WEBVTT - Anthropic Draws Investor Offers at Over $800 Billion Value

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Carolline Hide in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up and Thropic rebuffs investors

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>pushing offers on funding that would value it at more

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 2>than eight hundred billion dollars plus.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Metro expands a multi billion dollar partnership with Broadcom to

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 3>design and build custom.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Chips and ASML the supply of cutting edge chip making

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>machines raises, it's for your sales forecast. Is AI demand

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>fuels growth.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>And that demand is fueling growth. When it comes to

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the benchmarks today, ed despite the ongoing anxiety about conflict

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle East, but hope optimism that some sort

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>of extension to the ceasefire might be found, we are

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 3>at or near record highs. The S and P five

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred is at a new record high. We hold onto

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 3>these games towards the closed we're up three tens of percent.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Then aw's that one hundred ever so closed to a

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 3>record high that it had last year, up six tens

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>of percent. But look at the length of games that

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>we have had then, as that one hundred is now

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>up for eleven straight days. It is increased by thirteen

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.919
<v Speaker 3>percent over that stretch. So long as win in streets

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>is twenty nineteen.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 2>N single movers, this is what's driving the market right now.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Look at Broadcom up almost four percent, Metas actually also

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>pushing high. I think that's probably more in line with

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>where the market's at right now. This is an expansion

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 2>of an existing agreement. Broadcom works with Meta for their

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 2>custom silicon, and later in the block we're going to

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>talk to Mandate saying who leads our research and Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>It was going to take a look at some of

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the pictures from when I visited Meta and get into

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>detail about what those chips actually are. In private markets

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is where the big story is right now, and Tropic

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 2>is drawing investor interests at evaluation of eight hundred billion

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars or higher. That would be a massive jump from

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>its three hundred and fifty billion dollar price tag. Just

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>in February, bluemokes that Tasha Mascarene is part of the

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>team that broke this story.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's be super clear.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 2>This is investors going to Anthropic and saying, you guys

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>should raise money at this valuation, we want to do this,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>and Entropic saying we do not want to do this

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>at this time.

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you're absolutely right. I mean, we've both been covering

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 5>the AI boom long enough to know that the investor

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 5>interest can soon turn into an actual deal. But in

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 5>the case of Anthropic, I mean, they close their employee

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 5>tender at around half of this new valuation just earlier

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 5>this month, and so right now we're seeing Nthropic push

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 5>back on those prices. But these are serious term sheets

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 5>that we're hearing or even encroaching higher than eight hundred.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 4>And investors think the evaluation.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 5>On the valuation, Yes, and investors think that that's a

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 5>good deal.

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Natasha, what sort of amount would they want

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>to raise? Could they need to raise? Because as much

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>as they steal all the headlines, if ideas that Opus

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 3>four point seven is coming soon according to reporting, or

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 3>indeed that we see Mythos being very staged rolled out,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>there is this concern that maybe it's stage because there

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>isn't the access to compute and that costs money.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I mean, I think at this point we don't

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 5>know the exact numbers of how large the raise could be,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 5>but we do know that there is this time crunch

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 5>that everyone is thinking about when it comes to Anthropic

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 5>the IPO. As we've reported, this is a company that

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 5>has already been a high profile startup for the past

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 5>two years. But now there's this really real ticking time

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 5>crunch for an IPO as soon as October, as we've reported,

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 5>and so I believe that we're going to see new

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 5>capital talks continue pretty relentlessly until then. It's really just

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 5>a decision of if Anthropic needs it thinks it needs

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 5>to secure that capital before it makes the jump into

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the public markets. To your point, the new model gives

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 5>a real exact pinpoint reason to where where the capital

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 5>would go at this moment.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Brilliant reporting has always been braised in attach and mascotiness.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much, winning us on all things Anthropic. Let's

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 3>go from private back to the public markets. So you

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>see Meta up almost two percent, broad coom is up

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 3>three point six percent. That's as they expanded that multi

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar partnership with the chip maker to design and

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>build custom chips to power social media giants AI ambitions.

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Bloombag Intelligence has said that the move along when Meta's

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 3>new news spark model shows stronger confidence and in house

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 3>chips for inference. Though Meta could face more pressure on

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 3>spending returns without a cloud business. Many seeing BlueBag intelligence

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>helps pen that note joins us right now and just

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 3>talk to us a little bit man deep about well,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the desire to custom chips, what sort of edge does

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 3>it give it when it's already dependent on AMD and

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 3>video two.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look, the proof is what Google has done

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 6>with TPUs and when you think about, you know, token efficiency,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 6>there is no better company than Google when it comes

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 6>to how they have ramped up TPUs for both training

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 6>and influencing workloads. And now that Meta is getting more

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 6>confident about it's on model, they have redesigned the pre

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 6>training stack over the last nine months. They feel they're

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 6>at a point where they are looking for token efficiency

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's where they want to go to

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 6>the custom silicon route. It's worked for them when it

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 6>comes to recommendation engines and now they want to do

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.559
<v Speaker 6>the same on the accelerator side with Broadcom Mandy.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>But I want to look at the specific Meta chips

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>themselves MTIA Meta Training Inference Accelerator. These are some images

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that we took when we visited the MTIA Lab last

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>month and basically how it works is right. They work

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>with Broadcom on the design and architecture of the silicon

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and Broadcom then goes to TSMC and TS and what

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>this deal represents is expanded volume commitment on that existing technology.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>You can check out you know, Bloomber's coverage of the

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 2>specifics of the accelerators. At the same time, Meta is

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 2>a big buyer of GPUs and other accelerators from elsewhere.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 4>That part of your.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Research that you say they might be inhibited by lack

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of a cloud computing business. What do you mean by

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 2>that if there's such a great buyer of capacity, Well.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 4>So think of it this way.

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 6>If you are buying in video chips in volume, you

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 6>want to rent them through your cloud business because for Microsoft,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 6>Azure or Amazon or even Google for that matter, it's

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 6>a big source of you know, cloud revenue, cloud infrastructure

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 6>revenue that these companies are generating in their respective segments.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 6>For a Meta, if you're focused on token efficiency and

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 6>you're buying the most expensive chips out there without a

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 6>cloud business, that makes that ROI equation very hard. And

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 6>you know, they're at a point where they feel good

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 6>about their model. They have three billion users to serve

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 6>in terms of inferencing, they want to do it with

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 6>their own chip.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Is there average chance that with excess compute it does

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>start becoming more of a cloud company matter.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so, just because of the surface area

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 6>they have with the family of apps, you know, WhatsApp, Instagram,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 6>the core Blue App, three billion users. If we are

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 6>talking about personalized intelligence and you know AI agents that

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 6>really work for consumers, they have you know, a lot

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 6>of demand for inferencing that they can use their own

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 6>infrastructure force. So to my mind, they should have done

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 6>this probably a few years back in terms of starting

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 6>a cloud business like Oracle did you know with this

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 6>dep wave, But probably it's too late now.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Those MTIA chips, what they are useful currently is is

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 2>ranking recommendations in timelines. That's right, really focused on inference.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>So the idea that they leased them out, you've got

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to come back and get more into that. Man Deep

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing a Bloomberg Intelligence top Research. Thank you very much.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's continue with this sort of AI demand story. Look

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>at shares of ASML down four point four percent. Now

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the supplier cutting edge hip making Machines raised its four

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>year sales forecast, but that brought it in line with

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>analyst estimates and attention already turning to what can be

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>expected for next year twenty twenty seven. Let's discuss with

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Tammy Chew. She's the head of Tech equity research at Behremberg.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of this contradiction, right. The headline is

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>like really positive, raising that guidance, raising that outlook. The

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 2>demand is clearly there, the stock falls and so like,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 2>it seems like the expectations were high. People are already

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>looking much further ahead in terms of that demand picture.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 4>What was your read on it?

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 7>Sure, So that's a very big point. So basically I

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 7>would say don't forget that. To start with, ASMI is

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 7>already up nearly forty percent year to date, and semi

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 7>equipment segment has been one of the strongest i would

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 7>say subsegment in tech year to date in this year.

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 7>So therefore I would call the set of results reported

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 7>by ASMO today as solid. They raised a four year

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 7>guidance by four percent. The Q one gross margin was

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 7>way above constant expectation because of strow mix. At the

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 7>same time, they confirm that they are increasing their capacity

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 7>to about at least eighty UV tools from at least

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 7>sixty UVI tools year in twenty twenty seven. So I

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 7>would say the set of results has been very strong,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 7>but at the same time as the most let's say successful,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 7>our high profile tech company in Europe Asmo's always well

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 7>owned and asmox location has always been elevated. So I

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 7>would call today's share price movement as just lack of

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 7>revision on the back of this solid set of results

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 7>instead of anything which is worse to me.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Can we just linger for a moment what you just said,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight zero EUV machines. So a lot of people

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 2>they'll say, hold on, I don't understand that this is

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the world's most important maker of machines in the chip

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing process and they're guiding that they'll make eighty of them.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Of course, the context is there one hundred million dollars apiece.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Just explain why that number is significant?

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 7>Of course, So those tools you are correct are sold

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 7>for two hundred and thirty million each, So those are

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 7>probably one of the most expensive set of tool in

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 7>the market or in the world. And I would say

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 7>that it's important because we are moving from sixty in

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 7>this year and we were at about forty few years ago.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 7>So therefore, from forty to eighty, they're already doubling that capacity.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 7>They can serve the market, which is showing that AI

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 7>demand and memory demand has been super solid over the

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 7>next let's say six months or two years, and going

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 7>forward is likely to support the further expuilled expansion of

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 7>AI market or memory market. So therefore, as a result,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 7>I would say that eighty number, it doesn't look like

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 7>a big number, but don't forget those tools are two

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 7>hundred and thirty million each and we were at forty

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 7>two years ago.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Are they in any way supply strained here? Tammy? I

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>mean some on the straight and hope to see the

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>number ninety thrown around. Is there a limitation factor to them?

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Could they be making more so?

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 7>In our being, we don't think that asma will be

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 7>a bottleneck. You are right that ninety was mentioned previously

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 7>as the potential capacity number, but ASMO has been super

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 7>careful in terms of building capacity as for customer demand,

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 7>because you don't want to end up in the situation

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 7>that you build ninety tools or whatever the number is,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 7>but there is no demand for that. So therefore, as

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 7>a result, I would say that eighty number is a

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 7>result of smo's discussion with customers and that eighty number

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 7>for the time being is a reflection of asmo's agreement

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 7>with customer how to serve the and the market demand.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 7>And I don't think it's a limitation in theory. In

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 7>my view, Asma can actually do more. Is the customer

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 7>need more and what ASMO has been needing is to

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 7>hire more people expand with their supply chain. So I

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 7>don't think or be the bottleneck.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the demand constraints or fulfillment, because it

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>feels as though it's insatiable in terms of need for

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 3>chips and therefore needs for equipment. But they had exposure

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>to China. How is that continued to unfold?

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 7>So from a China perspective, China used to be forty

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 7>percent of their business two years ago and now with

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 7>the non China business been growing strongly, China is about

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 7>sub twenty percent of the total business, and China has

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 7>been stable. I would say China was slightly better than

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 7>the previous expected and China will be stable in this year.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 7>But in this quarter, the four year race was purely

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 7>because of non China business was stronger than expected. So

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 7>going forward, I would say ASM what will be continued

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 7>to be driven by this non China business, AI investment

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 7>memory shortage to further continue as the case for the

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 7>next few years. And China. I do have the view

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 7>that China will be flatish and China is working on

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 7>their localization. Of course, month for China is not likely

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 7>to fall off the cliff. So therefore, as a result,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 7>in conclusion, over the next few years a SMO will

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 7>be driven by both factors, which non China business will

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 7>likely to be the key driver.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Talking about two hundred and thirty million for for EUV,

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean if you think about twin scan exc some

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 2>of the people I talked to you go sub tun animeter.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>They can get three hundred and fifty million for that.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll get back to it at another day. There's a

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>big project. It's called TERRAFAB. It's basically on paper, but

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 2>it says that in the future there'll be one terrawat

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of compute capacity put through fabs operated by Tesla, SpaceX

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and XAI. That would on paper make them one of

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the biggest buyers of ASML's equipment. Have you and the

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>team modeled for that being real or for you, is

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>it still an idea.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we would love to and you're absolutely right.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 7>So ASMO do have a version of machine which cost

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 7>three hundred and fifty million, which is called hi Enna.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 7>That's probably we'll be seen when Terrrafab is ready to

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 7>take equipment. So for the time being, we haven't put

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 7>Terrorfab in our numbers, but as for our understanding, the

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 7>intention is real and there has been discussion already within

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 7>the supply chain of our Terrafab, but for the time being,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 7>it won't be something happening in the significant way from

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 7>a number perspective over the next two years, So therefore

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 7>we haven't reflected that, but I do hope that we

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 7>can put that in numbers in two years.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Siven, We love the numbers. Timing to you, thanks for

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>joining us, head of Tech Equity Research at Bahreenberg. Great

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 3>to have you with us. Now, we've got a key

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>conversation coming up with the IMF Managing Director Carstilina goo

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Java as the IMF Spring meetings they are underway in Washington.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>We're going out to Francin Laquar in a minute, discipling

0:14:49.720 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>their tech. Let's talk about where the IMF is right now.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Spring meetings are upon us in Washington. Francin Lava is

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 3>alongside the IMF Managing Director, Christine Millenakle, gavea please take

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 3>it away, fancy.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks so much.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm so delighted to be really here by the host

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 8>of the whole show where everyone from around the world

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 8>shows up, Christina Gregeva, thank you so much for joining us.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 8>Look the IMF and your world economic outlook. Everyone here

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 8>has read it three times just to understand exactly what

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 8>the dynamic is.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 4>You've down credited your forecast. But there's also a.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 8>Scenario where the world economy skims recession.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 9>How likely is that depends on the longevity of the

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 9>war in the Middle East and the scale of infrastructure

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 9>destruction that happens see in the countries over there, and

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 9>that is the big anon. We now have ceased fire.

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 9>I pray it turns into a ruble peace, and in

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 9>that case we can see somewhat faster recovery. But the

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 9>uncertainty has been profound, and we only need to learn

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 9>to operate in an environment of high end and permanent uncertainty.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 8>And even if there's a ceasefire that stays okay and

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 8>there's some kind of diplomatic resolution. Is a market discounting

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 8>the real impact on the price of all and their

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 8>for inflation.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, let me just say that even if the war

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 9>ends tomorrow, it would take quite some time for the

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 9>recovery to kick in, not only because of the infrastructure destruction.

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 9>Tankers are slow moving vessels. A tanker that leads today

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 9>would take forty days to reach the Pacific islands, So

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 9>we have to keep in mind that the impact is

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 9>already baked in. Why are markets so optimistic? I think

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 9>part of the reason is because there is a high

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 9>concentration of financial assets in the United States. The US

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 9>economy is doing well. It is relatively not so impacted

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 9>because the US is an export and not importer, and

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 9>that creates that picture of dynamism and vibrancy. But I

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 9>can tell you that's not the story of the rest

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 9>of the world. In the rest of the world already

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 9>there is a lot of pain.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 8>So I mean, does that mean that the market is mispricing,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 8>that all this market exuberance is actually misplaced?

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 9>What it means is that markets are geared by events

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 9>in the largest economy that are really positive. The United

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 9>States is the only large economy that has high productivity growth,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 9>and markets are seeing that technology optimism is here. Markets

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 9>are rushing on it. But should they be more caution?

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 9>I would argue yes, because what we are seeing in

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 9>terms of supply chain disruptions is already quite significant. And

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 9>with every day that passes, that anchor is not levius

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 9>living for a destination, and that delays the rebounds of

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 9>the world economy.

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 8>How much do you worry about governments trying to overadjust

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 8>if inflation expectations goes up, and actually how much of

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 8>a mess would this be?

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 9>And so such an important question. So look at what

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 9>is happening. Short term inflation expectations have moved up, not

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 9>by much, though we have increased our inflation projection from

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 9>three point eight percent to four point two percent. It

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 9>is up, but not dramatically and very important. Long term

0:18:54.160 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 9>inflation expectations don't budge. They're well anchored made they stay

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 9>this way. So it is very important that central banks

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 9>act carefully. Those that are in a good position of credibility,

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 9>they can take weight and see attitude. They also have

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 9>to signal we are prepared to act if it is necessary.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 9>But please don't rush my word is because of twenty two.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 9>Now central banks may say let's move faster, and that

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 9>could be very dangerous because it would suffocate growth.

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we're looking back at every IMF World Bank

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 8>meetings since twenty twenty. They spent something. Twenty twenty was

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 8>COVID twenty twenty two. Of course, it was the Russian

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 8>invasion of Ukraine. Then you had terriffs. I mean a

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 8>shock after shock.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 9>So it looks like a layer cake, shock upon shock

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 9>upon shock, except it is not at all tasty. I

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 9>can tell you that everybody has to absorb reality and realities.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 9>We are in a more shocked prone world. Shocks will

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 9>continue to come. What does it mean for fiscal authorities?

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 9>The buffers when you are in good time, don't way

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 9>your resources for monetary policy, Calibrate policy carefully, be prepared

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 9>to active if and when necessary, and everywhere. Countries have

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 9>to be much more alert to the high uncertainty within

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 9>which we operate. Agility, adaptability, this is what we have

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 9>to do.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 8>How worried are you about the UK? This was one

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 8>of the countries I was down graded the most.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 9>I mean they are downgraded, but also we see the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 9>UK very mature approach to policy. The UK is very

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 9>careful not to go into indiscriminate spending and Bank of

0:20:55.400 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 9>England is very clear around the approach they are going

0:20:59.920 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 9>to take the right approach to this situation. Actually, we

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 9>see the UK in terms of fiscal response as a

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 9>good example for others, because many other countries are rushing

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 9>to throw money they don't have out of the good

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 9>intention to help people. It has to be targeted, it

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 9>has to be temporary, and it has to be done

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 9>within the fiscal band boundaries of countries, and the UK

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 9>is doing that. UK is also a country where there

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 9>is a recognition that your best defense is growth. Pro

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 9>growth policies are gonna be your buffer for the future.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 9>Not easy, But.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 8>I also want to ask you about Look the US

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 8>is again President Trump is going after j Powell saying, look,

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 8>you'll fire family, doesn't step down from the Fed. I mean,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 8>we go back to this idea of central bank independence.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 8>How problematic is it, especially in a time where actually

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 8>central banks are a very very difficult job at hand.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 9>We have decades of evidence that independence center banks are

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 9>an economic asset. They serve well when they have the

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 9>opportunity to make decisions and the space to make decisions responsibly.

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 9>And I can tell you one very interesting fact, center

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 9>banks in emerging market economies outperformed their advanced economy peers.

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 9>They have built that independence strength of data dependent policy making.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 8>Again, market seems to look through a lot of these concerns.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 8>Just we're you that the function of almost keeping things

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 8>and tracks working differently.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 9>On one level, it is good that the economy functions

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 9>because getting into panic is not going to help. So

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 9>good functioning of markets is helping. Having that, we have

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 9>seen titaning of financial conditions by some but not by man.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 9>We have seen currency depreciation of some emerging markets, again

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:10.239
<v Speaker 9>not dramatically. As long as we have a trajectory for

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 9>the war to end and for economic activity to restart,

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 9>we are in a very good place. But if you

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 9>have a prolonged periods of time, it would be hard

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 9>to keep optimistic.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 8>And I also wanted to ask you a little bit

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 8>about some new countries or all countries that you know

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 8>are trying to access some of your programs. I wanted

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 8>to start with Venezuela, so CEE imf ready to recognize

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 8>the acting president to start negotiations.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 9>At this point, Venezuela does not have recognition by majority

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 9>of members. This being said, we are prepared to engage.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 9>Actually at a junior technical level. We have been approached

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 9>in good faith by the Venezuelan authorities. They desperately need

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 9>help because, as you know, the economy shrank from this

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 9>to one third. They have a risk of hyperinflation knocking

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 9>on the door. Eight million people are outside of the country.

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 9>So once our membership decides, even when they decide to recognize,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 9>we are ready to go. It is a matter of membership.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 9>I can tell you one thing that there is an

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 9>understanding among the region, the neighbors of Venezuela, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Chile.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 9>They don't want a failed state. They want Venezuela engaging

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 9>with the funds.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 8>And do thank you so much for joining. I also

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 8>send it back to your New York Fancine.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 3>A fantastic interview as ever, and we've got more coming

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 3>from you. Next up the ECB Governing Council member the

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>s A. Bloomberg Tech.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to blue Tech.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 2>The European Central Bank is facing a pivotal decision at

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.959
<v Speaker 2>the end of the month. Inflation risks are building daily.

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Is the Iran conflict drives energy prices higher. Bloomberg's Francine

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Lacroix is standing by with Jakim Nagel, Bundesbank President and

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Governing Council member of the European Central Bank Frean scene.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, thank you so much, and I'm so delighted to

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 8>speak to Yo Kenago. Thank you governor for joining us.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 8>Like you've said that a hike in April is an

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 8>option if the inflation outlooks ours. Are we there yet?

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think it is a very opaque situation. I

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 10>think I believe from today, from this time point, I

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 10>would say there's not enough clarity what will happen in April.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 10>But I still keep the position that we should have

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 10>all the optionalities that are necessary to tackle the situation,

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 10>and we will take into account the data we will

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 10>have in April, and then we will see.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 8>And I understand things flutuate, you know, on an hourly basis,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 8>But what do you need to happen to support a

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 8>rate hikin April.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 10>Well, what I see is that this cretion around the

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 10>strait of farmus is a very essential one. This is

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 10>the little heel of the world economy. So this has

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 10>to be resolved, and I believe this is ongoing, this uncertainty,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 10>and this will trigger also uncertainty regarding oil prices. Everything

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 10>what is going around in the world is dependent on

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 10>that question. This is a bottleneck, and so I believe

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 10>two weeks can bring a lot of new information and

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 10>we will take that into account.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 8>Good information as well, because you know, to be clear,

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm not a military strategist, but at the moment it's

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 8>very difficult to see a way forward in the immediate term.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm not a military expert on that, but what

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 10>I see is a lot of around this question. So,

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 10>as I alluded to, is changing on a daily basis.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 10>So it's all about cheer economics in geopolitics, and from

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 10>a monetary policy point of view, it's definitely not a

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 10>very comfortable situation. I think it developed a little bit

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 10>better over the course of the last week, but it's

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 10>still a very delicate situation and as I said, a

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 10>lot of uncertainties around this question.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 4>President.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, a lot of households, right, especially in Europe,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 8>will have the memory of twenty twenty two, the Russian

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 8>invasion of Ukraine. Is that what's lifting also inflation expectations,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 8>maybe higher than warranted.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 9>I can't exclude this.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 10>I think it's you're perfectly right that households learned from

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 10>the crisis in twenty twenty two, So we have to

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 10>see how how they might react, how their reaction function is.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 10>This is one of the things we have to look

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 10>at momentarily. I would say, on a medium term, inflation

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 10>seems to be well anchored, but this can change. So

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 10>it's really too early to say that we are again

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 10>on a safe ground. It's still it's a very shaky situation.

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 8>What the central banks learn from twenty twenty two. There's

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 8>a lot of criticism that you were a little bit

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 8>late to the game. Does that mean it gets readjusted

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 8>in twenty six Well.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 10>I would say the situation in twenty two two was

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 10>a different one. We came out of the pandemic now

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 10>we are when this war started in the Middle East,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 10>we were pretty much on our targets, so the situation

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 10>was completely different. Twenty twenty two, inflation was already high,

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 10>so it is not the same situation. But we learned

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 10>something from twenty twenty two. We will look at it

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 10>and we will assess the situation again when we are

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 10>coming together in Europe deciding about the future rate pass,

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 10>but there is no pre commitment where we are going.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 10>I think we should have our flexibility here what we

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 10>do and this gives us some let me see humto maneuver.

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and again.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 8>Because the situation is so fluid, there are a number

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 8>of scenarios. But does the baseline that the ECB has

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.719
<v Speaker 8>already warrant hikes?

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think the baseline scenario was based on data

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 10>of bits of March. So now we're here four or

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 10>five weeks later, so I would say we're somewhere in

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 10>between our baseline scenario and our edwords scenario. Now we

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 10>have to find out where it's going. It's going back

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 10>to the baseline, Sinni. I'm a very happy person. But

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 10>as I said, we should keep our flexibility. I think

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 10>this is the strength of good central banking that we

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 10>should take to We should take into account all the

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 10>necessary information and then draw the right conclusions.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 8>But if it doesn't go back to baseline next three weeks,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 8>is that what warrants a hike. I'm trying to understand. Again,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 8>it's a timeline, right, so you're trying to hit a

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 8>moving target.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 10>I will not exclude one or the other thing. I

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 10>think this is something. It is too early to say

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 10>where we are going. And as I said, I need

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 10>more information about this keepingtionalities, I have to repeat myself

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 10>here and then and then then we will and then

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 10>we will see.

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'm trying to push in your stigus Gods, I

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 8>like that.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 4>This is this is the game. Look.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 9>Your twenty twenty.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 8>Five strategy review also says that under certain circumstances, preemptive

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 8>action to the anchoring may be necessary. Is I mean,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 8>were you thinking about a scenario like this?

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think up still now I do not see

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 10>any de anchoring of inflation expectations. So this is good news,

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 10>but this could could change. Maybe it's too early to

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 10>come to the conclusion that everything is all right. So

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 10>I guess we need some time and coming back to

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 10>one pound. As long as the situation in the Middle

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 10>East around the Strait of Hormouse is not resolved. If

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 10>there's not a stable, let me say, situation about this

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 10>bottleneck that is so important for the world's economy, the

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 10>danger is rising that we will see again an inflation push.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 10>Uncertainty might go up even further, and this might trigger

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 10>than a process that could really become very really, very

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 10>tricky and I guess also dangerous government.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 8>I haven't mean, we've talked about hikes, but I haven't

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 8>asked you about how you calibrate it. I mean, could

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 8>you see two hikes a two point five percent sending

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 8>a message of the mean business but actually not too much.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, like baby hikes.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 10>You will not get from you any we say indication.

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 10>I see what markets are, what is the market expectation? Well,

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.719
<v Speaker 10>as always I think the market. We'll see how we

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 10>react in the governing council in Europe, and.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 8>I have to take this sy decent approach, I understand,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 8>which is why I love interviewing so much. But you know,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 8>would you say that equity markets are off, but actually

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 8>option markets for hikes are, They're in a better place,

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 8>because again we're not sure what the market is looking at.

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 10>I appreciate the optimism of the equity markets. I think

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 10>it is helpful to a certain extent that there's not more,

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 10>let me say, trouble lens we see from from equity

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 10>markets or stock markets. But again we should be very vigilant,

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 10>very cautious, take all necessary information and look what's happened,

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 10>what will happen over the course of the upcoming next

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 10>two weeks, and I hope really that we will find

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 10>a solution how to stabilize the situation.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 8>In the middle is if you see inflation and what's

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 8>your paying threshold for looking at inflation GLO above target,

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 8>if it's a bit short lived, like inflation at three percent,

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 8>four percent, design like what you know, what's a trigger

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 8>red alert sign.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 10>It looks like at least for the moment, As I said,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 10>we cannot say well, this is transitory or that will

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 10>stay for a longer period. I will not tagle one

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 10>number or give you one number that would make get

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 10>me to that or maybe two that would make me nervous.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 4>So it is.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 10>It is not a very comfortable situation. But at the end,

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 10>I believe we will deliver on our Minday, this is

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 10>a surprise the ability and we will do everything what

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.239
<v Speaker 10>is necessary to keep the interest rates to where they

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 10>are or change. We will decide on that in two weeks.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 8>Government, Thank you so much, it's always such a pleasure

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 8>to speak to you.

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 9>That was a bundessbag.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 8>President. I can naggle with that. I'm going to send

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 8>it back to your New York and I'll have plenty

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 8>more from IOMs throughout the day.

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Francy in Laqua, thank you very much. Let's get back

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to what's happening in technology and financial markets then, as

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 2>that one hundred is up for an eleventh straight session,

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>eleventh straight day, it's best run of gains since December

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of twenty nineteen. It's not quite at the record highs

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that it hit in October, but it's getting pretty close.

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 2>And within that, a single name that I've been looking

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>at is Tesla, up for a fifth straight day of gains,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 2>best run since September. Now, the story with Tesla is

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 2>that it's lagged some of the megacap peers, so a

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of rally in terms of catch up makes a

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of sense. But at that gain of seven and

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 2>a half percent, it's on track for its best day

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 2>also since September.

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Carrac Yeah, let's focus in on another single name, Ed

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 3>and it's on the higher side, but for reasons that

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 3>it's cutting up to sixteen percent of its workforce. Talking

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 3>about Snap and then push to end the years of losses.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 11>More on that.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Next, this is Blue meg Tech. Let's check in on

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 3>shares of Snap. They are rallying some nine percent a day,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 3>and the company is planning to cut it's people. About

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 3>one thousand jobs will go sixteen percent thereof of staff

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and says it pushes to really raining costs and try

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.959
<v Speaker 3>and reach profitability. Blommog social media reporter Alex Learn wrote

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 3>up the story and look, they're also closing down New Hire,

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 3>so that's another three hundred that will not be replenished.

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Is this an AI play or is this really about

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 3>just having less people to do more.

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 12>I think it's a little bit of both. CEO Evan

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 12>Spiegel sent in internal memo to employees this morning explaining

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 12>his thinking around this, and he really referenced what he

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 12>started starting last fall has been describing as a crucible

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 12>moment where where Snap is really having to just move faster,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 12>break things, and really push more aggressively to achieve profitability.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 12>And so even though he did say that AI is

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 12>one part of this, I think it's just one part

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 12>of a larger story for them.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 2>In the memo, Alex Spiegel kind of outlines that in

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 2>the dollar terms, how much money they think they can

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 2>save and so go over those details. But they're still

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 2>on track, it seems to go ahead with the plan

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 2>for the augmented reality glasses.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, I don't have the numbers in front

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 12>of me, but what I will say is yes, they

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 12>are still planning to go ahead later this year with

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 12>the debut of their first consumer pair of augmented reality glasses.

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 12>I think, though, one thing that we should really be

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 12>watching as the year progresses is what happens on the global,

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 12>national and global regulatory stage. One piece I think that

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 12>has been really challenging the business for Snap is just

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 12>this growing, this growing push all around the world, including

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 12>the United States, to ban social media for teams under

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 12>the age of sixteen, to rain in some of the

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 12>alleged addicted, addictive features on the platforms, as we've seen

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 12>in some of the trials that are playing out in California.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 12>And I think all of those are our shure to

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 12>sort of hang a cloud over any of the other

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 12>exciting announcements and progress the company may make throughout the year.

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>You said in the memo that the job cuts and

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 2>hiring pullback will cut or reduce snaps annualized cost base

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 2>by about five hundred million dollars by the second half

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>of this year. Bloomberg's Alex Lavine with the details on

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>snap Open AI is giving a select group of users

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>access to a new AI model to help them find

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity vulnerabilities. The move, of course, comes just one week

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>after Rival and Thropic announced the limited release of Mythos

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 2>due to concerns it may be capable of powering cyber attacks.

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the latest with Bloomberg's AI reporter Rachel Metz.

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it speaks for it's self the timing.

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 2>But what do we need to know about Opening Eyes

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 2>offering here? Who it's being made available to is also

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 2>an important point in the context of how Anthropic handled

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 2>their role.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 13>Out Sure, so Opening I started this program back in

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 13>February actually, where they started allowing a trusted user base,

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 13>a very small number of people at the time, to

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 13>try out some of their models that they were going

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 13>to be making available that would be tuned more toward

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 13>finding cybersecurity vulnerabilities and probing for these kinds of things.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 13>And now what they're saying is this new model is

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 13>going to be helpful for people in this program, a

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.439
<v Speaker 13>subset of people in this program to look for these things,

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 13>kind of similar to what Anthropic is doing with Mythos.

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 13>And they're allowing also a limited number of people. So

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 13>Opening Eye is going to have just a handful of people.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 13>I think they might have said either dozens or hundreds initially,

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 13>and then they're going to enlarge the number of people

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 13>that are allowed to access this model, but it'll still

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 13>be like individual cybersecurity people and then some companies that

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 13>they work with that kind of thing.

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a really interesting different way of doing

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 3>it than the mythos unravel because we're seeing people coming

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 3>on this show the smaller cyber focus who haven't got

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 3>access really want to or want to be able to

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 3>help plug any of these vulnerabilities. But also what's notable

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is Opening I had set up this sort of cybersecurity

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 3>program that people could go and apply for months ago.

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 3>It's back in February, wasn't it.

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 13>I mean they've been working on various cybersecurity related things

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 13>over a long period of time. This new model that

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 13>they have, they're saying this is, you know, this is

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 13>fine tuned to be especially meant for finding cybersecurity vulnerabilities,

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 13>and it also is a little more permissive in the

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 13>way that it lets people use it to look for

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 13>those kinds of issues, where like a normal model that

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 13>you use with chat GPT for instance, might not be

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 13>able to do that. So it'll be interesting to see

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 13>what kinds of things people say that they're finding who's

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 13>using it. We still don't really know about who is

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 13>being enabled to use this model, and also like how

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 13>that compares versus people that are using mythos, which it

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 13>sounds as of yet like it there are really varying

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 13>results and opinions on that.

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 4>Rachel, just a few basics.

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Is this model that open AI is making a limited

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 2>release of in the cyber security context an open source model,

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 2>or it's closed and just being made available to a

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>small group of existing customers. That distinction I put to

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 2>you because like people that come on the show basically

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 2>argue that this is why open source works in this context.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 4>If you want the market to.

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Be able to test vulnerabilities, that would be a good method.

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 13>Quickly, Yeah, I mean I think that, well, this is

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 13>not an open source or an open weight model, and

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 13>part of the reasoning behind that could be that such

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 13>a model could also be used to find the vulnerabilities

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 13>in other people so systems. So it'll be interesting to

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 13>see how widely they open the access going forward. But

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 13>for now it is to a very select group of

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 13>people for opening I and ourselves for entrapicsmith first model.

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Most racial mets across the open Ai story. We really

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 3>appreciate it. Look, let's turn our attention to Tomo Bravo

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 3>right now because it struck a strategic partnership with Google

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Cloud to help its portfolio companies accelerate you guess at

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 3>AI adoption. The arrangement will allow the portfolio companies to

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 3>access Google Cloud's AI platform to improve product offerings, and

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 3>for Google engineers to really embed with those businesses to

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 3>help solve technical challenges. We're seeing this more and more

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 3>ed with open Ai, for example, than some of the

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 3>other portfolio companies within Thrive.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, coming up on the program, California Billionaires is stepping

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 2>up their efforts to get Silicon Valley Darling Matt Mahon

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 2>elected as the state's next governor.

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 4>We have the story next. This is been in bog

0:40:50.400 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Tech time now for Talking tech.

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 3>First up, China's Unitary began selling its cheapest humanoid robot

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 3>on Alibaba's Ali Express Willy, expanding its international presence. Will

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 3>be sold to markets including the US, seeking out customers

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 3>in Tesla's home market at a time when the US

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:17.720
<v Speaker 3>company is still developing its humanoid Optimus product line. Plus

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Ali Baba, for its part, is also getting into robotics,

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 3>so plans to develop and sell its own four legged

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 3>model model, which would compete with Unitaris Go series. The

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Chinese company's Amat unit is also exploring the feasibility of

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 3>humanoid robots. An AXL that's the VC firm that has

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 3>backed the likes ofpanthropic cursor Perplexity, but its rose five

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in new funds to keep up its big

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 3>bets on AI. Now the firm will be dedicating four

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars to its fifth Leader's fund and six round

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and fifty million dollars into a sidecar fund to selectively

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 3>increase the size of certain bet said okay.

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 2>There is a vacuum in the California governor's race left

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 2>by the abrupt exit of Eric Swalwell and the allegations

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>of sexual assault claims, which we Weld denies. In his absence,

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 2>tech billionaires are pouring money into the democratic campaign of

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley Darling. Matt Mayhan, the mayor of San Jose,

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 2>has soalked through it with Bloombos California reporter Eliahu Chemisha.

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 2>This is getting a lot of attention a lot of readers.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 2>It's a key race. San Jose's mayor is a name

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that's come up a lot in the last few months.

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 2>What's changed, what's new and what are we learning about

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 2>the pool of people backing him.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well San Jose's Matt Mayhan. After Eric Swawall exited

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 11>the race has seen kind of a rush of some

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 11>of the wealthiest people in California coming in to support him.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 4>So we have and he's a tech people, some of

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of tech people.

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 11>We have vinode Kosla, who put a million dollars towards

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 11>his campaign yesterday. Mike Moritz of Sequoia, read Hastings of Netflix.

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 11>Really big names in Silicon Valley and in California have

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:58.240
<v Speaker 11>coalesced around his campaign and they're back in the outside committee.

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 11>They're sending millions of dollars towards towards him.

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, why do the billionaires like him so much? What

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 3>is Matt mahon really thinking about for them?

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 11>Well, Matt kind of he emerged in the scene first

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 11>when he opposed a wealth tax that's being proposed in California,

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.839
<v Speaker 11>there's a proposal to tax billionaire wealth and that kind

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 11>of helped him gain some of these supporters. But in

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 11>a wider sense, I think Silicon Valley is trying to

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 11>insert itself in California's political scene beyond just the issues

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 11>that their singular companies care about and more in kind

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 11>of a wider sense, they're trying to promote a moderate

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 11>democratic policies as they see.

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 4>It, so that manifests itself in another way. Very quickly.

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 2>You wrote about this five hundred million dollar funds to

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:49.479
<v Speaker 2>influence California politics. That was a March twelve, But again,

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 2>tech names are putting into that fund.

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 11>A lot of tech names of if you know Neil

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 11>Metta from Green Oaks Capital, a lot of vcs are there.

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 11>Coalescing is kind of this network effect. I mean, Sir

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 11>Gey Brin, the co founder of Google, has been big

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 11>in creating his own interest group to influence California politics.

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 11>They're all about trying to kind of create government in

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 11>California that is a little less progressive, more in the

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 11>moderate sense, a little more anti tax, and it's about

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.439
<v Speaker 11>kind of creating efficiency and a little more pro tech

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:21.919
<v Speaker 11>as well.

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergs Elia Chemische, Thank you very much, indeed for the

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 3>latest on politics. Now, somewhere else in Silicon Valley, something's

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 3>going on, because we're to take a look at this stock.

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 3>All birds shares going absolutely bonkers. Why because the former shoemaker,

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 3>just days away from ceasing operations, says it's going to

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 3>pivot its business into guess what ed AI Compute Infrastructure value.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Love the shoes and now they're going to love their GPUs.

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that the cell? Yeah, rub your eyes, curried, adjust

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 2>your set whatever we usually say.

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 4>That is a one day chart, right am? I reading

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 4>that correctly?

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 3>It's going from not much to just twenty dollars let's

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 3>call it. So, Yes, seven hundred percent is extraordinary. But

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 3>it's got fifty million dollars in financing to basically build

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 3>out AI native cloud data centers. It wasn't a neocloud

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 3>ed fifty million.

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Dollars isn't that much?

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, GPUs a service or gpu as like sas, Meta

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 2>is going to spend what in the next three years

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.359
<v Speaker 2>on AI six hundred billion.

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Fifty million.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how they're going to launch a business,

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 2>but no surprise, this is the most read story on

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg right now and the.

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Most read And what's the rebrand going to be. I

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 3>think they're going to be called New Bird. AI has

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that for the brand of Aubreen rebrands. That does it

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 3>for this edition of bluebg Tech.

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 2>A lot of newsflow coming from Bloomberg, some interesting market moves,

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and some important interviews around the global economy as well.

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Recap all of that on the podcast. You know where

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 2>to find it. If you're watching the show, It's there

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:58.399
<v Speaker 2>on your screen if you're listening. Iheartspotify and Apple. This

0:45:58.560 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech.