WEBVTT - Engagement Is Key to Solving Climate Change

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. Okay, I think

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people feel powerless when it comes to

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>addressing the climate crisis. And they do see stories about

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to the world and they say, well, I

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can try to recycle, I can try to drive less,

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately, what can I do? That's something that our

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>next guest, Paul Hawkin, tries to address in his latest book, Regeneration,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Ending the Climate Crisis in One Generation. Paul Hawkins is

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>an environmentalist and author. He's an entrepreneur, he's an activist.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>He's dedicated his life to environmental sustainability and changing the

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship between business and the environment. And he joins us

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>now on the phone from the San Francisco Bay area. Paul,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really great to have you on the show. Congratulations

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on your most recent book, Regeneration, Ending the Climate Crisis

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>in One Generation. How do we get how do we

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>do it? How do we how do we get to

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the point where we don't feel powerless? Well, I think

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we feel powerless, and thank you very much for invite

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of the program. We feel powerless because it was

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>being told to us. And the climate narrative is we

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>can call it that has been for quite a long time.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh fun the science point of view, which is future

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>existential thread and we don't do this if things are

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get worse, and it's great science and they've

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>been absolutely spot on in terms of their predictions. Um.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And then what happened is that a tactic there was

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>really adopted from tobacco, which was taken up by British

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Petroleum and there was individuated the problem, which is that

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we just drive, you know, oil wells and sell gas.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You can calculate your carbon footprint, you know, as if

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you can solve the problem, you know, and so yeah,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you can drive, Let's get a bike, recycle, use cold

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>water and washing machine, put power strips in your home

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>entertainment center. These are some of the solutions that are

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out, you know. And what happened is individuals will

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to that and understand that that makes sense, that

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>did lower impact. But unless you had you know, i

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Q loder in the room temperature, you know that they're

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>completely inadequate to the task at hand. Because you're reading

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the headlines, you know, right, it's like it's like sustainability theater, right, yeah,

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like you know, and it makes you feel disempowered

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>as an individual, go oh man, this is worse than

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought. And so um and then people didn't turn

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the big government. You know, government is big b the factor,

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but I mean government and just said, well, you know,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you should do something, you know, but there's only certain

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>things government can do and they should and they're not

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and they haven't been. But that's so I'm for that.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Government is the slowest institution to move, not the fastest.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh so to look the government to adopt policies

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that are complex, you know that actually would

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>make a difference is kind of uh you know, it's

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a prior wearing in a prayer. And

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so then people feel like, well, if you know, they

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>think that the only thing that can happen is between

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the individual, the individuated he she by himself herself, and

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>then the government in its enormity, and whatever the generation

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>talks about is actually the gold, the juice is in

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the between those two. You know, it's not the two

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>opposites at all. And I mean sustainability theater, I feel

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>frustrated all the time. Whenever I get a paper straw

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in a restaurant, I think about all the carbon if

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere. But Paul, I want to ask, where do

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we go from here? Because at the individual level there's frustration,

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you say, government can be slow to move. How

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>do we ultimately get started and and fix this? Two things.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>One is um right now, there's no difference between our

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>climate denier and somebody who understands the problem and does

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing from the most point of view of the same people,

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. And so you have four people who understand

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it and we're doing nothing. You have ninety of the

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>world just disengaged. And no matter how you see this,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't read this science and not under standard. This

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest crisis humanity has ever faced, and probably

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>will you know when you think about it. And so

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>how do you become disengaged? And that's your question reverse

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is how do we become engaged? And

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the way we do it is we've talked about it

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>in a very different way, and we talked about possibilities

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of probabilities number one. Number two, the rhetoric that

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>came out of science, which was good, which is about

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>existential threat, which occasion fear activists took that over, got

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to science. Then they blamed, shamed, you know, and pointed

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fingers and so forth. You know, you're the cause, you're

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem X and you're it, you know so and

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and then and then you then communicate to people with

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fear threat you know, shame, blame, you know, fingerpointing, and

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, cabin glaciers, and and then you expect them

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to do something. They're gone, They're off. That channel has

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>been turned off, you know yet, Jaman, element is is

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>very important. We're gonna talk more about it in just

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes. Paul Hawkins, Sit tight, because we're gonna

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be back with you after we do some news. Paul

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hawkin is environmentalist and author, also the author of his

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>new book, Regeneration, Ending the Climate Crisis in One Generation.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right back to Paul Hawkin, environmentalist and author.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>He's also the author of Regeneration, Ending the Climate Crisis

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in One Generation. The book came out yesterday. He's also

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the author of other books as well. He joins us

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from San Francisco. Paul, I

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have the book in my hand right now and There

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of things that I noticed. One is

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's very visually rich. There are lots

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and lots of photographs, beautiful photographs from all around the

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>world in the book. The other thing that I noticed

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is how collaborative of an approach this book was. The

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>first page is just a list of staff, researchers, contributing writers, says,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>advisors to the book, to the project. Um, take us

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>through your approach here, sure, because those books about climate,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>whether they're describing the danger, are the solutions, are pretty

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>much somebody saying, look at I've done the research. I

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>know you don't listen up, you know, and you you

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>may want to do that for sure, and so forth.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the conversations we need to have their

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>constructive or or the we talking to we it's us

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>talking to each other in other words. And so if

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the world inside our organization, inside our board,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, inside the creation of this thing, then

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>how can we trust ourselves to create a voice that

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to reach as many people as possible as

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a very diverse world now and um, and so it

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>works better, it's more fun. Um, we have the book

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>it does have a lot of photographs, and the reason

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>is that goes to a different part of the brain

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and it does show things that are quite beautiful. And

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons for that is to try to

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>help people fall in love with the living world. Because

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they've disaggregated climate fund the living world. They think it's

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a thing. It's not a thing. It's part of the

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bias here. Um. You know, you hear in terms like

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to fight it and battle it and combat

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it and mitigate it. And that doesn't work. Nobody wakes

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>up in the morning since I can't wait to mitigate today,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. And and so we're behind

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you to ReLit that together, that sensibility that the um,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the climate is not wrong, it is perfect. It is

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>responding exactly to the bias the biasor is creating climate.

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Nature never makes a mistake. We do. And what we're

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>getting is homeschooling. We're getting homeschooled by the planet every day.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And say, take a look at this. What do you

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think about this? Yep, that was a bad one. Uh.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not trying to minimize people's loss or something,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not at all. I'm not laughing at that. I'm just saying,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is that when you look at from that point of view,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>then it's feedback, and any system that ignores feedback parishes.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And so we're a system. We're called humanity, were called civilization.

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>We live here on this beautiful planet and it's giving

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>us feedback, and our response has been really inadequate, and

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to change that. So that regeneration, the term

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>has big arms and enlarges, is what we are. We

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are regenerative. All of life we generate. It's what you know,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>All thirty chillion cells in your body right now, every

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>now a second are regenerating. I mean, you wouldn't be

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>having this conversation as that wasn't true. So regeneration is

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>innate to us as people, as families, as fathers and

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mothers and uncles and aunts. You know. It is like

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this is what we do every day, you know. And

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so I wanted to take the climate conversation and and

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not to dismiss the technological solutions. It was certainly not

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss renewal energy, which is vitally important, but to

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>break it open to in a larger sense that people

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like that impetus they have innate to them. To

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>regenerate life on earth not only creates more life, but

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it brings us ourselves back to life. And so, Paul,

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the regeneration process. Because I'm looking at

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>page two forty nine of your book. You've laid out

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a few guidelines. I mean, what principles should people be

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>keeping in mind? As you know they try to regenerate, which,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like you lay out, our bodies are doing every day,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>every minute. Well, the first principle is to understand just

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a working definition, which is mine and you can do

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, your own definition, but mine is to put

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>life at the center of every act and decision. Nor

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>harm life or does it increase life? Pretty simple question really,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But but how do you answer a question like that,

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I think about it from the perspective

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, what what I'm gonna do for dinner tonight? Right?

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think We're gonna order pizza? Does does that hard?

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You know it's going to be delivered on to us?

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Um how in a bicycle? There you go? Which is

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which I guess? Is it? You know? But but does

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that harm life? Does it does it reduce life? Does

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it help? Should I have gone to the grocery store.

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Should I not have ordered groceries online? Should I go

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>walk by foot to groceries? I mean, there are all

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>these questions that we can try to answer with that

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>checklist every day, and we don't necessarily know the answers

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to them. Of course not. Let's just turn the question

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>around and say, do you want to degenerate lifeliners? I

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. That's not your purpose, that's not why

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you're here. And that's what the entire economic sector does.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>It extracts life. If you just go down a supply chain,

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll find when you get to it not very far,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that it is taking life itself, you know, removing it,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>killing it, you know. And the fact is that that's degeneration.

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So the book of saying, well, that road doesn't go

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>much further. We can see the end of that. That's

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the ocean of certification. That is extreme, whether that is

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fires we can't even put out, you know, not not

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>not just the fire, is not just the northern hemispheres

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on fire. We don't even know how to put the

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>fire out anymore. They're so big. And so we can see,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like we don't want to go down that road any further,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. So we generation is just a

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one eight is a pivot, and it is step by step,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>bit by bit. But at least the question is there,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, if it does it or does it not?

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And does it create more life or reduce it? Does

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it most importantly, does it steal the future or does

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it heal it? And we have this idea of the

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>world economic system works the way it does and makes

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so much money for so many people, blah blah blah

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>blah because it works well, yes, and it is also

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>stealing our future. If it wasn't stealing our future, there

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't be all these headlines about what's happening to the environment, people,

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And so we pose the question as what

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>would it look like to have an economy that heals

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the future. That would be a GDP two. That would

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be revenues too, that would be companies as well, but

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>very very different orientation. And it is a question. But

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you have companies. The biggest food company in the world

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is nest Lee and tomorrow they announced that their motto

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>going ahead is generation regeneration and and they're taking very

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>seriously about Okay, we need to pivot the regenerative agricultural

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>systems if we're going to continue to exist as a company,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as a food company, in this world, in this at

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this time. Paul Hawkins is an environmentalist and also the

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>author of Regeneration, Ending the Climate Crisis in One Generation.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The new book came out yesterday. Paul joined us on

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the phone from the San Francisco Bay area. He's also

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>an entrepreneur and activist. He's dedicated his life to environmental

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>sustainability and changing the relationship between business and the environment.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Paul Hawkins, thank you so much for taking the time