WEBVTT - TAAT CEO on Marijuana Legalization & CBD Cigarettes

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get over right

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>now to SETI Costarelity. He's the CEO of TAT Global Alternatives,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna talk about marijuana legalization, which is big

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. I don't think the Germans smoke pot.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>They basically it's just if you're a beer. If you

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>smell someone smoking weed in Germany, it's usually a brit

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 1>or An American living in East Berlin. But I just

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>walked up Lexington Avenue and saw a store that was

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>selling actual weed and gummies with THHC none of the

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>cb D you know, fake fakeery going on. Um there said,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is this going to sweep the nation? Is it going

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to sweep the globe and be come as normal as

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, drinking liquor. Well, first of all, thanks for

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>having me on UM. I do think that it has

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the absolute potential to do that. Um, you know, it's

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously a burgeoning category. There's there's a number of countries

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that have started to legalize it now and I think

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US, once those laws start to pass, you'll

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>likely see, um, obviously a lot more uptake in the market.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, say so, the big issue for the development

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the cannabis market in the US has been federal legalization.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And we've had a lot of states, a lot of

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>big states, including New York and New Jersey, legalize it.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So where are we in terms of federal legislation. Well,

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>think they they've tried to pass a number of these

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>laws through the House. Ultimately, you know, when when you

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of take a look at this, it's always just

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this plug a war between fear and greed. And I think,

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for as much as cannabis has been

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>elite goal federally in the US, you'd be hard pressed

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to find any American or very few Americans that haven't

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>tried it up until this point. Now, I do think

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that society as a whole is becoming a lot more

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>progressive and open to the idea. So I think it's

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of time before it does end up passing,

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>but even though certain states have legalized it, in order

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for it to really take hold, you need that federal

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>legalization so that banks can now start getting involved in

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>providing financing and really allowing these companies to generate sort

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of the capital and access to capital markets in a

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>way that they can become large organizations, which is really

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what's needed in the US if you want to see

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this market flourish. I mean, the banking issue is I

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>would say, probably the biggest in terms of growth. Right,

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>what kind of growth do you expect from from marijuana? Well,

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's again it's still a burgeoning category. And

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>when you kind of take a look at the product itself,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think in the getting a lot of people thought

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that cannabis was going to compete with tobacco um, but

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as a whole it really does. In cannabis competes more

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with alcohol given sort of the drugs that are involved.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>The CD is going to compete with alcohol. CBD, on

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, does have the ability to compete, uh

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with tobacco, which is what you know our company is

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>primarily focused on because it helps you quit smoking tobacco

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>or one well, exactly right, I think one of the

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>things that we're really proud of is that we've been

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>able to apply hemp, which is a derivative of cannabis

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have any t HC but does contain CDD.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>We've been able to figure out that when you can

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>apply CBD to a cigarette smoker, it does have a

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>high likelihood of helping them eliminate that nicotine addiction because

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>CBD in and of itself isn't addictive. It's also not psychoactive. Right,

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so when you think about the pool of smokers, which

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is immense, and a lot of people don't really understand

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>how big the tobacco market is. It's it's like the

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Mount everest of markets. Um, you know, comparatively to water,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottled water market is about two fifty billion dollars

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a year globally, Tobacco is approaching a trillion dollars a year.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>The CBD is not addictive, it's not psychoactive, and it

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't cause lung cancer. And you know, people behind you

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on the street don't hate you for it. I mean,

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>there's so many, uh, you know, there's so many arguments

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for it. My question is on the th HC side,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe this isn't you know your wheelhouse, But

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder, are we going to find out that

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a kid who smoked a ton of weed in high

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>school and college. I know a lot of kids like

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>that very very well, um ends up having some kind

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>of mental health issues later in life because I know

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of kids like that too. Well. Look, I

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think you one of the things that they're going to

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out is the regulations around the substance

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>now different than they have the regulations around alcohol. Right

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point when the cognitive factors of the

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>brain that's sort of finished developing, you know, consider these

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>substances won't have the same effect as when you consume

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>them when you're in the developmental stage. So as they

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>right as they kind of progress on on the regulatory side,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>those are the things that they're going to have to

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out. And it would probably make sense that they

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>regulate the substance similar to how they would regulate alcohol

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and put um certain age limits on when someone would

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to legally go in and buy it, Like

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't expect the three year old or ten year

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>old to want to go in and buy cannabis legally.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect a ten year old to walk into

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a store and buy a Cannabio said, he talked to

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>us about the tat cigarettes. What are they, how do they?

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>How do they work? So basically, what we've done is

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we've taken a hemp biomass and we've processed it in

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a way so that it tastes and behaves like tobacco,

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>which is fundamentally different than what other let's call it

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>hemp cigarettes in the market would have been able to

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>do because one of the key things for smokers is

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>that they want a taste profile that resembles a cigarette. Now,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>one thing I can tell you is that the number

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of smokers that exist, there's almost forty million smokers in

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the U s alone, about them have tried date. Yet

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look at the market of smokers,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the number of smokers still weighs the number of vapors

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, which tells you what to prefer delivery mechanism is. However,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I used to work at Philip Morris and

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand this quite well. You'd be hard pressed to

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>find the smoker that enjoys the factory because's a nicotine

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and when you take a look at a lot of

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the vape companies. They're trying to sell you on this

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>reduced risk element. However, they're still overly reliant on the

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>crutch of addiction in order to sell their wares, which

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is absurd reliant, that's the point. Yeah, But

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's so easy to any other product. There

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't any other product on it. If you have to

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>buy because you're addicted to it, you can buy it

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>because you like it, and there's still a market to

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>be had. So why can't we apply that similar mindset

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to tobacco and provide smokers with something that they can

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>consume by choice, not by me. And that's exactly what

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we're doing. So we've eliminated the tobacco, we've eliminated the nicotine.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We give you the same format as a cigarette, but

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>deliver CBD instead, which will still satiate a smoker the

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>same way nicotine will, but won't create an addiction. And

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that way we can give the freedom to choose to

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>smokers and they can decide you want to smoke, smoke,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to smoke, don't smoke any chance, you

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta chewing tobacco alternative can you can you help me

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>get get rid of the Copenhagen you like? You like

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to dip? I mean yes. I don't know if I

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>should say that publicly because it's kind of embarrassing, especially

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at my age, but yeah, especially if I'm at a

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>baseball game or driving a pickup truck or listen to

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>country music, I like to throw on a lip. It's

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a great it's a great alternative. Before you're looking at

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the markets here and Matt, we had that big sell

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>off on Monday, concern about growth, concern about the delta

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>variant and its impact on this economy. But boy, the

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>market recovered, to say the least, over this past four days.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh again, let's get a sense of where we

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>go from here. Brenda O'Connor joins us. She's a senior

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>vice president financial advisor UBS International, based in Miami. I believe,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if my notes are correct, we can talk about what's

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>going on down there in southern Florida, all the exodus

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from Wall Street. But Brenda, give us a sense of

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>how you because some of the conversations you had with

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>your clients this week after that big sell off on

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Monday and the subsequent rebound for the remainder of the week.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the conversations you were having. Yeah,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a pretty wild start of the week,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, when the markets traded off around two percent,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it looked pretty familiar to how and what

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw at the beginning of the pandemic. You know,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we saw the relly of the US dollar, a drop

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>in equities, a drop in oil, and an increase in

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>bond meals. And as you said, you know, this was

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly reversed on Tuesday, and we've seen markets grind fire

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout the weekend. Here we are on Friday. The SMP

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is up over sixteen percent year to date, and so,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, while some investors are concerned about the strength

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of the recovery, whether that's because of the delta variant

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or inflation, you know, for the most part are clients

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are big proponents that this recovery will stay intact. And

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we're so positive on christ As. What do you do

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>though with clients. I had dinner with a bunch of

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>traders last night who have just made so much money

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that they want to get some of it into cash

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>before this turns around. Not like it's going to turn

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>aroundy time soon. But you don't need to ride out

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the last hundred points of the S and P five hundred.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you start moving them out? No, So we're not

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>big proponents of moving to cash. I think the tactical

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>things that we've been speaking to clients this week about

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are taking profit in sectors like US tech for example.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Nasdaq was up thirty eight percent last year,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>it's up another fourteenth this year, and so this is

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity given where valuations are, where we're happy to

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>take a little profit off the table and allocated to

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>sectors that we do like. So, Bret, I think talk

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to us about how you're talking to your clients about

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>international exposure. I know that in Miami that you get

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>tends to be a nice international community, a global community

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>down there, and I'm guessing that's reflected a little bit

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in your book. How are you and your clients thinking

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>about international investment opportunities? Al Right, So we're still positive

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on equities on a whole, and you know, they're still

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>spectors of the U S market that we like, although

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do like certain parts of Asia, and

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my families aren't even looking at equities,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they're turning to things like an alternative investment. So, you know,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>these are our clients tend to have very long term

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>time horizons. They're great correlation benefits to alternative asset classes. Um.

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, investors are often rewarded for a little with

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a liquidity premium. So we've been looking at things like

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>private private real estate and private equities, specifically in the

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>secondary space. Well, luckily, some private equity firms are raising

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>some big funds right now. Carlisle raising twenties seven billion

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar fund right, Blackstone just wrapped up last year at

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty six billion dollar fund. Um. I think five d

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollars came into private equity in the first half.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of cash washing around, isn't there. Yeah, there,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there definitely is. And so there are certain parts of

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the private equity market that we maybe stay away from.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, um there are subsets like um um secondaries

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're really big fans of, and we still think

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that you can get kind of mid teen high team

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>net returns on these asset classes. And if we look

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>forward um to the next five years and we look

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at ubs as capital market assumptions, I mean those returns

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of beat what we think equities may do over

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the next three to five years or the market cycle. Brenda,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, get it. Love to get a sense of

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>how you're viewing US equities. What are some of the

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>sectors you like, because there is a little bit of

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a push and pool out there between some of the

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>folks that are saying, boy, I'm sticking with those growth names,

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the the Amazons, the apples of the world that have

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>done so well for me for such a long time.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And then there's obviously people that are you know, kind

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of rotated into the more cyclical side of the market

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and may be benefited from the some of this reopening trade.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>If you will, let me get a sense kind of

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>where you are putting your client's assets right here in

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the US. Yeah. So I'll talk about two sectors that

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>we like right now, and that's consumer discretionary and financials.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean with financials, yes, you know, the sector is

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>up twenty year to date, but we still think there's

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>upside here and that's really based on two reasons. Um.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>The first is, you know, in an interest rate increasing environment,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this um this this subset will will tend to outperform.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And then a lot of the banks that raise these

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>big provisions for loan losses are now starting to release

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>some of this capital, and we think that's gonna benefit

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>bank and financial names. The other area we're looking into

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is consumer discretionary, and this is really on the notion

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that there is just a ton of cash sitting on

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate and household balance sheets. If we look at household

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets as an example, I mean US savings as

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of disposable income is around twelve orcent. Listen,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not as high as it was earlier in the

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>pandemic at thirty five percent, but it's much higher than

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the five to seven that's the historical average. So our

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>view is as this cash continues to work its way

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>through the system, it will benefit sectors like consumer discretionary,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>anything you like in fixed income. I mean, I know, um,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to chase returns there, find returns there even um,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the further you've got the risk spectrum. Yeah, So you know,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>most of my clients view their portfolios as an overall

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>asset allocation and a diverse by portfolio. So we still

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have strategic allocations to fix income, but we tend and

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>are tending to UM stay away from that now, but

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we still have You know, I would argue ten to

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>allocated to liquidity, cash and fixed income. Hey, Brenda, thanks

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We really appreciate you taking

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the time. Brenda O'Connor, Senior vice president, Financial advisor for

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>UBS International. Her clients take a look at private equity

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>here and search for return. Since it was a suggesting

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>boy in the fix income mark with a ten year one.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Tough to find some yield out there. So some of

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the folks with longer term investment horizons putting some of

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the money to work in the private equity. And has

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned some big, big money is being raised out there

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>by some of these big funds. Now, let's talk real estate.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Cushman and Wakefield's head of head Economists and head of

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>retail research, Ken McCarthy joins us. And this is a

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>hot topic, UM hot industry, and you know, pricing on

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>at least on the retail side, the residential side, I

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>should say, has been amazing. But I have to say,

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can as I walk through UM the valley of Manhattan

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and look left and right, everything looks closed, It looks empty.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean here in our I guess Bornado building. Right,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we have no more UM anchor tenants. Home depot is gone. UH,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>container store is gone. H and M is gone and

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>no one's replaced them. So it looks really bad. How

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is it? So? Thanks very much. I don't think it's

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>as bad as it looks, you know. I think retail

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>has been challenged for a little while now because of

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>e commerce penetration, and then when COVID hit, it was

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>considered that this was going to be the end of retail,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the apocalypse. Uh. And definitely there have been some store closings,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been some movement around in where companies or retailers

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>decides to locate, but overall, the amount that's being spent

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>by consumers continues to grow. I think it's just a

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>matter of location more than anything else. You know. Many cities,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly cities like New York, which rely heavily on public transit,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have seen much slower adoption of back to work UH.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's particularly in a place like Midtown where most

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the retail is in office buildings. That's creating some challenges.

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But overall, as we look at the retail sector in

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate, it actually performed surprisingly well in the downturn,

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So I know it's interesting. I know for retail, the strategy,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the buzzword for many years has been omni channel. You know. Uh,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>an example that would be, you know, buying something online

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but picking it up at the physical store, so that

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>brings some life into a lot of the retailers in

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of the bricks and mortar. Is that a long

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>term trend? Do you think? Well? Certainly, right now the

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer is king in the retail world. Whatever the consumer wants,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>retailers are trying to get it to them. Uh, it's

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a combination. I think you're right.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Omni channel is a good way of describing it, but

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's also about um, it's about digitally native brands think

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon as an example, are now going into bricks and mortar.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's a fusion of both of those at the

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>same time. Uh, that's gonna content that's gonna lead to

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>higher demand for bricks and mortar as well. I think

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>net net consumer spending is rising, It's probably going to

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow, and as it does, the pie is

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>going to get bigger. But the question is, you know,

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how much of it is going to be e commerce?

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>How much of it is gonna be bricks and mortar

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>net net, most of it's going to be bricks and

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>mortar in terms of overall as it is today again,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as you're speaking, we're watching the SMPI extend gains to

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>set yet another intra day record high. So you know,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at least if you're invested, your wealth is rising. Companies

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>have more power in the stock market. And although a

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of debt has been taken on as we were

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, just talking um, uh with our previous guests

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>about financing costs are basically nothing. So, um, what does

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this mean for the market? Um? Is there is there

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to come in and get some deals here? Is

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there value out there? Or um, you know, is it

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fairly valued now? So? I think that's very location sensitive

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all. But second of all, I think there

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>was value. I think a lot of that has already

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>taken place. Uh that as we go forward, there the

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunities are starting to diminish a little bit. Uh. There

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>There definitely if you're an occupier, there are places you

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>can go and take advantage of softer markets. But overall,

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is probably pretty close to fairly

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>priced right now. It's a good point to keep reminding us,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that it's very location specific, and I'm

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sure can you probably have to remind people about this

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot because it is such a It's not um,

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, one solid America is very big. Um. Commercial

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>real estate is global, I'm assuming you know. And so

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's difficult for for the lay person to really

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>get that through, or for me at least to get

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that through my thick skull. Sure, now I feel the

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>same way when I walk the streets. I think this

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is the way it is everywhere, and you have to

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>step back and say, no. You know, some cities, cities

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that don't have as heavier reliance on public transity, for example,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people drive to work. They're seeing much

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>higher occupancy rates than cities that do rely on transit,

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and that affects them, you know, effects where retailer is

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 1>going to open, where they're going to go in the future,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So, as they always say, in real estate,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>it's all about location, all right, Well, my location is

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>midtown Manhattan. So here's my question, will Midtown man will

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan in general, what's the expectation within the commercial real

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>estate community, what needs to happen for this to come back,

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because the vacancy rates, as Matt mentioned, are just stunning

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to to behold, and is it just simply a question

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of they got all over the rates. So I think

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be about economic growth. That's the fundamental driver.

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We need to see more people in in the city

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>going to work in the office space. When that happens,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>then you'll see more retailers come back with them and

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>start to reopen stores that may have been shut down.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But the key thing is going to be getting more

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>people on the streets a little long run. It's a

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>good point. I went over to Chick phil A this

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>morning at six am to try and, uh, get my

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>first taste of that fast food chain. I've never been

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>there before, and um, there was a sign on the

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>window that said we're closed until later because there's no

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one here, and well then it's probably no one to

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>staff it as well. It's also a probably big issue, yeah,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know. And after that, I walk around

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and I noticed all of the deli's are just not

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>open as early as they used to. And why would

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they be because I was the only person walking around

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the streets, especially on a Friday morning. Quite frankly, I'm

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in the office. But you know, it's it's a bit

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>slow to to to pick up overall, and I think

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Um, it's going to take a while. So

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where where Where are the strong places for commercial real

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>estate right now? Well, if you look at migration, that's

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a good indicator. A lot of it is in UH

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Sun Belt. So places like Texas and Florida

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>which have UH, which recovered a little bit sooner, they're

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>also seeing faster growth in demand for office space, more

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>occupancy than we saw and driving that also is going

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we see more people moving migrating into

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Sun Belt, which is in a long term trend.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not a new trend. Um that's gonna drive demand.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna drive demand, and demand is gonna drive more occupiers,

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>whether they're retailers or or office occupiers into those areas

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to tap into that growth. All right, Ken, thanks so

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Kevin McCarthy is an economist and

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the retail research lead over at Kushman and Wakefield talking

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to us about commercial real estate and the retail side.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish we saw these vacancies and in residential real

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>estate like, especially in Westchester, that would be fantastic for me,

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately it's quite the opposite. But what a week

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been here. It was a decidedly risk off day

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, and again calls about the delta variant and

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the impact on economic growth. But boy, the markets have

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of turned it around since then. Greg Staples had

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a fixed income for the Americas for dw S Group,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which stands for in German Deutsche vert Papier Specialists and like,

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, Greg, thanks so much for joining us. Greg,

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about what you're seeing in your credit markets,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the recent trading days. You know, it's

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>actually been a pretty interesting market. We actually, we were

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty positive on credit overall. It's it's good that American

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>corporations have taken this opportunity with low interest rates and

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>tight spreads over the past year to issue to issue

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of death, and market has been receptive.

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And they strengthened their balance sheet and they pushed out maturities.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So there and it's gonna shape as we've ever seen them.

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're pretty positive on credit overall. And and now

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got the positive of grouping economic and market conditions

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>if you dig right in there, if a client comes

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and gives you some money to put to work, what

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>do you like best. Well, it's a tough market because

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the fixed income markets, with interest rates tenure at

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>one thirty and credit it spreads extremely tight. There's not

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upside here, but you are going to

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>earn some coupon interest, which is pretty decent. So we

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>like investment grade credit got to be selective. We like

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>high you'ld at the upper end of the credit spectrum,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and there are some opportunities and structured finance as well,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>like floating rate debt, because we do think that the

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>FED is going to start raising interest rates probably at

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of next year, and you do get that

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>upside as they start to move shorter term rates up. Hey, Greg,

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about just credit quality in general. It

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like with the FED being so accommodative, we the

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>credit quality has really kind of hung in there, and

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, going into this pandemic, you know, I was

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking across the high old space saying, oh boy,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>here are a lot of credits that are going to

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be at risk. Here, We're gonna see a lot of defaults.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But we really haven't have we No, And we've said

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upgrades as well. I'd say again, for

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the most part, corporations have have taken the opportunity to

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>strengthen their balance sh They've got a lot of liquidity there,

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and they pushed off maturities, meaning they refinance but prepaying

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>near term maturity debt and refinancing with longer term maturity debt.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Overall debt levels are high. Let's let's not ignore that.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>But the point is they've been refinancing with lower coupon

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as well to dept service meaning what they have to

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>actually pay on an annual basis to meet those interest payments,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately in the maturities, that's an actually pretty good shape.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So we think it's a positive. But you're not getting

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the returns um that that you'd like to I'm sure

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for for the risk. Are you getting paid for the risk?

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you're getting paid for the risk and not

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>too much more than that. And yes, you're not going

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to get the returns. It's not a situation where of course,

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the bond market you're benefiting from declining interest rates.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want a bond with a high coupon and

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>high in a high interest rate environment, and rates come down,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the price of your bond goes up, and there's where

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the return comes from. But in terms

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the current coup on the current yield right now,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be earning maybe two percent on a good

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>investment grade bond and maybe four on a on a

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>high old bond, which which isn't fantastic, but given the

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>alternatives that are available elsewhere in the marketplace, I mean,

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got cash earning virtually zero, and you know, equity

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>dividends are okay, it still it's probably not a bad

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>place to park your money. All right, talk to us

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about this Federal Reserve. How are you viewing you know,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the risk here, the tapering risk to the marketplace. It

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like the FED is, you know, doing all that

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they can to kind of communicate and signal and all

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>of that good stuff, trying to avoid a taper tantrum? Again,

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is is that kind of how you view it? Are

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>are you kind of pricing in some some risk here

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as maybe races start to tighten. Well, first off, we

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>do think that the FED is going to begin tapering,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that Powell and the rest of the

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>FED are going to try and inoculate the market as

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>much as they can by talking about it, talking about it,

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, and probably don't won't implement it until

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year call it December January, and

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>probably through a reduction in their mortgage back purchases. Initially,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>they're scared to doubt about what was what we would

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>call a taper tantrum, meaning the pulling back of that

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>quantitative using injecting a fair amount of volatility in the marketplace.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>There was an episode in two thousand and thirteen that

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was really egg on the face of of the fedback then.

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, I think, no matter what

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>they do, there was going to be volatility. I think

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>when you when you remove the biggest whale in the

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>marketplace that's been buying a hundred and twenty billion hours

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of treasuries and mortgages every month, and you start to

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>pull back from that, no matter what you think, there's

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be some volatility there. There's really not much

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you can do about it. The impacts are seen and unseen,

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's worked its way through the equity markets and

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the overall risk markets. It's a little bit like pulling

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>uh I I hate to go here, but but a

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>drug addict off the drug and there's gonna be some

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>some volatility as resolved, but there's there's no way to

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>get away from it. How important is Jackson Hole for you?

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>How important is it for you know, fixte income investors

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention in August? Well, it's obviously what they communicate,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and we think this could be the place where they

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>do start to talk about tapering. The FED meets next week,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and I know it's going to be a big item

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of discussion. We won't find it out until what they

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>really talk about until the minutes come out somewhere after that.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think there is an expectation, or at least

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a possibility that at the Jackson Hole meeting they do

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>start to grouch this tapering idea and present the framework

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for the pulling back later in the year. Just real quick, Greg,

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>at thirty seconds, where are you and your team doing

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>your work today? What we're doing in our work work?

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Are you home in the office. I'm sorry, I was

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 1>asking about that. We're in a hybrid right now, but

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we expect to be going back on a on a

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>more dedicated basis after Labor Day. Uh, three days a week,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>four days a week, and we've got some people in

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan that quite frankly want to be in five days

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>a week during studio apartments and would rather be in

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the office and out. People on the other side with

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>long commutes would be happy two days a week, but

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we're being sensitive to our employees needs and looking to

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>go back on that positive hybrid basis after labor dat

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, Greig, thanks so much for joining us. Always

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciate hearing from you, getting your thoughts on these credit

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>markets fixtae point. Yeah, I had a fixing come for

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the America's at DWS GRIP. Thanks for listening to the

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller V three

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.