WEBVTT - Week 14 rankings, Thursday night recap, and more... 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079 and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find 0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480 us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're 0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:39.440 listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best Friends Forever, 0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:54.880 m to to to to Do To to do Do 0:00:54.880 --> 0:01:02.480 Do Do Do Do Do yeo. This the Fantasy best 0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.959 Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports Right your Network, 0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:12.399 alongside Frankie Stanfill, Keith, Heriszari. What's up? I am Greg Susman, Freggy. 0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.360 What's fun on money? Greggy? Here? We are having have 0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.360 Keith on the show today as well. First round of 0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.400 the Fantasy Football playoffs. Getting ready here we are Week fourteen. We' 0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.199 sid Greg, alright, it's gonna be a fun show. Keith, 0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.880 are you sir? I'm great man. I love the studios, 0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.400 love hanging out, you know, welcome, welcome inside. I didn't 0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.479 realize that we were gonna be singing during the open. 0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.880 I've been told by everyone. I don't know it's related 0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.839 to me that says I have a voice him any angels, 0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.320 I believe it. It's it's it's well, we're gonna see Angelic. 0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.680 We're gonna see a little bit later on how good 0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.080 he is. Because you know, we have we have some 0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.240 we have some good stuff. Traitions game for almost anything, 0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.160 because we're all thank you for watching us here on 0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:59.000 the Pursuit Channel, watching us and listening to us. It's awesome. 0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.040 It is Week four team as we like to do 0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.400 each and every end of the week. We want to go. 0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.160 We want to get into the games, game by game, 0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.120 break it down as only weekend and Keith part of 0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.600 Tops another pregame show. You can check him out there 0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.680 each and every week throughout football season. He's gonna help 0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.000 us out. He's gonna help you out more importantly, because 0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.000 that's what we're here for. Frank win the show, the people, 0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.120 for the show, the people. We're here to help people win. 0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.920 Greg not talk about you know what are we gonna 0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:27.760 do after the football season. We're not gonna give you 0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.640 dfen pick if you if you like what we talk 0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.880 about but we're still talking about season long on like 0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.560 other shows, let's talking about football. Yeah, we talking about 0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.600 football there. There you go, at least for there. All right, 0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.840 let's start in New York Giants taking on. It's actually 0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.560 in Washington, point we're really Maryland if we're being honest, 0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.240 but Washington is hosting the New York Giants here. Uh, 0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.040 it's at one o'clock. The sand Shis gets the second 0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.320 start of this season for Washington. They bring in Josh 0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.200 Johnson to back him up. The big story here this 0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.880 week is in fantasy playoffs being able to stream the 0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.760 Giants defense. It's crazy at this point. Landon Collins is 0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.760 now on i R, but people are legitimately streaming the 0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.720 Giants defen this week. Defense this week, good moving, bad move, 0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.960 good move. It's Mark Sanche. So the first thing first, 0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.040 you're just picking up against Mark Sanche is bad offensive line, 0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.080 all the injuries there, and if you look at what 0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:20.880 the Giants have done actually over the last four weeks, 0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.360 they've scored between eight and twenty points each week. Actually 0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.560 a pretty good move. It scares me to say, like 0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.000 there's times I say these things that I'm like, oh 0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:29.360 my god, I can't believe it was saying that, but 0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.520 they're kind of a good streamer. It's crazy. We're at 0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.120 the this is it. It's it's decision time right now 0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.360 for fantasy owners. And I'm gonna be gonna be honest 0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.520 with you, Frankie. I was with Judy last night and 0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.920 I'm sitting there and I dropped the Buffalo Bills defense 0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:42.520 earlier this week to pick up at the James and 0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.920 Samuel's or one of these guys, and I was looking 0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.880 at her teams, like, this makes sense what we have 0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.840 in there. I think the only thing is the Chicago 0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.320 Bears defense. It's the Chicago Bears defense that you have 0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.320 facing the Rams on on Sunday night here, and do 0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.080 you want to keep fed? Or looks at the waiver 0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.560 wire and the only really good streaming d fence left 0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.040 this week was the Giants, And I'm like, do we 0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.360 play the Bears or should I pick up the Giants? Like, listen, 0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:07.920 it's not my call, it's your team. Do whatever you want. 0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:13.200 She was well, what would she goes, well, well, what 0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.560 would you do? And I'm like, I don't know. She's 0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.800 will ask, frank so don't all right, Well, I've already 0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.320 let Judy down once this year. I don't want to 0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.200 do it again. More times than once, Yeah, more times. 0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.080 You were I'll say this, you were the one I said. 0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.680 I said this all week long, that you were the 0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.120 one that said go down with Chicago. Because even when 0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.640 you're facing the Rams the Chiefs, when we go back 0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.360 to that crazy one the night game, they finishes the 0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.960 number one, number two defense and fantasy football that week, 0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.039 it's a little bit different now there in Chicago on 0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.520 Sunday night. I think she's gonna ultimately go down with 0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.760 the ship. Right or wrong, She's gonna stick with Chicago 0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.839 and just feel like it feels like they're good enough 0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.320 defense where they won't kill me. That's the one thing 0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.360 you're hoping for, they don't end you. A couple of 0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.520 years ago, before I let you answer your question, um, 0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.640 a couple of years ago, I started the Seattle Seahawks 0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.480 defense in the playoffs against green Bay, and it was 0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.640 green Bay at the height of green Bay with Aaron 0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.080 Rodgers and Jordy and Randall cob or whatnot. The Seattle 0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.480 defense was the Seattle defense. They got shredded and I lost, 0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.440 and it was a stupid managerial decision and I've I've 0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:08.760 been haunted by that in a lot of saying, and 0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.680 we can't play that way in fantasy football, but it 0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.760 was I was haunted by that. If Judy starts Chicago, 0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.480 where anybody starts Chicago on Sunday night over a team 0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.200 like the Giants, for instance, Frankie, are they going to 0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.800 be haunting themselves for years later? I don't think so. 0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:25.840 I just think that this Bears defense is on another 0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.120 another level. I know your referenced the Seahawks defense, how 0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.440 good they were, the Legion of boom obviously back then. 0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.560 But you know you referenced the Chiefs versus the Rams, 0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.000 how many you know how many sacks and takeaways were 0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.720 in that game. So look, just because it's still Rams, 0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.120 I mean they're still gonna drop back a lot. They're 0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:41.760 still gonna try and throw a lot. Jared Goff has 0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:43.720 not played a lot of games in cold weather. This 0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.560 game expected to be you know, it's in Chicago, so 0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.440 we're gonna be around thirty degrees. We got the weather 0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.000 update from Mitchelle. But I just think I'm I'm riding 0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.680 with the Bears. I have the Giants a little bit 0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.760 behind them. I like the Giants as a stream certainly, 0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.720 like if if you don't have the Bears and you're 0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:01.880 looking for a defensive stream this week, I like the Giants, 0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.640 but I'm just I'm with Judy, I'm going down with 0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.560 the ship when it comes to the Bears defense. Just 0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.880 going back to the Giants and Washington game, it's very 0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.240 like status quo, like start your studs. Obviously sat up 0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.520 on Barkley and Odell Beckham. From the Washington side, I 0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.720 would try my best to get away from Jordan Reed 0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.400 because Sanchez is the quarterback. But I do like Adrian 0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.320 Peterson quite a bit here Greg because it's been a 0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.400 direct correlation since when they lost Snacks Harrison. When they 0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.240 traded Snax Harrison to the Detroit Lions, their run defense 0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.120 just completely went out of uh went out with him. 0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.520 So they've they've been shredded by opposing running backs the 0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.600 past couple of weeks. They made Jordan Howard looked good, 0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:37.440 which you know it's not an easy thing to do. 0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.719 So I know that the Washington offensive line is banged up, 0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.640 but the fact that Mark Sanchez is their quarterback, I 0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.719 think they just turned and handed into the stomach of 0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.040 Adrian Peterson. Twenty times in this game. I like him 0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.719 as an RB two in this match. Heading it over 0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.280 to Adrian Peterson. Keith worked for one play, one really 0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.440 good play yard run ninety yard run last week, but 0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.720 other than that nine yards, he didn't have a hundred 0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.640 yards in that game, Spen having a ninety yard touchdown. 0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.279 What is Adrian Peterson's value this week? Considering Mark sat 0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.880 as the starting quarterback, the offensive linees beat up, this 0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.440 team is just perennially injured. Is a p that r 0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.080 V two that Frank suggested pretty close? Yeah, I'm kind 0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.000 of with Frank on this one. He's RB two, maybe 0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.720 just a hair below r B two. But because one 0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.280 the Giants run defense hasn't been great, like Frank was saying, 0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.680 that is a fact. Uh, you got that. And the volume. 0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.720 I'm always about volume if I can, whether it's a 0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.360 wide receiver that's getting a lot of targets, a running 0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.360 back that you know that's gonna get the ball a lot, 0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.600 give me that guy. I'm actually going up against Adrian 0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.160 Peterson in one of my leagues. Scares me a little 0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.760 bit because this dude, uh it's in my friend league. 0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.480 He has Drew Brees. Michael Thomas and Adrian Peterson. Just 0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.400 a lot of volume there for all of them. Drew Brees, 0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.960 Michael Thomas against Tampa Bay's defense scares me because I'm 0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.040 I'm the better team in that league. I'm afraid I 0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.080 can lose it because of that. Speaking of volume, I 0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:56.760 think it's a good time to get into Baltimore in 0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.760 Kansas City because this is one of these questions, frank 0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.880 that we've gotten all week, and I know you've had 0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.080 all week, and it's Spencer Wear, It's gust Bus, it's 0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.320 a whole crew of running macks. We're just like, what 0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.440 do I do? These two guys play each other and 0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:14.320 Spencer Wear itats Baltimore. Not a great matchup. Gust Bus 0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.240 and the Ravens against Kansas City very good matchup. But 0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:23.880 if you get behind, Gus Bradley doesn't catch passes. So 0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.840 if you had to choose, Frankie between Gus Buss and 0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.000 Spencer were ultimately is your final decision time the final 0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.080 time we're talking to the people, what would you do? 0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:36.720 It's a cop out answer, Greg, but I think it's 0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.840 formata depend It's gonna be format depending because Gus Edwards 0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.439 has one. Gus Bradley Format four head coach. I appreciate 0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.400 you guys. Just let it go. I know I looked 0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.560 at so I looked at you and I was just 0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.520 like talking to my head is like that doesn't sound right. 0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.599 But there is somebody named Gus Bradley. It was the 0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.560 former not so good coach everything that's a coordinator. Nevertheless, 0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.439 Gus Edwards there, Spencer wear I'll take Gus Edwards in 0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.760 standard just because the volume that he's seen seventeen carries 0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.800 at least in three straight games. I just worry about 0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.839 what you said, Greg, if they do fall behind. We 0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:08.920 saw a time on Gommery a week ago. Get used 0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.520 a lot in the pass game. You know, he's playing 0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.480 of the snaps, so he's in there, and now Kenneth 0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.600 Dixon is in the mix as well. I just worry 0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.880 about if the Ravens can't keep up with the Kansa 0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.480 City Chiefs. Again. This game is in Arrowhead, where the 0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.400 Chiefs have the highest margin of victory of all the 0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.840 teams that play at home throughout the NFL season. They 0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.080 have a sixteen point margin of victory. So they've been 0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.640 blowing teams out right. I'm you know, the Ravens defense 0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.640 is better than most, but I just I worry about that. 0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.559 So in standard, in non PPR, I'll use Gus Edwards 0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.640 just because he's getting the carries and on a per 0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.000 carry basis, the Chiefs do give up a lot of 0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.240 they give up a high yards per carry the running backs. 0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.160 But I think in PPR, and I know Spencer weaar 0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:48.960 didn't catch passes last week, but if you look at 0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:50.960 what his role has been in his career and also 0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.600 what he's done this season, he catches passes, So I 0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.120 think that's a little bit safer. In pprgo Spencer ware. 0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.319 In standard, I'll go Gust Edwards. To be fair, I 0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.720 don't like either this week, but if I have to choose, 0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:05.160 I'm going Guss. I don't know what Spencer's exact role is. 0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.280 He's not Kareem Hunt. We know that. I know that. 0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.440 You know he got hurt, which is why Kareem Hunt 0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.480 took over that role a year ago, and they expected 0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.440 Spencer was gonna be the guy, but he hasn't been. 0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.640 Baltimore's defense has been so good against the run. I'm 0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.880 pretty sure it's the least amount of points to running 0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.920 backs given up this year. I just I know game 0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.280 script could definitely trend towards Gus Edwards not getting as 0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.920 many carries. But with the way Lamar Jackson is running 0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.280 that offense, the way he's running the ball so much, 0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.920 I think ultimately this becomes run, run, run and run 0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.160 until we can't run anymore. So I think we still 0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.120 get fifteen to seventeen carries out of Gus Edwards. And 0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.079 I'll take that again. I'll go back to the world volume. 0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.240 I'll take that. And it's really interesting because as many 0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.480 yards as the Kansas City defense does allow against running backscreeny, 0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.160 ESPN and Fantasy Football this season, the total for running 0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.760 backs against Kansas City the lowest in the entire NFL. 0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.600 They only actually only allows seventeen fantasy points to opposing 0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.800 running backs, and that's simply because of game scripts and 0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.680 in the volume. Maybe there, I think game scripts obviously 0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.320 a thing we're talking about, a game script. I think 0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.320 we have to go to the other guys we've been 0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:08.760 talking about all week, And let me start with Jalen 0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.880 Samuels in Pittsburgh. Right, you're all that volume. We've now 0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.760 known that for the last thirteen minutes. Right, You're you're 0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.960 a big volume guy. Jalen Samuel's I don't know that 0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.080 the volume will be there, but it has been with 0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.960 James Conner, it hasn't before that, with D'angela Williams. It 0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.559 has been in between that, with Fitzgerald Toussaint. Right, whenever 0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.120 there's a backup or a third shoe running back in Pittsburgh, 0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.120 they get the volume. Now. Jalen Samuels already came out 0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.040 this week and said, Hey, I'm starting the first serieson 0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:35.839 Stephen Ridley's coming in and then I'm going in and 0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.560 blah blah. What we kind of predict it will happen 0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.160 is one of these guys can get at hot hand 0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.400 and that's going to be it. Are you comfortable with 0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.160 Jans Samuels this week? No? I I he is a 0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.360 guy that if you were obviously throwing your fab money 0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.560 on it or you know, you way Roy whatever, Yes, 0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.760 try to get him. But with that being said, I 0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.079 would not be starting him in any of my line ups. 0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.679 I'm a little fearful of which guy gets hot at 0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.960 the right time. Also, I of Roethlisber. I know the 0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:02.920 splits are bad on the road and home whatnot, but 0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.560 so I like Roethlisberger in this matchup passing the ball 0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.679 honestly for daily fantasy, and I know you were joke 0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:08.920 in that we're not going to talk about that. But 0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.440 for daily fantasy, I think he's as chalky as they 0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.760 are for Roethlisberger. Yeah, I think I agreed to. It's 0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.960 a great spot for Roethlisberger. Frank in Oakland, everybody loves 0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.200 Jiujie this week, and and for good reason. Antonio Brown 0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.280 obviously always a good play. Um. Have you cooled at 0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.520 all on Janlen Samuel's Janeen Samuels to me is a 0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.719 lowand RB two for this weekend smatch up. It's still 0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.520 just a really good matchup. Again, other than where he's 0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.400 tight in eligible and that changes everything, which is fun, 0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.760 which it was a fun loophole. Yeah, And I think 0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.800 you know, if you play on Yahoo, I think he's 0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.760 the top five tight end too. I've I've mentioned this. 0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.480 The only tight ends that I have ranked higher than 0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:44.160 him are urns Kelsey, Um, George Kittle, and Eric Ebroun. 0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.040 And that's just based on volume for those guys, and 0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.480 for me, I had Jannen Samuels above George Kittle. As 0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.800 I said earlier this week, I only have Ibron ERNs 0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.360 and Kelsey ahead of him this week, And if you 0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.600 want my rankings, feel free to ben moment. There you go. 0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.400 Jalen Samuels still in in a great out here, just 0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.880 against what the Oakland Raiders have allowed in terms of rushing, 0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.679 and I know that Steven Ridley is definitely gonna get 0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.320 some rushing here as well. But they have all had 0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.440 a hundred and thirty rushing yards per game five point 0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.880 one year yards per carry this year to running backs, 0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.000 and in the two games that James Conner left, Jalen 0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.679 Samuel's had receiving touchdowns in both of those games. So 0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.640 he's more of like the prototypical receiving back. Like we 0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.480 know that he played tight end college. He's gonna get Yeah, 0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.719 he's gonna get targets. He's definitely gonna get targets this week. 0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:26.839 What can he do with those targets against the bad 0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.840 Open Raiders defense. I think he can have some success. 0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.120 Never had more than twelve carries in the game in college. 0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.679 We'll see if he's a passing will have more than 0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.959 that this week and his first NFL start on Sunday. 0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.679 Is Jordy Nelson a thing this week for a friend, No, no, perfect, 0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.400 thank you. Alright, don't buy into the double digit targets 0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.480 from a week ago. Fantastic Green Bay did one thing right. 0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.640 Thing that's probably true. That's probably true. It's about it though, 0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.560 all right. And then the last running back in this crew, 0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.720 and I realized, guys, we've talked about these particular running 0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.560 backs NonStop over this week, but it's the story. And 0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.079 the last one of those guys is justin Acton, who 0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.040 looked fantastic last week for the Chargers. This week, you 0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.040 cannot have a better matchup. I gave you that the 0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.240 Chiefs were the worst or the best, I should say, 0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.080 I guess fantasy running backs, well, Cincinnati Bengals are the 0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.640 worst thirty two point nine. Actually read the start wrong 0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.840 before thirty two point nine fantasy points on average fantasy 0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.240 running backs, I gotta start wrong before Spencer. Where is 0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.040 the terrible playgainst Ravens. The Ravens are the best, not 0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.960 the Chiefs. I completely had that wrong. I went, let's 0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.520 pretend that it didn't happen, because Chiefs are second. They 0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:33.920 have thirty two point four fantasy points. I completely read 0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.800 the page on because I had the stat ready um 0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.200 thirty two point four fantasy points is Chiefs against oposing 0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.280 running backs. The Bengals are even worse than that at 0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:45.040 thirty two point nine. Which one do you start? Keith 0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.720 all about value. Who's gonna have the volume? Between Justin 0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.520 Jackson and Austin Ekeler. Justin Jackson Moore the prototypical guy. 0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.840 If you're looking for the Melvin Gordon running back, it 0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.240 is Justin Jackson. I said this last week on television, 0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.040 and I'll say it again. The thing about Austin Ekeler 0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.440 is people don't leave. He can run between the tackles. 0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:03.800 There is a report that he has, pound for pound, 0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.760 the strongest man in that locker room. They do weightlifting 0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.640 things where he grades out higher than everyone else. So 0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.360 I'm all in on that. Ultimately, I think Ekeler is 0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:18.680 the safer play than Justin Jackson. Um, but I kind 0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.840 of like sometimes rolling the dice. I kind of like 0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.960 Justin Jackson this week from rolling dice. I kind of 0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.200 like Justin Jackson, Yeah, why why not? Why not both? 0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.600 Let's have both? Greg and I know most people are 0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.600 not gonna want to start both. I mean, you have 0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.440 to decide between one. I think Austin Ekeler is more Uh, 0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:33.800 it's more of a lock to do more in the 0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.200 past game, just based on how we've seen him used, 0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.880 especially last week, still had more targets than Justin Jackson. 0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.400 Jackson more of that early downs back, but especially what 0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.120 he's done in the past few weeks fifteen carries a 0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.000 hundred and ten yards seven point three yards per carry, 0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.400 and you mentioned the matchup against the Cincinnati Bengals. Does 0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.000 not get better than that. They will have the most 0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.640 Fantasy points to opposing running back. So I think both 0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.000 guys are in a good spot here. I think they're 0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.600 both in that RB two conversation. If you're deciding between one, 0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.360 I'll go back to this again. I think gets. I 0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.680 think it's format dependent. I don't think Justin Jackson catches 0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.200 a lot of passes, but I could see him scoring touchdowns. 0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.480 I wouldn't be surprised if both guys score touchdowns, but 0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.960 Austin Ekeler is more so the lock to do work 0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:11.840 in the past game. I like both guys a lot. 0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.640 They're both inside of my top twenty at running back. 0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.160 I like both of them a lot as well, And 0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.520 kind of bringing it all back to Judy's team, if 0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.680 I may. I know she needs help and I don't. 0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:23.800 I don't want to be the one gets in trouble 0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.040 and a screw it up. So blame the new guy. 0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.480 I will. I'm gonna blame you. So here's her option 0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.680 this week. It's Spencer Ware, it's Justin Jackson, it's your 0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:37.800 boye Marlon mack or it's mark Ingram. Just one Aaron 0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.840 Jones is I'm locking Aaron Jones in there, and I'm 0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.240 locking Nick Chubb in there. You get one of the 0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.640 guys one of the others. I go Ingram market have 0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.680 Ingram rank the highst so it's so boom er busty. 0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.560 But it's in the next up against the Tampa Bay Bucks. 0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.200 If you look at what Ingram has, don't He's had 0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.640 a huge He's had huge games when the Saints are 0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.200 winning and grinding out the clock like in games where 0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.120 they win big. Those are the big mark Ingram Fantasy games. 0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.280 I think this game is a little bit more competitive 0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.080 this week against the Bucks and the Saints. The books 0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.280 playing with house money. But this is a good It's 0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.520 a great match on paper for mark Ingram as well. 0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.440 In one of the best offenses in the league. It's close. 0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:14.720 I have like all these guys in a row, but 0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:19.479 I have mark Ingram, Judy go Ingram. This wasn't me. 0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.320 I'm making that very clear. This wasn't me. Let's talk 0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.280 more about that Saints Bocks game and all the other 0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.359 decisions you have. We'll continue. You want to the FS 0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.879 right after this. Daily roado dot Com learned from the 0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.600 game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice. 0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.840 We play every day, all major sports, all year round. 0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.360 We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections, 0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.600 and now the Daily roado dot com optimize her in minutes, 0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.680 build an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys. 0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.919 Learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily roado 0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.360 dot com the following add continue shocking material. Listener, discretion 0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.440 is advised. Is someone in your family playing a dangerous 0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.200 game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die 0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.200 a year from drug overdose. A hundred and twenty people 0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:18.159 a day, five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes. 0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.800 Eighty eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse. 0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.359 Over two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour, 0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:31.159 one person every six minutes somebody you know. Maybe next 0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.360 learn how to help someone you love get away from 0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.240 the drugs, alcohol and bad influences. With the f m 0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.639 l A, people can take a leave of absence from 0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.720 their job and still keep it. Call now and learn 0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.520 how we can help you. Eight six six four eight 0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:52.000