Speaker 1: Welcome.
Speaker 2: It is Verdict with Senator Ted Kruz Ben Ferguson. With
Speaker 2: you and Senator we've got more bank records. But you
Speaker 2: and I knew about this weeks ago when we had
Speaker 2: James Comer on the show for that two part series.
Speaker 2: We now know where the money is coming from. The
Speaker 2: House Oversight Committee released payments coming in from Russia, from
Speaker 2: Kazakhstan and Ukraine, and the most important point is this
Speaker 2: they came in during Joe Biden's vice presidency.
Speaker 1: The committee has.
Speaker 2: Now identified over twenty million payments from foreign sources directly
Speaker 2: to the Biden family and their business associates. You and
Speaker 2: I are not shocked by the money coming in. I
Speaker 2: am shocked by how much of it was coming in
Speaker 2: while he was the acting vice President the United States
Speaker 2: of America.
Speaker 3: Well, look, that's exactly right. This is breaking news all
Speaker 3: over the place, and we do have to point out
Speaker 3: at the outset for regular Verdict listeners it's not particularly
Speaker 3: breaking news here. Three weeks ago we had James Comer
Speaker 3: for a two part exclusive interview on Verdict where he
Speaker 3: previewed this, and so we have known this was coming.
Speaker 3: What the Oversight Committee released this week are a series
Speaker 3: of memorandums summarizing the bank record. So this is not
Speaker 3: just allegations. This is evidence that is backed up by
Speaker 3: bank records showing the wires hitting the accounts. And what
Speaker 3: did they release. They released Number one that more than
Speaker 3: twenty million dollars in payments from foreign sources went to
Speaker 3: the Biden family and their business associates while Joe Biden
Speaker 3: was vice president. That's something very few people have picked
Speaker 3: up on. Joe Biden was vice president for eight years.
Speaker 3: Those were a very profitable eight years. And that more
Speaker 3: than twenty million dollars comes from three places, Russia, Kazakhstan,
Speaker 3: and Ukraine. And we'll break that out in further detail
Speaker 3: in a moment. On top of that, the House Oversight
Speaker 3: Committee detailed that an additional eight million dollars came from China,
Speaker 3: from Communist China, not while Biden was president, but shortly thereafter,
Speaker 3: just a few months after he was vice president, millions
Speaker 3: more came in from Communist China. This was a business,
Speaker 3: and it was not a business selling access. I want
Speaker 3: to say to everyone in the conservative ecosphere, effort to
Speaker 3: everyone talking about this scandal. To everyone, whether you're on media,
Speaker 3: whether you're an elected official, whether you're an influencer, stop
Speaker 3: using the Democrat phrase selling access. Because when they say
Speaker 3: selling access, that's something CNN says, why because you've got
Speaker 3: all of Washington, that is a town built on selling access.
Speaker 3: You get every lobbyist in Washington who makes a living
Speaker 3: selling access. And so when they say Hunter was selling access,
Speaker 3: you need to understand that term is meant to be
Speaker 3: a defense of Hunter and Joe Biden. O. Hunter's just
Speaker 3: being a lobbyist. It may be a little creepy, but
Speaker 3: it's what happens in Washington. No, when you're looking at
Speaker 3: twenty eight million dollars paid while Biden was president and
Speaker 3: shortly thereafter from Russia, from Kazakhstan, from Ukraine, and from
Speaker 3: communist China, what you are looking at and what the
Speaker 3: sum total of these allegations is that Hunter was selling
Speaker 3: official favors from Joe Biden. And to be clear, you know,
Speaker 3: we've had lots of questions about, well, gosh, was Joe
Speaker 3: involved in Hunter's business dealings. These aren't Hunter's business dealings.
Speaker 1: These are Joe's business stealings.
Speaker 3: Joe's the one making the official favors, Joe's the one
Speaker 3: getting on more than twenty phone calls with these foreign
Speaker 3: business partners. Joe's the one showing up at dinners at
Speaker 3: Cafe Milano. Joe is the one flying to Ukraine over
Speaker 3: and over and over again. Joe is the one holding
Speaker 3: over a billion dollars in federal loan guarantees hostage until
Speaker 3: the Ukrainian government fires Victor Choken, the prosecutor that is
Speaker 3: investigating Barisma and the oligarch that owned them. It is
Speaker 3: Joe's business.
Speaker 1: Listen.
Speaker 3: Hunter is a guy who's strung out on drugs, who's
Speaker 3: been a screw up his whole life. Ain't nobody paying
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden twenty eight million dollars for anything? This is
Speaker 3: Joe Biden. And Hunter is just the salesman Hunters, the
Speaker 3: frontman Hunters, the guy that goes out and says, Hey,
Speaker 3: you want to favor from Daddy. I got Daddy right here,
Speaker 3: I got Daddy on the phone. You know what I need?
Speaker 3: I need a pushup? You know what I need? I
Speaker 3: need a really expensive watch. This was Joe Biden, and
Speaker 3: the corporate media does not want to even acknowledge that possibility.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think this is as you mentioned a
Speaker 2: moment ago, this is something that we really need to
Speaker 2: start focusing on that. There's no business that Hunter Biden
Speaker 2: actually had. He was working for his dad. He was
Speaker 2: working for daddy, and he was selling Daddy's influence and
Speaker 2: selling out the United States of America. That's why all
Speaker 2: this money was coming in while he was the vice president.
