WEBVTT - Graham Weaver on Private Equity

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Mesters in Business with Very Results on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Graham Weaver is founder and partner at Alpine Investors, a

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>private equity firm focusing on software and services. Graham has

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting background, both engineering at Princeton and essentially

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>launching a PE firm while he was a graduate student

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford. Everybody knows the story about Michael Dell launching

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a computer business out of his dorm room in Texas.

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 1>This could be the first PE firm I'm familiar with

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that got started in a dorm room. What makes Graham

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is while everybody else in the world of

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>private equity is focused on the analytics and crunching numbers

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and creating econometric models that will tell you way to

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>invest I think they've found a very different model that

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>has been extremely successful for them, where the key focus

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is on talent. How do we find the best talent,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>put them in place running our investment companies, and allow

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>them to generate the sort of returns UH that you

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really generate by just looking at a model. I

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>found our conversation absolutely fascinating, and I think you will

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>also with no further ado my discussion with Alpine Investors.

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Graham Weaver, let's jump right into this, starting with your background.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>When I hear someone has an engineering degree, I tend

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to think of venture capital, not private equity. Tell us

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, how you went the PE route instead

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the VC route. Well, I actually started in private

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>equity right out of undergrad. I really didn't know the

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>difference between private equity or consulting or anything. I had

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>zero knowledge of at and I was fortunate to end

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>up in Morgan Stanley's private equity group. I loved it,

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've kind of been at it ever since. Really

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. So is it from Princeton to Morgan Stanley, uh,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and then Stanford or am I getting the order? Yeah?

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I when I was at Princeton, then I went to

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley and their private equity. Then I worked at

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it from called American Securities for a couple of years,

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and then went to went to business school after that.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And somewhere in the middle of this, there's a pig

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>farm in Missouri that I'm having a hard time figuring

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>out what a pig farm has to do with with

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>private acts. So the very first deal I worked on.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So I come out of school, I'm wearing my cross

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>pen and my lapel, and I'm like wearing a tie

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and well buttoned down exactly, and I think I'm a

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>big shot being on Wall Street. And I get shipped

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>out to this pig farm in Missouri, which was a

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>deal Morgan Stanley had invested in. They'd invested a total

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of a billion almost a billion dollars of debt and equity,

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and it, suffice to say was not going well. So

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not that I was going to go save it as

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a twenty two year old analyst, but I got shipped out.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I lived in the CFOs basement for about five months

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and we did everything we could, but it turned out

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not to not to be a great investment. So there's

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not big money and pigs. Well, it turns out hog

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>prices are wildly cyclical. And you know there's the expression,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>how does uh six footman drown drowned in a river

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that averages five ft? You know it's because there's parts

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the river that are deeper. Will you know, we

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>build our whole model on hog prices being forty seven

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars and when we with that's what they average. But

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't tell you how much they swing up. And

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, yeah, they were. They went to eighteen

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars and we had seven hundred million a debt and

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that didn't that that didn't go well. So that's the

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the old joke. It's not the price, it's the

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>volatility that it was. Yeah, it was rough, but it

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was a That was my introduction to the glamorous business

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of private equity. And you didn't turn around and say,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I want nothing to do. I had the time of

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>my life. It was so fun. Um, how is sleeping

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in the CFOs basement? What was his house on the

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it was it was the whole entire town smelled like

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a pig farm, and which was not especially delightful. It's not. No,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it turns out and every and pretty much everyone in

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the town worked and had some affiliation with the pig farm.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>The CFO was also a Morgan Stanley guy, and he

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was probably twenty seven. So neither of us years of experience, you,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>neither of us had any clue what we were doing.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, but but it really wouldn't have mattered. When

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>your revenue gets cut by like eight percent, there's just

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not a lot not a lot you're gonna do to

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>turn that around. So so there's a cliche about tech

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>firms being started in dorm rooms. How does a private

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>equity firm start in a dorm room? So I I

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>show up at Stanford and I'm in my first week

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of class, and then, similar as today, you have to

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>take these core classes your first year, which are just

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>not that you know there, just fundamental. They're they're not

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that exciting. So the first class, I sit down and

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there's this this twenty five year old who's never worked

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>today in his life. He's a PhD student, he's never

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>taught before, and he's kind of just reciting out of

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this strategy book. And I just thought to myself, Oh

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>my god, what have I signed up for. So I

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>had this idea that I was going to go try

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to buy a business, and I had you know, in

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>your first three years as an analyst, you basically build

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>a financial model. But I had the confidence of someone

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was much more, much better than I was.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>So I I convinced h an owner. I started cold

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>calling companies in a sector that I had looked at previously,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and I convinced this this owner to sell me his business,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and and then I had to go raise the money,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>most of which was debt and the little bit of

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.119
<v Speaker 1>equity that was needed I financed with credit cards, right,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So that was literally how I started, not your typical

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>private equity founding story. How did that initial PE transaction

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>work out? I did a total of uh three label

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>deals with some add ons, lost money on one, made

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>money on or made you know, lost a little bit

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of money on, lost made a little bit of money

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on the second one, and the third one. Third one

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>was a total home run which actually just sold uh

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>this year, twenty years later, so that that one turned out,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>well twenty years that's impressive. That's not the typical private

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>equity holding period. Yeah, well it was just me. I

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was the it was just mine, so you could afford

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to be patient, and it was It was awesome. It

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>was a great that one. What what what space was

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that it was? We had these companies that made these

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>little labels that went on products like, for example, in

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Trader Joe's Trader Joe's Private labels things. We made all

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>those labels. It's a totally unsexy business, but it was

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>very consistent and it's profitable. It was really profitable, and

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>no one wakes up and says, you know, I'm gonna

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>be a hero because I'm gonna save half a cent

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on my label. So it tends to kind of like

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>just clip along like a bond. So it turned out,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it turned out well. But I mean I had absolutely

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>no idea what I was doing, and uh, and so

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I made I made every mistake you can imagine, and

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it still worked out. When you launched in two thousand

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and one, you started with fifty million dollars something like that,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and now it's up to eight billion, of course, eight funds,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and your most recent fund just closed about two billion

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars more or less about two and two point four,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, so that's that's real money two point four.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you're doing something right. The track record has to

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>be attractive. Is it the same investors rolling over or

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>or new and different investors. Who's the clientele for this?

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>In the very early days, it was a number of

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>individuals because no institution was going to back at well.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a certain track record, be around

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for certain length of period, be able to check all

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of their due diligence boxes, and that takes time money,

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I checked zero of those boxes store room, check

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what else? What else we got? Check exactly? I checked

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>no boxes. And that took me like almost a year

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure out. I went to all these institutions and

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I never got past the first meeting anywhere. And then

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I found a number two really two individuals who thank

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>god there I still owe everything to these these two.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>UM one, I don't know if I can, you could

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>say whatever. So UM one was Tom Styer who ran

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for president. Um he was one of the early ones.

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And then Doug Martin from the Stevens family, And they

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>were just the two best investors you could ever have.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And um they were supportive and most importantly they were

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>supportive after Fund one, which was not a good fund.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's the reason we're still in business. Why not

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>a good fund? Just performance wise? Or was it because

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>when you launch, you know, one, we're still in the

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>early days of a massive downfall in technology, media, internet,

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>straight across the board. Not you know, it's not unless

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a distress fund, that's not the ideal time to launch. Yeah.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I would love to say that it was the market,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't. It was self inflicted. It was me

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>making a lot of dumb mistakes, being overconfident, you know,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and and just investing in companies that looked great in

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet and didn't. What looks great in a spreadsheet

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is low purchase price and a lot of leverage. That

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>looks always looks good in a spreadsheet. But the the

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>problem the qualitative, Yeah, the leverage is the problem. And

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the qualitative things about is it a quality business? Those

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>things you can't model in a spreadsheet. And so I

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>just made a lot of dumb mistakes and we will

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>actually the whole fund overall loss money. I would highly

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>bury not recommend having your first fund when you launched

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to lose money. It was probably not the best strategy.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It was an anchor around our neck for pretty much

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a decade. So that raises the question, if the first

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>fund was a bit of a stiff, how did you

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>raise money for the second film? Well, thankfully, we were

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>really I really communicated a lot with Doug and Tom,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and they understood they could see us getting better, you know,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they could see us making a lot of improvements, fixing

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that we got wrong. And both

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>both of them were pretty seasoned investors. Both of them

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>had had mistakes they'd made before and so they you know,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>thank god, we're really supportive. And then and then it

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like immediately we started knocking out of the park either,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but we started getting better and better and and and

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>then and then really around the time of the recession

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was when we really completely transformed and became kind of

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the business that we are today. And it's a little

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of a cliche. They're not so much investing in

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a fund as they're investing in you as the manager.

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they saw something that was, hey, needs a little seasoning,

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of potential here. Yeah. They saw

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>someone who was willing to literally run through walls and

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>run through a burning building to make it work. And

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and I almost literally did. I mean it was it

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>was that um we were and not just me but

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>our whole team was was really committed to trying to

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>try and make it work. And I think they saw

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that quite quite interesting. I have to talk a little

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>bit about your growth rate. You began with fifty four

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>million dollars all in your eight billion in assets totally

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a lot of that is not just growth but

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>new investors coming along. But still that's a as a

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>as an pe company Alpine has really seen quite a

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>corporate growth trajectory. Tell us what led to this success rate. Yeah,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So when when the recession hit, we were, uh in

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.479
<v Speaker 1>we're not well positioned. We didn't. Now, when you say recession,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>because some of our audiences, you know, older than twenty five,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming you mean oh, eight o nine crisis, Okay,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not the one in not the one that maybe happens

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>sometime in two and certainly not two thousands. So the

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>great financial crisis. So great financial crisis happens. We were

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we invested the last dollar from our third fund two

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks before h two weeks before Lehman Brothers blew up,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and so we were out of money and we had

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it took us forever to raise the next fund. But

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that period where we didn't have any money turned out

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to be the most important period for us. Why because

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we started deciding we were going to look at our

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>own business, you know, kind of like, rather than working

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in the business, We're going to start working on our business.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So I hired an executive coach, um and he helped.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He he really helped me kind of redefined the business

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that I truly was in which I'll come back to

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we hired a consulting and coaching firm for our whole organization,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we really started doing some soul searching for

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better word. And then and and from

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that we really you know, changed our strategy and developed

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a new playbook. Um, so let me interrupt

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you there, because that you raised something that I'm fascinated by.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So first, what leads you to say we need a

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>pro to come in and show us how to do this?

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>And second, how do you even go about finding an

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>executive coach that sounds like man, that's a consulting field

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>fraught with you know, let's polite and just say high risks. Yeah,

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a great question. And I am a

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of executive coaching. I have had a coach

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and nine. I've talked to a coach

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>every week or every other week since oh nine, No, Kidd,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and we at Alpine have twenty three coaches that are

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>part of our There their ten ninety nine folks, but

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they're part of our ecosystem that's available to our people

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>at Alpine and our executives. So I'm I'm just a

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of coaching and Basically, what I love about

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>coaching is you you create space away from the business

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the day to day and you ask yourself a

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of really important questions. You know, what do I want?

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>What success look like? What do I want to you know,

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what's a five year plan look like? And you actually

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>have to really burn some energy into thinking time thinking

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about um those answers, which are really hard answers, which

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>most of us never spend time thinking about. What was

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>it just in the midst of the crash and recession

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that you said, hey, maybe we just need a little help.

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not we we don't have the professional background to

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>run the business. We know the investing side, but the

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>business side is something very different. How do you get

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one of the benefits of face

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>planning in your first fund is that you get some

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>humility and you I've always just been open to learning

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>from people that are smarter and better than I am,

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and so coaching was an extra back then in two

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, it was not very well known, and it

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was definitely an exercise in humility of saying I think

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I need some help. That that's the old joke. Experiences

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>what you get when you don't get what you want right, Yeah, exactly.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So once you make the decision, Hey, we want to

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>bring in a professional to show us ways to improve

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>our busines, the methods. How does one go about finding

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a business coach? So I had an introduction from a

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>friend and then we had a number of lunches, and

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>his business wasn't going well in oh nine either. As

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, who other than people doing distress debt

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>investing whose business was going great knowing, yeah exactly nobody.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So in short sellers, everybody else was in trouble. So

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we had this awesome conversation. I can still it's one

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of these conversations you can still remember where you are

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and which you know exactly the moment. So we had

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this is actually after I brought him on. We have

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this awesome conversation where I said, hey, I have to

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>his name's JP Flam, and I said, hey, I have

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to cancel our our coaching engagement. I'm just too busy,

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which was like we'd already decided ahead of time that

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there was that was no go. I had to stick

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with it, like that agreement. So he he text back

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>immediately says, no, we're having it. So I get on

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the phone. He says, well, what's you know, what's so

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy that you're so stressed? Oh my god, JP, you know,

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta fly to Dallas and fix this. And then

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta, you know, we gotta deal we're to lose.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And then we lost a huge customer in Chicago. Then

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I got into d C, and then you know, I'm

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>going on and on, and he said, okay, well, let's

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>let's kind of slow down and chill out. Let's talk

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about Dallas. What's going on there? Well, we you know,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we just missed our bank projections the second time. And

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going on and on, and he starts saying, well,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>tell me about the CEO and Dallas. I'm like, what

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>does that have to do with anything, you know, in

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the Great recession, like blah blah blah.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know it's not it's you know, it's a

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>markets or whatever. Anyway, he it comes to the point

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he says, well, eventually he says, well, how would you

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>how would you rate that that CEO? You know, a

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>B C. I was like, oh, you know, probably a B.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>He said, Well, Graham, at the one of our engagements,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you said you wanted to build the greatest private ely

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>from of all time. Are you gonna Are you gonna

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>do that with a b CEO? And I just like

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>hit me between the eyes. And then he asked me

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>another question. He said, and Graham, if you're someone who

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>keeps a b CEO, what does it make you? How

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>would you rate yourself as a CEO? And I just

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I like, its stopped me dead in my tracks. And

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that was really this light bulb that went off that

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up having us having me realize I'm actually in

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the talent business us that's the fundamental business that I'm

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>really in. And that was like oh nine that we

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>came to that realization and then started completely redesigning our

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>our firm to like build our companies around talent, build

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>our firm around talent, build our investment strategy around talent.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So that that was just a huge turning point. So

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about that, because all of your investments

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually get a CEO that's been trained at Alpine and

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>has the benefit of all of this coaching, all of

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>this training, all of this expertise. It's not that you're

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just looking for attractive balance sheets. It's where can we

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>put someone in charge to move the needle by taking

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>our expertise and applying it to this business model. Is

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that what you mean by when you say you're in

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the talent business? Yeah, I think that's what I mean.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>There's two parts of it. One is our investment strategy,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>which is what you describe, the others how we run

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>our own firm. But sticking with what you were talking

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>about bury the investment strategy, we found that the single

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>most important investment decision we make is the management team.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's more important than the price we pay. It's

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>more important than the leverage levels, it's more important than

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the prior growth rate. And so we just said, well,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>if that's really the most correlated, most effective, our most

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>important criteria, you know, let's make sure we get that right.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And so let's actually kind of build our own CEOs

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and and and and put our own CEOs in so

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that we can make sure that we're getting a world

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.239
<v Speaker 1>class person to run each one of our companies. So so,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in some ways this is almost parallel in the public

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>markets to activist investing, where they identify a very attractive

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>business that isn't quite living up to potential, right, and

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they say, hey, with a few management changes, we can

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>turn this into a really good business. On the private

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>equity side, I'm assuming the conversation is something like, we

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>want to either buy your business or your entire business,

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but regardless, we want one of our professionals to come

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in and manage it. Yeah, that's right. A lot of

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the companies were buying don't have management. You know, might

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>be a corporate carve out, it might be a management

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>team that wants to retire or exit, and and that's great.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's never any conflict. We're totally transparent. We're not

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>doing hostile deals, nothing like that. It's always the transaction

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that the seller wants to do is they want to retire,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's always very friendly. But we there aren't a

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of private equity firms that want to go through

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the process of changing management because it's very very hard

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. And that's the value add that you guys,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of it. Yeah, that's really quite fascinating.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's a quote of yours I have to lead

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with which I find really intriguing. Quote. People create returns,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not deals, not price. That's a that's a huge statement

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>considering most of the analyst community, especially private equity is

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>so analytical and modern driven. You're saying, this is a

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>people business. Barry Um. I think that if you want

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.239
<v Speaker 1>to do something different than people, you have to have

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>some fundamental belief that's different than what other people believe.

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And our belief is that returns come from from people,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they come from talent and and and I think maybe

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why people shy away from that

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's hard to analyze, it doesn't fit in a spreadsheet,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's incredibly hard to manage. So it's a lot

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>easier to manage the the hard numbers that the financial

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>statements and things than it is to, you know, really

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>manage a team of people. So we were talking earlier

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that you appoint a CEO at these these purchased businesses

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that you've trained Um yourself, tell us a little bit

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:48.239
<v Speaker 1>about what that in house training looks like. So a

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the CEOs we're hiring, we're bringing right out

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of NBA programs, and they have five years of experience

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>typically before they go into business school, and that could

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>be anything that could be there in the military, they

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>could have been a consulting firm, they could have been

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>investment banking and we have success with any of those

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>back any and all those backgrounds. So and they've just

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>been in two years of business school, so we don't

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>want to put them back in business school. But what

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we're really teaching them, the fundamental thing we're teaching them

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is how to hire, how to build their team, how

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to set a vision, how to create priorities, how to

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>get everyone in their organization excited and aligned behind what

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do. Those are things that not a

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of business schools um teach. It's one of the

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>things I try to teach in my class, but it's

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>something that we bring in. It's the biggest thing we

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>bring in that in that training program that we do.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Hiring has been described as the most difficult aspect of

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>building a company versus everything else. How do you teach

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>good hiring? You can actually, to some extent, make hiring

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a science. UM and the simple I could talk for you.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I could talk for three hours about this, but I'll

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>try to do it in about two minutes, which is,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you build a scorecard for what you want that role

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in that role, a specific list of outcomes you want

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that role to do. And then as you're assessing a candidate.

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You're looking for very specific evidence that they're going to

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to perform against that scorecard. And you have

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>two things you're looking for, attributes and experience. Those are

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the two different parts of the interview process. Well, we

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>all know what experiences define what attributes me. So attributes

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is about who somebody is versus what they've done. So

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>an example for us, when we're hiring young people to

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>become CEOs, we're looking at, you know, do they have

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>a will to win? Do they have emotional intelligence and

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>self awareness that they can get along with people? And

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>then do they have grit? Can they Are they going

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to see things through after getting kicked

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the teeth, because they're gonna get kicked in the teeth.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are the three attributes that we're looking for.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Those are wildly more important than experience because they'll get

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>experienced quickly, and you can teach experience. You can't teach

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>those three things. You can't teach you know, the will

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to win, Um, they're kind of coming to us with

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that or they're not. That's a that's an intrinsic aspect

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the personality. You either have it or you don't.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>There's no way you're gonna learn that, not in a

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>period of time, or we don't know how to teach

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it if it is sable, really really interesting. So so

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned your class, let's let's talk about the management

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>course that seems to be related to that CEOs and

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Training to tell us about that. Yeah, so the CEO

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and Training is the that's the name for the people

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that were hiring. Did you want to talk about that

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>or the class itself? All right? So, um, the CEO

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and Training is the name we give to those people

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>were hiring right out of business school. We're giving them

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that experience training that I mentioned, and then we're putting

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>them right in. Um a lot of them are CEOs

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on day one of add on acquisitions and they get

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the reins and they're you know, they're off to the races. Um.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, there aren't a lot of positions

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>out of business school that you can become a CEO within,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, right when you graduate. So we're we've designed

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>that and it's been it's been a home run. We

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I underestimated how amazing these students would do and the

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>roles that they've done, and uh, and it's it's it's

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>been fantastic. Do you end up hiring people right out

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of your classes or yeah? I mean this is really

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>as recruitment. I don't interview anybody from Stanford period. I

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if they applied. I keep a wall

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>between you know, my teaching and um and and recruiting.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But I will say probably teaching there has helped the

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Alpine brand, uh and and help me and more importantly

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>helped me understand what students are capable of, which is

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and what they want, which is they want

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>to be the boss right away. And I think so

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>it's helped. It's helped me learn a little bit more

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about how to build a program that the students want

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually do. So one of the things the c

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I T program does is to try and increase underrepresented

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>individuals and pe tell us a little bit about what

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>diversity does for your business. Yeah, well it is. It's

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it's awesome what we can do if you The great

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>thing about hiring for attributes over experience is that we

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>can actually have a huge impact on diversity. So, for example,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>if I said we're hiring a CEO to run a

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>healthcare software business, and our criteria is they have to

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have done it for twenty years. Then I'm that that

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>battle has been won or lost twenty years ago. And yeah,

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I could hire someone who's a diverse candidate from one

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of my competitors, but I haven't really created any value

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>if I hire someone right out of business school. Let's

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>just use women as an example, and and and and

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and that woman wouldn't have necessarily seen a path to

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>become a CEO, and I can provide her a clear path,

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>then I can actually increase the number of women that

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>become CEOs, which is exactly what we've done. We have

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>over fifty of our CEOs and training that we've hired

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>have been women, About thirty have been underrepresented minorities, and

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so we have we can have a we can really

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>move the dial on creating more you know, diversity and

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO ranks. That that's really kind of interesting. Uh, let's

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about software and services. Why focus

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on those areas in particular. So one of the things

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that we figured out, which probably took us way too

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>long to figure out, is if you if you buy

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue, there's just a lot fewer things that go wrong.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're not unique and focusing on um recurring revenue.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But that we we turned the dial in and around

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that great recession time and decided that was all you

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>were going to do. And so it's less focused on

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>winning that one big sale and it's more about building

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a business that has a fairly steady revenue stream. That's right.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And then if you marry that with what I was

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>saying before about putting young people to run them, recurring

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>revenues really helpful because in the first year they have

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a big learning curve and you you know, they we

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>need them to have a little bit of a cushion

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for them to get up the speeds. Recurring revenue helps

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton because it does take them a little while

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to be a CEO. That's really interesting.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Software obviously has been really hot over the past couple

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of years. Any chance that that changes or slows down

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or is software just the driver of the future. I mean,

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think software is the driver of the future. And

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think anything, even the driver of the future, can

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>get overpriced, and you can overpay for any asset. And

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in the last few years, you know, people

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>have have gotten a little ahead of themselves with some

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the multiples that were paid. But I don't think

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that changes is fundamentally that I think sufferers. You know,

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>softwers here for a long time, and it's and it's

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of really exciting trends. I'm gonna ask

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a question. I'm gonna have you put this back earlier

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in the hiring discussion, because I missed something and I

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>want to come back to it. You've discussed episodic versus

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>program matic hiring. Explain the difference between the two. Yeah,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>great questions. So I might have made up those two terms,

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but well, that's why it jumped out at me. I'm like,

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I think. I think I did

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>make them up. But um, so, episodic hiring is what

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone does. Okay, we need to seven opening fill this.

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Go to LinkedIn and ad get me somebody here exactly,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>or or yeah, we'll hire Russell Reynolds to get us

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a CFO whatever. That's that's how everyone hires. Um. That

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is two problems, a number of problems. One is its slow, uh,

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and two is it's expensive, and three is it actually

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even work that well. Like the higher the hit

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>rate is pretty low. Hit rate across the board and

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hiring statistically is about fifty, but that's measured as are

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they still there in three years, not did they were

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they successful? So it's even worse than that. So that's

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.719
<v Speaker 1>a problem with episodic hiring. So programmatic hiring is you're

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>going to hire the same role a lot, and so

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you make that more of a program. So

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:05.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, we're hiring seventeen people from business

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>schools that start next month, or we're hiring seven undergrads

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be interns who will matriculate into full time roles,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and and then so there's a group of people that

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>are graduating, you can kind of have a class of folks.

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You can give them way more training, you can build

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a whole program using the pro you know, to use

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the programmatic term around that, and it's just a lot

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more effective. That's two roles that we do at Alpine,

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the CEOs and training and the and then the analysts.

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But then in our companies, you know, in some cases

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that's engineers technicians where that's they're recurring higher that they're

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>doing and we're helping them build programs to to start

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with people who don't know how to do those functions

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and bring them up. You know, through training to to

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to learn those really really quite interesting and you can excale.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>You can just scale a lot better and you have

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a way higher hit rate. So you're constantly maintaining a

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>pool of either potential hires or actual employees that you're

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting to promote. Absolutely. Yeah, before we get into the

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>current market environment for private equity, I have to circle

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>back to you. Teaching at Stanford at the graduate school,

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about the courses you teach

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and what students learned. So I I teach two courses there.

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I teach. They're both they're both basically similar. One is

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for first years and one is for second years, but

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they're both centered around entrepreneurship. And the idea of the

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>courses is that there's lots of classes on analysis and

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>accounting and finance, and there aren't a lot of classes

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>around how to actually manage people, lead people. And I'm

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>talking the nitty gritty stuff of literally like what to

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>say if you have to fire someone. My students have

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to rule that. My students will say, oh, I would

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just fire that person. I said, okay, great, I'll be

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>them and fire me. And then they have to do it,

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and they it's allow harder than it looks. So they'll say,

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that's why people just cheat and send emails. Yeah, that

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>would not be uh, something we teach. We do not.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We do not teach people this. So tell us about

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the role playing. What is that? So so we so

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the student will actually play the protagonist in the case,

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll play the antagonist, for lack of a better word,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of the other characters. And then they'll fire me, or

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to demote me, or they'll have to tell

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>me that they no longer want to be my partner

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the situation is that they're trying to get through.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And then we'll play around with it and they'll realize,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, some things they do right, some things they

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do poorly. And then the entrepreneur about whom we've written

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the case is in the class, and so then they'll

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>chime in and say, well, wow, this is you did

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this this way, This is why I didn't do that,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>or I wish I would have done it that way

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>instead I did this. Um. So it's a really it's

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a really really fun class. It's uh and and it's

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>something that they don't get anywhere else where. They actually

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of implement the stuff they're talking about.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So aside from firing, what else do you teach them everything?

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>We we actually teach a lot on hiring. UM. We

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>have a whole uh modules and playbooks and video and

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>things I've made, and we do a class on that,

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which is really important. We talk about uh complex partnership issues,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>things with your board. They have to sell stuff, they

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>have the fund raise, UM, how to how to make

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>an offense and defense deck, to sell, to sell something,

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and in a whole list of basically things that entrepreneurs

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have to face in their life. Really intriguing.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to imagine having been a graduate student at Stanford,

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's deeply satisfying teaching there. It's a blast. UM. I

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>started off as a case guest where they wrote a

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>case about me buying stuff in my dorm room. And

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I was a case guest and I kept I would

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>come home all energized, and it was my favorite day

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And then when the orv. Grossbeck, who

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote the case about me, who's a legend at Stanford,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>when he called me one day and said, hey, you

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>know I'm gonna stop teaching this class. Would you want

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to teach it. And and my first response was, um, no,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a job, you know, and I can. But

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say that. I said, hey, I'll think about it.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And then thankfully everyone I was around was like, Graham,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to do this, and it's your favorite thing

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you do, and and we we've figured out a way

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to make it work. So it's it's a blast. That

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds like that sounds like it's a lot of fun.

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>One more thing I would just add is, um, what

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I realized that for a few years is I'll teach

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>students all about entrepreneurship and we have this great class,

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and then they go take a job, you know, and

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>consulting or you know, investor making. They never become entrepreneurs,

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>even though that was what they wrote their essay about

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was what they were excited about. So I

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>added to the class a whole part on Okay, wait

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a second, what is it you really want to do

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.239
<v Speaker 1>with your life? You know, what's holding you back? How

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>would you make a plan to go do that? What

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are your limiting beliefs, what are the things? What are

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>your fears? So we have a whole thread probably of

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the class is on those things. Because I'm like, what's

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the point of teaching people to be entrepreneurs if they

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>don't become entrepreneurs. So so I've I've invested a lot

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>into like personal growth and uh and that's a really

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>really fun part. Well us too. Are any of those

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>skill sets transferable to consultants who are they'll be working

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>with other entrepreneurs and maybe haven't been exposed percent. It

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't so much that I have anything against consulting. It

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was just that the student at the beginning of the

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>class said, my goal is to do X, and then

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>they don't do X. That was all. So tell us

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your approach. What's your process like

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to finding a potential acquisition target? And since we look

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>at both private and public markets, what do you think

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of valuation? How do you come up

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with a number? Yeah, great questions. We we have a

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>large team that that looks for potential companies. We have

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>actually fifty two people at Alpine and in the in

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio companies they are looking for deals. Um, so

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of people. How big is a firm overall?

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Overall if you include the CEOs and training and um,

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>we have in your ten consultants. We probably have roughly two,

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, So that's a that's a decent size. The

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty two also includes a number of people that are

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>working at the company's doing sourcing, but they're doing the

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. They're calling companies looking for investments. So we

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have fifty two people looking for deals and then a

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of those conversations are directly with founders. And what

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do is figure out. The way we

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it is we can pay a price that

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>we can hit our target returns, which I can't talk

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>about on you know, but we can hit our so

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we we we can pay a price that we can

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 1>hit our target returns with like a seventy base case,

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and then we need there to be a lot more

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>upside to that than downside. So we want there to

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be like a case where we could hit many multiples

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of our target returns, and so based on that we

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of back into a price. And then where we

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get in trouble or where things get turned down at

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>investment committee is when everything in the world has to

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>go perfectly to hit that target. Because I've I've been

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in this business for twenty eight years, and when you

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>start pricing in perfection, that's a time when you realize

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you're overpaying. So that that's that's it's that seventy probability

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and lots of marginals safety thing that you really, as

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>someone who's like a little bit more senior at our firm,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to bring that to the to the discussions. Yeah,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that that perfect ten stuck the landing. Those are the

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>outliers you certainly can't rely on exactly. You can't underwrite

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to that for sure. So when you look at this

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>macro environment, it seems to be pretty supportive of economic

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 1>expansion generally. How closely do you pay attention to things like, hey,

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is raising rates pretty rapidly, maybe they're going

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to cause a recession next year. We pay um attention

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to it to some extent. If you go back to

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the O eight crisis, Now that's a recession. Yeah, and

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>we're we're just in a very different position. Um. I

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're way underbuilt on housing. So you know, I

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>don't while the underbuilt on housing, so I don't see

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't see things happen, you know, crashing there.

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we have the consumer isn't as leverage as

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>they were back in two thousand eight, businesses aren't as

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>leverage as they were. I just think it's a lot healthier.

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, we also don't have the FED

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>can't print money like they did in O A because

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of inflation. But I think generally it just feels like

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we're a lot healthier than we were back then. You're

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you're singing my song. I'm in the exact same place. I'm.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of perplexed by all the recession chatter. I mean,

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what are we two seven to eight million new jobs

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>in this year? That's not what usually see, although, to

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>be fair some past recessions, we were creating jobs right

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 1>until the moment it stopped and and the bottom dropped out.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it really depends on how aggressive the

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>powers that you're going to get about inflation. So here's

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the question related to that, and oh eight oh nine,

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Let's say the naysayers are are right and the end

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of this year or we see something more than just

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a mile sheallow recession, we see a real recession. How

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>does that affect the companies you look at and do

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you start doing, for lack of a better phrase, distress

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>private equity invest Now you know, I think that what

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>we've been trying to do over the last fourteen years

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is under age companies that would do well in a recession. Um,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully we're gonna our companies will hold up well

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in that time in terms of what we look for.

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>It does open up the door when you know, when

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a recession, there's a lot more different things

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that are for sale at different prices. And I think

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the great assets is if you have the

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>whole team of managers that you can put into run

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>distress things, you have a lot of options open to

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what you can look at. So there, you know, there

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>will be a lot more interesting things to do with

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, if that happens, certainly don't wish that on

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the on the economy, on anybody else. And then finally

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask about the way you score software

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>companies and services companies use a metric. I really am

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with e NPS. Can you tell us a

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Yeah, So, I think in general that

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there are leading indicators and lagging indicators. Lagging indicator is revenue.

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Those are lagging indicators. But yet a lot of managers

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they try to manage to lagging indicators, it's like and that,

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not very effective. So what we've tried

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to do is develop what are the leading indicators that

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to predict success. And the number one most

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>important leading indicator you're not going to be surprising to

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hear me say, is talent. So if you tell me

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the board of your business and and we're

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to build the world class management team, I can

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you in two years we'll have a home run investment.

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So one of those leading two of those leading indicators

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>related to talent are employee net Promoter score, which is

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the NPS, meaning how employees rate them exactly, would would

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they would they recommend this company to a friend, um,

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And we we measure that every quarter for every one

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of our companies. We measure at Alpine, we measure it

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for a whole bunch of different groups within Alpine. And

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>then retention is the other big one. So if we

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>can be managing those and getting those right, those are

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>leading indicators that are gonna help us set up you know,

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the revenue E but dota come later, and those are

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hard things to manage. Getting those those metrics right takes

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work. That's Actually, where I spend most

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of my time at out and believe it or not,

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is making sure that we're creating an environment where the

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>best people want to be and stay. And most people,

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>again in the finance world, they don't think about kind

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 1>of squishy soft metrics like that, but they should be

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 1>well because they have a really outsize impact on the

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>performance of a company. Absolutely, that's my view is they

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have they have the biggest impact. And my last question

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>before I get to our favorite questions we ask all

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>our guests. It's a little bit of a curve ball.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You were a captain on a national championship rowing team,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you look like you wrote so I uh,

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I came to college not even knowing anything about rowing.

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know that the boats went backwards until

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I got in a boat. Well, it's not that exactly.

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know that, um so I started as

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a novice. I walk on the team and it seemed

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like everyone else on the team had rowed before. So

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I was horrible, absolutely horrible, got cut and then just

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>kept kind of and and so there's this funny story

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>where the coach says, Okay, these are the people who

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>go into boats. The rest of you are quote land warriors,

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and your land warrior means you go on the rowing machines.

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And so that that night when he kind of posted

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the boats and I wasn't in the boat, he said,

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, you know, so I did this calculus, and

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, okay, well, gosh, all the land warriors gonna

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>show up before class. You know, classes first classes at nine,

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna show up at eight. But so I

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta show up at seven. No, no, no, everyone's gonna

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>think that. So I'll show up at six. So I

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>show up the next morning, zero people, and one of

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the guys like, hey, idiot. Land warrior is another way

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to say you got cut, you know. But I still

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>stayed as a land warrior and kept getting better at

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>getting my Earth times better and better over time, and

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the greatest things I ever did.

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I I had, I had a great time. And and

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when were the national champions my senior year, I was

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so by then you're on the team. By yeah, by

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>my Syria, I was pulling one of the best times

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nation. And rowing machine on the concept to

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>rowing machine that you see in the gym to actually

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>have a standard test which is two thousand meters that

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which you submit, you know nationally, And by my senior year,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I had one of it maybe a few times, the

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>number one time in the country. And and I was

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>elected captain by my teammates of our team. And then

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that year we were supposed to have a rebuilding year

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>because we lost all these seniors, and we actually won

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. It was awesome. Wow, that's really amazing.

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump to our favorite questions that we ask all

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of our guests, starting with what kept you entertained during

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic lockdown? Tell us what you were streaming? Um.

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I went on this whole Buddhist thing during the pandemic,

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and I started reading a lot about Buddhism and streaming Buddhism,

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was amazing meditating or meditating and

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>just kind of learning about Buddhism and you know, why

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we all suffer and how to you know, how all

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>these thoughts we have in our head, our our own imagination.

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And I went on this whole kick during the pandemic,

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which was phenomenal, highly recommended. Uh and And basically the

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>concept is that your reality is going through a filter

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and and everything that's happened externally, you're telling yourself a

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>story about what that means and whether that's good or

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>whether that's bad, and that that's really your reality isn't

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, it's the story you're telling yourself, and that

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you have complete control over that story. That's the classic narrative.

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah, that's the narrative fallacy. And that's kind of

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental premise of of Buddhism, which is your suffering

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>is coming not from what's happening, but the story you're

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>telling yourself. So I went on this long you know,

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>meditating and and eating and kind of journaling about that,

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was a lot of fun. So

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>so that we had this whole joke about um. We

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>had a softball team here over in Central Park and

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we had the Buddhists playing the Stoics and the game

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>never finished. Everybody just sat down and started having a

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>long conversation. But I'm right there with you. You mentioned

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>your UM two of your mentors who were some of

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>your earliest investors. Are there anybody else you want to

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 1>mention as mentors? The professor at Stanford you referred to us. Yeah,

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll both of those, Tom, Tom Styer, Doug Martin, and

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Irv Grosspec were super important in my life. I'll talk

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:43.439
<v Speaker 1>about Irv. He is probably probably if you had there's

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>probably literally very a hundred people you could have on

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this con on this podcast that would list Irv as

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>one of their most important real he was. He's a

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 1>professor at Stanford and just uh, you know, makes time

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for folks. He built an incredible business and he just

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>has this you know, unwavering moral code. Um. He was

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>an early investor. He's the one who asked me to

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>teach at Stanford, and I just I just find the

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>way he's set up his life and his uh, just

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just the way he treats other people. Um, you're always

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the most important person in the world when you're with him.

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I've I've I've definitely learned learned a lot

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>from him. Really interesting. Let's talk about books. What are

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorites and what are you reading currently? Um,

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I it's funny I end up rereading like the same

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ten books. Uh. In terms of my favorites I read,

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I have some I read currently too, but good too,

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>great Warren Buffett's biography, Snowball, Steve Jobs Biography by Isaacs

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and Walt Disney's Biography by Neil Gabbler. UH Switch by

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Danna chip Heath, Made to Stick Dana chip Heath buffets

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>annual letters like those are like I'm I reread those

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and and every time I reread them, I get kind

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of re energized. And We've modeled a lot of our

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>business and a lot of my life around some of

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the things I learned in some of those books, and

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those are required reading an Alpine I

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>can imagine what are you reading currently? And and right

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>now I started getting on this burnet brown kick. I

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you've read some of her stuff, but

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the The Gifts of Imperfection I'm reading right now, which

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is just phenomenal. She is I actually download on an

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>audible so I get to hear her talk about it.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But she has um just this incredible way of talking

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about UH about things that other people don't talk about,

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like shame and how to um how to deal with

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the things you're not good at, and how to be

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>intellectually honest and and admit when you don't know things.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And she's I love I love her work. What's the

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>title of the book. You're reading The Gift of Imperfection.

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>It sounds really it's phenomenal. It's phenomenal. Um before I

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>forget just as an aside, and you could edit this out.

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>So I went to law school with a guy named

0:46:55.920 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Cunningham who was the first person who recognized, Hey,

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all these letters from Warren Buffett. They're really fascinating deep stuff.

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 1>He bound them. Yeah, I bought that book. I owned

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>that book. That book has been like a perennial bestseller.

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's a you know, the old joke about the

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>two economists walking down the street. One says, is that

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollar bill on the floor, and the other says, no,

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if it was a hundred dollar bills, someone would have

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>picked it up. It's the same. Yeah, these have been

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>around for literally, I mean I think he first started

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>in like ninety or nine two, something like that. And

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Buffett had been around for thirty years. By an a radio,

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years nobody had thought of doing. And you

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>know what, like it doesn't matter if it's crypto or

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>software valuations or the internet. The stuff but Buffett writes

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>about is still the right stuff. Fundamental sense to discount

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the cash flows back and decide what you can pay.

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna put a premium on the discount rate if

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the stuff is a lot more uncertain. It's this is

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>exactly the right formula today, and it was fifty years ago,

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and it will be fifty years from now. And any

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>time that there's something new where people says this time

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's different, you should be really skeptical. Alright, our final

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>two questions, what sort of advice would you give to

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a recent college or business school graduate interested in a

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>career in private equity. Well, I'll start with the first

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.320
<v Speaker 1>part just general advice, um, and then I'll go to the

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the private equity. But you know, as you can imagine,

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>actually give this advice all the time teaching. But the

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that I think a lot of people

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>graduating don't ask is like what they what do I want?

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>What is five years from now, ten years from now?

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>If I could, if I knew I wasn't going to fail,

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what would I want to do with my life? And

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they and start with that question and then start working

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:53.479
<v Speaker 1>backwards from that about what job you should take now

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and next year in five years from now. Instead, a

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people just think, oh, these firms are interviewing

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on campus and I'll go here, I'll go here, and

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. But if you know where you want to

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>be ten years from now, it'll inform which firm you

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>go to work and what skills you're trying to acquire.

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think that would be My advice

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is like, in ten years you will you can do

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 1>almost anything you set your mind to, and so give

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself permission to really answer that question, what do I

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do in ten years? Why does it matter

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:28.839
<v Speaker 1>if you quote know you're you wouldn't fail, Yeah, just

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to open the set of possibilities, or because yeah, I

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:35.879
<v Speaker 1>always frame it as if you knew you wouldn't fail,

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what would you do? Because without that people already jump

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to I can't do this, like subconsciously in the big

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fear failure so powerful even amongst really high performing talent.

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I mean, Stanford graduate students, I have

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to think that's the cross. In some ways, it's almost

0:49:56.320 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>more prevalent because they have had so much success and

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't you know, they have this incredible track record.

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>But I would say the number one thing that Stanford

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Business School students are are really just about anyone in

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's the same thing, which is they they

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they there, Their subconscious mind defaults to fear and fear

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of failure. That's fascinating because when I have discussions like

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this with colleagues or friends in Europe, the thing or

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:29.399
<v Speaker 1>even Asia, The thing that makes the United States so

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>unique in the developed economy world is that failure isn't

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a scarlet letter. Especially in Silicon Valley. It's almost a

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 1>badge of honor. Look at all the vcs that list all, Hey,

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we missed Apple and Cisco, we invested money in pets

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Look how terrible we are except for our

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 1>compounded returns. It's a badge of honor to say we

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 1>tried this, face planted, brushed yourself off, and moved on.

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But when you're starting out your career and you don't

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have anything to fall back on, and you haven't yet

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>had the success that you can look back, it's really

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>scary for people. And the thing that they miss is

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they underestimate what they could really do in in ten years,

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and they underestimate themselves. They forgot what got them that

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>seat at Stanford Business School, and they compare themselves to

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, their roommate or their classmate or something. So

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the other half of the question, um, advice about private equity. Yeah,

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say I would say if if someone is

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>interested in a career in private equity, I would I

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.720
<v Speaker 1>would say, all private equities not created equal, and there

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are literally, like probably a thousand different models and figure out,

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, go talk to a bunch of companies that

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are doing private equity a whole bunch of different ways,

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what resonates with you and your interests

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 1>and your superpowers and where are you going to line

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>up because it's it's a very diverse industry and you know, um,

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there are some firms that are making their money based

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.439
<v Speaker 1>on you know, hardcore fundamental analysis. You know, are we're

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.280
<v Speaker 1>making our money on talent. There's others that are, um,

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing us cutting. There's a whole bunch of

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>different ways, and one or more of those is going

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to line up a lot better with what you're excited about.

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And our final question, what do you know about the

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 1>world of software services in private equity today that you

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>wish you knew twenty eight years or so ago when

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you were first getting started. Well, two things. The first

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>thing is I wish I knew that it was going

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>to work out fine, you know, so I was so

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:28.960
<v Speaker 1>stressed and put so much pressure on myself that I

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>wish if I could go back and tell myself anything,

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be like, hey, Graham, you know it's gonna

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>be okay because I went through a lot. That's a

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really interest. That's a really interesting answer, because you know,

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we just don't realize how much we freak ourselves out

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and and very often unnecessarily. What's the second thing? The

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 1>second thing would be, I would be I would if

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I could have realized earlier on just how important the

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>world of talent is and how that was really the

0:52:57.880 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that drove drove formans, because that that would have

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>saved me a a decade. Sounds really like, um, You've

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>honed in on exactly what makes your business work and

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really quite fascinating. Graham, Thank you for being so generous

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:15.919
<v Speaker 1>with your time. We have been speaking with Graham Weaver,

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>founder and partner at Alpine Investors. If you enjoyed this conversation,

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.240
<v Speaker 1>well be sure and check out any of our previous

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:26.919
<v Speaker 1>four hundred discussions that we've had over the past eight

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half years. You can find those at iTunes. Spotify,

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>wherever you feed your podcast fix. We love your comments, feedback,

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>end suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot net. Sign up for my daily reading list

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:45.839
<v Speaker 1>at rid Halts dot com. You can follow me on

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at rid Halts. I would be remiss if I

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>did not thank the crack team that helps put these

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>conversations together each week. Robert Bragg is my audio engineer.

0:53:56.760 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Atika Valbrun is my project manager. Sean So runs all

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of our research. Paris Wald is my producer. I'm Barry Ritolts.

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg radioa