WEBVTT - Pandemic Could Create Industries We're Not Yet Aware Of

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa brahma Witz. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot Com. It's ten thirty three on Wall Street.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Time to check in with Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined by

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>opinion columns. Max Nisson covers all things healthcare for US,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and we love to have him on, particularly during this

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>pandemic because there's so many topics. There's so much breaking news,

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and Max, I want to start with the Santa Fee

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>news here. I guess the CEO came out yesterday and

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>said that the US would likely get first crack at

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>their vaccine because the US was first to step up

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with funding here, and now he's getting some pushback on that,

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>including from the President of France here, So give us

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the background here. How common is that in the world

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare and vaccines for one country to get preference

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>over another. Uh, you know, it's not uncommon at all

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that you do see wealthier countries UM,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>countries that have a manufacturing base UM do do get

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>access more rapidly. There there was a flu outbreak that

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand nine one where where a lot of

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>those vaccine stocks, which which didn't end up being super useful,

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>were were bought up by by countries like the United States.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a kind of particularly special and case where

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the United States on one hand, is providing

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>some some extra funding helping me up potentially to build

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that that at risk manufacturing capacity before we

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>even know if the vaccine works UM. But at the

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>same time, the furor that this this kind of prompted

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>highlights that this is going to be a really complicated

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical issue, that there's such demand that that giving countries

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>preferences is going to be incredibly controversial and difficult, and

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and that you also, you know, you if you politicize it,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that that has some risks. What if you have a

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>situation where where the vaccine that turns out to work

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>best is one of the ones being developed in China

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>and they take the position that because they funded it, UM,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know that the United States should be last

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the queue. So it's it's a really risky path

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to step down um to do anything but try to

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>develop maximum capacity and give it out to whatever extent

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>possible based on need um. You know, the best situation

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>is not having to ration doses out or give countries

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>preference based on their income level max just zooming out

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I mean, we're all hopeful for a vaccine,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and we can argue over who's going to get it first,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 1>but we still don't have any clarity of how long

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>it is going to take. In the w H of

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the World Health Organization yesterday warned that it could take

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>up to five years before the coronavirus pandemic is under control.

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at more and more dire predictions of social

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>distance in distancing strikeing out for a longer and longer

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>period of time as we await some sort of treatment

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>or vaccine. Where are we How do we even judge that? Unfortunately,

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>anyone that tells you that they have, you know, an

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>accurate timeline is is making it up. You know, Okay,

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>will make it up and make it good, make it positive,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so we can prepare to leave our all. That's very

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>much the temptation, but you also want to avoid giving

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the sense of false hope because the best way to

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>proceed is is not in relationship to best case scenario.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the worst case scenario where you have to use

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>public health efforts, testing, tracking, tracing, um screening to to

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>keep people safe until there's a vaccine, whether it's you know,

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year or well into next year.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just worth highlighting again that that we we're working

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on an untrucedented timeline. Um, you know, it may well

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be that higher vaccine development efforts were overcautious because um,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just weren't willing to throw enough resources

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at them or or take enough risks and that that

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, these these rapid accelerations will prove successful. But

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not like it's a slow process on

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a whim. It's because if you're going to give something

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to billions of people, um, you know, a one percent

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>serious side effect rate that that's you know, close to

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the estimated fatality rate above the virus itself, you could

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 1>be having a negative impact on millions and millions of people.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So you really do have to approach is cautiously, and

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of things that can go wrong.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not just about the safety, it's about can you

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>actually produce a durable immune response if you take the

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and it peters out after a few months. Um,

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not all that much good, is it?

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know there there are only so many shortcuts

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you could take, and that's why you have to be

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>cautious about the timeline. Max Neeson, thank you so much

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for being with us as all is Maxinism and Bloomberg

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Opinion calumnist, joining us to talk about the vaccine and

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the arguments that are already occurring over the distribution of

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>those vaccines. Paul, all right, how you're gonna I'm not

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sure how you figure that out. You know, it's just

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be interesting to see when they're hopefully there will

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>be a vaccine, how it is distributed and the boy

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who goes first? And what does fair mean when everyone

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks that fair is for them to get it first? Okay?