Speaker 2: Now there's also another part of this. How did this
Speaker 2: go unnoticed? And there's a lot that now I think
Speaker 2: more questions about this timeline. Do you think the Obama
Speaker 2: White House didn't know that this was happening under their
Speaker 2: watch during the eight years that the vice president was
Speaker 2: clearly selling out America to the highest bidder? I mean,
Speaker 2: do you believe that the FBI and those that were
Speaker 2: around the present that were taking him to these meetings
Speaker 2: at Cafe Milano he was able to sit down with
Speaker 2: Russian oligarchs in essence, adversaries to us, and have these
Speaker 2: dinners and meet with these people from Ukraine and Kazakhstan
Speaker 2: that had ties to Chinese communists and these payments coming through.
Speaker 2: Do you think that the government didn't catch any of that?
Speaker 3: Of course they knew about it, and we know they
Speaker 3: knew about it. We know, for example, and we've covered
Speaker 3: on Verdict before, how a senior official in the Biden
Speaker 3: National Security Council, or rather the Obama National Security Council,
Speaker 3: raised the obvious conflict of interest, raised it in the
Speaker 3: Obama White House, and he was dismissed. His concerns were dismissed.
Speaker 3: We know that people were concerned about Devin Archer being
Speaker 3: on the bard of Barisma. We know that people were
Speaker 3: concerned about Hunter Biden being on the bard of Barisma,
Speaker 3: both of them getting paid a million dollars a year.
Speaker 3: And to be clear, look, your point about Hunter Biden
Speaker 3: doesn't add anything. Let's take Bearisma. He doesn't speak Ukrateian,
Speaker 3: he doesn't know anything about oil, he doesn't know anything
Speaker 3: about natural gas. He has no expertise whatsoever that would
Speaker 3: qualify him to be on the board of a natural
Speaker 3: gas company. What he does have is a father who's
Speaker 3: the sitting vice president, who is able to hold a
Speaker 3: billion dollars in federal loan guarantees hostage until the prosecutor
Speaker 3: investigating Barisma's fired. And boy, you know what for a
Speaker 3: million bucks a year, or even for five million to
Speaker 3: Hunter and five million to Joe, which is what the
Speaker 3: FD ten twenty three alleges the oligarch had to pay.
Speaker 3: That's a great deal to get the prosecutor fired. Who
Speaker 3: could destroy the entire company, who could seize the assets,
Speaker 3: who could take the company down, who could lock up
Speaker 3: the Ukraine? Ten eleven, twelve million dollars. That's quite the bargain.
Speaker 3: But let's be clear, it's not Hunter selling anything. It's
Speaker 3: Joe selling favors, and Hunter is just the salesman.
Speaker 2: Let's go over some of this timeline, and this is
Speaker 2: I think an important part about all of this is
Speaker 2: the fact that we are now kind of seeing when
Speaker 2: the payments came in and who they were coming in from.
Speaker 2: You look at the overview of the financial records related
Speaker 2: to Robinson Walker LLC. This was established as a limited
Speaker 2: liability company in Delaware eight We fast forward to twenty
Speaker 2: fifteen through seventeen, Biden family members and their companies received
Speaker 2: at least one point three million in payments from rob
Speaker 2: Walker related accounts. The Biden family members who received money
Speaker 2: from this account included Halle Biden. She received two separate
Speaker 2: payments we now know about in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: We had James Biden Senior. They also got a payment.
Speaker 2: We have Robert Hunter Biden that's again Hunter Biden and
Speaker 2: bank account identified an unknown Biden. The committee is continuing
Speaker 2: to investigate the identity.
Speaker 1: Of that account holder.
Speaker 2: But these records prove that the Biden family used at
Speaker 2: least three family members and they were taking money, and
Speaker 2: these lucrative payments were coming in from.
Speaker 1: People all over the world.
Speaker 2: Robinson Walker have LC also center paid Biden family members
Speaker 2: over a million dollars after receiving the State Energy HK
Speaker 2: Limited wire that is a company owned by the Chinese
Speaker 2: Communist government. That money came in we now know in
Speaker 2: March the first, twenty seventeen. That was less than two
Speaker 2: months after Joe Biden left Public Life and the state
Speaker 2: Energy company HK Limited. This Chinese communist company wired three
Speaker 2: million to Robinson Walker LLC. At the time of the wire,
Speaker 2: rob Walker's business account had a balance of one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty nine thousand, and guess what happened the next day,
Speaker 2: The Walker wired one million, sixty five thousand to European
Speaker 2: Energy and Infrastructure Group in Abu Dhabi, a company associated
Speaker 2: with James Galar, another one of the Biden crime family members.
Speaker 2: Galar was a business partner of Hunter Biden and involved
Speaker 2: in foreign transactions with the Biden family. Will you see
Speaker 2: these transactions. This was not the first time they'd done this.
Speaker 2: This was a well orchestrated, finely tuned money laundering operation
Speaker 2: going all over the world from anyone that was willing
Speaker 2: to write them a check.
Speaker 3: Well, and what we've seen is that Joe Biden, in
Speaker 3: the Biden Whitehouse's defenses, each one of them has collapsed
Speaker 3: and has been demonstrated to be an utter and complete
Speaker 3: lie for years. During the twenty twenty campaign and afterwards,
Speaker 3: Joe Biden and the Biden white House said Joe Biden
Speaker 3: had never talked with Hunter, never talked with his business associates,
Speaker 3: has never had any conversations about any of Hunter's business.
Speaker 3: That's now obviously a lie. Devin Archer's testimony demonstrates it's
Speaker 3: a lie, and even the Biden white House has been
Speaker 3: forced to retreat from that. So they shifted their narrative
Speaker 3: not to he never talked to the business associates or
Speaker 3: never talked about business, but instead and we we're the
Speaker 3: ones who really broke this connection. On verdict, Karine Jean
Speaker 3: Pierre shifted to saying Joe Biden has never been in
Speaker 3: business with Hunter and in fact, she gave the enormous tell,
Speaker 3: the enormous reveal where she said, I'm going to give
Speaker 3: you the same answer I've said every time, It's always
Speaker 3: going to be the same, and then she tells a
Speaker 3: totally different answer which he has never been in business
Speaker 3: with Hunter.
Speaker 1: But not only that.
Speaker 3: So their next line of defenses when Archer testifies that
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden got on the phone at least twenty
Speaker 3: times and went to multiple meetings at Cafe Milano, the
Speaker 3: next line of defense from Democrats and their media cheerleaders are, well,
Speaker 3: the conversation was just about niceties. It was just about
Speaker 3: the weather. You know what the weather was they were
Speaker 3: talking about. It was raining bs. That's the only weather.
Speaker 3: You don't put Daddy the Vice president on to say, Oh,
Speaker 3: pretty sunny outside, yep, okay, good talking to you, by Yeah,
Speaker 3: this was Let me ask you this, Let me ask
Speaker 3: you this. Is there a weather service you know of
Speaker 3: that you pay twenty eight million dollars to No? I
Speaker 3: mean you have an app on your iPhone that can
Speaker 3: tell you tell you the weather, doesn't cost you twenty
Speaker 3: eight million dollars. That's the next line they're saying is
Speaker 3: it's just the weather. The next line they're saying, and
Speaker 3: this was Dan Goldman's lie, is well Hunter was selling
Speaker 3: the appearance of access. No, no, it's not the appearance
Speaker 3: of access. Number one, it was objectively real access. If
Speaker 3: you're on the phone twenty times with the vice president,
Speaker 3: if you're meeting in person with the vice president, it's
Speaker 3: not the appearance of access, that is access. But to
Speaker 3: be clear, the allegations here are not even that he
Speaker 3: was selling access, it's that he was selling official favors.
Speaker 3: And then there's another spin that the media and the
Speaker 3: Democrats are trying to pitch. As these bank records come out,
Speaker 3: they say, well, yes, but it's not proven that any
Speaker 3: of these payments went directly to Joe Biden. Just to
Speaker 3: every member of the Biden family could find, but it's
Speaker 3: not proven that it went into Joe's personal bank account.
Speaker 3: Now number one for bribery, the payment doesn't have to
Speaker 3: go to you directly. Look, Joe Biden is eighty years
Speaker 3: old at this point in his life. Most eighty year
Speaker 3: olds are well into the process of transferring assets to
Speaker 3: their kids and their grandkids, and under the tax laws,
Speaker 3: particularly for someone as rich as Joe Biden, they're trying
Speaker 3: to get money to their family. So if Joe Biden's
Speaker 3: business was selling official favors as vice president and using
Speaker 3: Hunter to do it, it is still pribery. If the
Speaker 3: twenty million dollars go to his kids and grandkids and
Speaker 3: his family members, and Joe doesn't take it himself, it's
Speaker 3: still bribery, and it is not materially different than if
Speaker 3: Joe deposited the whole twenty million dollars in his bank
Speaker 3: account and then sent it to his kids and grandkids.
Speaker 3: You're not allowed to sell official favors for millions of
Speaker 3: dollars to your kids. You're not allowed to sell official
Speaker 3: favors for millions of dollars to your brother, to your grandkids,
Speaker 3: to all your relatives. And so that defense from the
Speaker 3: Democrats in the media may be the dumbest of all
Speaker 3: because they're saying, no, no, it's not a felony.
Speaker 1: It's just a felony. Yeah, great point. Want to tell
Speaker 1: you about our friends over a chalk.
Speaker 2: If you were a guy and you feel like you've
Speaker 2: lost your edge a little bit, maybe you feel like
Speaker 2: weakness and weakness and complacency are setting in.
Speaker 1: You're not alone.
Speaker 2: The problem in men's tet sastrom levels right now, they're
Speaker 2: off the cliff historically.
Speaker 1: At an all time low.
Speaker 2: Thankfully, there is an option to get your strength and
Speaker 2: vitality back and get rid of that weakness and complacency.
