WEBVTT - Meta Tries to Poach OpenAI Staff, David Sacks Weighs In On Genius Act

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is alive from coast to coast, with Caroline

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York and Eva low into En frances Go.

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Open Ai CEO Sam

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 2>Altman says Meta offered his employees signing bonuses as high

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 2>as one hundred million dollars.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Plus it's a win for the crypto industry. After a

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>stable coin bill passes the Senate, we discussed with the

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>White House cryptos are David.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Sachs and another extension for the sale of TikTok. We

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>have Frank McCourt Jr. To talk through where his bid stands.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, we talk about his market. The macro perspective, ED,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of a FED decision in but a few hours,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Middle East tensions will we see

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>outreach between the US in Iran. At the moment, we

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing a buying signal. We're up six percent on the NASAC.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Most of those magnificent seven names training higher. But ED,

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you're focusing in on one particular name.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm looking at Meta shares a kind of like

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 2>modestly higher up half a percentage point. Meta, open Ai,

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Scale i AI have all been in the news a

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>lot recently. The headlight right now is because of this.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 3>They started making these like giant offers to you know

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people on our team, you know, like

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>hund't mind our signing bonuses more than that comper years.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 4>And I'm actually it is crazy.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm really happy that, at least so far, none of

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>our best people have decided to take them up on that.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg has reached out to Meta, but we've not heard

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>back on a request for comment. For more on Meta

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and the competition for AI talent, Bloomberg's Jackie Duellis joins us. Now, Jackie,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what we didn't hear in the rest of that conversation

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>with his brother in Uncapped He went on to really

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>say some damning things, perhaps about Meta and the fact

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that they lack innovation and ultimately is not losing talent

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>because they want to stay for the mission of Open AI.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>How fierce is it out there right now?

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a few things that we can draw from

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 5>his comments on the podcast. One, it confirms that there's

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 5>this new chapter in the AI talent wars. It's always

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 5>been fears, but it's reaching a new level now.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 6>One hundred million.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 7>Dollar bonuses is something we've never heard of before, and

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 7>it's really telling of how much Meta is willing to

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 7>pay to regain its edge in this AI race.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 8>Altman's comments also highlight, like you said, there is confidence

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 8>that it's going to take more than just money to

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 8>bring the best and brightest to your team. If you

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 8>look at open AI's mission statement, they say that they

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 8>think about their work for the benefit of humanity. That's

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 8>really bold and large and purposeful. Whereas Meta I looked

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 8>up their mission statement earlier and it says we're advancing

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 8>AI for a more connected world to accelerate the potential

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 8>future META products for the benefit of people. It's not

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 8>as deep if you really dig into it, Jackie.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>A big part of the conversation that Sam Altman was

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>having with the reasons why one hundred million dollars isn't

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 2>enough to get open A employees to go to Meta.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>What was his argument.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Part of the.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 8>Argument is this larger purpose and also that they're not

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 8>as innovative that you know, people want to go to

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 8>a place where they feel like they're going to be

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 8>able to do their best work and some of that

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 8>culture problem that we've seen with Meta, and you know

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 8>they've also admitted in the past that they kind of

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 8>have trouble with middle management and just kind of the

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 8>almost internal bureaucracy of how you get things out there

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 8>that doesn't exist to the same degree according to all

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 8>men at Open AI. And so when you think about

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 8>the people that are going to go over, they won't

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 8>want to be able to have that assurance that their

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 8>ideas are actually going to make it into reality.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And Jackie, they want to be on the winning team.

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>They want to get to AGI first, and that seems

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the point of this. There's no point coming second.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You need to be at the business that leaves the charge.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly, those pay packages have led on some significant

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>talent to the superintelligence team from DeepMind, from sesame AI.

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 8>That's right, it's but you know, we have to remember

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 8>that they are working in a new kind of organization.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Meta at the end of the day needs.

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 8>To incorporate this technology into its products, which is, you know,

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 8>the money maker they have shareholders they need to appease

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 8>on a quarterly basis, and that kind of pressure could

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 8>also affect the way the speed at which they work,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 8>how quickly they roll out these these tools. But AGI

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 8>super Intelligence, this is new ground for Meta. They they

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 8>haven't really shredded this sort of landscape before in the

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 8>same way that open ai was really founded on these

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 8>principles to to create a gi and so you know,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 8>you have the best and brightest, going, really intelligent people,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 8>but we've seen some uh friction, some tension and.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know going on in.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 8>Its own in its fair team, the the research team

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 8>inside Mata, So they're not exactly going into a place

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 8>that has this all figure it out.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg, Jackie de Ballas, thank you very much. Let's get

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>to a story that broke in the last hour. Open

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 2>ai is phasing out the work it does with scale Ai,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>cutting ties with that company just days after Meta's fourteen

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar investment. Bloomboath Rachel Metz joins us with more So,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a very important distinction of what's happening here.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Open i has existing contracts with scale Ai, but what

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>we've learned is that that relationship is going to change

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 2>in the future.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 9>Yes, open ai is phasing out the remaining work that

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 9>is doing with scale Ai.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The company has.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Branched out a lot over the past few years as

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 9>its data needs have expanded vastly, and also changed based

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 9>on the kinds of models that it's building. So at

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 9>this point Scale represents the companies puts as a very

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 9>small fraction of its business, but over time it's going

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 9>to now be totally phasing that out.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Chill.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>These two stories, yours and Jackie's, are linked the narratives

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>because of course Alexander Wang goes to the superintelligence team

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>over at Meta and indeed takes a lot of the

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>talent from SCALEAI. There other companies, perhaps not just open Ai,

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>start to move away from SCALEAI. Are you hearing it

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere that maybe these contracts get undone in the future.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 9>We are definitely hearing that companies that provide data and

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 9>data services. It's a very fractured, fragmented space.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of companies.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 9>That are much less known than Scale but that are

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 9>also worked with by these companies like open Ai Andthropic,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 9>Google and many others. And I know they're seeing a

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 9>surge of inbound interest and they also are hearing from

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 9>some nervousness from some of their customers. Companies tend to

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 9>work with a bunch of players, and it is possible

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 9>that this tie up, even the Scale has said it

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 9>will remain as an independent business.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It will make people nervous.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>We should say that Scale ai did decline to comment

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>on the story, just as Meta declined to comment on

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.119
<v Speaker 2>the Sam Outman claims on comp The history of Scale

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>is interesting because there's an element of manual work that

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>they're doing and they relied on this kind of army

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of contractors. Just explain that the basics of that, because

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>my reading of your story is the open AI was

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking about the relationship over the past year before a

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of this happened.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 9>Anyway, Yes, so Scale ai at You're absolutely correct. It

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 9>started out as a business that had a large number

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 9>of contractors that were paid to label data for AI models.

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 9>Over time, though, the AI market has shifted and shifted

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 9>quite rapidly, so at this point, while it still has

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 9>that legacy human data labeling business, it's also expanded into

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 9>a few other areas, and one of them is increasingly

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 9>hiring experts, experts that might work a few hours on

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 9>the nights or weekend, someone with a PhD or a

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 9>law degree, and instead of labeling data directly, what they're.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Doing is coming up with difficult tasks for EI models

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to solve.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 9>And that's also something that's become increasingly important to open AI,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 9>but it seems like skill is opening. I felt that

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 9>skill was not quite up to the level that it

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 9>needed to support its products with this kind of work.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Remokes Rachel Mets. We appreciate it, thank you. Let's just

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about Emil Musk's AI startup now xai. It is

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>burning through one billion dollars a month, with expected losses

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of thirteen billion in twenty twenty five due to the

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>high costs of building advanced AI models.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>This is all according to sources, who say that to

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>cover the gap, musk start up is currently trying to

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>raise nine point three billion dollars in debt in equity.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But even before the money is in the bank, the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>company has plans to spend more than half of it

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is the next three months alone it Amazon CEO Andy

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Jesse says he expects his workforce to shrink as a

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>handles more tasks. In an email to employees yesterday, Jasi

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote that over the next few years, Amazon expects to

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>quote reduce our total corporate workforce. Is the later CEO

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>to warn of AI's impact on headcount. Now Amazon had

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>over one and a half million employees at the end

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of March, mostly though in warehouse jobs ed.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Another company that's warned about the impact of AI on

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the workforce is Klana, embracing generatorve AI tools, though with

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>some change of heart on hiring for customer services. Today,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the startup, known for its buy and now pay Lada service,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>is entering the mobile market with plans to launch a

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty dollars per month service in the US, with plans

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to expand into the UK and Germany later this year.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Klana's CEO Sebastian Schmierkowski joins us now welcome to the

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>world of Mvno. It was a headline I didn't expect

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 2>to see, Sebastian. I mean, the simple question for claner

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>is why why do this?

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 10>It comes back actually to the fact that we do

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 10>believe the future is a digital financial assistant that helps

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 10>you save time, save money. And in this case, if

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 10>we not only identify that one of our customers can

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 10>save money using this, but we can actually put it,

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 10>bundle it together and offer it by this seamless experience

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 10>of just a button say yes, I would like to

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 10>get a better price or a better offer, and here

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 10>it is and it's live on my phone with virtual

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 10>SIM cards. Now you can get it live very very quickly.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 10>That makes a lot of sense. So it's just a

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 10>way for us to kind of bundle more services and

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 10>value to our existing customer base.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 2>The mechanism, right is that this is on the AT

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 2>and T network forty dollars a month. Does Klana make

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 2>any money on that arrangement?

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 10>We do, But most importantly this adds value to our

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 10>customer base.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 4>I think also, like one of my beliefs is that

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 4>if you have if.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 10>We're going to have truly digital financial assistance that can

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 10>recognize can come to you and wake you up in

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 10>the morning and say I can save you on the

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 10>carrier bill, I can save you on electricity bill. The

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 10>only thing you need to do is say yes, and

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 10>I'll take care of all the switching. I'll do everything,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 10>you all the paperwork. So you're just going to save

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 10>ten dollars a month or whatever it is.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 4>The point is.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 10>What that means is the excess profits that have existed

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 10>in utilities, in banking and all these things will have

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 10>to come down because we are predominantly stuck with our

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 10>existing providers, not because we love them, not because they're awesome,

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 10>but because we hate switching and we hate leading reading

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 10>boring legal terms.

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 4>To realize is this offer really better or not? Right?

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 10>So the point is that, like we believe that their

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 10>marginsy in these services will be significantly lower going forward.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 4>And that's why. Also it's smarter of us to who are.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 10>A new entrance into this industry, to come in with

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 10>a very attractive offer from day one, rather than believe

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 10>that we can lure people into some long, lengthy contracts

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 10>and make too much money on them over time.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>New entrants that already serve twenty five million active users

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, many users who associate you

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>really would buy now, pay later. How is that narrative shifting?

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>How were starting to see you as everything happ instead?

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, definitely a neo bank at least.

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 10>I think that the neo banking concept again comes back

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 10>to that digital financial assistant, that we want to help

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 10>people save time, save money, and have them not worry

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 10>about their finances. We want to help them with all

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 10>of that, and that is kind of what banking was

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 10>supposed to do. But at some point in time that

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 10>banker got a little bit too smart realized you didn't

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 10>really have that good understanding of your own stuff and

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 10>put you in some pension funds where they were charging

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 10>you to I fees on it.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Like that has to change.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 10>We have to come back and be in customer obsessed

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 10>and offer it the greatest value at the lowest you know,

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 10>in the highest quality, at the most affordable price.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 4>So that is what we're doing.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 10>And to us, it's everything related to you know, your

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 10>every day spending, and phone is part of your everyday spending, right,

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 10>It's a every day.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 4>Cost for you. So this this falls very naturally into that.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You the Trump organization, everyone is getting into the phone companies.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm interested, Sebastian, and you say your customer obsessed.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>To be customer obsessed, you have to be employee obsessed.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested on the shift you've made when it comes

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to customer services. You've come on the show before and

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>said we're all in on general to AI, I could place,

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I could replace myself as CEO. I'm replacing customer services.

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to add in terms of people and headcount.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But you've changed your mind on that.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, Partially what we've said is that, like, look, I

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 10>think in many countries you'll see that in the last

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 10>ten to twenty years, our doctors and nurses have spent

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 10>less and less time with patients and more and more

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 10>times on administrative tasks. In addition to that, the cost

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 10>of administration in healthcare has risen much faster than the

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 10>amount of money spent on actual doctors, nurses and being

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 10>available to patients. So what this AI technology can enable

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 10>us to do is to again take all the administrative

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 10>burdens out, make those be processed by AI and allow

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 10>doctors and nurses to be available and actually spend time

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 10>on patients. And this is the same for us as

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 10>a company. We can use ais AT technology so that

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 10>when people want to speak to us and if they

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 10>want to speak to a human, which we want to

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 10>make sure that everyone who wants to speak to human

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 10>should always be able to do so, we also want

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 10>to make sure that those humans have less administrative task

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 10>and can actually spend more time. So to me, the

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 10>value of human connection rises in the world of AI.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 4>It becomes more valuable.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 10>It becomes more expected that you have people that have

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 10>time to talk to you properly, not rushed in the

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 10>customer service center, that can actually sit down with you

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 10>and resolve your errands and so to us two things

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 10>can be so true. At the same point of time,

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 10>we can use AI to take and automate the boring

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 10>and mundane task away, and we at the same point

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 10>of I must recognize that people will expect a human

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 10>connection Sebastian.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Being an everything app or everything platform is a goal

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and vision you share with others. X has similar ambitions,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly in finance, right, But Uber would also say there

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>are elements of its platform that in the future it

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 2>can move into the areas you're talking about. Where do

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>you see yourself sitting and who are your rivals in

0:14:59.400 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>that domain?

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 10>It's the billion dollar question, my friend, in the silicon

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 10>value right now, will there be one assistant to serve all,

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 10>one ring to forge them all or will there be

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 10>multiple assistants?

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 11>Right?

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 4>And the answer is nobody knows.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 10>I at least for one, need to know that our

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 10>assistant digital financial system needs to be the best in

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 10>the world at what it does for our customers, and

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 10>hopefully people want to use it for that now. On

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 10>the other hand, as much as some people are yeah,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 10>of course, it's just going to be one. I've been

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 10>around twenty years long enough to remember in two thousand

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 10>and seven, when Facebook was supposed to be where all

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 10>of Internet happened, and all of Internet was going to

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 10>happen inside Facebook, that didn't.

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Actually materialize that way.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 10>So I'm still probably in the camp that there will

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 10>be a few really smart assistants that help you on

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 10>different topics and that you trust more on specific topics

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 10>than others.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 4>But this is the billion dollar question.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're old enough to remember that Klan is older

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>than Facebook Meta. So the IPO not happening this year,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>mind it next year.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 10>Well, I would say market conditions look brighter than they

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 10>did back in April, but now, as you know, I

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 10>can't comment on.

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 4>That, so I'm sorry.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 10>I would love to say something more than that, but

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 10>I think at least it's great to see that markets

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 10>look better.

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian is always great talking to you. Thank you, Knnescio.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian instrum Kowski.

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Robotaxi firm Zekes has opened a production facility in the

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Bay Area that says has the capacity to turn out

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand robotaxes a year. The Amazon unit's been testing

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>its purpose built robotaxis that have no steering wheel wall

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 2>pedals in locations across San Francisco and Las Vegas.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Zooks.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>CEO I S. Evans joins us from the new facility,

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and the obvious question is, like ten thousand robotaxes a

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>year at full scale, it's a lot of potential, But

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>what's the reality. I've always known you to be very pragmatic.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Give me the sort of target for this year and

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>next year for what we'll roll off the line.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, the reality is really, first of all, thanks for

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 11>having me ed.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 11>The reality is that we're just ready. We are, as

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, we're very excited. We're finally headed to our

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 11>commercial lounge in starting in Las Vegas. Ladis is here

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 11>and from there you have more and more robot taxis

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 11>coming in than we have San Francisco. Right after that

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 11>Austin and Miami coming up, and so we're gearing up

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 11>to basically be ready because as you know, with our

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 11>robot taxi it's purpose built serial production in the United States,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 11>So putting the capacity in place and then turning it

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 11>on little by little as we go city by city.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 2>The ten thousand numbers important in the context of federal rules.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Right right now, there's a limit on the number of

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 2>vehicles that can be on public roads that have no

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>driver controls, just like your vehicle. But Nitza's looking at it.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>How are those talks going with nitzer And do you

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 2>think you'll get that exemption to really scale up in

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the coming year or two.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 11>So, as you know, we want the self certification route,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 11>that's all that was available at the time. I have

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.719
<v Speaker 11>to say we're very grateful to the administration for the

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 11>progress in this innovation is happening worldwide and so making

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 11>sure the US is prepared is really key. And the

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 11>talks aren't going really well. I've always said that this

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 11>is a huge transformation in transportation and working hand in

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 11>hand with the regulatory authorities is key. And really really

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 11>impressed with the speed so far.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>How about Amazon support as well? How much are they

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>loosening the purse strings? How much budget have you got Asia.

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 11>So I don't know about loosening the first string. We

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 11>want to be every day. Were still a startup. We

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 11>have a lot of work to do. This is very

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 11>expensive and so what I can say is that Amazon

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 11>has been very supportive. They ask us good questions, they

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 11>support us, and you know, of course we come in

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 11>with a budget.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 2>We discuss it.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 11>We come in with what we have to what we

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 11>say we commit to doing, we have to do it.

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 11>And if we don't do with their questions as there

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 11>should be. But frankly, super super happy. It's been five years,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 11>so way past the dating period and a greatful to Amazon.

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Full of relationship. What's interesting is they're also eyeing others

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>on the block. I'm sure the competitors just tell us

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>about the robo taxi competition weaimo and particularly from Tesla.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Is this narrative good for you? How much has that

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>impacted the government?

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 11>Look, we've always said this is a huge market right

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 11>at scale after a sort of shelter meaning homes, apartments

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 11>and dwellings. Transportation is one of the most important and

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 11>also costly things. We know that it could be a

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 11>lot safer than it is right now on the road,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 11>and so it's a big market, it's a big industry.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 11>It's good to have multiple players. I've been a public

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 11>that we're super proud of way Moore, especially if you

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 11>live in the areas they serve. I live in the

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 11>San Francisco Bay area and I call them the cute

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 11>Casper ghosts. They are roaming around and as far as Sessler,

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 11>I've also said the more the merrier, I know they

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 11>have their own path. I don't like to comment or

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 11>criticize others. I'm sure they have their path laid out,

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 11>and we all have to be on the same roads,

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 11>and we're all subject to the same regulatory authorities.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure I've taken the Zoo's vehicle on the strip

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in Las Vegas, right, and you're inching towards commercial service,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think people would really appreciate the literal understanding

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of what you'll do. Number of zoos vehicles on that strip,

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the pricing in charging fares for all of those tourists.

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 11>All right, So in terms of numbers right now, we

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 11>have over a dozen or so roaming around the strip.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you know, people could count them, so there's

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 11>no point in not telling you the number. And they

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 11>write every day because we have to learn it's not

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 11>just self driving is the underlying technology. But at the

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 11>end of the day, what the customer cares about is

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 11>a wonderful experience that makes them feel special, that they

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 11>are picked up where they want it to be picked up,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 11>dropped off where they wanted to be dropped off, and

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 11>that it took a reasonable amount of time and they

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 11>have a great experience while doing it, and then you

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 11>also have operations behind that.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 4>So you can expect us to be just.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 11>You know, adding tens and tens and tens and serving

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 11>the market and then controlling that relative to the demand.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 11>As far as pricing, obviously, I'm not going to get

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 11>into the details of pricing, but customers are already used

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 11>to a certain pricing, and we intend to be competitive,

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 11>and we also intend to be ready for what happens

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 11>at scale.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Ay.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Evans, it's great to talk to you. The CEO

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of Zoos or a backdrop, Welcome back to Blomberg Tech.

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline hid in New York and I met Love

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Love in San Francisco. I wan look at the chip

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>sector real quick, because there's bits and pieces of news

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>driving markets. Two names I'm looking at are Marvel and Intel.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.479
<v Speaker 2>Marvel best performer and then that's that one hundred and

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the socks. The news well, it's just been talking up

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 2>its competence in AI at a conference. Frankly, Marvel does

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 2>ace right custom silicon, but that's a significant gain and

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sales siders coming out and saying we

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>like what we're hearing about Marvell and where it's going

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to fit in in that custom silicon landscape. Then you

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>have Intel up two percent or so, a restructuring, new

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 2>engineering leadership, new chief revenue officer, and the market's cheering it,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 2>although in a more muted way, probably carried than Marvell's getting.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>But always keeping an eye on the semiconductor space.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Now you are. We're also always keeping an eye on

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok because the US deadline to divest or be banned,

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's got a third count them, third extension from President Trump,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the administration delaying the ban by another ninety days, allowing

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the social media app just keep on operating in the

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>United States as it proceeds with negotiations. For more on

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the future of TikTok, Project Liberty founder long time bidder

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>for TikTok, Frank mccott, JO Junior joins US. Now, Frank,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a never ending story, is it not?

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 12>Well, it just yeah, it does seem that it's it's

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 12>taking a long time to get a deal made here.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 12>You know, you had the two hundred and seventy days

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 12>and then the two seventy five day extensions, and now

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 12>another ninety days. So yeah, it's been a while, but

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, I've learned to be very patient, hang around

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 12>the hoop.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 6>A lot of good things get done when that happens.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 12>And you know, my sense is and this is not

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 12>a you know, this is pure, purely my opinion, but

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 12>I think this is the last extension. I think ninety days,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 12>not seventy five days, is significant, and I think something

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 12>gets done within the next ninety days or not.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But does it involve you. Have you been on the

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>phone with the Vice president? Have you been involved in

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations.

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 12>You know, we were very much involved during the first

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 12>extension and less so during the second.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 6>Things have been relatively quiet as a.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Matter of fact.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 12>So I don't know if I should, you know, draw

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 12>any inferences there, but it's been fairly quiet overall. Look,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 12>I still love our chances, Caroline, because look, the legislation

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 12>is very very clear on what is mandated. Our bid,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 12>as far as I know, is the only bid that

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 12>actually qualifies, that actually meets the criteria in that legislation

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 12>where we completely disentangle from.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 6>The Chinese technology.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 2>So, Frank, I want to get really detailed on this

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 2>because on the other side of the table in this

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 2>bidding process, there is a coalition of different individuals and

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>technology companies whose proposals I understand it is outside what's

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 2>legislated for, in other words, some element of collocation of

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>data and licensing the algorithm. Would you just explain how

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 2>your bid is distinct from that. Yeah, well, and I

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 2>think you've hit the nail on the head. And what

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 2>we are we're.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Not looking to co host the data or to use

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese algorithm.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 12>Project Liberty is about empowering individuals, not exploiting them. So

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 12>we're not interested in scraping people's down to surveilling them, right,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 12>spying on them, scraping their data, aggregating it, and then

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 12>micro profiling people and then using a black box algorithm

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 12>to manipulate them.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 6>That's not what we're interested in.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 12>And that's why TikTok is so attractive to us, because

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 12>we can not only solve the national security issue, but

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 12>we can move the user base in the data onto

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 12>this new, clean, made in America stack, which doesn't rely

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 12>on Chinese technology, doesn't surveil on people, and as a

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 12>matter of fact, empowers people to permission the use of

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 12>their data and get paid for it.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 6>This is going to be the new Internet. It's going

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 6>to happen sooner or later.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 12>How many more days can go by where we're going

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 12>to read about another horror story that is occurring with

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 12>the current Internet technology, which is highly exploitive and highly predatory.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 12>The current model is not sustainable. In my opinion, it's

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 12>going you change, we bring the sooner it change is

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 12>the better, Frank.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>As the extensions keep coming and the process continues, does

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the price for TikTok go up or down or stay

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the same?

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 12>Well, from our perspective, it stays the same because what

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 12>we were buying, assuming the user base stays the same

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 12>and there's no change in the numbers. As far as

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 12>the value to others, I can't, I really can't comment

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 12>on that, and I'd only be speculating. But you know,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 12>our view is we can put a really clear value

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 12>on TikTok, the US TikTok, with the current user base,

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 12>with the data, with the brand, without the algorithm.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank, we asked you, and we thank you for being

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so transparent about your conversations with the administration. What about

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>with China? What about with byte dance, Because we understand

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>much of the elongation of the process is they don't

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>want to let go of the algorithm and they want

0:26:59.160 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep it INtime.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 12>Caroline, I think that's a really important question you're asking.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 12>I don't think any of us know what China is

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 12>ultimately going to do here, and I think it's a

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 12>big if in this whole transaction. If I think, one

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 12>thing we do know is they're not going to let.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 6>Us TikTok go with the algorithm or with the IP.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 12>So any chance of a deal, in my opinion, would

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 12>be a deal that disentangles from their technology. And the

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 12>deal that disentangles from their technology, I mean, why not

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 12>make the deal then? Because if there's not going to

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 12>be a deal and the only option to shut down,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 12>why not sell.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 6>The pieces and parts for.

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 12>A lot of money and achieve their objective, which is

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 12>no sharing of their technology.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 6>So I think that we just don't.

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 12>Know if they're even going to let us TikTok go

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 12>without the algorithm.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 6>We're betting they will, and that's been our bet from

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 6>day one, But we'll see.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And what about the moon music of the user base.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>When this all first came to light under the Biden administration,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>there was fierce opposition from many of those users, but

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>actually the US public at large actually wanted to get

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>rid of TikTok. But now it feels as though we've

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>moved the other way. Where is general public consensus on

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>whether we want to kick out TikTok or not?

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think it shifts and moves. I think

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 6>right now what's happened is that because you know that.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 12>This is the third extension, people are a bit anesthetized,

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 12>and you know, you're not sure what's going to happen,

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 12>and so are kind of not as it's it's not

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 12>as front and center on the minds of the user

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 12>base as it was when it was.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Threatened to be shut down with the legislation.

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 12>By the way, I believe us TikTok is going to

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 12>be sold a shut down. The legislation is very clear,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 12>and something's going to give here. And I you know

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 12>again I said earlier, and I have no I please,

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 12>I have no proof of this, but I just have

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 12>a gut feel this is the last extension.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 6>Something's going to happen during this ninety days.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 2>So Frank, sorry to interrupt you. So you've also you

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 2>basically opened the door to a third path, which we

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>discussed less, which is that the President could indeed decide,

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I don't want to go with. I've

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>a bidder, and I will shut down US TikTok or

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>TikTok in the US just explain, you know how you've

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 2>You've been transparent. Contact with the administration has been limited

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>in this period. But that seems a possibility.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it is a third possibility.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 12>And this is again I've said from the beginning, I

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 12>think when push comes to shove, or when this process

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 12>has come to a conclusion, TikTok will be sold without

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 12>the algorithm.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 6>But you're quite right, it may be shut down on

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 12>Side and and or China may just not allow it

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 12>to be sold. These are all distinct possibilities. So there

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 12>is uncertainty here. But look, Project Liberty is continuing to

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 12>build the technology onboard users and create this alternative Internet,

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 12>which we think is we need now that the bottom

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 12>line is we have an Internet that's that's broken, but

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 12>nobody's not going to use.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 6>It until there's an alternative.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 12>So our goal is to build that alternative and then

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 12>and then actually migrate users and build and by the way,

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 12>build new apps in this new world, and to create

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 12>user base there. So who would not be given the

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 12>choice of an Internet that surveils you, scrapes your data,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 12>and it basically exploits you, versus an Internet where you're

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 12>permissioning the use of your data. You get paid for

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 12>your data if it's a commercial use case that it's

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 12>used for, and you're in charge of you Again, you're

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 12>at the center right now. We have an Internet, We

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 12>have the platform at the center. Were are all just commandities?

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 12>We need an Internet? Well, we're at the center.

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 6>We have agency. Again, we're in charge and we're respected

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 6>quite frankly.

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Frank McCourt, junior Project Liberty, one of the bidders as

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 2>well of course for us TikTok. Thank you very much.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Tech and you are looking at a

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>live shot for the principal room. Check out the premiere

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Tech Europe this Friday, where we'll dive into

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>all the key tech stories from across the pond. This

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is the bloemerg.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The US Senate voted to pass the Genius Act late yesterday,

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 2>moving the country's first crypto legislation forward. A rare moment

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of bipartisanship in the Senate However, Republicans did block Democratic

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 2>efforts to bar the president from profiting from crypto efforts

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>he's affiliated to while he's in office. White House, AI

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and Cryptos are David Sachs joins us now in an

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 2>exclusive conversation. David, good morning, Thank you for being back

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 2>here on Bloomberg Tech. I think that the immediate question

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>is the immediacy of how quickly the bill passes to

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the President's desk and how you see that happening.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 13>Well, thanks ed, glad to be here. So the next

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 13>step year is for the House to take it up,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 13>and I think the House is considering its options, but

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 13>I think we're basically at the finish line here. The

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 13>House already passed a similar version of the bill called

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 13>the Stables Act, and I think that we're very close

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 13>here to having a bill that can go to the

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 13>President's desk.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>There is also a lot of parallel interest from our audience,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in particularly in the market structure efforts that are underway.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you believe or see that the President considering packaging

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>them together the Stable Coain legislation with market Structure.

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 13>Well, like I said, I think the House is still

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 13>considering its options. The issue with packaging them together. Is

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 13>that is that the Market Structure Bill has never been

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 13>taken up by the Senate. It did pass the House

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 13>and the last Congress, but it never passed the Senator

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 13>or was even taken up by the Senate. And so

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 13>you could say that the market structure bills on the

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 13>ten yard line, whereas the whereas the Market Structure Bill

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 13>is really just a few yards away from becoming laws.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 13>So I think there are different stages of the process,

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 13>and if they were packaged together, it would slow down

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 13>the stable Coin Bill, But those decisions still have to

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 13>be made.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's just talk about what this could unleash. If it

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>does go forward. Stable coins could swell to its high

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>as three point seven trillion dollars by twenty thirty, that's

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>according to City. But are we seeing perhaps a delay

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in regulation elsewhere that could stymy that sort of growth,

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Zizy saying, Look, if we don't see others getting on

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the bandwagon here, it could be limited to just five

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 13>No, I mean, I think that the stable Coin Bill

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 13>is very helpful, provides regulatory clarity and stability for the

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 13>stable coin industry. Like you were saying, there's already something

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 13>like two hundred and fifty billion dollars in float of

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 13>stable coins, and that's out without there being a true

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 13>regulatory framework in the United States. Right now, the number

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 13>one issuer stable coins is offshore. And what this bill

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 13>would do is provide like I said, the regulatory clarity

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 13>and safety would bring the whole stable coin industry on shore.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 13>It would enhance consumer protection. The issuers of stable coins

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 13>would have to get audited on a quarterly basis. Consumers

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 13>could be confident that their dollar based stable coins were

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 13>reserved on a one to one basis with actual dollars

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 13>in US bank accounts, and I think this would increase

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 13>confidence in the industry. And I think that you would

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 13>also see banks getting into the act. I think you'd

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.919
<v Speaker 13>see traditional financial players getting involved in it, and that's

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 13>why the float is expected to grow from call it

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 13>roughly two hundred and fifty billion to trillions of dollars,

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 13>and that would create more demand for the US dollar Internationally,

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 13>I think you could see other economies start to dollarize

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 13>the bottom up, as their citizens would prefer to use

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 13>US digital dollars as opposed to whatever fiat currency they're using,

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 13>and that would create potentially trillions of dollars of new

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 13>demand for US Treasury. So I think this bill is

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 13>a is a major piece of legislation. I think it is.

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 13>It's a fantastic bill just on its own. I think

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 13>that the House would go ahead and take it up,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 13>and I think they will take it up and lots

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 13>that they're going to put it on the President's desk

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 13>very soon.

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>What about businesses taking it up? As you say, people

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>waiting in the wings reports Amazon, Walmart wanting to have

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>their own stable coin issuance? What is the regulatory oversight

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of be like you say, of course it's put

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in stone in terms of the law, What about the

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>resources for their regulation, because there's going to be a

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>lot to analyze.

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 13>It feels like, yeah, so it's going to stable coins

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 13>will be under the purview of the banking system, and

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 13>banking regulators will look at that, and stable cooin insurers

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 13>will have to go through a regulatory process and they'll

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 13>get approved and like I said, they'll be quarterly audits.

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 13>And I think that the bill will provide the framework

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 13>that will give confidence to a lot of traditional financial

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 13>players to enter the space. And so I think you're

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 13>going to see new stable coin products, and I think

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 13>you'll also see stable coins.

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Being used as payments.

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 13>I think this is one of the really exciting things

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 13>about the bill is that blockchain infrastructure will be used

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 13>as a new kind of dollar based payment system. Yes,

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 13>that's faster, it's more efficient, smoother, It's a payment system

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 13>of the future. It's kind of ironic that when the

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 13>crypto industry really started with bitcoin about fifteen years ago,

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 13>what was anticipated is that you would get a new

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 13>kind of currency, you get a non fiat currency. But

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 13>as it turns out, a really important use case of

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 13>blockchains has been to support digital dollars, to support tokenized dollars.

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 13>And I think you'll see the extension of that payment

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 13>system online with that legislation, and that's a really exciting thing.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 13>We don't want this being driven offshore right now. Like

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 13>I said, the leading staple coin issure is offshore. I

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 13>think that you will see this be a new US

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 13>based payment system that emerges online.

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 2>David, I'm looking at it, for example, shares of coinbase

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and Circle and basically the market hearing the passage of

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the bill, you're basically talking about dollarization, and I wondered

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 2>if you'd just reflect for a minute of how you

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 2>feel that the final sort of composition of this legislation

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 2>supports the goals, the bigger picture goals that you and

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 2>the President had hoped for when you set out to

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 2>do it.

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 13>Sure so, when the President first took office, and even

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 13>before he took office, when he was on the campaign trail,

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 13>he promised to make the United States the crypto capital

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 13>of the planet and to replace the approach of the

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 13>Biden administration, which was essentially regulation through prosecution. I mean,

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.959
<v Speaker 13>the Biden administration was doing everything it could to driveto

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 13>companies offshore, and he promised to change that approach and

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 13>make and provide regulatory clarity so that the innovation could

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 13>happen in the United States. And I think that you know,

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 13>the Trump administration has done that. Even before this bill,

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 13>the President had signed in an executive order to make

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 13>bitcoin a strategic reserve asset, providing I think a kind

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 13>of legitimacy for the industry that it had been seeking.

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 13>We also have formed a President's Working Group on Digital

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 13>Assets that's been systematically hunting down and eliminating some of

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 13>these war on crypto regulations that have been impeding in

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 13>the industry. The bottom line here is that we just

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.240
<v Speaker 13>want a fair approach. What founders and entrepreneurs been asking

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 13>for is just tell us what the rules are and

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 13>will abide by those rules. So we've been trying to

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 13>provide that regulatory clarity. But at the end of the day,

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.280
<v Speaker 13>if you want to make sure that the rules stay

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 13>stable for founders, you need to enshrine them in law.

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 13>And it's great when you can get the various agencies

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 13>and departments the government to change their rules to take

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 13>up better rulemaking, and we've done that. But again, the

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 13>way that you provide long term protection against certain of

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 13>you know, a new Garriginsler or something like that, just

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 13>do you enshrining them into law. And that's what this bill,

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 13>the Genius Act, would do, and it's also what the

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 13>Market Structure legislation would do, and we want to keep

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 13>that up.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Next to be sure, sorry to interrupt you, what is

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 2>missing from the bill and what Democrats push for, What

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 2>specific controls on the president and president's family in their

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 2>ability to move within the corners of the crypto market

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 2>with which they're affiliated. There's a lot of concern that

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't done. Is the concern justified.

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 13>I don't think so. I mean, so, first of all,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 13>you should ask them what they're doing, because I'm not

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 13>involved in any particular company's products. I'm just an innovation advisor.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 13>But my understanding is that what they've said is the

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 13>president's assets are in a blind trust. His sons are

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 13>not in the government. They're adults, and they're allowed to

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 13>engage in business, and they have a company. And I

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 13>think that these are unrelated things.

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You're an innovation expert, not just in crypto but in

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>AI too. We shift there a little bit because you've

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>hunted down rules that perhaps weren't serving some in the

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>business entrepreneurship in a US, for example, the diffusion rule.

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 1>But what follows it?

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 13>David Well, I think it's a good question about what

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 13>comes next. I think the problem with the diffusion rule,

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 13>this was the Biden difusion rule that was dropped at

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 13>the eleventh hour by the Biden administration something like five

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 13>days before the end of their term. I don't think

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 13>it was really thought through. It was overly burdensome, and

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 13>what it did is it required every sale of a

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 13>GPU worldwide, it required a license from the Commerce Department

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 13>or one of several narrow exemptions that also had to

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 13>be lawyered, and so this was just incredibly burdensome. I

0:40:54.320 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 13>think it impeded the global the US semiconduct business and

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 13>the US data center business. I think it hampered its

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 13>a market share worldwide, which should be an important objective

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 13>of US policy is for the US to win the

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 13>AI race by becoming the dominant tech stack internationally. So

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 13>the diffusion rule I think would have shot our technology

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 13>industry in the foot out of a concern to prevent

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 13>chips from going to China. To be sure, I think

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 13>that the leading American semiconductors should not go to China,

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 13>but we have export controls on that, and I don't

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 13>think we need a new global licensing regime on every

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 13>single GPU transaction to achieve that objective.

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 2>David Jensen Wong was on the show very recently and

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 2>he expressed his concern that Huawei has technology that is

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 2>as performances in Vidia's H two hundred. There had been

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot of focus on AG twenty. I know that

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the Commerce Department has issued some assessment of how much

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Huawei can produce. I think they said two hundred thousand

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 2>GPU capacity, but there are concerns, and actually that their

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 2>ability to export to markets outside of America is much

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 2>greater than that. What is your assessment of how China

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 2>can compete with its own GPUs in markets outside of America.

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:20.760
<v Speaker 13>Well, it is true that today China is supply constrained

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 13>on how many GPUs they can produce, but I would

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 13>expect that to change pretty rapidly because China has proven

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 13>adept at working around our restrictions, and you saw that

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 13>back in January. We had this Deep Seek moment where

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 13>before Deep Seek people thought that Chinese AI models were

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 13>years behind, and then Deepseak launch, we realized that maybe

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.439
<v Speaker 13>they're more like three to six months behind. I think

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 13>today China is maybe one and a half to two

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 13>years behind US in chip design, but Huawei is moving

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 13>fast to catch up, and even before they fully caught up,

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 13>I think you will see them exporting their chips for

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 13>the global market. For example, there was a story out

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 13>of Malaysia that they were creating a sovereign data center

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:08.439
<v Speaker 13>with Wawei send chips, and that story got walked back

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 13>because because I think the government was afraid of the

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 13>US reaction. But it was a minister of the government

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 13>who did announce that they were creating a sovereign data

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.839
<v Speaker 13>center using Huawei chips, So I think that we do

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 13>have to be concerned about Huawei competing on the global market.

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:26.479
<v Speaker 13>They may not fully be there yet, but I would

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 13>expect that to change in the future. And I think

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 13>that if we're overly restrictive in terms of US sales

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 13>to the world, I think there'll be a time where

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 13>we're kind of kicking ourselves saying, you know, when we're

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 13>in all of a sudden, Huawei is everywhere, We'll be saying, well, wait,

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 13>when we had this whole market to ourselves, why didn't

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 13>we take advantage of that opportunity and lock in the

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 13>American tech stack. I think it's very important that when

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 13>we think about our goals here with respect to AI,

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 13>we want the American tech stack to win. We wanted

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 13>to become the global standard. We want to have the

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 13>largest market share we can. We want all to be

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 13>the partner of choice for the world. And I think

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 13>it's a valid policy objective to prevent our leading edge

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 13>seming conductors from going to China, but at the same time,

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 13>we don't want to restrict them from going to our

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 13>friends and allies. To be sure, we should name our

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 13>security requirements, but our friends and allies are eager to

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 13>comply with those security requirements.

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:17.479
<v Speaker 4>So I think we can.

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 13>Achieve our objective here, our dual objective of preventing leading

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 13>chips from going to China while also making the United

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 13>States the global standard.

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>David Sachs, it's great to have you back on the show.

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Me thank you. Of course, the White House, AI and

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptos are meanwhile. That does it for this edition at

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech. What a wide ranging conversation with David Sacks.

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Have plenty of others. We've talked to autonomous vehicles, We've

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>talked AI within super apps as well.

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there's an intense focus on that bill, right,

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:48.919
<v Speaker 2>so I think go back and recap what David said

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 2>about what happens next? That is the question. Recap it

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast. You can find the Bloomberg Tech Pod

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal all the Bloomberg platforms, as well as

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 2>online on Apple, Spotify, I and on iHeart. From San Francisco,

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 2>New York City, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 9>Mm hmmmmmmmm mmmm