WEBVTT - The Best Weekend Talk Show In American Hour One (8/8/2026)

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty and he Armstrong and Getty. Thanks for

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>tuning into the best weekend talk show in America. We

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>are Armstrong in Getty. If you like what you're gonna

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>hear here, there's lots of us out there. Look for

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty on demand. We do twenty hours of

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>this every.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Week, action packed week too. My gosh, enjoy. We've distilled

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>it all down to the best weekend talk show in America.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Ross doubt that. If you know him of the New

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>York Times, he's been a columnist for a while. They're

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>conservative columnists. He got hired at the New York Times

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>when he is in his twenties. Still he's a he's

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>not your typical mainstream media especially New York Times, are

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Washington Post or whatever colonists. He's practicing Roman Catholic, very religious,

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>but he's not a bomb chucker, sort of like a conservative.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 2>He's like a I was going to describe him as earnest. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>very much so. And some of his religious books that

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>I've read or listened to, him talk about are really

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 2>really interesting in that sort of stuff. But anyway, he's

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>leaving the New York Times. Barry Weiss hired him over

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>at sixty Minutes to try to balance out their coverage. Good.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy to see that, man. I saw some pushback

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>on that online last week that was just oh yeah,

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 2>insane about this religious nut job will have had his way,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>we'd be living in a theocracy being hired by Barry

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Weiss to further blah blah blah blah blah.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Well not only that, but they're afraid that sixty Minutes

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>might become biased. I mean, can you imagine.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's right, I'd forgotten he wrote The Decadent Society.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I loved that book, with a different kind of view

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of what the word decadent means than we usually use.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's where we are culturally. But anyway, well maybe

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk about that at a different time. But sorry,

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm making a note.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>That is number eight hundred and six on books I

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>need to read back to you.

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 2>So who is this nut We're about to hear Ross

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>talking to oh Lordie Jack.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>So Ross does these interview podcasts, and this one happens

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>to be with a fellow by the name of Samuel Moyne,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>who is the Kent Professor of Law and History at

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Yale University. He also serves as head of one of

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the colleges within the University of Yale. He is an

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 3>academic super heavyweight and an important law school professor. Why

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>don't we just go ahead and play the audio, then

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 3>we will discuss. You may drive off the road, so

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 3>prepare yourselves.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 4>overweighting the votes of younger people or a cycle.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Stop it for just a second.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I've got to point out this guy went to the

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 3>same voice coach as the guy with the worst voice

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 3>in America, kind of that Northeast intellectual, very effeminate, vocal

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>fry e voice. Anyway, you got to get past that

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>to listen to his ideas well.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 2>And I know we're not getting to the content yet,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 2>but he just talked about overweighting the votes of young

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 2>people like they are the votes would count more than

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 2>if you're young. That is his premise. That's correct. Listen

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>to this, would you.

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 4>I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>overweighting the the votes of younger people or assigning the

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 4>youngest eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>our country. So those are edg why not assign them

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 4>to those children's parents. Well, because there's a divergence of

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 4>interest between parents and children, and I think it's likely

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>or that young people, not people who are raising families,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 4>will have the best insight into the interests of children,

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>whereas if you were awarded five.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Think I think it's absurd to imagine that a twenty

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 5>four year old recent college graduate has a better assessment

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 5>of the interests of my own children than I do.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 5>And I say this with all due respect to twenty

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 5>four year old recent college graduates of whom I hope

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 5>to be the parent in nine years or so. I

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 5>think parents generally confuse the interests of their family with

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 5>the interests of their children. And part of our goal,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 5>I think is parents, but also as a society, is

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 5>trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 5>their parents as much as we rely on parents to

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 5>raise them.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a sentence for you. Wow, there's a sentence

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>for you. We don't want children to have to be

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the hostages of their parents.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, and that children have a better grasp of their

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>needs and self interest than their parents do. Therefore, we

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 3>should give the youngest people more votes. Is there any

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 3>society like you get two votes because you're voting for

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 3>the children who can't vote as a nineteen year old.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Is there any society in the history of planet Earth

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>that has ever thought that? I mean, you know, you

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>picture Native Americans and elders and Asian cult no f no,

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I did like what he said. Often the desires of

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the children diverge from those of her parents. Oh really,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't noticed that as a parent. Did he say

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>desires or well, it doesn't matter, Yeah, but what your

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>kids want? Oh really, you want to go to Disneyland

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and eat cake all day? I hadn't noticed that.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>That diverges from my idea of your best interest. There

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 3>are some ideas so insane only an intellectual could have them.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 3>There is a Yale law professor saying that young people

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>should get extra votes. He is and including children. He is.

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Children are the hostage of the family. Our education system,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I feel like we say this every day,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.119
<v Speaker 2>but it needs to be said with like exclamation marks

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and underlined and highlighted and circled. Our education system is

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 2>so out of control. Yes it is. This guy is

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the most influential law voices on Earth, oh,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the most prestigious law universities in the country on the planet.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 2>And he believes the craziest thing I've ever heard.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he is something close to I doubt he is

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 3>textbook mentally ill. There are probably some plain spoken, common

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>sensical descriptions for this somebody who's gotten so swept away

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 3>by their ideology they're now completely unmoored from reality.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, getting back to his first sentence, he wants to

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>overweight the votes of young people, so the you know,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>two young people could outvote three older people or something,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>because they they're smart, they're wiser than us.

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>And indeed children children should be in charge of children's

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>lives because they know better than their parents.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, how long was that. Let's listen to that again.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot there. There is a lot there. Go ahead.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I've gotten in some hot water for proposing we consider

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 4>overweighting the votes of younger people or assigning the youngest

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 4>eligible voters proxy votes for the unrepresented children of our country.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 5>So those are edgy, why not assign them to those

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 5>children's parents. Well, because there's a divergence of interest between

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 5>parents and children, and I think it's likelier that young people,

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 5>not people who are raising families, will have the best

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 5>insight into the interests of children, whereas you if you

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 5>were awarded five. I think it's absurd to imagine that

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 5>a twenty four year old recent college graduate has a

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 5>better assessment of the interests of my own children than

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 5>I do. And I say this with all due respect

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 5>to twenty four year old recent college graduates of whom

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 5>I hope to be the parent of in nine years

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 5>or so.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I think parents generally confuse the interests of their family

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 4>with the interests of their children, and part of our goal,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I think is parents but also as a society, is

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 4>trying to make sure that children aren't the hostages of

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 4>their parents as much as we rely on parents to

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 4>raise them.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Actually makes the witticism that was partially cut off saying

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 3>experience the parents are more the hostage of the children,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 3>which is a funny thing to say. The learned professor

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 3>has no children as far as I can tell, no

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 3>way that will. I know, it's surprising, isn't it, given

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 3>his incredible insight. You know, I gotta admit I'm ed

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 3>An r uf In kidding me spot mentally, emotionally right now.

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe this guy is gainfully employed much less employed,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 3>is one of the head guys that Yales Law School.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I came across astonished. I came across that clip

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of different places being retweeted by people I like,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 2>like Joanah Goldberg said congratulations on Ross and Ross for

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 2>engaging him in the conversation. I think I want to

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>just hit him in the head with the microphone. It's like,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>you are a numbnuts. But so that thing at the

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>end distracted me. We don't want kids to be the

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 2>hostages of their parents. But that sentence before that with

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the the kids understand and their interests better than the

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>people in charge of the family or whatever it is.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>But what does that even mean? So that's that thing

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>you always talk about with college professors who think the

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 2>nuclear family is a negative. So it's an it's an

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 2>organ of oppression. So most of us the family unit is,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's kind of the highest everything. And he

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 2>thinks that gets in the way of the best interests

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 2>of the kids, which is so weird.

