1 00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: On this episode of newt World, I really want to 2 00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:12,319 Speaker 1: deal with what I think is an extraordinary threat to 3 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:16,480 Speaker 1: the whole fabric of the American system. This was triggered 4 00:00:16,840 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 1: in my mind as much as anything by the fact 5 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:24,680 Speaker 1: that on Monday, August fourteenth, a grand jury in Georgia 6 00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:30,000 Speaker 1: indicted former President Donald Trump and eighteen allies on state 7 00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 1: charges that stem from his effort to overturn the twenty 8 00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:40,960 Speaker 1: twenty election in Georgia. The forty one count indictment was 9 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:45,519 Speaker 1: unsealed on Monday and is the fourth criminal case that 10 00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:49,040 Speaker 1: Trump is facing. He now faces a total of ninety 11 00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:53,440 Speaker 1: one charges in four criminal cases in four different jurisdictions, 12 00:00:53,560 --> 00:01:06,959 Speaker 1: to federal and two state. Now, I think, in part 13 00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:10,520 Speaker 1: it all came together for me because I spent two 14 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:16,639 Speaker 1: hours Monday evening with Sean Hannity waiting for the grand 15 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:21,760 Speaker 1: jury to report, and I'm now convinced that this was 16 00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:27,880 Speaker 1: all rushed and looked stunningly stupid, because on Friday, the 17 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: Attorney General had announced that Weiss, the US attorney in Delaware, 18 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:39,480 Speaker 1: was now going to be a special investigator, whereas up 19 00:01:39,560 --> 00:01:41,320 Speaker 1: until then he said he didn't need to be because 20 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,400 Speaker 1: he had all the power that he needed, but now 21 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:46,120 Speaker 1: he had to do this. It was clearly a pr 22 00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:51,680 Speaker 1: move to try to indicate their being serious about Hunter Biden. 23 00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:56,640 Speaker 1: Which remember, this is the same Weiss who allowed the 24 00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:01,120 Speaker 1: Statute of limitations to drop on the most serious tax problems. 25 00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 1: This is the same Wis who agreed to a plea 26 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:09,320 Speaker 1: bargain so stupid that the federal judge threw it out. 27 00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:11,840 Speaker 1: And this is the same Wives who has now been 28 00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:16,080 Speaker 1: sitting on the Hunter Biden problem for several years and 29 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:20,840 Speaker 1: avoiding dealing with all the ramifications. The reaction to that 30 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:25,520 Speaker 1: was apparently so bad that the pressure was on for 31 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:29,720 Speaker 1: the Democrats to do something to take the news media 32 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 1: away from the degree to which they were clearly trying 33 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 1: to rig the game and trying to protect the Bidens. 34 00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 1: And their technique was to go after Donald Trump with 35 00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:42,239 Speaker 1: this indictment, which had been hanging out there for a 36 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:46,079 Speaker 1: good while. Now it made perfect sense for the Democrats 37 00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 1: to indict President Trump in Fulton County because he was 38 00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 1: defeated in Fulton County by about three to one, and 39 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:59,400 Speaker 1: that was a pattern you've seen developing. Trump got four 40 00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:02,080 Speaker 1: point one percent of the vote in DC in twenty 41 00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 1: sixteen and five point four percent in twenty twenty. Now, 42 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,640 Speaker 1: what does that mean in DC? Means that when Jack 43 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,280 Speaker 1: Smith is bringing a case against Trump in the District 44 00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:18,520 Speaker 1: of Columbia, the jury pool is nineteen to one against Trump, 45 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 1: nineteen to one, it's clearly impossible. Similarly, in New York City, 46 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: the jury pool would be about three to one, as 47 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 1: it would be in Fulton County. So what you have 48 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:35,520 Speaker 1: is four different indictments, two of them brought by a 49 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: US attorney, Jack Smith, who has such a terrible record 50 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:48,320 Speaker 1: of distorting the law that the Supreme Court unanimously reprimanded 51 00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 1: him when he went after Governor Robert McDonald, who's a 52 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 1: great guy and whose career was ruined by Jack Smith. 