haven't been able to
Speaker 1: independently corroborate certain things so far, things are now being
Speaker 1: corroborated by people that are involved in the enterprise. That's
Speaker 1: what's fascinating here, because now you have Hunter Biden associates,
Speaker 1: two of which one is in jail. This guy, Bevan Cooney,
Speaker 1: Devin Archer, is a convicted criminal. Now he's on his
Speaker 1: way to jail. Now we've got this new guy that
Speaker 1: comes out and absolutely corroborates every single thing with emails
Speaker 1: to back it up. This guy Tony babbal Lensky, and
Speaker 1: the media just ignores it. I mean, the thing that
Speaker 1: was just flabbergasted me about Leslie Stall she had yoh,
Speaker 1: come on, you were in spied on. I'm like, do
Speaker 1: you do you read a newspaper besides the New York
Speaker 1: toilet paper Times? What bubble are you living in? Or
Speaker 1: this idiot over at fake news CNN, Humpty dumpty, you know,
Speaker 1: knowing nothing about the the Trump Russia collusion hoax, lies
Speaker 1: in conspiracy theories that he and his network pedaled every
Speaker 1: single day that went on for years with no retraction,
Speaker 1: no apologies, no correction, nothing. Unbelievable. All right, let's say
Speaker 1: hi to Joe Is in South Carolina. Joe, Hi, how
Speaker 1: are you glad? You called? Sorry? I know that well,
Speaker 1: a lot of people trying to influence your Senate race
Speaker 1: down there, Barbara Streisan Rose o'donald, They're they're all trying
Speaker 1: to take out Lindsey Graham. I notice down there, but
Speaker 1: it's not going to work. Didn't work on me. I
Speaker 1: voted early and voted for lindsay. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: the other night when he was on your show, he's
Speaker 1: asking for a donation brands of the computer with my
Speaker 1: credit card and sent them fifty bucks. But upcoming showing
Speaker 1: of a wide range of emotions hopeful, scared and frustrated,
Speaker 1: of course, hopeful that the Republicans maintain majority in the Senate,
Speaker 1: get it back, get it back in the House, and
Speaker 1: Trump gets reelected, and kind of scared because these folks
Speaker 1: know how to cheat, and if they create anarchy and
Speaker 1: they win, the country's gone as we know it. You know,
Speaker 1: the extra states back in the court, you know, we're done.
Speaker 1: Who knows the only thing that might help conservatives is okay,
Speaker 1: let's split the country and a little bit of frustration.
Speaker 1: I think you've harked on this many times that the
Speaker 1: Republicans are just not aggressive. They are golfers while Democrats
Speaker 1: are hockey players, and they just don't get the message
Speaker 1: out there of Trump's accomplishments and its things that the
Speaker 1: Democrats have done, the corruption there. And again it's going
Speaker 1: to be two against one tonight and Trump is going
Speaker 1: to have to be the candidate and the moderator, and
Speaker 1: hopefully he can work it's going to be a two
Speaker 1: on one debate like it always is. And you know,
Speaker 1: one of the hard things that the President's going to
Speaker 1: have to do is, Okay, now, Joe's gonna lie, He's
Speaker 1: gonna you know, we have on tape Joe bragging about
Speaker 1: leveraging a billion dollars to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. You know,
Speaker 1: paying is zero experience on millions. We have you know,
Speaker 1: Ron Johnson, Chuck Grassley's report on the three and a
Speaker 1: half million to the Russian oligarch First Lady of Moscow.
Speaker 1: We have the wire transfers as it relates to the
Speaker 1: Kazakh oligarch. We have all the facts down as it
Speaker 1: relates to zero experience Hunter and the one point five
Speaker 1: billion dollars deal with the Bank of China would we
Speaker 1: haven't been able to find any any evidence that he
Speaker 1: knew anything about private equity. And then the Chinese national
Speaker 1: taking Hunter's family on a shopping spree with massive amounts
Speaker 1: of money. And you're right, you have a reason to
Speaker 1: be scared because the immediately yeah, and unfortunately the people
Speaker 1: who need to know this are listening to the met
Speaker 1: and watching the mainstream moftia and they're not getting. They're
Speaker 1: not getting, you know, the corruption and things that are
Speaker 1: going on. So hopefully our man could weave in a
Speaker 1: couple of questions to make sleepy Joe answer some things.
Speaker 1: But what I would love to see Donald Trump doo
Speaker 1: tonight is looking in the eye and say, let's have
Speaker 1: one more debate. We each pick a moderator and let's
Speaker 1: go for it. I hope I get picked. Please pick me,
Speaker 1: pick me, please, oh oh oh oh. I'm like the
Speaker 1: kid in the back of the room in the school
Speaker 1: and a class pick me, pick me. I want to
Speaker 1: do it, which, by the way, you know, hell would
Speaker 1: freeze over right, Joe, it would never happily. And uh,
Speaker 1: you and your staff and your contributors do a great job.
Speaker 1: We try and imagine how tough and frustrating it is.
Speaker 1: They'll keep up the good work. And like I said,
Speaker 1: I voted early. The line was very long, but the
Speaker 1: Elecington County voting were very efficient. Got into that of
Speaker 1: there in thirty one minutes and you don't have to
Speaker 1: guess who I voted for. Thank you for the call.
Speaker 1: We need every single state. Look, um, I'm not I
Speaker 1: don't like the pedal fear. I don't the risk to
Speaker 1: this country. They're stated policies will render this country unrecognizable.
Speaker 1: The power grab that Joe was referring to about packing
Speaker 1: the courts, the power grab, ending the legislative filibuster DC,
Speaker 1: Puerto Rican State, Puerto Rico state statehood. You know, that's
Speaker 1: four Democratic senators, which is why the Democrats would do that.
