WEBVTT - Nvidia Investors Digest Decelerating Growth Forecast

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and Vlow in San Francisco.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up in video. The world's

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>most valuable company underwhelms on earnings as investors digest decelerating growth.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>This as its CFO weighs in on the Trump administration's

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent commission on.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 3>Chip sales, telling us the.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Plan needs to be codified first, and we break down

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>other earnings from the tech world, the Snowflake HP gaining

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 2>on results and Dell on deck after the bell. But

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>first are we check in on this market, which of

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 2>course is dragged lower by one key stock we're looking

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in in video, off by nine tenths of a percent

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>looking after ours trade yesterday, it was more than three

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>percent lower, as people just digest a company that is

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>now revenue in with.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Both of fifty percent. But it's not a two.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Hundred and sixty percent growth that we were used to

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>in previous years. And I'm interested in the focus on

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>China in particular.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>This is a company that.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Has no h twenty sales for fiscal second quarter, no

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>sales baked in for the third quarter, but there is

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunity there. Just listen to what jensup Huang said on

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the call.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 4>So I think the you know, the opportunity for us

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>to bring Blackwell to the China market is a real possibility.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 4>And so we just have to keep advocating the sensibility

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 4>of and the importance of American tech companies to be

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 4>able to lead in win the AI.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Race for more bluebergs Ian King, who covers semiconductors, who

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>was up late last night, does this with us. Now, Look,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>China is the big overhang and why some think that

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the numbers were a little light, largely because we

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't know whether to factor in Chinese.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Revenue or not.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I yeah, I mean they said that in the release

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 5>and there was nothing China related in there in terms

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 5>of the data center stuff. Then on the call they

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 5>gave us a slightly extended picture and said, look, if

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 5>everything goes okay, if everything gets sorted out, we might

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 5>have up to five billion dollars worth of Chinese revenue.

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 5>And if you add that back into their forecast, then

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 5>this is an amazing quarter for them. So there's a

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 5>lot of moving parts.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>There is and it feels as though it's a knee

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>jerk to send the shares lower, many would feel the

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 2>analyst community out there saying, look, strip this out.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>And this was actually quite a rich beat.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>But in you got even more detail from the CFO,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>in particular collect cross walk us through what she said

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 2>about that fifteen percent stake taking that the government wants

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>on future H twenty sales.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think it's important to frame this appropriately.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 5>This isn't some kind of political stand or dispute with

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 5>the Trump administration. What she was doing was what investors

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 5>would like to do, which is to you know, for

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 5>sheer duty, which is saying, look, there is no mechanism

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 5>by which I can give fifteen percent of this China

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 5>related revenue to the government as statutes currently exist. Something

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 5>will have to happen before I can do that. So

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 5>she was really just making a point and reassuring investors that, look,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 5>we are running this company properly according to the rules

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 5>that exist.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So give us the detail on whether they do or

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>do not have licenses to certain Chinese customers yet in

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 2>the bag, and whether or not that two to five

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars worth for the quarter coming could become a

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>reality in.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and again, I mean they were very clear to say, look,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 5>we've got a few licenses right now, but there are

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 5>so many geopolitical variables in the mix here. What does

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Beijing want? What does Washington really want? Will there be

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 5>more licenses? Will they be given quickly? And all of these,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 5>to be fair to video, are not knowable right now

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 5>because as we know, things change on a daily basis.

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 5>With a social media post, the whole world changes. So

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 5>I think you know, when people calm down and look

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>at what we said, they'll perhaps realize that this is

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 5>something which you know, this is a company taking a conservative,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 5>perhaps measured approach to it and collect told us and

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 5>that was a message that was given to investors. Look,

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 5>we think we'll get some of this where you know,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 5>we're not saying this has all gone away, but we

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 5>just don't know when and how much. So we're going

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 5>to be careful, going.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>To be careful, Ian King always careful with this. Who ads,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate it. Let's get an investor. Take someone who's

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>dug deep onto the detail. Is Nazi Tengler, CEO CEO

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>at Leffa Tengo Investments. You've been taking some money off

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>the table with Vida recently, You've still got significant exposure.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 2>And Natzi, what's so interesting is this question mark on China.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>What's your read? Because again and again someone quit saying

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a fifty billion dollar opportunity here.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thanks for having me, Caroline, and I agree with

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 6>Ian on just about everything he said. I mean, China's critical,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 6>of course, but they already took the charge last quarter,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 6>and so the big disappointment overnight was they came in

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 6>below the whisper number, but their guidance did not include

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 6>China at I think it was fifty four billion, and

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 6>the whisper number was at fifty five. So if you

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 6>back out China from the whisper number, they actually beat

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 6>not only the street but the whisper number on guidance.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 6>So I'm giving it a triple play. A beat beaten rays,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 6>but I think it doesn't make I mean, if this

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 6>was a disastrous report, the stock would be off significantly

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 6>more than it is. We trimmed some at one seventy nine.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 6>That's where it's trading right now. We put it to

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 6>work in some other names like Palanteer and CrowdStrike, and

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 6>we got some good execution there, but it's still four

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 6>percent of our portfolios and a candidate for our twelve

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 6>Best Ideas portfolio. So I think that the report was excellent.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 6>Decelerating growth is something that Microsoft dealt with with Azure

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 6>early days, from ninety percent now down to thirty. I mean,

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't think Nvidious valuation is even as expensive as

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft if you look at it on price earnings to

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 6>growth basis below one time. So I think this is

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 6>an opportunity.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to that point, when a four point four

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollar company is still delivering in excess of fifty

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>percent revenue and earn ex for the share growth, it's

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty extraordinary.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 3>But the opportunity still is so extraordinary.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Jensen Hung did a very good job at

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 2>reminding us four trillion dollars is how big AI infrastructure

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>spend could be alone, but he wouldn't really give us

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>an amount of how much his take is of that market.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Can you do the math on that a little bit?