53 00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:58,640 Speaker 1: Even though the courts ultimately said that McDonald was clearly 54 00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:01,800 Speaker 1: innocent and it's had rigged the whole thing, and that 55 00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 1: Smith was really doing bad things. That's the person that 56 00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:11,040 Speaker 1: the Biden administration picked to go after Trump, and he's 57 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:12,920 Speaker 1: doing the same thing to Trump. And you know that 58 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:18,120 Speaker 1: because when one of the indictments includes the eighteen seventy 59 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:22,280 Speaker 1: ku Klux Klan Act in South Carolina, think about this. 60 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,200 Speaker 1: A law was passed in eighteen seventy to enable the 61 00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: US government to defeat the ku Klux Klan, which was 62 00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 1: in the process of intimidating former slaves in order to 63 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:41,080 Speaker 1: establish segregation. Ironically, when the law was passed, every yes 64 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 1: vote was a Republican and every no vote was a Democrat, 65 00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 1: because the Democrats in eighteen seventy were in favor of 66 00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: segregation and in favor of the ku Klux Klan. Now 67 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,000 Speaker 1: today you have Democrats who are now using that law 68 00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:58,320 Speaker 1: in order to go after a Presidentied States, even though 69 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:03,360 Speaker 1: it's clear that's nothing zero about Trump that involves the 70 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:06,640 Speaker 1: ku Klux Klan in South Carolina. Yet the same thing 71 00:05:06,720 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 1: happening with the Fulton County Court where this long indictment 72 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:14,560 Speaker 1: has all sorts of stuff thrown in it. It's what 73 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:17,440 Speaker 1: I would call a kitchen sink effect. If we throw 74 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 1: everything at you, maybe something will stick. Now that's the 75 00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:25,839 Speaker 1: kind of process we've been dealing with. What makes it 76 00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: really really difficult is that we're watching, at one and 77 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:38,800 Speaker 1: the same time, an all out effort to get Donald 78 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:43,320 Speaker 1: Trump so that he cannot become president again. And we 79 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:47,720 Speaker 1: are watching an all out effort to protect Barack Obama, 80 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:52,640 Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton and the Bidens. So if you do something wrong, 81 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:55,440 Speaker 1: but you're a liberal Democrat, you're not at risk. If 82 00:05:55,480 --> 00:05:57,920 Speaker 1: you do something that's not wrong, but you're a Republican, 83 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:01,280 Speaker 1: you're still at risk. And notice what makes it really 84 00:06:01,320 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 1: scary is they didn't just go after President Trump. They 85 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:07,520 Speaker 1: went after eighteen other people. This is happening all over 86 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 1: the country. In Michigan, the state of the Democrat attorney 87 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:14,520 Speaker 1: general when after people, including an eighty one year old 88 00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 1: woman who had agreed to be an alternate elector. Now, 89 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: let me explain about alternate electors. If you're in a 90 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 1: contested election, you're allowed to become an alternate elector in 91 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 1: order to be available if at the end they decide 92 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 1: the year side one. Now, in the year two thousand, 93 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: that happened in Florida and al Gore had a set 94 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:45,480 Speaker 1: of alternate electors, Nobody said, oh, these people are breaking 95 00:06:45,520 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 1: the law, these people are undermining the government. There was 96 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:52,480 Speaker 1: an assumption that that was totally legitimate and what people 97 00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:55,680 Speaker 1: were allowed to do. If the same rules that are 98 00:06:55,680 --> 00:07:01,159 Speaker 1: being applied right now by the district attorney in have 99 00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:05,920 Speaker 1: been applied to al Gore's electors, they would all have 100 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:09,480 Speaker 1: faced jail time for simply having exercised their right as 101 00:07:09,480 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 1: a citizen. So part of what's going on is a deliberate, 102 00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:19,640 Speaker 1: vicious attempt to use the law in order to bankrupt people, 103 00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 1: to make it scary to be a Republican, to indicate 104 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 1: that you do these things, the entire full weight of 105 00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:29,120 Speaker 1: the federal government's going to come after you. Now what 106 00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 1: makes that doubly infuriating is that at the very moment 107 00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:36,239 Speaker 1: that they are harassing an eighty one year old woman 108 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:41,239 Speaker 1: for exercising her citizenship, they're defending Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, 109 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, who have done all sorts of things. They're 110 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:49,840 Speaker 1: totally ignoring Barack Obama's role in corrupting the Justice Department 111 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:54,400 Speaker 1: and the intelligence community. And nobody's going to ask themselves, Gee, 112 00:07:54,600 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 1: how could fifty one intelligence officers have signed a false 113 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:05,240 Speaker 1: letter about the Hunter Biden laptop? Remember during the twenty 114 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 1: twenty campaign, all of a sudden, there's this letter signed 115 00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 1: by fifty one leading members of the intelligence community saying 116 00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 1: that the Hunter Biden laptop is probably Russian and probably 117 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 1: not real and you shouldn't pay attention to it. Now, 118 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 1: in fact, they knew that wasn't true. The FBI knew 119 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:27,440 Speaker 1: it wasn't true. Barack Obama knew it wasn't true. And 120 00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 1: you have to say to yourself, how corrupted had our 121 00:08:30,280 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 1: senior intelligence services become that fifty one professionals would sign 122 00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:38,640 Speaker 1: on to a political document that they knew was false, 123 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:43,319 Speaker 1: basically using the prestige and the respect they had acquired 124 00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:49,400 Speaker 1: defending America to undermine and deceive Americans. Similarly, in the 125 00:08:49,559 --> 00:08:53,280 Speaker 1: entire case that involves Donald Trump and mar Largo and 126 00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:58,400 Speaker 1: the handling of documents, it's a fact stated publicly by 127 00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:01,480 Speaker 1: the former head of the FBI that Hillary Clinton had 128 00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 1: secret documents at home. It's a fact that Hillary Clinton 129 00:09:06,520 --> 00:09:11,200 Speaker 1: literally eliminated over thirty two thousand emails that she had 130 00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 1: her staff member go out literally with a hammer. He 131 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 1: can't make this up with a hammer to break up 132 00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:20,840 Speaker 1: the hard drive. Now, if that's not obstruction of justice, 133 00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:25,240 Speaker 1: then the term obstruction of justice has no meaning. And 134 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:28,280 Speaker 1: this is the sort of thing that we're seeing with 135 00:09:28,360 --> 00:09:31,920 Speaker 1: Trump again and again. If it involves Trump, they are 136 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: stretching the law as far as possible. They're making charges 137 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:38,720 Speaker 1: and allegations because, after all, they have the power of 138 00:09:38,760 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 1: the government. They are paid for by the taxpayer. There 139 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,520 Speaker 1: is no great risk to them, and part of their 140 00:09:44,559 --> 00:09:47,520 Speaker 1: goal here is to bankrupt Trump and take money away 141 00:09:47,520 --> 00:10:01,360 Speaker 1: from his presidential campaign. This is newt In my new book, 142 00:10:01,480 --> 00:10:04,319 Speaker 1: March the Majority, The Real Story of the Republican Revolution, 143 00:10:04,760 --> 00:10:07,920 Speaker 1: I offer strategies and insights for everyday citizens and for 144 00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:11,959 Speaker 1: season politicians. It's both a guide for political success and 145 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:15,439 Speaker 1: for winning back the Majority. In twenty twenty four, March 146 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:18,800 Speaker 1: to the Majority outlines the sixteen year campaign to write 147 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:22,199 Speaker 1: the Contract with America. Explains how we elected the first 148 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:26,120 Speaker 1: Republican House majority in forty years, in how we worked 149 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:30,680 Speaker 1: with President Bill Clinton to pass major reforms, including four 150 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:34,880 Speaker 1: consecutive balance budgets. March to the Majority tells the behind 151 00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:37,800 Speaker 1: the scenes story of how we got it done. Go 152 00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 1: to ginglishtree sixty dot com slash book and order your 153 00:10:40,920 --> 00:10:44,840 Speaker 1: copy now. Order it today at gingishtree sixty dot com 154 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:57,640 Speaker 1: slash book. And part of their goal is to sow 155 00:10:57,760 --> 00:11:01,120 Speaker 1: scare Republicans that they be in to say, gee, I'm 156 00:11:01,160 --> 00:11:03,079 Speaker 1: not sure I can be active, because after I may 157 00:11:03,080 --> 00:11:05,720 Speaker 1: not build a for a lawyer. And this is a 158 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: truly vicious effort. Furthermore, the assault in the various indictments 159 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,839 Speaker 1: on the role of the lawyers should threaten every single 160 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:19,760 Speaker 1: American if your lawyer cannot give you honest advice, because 161 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: your lawyer may then be charged with having given you 162 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:27,680 Speaker 1: advice that the disk attorney thinks is inappropriate. You've now 163 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:31,800 Speaker 1: broken through the very base of the American legal system. 164 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:36,000 Speaker 1: The American legal system starts with the idea that you 165 00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:40,319 Speaker 1: have a right to protect yourself, that you are innocent 166 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:44,080 Speaker 1: until proven guilty, and that your lawyer can give you 167 00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 1: their best advice without worry because it's totally confidential. Well, 168 00:11:50,040 --> 00:11:52,480 Speaker 1: now what you have is a brand new model in 169 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:56,400 Speaker 1: which the Democrats asserting the right to measure whether or 170 00:11:56,440 --> 00:12:00,559 Speaker 1: not they believe that the advice you gave was in appropriate, 171 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,600 Speaker 1: whether or not they believe that you should have known 172 00:12:03,640 --> 00:12:06,440 Speaker 1: in advance so what your suggesting was not true, and 173 00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 1: that they are able to say that they're going to 174 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:14,319 Speaker 1: ruin you, ruin your reputation, ruin your business, and potentially 175 00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: bankrupt you financially defending yourself and you're basically helpless. Now 176 00:12:19,880 --> 00:12:24,840 Speaker 1: in that setting, you're in a situation that you're faced 177 00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:30,000 Speaker 1: with such a double standard that I think it's fair 178 00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:33,800 Speaker 1: to say that the Democrats have decided that they will 179 00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,160 Speaker 1: destroy the law if that's what it takes to destroy 180 00:12:37,200 --> 00:12:40,640 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I think it's also fair to say that 181 00:12:40,679 --> 00:12:46,280 Speaker 1: the Democrats have decided that protecting themselves is at the 182 00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 1: center of what they're doing. So no matter how much 183 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:54,079 Speaker 1: evidence there is, I mean, just ask yourself. Hunter Biden, 184 00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:57,920 Speaker 1: who by his own admission was a drug addict, is 185 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:07,720 Speaker 1: getting money from mzbec Kistan, Ukraine, Russia, Romania and China. 186 00:13:08,160 --> 00:13:12,760 Speaker 1: Now does anybody seriously believe that he's getting it because 187 00:13:12,760 --> 00:13:17,880 Speaker 1: he's smart, he's well educated, he has unique talent. Does 188 00:13:17,920 --> 00:13:21,040 Speaker 1: anybody believe if his name had been Hunter Smith that 189 00:13:21,080 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 1: he would have gotten a dime from these people? It's 190 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:27,920 Speaker 1: clear that he was relying on the prestige of his father, 191 00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:31,840 Speaker 1: And in fact, it's pretty clear, not yet proven in court, 192 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,560 Speaker 1: as the New York Times will gladly warn you, or 193 00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:39,560 Speaker 1: the Washington Post, who are bending over backwards to defend 194 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 1: the Bidens while doing everything they can to smear Donald Trump, 195 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:45,720 Speaker 1: and they will tell you that we don't have absolute 196 00:13:45,760 --> 00:13:48,360 Speaker 1: one proof that has stood up in a trial yet. 197 00:13:48,360 --> 00:13:55,440 Speaker 1: But when Barisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company, hires Hunter 198 00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:58,440 Speaker 1: Biden and pays him a great deal of money every month, 199 00:13:58,559 --> 00:14:01,800 Speaker 1: even though he knows nothing about natural gas, nothing particularly 200 00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 1: about Ukraine, and they're being investigated by a particular prosecutor, 201 00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:11,640 Speaker 1: and that prosecutor is a threat to the leadership of 202 00:14:11,679 --> 00:14:16,000 Speaker 1: the company. And all of a sudden, Vice President Biden 203 00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 1: shows up in Kiev. We have him on videotape talking 204 00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,480 Speaker 1: to the Council on Foreign Relations after he left the 205 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:28,080 Speaker 1: White House and saying to them, I went in and 206 00:14:28,120 --> 00:14:31,960 Speaker 1: I told the President of Ukraine, you either fire him 207 00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: or I'm going to cut off a billion dollars in 208 00:14:34,960 --> 00:14:38,120 Speaker 1: US support. That is, who's using the taxpayer's money to 209 00:14:38,240 --> 00:14:41,440 Speaker 1: blackmail the president of Ukraine. And there was an implication 210 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:45,080 Speaker 1: that we would also move to block a forty billion 211 00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:49,360 Speaker 1: dollar loan from the International Monetary Fund. And as Biden 212 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:50,440 Speaker 1: himself says. 213 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 2: So now, I said, I'm not going to or we're 214 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:55,760 Speaker 2: not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, 215 00:14:55,880 --> 00:14:58,280 Speaker 2: you have no authority, you're not the president. The President said, 216 00:14:58,320 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 2: I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you're not 217 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:04,240 Speaker 2: getting a billion dollars. I said, you're not getting a 218 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:05,800 Speaker 2: billion and I'm gonna be leaving here. And I think 219 00:15:05,840 --> 00:15:07,520 Speaker 2: it was what six hours. I look, I said, I'm 220 00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:10,640 Speaker 2: leaving it six hours If the prosecutor's not fired, You're 221 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 2: not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch got fired, 222 00:15:15,280 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 2: and they put in place someone who was solid at 223 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:19,560 Speaker 2: the time. 224 00:15:20,160 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: Now he knew his son was working for Barisma. He 225 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:29,000 Speaker 1: knew that Barisma was being threatened by this particular person, 226 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:32,520 Speaker 1: and yet he used the authority and power of the 227 00:15:32,600 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 1: Vice presidency. He used a billion dollars of your money 228 00:15:35,960 --> 00:15:39,120 Speaker 1: and my money to threaten them in a way which 229 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 1: totally helped Hunter and totally helped Barisma. And we're getting 230 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:50,200 Speaker 1: more and more information that gradually proves all of these pieces. 231 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:54,840 Speaker 1: It's important to remember that the power of a US 232 00:15:54,920 --> 00:15:58,200 Speaker 1: attorney in the case of towards the power of a 233 00:15:58,280 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 1: district attorney to bring things into the law is enormous. 234 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:08,800 Speaker 1: We rely on the discretion, the good judgment, if you will, 235 00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:12,200 Speaker 1: the character of the people who become US attorneys and 236 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:18,000 Speaker 1: prosecutors to not do things that are destructive, that are inappropriate. 237 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 1: We were warned about this by Attorney General Robert Jackson, 238 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:24,920 Speaker 1: who's a remarkable person. He was the attorney general for 239 00:16:25,520 --> 00:16:28,560 Speaker 1: Franklin DOWNA. Roosevelt. He became a member of the Supreme Court. 240 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:31,560 Speaker 1: He was the American judge at the Nuremberg trials of 241 00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:36,920 Speaker 1: the nazis a remarkable background, very prestigious person. In April 242 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:40,600 Speaker 1: nineteen forty, he gives an address called the Federal Prosecutor, 243 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:45,400 Speaker 1: which he delivers at the second Annual Conference of US Attorneys, 244 00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:50,080 Speaker 1: and he warns, quote, the most dangerous power of the 245 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:53,800 Speaker 1: prosecutor that he will pick people that he thinks he should, 246 00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:58,120 Speaker 1: rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted. He 247 00:16:58,280 --> 00:17:00,600 Speaker 1: was on to say, and this is all from Attorney 248 00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: General Jackson at that time, quote, it would probably be 249 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:08,000 Speaker 1: within the range of that exaggeration permitted in Washington to 250 00:17:08,040 --> 00:17:10,960 Speaker 1: say that assembled in this room is one of the 251 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:15,960 Speaker 1: most powerful peacetime forces known to our country. The prosecutor 252 00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:22,119 Speaker 1: has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any 253 00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:26,760 Speaker 1: other person in America. His discretion is tremendous. He can 254 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:30,159 Speaker 1: have citizens investigated, and if he is that kind of person, 255 00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 1: he can have this done to the tune of public 256 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:36,919 Speaker 1: statements and veiled or unveiled intimations, or the prosecutor may 257 00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:40,119 Speaker 1: choose a more subtle cars and simply have a citizen's 258 00:17:40,160 --> 00:17:44,679 Speaker 1: friends interview. The prosecutor can order arrests, present cases to 259 00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:48,359 Speaker 1: the Grandeurian secret session, and on the basis of his 260 00:17:48,560 --> 00:17:52,200 Speaker 1: one sided presentation of the facts, can cause the citizen 261 00:17:52,280 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 1: to be indicted and held for trial. He may dismiss 262 00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 1: the case before trial, in which case the defense never 263 00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:02,280 Speaker 1: has a chane as to be heard, or he may 264 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:05,680 Speaker 1: go on with a public trial. If he obtains the conviction, 265 00:18:06,240 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 1: the prosecutor can still make recommendations as to sentence, as 266 00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:13,679 Speaker 1: to whether the prisoners should get probation or a suspended sentence, 267 00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:17,000 Speaker 1: and after he has put away, as to whether he 268 00:18:17,119 --> 00:18:20,240 Speaker 1: is a fit subject for parole. While the prosecutor at 269 00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: his best is one of the most beneficient forces of society, 270 00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:28,680 Speaker 1: when he acts from malice or other base motives, he 271 00:18:28,760 --> 00:18:31,880 Speaker 1: is one of the worst. Let me repeat that, when 272 00:18:31,880 --> 00:18:35,760 Speaker 1: he acts from malice or other base motives, he is 273 00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:39,159 Speaker 1: one of the worst. And that, of course is precisely 274 00:18:39,240 --> 00:18:44,120 Speaker 1: jack Smith. Jackson goes on to say, quote, these powers 275 00:18:44,119 --> 00:18:47,159 Speaker 1: have been granted to our law enforcement agencies because it 276 00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: seems necessary that such a power to prosecute be large Somewhere. 277 00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:54,560 Speaker 1: This authority has been granted by people who really wanted 278 00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:58,680 Speaker 1: the right thing done, wanted crime eliminated, but also wanted 279 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:02,800 Speaker 1: the best in our American traditions preserved because of this 280 00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:06,479 Speaker 1: immense power to strike its citizens, not with mere individual strength, 281 00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:10,840 Speaker 1: but with all the force of government itself. The post 282 00:19:10,840 --> 00:19:13,560 Speaker 1: of federal district attorney from the very beginning has been 283 00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:17,520 Speaker 1: safeguarded by presidential appointment requiring confirmation. In the some of 284 00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 1: the United States. You are thus required to in an 285 00:19:20,760 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 1: expression of confidence in your character by both the legislative 286 00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:29,560 Speaker 1: and the executive branch of the government before assuming the 287 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 1: responsible as a federal prosecutor. Now think about all that. 288 00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:36,920 Speaker 1: What Jackson is warning about is that when you give 289 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:41,399 Speaker 1: this level of power, the power to interrogate, the power 290 00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:45,600 Speaker 1: to investigate, the power to arrest, the power to try, 291 00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:49,000 Speaker 1: you really have to be careful about it, and you 292 00:19:49,040 --> 00:19:54,320 Speaker 1: have to be careful to not be involved in chasing 293 00:19:54,359 --> 00:19:59,000 Speaker 1: people for political reasons. Jackson goes on to say, quote, 294 00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:01,360 Speaker 1: nothing better can come out of this meeting of law 295 00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:06,480 Speaker 1: enforcement officers than a rededication to the spirit of fair 296 00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 1: play and decency that should animate the federal prosecutor. Now 297 00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:12,840 Speaker 1: I want you to think about Jack Smith. I want 298 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 1: you to think about that district attorney in New York 299 00:20:14,800 --> 00:20:16,879 Speaker 1: and the district attorney in Footman County. And I'm going 300 00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 1: to reread this because I want you to see how 301 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:24,040 Speaker 1: totally they fall short of that. According again from Jackson, 302 00:20:24,359 --> 00:20:28,200 Speaker 1: a rededication to the spirit of fair play and decency 303 00:20:28,920 --> 00:20:34,520 Speaker 1: that should animate the federal prosecutor. Now, that's really important 304 00:20:34,520 --> 00:20:38,520 Speaker 1: to understand, and Jackson understood it perfectly. Jackson had warned 305 00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:43,640 Speaker 1: Roosevelt that there are so many laws that they could 306 00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:46,879 Speaker 1: find virtually everybody guilty of something if they really wanted to, 307 00:20:47,359 --> 00:20:50,360 Speaker 1: because there's so many laws of people just by accident 308 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:53,960 Speaker 1: on occasion, are going to make mistakes. I think that 309 00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:58,080 Speaker 1: it's clear that what Jackson is asking here, and it's 310 00:20:58,119 --> 00:20:59,880 Speaker 1: a fairly long speech which I'm not going to go through, 311 00:21:00,600 --> 00:21:03,959 Speaker 1: but what he's asking is that you recognize that the 312 00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:08,600 Speaker 1: power you're being given is in fact a power that 313 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:12,480 Speaker 1: you have to be very careful and very cautious about 314 00:21:12,560 --> 00:21:16,959 Speaker 1: not abusing. And jack Smith proved in the case he 315 00:21:17,000 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: brought against Governor Robert MacDonald of Virginia that he was 316 00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:28,560 Speaker 1: totally unworthy of being a federal prosecutor because he clearly cheated, 317 00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 1: he clearly rewrote the law. The fact is that the 318 00:21:33,640 --> 00:21:40,240 Speaker 1: Supreme Court unanimously rejected what he had done and said 319 00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:43,760 Speaker 1: that he had completely misread the law. He had given 320 00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:48,320 Speaker 1: the jury instructions based on a falsehood. They said, quote, 321 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:53,120 Speaker 1: the jury instructions at issue were impermissively broad and did 322 00:21:53,119 --> 00:21:56,880 Speaker 1: not provide enough guidance the jury regarding whether the actions 323 00:21:56,880 --> 00:21:59,359 Speaker 1: in question need to be formal exercise with government power 324 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:05,040 Speaker 1: for the conviction was vacated. Now, a whole range of 325 00:22:05,080 --> 00:22:10,239 Speaker 1: former attorneys general in Virginia had written in support, and 326 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:13,440 Speaker 1: they said, quote, we support the reversal of Governor MacDonald's 327 00:22:13,440 --> 00:22:17,480 Speaker 1: convictions and the dismissal of the criminal charges because the 328 00:22:17,560 --> 00:22:22,280 Speaker 1: expansive interpretation of federal law under which he was prosecuted 329 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:26,720 Speaker 1: and on which his convictions were based is erroneous. It 330 00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:30,679 Speaker 1: is completely alien to any legal advice that any of 331 00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:34,680 Speaker 1: us would have given to any governor of Virginia. Moreover, 332 00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 1: that expansive interpretation, if allowed to stand, would wreck havoc 333 00:22:39,920 --> 00:22:44,399 Speaker 1: upon participatory democracy by casting a shadow of federal prosecution 334 00:22:44,880 --> 00:22:50,560 Speaker 1: and imprisonment across normal participation in the democratic process. Now 335 00:22:50,600 --> 00:22:54,160 Speaker 1: think about that. What they're saying is the way Jack 336 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:59,960 Speaker 1: Smith totally distorted the law was the threat against normal 337 00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:03,160 Speaker 1: participation in the democratic process. Well, what do you think 338 00:23:03,200 --> 00:23:06,080 Speaker 1: it does about people? Agreeing to serve as an elector. 339 00:23:06,440 --> 00:23:09,160 Speaker 1: When they watch an eighty one year old woman being 340 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:12,879 Speaker 1: sued and threatened with jail in Michigan. What do you 341 00:23:12,920 --> 00:23:15,119 Speaker 1: think it does when they watch the chairman of the 342 00:23:15,160 --> 00:23:19,479 Speaker 1: Republican Party of Georgia being indicted by the district attorney 343 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:22,280 Speaker 1: for simply doing what the chairman should be doing. What 344 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:24,880 Speaker 1: do you think it does to the willingness to get 345 00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:29,200 Speaker 1: involved in public life? When lawyers see fellow lawyers being 346 00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:32,879 Speaker 1: attacked by the federal government, being potentially bankrupted, just to 347 00:23:32,920 --> 00:23:54,320 Speaker 1: defend themselves, having their names smeared, their reputation ruined. This 348 00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:56,720 Speaker 1: is the kind of thing that's going on that is 349 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:59,880 Speaker 1: a genuine threat to the survival of the rule of law. 350 00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:04,000 Speaker 1: And I believe what finally hit me was that we 351 00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:08,879 Speaker 1: are watching liberal Democrats who are prepared to destroy the 352 00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:12,240 Speaker 1: law if that's what it takes to destroy Donald Trump, 353 00:24:12,560 --> 00:24:16,400 Speaker 1: and in the process they are prepared to grotesquely distort 354 00:24:16,480 --> 00:24:21,880 Speaker 1: the law to try to destroy Republican lawyers and Republican volunteers. 355 00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:26,000 Speaker 1: This is an extraordinarily dangerous moment. But what makes it 356 00:24:26,040 --> 00:24:29,639 Speaker 1: even more infuriating and more dangerous is that on the 357 00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:34,440 Speaker 1: one side, you have a willingness to go after any 358 00:24:34,480 --> 00:24:37,320 Speaker 1: Republican and any conservative, and particularly to go after Trump. 359 00:24:37,400 --> 00:24:42,920 Speaker 1: And remember, Donald Trump in the latest poll has sixty 360 00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:46,760 Speaker 1: percent support to be the Republican nominee. He is a 361 00:24:46,840 --> 00:24:50,760 Speaker 1: former president, and he has sixty percent support in his 362 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:53,440 Speaker 1: party to be the nominee next to him. So they're 363 00:24:53,600 --> 00:24:58,679 Speaker 1: going after the leading political opponent of President Biden in 364 00:24:58,720 --> 00:25:02,080 Speaker 1: a way which we have seen in the American system, 365 00:25:02,359 --> 00:25:04,960 Speaker 1: and in a way which clearly is an assault on 366 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 1: the integrity of the Constitution and the rule of law. 367 00:25:09,240 --> 00:25:11,560 Speaker 1: And I think in that context when you go back 368 00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:16,080 Speaker 1: and you realize that person after person filed seventy seven 369 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:20,240 Speaker 1: former state attorneys general filed an amicus brief with the 370 00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:26,080 Speaker 1: US Supreme Court supporting the overturning of what Jacksmith had done. 371 00:25:26,160 --> 00:25:29,800 Speaker 1: Seventy seven former state attorneys general. They also had a 372 00:25:29,800 --> 00:25:33,920 Speaker 1: whole series of law professors who supported repudiating jack Smith 373 00:25:34,680 --> 00:25:39,520 Speaker 1: and with a unanimous decision that jack Smith had in 374 00:25:39,560 --> 00:25:45,119 Speaker 1: fact perverted the law, distorted the law, deliberately misled the jury. 375 00:25:45,640 --> 00:25:49,119 Speaker 1: This is the person that the Biden administration picked to 376 00:25:49,200 --> 00:25:51,320 Speaker 1: go after Donald Trump. And why would they do that? 377 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:55,000 Speaker 1: Because they want somebody who will distort the law, and 378 00:25:55,040 --> 00:25:59,879 Speaker 1: I would argue that using the eighteen seventy ku Klux 379 00:26:00,320 --> 00:26:04,720 Speaker 1: Act is a perfect example of distortion. Does anybody believe 380 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:08,880 Speaker 1: that the eighteen seventy Anti ku Klux clim Act has 381 00:26:08,920 --> 00:26:12,000 Speaker 1: anything to do with Donald Trump? Of course not. It's 382 00:26:12,040 --> 00:26:15,680 Speaker 1: just a handy weapon to try to destroy him Soonlarly, 383 00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:19,400 Speaker 1: if you look at the case being filed in Fulton County, 384 00:26:19,920 --> 00:26:22,800 Speaker 1: she is applying the Rico Act, which is Remember the 385 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:27,280 Speaker 1: Rico Act is about organized crime. The Rico Act was 386 00:26:27,320 --> 00:26:31,200 Speaker 1: designed for the mafia, for drug dealers, for people who 387 00:26:31,280 --> 00:26:35,879 Speaker 1: are a network of committed criminals, and she's applying it 388 00:26:35,880 --> 00:26:39,600 Speaker 1: to a group. Ironically, one of them, Rudy Giuliani, was 389 00:26:39,640 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 1: one of the original pioneers in New York in using 390 00:26:42,800 --> 00:26:46,679 Speaker 1: the Rico Act to lock up the mafia. Now to 391 00:26:46,760 --> 00:26:52,919 Speaker 1: bring an anti organized crime law into a case involving 392 00:26:53,520 --> 00:26:57,520 Speaker 1: the leading candidate for president on the opposition party is 393 00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:01,679 Speaker 1: astonishingly bad. But what's even worse in the case of 394 00:27:01,720 --> 00:27:06,480 Speaker 1: Georgia is that the former Democratic candidate for Governor, Stacy Abrams, 395 00:27:06,960 --> 00:27:11,760 Speaker 1: on at least thirty three different occasions, said that the 396 00:27:11,800 --> 00:27:15,679 Speaker 1: governor Kemp had not won, so she repudiated the election 397 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:19,480 Speaker 1: results thirty three times. Yet do you see the district 398 00:27:19,520 --> 00:27:23,119 Speaker 1: attorney in Fulton County bringing her in suggesting that she 399 00:27:23,280 --> 00:27:27,160 Speaker 1: was in fact cheating. You have Maxine Waters in two 400 00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:32,680 Speaker 1: thousand congressman getting up to object to Florida's votes, going 401 00:27:32,720 --> 00:27:39,200 Speaker 1: to George W. Bush. You have W. Wasserman Sharts again 402 00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:41,879 Speaker 1: saying the same thing. She said, al Gore won the 403 00:27:41,920 --> 00:27:44,200 Speaker 1: state of Florida, but not the presidency. Well, he didn't 404 00:27:44,240 --> 00:27:47,000 Speaker 1: win the state of Florida, and she didn't go to jail. 405 00:27:47,040 --> 00:27:50,959 Speaker 1: Freving Senate. You just go through item after item after item, 406 00:27:51,280 --> 00:27:54,280 Speaker 1: and the fact is Democrats can say it and it 407 00:27:54,320 --> 00:27:59,000 Speaker 1: doesn't matter. But if Republicans say it, now, it's illegal. 408 00:27:59,359 --> 00:28:02,760 Speaker 1: Now it's a problem. And I think what we're faced 409 00:28:02,760 --> 00:28:04,960 Speaker 1: with here, and I'll be picking up on this and 410 00:28:05,359 --> 00:28:10,840 Speaker 1: future podcast, is we have a tremendous problem as a country, 411 00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:16,600 Speaker 1: leading us potentially to the largest constitutional crisis since the 412 00:28:16,640 --> 00:28:20,000 Speaker 1: eighteen fifties. You have a group of people willing to 413 00:28:20,080 --> 00:28:24,359 Speaker 1: destroy the law, willing to destroy the constitution if that's 414 00:28:24,359 --> 00:28:27,880 Speaker 1: what it takes for them to destroy their major political opponent. 415 00:28:28,760 --> 00:28:32,440 Speaker 1: On the other side, you have people who are totally 416 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:36,879 Speaker 1: protected as long as they're liberal Democrats. So Hillary Clinton 417 00:28:36,960 --> 00:28:39,600 Speaker 1: can do things both in terms of obstruction of justice. 418 00:28:39,840 --> 00:28:42,800 Speaker 1: She can do things about the misuse of Secure Dad documents. 419 00:28:43,120 --> 00:28:46,400 Speaker 1: She can do things about taking money involving millions of 420 00:28:46,440 --> 00:28:50,800 Speaker 1: dollars from Russian companies. But she's a liberal Democrat. You 421 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:54,760 Speaker 1: now have just a stunning record, And I would recommend 422 00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:59,400 Speaker 1: to everybody Andy McCarthy's book Ball of Collusion, which was 423 00:28:59,400 --> 00:29:03,520 Speaker 1: written in twowenty nineteen and which clearly indicates how much 424 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:07,720 Speaker 1: Barack Obama was involved in corrupting the Justice Department and 425 00:29:07,800 --> 00:29:12,200 Speaker 1: corrupting the intelligence community, and how much he personally knew 426 00:29:12,240 --> 00:29:15,480 Speaker 1: about what was going on. That was dishonest and frankly 427 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:19,320 Speaker 1: done in the purpose of trying to protect people like 428 00:29:19,360 --> 00:29:23,720 Speaker 1: Clinton while destroying people like Trump. This is a genuine crisis. 429 00:29:23,800 --> 00:29:25,680 Speaker 1: I'm going to be coming back to it, and I 430 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:28,880 Speaker 1: think it's clear that the country gets it. In fact, 431 00:29:28,960 --> 00:29:33,360 Speaker 1: it's ironic that the day President Trump was taken in 432 00:29:33,360 --> 00:29:39,040 Speaker 1: in Manhattan, literally that week, he raised over three point 433 00:29:39,160 --> 00:29:43,320 Speaker 1: nine million dollars. Every time they indict him, more people 434 00:29:43,360 --> 00:29:47,160 Speaker 1: come to his side. I'm inclined to agree with Henninger, 435 00:29:47,160 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 1: who wrote in The Wall Street Journal today that Trump's support, 436 00:29:51,520 --> 00:29:54,280 Speaker 1: which is now somewhere between fifty five and sixty percent 437 00:29:54,320 --> 00:29:57,920 Speaker 1: for the Republican nomination, that a growing part of that 438 00:29:57,960 --> 00:30:02,360 Speaker 1: support is people who are so angry at a federal 439 00:30:02,400 --> 00:30:06,200 Speaker 1: government that's this corrupt that they feel compelled to support 440 00:30:06,240 --> 00:30:10,360 Speaker 1: Trump as a way of stopping the corruption and stopping 441 00:30:10,440 --> 00:30:13,240 Speaker 1: a genuine threat to our freedom. And I'll have a 442 00:30:13,280 --> 00:30:14,920 Speaker 1: great deal more in this, but I want you just 443 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:19,920 Speaker 1: to remember you are watching people liberal Democrats, including the 444 00:30:19,960 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 1: President United States, the Attorney General, who are prepared to 445 00:30:24,280 --> 00:30:28,239 Speaker 1: destroy the law and destroy the constitution if that's what 446 00:30:28,280 --> 00:30:31,000 Speaker 1: it takes to destroy Donald Trump, because he's such a 447 00:30:31,160 --> 00:30:34,240 Speaker 1: threat to their system. And I'll be back and talk 448 00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:36,400 Speaker 1: about more of this over the next few weeks, because 449 00:30:36,440 --> 00:30:38,800 Speaker 1: this is not going to go away. This is an 450 00:30:38,960 --> 00:30:45,959 Speaker 1: enormously important crisis of the American system. Thank you for listening. 451 00:30:46,160 --> 00:30:49,200 Speaker 1: News World is produced by Gingish three sixty and iHeartMedia. 452 00:30:49,440 --> 00:30:53,400 Speaker 1: Our executive producer is Guarnsey Sloan. Our researcher is Rachel Peterson. 453 00:30:53,840 --> 00:30:56,840 Speaker 1: The artwork for the show was created by Steve Penley. 454 00:30:57,400 --> 00:31:00,640 Speaker 1: Special thanks the team of gingishtree sixty. If you've been 455 00:31:00,720 --> 00:31:04,120 Speaker 1: enjoying Newtsworld. I hope you'll go to Apple Podcast and 456 00:31:04,200 --> 00:31:06,560 Speaker 1: both rate us with five stars and give us a 457 00:31:06,600 --> 00:31:10,080 Speaker 1: review so others can learn what it's all about. Right now, 458 00:31:10,360 --> 00:31:12,840 Speaker 1: listeners of newts World can sign up for my three 459 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:18,640 Speaker 1: freeweekly columns at Gingrishtree sixty dot com slash newsletter. I'm 460 00:31:18,720 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 1: new Gingrich. This is Newtsworld