WEBVTT - When Finance Is a Weapon of War

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg clovel News. Well, a story on the

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg about the omicron variant being much deadlier than the

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>seasonal flu, why that's important to remember, and also why

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's also important to remember that there will be a

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>next pandemic. It's the subject of a new book by

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates, by the way, and that's something that's highlight

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Pursuit section of the current new issue Bloomberg

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Magazine. We talked about it with Chris Rouser.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>That will be in our weekend show. Well. Dr Andy

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Pecos is professor of molecular microbiology and immunology at the

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health. The Bloomberg

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health is supported Michael R. Bloomberg, founder

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dr Pekosh joins us

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from Baltimore. Dr Pekosh, How

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are you doing well? How are you all? We're doing well.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Carol and I were talking earlier about the mass mandates

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>being lifted in different parts of the country, and indeed

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's gonna be happening in New York. Friends

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>texting me in the last few days that their students, theirs,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>their kids are no longer masked at school, and my

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>friends are pretty appreciative of that. Um. When you take

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a look at where the United States is, how would

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you describe it? Well, you know, we're we're. Everything is

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>trending in the really good directions. In some parts of

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the country, case numbers are still a little bit higher

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>from my taste, at least to be able to relieve

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the public health interventions. But everything is

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>looking like it's moving in the right direction. No new

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>variants that are of high concern are coming down the

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>pipeline at least immediately. So I think we're in a

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>really good place right now for most of the population,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would say the exception would be, you know,

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who are highly susceptible to severe COVID, the elderly,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>those with OFMS immune systems. Those are populations we still

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>need to monitor carefully because COVID can be such a

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>severe disease in those populations. But for most people, things

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>are trending in the right direction, but we do need

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to I'm sorry, ahead, well, I was just wondering. You know,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you said case numbers are still too high for you

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable. What is that number that you'll that

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to see for for you to say, Okay,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, We're no longer in a pandemic. This

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is now endemic because we are still seeing tons of

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>thousands of new cases every day exactly. And I think

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>you have to look locally to see how your spread

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>is locally. Um one good parameter rate is if your

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>positive test positivity rate is about two per cent or so,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that really tells you that two things are going on.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Case numbers are low and you've got enough testing going

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on to really be confident that you're detecting a lot

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the cases out there. Uh. What's interesting too is

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and I do think about this. As I said, I

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was like perplexed landing in Chicago Tuesday night, getting into

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a hotel outside of Chicago, and nobody had masks on

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>because they just pulled the mask mandate And to say

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr peckash, I was like, you know what to do?

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I had my mask on, I left it on. I

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>felt awkward. People were like, oh, keep mask like and

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody else had a mask on. Um, but I I

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have to rely on my community to do the right thing,

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and we know that that unfortunately, our community hasn't. So

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what's your advice to us increasingly as we go forward

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>with this and and what are the numbers that you're

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching that we don't. Is it just a

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>case of an uptick of cases that will remind us

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's still not completely safe. Well, you know,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the CDC recently updated their guidance from mask wearing, which

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is what really uh precipitated all of these mandates being relieved.

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think number one, you should always go

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>with how you feel and your conscience and if you're

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not feeling comfortable going out without masks, please mask up.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I still mask up when I go out, uh to

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>two groceries, shopping in other places as well too. I

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's nothing wrong with masking up. Um, Wearing a

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>mask for yourself is still good for protecting you, and

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something everybody should feel comfortable doing if

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they want to. Um, you know, I'm hoping that that

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that what we're going to see now is that COVID

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes a bit more seasonal, So as we get to

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>warmer weather, it will be less and less likely that

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we see significant surges of cases. So that will really

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be in a period of time now where we can

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more um comfortable that conditions won't

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be right for large surges of cases. So okay, well

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about those conditions. Um. You know. Carol mentioned

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates's new book that's reviewed in the upcoming issue

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. We've talked a lot about

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the next pandemic, But before we get