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Moment of truth, Paul, real, moment of truth. How many

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>times have you googled the symptoms of COVID nineteen as

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>well as the transmission mechanisms, the you know, rate of contagion.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what fortunately I have not, you know, I'm

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>really yeah, I'm just you know, staying at home, you know,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>doing all the common sense stuff. And I think that's

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the best way to go. And I'm fairly comfortable with that.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Definitely the best way to go. I cannot confess to

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the same, but I like at well, first it was

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>a trade dispute. Now it's fingerpointing about the coronavirus. But

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the US China trade and relationship has been anything but

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 1>smooth under the Trump administration. Now we've got President Trump

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>coming out recently saying he's looking at Chinese companies that

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>trade on the NASDAC and n Y s C, but

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't follow yours accounting rules. He says he doesn't

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>want to talk with Chinese President g So the question

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>remains is where are we in terms of the U.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>S And China in terms of global relationship. There's nobody

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>better to ask that of than Andy Brown, editorial director

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg New Economy, joins us on the phone, and

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he thanks so much for joining us here. It seems

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>like President Trump is ratcheting up the rhetoric, the anti

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>China rhetoric. Is there a strategy here that you're following right. Yeah,

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So so look, this is not the first time, obviously

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that we've heard uh inflated, overheated rhetoric on China from

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. Um. You'll remember in August last year, I

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think it was, um where, out of the blue, he

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>suddenly orders all US companies to exit China and return

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to the United States, and you know, companies at a

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>time sort of scratch their heads and tried to figure out,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, what it was. So in fact, it was

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>more a sort of verbal explosion than a serious declaration

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of intense still less, was it a strategy, um, And

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're seeing something of that here. I mean,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously at route what he's trying to do is deflect

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>blame for the coronavirus onto China. Both countries are playing

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this game. But the rhetoric this time, I mean, I

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>will say it it is it is even more overblown

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>than usual. And the one thing that actually caught my

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>eye was this comment on Ji Jim Ping. I mean,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been very careful, um, right from the

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning since he took office, to separate all the bad

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>things that were happening in the U. S. China relationship

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on the trade front, and on military front, security front,

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I p front, and so on, to separate all that

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>from his own personal relationship with Jimping. And he's been

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at pains to tell the world, you know, I have

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a great relationship. He's a terrific guy, he's my friend

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of it. And he today he's saying,

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>he's saying to Fox, you know, um, still I have

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a great relationship with him, but I don't want to talk.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to talk to him. And it just

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that that that is quite a significant step.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It's now starting to look really personal. Andy, I'm struck

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>by the increasing rhetoric by analysts who have watched this

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>space for a long time saying that it's really getting

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>close to a cold war between the US and China.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering how much this is due to the

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and concerns about the transparency from China, and how

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>much does this have to do with just this general

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling of anger towards the way that China has handled

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>trade and a host of other issues. Well, there's been

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>a reset, obviously in the United States view of China.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, China is now quite explicitly UM, you know,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a competitor and an adversary UM, and everything flows from that. UM.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, coming into this pandemic, you had real decoupling

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>taking place in areas of technology, in trade, in investment,

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in talent, the flow of people across borders UM, and

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus M has has has has added more poison to

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that well. And now you're starting We talked earlier about

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the latest area of potential decoupling, which is

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the financial sphere. And and you know, so you're

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing just yesterday, in fact, Federal Pension Fund, under pressure

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of from you know, the White House, announced that it

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>was postponing a decision on, you know, whether or not

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to to diversify into Chinese stocks. White Houses say, why

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>would why should American pension has be you know, supporting

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese companies that are competing against US companies and potentially

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ripping off their their I P you know, UM discussion

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know, for instance, UM, you know, whether whether

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>whether the U s should renege on its data obligations

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to China. This is this sort of loose talk, but

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>very very dangerous loose talk. Andy, Is there any sense

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that the medical community at least is working together on

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a global scale US and China as it relates to

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this virus and potential remedies and vaccines or is that

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>also uh kind of you know on the back burner. Yeah.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you you you read about collaboration and and and

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that there is collaboration going on, um, you

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>know in certain areas. Um, but you also read about

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, vaccine nationalism and um. You know, China in

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the US in a race to develop a vaccine. And

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know if if China got here, would they make

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it available to the US and vice of US? Um. So,

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's, it's it's I think it's an

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>area of some collaboration but also potentially of competition. Andy,

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of this has gotten wrapped up

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in you know, how much is deflecting blame? How much

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to China hide? But taking a step back, how much

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is China really to blame here? I mean, can you

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>give a sense of the legitimacy of the US has claims?