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, if you look at at earnings growth

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 6>expectations for twenty twenty fiscal year twenty twenty five, it's

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and thirteen percent growth. For twenty six it's

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 6>fifty percent growth, so you if you factor that in

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 6>to the total numbers, I mean, this could be an

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 6>incrementalion one hundred billion dollars in revenues over the next

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 6>twelve months. Don't forget too, Sovereign is starting to pick up.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 6>That was about twenty billion euro in expectations. And then

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 6>you've got the buyback putting a floor under the stock.

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 6>They announced a sixty billion dollar buyback. So the market

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 6>share take from Nvidia continues to remain or grow. And

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 6>what was interesting to me today is that you're seeing

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 6>AMD and Broadcon up on the news, but in Vidia

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 6>down slightly.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting actually that all the Chinese names are

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>up on the news as well. You just think of

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 2>what's happening with Smick, what you're having with other key

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>players who are building out AI accelrators for China.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>AMD.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>It really reminds me of AMD because they'd beat and

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>in any ways they raised, but they couldn't give clarity

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>on the future of China and they were punished because

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>of that.

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Do investors just need to understand.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>That it's very difficult to get real clarity on China.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and Caroline, remember too, there are investors and then

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 6>there are the hedge funds and the algorithms, and the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 6>latter tend to drive the volatility. Investors like me look

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 6>at opportunities like this and say, I want to be

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 6>in this for the long term. So last summer we

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 6>picked off in video at one hundred dollars a share.

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 6>Remember last summer people were saying the story was over.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 6>It's not going to continue. The hyper six scalers can't

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 6>continue to spend capex at this level. And not only

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 6>did they do that, but many of them increase their

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 6>capex budgets. So if you think about data center, it's

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 6>twenty nine percent growth, right, But China, he's saying, could

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 6>grow at fifty percent. So to answer your previous question,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 6>China's growing faster than the rest of the world. But

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty nine percent is unlikely to be the growth number.

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 6>It's likely to be closer to thirty to forty percent

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 6>in data center growth for Nvidia in the coming year

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 6>or two. So I think again, as I've said, you

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 6>want to take advantage of these periods of confusion or

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, melancholy around the stocks future performance and add

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 6>to your holdings if you own it, and initiate if you.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't, okay, and then the real opportunity is the fact

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that the cadence of innovation keeps them coming. You've got

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell Blackwell Ultra already in the FABS according to the CFO.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>So is the Ruben an architect show. Why does that

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 2>take us?

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean I think it takes us to quantum and

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 6>then some I think, you know, robotics. We've launched a

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 6>new fund that we're incubating at the firm and it's

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 6>called New Ara Thematic and it's all of the above.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 6>So you know, it's not just nuclear, it's quantum, it's robotics,

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 6>because photonics. So this is an area that investors need

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 6>to be sure they're not underestimating. You know, I heard

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 6>the naysayers overnight it's decelerating the growth. There's not ai

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 6>trade is over. It's not even close to over. We're

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 6>in the early stages, and I think you want to

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 6>be continue to be looking around and look for those

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 6>that are going to get left behind. And there will

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 6>be companies I believe, like Adobe that will probably get

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 6>left behind. But then you want to focus on the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 6>winners and you don't want to shy away from them

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 6>too early. And this is I think Reuben is the

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 6>next stage Blackwell had. We haven't even realized the staggering

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 6>demand for Blackwell that Jensen Wong spoke about last night.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, strap in it's going to be vol little

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 6>bit volatile to the upside.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting yesterday we had Jamigambetta of IBM on talking

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>about their deal while that partnership with AMD, the fact

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that they're looking in the future of soup coop and

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>computing twinning with the future of quantum as well. You're

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>talking about that as an area of growth. Where are

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>these companies, though, managing to pick away at in Video's

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>chants really with inference? Because yes, they are the chip

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 2>of choice, they are the architecture of choice when it

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 2>comes to training models. Are they really the only game

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>in town when it comes to inference?

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean I think not.

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 6>But that doesn't mean it's just like, you know, maybe

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 6>you could argue that Microsoft sort of pioneered cloud computing.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Larry Ellison might disagree with us from Oracle, but but

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 6>you can. But you know, you see eventually they that

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 6>their growth slowed, but there's still a dominant provider and

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 6>AWS obviously would disagree with me that as well. But

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 6>so I think you have to step back look at

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 6>where the marginal erosion is coming from. Yes, we know

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 6>Apple and Microsoft are developing your own chips. That's that's fine.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that's going to change the dynamic. It

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 6>goes back to Jevon's paradox. So when we had the

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 6>deep Seek news, you know, everybody sold the stocks. I

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 6>happened to be on air that day and said, listen,

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 6>this is an opportunity because Morbi gets more, and so

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 6>I think this is I mean, that's that's really the story.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 6>That they can lose share and still be growing at

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 6>rapid pace. And the margins. We haven't even talked about

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 6>the margins. You know about seventy percent. I mean, I

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.599
<v Speaker 6>don't know what there is to complain about.

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Instagram add a sixty brilliant lot of stock buyback, I mean,

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>and still the stock cast away some Nancy tang of

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>lef at Tangra Investments. It's always so good Tavy on

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the show, Thank you very much. Indeed wearing a leather

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>an ode to Jensen that I mean, well, coming up

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>more in Nvidia as China trade tensions. Of course, they're

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 2>weighing on earnings. We're going to speak with Teresa Payton

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>for Alis Solutions CEO on the China AI landscape.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Check in on those Nvidia shares we're off by let's

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 2>call it nine ten percent for a more than four

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollar stock. That's thirty eight billion that you've just

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 2>wiped out in terms of market capitalization in Vidia's business.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean the overhang has been China clouding the area

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>because of trade tensions. That the company now saying that

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 2>unconventional plan of course by the Trump administration to charge

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 2>a fifteen percent commission on AI chip sales to China

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>when it hasn't progressed actually beyond its early stages. Let's

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>check in what the CFO, Collect Crest told us earlier.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>She said to Bloomberg, I don't have to do this

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent until I see something that is a true

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 2>regulatory document. Let's get more from New Meg's executive editor.

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 3>Mike Shephard.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 2>You really sit at the intersection of politics and technology mine.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>So the ball is in the administration's court. They've told

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>us that they're going to take fifteen percent. Well, where's

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the regulatory approval here?

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's really the question of the hour here in Washington,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 8>in Silicon Valley and on Wall Street. When are we

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 8>going to see the fine print on this? And as

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 8>Ian noted at the top of the hour, the company

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 8>is proceeding very carefully on this front. It doesn't want

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 8>to commit without seeing something in writing, because the terms

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 8>could even change, especially with this administration halfway through. So

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 8>they want to make sure they see this imprint and

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 8>if they understand the legal and regulatory mechanism under which

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 8>they would make these payments to the US Treasury. Remember,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 8>it's not quite a tax, it's not quite an import fee.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 8>It's really kind of hard to figure out how they

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 8>would define it. And in a way it is holding

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 8>the company up a little bit in terms of making

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 8>those sales once again of the age twenty AI chip

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 8>to Chinese customers. They don't want to proceed too fast,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 8>as a CFO suggest that they had the right to do.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 8>They have some of the export licenses in hand. But

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 8>then again, if they proceed without actually giving the government

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 8>a cut, that does risk angering the administration. And this

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 8>is a government that Jensen Wong, the CEO of Nvidia,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 8>has tried very hard to cultivate good terms with He

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 8>is visited with President Donald Trump a number of times,

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 8>and the two men have built this report. So they

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 8>want to make sure they are treading carefully here, Caro,

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 8>because they're playing the long game. They are looking ahead

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 8>to how Trump can help them in China.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think Jensen and his CFO are trying to

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>really remind the administration just how much money's left on

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the table. Up to five billion dollars worth could be

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>made in H twenty sales in this next quarter alone.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>They're talking about the fifty billion dollar opportunity of China

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>sales if they can get a modified Blackwell architecture the country.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>And that really was what Jensen was talking about, his

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>hopes to talk to Trump about that, and actually the administration,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact, President Trump has put messages out posted on

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 2>his truth social about the fact that he expects some

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of request.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 8>Yes, and he is signaling his openness to granting that

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 8>permission to the company to sell a scaleback version of

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 8>the market leading Blackwell chip to Chinese customers. Now, again,

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 8>we would expect the president to insist on getting his cup.

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 8>Would it be fifteen percent, would it be more? What

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 8>other demands might he put there, But again, this would

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 8>be very much in tune and in line with what

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 8>the administration is doing, not only with Nvidia, but also

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 8>in a way trying to, I guess, restore some of

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 8>those economic and political ties with China that we've seen

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 8>bruised over the years.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Mike Shephard, we thank you so much, Bloomberg. Let's get

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>more insight now. Teresa Payden's with us for Tallis Solution CEO,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>former White House Chief Information Officer. At the moment, we're

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 2>seeing Chinese rivals gain on the back of this lack

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>of Nvidio competition.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Right now, what do you make of it?

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, all I know is we're going to have to

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 9>figure out there's a long race here and a short

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 9>race here, and we have to secure not only our

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 9>global leadership but also our intellectual property. And that's really

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 9>some of the underpinning of the discussions here of is

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 9>there a fifteen percent? Is there not a fifteen percent?

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 9>What does this mean from an export control? So a

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 9>lot more to come on this, but obviously China is

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 9>amping up their part in the race, trying to win

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 9>the global war on who's going to dominate AI?

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>What is the IP risk.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, the IP risk. So even though we're talking about

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 9>sending a modified chip over to China, in my opinion,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 9>based on my years of experience, it's like handing over

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 9>the keys to your R and D lab and saying

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 9>just be in the small QA lab, not in the

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 9>bigger lab, and don't look around. You wouldn't hand the

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 9>keys to your R and D lab to your competitor.

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 9>And China is our global competitor here for this technology.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 9>So that really what we're thinking about here is how

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 9>could they get access to these chips and perhaps reverse

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 9>engineer everything from performance to how things behave. Really, you

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 9>just don't know what they're going to be able to

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 9>do once they have their hands on all these chips.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Teresa, let's say you're back as the White House Chief

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Information officer. What are you advising President Trump as to

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 2>whether Jensen should have access to the Chinese market.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think this is a tough one because the

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 9>private sector does have the right. You know, companies do

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 9>have the right to sell their goods and services all

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 9>around the globe. We don't have a blockade on selling

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 9>technology and other goods and services to China. So this

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 9>is a very delicate balance here between a White House

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 9>administration and a private sector organization. And so really what

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 9>you have to do is look at the laws we

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 9>already have on the books, and then so what kind

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 9>of safeguards is this US based company going to follow

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 9>based on the laws on the books, What types of

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 9>inspection processes, what types of control processes. There is a

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 9>playbook for doing this, even though this technology is new,

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 9>and so we have to look at this playbook. The

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 9>question is is whether or not new rules and regulations

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 9>are going to be codified. And I think that's the

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 9>open question that in Nvidia is having to deal with.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>In Vidia put in its ten Q that it could

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>be exposed to potential legal implications because of this fifteen

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 2>percent issue.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 3>What would it face in terms of legal issues?

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, if we end up codifying some type of a

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 9>new barrier to the market in China or enforcing one

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 9>of the existing regulations in a way that hasn't been

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 9>enforced before, then in Video would have to make the

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 9>decision of am I now blockaded from actually selling to China?

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 9>Or do I have a lot of burdens on me

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 9>that maybe don't exist for other companies who are selling

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 9>technology to China. Remember, you've got big tech who's in

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 9>China's social media is in China. It's not just Nvidia

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 9>who is selling goods and services to China. And so

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 9>they may decide, well, this is an undue burden placed

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 9>on us. So they may decide to take on a lawsuit,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 9>or they may find themselves answering to for example, Siphius.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 9>As you know, TikTok Usa has had a lot of

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 9>legal challenges in legal bills as it relates to how

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 9>they operate and sifias interpretations of how they operate. So

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 9>I think they're just kind of looking at past cases

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 9>president precedent and then also looking at the president's remarks

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 9>as a potential future precedent and deciding that there could

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 9>be a risk for a long protracted legal battle.

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Theresa.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>We heard from Jensen Wang there's a fifty billion dollar

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>opportunity in this year alone in China, but push out

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>five years. Does that exist at the rate that Chinese

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>government trying to push their own companies away from the

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 2>US tech stack.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it may not exist in the future. That is

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 9>a tough one. All I can tell you is from

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 9>the frontlines of working with companies who have done business

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 9>with China. It is a very tricky proposition, especially as

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 9>it relates to cutting edge technologies, whether it's sort of

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 9>like clean energy, whether it's computer technology, and it's very

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 9>difficult and challenging to really understand what the regulatory environment

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 9>is going to be and the protection for your intellectual property.

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 9>Kind of the big elephant that we're not discussing in

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 9>having all of these conversations is we have a new

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 9>more detailed report from the FBI on Salt Typhoon, and

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 9>the findings from that report are stunning. We're talking eighty

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 9>countries were impacted, not just the United States, and the

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 9>access to metadata, phone calls and other information. You know,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 9>this is one of those things in China denies that

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 9>they had any part in this, but this is one

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 9>of those things where we're seeing sort of this vacuum

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 9>cleaner effect of China basically vacuuming up intellectual property data

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 9>information to use it for economic espionage.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 2>That was a breach that really hit the major US

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>carries in particular Verizon and AT and T and T Mobile.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Teresa Payton, thanks for reminding of us off it for

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Alice Solutions and it's time now for Talking Tech and

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>first Up d D Global will pay seven and forty

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 2>million dollars to resolve a sharehold or lawsuit concerning it's

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>fort twenty twenty one USIPO Now, an offering that not

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>only attracted into its scrutiny from Beijing also preceeded the

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 2>company's dlisting. The right Haling Giant announce the deal Thursday

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 2>alongside its second quarter results. Plus Taiwan, the prosecutors have

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 2>charged three people for allegedly stealing trade secrets from TSMC,

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 2>alleging that proprietary tech was stolen to help improve a.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Take Tokyo Electron Now.

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan is seeking jail terms for at least seven years

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>for the Trio, citing threat to the islands, national security

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and delivery hero cub It's earnings guidance for the full

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 2>year this after a week dollar in South Korean one cut,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 2>interprofit and free cashlow look. The company saw revenue rise

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 2>nearly eight point four billion dollars in the first half,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>but faces increased competition for rivals in Asia and the

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Middle East. And coming up more on Nvidia, let's take

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 2>a look at the stock and other global chip exposed names.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Shine Light on ASML. It is lower in sympathy. That's

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the European hip equipment maker can look on though. This

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>is the upstart in China trying to eat in on

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>AI accelerators in that country. We're p fifteen percent record high.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>It has doubled its market cap in this month alone.

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. We take a look at

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the earning story. Because benchmark's relatively flat, we're actually higher

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>just on the likes of the Nasdaq one hundred. I'm

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at what's happening with Snowflake having an absolutely brilliant

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 2>day best place that's November twenty twenty four.

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 3>We're up eighteen percent.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Are showing that the desire for Agenderki is working in

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>their business right now.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Revenue grow thirty two percent.

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 2>They beat and they raised as well in terms of

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 2>their forward looking guidance. The analysts across the street really

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>liking the strength coming from this particular software company that

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 2>many had anxiety perhaps that new AI startups the spell

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>to eat.

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Into the business model.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 2>No, no, they're managing to show real growth here and

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 2>retention of customers. Move on though, and we're all a

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit lackluster about what happened with Nvidia last night.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Look, this is a company that delivered fifty six percent

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 3>revenue growth for their fiscal second quarter.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Fifty four billion dollars is promised for the fiscal third quarter,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and that's not including any Chinese revenue.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 3>That's only upside.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>But this is already a company that was very close

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to its record highs were off by one and a

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>quarter percent, but off of those lows in the pre

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 2>market trade, here is the reaction on the results from

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a few analysts on Blueberg TV on Invidia.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 10>When we have a beat and stocks don't go up

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 10>or as hot stock like in video doesn't go up

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 10>where it starts to roll over a little bit, that

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 10>suggests to a trader and a technical analyst that everyone

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 10>who might own the stock already does. But we're nowhere

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 10>near there yet.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 11>The reason the stock has recouped some of those losses

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 11>and I think will rule retain strength is because of

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 11>that guide. For Q three, it was very strong. It's

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 11>really all about Q three, and it's because Blackwell and

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 11>Blackwell Ultra are starting to ship, and if you know

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 11>that story, you're not selling this stock right now.

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 7>They were very good about signaling to the market that

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 7>the chinahovertainning could continue and that has about a five

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar impact in the next quarters numbers. So, having

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 7>said that, fifty four billion represents a very strong showing,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 7>which means they expect hyperscalers and other parts of the

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 7>world to pick up that slack.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 2>More reaction for you now from an investor. Daniel Pilling's

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 2>with US Sans Capital Ponio manager.

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 3>So why is the stock down?

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think there's a few reasons. One stock had

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 12>a good run into the quarter, and two it probably

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 12>slightly a missed sort of the byside expectations and it

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 12>was mainly around I think China. And then secondly black

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 12>Hole is still a little bit supply constraints, so that

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 12>ramping it as fast as they can, but I guess

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 12>the ramp wasn't fast enough. But I would say though

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 12>to us, those were pretty strong results and maybe one

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 12>interesting fact to look at if you take out the

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 12>China revenues completely out of the data center, then the

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 12>rest of the world for them actually accelerated from about

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 12>sixty ish percent growth in Q one this year to

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 12>a guide that eighty percent growth in Q three this year.

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 12>So actually in Nvidia X China has been accelerating, which

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 12>which I think is really strong.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a really interesting take. We had Vladimir

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Galibov from MDA.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday talking about how Europe is stopped starting certain countries.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 2>You've got them up really going hard on sovereign AI,

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>other countries less. So we got told twenty billion dollars

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 2>for sovereign AI. Is that strong enough for you, Daniel, Yeah, I.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 12>Think that's a great number. But the truth of the

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 12>game is still within high scalers and AI startups. I

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 12>think that's where the real action is for now, and

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 12>it's a much much much larger number, and I think

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 12>the interesting aspects there are one as Jensen noted that

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 12>reasoning AI is so much more compute intensive. He quoted

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 12>one hundred two thousand times more on the one inside

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 12>and then on the other inside though it's also much

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 12>better so it reduces hallucinations. And he also mentioned that

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 12>the return and invested capitally received from buying these ships

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 12>is phenomenal.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 12>He mentioned if you invest three million today, you can

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 12>make thirty millions in token revenues in short order. So

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 12>I think that's where the real action is as of today,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 12>and is.

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>That why the real action is talking about where Rubin

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>takes us the cadence of innovation over at in video.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 12>I think so. I think Ruben will again that the

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 12>most important thing that Nvidia is doing is they're increasing

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 12>the performance per what and they noted that it costs

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 12>about fifty billion dollars for each one giga what data center.

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 12>Ruben will again improve that performance per WHAT, which means

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 12>that Nvidia's competitive situation improves on the one inside, but

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 12>also on the other hand side, you can do more

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 12>computer you can build better models with Ruben, which means

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 12>it's a self fulfilling prophecy a little bit because whatever

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 12>comes out of these models again have higher IQ and

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 12>effectively bigger and better apps.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 2>You're not worried in any way about Amazon's trainium, about

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Google's TPU, the fact that the customers are innovating themselves.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, no, I think it's our job to worry sometimes.

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 12>But we've looked at this in detail out and I

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 12>think the idea here is again to say, well, so

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 12>here's in Vidia. They're building a giant system of a company.

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 12>They have both networking CPUs, GPUs, hundreds of difference of

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 12>suppliers and they put the software on top. They say,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 12>and we believe in this that they are the best

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 12>performance for one supplier in the industry bar nobody else.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 12>And as long as that it's true, something like Trainium

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 12>cannot compete simply because they don't have the scale, they

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 12>don't have the system, and they don't have the software.

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 12>So in Vidia to us remains the winner in the sense.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's what's interesting about and what I'm trying to say, Look,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 2>we are more than just hardware in many ways, we

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>are the one stop shop, and we're leaning more into that.

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Did it lean more into the future opportunities enough for

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 2>you the robotic side of things, cause automotive remains a

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of an overhang when it comes to China. But

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>thinking also about quantum and real future here, I.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 12>Think in Vidia is probably the company in the world

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 12>that runs the fastest that I've ever seen. I mean,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 12>what they're trying to do is they're trying to align

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 12>hundreds of difference of suppliers. They try to design a

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 12>GPU on an annual cadence, and they're trying to update

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 12>their systems on an annual to eighteen months cadence, which

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 12>is unheard of. At the same time they're focusing on

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 12>quantum robotics, et cetera, et cetera. So I think in

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 12>Nvidia is running as fast as anything else I have

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 12>ever seen. And if I may mention that too, I

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 12>think quantum is probably going to slot into the Nvidia

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 12>ecosystem by saying they have CPUs, they have GPUs, and

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 12>at some point they'll have quantum somewhere in there too,

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 12>And you can just switch between those various sort of

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 12>compute layers.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 2>And that was what was interesting with IBM and AD's partnership,

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the idea that almost you reference how these reasoning models work.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>While I'm thinking of GPT five.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>How it just pushes you towards the best possible model

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>for your question. We're going to have the best possible

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 2>computing standard for your general task.

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I fully agree with that, the best possible as

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 12>well as the cheapest and the fastest. And again I

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 12>mean as we think through the next few years, the

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 12>question is like how much more compute can a video sell?

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 12>And as truthfully continues to be a question of the

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 12>scaling laws, right, and we've seen with GROCK four that

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 12>compute still provides better and bigger models. We're going to

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 12>have black Wood clusters scaling in the next twelve months

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 12>or six to twelve months, and hopefully we'll be seeing

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 12>good results coming out of whatever comes after GROG four

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 12>and chat GPT five, and that's ultimately truly going to

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 12>drive the bus fund video in terms of demand and

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 12>in terms of the revenue outlook.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 2>So you think we should think more about Colossus, We

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 2>should think more about what Meta is doing in terms

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of well it's scaling in Louisiana.

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Should we figure China out entirely.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Considering the government wants to push its own homegrown domestic

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 2>talent anyhow.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I think we should, and I would actually argue

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.239
<v Speaker 12>what China is doing seems to be relatively rational. What

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 12>China is basically saying is that you're trying to sell

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 12>the chip that's based off of an architecture that's three

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 12>and a half years old. And secondly, we've also grown

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 12>a local AI architecture or a stack that has caught

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 12>up somewhat to that old chip. So unless you start

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 12>selling us a newer derivative of Blackwell, we don't really

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 12>maybe need you as much anymore as we needed you

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 12>three years ago, so that all seems to make sense.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.959
<v Speaker 12>And I don't know whether the licensing will work out

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 12>or not, but the interesting piece is if it does,

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 12>that's a big, big upside of time fun video because

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 12>Jens noted is a fifty billion dollar market and if

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 12>they're allowed to ship a derivative of the newest chip

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.239
<v Speaker 12>their market share that should be enormous because there is

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 12>nothing in China that even can remotely compete with what

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 12>Nvidia has.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Fifty four billion dollar forecast for physical thirty culture and

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 2>not even fracturing in China.

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 3>And Daniel pilling A sounds capital. It's great to have

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 3>you on.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>All about Nvidio, But there are several of China's big

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 2>tech names also reporting earnings this week, including Ali Baba. Now,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the company has been stepping up it's AI efforts since

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Chinese firm Deep Seat released its own R one model.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Remember Blomberg's Isabelle Lee joins us. Now this stock has

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>been on a tear this year at some forty two percent.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>What more can it give in terms of where it

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 2>is on AI and cloud?

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 13>I think it's like everything in tech, investors just want

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 13>more and more and more, and even if you beat,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 13>it's still not enough. So for Alibaba, there's later to

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 13>report on Friday, and they're likely to really highlight their

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 13>AI strategy. But if you look at their peers, ten

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 13>Cent and by Do, they're likely to kind of disappoint

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 13>because it's really going to struggle or it may struggle

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 13>to show how it's big investments in AI will be

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 13>paying off. I mean, these companies ever since the chat

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 13>gip they came into the picture, they've invested billions of

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 13>dollars in AI, They've rolled out their llms, they've infused

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 13>therm flag your products with that, but making money has

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 13>been hard. Why because analysts are saying that Chinese users,

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 13>unlike Western counterparts, are reluctant to spend on premium paid

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 13>subscription models.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>What's also interesting is just everyone's trying to get on

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>every other game. They will want to be like the

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 2>megaaps to a certain extent, and you have a super

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>ropp with may Twon for example, that the phase competition

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 2>in food delivery, so.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 13>That too, and then I feel like if you look at,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 13>for instance, the ten cents earning this month, they showed

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 13>revenue from that business including selling a services going more slowly.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 13>By Do also when it comes to the cloud business

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 13>didn't expand fast enough, so I feel like, how will

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 13>you improve to your point? And if you look at

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 13>the contribution of AI, it's really going to dampen the

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 13>gross outlook of Alibaba, I mean, and it comes at

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 13>a time where their e commerce business is kind of

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 13>struggling compared to the arrivals. Consumption in China still remains

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 13>weak even as the economy slightly improves. So really lots

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 13>of moving parts for Alibaba. But in relation to Nvidia, yesterday,

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 13>we do have Bloomberg Intelligence saying that despite uncertainty over

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 13>Invidia's ability to provide H twenty chips, all these three Alibaba,

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 13>ten and by Doo are still well positioned, at least

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 13>in the medium term.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 3>In begs as Vali, we love our breaking it down,

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's stick with Chinese firms, but shift gears to the

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>automotive industry. Hong Kong shares of electric vehicle maker byd

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 2>fell yesterday concerns about possible decreases in exports after Mexico

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 2>announced plans to tariff China.

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 3>For Let's bring in. Bloomberg's Craig Trudell so.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>BYD on the day had had some issues around maybe

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>accessing Mexico, but boy, their sales in Europe going well,

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>what were they were up threefold while Tesla actually saw

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>sales drop forty percent.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, we've seen BYD really put a dent in the

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 14>European car market and take advantage of the softness for Tesla,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 14>maybe be a sort of factor in that softness where

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, it's not been uncommon now for BYD to

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 14>actually outseell Tesla in this region, which would have been

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 14>unthinkable even just a year ago. This was a company

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 14>that was really sort of taking off in its home market,

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 14>and yet overseas sales it's still had a long way

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 14>to go. So we've seen some progress on the export business,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 14>I think we have seen maybe a little bit of

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 14>a slowdown and some softness at home, And that's been

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 14>the real story this year where you know, for all

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 14>the sort of continued growth that we've seen out of BYD,

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 14>there's some real questions starting to emerge about can they

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 14>hit the full year sales figures that they were expecting

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 14>for twenty twenty five.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because what they've already sold two point one five

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>million in the first half of the year, but that's

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 2>only a less than forty percent of what they're aiming

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to do for the full year, so having to discount

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>in some ways.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and I think it's really an ironic story in China,

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 14>right where you've seen so much state support for this industry,

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 14>so much attempts to sort of foster this really competitive

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 14>auto industry and particularly ev industry, and yet maybe we've

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 14>seen sort of some overdoing of it. Right we have

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 14>Chinese companies with by D maybe front and center, discounting

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 14>their lineup in really aggressive fashion. Concerns about suppliers not

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 14>getting paid in a timely manner, and you know, maybe

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 14>some concerns too about you know, just how long this

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 14>can continue if if we just see manufacturers, you know,

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 14>aggressively discounting, at what point is enough enough? And do

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 14>we see some companies go out of business? So you've

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.879
<v Speaker 14>seen this kind of campaign in China and the part

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 14>of the government to do away with the you know

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 14>what people refer to as a price for and yet

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 14>some real reluctance on the companies to sort of sort

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 14>of take heed.

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 2>There most creature dell On BYD, we thank you.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 3>We're also keeping an eye on Dell today.

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>The stock is climbing ahead of earnings release of its

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 2>own after the close.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Mesters looking for signs that the company.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Will boost its forecast for AI server shipments has bring

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 2>in blooming intelligence analysts reugin Ho regin is interesting that

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 2>it's actually higher on the day when in video is down.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Often they move in sympathy with one another. But we're

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 2>expecting big things.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so there's a good thing. There are a couple

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 15>of things that's going on with Dell this morning. A

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 15>relative not only for AI but also for PCs, right,

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 15>you know, and video was more China related. Dell has

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 15>no China exposure as it relates to AI servers, and

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 15>I do expect them to report seven billion dollars in

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 15>AI server revenues. They guide you to about fifteen billion.

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 15>Street some of the bullcase on the street has guided

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 15>potentially guiding up to twenty billion. So that's the bogie

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 15>that the street is looking for.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>HP is an interesting read if you're thinking about PCs

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and HP had really resilient PC strength. It's about the

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 2>AIPC apparently, and actually the commercial adoption of that seems

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 2>to be holding things up as well as Microsoft's upgrade

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 2>reigin is that how we read across from perhaps HP

0:36:58.200 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 2>to Dell.

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 15>That's exactly it, so that that's the second tailwind for Dell.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 15>Let's keep in mind that Windows eleven upgrade cycle is

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 15>actually going strong, and what we learned from the HP earnings,

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 15>callers had only fifty percent of actually upgraded to Windows eleven,

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 15>So that means we have an elongated Windows eleven cycle

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 15>that's going to benefit Dell. How eighty percent of their

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 15>revenues come from commercial PCs, and those are the customers

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 15>who need to upgrade, and Dell should be a beneficiary

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 15>from that upgrade cycle. And the PC business actually actually

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 15>has been more resilient. So HP results essentially tell us

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 15>that downside risk on the PC might be limited, at

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 15>least for the near term.

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 2>The thing with Dell is everyone's very bullish on it.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 2>We've got twenty two buys across the analyst zero cells,

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and actually the price is pretty close to overall consensus

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 2>price targets. How much is already baked in to a

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>good set of numbers. Yeah, so.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 15>From well, let me tell you how much is baked in?

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 15>I think from a valuation perspective, fourteen times forward earnings.

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 15>If you look at Hpe, which is another enterprise IT company,

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 15>they're own trading around eleven times. So there was a

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 15>lot of good news baked into the shares from evaluation standpoint,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 15>so sales upside is expected. Now I will want to

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 15>cautions some people heading into the print. There are a

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 15>couple of red flags. Other enterprise IT companies are not

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 15>benefiting from an uptick and spending net APP report the

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 15>last night, New Tanics, Cisco a couple of weeks back,

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 15>they all cautioned US federal spending as being weaker than anticipated.

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 15>Keep in mind that Dell has roughly about three percent

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 15>sales exposure to the US FED. So if there is

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 15>any pocket of weakness, that could be one and a

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 15>yellow flag that I want to raise to investors heading

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 15>into the print.

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>So, Sarah, thank you, Lujin Hove, Senior analyst, Rubag Intelligence,

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 2>so appreciate having you on. Let's get back to the

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 2>key story of the day. Though it is in video

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the world's most valuable company, but there are other companies

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 2>around it that tell us the hardware versus software story.

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Bloomberg Intelligence Senior analyst man Leep saying, Look,

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 2>when we're anticipating Dell doing very well on AI servers,

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>this just speaks to the strength of AI adoption that

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 2>some are perhaps sleeping on a bit today.

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to in video's numbers.

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, and look, I mean when you look at the

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 16>overall ecosystem. You know, this quarter we saw Microsoft Azure

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 16>growth accelerating to thirty nine percent. Now Snowflake and Mango

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 16>deb outperforming. Just when you connect the dots, you can

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 16>see if Microsoft's AI consumption is going up and it's

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 16>reflecting in their cloud numbers, who is the user of

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 16>that cloud consumption. It's your Snowflake. And so from that perspective,

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 16>you know it's all intertwined. Dell doing well, Microsoft deploying

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 16>that on their clouds, Snowflake actually seeing an increment in

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 16>their product growth because companies are deploying more AI agents.

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 16>So you can see how the ROI question is getting answered.

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 16>When it comes to that aispan, It's like the.

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Whole food chain, isn't it. You've got the picks and

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 2>shovels of the end video and then got the user

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 2>of that. That's Microsoft that's going into then the use

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>case of Snowflake talk us through the Snowflake numbers. Because

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the shows are more than twenty percent. It was clearly

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 2>some anxiety built into these numbers that we were going

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to see competitors take a bit of an edge on

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a GenTech.

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 16>I mean, look, traditionally database businesses are very sticky. It's

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 16>just right now we are in an environment for everyone

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 16>is trying to figure out what gets disintermediated by llms

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 16>and AI agents, and all the software companies were getting

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 16>beaten up because everyone thought llms can do everything that

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 16>these software products do. Well, guess what if you're trying

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 16>to deploy an AI agent, llms don't have the data

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 16>that you want to customize your chat pot on. Snowflake

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 16>does or you know, data breaks does, and that's where

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 16>Mango dB does, and all these database companies are what

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 16>you need to custom your chat pot experience to your

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 16>particular use case. And I think that's what you are

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 16>seeing in the numbers. You're seeing them sequentially outperformed.

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, can we look at Manga DV for a second.

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Two days you pointed this out, it is almost fifty percent.

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 2>It is the best two day run for the company

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>on record. So they really managed to push back also

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 2>on that m I narrative that perhaps people aren't getting

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 2>any bang for the buck when it comes to using

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 2>AI pilots as well.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 16>When it comes to valuation multiples, what we have seen

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 16>traditionally is companies that grow at thirty percent will trade

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 16>at twenty times sales. But once that growth comes down

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 16>below twenty percent, then multiple goes from twenty times to

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 16>five times.

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 16>So the multiple compression is always huge and software and

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 16>that's why the top line growth is so important, I

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 16>mean snowflake. Going back again to thirty percent plus growth,

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 16>you will see a multiple expansion. It's not as if

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 16>the story changed completely, but just the multiple that investors

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 16>put on these companies growing over thirty percent versus under

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 16>twenty percent, it's huge.

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 2>But let's go to say, then a multiple on Nvidia,

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 2>it's not that high. If you're thinking about a Blend

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and Ford version of the price to earnings estimated price

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 2>to earnings, it's one of like thirty three times.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 16>And look with Nvidia, the biggest concern is it's not

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 16>a recurring business. Although they are proving that. You know,

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 16>they can keep releasing a new architecture every year and

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 16>it becomes a recurring refair cycle when it comes to

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 16>their data center chips. But that's the biggest I would

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 16>say risk is Right now, they are growing over fifty percent.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 16>They said Hyperscalers will increase their CAPEX by fifty percent

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.919
<v Speaker 16>next year, so that translates into similar growth for next year.

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 16>But it's very hard to sustain that. I mean, do

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 16>you think capex will keep growing fifty percent in perpetually? No,

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.959
<v Speaker 16>And if your largest customers are for Hyperscalers, then that's

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 16>a big risk. And that's what you have to model

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 16>for two years from now, three years from now.

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Man Nave saying he's always modeling for us from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 3>We thank him. That does it to this edition of

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech.

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Do not forget to check out our podcast kind it

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart this is Bloomberg Tech. Mm hmmm mmmmmmm