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to the next pandemic, I want to think about the

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>next variant, and I wanted us to have a realistic

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>set of expectations, because I remember how I felt in

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>June of one when I went to a wedding and

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like COVID was absolutely gone and we had

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>turned this corner. And then you know, a few days later, boom,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>delta variant. We get out of the delta variant. Boom,

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the omicron variant. Um, how should we be? How

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>should we be planning for our own future? It's just

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of risk taking and and and setting expectations.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm not slapped across the face again, right, Yeah.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what stars KVID two has shown us is

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>when it entered the population two years ago, it was

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>a virus that could spread well, but it really wasn't

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>optimal for infecting people. And what you've seen now, maybe

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>with a macron as the pinnacle, is this virus really

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>adapt to be able to infect and spread the human population.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So it will be here. We will see continuing variants

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>emerge because um, that's what viruses do. They mutate, and

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>if they mutate in the way that makes them better

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at infecting people, then they will become the dominant virus.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But the most important thing is we have now vaccines

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that induce population immunity. Now that's different from her immunity.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Population immunity just means that we're gonna dampen disease severity.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna damp in numbers of cases a bit, and

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be able to reach an area where we

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>can control the numbers of cases through vaccination and treatments

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and avoid those severe cases. And that's where I hope

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.679
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be, particularly in a few months, because

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>as more treatments come on board, UM, as people get

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>us hopefully little bit more comfortable with vaccines UM and

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>taking them UM, we will be able to get all

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of this population immunity together. That's going to really minimize

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the threat of severe COVID for most of us. You're

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, as we

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>just talked about the world increasingly sanctioning Russia following that

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine. We just talked about the US adding

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>sanctions to Vladimir Putin's press secretary, limiting the travel of

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen others in terms of Russians and forty seven of

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>their families. So the news continues to flow. Bloomberg's Nick

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Boddam writing about how the crackdown on Russia's economy that

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>could have consequences that last decades. Nick Wadham's Bloomberg News

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy reporter, he'd us on the phone from Washington,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>d C. Nick, you know, the headlines continue to come

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of moves by the US, UH and other

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>nations around the world going against Russia. At this point,

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>tell us about your reporting and why this may stay

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with us much longer than we all anticipate. Well, I

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think the concern I heard from folks on the outside

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and also a couple of people on on the inside

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of the administration is essentially that the US is ramping

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up so hard and fast on Russia right now, um,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in response to the invasion that they fear there's not

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>really like a longer term plan for Okay, then, what

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like if you if you sanction all the folks around

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Putin and all these companies, what are the what are

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the conditions under which you actually unwind these sanctions and

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what are they actually trying to achieve? Is it just

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>purely about punishment or is it trying to induce some

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of behavior, and the problem sanctions theorists will tell

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you is that if you're trying to duce behavior with

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>crushing sanctions like this and often only just has the

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>opposite effects. So it's a concern about not really understanding

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or thinking through what the consequences of all these sanctions

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>might end up be. Right, we understand the means in

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of going after Vladimir Putin in Russia, Right, we

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>see that with the sanctions we don't necessarily know what

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the end game is here, certainly when it comes to

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the US UH and NATO allies. What are some of

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that are being talked about that maybe need

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to be put before President Putin is saying here's what

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we need you to do. Well, I mean, this is

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a great challenge because, of course, obviously the first thing

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they would say is, okay, what we need you to

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>do is reverse the invasion, which he's obviously showing no

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>signs that he's going to do. So at that level,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, it does feel like we're caught in this

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>bind of wanting to do something, wanting to respond in

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>some way, but then you know there's this concern that

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>actually the response doesn't achieve the desired end. But the

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>question that I'm really trying to dive into now is,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, these lower level folks, so the oligarchs around Putin,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>you know what what needs to happen with them? What

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>do they need to do that it do they need

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to publicly disavow Putin does? What are the things that

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they can do that are actually in their control to

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>get these sanctions lifted? And so far I haven't seen

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a clear articulation of what the US actually wants from them,

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're going to start to see that

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>over the next little while, a better articulation of of

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>what they're actually going to need to do. But at

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment, the administration is not saying what it's asking

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>them to do. If anything, Nick, one of the things

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that jumped out for me and your latest reporting, and

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think about this when we're dealing with UM leaders

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of countries, UM that especially in more troubled areas of

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, that there that we need to think about

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>face saving measures that that is important to them in

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>terms of their position. How do we need to think

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about that when it comes to President Putin specifically. Well,

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting because Jen suck he was actually asked

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about that very issue today at the briefing. You know,

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is there some sort of face saving measure that Russia

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>could could do? Uh? And her suggestion was, you know,

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's way too early to talk about face saving measures

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>because this this military campaign is so intense. But but

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the impression I get from speaking to folks on the

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>inside of the administration is that yes, they are going

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to or they say they are going to start doing

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that at some point. The question is whether Vladimir Putin

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>will see these US actions as something that gives him

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to do that. I mean, I mean, the

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>US is saying, listen, we're not going to commit troops

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. But you know, Vladimir Putin doesn't see

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this as a substitute for war. He sees it as

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>an element for war. So then that provokes the bigger question. Okay,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he may respond, not necessarily with financial retaliation or whatever

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it might be, but something more kinetic. And I think

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you're starting to see a sense that that

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the US is going to need to prepare for that. Well,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was curious too, And I'm thinking about

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>sanctions in general. I mean, the world has ramped up especially.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this week in terms of financial sanctioning

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>UM and whether it's stocks, the Russian market, the rouble

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the oligarchs, um, are we getting to the end of

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that In terms of financial sanctioning, well, I think there

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is more they can do. I mean, the question of

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it works or not, that's one thing. I mean,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the oligarchs are the folks who were

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>named today had previously been sanctions, So it's not like

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have any real new impact on them

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>unless the U S is it's promised, really goes after

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>their assets in a way that it hasn't done before.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>But there is obviously the energy sector, and that is

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the big sort of untouched area where the US has

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>has so far decided it is not going to to

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>sanction Russia because of the fear about the blowback on

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the US market. But based on conversation I and some

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of my colleagues are having with officials and folks on

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the outside, it does appeal here that there's a growing

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>movement towards figuring out some way to squeeze the Russian

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>energy sector to really try to break the back of

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin's calculs again will it work. There's not a

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of evidence. I mean you've looked Lebron, Syria, Cuba.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no real evidence that their behavior has changed. But

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this is what the administration. Hey just got Nick, about

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds left here. So as you lay out, you know,

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got to be you know, tell President Booten kinda

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.599
<v Speaker 1>what we need him to do. Are those conversations of

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>going on inside the White House are among the President's cabinet.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're just you know, played back some sound

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>he's meeting with them right now earlier from conversations is no,

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>they are not at that point yet of telling Bloodin

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what he needs to do beyond all team the invasion.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we'll get a better sense of the next few days.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, really appreciate the update. Nick Waddams. He

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is our foreign policy reporter at Bloomberg News. This is

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. In this week's new issue

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine, it's a special report. By

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, the magazine it's all about the war in Ukraine,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and the magazine specifically taking a deep dive into the

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>tactic of using finance as a weapon. So let's get

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to it. Bloomberg News Financial Investigation senior writer Stephanie Baker

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from London along with Business Week editor

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Weber here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio in

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>New York. UM. I talked to Stephanie earlier. I've already

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>said this is Tim and I were saying favorite story

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the week. It is a really good one and

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>one of those ones where you know, you just are

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>thankful for having colleagues who have been around and covering

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>things for for a bit because, um, as she writes

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the story, Stephanie has been a close watcher of Russia

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>for for decades now. Um. And to rewind the clock here,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming out of the wall coming down, all

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of arcs amassed a whole bunch of of of assets basically,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're able to basically become billionaires in the process.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And we've long seen the repercussions of that. And a

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>key way that sort of the the US and the

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>UK and the EU are attempting to sort of fight

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>back to Putin's aggression is by targeting some of those

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>um olive arcs UM. So, so stephaniely walk us through

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>how that's played out so far and how how it

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>could play out yet. Well, the sanctions keep coming fast

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and furious. The UK and the US just announced additional

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:28.359
<v Speaker 1>aligarcs UM that have been sanctioned. The UK UM targeting

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to prominent Russians UM billionaire Alisher Usmanoff and um uh

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Igor Shuvalov, who is a former government official but he

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>hEDS the state he's the chairman of the State Bank

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>bb UM. And then the US did the same, sanctioning

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Usmanoff and a string of others, including their family members

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in many cases. So UM, the US going further trying

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to put pressure on them UM. And you know, I

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think we're to just see more coming UM as they

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>work their way through UM the list and try to

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out, you know what, what's the best way to

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to put pressure on Putin. There are many more

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the list, you know, people billionaires who for instance,

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>met with Vladimir Putin when he called them in last week. UM.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would expect further steps from both the UK,

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>from both London and Washington. So London is an interesting

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>one here because London Grad long been a nickname and

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>UK been a little slower on on targeting and sanctioning

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>them than than the EU and US. Um. And what

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that coming from London? Yeah, it's

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been a real um. You know, they talk a

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>tough game the UK, but they've just failed to follow through. Um.

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, as you said, it's been

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>nicknamed London Grad because so many Russians love to come

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>here and buy mansions and send their kids to schools here. Um.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the legal climate is making it I

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think a little bit more complicated and difficult, particularly post

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Brexit um for the UK government to move. And it's

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>surprising that they didn't have a lot of this prepared

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because they had been warning for so long about this

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>invasion that they hadn't done the ground mark beforehand to

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>try to target some of these oligarchs. Um. You know

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the moves that they announced just tonight. Um. Okay, there

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are two additional oligarchs that everyone has been saying, why

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't these guys sanctioned? Um? But that's a still a

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>small step compared to what the European Union has done,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which has been much more aggressive UM and sanctioning, you know,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>triple the number that the UK has, and seizing yachts um.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You know it's the French seized the yachts of the

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Rossness State, the state backed oil company UM

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>today and um uh usman Off, the billionaire who was

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>sanctioned by both the UK and the US today. His

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>yacht was sanctioned by the Germans in Hamburg. So UM.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, Europe has been a surprise player here in

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of its aggressive moves. Stephanie, you what's great about

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to you is that and you write this in

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>your story that you witness the collapse of the Soviet

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Union back you were in Prague. You are a college

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or recent college graduate. Um. What is it that maybe

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we've misread um as a world because there was so

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>much hope there, you know, hope at that time. But

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>here we are today. Yeah, I mean, you know, thirty

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>years a sort of as a business journalist, I reported

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on it Western companies trying to get into Russia. UM.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously there's a whole sordid story of you know,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>how the Russian state went about privatization and created all

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of these oligarchs to begin with, and you know, huge

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>problems in the way that we've done. UM. But you

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know now what you have is and I think it's

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>really sad, um that there are a lot of you know, UM,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all this all this effort to try to integrate Russia

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and the global economy and create a sort of functioning

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>business sector has been completely destroyed, you know, in a

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in a week, um, because of the actions of Putin.

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know it'll be very hard to recover that, UM,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's the only way, you know, because the NATO

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>does not want to be engaging in a direct war

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>with another nuclear power, they have to use these sanctions

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>as their only tool, um, really to try to force

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Putin to stand down, to try to isolate him starving

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the funds he needs to wage this war. All Right,

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it on that note. UM. There's so

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>much in this story, and there's so much in the

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>coverage in the magazine this week, and Stephanie, we know

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you've been really busy, so thank you for for finding

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>time for us once again. Stephanie Baker, she's financial investigation

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>senior writer at Bloomberg News. On the phone from London.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Check out her story and the other stories that are

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the magazine this week. You can find it on

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg at Bloomberg dot com and on newsstands and

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>our thanks to Joe Webber, editor a Business Week. You're

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So another of

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>our most read stories on the Bloomberg Today, how has

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with indexing major index providers officially cutting Russian

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>assets from their engauges. So really ratcheting up the pressure

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on exchange traded fund industry already facing an extraordinary stress test.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>We know what happens? Then. Carolina Wilson is senior Emerging

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>markets reporter for Bloomberg News. She joins us on the

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York. Carolina, how does it? How does

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it work when you actually drop a company or a

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>group of companies this in this case a region from

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>an index fund? How is that done? Yeah? Hi, and

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. You know, it depends, It depends

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>on the phone that we're talking about. These bigger indexes

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>by MSCI insle Do Russell, they're tracked by broader emerging

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>market ets, those that cover the global complex a bit

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>more generally, and those have a pretty small explosure to Russia,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe three to four percent of the fund holding. So

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the bigger stress questioned question and question here is what

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for those single country e T s

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>holding Russian assets a bit more exclusively? And while some

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of it is a way to see game, we know

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that many of these funds will have difficulty actually selling

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>those underlying Russian assets to either comply with these index

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>changes or in response to investors trying to their position.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Tarlie and I remember a time when the fun industry

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was starting right in those big countries. Single country funds

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>were massive, and that's how investors would often you know,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>look to get exposure, especially when it comes to an

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>emerging market like Russia. Um, but I'm curious how much

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>money are we talking? What kind of you know, fund

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>flows have we been seeing in these specific type of funds. Sure,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so when we look at sort of the globally listed

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>e T s tracking Russian assets a bit more exclusively

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as a closed yesterday, that was about I believe one

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion US dollars. And you're right careful, you know,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>part of the beauty or attraction at ets is that

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they promise you this access to this otherwise kind of

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>tough to invest in parts of the market. So even

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if the funds are having trouble washing their hands of

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>these underlying rush for now, a lot of these trading

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary market. Okay, So let's go from that

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>index conversation to more the E t F conversation and

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>speak a little bit about what's happening in these in

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>these funds right now on the actual fund level. So

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen you know, a lot of activity with RSX,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, the van neck uh one with e t

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>F with exposure to to Russia. Um, how does trading

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>work there if if the funds are being removed from

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the index, and if you know, they're not creating new

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>shares or like taking in new money, but it's still

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>being traded on the secondary market, because there this is

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>something that people can still act, says, using their trading

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>their like retail investors can still access using their trading platforms.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It sort of looks like a master ring,

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like at the surface level. So if the underlying local

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Moscow exchange is shattered, there will be a massive price

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>dislocation between the funds trading price and it's net active

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>value or the value of those underlying securities. But it

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>does allow the fund to act as a sort of

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>price discovery vehicle. And that's what a lot of people

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in this market will say, you know, for an otherwise

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>untradeable market, here's kind of a look at what investors

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like it should be priced at. And it's something

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in the past. You know. The story

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>talks about how the industry has been tested in this

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>way before, back in fifteen when the Greek stock exchange

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>closed during the country's government debt crisis. The Greek specific

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>ETS was available to investors during the arid spring when

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Egyptian stock market closed, that Veneck epdts continued to trade,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and in both events there was a big gap between

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the ETS price and it's n a V. And in

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>both situations, the fund act as price discovery vehicles while

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>those securities couldn't trade in the underlying markets. I mean,

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's part of what's tricky now, is I mean, could

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we potentially if the situation if this war, let's let's

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest about what it is, this Russian war against Ukraine.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, fingers crossed resolves itself sooner rather than later.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Could all of this just come and done very quickly,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or it doesn't. Necessarily we shouldn't assume it's going to

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>happen that way, right. It absolutely has to do with

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>timing here, right, So depending on how long we see

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>this war ongoing, depending on how long these sanctions remain

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of firm. Um, if it's too long, I could

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>foresee some of these funds happening having to close down.

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen one liquidate, We've seen several mentions sort

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of halt to their creation. Um, you know, so depending

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on timing here, these things could sort of pop back

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>up and continue to create, or we may see some

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>more closures in the market. I mean, this might not

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be something you can speak to, Carolina, but it's something

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that Caroline I've been been talking about. Is is depending

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>on what happens. You know, these sanctions might not be

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lifted for a really long time, right, And even if

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they are, what is the appetite for actually doing business

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in the in this area of the world, given what's

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>happening right now, like that might not continue? Am I not?

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's all about risk. It's risk appetite, right,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And so also if we see some of these investors

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>who like these single country et s and have liked

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>this Russia exposure for a certain aspect of the risk portfolio,

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the question is where will they turn to

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for that for that risk appetite? Where will they turn

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to for that yield? And so that's sort of why

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we continue to monitor flows and see, you know, follow

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>where that money will go, right, Becaud, do you know

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets? We know risky and sometimes that's where bottom

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>feeders come in. But nonetheless we'll keep an eye on it. Carolina,

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Carolina Wilson. She's senior Emerging markets

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News. Her story among the most read

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal road. Yeah but you let me drive?

0:24:55.040 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, all right, please the D level.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drive. Good question. This is the

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio. And just about

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>tennis left in today's trading session. In a session where

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing those major equity averages bouncing around, we're pretty

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>much at our loads of the session. As we just

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>heard from Charlie on that Nastac really taking tim the

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest hit on a percentage basis, it's down, yeah, really

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>being dragged down by names like Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft in Video, Facebook, Apple, Google,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a MD and more. That list certainly goes on. One

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>person who we love to have on talking about a

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of those names and more is Sylvia Jablonski, chief

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at Defiance ETS. Sylvia joins us on the

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York City. Sylvia, it's great to have

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you with us. I want to start with some of

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>these tech names and the way that you know that

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>tech is really underperforming as a whole today. Um. I

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>know because I know that you know. You and I

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>spoke earlier this week on Quick take Stock and you

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you told us that you know, tech was really an

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>area of interest for you guys and where you saw

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for investors to go in and and buy the

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>dip hi. Yes, good, good afternoon, and great to be

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with you again today. Um, you actually listed off a

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of my shopping list. So interesting, So definitely definitely

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a great conversation I have. So you know, my my

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of this is really that, um, you know, although

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the geopolitical situation Russian Ukraine is obviously dominating the news

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>headlights everywhere right now and is a major you know,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian issue very obviously, UM, and it is impacting markets.

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that even prior to that, sort

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of the FED and the sphere and and volatility in

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the market had had taken some of the froth off

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of what was thought to be overvalued megacap tech names

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>UM some of the ones which which you've listed, and

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I look at some of those names

0:26:55.520 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like Apple, UM, you know, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, to name

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a few, if you look at some of the earnings

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>information and kind of look back to a cloud for example,

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Cloud for a lot of those companies grew thirty UM.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, Google is going to have add growth with

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with the sort of reopen trade on top of that,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, cloud growth. There apples involved in automented reality,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially the feature of Web THREEO, the metaverse, you know,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>plus um subscribers, streaming products and you name it. So

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think these companies all have sort of diversified business lines.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of cash UM catfaxes is strong,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of them, Microsoft in particular, giving back

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cash to investors. And I just think

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that they remain resilient. So when I look at them,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a NAZAC more than fifteen percent high, it's

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, given today's market um activity anyway, and and

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these names off of their all time high

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 1>with with multiple pulling back. I really like it in here,

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this is going to be a

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a Poco trade. What did your thing too? And and

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to me a little bit about your investments that

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got your you know, you invest in hotel, airline

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and cruise. It's traditional and that that your e t

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>F has down about two percent this year, but you

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>really do tap into the changing world, the innovative world,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and your digital revolution equity e t F down so

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>far this year. You definance um next gen H two

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>down about seventeen that's energy hydrogen next gen fuel, which

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about so much in the context of

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion Ukraine and the world rethinking how it

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>gets its energy. Your next gen SPAC, you know, SPACs

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have been having a tough time down eighteen percent. How

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult though is this And for you guys and for

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you specifically this environment, you know, it's it's it's difficult

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>right when you when you see those performance members and whatnot.

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you kind of like look at what is

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in our et F, most of it is disruptive technology

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, so that's what's being hit the

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>harness right now. And and you know, not not far

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>behind than AZDAC, but you know, it's all of those trades.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So the reopen trade prior to things sort of heating

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>up and intensifying to the level that they're at, which

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is you know, even just a week ago, um, Marriott, Hilton,

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Southwest Airlines, Delta United, Um, you know, sort of sort

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of pick the travel reopened name, Royal Caribbean, We're um,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we're we're well, you know, more than out performing sp

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and SMP five at that point, down eight percent, and

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>these names were all up you know, seven eight nine,

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so um and and really the tensions kind of through

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that back and now that's down two percent. But once

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they sort of get past this, I expect to see,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the healthy economy and reopen trade,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of growth there. And in terms of the

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>other names, you know, hydrogen I think is part of

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. You know, we're talking about climate change and

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, now here we are and there's a

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>big debate about whether, well, maybe we should be drilling

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for more oil because look at this sort of situation.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that we're going to go that direction.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, you know, another way to look at

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it is maybe we should continue to invest in things

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like fuel cell technology and hydrogen um, you know, solar

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and green metals so that we don't need to rely

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on um you know, some of these environmental um types

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of commodities that that are you know, sort of holding

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>us housage a little bit right now. And Sylvia, we

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the CEO of of plug Power yesterday. Is

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that a company that you guys think of your it is?

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It is, it is. It's one of the top holdings

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in the hydrogen ts and I think what they're doing

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is great. I mean, they're they're creating this this sort

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of situation and are huge asset for for for the

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>future use of of you know, hydrogen and fuel cell

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>cell technology to power everything from crane, buses, bicycles, cars,

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, an airline. So it's a huge trend

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for the future. And you know, the same thing with

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>with the quantum and the five G. I mean, there's

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just no doubt in my mind that that the world

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to change and if we're going to have

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles, augmented reality about three point all these things

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>happen without you know, semi conductors by g and and

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>some of those disruptive technologies are just getting hammered right now.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So new money somebody has to commit. I mean, how

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>much new money is coming in right now for you?

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Or is it a little bit? Is it not happening?

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You know? And in all honesty, I think that, um,

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of investors sitting on the sideline,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so we're actually not really losing much, which is great.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the depreciation it's from pricing,

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>right because the stocks to show down markets down from

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>nats are down. So it's good to see that the

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>shares outstanding remains strong. And we're seeing a lot of

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>slow actually into hydrogen and into cruise that travel related

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to ETF right now and everything else. I mean, as

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you would suspect, I think that there's enough fear out there.

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, it's like, um, you know, March, it's sort

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of another last year, but for a different reason. And

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think when we look back on this, we'll see

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't call the bottom here, right, but

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think this is a good dollar cross averaging

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>type of you know, week and month. Yeah, And I

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thought that's telling what you said, you can't you don't

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>see the or you can't see the bottom yet. It's

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's very tricky, and we certainly hear that from lots

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of other folks who are watching this market environment. Hey, Sylvia,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Sylvia Jablonsky, she's chief investment officer

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>at Definance CTF with us on the phone in New

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>York City. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. And

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News