WEBVTT - Nike Down, Muni Check-In, Geopolitical Unrest

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market crows, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I n go on

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>your Bloomberg terminil that brings up the Bloomberg Index browser.

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It gives you all the total returns on a year

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to date basis for a lot of the fixed income

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>aggregates the U. Alright, so look at this, folks, The

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg US aggregate fixed income return here to date minus

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point three five. Yikes, that's sixty forty portfolio that

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>ain't working for you this year. Alfonso Peccatiello, author and

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>former head of Fixed Income Portfolio manage at I n

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>G Deutschland, he joins us here. Uh, Alfonso, thanks so

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>much for taking the time here. Boy, it has been

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a brutal year for fixed income investors. Nowhere to hide.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it? You've been doing this

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, what do you make of this? Well?

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Will that make of this is that basically central banks

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 1>try to warn us that they were very serious about

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>fighting inflation, but the bond market didn't want to listen

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at first, and they just had to double down to

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that everybody understands it. This is not like

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>it does in an eighteen or nineteen, where you know

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they can basically tighten a little bit and make sure

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that they are respected by markets. Because inflation and inflation

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations went out of control, the reaction function is not

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>linear anymore, and they need to get ahead of the curve.

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they're trying to do now, which obviously

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hits the bond market. I find I'm looking at the

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>volatility across treasuries and we're at a stage or at

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a height that's even greater than what we saw in

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of crunch moments of the pandemic where none

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of us knew what was going to happen. And what

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm struggling to understand is why is this market struggling

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to price in the future path in terms of recession,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where policymakers go next. Some things more

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>certain now than they were in that early pandemic era.

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is such a great point. And the problem with

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this is that central bankers told us they're going to

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be pretty mechanical, So I'm gonna quote power. Basically, it

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>told us that he wants to have a real fat

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>funds rate at least in the one percent positive area

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>before it feels relatively satisfactory with the stunts. And that

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>means that even if inflation slows down a little bit,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and we all hope that next year, that fat funds

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>rate will have to be in the four and a

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>half five percent area. Now, if inflation doesn't slow down,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, that means that mechanically the Federal Reserve,

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to preserve the credibility, will need to have nominal fat

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>funds rate even higher than that. So when new price volatility,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>as a bond trader, obviously you left to look at

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>both the right end and the left end of your distribution,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and at the moment, because of recession risks, the left

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>end is open, but the right end is also open

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>because if inflation doesn't slow down, then central banks will

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>just mechanically keep hiking rates. The last one I have

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is that higher bond volatility actually deters investors from taking

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>risks in other rest classes. The bond market is the

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest market in the world, the most liquid and deep.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And if people can figure out and they have to

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>price alativity is so wide in the most liquid us

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>at so ball, how can they take risks when it

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to risk your uset classes. And that also has

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>implications for equities and credit spreads which are widening. Indeed,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so one of the things we hear about when we

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about fixing come folks, particularly on on the trading

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sign is poor liquidity in the marketplace. Can you define

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>what that means to you and maybe how the practical

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>implications day to day for investors. So how would define

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that is, if you're a market practitioner, if you try

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to trade anywhere above a hundred to two hundred millions

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of ten year treasuries, you would have big dusk quotes

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>which are much wider than you know, what you're used

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be, you're used to have in the past. So

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>when you have that kind of big dusk spreads that

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to widen in the most liquid market doable, it's

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a sign that the plumbing is not really working well.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And for plumbing, refer to the ability of market makers

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to warehouse risk, and this ability was crippled from Great

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Financial Pride, the post Great Financial Prices regulation, which effectively

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>made it much more capital expensive and inefficient for market

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>makers to provide liquidity to such a market. But the

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>real underlying problems actually happen when the report market doesn't

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>work because most of this balance sheet, the risk, the

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>risk taking ability out of market makers and hedge funds

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>actually happens to be balanche it heavy. So there are

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>report transaction underlying the ability to provide liquidity. If the

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>report markets show some sign of stress, you immediately see

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the treasury market right now, That's really not

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the case yet. It also has to do with some

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>facilities the Federal Reserve set up, like the standard reper facility.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>But it is definitely something to ever look at. I

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>want to look some other corners the market Europe corporate

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>bond September is kind of classically. I believe a great

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>month for the bond market this year. It's not why well,

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this year is not because we saw an acceleration of inflation,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>both in your up and in the US. And when

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm in acceleration, guys, it is not only the level

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of inflation which is undoubtedly very high. But it's the

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>momentum and the composition of these inflationary pressures which is

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting if you look at the moving average of core

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>inflation x energy. So I'm looking like at the momentum

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stickiest part of the inflationary basket, the one

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that central bankers are the most worried about because they're

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>tough to bring down. They're actually accelerating, both in the

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>US and in Europe, two levels last set in momentum

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>terms in the eighties. So no wonders that actually have

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>to tighten the stands, which hits the bond market further. Alright,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a fan, so great stuff. Really appreciate getting your thoughts

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on your perspective. Afonso Peccatillo, author and former head of

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fixed income portfolio management at I n G Deutschland. Looking

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at the shares of Nike down by ten and a

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>half percent today eight change on agre day basis down

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty per sent here so uh, and they reported

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>some numbers today that disappointed Wall Street. Let's get the

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>latest with Bloomberg's Abigail Doolittle. Abigail, I guess they got,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of other retailers. They got an inventory problem.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>They do. North American inventories up six overall global inventories

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>up more than And what's interesting about this is a

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>piece of it has to do with the supply chain

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>kinks because they can't get what they have had made

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>abroad where they needed to get it on time. By

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the time it gets to where it's needed, it's out

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of season and it's sort of rocks like bad food. So, yeah,

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>bloated inventories like so many other UH companies and retailers.

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So that led to a miss and led to them

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cutting the outlook. Gross margins are real big problem. They're

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>now going to be two two hundred and fifty basis

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>points lower than expected. But it's not just the inventories.

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's also those higher freight their freight issues, but the

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>higher freight costs and of course for an exchange. Yeah,

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they had the kind of full potion cauldron of problems, right.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting. I'm gonna get some of the other

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>stocks in the market that pays Lulu lemon for example,

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the shoemake is also lower. It's not getting better,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is it? It's not getting better? And the sense that

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I get from this quarter because the miss actually wasn't

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that bad. They actually beat on sales sales three percent

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>out of than estimates, and the earnings miss by less

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>than one percent. Again, it's more the outlook. First of all,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>China was very weak because of the continued COVID outlook.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But my sense is that there's not so much of

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a weak US consumer factored in here yet. It has

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>more to do with these other issues. So if we

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are stumbling into some sort of a true recession, I

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think we can all agree that on some level the

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>economy is slowing, it could really be a strong issue

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>when you put it together with these other factors. And

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned from you know, reading the research of

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like Punham Goyle from Bloomberg Intelligence, for example, is when

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you got extra inventory in the pipeline, it's not like

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of keep there and I'll sell it

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>next year. You gotta blow it out. You gotta blow

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it out. The way you do it is a discount,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>massive discounting. Well, I will admit the first time I

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was reading these discounts, as I told you, I'm in

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the the market for some new golf clothing. I was thinking, oh,

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know what the one thing I will say is,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>so we heard this. We've heard the story so many times,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but we heard it in big time earlier this year.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Probably the real the big company that started all this

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>target I went to those stores and I didn't find

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>any of the good deals, right, So I'm thinking that

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of the inventory problems are more regional. But

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going to try relative to Nike. Something relative

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to the stock though, to think about. So as we're

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioning Paul, it is down on the year, the worst

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>year ever. The evaluation is still sky high. That they're

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>trading at a pe of twenty four times forward, that

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is at the high end of the two year range,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's also above the mean of eighteen point times

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the group, and it's also high

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>for all the other evaluation metrics. So you could make

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the case that fundamentally and technically this stock has more

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to go as high to most of them has some

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of the stretched chip covering day to day. It's actually

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>astonishing to see that stats walking behind us. He made

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the point earlier that actually another intr entry issue. You

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>go onto the website, you can't get the thing that

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you want anyway, and that speaks to the shipment issues.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>But you love golf, I love football, European football soccer

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to you out there. We have a World Cup here,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and you do wonder if that event that catalyst helps

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a company like Nike later on in the year. Well,

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if it could, if they can make the product that

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is appealing to you and to John and to other folks,

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and then if they can actually get it to you,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can order it and buy it. I mean

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to have these supply chain kinks. I remember these sorts

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of issues back in the tooth, that early two thousand area,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that their bear market unrelated to uh this sort of

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>factor was actually more about uh fashion wrong. So companies

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>would make the fact, you know, whatever the style was,

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and then folks didn't want it, so kind of sit

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there and they would have to discount it. But it'll

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see whether or not they'll be able

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of it. That could that could be

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a nice opportunity for them to kind of come out

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of this hole. All right, So ed you mentioned this.

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>The World Cup. English plans notably are good. They travel well,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>they do travel well. Are they going to go to cutter?

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting there are lots of moral cultural issues.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Football fans, I would say, tend to look past those.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Qatar is an expensive place to go at the best

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of times if you're if you're a UK football fan.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Remember also Whales are in that group as well. I'm

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>proudly Welsh and I'm looking forward to that show down

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>with the United States and h are on um. Do

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they travel? I have no idea, but they can drink

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I think now I saw news not twenty four hours

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a day, but maybe like eighteen or nineteen hours a day.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They can, but only in like selected places. I mean

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>football fans like that their adult beverage of choice they do.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And also how big a factor is the pound right now?

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>If you I mean, I'm hoping to go home in

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>December for the holiday period and as a somebody that

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>draws a salary in dollars, you know, it's not so

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>bad for me but for my family. Yeah. Well it's

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting you're saying that because I've been thinking about winning

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a trip and somebody was saying, well, you should go

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to Europe, you know, because it's on ze um. So

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with UK. You know, looking at these

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Nike numbers, it kind of makes me think about and

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever we have these earnings issues, it kind of goes

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to show you that the earnings risk in this market.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still there. Oh, I can't say. I

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's just starting. Yeah, And I just wonder

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>how much you know earnings are going to come down

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>in this period. Are our company is gonna kind of

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>really throw in the kitchen sink? And if so, this

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>market can't really make a bottom until we get through that. Yeah.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a great point. And to go

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>back to that two thousand to two thousand three time

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>period that was just a long, slow move lower for

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>earnings and companies not being able to manage expectations and

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>having to cut quarter after quarter after quarter, like the

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>kitchen sink really didn't exist at that point. So now

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you see a company trying to do this but kind

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of get worse than this. Absolutely, if the consumers slows down,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>earnings expectations are coming down, but in a recession, historically,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>looking at the data, they get a mega reset right

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>ten to depending on the sector. Is that happened yet? No?

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not. And the other thing is this is a

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>recession that will also come against with the FED raising

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot of people are. I

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>saw something about like the FED pudd is coming back soon,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's uh that personally, I don't agree with that.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that every single UM FED official and you know,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the dot plot, the average year

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>end rate FED funds rate for the media and FED

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>is four thirty seven. WARP has it at four twenty.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>That's a seventeen bit difference between what the FED is

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>saying and what the markets are saying. If the FED serious,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>even just this year, there's some catchup. So to have

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of liquidity pressure, uh, in addition to the

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental slowdown, it's just it's something we haven't seen. I mean,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess we sort of stow in the early eighties.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember it, but wasn't that I was very small.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Early eighties were very good for me. Thank you very much.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Abigail the little thank you so much. We

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. She covers all things markets for Bloomberg Radio

0:12:55.120 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and Television. Let's talk geopolitics as we talk about these markets,

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>because boy, there's a lot going on in the world

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with Russian, Ukraine and so on. We can do that

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with Nick stat Miller, Director of Emerging Markets at Medley

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Global Advisors. So, Nick, I mean emerging markets at a

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>time when interest rates are rising, We've got geopolitical issues

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like we haven't seen since World War Two in Europe.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>How does that factor into what you guys do in

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>your emerging market work there? Well, you know, one observation

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I've heard from a lot of a lot of our

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>clients is that they feel like geopolitics is more relevant

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for the market now than it has been any time

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty years, going back to the First

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Gulf War. So it obviously takes up a lot more

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>of our bandwidth. And geopolitics is, by necessity, by definition,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a very qualitative discipline, so it becomes very hard to

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>quantify what the impact. You know, you can talk through

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all the scenarios and assigned probabilities, but figuring out what

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that's going to do to a currency or rates or

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>stock markets is is really hard. So you have to

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time tracking the psycho oology of

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the market around those events. We're talking about Russia, but

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we're also thinking about Turkey. I find this fascinating that

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Riship tie Burdwan is kind of offering himself as a

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>mediator in the conflict Russian Ukraine conflict. At the same time,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Turkish economy is suffering. I think I'm right and

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>saying the trade deficit hit the worst on record in August, Right,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So where do you look to in that scenario? Should

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>should Turkey stay out of the way? What's going on there? Yeah,

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of moving parts, and Turkey is

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>on track to post a record current account deficit this year.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>It probably is going to be around fifty billion dollars.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And the other problem they have is that their effects

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>reserves are very low. Radwan is forcing the central Bank

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep interest rates low. They're at twelve percent when

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>inflation is eighty percent and they're looking to cut more.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know the energy markets that are a big

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>factor in this, right absolutely, the the energy import bills

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest driver in that current account deficit, and

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>uh in the high cost of energy. So everyone is

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in a very weak position economically, and He's tried to

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of balance his support for Ukraine and Russia and

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, play that sort of impartial mediator, but he

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>frequently gets caught on the side. And then you've got

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Russia that has faced unprecedented unified sanctions from the West

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and really looking to figure out ways to do foreign

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>trade and investment around those sanctions, and they're trying to

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>do it in Turkey, and Turkey really needs the money,

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but the US really does not want Russia to subvert

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>those sanctions, so it's really sort of becoming a pressure

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>point in the confrontation between Russia and the West. So

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just broadly to find how do you think, how do

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys think about Turkey as a place to invest.

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it just too too risky at this point? You

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>need more stability, whether it's from the government or just

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal side. It's it's wrong on all fronts. You

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of political instability and increasing repression, so

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't score very well on policy predictability

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and stability. Monetary policy as a disaster, the central banks

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet is a mess, Fiscal policy is becoming increasingly

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not credible um, so it's very hard to see how

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone would want to firm make some firm commitments there

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>until you see some serious policy changes. When we consider

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, how has the war in Ukraine prompted the

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>market to reshuffle where it places capital because of all

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the interlink between these nations and also of course because

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of the effects of sanctions. Right well, the big impact initially,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know there's risk off whenever you have

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>any sort of geo political uncertainty, you get this broad

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>risk off, and emerging markets are always friends in the

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fire line. But then you had this price shock into

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>commodities because particularly on grain and wheat and on the

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>oil side. That's largely subside it since then. But then

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you have these lingering sort of regional problems. Great example

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is the cut off of Russian gas into europe Um,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the emerging markets front. You have the central

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>European economies, most notably hungry, very vulnerable to that. So

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it there is a global impact in terms of the

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the commodities and the risk off sentiment, but

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's sort of this regional impact that you have

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to sort of suss out on a country by country basis.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And again back to Turkey, higher energy prices really hurts

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>them on the external account. Where are given all these

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>uncertainties in the backdrop in whether it's interest rates, monetary policy,

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>political issues, the least place I want to be as

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, But you have to do it for a living.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So what where are you and your clients kind of

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>doing work and seeing opportunities in emerging markets? Yeah, I

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>mean the strong dollars killing EM currencies, higher rates, and

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>tighter liquidity globally are really tightening up their access to credit.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point it's it's a relative value story.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So you look for places, um, you know, where they're

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that could outperform others. And so you know, you have

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Czech Republic which has you know, a stronger balance sheet,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and um, you know, a very stable currency because

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the central bank policies. You know, I think that

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>has a really strong chance about performing Hungary. You know,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look in Latin terms of trade, probably favor

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>countries like Columbia that are oil exporters over places like

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Chile which are very exposed to copper prices which have

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really taken a plunge in recent months. So it's really

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of selective and it's more relative value than just hey,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>let's expand our exposure to EM as a whole. What's

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest cat list for emerging markets in I think

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say two very interrelated things, which is how

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>long this dollar strength persists, and I don't think it's

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so much a story about what the Fed does. You know,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's fifty or seventy five and an individual meeting,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But the overall structurally higher set of dollar rates that

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing, I think, um, those two and then I

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>would say, secondarily is the extent to which inflation starts

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to normalize globally and this inflation shock recedes. All right, Nick,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that's great stuff. Nick stad Miller, Director Emerging Markets at

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Medley Global Advisors. Joining us live in studio, so it

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>gets a gold star for being in studio. We appreciate

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that today's focus on munities has brought to you by

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Built American Mutual. When the market is volatile, BAM provides stability.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>BAM insured municipal bonds delivered the fall protection, value, preservation,

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and a durable rating. Ask your broker about BAM in

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>short municipal bonds. That that's a read that Matt Miller

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>just loves to read. He goes all off on the

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>BAM thing, and it's it's kind of embarrassing, but it's

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>his thing, so I leave him to it. Yeah, I

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>did not do it justice. Joe Mysac joins us here.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe does all things municipals for Bloomberg News. Joe, we're

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're all kind of looking at the images

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the video of the terrible tragedy down in Florida.

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it an issue for the missible bond market when

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you see that type of disruption and destruction, destruction, and

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just Florida. If it's kind of it

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>back out in the ocean, it's winding up, it's going

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to South Carolina, more destruction there. But in answer your question,

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>it's very surprising to most people that natural disasters tend

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not to be a credit issue for municipalities, for states

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and municipalities, purely because insurance money, you know, following the waves,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>following the actual water that comes in comes waves of cash,

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>insurance money, federal assistance, rebuilding efforts get under way. So yes,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a tremendous agity, tremendous destruction and then

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this tremendous renewal, if you will. So unless a municipality

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>goes kind of out of business. Uh, the the jet

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>service is completely intact. Things occur um just as they

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>normally would, and natural disasters are really just uh, you know,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>something that the market, shrugs off. The only thing that

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I could think of otherwise is, uh, you know, a

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>couple of those towns that were destroyed by wildfire in California,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>they missed debt service because the whole town was wiped

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>out and records were lost and things like that. But otherwise, no,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not really a credit event. Interesting, all right, you've

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>got let's move from South Florida up to preppy island

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of Nantucket. Are you trying to tell me, Joe that

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Nantuckett is going into the bond market? Are they gonna

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>do an issuance here? They did? They, they did it. Yes,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>they sold this week. And most of the issue is

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for affordable housing because Nantucket, like uh, your nearby island,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Martha's Vineyard. Um, like I want to say Aspen, I

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>think Veil as well. Uh. These are places that people

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>love and they're charming and they're enchanting, and there's no

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>room for the people who are essential service providers to live.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>They're being priced out of their own homes. So you

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>know you're seeing police and fire, nurses and teachers. Uh,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that's who's going to benefit from this affordable housing bond issue.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And Nantucket, let's face it, and Martha's vene your two

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there's really you can't say, well, you ought the community

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>from the suburbs because you just know the ocean. This

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sting in your column, which you wrote beautifully by the way,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you paint an idyllic picture of Nantucket, Massachusetts. But ultimately

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they're issuing this debt for affordable housing, and in the

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>prospectives they're very much not focused on affordable housing. They're

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just trying to sell the vision of the town. Well, yes,

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, the kind of the amazing factoid

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I discovered there was that the median house

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>price on Nantucket is three million dollars. Interesting, you know,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so who funds it? Who pays this bond? Like is

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it gonna be property taxes or is it going to

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be this is a general obligation bond, so full faith

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and credit of Nantucket. Uh, you know that includes all

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the money they bring in, including this tax on hotel rooms,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that size taxes, and that has that's been a bowman

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>since the pandemic because people really wanted to get out

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there and they couldn't go abroad. It couldn't you know, uh,

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 1>go to London, Like we're talking about so like, well,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>let's you know, go domestically equisode Nantucket. Let's go there

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so that the money has been coming in over the guddals.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>If I were going to ever buy a house in

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Nantucket and I'm not in the market, you have to

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>factor in the cost of an ownership of a plane,

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way you're doing that fery thing. That's

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a crazy trip. So if I can't afford a plane

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and the house, I'm not buying the house. What do

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you think of that strategy? Not a boat? Come on? Yeah? No, No,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I need to take off from you know, like Marshtown

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and just jet up to Nantucket. If I can't afford

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that, that that doesn't fit into talking about a little propeller

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>plane or what. Yeah, I could do that, but no,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably need a jet because the weather gets kind

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of funky up there, you know. So the last person,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, John F. Kenny Jr. Flew a plane up

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there and propeller. That didn't work out so well. Well no,

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, So Nantucket in the bond market raising money.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming it's a top rated bond, right triple, A

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>rated triple because Nantucket has the money coming in and

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they also got money from the federal government, the ARPO

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>funds and things like that. So uh N, tuxs doing

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>very well, and these bonds sold at very you know,

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>good prices for them, so they'll be able to uh

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. The building of affordable housing is something that

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they have been doing, so it's not as though this

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is brand new. They have been trying to keep up

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with this, and yet the demand is fabulous because they

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't sold enough. They haven't built enough affordable housing. All right, Joe,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. No, that's it. That's it, Joe Mysa, Editor.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg brief are weekly overview of all things municipal bond.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>We go from all of America in Secaucus, New Jersey,

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to Nantucket for affordable housing. The

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>municipal bond market is everywhere, and it is triple tax free.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>ED has no idea about the US municipal bond market,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>but what we'll school them on it here. It's triple

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>tax free. That's what I know. Let's check you with

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Dr Quincy Crosby, chief Global Strategist for LPL Financial LP.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>L A is the stock symbol to put into your

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. I'm looking at it. It's a seventeen billion

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap company, stocks up thirty nine year to date.

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Go figure one of the big strong names out there. Uh, Quincy,

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Why is your

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>company stock up? This is a great company with the

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>largest we're the largest independent UH broker dealer in the country,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's also growing at at a rapid pace and

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very well manage as you can imagine in this environment

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to see the share price up, you know, in that trajectory. Yeah,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't say that. It's also a great company to work.

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff, all right, we got a little

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>green on the screen today. But this has been just

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a brutal year. What's the view from LPL Financial? With

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>your stock up thirty percent? What are you guys thinking

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about this market? Well? Yeah, I mean this it's a

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>market that is is chopping. There's tremendous uncertainty. And you

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting about this is we we've seen the

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>volatility index climb, the vix UH as the said began

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>raising rates. The next sape fairly dormant, fairly quiet. It

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>was understood what the Fed was doing. It was, you know, clear.

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But what has happened as other central banks are raising

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the rates and as their concerns grow that the FEDS

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>um aggressive campaign maybe pushing us into a recession. And also, uh,

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just what happened in the UK that perhaps

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>there are other thought lines lurking in the global global system. Uh,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the vix is climbing because there's more uncertainty.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>There's uncertainty regarding where this is taking us, and how

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>does the set actually bring us to price stability, which

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out as the proverbial breaking something. You know what happened

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the UK with the pension fund issues and the

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England having to go out and um, you know,

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>buy bonds again. It could happen anywhere and it does

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and it does when financial conditions tighten. So that's the uncertainty.

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And also, you know we're going into third quarter earning

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>season and the questions are what are those companies saying

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not only their bottom line but their margins, But what's

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the guidance? How are they seeing things? Are they all

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be giving us the same guidance as set

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Ex did on that Friday that you know the market

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>melted down. We don't know. So this is the uncertainty,

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to just navigate through this. And it

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>looks as if the market wants to go lower and

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>find a you know, a level that has discounted all

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of the headwinds, all of the problems. But you know,

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>most likely we're not there yet, so that that's what's

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>going to gone, but more defensive quincy. In periods of recession,

0:28:55.760 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings expectations come down. Right, have earnings expectations come down

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>enough that we're reflecting that recession risk? Probably not? No,

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, And that's that's the that's the other issue

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for the market. It probably hasn't. But until we hear

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>from companies, either before they actually come out and you know,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have their official earnings call, but perhaps with pre announcements,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>will have a will have an understanding of what they

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>are seeing, and the market then has to adjust. And

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know, no one knows if there

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>will be a recession. If there is, will it be

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a shallow one, will be a growth recession, or just

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an earnings recession. The market right now is trying to

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>figure that out, and until it does, expect more chopped

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So I mean this federal reserve, I mean, are you

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in the camp that says this Federal Reserve is likely

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to go too far, too fast, too high, and and

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact pushes into recession. That seems to be the consensus.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It is, it is the consers. Clearly, it's the consensus.

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've made it very clear. They don't want

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to wait and watch to see how, you know, things

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are turning out. They want to frontload it. And by

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that, at least they have the luxuries. You can

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>see from the from the data, people are still spending.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Retail spending is still is still maybe not stellar, but

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still solid. The labor market remains solid, probably too

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>much for the Fed. But the point is it's not

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>denting the economy in the way they want. Surely the

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>housing market is slowing, but they need rents that come down.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>That's number one. The second thing is they need proofs

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>food prices to pull back, along with gasoline prices which

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>have obviously started moving back, and they need to have overall, uh,

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire economy and demand to decrease, to decrease to

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the point it's not going to push prices higher. I

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>just have to mention, you know, I saw the announcement

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon. They're raising wages for those who work in

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>factories and the driver's nine. Amazon is going to pass

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that along somewhere along the line. They're not. They're not

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>going to sit there and say do we we'll we'll

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>take care of this somewhere that is going to be

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>passed along to consumers, either to the companies on their

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>platform or yeah. So that's what the set is fighting.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the irony of this whole thing. I doesn't

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>want to see this private wage price spiral. It's a difficulty,

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, Quincy, great stuff. Really appreciate getting your insight

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Quincy Crosby, cheap Global strategist for LPL Financial Again.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It trades on the nastac lp l A is the

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ticker to put into your Bloomberg Professional Service. It's got

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a seventeen point seven billion market cap stock up. There's

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a winner for you in Thanks for listening to the

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three On

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg radio