WEBVTT - Breaking Points Full Election Night Audio

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Good evening, everybody. Welcome to our election live stream. We

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have an amazing show for all of you today, as

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>you can all see. I hope this is working, Crystal.

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So what do we have today? Indeed, we do a

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>few things to talk about. There will be results, of course,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>coming in all night. We'll be doing our analysis here

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with Marshall and with Kyle. We have the Counterpoints crew,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan and Emily coming in later. So we're very excited

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about that. We have reporters on the ground from Status KUP,

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>both with Team Oz in Pennsylvania and also with Team

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman in Pennsylvania. We've got great election like data geek

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>analysis from j Miles Coleman later on. So we'll be

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>tracking all of those things and more. Before we get

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to any of that, though, I have the biggest announcement

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the night, which is that for those of you

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>watching this live stream, handing out a little bit of

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a discount. That's right, premium subscription. We've got the ten

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>percent off on the premium subscription. It's the last time

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear it, I promise. Listen, guys, this is all

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>made possible because of our premium subs, many of whom

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are watching right now, what christ will just describe people

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ground having our full control room back there,

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Marshall Kyle, the Counterpoints crew. It costs a lot of

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>money and so as we gear up not only for

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this but for the future and given the imminent possible

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump announcement, if you can help us build up, it's

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>really really helps us out so much. There's a link

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in the chat and also in the description of this

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>video ten percent off on the annual which just helps

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>us so much in terms of planning. So thank you

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>all so much to the existing ones who are watching,

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and the link is there for those of you have

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the kindness in your hearts. But with that, why don't

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we kick it off? What do we know? All right?

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So first we are already getting some results out of

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Indiana and Kentucky. Their polls closed at six There aren't

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>really many competitive races there, so there isn't a lot

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to read into those results just yet. But right now

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>seven pm, there are some key states that's polls whose

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>polls just closed, including Georgia. Also Virginia which does have

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any state wide races, but does have some

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like key bell Weather races, including the district that Kyle

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and I live in at this point, so Abigail Spanberger

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that one. So we'll be keeping a close eye there.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Seven thirty we get all of North Carolina, Ohio, West Virginia,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>parts of New Hampshire, so you can see right away

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll be starting to get some election results in that

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>will start to tell us what the night is going

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to look like. Eight PM you get a whole slew

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>of states, including Florida, including Pennsylvania is At eight, you've

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>got Texas. At eight you've got New Jersey, Kansas, and Michigan,

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot others also closing at eight. Then at

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>eight thirty you get all of Arkansas. I know a

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks out there really waiting on those Arkansas

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>results with baited breath. Nine PM, no offense, Arkansas, lovely

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>staying from nine pm. We got Colorado, we got Io,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we got Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan comes in at nine, New York,

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>which Democrats have ended up being surprisingly kind of nervous about. Wisconsin,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and some of Arizona we start to get at nine,

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and at ten we get all of Arizona, all of Nevada,

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and a few other states. Oregon starts to come in

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>then as well, and then we go on from there,

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so you can see we're getting key results throughout the night.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to put in the warning that

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there have already been results of some problems in Arizona, Pennsylvania.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, in particular, we expect the results to be

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>relatively slow going. You might have an effect in some

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>of these states same as we did in twenty twenty

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>where you have like the red mirage because you now

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have such a partisan divide in terms of how voters

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>cast their ballots. So if the election day votes are

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>counted first, you may see a huge red wave that

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>then Democrats sort of eat into. You might see the reverse.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You might see the mail in ballots come in first,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in which case you might have a huge Democratic margin.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So I would just say, you know, hold tight, wait

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>until the results all come in, and we will see

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where this all ends out. Yeah, I just want to

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>reiterate that Pennsylvania, in particular, they've already come out of

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of State said we likely will not the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>results for a couple of days, which is kind of

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy if you ask me the same thing. In Arizona,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they were saying around Arizona for Nevada as well. Also,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I should remind people I actually didn't even know this.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We were doing research, which is that the Red states

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Midwest, or the Purple States, if you will,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>many of them have enacted loss Crystal where the early

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>vote is not actually allowed to be counted until today, right,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and so even though many of those votes and ballots

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>are banked, they're not allowed to count them, which would

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lead to the so called reg mirage phenomenal the year,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>same deal in twenty twenty as we had then, and

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>we went through an excruciating detail which states had which laws,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but just suffice it to say some of the key

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>states have that similar dynamic going on. Okay, So Soger

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and I on the show yesterday we gave you kind

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of our analysis of what we think is going to happen.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So I thought we could check in with our friends

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>here Cala Marshall find out what you guys think for

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the night. Marshall, since i'm you know, buiased towards this one,

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll go ahead and kick it off to you. What

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is your overall expectation. I think we all probably expect

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to take the House do you think do you

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's a huge margin. Do you think this is

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like red tsunami situation, red waves situation, or do Democrats

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow manage to cobble together their control of the Senate.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big ocean guy, but yeah, whatever, A

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>moderate tsunami is tywhoon. Yeah, moderate red tsunami. The take

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a little less hardcore than our

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>friends on like conservative Twitter are saying, yeah, but it's

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>still going to be a really devastating the term. Yeah, yeah,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? I mean, I kind of agree

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with Marshall. I will say that coming into this election

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it was weird because this was the first election where

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I really felt like I had zero intuition about which

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>way it was going to go. I remember back in

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, I was one of the people who was

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of sounding the alarm when it was clear there

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to be Hillary versus Trump, because I felt

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like he could kind of hammer away on all of

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>her weaknesses effectively. But in this race, there's just so

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>many variables that I keep bouncing around in my head.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, you think, look inflation, inflation, inflation, crime, crime, crime,

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>all the Republicans have to do is repeat that until

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of time, and then you know, effectively they

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>could win. But then on the other hand, Roe versus

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>WAD was overturned, and that's like a that's a huge deal.

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you also have, I think this pretty

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>open extremism on the right that's different from previous iterations

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>on the right because about fifty three percent of the

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican candidates either deny or question the election, and I

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think that might actually weigh on voters. And then you

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>also have what I think are some pretty significant accomplishments

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>from the Body administration from my perspective in terms of

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>my ideology, because you have student loan debt reduction, partnering

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>non violent weed defenders. You have the IRA, which, granted,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>even though I think it was a weak piece of

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>legislation overall compared to build back better, you still had

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>some great provisions in that like fifteen percent corporate minimum

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tax rate, one percent tax on stock buybacks, billions dollars

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>more for Obamacare, which will give millions more Americans health care.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So you have this like amalgamation of factors which just

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>makes it a big question mark. So I kind of

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>agree with Marshall that ultimately, if he had a gun

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to my head and said you have to pick something,

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't be agnostic when I want to be agnostic.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But what I would say is probably Republicans fifty one

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>or fifty two seats in the Senate, and they're going

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to take the House, but it's not going to be

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>as big as like the twenty ten Tea Party wave.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So Amy Walter over at cook Political actually had a

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>good in terms of the like wave terminology. She had

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a good way of breaking down the three possibilities for

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the night. So one, she said, the red tsunami, which

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is like Republicans sweep all of the toss up races,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge wave in the house. You know, they

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>gain control of the Senate quite handily, talking about something

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>like twenty ten, right analogous to twenty ten or two

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six for the Democrats. The next would be

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what she called wavy or maybe like wavesh which is

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the scenario that I think you guys are

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>laying out and that I also sort of envision, which

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is the Republicans take control of the Senate, but it's

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like just barely. They have essentially matched or

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit of an enthusiasm edge over the

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Independence break their way, but it's not overwhelming.

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And then you fall in that mark of like maybe

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty seats in terms of the House, and

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>then you have the red ripple, which is like the

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>House margins are really held down. They aren't able ultimately

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to take the Senate, or it's very close, or it's

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty to fifty again, or it comes down to a

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>runoff in Georgia, which I also think is definitely a possibility.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think those are like the realistic possibilities that

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are kind of on the table at this point. So

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we will read the tea leaves even though you're not

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to, and just let me. Let me also just

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>before I read. These exit polls oftentimes mean absolutely nothing.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>They can be inaccurate. They are also all that we

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have at this moment. Okay, so what do we have?

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And we were all looking at this it's a little

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>bit interesting. So this is from the CNN exit poles.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's what they say, feeling the way that things are

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>going in the United States. Enthusiastic five percent, satisfied, percent dissatisfied,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine percent, angry thirty four percent. What is your

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>opinion of Joe Biden as president? This is surprising, Crystal

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Approve forty five percent, disapprove fifty four percent. That is

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>much higher approval rating. That's actually for a long time

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>not bad, yep. I mean, you know, if you're president

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and you're going into the midterms,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you never want to see your approval rating underwater. But

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>forty five percent is on the higher end of what

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been getting. You know, it tells you at least

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>in the composition of this exit pole, which again you

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>should take with like a million grains of salt and

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>basically discard entirely, but at least in the composition of

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>this exit pole, they're slightly more favorable to him than

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what poles have been showing recently. And we also have

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>seen a pretty consistent trend of the Democratic Senate candidates

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>out running Joe Biden. Not so much because I mean

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>some of them I do think genuinely are good candidates.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly I would put in that category. I think

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Warnock I would put in that category as well. Fetterman

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I put in that category until he had a stroke.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But also because the Republicans nominated a bunch of psychos

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that has caused, you know, some problems for them on

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the other side. So I think that's why Democrats at

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Senate level have kind of consistently outperformed Biden's approval ratings.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So when you see him at forty five percent, if

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that was accurate, which is like again a gigantic, gigantic,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if that's word, is doing a lot of work there,

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>then if your Democrats are going, Okay, we're in the ballgame.

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>We got a shot, right, And I think, actually, I'll

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>kick it to Marshall and to Kyle on this one.

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>This is I found absolutely fascinating. Was your us hout

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>vote to quote support Biden eighteen percent, oppose Biden thirty

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>two percent, Biden not a factor forty eight percent. And

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>this also impacts one, which is that the effect of

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden's policies on the country hurting forty six, helping thirty six,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>not making a difference sixteen Did any of those numbers

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>stick out to you? For me? It was Biden not

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a factor. What do you think, Marshall? Biden not a factor?

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think to Crystal what you were saying about

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>how Biden's polls are decent actually for a president in

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this period. I think they're a little better than what

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump's were yes during the twenty eighteen mid terms. This

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>gets at the difficult of trying to read too much

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>into these election results for twenty twenty four. The second

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it becomes personal, that is going to scramble and this

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel personal right now out of a repudiation level,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at these houses and candidates, I wanted

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 1>to pick up one thing, Kyle, you said, that's interesting

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>here why it's hard to get a big narrative about

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this election, the democracy, the election integrity claims, like the

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>races where it's making an effect or not like Pennsylvania,

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Doug Mastrigano, he's probably going to lose tonight because he's

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>seen as an extreme because he is an extremist. It's

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not just like a perception. I think it's actually extreme

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on election denial issues. But Carrie Lake Arizona, if she

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, is not being punished for it.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm interested in not just like dunking on people

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>saying like, oh, why are you talking about democracies so much?

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Why does it work in certain races? And not in others.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, like if you have a theory for that, Kyle.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a theory for that. But I also

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>find it fascinating, like you do, Crystal. You bring something

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>up all the time that I think is really interesting,

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>which is what our voter is going to prioritize, like

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you aading individual candidates or just like the national mood,

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>because in this instance, those things are totally at odds,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they are completely contradictory. If you go like individual candidates,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to look at the carry Lakes, You're going

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to look at the Mastriano's, You're going to look at

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>look even odds, I would argue, and you're going to

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, I don't like that. But if you

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>just go national mood, I mean historically, and I actually

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have the numbers up here, I wanted to share this

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with you guys. Historically, it is the case that, at

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>least in recent American history, it is the case that

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you have these backlash pendulum elections. So in nineteen ninety four,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton had a forty four percent approval rating, which

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is the exact same approve rating Biden

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>has today. In the average of polls, he lost fifty

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>four seats ye had Barack Obama had a forty five

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>percent approval rating, he lost sixty three seats in twenty ten.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And then of course twenty eighteen, Trump had a forty

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>six percent approval rating and he lost forty seats. So

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing Biden with a forty four percent approval rating.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to lose as many as Bill Clinton

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>did have the exact same approval rating or is it

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be less. Part of why it could be

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>less could is because you know, I was actually on

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the ballot in twenty ten running a hopeless campaign as

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat for Congress and very conservative area in like

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the Tea Party wave year, and so I remember it

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>quite well. And it wasn't just that Republicans were super energized,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and they were. It was also that Dems were depressed.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they had so much hope for the Obama era,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and they had so much you know, they really believed

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in the sky, and they really thought that things were

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going to change in the country, was going to be transformed,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be this whole thing. And then

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>when he's a disappointment, and you know, the dreams didn't

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all come true. There was a huge depression in terms

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic vote. Democrats are very highly motivated. I

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>mean Republicans might be more motivated, and I think independence

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>seemed to at least in the most recent polls have

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>swung towards Republicans for a variety of issues. I would

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>lay that, you know, primarily in terms of the economy,

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think crime has been a part of that

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>as well. But you do have perhaps a match in

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of Democratic enthusiasm Republican enthusiasm. That's why I don't

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>know that it'll be the blowout tsunami wave that you

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>saw in You're like twenty ten. I'll tell you another

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that I was thinking about today in terms of

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>what you were just saying, Kyle, and like the candidate

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>quality question versus the national mood question. To me, the

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>House races are almost one hundred percent just national mood. Absolutely,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>people don't really pay attention to the congressional candidates. There's

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>not enough ad spending, Like you don't really know the

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ins and outs of who they are and whether you

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>like them or not, and what they've done or what

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. That to me is almost completely

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just national mood. At the Senate level, you get a

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of a sense of these people as

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>characters and as individuals, And so I could see a

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>scenario where it really is kind of a democratic blood

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bath in the House, and yet it's not quite as

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ugly a picture for them in the Senate. And that

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>really is again less attestament, I think, to any sort

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of democratic messaging or strategy or whatever. But the fact

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans have really, you know, tested the willingness of

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>voters to see how far they will go. And there

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>were some numbers out of Georgia Soccer, I don't know

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have them in front of you, exit poll

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers asking voters what they thought of herschel Walker versus

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Warnock, and they asked in particular like who shows

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>good judgment? And it was overwhelmingly like people felt like

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Warnock had much better judgment than herschel Walker does. So

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly there has been an assessment of their character. Now

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is that determinant of their vote? Nobody knows, But I

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>can see the candidate quality piece being at least somewhat

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>more significant at the Senate level than it is at

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the House lode. To me, this is the ultimate test

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of that political science study which had about a decade ago,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>which is does political quality? Does candidate quality matter at all?

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And in general overwhelmingly people continue to tell us no. Now,

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>as Ryan very aptly pointed out on the show, we

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have never had the candidates that we had of this

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>titan special sort. It's a true testry. So what you

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, I have it in front of me. Who

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>shows good judgment? For again, exit polls taken with a

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>massive grain of solid don't if it's true or not,

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's all we got. Only Warnock forty six percent

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>shows good judgment. Only Walker shows good judgment twenty eight percent,

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>both at five neither at eighteen. Another I think interesting one.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>You know in that regard around Georgia is around the

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>extreme is an issue. They're like, do you think that

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Herschel Walker is extreme or not? And in that one,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you didn't see. Sorry, it was fairly close.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It was like in front of me Warnock had actually

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was forty three percent nine percent for oh, I got

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it almost right forty four and thirty nine percent right.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So only Warnock, they've say is too extreme forty four percent,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>only Walker thirty nine neither at nine and both at five,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>which is just such an amazing testament to candidate sorry

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to partisan polarization in terms of nobody says both. It

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>really is either this guy or my guy, neither or

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I find that a little bit interesting as to whether

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it even matters or not. I mean, I think it's

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>worth going over the five thirty eight elements. So why

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>don't we go ahead, guys number two, Let's go and

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>put that up there on the screen. So we had

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the five thirty eight average polled, and what we'll put

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>up there on the screen shows it at fifty five

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to forty five. Now it's actually adjusted so that one

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>shows fifty eight to forty two. Since that actually was made,

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it is now actually at fifty nine to forty one

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their percentage chances. I think it's also

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>worth going race by race as to what the most

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>razor type ones are according to their polling average weight.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Adam Laxalt and Cortes Masso, they have a fifty one

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in one hundred in Nevada. For the audience which is watching,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Ryan and Emily will be on at that time, but

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we really are not going to know a lot on

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>term around eleven pm Eastern time, Oz Fetterman, though they

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>switched Chrystal much more in the OZ direction. Just in

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours. They have it now at

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven percent chance of Oz winning given the last

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>polls that all came in his favor. For Warnock, they

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>actually have it at sixty three percent for herschel Walker,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 1>which I found interesting. Blake Masters they have losing. They

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have a sixty six percent chance in favor of Mark Kelly.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of an interesting one. I thought it'd be. Yeah,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean curious what you think, Marshall. Something

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I floated on the show was I think the strength

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of Kerry Lake's candidacy visa v. Katie Hobbs, who is

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>just objectively like a very bad candidate, didn't do the debate,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>was hiding may actually be the saving grace for Black Masters,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>because the split ticket voting is just it's a rare

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon in the year twenty twenty two. Yeah, there's a

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of that. And I think the other thing that's

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>clear here is christ who said this Mark Kelly is

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a good Democratic candidate state like Arizona. Yeah, so you're

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just really seeing that this is where the to your point, anecdotally,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I just can't reject the candidate quality story here, but

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be the story of this year right now.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the other thing that I want to

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>just pick up on real quick, Crystal, because I think

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's important to know from people when you're talking about

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten versus twenty twenty two. The difference in twenty

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ten is like you're not with door knocking. Yeah, you're

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of having to walk around and be like, oh, like,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>here are all these things that are happening, and here's

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>why this Obama Jenit thing is actually kind of good,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of difficult to do Democrats, like I'm

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>coming from Texas, so Democrats are energized, and in weird ways,

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they're acting like they're not in control right now. So

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Democrat, you control the House, you could

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>roll a cent you control the presidency. It does not

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like that in the country right now. And if

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you're looking where the Biden administration has really struggled, it's

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the contradiction there. You both own it. But if you're

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at Supreme Court decision, if you're looking at the

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>student loan issue, the Supreme Court itself too. You don't

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're in control. So that's going to be

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>confounding variable for the next bit. Let me give you

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>guys an interesting data point on Pennsylvania, because I know

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that the polls now show that Oz is up and

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he closed the gap. I mean, there was a while

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 1>where Fetterman was way up. OZ closed the gap, and

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>now he's up at least according to the five thirty

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>eight numbers, which is like the average of the polls.

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>CBS Pennsylvania exit poll, which one of these issues mattered

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>most to your vote, Abortion is number one thirty six percent.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting behind that is inflation twenty after that. I

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was shocked by that too. I was very shocked by that. Well,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's true or not, you know, that's that's the

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>real question. I think. Let's go ahead put number six

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>up there. We've got the Pennsylvania RCP average that shows

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>us exactly what we're working with. Then why the five

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight average moved in that direction? So we have

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>RCP and five there eight there. What they show is

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that Oz in the final average is at up by

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>only point one. I mean, that's not a margin that

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you necessarily a good one. You've got plus two, plus two,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>plus three, and then you had that very strange Marris

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>poll which we talked about on our last show, Crystal,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with Fetterman up by six points. I mean, look on

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that one, I think it's difficult, which is that I

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>do tend though to come back on Biden may be

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>more important in Pennsylvania, given that he has such a

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>low approval rating. Well here is rec going well, going

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>back to like the whole candidate quality question, which is

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of central to what ultimately happens tonight, right, because

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're going by the fundamentals, the Democrats are done.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>They're toast, it's over, it's ugly. You know, Republicans are

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>winning like fifty six seats in the Senate. The only

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>reason Democrats really have a shot is because there are

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>some questions about these candidates. I mean Pennsylvania at this point,

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I at the beginning of this race, I really thought

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman was not just like an Okay can. I really

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>thought he was one of the best Democratic candidates in

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the country because he had that just natural, authentic everyman appeal.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it. The fact that he had

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a stroke really made things challenging for him. I'm in

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the debate performance it was very difficult to watch. But

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Oz is also a terrible candidate, like need we remind

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>every one of the whole crew de Tae situation and

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>how he was completely at the beginning of the campaign,

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>especially the Fetterman team did an amazing job of reminding

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>people like, this guy's a carpetbager, and he's an elitist,

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's out of touch. And even post stroke, Oz's

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>approval ratings have been abysmal, and Fetterman's have been really solid.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Like people like John Fetterman. They may have questions about

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>whether he's really up for the Senate now or not,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but they generally like John Fetterman more than they like

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>doctor Oz, So that one I sort of put as

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like a wash in terms of candidate quality. But I

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think the governor's race in Pennsylvania you're talking about, well,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what's different there versus the governor's race in Arizona. Since

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you have two extreme election deniers on the Republican ticket,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and one of them, Carry Lake, seems very likely to

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>win and the other one, Doug Mastriano, seems very likely

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to lose. There, I think candidate quality really is the

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>only thing you can point to, and in my opinion,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>candidate quality is actually more important for governor's races, which

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>tend to be somewhat less partisan. You see a place

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like Vermont elect a Republican. You see a place like

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Maryland elector Republican. You say a place like Kentucky elect

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat. So you have a bit more of voters

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>who are open to either party at the gubernatorial level,

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>because it's less about like these hard partisan who's going

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to control the Senate kind of questions. And in Mastriana,

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a very poor candidate who's also very extreme.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>In Joshapiro, who's the Democratic choice, you actually have a

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>very good candidate who has proven himself to the state

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>at a statewide level. He's taken on big corporations, he's

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>taken on big pharma, he took on the Catholic Church,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and there seems to be an awareness of that among

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the elector and I think that's part of why he's

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>had a consistent edge going into election night, and maybe

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that's something that helps Fetterman here down the stretch. On

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, to your point saga about you know,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Arizona at the gubernatorial level, Katie Hobbs, the Democrat, has

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>been very lackluster. She was very obviously too scared to

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>debate Carrie Lake. Carry Lake is crazy, but she is

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>very talented and charismatic on camera, She's, you know, a

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>television personality. She knows what she's doing. She comes across

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as very confident, and so I think in those situations,

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the only thing you can really point to there is

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you have two very different slates of candidates and candidate

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>quality situation. Great question for the panel around Fetterman, Chris,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of hinting at this. How much did the

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>peak Fetterman June to July online dunking matter. It felt

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like it really mattered at the time, so once again

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the crititay ads the brilliant memes. Did it matter at

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all or was it a wash? I think it mattered.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the substance of the dunking because

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the original argument was basically like a carpetbag argument. He's

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a carpetbagger, plus he's a massive elitist, and they kind

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of hammered away on that endlessly. But then I do

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like they sort of lost those the specific nature

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of those attacks moving forward, and then of course the stroke,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, throws a wrench into the whole thing.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I do think I do think that mattered.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But Chris, so let me ask you about Carrie Lakeby,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is you know I've been thinking about this. Is it

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really just like the charisma thing? Because the fact of

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the matter is, if you like take what she says

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and just like write it down and hand it to somebody,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>people be like, whoa, what is this? This is wild?

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But is it just like that, like you said, she's

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>good on camera, she delivers stuff. Well, is that enough?

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that really all that matters? And what does that

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>say about us? If that's the case? Donald Trump is

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States. So listen, I can't claim

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to be like really deep into the weeds of Arizona

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>politics to say for sure, if there weren't things that,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like Katie Hobbes did that piss people off other than

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not doing the debate or like that people actually like

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>about carry lakes platform, I really don't know. But from

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>at the surface level, it appears to me that the

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that she is super confident, charismatic, you know, presents

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>herself well, super comfortable on television seems to be doing

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot for her here. And just to go back

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the Oz Fetterman question of whether those dunks mattered, I

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.959
<v Speaker 1>think they really defined Oz in a very negative way

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, and he's never recovered. I mean he's

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>still I'm looking at this poll from five days ago,

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>he's underwater favorability rating upside down, only thirty five percent

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have a favorable rating of him to fifty two percent unfavorable,

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.719
<v Speaker 1>whereas Fetterman is still above water in terms of his

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>favorability rating. So to the extent that Fetterman is still

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in this fight, and you know, my prediction was that

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>ultimately Oz is actually going to pull it out. So

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I you know, on the record of saying I think

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>at this point it's probably Oz is raised to lose.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>But to the extent that Fetterman still has a shot

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in this thing, it's because people just like him more

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>than they like doctor Oz. No. I think you're absolutely correct.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You know some interesting data that we have out right

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>now on Miami Dade County. So in terms of what's

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>happening with Ron DeSantis, he is up currently by eight

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>points with sixty six percent of the votes in and

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that is the same county that he lost Crystal by

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty points just four years ago. Well, so that is

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a mett I mean, look, I don't have to tell

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>everybody about the demo graphics of Miami Dade County, but

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>just to show you about how exactly the Latino realignment,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly with Cuban immigrants and others in Florida, that is

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a stunning development. The other newsy point that I want

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to point on Arizona, this I predict is going to

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>be a big thing. I was flagging it to you earlier.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>There were reports about problems in Maricopa County about voting machines.

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The RNC right now is actually filing an emergency motion

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to extend polling hours in Maricopa County because voting machines.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>This is according to them, in over twenty five percent

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>of voting locations have experienced quote significant issues. The widespread

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>issues in election administered by Katie Hobbs are unacceptable. This

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is from RNC Chairwoman Ron McDaniel. As Republicans are flocking

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to the polls vote in person on election day, they

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>have dozens of attorneys and thousands of volunteers. So if

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it is close, I expect that to be a major flag. Well,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's ironic because it used to be that

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats were the ones that were really concerned about election

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>day issues because typically those issues were in this cities,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that today in Philadelphia and they're having

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>issues and typically, you know, it was Democratic voters who

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>are actually more likely to vote on election day. Post

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>COVID and especially post Trump, you now have this hard

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>partisan split where and this is you know, this is

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>an important factor for Republicans. Democrats have had weeks of

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>early voting to turn their people out and figure out

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>who vote and who has it. Let's get them to

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the polls and let's turn out like the ones who

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>are reluctant, et cetera, et cetera. Republicans put all of

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>their eggs now in this election day basket. So when

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>there are problems in Maricopa County, as there are always

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>issues every election somewhere in the country, they're freaking out.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And of course they're not freaking out of like oh no,

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it's they're having issues. They're freaking out of like they're

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>stealing it again and it's rigged. Of course, if the

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>results go in their favor, then suddenly it's going to

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>be all about I think they're pre pre working the

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>ground there certainly. I mean, look, we'll see in terms

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of what the actual effect on that was, it was

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>incredibly It's just my thing is with Katie Hobbs and

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>all of them is like, you knew this was coming,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, still, like what happened? Why exactly did

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty five or ten percent? I'm going to go with

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty which is what I saw from the

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actual press conference, Like how do these machines just go down?

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>You have to know that that is going to fuel

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>like a serious Priortistan problem after two years of literal

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>madness in Arizona where you had all those lawsuits and

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the fake audits and then there was actually a compromise

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>voting machines by the Republican side by the overstock billionaire,

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>which I'm going down real rabbit holes in terms of

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>my memory for the fallout from that. I do think

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a major problem, as you said, which is

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>that Pennsylvania now says that they had that problem. Then

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you also have the sorry Philadelphia had that problem Arizona.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I do expect that to be a flashpoint, but I

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>also it could disappear, like if Katie Hobbs just comes

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>out at the moment that the polls closed in Arizona

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and wins, that it'll very likely disappear. But this is

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>one I wanted to highlight for the audience because I

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>do kind of expectively see some closer results. Do you think, Marshall,

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that the election denialism will play a big role here

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in the election in terms of like day of the

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>awkward situation, which is not if Republicans wait right right?

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So I was listening to a podcast earlier to Prapp

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and pointed out that, look, Katie carry Lake is going

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to declare victory whether she wins, and that's kind of

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the datamic. Karen think, I kind of want to build up.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about this election denial issue. Look, there's

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>no conspiracy. I think that there's a large amount of

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>incompetence in these systems. But I think if we're going

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to focus on where is the threat to democratic legitimacy,

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's perfectly reasonable for people who aren't engaged

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>with politics to say, like, wait, like it doesn't feel

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like elections have always been this much of across the

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ref So I think that, but they actually have been. Yeah,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they have they been. I guess too, I mean exactly

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the hanging chads like, come on, they always because and

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's part of like part of the strength and the

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>resilience of the system is that you have each individual

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>county running these things by a bunch of volunteers, you know,

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And so of course sometimes things are going to go

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>awry thinking out about and by the way, I wanted

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to point out that the Maricopa County Twitter account is

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>throwing haymakers at everybody who's criticizing them right now. They're

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>responding to Charlie Kirk everybody and saying, like all this

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff is fall engaging in the discourse, right But I

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>also wanted to give you guys just some more specifics

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>on the election deniers, because I think these numbers are fascinating.

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So apparently sixty percent of Americans have at least one

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>election denier on the ballot. Out of five hundred and

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty two total Republican nominees running for office, one hundred

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and ninety nine fully denied the legitimacy of the twenty

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty election, sixty one still question the election. Only seventy

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seven have fully accepted the results of the twenty twenty election.

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Ninety three accepted it with reservations. And what they say,

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>at least according to five to thirty eight, is that

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you have at least one hundred are guaranteed to win,

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know it's not even competitive, including including three

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. But the more important point, in Crystal,

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you pointed this out to me earlier, is that you

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>also have in governor's races, there's two election deniers and

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>four election doubters are shoe wins. And then you have

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>probably even more importantly attorney generals and or attorney general

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and secretaries of state. There's a bunch of them as well.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Seven election deniers running there for both respectively, for both

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>secretary of State and attorneys general. So in total, fifty

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>three percent of Republicans running either question or deny the

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>election out right. So we are starting to get some

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>very very early numbers out of the state of Georgia,

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not even really worth telling you exactly what

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they are, but there is one trend that is pretty

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>clear already again into the question of candidate quality. Governor Kemp,

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>who is being challenged by Stacy Abrams again rematch there

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is outpacing Herschel Walker in his challenge to Rafael Warnock.

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So Kent feels very confident, you know obviously that he's

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>going to ultimately prevail. The polls have consistently shown him up.

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But it does show you that, you know, in Georgia,

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>even in times as sort of partisan and hardened as

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>they feel, you have a significant and potentially determinative number

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of voters who are splitting their ticket and voting for

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republican for governor and voting for the Democrat for

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. Also a reminder, in Georgia you have to

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>get over fifty percent in order to avoid a runoff.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And all of the polls leading up to election day

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have shown, you know, whether they show Walker with a

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>narrow lead or Warnock with a narrow lead, they show

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>both of them coming in under fifty percentage points. So

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it is, you know, highly possible that we

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>end up with yet another Georgia Senate run off. I

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, and Sean Trendio or Real Clear Politics

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, saying that Walker is currently is running

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in about four points behind Brian Camp. So that is

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a question of do you think that Brian camp is

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get more than fifty four percent of the

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>raw vote. So if he does, then it's possible that

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Walker could have over fifty. I generally think you're right,

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>which is that I don't see necessarily a world. But listen,

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we will see in terms of right now, like what

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the major hot story I think is, it's what I

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before on Miami Dade County and the interim numbers

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Florida. With regards to Ron DeSantis, there's

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some current numbers do look like he may win, actually

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>by almost ten percent, which is crazy when you consider

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>how he barely won the gubernatorial election against Andrew Gillum.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he almost didn't win the Republican primary until

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump came and endorse him, which is a different question

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which I think you will hear quite a bit about

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it if he does decide to run against Trump. Marco

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Rubio also, right now, we've got fifty percent of the

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>vote in so far from Florida. He's up very comfortably

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>over val Deemings. It wasn't necessarily a question in terms

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of any other races. If people are interested that have

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>only been called we're going by the ap tonight everybody

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky ran, Paul officially re elected. Okay, big surprise, Tim

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Scott officially re elected there, and then Peter Welch winning

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in Vermont. The Tim Scott one just reminds me of

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite stories around how exactly and how

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong the polls truly can be. Well, let's all remember

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Lindsey Graham in twenty twenty. Jamie Harrison was said to

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>be within just one shot. He raised over one hundred

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars only one point away. Jim Clyburn said that

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>he could pull him across the finish line. He ended

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>up winning by losing by seventeen points, which is almost

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the exact same margin as the person who ran against

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Graham six years prior. So to have nearly a

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen point wrong swing in the state of South Carolina,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we should all prepare ourselves for results like that. I've

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>rewarded him by making him dean. Yeah, that's right, they

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>rewarded him by making him the DNC chair. I'm also

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>really reminded whenever we're going to talk in the context

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in New Hampshire is Maine. I mean, we cannot forget

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins outpaced by nine points to actually finish quite

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>comfortably in the state of Maine, when she was considered

0:34:55.160 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>an absolute goner on almost every statewide pole so called

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>high quality. I was talking about this earlier today. I'm

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>actually curious, Marshall Kyle, what you guys think. Why is

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it that we seem unable to properly pull non college

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>educated whites. It is a story that is just does

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not seem solvable, like it seems at this point somebody

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would be able to properly wait some you know, formula,

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and yet since Donald Trump came on the ballot, Marshall,

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it has just not yet been possible, which is crazy

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for the people like us who have to sit here

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in prognosticators like listen, we have to bake it an

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>assumption of complete, of completely being wrong in a way

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't in modern history in a long time. Yeah,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, it's a new dynamic to politics,

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been. It's hard because very well paid, very

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>smart people have spent the last eight years it's literally

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on this issue, and it just seems like this

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>is one of those categories where we're going to have

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to just factor this in for the next, our next

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>eight years like this, this is kind of the story

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of the decade. Just how that gap between college educated

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and non college educated whites that's the center of politics

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, what do you think Kyle Well Crystal

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>was reading me earlier today, Remember the five thirty eight

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>article from Nate Silver. He was like having an identity

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>crisis and writing it down, explaining like, how do we

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>weigh this thing versus how do we weigh that thing?

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you know, how do we make it work?

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>And you know, look, the thing that really shook my

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>faith massively was that typically in modern American history, you had,

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there would be an advantage for the Democrats

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>baked into the polls. But then it was the opposite

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>in this these special elections that just happened. I think

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it was five House special elections post Dobbs correct, and

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it was the it was the exact opposite. And I

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait, what I always thought, either the polls

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>are going to be like roughly accurate, or you're gonna

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have a baked in like four point Democratic advantage. But

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>at this point, now this is my answer. Every time

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you lasted, I'm like, I don't know, I'm going off

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>gut feeling. Now it literally, I know, it is so crazy.

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's a fun data point coming out from the Stacy

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Abrams currently running behind Warnock by eight points. So the

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic dream Stacy Abrams raised, I mean tens of millions

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, became a massive star in her own right.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead. Kemp stood up to Trump. Yes, he is

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not an election denier. Correct, And it looks like he's,

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>if anything, he's being rewarded for that. You know what's funny,

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Trump. Trump actually endorsed him yesterday. To Trump. It

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>was a quiet adment. Johnny came out. It was like,

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I give Brian Kemp my support. Why we all, you

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>know what, because he's gonna win. So you see, I

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>had the better even though I literally went to the

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>state and said I would rather have Stacy as governor.

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>After it looks like he's gonna win. Trump is behind me.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say one thing about Stacy Abrams,

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>who was really built up as like this next Democratic star,

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and there were, you know, glossy profiles written for her

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington Post photo shoots and all this stuff.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Part of her mistique was that she had built this

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>voter turnout operation in Georgia. That was the whole idea

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>is like Stacy Abrams crack the code number. When Joe

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden wins Georgia by this narrow margin, and we're saying

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's because of this voter turnout machine that Stacy Abrams

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was able to put together and focused on and what

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>she did and listen, I'm not there. I don't know.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it did make a difference ultimately, but she wasn't

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>able to turn that machine on clearly in order to

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get herself sufficient votes to come close to defeating Brian Kemp.

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>It's not over yet, it's not called, but doesn't look

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>good for her when she's running so significantly behind Warnock ultimately.

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.439
<v Speaker 1>One other note on the Georgia race. This is from

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at Taniel O'Daniel Nasheniyan, who by the way, Bolts Magazine.

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You guys got to follow up support them if you can.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>They have a wonderful election cheat sheet with all of

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the ballot initiatives, everything that is at stake in this election.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>No matter they lean to the left. They focus a

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>lot on criminal justice issues, but just in terms of information,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>totally second to then, So shout out to them. But

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>he's saying that we now have an interesting data point

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 1>from Georgia, which is that the libertarian candidate is only

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>guard wondering about one point four percent. That's crazy. So

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that means that the Walker Warnock margin would have to

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be under whatever the libertarian candidate is getting in order

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to a runoff. So since the libertarian candidate

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is getting such a small proportion, that makes it less

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>likely that it is ultimately going to go to a runoff.

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>That's actually a fascinating point. Go ahead, Mark, Yeah, I

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>want to build on the on the Warnock versus Stacy

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Abraham story because if you're looking at lessons for Democrats right,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a lesson for Republicans we focus on tonight is, look,

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna have an election denier, make sure they're

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>television talent. If you're a Democrat operating in a purple

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>to red state, you need to be able to not

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the national mood. And it seems

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to me the big mistake that Stacy Abrams has consistently

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>made this is the mistake that also like nuke to

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>her vice presidential one, like brought a twenty twenty chen,

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is she feels the need to jump into the national discourse.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 1>And I don't just mean like commenting on issues, but

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>she just clearly is a national figure, and Warnock is

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>not an political figure. Same thing goes for Mark Kelly,

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing goes for Fetterman. So if you're a Democrat

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in these types of states, you need to have a personality,

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which all three of those do, but you also just

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>cannot be part of that national story. So I read

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>it just a little bit differently. I mean, I agree

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with what you're saying, but the other thing is Georgia

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>historically is a red state, and you have Warnock and

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Assoff pulled off the upset there recently. And when I

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>look at Warnock, I think he has like every excuse

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world to go full Joe Mansion in full

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Kirston cinema, and he just didn't. He's actually been like

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>a loyal vote for Biden. And I view that as

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>almost like super serving the Democratic base. So the model

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward should be for Democrats like super serve your

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>base and then maybe you'll have a shot even in

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>an off year, as opposed to trying to please everybody

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like Joe Manchin and of course most importantly manched In

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>cinema like to please their donors, but like trying to

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>portray yourself as like, oh, I'm a Maverick and I'm

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>an iconoclass and I could reach across the aisle. Sometimes

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>voters sniff that out for what it is and it's

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 1>really fake. And in the case of Warnock, he didn't

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>do that, and perhaps he's getting rewarded for that. It's possible,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. Mark Kelly is an interesting example too. He

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>basically around ninety seven percent voting record with Biden, and

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>yet like, how exactly does he maintain his credibility From

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>what I have read, Really, what it is is that

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to depart with Biden on the border, He's

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>willing to call him out locally. He grants a lot

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of interviews to the local This is where I just

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Marshall, Like how much of the whole all

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>politics is local, all politics is national. But then guys

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like Kelly exist and you're like, hey, I mean he

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>does well. I mean he didn't do particularly well in

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the debate, but like he gives interviews to like Arizona Central,

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and he makes sure that in the debate he's like

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I call on Joe Biden to like restore our board,

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't ever do that whenever he's here in Washington.

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't go up to Manu Raju and the CNN

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>cameras and we're like, I'm calling out Joe Biden here

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>right out. But he does it in his heads and

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>somehow it doesn't come across as fake. It's a very

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting story. There's something we kind of totally different topic.

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>We kind of glossed over it, right with those Miami

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Dade numbers. What happened to Florida over the past twenty years?

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>That's actually really like, it's not it's not it's not purple,

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's red. You know, it's two thousand election. That's Florida.

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a state that Democrats we're very, very quite close

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to winning two thousand and eight. Like, what what do

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys think happened Avenue, Ohio? Yeah, I mean I

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>have to think that it has a lot to do

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Latino swim swing too, Republicans. I mean, the

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dade numbers are a perfect indication of that, and

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>especially I mean the Florida Latino community. Latino community tends

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>to be more conservative because it's disproportionately in Cuban. So

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if I had to say what happened in Florida, I

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's got to be a significant part of it.

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I got one more for you too, the villages. That's

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the villages. You had all these retirees

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>moving there, and there's a lot of boomers, a lot

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of QAnon faithful down there. One of

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff. Rick Scott mister cut social Security

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>as their senator. So it's a weird state. This is like,

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the get Rick's personal profile versus how he is

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>in the state actually is again to the whole local thing.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Rick actually speaks fluent Spanish, and he made like

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve trips to Puerto Rico whenever he was running. He

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>made like Puerto Rico ad a big thing for him.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I always found that kind of fascinating. I don't know,

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious for everybody before we all jump in at

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>eight PM. A lot of DeSantis bros. Are blowing out

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about his numbers right now. So even my friend Michael

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Brennan Doherty, who generally is not one to go at this,

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>he says, quote every political professional, GOP conservative Populace is

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>going to look at these Florida numbers and want DeSantis

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>as the twenty twenty four nominee. Noah Roffman also, to

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be clear, never Trump guy, but he says, quote Donald

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump has spent the last forty eight hours loosing unprovoked

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>attacks on DeSantis. If DeSantis only response is a fifteen

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to twenty point statewide victory in Florida, I don't think

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that he needs any other What do you think, Marshall,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of this is this. You did a

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>good job of picking two people who I don't think

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>are coping. They're actually giving their they're given their real

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But these are stupid opinions, right, the notion that Republican voters,

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like the actual base of the republic voter is saying like, oh,

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>look at those fifteen to twenty per but literally no

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>one is choosing their twenty twenty Like, hey, Florida, any

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the Republican nominee in twenty twenty four is winning Florida. Yes, Like,

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the whole point of this conversation we just had.

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's not the debate. The debate and within the

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party is not like, hey, you know, can you

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>win Florida? The debate is who do we want representing us?

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And from my perspective, you talk to any actual There's

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a great tweet on this where someone said people on

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter who are standing for DeSantis right now over Trump

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are disproportioned with people who want to get jobs for

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 1>DeSantis versus like actual Republican voters. Like, talk to any

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of your family members who are Trump people. They'll say DeSantis,

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>nice guy. I like him, he can come in twenty

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, twenty thirty two. He's young. I like Trump. Yeah,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I haven't said edual debate and that Kyle has the

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>difference of it. They really go ahead privately, having like

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>several months now, it's here privately and publicly, so let's here. Look.

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, bottom line is we're looking at the reality

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of a potential indictment for Donald Trump, and not only that,

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you might also look at a conviction for Donald Trump

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>because he's got so many lawsuits. I mean I literally

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>can't even name them all, that's how many there are. Yeah,

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, you have the federal investigation in

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>DC over the top secret and classified documents. You have,

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, the civil case in New York over all

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of his fraudulent business practices, and that press commons from

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Letitia James. If you haven't seen it, go watch it

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's amazing. Like the crimes she alleges are so specific,

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there's so much detail that it's mind blowing anyway, So

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>there's all these different cases against Trump. I think an

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 1>indictment is likely. I think conviction is possible. The only

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're really relying on in granted, this is

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do, but does Merrick Garland have a pair?

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>If he has a pair and he does what he's

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do. Look, I'm very critical of the Republican

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Party and the Republican base, but you know, Chris and

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I were debating this the other day. Can Donald Trump

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>win the Republican primary from prison? I'm a hard no

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on that. I think that it would be Gavis definitely

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>not only win, he would win bigger than if he

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was in disagree. I disagree on it. One big thing

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to respond to this on we kind of had attest

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to this already, which is that when when the mar

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Lago raid happened, every single Republican who given everything you

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 1>just start to believe what you just said right, every

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>single establishment Republican in the back of their head is like, yeah,

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously not good. This is definitely bad. They

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't privately defend it, but they fell on their sports

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for heading time desatus. So when every single time they've

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>had an opportunity to implement what you've described, they haven't

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>gone for it. I do not see a word of

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Rhonda Santis gets on the debate stage and says, you

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>know what, Donald, we both You're gonna be in prison

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this time next year. You're not gonna do the nom

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>He needs to do that, don't you need to do

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Look we're talking short term, long term too. I mean,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I saw the numbers right after that raid. I saw

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that they went up for Trump. But I think it's

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a little fake in the long run, in the

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>same way that an investigation into Hillary Clinton by the

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:57.800
<v Speaker 1>FBI didn't help her in the twenty sixteen race. I

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think this helps Trump in any way, shape or four.

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think in many ways, like the chances of

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>him winning becoming president again after everything that's already gone

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>on zero. Absolutely get oubliterate everybody, by everybody, by anybody,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>by anybody, Americans. They're over it. Americans are over it.

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I get you have your little clique of thirty percent.

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>That's just absolutely psychotic for you. Great, have fun with that.

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Try winning a national election on that's not that's the problem.

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But there are real outside repeal in twenty sixteen. I

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think there are two totally different questions there. One is

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the general election. Let's put that to the side, because

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I do think if he's in prison, I think it's

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a better Republican primary electorate. They're his I mean, he's

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>announcing in like eight as it's done, and Ron de

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Santa is like he immediately vent they the moment, and

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the same thing that's going to happen. Trump is

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna then he's probably going to get indicted, and it's

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be another moment where they all have to

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>rally to him. And then what I mean, you've already

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.720
<v Speaker 1>filed for presidency and Ron DeSantis has never done anything

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>other than these little sort of like you know, subtweet

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>jabs at Trump. The minute you come directly for him,

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>it is a totally different one. Second, guys, we do

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:21.439
<v Speaker 1>have our people on standby. I'm just going to gohead

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and tell the crew. Let's go ahead and get Lewis

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ready from oz HQ. I believe because I know that

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we are there, all right, so we actually have him.

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We have him ready, all right, Let's go ahead and

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bring him in if we can. Okay, Lewis, how are

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you so? This is Louis Angels. He's the Doctor OZ event.

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for our premium SUBJT enabled to

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>be there, Lewis. Give us a sense. What's going on

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:44.839
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. You're there at Doctor oz HQ. What's

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the feeling. Poles are closing very soon? What are you seeing? Absolutely?

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me on. Guys. Excited to be here. Yep,

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm here at the Doctor OZ event. The last couple

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of days have been across the state. Came in on Saturday,

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>first thing in Pittsburgh. We headed over to the Donald

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump event that was going on there. Sunday we were

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Bernie Sanders event that was taking place in Pittsburgh.

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Monday night we were at a John Fetterman event, so

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we really, you know, talked to all sorts of people

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. May I drew the short stick

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and had to drive over from from Pittsburgh this morning

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and May the six hour checkover. But we made it. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>no problem, no problem. Holdough, I'm a little upset. I

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was expecting there to be potentially some crew to take here.

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>None yet, I hosted. If that changes, we'll play, We'll see.

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But yes, thank you. I've been saving that one. You know,

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>since you talked to voters who were clearly, you know,

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>very enthusiastic about doctor Oz, or at least voting for him,

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>very enthusiastic about Fetterman, did you see a difference in

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, how they were viewing the key issues.

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>One thing I noted from some of the coverage that

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you all at status Ku had sent us is the

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman voters talked a lot about doctor Oz's character. The

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Oz voters talked more about you know, inflation, crime, immigration.

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>They had sort of like big picture national issues in mind.

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Was that a sort of consistent theme with the voters

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that you spoke with. I would say that's fairly consistent. Yes.

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:12.479
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I noted that I was a little

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bit surprised about, you know, from Afar looking online online,

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman looks like the campaign has tons of energy behind

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>it and everything in person, I haven't seen it as much.

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>If I'm being honest, when you compare Saturday night at

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the Trump event and the energy that was there, some

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of it, I'll be it crazy, but there's definitely an

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>energy around all of that movement still. And then you

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>compare it to on Sunday. The Bernie Sanders event that

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I was at was directly across the street from a

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>big college in Pittsburgh, dorms right across the street. There

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 1>were maybe four or five hundred people there. The park

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even close to full, and that was surprising to me.

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bernie Sanders and college students, that's his easy

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>demographic to get them over there, and they weren't showing up.

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>And then again last night at the Fetterman event, same

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of deal. It was a little bit further out

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of Pittsburgh, but the turnout was really not not what

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting. The energy was fairly low. I will

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 1>say Fetterman's speech last night was probably the best I

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>had heard him speaking so far, but unfortunately I think

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that might be a little too little, too late. That's interesting.

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's so valuable to have you on the ground.

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not something that we can really get

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a sense of you know, in the interviews and stuff

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that you were giving for us, it was a lot

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of national talk about inflation from the gopeople. Have you

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>talked to any swing voters? I'm curious, like any people.

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, let's be clear. Some people say the

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>swing voters, but then they're like, I would never vote

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for xmy life. But any actual swing voters in your estimation,

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the people who made up their mind in the

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days. What are they saying? What is

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at the top of their mind? For sure. So a

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of people that I spoke to that were interesting,

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And then a couple of folks I spoke to outside

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>while the press were waiting in line to get in

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>here today said that anecdotally they had heard this a

0:51:55.800 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>lot too. The Oz Shapiro vot exists in decent number.

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I would say, wow, yeah, yeah, and I heard again.

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I had the six hour car ride today, so I

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>listened to your show from yesterday just to see what

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you all were talking about, and I heard one of

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you at one point say that you didn't think that

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna be a thing, And I was actually surprised.

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday I've met two of them myself just on the street.

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's one thing doing interviews with people on

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 1>camera and everything. It's a whole other thing in the Uber,

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking to the hotel front desk person. And

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've learned a lot more doing that

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. I've got one good anecdote from an

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Uber driver. He was like a self described conservative, and

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he was the first person actually to tell me that

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a you know, somebody who's gonna vote for Oz.

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But to him, Mastriano was a little too out there.

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 1>He said that Oz kind of wrote the line well

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>on the issue of abortion. This gentleman was a self

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>described pro life, but he says that, you know, a

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of the Republicans running nationally have gone too far,

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and that doctor Oz is kind of, you know, written

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the more moderate line, if you will, and kind of

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>making more compromise. Maybe not moderate, it might not be

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the right word, but that he's a little bit open

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to the compromise. Okay, Yeah, very interesting stuff. Cool. Thank

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you so much. We're going to check back in with

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you later, keep us posted, stay in touch, and let

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:23.800
<v Speaker 1>us know what you were seeing there on the ground.

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Than we really appreciate it absolutely, Thank you for pleasure. Okay,

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>so I think we have the next guy who is up.

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go ahead and see control room if we good

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:36.239
<v Speaker 1>John to go at the fetterment event. All right, we're

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 1>not gonnat anything for so okay, John at the fan event.

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you, John, Welcome, Thank you. So just

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>give us a little bit of a vibes check there

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and what you have heard from voters while you're on

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground. So, uh, people haven't actually started coming into

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the the uh to hear the arena, it's mostly just

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>pressing staff. I guess they'll sell letting people in in

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes around eight. Uh. I haven't spoke with

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody outside here, but you know I was with Lewis

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this whole weekend and and yesterday. Basically a lot of

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>people are are looking forward to voting for Frediman. Haven't

0:54:23.160 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>really spoke with any odd supporters except at the Trump rally.

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You know they're not they're not as excited for Oz,

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>but you know they're going with him because Trump is

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>endorsing him, basically, got it. Uh. So you know whoever,

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 1>whoever Trump's Trump's going with, they're they're going with you know,

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, actually speak with uh some people

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:52.359
<v Speaker 1>at the health low a seconds, No problem, John, It's

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all good. Am I here, John, We're gonna we're gonna

0:54:58.080 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>check back in with you later in the night when

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>folks are arriving there and we start to get some

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:03.840
<v Speaker 1>whole results so we can see what is going on

0:55:03.880 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>there on the ground. Thank you so much for taking

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the time with us. And by the way, guys, both

0:55:08.360 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of these folks are with Status kup. They enable all

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of our on the ground reporting. Actually, you guys, Freemium

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:19.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribers enable that reminder ten percent discount. It's in the description.

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Give it ascription, but also make sure you give status

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:23.919
<v Speaker 1>kup a follow because they're doing great work and it's

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>very expensive to travel around the country and they are

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>doing that work which really benefits us and benefits the

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>entire independent media service system. Yeah, it really does help

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to have those guys. They travel all

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:37.320
<v Speaker 1>over and you know, Louis in particular finding those interviews

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and he filmed some of that stuff for us that

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we played on the show, which was really really valuable.

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So look seven fifty five, everybody, if things are going

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to close five minutes, it's interesting. Let me make it now,

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Yeah, I was going to say, let me

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:53.720
<v Speaker 1>give you the numbers where they're at with a small

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the vote in, which means these numbers are

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>not representative of the entire state. But I just want

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to give you a little bit of a sense of

0:56:00.760 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>where things are right now early in the night. So

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>if we look at Florida, which actually, according to New

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:09.839
<v Speaker 1>York Times, has seventy one percent of votes in, so, yeah,

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>decent percentage of the state. And I'm just talking Senate

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, Rubio is up on val Deming's fifty five

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to forty four. I'd say that's roughly in the ballpark

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of what we're kind of expected there. Over in Georgia

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, you only have twenty two percent of the

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 1>vote in, so that is still extremely early. So these

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers will definitely change, will definitely tighten up. But you've

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:32.359
<v Speaker 1>got Warnock at fifty eight percent to herschel Walker at

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 1>forty percent. That again is with according to the New

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.840
<v Speaker 1>York Times, twenty two percent of the vote in. You

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have in North Carolina the Democrat. This is with forty

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the vote in. Not sure what parts

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the state but again these numbers will definitely change.

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>You have the Democrat Sherry Beasley up fifty five percent

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to Ted Budd forty three percent. Hashtag stop the count.

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Over in Ohio you have just six percent in and

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 1>again Tim Ryan up sixty two. JD Vans thirty eight

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>very early, definitely going to change. And then you have

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>over in New Hampshire. This is one that Democrats got

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 1>super nervous about super late. And by the way, this

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is also a state where they decided to spend a

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money trying to make sure that a psycho

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>election denier got the nomination on the Republican side. Now

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that guy is in striking distance of actually winning a

0:57:23.560 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat. Way to go, guys. Anyway, at this point,

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Maggie Hassen does have the lead, that is, with a

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>mere ten percent of votes in. She's at sixty three

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>percent and Don Baldock election denier as at thirty five percent. Ye,

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll endorsed, by the way, that's right. What's interesting about

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Baldock is that, as I'm sayg earlier in our last show,

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>there is no early voting in New Hampshire, like, not

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 1>even close. So the election result is much more reflection

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the electorate today as opposed to let's say two weeks,

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. It could have some given the fact that

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>things were narrowing and moving much more in Republican direction.

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody always talks about momentum and like whether that matters

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or not. I tend to think especially less in the

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>democratic context, given mail in balloting and the way that

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the chang is generally nationally. But to have that dynamic

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in New Hampshire is pretty interesting, Marshall. And one thing

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring up that came through the correspondence.

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe we haven't talked about this. Was Trump

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a positive or a negative on the trail this year? Right?

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Because he was. He made the point that people, if

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you're at that, you know Trump show, and I think

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the way to describe it. You're definitely there for Trump,

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not for Oz. But there's a lot of controversy of

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like is Trump going to announce a few days ago?

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Is Trump starting off? It's really a big deal. So

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>where did we come to on positive or negative? I mean, oh,

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 1>my opinion is overall negative because he's the reason why

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have such poor candidates, especially walk Many of these races.

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I means is him Walker is him? Didn't he like

0:58:51.360 --> 0:58:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Masters is him? And not only that, but then when

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at the number of like Trump is stopped

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the steal. And so when you have all these election deniers,

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>people like Masterrano, I mean, there's no reason Republicans shouldn't

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be winning the Pennsylvania governor's race this year in Mastrano

0:59:08.200 --> 0:59:10.480
<v Speaker 1>very likely to lose. So when you look at the

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>way that he shaped the candidate field and made it

0:59:13.520 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>much poor quality, I think you have to say he's

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 1>an etneg to be fair, though you know, I think

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Mastriano he didn't endorse him until like two days before

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because Mostreiano was just gonna win. So it's really Trump.

0:59:24.440 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no January sixth, there is no election to stop

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the steal. So when I look at that holistically, you

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 1>have to say, like, you know, Kyle and I were

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about this Earli, you should actually make this point, Kyle,

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because I'm just stealing it from you. But right now

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a bunch of Republicans who are elected, who

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>go along with a bunch of nonsense but do not

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really believe it. You're about to have a lot of

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are actuallyable believers, right, and that's that is

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary. Yeah, I mean, I think it's they're

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in an impossible place right now because you can't really

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>win a Republican primary. You're more likely to win a

0:59:55.880 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican primary if you have Trump's acting, but then you're

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely less likely to win the general because you're not

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get the independence. You're not going to get

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the moderates, you're not going to get the normies, you're

1:00:04.280 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to get the young voters. You're not going

1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to get the women. You're not going to get them exactly.

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's the only one who's like bucking the trend. But

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, yeah, it's difficult. It's it's difficult for these candidates,

1:00:14.840 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of like, you know, a deal with

1:00:17.120 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the devil effectively, like you'll get me through the primary,

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>then I'll hit a brick wall in the general. Thanks, coach.

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what's the crazy thing is that carry? You know?

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump said today that he'll be announcing his VP pick

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>very soon. I think it's going to be Carrie Lake.

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I really do. You know he loves the one thing

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I because I was thinking about this earlier because I

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>bought that. I buy that too. I think he really

1:00:36.160 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>likes her, but he also needs her there. Yeah, you know,

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>like it's there's a it's important for him to have

1:00:43.480 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>his election denial people in place for next time around

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure it can swing in his director. I don't.

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I also don't believe him because I think of I

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>hate doing the whole like think of the apprentices. I

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think of Trump. But why would Trump declare his VP

1:00:57.320 --> 1:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>VP candidates so early? Like it should be a thing,

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It should be entertaining, There should be auditions in trouts

1:01:03.120 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and look, Carrie Lake, Carrie Lake could totally fall in

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>her face. Oh yeah, totally fall in her face. If

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there was an environment where Carrie Lake was going to succeed.

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's charismatic as how Carrie Lake against a mediocre Democrat

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>during a red tsunami election, she can get into office

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>when voters aren't purely thinking of inflations. It's not as

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>much like the governor's issue as much and totally fall flat.

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So I just I think I think Trump is not

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>true true about that. You might be right. Okay, it's

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>eight oh one pm here on the East Coast, So

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>here are the polls where they have closed Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri,

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, oh Boy Rhode Island,

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and here in Washington, d C. So, Pennsylvania,

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's going to be the one that we're all watching.

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm I really am fascinated to see

1:01:56.680 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>how it all comes out. Reminder that the Pennsylvania Secretary

1:01:59.320 --> 1:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of State has all already come out and said that

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we are not going to likely to know the results

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for several days there, So everybody hold on to your hats,

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>especially if it is as close as people are indicating

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some early vote numbers coming out some place in the Midwest.

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>They already called the race for Todd Young winning his

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>reelection in Indiana. Ohio, We've only got nine percent of

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the vote that's come in there right now. Connecticut they've

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>called the race for Richard Blumenthal. Literally the moment the

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>polls closed, they went ahead and called the race. Peter

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Welsh also News Center that we in Vermont, they went

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead and they called that for him, and then Maryland,

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Chris van Holland winning his reelection in Maryland. Basically no

1:02:36.960 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>major upset there. James got there, so they go ahead.

1:02:40.400 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you mentioned this yet, but they

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>called Florida for DeSantis and Rubio. Yes, so they did that.

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And then also, this is going back about twenty minutes

1:02:47.120 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or so, but I want to bring it up. Marjorie

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green has officially been reelected. Oh well, you know,

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question in terms that's a good example

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of these scam or it's not scam candidates.

1:02:55.680 --> 1:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>But you know, she believes, she believes. I'm not saying

1:02:58.960 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to hurt the person running a answer that raised some

1:03:01.880 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen million dollars. That's as It's like those Republicans are

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>run against AOC, we don't have a chance in hell,

1:03:07.160 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and they end up raising like twenty million. So if

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you're one of those people, don't fall for one of

1:03:10.920 --> 1:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>those ads. He was like, I'm gonna take on Margie

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green is ilhan Omar wins re election by seventy

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>three percent. People like, it's not hers. The race is

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty like your scare candidate ads with their problem.

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Marshall, no TV ads at all and she

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>almost lost the cameral sauce no republics. I'm talking about

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the oppositional candidate. It's not in the pro fair enough.

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So I have some interesting numbers out of Kentucky where

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they have an anti abortion ballot initiative. Voters are are

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>also casting ballots on So this is again from Daniel

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and Shaneyan a Bolts magazine. He says that the pro

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>choice side in Kentucky has a chance to defeat the

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>anti abortion referendum. So it's it's early, only ten percent

1:03:57.240 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting Rand Paul, who's already been declared the winner based

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on what they have been so far. But he leads

1:04:02.280 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven to forty three. But the anti abortion referendum

1:04:06.040 --> 1:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is actually down by ten points. We saw this reserve

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so huge divite. I mean that means you have a

1:04:12.600 --> 1:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>huge percentage of the kentuckt population that is like yes

1:04:15.840 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to Ran Paul, no to this anti abortion referendum. So

1:04:20.000 --> 1:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely fascinating. So let's dig in a little bit

1:04:21.840 --> 1:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to the DeSantis numbers. Everybody calling it now here guys,

1:04:24.240 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he is at fifty seven percent of the vote. Well,

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Christ at forty two. This is with seventy three

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>percent in all major networks. Everybody go ahead and calling

1:04:32.920 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>him for Ron DeSantis but leading by fifteen points, Charlie

1:04:35.840 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>crist I mean, barely winning the election by what less

1:04:38.480 --> 1:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>than point one percent something last time around against Andrew

1:04:42.360 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>gil just staer stonning. This will be one of the

1:04:45.680 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>major national stories coming out of this, no question, Marco Rubio,

1:04:49.280 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as you said, already getting declared the winner at eight PM,

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy. I mean, you know, to have Florida,

1:04:55.200 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed for my entire lifetime, Florida, Ohio. These states

1:04:59.840 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>were considered the major bell weathers. Now what is it.

1:05:02.600 --> 1:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Georgia, We're talking about Arizona, We're talking

1:05:05.280 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Midwest, places that should not be in play

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>or never were. And you know, in really the political

1:05:10.560 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>environment all of us came up really shifted. Well, I

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>mean now for Democrat. Democrats have this great way of

1:05:16.600 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>being like, oh, that's state Ohio. We don't care about

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that state anymore. Let's Obama Attle Greener. Yeah, I mean

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a red state. Forgot about that place. But yeah,

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's really shifted now they're focused more on,

1:05:28.760 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sun belt state certainly Georgia, you know,

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina was a big hope for a while. Those

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hopes have faded a little bit. But certainly Arizona is

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>new turf for for Democrats in terms of you know,

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it was not long ago where it is very difficult

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats to win in Arizona. And now you have

1:05:45.560 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly there, you know, favored. It's far from over,

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but favored to win in the state. And obviously Biden

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>won their last time around. So I mean, this is

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the political realignment. And they also got Colorado. Colorado used

1:05:58.960 --> 1:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to not be either, So there's I would say if

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I were Democrats stratis, I would not trade Ohio and Florida.

1:06:05.680 --> 1:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Colorado no offense to college. So we have our official

1:06:09.320 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>flip of the night A Charlie Chris old Sea Florida

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth District, Anna Paulina. I think she used to work

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for Turning Point. I believe I met her once or twice. Anyway,

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>she and Paulina Lena. She has officially flipped Florida thirteen.

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That is officially one gain for the Republicans in the

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives. As a reminder, everybody, it's only eight

1:06:26.960 --> 1:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>oh six, so it is really beginning to get started

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. I have a call for you. Go ahead.

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have flipped the Maryland governorship. Oh, Wes Moore will

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>be ghosts technically, but yeah, Maryland's first black governor. Yeah,

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean this was one where again, uh, going back

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to the question just Trump Helper Herd, Republicans nominated an

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>extreme candidate in Maryland. Maryland is a state that you know,

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>currently has a Republican governor. So you know, it is

1:06:53.600 --> 1:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a blue state, but it's one that has a track

1:06:55.560 --> 1:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>record of being willing to vote for Republicans for governor.

1:06:59.360 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Larry Hogan, the current governor, I

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he outright endorsed to Wes Moore, but

1:07:03.520 --> 1:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I do know he said he would not vote for

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Republican nominee. So you know, this turns a seat

1:07:09.520 --> 1:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, maybe Republicans could have contested with a

1:07:11.880 --> 1:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>different candidate into one that was just a slam dunk

1:07:14.400 --> 1:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for West One. Here's another fun game, which is by

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>how much are DeSantis and Rubio winning by? So Rubio

1:07:19.840 --> 1:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>right now is up about twelve points over val Deming's

1:07:22.840 --> 1:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. The five point thirty eight average had him

1:07:25.400 --> 1:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at twelve points leading. So that's interesting. So to consider

1:07:28.600 --> 1:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this one of the first times. Well okay, so maybe

1:07:31.320 --> 1:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we can consider this in now red states. Maybe they

1:07:34.760 --> 1:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>are getting good at calling these although Florida was pretty

1:07:37.960 --> 1:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>off in twenty twenty. If we'll all recall by add

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden up by three but Trump letting it by two.

1:07:44.120 --> 1:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's this is These are the fun things. Also

1:07:46.960 --> 1:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to look at is the margins, the actual polling average

1:07:50.040 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the day of, and it does look like both DeSantis

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and Rubio. DeSantis actually outperforming a little bit his polls.

1:07:55.440 --> 1:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They had him up by about ten. He looks to

1:07:56.920 --> 1:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be winning by almost fifteen, but Rubio dead on at

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve in Florida. That's a win actually for the polling industry,

1:08:02.840 --> 1:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I think so far, so we should celebrate some of

1:08:04.920 --> 1:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the little wins before we get on the dunks. I

1:08:07.040 --> 1:08:09.439
<v Speaker 1>do find it interesting though, I mean, just look, let's

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all let it sink in Florida's a red state. That's crazy.

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>We've also got a flip for governor of Massachusetts, which

1:08:16.600 --> 1:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>had been a Republican. Again a blue state where a

1:08:19.800 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican was governor. Now you have Democrats flip that one

1:08:22.400 --> 1:08:25.639
<v Speaker 1>as well. Similar dynamic where you had an extremist candidate

1:08:25.720 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it was nominated by the Republicans and made this an

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>easy win ultimately for the Democrats. So similar dynamic in

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts as you ultimately had in Maryland. By the way,

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what did you think of that political strategy, which you

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>can call it that where Democrats would prop up the

1:08:41.560 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more extremist Republican candidate, Because as a matter of principle,

1:08:44.960 --> 1:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a messed up thing to do because

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you're rolling the dice with these people who you admit

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>are like a threat to democracy and flat out authoritarian.

1:08:51.240 --> 1:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But like in terms of the actual strategy of it,

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it's effective, it's like I kind of

1:08:56.680 --> 1:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>see where they're coming. So it's effective with a very

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 1>very high consequence, right, Buldock WEDNESDA Night, that's going to

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>be a big, big screw up. Yeah, it's the master

1:09:04.120 --> 1:09:06.519
<v Speaker 1>one of those propped up Austrana was. So that's why

1:09:06.520 --> 1:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a mixed bag. It's one of those things where

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>if it works, yeah, it's smart strategy. If it doesn't

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>work and you end up with Baldock to the balduck

1:09:13.040 --> 1:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>literally in the United States Senate for six straight years

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, you have a serious problem. Well, and this

1:09:17.040 --> 1:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is where it's tough too, because it seems that the

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is and this is why mestern has been

1:09:22.280 --> 1:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a super hurt by the election denial issues. Governor from

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>an election denial perspective matters way more than a senator

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>because they point the secretary. Yeah, but that's the that's

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the key differentiator there. But look, I

1:09:35.720 --> 1:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think the problem with the thing that's curious the two

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of you think about this, because this is this gets

1:09:40.800 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty of like the democratic partic because Kyle, you

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>were like democrats did its like democratic like political operatives

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>did it? So like it's this weird coalitional politics where

1:09:50.000 --> 1:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you have like so, I don't think we have a

1:09:52.000 --> 1:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>big answer to this thing. But it just seems like

1:09:54.720 --> 1:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea because if you believe the election issue

1:09:57.120 --> 1:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>is a serious as you believe obvious, if if American

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>democracy is at stake, we could also believe that people

1:10:04.200 --> 1:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>would elect. Therefore I would not like fuck around and

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>find out that way. Biden's final speech, right after he'd

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>already done the one with the red lighting that freaked

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>down about whatever and said they were what did you

1:10:21.120 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>say semi fascists, Yeah, semi fascist and then he did

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the final election pitch was like democracy is on the

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ballot they did the January sixth years. I mean, if

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they believe their own rhetoric that the real dividing line

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is not even D or R left or right, it's

1:10:38.000 --> 1:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you believe in the basic tenets of democracy.

1:10:41.160 --> 1:10:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Like if you actually believe that, how do you then

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>go and like bolster a candidate like Don Bulldock or

1:10:47.280 --> 1:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania. I mean that's why I said,

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of principle, you shouldn't do it because

1:10:53.080 --> 1:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like it shows like like you're playing with fire exactly.

1:10:56.720 --> 1:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But also in terms of strategy, you can't deny that

1:10:59.320 --> 1:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they probably would have had way more wins if it

1:11:01.880 --> 1:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>was the more moderate Republicans. You know, you made that

1:11:03.560 --> 1:11:05.879
<v Speaker 1>point before. If it was Glenn Yunkin everywhere in the country,

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Democrats be screwed. Definitely, wh absolutely absolutely. Second GOP flip

1:11:10.439 --> 1:11:13.479
<v Speaker 1>of the night is in Florida seven, So Corey Mills

1:11:13.520 --> 1:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>winning there. So that's two net two right now in

1:11:15.880 --> 1:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>terms of seats, I expect many more will be coming in.

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting in order to consider the Florida results. Also,

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, so get this. Val Demings raised seventy two

1:11:26.720 --> 1:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in that race, Marco seventy two. I think

1:11:31.320 --> 1:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we should let the audience let that sink in. I

1:11:33.720 --> 1:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>remember when Beto raised twenty million, and I was like,

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy. I can't even believe that he raised twenty

1:11:39.600 --> 1:11:42.599
<v Speaker 1>million dollars like in a week, and he ended up

1:11:42.600 --> 1:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>against Ted Cruz with his competitive almost and that was

1:11:45.040 --> 1:11:48.799
<v Speaker 1>competitive within two points. I mean, that was the national story.

1:11:48.840 --> 1:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>We talked about, Crystal. You and I talked about that

1:11:50.960 --> 1:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ad nausea. Beto and Ted. We could not even believe

1:11:54.080 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money that he had in the tank.

1:11:55.800 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And val Demings now outpacing even some of those landmark

1:11:59.320 --> 1:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>campaigns of twenty eighteen in terms of dollar fundraising, very

1:12:03.880 --> 1:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>well fundraised all of these candidates, and she loses the

1:12:06.560 --> 1:12:09.479
<v Speaker 1>race at eight ZHO one. Well, I'm stunning. There is

1:12:09.520 --> 1:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a big story in this election about the amount of money.

1:12:12.200 --> 1:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It will be overwhelmingly record breaking sums spent on this

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>midterm election. One thing that you know, sort of the

1:12:20.360 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like Democratic hopium on Twitter that I saw was that

1:12:24.280 --> 1:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Democratic candidates, especially at the grassroots level, they were wildly

1:12:28.720 --> 1:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>out fundraising their Republican counterpoints, and so they were saying, look,

1:12:33.920 --> 1:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this is counterparts. So they're saying that this is an

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>indication the democratic base is more enthusiastic, and so this

1:12:39.760 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is one indicator of that ultimately. But you know, the

1:12:43.200 --> 1:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that billionaires flooded into these races is

1:12:48.560 --> 1:12:52.479
<v Speaker 1>really disturbing and really disgusting if again, you actually really

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>do care about like democracy and people having a voice

1:12:56.760 --> 1:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and not just being controlled by a bunch of billionaires.

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So I actually have this pacifics on that. Americans for

1:13:01.400 --> 1:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Tax Fairness did a report and they released it last week.

1:13:04.479 --> 1:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>New analysis finds that four hundred and sixty five billionaires

1:13:08.880 --> 1:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>had pumped eight hundred and eighty one million dollars into

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty two federal metrum elections by October. That's

1:13:14.840 --> 1:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven times more than they contributed before Citizens United

1:13:19.560 --> 1:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was decided. So back in twenty ten, those billionaires only

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>spent thirty two million on the election. Again, now it's

1:13:25.840 --> 1:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and eighty one million. Wow, that's fascinating, I

1:13:28.920 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it is. It's also funny too, because you know

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that those set are much more influenced by the hopium

1:13:34.200 --> 1:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of these many of these polls, like the val deemings

1:13:36.320 --> 1:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in them, and it's just to watch it all just

1:13:38.280 --> 1:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get flushed down the drain. Is just really stunning. Some

1:13:41.120 --> 1:13:44.479
<v Speaker 1>interesting numbers here from Miami Day, just to reiterate twenty eighteen,

1:13:44.600 --> 1:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>DeSantis won thirty nine percent twenty twenty. This was a

1:13:47.200 --> 1:13:49.519
<v Speaker 1>big story that we covered Trump at forty three percent

1:13:49.600 --> 1:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, basically near almost one hundred percent reporting desantus

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>at fifty three. So a ten point swing in the

1:13:55.640 --> 1:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>DeSantis direction away from Trump from twenty twenty to twenty

1:13:59.240 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two and a near like fifteen percent gain to

1:14:02.360 --> 1:14:05.519
<v Speaker 1>an outright majority in Miami Dade County for Disantis there

1:14:05.800 --> 1:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Latin just four years, which again really is stunning.

1:14:09.120 --> 1:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's quite a bit I'm seeing pumped out by

1:14:12.000 --> 1:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Republican elites talking about the DeSantis victory. The margin of

1:14:15.560 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>victory outlines how popular his platform is when compared to

1:14:18.120 --> 1:14:20.559
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. The Club for Growth, which is a major

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:23.519
<v Speaker 1>organization obviously battling right now with Trump, they went to

1:14:23.560 --> 1:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bat with Trump over Blake Masters, they went to sorry

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:29.439
<v Speaker 1>over JD. Vance. There was a big fight there if

1:14:29.479 --> 1:14:32.519
<v Speaker 1>we'll all recall whenever they endorsed Josh Mandel. Wow, that's

1:14:32.560 --> 1:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the name I haven't thought of in a long time.

1:14:34.880 --> 1:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank god we don't have to talk about that one tonight.

1:14:37.400 --> 1:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it highlights that there is a major war

1:14:40.560 --> 1:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>right now for the quote unquote narrative amongst Republican elites,

1:14:44.160 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of Desanta's twenty twenty four. Our respective opinions regardless,

1:14:48.439 --> 1:14:51.719
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of gop elites right now are pushing

1:14:51.880 --> 1:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>very very hard, from what I can see, the idea

1:14:54.200 --> 1:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of Haymlessen running for president. My view of this is

1:14:57.320 --> 1:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what I said on Breaking Points the other day, which

1:14:59.240 --> 1:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is like this is like the more clever version of

1:15:02.400 --> 1:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like the never Trump movement. It's like it is they think, okay, well,

1:15:06.439 --> 1:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we tried going straight up against him. Didn't work with

1:15:09.760 --> 1:15:12.559
<v Speaker 1>like people who would actually repudiate him and be critical

1:15:12.600 --> 1:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of him and like you know, call him names or

1:15:14.840 --> 1:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>what I like. That clearly failed. Liz Cheney obviously not

1:15:18.000 --> 1:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>going to work out this time. Let's go with someone

1:15:20.240 --> 1:15:22.439
<v Speaker 1>who's like trying to mimic him and trying to be

1:15:22.800 --> 1:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just like him, except for you know, maybe a little

1:15:25.000 --> 1:15:28.719
<v Speaker 1>bit less crazy and not really directly criticize him. Maybe

1:15:28.760 --> 1:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that will be the thing that will work, but ultimately,

1:15:32.080 --> 1:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you still have a working class megabase that is deeply

1:15:36.080 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>committed to Donald Trump. And they may be fine with

1:15:38.240 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Ron DeSantis, they may be okay with him, but this

1:15:41.400 --> 1:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is disproportionally. It's not one hundred percent, but it's disproportionally

1:15:45.560 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a sort of like elite, highly educated, highly online phenomenon

1:15:50.080 --> 1:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to make this guy a thing go ahead. And

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this is why I'm fascinated how the two parties and

1:15:56.400 --> 1:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>their incendiisms are different. So the Democratic Party, this is

1:16:00.280 --> 1:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>why Hillary Clinton ultimately beats Bernie this is why Joe

1:16:03.800 --> 1:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden becaus nominee. Like your average normally Democratic voter is like,

1:16:07.280 --> 1:16:11.519
<v Speaker 1>what's electability? Am I super excited by Joe Biden? No?

1:16:11.920 --> 1:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Is Hillary pass just so by date? Probably, but like

1:16:15.439 --> 1:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>she's gonna win. The Republican base is not voting for electability, right,

1:16:20.320 --> 1:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and they've ever since twenty twelve. Romney was the last

1:16:23.720 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>time the Republican Party picked their choice off of electability.

1:16:27.280 --> 1:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's just the critical difference here. And it seems

1:16:29.479 --> 1:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like the weird situation that DeSantis stands are in is

1:16:31.680 --> 1:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they're basically trying to make an argument that you would

1:16:33.800 --> 1:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>make to the Democratic Party. Right. That is funny because true,

1:16:38.360 --> 1:16:41.479
<v Speaker 1>right now, the people who are still big time supporters

1:16:41.479 --> 1:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump after everything we've seen, it is super cultish,

1:16:46.479 --> 1:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>way more cultish than any dissentist stands on Twitter. In

1:16:49.400 --> 1:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, I don't know in a sense, I don't

1:16:51.040 --> 1:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with the analysis of like, oh, we still got

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this working class base. He's got like quean On people

1:16:56.200 --> 1:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point, Like, yeah, I get thirty percent of

1:16:58.200 --> 1:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the country, I admittedly, but like that's not merely as

1:17:01.560 --> 1:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't person the base things that the election was stolen.

1:17:06.000 --> 1:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>It's an overwhelming majority. I understand that. But again the idea,

1:17:10.680 --> 1:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't buy this notion anymore, like, oh, he's got

1:17:12.920 --> 1:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this working class base, like all the two times Obama

1:17:15.160 --> 1:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>voter who flipped a Trump because his job was outsore.

1:17:17.240 --> 1:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Those people are gone. Now it's people who are trying

1:17:20.120 --> 1:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what Qwanon is saying and they're going

1:17:22.400 --> 1:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to try exact tion more votes. Okay, but there's a

1:17:29.360 --> 1:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that have happened since then, right, I mean,

1:17:31.240 --> 1:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like January sixth happened, and he's gone full authoritarian and

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>every other day he's on truth social saying put me

1:17:36.400 --> 1:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>back in or let's redo the election, good struggle, let's

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about let's talk about this though. Yeah, I don't

1:17:43.640 --> 1:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>think there's an equivalence between these two things. But narrative,

1:17:46.680 --> 1:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you've kind of seen that in the paper recently has

1:17:48.439 --> 1:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>been If you talk to a lot of like Trump

1:17:50.479 --> 1:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>voters about the extremism January sixth argument, they'll say in

1:17:53.640 --> 1:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a kind of what about his way, Well, what about

1:17:55.360 --> 1:17:58.559
<v Speaker 1>like summer twenty twenty and the riots, and actually both

1:17:58.600 --> 1:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the parties are extremists and bad, Like I just think

1:18:00.960 --> 1:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're in this weird area where it just kind of

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>washed out. I agree with you, though they say like,

1:18:04.920 --> 1:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>oh it was Antifa who did it? For like, oh

1:18:07.000 --> 1:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Antifa did it? Or I actually know was we did it?

1:18:08.880 --> 1:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But it was based They go back and forth. But

1:18:10.680 --> 1:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of making my point. It's like this weird

1:18:13.120 --> 1:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>contradictory cult that he has around him. I don't view them.

1:18:16.200 --> 1:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's like representative. Certainly not fifty one

1:18:19.120 --> 1:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the country nowhere near that. So from what

1:18:21.160 --> 1:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I well, I'll remind director in college, but I have

1:18:25.760 --> 1:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the most but the other interesting one. Actually we haven't

1:18:28.320 --> 1:18:30.519
<v Speaker 1>talked about this yet, which I found fascinating. Ahead of

1:18:30.560 --> 1:18:34.719
<v Speaker 1>congressional preference, guys number fifteen, please, this is the gender gap.

1:18:35.000 --> 1:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>This is something which actually bears a lot of discussion,

1:18:37.600 --> 1:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that it will be born out tonight,

1:18:40.280 --> 1:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>especially in those Miami Dad numbers and elsewhere. Let's just

1:18:43.400 --> 1:18:46.799
<v Speaker 1>highlight here congressional preference for those who might just be listening,

1:18:47.120 --> 1:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>men with college educated men who are college educated or more.

1:18:51.160 --> 1:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We had a D plus sixteen preference in twenty eighteen.

1:18:54.400 --> 1:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Today is R plus ten with a twenty six point

1:18:58.160 --> 1:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>shift over four years. That's insane. But then look at

1:19:02.000 --> 1:19:04.519
<v Speaker 1>it with the no degree. So basically you continue to

1:19:04.560 --> 1:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have a Republican preference R plus eight in twenty and

1:19:07.479 --> 1:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen R plus twenty now at twelve point shift. Here's

1:19:10.840 --> 1:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the crazy one though, with college educated women and Crystal.

1:19:13.240 --> 1:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>This gets to the suburban women discussion that we had previously.

1:19:16.439 --> 1:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Dems bet the House that they could try and keep

1:19:18.600 --> 1:19:21.519
<v Speaker 1>college educated women. They have it there at D plus

1:19:21.560 --> 1:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty four in twenty eighteen, now D plus thirty eight

1:19:24.520 --> 1:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>only a four point shift. And then finally women with

1:19:27.160 --> 1:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>no college degree had a D plus three preference in

1:19:29.920 --> 1:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, a D plus one preference effectively tied today

1:19:34.160 --> 1:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two with a two point shift in

1:19:36.320 --> 1:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the Republican direction. So you effectively see massive swings or

1:19:39.760 --> 1:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a tiny swing with women with no college degree, and

1:19:42.720 --> 1:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the only ground that is made up there Crystal was

1:19:45.320 --> 1:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>women with a college degree and only by four points,

1:19:48.000 --> 1:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>So really fascinating from a gender persse. I do think

1:19:50.800 --> 1:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that one of the stories we might be talking about

1:19:53.240 --> 1:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow is a huge gender devive. I think we may

1:19:55.840 --> 1:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>see a massive because you know, ultimately, you know, the

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the country is sort of living in these separate media ecosystems,

1:20:03.600 --> 1:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>separate bubbles. They're experiencing this election in like totally different ways.

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>The issues that they're concerned about, that they're voting on

1:20:11.400 --> 1:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are completely separate. The way they're thinking about these issues.

1:20:14.320 --> 1:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it really is almost like the countries on

1:20:16.960 --> 1:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>two parallel tracks. And it does seem like, you know,

1:20:20.920 --> 1:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>the Row versus Wade being overturned, the DABS decision that

1:20:25.600 --> 1:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>also helped to set women in general and men in

1:20:28.800 --> 1:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>general on sort of a different track in terms of

1:20:30.920 --> 1:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>how they were viewing this election. Listen. I mean, it

1:20:33.479 --> 1:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. If you're a woman, this

1:20:35.720 --> 1:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>feels a lot more direct, a lot more personal. You

1:20:38.160 --> 1:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have like more just like directly at stake in terms

1:20:41.000 --> 1:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the decision. Of course, there's long been a widening

1:20:44.200 --> 1:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>jender divide, with Democrats doing better with women in general

1:20:47.479 --> 1:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans doing better with men in general. But I

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>do think it will be probably particularly stark in this election. Well,

1:20:53.680 --> 1:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one quick thing and this is this is like a

1:20:57.120 --> 1:21:00.599
<v Speaker 1>policy endorsement, but it was a course correction the Republicans

1:21:00.640 --> 1:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>pulled off, like the abortion rhetoric Lake Masters, June twenty

1:21:05.160 --> 1:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Once it's clear how devastating the abortion decision

1:21:09.000 --> 1:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was for Republicans in those Kansas referendums, deletes the you know,

1:21:13.040 --> 1:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>National Abortion Band from webs right Republicans, and it's kind

1:21:18.320 --> 1:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of interesting that the pro life movement was this forgetting.

1:21:21.080 --> 1:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It shows how calculating this was, Like the pro life

1:21:22.880 --> 1:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>movement forgave Republicans really dialing back where they went, trying

1:21:27.800 --> 1:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to turn the debate into like democrats of the real

1:21:29.680 --> 1:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>extremists un abortion. So that was a that was a

1:21:32.000 --> 1:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that could have gone a different direction. I mean, it's

1:21:34.160 --> 1:21:36.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of test case here. It's honestly a sign of

1:21:36.600 --> 1:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of political maturity in the pro life movement, because

1:21:40.120 --> 1:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately they, I mean, they have been building this machine

1:21:46.280 --> 1:21:49.559
<v Speaker 1>for decades. They had their eyes on the prize. They

1:21:49.640 --> 1:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>knew this was going to be one or loss at

1:21:51.800 --> 1:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. They created an entire infrastructure, They made

1:21:56.600 --> 1:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the alliances of convenience with the billionaire clubs and the

1:22:00.720 --> 1:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like radical libertarian economic people in order to make this

1:22:04.880 --> 1:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>thing happen. They looked at Donald Trump and they're like,

1:22:07.840 --> 1:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this man stands for used to give too like pro

1:22:11.200 --> 1:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>life causes, used to literally give to planned parenthood. His

1:22:14.520 --> 1:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>personal life is a total catastrophe and a disaster. No

1:22:17.439 --> 1:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one would be shocked if that man is paid for

1:22:19.280 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>one or multiple abortions himself. But they said, he gave

1:22:22.720 --> 1:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>us the list, he's gonna put these nominees on the court,

1:22:25.360 --> 1:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and so am I surprised that they look at Blake

1:22:27.120 --> 1:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Masters like scrubbing his website from his previous abortion language,

1:22:29.960 --> 1:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, Eh, what are you gonna do? Ultimately,

1:22:31.960 --> 1:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to vote the way we want him to.

1:22:33.280 --> 1:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And Mark Kelly's not. No, I'm not shocked by that.

1:22:35.280 --> 1:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Pretty interesting. I still I think if they get the

1:22:38.160 --> 1:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers though, they're going to go for a national abortion bit.

1:22:41.280 --> 1:22:43.519
<v Speaker 1>This is the testiny. This is actually you know, people

1:22:43.560 --> 1:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>got pistel. Lindsay Graham introduced his band. That's true. Yeah,

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:48.519
<v Speaker 1>they know. So we actually you run in some people

1:22:48.520 --> 1:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with some people who often update us on what are

1:22:51.360 --> 1:22:53.519
<v Speaker 1>the major pro life folks paying. They were mad at

1:22:53.560 --> 1:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay because Lindsay was only capping it at fifteen Reichs.

1:22:57.160 --> 1:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>They were like, no, no, no, They're like, that's not

1:22:58.880 --> 1:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>where we're going for. I mean, look if they do,

1:23:01.600 --> 1:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if they do that, well, I mean I can just

1:23:03.840 --> 1:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>say good luck, Chrystal. Want to check in with you

1:23:06.560 --> 1:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>your district Stamburger, do we got fifty of the votes

1:23:09.840 --> 1:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>in Okay? We have a Silly Vega at fifty five

1:23:14.160 --> 1:23:16.519
<v Speaker 1>and span Burger at forty five percent. With one hundred

1:23:16.560 --> 1:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and twenty thousand votes which have been cast so far,

1:23:19.040 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>we've got what all right, So let me a margin.

1:23:21.520 --> 1:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I got to see which counties are in? Are the

1:23:23.720 --> 1:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>ones because so this district, the more you get to

1:23:27.000 --> 1:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the north, the more democratic it ultimately is. So it

1:23:30.880 --> 1:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like you've got Orange County is partially in. That's

1:23:35.000 --> 1:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a very Republican area. You've got Culpepper County, which is

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of mixed. You've got Prince William County partially in

1:23:41.880 --> 1:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a good area for Spanburger. That's about twenty eight

1:23:44.240 --> 1:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>percent in. It's still too early to say because you

1:23:46.840 --> 1:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>have some key areas down. And for example, my vote

1:23:49.920 --> 1:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in King George County has yet to be counted. Yet

1:23:52.360 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we all know it's not over. It's one I have

1:23:55.479 --> 1:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to say at the ballot box, the CIA ghoul versus

1:23:58.920 --> 1:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the cop in my district, way go ahead. Can I

1:24:01.120 --> 1:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>give you guys some early voting numbers in Crystal you

1:24:03.680 --> 1:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I were we talked about this earlier today. What's

1:24:05.880 --> 1:24:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the name of the guy, the Democratic polster Stan Greenberg?

1:24:08.880 --> 1:24:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Vonear that guy Bonyer? Yeah? So with the target smart, Yes,

1:24:12.720 --> 1:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with target smart, so he said, in early voting, the

1:24:15.400 --> 1:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Democratic advantage is eleven percent, and in twenty twenty, to

1:24:20.200 --> 1:24:23.599
<v Speaker 1>put it in perspective, it was seven percent. In twenty

1:24:23.640 --> 1:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen it was one percent. So before any of the

1:24:27.840 --> 1:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>votes that were cast today, Democrats had already built up

1:24:31.080 --> 1:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a four point four million vote lead. And that actually

1:24:34.360 --> 1:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>leads into another question I wanted to ask you guys,

1:24:35.880 --> 1:24:38.519
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about the gender gap here, do you

1:24:38.560 --> 1:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think that there's going to be a giant like age

1:24:41.200 --> 1:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>gap as well, Like, are you going to are we

1:24:43.200 --> 1:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>going to see young voters turn out for Democrats for

1:24:47.920 --> 1:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons being that, you know, Biden did

1:24:50.400 --> 1:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the student loan debt reduction which ninety percent of the

1:24:53.120 --> 1:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>people impacted make seventy five thousand dollars year or less.

1:24:55.960 --> 1:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see basically like politically Biden the

1:24:58.479 --> 1:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats getting rewarded for what they did. There. So the

1:25:01.240 --> 1:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>only indication that I've seen yet and because remember that

1:25:03.920 --> 1:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>detailed breakdown doesn't come until sometimes even weeks later, was

1:25:07.200 --> 1:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>John Rawlson was looking at this in terms of Clark

1:25:10.040 --> 1:25:13.559
<v Speaker 1>County and Nevada. He said, actually, the younger voters between

1:25:13.600 --> 1:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>eighteen and twenty five were not showing up at all,

1:25:15.520 --> 1:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like almost wow. Only at one point you land like

1:25:18.400 --> 1:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a thousand votes even come in in that age group,

1:25:21.240 --> 1:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>which is he said, you know, this just shows you

1:25:23.439 --> 1:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>young people not showing up to vote. Again, that was Nevada,

1:25:26.520 --> 1:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that was early vote. But that is the only actual

1:25:28.680 --> 1:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>demographic data that we have. Here's an interesting one Washington

1:25:32.120 --> 1:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Post exit polls from a couple of different states that

1:25:34.840 --> 1:25:38.839
<v Speaker 1>they put together New Hampshire, Georgia, and North Carolina, little

1:25:38.880 --> 1:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>perceived differences in the extremity of Republican and Democratic candidates,

1:25:43.040 --> 1:25:45.719
<v Speaker 1>which gets to all of our questions around candidate quality.

1:25:45.960 --> 1:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>In Georgia, they actually verify more. We're saying that Warnock

1:25:49.439 --> 1:25:54.559
<v Speaker 1>is extreme than actually Herschel Walker, given Walker's past position

1:25:54.680 --> 1:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on abortion and obviously his own personal dalliances all being

1:25:58.040 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in the news. That just shows you a tremendous amount

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>of political polarization, which we were talking about earlier. So

1:26:03.560 --> 1:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to have little perceived differences, Kyle, this kind of gets

1:26:06.200 --> 1:26:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to the Trump question we were talking about earlier, as

1:26:08.600 --> 1:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to all the stuff which is in a level of

1:26:11.160 --> 1:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>such partisan hatred, of polarization, the other side is always

1:26:16.520 --> 1:26:19.599
<v Speaker 1>just perceived as as is extreme. And I think that

1:26:19.600 --> 1:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that Warnock number bears that out to find it really interesting.

1:26:22.560 --> 1:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So we do have some numbers very early out of

1:26:25.800 --> 1:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania five percent, and found this dude, Ryan Dido, who

1:26:32.000 --> 1:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is a reporter for Pittsburgh Paper, and he says, in

1:26:36.720 --> 1:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of how you interpret these results coming out of Pennsylvania,

1:26:40.600 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>very likely Fetterman will when vast majority of mail in's

1:26:44.400 --> 1:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going to be counted first. Then OZ is

1:26:47.080 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>going to appear to gain ground is in person votes

1:26:49.040 --> 1:26:51.599
<v Speaker 1>are counted, and then fetter Men will appear to gain

1:26:51.640 --> 1:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>some ground with late arriving mail ins. So just in

1:26:54.720 --> 1:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of how you're viewing these numbers as they're coming in,

1:26:59.320 --> 1:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to keep those dynamics in mind, not

1:27:02.320 --> 1:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>just in Pennsylvania but all over the map because all

1:27:05.240 --> 1:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of these states have a different different rules about how

1:27:07.840 --> 1:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and when and where what they count at what time.

1:27:10.600 --> 1:27:13.519
<v Speaker 1>So just keep that really in mind as you're taking

1:27:13.520 --> 1:27:15.559
<v Speaker 1>a look at all of this. So far, most of

1:27:15.600 --> 1:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the votes have come in from places that are, you know,

1:27:18.160 --> 1:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>more favorable to Fetterman. You've got a lot of votes

1:27:21.200 --> 1:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in from Philly, you got a lot of vote votes

1:27:22.880 --> 1:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in from Pittsburgh. And it is also that you know,

1:27:26.240 --> 1:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>early the mail in ballot so far, so very favorable

1:27:29.720 --> 1:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>results right now for Fetterman. But it's five percent in

1:27:32.040 --> 1:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's mostly the mail in vote, so you literally

1:27:33.840 --> 1:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>have them right now at eighty five percent. It's I

1:27:36.439 --> 1:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to end up being an eighty

1:27:38.439 --> 1:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>five percent kind of a that's really good context there

1:27:42.880 --> 1:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for the swing, so we could see a swing fatter Man,

1:27:44.840 --> 1:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>then back to us, then maybe back to Fatterman. I mean,

1:27:47.760 --> 1:27:50.559
<v Speaker 1>that's just I just really want everybody to be patient

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and not like read anything nefarious into these vote totals

1:27:55.160 --> 1:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>changing because it's predictable because Republicans have made it a

1:27:57.960 --> 1:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy strategy of like we are going to have our

1:28:00.960 --> 1:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>voters go to the polls on election day. There is

1:28:03.960 --> 1:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a hard partisan divide between how the parties are approaching

1:28:07.000 --> 1:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these elections, and so that's why you may see some

1:28:10.400 --> 1:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of wild swings of these vote totals throughout the night.

1:28:12.720 --> 1:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And why frankly, like when you look at a lot

1:28:14.360 --> 1:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of these states that we expect to end up being close.

1:28:17.960 --> 1:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right now, the Democrats are up in New Hampshire,

1:28:21.160 --> 1:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>They're up in North Carolina, They're up in Georgia, they're

1:28:23.280 --> 1:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up in Pennsylvania, they're up in Ohio. But again, this

1:28:27.200 --> 1:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is the probably and most if not all of those

1:28:29.840 --> 1:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>places the early mailand vote, which we expect to be

1:28:32.880 --> 1:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly Democratics. So I wouldn't read too much into any

1:28:35.400 --> 1:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, And to your point, usually they'll like

1:28:38.760 --> 1:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll count all of the ones from election day and

1:28:41.160 --> 1:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>then at the end more mailands like you said, so

1:28:42.960 --> 1:28:44.679
<v Speaker 1>this is why they say. There was an article earlier

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:48.559
<v Speaker 1>today in ABC talking about there were three states in

1:28:48.600 --> 1:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>particular that they say a red mirage scenario could happen.

1:28:51.400 --> 1:28:53.679
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, Look, I think we're going to see people

1:28:53.720 --> 1:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>out there making all sorts of bad claims when they say, oh,

1:28:59.200 --> 1:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>why why is the Democrat coming back now that it's

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>two days later and there's nothing to fairies about it.

1:29:03.200 --> 1:29:05.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're saying it beforehand, just like you know

1:29:05.439 --> 1:29:08.639
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty twenty election, when I was on Joe

1:29:08.720 --> 1:29:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Rogan Show with Tim Dillon, I was telling them up front, like, look, man,

1:29:11.640 --> 1:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this is what's going to happen. And Joe says, now,

1:29:14.320 --> 1:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like the only reason he didn't end up going down

1:29:16.240 --> 1:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad path with the election is because I was

1:29:18.040 --> 1:29:20.439
<v Speaker 1>there to tell him beforehand what was going to happen. This, Wow,

1:29:20.479 --> 1:29:23.439
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna unfold. Look, I know no one will heed this,

1:29:23.560 --> 1:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but can we please please just make it so that

1:29:26.320 --> 1:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we can count early votes like before the day of

1:29:29.880 --> 1:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Like so many of these state legislators across the Midwest

1:29:33.200 --> 1:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have made it so that you can't do that, I

1:29:35.400 --> 1:29:40.439
<v Speaker 1>think personally because they like the chaos. Well, because a

1:29:40.520 --> 1:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot bad for us. It's a lot of Republicans they

1:29:44.360 --> 1:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>want that passed these rules and then they like complain

1:29:47.320 --> 1:29:49.559
<v Speaker 1>about like why is it so crazy? It's like you

1:29:49.640 --> 1:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>literally made this rule, Like go look in the mirror.

1:29:52.520 --> 1:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>This stuff drives me insane. What's that I voted early

1:29:56.960 --> 1:30:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in person, I voted in person today, which is stand

1:30:00.439 --> 1:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>on that actual day. You're literally I literally have one

1:30:04.920 --> 1:30:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of the most least competitive districts in the country. So basically,

1:30:08.120 --> 1:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm not normally re drew all the districts

1:30:11.040 --> 1:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, and so for the rest of my entire

1:30:14.280 --> 1:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>life in King George County, it has not been in competitive,

1:30:16.800 --> 1:30:19.479
<v Speaker 1>including the race that I personally ran in, right, but

1:30:19.760 --> 1:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>now I'm in you know, the Spanburger district actually is

1:30:22.880 --> 1:30:24.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the ones that everybody's watching. That is such

1:30:24.439 --> 1:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>an amazing Like the fact that Biden's last campaign stop

1:30:27.280 --> 1:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was Ashbourne, Virginia. I just can't get over that. Like

1:30:29.720 --> 1:30:33.519
<v Speaker 1>for context audience, he won. Biden won that district by

1:30:33.680 --> 1:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen percentage points in twenty twenty, So to have to

1:30:37.240 --> 1:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>stop over there, you highlighted this a He's not that popular,

1:30:40.240 --> 1:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so most people just don't really want him in their district.

1:30:43.080 --> 1:30:47.799
<v Speaker 1>So he's terribly he is bad. They're sorry. I celebrate

1:30:47.840 --> 1:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the policy victories and like personnel choices, but

1:30:50.800 --> 1:30:53.439
<v Speaker 1>he's he can't speak. He's a terrible campaign er. So

1:30:53.840 --> 1:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they're sending him places where it's like, yeah, Joe, go

1:30:56.400 --> 1:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>down to Florida and see what you could do for

1:30:58.760 --> 1:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Christ. It's actually really sad in my opinion, because

1:31:02.320 --> 1:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you got to separate it out right. There's the politics

1:31:04.560 --> 1:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's policy. Yes, And on the politics front, yeah,

1:31:08.080 --> 1:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden's zombie. Biden's half dead, like nobody would want him CA.

1:31:11.160 --> 1:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Obama goes out there. I think Obama's record

1:31:13.040 --> 1:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>policy wise is worse than Biden's. But Obama gave me

1:31:15.960 --> 1:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the other day. Yeah, and it was I mean, I

1:31:18.280 --> 1:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>told it, and I was like, I forgot how good

1:31:19.760 --> 1:31:22.559
<v Speaker 1>this guy was. Listen from Personal Chrisma. Absolutely, we got

1:31:22.600 --> 1:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>j Miles Coleman standing by control room. If you guys

1:31:25.160 --> 1:31:26.519
<v Speaker 1>want to go ahead and bring him in, just give

1:31:26.560 --> 1:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>me a heads up whenever he's ready to go for

1:31:29.000 --> 1:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Remember Jay Miles Coleman. He's joined us a

1:31:31.640 --> 1:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of times. Works over at Larry Sabatae's crystal Ball.

1:31:34.600 --> 1:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>No relation there, no relation. I'll steal you. Can I

1:31:37.960 --> 1:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you a funny story? Yeah? My mom, bless her heart,

1:31:42.360 --> 1:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>when I stopped by her house today and she's like,

1:31:45.160 --> 1:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I heard about you on the local news last night.

1:31:47.400 --> 1:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh God, what you do now? They

1:31:50.760 --> 1:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were talking about you and this guy Larry and our

1:31:54.200 --> 1:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>lesson predictions. And I was like, no, no, Mom, Larry

1:31:59.479 --> 1:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Sabagage crystal Ball at the University of Virginia. So anyway,

1:32:03.400 --> 1:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>my mother was wishcasting that the local news was touched.

1:32:06.120 --> 1:32:09.879
<v Speaker 1>It's OK, but breaking points audience, they know what's going on. Miles.

1:32:10.040 --> 1:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>We go and bring Miles in. Guys. You guys said

1:32:12.080 --> 1:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he's ready. Hey Miles, let's go and put it. Throw

1:32:14.200 --> 1:32:15.639
<v Speaker 1>him up there on the screen. Welcome to the show.

1:32:15.880 --> 1:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>It's good to see you. Can he hear us? There is? Yeah?

1:32:19.720 --> 1:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh I'm not sure there is? Gotcha? All right? So, Miles,

1:32:22.880 --> 1:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of the Senate picture numbers are very early.

1:32:27.800 --> 1:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Are there any Is there anything that, like tea leaves wise,

1:32:31.720 --> 1:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is standing out to you that's giving you any sense

1:32:34.520 --> 1:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of what directions might night might go in? Sure, So

1:32:38.400 --> 1:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the sort of early bell weathers, I told

1:32:40.800 --> 1:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>people to look out for if the Republicans could beat

1:32:44.360 --> 1:32:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Senator Maggie Hassen in New Hampshire. Some polls had her

1:32:49.479 --> 1:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in a close race. From from what I'm seeing, she's

1:32:52.960 --> 1:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>overperforming Joe Biden's numbers with some areas. So she's looking

1:32:58.000 --> 1:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. So, you know, probably not going to be

1:33:01.240 --> 1:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it could be a good Republican night, but

1:33:03.280 --> 1:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be the whole damn breaks right. Yeah,

1:33:08.680 --> 1:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And then it's it's what I'm noticed. In a state

1:33:12.120 --> 1:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like Georgia, as expected, you have Warnock who is over

1:33:17.439 --> 1:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>performing Stacy Abrams by a few points. We're just gonna

1:33:21.200 --> 1:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have to see if it gets to the point where

1:33:23.000 --> 1:33:25.759
<v Speaker 1>he can actually he win out right and to runoff.

1:33:26.360 --> 1:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. So you feel like in Georgia, you said,

1:33:30.160 --> 1:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the question for Warnock is whether he can win outright

1:33:33.080 --> 1:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or go to a runoff. You think he's in that

1:33:35.800 --> 1:33:38.439
<v Speaker 1>strong of a position right now vis a vis Walker

1:33:38.479 --> 1:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that you think he'll end up with more votes on

1:33:40.080 --> 1:33:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the night. You know, he could end up ahead of Walker,

1:33:43.560 --> 1:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but he may still be under fifty percent. You know.

1:33:46.479 --> 1:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>One you know, one of my favorite ads was basically

1:33:50.880 --> 1:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Warnock had this ad that, Okay, well, you know I

1:33:55.320 --> 1:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>may be one of your Thanksgiving guests if my race

1:33:58.479 --> 1:34:00.759
<v Speaker 1>goes to a runoff into Sound where you'll be seeing

1:34:00.800 --> 1:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>more of my ad, So want to avoid having him

1:34:04.920 --> 1:34:09.519
<v Speaker 1>over for Thanksgiving. That's interesting. Another thing that is interesting

1:34:09.560 --> 1:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to me about what you said in New Hampshire is

1:34:12.080 --> 1:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at the presidential results because you said

1:34:14.880 --> 1:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Maggie Hassen is outperforming Joe Biden. I mean, Joe Biden

1:34:18.840 --> 1:34:23.519
<v Speaker 1>won New Hampshire easily. He won that state by more

1:34:23.560 --> 1:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>than seven points. The polls had Maggie Hassen, some of

1:34:27.479 --> 1:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>them had her down, the mainstream poles mostly had her

1:34:31.479 --> 1:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>up by one two points. I was very close. So

1:34:35.479 --> 1:34:38.599
<v Speaker 1>if she's out performing even Joe Biden's margin, I mean,

1:34:38.680 --> 1:34:42.639
<v Speaker 1>that's a significant polling miss in a direction that we're

1:34:42.680 --> 1:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>not used to getting significant polling misses. Oh yes, and

1:34:46.920 --> 1:34:49.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, just with the usual caveats that you know

1:34:49.680 --> 1:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>these results are incomplete, but you know, one of the

1:34:53.439 --> 1:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>things you can keep us so sort of looking for

1:34:58.439 --> 1:35:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in our election return is, I think educational polarization or

1:35:03.280 --> 1:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you have a college degree. I think

1:35:07.439 --> 1:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as is basically becoming as important as things like race

1:35:11.439 --> 1:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or gender when it comes to how people book. Well,

1:35:14.720 --> 1:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>guess what, New Hampshire is a relatively more college educated state.

1:35:19.720 --> 1:35:22.479
<v Speaker 1>So I can see Democrats holding up better in a

1:35:22.520 --> 1:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>state like that compared to one like four where you

1:35:26.400 --> 1:35:29.919
<v Speaker 1>have more of a working class population. I mean, especially

1:35:29.960 --> 1:35:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in especially in a place like my Miami off for

1:35:34.439 --> 1:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Republic, off of for the them Democrats. But so

1:35:38.160 --> 1:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, just some it's it's just from election to

1:35:42.280 --> 1:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>election you can always see some of these larger trends

1:35:45.280 --> 1:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as at play. That's fascinating. We are very early in

1:35:50.439 --> 1:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting in from Pennsylvania. I'm looking at this

1:35:54.280 --> 1:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>decision desk HQ right now, they've got five point three

1:35:58.320 --> 1:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>four percent. In my understanding is this is likely mail

1:36:03.080 --> 1:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in vote that they're counting in Pennsylvania first. Is there

1:36:07.040 --> 1:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>anything that you can read into those results, because that's

1:36:09.880 --> 1:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously maybe the race of the night. To take a

1:36:12.240 --> 1:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>look at Pennsylvania, I would avoid No, I mean okay there,

1:36:20.080 --> 1:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it really was until at really in twenty twenty,

1:36:24.200 --> 1:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't called for Joe Biden until the Friday or

1:36:27.200 --> 1:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Saturday after the election. So I don't think we'll have

1:36:31.439 --> 1:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to wait that long. But the thing, every state is

1:36:36.400 --> 1:36:39.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of different in terms of how it counts its vote,

1:36:39.640 --> 1:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so just something to keep in mind. So I think

1:36:43.160 --> 1:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in a state with Pennsylvania, they may just be counting

1:36:46.160 --> 1:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>all their mail in votes first. So yeah, go ahead,

1:36:49.400 --> 1:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>sicker Miles. What do you make of the college dynamic

1:36:51.760 --> 1:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia that you were talking about, and how will

1:36:53.920 --> 1:36:56.959
<v Speaker 1>that bear out whenever we're looking there also in Arizona

1:36:57.000 --> 1:36:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other key Bell Weather states. Yeah,

1:37:00.160 --> 1:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's well, it's basically that same group of more

1:37:03.760 --> 1:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>college educated white vote voters who you know, a lot

1:37:08.320 --> 1:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of those voters used to be Republicans like Democrats a

1:37:13.080 --> 1:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more now. So to me, the big question is, yes,

1:37:17.360 --> 1:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I can see a lot of those going for Governor Kemp,

1:37:20.600 --> 1:37:23.439
<v Speaker 1>but how many of them are going to stick with

1:37:23.560 --> 1:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Warnock and how many of them are going going to

1:37:26.040 --> 1:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of hold their nose and sort of vote for

1:37:28.800 --> 1:37:34.639
<v Speaker 1>herschel Walker. It looks like, again these results are very early.

1:37:35.520 --> 1:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. It looks like Warnock is at least matching

1:37:39.280 --> 1:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>what Joe Biden got in the Atlanta area, So it's

1:37:44.960 --> 1:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be very close. Okay, I got another one

1:37:47.960 --> 1:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for you, miles. How about North Carolina. We've got Sherry Beasley,

1:37:53.400 --> 1:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>who in some polls you know, was running even I

1:37:56.320 --> 1:37:58.519
<v Speaker 1>saw a couple of polls that had her up over

1:37:58.880 --> 1:38:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Republicans had bud Right. Now, you've got fifty four percent

1:38:02.680 --> 1:38:05.519
<v Speaker 1>in there, and she has a sizeable lead, fifty two

1:38:05.520 --> 1:38:09.599
<v Speaker 1>percent to forty six percent roughly. How do they count

1:38:09.640 --> 1:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>their ballots? Where are those votes coming from? What do

1:38:13.200 --> 1:38:16.519
<v Speaker 1>you think of her performance there thus far? Sure so, no,

1:38:16.680 --> 1:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think she's putting up a pretty decent

1:38:18.880 --> 1:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>per performance. It was something you have to keep in

1:38:21.400 --> 1:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>mind about knowing North Carolina is there sort of like Pennsylvania.

1:38:25.000 --> 1:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Like we were just talked talking about North Carolina is

1:38:27.960 --> 1:38:32.599
<v Speaker 1>a state that basically reports its early votes first uh,

1:38:32.800 --> 1:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and as an election day batch comes in, stuff gets

1:38:36.200 --> 1:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>more Republican. In fact, that's what basically save Donald Trump.

1:38:41.120 --> 1:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Really twenty twenty, Joe Bonden won the early and mail

1:38:46.120 --> 1:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in vote, but Donald Trump got sixty five percent of

1:38:49.400 --> 1:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the election day vote and that's what sort of killed

1:38:52.080 --> 1:38:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats there. So you know, we'll see, I mean,

1:38:55.560 --> 1:38:59.559
<v Speaker 1>what's what's you know, what's really interesting is I'm looking

1:38:59.640 --> 1:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at a like, oh, like this would be Wake, which

1:39:04.400 --> 1:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is the capital Raleigh. You know that used to be

1:39:07.000 --> 1:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of a marginal county. Beasley's at over seventy percent

1:39:11.920 --> 1:39:15.479
<v Speaker 1>there and She's probably gonna at least get over sixty.

1:39:16.240 --> 1:39:18.599
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we're really seeing this sort of urban

1:39:18.760 --> 1:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>versus a rural trend in North Carolina. That's interesting, Miles.

1:39:23.240 --> 1:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>As the polls close around nine o'clock, and then further

1:39:26.200 --> 1:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the things that people should keep

1:39:27.760 --> 1:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in mind as some of the information comes in. I'm

1:39:30.120 --> 1:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking of places like Wisconsin. I think a lot of

1:39:32.320 --> 1:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>eyes are going to be on the Midwest there, also

1:39:34.920 --> 1:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, and then even you know, I heard some

1:39:37.240 --> 1:39:40.439
<v Speaker 1>rumblings around Washington and things like that. So any thoughts

1:39:40.439 --> 1:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as we think even more further west of the country. Yeah,

1:39:44.280 --> 1:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's well, what you have to keep in mind is

1:39:47.640 --> 1:39:52.280
<v Speaker 1>voting by mail east before twenty twenty has been more

1:39:52.280 --> 1:39:55.519
<v Speaker 1>of a West coast thing, So Arizona is going to

1:39:55.600 --> 1:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>take several days to count's about So I would just

1:39:58.920 --> 1:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>tell people would be Pati, Okay, yeah, that makes one

1:40:02.840 --> 1:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>more for you before we let you go for now,

1:40:05.960 --> 1:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Miles is Ohio. You know this was a big Democratic hope.

1:40:10.479 --> 1:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a state that is trended hard to the right.

1:40:13.479 --> 1:40:15.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, there were some polls showing Joe Biden having

1:40:15.680 --> 1:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>chance of winning Ohio in the final days of that campaign.

1:40:18.080 --> 1:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>That obviously didn't work out. I think Trump won the

1:40:19.880 --> 1:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>state by about eight points in the final days. It

1:40:23.080 --> 1:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed like jad Vans was really pulling away from Tim Ryan.

1:40:26.640 --> 1:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Were again in a situation where it was very early.

1:40:29.560 --> 1:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got only nineteen percent in Tim Ryan at sixty

1:40:33.040 --> 1:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>percent JD Vans at forty percent. How is Tim Ryan

1:40:36.920 --> 1:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or can you even tell at this point running versus

1:40:40.120 --> 1:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>how Joe Biden ran in twenty twenty. What I would

1:40:43.880 --> 1:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>say is it's actually looking a lot like what we

1:40:47.880 --> 1:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>had two years ago, because remember early on election n

1:40:51.400 --> 1:40:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Boden was up about ten points there. You know, that's

1:40:53.800 --> 1:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about where Ja where Tim Ron is now only for

1:40:58.160 --> 1:41:02.519
<v Speaker 1>those election day votes in and give it to Donald Trump.

1:41:02.560 --> 1:41:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So I can see I can see Van's pulp on

1:41:06.960 --> 1:41:11.280
<v Speaker 1>off to me, the value for Tim Ryan, uh, you know,

1:41:11.360 --> 1:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>may have been this is a state that republic at

1:41:14.880 --> 1:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>least he made it into a race. Republicans had to

1:41:18.240 --> 1:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>spend millions of dollars there just to shore up Ohio.

1:41:22.800 --> 1:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe those millions who had they run a better candidate

1:41:26.560 --> 1:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>could have gone to a state like New Hampshire or

1:41:29.439 --> 1:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina or Nevada or Georgia, basically a state that

1:41:33.800 --> 1:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>may be more decisive in terms of control of the Senate.

1:41:37.400 --> 1:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Got it, well, great point. We're going to check in

1:41:39.880 --> 1:41:42.639
<v Speaker 1>with you, possibly in another hour. Producers will be in touch.

1:41:42.680 --> 1:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But man, so so helpful. We always love having you

1:41:45.880 --> 1:41:48.559
<v Speaker 1>on the show. All right, thank you' all, Thank you

1:41:48.640 --> 1:41:52.519
<v Speaker 1>very much. So New Hampshire. Yeah, I mean takeaways from

1:41:52.560 --> 1:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Miles is that the blowout has not yet appeared. It's

1:41:56.160 --> 1:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>possible could materialize. But given his knowledge of exactly where

1:42:00.360 --> 1:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the election was in twenty twenty, things to look for,

1:42:03.120 --> 1:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Maggie Hassen outperforming Biden, I might have

1:42:06.760 --> 1:42:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to eat grow on this one. I really thought that

1:42:08.840 --> 1:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that one might be one of the flips. It's not

1:42:11.400 --> 1:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just that she's out performing again. Biden won that state

1:42:15.120 --> 1:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>by more than seven points. It was not close. That's right.

1:42:18.280 --> 1:42:20.720
<v Speaker 1>This was really coming down the stretch of jump ball

1:42:20.800 --> 1:42:23.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what the polls were saying. So what

1:42:23.600 --> 1:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that is reflecting is actually a miss on the polls, right,

1:42:26.960 --> 1:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>but underestimating the Democrats, which is something that we saw

1:42:31.320 --> 1:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of those special elections that got Democrats

1:42:34.880 --> 1:42:38.519
<v Speaker 1>really really super hopeful right after Roe versus Wade. So

1:42:38.800 --> 1:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that is pretty stunning to me. How much of

1:42:41.640 --> 1:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a function of, like, you know, there's early

1:42:45.800 --> 1:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>voting in a lot of these states, and the polls

1:42:48.600 --> 1:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the further back you go, the more favorable they are

1:42:51.360 --> 1:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>too Democrats, correct, So how much of this can we

1:42:53.640 --> 1:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>attribute to that? Do you think in New Hampshire? Well,

1:42:56.400 --> 1:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in New hamp anywhere we're seeing democratic Hampshire in particular,

1:42:59.080 --> 1:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you said they don't really early, they don't all, yeah,

1:43:02.000 --> 1:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>which was why September so like voting hadn't quite yeah,

1:43:06.200 --> 1:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but I mean that was part of why Democrats were

1:43:08.680 --> 1:43:11.240
<v Speaker 1>getting really nervous and Republicans were getting really hopeful about

1:43:11.280 --> 1:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire is exactly that dynamic you're talking about in

1:43:13.680 --> 1:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other states. They were able to bank

1:43:16.280 --> 1:43:19.760
<v Speaker 1>votes while their positioning was a bit more favorable than

1:43:19.800 --> 1:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to erode down the stretch. But you know,

1:43:22.439 --> 1:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean what Miles is saying there, and I think

1:43:25.000 --> 1:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to have a lot of caveats in because,

1:43:28.080 --> 1:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as I try to say, every like five minutes each

1:43:31.040 --> 1:43:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of these states counts votes differently. It's very hard to tell.

1:43:33.640 --> 1:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Are these mail in ballots are the day of ballots

1:43:36.200 --> 1:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>like that could shift everything, that could really change the picture,

1:43:38.760 --> 1:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But he's saying in New Hampshire, in Georgia,

1:43:43.840 --> 1:43:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and in North Carolina, at least the Democratic candidates are

1:43:47.600 --> 1:43:51.519
<v Speaker 1>actually out running Joe Biden, and in North Carolina, Joe

1:43:51.560 --> 1:43:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Biden did not lose by all that much. I mean,

1:43:54.560 --> 1:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that ended up being a very close race. So to

1:43:57.320 --> 1:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I never really bought the poles

1:44:00.360 --> 1:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that had the Democrat in striking distance in the state

1:44:03.960 --> 1:44:06.639
<v Speaker 1>of North Carolina. But at least where we sit right

1:44:06.720 --> 1:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>now with some fifty eight percent in apparently she's really

1:44:10.240 --> 1:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got a shot. That is. Yeah. Look, it's very interesting.

1:44:13.160 --> 1:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, my takeaway from Miles is

1:44:15.400 --> 1:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I expected, which is that it's going

1:44:17.360 --> 1:44:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to be complicated. I he's to be multifaceted. I was

1:44:20.880 --> 1:44:24.519
<v Speaker 1>not expecting the quote unquote read tsunami. In terms of

1:44:24.560 --> 1:44:27.559
<v Speaker 1>the New Hampshire vote apparently is still only fifteen percent.

1:44:27.960 --> 1:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's also the question about early vote,

1:44:31.479 --> 1:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>about the mail in ballots, about when exactly they reported

1:44:35.000 --> 1:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the counting. I mean, it has turned into a b

1:44:37.920 --> 1:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire is the one that must be that should be

1:44:40.400 --> 1:44:43.599
<v Speaker 1>the most clear because they don't really have early vote.

1:44:43.800 --> 1:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So if he's saying she's out pacing where Biden is,

1:44:47.360 --> 1:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe one thing that could be going on

1:44:50.960 --> 1:44:53.519
<v Speaker 1>is the places that are being counted right now are

1:44:53.600 --> 1:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the college educated more college educated parts of the state.

1:44:57.160 --> 1:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But overall, as he points out, I mean, New Hampshire

1:44:59.040 --> 1:45:02.559
<v Speaker 1>demographically in terms of college education, is more favorable dem

1:45:02.760 --> 1:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>territory anyway. And so that's kind of consistent with what

1:45:06.080 --> 1:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we saw in that upstate New York special election and

1:45:09.760 --> 1:45:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the other special elections as well, where

1:45:12.280 --> 1:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they happened to be in areas that had highly college

1:45:15.320 --> 1:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>educated where you might have some college towns, there is

1:45:17.400 --> 1:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge surgeon turnout, and so it would kind of

1:45:20.040 --> 1:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fit that you might have that same dynamic in the

1:45:22.800 --> 1:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>state of New Hampshire. So I mean, look, this is

1:45:25.200 --> 1:45:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the simple question to what do you attribute this, assuming

1:45:28.360 --> 1:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's real for a second, right to what Let's wait,

1:45:31.600 --> 1:45:34.439
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know, man. It's like I just si

1:45:35.560 --> 1:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>soccer if it turns out to be Democrats when George

1:45:42.439 --> 1:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when North Carolina win New Hampshire. Let's not get crazy

1:45:47.760 --> 1:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if they outperform what the polls are saying and they

1:45:51.240 --> 1:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>end up holding the Senate, which I think is the

1:45:53.320 --> 1:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>best that they could possibly hope run the situation. What's

1:45:57.200 --> 1:45:59.479
<v Speaker 1>your theory abortion? It's abord, it would be abortion. I

1:45:59.479 --> 1:46:01.479
<v Speaker 1>think it would be the I mean, look, I actually

1:46:01.520 --> 1:46:03.280
<v Speaker 1>had this pulled up in order to pivot the discussion.

1:46:03.320 --> 1:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But actually give us exactly thirty five percent of the

1:46:06.160 --> 1:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>vote is in in the state of Kentucky right now.

1:46:08.520 --> 1:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The abortion Amendment, which would state there is no right

1:46:11.840 --> 1:46:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to an abortion or any requirement to fund abortion in

1:46:14.320 --> 1:46:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the state constitution, is currently the no is leading in

1:46:17.600 --> 1:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty six percent. In order to make sure that the

1:46:20.240 --> 1:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so look, you have a Republican state where rand Paul

1:46:24.160 --> 1:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>was literally declared the winner, where they are underwater by fifteen.

1:46:28.400 --> 1:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Look again, thirty five percent of the votes that are in.

1:46:31.320 --> 1:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think that if the Dems hold on to

1:46:33.000 --> 1:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, it will be one hundred percent attributable to

1:46:36.080 --> 1:46:39.519
<v Speaker 1>abortion and Crystal we will have to frankly say, hey,

1:46:39.680 --> 1:46:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that one hundred million or so that you

1:46:41.280 --> 1:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>spent on abortion, not only again that is a big if,

1:46:46.360 --> 1:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and I do think we should really hold it, especially

1:46:48.120 --> 1:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with the West coast. Like, given the fact that Arizona

1:46:50.080 --> 1:46:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nevada are going to come in so late, some

1:46:52.320 --> 1:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>of our discussion just could reflect the East coast bias.

1:46:55.000 --> 1:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think those are really going to change, and

1:46:57.080 --> 1:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it could reflect that earlier. I mean, I do like's

1:47:00.120 --> 1:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>be clear, like no one is saying this is the

1:47:01.920 --> 1:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>reality that's happening. But if things continue to trend in

1:47:06.200 --> 1:47:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this direction, I would say abortion is the pivot point.

1:47:09.320 --> 1:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But I would also say, and this kind of ties

1:47:11.240 --> 1:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>into the candidate quality issue, it's a general sense of

1:47:15.880 --> 1:47:20.559
<v Speaker 1>GOP extremism with these specific candidates. Yeah. I mean, first

1:47:20.600 --> 1:47:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, to your point talker about Kentucky, this is

1:47:22.840 --> 1:47:25.479
<v Speaker 1>why I love direct democracy. Like, one of the data

1:47:25.520 --> 1:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>points that always stuck out in my mind was when

1:47:28.160 --> 1:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump won Florida in twenty twenty, you also had

1:47:31.040 --> 1:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen dollars minimum wage, a direct valvotative passed with

1:47:34.800 --> 1:47:38.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of the vote. So and to your point, Crystal, yeah,

1:47:38.720 --> 1:47:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, so you have a Republican Supreme Court

1:47:41.680 --> 1:47:44.360
<v Speaker 1>overturning roll versus weight, and then another thing that stuck

1:47:44.360 --> 1:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>out to me after the fact. I don't know how

1:47:45.640 --> 1:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>many Americans know this, but it really stuck with me.

1:47:48.600 --> 1:47:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You had a vote in the House on gay marriage.

1:47:51.439 --> 1:47:54.519
<v Speaker 1>One hundred and fifty seven Republicans voted against it, right

1:47:54.520 --> 1:47:57.679
<v Speaker 1>one hundred Here, one hundred and ninety five Republicans voted

1:47:57.720 --> 1:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>against a right to contraception. So they want, you know,

1:48:00.880 --> 1:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a state like Mississippi or Alabama or whoever, to be

1:48:03.400 --> 1:48:05.240
<v Speaker 1>able to say no, you can't buy condoms, you can't

1:48:05.240 --> 1:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>buy the pill, you can't buy Plan B. So this

1:48:07.760 --> 1:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, look, and this is why I've always

1:48:09.840 --> 1:48:13.760
<v Speaker 1>argued Democrats need to embrace freedom, they need to be

1:48:13.800 --> 1:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the onest. Actually, no, we are in favor freedom. They

1:48:15.960 --> 1:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>are not in favor freedom. You've got a candidate who

1:48:18.160 --> 1:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>has been using that rhetoric and it seems like kind

1:48:20.640 --> 1:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of a wash. But this is Gavin Newsom's whole play

1:48:23.439 --> 1:48:26.559
<v Speaker 1>because he's spending right a lot money on ads in Florida.

1:48:26.560 --> 1:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the broad thing that gets I

1:48:28.040 --> 1:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think this gets to why this political moment is frustrating,

1:48:31.200 --> 1:48:34.639
<v Speaker 1>because Republicans are being rewarded because they're out of power,

1:48:34.880 --> 1:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and our system punishes whoever is in the driver's seat

1:48:37.960 --> 1:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if Republicans do well, Democrats are doing well in twenty

1:48:40.120 --> 1:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty six or twenty twenty eight, and vice versa and

1:48:42.680 --> 1:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. And if we're looking at previous areas of

1:48:44.439 --> 1:48:49.639
<v Speaker 1>American politics, you just won Reagan just won FDR just one,

1:48:49.760 --> 1:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy LBJ just one. And just the lack of anyone

1:48:52.960 --> 1:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>just to actually control it is the central issue. So

1:48:55.880 --> 1:48:57.760
<v Speaker 1>here's an interesting insight from nay con I was trying

1:48:57.760 --> 1:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring up that actually speaks to J. Miles Holman's point.

1:49:00.880 --> 1:49:03.439
<v Speaker 1>He says, quote, so far Democrats are running ahead of

1:49:03.439 --> 1:49:07.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations outside of Florida in places with a meaningful vote,

1:49:07.240 --> 1:49:09.840
<v Speaker 1>which may still be contaminated with early votes, but they

1:49:09.840 --> 1:49:12.599
<v Speaker 1>are running way behind in Florida, so it is almost

1:49:12.720 --> 1:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>entirely canceling out. So the parathetical is worth worth taking seriously,

1:49:17.360 --> 1:49:21.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that there isn't much that's unequivocally done outside

1:49:21.439 --> 1:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of Florida right now, so early vote contamination could risk

1:49:27.240 --> 1:49:30.519
<v Speaker 1>remains very real in terms of the North Carolina results

1:49:30.520 --> 1:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and all those things that were here. Let me get

1:49:32.920 --> 1:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire of course accepted, given their unique state there.

1:49:36.160 --> 1:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you a couple of the specific numbers

1:49:38.760 --> 1:49:42.240
<v Speaker 1>from New Hampshire, because that's the one that's probably the

1:49:42.280 --> 1:49:45.679
<v Speaker 1>most clean since they don't have a significant early vote

1:49:46.800 --> 1:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in I don't know any of these towns. I'm sorry,

1:49:49.000 --> 1:49:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna butcher all of the names. Not a

1:49:50.800 --> 1:49:52.679
<v Speaker 1>big New Hampshire stand I mean, I have no problem

1:49:52.720 --> 1:49:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with New Hampshire. I just don't know the state that well.

1:49:54.280 --> 1:49:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm trying to say here, Okay, Brookline, Biden

1:49:57.520 --> 1:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was plus seven. Maggie Hassen is plus nine. In New Ipswich.

1:50:03.880 --> 1:50:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I loved you. I love that sounds delicious, by the way, Yeah,

1:50:07.280 --> 1:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love an Ipswich. Hey live for your head.

1:50:09.200 --> 1:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I love Trump won by thirty six. Bullduck is actually

1:50:13.320 --> 1:50:17.880
<v Speaker 1>outperforming Trump a bit plus forty in a Cippy Trump

1:50:17.920 --> 1:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty one, Bullduck underperforming him a little bit plus nineteen.

1:50:21.160 --> 1:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>In Sumrsworth Biden plus fourteen, Hassen plus twenty. In Hillsboro,

1:50:26.800 --> 1:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump plus eight, Bullduck underperforming him plus so Bolduck plus three.

1:50:32.120 --> 1:50:34.639
<v Speaker 1>In the state capitol of Concord, which has ninety four

1:50:34.680 --> 1:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>percent reporting, Hassen is at sixty seven percent. Bullduck is

1:50:39.880 --> 1:50:44.280
<v Speaker 1>at thirty point nine percent. So D plus thirty seven

1:50:44.880 --> 1:50:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in a town that last time around was D plus

1:50:47.360 --> 1:50:52.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. So it looks like a pretty consistent trend

1:50:52.240 --> 1:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in New Hampshire. I got one more for you here

1:50:54.920 --> 1:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in this thread. This is from Ryan Matsumoto, who is

1:50:58.240 --> 1:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a contributing analyst at Inside Elections Bylines at five thirty eight,

1:51:01.640 --> 1:51:03.439
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. Anyway, I just want to give

1:51:03.439 --> 1:51:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the guy credit. The town of Fitzwilliam, New Hampshire is

1:51:06.520 --> 1:51:09.760
<v Speaker 1>now ninety five percent reporting, so very close to all in.

1:51:10.200 --> 1:51:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Boldock is narrowly ahead here forty nine point one percent

1:51:13.280 --> 1:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to Hassince forty seven point eight percent. That's our plus

1:51:17.040 --> 1:51:19.639
<v Speaker 1>one point three in a town that was our one

1:51:19.680 --> 1:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>point two in twenty twenty. So Boldock is not outperforming Trump,

1:51:25.600 --> 1:51:30.519
<v Speaker 1>but Hassen seems to be outperforming Biden. And this was

1:51:30.560 --> 1:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the other questions is like, you know, part

1:51:33.000 --> 1:51:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of what we've seen in twenty sixteen, twenty eighteen, and

1:51:36.360 --> 1:51:40.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty is that Democrats are super enthusiastic. They you know,

1:51:40.439 --> 1:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>push their margins up in their places, but it's matched

1:51:42.880 --> 1:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>by Republican enthusiasm in rural counties, at least in New Hampshire.

1:51:47.200 --> 1:51:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Based on the numbers we have right now, you know,

1:51:49.560 --> 1:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this looks very good for Maggie Hassen and Democrats have

1:51:52.720 --> 1:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to be encouraged that at the very least they're not

1:51:56.120 --> 1:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be facing the red tsunami that they were

1:51:59.720 --> 1:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to really be afraid of. Yes point so far

1:52:02.439 --> 1:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and what we've seen, so we have a little bit

1:52:03.920 --> 1:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>more vote coming from Georgia that I can read off.

1:52:06.040 --> 1:52:07.720
<v Speaker 1>We got about forty eight percent of the vote in,

1:52:07.760 --> 1:52:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're getting a bit of a better idea and

1:52:09.320 --> 1:52:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it is tightening it up exactly as we expected. So

1:52:12.320 --> 1:52:14.439
<v Speaker 1>we've got two point one million votes that are in

1:52:14.520 --> 1:52:17.439
<v Speaker 1>right now. Warnock is currently at fifty percent, herschel Walker

1:52:17.479 --> 1:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>at forty eight percent, and exactly to the point that

1:52:19.680 --> 1:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you make Crystal only one point seven percent of the

1:52:21.640 --> 1:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>vote right now going to the libertarian So we are

1:52:23.880 --> 1:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>talking at a margin here of really we got one million,

1:52:27.040 --> 1:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven thousand votes there for Raphael Warnock one million,

1:52:30.280 --> 1:52:33.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thousand votes for herschel Wats. So it's a dead heat.

1:52:33.280 --> 1:52:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is close, and the closer and the

1:52:35.880 --> 1:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>more that we get to the full counting of you know,

1:52:40.120 --> 1:52:42.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the mail in ballots and absentee and all

1:52:42.439 --> 1:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that counted along with in day. We are just going

1:52:44.880 --> 1:52:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to see that. It's I think it's going to take

1:52:46.439 --> 1:52:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a while in terms of go ahead, go ahead, Kyle, Yeah.

1:52:49.040 --> 1:52:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Can I give you guys an Ohio update real fast? Yees? Yeah,

1:52:51.720 --> 1:52:54.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. So we have thirty four percent in and

1:52:55.280 --> 1:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Ryan leads Vance by ten points right now. Wow. But

1:52:58.720 --> 1:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I will say this is effectively this is like the

1:53:01.200 --> 1:53:05.599
<v Speaker 1>blue miragement networks in Ohio. The way they count the votes,

1:53:05.640 --> 1:53:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and so what you're going to see is as more

1:53:07.400 --> 1:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>votes come in, Vance is going to close that gap.

1:53:09.200 --> 1:53:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Close that gap, close that gap, and then the question

1:53:11.040 --> 1:53:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is will you overtake him? And if so by how much? Look?

1:53:15.720 --> 1:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think what goes to what Miles said, which is

1:53:17.680 --> 1:53:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know he was Trump was down by ten

1:53:20.080 --> 1:53:22.839
<v Speaker 1>then the vote came in. Actually, if I recall from Ohio,

1:53:22.920 --> 1:53:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Trump ended up beating expectations in a historic degree. There

1:53:25.560 --> 1:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>was I forget exactly how to pronounce is it mahoning,

1:53:27.880 --> 1:53:31.240
<v Speaker 1>mahoning count mahon mahone counting, Sorry, no, mahoning, You're right,

1:53:31.800 --> 1:53:35.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, I don't mean any disrespect. The point is

1:53:35.880 --> 1:53:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is that Trump won it in twenty sixteen or sorry,

1:53:38.840 --> 1:53:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it didn't win in twenty sixteen, it was seen as

1:53:40.439 --> 1:53:42.599
<v Speaker 1>a belt. Whether he ended up winning it in twenty twenty,

1:53:42.640 --> 1:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which was seen as a big kind of it was

1:53:44.680 --> 1:53:47.320
<v Speaker 1>an affirmation of his candidacy because I think there was

1:53:47.360 --> 1:53:49.519
<v Speaker 1>like some GM things that were going on there. My

1:53:49.600 --> 1:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>point being that that didn't come until later in the night.

1:53:52.400 --> 1:53:54.479
<v Speaker 1>So that's something that we have to pay attention to

1:53:54.840 --> 1:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in general. Though I guess I'm being this is just

1:53:56.920 --> 1:53:59.559
<v Speaker 1>a stark reminder of like how long it can take

1:53:59.600 --> 1:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on electnight for some of this stuff to come in,

1:54:02.439 --> 1:54:05.760
<v Speaker 1>especially given the dynamics of the way that people all vote. Now,

1:54:06.360 --> 1:54:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we really don't have that many competitive states with all

1:54:09.880 --> 1:54:11.519
<v Speaker 1>that much the vote in, so I'll just read it off.

1:54:11.560 --> 1:54:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania is only at nine percent, Fetterman is up by

1:54:14.479 --> 1:54:17.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. So if you really want to cling to Hope,

1:54:17.479 --> 1:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>stop the count. I guess if you're a pahm Ohio,

1:54:21.360 --> 1:54:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you said only thirty five percent of the vote in

1:54:23.560 --> 1:54:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Georgia right now is in forty nine. The real stunner,

1:54:26.400 --> 1:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess is North Carolina Crystal. You've got Sherry Beasley

1:54:30.439 --> 1:54:34.320
<v Speaker 1>up by at fifty percent to Ted Budd's forty eight percent,

1:54:34.520 --> 1:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's with about sixty percent of the vote which

1:54:37.080 --> 1:54:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is in now again, you could have the eve vote,

1:54:39.960 --> 1:54:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the election day vote. It just comes in massively at

1:54:42.720 --> 1:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the end and it's a total blowout. But I have

1:54:45.120 --> 1:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer there than I think a lot

1:54:47.240 --> 1:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of other people had anticipated for the House of Representatives.

1:54:50.440 --> 1:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Just to keep everybody updated, I don't have the official number,

1:54:53.320 --> 1:54:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but you do have a decent amount of flips which

1:54:55.880 --> 1:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>have happened here so far. I guess the best one

1:54:59.080 --> 1:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to go with is actually the New York Times needle.

1:55:01.760 --> 1:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>If everybody will remember this, Oh, I remember the needle,

1:55:05.480 --> 1:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the infamous needle. It took it away, right, No, no no,

1:55:08.440 --> 1:55:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they took it away from it. They took they did

1:55:11.920 --> 1:55:14.720
<v Speaker 1>actually bring it back. So then they brought it here.

1:55:14.840 --> 1:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, wow, the needle crashed out. That's actually kind

1:55:18.080 --> 1:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of crazy. Oh really, okay, I was just looking stopped

1:55:22.160 --> 1:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the count, all right, two minutes ago. I looked at

1:55:24.000 --> 1:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the needle. I took a little peek, and it was

1:55:26.480 --> 1:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in toss up, but it was a little bit towards

1:55:28.520 --> 1:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, but really tossed up, right, Yeah, I was

1:55:31.160 --> 1:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about the House. It was like it was lean Republican,

1:55:35.560 --> 1:55:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't like likely. We probably was just over

1:55:37.440 --> 1:55:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and lean Republicans. Five have a real time updating thing,

1:55:41.400 --> 1:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>though New York Times is the only one, the only honestly,

1:55:43.480 --> 1:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it is very useful, but it is also it crashes

1:55:46.120 --> 1:55:48.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And of course all the Dems freaking

1:55:48.320 --> 1:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>out from twenty sixteen uh that were saying this. Nate Cone,

1:55:51.600 --> 1:55:53.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, for those who are needle watchers, says

1:55:53.760 --> 1:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we need to pull the needle off. Louisiana appears to

1:55:56.640 --> 1:55:59.280
<v Speaker 1>have been coded as Democratic at some point, adding an

1:55:59.280 --> 1:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>extra seat for them. All other streates would be unaffective.

1:56:03.040 --> 1:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Come on, you guys, have one job on. You can't.

1:56:05.920 --> 1:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't. This is why they took away at the

1:56:07.680 --> 1:56:10.840
<v Speaker 1>needle in the first place. Yeah, that's why we can't

1:56:10.840 --> 1:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have nice thing Spira there, Okay, come on, I've got

1:56:16.280 --> 1:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few more New Hampshire notes for you.

1:56:20.280 --> 1:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>More positive indications for New Hampshire Democrats because it wasn't

1:56:24.240 --> 1:56:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just the Senate race where they were concerned about. There

1:56:25.920 --> 1:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>were a number of congressional races they were also concerned about.

1:56:29.400 --> 1:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like Democrats at the House level also

1:56:34.040 --> 1:56:38.360
<v Speaker 1>outperforming Biden in the state of New Hampshire. New Hampshire,

1:56:38.400 --> 1:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so you have Representative Papas remains ahead in Rochester, which

1:56:42.000 --> 1:56:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump carried. This is from Daniel and Shanean with eighty

1:56:44.280 --> 1:56:47.920
<v Speaker 1>six percent, and you have Representative Custer in Concord with

1:56:48.000 --> 1:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight percent reporting also running ahead of Biden. So

1:56:51.480 --> 1:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the House seats there, that's also positive

1:56:54.640 --> 1:56:58.720
<v Speaker 1>news for them. I was also looking at the sort

1:56:58.720 --> 1:57:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of ticket splitting dynamic, and you've got a pretty you know,

1:57:03.360 --> 1:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty sizable gap both on the Kemp the Kemp Warnock voter,

1:57:08.200 --> 1:57:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of those. You also have a

1:57:09.920 --> 1:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>good number of Shapiro Oz voters as well, already in

1:57:14.760 --> 1:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the early vote. Now again in Pennsylvania it's all mail in,

1:57:18.040 --> 1:57:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's like Shapiro has eighty three percent, Federman has

1:57:20.320 --> 1:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight percent or something crazy like that, which is

1:57:22.240 --> 1:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously not going to be the end result, but it

1:57:24.160 --> 1:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>shows you, even in that early mail in vote, that

1:57:27.520 --> 1:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you do have a significant population of ticket splitters who

1:57:30.280 --> 1:57:33.000
<v Speaker 1>could end up being determinative in these races. Yeah, that's

1:57:33.040 --> 1:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. It is factual vote. I mean they vote

1:57:35.640 --> 1:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>based on vibes. Yeah, right, isn't that really what it is?

1:57:38.160 --> 1:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I listened, Kyle, I made peace with that a while ago,

1:57:41.000 --> 1:57:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and to be honest, I like it. I'm going to

1:57:43.560 --> 1:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I kind of like it. I like being surprised.

1:57:46.880 --> 1:57:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact that people are not as into

1:57:49.120 --> 1:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this as everybody, and that the things that

1:57:51.080 --> 1:57:54.600
<v Speaker 1>people vote on make them idiosyncratic and truly human. So

1:57:54.680 --> 1:57:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually a good story for America. It's

1:57:57.800 --> 1:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a hopeful story. I mean, the I think the we

1:58:00.160 --> 1:58:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this was a discussion we were talking about earlier about

1:58:02.320 --> 1:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>how the electorate fundamentally changed in twenty sixteen. And look,

1:58:06.080 --> 1:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can like or dislike how exactly things

1:58:08.440 --> 1:58:10.520
<v Speaker 1>are trending. But what I like about that, Marshall, is

1:58:10.560 --> 1:58:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like it just shows that a lot of things are

1:58:12.000 --> 1:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>up for grabs in a way that people don't as

1:58:14.600 --> 1:58:17.440
<v Speaker 1>stuck as we are. To see Florida become a red

1:58:17.480 --> 1:58:20.320
<v Speaker 1>state in my lifetime, and to see Wisconsin be one

1:58:20.360 --> 1:58:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of those places which we now have to watch as

1:58:22.400 --> 1:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a bell Weather say, I mean, I remember Ohio as well.

1:58:25.880 --> 1:58:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama won the state of Ohio Florida. Obama won

1:58:30.040 --> 1:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of Florida in two thousand and eight, by three points,

1:58:31.920 --> 1:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and he won it by two points in twenty twelve.

1:58:34.040 --> 1:58:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Ten years later, we're sitting here at the desk and

1:58:36.000 --> 1:58:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we're like re marveling at a fifteen point win for

1:58:38.640 --> 1:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a Republican candidate. So it just shows me like, actually,

1:58:41.560 --> 1:58:44.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing is static. Everything can change, and you know, it

1:58:44.080 --> 1:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>may not change necessarily the way that all of us

1:58:45.920 --> 1:58:48.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want, but they can't change, and they can change

1:58:48.320 --> 1:58:51.800
<v Speaker 1>significantly in a relatively short period of time. Yeah, I'm

1:58:51.800 --> 1:58:54.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's so interesting because your point is like

1:58:55.000 --> 1:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that things can change could be a good thing.

1:58:57.440 --> 1:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But like I kind of said earlier, I I want

1:59:01.360 --> 1:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>some I want I want someone to win a state

1:59:03.560 --> 1:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't expected to win and then actually be able

1:59:06.040 --> 1:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a governing agenda. Basically the pendulum swinging back

1:59:11.920 --> 1:59:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and forth for thirty years because everyone's just pissed off.

1:59:15.200 --> 1:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That isn't that doesn't feel great. This is the you know,

1:59:22.600 --> 1:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this another debate Kyle and I've had like eighty three times,

1:59:25.200 --> 1:59:31.160
<v Speaker 1>both publicly and privately, But clearly, the neoliberal consensus is dying,

1:59:31.320 --> 1:59:33.720
<v Speaker 1>at least among the public. It's dead, even as they

1:59:33.880 --> 1:59:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, hold on to like Joe Biden as president.

1:59:36.000 --> 1:59:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Clearly they still hold on to power. But what you

1:59:39.160 --> 1:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>see in these swing elections is just a rejection of

1:59:42.680 --> 1:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>this paradigm, whether it's being offered by Democrats or being

1:59:45.480 --> 1:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>offered by Republicans. It's like, ah, to help with to

1:59:48.400 --> 1:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>hell with this, We're going to try something different. And

1:59:50.680 --> 1:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think until you have whatever the new paradigm,

1:59:55.360 --> 1:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever the new era is actually born and like power consolidated,

1:59:59.800 --> 2:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to continue having these swings. Although I mean, listen,

2:00:03.120 --> 2:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to say, like if Democrats outperform tonight in

2:00:05.920 --> 2:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the way that might be happening, if New Hampshire is

2:00:08.880 --> 2:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in any indication of the rest of the country, which

2:00:11.120 --> 2:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is a big if and caveats, et cetera, et cetera.

2:00:14.200 --> 2:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>We can't deny normally the party in power in modern history,

2:00:18.120 --> 2:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they get shellacked in the midterms, and I think it

2:00:21.600 --> 2:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is a remarkable indictment of the Republican Party that they

2:00:26.960 --> 2:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>managed to look like this should not be in question.

2:00:31.680 --> 2:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You have seventy percent of the country saying the country

2:00:35.080 --> 2:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is on the wrong track. You have inflation at very

2:00:38.400 --> 2:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>high levels, you have concerns about inflation and concerns about

2:00:41.800 --> 2:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy at very high levels. You have a majority

2:00:44.480 --> 2:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of Americans saying that gas prices are hurting them financially.

2:00:47.600 --> 2:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now as we speak, it's like sixty some percent

2:00:49.920 --> 2:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>saying this is hurting me. Right now, you have a

2:00:53.040 --> 2:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>president whose approval rating is quite low. It's in like

2:00:55.920 --> 2:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the low forties right now. You look at those numbers,

2:00:59.680 --> 2:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this come should not be in doubt. And so when

2:01:02.800 --> 2:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I look at that, it's not. Listen, I'm gonna have

2:01:05.160 --> 2:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to give some credits to Democrats and their strategy was

2:01:07.200 --> 2:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>better than I thought if this ends up being good

2:01:08.880 --> 2:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for them, But I really think it is a thorough

2:01:11.640 --> 2:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>indictment of the direction of the Republican Party, which you know,

2:01:16.120 --> 2:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>really motivated people to turn out to the ballot box

2:01:18.600 --> 2:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way that they normally don't in the midterm

2:01:20.320 --> 2:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>election to protect the party in power. Is it is

2:01:23.160 --> 2:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>actually fascinating to see demon go ahead, Yeah, I want to.

2:01:25.720 --> 2:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to switch policy for a secon because you've

2:01:27.840 --> 2:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about these previous like midterm elections, right, so we

2:01:30.160 --> 2:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>referenced the nineteen nineties, Bill Clinton gets like the first

2:01:34.120 --> 2:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>big modern shellacking, and then two years later the era

2:01:37.400 --> 2:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of big government is over. Right, there's this big correction

2:01:40.360 --> 2:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten, another shellacking. Obama's ambition just goes away and

2:01:44.560 --> 2:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the presidency goes into defense. That helps you win re election,

2:01:47.480 --> 2:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the hope and change room is over.

2:01:49.840 --> 2:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys see as like the not what

2:01:52.440 --> 2:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you want? Right? But what takeaway do you think the

2:01:55.000 --> 2:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden people are going to take from? Let's say this

2:01:57.280 --> 2:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like moderate tsunami we're talking. Yeah, so culture first, First

2:02:00.560 --> 2:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, I love that question because I was transitioning

2:02:03.920 --> 2:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>right into the thing I wanted to bring up, which was,

2:02:06.280 --> 2:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's say the dynamic we're talking about now

2:02:09.040 --> 2:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>holds the rest of the night and the Democrats do

2:02:11.080 --> 2:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>better than expected. I mean, I really think it just

2:02:14.480 --> 2:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it proves that if you materially deliver for the American

2:02:19.200 --> 2:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>people to any degree, even if it's just a little bit,

2:02:21.760 --> 2:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh thank god, okay, I'll reward you. So

2:02:24.960 --> 2:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>let me make the case real quick. And I know

2:02:26.440 --> 2:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an unpopular case. I agree that on politics

2:02:29.520 --> 2:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden is a zombies half dead not good, but on

2:02:32.200 --> 2:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>policy he's way better than I thought he would be.

2:02:35.280 --> 2:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>My I mean, I had nonexistent hopes when Biden's approval

2:02:39.920 --> 2:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>rating was thirty three percent and he was doing nothing.

2:02:42.360 --> 2:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this is what it's going to be

2:02:43.880 --> 2:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like the rest of his time in office, and I'm

2:02:45.360 --> 2:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>going crazy over here. Then what do we get? Biden

2:02:48.440 --> 2:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>comes out and pardons we defenders. He pulls the troops

2:02:52.160 --> 2:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>out of Afghanistan. He does an executive order that raised

2:02:55.480 --> 2:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the federal minimum wage to fifteen dollars an hour, which

2:02:57.720 --> 2:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>impacts three hundred thousand workers who are federal contractors and

2:03:00.520 --> 2:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>federal employees. He has a pro union n LRB, which

2:03:03.480 --> 2:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>has allowed this wave of unionization now to sweep the country.

2:03:06.280 --> 2:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He's appointed anti monopolist Lena Khan to the FTC. She's

2:03:11.000 --> 2:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>currently blocking mergers. He does the Chips Act, which on

2:03:13.960 --> 2:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>shore is three hundred and fifty thousand jobs. He does

2:03:16.400 --> 2:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the Pack Deck, which is healthcare for veterans exposed to

2:03:19.120 --> 2:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>toxic burn pits. He does gun reform, bipartisan gun reform,

2:03:22.520 --> 2:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>which includes money for red flag laws, money for school security,

2:03:26.400 --> 2:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>money for mental health treatment. He killed zawaharive Haad of

2:03:29.440 --> 2:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>al Qaeda. We know inflation is a big problem, but

2:03:32.480 --> 2:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>also at the same time, we do currently have low unemployment.

2:03:35.160 --> 2:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Kataji Brown Jackson is on the Supreme Court. And then

2:03:38.000 --> 2:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>probably most importantly, you have the IRA, which lowered prescription

2:03:42.440 --> 2:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>drug costs for seniors. It has made an America provision

2:03:46.000 --> 2:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for clean energy technology. There's a fifteen percent called Riminimum

2:03:49.320 --> 2:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tax rate, a one percent tax on stock buybacks. Obamacare

2:03:52.160 --> 2:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>expansion now covers three million more people. And I mean, look,

2:03:56.000 --> 2:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I only gave you like maybe half the list here.

2:03:58.280 --> 2:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I can go on. But the fact of the matter is,

2:04:00.280 --> 2:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that people, when they get materially helped,

2:04:02.840 --> 2:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they go, Okay, good, Now that's all I want from you.

2:04:06.000 --> 2:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So now I will reward you. I will go vote

2:04:07.600 --> 2:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for your party. Joe Biden should hire you, Kyle. It's

2:04:09.480 --> 2:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the most eloquent defenses I heard of his presidency.

2:04:12.200 --> 2:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Yet look, bros, there's another. There's another, There's another. There's

2:04:16.760 --> 2:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>another interesting takeaway here that I want people because I

2:04:18.960 --> 2:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>always I always get really annoyed when people talk about, oh,

2:04:21.800 --> 2:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like the problem her politics is there's just like a

2:04:23.720 --> 2:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of older people, and you know, we need your incumbents.

2:04:27.840 --> 2:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And this Joe Biden on paper should not have done anything.

2:04:32.360 --> 2:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You just articulate. You would look at Barack Obama like

2:04:35.480 --> 2:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he's I don't think I wrote things either, right, So

2:04:38.440 --> 2:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I and you know, if you talk to I get

2:04:40.720 --> 2:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>really like red pill and people say, like, man, if

2:04:42.720 --> 2:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we saw a bunch of Yoka guys like what was

2:04:45.120 --> 2:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>his name? The guy from with Carolina who lost to

2:04:47.320 --> 2:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Madison cold. So I think I think they are like

2:04:53.280 --> 2:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just what I always thinking of, Like, God fucking forbid,

2:04:55.760 --> 2:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>there's just something hopeful, I think. I think I think

2:04:57.240 --> 2:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing which is hopeful there, which is that

2:04:59.680 --> 2:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>end of visuals matter more than you kind of would think.

2:05:03.000 --> 2:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's something. I think there's something there.

2:05:05.960 --> 2:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I think on this question. But

2:05:08.960 --> 2:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the other theory would be actually that it doesn't have

2:05:13.960 --> 2:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so much to do with Biden as it does with

2:05:16.480 --> 2:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like shifting of the era, because if

2:05:19.640 --> 2:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at Joe Biden over the course of his career,

2:05:22.160 --> 2:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you would not think this would be his presidents, right.

2:05:25.000 --> 2:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he goes with the winds. That is, that

2:05:27.280 --> 2:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is what he has always done, is he centered himself

2:05:29.440 --> 2:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the Democratic Party, tried to center

2:05:31.240 --> 2:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>himself in the middle of the electorate, and then done

2:05:33.320 --> 2:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing that he thinks that you know that entails

2:05:37.000 --> 2:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with a like basket of cliches and euphemisms or whatever

2:05:40.880 --> 2:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>from his family lore that he uses as his kind

2:05:43.360 --> 2:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of guideposts. So to me, it's more a sign of

2:05:47.280 --> 2:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the times that he's had a he has in certain things,

2:05:53.240 --> 2:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he has consequentially shifted the direction of the country and

2:06:00.240 --> 2:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in particular, I mean the NLRB and the anti trade stuff,

2:06:03.440 --> 2:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean not anti trade, the anti trust stuff in particular,

2:06:06.840 --> 2:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and and has a trade policy that is not unlike

2:06:09.880 --> 2:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's trade policy, to be perfectly honest with you, So

2:06:14.400 --> 2:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me, there's a question or okay, is

2:06:16.920 --> 2:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that Biden and he actually connects to an older ares

2:06:19.560 --> 2:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>more of the New Deal areas bringing some of that

2:06:21.320 --> 2:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>into his presidency and sort of like digging it up

2:06:23.320 --> 2:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in the depths and his experience in his age is

2:06:25.080 --> 2:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a benefit. Or is it that he is reflecting

2:06:29.280 --> 2:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're in a different moment in America and that's

2:06:33.080 --> 2:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>where some of these policy shifts ultimately come from. I honestly,

2:06:37.000 --> 2:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of like on the fence about which one

2:06:38.800 --> 2:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of those things are. But I think it could be.

2:06:40.440 --> 2:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it could ultimately be either one. Let me

2:06:42.720 --> 2:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>say what they want. They won't learn the things that

2:06:46.720 --> 2:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you just said, though even If that's true, what they're

2:06:50.320 --> 2:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going to think is abortion in January sixth, that you know,

2:06:56.400 --> 2:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're closing. Let me just their closing pitch

2:06:59.680 --> 2:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was the top of the bit. Their closing pitch was

2:07:02.440 --> 2:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>democracies on the ballot January sixth election deniers. And you

2:07:06.400 --> 2:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know what, they're not wrong because when you do look

2:07:09.560 --> 2:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>at these races, like part of why Maggie Hassen appears

2:07:12.480 --> 2:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to be cleaning up here is because Don Bulldock is

2:07:14.760 --> 2:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this like psycho election denier. Right. Part of the reason

2:07:17.800 --> 2:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>why you have Democrats, the base of the Democratic Party

2:07:22.120 --> 2:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so energized to go out and vote and protect democratic

2:07:25.800 --> 2:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>power is because they truly do fear that there is

2:07:29.480 --> 2:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like a democracy ending potential event if they don't go

2:07:33.880 --> 2:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and do that. And that's why you do have these

2:07:37.240 --> 2:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections with much higher enthusiasm for the party in

2:07:40.920 --> 2:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>power than you normally do. So, you know, I don't

2:07:44.680 --> 2:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think that they're wrong to look at some of how

2:07:47.680 --> 2:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they went all in on January's all, when all in

2:07:49.920 --> 2:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on extremism closed with democracy on the ballot, given that

2:07:54.160 --> 2:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were elevating so many election deniers. So, I mean,

2:07:58.760 --> 2:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I mostly agree with what you said, the only counterpoint

2:08:01.120 --> 2:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I would make is if, for example, we get the

2:08:03.960 --> 2:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers on this election and we see that there was

2:08:05.720 --> 2:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a giant surge in young people showing up to vote. Yeah,

2:08:08.360 --> 2:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would say, you know what, maybe this has

2:08:09.720 --> 2:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>something to do with the student loan debt reduction, and

2:08:11.080 --> 2:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe it just has to do with like weed pardons

2:08:12.480 --> 2:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for example. So that's substantive. And then the second point is,

2:08:15.440 --> 2:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>even if I grant you the point you made, I

2:08:17.960 --> 2:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do think that, you know, running on the abortion stuff,

2:08:20.800 --> 2:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>even tho I don't think it should be the whole

2:08:22.120 --> 2:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>picture of what they ran on, it is substantive because

2:08:24.880 --> 2:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it's fundamentally an argument for No, we want to be

2:08:27.760 --> 2:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the freedom people. If we're if we're now descheduling weed,

2:08:31.160 --> 2:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that means we want to increase your social freedoms. We're

2:08:33.800 --> 2:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the pro choice party, we want to increase your social freedoms.

2:08:36.440 --> 2:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. And again, this is an argument I'd love

2:08:38.920 --> 2:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to see them embrace wholeheartedly. Because my politics, you can

2:08:42.920 --> 2:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>boil it down to, I believe in economic patriotism and

2:08:47.800 --> 2:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>freedom on the social front, social freedom, and so I

2:08:50.600 --> 2:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think those two things together are I mean, are winner

2:08:54.160 --> 2:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>could be an interesting thing Okay, so it is nine

2:08:56.440 --> 2:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>pm or it's nine point nine specifically, so that we

2:09:00.040 --> 2:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>off everything that has now closed. Arizona nine pm Eastern

2:09:03.840 --> 2:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Standard time are officially closed. It's about to get fun

2:09:06.200 --> 2:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>here people. Colorado officially closed, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska,

2:09:13.840 --> 2:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico, New York, which, by the way, we have

2:09:16.760 --> 2:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to watch because that was also predicted as possibly closer

2:09:19.760 --> 2:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>than people thought, especially with Leez Elden and Kathy Hochel,

2:09:22.600 --> 2:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. So Georgia,

2:09:28.120 --> 2:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>New York isn't going to count their votes, I like,

2:09:29.880 --> 2:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't like two months. They'll don't hold your breath host

2:09:35.560 --> 2:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Inauguration day. They will eventually inform US election. Fifty eight

2:09:39.720 --> 2:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote now currently and in Georgia, so

2:09:42.480 --> 2:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Warnock currently at fifty one percent, Herschel Walker at forty seven.

2:09:46.120 --> 2:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But there was a big dump from a major Democratic

2:09:48.440 --> 2:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>area there. In terms of the other ones that we

2:09:50.640 --> 2:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>should pay attention to, Pennsylvania, John Fetterman soon up there,

2:09:53.680 --> 2:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but only thirteen percent of the vote. New Hampshire holding

2:09:56.200 --> 2:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>steady at sixteen. Ohio is at forty one things much

2:10:00.320 --> 2:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>tighter now. It's at fifty one and forty nine for

2:10:03.000 --> 2:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>jam very VERYA. That's true, but there is an interesting

2:10:07.760 --> 2:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>again ticket splitting dynamic in Ohio. A third of the

2:10:12.720 --> 2:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Ohio voted huge gap of more than twenty percentage points

2:10:16.280 --> 2:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>between the march and the Governor's race and the marchin

2:10:18.240 --> 2:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in the center race. So you have a lot of

2:10:20.120 --> 2:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are voting for Dwine the Republic, he's already

2:10:23.600 --> 2:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>been declared victory of victorious in Ohio for the governor's race,

2:10:27.560 --> 2:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and then are voting for Tim Ryan. Let's talk about

2:10:29.760 --> 2:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Tim We have Tim Rynan at all. Tim Ryan thoughts, Oh,

2:10:32.920 --> 2:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he ran a phenomenal campaign, and I'm not

2:10:34.800 --> 2:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not a big fan of Tim Ryan. I

2:10:36.360 --> 2:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>mean I remember back during the when he ran for President.

2:10:39.360 --> 2:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim Ryan, Yeah, meditation. He was like us went after Bernie.

2:10:44.960 --> 2:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It was like, we don't have to yell at shirts

2:10:47.920 --> 2:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that said stop yelling or whatever. We don't have to

2:10:51.480 --> 2:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>yell at ye. He's signed on to the list on

2:10:56.000 --> 2:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the Medicare for All Caucus. So he endorsed support for

2:10:58.440 --> 2:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Medicare for All bill in the House, and then

2:11:00.080 --> 2:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>he was interviewed later on and asked to U sport

2:11:01.960 --> 2:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for all. He was like, no, I hate that policy,

2:11:04.360 --> 2:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and so I have big, big issues with Tim Ryan.

2:11:06.920 --> 2:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of politics, I think he's run a

2:11:09.560 --> 2:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal campaign. I think he's been really aggressive, which is

2:11:12.640 --> 2:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>something that we don't often see from Democrats. I think

2:11:14.800 --> 2:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of correctly portrayed jd Vance as an extremist

2:11:18.600 --> 2:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and a Trump asked Kisser quite literally, I think he

2:11:20.600 --> 2:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>said those words on stage. Trump said that about jade

2:11:23.840 --> 2:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Van and then yes, hey, remember when he said that thing. Ye,

2:11:28.120 --> 2:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I just thought he ran a good campaign. Yeah, Well,

2:11:30.800 --> 2:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And that is the question is, like,

2:11:32.920 --> 2:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, clearly Tim right did some things right because

2:11:35.840 --> 2:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he's outperforming the other dude. Yeah. I don't even know

2:11:38.720 --> 2:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who it was running for the I think it is

2:11:40.200 --> 2:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a woman running for governor for the Nan Whaley is

2:11:42.120 --> 2:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that whould be lckamist, gender and whatever canceled anyway, So

2:11:47.240 --> 2:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he did definitely did some things right to be outperforming

2:11:49.720 --> 2:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the other Democrat that he's sharing a ticket with statewide.

2:11:52.760 --> 2:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the question is how much of it is

2:11:54.440 --> 2:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like what did Tim Ryan to write and how much

2:11:56.840 --> 2:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of it is what did JD vance do wrong? Right?

2:11:59.520 --> 2:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>What is it that voters didn't like about him his platform?

2:12:02.760 --> 2:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Do they view him as extreme? Did they view him

2:12:04.720 --> 2:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as untattouched? Did they view him as like Yeah, I

2:12:07.160 --> 2:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it is It does have this sort of gross

2:12:09.960 --> 2:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>feel that you were the guy that was like the

2:12:11.800 --> 2:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>principled critic of Trump and then all of a sudden

2:12:14.240 --> 2:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, I love you and please endorse me

2:12:16.240 --> 2:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and basically owes his totally owes his victory in the

2:12:19.280 --> 2:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican primary to securing the Trump endorsement. So, you know,

2:12:23.600 --> 2:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to that question, but it

2:12:25.520 --> 2:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly has to be like a little bit of both there. Well,

2:12:27.720 --> 2:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Tad to your point, Christ it kind of gets into

2:12:29.480 --> 2:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the weird dynamic. It seems like Tim Ryan because of

2:12:34.320 --> 2:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the way like JD's had to kind of like shift

2:12:36.000 --> 2:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>his position around Tim Ryan kind of rank. And you

2:12:37.960 --> 2:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>almost would think that the JD's the incumbent right now,

2:12:41.560 --> 2:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>right that's how like aggressive at Tim Bran's being like

2:12:44.760 --> 2:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's probably like there's probably a lesson

2:12:46.880 --> 2:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>there when this is I think your point on aggression

2:12:49.960 --> 2:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and how like that wo make it. It might help though,

2:12:52.240 --> 2:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because because Ohio is such a red state you should

2:12:55.320 --> 2:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>treat it as incumbents see. So it makes it like

2:12:57.680 --> 2:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more up there. So some interesting call

2:13:00.760 --> 2:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>out Sarah Huckabee Sanders, press secretary officially Arkansas's governor. I

2:13:05.440 --> 2:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>told Chuck Schumer has now won his fifth term to

2:13:10.400 --> 2:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>become the New York longest Senator in the history of

2:13:14.040 --> 2:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the state of New York. He's only he's a young man,

2:13:16.960 --> 2:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he's only seventy three. So I predict that is not

2:13:19.080 --> 2:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the last election that we will see him. By the

2:13:21.480 --> 2:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>way he's taken. In the Democratic North Carolina. What we

2:13:24.360 --> 2:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>were all taking a look at, Ted budd has actually

2:13:26.320 --> 2:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>now gone ahead and pulled ahead in the race there.

2:13:28.360 --> 2:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It's still closed, so it's fifty and fifty nine. Again

2:13:31.200 --> 2:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we all fell for the Blue mirage. It's a joke.

2:13:33.320 --> 2:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Sixty eight percent of the vote coming in there now

2:13:35.280 --> 2:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and things starting to trend a little bit more in

2:13:37.680 --> 2:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that direction. Georgia, I'm keeping an eye on it. At

2:13:41.360 --> 2:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>no surprise. It gives me great pleasure to say all this.

2:13:44.120 --> 2:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Immediately after the polls closed, Fox News went ahead and

2:13:47.240 --> 2:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>called the race for Greg Abbott over Beto Rourke. Is

2:13:51.160 --> 2:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing to consider him four years later. Right, twenty

2:13:55.040 --> 2:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen was his big moment. He raised more money than God.

2:13:58.600 --> 2:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember rocking around Marshall this when we were living

2:14:01.480 --> 2:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in Adams Morgan, and I remember seeing Beto stickers everywhere.

2:14:04.800 --> 2:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>He was raising so much money. Anytime I visited Texas

2:14:07.640 --> 2:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>at that time, if you landed in Austin, you'd see

2:14:09.640 --> 2:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Beto T shirts. He was irrelevant in the year twenty

2:14:12.800 --> 2:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. And it's a real fall from grace for him,

2:14:16.120 --> 2:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for Stacy Abrams as well, like many of the twenty

2:14:19.120 --> 2:14:22.839
<v Speaker 1>eighteen stars did not pan out at all, built huge

2:14:22.920 --> 2:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>campaigns and fundraising dollars on the backs of that, and look,

2:14:27.360 --> 2:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's a huge failure for the quote

2:14:30.040 --> 2:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>unquote like the stars of twenty eighteen who didn't actually

2:14:33.320 --> 2:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>win was a couple. Yeah, it's kind of it's funny,

2:14:36.520 --> 2:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I live in Austin now obviously, so like I've

2:14:38.760 --> 2:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>been thinking, there's a very little like Beto energy, and

2:14:41.640 --> 2:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he was so much there's this very little like Beto energy,

2:14:44.400 --> 2:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like very I mean, there are signs, but Stephie doesn't

2:14:46.720 --> 2:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like the environment. But two there's a there's a

2:14:49.120 --> 2:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>broad left and I think Beto was worse on this

2:14:51.920 --> 2:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>than Stacy Abrams. Was the transition he made from I'm

2:14:56.200 --> 2:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a Texas guy to running nationally. There was no no

2:15:00.280 --> 2:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>reason for him to say I'm coming for your ars

2:15:03.680 --> 2:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, and I'm talking about that. We're not talking policy,

2:15:07.080 --> 2:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that literal phrasing, pointing to the camera and saying I'm

2:15:11.000 --> 2:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Okay, it's over. So if you're going to

2:15:13.160 --> 2:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be successful, hey, it's the second interviews has got people

2:15:15.800 --> 2:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't like Ted Cruz, so candidate choice really matters.

2:15:19.400 --> 2:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But just this, this is we're debating, like how much

2:15:21.880 --> 2:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of this is local and national? This shows that there

2:15:24.360 --> 2:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are cases where you can be a Texas Democrat, you

2:15:28.880 --> 2:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>can be a Georgia Democrat, but you have to can't

2:15:32.760 --> 2:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be thinking of the programtic one you just got picked.

2:15:35.240 --> 2:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is I think people really got the

2:15:37.880 --> 2:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sense he was so forced on us by the media.

2:15:41.240 --> 2:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Remember when he was on all like those magnanity I'm

2:15:44.720 --> 2:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>just born to be in standing on every table he

2:15:47.160 --> 2:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>could stand on for no reason, that Oprah, And then

2:15:50.960 --> 2:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he started talking and people were like, oh, this is

2:15:54.200 --> 2:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>what all the hypees about, Like this is this is

2:15:56.080 --> 2:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy and to your point. Yeah, if you're gonna run

2:15:58.760 --> 2:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for governor of Texas, how the fuck are you going

2:16:02.280 --> 2:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, Yeah, I'm coming to take your guns? Yeah,

2:16:04.280 --> 2:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>any other phrasing. I actually cannot think of a first

2:16:08.360 --> 2:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It is Texas, the one thing you cannot say in Texas. Yeah,

2:16:12.720 --> 2:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and he did it, and so yeah, I mean, I'm

2:16:14.120 --> 2:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>not surprised he was forced on us by the media.

2:16:16.560 --> 2:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And I actually kind of liked the fact that Stacy

2:16:18.880 --> 2:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Abrams and Better o'rourk overall, their national profile has just

2:16:22.360 --> 2:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely tanked, because again, this was the media trying to

2:16:24.840 --> 2:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>send up the air apparent to the like Okay, well

2:16:27.760 --> 2:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you Hillary, and then okay, maybe Biden at

2:16:30.120 --> 2:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the last minute will give you Okay, now they're going

2:16:32.320 --> 2:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to do mayor Pede of course, and Conin Harris.

2:16:34.800 --> 2:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But like the fact that so many of them have

2:16:36.480 --> 2:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>failed spectacularly leaves me hope that they're still room for

2:16:41.040 --> 2:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>like a candidate Obama back in two thousand and seven,

2:16:43.240 --> 2:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight who kind of came out of

2:16:44.879 --> 2:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>nowhere and just captured the imagination, Like why couldn't Warnock

2:16:47.560 --> 2:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do that in a presidential race for the Democrats? You

2:16:49.520 --> 2:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>know what, I mean, I mean, I think Kamala is

2:16:52.959 --> 2:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>another one that I would put on the list of

2:16:54.440 --> 2:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>failing spectacularly, right, Like, she might be vice president and

2:16:58.800 --> 2:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they might try to force her because they don't feel

2:17:00.760 --> 2:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like they can get past the first black woman vice

2:17:03.240 --> 2:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>president and we kind of, you know, have to go

2:17:05.560 --> 2:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there next. But she's obviously already failed spectacular in terms

2:17:10.120 --> 2:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of how the public feels about her. So yeah, I mean,

2:17:13.120 --> 2:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole theory of the Democratic Party is like, Okay,

2:17:16.480 --> 2:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>let's just let's find the next Obama. Let's find someone

2:17:19.400 --> 2:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>who's you know, sort of like parrots his way of

2:17:22.480 --> 2:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>talking and his speech patterns, and let's just like put

2:17:26.440 --> 2:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>them out as this is the next one here. Congratulations

2:17:30.400 --> 2:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to all of you. We've bestowed Beto and Pete and

2:17:33.440 --> 2:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Kamala and Stacy Abrams upon you. And you know, it's

2:17:37.200 --> 2:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no accident then that all of these media creations who

2:17:40.640 --> 2:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>really didn't have a lot of any like vision or

2:17:43.240 --> 2:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>substance or like charisma of their own to back it up,

2:17:46.040 --> 2:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that they ultimately sort of fizzle out. So and it's

2:17:48.440 --> 2:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a different thing for the Democratic base that was very

2:17:51.080 --> 2:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>excited about Stacy Abrams in Georgia last time. Aroundm very

2:17:54.200 --> 2:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>excited about Beta or Burke, but they also didn't really

2:17:56.879 --> 2:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to sort of examine them at that point,

2:17:59.680 --> 2:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they were excited about the dream of

2:18:02.480 --> 2:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>winning in Texas. The other thing I would say about

2:18:05.120 --> 2:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, I think the Democratic like Texas

2:18:09.560 --> 2:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hopium has also significantly cooled and dimmed dramatically because of

2:18:14.840 --> 2:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the shift in Latino voters absolutely right to Republicans. So,

2:18:18.879 --> 2:18:21.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, the dream there always was you'd say, look

2:18:21.080 --> 2:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at all these Latino voters and if we can get

2:18:23.080 --> 2:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>them to turn out, and we just need a registered

2:18:24.840 --> 2:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in the vote, we get them to the polling places

2:18:26.400 --> 2:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and they'll vote for Democrats. And now it's like will

2:18:28.959 --> 2:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they vote for Democrats no longer clear? And in the

2:18:32.200 --> 2:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Rio Grand Valley, as we have talked about and many

2:18:34.160 --> 2:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>others have talked about as well, huge shifts to the right.

2:18:37.280 --> 2:18:40.039
<v Speaker 1>So that has kind of killed, let's put a real

2:18:40.120 --> 2:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>damper on the Democratic dreams in Texas for the moment. Well,

2:18:42.840 --> 2:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>there's one other thing that it's also killed because the

2:18:44.800 --> 2:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>real the way this, you know, Latinos like black men

2:18:48.280 --> 2:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically going more for Republicans from twenty sixteen to twenty

2:18:50.920 --> 2:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty was talked to us. This is just like Trump, right,

2:18:53.720 --> 2:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were to build a guy in a lab

2:18:56.800 --> 2:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>who could do better for minorities, and let's hmit Romney,

2:18:59.640 --> 2:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it wrote to be Donald Trump. The fact that Republicans

2:19:02.520 --> 2:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>are able to pull that off when Trump is not

2:19:04.840 --> 2:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot, that's really the dream of that, because

2:19:08.000 --> 2:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the hope the copium was Okay, let's get real, it's Trump.

2:19:12.480 --> 2:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>No one's shocked at that. But when generic Texas, what

2:19:16.000 --> 2:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>boomer Republicans pulling that up, pulling that up Myra Flores

2:19:19.000 --> 2:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like whenever she won in her race. And actually, I

2:19:20.760 --> 2:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I expect some of that data to come out

2:19:22.440 --> 2:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of text. I'll be watching that very closely. So a

2:19:25.120 --> 2:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an update. Vance is actually pulled ahead

2:19:27.440 --> 2:19:30.039
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Ohio at fifty points three percent

2:19:30.040 --> 2:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of the vote to Tim Ryans forty nine point seven.

2:19:32.600 --> 2:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>As we get more and more and North Carolina similarly,

2:19:35.680 --> 2:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Ted Budd continued to maintaining the hold, although still only

2:19:38.920 --> 2:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in thirty nine point four and forty eight point six.

2:19:41.200 --> 2:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>That's sixty nine percent of the vote. Okay, so I

2:19:43.240 --> 2:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the red votes I've got, I've

2:19:45.360 --> 2:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>got a John Ralston update out so this is the guy. Yeah,

2:19:50.040 --> 2:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he's very well known. He has a great track record

2:19:52.640 --> 2:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in Nevada in terms of predicting what the income is

2:19:54.560 --> 2:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be. He watches the early vote in Nevada

2:19:56.240 --> 2:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>has long had a sizable like early mail in vote,

2:19:58.680 --> 2:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so he looks at, okay, what's the parson and break

2:20:00.240 --> 2:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>down how much Republican, how much Democrat, how much of

2:20:02.080 --> 2:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic firewell whatever. So in advance of election day,

2:20:06.360 --> 2:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he actually predicted that Catherine Cortez Master, the Democrat, would

2:20:10.200 --> 2:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>hold on and win and that the Republican would win

2:20:12.640 --> 2:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for governor. Then he started to see the votes come

2:20:14.680 --> 2:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on an election day and was like, oh, I might

2:20:16.800 --> 2:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>need to really take that one back. So where we

2:20:20.400 --> 2:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>are now is he says, I've just confirmed that whatever

2:20:25.400 --> 2:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>mail has been dropped off today is not going to

2:20:27.640 --> 2:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>be tabulated tonight in Clark County. That's where Las Vegas

2:20:30.120 --> 2:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is overwhelming bulk population is like the whole ballgame is

2:20:33.440 --> 2:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Clark County, Indova may take until Thursday. Oh no, what

2:20:38.200 --> 2:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>will be tally tonight? Our election day in person and

2:20:40.680 --> 2:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>all the early mail votes already in the system save

2:20:43.280 --> 2:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for provisional ballots. So he says it is very likely

2:20:47.520 --> 2:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the top of the ticket Republicans will be ahead after

2:20:50.200 --> 2:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>tonight with thousands of mail ballots still uncounted, will they

2:20:53.760 --> 2:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>try to declare victory even though the races may not

2:20:56.120 --> 2:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be over. What do you think? So, oh my god,

2:20:58.320 --> 2:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>there was Carrie Lake. We know what would happen. You

2:21:00.640 --> 2:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>know what would happen, but we don't know. Lo Salt

2:21:03.200 --> 2:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit, he's not He's more of an

2:21:05.680 --> 2:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>establishment guy, like moved the state a couple of years ago.

2:21:07.920 --> 2:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>He's more of like a rich guy Republicans. So I'm

2:21:10.720 --> 2:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>not so sure that that would happen. I don't know

2:21:12.680 --> 2:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>anything about the gubernatorial Republicans. I don't know nominee in

2:21:16.640 --> 2:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the state. So anyway, just heads up that that one

2:21:20.720 --> 2:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to flip Man and that's going to feed

2:21:22.240 --> 2:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of We will probably not know tonight,

2:21:24.760 --> 2:21:27.039
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, maybe it'll be clear, maybe it'll be

2:21:27.160 --> 2:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are up by a whole lot. And it's basically,

2:21:29.680 --> 2:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't he predict Democrats that Cortes Master is gonna hold

2:21:32.440 --> 2:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on receipt yea his initial projection away a little bit? Yeah, okay, understood.

2:21:37.920 --> 2:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's say there's a tiny lead for Republicans and

2:21:40.400 --> 2:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you still have all these uncounted Clark County. Yeah, that's

2:21:42.959 --> 2:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to flip to the Democrats, and that's you're going

2:21:44.720 --> 2:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to have like seventeen divisied susive documentaries coming out. Facts.

2:21:48.320 --> 2:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That's fun. It's fun to live in America. So, I mean,

2:21:58.879 --> 2:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's worse saying that other countries do

2:22:03.480 --> 2:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>manage to count their ballots, even with early vote and

2:22:06.320 --> 2:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>mail in ballots and whatever on election day. And still, yes, Brazil,

2:22:10.920 --> 2:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we knew who won like right away, and we're talking

2:22:13.680 --> 2:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know, like people voting in far flung plays.

2:22:17.040 --> 2:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a big country. Whatever. I have a love I

2:22:19.959 --> 2:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just you know, we should we should get our act

2:22:21.959 --> 2:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>together a little better on this. I have no reason

2:22:23.680 --> 2:22:26.039
<v Speaker 1>you have to wait till freak Thursday to count these ballots. Guys.

2:22:26.280 --> 2:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a good one for the panel. Guys. I

2:22:27.680 --> 2:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have a love hate relationship with federalism and some things.

2:22:29.879 --> 2:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it, but like on election and look, I

2:22:31.879 --> 2:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>get it, everybody like why it isn't design this way,

2:22:34.120 --> 2:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's a pain in the ass, like you know,

2:22:36.640 --> 2:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And I also talk about this with Republicans. Marshall's actually

2:22:38.959 --> 2:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the one I remember I was at your house when

2:22:41.000 --> 2:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys were all voting, and everybody in Oregon votes

2:22:43.320 --> 2:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>by mail. It's awesome. It's actually a much higher turnout.

2:22:46.720 --> 2:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a lot easier. I understand drop boxes all stuff.

2:22:50.280 --> 2:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Oregon in Washington like seem to have figured it out.

2:22:52.720 --> 2:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>They have way higher voter participation. It seems like everybody

2:22:55.720 --> 2:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in the state likes it. And I'm not even saying

2:22:57.800 --> 2:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily voting by mail, but I was thinking about it

2:23:00.600 --> 2:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>today and I'm like, if I can log into my

2:23:02.120 --> 2:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>bank account with a text message, and I'm like, why

2:23:04.800 --> 2:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is this so antiquate? Like so many other functions of

2:23:08.000 --> 2:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>our lives, like don't and I have modernized in a

2:23:10.800 --> 2:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sense where voting just seems to be a shit show

2:23:13.760 --> 2:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>every single time that we cover it. And your nail, Crystal,

2:23:17.120 --> 2:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you were some of them saying, is like it seems

2:23:19.160 --> 2:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to have gotten where it does seem to be ever present,

2:23:21.000 --> 2:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like you know, with two thousand, even two thousand and four,

2:23:23.120 --> 2:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>if I recall, I remember going to bed on two

2:23:25.560 --> 2:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four election night and people saying, well, we're

2:23:27.840 --> 2:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to know Ohio for a couple of days,

2:23:29.840 --> 2:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think John Carrey conceded until the day after.

2:23:33.040 --> 2:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, I mean, it's funny because so I voted

2:23:37.400 --> 2:23:40.039
<v Speaker 1>in Austin on Friday. That's my first I've always just

2:23:40.040 --> 2:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't drop off like Neil Ballots. I waited like an

2:23:42.560 --> 2:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>hour in line, and I was I was early. I

2:23:45.240 --> 2:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>basically the answer is, I actually cannot talk of Republicans.

2:23:48.160 --> 2:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I'mout this issue because Oregon it's been vote by mail forever.

2:23:51.160 --> 2:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of like, this is crazy, right, but I

2:23:53.520 --> 2:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's kind of I don't know. It's just

2:23:55.200 --> 2:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like I think it should be pretty like

2:23:57.560 --> 2:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Ford to vote vote, and I agree should be, uh,

2:24:00.840 --> 2:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it should be it should be federalized. I mean, I

2:24:03.640 --> 2:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>see that. It's just I know it's not gonna fly.

2:24:05.720 --> 2:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, if you're designing a system from scratch,

2:24:07.920 --> 2:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're gonna have the same rules everywhere. Right, We're

2:24:10.280 --> 2:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be like, well, in miss Stape we count

2:24:12.320 --> 2:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>using donkeys. That is also why I do want to

2:24:14.840 --> 2:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>say that some of the g OPI talking points on

2:24:16.680 --> 2:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff drive me into the story tradition a donkey ballot count.

2:24:21.600 --> 2:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Dare you take that away from get back to the

2:24:23.000 --> 2:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>GOP legislators they're the ones who pass law saying you

2:24:25.560 --> 2:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>can't count early vote until elections. Why why well, we

2:24:29.760 --> 2:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>do not let me play, let me play doubles advocate,

2:24:32.600 --> 2:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. I don't even know that I agree

2:24:34.440 --> 2:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with this position, but somebody's got to take it. So

2:24:37.840 --> 2:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>if you did have the federal government basically overseeing the

2:24:42.320 --> 2:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>entire election infrastructure, it strikes me as likely that that

2:24:46.120 --> 2:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would feed more conspiracy definitely would You're right, No, you're

2:24:50.200 --> 2:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think Kyle, not just speak for you, but

2:24:53.280 --> 2:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you put it accurate, normalized standards. So like

2:24:57.959 --> 2:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's that like you have eight days early voting

2:25:02.760 --> 2:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or this is that I think there'd be I guess,

2:25:06.640 --> 2:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess the philosophical question, like I think people should

2:25:09.360 --> 2:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>think about it is like is our responsive, Like is

2:25:12.360 --> 2:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>our election system like not responsive enough? Or it should

2:25:15.360 --> 2:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it be like more responsive? I think we should have

2:25:16.879 --> 2:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>more people voting, like I think that. I think the

2:25:18.480 --> 2:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>total thing one of my favorite things the Night Foundation

2:25:21.080 --> 2:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>has talked about a million times, So forgive me everybody,

2:25:23.920 --> 2:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is the one hundred million American project where they talk

2:25:26.120 --> 2:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>about the one hundred million Americans is a compedter. Okay, right, Okay,

2:25:30.040 --> 2:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a microsoft surface. It's not water. It's different than water.

2:25:36.520 --> 2:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just trying to don't worry anyway. One of my

2:25:40.320 --> 2:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite studies, one hundred Million Americans Project, which talks about

2:25:43.000 --> 2:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million Americans who don't vote and the vast

2:25:45.000 --> 2:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>majority of Glenn Greenwald actually was tweeting about it today.

2:25:47.320 --> 2:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of people who don't vote are working class,

2:25:50.160 --> 2:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>are people of color, and most of them just think

2:25:52.440 --> 2:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that their vote doesn't matter at all. It's sometimes there

2:25:56.080 --> 2:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, people will ask is it too hard

2:25:58.240 --> 2:25:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to vote, and they're like no, like I could have,

2:26:00.080 --> 2:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to, Like I just don't care. And that

2:26:02.800 --> 2:26:05.039
<v Speaker 1>is something where Look, we seem to have very high

2:26:05.040 --> 2:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>turnout today. I think that's great, but if you look

2:26:07.360 --> 2:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>peck it to our historical standards, it still seems to

2:26:10.640 --> 2:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be incredibly low. Even in twenty twenty, we s have

2:26:13.640 --> 2:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>much higher voter participation in this country. Yes, I know,

2:26:16.360 --> 2:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not everybody could vote and all that, but if you look,

2:26:18.560 --> 2:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in other developing in western countries, even put

2:26:21.440 --> 2:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>aside the whole like it should be a national holiday,

2:26:23.840 --> 2:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, discourse, people there just seem to care a

2:26:26.360 --> 2:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more. I do think that's something that I don't

2:26:28.760 --> 2:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>even know if that's a federal problem that can but

2:26:30.440 --> 2:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean Trump has driven up turnout. No,

2:26:34.120 --> 2:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he certainly has done that, and it hasn't been good

2:26:36.240 --> 2:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for the country. So I mean, I would like turn

2:26:39.920 --> 2:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>out to be up, but for less or I'll take

2:26:43.040 --> 2:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>more turn if anything was going. I actually understand voting

2:26:46.959 --> 2:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>being mandatory, even more than I understand like jury Dewey

2:26:50.080 --> 2:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>being mandatory. You're going to make anything mandatory. I'm so

2:26:53.280 --> 2:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>against that. Voting isn't the way I'm not saying. I'm

2:26:56.959 --> 2:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying if there is anything that you can make

2:26:59.520 --> 2:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>argument vote that should be mandatory, it would be that

2:27:01.600 --> 2:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>over jury duty or anything. All Right, I've got a

2:27:03.480 --> 2:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Georgia update. It's okay. I'm pretty surprised by this one

2:27:08.400 --> 2:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point with more than half of Georgia ballots counted.

2:27:11.600 --> 2:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>This is per Greg Bluestein, who we've had on rising

2:27:14.360 --> 2:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and on breaking points as well. Republican Governor Kemp and

2:27:18.040 --> 2:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic center Rafael Warnock have almost an equal number of votes. Wow,

2:27:23.840 --> 2:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>whoa Warnock and Kemp equal number of votes? That is astonishing.

2:27:29.520 --> 2:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're off by I mean it's very very

2:27:32.879 --> 2:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>little that there's a difference here. So Michel Walker's underperforming

2:27:36.320 --> 2:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Abrams. Correct, wa actually herschel Walker right now. And

2:27:41.800 --> 2:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this is because in the Senate race there is a

2:27:44.520 --> 2:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>libertarian candidate who's garnering about two percentage of two points

2:27:47.959 --> 2:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of the vote right now. So herschel Walker actually has

2:27:50.879 --> 2:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>fewer votes than Stacy Abrams. That is crazy. Wow, that

2:27:54.680 --> 2:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it really does. Shore. I mean, look, this again could

2:27:56.760 --> 2:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be the cannon quality. At the same time, it's only

2:27:59.160 --> 2:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty six percent. Do we know Brian Kemp is going

2:28:02.600 --> 2:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to win? No, I agree, So if you've got Warnock

2:28:05.520 --> 2:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>running equal with him, this is looking to me like

2:28:08.680 --> 2:28:11.039
<v Speaker 1>the question isn't who comes out on top, it's whether

2:28:11.320 --> 2:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he avoids a or not. Great point, but the fifty

2:28:14.200 --> 2:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty Oh go ahead, I have a call. It is

2:28:15.959 --> 2:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>with a call JB. Pritzker. Oh, big boy, big boy. Well,

2:28:22.879 --> 2:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a This is somebody who you

2:28:25.160 --> 2:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>know certainly thinks of himself as a potential presidential candidate

2:28:28.760 --> 2:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>in the future. This is someone who, uh similar to

2:28:31.920 --> 2:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom, although not quite as overt and shameless, has

2:28:35.480 --> 2:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>made some moves to try to position himself in the eventuality.

2:28:38.640 --> 2:28:41.199
<v Speaker 1>If Biden doesn't run, I think he would be one

2:28:41.240 --> 2:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who would run. He's also happens to be a billionaire,

2:28:44.080 --> 2:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so uh, you know that never hurts in terms of

2:28:46.440 --> 2:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>our political system. And it's Michael Bloomberg. I think I

2:28:50.240 --> 2:28:55.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably not a money though I actually actually

2:28:55.959 --> 2:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>mad stage. Yeah, I think being a billionaire probably hurts

2:28:58.600 --> 2:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you as a presidential candidate. I think I think I

2:29:02.080 --> 2:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think it causes it insolarty and just like the things

2:29:05.760 --> 2:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that happened you for your a billion I know, obviously

2:29:07.959 --> 2:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's bad. I think you

2:29:09.480 --> 2:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>want to be like in the hundred million. All right,

2:29:12.640 --> 2:29:17.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a sweet spot, millionaire ritory spot. He's getting re

2:29:18.000 --> 2:29:22.039
<v Speaker 1>elected tonight. The funny thing. The funny thing about Pritzker

2:29:22.440 --> 2:29:26.039
<v Speaker 1>is like there was a moment in online discourse where

2:29:26.040 --> 2:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>progressives and lefties got like super excited about this guy,

2:29:29.120 --> 2:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's like a whole thing. And it was really

2:29:31.800 --> 2:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>because he just like ran on a couple of things

2:29:34.840 --> 2:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and then actually did them when he became governor, and

2:29:37.440 --> 2:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the bar was so low that they were like, oh

2:29:38.800 --> 2:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>my god, we love this guy. He's amazing. By the way,

2:29:40.640 --> 2:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>one more call Jared Polis has been re elected governor

2:29:43.959 --> 2:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of Colorado, Governor of colorow other guy position. That is

2:29:47.400 --> 2:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>an important point because in the red tsunami scenario, they

2:29:50.600 --> 2:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>actually thought that Polis was possibly so that is an

2:29:53.600 --> 2:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>important That is an important data point to shout out

2:29:56.000 --> 2:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. Also, Michael Bennett there with thirty eight percent,

2:29:59.440 --> 2:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is at three percent. Reporting is up by sixty to forty,

2:30:03.320 --> 2:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty remarkable for what we have there. Wow,

2:30:06.440 --> 2:30:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I'm pretty stunned by those numbers,

2:30:08.959 --> 2:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia numbers, because we've got two thirds of the

2:30:10.760 --> 2:30:14.959
<v Speaker 1>vote in from Georgia. I so far very surprised that

2:30:15.320 --> 2:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Warnock and Kemp a running even I did not see

2:30:19.440 --> 2:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that coming. And that again, I mean that seems like

2:30:23.160 --> 2:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>again polls under estimating the Democrats a little bit in

2:30:26.480 --> 2:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the state of Georgia. So all right, we'll keep an

2:30:28.400 --> 2:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>eye on it. In the meantime, we've got our great

2:30:30.360 --> 2:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>friend Jameiles Coleman is back to tell us what he

2:30:33.520 --> 2:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is making of these numbers. Great to see you again,

2:30:36.879 --> 2:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we missed you. So we're just talking about Georgia. Greg Bluesein,

2:30:41.800 --> 2:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>who's with the Atlanta Journal Constitution, just tweeted out that

2:30:45.600 --> 2:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Warnock and Kemp are running even in terms of the

2:30:48.920 --> 2:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>number of votes they are getting, which is something that

2:30:51.080 --> 2:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>really surprised us. I mean, how is Georgia looking to

2:30:53.200 --> 2:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you at this point? Well, someone who I also think

2:30:56.720 --> 2:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>had a really really good tweet is Nate Towing at

2:31:00.640 --> 2:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times. He's like, well than Florida, it

2:31:03.480 --> 2:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's a decent night for Democrats and right,

2:31:07.160 --> 2:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and like, one county I'm really looking at in Georgia

2:31:11.400 --> 2:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is called Clayton County, really south of Atlanta, majority black.

2:31:17.760 --> 2:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>In the twenty twenty one runoffs, I think Warnot got

2:31:21.160 --> 2:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about eighty nine percent of the vote there. He's at

2:31:23.280 --> 2:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, so, I mean, Warnock is definitely holding up

2:31:26.879 --> 2:31:30.039
<v Speaker 1>very well. So you know, it's it's going to be

2:31:30.080 --> 2:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>an interesting kind of ticket split that we're seeing in Georgia.

2:31:32.959 --> 2:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>In favorite Warnock at the tempt which is quite interesting. Yeah,

2:31:36.520 --> 2:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of tickets splitting going on. What are some of

2:31:38.400 --> 2:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that you're taking a look at, Miles, give

2:31:40.040 --> 2:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>us some of your insights some of the big things

2:31:42.200 --> 2:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>flashing across your radar that you think the audience should know. Sure, So,

2:31:47.320 --> 2:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier we were talking about how you know, sometimes you

2:31:49.640 --> 2:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have to be a little patient when looking for some

2:31:52.080 --> 2:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>when waiting for some of these results to come come in.

2:31:55.040 --> 2:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, last week talked Tim Ryan was up in Ohio.

2:31:58.560 --> 2:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Looks like jd Vance has taken the lead lead there

2:32:01.720 --> 2:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>very so lightly. One thing in the House that's sort

2:32:05.760 --> 2:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of caught my attention is a lot of Republicans were

2:32:09.520 --> 2:32:12.199
<v Speaker 1>very excited about picking up a seat in Rhode Island.

2:32:12.879 --> 2:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They had a good candidate in Alan fond Long. It

2:32:16.840 --> 2:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like you lost that seat in Rhode Island. So

2:32:22.160 --> 2:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>overall it looks like, you know, it may not be

2:32:25.040 --> 2:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as much of a red wave as you know, maybe

2:32:27.080 --> 2:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>red rain as pe Or Gabriel said, Yeah, I've got

2:32:31.400 --> 2:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>another one here, which is a CNN at least has

2:32:33.959 --> 2:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>projected that Jennifer Wexton is going to hold her seat

2:32:36.920 --> 2:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia's tenth congressional district. Now, of the districts that

2:32:42.480 --> 2:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>were vulnerable in Virginia, of the Democratic districts that were

2:32:45.920 --> 2:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable in Virginia, I think this is the one where

2:32:48.160 --> 2:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden had the largest margin. Correct me if I'm wrong.

2:32:51.600 --> 2:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But the worry was if we really were in like

2:32:54.680 --> 2:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a red tsunami kind of a year, even a Jennifer

2:32:57.760 --> 2:33:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Wexton could end up losing her seat. Sure. That's something

2:33:01.320 --> 2:33:03.959
<v Speaker 1>you saw within the last few weeks is that there

2:33:04.040 --> 2:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was all this talk of dij you Boden. This is

2:33:06.959 --> 2:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a seat that Joe Biden won by eighteen points. So

2:33:09.440 --> 2:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a seat like that is in play

2:33:11.240 --> 2:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>or even clips now, that's going to be the sign

2:33:13.320 --> 2:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of a really good night Republicans. One other thing in

2:33:16.959 --> 2:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Virginia is it looks like Abigail Spanberg, who has a

2:33:21.760 --> 2:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more marginal seat to see that Joe Biden won by

2:33:24.560 --> 2:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only six or seven, she's only slightly down now, and

2:33:28.400 --> 2:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there are more early votes out that

2:33:30.600 --> 2:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to be more frank friendly to her. So

2:33:33.360 --> 2:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the Democrats are very going to are

2:33:36.520 --> 2:33:40.199
<v Speaker 1>very likely going to go to for three seats in Virginia.

2:33:40.600 --> 2:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>The only one they lost was Elaine Laurier, who you

2:33:43.280 --> 2:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>know that that's just a tough seat. So you know,

2:33:46.320 --> 2:33:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I think if Spanberger lost in District seven that Republicans

2:33:51.240 --> 2:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>were on track to gain over twenty five seats. That

2:33:54.240 --> 2:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it's going to be the case. Wow,

2:33:56.840 --> 2:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So what would you what would you put it at now? Actually,

2:33:59.560 --> 2:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>live in that Bamberger district, so I know it decently well.

2:34:02.040 --> 2:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, would what would you put it at now

2:34:05.040 --> 2:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where you project Republicans may end up

2:34:07.640 --> 2:34:10.039
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the House. Yeah, now it's hard to tell,

2:34:10.080 --> 2:34:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but maybe about fifteen to twenty seats, so you know

2:34:13.320 --> 2:34:16.119
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have a comfortable majority, but it's not

2:34:16.200 --> 2:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know, it's not going to be

2:34:18.959 --> 2:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>like two hundred and fifty seats or anything that's fascinating. Well,

2:34:21.800 --> 2:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that really doesn't stick. I mean, look, I

2:34:23.640 --> 2:34:26.119
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a lot of surprises, like you said, other

2:34:26.200 --> 2:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>than Florida, it looks like a better night than expected.

2:34:29.879 --> 2:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So as we're beginning to move west on the map, miles,

2:34:33.520 --> 2:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing anything yet that we should know about Wisconsin,

2:34:36.240 --> 2:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about Texas, or about any of the Midwestern states that

2:34:39.560 --> 2:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>could be noteworthy? You know, it looks like, you know,

2:34:42.959 --> 2:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly the early boat there. It looks like Governor

2:34:47.480 --> 2:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Whitner is ahead. She's someone who if she lost, you know,

2:34:52.800 --> 2:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be a very big upset for the Republicans.

2:34:55.800 --> 2:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But just one to sort of watch. You were talking about,

2:35:01.800 --> 2:35:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, right before I came on, I think we

2:35:03.280 --> 2:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Colorado, where Republicans talked a lot about

2:35:07.560 --> 2:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>unseen Senator Bennett. Yeah, you know, I think he's probably

2:35:10.920 --> 2:35:13.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be in decent shape as well. So, you know,

2:35:13.959 --> 2:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>again just not a super Republican knight. They may end

2:35:18.560 --> 2:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>up underperforming expectations. Talk to me about Pennsylvania. I know

2:35:23.760 --> 2:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still very early. I know we likely I mean,

2:35:26.640 --> 2:35:31.039
<v Speaker 1>I know we have a big blue barrage there right now.

2:35:31.080 --> 2:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the ticket splitting that is

2:35:34.200 --> 2:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>going on there with Shapiro outperforming Fetterman. Yes, I'm very

2:35:40.120 --> 2:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>glad you brought that up. In fact, that's why Pat

2:35:43.000 --> 2:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Toomey was re elected in twenty sixteen to the s

2:35:47.440 --> 2:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>say same seat. What I'm really watching is the collar

2:35:51.640 --> 2:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>counties around Philadelphia. This isn't an area that Oz has

2:35:56.840 --> 2:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to win, he just has to come close. In twenty sixteen,

2:36:01.000 --> 2:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the coller counties around Philadelphia went to Hillary Clinton by

2:36:06.320 --> 2:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think ten to fifteen points. Pat Toomey only lost

2:36:10.680 --> 2:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>him by five or six, so you know, he kept

2:36:13.520 --> 2:36:18.039
<v Speaker 1>those types of counties closer. So that's in Pennsylvania. That's

2:36:18.080 --> 2:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>an area I'm really watching. That's really interesting. Miles. So

2:36:21.680 --> 2:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a couple of initial calls by Decision desk

2:36:24.640 --> 2:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and others for Brian Kemp in Georgia. That's what I

2:36:27.879 --> 2:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was just taking a look at. I know it's too

2:36:29.480 --> 2:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>early necessarily for you to say, but would we then

2:36:32.879 --> 2:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Camp's vote total visa vi Warnock? Is that

2:36:36.120 --> 2:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>looking pretty good for him? Is that a takeaway that

2:36:38.000 --> 2:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we could say? Yeah, I mean I would say, it

2:36:42.160 --> 2:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like, you know, I can see there being a

2:36:44.760 --> 2:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of tickets splits between Kemp and Yayn Wornock. Interestingly,

2:36:49.680 --> 2:36:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia, one thing that caught my attent attention is

2:36:52.800 --> 2:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks like someone who's performing even better than Kemp

2:36:56.000 --> 2:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is Brad Brafensberger was their second Who is their secrettech area? Say,

2:37:00.240 --> 2:37:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know he's a one who wouldn't you know who who?

2:37:04.200 --> 2:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>After the twenty twenty election, Trump was like, you know, hey,

2:37:06.560 --> 2:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>could you find you know, eleven thousand votes for me?

2:37:10.120 --> 2:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And Brad Raffensburger stood up a Trump. So I think

2:37:13.600 --> 2:37:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. You may have some Democrats who say, no,

2:37:16.840 --> 2:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't normally vote Republican, but we like that Camp

2:37:21.000 --> 2:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and raffens Burger they did their job and stood up

2:37:24.400 --> 2:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to Trump. Yeah, what can you tell us? Miles about

2:37:29.879 --> 2:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the history here, because you know, one of the things

2:37:33.400 --> 2:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that was really going against Democrats hard is they're the

2:37:36.360 --> 2:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>party in power, and party in power usually does not

2:37:39.480 --> 2:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>do well in these midterms, and so you know, they're

2:37:43.680 --> 2:37:45.879
<v Speaker 1>still likely to lose the House. I mean, they're almost

2:37:45.879 --> 2:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>certain to lose the House. So it's not like this

2:37:48.520 --> 2:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great year for them. But if they hold

2:37:50.840 --> 2:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>on to the Senate, which they certainly, you know, are

2:37:53.480 --> 2:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in position out of the potential to do at least,

2:37:56.680 --> 2:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be a sort of a victory in and

2:37:59.040 --> 2:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of itself, and a lot less than what Republicans were

2:38:01.920 --> 2:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hoping to get out of this day. You know, how

2:38:06.000 --> 2:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>unusual is that historically? And what can we say about

2:38:10.200 --> 2:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what may have contributed to an unusual dynamic this election year? Yeah,

2:38:15.040 --> 2:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I think in something like the forty mid

2:38:20.200 --> 2:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>terms since the Civil War, the president's mid the president's

2:38:25.320 --> 2:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>party almost always loses seats. The two exceptions were in

2:38:29.920 --> 2:38:33.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety eight or two of the most recent exceptions

2:38:33.680 --> 2:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>were in nineteen ninety eight, where a lot of people

2:38:36.959 --> 2:38:40.039
<v Speaker 1>didn't like how the Republicans were trying to impeach Bill Clinton.

2:38:40.160 --> 2:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>That kind of that back back far on them. And

2:38:43.760 --> 2:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in O two where George W. Bush was really riding

2:38:47.120 --> 2:38:50.039
<v Speaker 1>high after nine to eleven. You know, I think what

2:38:50.120 --> 2:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>could make this year? You know, maybe something of an

2:38:53.000 --> 2:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>exception is biding by most measures, isn't a popular president,

2:38:58.200 --> 2:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Supreme Court isn't popular either, and that's kind

2:39:02.920 --> 2:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of controlled by most of Republican appointed justices. One thing

2:39:08.600 --> 2:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I was one thing that I think is maybe making

2:39:12.160 --> 2:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>this election different is we sort of touched on this earlier,

2:39:19.160 --> 2:39:23.439
<v Speaker 1>but Democrats tend to be gaining with college educated white voters.

2:39:23.840 --> 2:39:28.039
<v Speaker 1>They tend to vote at the highest rates. In twenty ten,

2:39:28.360 --> 2:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Republicans carry the college white vote excuse me,

2:39:34.720 --> 2:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>by sixty forty. In twenty eighteen, the Democrats won that

2:39:39.000 --> 2:39:42.240
<v Speaker 1>group by about eight points. That's stuck in twenty twenty.

2:39:43.000 --> 2:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So their gains with college educated whites, who are a

2:39:46.440 --> 2:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>higher propensity voting group, may be helping them in some

2:39:50.480 --> 2:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of these key races. That's really interesting. Okay, So what

2:39:54.160 --> 2:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are some other things people should take a look at

2:39:55.959 --> 2:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>as the night progressive? Miles? Is the night very young?

2:39:59.280 --> 2:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Are we learning things? Where where would you

2:40:01.760 --> 2:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>put us in terms of where we are going to be?

2:40:04.520 --> 2:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's quite young. I mean, I would

2:40:06.640 --> 2:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>do you know, I mean not to be selfish and

2:40:09.440 --> 2:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>stick to my home state of Virginia. Uh. Just the

2:40:13.520 --> 2:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that it looks like Democrats are going to hold

2:40:16.040 --> 2:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>two of those three competitive Thiefs Center, that to me

2:40:20.000 --> 2:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good sign that this might not be

2:40:22.520 --> 2:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as big a Republican night as something expect. Yep, I

2:40:26.440 --> 2:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's the That's the only takeaway that we can

2:40:28.400 --> 2:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>really come away with right now. It was great talking

2:40:30.400 --> 2:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with you, Miles once again. Thank you so much for

2:40:32.000 --> 2:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Sarah, We're fantasy. Yeah, super super helpful. Thank you,

2:40:34.640 --> 2:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>miss Thank you absolutely so. While he was talking reflections takeaways,

2:40:40.000 --> 2:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys? So I want to ask you

2:40:41.480 --> 2:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>guys a question. Yeah. This this popped into my head

2:40:43.640 --> 2:40:46.119
<v Speaker 1>as I was listening to him talk. Remember when Mitch

2:40:46.200 --> 2:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>McConnell was getting in that back and forth with Rick Scott. Yes,

2:40:49.600 --> 2:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because Rick Scott released an agenda and said we're going

2:40:52.000 --> 2:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to run on this and like seventy percent of it

2:40:54.520 --> 2:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was like cut some terribly on podcast. So my question

2:40:58.520 --> 2:41:01.959
<v Speaker 1>for you is, Yeah, is Mitch McConnell correct in that

2:41:02.160 --> 2:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>basically the Republican plan should have been everybody shut the

2:41:05.920 --> 2:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fuck up. Yeah no, yes, I think he was. And

2:41:10.360 --> 2:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this is where Republicans will be. This is my Republicans.

2:41:12.400 --> 2:41:16.039
<v Speaker 1>We're in trouble when Trump was president. You shouldn't say anything,

2:41:16.480 --> 2:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>yeah you actually you should just be like things are bad,

2:41:21.600 --> 2:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we have this like vague thing to make them better.

2:41:24.600 --> 2:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Because if you say, oh, are you word oft inflation?

2:41:27.640 --> 2:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Word about energy prices, it's the country's vibe off. We're

2:41:30.840 --> 2:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>going to cut a security. That's not a good message.

2:41:33.640 --> 2:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's the that's the that's your inflation. Certainly what

2:41:39.520 --> 2:41:42.760
<v Speaker 1>let's give it to me. I mean if they had

2:41:42.879 --> 2:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>run Glenn Youngkin type Plaine Vanilla wearing the sweater vest

2:41:48.680 --> 2:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in offensive, rich Duke sas banker, wasn't Carlisle your hard

2:41:56.280 --> 2:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for Carle So they couldn't even make the case against

2:41:59.879 --> 2:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>anyway if they just run like Bland, no record have

2:42:04.280 --> 2:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in like put him through the primary. And this is

2:42:07.400 --> 2:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what they did with young Kin. He didn't have a

2:42:09.280 --> 2:42:11.720
<v Speaker 1>normal like voters go to the polls primary. He was

2:42:11.760 --> 2:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>basically picked by Republican elites. Didn't have to say much

2:42:15.680 --> 2:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>about anything controversial. And you know, if Republicans had candidates

2:42:20.080 --> 2:42:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that were like that in all of these Senate races,

2:42:22.920 --> 2:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we would see a different result. But I

2:42:26.000 --> 2:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>also think the way Miles put it is very interesting

2:42:28.320 --> 2:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because effectively, throughout history, typically party in power does poorly

2:42:34.480 --> 2:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in midterm elections. But what he's saying is, effectively, because

2:42:37.959 --> 2:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court made this really dramatic decision, people didn't

2:42:42.720 --> 2:42:46.760
<v Speaker 1>have the sense of like Democrats are in charge of everything.

2:42:47.240 --> 2:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>They saw there was this other power center that was

2:42:50.040 --> 2:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>actually controlled by Republicans. And so he's saying that's what

2:42:54.080 --> 2:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>made this historical situation potentially a little different, is because

2:42:59.360 --> 2:43:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it didn't actually feel to voters like there's just one

2:43:02.800 --> 2:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>party that's controlling the country right now. I think that's

2:43:05.000 --> 2:43:06.959
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way. I think it is really interesting, and

2:43:07.000 --> 2:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just to try and piece little signs together.

2:43:10.480 --> 2:43:12.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, given the fact that it is early to

2:43:12.920 --> 2:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not have those two Virginia seats go red is somewhat

2:43:17.120 --> 2:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of a bell weather. On top of you have NBC

2:43:20.120 --> 2:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>News now calling the race straight up for Michael Bennett

2:43:23.840 --> 2:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>only what right, So it's not even close, and as

2:43:27.480 --> 2:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wigel puts it, this does not seem like a

2:43:29.959 --> 2:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>midterm electorate that's going to bounce Patty Murray or Michael Bennett.

2:43:33.440 --> 2:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's an important takeaway, right, which is

2:43:35.600 --> 2:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's the quote red rain, that's the quote that

2:43:39.440 --> 2:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it shows you that the red puddle, the red puddle puddle,

2:43:42.640 --> 2:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>which is that I thought there was, let's say, ten

2:43:45.360 --> 2:43:47.240
<v Speaker 1>percent chance. I think that I said that on the show.

2:43:47.280 --> 2:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was a ten percent chance, and my

2:43:49.600 --> 2:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>emotional leanings were genuinely putting me there, but I was

2:43:52.360 --> 2:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to be objective about it. I was like, you know,

2:43:54.400 --> 2:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chance Patty Murray could could lose, right,

2:43:57.560 --> 2:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I was telling you before I'd heard rumors this

2:43:59.720 --> 2:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>morning she's worried about it. They were saying, look, guys,

2:44:02.360 --> 2:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a long time. I don't think

2:44:04.000 --> 2:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>she says in danger given the Michael Bennett vote, given

2:44:06.600 --> 2:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the electorate that we've seen in Virginia. And that is

2:44:09.640 --> 2:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just going to be a really interesting, multifaceted takeaway for everybody,

2:44:13.360 --> 2:44:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because Crystal one could make the case. And I think

2:44:15.800 --> 2:44:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you're right, which is that if the Dems do hang

2:44:18.320 --> 2:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on and they do better, especially if if Warnock wins,

2:44:21.680 --> 2:44:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's going to be a tremendous

2:44:23.640 --> 2:44:26.320
<v Speaker 1>upset for them. It really will be one of those

2:44:26.400 --> 2:44:30.240
<v Speaker 1>where it would be a vindication for the abortion first messaging,

2:44:30.280 --> 2:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that will be the absolute takeaway for

2:44:32.760 --> 2:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the MSNBC kind of left very convenient, you know, for

2:44:35.640 --> 2:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the centers of power. That's going to be a fascinating

2:44:38.680 --> 2:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>thing though, because in some ways it did work some

2:44:41.640 --> 2:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of what you talked about, Kyle. Look, whether it's true

2:44:44.480 --> 2:44:45.720
<v Speaker 1>or not, they're not going to talk about it, so

2:44:45.840 --> 2:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree. So I agree, whether it is true on

2:44:48.680 --> 2:44:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that front or not, I don't think it will necessarily.

2:44:50.959 --> 2:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I also think it will be a vindication of the

2:44:53.680 --> 2:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Dems talking as much as they are about democracy again,

2:44:57.120 --> 2:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it is even true at the batt level.

2:45:00.520 --> 2:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So trying to think now about the meta takeaways from

2:45:03.120 --> 2:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what we generally see things are going on tonight, we

2:45:06.040 --> 2:45:08.720
<v Speaker 1>don't yet know. If it's very early obviously Arizona, I

2:45:08.840 --> 2:45:11.440
<v Speaker 1>still expect to be, you know, a really crazy one

2:45:11.440 --> 2:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna have to follow for days on end.

2:45:13.480 --> 2:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Same thing in Pennsylvania, et cetera. Let's put that aside.

2:45:17.080 --> 2:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting about what the meta debates will be

2:45:19.680 --> 2:45:21.760
<v Speaker 1>because from what I can see right now on the right,

2:45:22.000 --> 2:45:24.879
<v Speaker 1>there's only one thing coming out Florida is a red state.

2:45:25.200 --> 2:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like, Okay, well that's great. They're putting up the part,

2:45:27.320 --> 2:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're not but they're not celebrating really everything else.

2:45:30.760 --> 2:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of interesting to me. Okay, I want

2:45:33.720 --> 2:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to know if you guys think this is a crazy thought,

2:45:35.959 --> 2:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But like, in a way, I kind of think this

2:45:38.160 --> 2:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>might be a rebuke of Trump, because Trump is still

2:45:41.080 --> 2:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the shadow, like, you know, leader of the Republican Party,

2:45:44.360 --> 2:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and every time he pops up in the news, it's

2:45:46.120 --> 2:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for some psychotic thing that he said or did. And

2:45:49.200 --> 2:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there at some point there was

2:45:51.360 --> 2:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a breaking point among the American public. Obviously, he didn't

2:45:53.800 --> 2:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>get reelected in twenty twenty, and I feel like he's

2:45:55.920 --> 2:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>only steadily in the eyes of the normy, the moderate,

2:45:58.200 --> 2:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the independent, the average Joe and Jay, and he's gone

2:46:00.520 --> 2:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>down and down and down in their estimation. And to

2:46:03.160 --> 2:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the extent that this party is still effectively tied to him,

2:46:06.000 --> 2:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they even like want to be optically

2:46:08.840 --> 2:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that they are, is that sort of like,

2:46:11.440 --> 2:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, an anchor around their neck that they can't shake.

2:46:13.640 --> 2:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the weird thing is I don't

2:46:15.920 --> 2:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's a repudiation of Trump, it's a repudiation of

2:46:18.480 --> 2:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party because things trend this way things, and

2:46:23.600 --> 2:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>repudiation is like a little overstating impart the realitiest people

2:46:27.200 --> 2:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like, which is in the polls where the country's

2:46:30.240 --> 2:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>going right now. But they don't trust Republicans to take

2:46:34.040 --> 2:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the to take the will either, right, That's what I think.

2:46:37.240 --> 2:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, that's that was. It has nothing that is

2:46:40.520 --> 2:46:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump and it also isn't Trump. Well, let me let

2:46:42.800 --> 2:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>me temper our the positive vibes for Democrats with some

2:46:48.160 --> 2:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>new news out of Georgia, which is that Herschel Walker

2:46:50.440 --> 2:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>has now taken the lead. There you go, with sixty

2:46:53.920 --> 2:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of votes in He's at forty nine point

2:46:56.720 --> 2:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>six percent under the just under that fifty percentage point mark.

2:47:00.560 --> 2:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Warnick got forty eight point six percent, So they

2:47:03.200 --> 2:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>must have gotten a big jump dump of some you know,

2:47:05.600 --> 2:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Republican area that's positive for them, or day of voting

2:47:08.680 --> 2:47:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And now the New York Times with their

2:47:12.360 --> 2:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like needle situation, they actually have Walker as a sixty

2:47:17.240 --> 2:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>one percent chance of winning in Georgia, so they have

2:47:21.800 --> 2:47:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Walker favored at this point. Now that doesn't say anything

2:47:24.320 --> 2:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>about whether it's going to go to the runoff whatever whatever.

2:47:26.520 --> 2:47:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That's all And you know, sixty one percent is not

2:47:28.840 --> 2:47:31.959
<v Speaker 1>saying he's it's a done deal. But that picture has

2:47:32.040 --> 2:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>just shifted significantly towards Republicans. They have right now Fetterman

2:47:38.200 --> 2:47:41.199
<v Speaker 1>with a fifty three percent chance of winning in Pennsylvania Senate.

2:47:41.240 --> 2:47:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So that one is still just like with the numbers

2:47:43.280 --> 2:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we have in nobody has any idea how is it

2:47:45.720 --> 2:47:48.959
<v Speaker 1>counted in Georgia, Like, so, where's the next dump coming from?

2:47:50.120 --> 2:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a mixer, no I match. It also depends

2:47:53.520 --> 2:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on individual counties because sometimes individual counties won't be reporting

2:47:58.120 --> 2:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at a big I remember in twenty twenty we went

2:48:00.080 --> 2:48:01.879
<v Speaker 1>through this with Fulton County and you know a bunch

2:48:01.879 --> 2:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of these other places. So if it is really tied,

2:48:04.280 --> 2:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it could still take a while. But you know, noteworthy

2:48:06.840 --> 2:48:08.800
<v Speaker 1>herschel Walker is pulling ahead though he's got you know,

2:48:08.920 --> 2:48:11.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent now. Yeah, one, I'm trying to remember if

2:48:11.440 --> 2:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it was mail in election day more mail in in Georgia. Well,

2:48:15.240 --> 2:48:18.280
<v Speaker 1>if there's mailing, there's a early vote and there's election day,

2:48:18.360 --> 2:48:21.280
<v Speaker 1>right right, So in terms of happen in New Hampshire though,

2:48:21.320 --> 2:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she looks pretty solid to hold on to

2:48:23.879 --> 2:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that seat. They have her with a seventy six percent

2:48:26.440 --> 2:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>chance of winning based on what is in so far.

2:48:29.560 --> 2:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the picture is still muddled. I think

2:48:32.600 --> 2:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing we can say very clearly is the red

2:48:34.600 --> 2:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tsunami did not material less. Now you could still end

2:48:38.080 --> 2:48:40.800
<v Speaker 1>up with Republicans winning Georgia, you could still end up

2:48:40.840 --> 2:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with Republicans winning Nevada. I still end up with them

2:48:43.560 --> 2:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>winning Pennsylvania. You still end up with them winning Arizona,

2:48:47.200 --> 2:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and they would still look at that as that was

2:48:49.160 --> 2:48:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a really good night for us. It is a good yeah,

2:48:51.240 --> 2:48:53.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no question. So how as senators would that get

2:48:53.360 --> 2:48:56.840
<v Speaker 1>them to that's fifty four? Fifty four is like three

2:48:56.920 --> 2:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty four is the top end of what I write,

2:48:58.560 --> 2:49:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So fifty three to fifty five. So if they won,

2:49:01.520 --> 2:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is for David Shor's analysis on here. This

2:49:04.920 --> 2:49:07.039
<v Speaker 1>is for David shores analysis, which is that if they

2:49:07.320 --> 2:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere between fifty three and fifty five, they have

2:49:10.000 --> 2:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a probability actually of getting a filibuster proof majority twenty

2:49:14.600 --> 2:49:16.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty four in the event that Trump would win. So

2:49:17.120 --> 2:49:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of interesting. However, if we do come out

2:49:20.280 --> 2:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at fifty one or even at fifty, then that's a

2:49:24.920 --> 2:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>totally different story as to what exactly we can expect

2:49:28.959 --> 2:49:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. So I don't know. It's it's really really

2:49:31.879 --> 2:49:34.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting to look at all this. Tim Alberta tweeting this,

2:49:35.040 --> 2:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's an analyst over at the Atlantic quote, this is

2:49:37.640 --> 2:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>not the red tsunami. In fact, it could be could

2:49:40.760 --> 2:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be the best midterm cycle for an incumbent president since

2:49:44.040 --> 2:49:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Rally round the Flag election of two thousand and two,

2:49:46.440 --> 2:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>which if that's true, that would just be marpha. That

2:49:49.200 --> 2:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would bust every narrative. That would bust literally every narrative.

2:49:53.560 --> 2:49:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Moderate like that wouldn't take much, though, because I think

2:49:57.840 --> 2:50:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the like all Biden would have to do it was

2:50:00.280 --> 2:50:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like lose what twenty seats in the House or something

2:50:02.879 --> 2:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or thirty seats and he would still be the best.

2:50:04.440 --> 2:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, Yeah, you're right. Which is that?

2:50:08.280 --> 2:50:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And as many people are pointing out their replies, they're like, yeah,

2:50:10.879 --> 2:50:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that would help though, because they've been waives every single

2:50:13.400 --> 2:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>time from two thousand to two thousand or two thousand

2:50:16.640 --> 2:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and six to consider that for everything. So anyway, I

2:50:20.600 --> 2:50:23.480
<v Speaker 1>think it is really interesting to consider it all within

2:50:23.520 --> 2:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that framework. Chris, So, I have one more for you.

2:50:25.680 --> 2:50:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Could I just throw this out here ahead or yeah?

2:50:27.959 --> 2:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So Hocal in New York. Now, this Hocal versus Zelden

2:50:32.240 --> 2:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>governor race in New York is a real race. There's

2:50:34.360 --> 2:50:37.720
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of talk about that recently. Hogle takes

2:50:37.760 --> 2:50:41.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent of the early vote in New York City.

2:50:42.440 --> 2:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't tell us much New York City is like,

2:50:45.440 --> 2:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised it's not ninety two percent for HOCl. But

2:50:50.600 --> 2:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought that said seventy five percent of early

2:50:52.840 --> 2:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>vote in New York, which is why I presented it

2:50:54.800 --> 2:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to you, and then I read it, I said, oh,

2:50:56.200 --> 2:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>okay in the city. Well, I'm wasting everybody's time, Marshall, Kyle.

2:51:01.280 --> 2:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>We have Emily and Ryan on standby. Do you guys

2:51:03.480 --> 2:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>have final thoughts before we'll have a five minute period.

2:51:06.840 --> 2:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to play some campaign ads that are

2:51:08.600 --> 2:51:10.960
<v Speaker 1>closing for all of you while we get them all

2:51:11.000 --> 2:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in here. And also, I need another Liquid death to

2:51:13.120 --> 2:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>part to murder my thirst. I'm sorry, by the way, Yeah,

2:51:17.640 --> 2:51:20.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they don't. They gave us some free

2:51:20.280 --> 2:51:23.039
<v Speaker 1>Liquid death and I genuinely enjoy it. So thank you

2:51:23.600 --> 2:51:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to final thoughts. One shout out to the viewer who

2:51:26.760 --> 2:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>called out the surface. We are dozens of us, but

2:51:30.200 --> 2:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we are strong and we love our Microsoft surfaces too.

2:51:33.320 --> 2:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Though serious note, I think our early call that this

2:51:37.440 --> 2:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a red wave was kind of vindicated. But no

2:51:40.040 --> 2:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens tonight, I think it was clear when

2:51:43.000 --> 2:51:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we started this recording, I just didn't feel like you're

2:51:46.760 --> 2:51:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have like this like transformation, like red wave

2:51:50.120 --> 2:51:53.240
<v Speaker 1>election that many people on Twitter especially, we've been tweeting around. Yeah.

2:51:53.280 --> 2:51:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's just gonna takeaway. It's just not going

2:51:56.320 --> 2:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to be We are not going to talk with this

2:51:59.400 --> 2:52:02.440
<v Speaker 1>election the way we talk about twenty ten, nineteen ninety. Definitely,

2:52:02.480 --> 2:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that is a really important not yet Barack Obama got Yeah.

2:52:07.320 --> 2:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So the other day on my show, I made a

2:52:10.520 --> 2:52:14.200
<v Speaker 1>similar argument that I want to just be wishy washing

2:52:14.200 --> 2:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>an agnostic out and I said, I don't what's gonna happen.

2:52:15.920 --> 2:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Let wait to see, and in part that's what we're

2:52:17.640 --> 2:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>doing here. But also at the same time, I said,

2:52:19.240 --> 2:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>if you had a gun to my head, I'd say

2:52:20.840 --> 2:52:23.879
<v Speaker 1>fifty one or fifty two in the Senate for Republicans

2:52:24.240 --> 2:52:28.039
<v Speaker 1>and they'll pick up maybe twenty twenty five seats in

2:52:28.080 --> 2:52:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the House, which puts it significantly below the twenty ten

2:52:31.760 --> 2:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>red wave. So and as of right now, it looks

2:52:34.440 --> 2:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like that's what's panning out. But you know, it ain't

2:52:37.560 --> 2:52:40.800
<v Speaker 1>over until it's over. And it's very possible that that

2:52:41.200 --> 2:52:43.119
<v Speaker 1>it looks that prediction looks good now, but it's very

2:52:43.120 --> 2:52:45.720
<v Speaker 1>possible that it doesn't materialize. And again, I think the

2:52:45.720 --> 2:52:47.720
<v Speaker 1>reason why this was such a difficult election to get

2:52:47.879 --> 2:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to get our finger on the pulls of is because

2:52:50.280 --> 2:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>there's just so many complicating factors. The inflation thing, the

2:52:53.520 --> 2:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>crime thing. I mean, only nineteen percent of the country

2:52:55.920 --> 2:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thinks for going on the right track. I mean, this

2:52:57.600 --> 2:52:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that it should have been a schill lacking

2:52:59.280 --> 2:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats. But when you add in the fifty

2:53:01.680 --> 2:53:04.440
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the Republicans running deny the election, and

2:53:04.480 --> 2:53:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you add in Trump, still I think an anchor around

2:53:06.959 --> 2:53:09.800
<v Speaker 1>their neck. You add in Biden, student loan dead reduction

2:53:09.920 --> 2:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and Roby Wad being overturned, it's like, I don't fucking

2:53:13.080 --> 2:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>know what's gonna happen. We're all just waiting. And I

2:53:15.440 --> 2:53:17.480
<v Speaker 1>say this every time. This is why I love election night.

2:53:17.560 --> 2:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I like to be humble, but beyond that, like I

2:53:19.440 --> 2:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like to see what people think. Yeah, it always surprises

2:53:22.720 --> 2:53:24.720
<v Speaker 1>us no matter what. And I think that has been

2:53:24.800 --> 2:53:28.760
<v Speaker 1>vindicated tonight. Yep. Indeed. All right, guys, Okay, guys, thank

2:53:28.800 --> 2:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you both so much. You both did a fantastic, fantastic job.

2:53:31.920 --> 2:53:34.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, everybody, give us five minutes. We're going to

2:53:34.560 --> 2:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>play some mads closing pitches from all the candidates for

2:53:37.160 --> 2:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>all of you, and we'll be right back here at

2:53:38.680 --> 2:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the desk with Emily and Ryan. Let's get to a

2:53:40.600 --> 2:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>control room. Let's roll. It's crazy. Crystal was just saying

2:53:43.600 --> 2:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>she wants Tim Ryan to run for president. Right, that's

2:53:46.520 --> 2:53:51.720
<v Speaker 1>right again, you'll actually really been the whole nation. That's

2:53:51.720 --> 2:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a great triviat question. Did Tim Ryan run for president?

2:53:54.640 --> 2:53:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny. I was doing a monologue about

2:53:57.280 --> 2:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like Biden twenty twenty four, and I was remembering of

2:54:00.200 --> 2:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the people that ran, and I was like, wow, we

2:54:02.400 --> 2:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just never heard from them. Again. It trivia thing like

2:54:05.879 --> 2:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>did this like of twenty different people, did they run

2:54:08.120 --> 2:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for president? I remember John de Lady, Oh, I do

2:54:11.280 --> 2:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>remember that. Unfortunately, Crystal, if I recall, we were forced

2:54:14.440 --> 2:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to interview him like twelve times over at rising and

2:54:16.680 --> 2:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I like the thirteenth time, I was like, they were good.

2:54:19.920 --> 2:54:23.760
<v Speaker 1>They were good. I cannot sit with this man. Okay,

2:54:24.240 --> 2:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all of that aside. Emily Ryan, you guys have been

2:54:27.080 --> 2:54:29.760
<v Speaker 1>watching the results, You've been taking it in. What you

2:54:29.920 --> 2:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys top takeaways? Emily, what do you

2:54:31.520 --> 2:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think so far? So I agree with much of what

2:54:34.160 --> 2:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>has been said that what I think right now is

2:54:36.680 --> 2:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>happening is we're teetering between whether this is a good

2:54:39.040 --> 2:54:41.840
<v Speaker 1>night for Republicans or a great night for Republicans. And

2:54:41.879 --> 2:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree with what Kyle and Marshall were saying as

2:54:44.920 --> 2:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they were giving their final thoughts, which is that it's

2:54:47.800 --> 2:54:50.680
<v Speaker 1>looking more like this is just a good night for Republicans,

2:54:50.720 --> 2:54:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Like this is politics as usual when you have an

2:54:53.320 --> 2:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>unpopular president and a bad economy. This is just going

2:54:56.680 --> 2:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a sort of an easy win for Republicans

2:54:59.160 --> 2:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to stop there. I do think there

2:55:01.640 --> 2:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>are some interesting indications. I think people should be watching

2:55:04.400 --> 2:55:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas really closely. The real Grand Valley slager. You know

2:55:06.879 --> 2:55:09.000
<v Speaker 1>all about it. But one of the things that stands

2:55:09.040 --> 2:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>out to me is where Maria Alvirs Salazar one reelection

2:55:12.959 --> 2:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in Florida's twenty seventh district, which was redrawn a bit,

2:55:16.520 --> 2:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but redrawn a bit still if you look at daily

2:55:18.400 --> 2:55:21.039
<v Speaker 1>coosis metrics, withdrawn a bit to the point where it

2:55:21.120 --> 2:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was still a razor thin margin for Donald Trump in

2:55:24.080 --> 2:55:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a twenty twenty election. She that was an absolute blowout.

2:55:28.160 --> 2:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And so what we're talking about there is the Hispanic vote.

2:55:31.160 --> 2:55:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about whether Republicans made inroads, and that's particularly

2:55:35.400 --> 2:55:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Cuban vote. Of course, in Miami, Marie al

2:55:37.879 --> 2:55:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Virus Salazar is a long time Telemundo person. But if

2:55:42.800 --> 2:55:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at that race, I then want to see

2:55:45.720 --> 2:55:48.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens. I want to see what Texas thirty four

2:55:48.400 --> 2:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like with Myra Flores's reelection. I want to see

2:55:51.080 --> 2:55:53.760
<v Speaker 1>if and that's a redrawn district too. So there's where

2:55:53.760 --> 2:55:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at, particularly because I think if those indications

2:55:56.360 --> 2:55:58.840
<v Speaker 1>come in, we might see different things in the Oregon

2:55:58.920 --> 2:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>governor's race. We might see different things in Wisconsin. So

2:56:02.600 --> 2:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think we know whether it's a good

2:56:05.240 --> 2:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>night or a great night for Republicans, although I do

2:56:07.240 --> 2:56:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think where things stand now just good. Yeah, I think

2:56:09.840 --> 2:56:11.199
<v Speaker 1>you're I think you're right. What do you think Brian,

2:56:12.080 --> 2:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so well, it's a good night so far for weed

2:56:14.240 --> 2:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and psychedelics. Okay, so in other words, it's a great

2:56:17.600 --> 2:56:20.920
<v Speaker 1>night for Ryan Grew. First, there are two. There are

2:56:20.959 --> 2:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>two key abortion referendums that I mean, there are several.

2:56:25.560 --> 2:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>There's Vermont, which guess what it's going to win, California

2:56:29.120 --> 2:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>guess what that one's going to win. But the ones

2:56:31.600 --> 2:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people were looking at, we're Michigan and Kentucky, and so

2:56:34.240 --> 2:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>far voters in both of those states are overwhelmingly approving

2:56:38.160 --> 2:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>abortion rights. It could it could still swing, but I

2:56:41.240 --> 2:56:47.720
<v Speaker 1>think Kentucky following Kansas has to make people think differently

2:56:47.760 --> 2:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>about where this country is when it comes to abortion rights.

2:56:51.280 --> 2:56:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think not only those ballot initiatives, but also these

2:56:55.920 --> 2:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>results have to make people think differently about abortion rights

2:56:59.240 --> 2:57:01.680
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, I was among the people who were

2:57:01.760 --> 2:57:04.040
<v Speaker 1>out there like screaming and beating my childs Like you

2:57:04.160 --> 2:57:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about the freaking economy, Like where is

2:57:06.280 --> 2:57:08.800
<v Speaker 1>your economic message? You can't run every ad on abortion.

2:57:10.280 --> 2:57:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you can run every ad on abortion, because I mean,

2:57:12.879 --> 2:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, yeah, we don't know. There are a lot

2:57:14.560 --> 2:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of seats down et cetera, et cetera. It's definitely not

2:57:17.120 --> 2:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the red tsunami. I mean, Democrats won two out of

2:57:20.480 --> 2:57:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the three swing districts in Virginia. There was a lot

2:57:23.920 --> 2:57:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of Republican opium around New Hampshire. That bulldeck was going

2:57:27.240 --> 2:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to pull that one out back to win one of

2:57:29.160 --> 2:57:31.520
<v Speaker 1>those houses is out. Yeah, they were going to win

2:57:31.560 --> 2:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the houseas they thought they were going to

2:57:33.200 --> 2:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>win a house seat in Rhode Island. I mean, so

2:57:35.480 --> 2:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the maximalist red tsunami did not happen. Now, do Republicans

2:57:41.879 --> 2:57:45.240
<v Speaker 1>manage to cobble together a bear majority in the Senate,

2:57:45.360 --> 2:57:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that's possible. They're certainly going to get control of the House,

2:57:48.320 --> 2:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about that. But you know, Emily, you

2:57:50.720 --> 2:57:52.560
<v Speaker 1>said like, oh, this is just what happens when the

2:57:52.600 --> 2:57:55.000
<v Speaker 1>economy's bad. In the present's approval rating is in the

2:57:55.080 --> 2:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>low forties. No, what happens normally when you have that

2:57:58.600 --> 2:58:01.560
<v Speaker 1>set of affairs is is the red student, the shellacking,

2:58:01.640 --> 2:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the what you normally get in you know, seventy percent

2:58:04.879 --> 2:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong track and everybody like, oh my god, the economy's

2:58:07.680 --> 2:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible and gas prices are high and inflation is out

2:58:10.400 --> 2:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of control, and I really don't like this president. I

2:58:12.400 --> 2:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>really don't want him to run for president again, you

2:58:14.879 --> 2:58:19.560
<v Speaker 1>get a shellacking. So to me, what's really striking is

2:58:19.680 --> 2:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that that hasn't materialized. And I think it's because of

2:58:23.320 --> 2:58:26.800
<v Speaker 1>two things. I think it is, like, obviously, abortion, you know,

2:58:27.160 --> 2:58:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is important here, and I think abortion did contribute to

2:58:31.080 --> 2:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the problems Republicans had in terms of the

2:58:34.080 --> 2:58:36.720
<v Speaker 1>candidates that they chose and the sense that not just

2:58:36.879 --> 2:58:40.119
<v Speaker 1>on abortion, but on a whole raft of issue, these

2:58:40.240 --> 2:58:42.680
<v Speaker 1>people are freaking crazy and they're out to lunch. And

2:58:42.720 --> 2:58:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I might not be that abby with the Democrats in charge,

2:58:44.920 --> 2:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I can hand off the ball

2:58:46.840 --> 2:58:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to these people. Do you think. I think it's interesting

2:58:48.600 --> 2:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because so Ryan and I were just on Megan Kelly

2:58:51.160 --> 2:58:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan was talking about you you mean such an

2:58:53.480 --> 2:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting point, which is that the youth vote in twenty

2:58:57.440 --> 2:59:00.040
<v Speaker 1>eighteen was really crucial for Democrats, and we actually I

2:59:00.200 --> 2:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>still don't know if the youth vote in twenty twenty

2:59:02.440 --> 2:59:05.040
<v Speaker 1>two will be crucial to Democrats, particularly because of this

2:59:05.160 --> 2:59:08.040
<v Speaker 1>issue of abortion and the reason and I think this

2:59:08.160 --> 2:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>gets lost in sort of the belt white chatter, especially

2:59:10.400 --> 2:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks that Democrats ran hard on abortion.

2:59:14.120 --> 2:59:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not just because they're completely out of touch, which

2:59:16.879 --> 2:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, though they are, they are completely out of touch.

2:59:19.920 --> 2:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not just that, it's also though, because of turnout.

2:59:23.680 --> 2:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Midterm elections are about turnout. And if you think you

2:59:26.560 --> 2:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>can get your base to turn out for democracy and abortion,

2:59:30.200 --> 2:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>because those are the people you do not want sitting

2:59:32.680 --> 2:59:35.039
<v Speaker 1>on the couch come election night, then you are going

2:59:35.080 --> 2:59:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to run a bunch of ads on democracy and abortion.

2:59:37.600 --> 2:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Now did they overdo it? I think very clearly the

2:59:40.240 --> 2:59:42.520
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is yes, they didn't have a good

2:59:42.560 --> 2:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>economic message. I think though that's why they were running

2:59:45.520 --> 2:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on those things. And the other point that I'll make is,

2:59:48.760 --> 2:59:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like I guess I was talking about the context of

2:59:51.080 --> 2:59:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the realignment. So this bigger conversation about whether it's a

2:59:54.200 --> 2:59:58.680
<v Speaker 1>great night for Republicans make a generation defined it right right, right,

2:59:58.760 --> 3:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if this is a real turning point pivot for

3:00:01.120 --> 3:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans because you see, for instance, in roads with black

3:00:05.840 --> 3:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and Hispanic voters, like I think we should be looking

3:00:08.080 --> 3:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>really closely at Milwaukee and Philadelphia. It's not like the

3:00:11.160 --> 3:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>black vote in Milwaukee and Philadelphia is going to go

3:00:13.080 --> 3:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to Republicans, but are the margins slimmer, then they should

3:00:17.480 --> 3:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be for a midterm election for Democrats. That's those are

3:00:21.800 --> 3:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of things that I think will will make

3:00:23.920 --> 3:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it a quote great night for Republicans if that's what

3:00:26.600 --> 3:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at. But no, I think that's a good point, Christal.

3:00:29.440 --> 3:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got a piece of data here to add into

3:00:31.600 --> 3:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. This is from Nate con of the New

3:00:34.440 --> 3:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>York Times. He says, it's still early, obviously, but Fetterman

3:00:38.400 --> 3:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is running ahead of Biden the Pennsylvania counties that seem

3:00:42.280 --> 3:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like they may be complete that. I mean, if that

3:00:46.360 --> 3:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is running out of Biden, then he's gonna win. And now,

3:00:50.480 --> 3:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, maybe Oz dramatically outperforms Trump in

3:00:53.520 --> 3:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the red counties, and that sort of polarization is certainly

3:00:55.840 --> 3:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>something that we have seen. But you know, the other

3:00:59.440 --> 3:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that Conas said is it looks like Democrats are

3:01:02.440 --> 3:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>running about a point ahead of our expectations outside of Florida.

3:01:05.800 --> 3:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So put Florida aside. I mean, I guess the question

3:01:09.360 --> 3:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans is, you know, maybe as you get further

3:01:13.680 --> 3:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>out west, maybe there is a different dynamic. Maybe in

3:01:15.959 --> 3:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>states where you have a more significant Latino population, maybe

3:01:19.000 --> 3:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you have more of that realignment, more of those shifts

3:01:21.840 --> 3:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and so even though they you know, it looks like

3:01:24.400 --> 3:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Georgia probably going to a runoff, Pennsylvania, who knows. At

3:01:27.800 --> 3:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this point, New Hampshire certainly totally off the table. Do

3:01:30.920 --> 3:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>they pick up in Arizona, do they pick up a Nevada?

3:01:33.440 --> 3:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>What do those pieces look like? Yeah? And I think

3:01:35.840 --> 3:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this also goes to the messaging and reality, Like we

3:01:40.240 --> 3:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>focus so much on the way that candidates are messaging

3:01:44.680 --> 3:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what Democrats are talking about, but that's only a small

3:01:48.480 --> 3:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>amount of the input that voters have. You know, very true,

3:01:51.520 --> 3:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>voters are filling up their gas tank. Voters are also

3:01:54.560 --> 3:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to people all the time about abortion rights, but

3:01:58.840 --> 3:02:02.199
<v Speaker 1>things that are in the new education about education, about

3:02:02.200 --> 3:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the school, the school's question. We'll see how some of

3:02:04.520 --> 3:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that shakes out, but it you know, it comes down

3:02:07.640 --> 3:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to sailings. Like when people say that the most important

3:02:10.800 --> 3:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>issue to them is inflation, does that mean that that's

3:02:12.680 --> 3:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're hearing in the news. But if somebody is

3:02:15.440 --> 3:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saying the most important issue to me is abortion and

3:02:18.800 --> 3:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's overwhelmingly for Democrats, that mean these are people who

3:02:21.120 --> 3:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are coming out and voting who otherwise wouldn't have voted.

3:02:23.680 --> 3:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't actually matter whether Democrats had message on it,

3:02:26.600 --> 3:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Like for people in Pennsylvania the last month or so,

3:02:30.640 --> 3:02:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how a candidate could break through on anything.

3:02:33.720 --> 3:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Like every time you turn on the TV, it's eight

3:02:37.320 --> 3:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>ads and then it's back to the show you're watching,

3:02:39.680 --> 3:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the Phillies lose, the Phillies lose, altho all

3:02:43.240 --> 3:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are still undefeated, and you're like, you, what

3:02:46.480 --> 3:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>am I even taking from this? And Yeah, well I

3:02:48.879 --> 3:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say. Crystal's point about the Nate Cone data

3:02:51.480 --> 3:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is I think really really important because a lot of

3:02:53.840 --> 3:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what we pulled here with our elements, it's looking at

3:02:56.000 --> 3:02:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the predictions from five point thirty eight and RCP and Republicans.

3:02:59.520 --> 3:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Just as at last couple of days, I can tell

3:03:01.280 --> 3:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you talking to conservative sources, Sager, you may have had

3:03:03.800 --> 3:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a similar experience. They were actually expecting that the polls

3:03:08.600 --> 3:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>were still under I was estimated Republicans. So like when

3:03:13.720 --> 3:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at Oregon, when you're looking at New York.

3:03:16.760 --> 3:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So if the polls are underestimating Lee Zelden, is it

3:03:19.800 --> 3:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>possible that Zelden wins by two to three percent? That's

3:03:23.000 --> 3:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what Republicans were going in tonight to tonight thinking and

3:03:26.360 --> 3:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people on the right were building into

3:03:28.680 --> 3:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, perhaps a couple two three extra points for

3:03:32.040 --> 3:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in places like deep blue places like New York

3:03:34.879 --> 3:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and Oregon. And if that doesn't pan out, if Democrats

3:03:37.879 --> 3:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>actually overperform the polls, that is a very big story.

3:03:42.480 --> 3:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, yes, well, and we know in

3:03:45.160 --> 3:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one state they did, and that's New Hampshire. New Hampshire

3:03:48.680 --> 3:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is the state that where we probably have the clearest

3:03:50.800 --> 3:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>picture right now because they have limited early vote, because

3:03:53.840 --> 3:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the vote it is in because Maggie Hassen

3:03:56.040 --> 3:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is like consistently outperforming Biden in county after county after county.

3:04:00.640 --> 3:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden won New Hampshire by seven points. Right, the polls

3:04:03.840 --> 3:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>did not have Maggie Hassen up by anywhere near seven points.

3:04:06.760 --> 3:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Even the most optimistic polls for her down the stretch

3:04:09.080 --> 3:04:11.959
<v Speaker 1>hot are up by like two. So at least when

3:04:12.000 --> 3:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a significantly college educated electorate, which is what

3:04:15.800 --> 3:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you have disproportionately in the state of New Hampshire, you

3:04:19.120 --> 3:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>had a dynamic of them actually underestimating Democratic support. We

3:04:23.080 --> 3:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>can show that number twelve guys, if you can please

3:04:26.040 --> 3:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that's our New Hampshire element, just to give everybody some insight.

3:04:28.760 --> 3:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be a fun game in the future,

3:04:30.400 --> 3:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the exact call so you can see there,

3:04:33.440 --> 3:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>which is that now the final RCP average had Maggie

3:04:36.800 --> 3:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Hassen only up by one point, and while the five

3:04:39.920 --> 3:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight average did have her in seventy two in

3:04:42.640 --> 3:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a twenty eight percent, they also still pointed to a

3:04:45.520 --> 3:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>much narrower race. And that doesn't yet seem so like

3:04:48.760 --> 3:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>right now the data that we have is forty one

3:04:51.000 --> 3:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote is in in New Hampshire, fifty

3:04:54.080 --> 3:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>six percent Maggie Hassen, forty two percent Bolda. Now, some

3:04:58.040 --> 3:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of that could come back, you know for Bolda as

3:05:00.640 --> 3:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the later I think more rural areas are

3:05:02.959 --> 3:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones where he's expected to have support. But the

3:05:05.640 --> 3:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>blowout scenario, which is what I'll be honest, I really

3:05:09.240 --> 3:05:11.879
<v Speaker 1>thought that it was a very distinct possibility that Michael

3:05:11.920 --> 3:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Ben not Michael Bennett, losing necessarily. But I didn't think

3:05:15.360 --> 3:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they would just call it for him, you know, like

3:05:17.800 --> 3:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that Patty Murray like sweating it right exactly. I thought

3:05:22.600 --> 3:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>she was going on. I thought she would believe that

3:05:25.400 --> 3:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was closed. Yeah, I thought she would win, but you

3:05:26.959 --> 3:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>win by to remember who's the new Jersey governor. What

3:05:29.280 --> 3:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>was the guy's name, Phil Murphy? Yeah, and he won

3:05:31.240 --> 3:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>by three everyone point. I thinks he's going to run

3:05:34.680 --> 3:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for Presidentemross elimination. Yeah, I mean, I I do think

3:05:40.240 --> 3:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like the reason that this election midterm, I think we

3:05:44.600 --> 3:05:47.879
<v Speaker 1>can already say it is definitely not a schlacking. It's

3:05:48.040 --> 3:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely different than what normally happens when you have a

3:05:51.840 --> 3:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>party in power. And I really attribute that to the

3:05:54.440 --> 3:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that Democrats were just as energized as Republicans normally.

3:05:58.879 --> 3:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>The reason you have the show lacking is because the

3:06:01.520 --> 3:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>party in powers voters are sort of dispirited, hasn't really

3:06:04.840 --> 3:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>been everything that they expected. They're kind of disappointed. They

3:06:07.560 --> 3:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really love these people anymore, and they're like, fuck it,

3:06:09.879 --> 3:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just staying home this time. And I do think

3:06:12.600 --> 3:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that this is, you know, this is a Trump effect.

3:06:15.480 --> 3:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>There is a sense of existential dread and doom and

3:06:19.400 --> 3:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>energy and whatever going on with the Democratic base. The

3:06:22.320 --> 3:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>abortion ruling certainly fuels that, and so that's causing them

3:06:25.560 --> 3:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to turn up out at the polls in the same

3:06:28.000 --> 3:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>margins of you know, enthusiasm as Republicans, And I do

3:06:31.840 --> 3:06:35.439
<v Speaker 1>think that that's why this election looks different than midterms

3:06:36.040 --> 3:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>when you have the party in power, and you have

3:06:39.240 --> 3:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad economy, and you have inflation, and you have

3:06:41.800 --> 3:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a low presidential approverating all those things, and yet Democrats

3:06:46.040 --> 3:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>might still hold on to the Senate. Like that is

3:06:48.959 --> 3:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>really that's really different. I think that that's a big

3:06:51.400 --> 3:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>part of it. But also the and and also the

3:06:53.640 --> 3:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>changing Democratic coalition changes that. So in the eighties and nineties, sixties,

3:06:58.840 --> 3:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy eighty ninety, when Democrats are still like, if you're

3:07:01.720 --> 3:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a working class voter, you're a Democrat first, and if

3:07:04.240 --> 3:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not, then you have questions to ans for like, yeah,

3:07:07.000 --> 3:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>why are you voting for these Nelson Rockefet's Republicans, And

3:07:10.760 --> 3:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>those types of voters show up in presidential years and

3:07:13.560 --> 3:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then drop off in midterms. Now they have a much

3:07:16.440 --> 3:07:19.959
<v Speaker 1>more educated electorate that is showing up in primaries. They're

3:07:20.040 --> 3:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>voting for city council, they're voting for school board, and

3:07:22.160 --> 3:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely showing up for midterms. So what's interesting though,

3:07:26.000 --> 3:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is the one sort of like Devil's Advocate

3:07:29.440 --> 3:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>argument that I'll continue to make, is that those Florida

3:07:32.400 --> 3:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers are really interesting to me because that's a blowout

3:07:34.680 --> 3:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for Maria Alviro Salazard to win that district, which was

3:07:37.600 --> 3:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Dona Shalala's district. It was shifted a little bit to

3:07:40.640 --> 3:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite Republicans. I think it went from plus four Dems

3:07:43.360 --> 3:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to plus one Dems according to a five point thirty eight,

3:07:45.800 --> 3:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but for a double digit win for Republican there, I

3:07:48.480 --> 3:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's really interesting. And I just don't think we

3:07:50.720 --> 3:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen in Texas yet. And so

3:07:52.959 --> 3:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of that sort of broader realignment question,

3:07:56.320 --> 3:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>whether there is more evidence of a pivot, I do

3:07:59.440 --> 3:08:02.039
<v Speaker 1>think it's we still the jury is kind of out

3:08:02.120 --> 3:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on that question. Well, we may still, I mean, we

3:08:04.320 --> 3:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>may still have a real full on realignment, but also

3:08:08.680 --> 3:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have Democrats do better than expect because of the point

3:08:11.480 --> 3:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Ryan is making of, like, you know, Democrats used to

3:08:14.200 --> 3:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>really be envious of the fact that like all these

3:08:16.360 --> 3:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like affluent white Republicans would show up every brick in

3:08:19.120 --> 3:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>election no matter what. Now those people are Democrats. Yeah,

3:08:23.920 --> 3:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>so that does kind of help you out a midterm

3:08:25.840 --> 3:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>election ultimately, doesn't it. I also wonder let's put the

3:08:28.400 --> 3:08:29.959
<v Speaker 1>House aside and let's look at the Senate. I mean,

3:08:30.000 --> 3:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the New York Times probability right now

3:08:32.959 --> 3:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>has a fifty three percent chance that herschel Walker does win.

3:08:36.320 --> 3:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Their quote unquote Needle has a tassa has it currently

3:08:39.720 --> 3:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards fifty one seats for the Republicans. So look,

3:08:43.560 --> 3:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still within the realm of possibility. As

3:08:46.160 --> 3:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, Crystal Fetterman may be out running Biden, but

3:08:49.280 --> 3:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>doctor oz is very likely to outrun Trump in the

3:08:52.640 --> 3:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>mainline suburbs of Philadelphia, so that could equal out. We

3:08:55.879 --> 3:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>could still have a scenario where doctor oz ekes out

3:08:58.959 --> 3:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one point one percent of victory. So on an absolute

3:09:02.480 --> 3:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers basis, that's a bad Canada, right, And we could

3:09:05.080 --> 3:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>still end up in an absolute numbers basis with like

3:09:07.240 --> 3:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty three Republican seats, right like lake Master. We you

3:09:10.400 --> 3:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know Arizona. I don't have a scrap of data in

3:09:12.600 --> 3:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>front of me yet out of Arizona, no idea. What's

3:09:15.360 --> 3:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen Nevada. I mean, we still got an

3:09:17.640 --> 3:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>hour until or forty five minutes right now until Nevada

3:09:20.520 --> 3:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>polls go ahead and close. So I think you know,

3:09:22.720 --> 3:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>when Chrystal and I wake up tomorrow morning and we

3:09:24.760 --> 3:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do the show seven am. Whenever we're reporting

3:09:27.440 --> 3:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for everybody, it's gonna be fun. Oh well, so badly. Well, Well,

3:09:31.720 --> 3:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>when we're all up here at seven, I will at

3:09:35.000 --> 3:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>least at least standard at least Standard time is back,

3:09:37.920 --> 3:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and at least the sun will be up at that time.

3:09:41.200 --> 3:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It could be a totally different night. We could be

3:09:42.640 --> 3:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about your still about fifty three Republicans, and for Republicans,

3:09:46.040 --> 3:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans who are disappointed that they are not yet

3:09:48.800 --> 3:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at a bigger night, one thing they can remember

3:09:51.040 --> 3:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is that if you look at two thousand and eight,

3:09:53.480 --> 3:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>when Obama came in, he had a bunch of coattails.

3:09:56.160 --> 3:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He swept in something like thirteen to fifteen House Democrats.

3:09:59.760 --> 3:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember with him, Biden had reverse coattails. Biden lost what

3:10:05.160 --> 3:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen I think about fourteen, right, thank you,

3:10:08.280 --> 3:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And so he baked in a bunch of losses. Biden

3:10:13.040 --> 3:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>has been so good at losing that there's less losing

3:10:16.040 --> 3:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for him to do this time around. So if you

3:10:17.520 --> 3:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine him losing all of those seats right those fifteen

3:10:22.000 --> 3:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or so that he lost already, and then you add

3:10:24.560 --> 3:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>them to the ones he's losing tonight, then you've got

3:10:27.360 --> 3:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a really big number, which if you're Obama, you kind

3:10:30.680 --> 3:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of He wouldn't say that's publicly, but privately, I'm sure

3:10:33.440 --> 3:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking, Okay, yeah, the only reason your wipeout isn't

3:10:36.640 --> 3:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>worse is that you already got half wiped out when

3:10:39.640 --> 3:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you swept your way in. That's not a bad I've

3:10:42.080 --> 3:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>got some Arizona numbers. Ah, some data, some data from Arizona,

3:10:47.080 --> 3:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is forty percent. Now caveats, we don't know

3:10:51.600 --> 3:10:54.879
<v Speaker 1>early vote they have, where they're from, all that stuff. Okay,

3:10:55.680 --> 3:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly is from Venezuela. No no, no, no, bam boo,

3:11:00.320 --> 3:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>balance straight into the mules. The mules brought him in.

3:11:06.720 --> 3:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm typing the mill right now. Mark Kelly fifty tixo

3:11:10.000 --> 3:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>point four percent and Blake Masters at forty one point

3:11:13.040 --> 3:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>three percent. And the New York Times has this now

3:11:17.440 --> 3:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>based on what's in as lean Democrats, so they are

3:11:21.160 --> 3:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing this based on what's I mean, forty percent is

3:11:23.400 --> 3:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not nothing. Forty percent You can look at it and

3:11:25.200 --> 3:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>start to get a gauge of where it's going to go.

3:11:27.560 --> 3:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They are feeling like Democrats are doing well there, so far.

3:11:31.040 --> 3:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>What about Maricopa County, So I think that's obviously the one. Okay,

3:11:34.320 --> 3:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So we've got fifty three percent of the vote in

3:11:36.040 --> 3:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>from Maricopa County. Mark Kelly is leading there at fifty

3:11:39.480 --> 3:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. If it does get close. A lot of

3:11:41.440 --> 3:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that we talked about that is going very

3:11:44.280 --> 3:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>viral amongst MAGA folks about the closure about the oh

3:11:48.160 --> 3:11:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and I should update everybody that lawsuit that I talked

3:11:51.120 --> 3:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about that the Republicans filed that was denied by a judge,

3:11:54.600 --> 3:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>so the extra vote time they were asking for was

3:11:58.200 --> 3:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not granted. So of course we can also see a

3:12:00.680 --> 3:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>potential fight in the future there. So it's interesting, I

3:12:03.640 --> 3:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>mean to have forty one percent of the vote in

3:12:06.280 --> 3:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where else I was also looking, you know,

3:12:08.840 --> 3:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we almost overlooked this one, but you got twenty two

3:12:11.320 --> 3:12:14.119
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote in and Gretschen Whitmer actually looks

3:12:14.160 --> 3:12:18.039
<v Speaker 1>to be doing quite well. That's another that's another huge

3:12:18.520 --> 3:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and the huge abortion referendum is it's currently up fourteen points.

3:12:22.480 --> 3:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think the abortion referendum has hoattails for wit

3:12:25.560 --> 3:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's a significant one. This is per Decision Desk

3:12:29.520 --> 3:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Shapiro wins Pennsylvania. Yeah, that's a big one. And

3:12:32.120 --> 3:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>here's what is the big one they promises when that results,

3:12:35.040 --> 3:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and then they're like, oh, Joshua, well, well we should

3:12:37.879 --> 3:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>get the caveat that is decision desk, right, it's there.

3:12:41.040 --> 3:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I've actually said this, Arkle. They are very premature, in

3:12:44.200 --> 3:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, in some of their calls. So we'll see.

3:12:47.840 --> 3:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But if even though you know it is still a

3:12:50.440 --> 3:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>major organization, they're a bit trigger. Happened for them to

3:12:53.240 --> 3:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>say that that is significant early on in the process

3:12:56.760 --> 3:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for Shapiro to be called. And that is significant not

3:13:00.160 --> 3:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just because you know, we're Pennsylvania's trending and is it

3:13:02.600 --> 3:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the red okay wave of the red puddle or the

3:13:04.879 --> 3:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>red whatever, but also because Mastriano was genuine like election

3:13:10.240 --> 3:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>psycho and he was in Pennsylvania. This something we covered

3:13:14.800 --> 3:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot on breaking points. You as governor appoint the

3:13:18.840 --> 3:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>secretary of state and this is a dude who wasn't

3:13:21.480 --> 3:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't just like echoing stop the steel stuff. He was

3:13:24.440 --> 3:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>there on January sixth. He was part of the boss

3:13:27.640 --> 3:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or something. He came, he came the capital. He came.

3:13:30.959 --> 3:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He did not to the capital. He came up in

3:13:33.360 --> 3:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the like January sixth Committee testimony thing, because he was

3:13:37.120 --> 3:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so integral a trump'shule, fake elector plot in the state,

3:13:40.720 --> 3:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Like this guy was in it in like true believer

3:13:43.920 --> 3:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>all the way in. And so you know, this is

3:13:46.400 --> 3:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a real This is a real rebuke of the Trump

3:13:50.280 --> 3:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>stopped the steal candidates. I think Shapiro also deserves credit. Actually,

3:13:54.280 --> 3:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>David Strode, our partners over at the lever Sorrotas, known

3:13:57.240 --> 3:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Shapiro for a while and he went and went to

3:14:00.040 --> 3:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>school together. Yeah, right, and he went and actually followed

3:14:02.720 --> 3:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Shapiro on the campaign trail, and he has done He

3:14:05.720 --> 3:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>has established a real statewide profile for himself to going

3:14:09.400 --> 3:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>after big pharma, actually taking on the fracking companies, taking

3:14:13.360 --> 3:14:16.039
<v Speaker 1>on the Catholic Church. And so I don't think it's

3:14:16.320 --> 3:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>just a rebuke of Masteriano. I think it also is

3:14:19.160 --> 3:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>an affirmative, you know, vote in favor of Joshapiro here,

3:14:22.600 --> 3:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>who seems to have impressed Pennsylvania voters. I think that's

3:14:25.200 --> 3:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>complete like that. For that to come in this early

3:14:28.800 --> 3:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is a really big deal, and to look like it

3:14:30.760 --> 3:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>does this early is a really big deal in terms

3:14:32.959 --> 3:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of whether this will be a tsunami or a wave.

3:14:36.240 --> 3:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And another question of that is in your district that

3:14:38.920 --> 3:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about earlier, Crystal, which is Virginia seven.

3:14:41.800 --> 3:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Abigail Spanberger has bounced back and then

3:14:47.959 --> 3:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just called it. She held on her. That is a

3:14:51.040 --> 3:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>really big deal because before we came up, he knows

3:14:57.520 --> 3:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a thing or two. So when I was before we

3:15:03.560 --> 3:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>came into the studio, I had Fox News on, and

3:15:06.360 --> 3:15:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I forget who said this. On Fox. They said, if

3:15:09.160 --> 3:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at just a red wave, what you would

3:15:12.120 --> 3:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>expect is for yesly Vega to win Virginia seven. They

3:15:16.800 --> 3:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>were looking at other Virginia districts and saying, if you're

3:15:19.200 --> 3:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>expecting a tsunami, you would I think it was like

3:15:22.000 --> 3:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Virginia ten. It was Jennifer Wexton. It was Wexton. That's right,

3:15:25.840 --> 3:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you would expect that you can expect the tsunami. If

3:15:29.360 --> 3:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Wexton loses, Abigail Spamburger is not even gonna lose. So again,

3:15:34.360 --> 3:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're looking at here as this number,

3:15:36.760 --> 3:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>these numbers sort of come out, is a kind of

3:15:40.040 --> 3:15:45.119
<v Speaker 1>targeted tsunami in certain places like in Florida, which is insane. Again,

3:15:45.280 --> 3:15:49.199
<v Speaker 1>like double digit win in in Florida twenty seven insane

3:15:49.959 --> 3:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a loss for a Republican I think in Virginia seven,

3:15:53.440 --> 3:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>which I know it was redrawn, but that was Dave

3:15:55.600 --> 3:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Bratt's district in Eric Canter's district, right, Yes, this is

3:16:00.080 --> 3:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost unrecognizable though, because yeah, it's almost completely

3:16:04.000 --> 3:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>different district. So I mean it's close, Yeah, it's it's

3:16:08.280 --> 3:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it is a swing district. Biden did win it, so

3:16:11.600 --> 3:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know there's another seat in Virginia. There were three

3:16:14.920 --> 3:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Virginia and Lauria who were basically on the rocks. The

3:16:18.480 --> 3:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>last one of the lady Lauria, she lost according to CNN,

3:16:23.360 --> 3:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>she has lost. Now that is a Virginia beach district,

3:16:27.200 --> 3:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's long been. It's gone back and forth. You

3:16:30.520 --> 3:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>remember that dude, Scott Rigel, he held that seat. Glenn nine.

3:16:34.959 --> 3:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember Glenn and I he's like this blue

3:16:37.080 --> 3:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>dog Democrat he held that seat. So anyway, that's one

3:16:39.720 --> 3:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that really goes back and forth. Now, if you were

3:16:41.760 --> 3:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>really like, you know, the the Democratic like actually it's

3:16:45.400 --> 3:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a blue wave kind of person, you

3:16:48.400 --> 3:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>would expect them to hold on to this kind of

3:16:51.280 --> 3:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a seat. So it does show you, you know, there

3:16:54.000 --> 3:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is a shift towards Republicans, especially I think in the House,

3:16:56.800 --> 3:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>where the national trends in the national mood are basically

3:16:59.680 --> 3:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing that determines. But yeah, the fact that Democrats

3:17:02.520 --> 3:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>held on to two out of those three seats shows

3:17:05.680 --> 3:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you it's not quite what Republicans were ultimately hoping for.

3:17:09.120 --> 3:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's an interesting data point, Nate Cone saying that the

3:17:11.520 --> 3:17:15.039
<v Speaker 1>GOP chance of taking the House has stayed steady. However,

3:17:15.240 --> 3:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrats now favor to actually hold two hundred and eight seats,

3:17:18.959 --> 3:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>up from the two oh three at the beginning, so

3:17:21.760 --> 3:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, five point five more seats they're held on to. Ran.

3:17:25.280 --> 3:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>As you said, it doesn't necessarily matter in terms of

3:17:28.240 --> 3:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the actual doings of the House whether you have two

3:17:32.800 --> 3:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>three or two o eight whenever you're in the minority.

3:17:35.720 --> 3:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's an indication to us of the tsunami, the whatever,

3:17:39.640 --> 3:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the rain, the wave, that we can try and look

3:17:42.800 --> 3:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>at same interesting new data actually out of Georgia they

3:17:46.800 --> 3:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are back to a true toss up with some of

3:17:49.360 --> 3:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the new county data that is coming out. Unfortunately, Georgia

3:17:52.680 --> 3:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is still not No county is like near one hundred percent,

3:17:56.400 --> 3:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So we don't really have all that good of an

3:17:59.400 --> 3:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>idea of what's going on, but we do have RUF.

3:18:02.240 --> 3:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. So we got eighty percent of

3:18:03.920 --> 3:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the vote in right now, herschel Walker is at forty

3:18:06.240 --> 3:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>nine point three. Raphael Warnock is at forty eight point eight,

3:18:09.360 --> 3:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So I mean it is Razor type, go ahead, right, Yeah. Oh,

3:18:12.800 --> 3:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and I just wanted to talk about weed and psychedelics.

3:18:14.440 --> 3:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So something else went on herschel Walker. Yeah, yeah, no,

3:18:19.800 --> 3:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually think though, one important thing to keep in

3:18:22.720 --> 3:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>mind is that for Republicans, if herschel Walker doesn't go

3:18:25.800 --> 3:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to a runoff, they were told, especially sort of the

3:18:29.080 --> 3:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Maga sect, they were told that herschel Walker was an abomination,

3:18:34.040 --> 3:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible candidate that they could put up. And

3:18:36.400 --> 3:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>herschel Walker from the sort of conventional wisdom standpoint of

3:18:40.040 --> 3:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a non sort of typical voter, of a sort of

3:18:42.760 --> 3:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>DC journalist person, yeah, he's a terrible candidate by a

3:18:45.959 --> 3:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of different metrics, especially if you're Democrat. Just a

3:18:48.640 --> 3:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>terrible candidate. But at the same time, if you're a

3:18:51.360 --> 3:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump voter, you might look at herschel Walker and the

3:18:54.120 --> 3:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>way that he handled all of that oppo research that

3:18:56.560 --> 3:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was dumped on him in October about potentially paying for abortions,

3:18:59.440 --> 3:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>which he didn't, which seems ridiculous to me that he's

3:19:02.360 --> 3:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>denying it. But anyway, the point is he handled that

3:19:06.480 --> 3:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of Trumpian fashion, which just like this

3:19:08.680 --> 3:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is baked in to the herschel Walker that people think

3:19:12.000 --> 3:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they already know it doesn't bother him. It was this

3:19:14.600 --> 3:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>idea that like he was changed, and so saying what

3:19:18.879 --> 3:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he did in the past only confirms his point that

3:19:21.320 --> 3:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he changed. So there are some of these candidates. Herschel Walker,

3:19:25.000 --> 3:19:28.039
<v Speaker 1>doctor Oz is one of them. I think Ron Johnson

3:19:28.120 --> 3:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you can count as one of them, Blake Masters, Carrie Lake.

3:19:31.200 --> 3:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what's going to happen with them. But

3:19:33.280 --> 3:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen in this internice fight among Republicans

3:19:36.879 --> 3:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is some people are going to say if herschel Walker

3:19:39.360 --> 3:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>pulls it out, which we don't know, they're going to say, Look,

3:19:42.200 --> 3:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell, it was all fine, Well what was wrong

3:19:45.840 --> 3:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with you? But Shapiro's early win is a good sign

3:19:48.760 --> 3:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of to the contract. Well, you don't have to go

3:19:50.520 --> 3:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to Pennsylvania. Look at Georgia, Brian Kemp and Roethensberger. They've

3:19:55.040 --> 3:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>already been declared to a great point, and it wasn't

3:19:57.200 --> 3:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>even close. I think it's a great in fact, Roethensberger,

3:19:59.480 --> 3:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, one by an even larger margin than Kemp.

3:20:02.320 --> 3:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you're really trying to make the apples tables

3:20:04.840 --> 3:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>comparison here, Herschel Walker is dramatically underperforming what his fellow

3:20:09.920 --> 3:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are. And you know, obviously, like they did not

3:20:13.800 --> 3:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>go along with stop this deal, they very courageously really

3:20:18.200 --> 3:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>stood up directly to Donald Trump and voters clearly rewarding

3:20:21.680 --> 3:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>them for that independence ultimately, and Kemp survived his primary

3:20:26.320 --> 3:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately very easily too, which was kind of a surprise

3:20:28.600 --> 3:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to me. Honestly, I think that's a good point. Also,

3:20:31.160 --> 3:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they would counter and say nobody got more hate this

3:20:33.360 --> 3:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>cycle than Herschel That's just how they would counter it.

3:20:35.879 --> 3:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But Ryan, what were you going to say if he

3:20:38.200 --> 3:20:41.199
<v Speaker 1>does win and what Democrats ought to do is flip

3:20:41.280 --> 3:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the script and just lobby him relentlessly. If you want

3:20:44.920 --> 3:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to throw these complete wild cards into the Senate, then

3:20:48.560 --> 3:20:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we're going to talk to this guy.

3:20:51.240 --> 3:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That'd be interesting because if you talk if he's conservative,

3:20:55.640 --> 3:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>he's like got some lazy, generine sort of general view.

3:21:00.000 --> 3:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It was like the world. But you sit him down

3:21:02.680 --> 3:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>before a vote with the person that can connect with him,

3:21:07.080 --> 3:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how he's going to vote. So here's

3:21:09.720 --> 3:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting number. Seventy one percent of the vote is

3:21:12.280 --> 3:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in in Lauren Bobert's district. CBS is flagging this as

3:21:15.959 --> 3:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a potential upset for the Democrat Adam Frish, who is

3:21:18.920 --> 3:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>right now up at fifty two percent of the vote

3:21:22.240 --> 3:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bobert is at forty seven point nine, so almost

3:21:24.600 --> 3:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>forty eight, she's down four points. Wow, with seventy one

3:21:27.560 --> 3:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of this that would be big. Well, this gives

3:21:29.959 --> 3:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>me one in to my psychedelic point. At least Colorado

3:21:34.240 --> 3:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>has psychedelics on the ballot. Didn't Degreaver Denver already had

3:21:38.840 --> 3:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics right right? Yeah, okay Colorado. Colorado has its statewide

3:21:42.400 --> 3:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot. Okay, it's up right now by thirty

3:21:45.280 --> 3:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>three points. Holy do they have absolute blowout. Wow. I

3:21:48.879 --> 3:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know what else Colorada has. That one's going to

3:21:51.440 --> 3:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be on the ballot and Bobert goes down. That's a

3:21:53.840 --> 3:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of that. One's going to bring the young people out, Yeah,

3:21:56.760 --> 3:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and other tinerant voters who are like that's they are

3:22:01.560 --> 3:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>our block. Theineran. I saw them at Bataru. Yeah, and

3:22:07.600 --> 3:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>they're like, look, okay, wait, you're going to legalize mushrooms here, Okay,

3:22:12.160 --> 3:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll come out and do the vote for that. Oh

3:22:13.920 --> 3:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and Polbert's on the ballot too. Don't like her? Yeah,

3:22:16.560 --> 3:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Emily's not wrong. Like they've got seventy percent

3:22:20.360 --> 3:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the vote there in that district. Yeah, and she's

3:22:22.840 --> 3:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's not up by all that much. Interesting,

3:22:26.600 --> 3:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So checking in again, Gretchen Whitmer twenty five percent, she's

3:22:29.920 --> 3:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>at fifty three forty four. Also, you know, I have

3:22:32.360 --> 3:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the Camp numbers. Brian Camp is

3:22:35.080 --> 3:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>destroying Stacy Abrams right at fifty four to forty five.

3:22:38.879 --> 3:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is not even close, like a nine

3:22:41.000 --> 3:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>point margin with eighty one percent. Can I say, I

3:22:43.400 --> 3:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's also worth when you're looking at Abrams. I

3:22:46.520 --> 3:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's also worth looking at Christ and Demings, which

3:22:51.200 --> 3:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>got a ton of money. Yes they did so, Stacy Abrams,

3:22:54.280 --> 3:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Charlie crist but especially also Val Demings and Stacy Abrams,

3:22:57.040 --> 3:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like they got so much money and we already know

3:22:59.760 --> 3:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that the getting trounced. Those are three money pits for Democrats.

3:23:02.720 --> 3:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It's so weird right to look at, Like Florida is

3:23:05.760 --> 3:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest Republican story of the night. I mean, Desanta's

3:23:08.280 --> 3:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>has won now by twenty points, that's insane. I mean

3:23:11.760 --> 3:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in modern Florida history, I can't even think of a

3:23:14.400 --> 3:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>single you know election to even come close to that.

3:23:17.160 --> 3:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And the in terms of Marco Rubio and his victory

3:23:19.800 --> 3:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there same thing. I mean, he's running ahead by sixteen points.

3:23:23.080 --> 3:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Like if you look at the two of those. Yeah,

3:23:24.920 --> 3:23:27.959
<v Speaker 1>val Deming spent seventy five million to lose by sixty

3:23:28.240 --> 3:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to lose as if she was running in a deep

3:23:30.480 --> 3:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>red state like Southwell, she also did she do the

3:23:33.280 --> 3:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>like didn't she was a police officer y, Yeah, whe

3:23:38.600 --> 3:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>she did a kind of like I'm the sort of

3:23:40.600 --> 3:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like tough on crime. Yeah. And she was a really

3:23:43.320 --> 3:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>good candidate And it's a shame that Democrats had to

3:23:46.800 --> 3:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>waste her in a like unwinnable rate. Like Beasley was

3:23:51.200 --> 3:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not a very good candidate. Beasley was fine as far

3:23:54.600 --> 3:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know. She's kind of a run of the

3:23:55.720 --> 3:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>mill Democrat, not objectionable to anybody, but like wasn't blowing

3:23:58.760 --> 3:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>anybody away, whereas Valdemi has had like some some real

3:24:02.040 --> 3:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>political skill that she brought to this race. It was

3:24:04.720 --> 3:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like that that's going to move the needle maybe two points,

3:24:08.160 --> 3:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>right whereas and that might be that might be something

3:24:11.480 --> 3:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that Beasley ends up like if Beasley runs in Florida,

3:24:15.200 --> 3:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like maybe she loses five right. No, So we've we've

3:24:18.240 --> 3:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>been talking a lot about ticket splitters, which, you know,

3:24:21.000 --> 3:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>considering how hard and how partisan whatever, the fact that

3:24:24.040 --> 3:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>ticket splitters are obviously a really significant part of the

3:24:26.640 --> 3:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>story is quite interesting. And in Arizona you have this

3:24:29.720 --> 3:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>dynamic again, although maybe somewhat less extreme than we see

3:24:32.480 --> 3:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in other places. Right now, Carrie Lake is running about

3:24:35.320 --> 3:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>four percent ahead of Blake Masters in Maricopa County. So

3:24:40.680 --> 3:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that's tough. That's like, I guess if you do the

3:24:43.000 --> 3:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>election denial, but you're like good on TV. But here's

3:24:45.600 --> 3:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Does anybody does anybody? She is good? Though? Look,

3:24:48.160 --> 3:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say her career, that lady, that lady is

3:24:51.280 --> 3:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a star. I honestly, and I say this with no pleasure.

3:24:53.840 --> 3:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think she will be probably she will be President's wedding.

3:24:57.000 --> 3:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't win though, Yeah she doesn't, you know what

3:25:02.520 --> 3:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it really I mean, I got to look at the

3:25:05.640 --> 3:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>projections with her. But it's definitely not clear she wins

3:25:08.400 --> 3:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I mean, considering Kelly has a significant

3:25:12.240 --> 3:25:16.039
<v Speaker 1>lead of her Masters enough for the New York Times

3:25:16.120 --> 3:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to say the race is leaning toward Kelly. You know,

3:25:18.480 --> 3:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, it's going to be cool. Think

3:25:20.400 --> 3:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about it this way, What are the chances that Lake

3:25:22.920 --> 3:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>wins by four or more? Yeah, at this point, like,

3:25:25.840 --> 3:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not even clearer she'll probably win, right, not totally

3:25:29.480 --> 3:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>clear that she'll win. But if she wins by less

3:25:33.520 --> 3:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>than four and Masters is running four points behind her,

3:25:37.360 --> 3:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>then he's toasted. Like he needs to close the gap.

3:25:40.440 --> 3:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>He needs to be running a little bit closer to Lake.

3:25:44.280 --> 3:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Unless you think Lake's gonna win with this significant I'm

3:25:47.520 --> 3:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure. Yeah, maybe you guys are right, because maybe

3:25:49.920 --> 3:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>somebody help me understand this, right, because you've got forty

3:25:52.440 --> 3:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote in and you've got Katie Hobbs

3:25:54.240 --> 3:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at fifty five and Carrie Lake at forty five. But

3:25:56.720 --> 3:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the the Senate it's actually Blake Masters is running

3:25:59.440 --> 3:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>four points behind that, but Mark Kelly is retaining the

3:26:02.240 --> 3:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>same amount of votes. So does that mean that there's

3:26:04.440 --> 3:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ticket splitting going on with Katie Hobbs or are we

3:26:07.720 --> 3:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing a significant underperformance here with Kerry Lake, I mean

3:26:10.720 --> 3:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the other Lake Kelly voters. So right now we've got

3:26:13.120 --> 3:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Maricopa still only in fifty three percent. But as I

3:26:15.720 --> 3:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>understand it, that one is like that was the major

3:26:17.800 --> 3:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bell weather right like where Biden I think he won

3:26:20.000 --> 3:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>by fifty one percent or something, so that was a

3:26:21.879 --> 3:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>big event. We still only got fifty three percent in there.

3:26:25.080 --> 3:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>There are two counties in Arizona where we don't have

3:26:27.959 --> 3:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>any vote in at all. I'm not unfamiliar enough with

3:26:32.520 --> 3:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the geography of Arizona to say the rest of the counties,

3:26:35.959 --> 3:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it does look like it's around like fifty to sixty

3:26:38.520 --> 3:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>something percent that are reporting in. So this could be

3:26:41.240 --> 3:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>premature in the way that we're talking here right emily

3:26:43.680 --> 3:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>about Arizona. Or are we seeing an underperformance like we

3:26:46.440 --> 3:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>are pretty much all across the board. Yeah, I mean,

3:26:48.120 --> 3:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's early. But if we are seeing

3:26:50.240 --> 3:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>similar mpers to what we saw in Pennsylvania, if you're

3:26:52.920 --> 3:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing similar numbers to what we saw with the Spanburger district,

3:26:57.879 --> 3:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, we would expect this to be within a

3:27:00.040 --> 3:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>margin of like one or two percent for both carry

3:27:02.200 --> 3:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Lake and Blake Masters. With masters running a little bit

3:27:04.959 --> 3:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>behind her probably. And one thing I wanted to toss

3:27:07.360 --> 3:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to you guys was I pulled this quote from Dave

3:27:10.320 --> 3:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Wasserman just yesterday. He said, encouraging news for Dems. In

3:27:13.680 --> 3:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the final NBC News poll, voting enthusiasm gap closes from

3:27:17.800 --> 3:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight percent to sixty nine percent pro R two.

3:27:21.200 --> 3:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is like way counter narrative from what the

3:27:24.600 --> 3:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>legacy media was talking about the last few days to

3:27:27.320 --> 3:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy three to seventy three percent. The enthusiasm gap closed. Yeah,

3:27:31.920 --> 3:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in the days leading up to the election, with as

3:27:34.000 --> 3:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you've been pointing out, crystal super high gas prices, a

3:27:37.840 --> 3:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>very unpopular president, the consumer price index, crazy high, real

3:27:42.680 --> 3:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>wages down, all of these different things, bad housing market. Now,

3:27:46.440 --> 3:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Wasserman continued, biggest problem for Dems is still independence. Just

3:27:50.080 --> 3:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight percent approve of Biden and sixty six to

3:27:52.480 --> 3:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight percent say cost of living is more important

3:27:54.640 --> 3:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>than abortion. But when you have Democrats with that same

3:27:58.400 --> 3:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>level of enthusiasm and a five NBC newspots seventy three

3:28:01.440 --> 3:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to seventy three percent, that is telling. That's very interesting.

3:28:05.480 --> 3:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I do really feel like that's almost the key story

3:28:09.040 --> 3:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of this election, as we see it so far, because again,

3:28:12.440 --> 3:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if it was normal midterm election, party in power, economy

3:28:18.240 --> 3:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is terrible, people are angry, not having residential preper rating

3:28:21.840 --> 3:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>really low, you would see much worse results than even

3:28:24.400 --> 3:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what we know already. And so I really do think

3:28:27.680 --> 3:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what is different is that you do have that democratic enthusiasm.

3:28:31.320 --> 3:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Number I do think that is the story of what

3:28:33.440 --> 3:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>makes this election different than other midterm elections. And I

3:28:38.240 --> 3:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think that comes from a couple places. I mean, number one,

3:28:41.000 --> 3:28:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump continues to be he's not on the ballad.

3:28:43.240 --> 3:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He's a very motivating factor. It doesn't help that he's

3:28:45.959 --> 3:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out there like maybe I'm better know it's something to

3:28:47.840 --> 3:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>run tonight or maybe next week or whatever. That's a

3:28:50.400 --> 3:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>good point. Yeah, I mean that you know, that was

3:28:52.480 --> 3:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>probably not helpful. So there's a sense of like the

3:28:55.600 --> 3:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>stakes are existential. And then I do also think that

3:29:00.240 --> 3:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>previously Biden's approval rating with Democrats was really not great,

3:29:05.280 --> 3:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and once he did some stuff that they liked, his

3:29:08.959 --> 3:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>approval rating with Democrats went up really significantly and they

3:29:12.520 --> 3:29:14.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of like rallied around him and that was responsible

3:29:14.920 --> 3:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for his uptick in terms of the approval rating. And

3:29:17.920 --> 3:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's the combination of like, actually, they're

3:29:20.800 --> 3:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of good with some of the things Biden's been

3:29:23.000 --> 3:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>getting accomplished. They feel like he's been a decent president,

3:29:26.959 --> 3:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>even though they, you know, continue to tell polsters they'd

3:29:29.200 --> 3:29:31.119
<v Speaker 1>rather have someone else next time around. But they're like, Okay,

3:29:31.160 --> 3:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you're getting some stuff done, and we really don't want

3:29:34.200 --> 3:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>these people in there, and Donald Trump is ready to

3:29:36.200 --> 3:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>run for president, we got to go vote to me,

3:29:39.040 --> 3:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>those dynamics are what is making this result different from

3:29:42.360 --> 3:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>what the typical midterm result was. Here's an interesting call

3:29:44.840 --> 3:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>against from our president friends. The first the trigger happy,

3:29:47.640 --> 3:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but still interesting. Nonetheless, they're calling the race for Maggie Hassen.

3:29:50.720 --> 3:29:53.879
<v Speaker 1>They're saying that Maggie Hassen there Wuen's re election there. Also,

3:29:54.040 --> 3:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>here's a really interesting stat from Pennsylvania, and this gets

3:29:58.640 --> 3:30:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to exactly what you were talking about. Out with outperforming Biden.

3:30:01.959 --> 3:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He's outperforming it in all eight of those districts, Crystal

3:30:05.640 --> 3:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that you would highlighted before, all eight of the Pennsylvania

3:30:08.800 --> 3:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>counties that fully have reported their vote, He's outperforming them

3:30:11.640 --> 3:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in every single one of them, meaning that Oz will

3:30:14.640 --> 3:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have to significantly outrun outrun Trump in the Philly suburbs. Well,

3:30:20.280 --> 3:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>now I think that's still possible, right, Yeah, I do

3:30:23.680 --> 3:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>think that is one Emily was talking about sort of

3:30:26.440 --> 3:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the media narrative around herschel Walker. I mean, there is

3:30:29.520 --> 3:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like an immediate narrative around John Fetterman two and the

3:30:32.680 --> 3:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>impact of his stroke, and you know, ultimately I highlighted

3:30:36.600 --> 3:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this earlier, even after seeing the debate performance and that

3:30:40.520 --> 3:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>was very difficult for everybody to watch and understanding their

3:30:43.560 --> 3:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, very significant lingering effects of the stroke. People

3:30:46.720 --> 3:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>still like John Fetterman a lot more than they like

3:30:49.959 --> 3:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>doctor Oz. And at the end of the day, I mean,

3:30:52.440 --> 3:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>if he pulls us out and he ultimately wins, I

3:30:55.200 --> 3:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be a lot of the reason

3:30:56.680 --> 3:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>why Just Sam, I was just texting with a Fetterman person. Yeah,

3:31:01.000 --> 3:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how are they feeling? Said, Oz only got bad news

3:31:04.160 --> 3:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>so far. We got to make sure we hold our

3:31:06.360 --> 3:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>own in the suburbs, which goes to your point, that

3:31:08.600 --> 3:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is a really big deal. Feels good knock on wood suburbs.

3:31:12.160 --> 3:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Like if Oz. If Oz's hope is in the Philadelphia suburbs,

3:31:16.080 --> 3:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not the hope He's not when he went into

3:31:18.600 --> 3:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the But yeah, that's right. But in that sort of

3:31:22.520 --> 3:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that Republicans had going into tonight that was

3:31:25.360 --> 3:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the hope, because these are people that are voting on

3:31:27.480 --> 3:31:30.199
<v Speaker 1>what they see as pocketbook issues, that are voting on inflation,

3:31:30.320 --> 3:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that are voting on education. That actually was they were saying,

3:31:33.840 --> 3:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we did it. We got those swing voters back in

3:31:36.000 --> 3:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the suburbs at least for this cycle, because of both

3:31:39.920 --> 3:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy and culture war issues. They really saw the

3:31:42.160 --> 3:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>culture were issues as a win for them on this

3:31:44.080 --> 3:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>point because of education. And I think, you know, that's

3:31:47.240 --> 3:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly the case in Florida, and I think we're going

3:31:50.520 --> 3:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to see a couple of pockets where that is true,

3:31:52.959 --> 3:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's clearly not going to be true in different pockets,

3:31:56.080 --> 3:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and that might be the real story going out of this.

3:31:58.320 --> 3:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And a really counter narrative question that I want to

3:32:00.320 --> 3:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to you guys is whether abortion and democracy very

3:32:05.600 --> 3:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>counter narrative. They're so helpful enough with a democratic base

3:32:10.240 --> 3:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that they offset perhaps some Republican gains. I'm not saying

3:32:15.720 --> 3:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that happened, but I'm saying, what if actually the numbers,

3:32:19.160 --> 3:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the internal numbers that Democrats had when they were poll

3:32:21.520 --> 3:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>testing talking about democracy, waxing poetic about democracy and talking

3:32:26.640 --> 3:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about Dobbs. What if that actually did help them in

3:32:30.240 --> 3:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the Philly suburbs significantly. I think I think abortion and

3:32:33.400 --> 3:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>democracy are actually shorthands for what Crystal was saying earlier,

3:32:36.959 --> 3:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>which is that a okay, abortion really mattered and really

3:32:40.240 --> 3:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>joe people out the pulp, and democracy can can be

3:32:43.320 --> 3:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>considered to be a stand in for what you were

3:32:45.160 --> 3:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>saying about these people are crazy. Mastrian is totally crazy

3:32:48.840 --> 3:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is not the country that we see ourselves

3:32:51.280 --> 3:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as part abortion. It's even some of the stuff they're saying,

3:32:53.760 --> 3:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>cutting social Security, medicare like, all of this are like,

3:32:56.720 --> 3:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. This was what came out in the

3:32:59.360 --> 3:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>New York Times in a college pole that I personally

3:33:02.920 --> 3:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was very skeptical of. It was like, this looks very

3:33:05.080 --> 3:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>rosy for Democrats and they've been off before and I

3:33:07.280 --> 3:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>don't really think so. It very oft Yeah, one of

3:33:10.240 --> 3:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>their big takeaways was overall, people want Republicans to control

3:33:14.760 --> 3:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, but they don't like the Republican candidates. They

3:33:18.240 --> 3:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>prefer the Democratic candidates in their state. And so I

3:33:22.120 --> 3:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's, you know, part of what you are seeing

3:33:24.879 --> 3:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately play out here. I also remember soccer, We covered

3:33:28.280 --> 3:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that Wall Street Journal poll that had white suburban women

3:33:34.040 --> 3:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fleeing the Democratic Party and moving abruptly to the Republican Party.

3:33:39.000 --> 3:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>From the time of like Roe versus Wade and the

3:33:41.240 --> 3:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>maximums Democratic hopes to the close of the election, that

3:33:45.520 --> 3:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really starting to question because especially when you look

3:33:48.600 --> 3:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>at New Hampshire, right, this is a largess a lot

3:33:51.640 --> 3:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of white people in that state, a lot of college

3:33:53.360 --> 3:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>educated people in that state, a lot of suburban, white

3:33:55.480 --> 3:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>college educated people in that state. Clearly did not have

3:33:58.879 --> 3:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>some big shift to the right over either pocketbook issues

3:34:02.600 --> 3:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>or any culture war issues that they were trying to

3:34:05.200 --> 3:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>run on. Either. Go ahead, I throw out a point

3:34:07.280 --> 3:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that might be crazy, but you're not going to hear

3:34:08.640 --> 3:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>it anywhere else. All of the talk on the economy

3:34:13.360 --> 3:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>from the media has been about inflation. Yeah, inflation matters

3:34:16.280 --> 3:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to people. Obviously, see gas pumped the groceries. Are not

3:34:19.240 --> 3:34:22.959
<v Speaker 1>dismissing that we are in one of the best jobs

3:34:23.000 --> 3:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>economies and wage economy. Great point that we have been

3:34:26.400 --> 3:34:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in in fifty years. Yeah, So what if And going

3:34:29.280 --> 3:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the point I was making earlier about material

3:34:31.600 --> 3:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>reality versus messaging, what if in order for that economic

3:34:35.800 --> 3:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>messaging to really break through in a red wave type

3:34:38.920 --> 3:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of way, you actually need significant jobleishness and unexployment. Yeah,

3:34:43.120 --> 3:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I was wondering about as possible, I

3:34:45.480 --> 3:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have a very good point. I think it's an interesting point.

3:34:47.600 --> 3:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite buy it because you have so consistently

3:34:50.280 --> 3:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>people saying, like, my finances suck, I've been hurt by it,

3:34:53.800 --> 3:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>my wages are going to inflation, gas prices are hurting me.

3:34:57.400 --> 3:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are genuinely feeling the pain. What

3:35:00.200 --> 3:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I wondered about, though, is like when you ask people

3:35:02.800 --> 3:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what's causing inflation, they mostly don't say Joe Biden. They

3:35:06.040 --> 3:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly are like corporate profits, supply chain issues, Ukraine war.

3:35:10.680 --> 3:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if there was, you know, an attempt

3:35:13.879 --> 3:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to totally pin this like this is Joe Biden's fault

3:35:17.040 --> 3:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that people just didn't really buy. They actually had kind

3:35:19.280 --> 3:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of a more realistic view of like you know, I mean,

3:35:23.440 --> 3:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>there's inflation everywhere, and we had COVID and all these

3:35:26.720 --> 3:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy all this crazy shit just happened. So I don't

3:35:28.959 --> 3:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know that you could really totally lay the blame at

3:35:31.560 --> 3:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>their feet. And then I've been very critical of the

3:35:35.000 --> 3:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>democratic lack of messaging on the economy which I still

3:35:38.240 --> 3:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think was a missed opportunity. But perhaps there's a critique

3:35:42.000 --> 3:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican lack of messaging on what they would

3:35:46.120 --> 3:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>actually do economically, And it turns out it wasn't enough

3:35:50.680 --> 3:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>just to say like, inflation's bad, inflation's bad, inflation's bad, true,

3:35:54.400 --> 3:35:57.720
<v Speaker 1>when people aren't really persuaded that that is in fact all.

3:35:57.800 --> 3:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, that is a fantastic point. And look, I

3:36:00.080 --> 3:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>think there will be a lot of takeaways from the selection.

3:36:02.120 --> 3:36:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I still think, you know, it could be premature all this.

3:36:04.959 --> 3:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we can only work with the data that

3:36:07.000 --> 3:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we have. Also, did want to give people an update,

3:36:08.800 --> 3:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny. Maricopa County says they will

3:36:11.560 --> 3:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>expect to have all their ballots counted by Friday. So

3:36:14.800 --> 3:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you. We really appreciate the work that you will

3:36:18.879 --> 3:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>put in over the last two years to make sure

3:36:21.240 --> 3:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to live through the hell of

3:36:22.840 --> 3:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty They didn't have to spend the last two years.

3:36:25.160 --> 3:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>What are you people been doing for the last two years.

3:36:28.440 --> 3:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>What they've been doing is then recounting because like dodging

3:36:31.640 --> 3:36:36.240
<v Speaker 1>death threats. Okay, Chrys, you've got a big one, yeah, Fetterman.

3:36:36.400 --> 3:36:39.760
<v Speaker 1>According to The New York Times now has a seventy

3:36:39.840 --> 3:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent. Wow, that's big. Yeah, it is bad. That's

3:36:43.760 --> 3:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a big one. So doctor Oz won't have to move

3:36:45.560 --> 3:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to Pennsylvania's got eight. When you're that rich, you don't

3:36:53.320 --> 3:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>live anywhere. You just simply float amongst which sounds kind

3:36:57.160 --> 3:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of how many houses he on? He was like, well,

3:37:00.120 --> 3:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>legitimately I only have three or some. Are we talking

3:37:03.920 --> 3:37:05.880
<v Speaker 1>about tax shelters? Are we talking about houses? Are we're

3:37:05.879 --> 3:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about that? We're talking about safe houses? Well, okay,

3:37:09.400 --> 3:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so a little And this is from Third Way. So

3:37:12.320 --> 3:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Third Way to their survey, sent big centrist group and

3:37:16.160 --> 3:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they had this this report where they said, to the

3:37:19.520 --> 3:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>conversation we were just having about the economy, they said

3:37:21.879 --> 3:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a majority of voters fifty three percent also worry that

3:37:24.640 --> 3:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>continued Democratic control of Congress will make inflation worse. Well

3:37:28.520 --> 3:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>less than a quarter say the same about Republican control,

3:37:31.600 --> 3:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and fifty six percent say Democrats are not focused enough

3:37:34.280 --> 3:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on the economy. Will only thirty six percent say the

3:37:36.760 --> 3:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>same about their opponents. So fifty six percent actually, now

3:37:42.200 --> 3:37:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that it comes up or I'm sorry, fifty three percent

3:37:45.800 --> 3:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>who are worried about whether a democratic control Congress will

3:37:50.480 --> 3:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>make inflation worse. And then you have according to Third Way,

3:37:53.680 --> 3:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty four percent of people said that Democrats or that

3:37:56.520 --> 3:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans would do a better job handling the inflation and

3:38:00.120 --> 3:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy. That number is not as high as maybe

3:38:04.240 --> 3:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you would expect. Actually that that's actually kind of an

3:38:07.440 --> 3:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>indicator that in some of these regional blue areas, where

3:38:11.840 --> 3:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of built in trust and support and

3:38:14.720 --> 3:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>muscle memory infrastructure wise for Democrats, that we weren't going

3:38:19.120 --> 3:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to see a tsunami. Yeah, that that actually in retrospect,

3:38:22.400 --> 3:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>when we're looking at Shapiro winning, when we're looking at

3:38:25.400 --> 3:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Spanburger winning, those are indicators that were not in a

3:38:28.160 --> 3:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>tsunami period. That kind of gets to it, and maybe

3:38:31.680 --> 3:38:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that in these these blue enclaves, people genuinely that forty

3:38:36.840 --> 3:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>four percent of voters trust Democrats more. It's very you know,

3:38:40.080 --> 3:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like all of the data that is coming out is

3:38:42.680 --> 3:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really just it shows us that trying to base our

3:38:46.400 --> 3:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>priors on twenty eighteen, because twenty eighteen, you know, the

3:38:49.560 --> 3:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>polls actually work quite off twenty twenty and twenty sixteen.

3:38:52.280 --> 3:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's difficult, and you know, we have no

3:38:54.600 --> 3:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>choice but to come really we have no choice but

3:38:56.680 --> 3:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to come with the data and the biases of the

3:38:58.959 --> 3:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>modern history that we have. But in general, like what

3:39:02.280 --> 3:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing here is that I'm even looking at you know,

3:39:05.800 --> 3:39:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Dems might actually gain a seat. And this one district

3:39:08.959 --> 3:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio in Cincinnati, like I'm looking at data that also, Yeah,

3:39:13.560 --> 3:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there we go. In the Emily pulled this up here

3:39:15.840 --> 3:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>from Nate Silver. In house races as toss up or Lean,

3:39:18.400 --> 3:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are leading in seventeen in Republicans only in seven.

3:39:21.959 --> 3:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is just simply not the scenario which

3:39:25.200 --> 3:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of us expected. I think the

3:39:27.280 --> 3:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>takeaways from this are going to be really interesting. With

3:39:29.920 --> 3:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the seventy three percent there for John Fetterman, I mean

3:39:32.720 --> 3:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that is just that is stunning. Like again, it's early.

3:39:36.640 --> 3:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It will take at least a couple of days to

3:39:38.680 --> 3:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actually find out what's going on Maricopa County. As I

3:39:42.680 --> 3:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>alluded to earlier, Georgia actually remains right now in a

3:39:46.360 --> 3:39:49.240
<v Speaker 1>total toss up. They have seventy seven percent of the

3:39:49.360 --> 3:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>vote that is in there. But well here's another very

3:39:52.200 --> 3:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in the pure toss ups, Democrats are ahead and eight

3:39:55.600 --> 3:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and the GOP in two. A tsunami that's not what

3:39:59.560 --> 3:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you're looking. Yeah, RSI Captor. People people wrote off Marcy Captor,

3:40:05.640 --> 3:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but then the Republicans wrote off JR. Madjeuski, like he

3:40:10.040 --> 3:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like made up a bunch of stuff. Well he was

3:40:11.680 --> 3:40:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the guy who he got Trump's endorsement by mowing Trump's

3:40:15.400 --> 3:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>face into his lawn. Oh my god, Oh yeah, remember

3:40:18.640 --> 3:40:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this guy, and he won the prime the Marshall, I thought, Marshall,

3:40:22.520 --> 3:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe he doesn't he doesn't have a lot, Marshall.

3:40:27.440 --> 3:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Marshall's lawn service is that he goes and he has

3:40:30.440 --> 3:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a Now he mows in the candidate of your choice

3:40:33.440 --> 3:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to try to get the endorsement all of Brooklyn. So

3:40:37.200 --> 3:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks like, so seventy nine percent in and she's

3:40:39.680 --> 3:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>up by eight eight percent. I mean, it looks like

3:40:42.480 --> 3:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Captor is going to hold on. When I saw the

3:40:44.480 --> 3:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>first exit polls out that were like nationally motor set

3:40:49.879 --> 3:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation was most important, like thirty four percent, but abortion

3:40:53.320 --> 3:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was kind of close on its heels, I was like,

3:40:55.840 --> 3:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a different picture than we've been getting from

3:40:58.400 --> 3:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>these holes leading leading up to now, it's been like

3:41:02.879 --> 3:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly inflation, economy, etc. And abortion is like third on

3:41:07.040 --> 3:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the list, not even second, and so when I saw that,

3:41:09.440 --> 3:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hmm. Then we got the Pennsylvania exit

3:41:13.000 --> 3:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>polls and voters there actually put abortion as the number

3:41:16.400 --> 3:41:19.720
<v Speaker 1>one issue, which in some ways makes sense. I mean,

3:41:19.800 --> 3:41:22.199
<v Speaker 1>that might be another thing to parse in the days

3:41:22.240 --> 3:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to come, is the states where voters really felt that

3:41:27.240 --> 3:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>abortion rights were truly at stake, and I would say

3:41:30.120 --> 3:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania is one of them. Republicans have both the House

3:41:34.280 --> 3:41:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate. If you end up with Mastriano as governor,

3:41:38.480 --> 3:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>they can do whatever they want. So they probably really

3:41:42.000 --> 3:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>really felt like, oh, this issue is I can actually

3:41:45.040 --> 3:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>see how my vote is going to change what ultimately

3:41:47.720 --> 3:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>happens here. So that might be another dynamic sort of

3:41:51.080 --> 3:41:54.800
<v Speaker 1>underpinning what happens what happened here. Two key races on

3:41:55.000 --> 3:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania on that point. One is at Allentown Lehigh Valley,

3:41:59.040 --> 3:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>people were looking Exus wild as quite vulnerable. She's up

3:42:02.440 --> 3:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>by six points with sixty five percent in and then

3:42:06.480 --> 3:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>up in Scranton, which is a race that Emily and

3:42:08.879 --> 3:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I covered on Counterpoints a couple of times. Matt Cartwright

3:42:11.720 --> 3:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>versus Jim Bognet. Matt cart Wright one of the few

3:42:14.080 --> 3:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like actually populous Democrats up by ten points. Wow, with

3:42:18.080 --> 3:42:22.039
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine percent in against Jim Bognet and it's not over,

3:42:22.200 --> 3:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but they've got him leaning d here how many votes

3:42:25.200 --> 3:42:27.959
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the votes? Fifty nine percent of the vote

3:42:27.959 --> 3:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in and he's up by twenty thousand votes. So like,

3:42:31.080 --> 3:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a hard I think I just realized this. But

3:42:33.440 --> 3:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all from swing states. Ryan's Pa, Crystal's Virginia or

3:42:37.040 --> 3:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Texas in Wisconsin, I don't know if Texas yet. Not yet,

3:42:41.879 --> 3:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a percent Okay, it happened one time, it is

3:42:45.280 --> 3:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, yeah, yeah the future one day swing say,

3:42:48.480 --> 3:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have said Virginia is a blue state. That's true, Lily. Okay,

3:42:54.160 --> 3:42:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So Crystal, you and I were doing breaking points tomorrow morning,

3:42:58.440 --> 3:43:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do a hand off here in a

3:43:00.360 --> 3:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit. What do you think we should sum up with.

3:43:02.360 --> 3:43:07.119
<v Speaker 1>For let's be clear, it's ten pm on the East coast,

3:43:07.560 --> 3:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so as of right now time at this moment, standard time,

3:43:10.680 --> 3:43:15.720
<v Speaker 1>baby standard as hell. All. Yeah, I mean, here's what

3:43:15.840 --> 3:43:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we know. The red tsunami did not happen. Yes, we

3:43:19.520 --> 3:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>know Republicans underperformed the fundamentals. There's just no doubt about that.

3:43:25.000 --> 3:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And I do think it is a real indictment in

3:43:28.640 --> 3:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the direction of the party, especially, I mean,

3:43:32.720 --> 3:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>abortion extremism has been there for a long time for

3:43:34.800 --> 3:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans, but laying on top of that, like I'm

3:43:37.840 --> 3:43:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to accept the results of the elections, I'm

3:43:39.840 --> 3:43:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going to deny what happened in the last one. We're

3:43:42.320 --> 3:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>going to nominate the most fringe candidates we can possibly find.

3:43:45.760 --> 3:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can read these results, even if

3:43:48.800 --> 3:43:50.879
<v Speaker 1>everything else sort of falls in the Republicans direction, they

3:43:50.959 --> 3:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>end up doing better than they've done up to this point.

3:43:53.920 --> 3:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can read these results given the

3:43:56.560 --> 3:44:00.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals of this election, as anything but a rebuke the

3:44:00.680 --> 3:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>direction of the Republican Party. I think you were correct.

3:44:02.959 --> 3:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I think my takeaway from this is that it will

3:44:05.240 --> 3:44:07.240
<v Speaker 1>get I still don't think, by the way, that even

3:44:07.400 --> 3:44:09.280
<v Speaker 1>if even if the Dams do hold the Senate, I

3:44:09.320 --> 3:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think it will diminish Trump's chances of completely holding

3:44:12.560 --> 3:44:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on to the GOP and all that. Oh yeah, I

3:44:14.520 --> 3:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do think this will increase discussion around Trump's hold on

3:44:18.200 --> 3:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the GOP, given that he pushed Walker, given that he

3:44:22.320 --> 3:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>pushed doctor Oz Blake Master. I don't know yet know

3:44:25.680 --> 3:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen with to Blake Masters, with Carry

3:44:27.720 --> 3:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Lake or with Brian Sorry, with Dan Boldock in New Hampshire.

3:44:31.520 --> 3:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, so let's be clear on all

3:44:33.800 --> 3:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of those races. But if some of those lose, or

3:44:36.560 --> 3:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>if the GOP only wins fifty one seats and they

3:44:38.959 --> 3:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>don't perform as well in the House, I do think

3:44:42.080 --> 3:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it will give Trump is going to have a tougher

3:44:45.000 --> 3:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>time consolidating you or getting some of the GOP elite

3:44:48.480 --> 3:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to bow to him. I'm not saying that this will

3:44:50.280 --> 3:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>lead in any way to sometis you know, Dysantis win

3:44:54.080 --> 3:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>or any of that, but it will be difficult to

3:44:56.240 --> 3:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>say this Republican governor who just blew out Florid would

3:44:58.920 --> 3:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>turn it into a red state and won by twenty

3:45:01.000 --> 3:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>points in a way that you never could have. He

3:45:03.840 --> 3:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>outperforms you dramatically, mean by what sixteen points? Sixteen points? Right?

3:45:08.160 --> 3:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump won by three point five, Desanta's is now up

3:45:11.240 --> 3:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>by twenty, so seventeen points, they're sixteen five. Sorry for

3:45:15.240 --> 3:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's out there, Charlie. See this is the This is

3:45:18.560 --> 3:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a tough one because Trump was planning Trump

3:45:21.680 --> 3:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was planning on running for in twenty twenty four on

3:45:25.760 --> 3:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the back of a red wave. On the expected red wave. Now,

3:45:28.959 --> 3:45:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I still think he's going to run. I still think

3:45:31.000 --> 3:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he will win the nomination, to be clear, but this

3:45:34.440 --> 3:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>will make it a little bit more interesting. We're gonna

3:45:37.360 --> 3:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have to see like what the Kopia wants to come

3:45:39.440 --> 3:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>up with, and I think it will make Mitch McConnell

3:45:41.440 --> 3:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and all of them be willing to buck him much

3:45:44.160 --> 3:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>longer than they would have in the event of a

3:45:46.680 --> 3:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>red wave scenario. That's a very interesting and good point

3:45:50.240 --> 3:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, I mean, he's announcing next week and the

3:45:52.480 --> 3:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>thought was there's gonna be a red tsunami tsunamid nominee.

3:45:57.280 --> 3:46:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Now you know it's been four hours, folks, there's going

3:46:01.840 --> 3:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to be red tsunami. I'm gonna take credit. Now you're

3:46:06.000 --> 3:46:08.840
<v Speaker 1>taking credit for the like twelve house seats that they

3:46:09.080 --> 3:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>pick up and the maybe they get to fifty to

3:46:11.879 --> 3:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty again in the Senate. No, it's a less compelling picture.

3:46:15.080 --> 3:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. Okay, soccer, we do soccer. We

3:46:17.160 --> 3:46:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do a gift bag for you. Oh what is it?

3:46:19.640 --> 3:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>What you sean? Patrick Maloney down by ten points? Oh?

3:46:23.600 --> 3:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I like that, all right, that's an Ye, We're all true. Yeah, Okay, guys,

3:46:32.600 --> 3:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody stick around. We're gonna play the ads again just

3:46:34.879 --> 3:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so we can all switch things up. Emily and Ryan

3:46:36.720 --> 3:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be here at the desk at least

3:46:38.480 --> 3:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>until midnight, longer if they need to. So we've got

3:46:41.000 --> 3:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff for all of you for the team.

3:46:43.760 --> 3:46:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, I go. I just want to remind everybody

3:46:46.320 --> 3:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that the reason that we have Emily and Ryan and

3:46:49.240 --> 3:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that they are part of our beautiful family here is

3:46:52.080 --> 3:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>because of you guys. You made counterpoints possible, and I mean,

3:46:56.240 --> 3:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys are doing such a phenomenal job. I'm a

3:46:58.440 --> 3:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>genuine fan of the show. I don't know sure episode.

3:47:00.760 --> 3:47:03.879
<v Speaker 1>The response we've gotten from everybody has just been overwhelmingly positive.

3:47:04.200 --> 3:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Premium subscribers are over the moon about it. So thank

3:47:06.879 --> 3:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you to you guys for making that happen. Reminder, there's

3:47:09.640 --> 3:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a discount link in the description at the top of

3:47:12.600 --> 3:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the chat too, Yes, top to the chat in the

3:47:14.640 --> 3:47:16.800
<v Speaker 1>description this stuff. Look, it costs a lot of money

3:47:17.080 --> 3:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>renting the studio. We've got the full crew, Ryan's chair,

3:47:20.200 --> 3:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's hair. That's a day to day expense that we

3:47:24.640 --> 3:47:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have just in order to keep it looking just like that, everybody,

3:47:27.879 --> 3:47:30.280
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine? All right, So look here's the deal.

3:47:30.800 --> 3:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Now the election, we're nearing the end for that, so

3:47:34.879 --> 3:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to gear up also for twenty twenty four.

3:47:36.680 --> 3:47:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you enjoyed this, we've got two years now

3:47:38.920 --> 3:47:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to build so we can have even better election live

3:47:40.879 --> 3:47:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stream in that year. So to all of you who

3:47:43.320 --> 3:47:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have helped us, it is just so we can't thank

3:47:45.720 --> 3:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you all enough in order to make this possible. It's

3:47:48.160 --> 3:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>very nice to be at this desk and not over

3:47:49.760 --> 3:47:52.760
<v Speaker 1>at the hell desk for an election night, So you

3:47:52.840 --> 3:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>guys stick around. They will be here in our chairs

3:47:56.120 --> 3:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in five minutes and then they're going to continue on

3:47:58.240 --> 3:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>through the night. Christal will be and I'll be back

3:48:00.560 --> 3:48:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on for breaking points tomorrow morning for a full show.

3:48:03.879 --> 3:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll try and get it out as early as possible,

3:48:05.760 --> 3:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>just because we know how we want to sleep with

3:48:07.400 --> 3:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>my keep on yes right there, pro maybe I won't shower,

3:48:11.320 --> 3:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll be able to tell with the uh with Okay, guys,

3:48:15.160 --> 3:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you guys. You guys have been back in

3:48:17.000 --> 3:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>five stick around. Emily and Ryan are taking over the desk.

3:48:20.560 --> 3:48:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the streams and saga's gone, so we

3:48:23.760 --> 3:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>can talk about drugs now gone, so we can talk

3:48:26.040 --> 3:48:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about drugs. We're talking about in the sort of broader

3:48:28.840 --> 3:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>context about how this hasn't been necessarily a tsunami, that

3:48:31.920 --> 3:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the evidence is not indicating what a lot of Republican

3:48:34.760 --> 3:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and prognosticators sort of in the Beltway in general, thought

3:48:37.280 --> 3:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>might happen over the last few days, that this could

3:48:39.600 --> 3:48:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be a trouncing of shellacking in the words of President Obama,

3:48:42.879 --> 3:48:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what was that in twenty ten or twenty fourteen, and

3:48:45.320 --> 3:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a thumping That's what George Bush called his two thousand

3:48:48.160 --> 3:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and six loss thumping, and then and then Obama went

3:48:50.480 --> 3:48:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with shellacking shellackin all right, Well, Ryan, we've been covering,

3:48:54.040 --> 3:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of these candidates different races, but

3:48:56.920 --> 3:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you're following the ballot referendums really closely. And by the way,

3:49:00.080 --> 3:49:02.720
<v Speaker 1>before Ryan digs into the numbers, let's remember that the

3:49:02.879 --> 3:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>ballot referendums actually are very relevant to what's happening with

3:49:06.520 --> 3:49:10.280
<v Speaker 1>these candidates, because if you have people showing up for abortion,

3:49:10.760 --> 3:49:12.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say, in a state like Michigan, when that's where

3:49:12.840 --> 3:49:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that's on the referendum, if you have people showing up

3:49:15.320 --> 3:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for weed, for psychedelics. That makes a difference in some

3:49:18.800 --> 3:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of these very close elections. And that's not a thing

3:49:21.240 --> 3:49:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of legacy media folks factored into their predictions.

3:49:24.880 --> 3:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>What is it looking like right now, because it's so

3:49:27.040 --> 3:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to know who's going to come out, and usually

3:49:29.320 --> 3:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it is usually you can tell on the side of

3:49:32.040 --> 3:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the intensity. So if it's a psychedelic referendum, for instance,

3:49:37.440 --> 3:49:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like in Colorado, there aren't many people who are like

3:49:41.040 --> 3:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>rabidly hostile to psychedelics and are like only going to

3:49:44.680 --> 3:49:47.240
<v Speaker 1>vote so that they can vote against psychedelics. But you

3:49:47.320 --> 3:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to have a handful of people who will

3:49:50.600 --> 3:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>hear that it's on the ballot and they'll come out.

3:49:52.240 --> 3:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Now that numbers have gone way down, you want to

3:49:54.080 --> 3:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>check Bobert while I'm looking at this. By the way,

3:49:56.320 --> 3:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>great point. So in so Colorado proposition one twenty two,

3:50:00.080 --> 3:50:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this is this is to lea to decriminalize a bunch

3:50:02.720 --> 3:50:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of different psychedelics. It's now up by six points. It

3:50:05.920 --> 3:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>was up it was up a ton earlier. So that

3:50:09.280 --> 3:50:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that was probably because Boulder and Denver were coming in first,

3:50:11.840 --> 3:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and now some of the rural areas are are coming in.

3:50:14.080 --> 3:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not clear if this is going to actually

3:50:17.600 --> 3:50:20.720
<v Speaker 1>help Vobert or not. But separate from that, it looks

3:50:20.760 --> 3:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's it looks like it's still in strong shape,

3:50:23.880 --> 3:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which is itself a good thing. Like the more I

3:50:27.280 --> 3:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>think the more that we can remove penalties around around

3:50:30.920 --> 3:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>uh psychedelics, the better uh, you know, the better world

3:50:34.880 --> 3:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that this becomes. Like also like as we're like facing

3:50:39.600 --> 3:50:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this like dystopian future, where like we were talking earlier

3:50:43.360 --> 3:50:46.760
<v Speaker 1>about people's views on the economy and whether or not

3:50:46.800 --> 3:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>whether they thought Republicans would make it better, whether the

3:50:49.080 --> 3:50:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats would think it make it better. I think we're

3:50:51.160 --> 3:50:53.960
<v Speaker 1>going to find going forward over over the next decade

3:50:54.080 --> 3:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or so that voters aren't going to think anybody is

3:50:56.640 --> 3:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>going to make anything better. That that people feel that

3:50:59.440 --> 3:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we're just on a glide paths of doom and the

3:51:02.560 --> 3:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one bright spot it's like at least at least bring

3:51:06.280 --> 3:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics out of the shadows. It does depend on how

3:51:09.560 --> 3:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>these referendums are written, and there have been psychedelic referendums

3:51:13.400 --> 3:51:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen, for instance here in DC, that people

3:51:16.280 --> 3:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>may be favorable to until you kind of read the referendum,

3:51:18.720 --> 3:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like, there was a better way to write that.

3:51:20.080 --> 3:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>There was a more consensus way to write that that said,

3:51:22.920 --> 3:51:25.280
<v Speaker 1>ran you, you pulled some really interesting numbers about what

3:51:25.400 --> 3:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>happened in Kentucky with their abortion reference, and let's just quick,

3:51:30.000 --> 3:51:34.240
<v Speaker 1>how are they holding up that. Let me update everyone

3:51:34.320 --> 3:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bobert. Bobert is Lauren Bobert. We flagged this over

3:51:38.080 --> 3:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last hour because CBS News actually

3:51:41.160 --> 3:51:44.040
<v Speaker 1>flagged it and said we could have an upset brewing

3:51:44.200 --> 3:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado's third district, and indeed that is continuing. We're

3:51:47.960 --> 3:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing a really I think shocking. I mean, it's not shocking,

3:51:51.360 --> 3:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess in terms of candidate quality, but shocking in

3:51:55.160 --> 3:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of that. It was on absolutely nobody's radar. Nobody's

3:51:58.520 --> 3:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>radar on the right, nobody's radar the center, maybe nobody's right.

3:52:01.760 --> 3:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>On the left. Adam Frish, the Democratic candidate, is up

3:52:05.440 --> 3:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>by so he's up fifty one point eight percent to Bobert,

3:52:09.120 --> 3:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Bobert, who is at forty eight point two percent.

3:52:12.200 --> 3:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what seventy one percent of votes counted. That's a

3:52:16.640 --> 3:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>big deal because again, there was this idea that we

3:52:21.400 --> 3:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>were going into a tsunami, which, by the way, I'll

3:52:24.040 --> 3:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>freely admit I thought was a possibility. It's not a

3:52:26.720 --> 3:52:28.800
<v Speaker 1>prediction I would have ever written in stone, but I

3:52:28.840 --> 3:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it was. It was a possibility that we might

3:52:30.720 --> 3:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have been looking at over the last few days, given

3:52:33.480 --> 3:52:37.320
<v Speaker 1>where some of these numbers were trending. But and again,

3:52:37.600 --> 3:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it could still be a very good night for Republicans.

3:52:39.760 --> 3:52:42.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't totally know yet. It's it is falling short

3:52:42.360 --> 3:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of those fantasy predictions, There's no question about it. And

3:52:44.840 --> 3:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Bobart Bobert being down in the poll, she's

3:52:47.640 --> 3:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a very very maggot candidate, as many people know to

3:52:51.040 --> 3:52:55.480
<v Speaker 1>say the very least. That is, it's getting into territory

3:52:55.480 --> 3:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's looking like this might not this night might

3:52:57.480 --> 3:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be a win for Mitch McConnell and a loss for

3:52:59.520 --> 3:53:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Yeah, and could also be a loss for OZ.

3:53:03.120 --> 3:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And apparently we have we have a live update from OZ.

3:53:06.520 --> 3:53:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Can we do we have them? Right? Excellent? Oh, welcome,

3:53:10.880 --> 3:53:13.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. We weren't on the first time we were

3:53:13.360 --> 3:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in the control room watching your update, Lewis. So what

3:53:18.440 --> 3:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was the mood like at the beginning of the night,

3:53:20.680 --> 3:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and what's the mood like now? Yeah, thanks for having

3:53:25.560 --> 3:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>me back on, guys, goodness evil. Yeah, the mood in

3:53:28.760 --> 3:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the room has definitely shifted a little bit more negative.

3:53:32.280 --> 3:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>The first real mood shift was when Fox News, which

3:53:35.520 --> 3:53:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is actually playing on the big screens back here behind

3:53:37.920 --> 3:53:40.440
<v Speaker 1>me if you can't hear them, when Fox News called

3:53:40.520 --> 3:53:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the governor's race for Shapiro. There were definitely some audible

3:53:44.400 --> 3:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>groans in size throughout the room. Some Yeah, definitely a

3:53:49.720 --> 3:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>five shift when that happened. Otherwise, folks are still watching.

3:53:54.240 --> 3:53:57.280
<v Speaker 1>There's still some moptimism that the Bulls might turn around,

3:53:57.360 --> 3:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>but at this stage in the game, I'm definitely of

3:54:00.200 --> 3:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Oriz to see betterment still with the lead here as

3:54:04.400 --> 3:54:07.200
<v Speaker 1>more and more results are coming through. Wasn't what I

3:54:07.320 --> 3:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>was predicting, you know. Yeah, but the moodshift has definitely

3:54:11.200 --> 3:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>happened quite a bit. If you're just joining us now,

3:54:13.520 --> 3:54:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we're with Louis Dangelis, who is at doctor Oz doctor

3:54:16.600 --> 3:54:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Roger's victory party. We'll see if it actually is a

3:54:18.840 --> 3:54:22.240
<v Speaker 1>victory party at Lewis. I'm curious. There's a lot of excitement.

3:54:22.360 --> 3:54:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, you cover these things, you go to different places,

3:54:24.760 --> 3:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>do you since that there's excitement, particularly for doctor Oz.

3:54:29.040 --> 3:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you go to a Trump rally. It's

3:54:30.600 --> 3:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not as though there's all of this excitement for the

3:54:32.920 --> 3:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party. If you're at a Bernie rally, it's not

3:54:35.640 --> 3:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as though there's tons of excitement for the Democratic Party.

3:54:38.480 --> 3:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there a particular sense of excitement for doctor Oz

3:54:42.440 --> 3:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>as a candidate? This man is a massive television star

3:54:45.320 --> 3:54:48.320
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years. But are people behind

3:54:48.440 --> 3:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>him personally or are they sort of anti Fetterman, anti

3:54:51.760 --> 3:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dem I think kind of on both sides of this,

3:54:56.880 --> 3:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard that many folks excited excited about either candidate.

3:55:00.400 --> 3:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of talked a little bit about this earlier,

3:55:03.000 --> 3:55:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we were at the Trump event on

3:55:05.360 --> 3:55:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night and I was talking to folks there, and

3:55:08.960 --> 3:55:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the first five or six people I talked to, they

3:55:10.840 --> 3:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>said they were going to be voting for Oz, but

3:55:12.960 --> 3:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they weren't that excited about it. For a lot of

3:55:15.000 --> 3:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>those folks, Oz was not their first choice. The same

3:55:18.240 --> 3:55:20.640
<v Speaker 1>thing goes for Fretterman, though, And one anecdote that I

3:55:20.720 --> 3:55:23.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely want to share is that this is more so

3:55:23.960 --> 3:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with Betterman. Voters and folks had those events, Like I mentioned,

3:55:28.120 --> 3:55:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they weren't super excited about him. But I asked people

3:55:31.440 --> 3:55:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what's your number one issue? Despite what a lot of

3:55:34.800 --> 3:55:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the polling has kind of been saying over the last

3:55:36.800 --> 3:55:39.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, a lot of people's number one issue

3:55:39.440 --> 3:55:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is still abortion, especially with Democrat voters. And you know, I, personally,

3:55:45.280 --> 3:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>similarly to what you all have said in the past,

3:55:47.840 --> 3:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that inflation was number one on all sorts of

3:55:51.520 --> 3:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. But abortion seems to potentially be playing a

3:55:54.480 --> 3:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger role in all of this than we initially thought

3:55:56.600 --> 3:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it might. Interesting. I see you're in the press area

3:56:00.120 --> 3:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>over there. Have you talked to other reporters, what what? What?

3:56:02.840 --> 3:56:06.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the reporter's conventional wisdom as they're watching the numbers

3:56:06.640 --> 3:56:11.240
<v Speaker 1>come in. Surprised? Yeah, we're all kind of in there.

3:56:11.320 --> 3:56:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We were all surprised to see first the you know,

3:56:14.160 --> 3:56:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not surprised to see Shapiro having won that race,

3:56:17.040 --> 3:56:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but having it me as larger of a margin as

3:56:19.800 --> 3:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, and how quickly it's being called. And again

3:56:23.280 --> 3:56:26.160
<v Speaker 1>surprised that Betterment is still up right now. I mean,

3:56:26.280 --> 3:56:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't envision, and a lot of the folks that

3:56:28.160 --> 3:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been chatting with didn't envision a scenario where Oz

3:56:31.080 --> 3:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't up at this point. And then as the mail

3:56:33.400 --> 3:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in ballance start to come in. Uh, you know, Betterment

3:56:36.760 --> 3:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>slowly chips away at the lead, trips away at the lead,

3:56:39.320 --> 3:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like we saw with you know, the election with President

3:56:41.920 --> 3:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Biden in twenty twenty. I just again, I

3:56:46.680 --> 3:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of us are really envisioning the scenario

3:56:49.320 --> 3:56:51.840
<v Speaker 1>where better mccamp was in the position that it is

3:56:51.920 --> 3:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and the OZ campaign is down at the moment, I

3:56:55.040 --> 3:56:58.760
<v Speaker 1>am hearing some cheers behind me. I'm not sure what

3:56:59.040 --> 3:57:01.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly that is. Bill just as too early to call

3:57:01.400 --> 3:57:06.160
<v Speaker 1>okay there, but you know how it goes, I don't know. Yeah,

3:57:06.920 --> 3:57:09.240
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, and let's I mean, maybe it's splitting hairs.

3:57:09.320 --> 3:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But you've been there sort of gauging everybody's temperature. Is

3:57:13.360 --> 3:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there cautious You said this a little bit earlier, But

3:57:16.240 --> 3:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>if we can just keep pulling out that thread, is

3:57:18.400 --> 3:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it a sense of cautious optimism? Because in truth, you know,

3:57:21.440 --> 3:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it is surprising to I think

3:57:23.920 --> 3:57:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably surprising to me that it's as close as

3:57:26.080 --> 3:57:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it is right now in the night. But that doesn't

3:57:28.480 --> 3:57:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it's over. It certainly doesn't mean it's over. It

3:57:30.680 --> 3:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>could go one of two ways, obviously, So what is

3:57:34.200 --> 3:57:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the do people still feel okay? Is everybody depressed or

3:57:38.400 --> 3:57:40.480
<v Speaker 1>are they like, all right, well, we're just going to

3:57:40.520 --> 3:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>be here longer than we thought we would. You know,

3:57:43.400 --> 3:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't I wouldn't say depressed. Yet, Yes, I agree.

3:57:45.920 --> 3:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more of a I think we're going

3:57:47.760 --> 3:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to be here longer than we thought, but definitely concerned

3:57:50.360 --> 3:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes. If you will, yeah, it's yeah, it's

3:57:54.360 --> 3:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's less less excitement than I thought was going

3:57:57.800 --> 3:58:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to be going on if if you will, any good

3:58:01.920 --> 3:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>anecdotes of interactions with OZ voters you can share, Yeah,

3:58:07.360 --> 3:58:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I talked a little bit about this one

3:58:09.560 --> 3:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>or earlier. But first I met a bunch of different

3:58:13.800 --> 3:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>folks who were OZ voters, but they were also Shapiro voters.

3:58:19.200 --> 3:58:21.440
<v Speaker 1>A couple of volunteers for the OZ campaign that I

3:58:21.520 --> 3:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>spoke with earlier. Obviously, like when folks who are out

3:58:25.040 --> 3:58:28.200
<v Speaker 1>canvassing and whatnot, usually the parties work together, and if

3:58:28.240 --> 3:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you're putting out signs for one candidate, you might also

3:58:30.560 --> 3:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>be doing it for the other. And a lot of

3:58:33.200 --> 3:58:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the OZ volunteers were telling me that they weren't necessarily

3:58:37.960 --> 3:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>excited about putting Masterriano signs out as well, and they

3:58:40.680 --> 3:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily support him. They think he goes a little

3:58:43.280 --> 3:58:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bit too far on issues like abortion. They think he

3:58:45.880 --> 3:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>goes a little too far on some of the certifying

3:58:49.000 --> 3:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the election comments that he's made in the past.

3:58:51.320 --> 3:58:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So that was that was an interesting anecdote. Another interesting

3:58:55.480 --> 3:58:56.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that happened in the room, and I want to

3:58:57.000 --> 3:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>shout out one of these people. After I was on

3:58:59.120 --> 3:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the first time, a Breaking Points premium member from the

3:59:02.960 --> 3:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>crowd in here came out and bound me. Her name

3:59:06.040 --> 3:59:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is Samantha. I told her I would shout her out,

3:59:08.000 --> 3:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>so if she's still listening Jumpsters, she'll probably pop back over.

3:59:10.960 --> 3:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And then actually an OZ staff person came over and

3:59:14.440 --> 3:59:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the OZ staff member was listening to Breaking Points in

3:59:16.920 --> 3:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>his ear and came and found me as well, which

3:59:19.520 --> 3:59:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool. I gotta say that's awesome. Do you

3:59:22.720 --> 3:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>get what kind of shwag do you have that shows

3:59:25.680 --> 3:59:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're like Breaking Points? I actually don't have any

3:59:30.680 --> 3:59:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Breaking Points swag with me. Maybe you guys can hook

3:59:33.000 --> 3:59:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it up for next time. Well counterpoints counterpoint, well yeah, yes,

3:59:42.000 --> 3:59:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Crystal and Sager did not offer me that earlier, So yeah,

3:59:45.480 --> 3:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys, what we'll do The counterpoints stuff excellent. So

3:59:50.160 --> 3:59:52.520
<v Speaker 1>she just saw you and the staffer heard you. So

3:59:52.600 --> 3:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how they saw me. They saw and they

3:59:55.400 --> 3:59:57.120
<v Speaker 1>came and found me in the press area. The dress

3:59:57.240 --> 4:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are very much weaseled into a tiny, little cooped up area.

4:00:01.520 --> 4:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't have much space to move around. So yeah,

4:00:04.640 --> 4:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if folks are interested, I can try to and then

4:00:06.560 --> 4:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you guys get back to it. I can

4:00:08.120 --> 4:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>give a quick little we'll see if it works. If

4:00:10.080 --> 4:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't, feel free to pull away. Yeah, yeah, well, yes,

4:00:17.600 --> 4:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually at a flooding club, I think, like

4:00:21.160 --> 4:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a country club type five, but without the uh a

4:00:26.600 --> 4:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the room here on the other side,

4:00:30.120 --> 4:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of all the cameras there, it's

4:00:33.000 --> 4:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a little area where we've got our laptops and what

4:00:35.320 --> 4:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not set up. But uh, I will say, I do

4:00:37.760 --> 4:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>think that we're probably the only real independent outlet here,

4:00:40.680 --> 4:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty awesome as well. Mostly just uh the

4:00:45.200 --> 4:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>big guys are here, local TV stations and whatnot, but

4:00:48.680 --> 4:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely not seeing any other independent Well, Lewis, We'll try

4:00:51.880 --> 4:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to get back to you later. Go ask them. Go

4:00:55.000 --> 4:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ask folks there what what the hell happened? How their

4:00:59.120 --> 4:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Man couldn't sell this. He's he's been able to sell

4:01:02.760 --> 4:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things that anybody, all kinds oft but

4:01:05.000 --> 4:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't sell this. Well, we don't know. He may

4:01:07.440 --> 4:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>come back, we really, yeah, we don't way. We might

4:01:10.160 --> 4:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not have like really confidence in these results for the

4:01:12.800 --> 4:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>next few days because they're having a lot of issues

4:01:14.920 --> 4:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>counting in Philadelphia based on different cases and reconciliation and

4:01:19.320 --> 4:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>all dated ballots and all that kod stuff. Lewis, thank

4:01:23.280 --> 4:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you so much. It was fantastic. We really appreciate it. Yeah,

4:01:26.720 --> 4:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me us awesome. New York Times still

4:01:30.960 --> 4:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>has him up by fifty thousand votes, and New York

4:01:33.320 --> 4:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Times is slower, so you might have Fetterman up by

4:01:36.480 --> 4:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand, up by fifty thousand votes, and so that's

4:01:39.280 --> 4:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>not a small gap at this point, Like that's seventy

4:01:42.160 --> 4:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent in fifty thousand up. That's you'd rather be Fetterman.

4:01:45.080 --> 4:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They're absolutely rather be fed. Yeah, and especially with the

4:01:47.600 --> 4:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>remaining I mean, this is your home turf point literally, Yeah,

4:01:50.800 --> 4:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you got the Philadelphia suburbs you got Yeah, and they're

4:01:55.560 --> 4:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>still counting so Philadelphia. Do they count mail in ballots later? Yes,

4:02:01.520 --> 4:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I thought. That's a big advantage. Yes,

4:02:04.360 --> 4:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's because there was a lawsuit that like banned

4:02:09.240 --> 4:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>them from counting them earlier by Republicans, and so they're

4:02:14.440 --> 4:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're moving them through now. But that's why it's

4:02:16.560 --> 4:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>taking That's why it's taking longer. So if any if

4:02:19.280 --> 4:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you hear anybody complaining that Philadelphia takes so long, it's

4:02:21.720 --> 4:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>because Republicans sued them and stopped them from counting them

4:02:24.840 --> 4:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the way that other counties are allowed to do. So. Yes,

4:02:30.160 --> 4:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so you would if you were Fetterman and you were

4:02:32.840 --> 4:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>down by fifty thousand, you might be thinking, like, hey,

4:02:36.160 --> 4:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I still have some hope. I'm probably gonna lose, but

4:02:38.480 --> 4:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a hope Fetterman being up by fifty thousand

4:02:41.120 --> 4:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I think he's feeling pretty good. We'll see.

4:02:45.320 --> 4:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But but like you said, like the suburbs, how the

4:02:48.920 --> 4:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>suburbs come in, and how the culture wars, you know,

4:02:51.880 --> 4:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>shake out. We're going to talk. We'll talk to Terry Shilling,

4:02:54.800 --> 4:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who's been, you know, waging the culture war all over

4:02:57.560 --> 4:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the country in this in this camp. Pain is probably

4:03:00.800 --> 4:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>disappointed that it's at these results so far. Yeah, I

4:03:06.040 --> 4:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean a lot of that was a

4:03:08.320 --> 4:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of those efforts, and we'll ask Terry. I think

4:03:10.040 --> 4:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>he spent about fifteen million dollars on ads if I'm correct,

4:03:13.440 --> 4:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that there should be a lot

4:03:15.480 --> 4:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of money. Yeah, a lot of that those in Arizona,

4:03:18.960 --> 4:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and we just don't know what's happening in Arizona. We

4:03:21.680 --> 4:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's happening with Catherine Cortez Masto. These are

4:03:24.640 --> 4:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>some big places. And Oregon is another place where you

4:03:27.680 --> 4:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a governor that's Republican since the nineteen eighties.

4:03:31.040 --> 4:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea what's happening in that race. But

4:03:33.240 --> 4:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what we do have are indicators. For instance, from Virginia seven,

4:03:37.160 --> 4:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's Crystal's district where Abigail Spanberger seems to have eked

4:03:41.160 --> 4:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>out that win. It's been called she's eked out that win.

4:03:44.120 --> 4:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And that was supposed to be one of the bell

4:03:45.680 --> 4:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>weather districts that not just for a tsunami, but just

4:03:48.720 --> 4:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for a red wave. So a red wave would have

4:03:50.960 --> 4:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>been if Yesli Bargo wins Virginio seven, Republican just knocks

4:03:54.880 --> 4:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>out thecumbent Abigail Spamburger. It is a different district. But

4:03:59.360 --> 4:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if that were the case, then people said, all right,

4:04:02.160 --> 4:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>then we can look at Jennifer Wexton, then we can

4:04:03.920 --> 4:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>look at Virginia ten. If she loses, then we're in

4:04:06.600 --> 4:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for a tsunami. And that hasn't been the case. One

4:04:10.480 --> 4:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think is important to start teasing out here, though,

4:04:13.720 --> 4:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is kind of the the big

4:04:18.640 --> 4:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>story in the legacy media right now, and I think

4:04:21.200 --> 4:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>genuinely sort of across the board, because the narrative going

4:04:24.880 --> 4:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>into this was Momentum is building for Republicans. Momentum is

4:04:27.600 --> 4:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>building for Republicans. But at the same time, there was

4:04:33.400 --> 4:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of coverage over the course of the summer

4:04:35.440 --> 4:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about how they were going to be shocking Democratic upsets,

4:04:38.440 --> 4:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's val Deming's toppling Mark or Rubio, whether it's

4:04:43.320 --> 4:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like that was like a big jd Vance losing jd

4:04:46.440 --> 4:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Vance has been called for jd Vance. As far as

4:04:48.480 --> 4:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we know, jad Vance is going to handle that up

4:04:51.200 --> 4:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>by ten, He's going to handle that easily. I think

4:04:53.760 --> 4:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're potentially looking at here are sort of spotty tsunamis,

4:04:59.160 --> 4:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's just the numbers. Because one of the districts

4:05:01.920 --> 4:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we've zeroed in on is Florida twenty seven. Florida twenty seven,

4:05:05.800 --> 4:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And I hate to sound like a broken record, but

4:05:08.120 --> 4:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're just tuning in here, now, that's a district

4:05:10.600 --> 4:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump eked out a win in. If you

4:05:14.040 --> 4:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the Daily Coast tabulations, which they do a

4:05:16.600 --> 4:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>really helpful thing. They put it a full spreadsheet so

4:05:19.160 --> 4:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you can see how the new redrawn districts that people

4:05:22.240 --> 4:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are voting in tonight would have voted in twenty twenty,

4:05:25.480 --> 4:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>just barely by the by like one percent. You get

4:05:29.680 --> 4:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a win for Donald Trump in that district. Maria Elvirus

4:05:32.200 --> 4:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Salazar Republican looks to have taken that by double digits.

4:05:35.880 --> 4:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to be thanks in part to the

4:05:37.440 --> 4:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Cuban vote, to the Hispanic vote. The Cuban vote is

4:05:40.080 --> 4:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a very specific kind of vote. The Hispanic vote more

4:05:42.320 --> 4:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>broadly is not a monolith. But that is really really interesting.

4:05:46.520 --> 4:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And again in Florida, we just see Ron de Santis

4:05:50.680 --> 4:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>outperforming Donald Trump. We see Mark or Rubio doing better

4:05:53.840 --> 4:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>than people expected him to. And where we're going to

4:05:56.080 --> 4:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>continue looking is Texas. If we see in the Rio

4:05:59.360 --> 4:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Grand Valley numbers like that for Myrafloras in the thirty fourth,

4:06:03.000 --> 4:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these are going to be where you see not the

4:06:06.240 --> 4:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>across the board tsunami, but you do see Republicans walking

4:06:10.000 --> 4:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>away from tonight. Potentially, we don't know yet with the

4:06:13.160 --> 4:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sense that the realignment and when it comes to Hispanic voters,

4:06:17.240 --> 4:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe if we're zooming into Milwaukee and Philadelphia over the

4:06:20.200 --> 4:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>next few days, maybe Democrats lose some enthusiasm, lose some

4:06:24.080 --> 4:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>support in the black vote. We don't know, but that's

4:06:27.800 --> 4:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>very much still on the table, especially given some of

4:06:30.320 --> 4:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the results that are already in so to just sort

4:06:32.480 --> 4:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of to poke a little bit of a hole in

4:06:35.320 --> 4:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that broader narrative. And I'm not just saying this because

4:06:37.840 --> 4:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm conservative. I'm saying this because I do think it's

4:06:40.520 --> 4:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>worth pushing back a little bit on the narrative that's congealing.

4:06:45.480 --> 4:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, though that top line very much

4:06:48.360 --> 4:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is the case is very clear. That top line is

4:06:51.280 --> 4:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that the tsunami fantasy that Republicans had been sort of

4:06:56.480 --> 4:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>gloating about, I would say the last few days, and

4:06:59.280 --> 4:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I really thought that was a probability or a possibility,

4:07:02.040 --> 4:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not a probability, but a possibility that's not going to

4:07:04.920 --> 4:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>pan out. Although if you're going to Pocohol, does this

4:07:08.280 --> 4:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>patch the whole back up? We got one point three

4:07:11.720 --> 4:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>million votes counted in Arizona. No, because only Katie Hobbs

4:07:20.360 --> 4:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>being up over Carry Lake. So she's up. That's I

4:07:26.160 --> 4:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>would not expect that though. I mean, so you've got

4:07:28.960 --> 4:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so in Arizona, you have the northeastern Apache County, which

4:07:33.560 --> 4:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is Republican, not reporting anything at all. Yet you have

4:07:37.280 --> 4:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Navajo County only reporting half, although that's fairly split the

4:07:42.280 --> 4:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>big I don't know. I mean, you would expect Carrie

4:07:48.800 --> 4:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Lake to be doing better than this if she was

4:07:51.640 --> 4:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going to win at this point. So compared to so

4:07:55.760 --> 4:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>she's down fifty seven forty three, compared to Mark Mark Kelly,

4:08:01.360 --> 4:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>who's who's up fifty eight to forty Oh no, not sorry,

4:08:04.880 --> 4:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not fifty eight forty that's that's in one county. Not

4:08:10.480 --> 4:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not not what people were expecting. I think it's it's

4:08:14.480 --> 4:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>tough to say with forty seven percent, but we'll those

4:08:17.480 --> 4:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers will change and the very it is fifty yeah,

4:08:20.920 --> 4:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it is fifty eight to forty right now, right, yeah,

4:08:24.480 --> 4:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So those numbers can change a lot one point and

4:08:27.040 --> 4:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>then we don't do we have anything in on Texas

4:08:30.080 --> 4:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>yet because one point. Oh here, if numbers are starting

4:08:34.160 --> 4:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to come in, yes, one point on Miami and South Florida,

4:08:38.320 --> 4:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's such an unusual place in you know, when

4:08:42.800 --> 4:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama was elected, there was this sense that the next

4:08:46.480 --> 4:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>generation of Cubans were going to move democratic and this

4:08:50.920 --> 4:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to become a city that basically voted in

4:08:53.960 --> 4:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the same way that a lot of other cities did.

4:08:56.320 --> 4:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Eventually as the kind of hostility that Democrats died out,

4:09:00.120 --> 4:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hostility which is literally still rooted in hostility towards JFK

4:09:06.480 --> 4:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for his betrayal during the Bay of Pigs. Like that's

4:09:12.000 --> 4:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami Cubans support the embargo right right, but not the

4:09:16.920 --> 4:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>children of those Cubans, So but a ton of them

4:09:19.560 --> 4:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>moved away. And then you also had this mass influx

4:09:24.320 --> 4:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of rich, right wing Venezuelans, Colombians, South Americans, Mexicans across

4:09:30.720 --> 4:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the board. So in Miami went from a place that

4:09:34.720 --> 4:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was very Cuban American dominated to now being a place

4:09:39.760 --> 4:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>where basically people with right wing politics already and wealth

4:09:43.680 --> 4:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>from South and Central America are heading. And I think

4:09:46.160 --> 4:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it is reshaping the entire politics of South South Florida.

4:09:50.440 --> 4:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Combined with the trumpification of the entire state, but also

4:09:53.600 --> 4:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe reshaping the politics of southeastern Texas, and that is

4:09:58.640 --> 4:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps we'll see some of So let's roll through

4:10:01.440 --> 4:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some of this. So Maya Flores, that's one we were

4:10:04.480 --> 4:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at, right, Yeah, Myra Flores, So thirty four, she's

4:10:07.880 --> 4:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>down by ten thousand votes with sixty seven percent in.

4:10:10.600 --> 4:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>That's super interesting because that's again a tsunami would have

4:10:14.200 --> 4:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>been Myra Flores right now, comfortable, right comfortable, and she

4:10:19.840 --> 4:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>down eleven eleven percent against Vicenta Gonzale. She is a

4:10:23.760 --> 4:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>very good candidate from the perspective of Republicans, from the

4:10:26.400 --> 4:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>perspective of me, I mean as a conservative journalist, I've

4:10:29.800 --> 4:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to her. I think she's a good candidate.

4:10:32.920 --> 4:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what happens there. Looks like Michelle Vaejo

4:10:35.880 --> 4:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to lose. That's that's a big to Monica

4:10:39.840 --> 4:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>de la Cruz. She's down by eleven points with seventy

4:10:42.040 --> 4:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the vote in. So this is roughly

4:10:44.000 --> 4:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the same. Now there's a ten percent more in in

4:10:47.280 --> 4:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen here. So now Henry Henry Quaar cruising despite that

4:10:53.200 --> 4:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was another big if that's a same subject of a loser, right,

4:10:56.960 --> 4:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So he's he's up by He's up by twelve points.

4:10:59.320 --> 4:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He's up by fourteen thousand votes. Greg gasar squad member,

4:11:05.080 --> 4:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>incoming squad member. He was obviously always going to win.

4:11:07.680 --> 4:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>He's he's up by fifty points. This is an Austin,

4:11:10.400 --> 4:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Austin guy. Let's see who else wal Qing Castro oh here,

4:11:16.880 --> 4:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Tony Gonzalez winning comfortably Republican Tony Gonzalez, what other whatever?

4:11:25.640 --> 4:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So the Myyra Flores you said, they were, like, what's

4:11:27.800 --> 4:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent in in Texas six sixty seven sixty seven percent,

4:11:32.760 --> 4:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>she's down by eleven percentage points in ten thousand votes.

4:11:35.680 --> 4:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So they redrew that district. But that's a again that

4:11:40.200 --> 4:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans felt very good about that, right they loved Meyra Flores,

4:11:43.840 --> 4:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>like she became like a celebrity, like she's our counter

4:11:47.040 --> 4:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to AOC, and again like she's a good candidate, could

4:11:50.320 --> 4:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>come back and win. But it's not looking good for

4:11:52.760 --> 4:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>her right now. Well, and it's certainly not an easy,

4:11:55.240 --> 4:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>comfortable win either way. And and that's and we're again

4:11:59.640 --> 4:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at Lauren Bobert. How's Bobert looking so like,

4:12:04.920 --> 4:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>let's just be clear, Bobert's at forty eight percent yeah, okay,

4:12:08.520 --> 4:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's still the last time we said it was

4:12:10.000 --> 4:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at seventy one percent reporting. Frish is at fifty one

4:12:12.560 --> 4:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>point nine, Bobert's at forty eight point one. This is

4:12:14.880 --> 4:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not a race that was on anybody's radar. But let's

4:12:18.520 --> 4:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>continue on and just say we had over the summer expectations.

4:12:24.600 --> 4:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Ron Johnson is going to win. There was

4:12:26.760 --> 4:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>an expectation that perhaps Ron Johnson wasn't going to win.

4:12:30.200 --> 4:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It looks like right now Ron Johnson is going to win.

4:12:32.480 --> 4:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be I thought he would win by

4:12:33.880 --> 4:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>eight or ten. You did, Yeah, he's He's only up

4:12:36.640 --> 4:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>by a couple at this point. Right, Well, he might

4:12:38.440 --> 4:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>still end it. It's early. Yeah, although I imagine the

4:12:41.800 --> 4:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>votes on milwaukeeer saw it standing. But so that was

4:12:45.800 --> 4:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>there was this idea that Ron Johnson probably wasn't going

4:12:48.400 --> 4:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to pull it out. There was real chatter that Mark

4:12:51.400 --> 4:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Rubio might lose. That sounds ridiculous, but there was real

4:12:53.840 --> 4:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>chatter that jd Vance might lose. Jd Vance has won.

4:12:57.600 --> 4:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So it is the case that we've seen some counter

4:13:02.320 --> 4:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>narrative Republican victories here and that Republicans that were sort

4:13:05.840 --> 4:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of counted out over the course of the summer have

4:13:09.200 --> 4:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>been able to hang on. And so that's why I

4:13:12.440 --> 4:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>do think there's a little bit of air being let

4:13:16.320 --> 4:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the balloon right now, a lot of air

4:13:18.000 --> 4:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>probably for Republicans. If you lose Myra Flores, if you

4:13:20.840 --> 4:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>lose I mean they lost to Shapiro in Pennsylvania. If

4:13:27.080 --> 4:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're losing New Hampshire. They did lose New Hampshire. That's

4:13:30.080 --> 4:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>been called for Maki Hassid. These were the fantasy things

4:13:32.840 --> 4:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that seemed in reach. That's letting air out of the balloon.

4:13:36.040 --> 4:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>There's no question about it. The same thing or same

4:13:39.480 --> 4:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>story though in Florida. On the flip side, this is

4:13:42.480 --> 4:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>big stuff. In Ohio, that's a big win for jd

4:13:46.280 --> 4:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Vance especially, you know when Mitch McConnell didn't want jad

4:13:49.640 --> 4:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Vance to do anything. So from the perspective of, you know,

4:13:53.640 --> 4:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the sort of right more broadly, I don't think they're

4:13:57.800 --> 4:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>depressed right now. I should check in with some sort

4:13:59.960 --> 4:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of is while we're talking here and see what the

4:14:01.600 --> 4:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>mood is. I don't think they're depressed, but I do

4:14:04.280 --> 4:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's deflation. I imagine another one that people were

4:14:07.400 --> 4:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>watching Democrats were watching closely. Johanna Hayes, who represents a

4:14:12.320 --> 4:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>swing district in Connecticut, and she's been a super progressive

4:14:17.840 --> 4:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in her voting record, and she was famously she was

4:14:21.400 --> 4:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Teacher of the Year in twenty fifteen twenty sixteen.

4:14:23.720 --> 4:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Grew up in a housing project in this very rich district,

4:14:27.080 --> 4:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>now represents the district. Had always said, look, you want

4:14:31.240 --> 4:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to if I'm going to say what I believe, if

4:14:33.560 --> 4:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a one term member of Congress, that's what it is.

4:14:36.400 --> 4:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>She now looks like she's on her way to her

4:14:38.120 --> 4:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>third term. She's up. I mean, she's only up by

4:14:40.040 --> 4:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>four points with forty percent in, but she's you know,

4:14:45.440 --> 4:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>if it were that kind of red wave year, she'd

4:14:48.320 --> 4:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>be down right now and people would be stressing, oh wow,

4:14:51.600 --> 4:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like Johanna Hayes is out. What about Michigan? So Michigan?

4:14:55.120 --> 4:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And do we have Terry ready? Let's see he's almost ready,

4:14:59.520 --> 4:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but Michigan. It's another good example that's a fantasy, that's

4:15:03.240 --> 4:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy win for Republicans that it felt like we're

4:15:05.760 --> 4:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at their fingertips that were going to knock out Gretchen

4:15:07.680 --> 4:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Whitmer because of COVID. It's something we haven't even talked

4:15:10.240 --> 4:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about on the broadcast so far, that's certainly front and

4:15:12.960 --> 4:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>center in a lot of voters' minds school lockdowns. Gretchen

4:15:16.480 --> 4:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Whitmer has really tried to pretend that her her legacy

4:15:21.160 --> 4:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of school lockdowns isn't what it is and isn't what

4:15:24.560 --> 4:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it was, and looks like she's going to pull this

4:15:26.520 --> 4:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>out so interestingly Alyssa Slotkin, So the Times lists are

4:15:31.680 --> 4:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>down by twelve points, but they still lift it leaning

4:15:36.120 --> 4:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>D which means there must be a lot of Democratic

4:15:40.280 --> 4:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>areas still out, but she has by no means, you know,

4:15:44.040 --> 4:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>put that one away. Alyssa Slockin is one of the

4:15:48.520 --> 4:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>key Democrats that there that they're trying to knock out.

4:15:52.440 --> 4:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Schulton is still leaning D up fifty two forty

4:15:57.280 --> 4:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>five against against John Gibbs was the one that Democrats

4:16:01.880 --> 4:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>put a bunch of money in behind right to try

4:16:05.120 --> 4:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to this. That was one of their plays where they're like,

4:16:07.680 --> 4:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go elect an unelectable right winger and

4:16:11.360 --> 4:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then how ha ha ha, we'll own the Republicans that way.

4:16:14.080 --> 4:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>They did that with Baul Duke in New Hampshire. Was

4:16:18.640 --> 4:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Gibbs the one that beat the modern Republican that everybody hates.

4:16:24.080 --> 4:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Well, so we have actually Terry here.

4:16:28.920 --> 4:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>On last week's Counterpoints, we played some ads specifically, I

4:16:33.200 --> 4:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think we focused and played this ad from Nevada against

4:16:35.920 --> 4:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Cortez Masto that was produced by the American Principles Project.

4:16:39.760 --> 4:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And we have Terry Shilling here with us now from

4:16:43.480 --> 4:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the American Principles Project. Terry, welcome to Counterpoints. We're excited

4:16:47.840 --> 4:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to have you here on election night. Hey, thanks so

4:16:50.520 --> 4:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>much for having me, Emily and Ryan. It's really great

4:16:53.840 --> 4:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to be here. So you've got an American Principals Project

4:16:56.880 --> 4:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>has a decent chunk of change on the line to night.

4:16:58.880 --> 4:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys have spent fifth teen million dollars.

4:17:01.520 --> 4:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that just an ads, Terry, Uh No, that's a

4:17:04.720 --> 4:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>portion of that's been in ads and direct voter contact.

4:17:09.800 --> 4:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's our total spend for the cycle counting twenty

4:17:12.360 --> 4:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and twenty twenty two. But you know, it's

4:17:15.120 --> 4:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting because well, we spent you know, that

4:17:17.840 --> 4:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>much in this cycle the economic groups and the the

4:17:22.400 --> 4:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>crime groups and all that the most the vast majority

4:17:24.760 --> 4:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of spending has been on on those top issues. It's

4:17:29.240 --> 4:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting. We have a long night ahead of us,

4:17:31.640 --> 4:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>where we still have a lot more results to see.

4:17:33.560 --> 4:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>We still have Arizona to come in in Nevada, but

4:17:36.560 --> 4:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's looking like it's not such a

4:17:38.600 --> 4:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>big red wave as a lot of people predicted. Yeah,

4:17:42.280 --> 4:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what we wanted to ask you about that. Yeah,

4:17:44.040 --> 4:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>talk talk us through Arizona here, because you know, what

4:17:47.200 --> 4:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what what's your understanding of what's in so far and

4:17:51.200 --> 4:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what's still outstanding when it comes to both the you know,

4:17:54.480 --> 4:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the the Carry Lake Race and the and the Blake

4:17:56.960 --> 4:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Masters Mark Mark Kelly Race. Let me pulled up real quick.

4:18:00.960 --> 4:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I was going through it before I was talking with

4:18:03.280 --> 4:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys. So it looks like, you know, about half

4:18:06.360 --> 4:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the votes are counted. Lake is still she's under about

4:18:09.880 --> 4:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen points with fifty four percent to go. Look, we

4:18:13.840 --> 4:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot to still count and you know,

4:18:17.200 --> 4:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. But we don't know, We don't

4:18:20.360 --> 4:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what happened here. It's obviously not great for Republicans.

4:18:24.760 --> 4:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that we were really hoping for a much

4:18:27.320 --> 4:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger night here. But we'll see. We're the good thing

4:18:31.960 --> 4:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about elections that they're clarifying, Right, it's a moment where

4:18:35.480 --> 4:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you get to see where the American people actually are.

4:18:37.920 --> 4:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>They cast their votes, they tell you what they want,

4:18:40.080 --> 4:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>who they don't want in office, and you have to

4:18:42.880 --> 4:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>reassess things. And ultimately, we had a really big winner tonight,

4:18:47.080 --> 4:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's Ronda Santis. He won Florida

4:18:50.520 --> 4:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as it stands right now by twenty points. That's a

4:18:53.600 --> 4:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>big deal. And so we have to ask ourselves why

4:18:55.880 --> 4:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>did Ronda Santis win in Florida, which he barely won

4:18:59.080 --> 4:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen, right he wanted by I think less

4:19:02.040 --> 4:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>than a percentage point in twenty eighteen, But now he's

4:19:05.000 --> 4:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>won by twenty points. Why did that happen? And why

4:19:08.120 --> 4:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are Republicans now still floundering? I would argue that Republicans

4:19:12.160 --> 4:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>still lack a real message, a real vision that they

4:19:17.040 --> 4:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>presented the American people. It was an anti Biden message,

4:19:20.160 --> 4:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it was an anti progressive message, but it was not

4:19:24.120 --> 4:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>an inspirational message. They did not cast a bold vision

4:19:28.080 --> 4:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that showed Americans where they wanted to take the country.

4:19:31.400 --> 4:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately, I think until they give that vision where

4:19:33.840 --> 4:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they want to take the country, voters are going to

4:19:36.960 --> 4:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>not be motivated to vote for them. And I want

4:19:39.120 --> 4:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about Nevadaterrey because we spent a

4:19:41.040 --> 4:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bit there, But before we get to that, I actually

4:19:42.840 --> 4:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>want to tease out maybe this distinction. That's interesting because

4:19:45.720 --> 4:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>going into this for the last week or so, the

4:19:48.360 --> 4:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>legacy media was talking a lot about and we talked

4:19:51.120 --> 4:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about it frankly, about how Democrats had not sort of

4:19:54.800 --> 4:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>come to the right argument when it comes to the economy.

4:19:58.640 --> 4:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>They did not spend as much on all of these

4:20:01.520 --> 4:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>other issues as they did on abortion all of the

4:20:03.800 --> 4:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>other issues combined. Yes, they spent ads enough ad money

4:20:06.960 --> 4:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on to overcome how much they spent on abortion, but

4:20:09.480 --> 4:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they like they spent way more on abortion than any

4:20:12.080 --> 4:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>other single issue. Now, I think there's an argument that

4:20:14.480 --> 4:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was about turnout, But people like to talk about how

4:20:16.360 --> 4:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats this election were obsessed with the culture war and

4:20:19.280 --> 4:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that hurt them. I actually don't know that that's going

4:20:21.560 --> 4:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the case, because midterm elections are about turnout,

4:20:23.840 --> 4:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and abortions can motivate the Democratic base. On the flip side,

4:20:27.920 --> 4:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Terry tell us about the culture war type ads that

4:20:31.720 --> 4:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys at American Principles Project have been running, because

4:20:36.240 --> 4:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think personally they're sort of the smart approach the

4:20:39.520 --> 4:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>smart conservative approach to some of these big questions that frankly,

4:20:43.600 --> 4:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the RNC itself should have been on top

4:20:46.240 --> 4:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of ten years ago, let alone five years ago. And

4:20:48.600 --> 4:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys are running on now, what are some of

4:20:51.000 --> 4:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the issues that you guys highlighted and do you still

4:20:55.320 --> 4:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like they could be really consequential as the numbers

4:20:59.640 --> 4:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>come in. Yeah, So, look, the big things that we

4:21:03.200 --> 4:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>focused on was protecting children, right, protecting children from gender

4:21:09.000 --> 4:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>transitions that are being pushed on them by big pharmaceutical

4:21:12.480 --> 4:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>companies and transgender activists, but also protecting children from being

4:21:16.080 --> 4:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sexualized by pornographic materian schools like the book Genderqueer, which

4:21:20.600 --> 4:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is a graphic novel that depicts sex between minors, among

4:21:25.560 --> 4:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>other things, and it freaked out the parents in Dearborn Michigan.

4:21:29.200 --> 4:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Even CARE got behind some of those parents that were

4:21:32.920 --> 4:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly Muslim in Dearborn Michigan. And again, CARE is not

4:21:35.840 --> 4:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a typically a conservative organization on politics American politics. But sorry,

4:21:41.120 --> 4:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Terry interrupted you. No, no, no, it's okay. You made

4:21:44.040 --> 4:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a very good point. I think it's important to remember

4:21:46.760 --> 4:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that just a year ago, right in Virginia in twenty

4:21:50.080 --> 4:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, when the election was about parental rights and education,

4:21:54.080 --> 4:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which that is what that election was about. We won handily, right,

4:21:59.280 --> 4:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but then Republicans juked that message and for the large part,

4:22:04.800 --> 4:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>gave up on it and didn't really campaign on it

4:22:07.760 --> 4:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and instead focused on Joe Biden's inflation, Joe Biden's economy,

4:22:11.560 --> 4:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the crime sprees that are going across the country. That's

4:22:15.720 --> 4:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when they began to lose. And so we focused on

4:22:19.200 --> 4:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the issues that we knew that Americans were in support

4:22:22.760 --> 4:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of a Republican or a conservative message on, which is

4:22:25.800 --> 4:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>protecting kids from pornography in their own schools, from being sexualized,

4:22:29.440 --> 4:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from being groomed, and also from exploitative section procedures that

4:22:34.400 --> 4:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, doctors and surgeons and pharmaceutic companies are making

4:22:38.320 --> 4:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of money off of our kids off of so

4:22:40.680 --> 4:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, those were winning issues. We could produce ads

4:22:43.640 --> 4:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with experts like Miriam Grossman, who's a pediatric psychiatrist that's

4:22:47.680 --> 4:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for decades. We told stories from a

4:22:52.800 --> 4:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>mother in California, Abby Martinez, who you know, lost her

4:22:57.320 --> 4:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>daughter to transgenderism, right had the daughter ripped from the home.

4:23:01.000 --> 4:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The daughter ended up going on to cross sex hormones

4:23:03.800 --> 4:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>while on foster care, and then shortly after that took

4:23:06.480 --> 4:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>her life. We were telling persuasive stories on issues that

4:23:10.400 --> 4:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we knew the American people were way in a disagreement

4:23:15.440 --> 4:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Democratic policies. It was really tough to get

4:23:19.200 --> 4:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans on side with these. But what we're seeing is

4:23:22.680 --> 4:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Republicans who really went on offense on these issues,

4:23:26.000 --> 4:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like JD Vans, like Rond De Santis, they're winning their

4:23:29.160 --> 4:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>elections handily. They're getting called very early. And the ones

4:23:32.680 --> 4:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that didn't, that didn't go on offense, they're the ones

4:23:35.920 --> 4:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that are behind right now. Do you know why do

4:23:39.640 --> 4:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you think? You know? If you think that message resident?

4:23:42.960 --> 4:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that Blake Masters didn't do enough of that?

4:23:46.120 --> 4:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Kerry Lake didn't do enough of that?

4:23:48.400 --> 4:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Baldoke didn't do enough of it? Yeah? No,

4:23:51.360 --> 4:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>look I yeah, no. Oz definitely shied away from all

4:23:55.600 --> 4:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of the social issues. Right. I think that Oz was

4:23:58.280 --> 4:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>an exceptionally poor candidate in Pennsylvania. I think if you

4:24:01.960 --> 4:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had any other candidate in that race, it would have

4:24:05.040 --> 4:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>been locked up at the moment that debate happened with

4:24:08.520 --> 4:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>John Fetterman, where it was clear that he has suffered

4:24:12.000 --> 4:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>severe brain trauma and brain damage. But Bulldog did not

4:24:17.040 --> 4:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>go into or lean into the social issues. Look, we

4:24:20.720 --> 4:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>still have to see the results come in fully from Arizona.

4:24:24.280 --> 4:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>That race isn't over yet, and we obviously know that

4:24:26.640 --> 4:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there were you know, major problems with delays and problems

4:24:30.560 --> 4:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>with the election machines and how they were being counted.

4:24:33.440 --> 4:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So look, we saw the weight there. But at the

4:24:36.120 --> 4:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, Ron DeSantis I think is the

4:24:38.720 --> 4:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>big winner today. I mean he's the one that stands

4:24:41.720 --> 4:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>out as the biggest winner, not just by like my

4:24:44.480 --> 4:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>own judgment, but literally by the margins that he's won

4:24:47.360 --> 4:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>his race by. He governed very boldly. He was very

4:24:50.960 --> 4:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>clear about what he wanted to do and where he

4:24:52.880 --> 4:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take Floridians, And I think ultimately that's the

4:24:56.920 --> 4:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>big message is that if you want to win your

4:24:59.000 --> 4:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>campaign's elections, you have to be very clear with what

4:25:02.040 --> 4:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do while in office. And I think

4:25:04.000 --> 4:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that of all the candidates that were running the cycle,

4:25:06.600 --> 4:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Ron DeSantis was the most clear and painted the biggest

4:25:09.520 --> 4:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>vision and the clearest vision for what he was going

4:25:12.280 --> 4:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to do for voters. So Terry, before before we let

4:25:15.360 --> 4:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you go, as of right, now, I imagine you've been

4:25:17.560 --> 4:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>monitoring the race in Nevada. I mean, I know you've

4:25:21.040 --> 4:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>been monitoring the race in Nevada because you have money

4:25:22.880 --> 4:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on the line there. But what can people expect? There

4:25:25.640 --> 4:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was this potential Republican fantasy that Catherine Cortes Maasso might

4:25:30.960 --> 4:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>go down, and that's that has not been ruled out

4:25:33.440 --> 4:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as of right now. What are you looking at in Nevada?

4:25:36.480 --> 4:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know what were you looking at over the

4:25:38.840 --> 4:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>course of the past week as well well. Obviously Clark

4:25:41.720 --> 4:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>County is the most important part of that state. It's

4:25:44.520 --> 4:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>where the vast majority of the population of best majority

4:25:46.880 --> 4:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of voters live. It's going to come down to where

4:25:50.720 --> 4:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the early vote was and what the turnout was with that,

4:25:53.320 --> 4:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and then what election day turnout was. All day long,

4:25:57.160 --> 4:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I was paying attention to John Ralston and what he

4:25:59.600 --> 4:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was reported from what he was seeing as election day turnout,

4:26:02.760 --> 4:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, he was pretty dire about this. But ultimately,

4:26:06.600 --> 4:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think what this all comes down to is Democrats

4:26:09.760 --> 4:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>really have built a turnout machine. Whether you like it

4:26:13.120 --> 4:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or not, they do know how to turn out their

4:26:15.680 --> 4:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>voters and get them to the polls. And I don't

4:26:18.080 --> 4:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think Republicans have built anything close to what the Democrats

4:26:21.240 --> 4:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have built, and apparently it's effective and it's a very,

4:26:25.520 --> 4:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>very instrumental in staving off losses. The thing that's frustrating

4:26:30.160 --> 4:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for me is you have all of these dynamics in

4:26:33.600 --> 4:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a midterm cycle. Right. You have literally a senile president

4:26:36.560 --> 4:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>who can't put two sentences together. You have record high inflation,

4:26:40.680 --> 4:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy is terrible for one case, and our stock

4:26:44.600 --> 4:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios are all down. Things aren't that great in

4:26:48.000 --> 4:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this country. How the hell did Republicans manage to not

4:26:51.680 --> 4:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>get a massive Republican wave? I don't know. I think

4:26:54.720 --> 4:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately they didn't pas cast a big vision, But I

4:26:57.720 --> 4:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>also don't think that they've built any type of machine

4:27:00.440 --> 4:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that's competitive, competitive with what the Democrats have built. So look, ultimately, this,

4:27:06.360 --> 4:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like I said earlier, this is a clarification moment for

4:27:08.880 --> 4:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party for America where this nation stands, and

4:27:12.440 --> 4:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to reassess things going forward. But it's

4:27:15.680 --> 4:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>still we have a long night ahead of us, for sure. Terry,

4:27:19.120 --> 4:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>last question, do you think that maybe raging the culture

4:27:24.040 --> 4:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>war actually backfired on Republicans this time and that that

4:27:27.760 --> 4:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if to your point, that the economy is what people

4:27:30.880 --> 4:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>are actually interested in that they don't want to actually hear,

4:27:34.120 --> 4:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know about all this the culture war stuff. You know,

4:27:37.640 --> 4:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with that. I don't think that, you know,

4:27:41.240 --> 4:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>opposing sex changes for minors or opposing giving children pornography

4:27:45.600 --> 4:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and schools is going to create any type of backlash.

4:27:49.160 --> 4:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just it doesn't make any sense. And frankly, if

4:27:52.360 --> 4:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that is the case, if opposing those two issues is

4:27:55.880 --> 4:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>going to cause you to lose elections, then America is

4:27:58.880 --> 4:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>not salvageable in a lot of ways, right. I mean,

4:28:02.760 --> 4:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like you have a nation where little children are being given,

4:28:05.560 --> 4:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, being sexualized in schools and being given section changes, Like,

4:28:08.880 --> 4:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>how are those people going to vote going up? They're

4:28:10.880 --> 4:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely not gonna be voting for tax cuts for billionaires

4:28:13.160 --> 4:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and major corporations in the future, I'll tell you that.

4:28:16.000 --> 4:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, I think that what this is is it's

4:28:19.240 --> 4:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a lack of leadership in the Republican Party. I think,

4:28:22.680 --> 4:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they Kevin McCarthy right in the last few

4:28:24.960 --> 4:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the election, what's he talking about entitlement reform?

4:28:28.200 --> 4:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>That was not it was just not what this election

4:28:31.400 --> 4:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was about. He put gasoline on the fire right. So

4:28:34.320 --> 4:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, you know, entitlement reform, we're talking about

4:28:36.840 --> 4:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>cutting spending. I get it, But the economy was on

4:28:40.240 --> 4:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the line, inflation was on the line. You had to

4:28:42.480 --> 4:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have a real, UH policy proposal that would address the

4:28:46.120 --> 4:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>major concerns of the American people. And I just don't

4:28:48.880 --> 4:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think Republicans met those those concerns. They just thought that

4:28:52.520 --> 4:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they would be good enough and and and perform well

4:28:56.160 --> 4:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>enough just by saying that they weren't show Biden that's

4:28:58.560 --> 4:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously not the case. Terry. Thanks thanks for your time.

4:29:01.680 --> 4:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it. Go back to a couple more more updates Terry,

4:29:07.160 --> 4:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the American Priscals Project. Thank you so much. Thank you

4:29:09.480 --> 4:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>so much, Terry. So there was some hope Republicans had

4:29:14.280 --> 4:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>some hope that PAULA. Page might be competitive. That's yeah,

4:29:20.200 --> 4:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he's behind Janet Mills by nine points right now, only

4:29:25.440 --> 4:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight percent in UH. So you know, I need

4:29:29.960 --> 4:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>not over yet, but it's not not panning out the way. Also, Terry,

4:29:33.360 --> 4:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>when Terry was the substance aside, when Terry was saying

4:29:37.040 --> 4:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that maybe the country's not salvageable, that actually felt that

4:29:40.640 --> 4:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>sounded to me like the way that some progressives sound

4:29:44.120 --> 4:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>yes when elections don't go their way well yeah, which

4:29:47.160 --> 4:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a real sign of how frustrating and how

4:29:50.240 --> 4:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>disappointing this is to someone the right Well, and I

4:29:52.920 --> 4:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's the reason we're done with this. I'm going

4:29:55.200 --> 4:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to Canada. So Terry is like a graspros conservative activist

4:29:58.520 --> 4:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that most of the legacy will not talk to, and

4:30:01.360 --> 4:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if they do it's as a freak show, but as

4:30:03.280 --> 4:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's actually very influential has put a lot of

4:30:05.880 --> 4:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>money into these Republican races in swing states like Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin,

4:30:10.200 --> 4:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>where Ron Johnson's actually doing all right as of right now.

4:30:13.560 --> 4:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's important, I think, to e gauge the

4:30:15.520 --> 4:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>temperature of folks that are putting the money right there,

4:30:17.600 --> 4:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's I think a pretty good indicator of what

4:30:21.440 --> 4:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a JD Vance would be looking at on an agenda

4:30:24.760 --> 4:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>come January, what the battle for Mitch McConnell versus Rick

4:30:29.920 --> 4:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott looks like come January, and what happens with Blake Masters.

4:30:33.880 --> 4:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We saw Terry was wearing a Blake Master's teach shirt.

4:30:37.480 --> 4:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Has definitely been involved in that race, and Republicans really

4:30:40.440 --> 4:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>thought that taking offense. Kerrie Lake multiple times said you know,

4:30:46.240 --> 4:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>when reporters would ask her about abortions, she said, no, no,

4:30:49.360 --> 4:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to ask Democrats this question about what restrictions

4:30:52.880 --> 4:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they support on abortion. And Republicans had a lot of

4:30:57.520 --> 4:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the right word is, enthusiasm or

4:31:00.760 --> 4:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>optimism that some of these candidates who were flipping the

4:31:04.200 --> 4:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>script in maybe a Trumpian way, and we're willing to

4:31:07.160 --> 4:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lean into the culture war in a way that Glenn

4:31:10.560 --> 4:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Youngkin pulled off last year in Virginia, that that would

4:31:14.160 --> 4:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>be the key to a tsunami, not just to a

4:31:16.240 --> 4:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>good night, but to a tsunami. And so I think

4:31:19.520 --> 4:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting from that interview is that the rights

4:31:22.480 --> 4:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>grass roots, and Terry's a good gauge of that, the

4:31:25.600 --> 4:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>rights roots is gonna want more. They're gonna want pedal

4:31:29.360 --> 4:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to the metal, as opposed to saying like the Republican

4:31:32.800 --> 4:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>autopsy in twenty twelve, which was let's back off, let's

4:31:36.960 --> 4:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>back off of all of these social and cultural issues.

4:31:39.480 --> 4:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>This was the ranks previous RNC put out the twenty

4:31:41.560 --> 4:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve autopsy after Romney lost and said we will never

4:31:44.800 --> 4:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>be winning Hispanic voters if we continue on this track,

4:31:47.440 --> 4:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we will never be winning. The sort of emerging Democratic

4:31:50.840 --> 4:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>coalition is going to be straight in one direction. But

4:31:55.120 --> 4:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it seems like what we're seeing is

4:31:58.280 --> 4:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not more of that, but the opposite from the conservative grossrooms. Yeah,

4:32:02.760 --> 4:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and instead, in Kansas right now, Laura Kelly, the Democrat,

4:32:08.200 --> 4:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is ahead in her re election bid with eighty eight

4:32:11.160 --> 4:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of the votes in. She's up by four point

4:32:16.040 --> 4:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>two points. She was considered to be someone who had

4:32:21.240 --> 4:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a shot, a good shot at reelection. It wouldn't be

4:32:24.120 --> 4:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a total shock that she wins, but for people who

4:32:26.640 --> 4:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>were from outside of Kansas and went, wait a minute,

4:32:29.240 --> 4:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat is winning a reelection in Kansas. Thought this

4:32:32.040 --> 4:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a I thought there's gonna be

4:32:34.200 --> 4:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a red wave. Gretchen Whitmer still up at this point

4:32:38.720 --> 4:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>by three point four points with forty percent in. Yeah,

4:32:45.840 --> 4:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that has narrowed a good bit. What was she up before?

4:32:50.680 --> 4:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So you're wayne, Wayne County has eight percent in. Wayne

4:32:55.000 --> 4:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>County only has eight percent in at this point. So no,

4:33:00.520 --> 4:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a So Gretchen Whitmer was a and is

4:33:04.280 --> 4:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I think continues to be a real like if we're

4:33:07.720 --> 4:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in a tsunami, That's a good pick up for Republicans

4:33:10.360 --> 4:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>because Tudor Dixon, from their perspective, ran a good campaign,

4:33:14.720 --> 4:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in the home stretch. And Gretchen Whitmer I think

4:33:18.200 --> 4:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is a bad candidate. I think she really botched her

4:33:20.800 --> 4:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID response. I think she's been similar to Kathy Hokeel

4:33:23.919 --> 4:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and being dismissive of parents' concerns and the same way

4:33:28.440 --> 4:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that Hochel has been dismissive of concerns about crime. But

4:33:32.720 --> 4:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what but she's still up right now, right there, there

4:33:36.520 --> 4:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of votes that are remaining right Hokel

4:33:39.120 --> 4:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>was seventy seven percent in still up, is up by

4:33:42.280 --> 4:33:45.919
<v Speaker 1>nine points. Tough to see how Zelden makes that up.

4:33:47.600 --> 4:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And another reach that republic Republicans were going for was

4:33:51.400 --> 4:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in New Mexico, Michelle Leuhan Grisham was seen as vulnerable,

4:33:55.080 --> 4:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like they thought that maybe they could knock her, knock

4:33:57.160 --> 4:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>her out in a real red wave. A way, how

4:34:01.720 --> 4:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>many we got in about half a million votes in

4:34:04.160 --> 4:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the votes counted. She's up by about

4:34:07.560 --> 4:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>seven points so far, could still lose. But again, like

4:34:12.440 --> 4:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this is where Democrats would prefer to be rather than

4:34:16.800 --> 4:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>hoping that they can come back. All right, we're getting

4:34:19.160 --> 4:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>some numbers from Oregon. Yes, this is the race where

4:34:25.440 --> 4:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Betsy Johnson, who is the independent Democrat bankrolled by the

4:34:30.080 --> 4:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Nike CEO. What a political system. Well this is just wonderful.

4:34:34.040 --> 4:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Like Bessy Johnson. By the way, Nike itself bankrolled by China,

4:34:38.240 --> 4:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and so Betsy Johnson herself, if she decides to run

4:34:41.600 --> 4:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>as a third party candidate, it's free country to do

4:34:43.960 --> 4:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what you want. She's going to get one or two percent.

4:34:46.200 --> 4:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But then a billionaire is like, you know what, I

4:34:48.160 --> 4:34:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think this would be funny and just bankrolls her entire

4:34:51.320 --> 4:34:54.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign and then becomes a credible one. She's doing worse

4:34:54.360 --> 4:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so far, at least then Republicans that hope she's at

4:35:00.640 --> 4:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>nine point. She's at nine percent of the vote, but

4:35:04.560 --> 4:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at very close race with fewer than half the votes in,

4:35:07.960 --> 4:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>just under half the votes in you have the Democrat

4:35:11.360 --> 4:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>over the Republican by one point. You know, this is

4:35:13.440 --> 4:35:19.199
<v Speaker 1>one This is one that that I think Republicans correct

4:35:19.200 --> 4:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm wrong here, would really love to win

4:35:21.080 --> 4:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to show that like Antifa and the Wolkesters out in Oregon,

4:35:25.560 --> 4:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, really got their got their come up and yeah,

4:35:28.200 --> 4:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and let's look at this right now, the

4:35:30.000 --> 4:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Oregon governor's race. It's another one like Gretchen Whitmer, but

4:35:32.759 --> 4:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>way even more dramatic than Gretcha Whitmer. That Republicans said,

4:35:36.080 --> 4:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if if these polls are correct, because there was a

4:35:40.680 --> 4:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>shocking level of closeness between Kotech and Dresen in the

4:35:45.960 --> 4:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>remaining days of the race for Oregan's governorship right now

4:35:50.160 --> 4:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>with forty seven percent of the votes in Oregon has

4:35:52.800 --> 4:35:55.879
<v Speaker 1>not had a Republican governor, mind you, since the nineteen eighties.

4:35:56.280 --> 4:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That's forty five point five percent to forty four point

4:35:59.200 --> 4:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>six percent, So that's within a percentage point in freaking Oregon,

4:36:04.919 --> 4:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know if that stands. I think it's

4:36:07.240 --> 4:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's very possible Dreson ends up losing that by a

4:36:10.000 --> 4:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>few points. And if that's the case, I mean, I

4:36:12.919 --> 4:36:16.079
<v Speaker 1>think Republicans will still feel okay about it. But if

4:36:16.160 --> 4:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Drayson pulls that off, whatever happens in Pennsylvania gets sort

4:36:20.800 --> 4:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of counterbalanced by that, and the downstream implications for that are, well,

4:36:25.919 --> 4:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>then what happens to Mitch McConnell and are the you know,

4:36:30.640 --> 4:36:33.720
<v Speaker 1>do you then need to listen more to the Terry

4:36:33.759 --> 4:36:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Shillings of the world. Do you need to listen? Uh,

4:36:36.440 --> 4:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, less this becomes a question like, is there

4:36:39.680 --> 4:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a real pickup opportunity for Democrats if you have the

4:36:42.200 --> 4:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>right candidate. And I don't know, I don't have a

4:36:45.680 --> 4:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>good answer to that. But in Oregon it's still not

4:36:48.480 --> 4:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>clear cut, and there's no universe in which we should

4:36:52.000 --> 4:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>be saying. In Oregon it's still a clear cut at

4:36:55.400 --> 4:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this point, and so we'll see again. I think it's

4:36:59.160 --> 4:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>still POSSI that, uh, Jason Lews is probably more likely

4:37:03.440 --> 4:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>than not. We don't know. It's hard to say, but

4:37:05.800 --> 4:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's worth looking at. Uh. Back on back

4:37:10.480 --> 4:37:17.559
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate with Fetterman and Oz Fetterman, with more

4:37:17.600 --> 4:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>than ninety five percent of the votes in in Erie County,

4:37:20.720 --> 4:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>has beaten doctor Oz up there fifty three to forty four.

4:37:24.280 --> 4:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>What's that tell you? I mean this, this shouldn't necessarily

4:37:29.120 --> 4:37:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this shouldn't be Democratic country. Up. This is the very

4:37:33.320 --> 4:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>northwest tip of the state. This is a very rural area,

4:37:37.960 --> 4:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, for Trump area. Let's see how did how

4:37:41.520 --> 4:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>did Trump? Let's see how did Trump vote Erie County?

4:37:46.280 --> 4:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Because I think that's the real story here is is

4:37:49.040 --> 4:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if Oz is dramatically underperforming Trump. You're getting a good

4:37:55.400 --> 4:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of answer to this question because again you look

4:37:58.720 --> 4:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>at DeSantis over performing Trump. But so far there's no

4:38:03.759 --> 4:38:06.919
<v Speaker 1>real clear cut narrative about some of those other candidates. JD.

4:38:07.080 --> 4:38:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Vance did fairly well. But did Erie County go for Biden?

4:38:12.560 --> 4:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it looks like this was a Clinton

4:38:15.000 --> 4:38:20.039
<v Speaker 1>to Trump hol on, let me say so. The other

4:38:20.080 --> 4:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thing I'll say is Wisconsin right now. So it was

4:38:22.880 --> 4:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight So the final unofficial results Biden sixty eight thousand,

4:38:26.600 --> 4:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump sixty six thousand, So it's very tight. And Trump

4:38:30.680 --> 4:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>had beaten Hillary in twenty sixteen in Erie County and

4:38:36.960 --> 4:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so now you but now you have Fetterman winning this

4:38:41.680 --> 4:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>by twelve thousand. So listen to this. All right. This

4:38:45.040 --> 4:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is from Vox, and I want to pick up on

4:38:46.960 --> 4:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>something that Crystal said last hour, which was really real.

4:38:51.440 --> 4:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really interesting about and you were

4:38:55.360 --> 4:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about this as well, just sort of whether Republicans

4:39:00.880 --> 4:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and we read the Third Way data about how Republicans

4:39:03.400 --> 4:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>were generally more trusted on the economy and inflation than Democrats,

4:39:06.520 --> 4:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and most people are saying that they they think if

4:39:09.680 --> 4:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>democrats control Congress, inflation will get worse. That's from the

4:39:13.080 --> 4:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Third Way survey that came out in the last week.

4:39:14.840 --> 4:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Here from Vox, Republicans have spent one hundred and fifty

4:39:18.480 --> 4:39:20.919
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars on crime related ads at the national

4:39:21.040 --> 4:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>level compared to one hundred and five million on the

4:39:23.240 --> 4:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>economy and inflation, according to data from the ad analysis

4:39:26.800 --> 4:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>firm Impact ad Impact. So that's one hundred and fifty

4:39:30.200 --> 4:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>seven million on crime and then one hundred and five

4:39:33.720 --> 4:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>million on the economy and inflation. Now, Vox continues, the

4:39:37.640 --> 4:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>breakdown is even starker in the Pennsylvania Senate race, where

4:39:41.640 --> 4:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have spent nearly twelve million dollars on crime ads

4:39:45.360 --> 4:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>compared to two point five million on the economy and inflation.

4:39:50.400 --> 4:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Where this race stands right now, is a potential Fetterman win. Yeah,

4:39:55.960 --> 4:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is it? Because so Hillary very narrowly won Erie Counting.

4:39:59.040 --> 4:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I just s against Trump, Biden very

4:40:01.680 --> 4:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>narrowly wanted. He's and is crushing os in Erie County.

4:40:09.160 --> 4:40:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Another Fetterman person says, quote, we feel fucking good, okay,

4:40:13.400 --> 4:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and that they said that to you. Yeah, all right,

4:40:15.240 --> 4:40:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So you have a story from Fetterman saying we feel

4:40:17.320 --> 4:40:19.079
<v Speaker 1>fucking good, which is a big deal right now at

4:40:19.120 --> 4:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven fifty two, because if the red tsunami prediction was

4:40:21.720 --> 4:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>panning out right now, if the red wave prediction was

4:40:25.080 --> 4:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>panning out right now, you just probably wouldn't see that.

4:40:28.160 --> 4:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>They would not be feeling good. They would not be

4:40:30.200 --> 4:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling so if we again, like you could still see

4:40:33.880 --> 4:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>certain places Republicans doing better than people think. We don't

4:40:36.480 --> 4:40:38.079
<v Speaker 1>know what's gonna happen in Arizona. We don't know what's

4:40:38.080 --> 4:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen in Nevada, we don't know what's gonna happen

4:40:40.120 --> 4:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in Oregon. That is all very true, But what is

4:40:43.800 --> 4:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not true is that we're in some giant wave. And Ryan,

4:40:46.120 --> 4:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask that question to you, did Republicans

4:40:48.440 --> 4:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>talk too much about crime? Because the conventional Belwegh wisdom

4:40:52.759 --> 4:40:57.919
<v Speaker 1>going into tonight was the Republicans that Democrats talk too

4:40:58.040 --> 4:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>little about crime. I think I think this is and

4:41:01.040 --> 4:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this is going back to something that I've been thinking

4:41:03.360 --> 4:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>about more that a lot of what we do is

4:41:06.640 --> 4:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pointless because you can only shape reality so much. And

4:41:14.759 --> 4:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that goes that's messaging, that's media, that's social media, and

4:41:19.240 --> 4:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>then there is also reality. Now you can shape, you

4:41:22.200 --> 4:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>can create vibes, you can, you can, you can indeed

4:41:26.000 --> 4:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of shape vibes, create media, narratives. Media and arrators

4:41:29.480 --> 4:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>can then you know, work downstream and then affect the

4:41:32.720 --> 4:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>way that people make decisions. So it's all of these

4:41:36.520 --> 4:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>things are related, but we talk in the media as

4:41:39.320 --> 4:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's all that matters. And the reason we talk

4:41:43.040 --> 4:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>about that is because that's what we can look at.

4:41:45.280 --> 4:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like that famous joke about the guy who's looking

4:41:49.360 --> 4:41:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the drunken losses keys and is looking underneath the lamppost,

4:41:53.400 --> 4:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like is this where he lost He's like, no, I

4:41:54.600 --> 4:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lost it on the other side of the street. But

4:41:55.840 --> 4:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this is where the light is. And so we look

4:41:59.720 --> 4:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>where the light is, and the light is. What are

4:42:01.880 --> 4:42:05.919
<v Speaker 1>democrats saying? What are Republicans saying? What are the fundamentals?

4:42:06.480 --> 4:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's where we get to reality when we

4:42:08.560 --> 4:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>start to talk about fundamentals, and that's important. You know,

4:42:13.040 --> 4:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the first midterm of a presidential blah blah blah. Everybody

4:42:15.600 --> 4:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>knows those fundamentals. But the material reality of two things

4:42:21.480 --> 4:42:28.720
<v Speaker 1>one dobs like democrats talking about not talking about it

4:42:28.840 --> 4:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change the fact that a right that existed for

4:42:32.600 --> 4:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty years that had widespread support depending on you know,

4:42:38.520 --> 4:42:43.199
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you pull, it was taken away. People

4:42:43.360 --> 4:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>voted in special elections throughout the summer in ways that

4:42:47.160 --> 4:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>defied the polls. They voted in Kansas in ways that

4:42:49.800 --> 4:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>defied the polls. Are voting in Kentucky tonight in the

4:42:51.759 --> 4:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>ways that defied the polls. And what people talk about

4:42:56.960 --> 4:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is important. But people are their own individual individuals moving

4:43:06.600 --> 4:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>through this world, and they know that the Supreme Court

4:43:11.240 --> 4:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>overturned Roe v. Wade. They also know that jobs are

4:43:14.240 --> 4:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>increasing that if they get fired they can probably get

4:43:18.360 --> 4:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>another job. Although real wages are pretty significant, real wages

4:43:23.040 --> 4:43:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are either flat or up depending If you're a lower

4:43:26.320 --> 4:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>wage worker, your wages are up. If you're a higher

4:43:29.400 --> 4:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>wage worker, they're not. If you've jumped, if you've switched jobs,

4:43:33.720 --> 4:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>your wages are significantly up. But on average, real wages

4:43:38.080 --> 4:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are up for the lowest income workers, but down because

4:43:41.160 --> 4:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of inflation for the median. You can, but you have

4:43:45.200 --> 4:43:46.559
<v Speaker 1>more power at work, and you can get a job

4:43:46.600 --> 4:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if you get fired. People forget the media, forgets how

4:43:50.200 --> 4:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>much it sucks when unemployment is up at five, six, seven,

4:43:53.280 --> 4:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>eight nine percent. Absolutely, but maybe real people don't forget

4:43:56.759 --> 4:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that and are like, yes, I hate inflation, but I

4:44:00.640 --> 4:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like that there are jobs. I like that I have

4:44:03.080 --> 4:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>more power at work, and I don't necessarily blame Democrats

4:44:05.720 --> 4:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>only for inflation because Joe Biden just came in. So

4:44:10.560 --> 4:44:14.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe we maybe all the talking about messaging is a

4:44:14.360 --> 4:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit much, and that actually, like it didn't matter

4:44:18.480 --> 4:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that people do not like that Roe v. Wade was overturned.

4:44:23.240 --> 4:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>People want to People want to come out and vote

4:44:25.720 --> 4:44:29.880
<v Speaker 1>because now for once people can actually, you know, it

4:44:30.120 --> 4:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>make a difference voting on that. Now here's here's you know,

4:44:34.320 --> 4:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>here's where they say democracy is on the ballot. Except

4:44:39.720 --> 4:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the result of this election, in which the country I

4:44:43.200 --> 4:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>think pretty thoroughly demonstrated that it supports abortion rights. The

4:44:47.320 --> 4:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>result is not going to be that the country then

4:44:49.480 --> 4:44:52.199
<v Speaker 1>gets abortion rights back. So democracy might be on the ballot.

4:44:52.320 --> 4:44:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got a weird democracy. Meanwhile, and I mentioned this earlier,

4:44:56.680 --> 4:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We're probably going to get a giant debate over cutting

4:44:59.000 --> 4:45:03.399
<v Speaker 1>social security and medic here from Biden and House Republicans.

4:45:03.800 --> 4:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobody ran on that, nobody voted for it. So what

4:45:06.520 --> 4:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of democracy is that? I actually think this probably

4:45:09.960 --> 4:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>blunts any discussion of that because you noticed Kevin McCarthy

4:45:13.240 --> 4:45:15.879
<v Speaker 1>only started talking about that, as as Terry pointed out,

4:45:15.960 --> 4:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>only started talking about that when Republicans really felt like

4:45:18.600 --> 4:45:20.879
<v Speaker 1>they had the win at their backs, and it was like, hey,

4:45:21.360 --> 4:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>now we can sort of feel good enough, we're going

4:45:23.400 --> 4:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to start talking about X, Y and Z. And that's

4:45:26.360 --> 4:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just not what happened, you know. It's it's like that.

4:45:30.800 --> 4:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think this probably feels like a

4:45:32.840 --> 4:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>rebuke to Republicans who wanted to talk about social security,

4:45:37.040 --> 4:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it wanted to talk about entitlements in general. Now that

4:45:40.120 --> 4:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen, but another slap in the face

4:45:42.800 --> 4:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to this, the red title Wave narrative would be looking

4:45:47.360 --> 4:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>at New York. New York was a pick up that

4:45:51.120 --> 4:45:57.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like tsunami territory. It felt like really tsunami territory.

4:45:57.560 --> 4:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Because right here I have the r CDP average. As

4:46:00.960 --> 4:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday you had Hokeel up in general. I mean, Hockel

4:46:06.919 --> 4:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was was pretty well. Pokel was up seven in the

4:46:10.320 --> 4:46:14.720
<v Speaker 1>RCPA average as of yesterday, and as of right now,

4:46:15.400 --> 4:46:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Hokel is perhaps this right here, Hokel is uh fifty

4:46:23.000 --> 4:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>four point to Zeldon's forty five point eight percent in

4:46:28.040 --> 4:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York governor race. That's was seventy nine percent reporting.

4:46:30.640 --> 4:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>That looks like we're how Sean Patrick doing. I think

4:46:33.960 --> 4:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he's not. Oh, he's still down by six points. D

4:46:36.560 --> 4:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Triple C chair down by six percentage points. Tell us

4:46:40.360 --> 4:46:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about meaning Republican, tell us more about that. I mean

4:46:43.600 --> 4:46:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so yes. So for people that didn't follow this, So

4:46:46.919 --> 4:46:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Sean Patrick Maloney is the chair chair of the D

4:46:51.440 --> 4:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Triple C, which runs the House campaign arm. He used

4:46:55.280 --> 4:46:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to be in district what eighteen or seventeen what, it

4:46:59.280 --> 4:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. He would he was in a district to

4:47:01.040 --> 4:47:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the west. A Republican in Pittsburgh redrew all of New

4:47:06.000 --> 4:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>York's districts. The weirdest thing, Like there's all sorts of

4:47:11.000 --> 4:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>fun conspiracy theories if you'd go down the rabbit hole

4:47:13.200 --> 4:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>about what role the Cuomo Worlds was and payback and

4:47:16.440 --> 4:47:20.120
<v Speaker 1>all this nonsense. But anyway, so that in the middle

4:47:20.160 --> 4:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the races, they redraw all of New York's congressional districts. Immediately,

4:47:27.400 --> 4:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Sean Patrick Maloney, who's the chair of the Teacherble C,

4:47:30.120 --> 4:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>announces he's leaving the district he's in, which is which

4:47:33.720 --> 4:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was like a deep split district basically to jump into

4:47:38.560 --> 4:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a district that's more favorable for him. Only problem it

4:47:43.000 --> 4:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was currently occupied by an incumbent Democrat mondere Jones. Is

4:47:46.919 --> 4:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that puts mondere Jones in this really difficult situation. Does

4:47:50.560 --> 4:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he want to run a primary against the D Triple

4:47:52.680 --> 4:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>C chair if he wins, what kind of help is

4:47:55.120 --> 4:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>he going to get from thed Triple CE in the

4:47:56.600 --> 4:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>general or is he going to find another district run

4:48:00.280 --> 4:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and or is he he didn't have to run, or

4:48:02.040 --> 4:48:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna, you know, step down and go work

4:48:03.759 --> 4:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with the DOJ for a couple of years and then

4:48:05.160 --> 4:48:10.360
<v Speaker 1>come back. So he looked at Jamal Bowman's district, which

4:48:10.440 --> 4:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was just just to the south. His team did polling

4:48:13.000 --> 4:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of that district. Then we're stunned to find how popular

4:48:15.240 --> 4:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Bowman was. Paul Bowman ended up winning his primary

4:48:18.600 --> 4:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and a landside went one tonight in a landside, Richie

4:48:22.840 --> 4:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Torres sent out a signal, you don't don't come up,

4:48:25.000 --> 4:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>don't don't come over here, Jamal Bowman yep. So so

4:48:28.720 --> 4:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>then he looks around. He goes to Manhattan and he

4:48:30.480 --> 4:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>runs in New York's tenth district, which represents Manhattan. So

4:48:33.160 --> 4:48:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Mande Jones loses there, so he's heading out of Congress.

4:48:37.720 --> 4:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Also that Jean Patrick Maloney can get an easier seat,

4:48:40.400 --> 4:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and now he's it looks like he's losing that man

4:48:43.960 --> 4:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe so maybe now mandere Jones goes back to that

4:48:46.160 --> 4:48:49.280
<v Speaker 1>district and runs in twenty twenty four. Right, So, Ryan,

4:48:49.840 --> 4:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you explain that you wanted to represent Manhattan? Oh?

4:48:53.320 --> 4:48:57.079
<v Speaker 1>Good God? So Ryan and I could keep going here

4:48:57.400 --> 4:49:00.720
<v Speaker 1>all night. Actually we would if not, so Sager, until

4:49:00.800 --> 4:49:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Saga rolled in. Yeah, Soccer would come in and he

4:49:03.320 --> 4:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>would have water, and he'd be looking up at the

4:49:05.320 --> 4:49:06.920
<v Speaker 1>sun and have all the energy in the world. And

4:49:07.240 --> 4:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and and Ryan and I woke up this morning and

4:49:09.480 --> 4:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>chose the violence in terms of our liquids. Yeah, heady

4:49:15.040 --> 4:49:17.919
<v Speaker 1>topper smuggled in from Vermont. That's right, and it will.

4:49:18.200 --> 4:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>My dad texted, he said, stop cursing. I'm just quoting

4:49:20.720 --> 4:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>your dad's I'm just quoting what people are telling me. Yeah,

4:49:25.040 --> 4:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I'm not gonna suppress. Why would you

4:49:27.520 --> 4:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>dad shoot the messengers as a sensor? Yeah, tell them, Yeah, no,

4:49:32.480 --> 4:49:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I I this is not this is not water. It's

4:49:34.560 --> 4:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it's well, it's it's wine. But all that said, we

4:49:39.919 --> 4:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>could keep going here, but the team needs to get

4:49:42.680 --> 4:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>up by point, right by point. The crew has to

4:49:45.600 --> 4:49:47.240
<v Speaker 1>get up for tomorrow. Yeah, right, the crew has so

4:49:47.360 --> 4:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do you guys. You guys probably work tomorrow, but Soccer

4:49:49.520 --> 4:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and Crystal are coming in early to get results out

4:49:52.720 --> 4:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to you guys right away. And frankly, I think that

4:49:54.600 --> 4:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>makes the most sense because Philadelphia right now announced just

4:49:58.720 --> 4:50:00.919
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of days that it was going

4:50:01.000 --> 4:50:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to be really hard for them to get any vote

4:50:03.560 --> 4:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>clarity on what happened in photo Republicans the well, but

4:50:06.720 --> 4:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans sue them because of the mass influx of mail

4:50:09.080 --> 4:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and bouts, which I forgot to say earlier when you

4:50:10.640 --> 4:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were making that point there we are seeing historically like

4:50:14.080 --> 4:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented levels of mail in ballots. Still, people like to vote.

4:50:19.040 --> 4:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>People like to vote. So that said, I actually think

4:50:22.759 --> 4:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense because there's only so

4:50:24.720 --> 4:50:26.840
<v Speaker 1>much we can do. We can't talk about Rick Caruso

4:50:27.120 --> 4:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in the LA Mayor's race, which is if Republicans want

4:50:30.720 --> 4:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to feel good about a so called realignment, the message

4:50:34.720 --> 4:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>might not be as we're wrapping up right now, Ryan,

4:50:38.120 --> 4:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the message Republicans I think wanted to take from this

4:50:41.000 --> 4:50:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was a MAGA message, was that the realignment was going

4:50:44.400 --> 4:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to come on the back of the Maga movement, And

4:50:48.360 --> 4:50:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the message that they might be getting, in fact, is

4:50:50.880 --> 4:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>that the realignment that's going to help them with Hispanic voters,

4:50:56.120 --> 4:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with Cuban voters and Mexican voters, with Black voters and

4:51:00.080 --> 4:51:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Cuban voters might not be a Maga message, but might

4:51:04.320 --> 4:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be something actually that is completely different, that is independent

4:51:08.400 --> 4:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in its feeling and not tied specifically to Donald Trump,

4:51:13.880 --> 4:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who is his flirting with whether or not he would

4:51:16.960 --> 4:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>run in the last few days felt like a potential

4:51:20.120 --> 4:51:23.720
<v Speaker 1>turnout mechanism for Republicans because he's popular with some, you know,

4:51:24.000 --> 4:51:26.320
<v Speaker 1>really hardcore trunk of like thirty percent of the base

4:51:26.400 --> 4:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that love Donald Trump, and there are a lot of

4:51:28.640 --> 4:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump voters who love Donald Trump more than a Republican party.

4:51:31.120 --> 4:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's even more than half if you look

4:51:32.680 --> 4:51:36.720
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers. But whether or not that translates into

4:51:36.800 --> 4:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>electoral victories outside of Republican strongholds means Republicans might need

4:51:41.800 --> 4:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>more Glenn youngkins than they do Maga cannon. Although Mayra

4:51:47.000 --> 4:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Flores was at Glenn Young Canada, she was one of

4:51:49.160 --> 4:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your Bellwethers. So update on that ninety two percent of

4:51:51.919 --> 4:51:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the votes in and she's down by nine. I was

4:51:53.720 --> 4:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>actually going to say the opposite. She's she's not a

4:51:55.759 --> 4:51:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Glen Yunkin candidate. She's a maga candidate. She's pretty hard maga.

4:52:00.720 --> 4:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>She she's very much Trump candidate. And Lauren Bobert, by

4:52:05.720 --> 4:52:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, it might be headed to a surprise loss

4:52:08.200 --> 4:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado, which nobody saw coming a very magic candidate.

4:52:11.800 --> 4:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>She's still down for. She's down for. Okay, Times calls

4:52:14.560 --> 4:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>her likely Republican. But she's still down for with seventy

4:52:17.360 --> 4:52:20.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent, So the margin is narrowing. Okay, so that

4:52:20.600 --> 4:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>could easily flip. But if she's in a close race,

4:52:23.640 --> 4:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that could still prove the point. We don't

4:52:26.120 --> 4:52:28.320
<v Speaker 1>know yet. And again that's why Sager Crysler coenim right

4:52:28.400 --> 4:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and early. But the point remains, I'll stop looking. Yeah,

4:52:32.120 --> 4:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a good idea. The point remains that like this

4:52:35.280 --> 4:52:38.720
<v Speaker 1>could be going in a direction that's like okay for

4:52:38.840 --> 4:52:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and okay for Democrats, and okay for Democrats. It's

4:52:43.000 --> 4:52:46.800
<v Speaker 1>better than expected for Democrats and okay for Republicans. Is

4:52:46.960 --> 4:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>worse than expected for Republicans if you really need to

4:52:50.040 --> 4:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>fix I've been doing a live chat which I've been

4:52:52.400 --> 4:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>neglecting on my substack, which is called called bad News.

4:52:55.400 --> 4:52:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what Ken did? Oh yeah, so my substack

4:52:58.400 --> 4:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is called bad News. Ken's I forget what his is called,

4:53:00.560 --> 4:53:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but probably just Ken Clippenstein. So I's tried out this

4:53:05.400 --> 4:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>chat functions live chat that's going on right now, and

4:53:10.840 --> 4:53:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Ken kept jumping in there and posting links to his

4:53:13.600 --> 4:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>own newsletter in my live chat, which is great. Everybody

4:53:16.680 --> 4:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Ken clippin Stein's newsletter. I'm all for that. Yeah.

4:53:19.680 --> 4:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So as I head out of here, I'll go back

4:53:21.360 --> 4:53:25.160
<v Speaker 1>into that live chat. That's bad News on substack. Emily,

4:53:25.280 --> 4:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been it's been fun. And I guess we will

4:53:28.640 --> 4:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>see you. We'll see you on Thursday and here you

4:53:31.040 --> 4:53:34.000
<v Speaker 1>guys will see Soger and Crystal tomorrow morning. That's right.

4:53:34.040 --> 4:53:37.280
<v Speaker 1>You have full breaking points coverage all week because it's

4:53:37.320 --> 4:53:40.960
<v Speaker 1>election week obviously. And Crystal ended there sort of part

4:53:41.000 --> 4:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of the broadcast tonight just by thanking premium subscribers. Yeah,

4:53:45.200 --> 4:53:47.519
<v Speaker 1>the crew was telling us that a bunch of subscriptions

4:53:47.560 --> 4:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>were coming in tonight. That's what makes this possible. That's

4:53:50.600 --> 4:53:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what makes having people on the road possible. That's what

4:53:54.080 --> 4:53:57.240
<v Speaker 1>makes bringing Status Kup and Jordan Charrisan's reporters from the

4:53:57.280 --> 4:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ground in. So thank you for doing that. Keep those

4:54:01.080 --> 4:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions coming in so we can keep growing. So we've

4:54:03.480 --> 4:54:06.360
<v Speaker 1>got a presidential election coming up. All we can say

4:54:06.440 --> 4:54:08.559
<v Speaker 1>is thank you, We appreciate it so much, and Soccer

4:54:08.560 --> 4:54:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and Crystal will be back here with you all tomorrow morning.

4:54:11.640 --> 4:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the right call because a lot of the stuff,

4:54:13.600 --> 4:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's going to be morning until we have

4:54:15.960 --> 4:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>concrete answers. So thank you to everybody for tuning in.

4:54:18.520 --> 4:54:21.079
<v Speaker 1>They'll see you back here bright and early. Get some sleep.