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Look this this whole issue about you know where it

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>came from? So um, you know, the science says it

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>came from from bats and was passed too uh to

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>humans through through an animal. We we don't know, we

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what kind of animal. And that's a question

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that that demands urgent inquiry and answer, which is why

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's so important, I think, to have a real independent

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>international inquiry into into what happened. But the there is

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>no evidence to support the Trump White House accusations that

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, it came out of it, it it came out

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of a lab, and I think the White House as

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>now sort of abandoned that about it was deliberate and so.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But but they say that they've been you know and

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just just real quick, we've got twenty seconds left, but

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been talking about just a lack of transparency and

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>how that's really hampered the ability to fight this pandemic.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>For sure, it has China, China, stone Wall, China has

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>uh stiff on the w h O and continues to

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>deny access to w h O scientists, um, you know who,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>who are interested in figuring out where there's the origin

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of of the virus. So there are legitimate complaints about

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>China and its lack of transparency, certainly in the early

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the the early stages of the of the

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>outbreak is equally true that the Trump White House ignored

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or you know, did very little to prepare the United

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>States for this, for this coming pandemic during the entire

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>months of February. What happened then, Andy Brown some legitimate

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>questions and ones we will continue to ask through the

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks and months ahead, and editorial director of Bloomberg New

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Economy joining us on the phone from New Hampshire. Until

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the past few days, a lot of people have been

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the resiliency of US equities and the contrast

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with that against and in creed increasingly bleak outlook for

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the US labor market. However, when we talk about equities,

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they are not all the same, and there's been a

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>huge divergence between the mega caps, the big tech names

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and everybody else. Joining us now, Talcohen, head of US

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Markets for NASDAC in New York, tow thank you so

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. I want to start there.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this growing bifurcation where the

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>top performing stocks, the biggest stocks, which are actually the same,

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>have continued to outperform what everything else actually gets left

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>behind with a bigger and bigger gap. Well, thank you

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Lisa for having me today, and just to touch on

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what you mentioned in terms of the bification. The markets

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are distinguishing between companies that they think are part of

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the solution, such as tech and biotech, versus those that

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are most vulnerable, like travel and hospitality. And we're not

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>just seeing it in the day to day we're seeing

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it in the inflows into the market. So for instance,

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and ask a q Q and I was like one hundreds,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>which we've seen eight billion dollars of inflows over just

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two to three months. So investors are trying

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to understand what parts of the economy are vulnerable, what

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the economy came into this crisis on the

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>position of strength, and what we'll leave on a position

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of strength. And then further, you're seeing a lot of

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>unclear economic data such as the job support which is

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>historically bad, and people are trying to figure out Investors

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are trying to figure out whether the to reflection of

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the long term impact or is it highlighting more of

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a temporary impact of the here and now. And then finally,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on a day to day basis, you can wake up

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one morning and you can hear conflicting data on the

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>longevity of this health crisis, where some folks will come

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>out and say it will last throughout the year, and

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>then you can see news at the end of the

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>day from a healthcare company talking about a potential vaccine

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>or potential treatment. So I think the markets and investors

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are trying to make sense of all of that while

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>understanding there are going to be different parts of the

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>economy that will be impacted severely differently than others. So

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>tell I mean, some folks have been suggesting that we

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have in fact put in a bottom on this market

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and unlikely to retest the lows. How do you feel

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about that? Given some of this economic data that we see,

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>including today's jobs claims and what we're likely to see

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of unemployment and declining earnings. We'll leave that

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to the experts who watched the markets more closely. From

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, I would say that there's still a lot

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of unknown. We're still just looking to re enter into

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the into offices. We're talking about re entry plans there. Uh,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they're still talking about a second way. There's in clarity

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>around the vaccine or treatments, and on a state by

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>state basis here, at least in the US, you see

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>very very different conditions throughout the U S. I think

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's still early to tell, and from an AZACT perspective,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we just look at our own experience. We're still going

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>through and trying to understand what it means to re

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>enter offices. But that being said, we're very comfortable working

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>from home. So it will depend on how comfortable you

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are with the situation you're in now and how long

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you think you'll be in this situation. Tell I'm wondering

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about your point with people being somewhat discerning when it

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to which companies they bet on. What does that

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>mean for index strategies given the fact that everybody was

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>going into passive investing and suddenly it really is a

0:16:55.320 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>stock pickers market, particularly Pick Fang and nothing else. Yes,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a couple of things to note. There

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is number one, you know, the FED and government have

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>taken actions that probably have helped certain sectors, and so

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just not the market forces at work. You have

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED and government at work, and they've taken very

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>strong and decisive actions in certain parts of the economy.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's that's a factor. The second one is,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>once again, when you're working from home and you're thinking

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about the impact of this crisis for me personally, I'm

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>using all these collaboration tools on a day and day

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>out basis that I might not have been using before.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So those companies that enable work from home, that enable

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the remote and virtual working environment, they're going to be winners.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And those industries that clearly there isn't any clarity at

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this point in time as to when they're going to

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>come back or how they're going to come back, and

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a debate as to, you know, what it looks like,

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the new new normal look like. So people instead

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of just taking bets on individual companies might feel more

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>comfortable going into sector et F or thematic ets. But

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to your point, with interest rates and everything else being

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>where they are, people are also looking at and being

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>more critical about how the stock selection process would work.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Now the nastack market held up in terms of performance

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of kind of handling the order flow given

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the altivy we've seen over the past

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, great questions. So we've been almost all

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of us have been working from home for the better

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>part of two months of our workers at home, and

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been able to operate without interruption to our business

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and continue to serve our markets and our clients. And

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we've helped up really well. The markets have functioned really well,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're comfortable as a company because we've

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>gone through it. We were lucky in some ways that

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry had gone through nine oleaven Hurricane Shandy,

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and some other events that have provided us with an

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to ensure that we have the resiliency and the

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>BCP plans to withstand something like this. So I think,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we look at it and we think we'll

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>be able to function well and we'll likely be a

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>fast follower as people look onto the office till twenty seconds.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you think a lot of people won't ever return

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to the office. I think it will be done on

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a voluntary basis. It will be done in ways and

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it who's companies to collaborate and talk to their employees

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>about what they're comfortable doing, and then that will tell

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>us the answer. Tal, thanks so much for joining us.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate your thoughts. Tal Cohen, head of US

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>markets for NASDAK Nastack, of course based in New York City. Interestingly,

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think you know a lot of companies are

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 1>really going to be rethinking this work from home situation.

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Given I think what's most feel like it's pretty decent productivity.

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the Connecticut governor's comments yesterday where he

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>said that the Monday through Friday commute from Greenwich, Connecticut

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe a thing of the past. Yeah, exactly. It's interesting.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, as a thirty year commuter on New Jersey Transit,

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that is a fascinating thing to think, you know, So

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as we think about that, so we'll have to see

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>how this plays out over time. When we talk about

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>reopening economies, a lot of it has to do not

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>only with testing, but tracing. This raises a whole host

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of questions. Who will do the tracing, how will they

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>do it, What kinds of personal privacy issues does this raise?

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And how organized is United States? Not to mention, who

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>pays for it? Joining us now to answer all of

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>these questions completely and fully is take him technology calumnists

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for Greenberg opinion, no pressure or anything. Hey, let's get

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>started with big tech and how they have offered to

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>help track and trace everybody in order to prevent the

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>spread of the of the coronavirus. So on, April Tense,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>about a month ago, Apple and Google announced this unprecedented

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>joint effort. I mean they've never really worked together like

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this before to develop smartphone technology to do context tracing.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Basically the learning users that they've been in the proximity

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of a detected person so they can get tested in

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>self quarantine. Um the crux and my column was a

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of countries in Europe have adopted the Google Apple

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>proposal and plan Germany, Italy, Austria, even the United Kingdom

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is considering it. And I'm a little worried that the

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>US is not doing anything on a national basis. Um

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>President Trump days after it was first announced that it

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>looked great, but he needed to talk to all these

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>experts and he's gonna make a vision and that he's

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>doing weeks, and it's been about four weeks, and we

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard anything from the American government. So I'm worried

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that the US is not actively working on this while

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>all these European countries and countries around the world are

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>basically accepting this great proposal that Apple and Google are presenting,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and the US doesn't seem to have his app together.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So tay, do I even need the US approval. Don't

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I just download it from my Apple you know apps

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>like any other apps. Unfortunately we do. UM. Apple and

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Google's plan they don't actually create the app. They say

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>one app per country. A public health authority needs to

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>create the app to use their software technology, and for

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it to work, it really has to be a national

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>app because everyone has to get involved. We have to

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have to share specific duty to do it. UM. It

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like in the US we have like the Utah

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>making app in North Dakota, state by state. Thing is

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to work. We need the whole country to

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>get behind it. And for that to be effective, we

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>need the president, we need the federal government to be

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>behind it and basically say, this is a great idea.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's have the CDC where n I h to put

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>out an app so everyone can use it. But I

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't see that happening here. And I'm very worried

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're not going to use this despective tool UM

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to Really we need to fight this virus with every

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>tool we have. UM. It's a public health crisis and

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing it. So what's the main opposition to this?

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it a is it a security issue? An independence

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>issue or is it a lack of organization issue you

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of it is just people were

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>really worried about kind of health and privacy big technology companies.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>That reputation has been getting hit in the last few years,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>especially after the whole Facebook stuff a couple of years

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>ago with Cambridge parent Wika, And I mean, this is

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>just me postubly, but I just fear that politicians and

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>officials are so worried about the political risk of partnering

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with still calm dality because they have this reputation, um,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to do it. And the issue is

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this Apple Google plan is actually a really good plan.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>They vigorously designed it to protect um consumer privacy, all

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>identities to protected. They don't do physical location tracking at all.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not GPS based on this you too through Ranks technology.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>It works, it's smartly engineered, it's greatly designed, and it

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like we're ignoring it alright, So t I'm still

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>confused a little bit who is creating who has created

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>this app as it Is it the Apple Google Consortium

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>or is it the US government? And what's the role

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of these tech companies? So what Apple and Google is doing,

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is there um installing. They're going to create at the

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>middle of this month, the software API that allows public

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>health authorities to create apps that can do to contact tracing.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 1>So Apple, Apple and Google a kind of creating the

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>programming a p I s let um a public health

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>authority create an app. So Apple and Google aren't creating app,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of doing the groundwork infrastructure software to let

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>countries develop their own apps that can doing. Okay, interesting

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to see how this place is that. It's interesting because

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the European countries generally be more apprehensive about uh,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving out personal information and you know, whether

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's related to advertising or anything. So it's interesting to

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>see that they are perhaps out of front relative to

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the U S. Take Cam, thanks so much for joining

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>US technology calumnists for Bloomberg Opinion. I mean, I think, clearly, Lisa,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>as you and the Governor Cuomo and others talk about it,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the next big step in combating the viners is you know,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of tracking and tracing, testing and tracing, testing and tracing. Yeah,

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and the question is how are they going to do that.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I know that in New York City they're hiring a

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>whole host of people to help do that. The question

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is how can you employ technology to help do that.

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I know that in South Korea, for example, you have

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to register yourself right away when you get off, and

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>then that you get you get tracked and traced, and

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of things happen happened across Asia. I'm

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, what's the alternative. Yeah, I I agree. I

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>think you know, again, given the importance of kind of

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, tracing, that's going to be to really combating

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>this and confronting it and beating it back. I think

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to have to happen to some exempt. Thanks

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woids. I'm on Twitter

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa abram woods One. Before the podcast, you can

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio m