WEBVTT - What's Next In The Apple, Epic Saga? 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Now, let's talk to

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Mountain. This is a company that builds

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>advertising software for brands to drive UM conversations, conversions, revenue,

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>site visits, all you can imagine. Really, it's basically a

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>digital advertising tool and it's so important. Um the uh,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the Apple ecosystem to this world. Mark Douglas is the

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder of Mountain. He joins us now to

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about what's happened just now at the app Store

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and Epic in this court ruling. Um, Mark, give us

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>your take first off on um on how important the

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>app store is the Apple App Store for you know,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the entire business. Yeah, so the the obviously, the iPhone

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is arguably one the most important devices ever created. And

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the way you get software on there is the App

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Store and Apple. People forget the first iPhone you could

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>only use software from Apple. So when Apple opened that

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up and allowed people anyone to create software for the iPhone,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they created this app store, and they started to c

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>two developers for any revenue that's created on it. And

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so this ruling starts to essentially possibly shape loose that

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>which I think arguably is really excessive. So Mark, I

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>guess app Apple's contention has been that, yes, it's is

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>by some measures excessive, you know from the app developers perspective,

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But boy, you get access to Apple's two billion device users.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>That's huge in tern is a value to uh these

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>app developers. Now, Yeah, but the Apple also has a Mac,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>and I get access to all Mac users for free.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So the and all and the software is often very similar,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know the means of distribution there's the Internet.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the ruling here. I think also

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing to keep in mind on this ruling, there

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>were ten planes against Apple. Apple one nine of the

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>ten planes, and and it it lost one of the planes,

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>which I think has people, um, you know, kind of

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>very excited about the possibility that the app store fees

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to go away. But um, I think people

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are just excited because Apple loss that the This is

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not a complete loss for Apple, and it's not a

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>complete win for developers, but it starts to make a

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>dent in in what I think is, clearly my opinion,

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is a monopoly. But the judge did not rule a monopoly.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>They just ruled that was unfair competition, and developers can

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>now make changes that potentially eating that, you know, retain

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>some of that. If I'm a user, I want the

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>money for the app to go to the person that

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>created I run, not to Apple that you know, that's

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>my personal perspective. Let me make this personal for a second,

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because I always pull out of your bio mark that

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in the Bronx near Yankee Stadium, and

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're a normal person, and you went out

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>west and started a bunch of um your own companies,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and now have created this incredibly successful business and you're

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>living the American dream. You fly to work in your

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>own private plane every day. I don't know if you

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>really do that, but you could if you wanted to,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because you're a pilot. So isn't this um a story

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>also uh from Apple's perspective of private property, of the

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>American dream of you know, a company that builds something

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and gets to control how it's used. Right, Yeah, an

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple sells me and you know millions a hundreds of

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>millions of other people are an incredible device and we

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>gladly while gladly, but we pay over a thousand dollars

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>devid device and then and then and and then they say, oh,

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, if you want to use anything

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on that advice were it takes of that also even

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>though we didn't create what you're using. Yeah, but dude,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for them that they made the device, they made the store.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a good for good for Apple. Shouldn't they

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to do what they want with their own stuff?

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe, But that's also kind of a plastic example

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of a monopoly. And that was the argument that was

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>made here, and the judge didn't go so far as

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to say it's a monopoly. Um And monopolies are generally

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive. It's not another competing app store, for example,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with you know, a Apple devices, um and of accept

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the profit. And I think this ruling will potentially have

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>some dent on Apple's profit if you're an investor. That's

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>why it's one of the reasons that stock drops. But

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the ruling is it should Apple take a

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>cut of the whole equal system? And the ruling is

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is that potentially not? And um, but yeah, Apple's a

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>great success story they've been. That's a lot. It's quite frankly,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they make a lot without taking out the development well

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so as so is Mountain. We were talking, by the way,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier about your acquisition of Ryan Reynolds. Ryan Reynolds Maximum Effort,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>such a cool agency, and um, we were each giving

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>our favorite Ryan Reynolds movies. What's yours? Just out of curiosity, Mark,

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your favorite riots Ryan reylds production? Um, I'm terrible, nately,

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's Ryan asking question over dinner two months ago.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was the vampire movie he was in. Oh

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>my god, I'm blanking on a name. This is so embarrassing.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's not. It's not. It's because I don't remember

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the Vampire movie either, And I feel like I've seen

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>everything that he's been well states of movie he made,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with the wedding movie he made, and that's what I'm

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about the proposal. I loved it too, also, it's amazing. Yeah,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>it was a great movie. I watched that a few

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>months like two months ago, and I've seen a lot

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of Ryan movies. But I did a little refresh your

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>course once I was put on the spot, and he

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't ask that question to him. He doesn't go around, Bud,

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what of my movies? Do you like? Someone else at

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the table at Okay, our producer Sarah Lives Lives. He

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>told me that Blade Trinity is the vampire movie he's done.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So um, that's correct. Owner Mark Douglas, founder of Mountain

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>Just get over to David Kotalk right now, Chairman and

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors. It's always great to

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 1>get David's thoughts on the markets and the economy. David,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>what what do you make of this resurgence of the

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>virus along with the incredible resistance of American people to vaccines,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Not just Americans, but you know in the Western world

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there's such resistance to these vaccines. It looks like it's

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna the pandemic may last longer than we may have anticipated. Yeah,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I fear it will. Um um. And of course there's

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>mixed views of this vaccine hesitancy is something that we

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the past. We don't see a way

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to resolve it. I found a quote from Robert Kennedy

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty four and he said, one of the

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>persons are against everything all the time, and I guess

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that characterizes uh, this human condition. So we don't vaccinate,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we get the results. I'm a little worried. Mike ostar

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>home in his By the way, David, it's interesting because

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>his son, Yeah, UM is one of the biggest anti

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>vaxers who supports conspiracy theories about things like you know,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates working with UM the global elite, to inject

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>us all with like five g nanobots. It's so true.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>What a quirk of fate. You know, Why can't somebody

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>come up with something that says Ivermectin has a Chinese

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>chip instead of Maderna. I mean, we have a crazy

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>world and that's the nature of the human being. And unfortunately,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what that does is extend the pandemic and it makes

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it works. It gives more time for more mutations, I

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was saying. Mike Osterholmen his podcast issued a warning because

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find out what happens when we open

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>these large school systems, and of course we hope and

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>pray that we don't have a lot of sick people,

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but we're doing it and that's the nature of the evolution.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I don't think we're rather than Woods on

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>delta virus our positions in their ports, oios in our

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.479
<v Speaker 1>management says, this is a pandemic and it's still underway

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide and it's too soon to declare that it's over all. Right.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So the pandemic is an issue for you, David, and

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for these markets. So is China. Um. You know, we've

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>seen the crackdown that China has had on a number

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of its industries and the impact it's had on Western investors.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you kind of contextualized that? Well, this is interesting.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>We published on this last weekend and on our morning

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>call this morning, we had an extensive conversation uh Matt

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>McLear and Bill Witheral and others on the call about

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the difference between the A shares and the eight shares

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and the old days the eight shares the A d

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>R s the US capital market rules were accepted worldwide

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is the highest standard. And now it looks like this

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is a rotation or reversal, and we see the a

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Jing is going to open a Beijing stock exchange for

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>small caps and new startup companies. So what does it

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>mean if China says we don't need New York, we

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>don't need the capital markets anymore. We're big enough, we're

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>advanced enough. The rules have changed, the game has changed.

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a monumental shift between the two largest economies of

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. We're actually looking at the A shares and

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't taken the position yet, but we're looking at

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the A share side and we're underweight China, and it's

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>really in the eighth share side that we're underweight. So

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this will be fascinating to see how this turns out.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's huge, two largest economies in the world face off

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with each other. Yeah, and George Soros, I thought had

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>an interesting opinion piece. I wonder what your take is.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>He was basically saying, Um, you know, put aside the

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>profit to for a second, you can't be supporting this

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>anti democratic regime from a moral standpoint. Well, that's that's

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a that's a debate. In fact, you know, there's there

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are e t s which are built on E s

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>G standards and governance. They would say stay away from China.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Um that there is a the behavior of large institution

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>sorrows Cathy arc What do you do, do you go there,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you go there? Where do you draw the line

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>between the profit and the ethics or morals? And how

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>do you do it? And are there ways to do

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it so they are aligned because and that's a difficult

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one for me personally, because I'm involved in policy organizations,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and in the policy organization you want the best outcome

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>from the world. And I'm a money manager. They have

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>clients and they say, hey, your job is to make

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a profit for me, and so there's a tension between

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 1>those things. A very profound question for the financial services industry. Hey, David,

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.599
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. As always, we

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate your perspective. David Kotok, chairman and chief investment

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Officer of Cumbland Advisors, over about four billion dollars in

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>assets under management, and he is located today out in Colorado.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Good for him. All Right, We've got markets this year

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>hitting nearly all time highs, nearly on a on a

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. Yet we have Wall Street strategies coming out

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with increasing caution. Let's get a view from the street.

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>If you are Katarina Semeneti, Senior Vice president and Private

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>wealth advisor for Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management, joining us

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from the town of brotherly love. That

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>would be Philadelphia, Katarina, thanks so much for joining us.

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing from your clients as you talk

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to them over the last several weeks and months, Well,

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me on the show. And you're right,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it's um. You know, it's been crazy market and investors

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can't ignore the fact that S and T five hundred

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is up over twenty percent UM so far for the year.

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And as exciting as it might be, you know, seeing

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio go up this much, you know, it also

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>raises concerns and investors are naturally worried about the economy

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>staying power. Um. They're looking at the position of their

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and they're hearing about the negative impact on the

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>future earnings of the companies based on everything they're seeing,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>including the labor shortages, strice pressures, supply chain interruptions. You know,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we see every day. You know, there's

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk about inflation, and it's one thing

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about it theoretically, and another thing is when the

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>consumers and investors see the increased cost of goods and

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>services the normal basket. You know, that is something that

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is their day to the experience, so naturally, you know,

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it's something that on our side, from the investment and

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>vice perspective, we are advocating to risking portfolios. We're advocating

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>taking profits reasonable profits within uh certain parts of the portfolio,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically when it comes to the market indexes. But this

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a great time to take profit from S

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and D by hundred from Russell two thousand in reposition

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>into individual equities and very carefully selected um specific sectors.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Like so it's time to pick stocks. I mean, Lisa

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Shallott was on with US last week and she said

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen percent pullback isn't unlikely by the end

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I agree with her. You know, as

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, like everything that we're hearing from

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the US corporations is that all of the pressures that

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I already mentioned are going to be resulting in the

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings that are not going to be quite as exciting

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>as what we have been seeing so far. There's a

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of negative pressures. Intend to fifteen percent correction in

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this space would be there, very much expected, but it

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>also presents great buying opportunity for investors as long as

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they are strategically prepared for that. So if I want

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to de risk my portfolio, how do I do that?

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Though I just raise cash? Or how do I do that?

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I would take profits from the broad market sectors profits

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>from S and P five hundered from Russell two thousand,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and look specifically at sectors that are well positioned for

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this environment. Sectors like healthcare, sectors like financials, like consumer staples.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Were less excited about consumer discretionary for example, because we

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like the buying power of consumer went down. Stimulus

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>check already went out. You know that they are not

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not that many of them are expected to go forward,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and all of these discretionary purchases that we so initially

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>happening are really subsiding right now. We see a lot

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of appetite for services still. But coming back to the

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sectors that I've mentioned, health care, for example, is a

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect sector to be There's a lot of pent up

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>demand in that state. Both pharmaceutical companies and healthcare in general.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Financials are historically positively correlated for writing interest rate environment,

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>so banks, um steam and facilitators are very well positioned.

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So again We'll have to look at valuations, we have

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to look at future earnings, we have to look at

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the overall positioning or these individual equities within their sectors.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is a great time to pick up some

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>high quality positions and be ready for a market callback

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and be ready to you know, have some cash on

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines in order to be making the strategic purchases.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>What when you look at individual stocks, what are you

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at? What do you like here? Or how do

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead and screen for those We we look

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>at quality, you know, we look at the valuation, the

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>earning positioning. In other words, you know, when we are

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>discussing all the cost pressures, there are certain sect ares

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and certain stocks that are someone just just sensitized to

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this risk. So that's where security selection comes into play.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is not you know, there are going

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to be times again when we look at broad market

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>index ism they will make a lot of sense. But

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, you know, looking at quality, looking at dividend fields,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>looking at just overall, how is this certain positions a

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>certain certain company positions within their overall sector, what is

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>their competitive advantage? This is the time to to make

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this deep dive analysis. You know, and know what you

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>own going into this market, this mid cycle transition, as

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we see, there's going to be a lot of volatility,

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a lot of noise, and knowing

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>what we own, having higher quality portfolios, um having this

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>this very thoughtful type of accidilication. This is the time

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for that. Karina, just thirty seconds, do you recommend any

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>bonds in your portfolio? We got the tenure at one

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>point three. Absolutely, there's always time for the bonds in

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio. This is like when you're building a house.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You absolutely need that foundation. You know, this is our

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>risk management. But with bonds, just like with stocks, this

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is the time to look at quality and this is

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the time to make sure that the bonds positioning the

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>portfolio makes a lot of sense. You know, get away

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>from high yield, get away from those higher risk exposures

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and bonds, you know, and look at the very very

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>high quality of strategic positioning in that sector. But they

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 1>always make sense in the portfolio. Katerina, thanks so much

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, Katerina Seminetti. They're a private wealth advisor,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Senior VP at Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management. Great to

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>get your outlook on the market. Especially as UM we

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>bounce along the top here, it's time maybe to take

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>some profits. Katerina tells us this is Bloomberg. Just get

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>over at Matt Maldy now managing director and chief market

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>strategy did Miller tay back And there's a number of

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>things that I want to get to with you, Matt,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna start off with UM rates. We're looking

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at a tenure that's now coming back down to one

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, and it has looked like since Jackson Hole

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it was rising from one UM and headed for one forty.

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see rates and y well, I mean, yeah,

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they have been climbing here. It's it's very interesting because

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we had that you know, that period from last August

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>August for two thousand twenties through March where obviously they

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>were training higher from his you know, crazy historic low level,

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and then of course we went for four or five

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>months there from March to early August where it was

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>going down. Now they're keeping back up. I think they're

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>poised to go higher. I mean, this whole issue with inflation,

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is is a big concern. And I'm looking

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at the one point three seven level that was the

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>high we saw a couple of times in August and

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the once just a little over a week ago. But

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the real number gonna be one. It for because you

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>always need to see more of it, more than just

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a slight move above any key resistance level. At one

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>point four, that's gonna be a problem. I'll pose a

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>John Farrell question for you, do we get to two

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>percent or one percent? For well, I mean, the thing

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is I I definitely think we get to two percent. First.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>The one thing, of course, that we're in the seasonally

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a tough time for the stock market. People get worried

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>if there's a severe correction rather than just a mild one. Uh,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd have flight to safety that may take us down

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to one percent. But I just don't see that from happening.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we could very well see a correction, but

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not want to send it that low and then uh

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>uh And I do think that right. I think the

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>changing we get above one point four uh in the tenure,

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna signal important change in the near term trend

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>FORER for interest rate, So that's going to be important.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Him at um you know markets, equity markets hitting a

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>new high seemingly on a daily basis. Yet we've seen

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene this morning was just pointing out in his

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>email inbox over the weekend a lot Wall Street strategist

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more cautious. Here, how do you think

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about these equity markets? Again, this wall of worry, everybody's

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>been climbing it. But are we getting a little yes, exactly,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, It's it's funny because as more people get

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>more concerned, you tend to see that there's say, there's

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>too many bears around, and then that should actually be

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a contrary contrary and indicator and and

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>be bullish for the market. But I do understand why

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>people are coming more more concerned. I mean, I'm just

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking and I'm in that boat. I mean, look just

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what we saw again today with the market opened very strongly. Uh,

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and now it's sold off. It's it's it's not down,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it's down unchanged. All the NASDAC is down. But that's

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a definite And we've seen that for a couple of

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>days in the last week. You know, we really saw

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it almost every day last week. We're seeing it again today.

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And we used to see just the opposite where the

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>market opened down and then rallied then to the end

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of the day. And so this kind of change in

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>trend is has got some people worried and and rightfully

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>so I just think that with the concerns over inflation

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even stagflation, uh, those aren't good from markets.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, correcsitions are normal and healthy and there's

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing to worry about. But uh, do people do do

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful about them? But do we expect

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do you expect the correction? So many people have come out,

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>from Deutsche Bank to Morgan Stanley to Goldman Sachs saying

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's time and um, you know, maybe ten to fifteen percent. Yeah,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to sound too alarming, but the one

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>problem we get, we get is if we get to

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>tender tender fifteen percent. Uh you're well, if you get

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to ten to twelve percent, I think you get the

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and I do think there's a good chance of that.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I say, why why would get there,

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>why would accelerate, is because of this massive levels of

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>leverage in the system. You know, this whole thing with

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>margin dead. Margin dead isn't a problem when it's going up,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's when it rolls over. Well, sure enough, in July

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>started to roll out a little bit. If it's starts

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>if the markets down, people don't get margin calls until

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the market has gone down a certain amount. So the

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>market goes down ten percent, it's almost certainly going to

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>kick in some margin calls and therefore be a little

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more severe. Uh so it could be as much

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>as fifteen to That may sound like a lot of alarming,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think if people raise just a little bit

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of cash right now, then you're gonna be one here,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>will be gonna be the one who keeps your head.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>What of those around them are losing theirs or being

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>forced to sell, and you're gonna be able to pick

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>up some unbelievably great bargains. Yeah, that's kind of where

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go, Matt, if I wanted to get

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. If I if I'm thinking about

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the next movements, market could be a ten percent or

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so moved to the downside. Do I raise cash? Do

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I just rotate into some safer names? How do I

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>prepare for that? Well? I think again, I do think

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>raising cash is a good idea. And again it's not saying,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, you're gonna miss this move It's like

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>we're not saying going to or fift percent cash, just

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe five or ten percent cash. And it's not just

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because you can take advantage of it, but psychologically, especially

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for individual traders, it's really really helpful because you're sitting

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>there going, oh my gosh, uh, I don't have any

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any cash. On the market's going down,

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>it may go down more. I've got to sell and

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the end up selling at the exact wrong time. If

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a little bit of cash, even if it's

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>only five or ten percent, you're gonna be much more

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Even if you don't get the exact bottom, uh what's

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the bottom is in, you're gonna be willing to buy

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>rather than selling it. You know, similars, You're gonna be

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a buyer rather than the seller at the at the

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>right time. And most of the people are gonna be

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>selling at the exact wrong time. And so I think

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>raising a bit of cashier is a good idea. Matt

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is crypto currency here this day. I mean, does it

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>make sense for an investor um to allocate one percent

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of his or her portfolio to bitcoin A theory um, etcetera. Well,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it certainly seems to be here

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. Um, you know, very bullish on it

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>on a longer term basis. I mean, it's gonna run

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>into regulatory issues and it's going to remain incredibly volatile. Uh.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I think these are things that you buy, uh,

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, spread out any kind of purchases, Like you said,

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be loading up with you of

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio there but adding it over time. Uh And uh,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know, I kind of look at we

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>look at all of them a theoryum, probably more closer

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>than others. But let's look at that theory two thousand

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>dollar level on bitcoin that has been unbelievably key support

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, and if it breaks below that level at

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>any time, uh, you might want to take some chips

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>off the table and look for for a lower basis

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>away from that exactly. So that's but we got you know,

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we rallied back. This rally above forty has been very

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>important because it's been it was stuck in a sideways range.

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It broke out of that range, it got overbought. It's

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>settling back in, but it's nice and stable. I think

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing is the upside is still pretty good here. Uh,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think over a long term basis again,

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>ease into it. Uh, you don't. You don't have to

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be you know, money a little money in every month

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and and like you said, keep that to you know,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>three to five percent of your portfolio. All right, Matt,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>getting your thoughts and perspective. Matt Maley, Managing director in

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>chief market strategist at Miller tay Back, also the founder

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of The Maine Report, joining us on the phone from Newton,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Mass Patriots lost, I believe in the first week, so

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be too happy up there. But Matt, we've kind

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of got a market here. That's you know, We've got

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the down SMP higher, Uh, the Nastack pulling back, but

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>still pretty steady. She goes, This is Bloomberg. Thanks for

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. Pet On Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter at

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio,