WEBVTT - U.S. Payrolls Growth Misses Big Again

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. The US job growth in September

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>slowest this year, signaling a tempering of the labor market recovery,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>really complicating that FED decision, that next FED decision when

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to scaling back monetary support before the year

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>under the little many still think the FED will kind

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>of continue ahead. Here at the front row seat on

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the US labor market and hiring trends and metrics, we

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>have a perfect gas. We do. Peter Quigley, as president

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and CEO at Kelly, joins us on the phone from Michigan. Peter,

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's great to talk to you, again, you haven't really

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting role because your firm has really its finger on

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>the pulse of what's happening when it comes to labor

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>because you provide staffing solutions in many parts of the country.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering if this report was a surprise to

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you or if you were expecting something that was really

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going to miss and at this magnitude. Well, I think

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the jobs report was disappointing to those that expected a

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>bounce due to the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and schools reopening, but that didn't materialize. UM. But I

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to think of this as these three months July,

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>August and September is the UH delta variant book ends.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So in July we had outstanding jobs report, but the

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>survey was taken before this spike, and in September the converse,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>where we had a really disappointing report. Um. But it

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>was also at the beginning of September when we were

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of the spike. So I was encouraged

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>by the private sector. Seventeen thousand not overwhelming, but but

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>decent um because the big drag was in government payrolls.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Local education was a big drag um. And this wasn't

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>surprising to us because we've seen major talent challenges in uh.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we support fifteen thousand schools across forty five states,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and not only there shortages of teachers, but the entire

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>education ecosystem, so food service workers, custodians, bus drivers, para educators, um.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So all of that led us to believe that there

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to be some some depression. UM. Okay. So

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we discussed, Peter, is that

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the second half of September, at least anecdotally, people have

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about that which is not reflected in the Job's

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>report this morning, that you are seeing signs of more

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>people going into jobs. What are you seeing in the

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>leader or what did you see in the later half

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of September. Well, the first thing I would say is

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there is no change in the demand. So that's the

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>good news from the economy standpoint. Demand is strong across

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the industries we served. We didn't see a

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say, a significant uptick in the availability of

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>talent in the back half of September. Um, it's it's anecdotal,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but um, we probably saw greater inflows of talent in

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>areas where schools were fully reopened and not under some

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of temporary lockdown UM, and that I think just

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the importance of UM allowing UM parents to

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get back to work. If anything was concerning about the

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>job's report, it was the labor force participation rate dropping

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because so many women and it was all women that

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>are leaving the workforce in UH in droves. Yeah, that

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>among among the parts that certainly got our attention. Peter,

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what you think this means for the remainder

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year and what you can tell us right now,

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because you do have this unique insight into what's happening

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>real time when it comes to your clients all over

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States. What can you tell us about what

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in October as we do get past the

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>delta variant. Well, I think the UH the expected bounds

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>due to the reopening of schools and and the UM

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>exploration of employment benefits, we'll likely see that UM materialized

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>later in the year. Whether it's October or November, I

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>think remains to be seen. UM. But as well, the UM,

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain issues that we're having, especially around microchips,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>UM as those begin to be sorted out, I expect

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that there will be UM an improving jobs picture. So

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, Peter, that people shouldn't hold their breath too

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>much for even next month's jobs report because we still

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>could see the effect of the expanded unemployment insurance as

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>well as people kids going back to school. Yeah, my

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sense is it's gonna be coppy for probably the remainder

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I think until we get past the UH,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant and and you know, other issues surrounding COVID.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a little bit uncertain

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the labor markets because we don't really understand why

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so many people are staying on the sidelines as as

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>opposed to coming back to UH the plethora of jobs

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>as as you know, record number of jobs across industries. UM.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's gonna be um period of time

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>probably into two before we see some stabilization. Peter just

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>got about fifty seconds left here. You talked about women,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and we two noticed UH labor participation, women really leaving,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>and we really thought the beginning of pandemic flexibility and

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.559
<v Speaker 1>working was going to be helpful for women. We've learned

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. Um. What are you hearing on

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the front that women are leaving the workforce and they

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>are not coming back. Yeah, we're hearing that. Um. And

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and largely it's due to childcare or elder care responsibilities. Um.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if kids don't go to school or if

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they're at home schooling. Um, parents don't go to work

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if they can't work remotely. And even then it adds

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to a level of stress that makes work intolerable at

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>some point. So I think this is a really serious

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>issue that we need to focus on to ensure that

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>we get more women back into the labor force. Right.

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It really speaks to the heart of your organization, really

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the creation of it way back when, Um, Peter, thank

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Peter, quickly he's president. Cef Kelly, I

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have to say, my sister got a college degree years

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>and years ago, um, to get a job, how to

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>get some secretarial skills, went to Kelly, got a job

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>in the city, uh, and ended up getting your masters

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and doing really really well. So I can understand that path.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>How it it helps. Look, it was called the Kelly

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Girl Company at nineties and nineteen fifties. You're listening to

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>too Stovic on Bloomberg Radio. We've been talking about Mark

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and their experimental pill for COVID nineteen should be accompanied

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>by other treatments as soon as they're available to cut

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the risk of drug resistance that would limit its effectiveness.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Foundation director Jeremy far saying that, Yeah, this is

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a story that caught our attention because of all the

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>attention that Mark's experimental pill for COVID nineteen got over

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the last week. We saw mark stock rise starting Friday

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>as a result of it. Riley Griffin is US healthcare

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News, and she joins us now on

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. So, so let's start

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with with where things stand with regulators and Mark's pill.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>What is it and what is the well. I don't

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>want to say promise because it hasn't been fully approved

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>by regulators rally, but what's it supposed to do? Yeah,

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Mark's pill is really important because what we don't have today,

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>um TIM, is a cheap and effective pill that can

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>be prescribed to people who have contracted COVID. Right now,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the treatment landscape is rather barren. You can get the

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>mono quota antibodies which are in an a few shin,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>or if you proceed to the hospitalized setting, you might

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>get dexa meta zone, a steroid or rem deservie. But

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what we really want is something like Tamma bloo, something

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that you can take from home, you don't have to

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>venture too far, and it will stop COVID in its tracks,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>stop that replication process. We've been following Mark's pill four

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>months now. Actually had a feature in Business Week back

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in spring about this very concept um and now we've

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>got the data and it looks fairly promising. But the

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>question at hand um that the director of the Welcome

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Foundation is posing, is is it going to face drug

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>resistance like we've seen with some of those monoquona antibodies.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>In the backtrack for a second, what is drug resistance

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that occurs when the virus and bacteria evolved to blunt

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or defeat a drug mechanism of attack, which is what

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to have happened, right And this is

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>what's fearful right now. I feel like we're in that

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Netherlands right now of right to people who have had

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccines or waiting, not all of his supply, you know,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>can get boosters, and you're just wondering, am I still safe?

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there going to be a Okay, we're kind of dealing.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We are dealing with the delta variant, But is there

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a variant that all of a sudden

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be like, yeah, fiser moderna vaccine J

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and J vaccine not a problem. Yeah, And and people

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are following that with vaccines. But viruses are really wildly things.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They mutate to survive and we've always seen this with

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>anti virals in particular um and so that's a question here.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But Mark I spoke with them just yesterday, one of

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the leaders of developing this pill, and he says the

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>bar for resistance with mona peer of year the COVID

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>pill is rather high. He sees it as different from

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>other anti virunts in the past. Can can it be

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>changed in real time the way that other treatments or

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>vaccines have been. At least the hope has been that

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they can be changed and tweaked with two help attack.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of these are potentially resistance. So typically how companies

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>do this is they actually combine one anti viral with another.

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>You might have heard the term cocktail to describe a

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>silly term, right, But it really means you're combining more

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>than one thing, and together, Um, you're combating resistance, and

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you might also be encouraging greater levels of efficacy. But

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not what Mark is claiming here. To get a

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>little wonky with you, guys, Um, I like wanky too,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he had said to me. Nick Kurt Sunis, the senior

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>vice president of clinical research for infectious Diseases and Vaccines

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>at Mark, that earlier experiments with other viruses showed that

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of resistant mutations was really rare with mulipure beer.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And another thing, the course of treatment is short, meaning

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that viruses get very few chances to evolve into resistant

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>forms during that course. UM. And then the last reason

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he shared with us was the drugs met kind of

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>mechanism of action. To put it in as simple terms

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as I can, the way manipeer of your works is

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>by inducing errors into the coronavirus's genetic material. Those errors

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>are then replicated until the virus is practically defunct. And

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what Marcus found is that by UM inducing those errors,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>they're actually spread more or less randomly throughout the viral genome,

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which again means that the virus has fewer opportunities to

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>develop those mutant forms that will overcome those errors, and

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that in and of itself, he said, makes resistance to

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>manopere of your a tufting. Only time will tell you know.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>That's that's marks perspective right now. Um, And they're not

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>actively pursuing combinations. But should we c say Fiser's oral

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>anti viral proved successful as well, I'd be asking could

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they combine the two together? Aren't two better than one?

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we've certainly seen that in meta history and treatment

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>history before. Um. Riley, thank you so much, really clarified

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot on that. Roley Griffin Cheese u S healthcare

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>report at Bloomberg News. Joining us on the phone in

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>We do want to just rehash a former Win Resorts

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>executive and a private equity investor found guilty in the

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>first trial of parents accused of cheating to get their

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>children into elite US universities. We're talking about varsity blues.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh and UH it looks like the two of them

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are potentially facing some jail time. Um. Yeah, and you

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, it actually is a perfect segue into our

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>next story that talks a lot about wealthy parents and

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what wealthy parents are doing to help their kids, uh

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>afford homes, specifically in New York City that weren't necessarily

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>meant for them exactly. It's in the new issue of

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It's among the most right. We're

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>not saying, I think illegals being done, that there's no parallel.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to apply a parallel that there is

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>anything illegal. But it's time just working on my segway, Carol.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It's among our most read on the Bloomberg Today's story

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>about New York City's real estate tax breaks that, as

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Tim mentioned, have turned out to be a loophole for

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>rich kids. That tale and reality. Let's get to it

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg News Financial Investigations reporter Caleb Melby. He is

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on the phone, he's hard working, he's in St. Louis. Caleb,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting story. First of all, tell us about this tax

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>break and how that's become a loophole for some Yeah. Absolutely,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a program uh called the HDFC cooperative program

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>here in New York that stands for Housing Development Funded Corporation,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole elpha bit soup of a name. And what

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>happened in the in the nineties seventies was, of course,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you had white flight out of New York, you had

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis in New York City, and you had

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the slum lords who both stopped making repairs to their

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>buildings and stopped paying taxes. UH. The government eventually sees

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>those buildings runpaid taxes, but didn't want them to go

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the same landlords for fear that the same

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>thing would happen all over again. So they looked to

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this um UH state law that allowed them to create

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>UH cooperatives designed to be low for low income people,

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to provide income for low income people. They turned these

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>buildings over to the former renters for two hundred fifty

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars a unit um UH, and it was kind of

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>historic transfer of wealth and property in New York City. UM.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of those people didn't have money to

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>repair their buildings either, so the government created this tax

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>break to try to help them out in but throughout time,

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody has really created any stringent rules about um what

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>these units can go for UM or how much how

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>much you can have in way of assets to buy them.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So they have these income limits on them, but no

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>asset limits. And UH, that actually means there's kind of

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a perfect buyer out there and the sort of person

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who would love to live in Manhattan where a lot

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of these a are uh, low income, high asset Uh

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, children of the affluent who are moving here

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to the city. Okay, so let's say you are an

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>aspiring you know, fill in the blank, uh, and you

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>moved to New York City after graduating from college. You're

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>making you know, between thirty thousand and fifty thousand dollars

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a year, scraping by in a lot of cases, but

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not really because you perhaps have access to half a

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollars from parents, from wealthy relatives like you lay

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out in your story, you're kind of the perfect fit

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually buy one of these homes, and you're getting

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it at a huge discount compared to uh a house

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have the limits. That's exactly right, Timm, And

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you raise another good point, which is that because some

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of these buildings still have some level of financial distress,

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>banks won't lend to them. They can still be beautiful,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, lovely buildings, um that have a little bit

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of debt on the books. But that means you do

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>need to have all cash, and they will sometimes advertise

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves as all cash all. So you can't take a

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mortgage out to get one of these. Well, for for

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the more stabilized ones, you can, but in a lot

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of cases you can't. And that's where you'll see them advertised.

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>You must make, as you say, something like less than

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars, but also have five dollars cash or more

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>on hand. It's, um, it's quite an absurd situation. Um

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>as as this is unfolded through history to our present moment.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So how many are taking advantage of you know, to

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some extent gaming the system? Not illegal, but it's certainly

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not getting to the population that it was intended for.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right, this is for to help out those

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that are lower income. Um. How how how much has

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it been being gamed? Basically? Yeah, So, so the universe

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of these buildings is about a thousand UM with about

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen or eighteen thousand units in them. Uh, to give

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you an idea that I mean, that's roughly twice the

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>size of Stevenson Town Peter Cooper Village for our listeners

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the New York area, very big multi block complex

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the city, a lot of units, but because they

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>do offer such tremendous protection against rising costs in the city,

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>even better than a rent stabilized apartment, people do hold

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>onto them for a very very long time, and so

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they do trade infrequently. But kind of like how whenever

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>home cells and an up and coming neighborhood, and it

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>always tends to go in one direction, up and up

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and up. Um, these buildings are doing the same. Uh.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing that again and again that even though

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>these units trade infrequently, for the ones on the Upper

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>West Side or Central Harlem or the East Village, these

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>neighborhoods that in the seventies and eighties weren't places everybody

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be, but are now much more desirable places

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. You're seeing more and more of these deals.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So what did the parents say, who did you talk to?

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about that, right, because that's who you really

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk to. Yeah, yeah, I mean, um, I

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I talked to it to one parent who um you know,

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>she she had been a lawyer herself. Her husband had

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>been a partner and engineering firm, and they had a

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>daughter who was a musician, and they were worried about

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>her having an even income being in the city, but

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be in the city, so they you know,

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the daughter was able to pay four hundred thousand dollars

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>cash for a one bedroom on the fr West Side

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>where she can have rehearsals away from her roommates, any roommates,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and also not worry about, you know, the very burdensome

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>housing costs that exist for most renters or even owners

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in in New York. Um and I also talked to

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of musicians who have since become adults, a

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of them that have actually transitioned from being musicians

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>into real estate brokers specializing in exactly these kinds of units.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>That one was a bass guitar player, one was a

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>jazz flutist. Um and uh and talk to them about

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, how this pro graham has unspooled in a

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>way that the city definitely didn't didn't help well. Also

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.239
<v Speaker 1>seems like the rules aren't hard and fast. I mean,

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you do share the example of anecdotes of people printing

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out you know, turbo tax tax returns that potentially might

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not reflect a real income for somebody. Yeah, and that's

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So, and every diminishing number of these buildings

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>has formal regulatory agreements with the city. They may require

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that they actually file documentation around the stuff, but the

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of them, especially the more expensive ones, no

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>longer have any sort of regulatory agreement, and the city

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>has basically thrown up its hand to try and regulate

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>these at all. So so to the extent that there

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are even income caps on a lot of these these days,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they're essentially functioning on an honor system. So it will continue.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to just continue. Twenty seconds left here. Um,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be very hard to put this one back

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in the bottle. You try, you try to put price

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>caps on these when there wasn't them before, you're going

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to get law suits. And it's not clear that the

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>city wanted to do that. All right, Well, a very

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting story in terms of what's going on. Hey, Caleb,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Caleb Melby, financial investigations reporter of Bloomberg News

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>on the road in St. Louis, And uh what I

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>opened up my Twitter feed this morning? And this was

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like the story that everybody was talking about a lot

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of rage tweeting, was there. Yeah, yeah, well understandably. So

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So you are

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week on this Friday, and this

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>happens to be also among one of our most read

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. We were all talking about it, certainly

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in our call It's a Store by Bloomberg. Simon Kennedy

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and Timid notes that the US were already in a

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>recession based on consumer sentiment, which is based on a

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>new study co authored by former Bank of England policymaker

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Danny blanche Flower. He is professor of economics at Dartmouth College,

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and he joins us on the phone from Hanover, New Hampshire. Danny,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you back. How are you are. I'm

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>actually teaching class again. It's great. I know you're on campus.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's great. I'm looking out of my office windows. Great. Um,

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so what's going on here? We're already in a recession? Well? Um.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I called this earlier in the week with my co

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>author Alex Bryson Um. I mean the issue here is

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>what actually can you use to say something about a

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>recession coming before it hits. So the NBR dating group

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>tells you six to eight months to a year later,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the labor market data tells you pretty much at the

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>point that you turn what can you use to predict

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>it common? And it turns out we can success now

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and the new paper we show we successfully predict every

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the last six recessions beforehand. And essentially what

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing today is almost identical to what we saw

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seven across the whole economy and particularly

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>across the eight biggest states. These measures of sentiment what

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do people think is happening? Turned around May, and that

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>suggests that recession will probably start around Christmas time. So

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the predictors are almost exactly as they were in two

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. And this is how you can predict every

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>prior recession to it. So these this prediction came well before,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>obviously a couple of days before the non farm perils,

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.719
<v Speaker 1>which didn't surprise me, and I expect to see nonfarm

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>payrolls declining and probably going negatives by negative by the

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. Wow. That's certainly yeah. I mean

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's the problem is obviously the labor market data

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't giving us a very good deer, but people don't

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>seem to understand what's going on. There's base and composition effect.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of measures. If you go and look

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>at total compensation, that's up by one point nine percent,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and on the last month it's flat. And if you

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>go to hourly earnings using the current population survey, that's

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>down one two percent if you take Q to two

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one to Q two. So there's a lot

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of indicators people have not been looking at. And and

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the question is you know what happened in two thousand

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and the previous five and the answers these measures

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>told you six or nine months before it was coming

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that this was happening in it and people should look

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in our paper. It's remarkable how comparable is compared to

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's and in fact there's a set of services

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's really about women. It turns out that since

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the turn women people in the Grants Thaunton service says

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if they're forced to go back to the office, they

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>won't go, they'll quit. So for people in the conference board.

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They say women say, especially that they're very fearful of

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going back to work. So I think that's what turns

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the delta variants turn people so Danny for people who

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't follow this as closely as you do, tell us

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the connection between how people feel about sentiment, what what

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is about the economy, and how that translates into

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>economic growth or spending. Yes, so we've done a lot

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of work on this. The sentiment is about you ask

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people what do you think is going on? What do

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>you think is going on in your economy? Me, do

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that the jobs are good? Do you think

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the economic situation is good? And what do you expect

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen? And so what we see in these data

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>from around the spring is that anxiety in the United

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>States rises. People get more and more fearful, as I'd say,

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly about delta. And the way to think of this

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is if people are anxious, if people fear that flowing

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is coming, flowing is going to come, If people think

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that's a recession coming, then a recession comes. So these

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>days are really crucial. And every time this has happened before,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what followed it. And it appears to be that

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the delta various and the thought that people might have

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to go back to work has made them incredibly anxious.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're spending patterns are going to change,

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and unless we see some big change that the fear

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of going back to work is a big deal. And

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, I'll quit my job if I have to,

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or our retire and that's what we're seeing in the data.

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And you think that stays with us much longer or

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or does it? At some point? Danny right at itself.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at some point we get beyond this fear.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess what I'm asking you is this

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be a protracted recession or is this going

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of a hit? Yeah? What a great question.

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, obviously that the issue in

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>each of these cases is when do you go into it,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>how long is it going to last? And how quickly

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be able to persuade those fears.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think the answer is that if you can't,

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go on for quite a long time.

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>If you can, and people become confident that you know,

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the virus has been been solved, it's ever everything's okay,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's fine that it's appears in these days where people

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>are very worried about having to go back to the work,

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>having to stop doing remote work. And I think that's

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the really big thing. I mean, the other thing is

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking. I mean, people have been talking about the

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>FED bit going to taper big era. Should we not

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be doing that. That's exactly mistake they made in a

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>great recession. Didn't spot it well? We know in these

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>days they told us in July oh seven they were

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>forecasting recession coming in December seventh, and the FED even

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>by September eight havn't worked it out. So we should

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>be very fearful that the Fed will make an error again.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's absolutely clear in these days the last thing they

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>should be doing is even thinking about taking so nothing

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and nothing for what any of the meetings this year

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in your view, Oh, absolutely nothing. They should be thinking

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about whether necessary, what they can do about further stimulus. Yeah,

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think we've had We've had a discussion

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with somebody else who said it's not going to be

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a case of pulling back, but you know, reigniting some

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of the stimulative measures. So Danny, if the FED does

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>indeed go through with its taper measures later this year,

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and we are indeed in a recession already. Help us

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>paying a picture for for what the U. S economy

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>looks like in a year. Well, again, it's a very

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>good question. I mean, in a way, we're pretty good

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at getting to the start. I mean, it's going to

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>take a while to get out of it. It's going

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to take a while for the economy to pick back up.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I certainly think we're going to start to

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>see unemployment rates rising. Um that that's the big story

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I think, and people being you know, wages are going

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to be certainly going to wage grow. It is certainly

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>going to come down, and we're going to have to

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>start to think about something obviously, the impact of the steamulus,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the measures being discussed in Congress. If you can get

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>these infrastructure builds and spending builds in place, that will

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that will help to asuade this this negative shots coming.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got to persuade people that they can

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>go back to work safely. Otherwise they're going to stop,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna stop spending. They're not going to go back

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to work, They're going to quit. And that's the big deal.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>People are frightened, and that's what's true in the data.

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>People are frightened. You do, dofully see that that people

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>are having a hard time, you know, making sense of

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and clearly explaining what's going on the labor market. Danny,

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. I'm glad you're back at campus,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Stay safe, and so glad to check in with you.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Danny blanche Flower, professor of economics at Dartmouth College and

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>former Bank of England policymaker. That story you can find

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it too at Bloomberg dot com. This is Bloomberg Business

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Master and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stenovich

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Well, let's talk more crypto and joining

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>us now to do that as Eric Irvin, the co

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief investment officer of on Ramp invest. Eric

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Sandy go. On Rap

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Invest is a fintech company. What does is it provides

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>education and access to people about crypto assets for financial planners. Eric,

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been talking a lot. We we do talk

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about crypto. I've been talking a lot about

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto on Quick Take stock or or quick Take show

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's each day at noon Eastern time. And one

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that I keep coming back to is the idea

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that there is so much confusion about what a cryptocurrency is,

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what is bitcoin versus blockchain, what ether versus ethereum is?

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And I still think there's so much room for the

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>general consumer to actually understand more about the space. What

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>are you guys doing at on ramp invest to to

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>raise awareness? Yeah, and and it's funny that you mentioned

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that when I first got got involved, that we call

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it the rabbit hole where you know, first you you

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>start to dig in, and first you dismiss it, and

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and then later on you kick yourself for for dismissing it.

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But but as you go deeper and deeper into the

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole, it's a completely new financial system, right, And

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and so you can't just take the conventional framework of

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of what we know as as an asset class and

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>then just apply it here, So you have to almost

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like learn everything from scratch. So um, So that's exactly

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>what Invests is doing is is just starting with the education.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We're educating financial advisors so they can educate their clients

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about what is a crypto asset, what's the cryptocurrency? Like

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, what's about big B bitcoin versus little B bitcoin,

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain itself, the network versus the token, the trades

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on that network, and and then just starting there and

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>then starting to open their eyes towards sorry, how does

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it behave in a portfolio? And how can your clients

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>invest in? And what about the state planning issues and

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>all of those different assets. When clients can actually own

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>an asset entirely themselves, they don't have to necessarily have

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it at a custodian so um so yeah, really, that's

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the the idea behind un ramp a cat to me.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the platform which gives people access so

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that they can invest in the asset class themselves or

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>through I have to jump in because I do find

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it interesting that even people who have been writing stories,

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.239
<v Speaker 1>doing lots of research, or you know, my colleagues who

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are super smart and just people you know, smart investors,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are still like, I don't quite get the scripto thing.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So there is a lot of education that needs to

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be here. What seems to be the biggest thing, especially

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to you know, our I as who

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have been so used to you know, asset classes that

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we pretty much understand how this works. For

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the most part, um what seems to be, you know,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the typical training and the things that they need to

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>truly understand so that they can represent it well to

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>their clients, especially in an environment where still regulators are

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure it out. Yeah, and and this is

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>probably the first sset class. I used to be a

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>finance advisor many years ago, and this is probably the

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>first st class that I can think of. The clients

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>know more about it than the advisors. So the clients

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are coming to the advisor asking them questions. And it's

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily about the advisor getting educated so that they

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>can present why why crypto makes sense or why um

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't or you know, this asset person is that

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really just what, you know, how do they handle

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves as their clients are bringing questions to the table.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And so that's that's one of the most interesting pieces

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of this is, you know, this entire ecosystem grew up

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>outside of the traditional financial system and and no one

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ever thought that it could become this two trillion dollar

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 1>asset class and now here we are. But everything had

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to grow up outside and so there's there's this chasm

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in between stock exchange and the crypto asthetic exchanges. Hence

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, like the demand for any ts go

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>go get that bitcoin, wrap it up and bring it

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>onto this exchange so I can talk about it and

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I can buy it. And that's um. That's really kind

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of like the unique piece here is it's more than

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>an investment vehicle. It's a whole tool we can use. Yeah,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll put on your financial advisor hat, put it back

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on for a second, grab it off the off the rack,

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and throw it back on. Because earlier this week, our

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>colleague Eric Shatzker here spoke with Don Fitzpatrick, the chief

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>investment officer for George Soros's family office. She said that

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>crypto has quote gone mainstream, and Eric came on our

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>show and made the point that institutional investors are not

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ignoring crypto anymore, and they're allocating a small portion, whether

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's two percent or five percent, what have you to

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency translate that for the normal person and the normal

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>person's portfolio. Do you suggest that everybody have a sliver

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of their assets in crypto? Yeah, I do, I personally do,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I and I think the mass kind of bears

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it out as well. It is. You know it's I

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of talk about this rule of three where you

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>know no more than if you've never invested in it

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and you don't understand it, then no more than three

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of your kind of investible net worth should to

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>go into this and this is probably like your liquid

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>investible networth. And then commit to three years, like, don't

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>touch it for three years before before you do anything.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And then if you can, because it's so dang volatile

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar cost average, so three percent of your discretionary income

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can apply to it. And if you can

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>do that, then you'll probably end up with a pretty

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>good outcome. But even if you don't, if you take

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>take more of a like kind of an institutional approach,

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a smaller allocation like that because it is not correlated,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>has meaningful benefits, especially if you're rebalancing on a regular

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>basis because it's so volatile. Hey, listen, we gotta run, Eric,

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much and look forward to checking with

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you again. Eric Irvin uh Heaths, co founder, chief investment

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>officer at on Ramp invest with us from San Diego.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg. Mo. Yeah, but you let me drive?

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, this is not ain. Please,

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. Good drive.

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the Drive to the Globes on Bluebird Radio.

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So just about ten minutes left U in today's trading session.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It is time for the Drive to the clothes. Let's

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get to it with Alan Lance, a friend of the show,

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 1>research director at Lance Global dot com, President of allenby

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Lance and Associates. He's back with us on the phone

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>from Toledo. You're gonna explain the wackiness that we've seen

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the markets as of late. I'm counting on you, Allen.

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>How are you it's been I'm doing well, thank you.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, it's been an amazing market. I mean what

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen is, you know, a select group of bubbles

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that have formed and and been popped and and and

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>then resurrected. You saw that in the beginning of the year,

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, with um the Spack in the Spack Arena,

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the I P. O craze and and uh

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we have the mega tech name, the growth oriented names

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that last month finally fall from grace and and I

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're going to see in this type market.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, big Bitcoin collapse and now it's you know,

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>pushing back up and and you know it's good for

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the investor, you know, I like these rotational corrections. Um.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we expected more volatility the second half of one,

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're getting, even a greater variety than

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>than we even expected. Well, it's interesting that you mentioned bitcoin,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and we definitely have seen a big move up this

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>this week, and it continued to trend higher. I mean,

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we went back up above fifty thousand, just crossing the bloomberg.

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The Body Administration weighing an executive order executive order on

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies as part of an effort to set up the

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>government wide approach to the white hat classet classes. According

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to people in the know, the proposed directive would charge

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>federal agencies to study and offer recommendations on relevant areas

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of crypto, touching on financial regulation, economic innovation, and national security.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>According to those in the know, So it does feel

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>like Alan, and I know we tend to talk about

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>much more traditional assets, but it does feel like um,

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the SEC and Gary Ginsler, whether it's j

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Powell in a recent recent testimony up on Capitol Hill,

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we do see like regulators those we look to for

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>guidance increasingly kind of stepping up and giving us some clarity,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're not going to ban it, and they're thinking about, Okay,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>how do we regulate it? Yeah, I think it's legitimizes

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the asset and you know that's positive for the long

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>term and and that's why you see it moving up.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>So you'll you'll still have the volatility. I mean a

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of this even with natural gas prices. It's short

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>covering and what's going on you know overseas, you know,

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so so it's really hard to anticipate these swings, especially

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the magnitude of them. But well, do you do you

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>invest in crypto? Um? No, No, we really haven't. Um,

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had some clients that wanted to get

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>involved and we bought for them, you know, in the weakness,

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Uh don't don't really chase. So we use our uh

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, long term um, you know, defensive type strategies

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>into that. But for our our average client, now we

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>we we really haven't. I'd rather buy indirectly and in

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>ways that we think, you know, like the video and

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what have you that can benefit but not you know,

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>betting solely on you know, bitcoin or you know, one

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one atht amongst amongst that that that that whole vertical

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the so called if you will pitch pitch for our

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>picks and shovels right of of of the cryptocurrency boom. Hey, alan, um,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>help us make sense of today's jobs report because it's

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty much ahead scratch or a huge miss coming in

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and under two hundred thousand when economist survey by Bloomberg

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>expected five hundred thousand, the market not really knowing what

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to make of it. It does it change things for

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed? Um? You know I think it it might

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>uh delay, you know, it looked like that, you know,

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>they might do something, you know, more quickly than what

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>they're talking up the beginning of a year, you know,

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with the latest FED meetings and and you know it

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>might get delayed. Obviously they're gonna wait for more data

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>coming in. So you know, if that is a trend, obviously,

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I I think it will change. But you know it's

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>been again so volatile, just like the stock market that um,

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll have to wait and see. Yesterday's lumbers

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>weren't weren't bad, and then today's were you know totally um,

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the opposite, so so it's a matter of

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna wait for more evidence, all right.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's tricky if I look at the SNP five

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred names lower higher, this is just some basic stats

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>on the market to unchanged. So we are seeing increasingly

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a risk off trade. We've talked about that fifty day

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>moving average on the SNP five hundred, that trend line

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>moving lower. Even though we kind of moved uh not

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of, we did move back above it. Um people

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are making investment bets. There are stocks that are gaining,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>their stocks that are losing. Where would you be putting

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>money right now? Allan, I still think it's it's a

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>matter of being you know, just selecting the right companies,

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>companies that have a catalyst that it's not yet recognized

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street, you know. And this way you can

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>outpace the market, you know, whether it's down or flat.

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it is going to be challenging. So I know,

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>last time we talked about Ball Corp. And that's moved up,

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and and we bought some tech Resources, which is a

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>copper play, and and I like um real assets. We

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>bought Murk near its lows and it's moved up, you know.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>With with a catalyst. So I like the biotech special situations. Um,

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:36.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like uh Tutor Parny, which is uh TPC.

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's an infrastructure play. But also I think they're

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 1>turning around some some problems they had. So so if

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you get the infrastructure, you've got that catalyst. If you don't,

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the company specifically can can be a special situation.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think those are the areas you really got

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to concentrate in instead of just playing you know, the

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>broad market, which I think it's gonna be difficult the

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>second half the year and and uh, you know it's

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be flat flat the down and you're going to

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>see more days like today where you just have to

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the right areas. So are you staying in

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the right areas? Are you using this as an opportunity

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to pull back your own hold things, build a little

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of cash and wait for the market to move

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>even lower. Yeah, we've been raising cash this summer into

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the strength, so we have used some of that for

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>September sell off. And and if the market you know,

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>continue to advance and touch on new highs, you know,

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>we'd be pruning, especially areas that have done you know,

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>so well, and that's really paid off in the long run,

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will continue to just reduce risk

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>when the markets are high and and then uh, you

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>know when there's panic selling trying to accumulate quality. Hey

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, just got about thirty seconds out. And there's

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>still though we've got some clarity at a d C.

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 1>But again we're we've got a new clock ticking down

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to December. So it does feel like in terms of

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>those things that can create some uncertainty in the market,

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>there's still a bunch out there for investors to have

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. Incredible number of things out there, Carol.

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got rising interest rates, You've got you

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>know the situation which China, You've got supply chain items.

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is a long list. And that's why

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the second half the year we said we're

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna see volatility in both directions and just you know,

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>all but down and that you know, it's time to

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>really be selective and and take take some profits. And

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it's going to be an error

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>to raise cash in any strength. I don't expect this

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a two thousand, you know, eight nine, or

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but I do expect it a difficult market, alright. Listen.

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Always good to check in with you. Allen Lance. He

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is Research director at Lance Global dot com, President of

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>allenby Lance and Associates. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News