Speaker 2: Chalk They are helping real America men just like you,
Speaker 2: take back your masculinity by boosting your testosterm levels up
Speaker 2: to twenty percent over ninety days.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: I've been taking Chalk now for months, and I can
Speaker 2: tell you it works. Choq dot com. You can go
Speaker 2: there right now and see exactly what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: Manufactured right here in the US of A.
Speaker 2: Chalk's natural herbal supplements are clinically proven to have game
Speaker 2: changing effects on your energy, your focus, your mood. So
Speaker 2: maximize your masculinity today at Chalk choq dot com.
Speaker 1: Use the promo code Ben.
Speaker 2: You're gonna get thirty five percent off your order Chalk
Speaker 2: choq dot com. Boost your testosterrum levels up to twenty
Speaker 2: percent over ninety days choq dot com.
Speaker 1: Senator.
Speaker 2: There's also another problem the White House has, and this
Speaker 2: is the fact that Joe Biden got really snappy with
Speaker 2: Peter Doucy over the question about, Hey, you know you
Speaker 2: were selling an access influence pedaling.
Speaker 1: He didn't like it.
Speaker 2: He got angry about that, and then he said, I
Speaker 2: did not talk to my son about his business dealings.
Speaker 2: You know this is you asked me a stupid question,
Speaker 2: right these ways said back to Doucy in essence, and
Speaker 2: that contradicted.
Speaker 1: The White House Press Secretary.
Speaker 2: So the White House Press Secretary is saying something very
Speaker 2: different now. And then over at Fox, Joe Conscia just
Speaker 2: said this about the reason why Biden got angry.
Speaker 4: And here you have the sitting president of the United
Speaker 4: States answering like a jilted teenager who just got caught.
Speaker 1: Cheating on a test.
Speaker 4: I mean, every reporter that covers Joe Biden should be
Speaker 4: following up in questions like these every time he provides
Speaker 4: the opportunity to do so, which is rare. I mean,
Speaker 4: this is the president who has not had a solo
Speaker 4: press conference on US soil since November. He simply cannot
Speaker 4: answer anything outside of a teleprompter, and especially as it
Speaker 4: pertains to the Biden broadbery scandal, which are not going
Speaker 4: away as long as the GOP controls the House.
Speaker 2: He's right, by the way, but he simply cannot answer
Speaker 2: the question. Is the other problem with this White House,
Speaker 2: and now they're contradicting each other. Joe Biden sang I
Speaker 2: never talked business. The White House is saying, well, he
Speaker 2: was never in business with Hunter Biden. Okay, So my
Speaker 2: question is then, which one is at White House? Because
Speaker 2: now you're literally contradicting the president.
Speaker 1: The White House Press.
Speaker 3: Secretary is well, it's neither. And you've got to understand
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden is angry. He's angry that anyone would
Speaker 3: dare ask him about this. He's angry that he got caught.
Speaker 3: He's outraged that anyone questions him. That there is a
Speaker 3: sense of entitlement. Listen for a vice president of the
Speaker 3: United States or a president of the United States to
Speaker 3: endeavor on a business where you're selling official favors for
Speaker 3: tens of millions of dollars, and it's worth noting if
Speaker 3: this were just influence pedling. Let me ask you something.
Speaker 3: Why didn't Hunter get paid by France? Why didn't he
Speaker 3: get paid by England? Why didn't he get paid by Canada?
Speaker 3: Why didn't he get paid by there that there are
Speaker 3: a lot of countries that are our friends, that are
Speaker 3: our allies. The Italians, look, you could you could get
Speaker 3: paid by the Italians. You could go have good Italian meals,
Speaker 3: some good wine, You could have a Ferrari. He likes
Speaker 3: fancy sports cars. No, it was none of our friends.
Speaker 3: They realized where the money is is selling favors from
Speaker 3: Daddy to our enemies, selling favors from Daddy to the
Speaker 3: Chinese communists, selling favors from Daddy to Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs.
Speaker 1: It was bad guys.
Speaker 3: If you're the vice president of the United States and
Speaker 3: you can coct a scheme to make tens of millions
Speaker 3: of dollars by having you or Druggie Son sell favors
Speaker 3: from you, that reflects an incredible level of cynicism and entitlement.
Speaker 3: And what you see now when people ask Joe, he
Speaker 3: gets angry. How dare you ask me that? But what
Speaker 3: is also amazing is there's not a single elected Democrat
Speaker 3: who seems to care. They don't care if the president
Speaker 3: of the United States has taken millions of dollars of
Speaker 3: bribes from foreign nationals who are enemies, doesn't matter to them.
Speaker 3: For most of the corporate media, they do not care,
Speaker 3: no matter what the facts are. They don't care bribery
Speaker 3: for them is okay. And you may think, well, gosh,
Speaker 3: don't care is too strong. If they cared, they do
Speaker 3: something about it. If they cared, they'd say.
Speaker 1: Something about it.
Speaker 3: Name a single Democrat senator who said anything. For example,
Speaker 3: Take a look to Jake Tapper interviewing Elizabeth Warren, ask you, this.
Speaker 5: Is not the kind of child you want to talk about,
Speaker 5: but the adult child, the adult son of President Biden
Speaker 5: Hunter Biden. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee say that
Speaker 5: they have identified more than twenty million dollars in payments
Speaker 5: from foreign sources to the Biden family, including Hunter Biden
Speaker 5: and their business associates. So far, we haven't seen any
Speaker 5: direct evidence pointing to Joe Biden president by doing anything illegal.
Speaker 5: And I don't necessarily know what's everything that's in this,
Speaker 5: but I do wonder on a broader level the thirty
Speaker 5: thousand foot view of this. People close to Donald I
Speaker 5: mean people close to Joe Biden or people close to
Speaker 5: Donald Trump. But I'm talking about Joe Biden making tens
Speaker 5: of millions of dollars because of their closeness to him.
Speaker 5: That can't be something that you like. That can't be
Speaker 5: something that you're comfortable with. As a pnomenon.
Speaker 6: Look, I always worry about the influence peddlers in Washington,
Speaker 6: regardless of party affiliation. One of the things, as you know,
Speaker 6: I've spent a lot of my time in Congress working on,
Speaker 6: is how we bring just more ethics and more oversight
Speaker 6: in general to everything that we do in government.
Speaker 2: That's not answering the question, right like saying more oversight.
Speaker 2: That's her response to that. Give me a break.
Speaker 3: So let's break that down on multiple fronts. Number One,
Speaker 3: you finally have CNN mentioning it. That's actually seismic that
Speaker 3: they even acknowledge that this scandal exists.
Speaker 2: Can you and I just laugh at a moment about
Speaker 2: how look at how Jake Tapper like he's stumbling all
Speaker 2: over himself. I was dying laughing. It's like he can't
Speaker 2: even believe he's mentioning right.
Speaker 3: Well, and then what does he say?
Speaker 1: Says?
Speaker 3: Well, Number one, this isn't a child that anyone wants
Speaker 3: to talk about. Hunter Biden is not a child. He's
Speaker 3: not a team nature, he is not a kid in trouble.
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden is a grown ass man who is a
Speaker 3: repeat felon who breaks the law. And you listen to
Speaker 3: how Jake says it, Well, there's no evidence that Joe
Speaker 3: Biden did anything wrong, no direct evidence. Really, what do
Speaker 3: you think Devin Archer's testimony was. That's called direct evidence.
Speaker 3: What do you think the confidential human source who says
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden solicited and received a five million dollar
Speaker 3: bribe from the Ukrainian oligarch. That's called direct evidence. Testimony
Speaker 3: of a witness is in fact direct evidence. That's not circumstantial. Now,
Speaker 3: the evidence may be false, the testimony may be false,
Speaker 3: but that is direct evidence. You look at what the
Speaker 3: House Oversight Committee put out. They put out the actual
Speaker 3: records of the wires of more than twenty million dollars.
Speaker 3: Noticed something else Jake Tapper omitted when he said more
Speaker 3: than twenty million dollars. You know what phrase he didn't
Speaker 3: say while he was vice president? He emits that doesn't
Speaker 3: mention the timeframe at all. This is while he was
Speaker 3: vice president from foreign shady sources. He omits that too.
Speaker 3: And you know, Tapper says, well, there's no evidence of
Speaker 3: wrongdoing from no direct evidence of wrongdoing from Joe Biden. Well,
Speaker 3: what did the Biden brother kid grandkid dog? I'm going
Speaker 3: to start with a crazy proposition. People don't give you
Speaker 3: twenty eight million dollars for the heck of it. They
Speaker 3: don't say, gosh, you know, Ben, I think you're a
Speaker 3: charming guy. Here's twenty eight mil just just because I
Speaker 3: like your teeth. Like, that's not that's not planet Earth.
Speaker 3: So there are two potential hypotheses. Number one, the core
Speaker 3: hypothesis that you and I both believe is true, which
Speaker 3: is that Joe Biden was selling favors, government favors, and
Speaker 3: that's what they were paid twenty eight million dollars to
Speaker 3: the family for. Or number two, Hunter performs some service
Speaker 3: which nobody knows and nobody understands, and James and the
Speaker 3: kids and everybody else, and the obvious question is, okay,
Speaker 3: what what did they do that was worth twenty eight
Speaker 3: million dollars? Because if you can't point to anything, then
Speaker 3: you go back to hypothesis number one, that the only
Speaker 3: thing possibly worth twenty eight million dollars were the official favors.
Speaker 3: And notice how Elizabeth Warren answers it. She doesn't say, gosh,
Speaker 3: if Joe Biden took bribes from a foreign national, that's bribery,
Speaker 3: that's a felony. He should be removed from office. He
Speaker 3: should be prosecuted, he should go to jail, all of
Speaker 3: which is unquestionably true. If a government official takes bribes,
Speaker 3: multimillion dollar bribes from a foreign national, they should go
Speaker 3: to jail. That did not use to be a debatable proposition.
Speaker 3: But what does she say? She self righteously says, well,
Speaker 3: I've always been concerned within luence peddlers. No, no, Hunter
Speaker 3: is not selling influence, He's selling favors. And I always
Speaker 3: think we need more oversight. No, no, She doesn't point
Speaker 3: to me one time in the last two and a
Speaker 3: half years in which Elizabeth Warren has asked a single
Speaker 3: witness a single question about the mounting evidence that the
Speaker 3: president of the United States took bribes. She doesn't want oversight.
Speaker 3: She wants to attack Donald Trump. She wants no oversight
Speaker 3: of Joe Biden, she wants no oversight of the corruption
Speaker 3: and criminality. And that exchange is a perfect example of
Speaker 3: how Democrats don't care and Jake Tapper doesn't care. Contrasts
Speaker 3: that to his rabid questioning about Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia,
Speaker 3: where he'd get Adam schiff On there and they'd foam
Speaker 3: at the mouth about Oh, we've got so much proof.
Speaker 3: And by the way, all of his proof was nonsense.
Speaker 3: It was ridiculous things like the Steele dossier that were
Speaker 3: completely made up. But they devoted every waking moment to this. Here,
Speaker 3: Jake Tapper is sheepishly. Well, I guess it doesn't look
Speaker 3: great eat to be getting tens of millions from shady oligarchs.
Speaker 1: But he's a kid.
Speaker 2: Remember, he's a kid, so therefore it makes sense. Right,
Speaker 2: It's not a real crime if it's a kid. That's
Speaker 2: why I use that.
Speaker 3: He does say, no one wants to ask this question, right, yeah, yep, yep.
Speaker 3: And he says, none of us want to ask this question. Well, no,
Speaker 3: if you were a journalist, you would serious evidence that
Speaker 3: the president of the United States is taking multimillion dollar bribes.
Speaker 3: A real journalist actually wants to ask that question, and
Speaker 3: actually has a follow up, and another follow up and
Speaker 3: another follow up. You know what would have happened if
Speaker 3: Jake Tapper, said Senator Warren, if Joe Biden in fact
Speaker 3: solicited and received millions of dollars of bribes from a
Speaker 3: Ukrainian oligarch in exchange for official favors when he was
Speaker 3: Vice president of the United States.
Speaker 1: Should he be impeached? Yes or no?
Speaker 3: That's actually what a journalist would ask.
Speaker 1: Yeah, should he be removed from office? Yes or no?
Speaker 3: If it's proven that he took bribes, would you vote
Speaker 3: to convict? If it's proven that he solicited and receive
Speaker 3: bribes from aforeign national, Yes or no? Would you vote
Speaker 3: to convict? The Constitution says the president can be impeached
Speaker 3: for trees and bribery, other high crimes or misdemeanors. If
Speaker 3: it's proven that he took a bribe, took a big
Speaker 3: bribe for official action, would you vote to remove him?
Speaker 1: Yes or no?
Speaker 3: Should he be prosecuted? Should he go to jail? Those
Speaker 3: are actually the questions a journalist would ask. The gosh,
Speaker 3: no one wants to talk about this, and it kind
Speaker 3: of feels icky, doesn't it. That's not a journalist, that's
Speaker 3: an apologist and propagandist for the regime.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a great, great point.
Speaker 2: I want to ask you one other thing about these
Speaker 2: the possibility now we're being told that Biden family members
Speaker 2: are going to be subpoenaed by the House. We'll have
Speaker 2: more on that in a second, but first let me
Speaker 2: tell you about Patriot Mobile. If you are sick and
Speaker 2: tired of giving your money to woke companies that actually
Speaker 2: fight against your values, well then you need to make
Speaker 2: the switch the only Christian conservative cell phone provider in
Speaker 2: the country, a company that gives you amazing coverage, nationwide
Speaker 2: coverage on all three major networks, so you get the
Speaker 2: best possible service in your area, period, without the woke
Speaker 2: propaganda being pushed by leftists.
Speaker 1: Working hard to destroy this country.
Speaker 2: You may not realize that the cell phone provider you
Speaker 2: have right now is actually could be giving massive donations
Speaker 2: to Plan parent It.
Speaker 1: Yes, that happens.
Speaker 2: Big Mobile gives big money to leftist causes all the time.
Speaker 2: So if you're ready to stand with a company that
Speaker 2: stands with your values, a company that actually takes a
Speaker 2: portion of your bill every month and they give it
Speaker 2: back to organizations that support free speech, that support religious freedom,
Speaker 2: that support the sanctity of life, support the Second Amendment,
Speaker 2: support our military veterans and first responders, switch to Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 2: Call them eight seven eight Patriot. You can keep your
Speaker 2: same cell phone number, keep your same cell phone you
Speaker 2: have right now, or you can upgrade to a newer
Speaker 2: phone eight seven eight Patriot. That's eight seven eight Patriot
Speaker 2: eight seven eight Patriot use a promo code vertict you
Speaker 2: get free activation the best deals of the year or
Speaker 2: online at patriotmobile dot com verdict. That's Patriotmobile dot com
Speaker 2: slash verdict. Senator Marie Bartromo had this to say about
Speaker 2: this new plan from James Comber and subpoena Joe and
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden and documents.
Speaker 1: Take a listen, Oh, welcome back.
Speaker 7: Moments ago coentuckting Congressman and Truman of the House Oversight Committee,
Speaker 7: James Comer told me that the House Oversight Committee is
Speaker 7: planning to subpoena President Joe Biden and his son Hunter
Speaker 7: Biden in the influence pedaling case.
Speaker 1: How significant is that going to be? Well?
Speaker 3: I assume Hunter Biden will plead the fifth and so
Speaker 3: they'll subpoena him, and he may or may not show up.
Speaker 3: He might defy the subpoena. If he defies the subpoena,
Speaker 3: I expect the House will vote to hold him in contempt.
Speaker 3: If the House votes to hold him in contempt, I
Speaker 3: am certain that the Biden Justice Department will refuse to
Speaker 3: prosecute the contempt finding, so he will either refuse to
Speaker 3: show up and have the Biden doj cover for him,
Speaker 3: or he'll show up and say, I plead the fifth.
Speaker 1: I plead the fifth, I plead the fifth.
Speaker 3: I think the chances that Hunter Biden actually answers questions
Speaker 3: in front of the house are zero point zero percent.
Speaker 3: And given the massive criminal liability Hunter Biden faces, that's
Speaker 3: actually probably what any decent criminal lawyer would tell him is,
Speaker 3: you cannot testify under oath when you're facing an ongoing
Speaker 3: criminal investigation. Joe Biden, I think the chances again are
Speaker 3: one hundred percent that he would refuse to comply with
Speaker 3: a subpoena, that they would fight it. They would say
Speaker 3: he's not testifying and he's not going to answer questions.
Speaker 3: So both of those I think are not going to succeed.
Speaker 3: It's fine to do it, it's fine to have that battle,
Speaker 3: But in terms of actually getting evidence and testimony, I
Speaker 3: think Eric Schwerin we talked about in the last podcast.
Speaker 3: If you didn't listen to Wednesday's podcast, you should. It
Speaker 3: lays out he was the other business partner along with
Speaker 3: Hunter and Devin Archer. He was Joe Biden's money guy
Speaker 3: that I think could be a very fruitful witness we
Speaker 3: need to have a hearing, a public hearing under oath.
Speaker 3: By the way, Devin Archer needs to testify publicly. At
Speaker 3: this point, he's only testified behind closed doors at a deposition,
Speaker 3: but nobody's actually seen him, nobody's actually heard him among
Speaker 3: the public. That needs to happen. David Weiss, the US
Speaker 3: attorney who is accused of covering up and obstructing the
Speaker 3: investigation into Hunter Biden and protecting Joe Biden, he needs
Speaker 3: to testify. I think Merrick Garland needs to testify. And
Speaker 3: the allegations from the IRS whistleblowers. Paused for a second,
Speaker 3: and think we had just a few weeks ago two
Speaker 3: senior career officials at the IRS testified to multiple felonies
Speaker 3: from the Attorney General of the United States. There have
Speaker 3: been so many other accusations and so much more evidence
Speaker 3: has come out that people have almost forgotten that that's
Speaker 3: how much crap is coming out on a daily basis,
Speaker 3: And yet all reporters want to talk about as Trump Trump, Trump,
Speaker 3: Trump Trump. And by the way, when we see next week,
Speaker 3: when we see in Atlanta them indict the Atlas prosecutor
Speaker 3: indict Trump yet a fourth time, And I think that
Speaker 3: is very likely to happen. That again will be the
Speaker 3: excuse for all the Democrats and all the corrupt corporate
Speaker 3: media to talk even less about the allegations against Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: because the only topic they want to discuss is Trump, Trump,
Speaker 3: Trump and the latest indictment.
Speaker 2: I want to tell you real quick about an amazing
Speaker 2: product that can help clean the air in your home
Speaker 2: or your office. It's called in viro Clins. I have
Speaker 2: asthma and this is an amazing air purifier. And they're
Speaker 2: not all made the same. I can promise you that
Speaker 2: there's a lot of them out there. There's a lot
Speaker 2: of them online, and you can get a big discount
Speaker 2: or you can actually get clean air. There's a reason
Speaker 2: why in viral Quinns was used by the use of
Speaker 2: Department of Defense to protect and purify the air on
Speaker 2: board our navy ships. It is a patented earth mineral
Speaker 2: technology plus hospital grade HEPA filter and viral clins destroys
Speaker 2: cold and flu viruses, covid allergy, inflaming toxins, mold and
Speaker 2: more hospital grade technology that is powerful. It's on our
Speaker 2: Navy fleet of ships, in thousands of classrooms in the
Speaker 2: country and you're going to have far I F you're
Speaker 2: cold and allergies and get better sleep. You want to
Speaker 2: check them out. They are amazing. They even do a
Speaker 2: free air quality monitor. You can test the difference in
Speaker 2: your own home. Now visit ekpure dot com and use
Speaker 2: the promo code Verdict for ten percent off. You're in
Speaker 2: Viroclin's home air purification unit and free air quality monitor
Speaker 2: plus fast free shipping. Now that's one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: dollars savings right there, So go right now to ek
Speaker 2: pure pure e dot com use the code verdict ek
Speaker 2: pure dot com promo code Verdict Center. One last question
Speaker 2: from this report that came out from the House side,
Speaker 2: and it's specifically deals with and I want to read
Speaker 2: from this. It says the committee is concerned about the
Speaker 2: information revealed in these bank records, including number one, why
Speaker 2: the Chinese Energy Company waited less than two months after
Speaker 2: Vice President Biden left public office to send three million
Speaker 2: dollar wire, Number two why the Robinson Walker LLC account
Speaker 2: received the China Company's payment instead of the Biden family members' companies,
Speaker 2: and three why the payments to Biden family members were
Speaker 2: structured in incremental payments to different bank accounts. Number four,
Speaker 2: what services the Biden family members provided to the Chinese
Speaker 2: company and when the.
Speaker 1: Purported services were provided?
Speaker 2: And five why Hollie Biden publicly reported to work at
Speaker 2: as a school counselor received money from Robinson Walker LLC?
Speaker 2: And six who the account holder is for the bank
Speaker 2: account entitled Biden.
Speaker 1: That's the mysterious Biden. We don't know yet, they say.
Speaker 2: We hope our democratic colleagues would join us in addressing
Speaker 2: these important issues. Now, this obviously has national security implications.
Speaker 2: You have a president and then a vice president and
Speaker 2: family members receiving millions of dollars from foreign nationals and
Speaker 2: companies without any oversight. You have the Chinese communist government
Speaker 2: that owns some of these companies that are sitting direct
Speaker 2: payments into these bank accounts and multiple bank accounts that
Speaker 2: are all being funneled into the Biden family business. How
Speaker 2: concerned are you from a national security standpoint now that
Speaker 2: the Bidens are truly compromised, not just in China, but
Speaker 2: maybe even in Russia, Ukraine other places around the world.
Speaker 3: So I'm very concerned. We have a pattern that we
Speaker 3: know Joe Biden has been willing to engage in questionable
Speaker 3: official activity, and I believe the evidence is more and
Speaker 3: more compelling every day that he was selling official favors.
Speaker 3: We know, for example, because Joe Biden has admitted it
Speaker 3: in a televised interview that he held over a billion
Speaker 3: dollars in federal loan guarantees to the government of Ukraine
Speaker 3: hostage in order to force the government of Ukraine to
Speaker 3: fire Victor Chokin, the prosecutor who was investigating Barisma and
Speaker 3: the oligarch that owned it. We know that because Biden's
Speaker 3: admitted to We also know that as president, Biden sold
Speaker 3: over a million barrels of oil from the America's Strategic
Speaker 3: Petroleum Reserve, designed to protect our national security in times
Speaker 3: of crisis, sold it to China, and in particular, sold
Speaker 3: oil to a Chinese company that his son Hunter Biden,
Speaker 3: had been in business with. We know that he did that,
Speaker 3: and as we've talked about in this podcast, just two
Speaker 3: weeks ago, I passed legislation on the floor of the
Speaker 3: Senate to prohibit the federal government from selling any oil
Speaker 3: from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China or Russia, or
Speaker 3: North Korea or Iran. That passed with a big bipartisan vote.
Speaker 3: But we know Joe Biden has already done it and
Speaker 3: already sold it to China. And we also know what
Speaker 3: was in Hunter Biden's WhatsApp text where he again threatened
Speaker 3: official conduct, and I want to revisit that text for
Speaker 3: a second. This was sent to a prominent Chinese businessman
Speaker 3: and Communist Party official. Here's what Hunter allegedly sent in
Speaker 3: the text quote, I am sitting here with my father,
Speaker 3: and we would like to understand why the commitment made
Speaker 3: has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would
Speaker 3: like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand,
Speaker 3: and now means tonight, and Zee, if I get a
Speaker 3: caller text from anyone involved in this other than you,
Speaker 3: Zang or the chairman, I will make certain that between
Speaker 3: the man sitting next to me i e. Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: and every person he knows, and my ability to forever
Speaker 3: hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.
Speaker 3: I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father. Now,
Speaker 3: once again Hunter is threatening official retribution. He's saying, Dad
Speaker 3: will punish you if you don't pay me millions of dollars.
Speaker 3: Given that pattern, I think there is a lot of
Speaker 3: reason to be concerned that Joe's official conduct towards China,
Speaker 3: towards Ukraine, towards Russia, towards enemies of America has been
Speaker 3: significantly compromised by this, this bribery scheme, which is what
Speaker 3: the evidence is building towards. I think this is an
Speaker 3: issue that should concern anyone worried about America's national security.
Speaker 2: On top of the fact that we're also hearing rumblings
Speaker 2: that more financial bank records are going to come out,
Speaker 2: with possibly more payments coming into the Biden's We're going
Speaker 2: to cover all of it here on Verdict. Make sure
Speaker 2: you share this podcast on wherever you are on social media.
Speaker 2: That helps more people hear what we're talking about and
Speaker 2: what we're exposing here. Also hit that follow button if
Speaker 2: you're listening on Apple, or subscribe button depending on what
Speaker 2: platform you're listening on, so you get every single episode
Speaker 2: We do this Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and if there's big
Speaker 2: breaking news, we'll even do an extra pot in there
Speaker 2: as well, So make sure again that you follow, hit
Speaker 2: that follow or subscribe button, auto download button, and we'll
Speaker 2: see you back here on Monday morning.