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I could parse more of what he said.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 3>But at this point I feel like I'm listening to

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the rantings of a madman in my uh my patience

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 3>is limited.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wouldn't be bothered really at all if he's

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>just a I don't know, he's just some online guy

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that you know, got a PhD in something weird. But

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the most important law schools in the world,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 2>or in law school in America.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's our Nobody like him should be able to

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 6>be running anything ever teaching kids, and.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 2>He's at like the highest level of it.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm not gonna I'm not gonna tell you to

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 3>say I told you so. But if any of you

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 3>thought old Joe Geddy ranting about how completely insane our

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>university systems have become, you know what, a writen apology

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 3>would be.

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Great. God, that's crazy. I know, it's crazy. Where did

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 2>we have the common sense conversation? Now or two kind

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of fits in with that. So this is a guy

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>that's got so much education that he ignores what he

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>sees around him, Because I would think that he would

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>look around him and realize that twenty one year olds

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 2>often have really distorted wrong views of the world because

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 2>of their lack of life experience, not their fault. I

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>did too, Whereas somebody who's fifty years old and has

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>had multiple jobs and raised kids and pay taxes all

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>this sort of stuff has all kinds of insights that

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>a twenty year old does not have.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 3>For instance, seen every scam political and otherwise that's come

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>down the pike and recognizes them and thinks, oh, I

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>know that one. No, a twenty something, you know, Ross

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 3>does that at one point said with all due respect

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four year old recent college graduates, And I

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 3>thought that was one of the most ironic uses of

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that phrase I've ever heard.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 2>How much respect is do them exact?

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 7>Not?

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Anyway?

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, one of the reasons I soured on academia,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 3>and it had some role in me not going to

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 3>law school, was that I realized in academia you spin

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a line of bull crap, and sometimes it's truth and

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 3>exploring science or coming to great you know, you know,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 3>realizations about humankind, but often.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just crap.

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 3>And your career depends on you reinforcing your bull crap

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent and making it more complicated, writing books

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 3>about it, selling it to other people, convincing your undergrads

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 3>having grad assistants who help you perpetuate your bull crap,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>which when if it is exposed to the real world

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>for like a day, it would wither because it's.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Crap's crap, it's crap, it's crap. That's my point precisely.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 2>And this guy.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Has spun one of the more ridiculous lines of bull

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 3>crap I've ever heard in my life. He has attained

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 3>great heights of academia. People probably tremble in his presence.

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 3>He's so important and he is completely divorced from reality.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm sure if he gives you the nod for

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>a job or a position in another college or something

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>like that, it's among the most important things that could

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>happen to you.

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh if he writes your letter of recommendation as you're

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 3>applying for law jobs, as my daughter is right now.

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Okay, here's everybody do an experiment this week

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and let your kids be in charge of everything, what

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you do, where you go, how you spend your money,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>what you eat. Then see how it goes. They know

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 2>better than you do. You a presser, get out of

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 2>their way shanty shop on shron and.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Heyetty here's your freedom loving quote of the day. Continuing

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 3>on our on and off series on Iran. This is

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>from Zippy Livney Use, a commentator on the Middle East.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Hamas does not represent the national aspirations of the Palestinians.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>It represents extreme Islamic ideas which they share with Iran,

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Hesblah and Syria. That was back when Asad Ran Sirih.

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I think I wonder when that was dated, because Sirih

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 3>has changed a great deal a former Islamist now in charge.

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Interesting question mailbagot drop us a note mail bag and

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm strong getdi dot com. Dave from South Carolina writes, yes,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Jack Trump can call it off and he did. Did

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 3>you ever stop to think that he might have a

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 3>little more info about this situation than you two chuckleheads?

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 2>And is there something wrong with not going to war? Really?

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Can I say this with the utmost affection for the

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 2>two chuckleheads?

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I agree. And a lot of Trump's critics who would say,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, he won't listen to allies and he's going

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>to start World War three. He should be happy that

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 2>he didn't pull off the biggest military operation since World

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 2>War Two, he said, And he's listening to allies. He

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>called it off because NBS and Saudi Arabia said, hey,

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>please don't do that. But the part is the crying wolf.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 2>You gotta stop crying wolf, Daves.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 3>The counterpoint would be, he started a bar fight thinking

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the other guy would back down, and when the other

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>guy didn't back down, now he's left a situation that's

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>much significantly worse in a lot of ways than it

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 3>was before and has no idea what to do with it,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>do about it.

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Rather, I am a chucklehead though.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Some folks today is Henry's topic. I was listening to

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Jerry Klower's a popular country comedian from the seventies. Jack,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Did you know Jerry Klower's act o? When I was

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 3>a little kid, he was on heel. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna say the name is vaguely familiar, but I

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 3>was more of a city boy anyway. He said, some

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 3>folks today are educated beyond their intelligence. I thought that

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 3>explains today's socialists pretty well, educated beyond their intelligence.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>That's an actual thing. That's an interesting concept, Yeah, but

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 2>it clearly is true. It's a thing. Oh yeah, yeah, absolutely.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, once you surpass somebody's level of intelligence, or sophistication,

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>skepticism maybe what would you call it, because it could

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 3>be somebody with a fourth grade education who's very, very

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 3>street smart. Once you surpass the level of somebody's skepticism

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>or intelligence, education just becomes indoctrination. You're not introducing ideas

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 3>to them, You're just imprinting ideas upon them.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And what is common sense? Has that ever been like

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 2>analytically nailed down as a part of intelligence. I don't

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>think it's one of the They talk about emotional intelligence,

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, all kinds of different musical mathematics. I've

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>never heard common sense. But that's got to be something,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>oh star.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Scholarly papers and or you know, thought provoking books on

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the topic. But not you'd think at this point in

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>our lives we would have heard a good, solid sentence

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>or two definition of common sense, like the sort of.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Person would say, you can't close prisons, not have jails,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that's nuts, right, since the dawn of man, Offer your

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 2>own make your subject line common sense in all caps.

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>If that help me see it quickly, offer your simple

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>definition of common sense, and we will reconvene perhaps tomorrow

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 3>at roughly this time, and share those with each other.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that'd be cool again.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 3>The email address is mail bag at Armstrong and getty

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Here's a great point from Alan from Rosetown.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 3>If Mayor Mumdanni's going to open up government grocery stores,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 3>think about this. And I've been thinking about this a

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 3>great deal. Inspired by another learned commentator, I heard if

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 3>eggs cost a bodega owner ninety five cents, so the

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 3>private store owner can sell them for a dollar, why

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 3>not buy them wholesale at the government store that's selling them,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 3>as Mundani claim, is at thirty percent less than the

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 3>private owner. So the bodegas just buy them at seventy

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>cents and sell them at seventy five cents. Government store

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 3>will have their shelves emptied by egg sellers. You're exactly right, Allan.

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 3>It hadn't occurred to me, and I'm a bit ashamed

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 3>of this, having studied this for a long time. There

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 3>will be hoarding and reselling because the government proposes to

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 3>artificially subsidize, to fix the price by artificially subsidizing it.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>And whenever you distort a market by doing something like that,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's price celings, maybe it's price floors. You cause

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 3>people to adjust their sales in a significant way. Well

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 3>in distort less is all right?

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. Yeah.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 3>And so whether it's bodega owners or just I'm gonna

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 3>go in there and buy every single ham at thirty percent,

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, bolow market.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Sell them in the parking lot. Exactly.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to corner the ham market and then sell

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 3>them at a modest profit in the parking lot.

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Why he wouldn't die, honey, This is only four hundred dollars.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Why didn't we make more? I ate half the ham

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>tied cornered.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 3>The market than I ate the market shown getty shop

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 3>arm showing. Jack just sent me. We were talking about

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 3>this not too long ago. This transgender player dominating Frank

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>pardon basketball. Yeah, yes, this transgender player dominating France's second

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 3>tier women's basketball league and now the WNBA is is

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 3>not out of question. I mean, he is is clearly

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 3>heading toward I mean he he's a hell of a woman.

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this woman deserves our respect. He averaged twenty

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>one points and twenty rebounds, swept Player of the Year,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Defensive Player of the Year and uh Domestic Player of

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the Year. Meeting French Player of the Year in the

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>French League after a record breaking campaign and won't rule

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 3>out a run at the WNBA, proving once again men

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 3>are better at being women than women.

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>And he got a couple of coaches in recent days

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 2>because of the whole Maga Barbie Sophie Cunningham thing. I

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>don't like that term. I just that's what they call her.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>And the coach is coming out and saying, I believe

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in inclusivity. So yeah, guys should be able to play

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 2>trans women should be able to play in a league. Okay,

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 2>you just set it out loud. Well, here he comes

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and on your bluff, Yeah, here he comes. And are

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>you not gonna sign him because would he make your

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>team better or not? Clearly yes, of course yeah, because

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>he's a man, is a very big if you don't

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 2>sign him up for your team, what's the reason?

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Exactly? And muscular too. I wish I had arms like

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 3>that woman anyway, who is a man? The idea that

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 3>that is Looney Tunes is just common sense. And we

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>were talking about common sense the other day and talking

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 3>about a definition for it, and I threw it out

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to you good people to find common sense for us.

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Thought I'd run through a handful of those. I have

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>my own, Jack, I don't know if you have one

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 3>or or could craft one. Well, just to set it

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 3>up what I've always been hearing this your whole life. Yeah,

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 3>he's book smart, but he doesn't have any common sense. Well,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard did they qualify that as one of

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the kinds of intelligence now that we've broken it down

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 3>to emotional intelligence? Or what are some of the other ones? Mathematical, spatial, musical, right,

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.719
<v Speaker 3>athletic intelligence, which is the brain communicating with the muscles.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 2>It's absolutely a form of intelligence. Is there one that's

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>just common sense? Right? Yeah?

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Such an interesting question. I'm going to kick it off

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the various attempts with our good, good old friend Paul,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 3>former colleague Paul Robbins, just one of the best people

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>we've worked with, and he's quoting from the book Being Logical,

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 3>A Guide to Good Thinking by d Q Mcinernie, which

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, but I'm going to dig into.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Common sense.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Is that homey, everyday type of reasoning which is born

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 3>out of an alert awareness of and respect for the obvious.

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 3>It is characterized by the unfailing capacity consistently to distinguish

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 3>between a cat and a kangaroo. I don't know that

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>last part, but anyway, thank you for that.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Grasping the obvious, because the reason we got into this

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>conversation was talking about how can these socialists believe these things?

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>That whatever that first phrase was, you'd think looking around you,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you'd recognize this doesn't make any sense, right, this is

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>this could never work? Yeah, right, right?

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 3>And which you know, I'm going to end with mine,

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 3>which is only ten words long. I think I kind

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 3>of correctly. My mathematical intelligence is unimpressive. Let's see how

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 3>about Ron, He says, Guys, I'll give this a shot.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Common sense the understanding of basic truisms. That's not exactly

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 3>what a truism is. But then he says, next question

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 3>would be why if some people seem to lack common sense?

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's due to either a people who see

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 3>the world as they wish it to be rather than

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 3>what is, and or ideology, social pressure, etc. Is at

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>odds and supersedes the basic truism. Yeah, I think that's

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 3>pretty You're definitely you know, Ron, what is? Sometimes you

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 3>can define something by defining the lack of it more accurately.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 3>So nice nice job there, Baljeet says, definition told me

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 3>when I was a kid. Common sense or ideas that

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 3>are so obviously true that they are commonly held by

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>a majority of people, or at least should be interesting.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 2>There is something going on there with the you cloud

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 2>so human beings. We take in all kinds of information

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 2>through our eyes and ears and reading everything like that,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>and you cloud reality with a theory either that you

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>came up with on your own or somebody put in

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 2>your head. Right, that might be it. And I've talked

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>for years about how I've known so many successful businessmen

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 2>that like, don't pay attention to the news, they don't

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 2>read books, They just like observe the world. Yeah, and

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 2>they're not clouded by all these different things. They're just

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>as what do I got to do to make this

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>business make money? People would like this, people would hate that.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 3>And I wonder if it's some of that, you know,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>the lack of common sense I might describe as trying

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 3>to put a framework on the world that doesn't fit.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 3>That's what these you know, That's why Soel has said,

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 3>and I've quted him so many times, there's some ideas

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 3>so ridiculous only an intellectual could have them. I think

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 3>that's it. They are so determined not only to put

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a framework on the world, but like an original one

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that makes them seem really really smart, and they're so

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 3>ego driven it blinds them to common sense and a

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 3>few more. Yeah, let's see. Ana Luisa writes the ability

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to deal with situations and people in a practical, clear

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 3>headed way apart from emotion, sentiment, and social pressure. That's

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 3>really good. And that's really similar to mine too, and

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 3>hold that one. Uh, let's see. Corey says the reason

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 3>common sense is the reasoning capacity to survive in a

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 3>world with no warning labels. That's that's funny, that's you

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 3>know what. That's even better than I thought it was.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't need a label to tell me if I

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 3>fall off the ladder, I'm gonna break my head.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Common sense tells me that. Wow.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Nice point, Cory, don't drink this cleaning supply. How about dawn?

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 3>Common sense equals if plus then maybe common sense is

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 3>just the ability to see if then not just if.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Like the developmental stages of realizing actions have consequences, the

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 3>lure of the socialist communist might be dan yet another

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 3>shiny if. Every time someone brings up than this, it's

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 3>an interesting thought.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 2>A couple more. That's kind of tough.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 3>To follow, Yeah, Mary and Idaho. Common sense is basic

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 3>practical wisdom. It has learned from general generational truism, sayings

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 3>and warnings. It's protect protective advice, learn from bad experiences.

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Then finally this from Brian, common sense is different for everyone.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 3>It's based on personal experience and what you've learned from

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 3>people with more experience than you, So listen to people

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 3>with more experience than you. That's just common sense, all right.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 3>I think Anna Luisis was probably my favorite. Here's the

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 3>one I cooked up. Common sense is clear perception combined

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 3>with a solid understanding of human behavior, clear perception of

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the point of not being blinded by ideology or your

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 3>hopes wishes.

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 2>And the human behavior part.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Is if somebody comes on way too friendly, way too aggressively,

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 3>common sense tells you they want something, watch out. So

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 3>emotional intelligence, clear perception plus emotional intelligence.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 2>That's common sense with a twist of lemon. What I

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 2>like the uh whoever had in there? Something about like

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 2>knowledge or information, experience and social pressure because social pressure

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>is the thing too. Clearly, some people are susceptible to

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 2>social pressure. Sending them against all of their experience, Right,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you've never had the experience of I mean, it probably

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:52.479
<v Speaker 2>had never occurred to you in your life, the idea

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 2>that boys should participate in girls' sports. Just to use

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 2>that one again, but the social pressure just overrode all

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of the common sense, other and sense stuff. Wow. Wow.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 3>So and that social fear is fear, a fear of

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 3>not being accepted. So fear blinds common sense at times,

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 3>as does hope or or wishful thinking.

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Huh.

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. Well, I hope that was even slightly helpful to anybody.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of surprised this isn't a more common conversation.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Seems to be pretty important.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would agree, I would agree. I think, you know,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 3>it's one of those we know when we see it

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 3>things common sense.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 2>But can you have too much common sense and not

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 2>enough no book smarts?

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so either.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, I don't think common sense blinds ideology

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 3>blind's common sense?

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it only goes one direction.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 3>No, In fact, I think it's common sense to learn

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>as much as you can and filter it through. Well,

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 3>that theory makes sense to me. That is crap. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 3>A word from our friends at blue Collar Dollar. You're

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>a hard work or you're a saver, you're you're the

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of person that makes America great, and you're a

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 3>practical person, and you want to talk to somebody who

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 3>gets you in your lifestyle and talk to you them

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 3>about finance and investment and retirement. And we'd like to

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 3>introduce you to blue Collar Dollar.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, regular hard working men and women talking to and

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>a financial advisor about your financial dreams and that sort

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of stuff, with someone who understands you and your lifestyle.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>If you've saved at least five hundred thousand dollars or more,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 2>we invite you to call blue Collar Dollar for a

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>no cost consultation, no obligation. If you don't like what

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>you hear, no harm done, just move on.

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 3>They talk with you, never at you from your mobile phone.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Just to get acquainted, Dial pound two fifteen and when

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you're prompted, say the keywords blue Collar Dollar once again

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>on your mobile phone, dial pound two fifty and say

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>blue Collar Dollar. Advisory surfaces offered through Talent LLC and

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 3>SEC registered investment advice marketing is conducted by its affiliated company,

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 3>blue Collar Dollar, LLC registration as an investment advisor does

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 3>not imply a certain level of skill or training. For

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 3>more important disclosures, visit blue collar dollar dot com. A

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of those disclaimers are ridiculousous, a lot of your being,

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of your blue collar sort of worker.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>People I have grown up with and better around my

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 2>whole life have more common sense than other people. Why

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 2>do you suppose that it's because it's necessary to survive?

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I think so, or having just much crap thrown at

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 2>them that clouds your common sense, because that might be

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 2>what happened to a certain extent. Going to college. Clouds

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 2>people's common sense. I think it can.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you can lose it in enthusiasm for new ideas.

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm trying to process.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Where does uh?

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Some working class guys who I was very fond of,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 3>really enjoyed talking to them, who were absolute falling for

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the Candice Owen's grift.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>A good point.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Good points because that is a grifter appealing to their

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>perception of their own common sense but twisting it for

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 3>her profit, saying come on, this doesn't connect. I mean

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 3>there's something going on here. No, you can't fool me,

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>saying hey, if you have common sense, you'll agree with me,

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 3>and as people who pride themselves on their common sense,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 3>they get yanked along by that. So I don't know

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>where that falls into our rubric or X and Y

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 3>axis or cloud of word cloud or whatever the hell

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 3>we're doing here.

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But Jack Armstrong and Joe Gaddy.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>We've decided to call this the best weekend talk show

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 2>in America. And if you like it and download Armstrong,

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you get it on demand. You got this other person

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 2>running in Wisconsin, Francesca A. Hong, who's just a what

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>is she just? A congress person there currently the front

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 2>in the Democratic primary for governor Wisconsin. Bah blah blah

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>blah bah. Anyway, she's a member of the Democratic Socialist

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of America also, and as we talked about the last

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks, and you know, their platform includes lots

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 2>of crazy crap like closing prisons and abolishing the Constitution

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and all kinds of different stuff. Anyway, she's been asked

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 2>about a number of things. She is not a smart,

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>formidable person, but she still might get the nomination. Here

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 2>she is on CNN and they got on this topic somehow.

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>You said Americans should cancel Thanksgiving. Should have done this

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>in sixteen twenty one, do you still believe that Thanksgiving

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 2>should be canceled.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm a chef and one of the first meals that

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 8>I made that was for the community when I was

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 8>sixteen was a Thanksgiving meal. Now, I always think my

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 8>hospitality background and owning a restaurant for steff in eight years,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 8>that bringing folks around the table to share conversation and

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 8>build community is always a good thing, Okay, But Thanksgiving

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 8>is also a time that's incredibly painful for many people

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 8>in our communities, and.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to make sure it is at all.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 8>Understood that there are multiple views, but views can evolve,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 8>and the position that I'm running for right now, and

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 8>I think my background as a chef will actually help

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 8>me become a better governor that's able to bring more

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 8>people to.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 2>The table, literally the Thanksgiving table. So that is being

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>highlighted by lots of Republicans because it's just it's kind

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>of funny that you wouldn't, well, she's obviously a dope.

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Anybody who who was a serious politician would find a

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 2>way to pivot out of that stupid controversy very quickly.

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Get to something anybody cares about, is what is abolishing

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving as an issue in this country ninety eight too.

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what the hell? And again it does not

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 2>exactly rise to the top one thousand issues on any

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>gallup poll of what people are caring about.

0:33:55.240 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The colonialism that's why she oppressed. The opposes it ice

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 3>colonial is.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>How about the next one in order, Michael, with tipping

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 2>being racist? I haven't heard this one.

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 7>In the service industry. We are finally having this conversation about,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, how our industry really did come from it

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 7>and kind of is rooted in white supremacy. That tipping

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 7>in itself. If we look at the history of tipping

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 7>and how racist it is and how it has kept

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 7>wages low for black people for very long time. And

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 7>if you look at tipping now, how different the scales

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 7>are in terms of who receives higher percentage of the tips

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 7>over other folks.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Wow, she's one of those people. Okay, So somebody bringing

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you food to your table at a restaurant is all

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 2>from white supremacy, and we got to do something about

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the tipping situation.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 3>In a post a few years ago, she said, I

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 3>ate two bites of my kids cheeseburger at culvers in

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Black River Falls and told him they ran out of

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 3>ice cream. But mostly I just wanted to leave because

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 3>I was on the verge of an anxiety attack. Too

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 3>many the old white people who didn't think we spoke English,

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, English something something. She is a absolutely

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 3>poster child for grievance study, miseducated, obsessed with colonialism, soft head.

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, she is not vernable. But you know, these people

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.959
<v Speaker 2>got the wind at their back because there's such a

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.919
<v Speaker 2>stiff breeze blowing towards socialism, which a lot of young

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 2>people think is the same as socializing. So that's why.

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Or they bought a great lie of communism. Right. But

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 2>one of my favorite thinkers wrote, ironically, there's a very

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 2>real possibility that Francesta Hang is such an electoral disaster

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 2>for Democrats that she sets Dems back a few years,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>but also sets the DSA back decades and devastates the

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 2>reputation of zelots like Hassan Piker. That could happen. Oh wow,

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 2>this could get This could be really good news for

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 2>people who hate socialism for getting a bigger stage and

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 2>then just getting trounced in the election. Yeah, this is

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a ongoing conundrum. It seems like in politics do you

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 2>fight to stop dangerous and or dopes from getting into office,

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 2>or do you hope that they win nominations so they

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>can discredit that ideology. I guess that's an ongoing thing.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I think if you are an American citizen who loves

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 3>this country, you fight stupid ideology every time you hear it.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a good idea too. I don't like

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>the I haven't heard of this go around, but least

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 2>few election cycles we've heard both sides do this, where

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 2>you spend money on a bad candidate or an evil

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 2>candidate to try to get them the nomination. And I

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 2>don't like that. That is playing too close with the

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 2>playing with matches.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Well yeah, and you're allowing the weed of their awful

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 3>ideas to grow and flourish. And as we've seen lately,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and I've been thinking about this a lot, the effect

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 3>of really bad ideas on young people, and how we

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 3>as a people have assumed, because we've been so successful

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and so comfortable, that the idea of radical political movements

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 3>has always been kind of just funny to us or pathetic.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 2>It's like, you know.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Upstart football leagues, you know what's going to happen. You know,

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 3>you think, wow, they're going to try that again, and

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 3>sure enough, two years later they declare bankruptcy and we're

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>all watching the NFL.

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, poor idea reality shows, right exactly.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And we have that idea about radical political movements too,

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>but if you study it around the globe and through history,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 3>you know that often they succeed and either take power,

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>millions of people die. And we are much much closer

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 3>now to this radical political movement getting the stage where

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 3>people die or certainly fortunes are lost and people are

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 3>oppressed and screwed bad. And so yeah, I don't like

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the idea of let's put some fertilizer on these weeds,

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 3>because when the time comes, we'll just mow them down.

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Careful, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.479
<v Speaker 2>We've decided to call this the best weekend talk show

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 2>in America. And if you like it and download Armstrong,

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you're Getty on demand