Speaker 1: So they want to senate majority of Democrats in perpetuity
Speaker 1: amnesty for fifteen million people that didn't respect our laws,
Speaker 1: our borders, and our sovereignty. Well, that's something of great
Speaker 1: value that I'm assuming that Democrats think, well, we ought
Speaker 1: to be able to convert eighty percent of the people
Speaker 1: that get amnesty to voting for US. Oh, that could
Speaker 1: impact a lot of swing states. Then you add the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal, everything's for free. Then you add, you know,
Speaker 1: open borders, amnesty, United Sanctuary States of America. You add
Speaker 1: to that higher taxes. The fifty cent I don't want
Speaker 1: to be twenty cent because it's what sixty two cents
Speaker 1: out of every dollar and it's still not going to
Speaker 1: be enough. If they confiscated everybody's wealth. They're going to
Speaker 1: get rid of oil, gas, fossil fuels, fracking, all of it.
Speaker 1: It's all going away. Joe's not going to be able
Speaker 1: to say no to his radical base, you know, activists
Speaker 1: on the court, weak foreign policy, all of it has
Speaker 1: on order, safety, security, It's all on the ballot in
Speaker 1: twelve days. Am I afraid. I don't live my life
Speaker 1: in fear. This is not my first rodeo. I've lost
Speaker 1: elections that i've I wish we would have won. I'll
Speaker 1: fight for liberty and freedom and the things I believe
Speaker 1: until my dying breath, I guess, but it would be
Speaker 1: so sad. I don't see how America will become unrecognizable
Speaker 1: based on their stated policies. Yes, Linda, So I just
Speaker 1: had a quick point and excellent points that you're making
Speaker 1: as well, But I just wanted to say one thing
Speaker 1: to our audience something that has been really bothering me
Speaker 1: for the past two weeks, which is, if we really
Speaker 1: look at what's happening right from the big tech censorship
Speaker 1: to what happened with Leslie Stall, what happened with the
Speaker 1: ice cream question, I just want everybody to think about
Speaker 1: one thing. Let's just really dumb it down and harken
Speaker 1: back to one thing, which is that the idea of
Speaker 1: America is the concept of a free exchange of ideas, conversations,
Speaker 1: you know, being able to hear somebody else's thoughts where
Speaker 1: they're coming from, their positions, discussing your own and letting
Speaker 1: that be okay. And what we're seeing is that they
Speaker 1: know how bad their ideas are, they know how corrupt
Speaker 1: they intend to be in our already being, and so
Speaker 1: they have no desire for the American people to know that,
Speaker 1: so they shut it out. How many times do you want?
Speaker 1: You want a great example of this, name one Democrat
Speaker 1: that gave a flying rip about a Russian disinformation campaign,
Speaker 1: a dirty dossier that was used as the bulk of
Speaker 1: information to get a FISA application to destroy Carter Page's
Speaker 1: life and take away his constitutional rights, but to spy
Speaker 1: on a presidential campaign, and Transie Democrat cared. They No
Speaker 1: average American cares either those Sean and I think that's
Speaker 1: what's really missing. If I talk to somebody at the supermarket,
Speaker 1: they don't care about Russia, they don't care. But what
Speaker 1: they do care about, let me let me tell you, you
Speaker 1: you don't have a country if you're able to spread
Speaker 1: that those types of lies. No, I agree, accept it.
Speaker 1: You know if Russia. Everyone cared about the media acted
Speaker 1: like they cared about Russian interference. But when we've found it,
Speaker 1: their silence is deafening. Agree. But here's here's my really
Speaker 1: low level point, not my high level point. What I'm
Speaker 1: saying is it's more simple than that. It's any idea
Speaker 1: that they don't agree with they want to silence. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what it is. It could be I like
Speaker 1: wheat over whitebread, you know, I like chocolate over vanilla
Speaker 1: ice cream. That this is what I'm saying. It's not
Speaker 1: just about Russia or China affecting our country negatively. It's
Speaker 1: also about this deep dive into silencing American freedom of thoughts.
Speaker 1: And that's what you're voting for. That's what's happening on
Speaker 1: November think freely. If they could knock off anybody and
Speaker 1: talk radio or people on Fox News that they don't
Speaker 1: like and take us out and silence us. We you know,
Speaker 1: I don't come on the air whining every day, but
Speaker 1: we deal with this crap every day, and we deal
Speaker 1: with this crap every day. Now, I don't think any
Speaker 1: of you really want to hear me whining and moaning
Speaker 1: and complaining. I'm not I understand. It's, you know, the
Speaker 1: cost to do in this business. We don't like everything,
Speaker 1: but I'll tell you it's even more simple than this.
Speaker 1: It is every It might be appealing that everything's free,
Speaker 1: but you're going to lose freedoms that we may never
Speaker 1: ever be able to retrieve. I don't know how. I
Speaker 1: don't see a path back. If the power grab of
Speaker 1: court packing, amnesty, ending the filibuster, statehood for DC and elsewhere,
Speaker 1: I don't and the New Green Deal and eliminating oil
Speaker 1: and gas, I don't see a path back for the country,
Speaker 1: and we will disintegrate into your typical socialist hellhole. That's
Speaker 1: all on the ballot twelve days, all right, Hannity Tonight,
Speaker 1: eleven o'clock, right after the final presidential debate. Don Junior,
Speaker 1: Ari Fleischer, Sarah Anders, Lindsay Graham, Rick Runel, Dan Bongino,
Speaker 1: Judge Pierro, Ryan's previous Matt Gates, Haraldo. We've got you
Speaker 1: covered the best post election analysis, post debate analysis on
Speaker 1: Hannity Tonight, levin Eastern right after the debate. We'll see
Speaker 1: you then,