WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 16 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No Down Thursday morning, December one,

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Festivus for the rest of US Megapod Week sixteen National

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Football League Live from the D. It's Gil Alexander. Glad

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you could join us from our home at the D

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>with our big shield table and a packed crowd. Here

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>uh the day before Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Mike Palm,

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the vice president Operations, Circuit Sports Derek Derek Steven's conciliary.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, thanks for having Derek on with us.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>He called the Lions out right over the Cardinal. He

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>did he called it. He did call it. Todd wished

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>ever from his mom's cork attic in Pittsburgh, PA. How

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you doing, Toddy. We're a college ship. Thanks for We're

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in a college. He's being stupid and ladies and gentlemen

0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are rotating. Guest on the Megapod. Jeff Parlay, producer number

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>five and eight of the Numbers Game to Grow. We're

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>clevand Up producers and also the hosts of bet Center

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>on Christmas Day, Christmas Day afternoon ish at Visa four

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hours on Christmas Day. From young Jeff Parlay, who by

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, goes by the name Jeff Pearls when he

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>does Bet Center. Are you doing, Jeffreys? Thanks for a

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>man of many names apparently now, Gill and every Saturday,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>not every time, not just not just Christmas Day. I

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>just happened to be alone and that happened to have

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>multiple segments with Young Gil on Joes have to volunteer.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>We we volunteer on Christmas coming into studio. I'm not crazy.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not Are you leaving town? Are you

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>going to San Francisco? But I used to do it

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was at Camel. I used to volunteer for

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>shifts on Christmas. At least we could do so. At

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>least we could do. We all celebrate the christ So

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you work on Young kiphor but yet you will you

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>won't work, but you will work on Christmas. Wow. I'm

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not sure where they cut. I don't know what the

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>contradiction was. I don't know what I'm I don't know

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. Actually, Okay, Mikey. First off, we're down

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen and Survivor and we have the Christmas three

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>game fest about to happen. What are the deadlines on

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these? That's a very interesting point. Gil If

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you're using either the forty or the Titans tonight, it's

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>got to be before kick. I'd get it in before

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because it will shut off in the computer, not actually

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 1>win the kick, but whenever the game is is scheduled

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to go in the computer, in the in the software.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're not, if you're using one of the Saturday games,

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>your deadline is ten pm Pacific Friday night, one am

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Saturday morning, and then there's a nine hour window.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>If you survive this three game window on your phone

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at the counter on the kiosk, it will populate your

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>survivor at midnight Saturday night into Sunday morning, and the

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>picks must be in by nine am, wow, hour before kick.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>No one's gonna mess this up, right, No, you're solely

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventy five thousand dollar intrinsic value, sixteen entries out

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of four thousand eighty nobody has multiple entries anymore. Sixteen people.

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And so what's interesting about this, and again this is

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>like the Thanksgiving Cork where there were three games. What's

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting that most of us who were in this, we're

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of earmarking Arizona as the team to save. But

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that has obviously changed as Arizona has fallen on hard

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>times and the real team. The real advantage is that

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>eight of those remaining sixteen have green Bay left. What

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>are the odds that eight don't take green Bay? I mean,

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I put it as high. I would be shocked. If

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>there aren't be shocked, it's gonna have to take. That's

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>your advantage. But then, now where do you go? No Colts?

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>No one has the Colts left. So if you don't

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>have green Bay, if you're one of those eight people,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>do you go forty Niners, Titans or Cardinals? Those are

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>your three choices. I would take San Francisco tonight, That's

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what I would do. I just with with those offensive

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>line injuries for Tennessee. I think San Francisco's D line

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to dominate the game. I know Gil already

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>has the Titans getting three and a half and in

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>his account, I know A. J. Brown is back, But

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think San Francisco's defense is gonna be too much.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you could properly evaluate Tennessee. I think

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they've they've tried to replace what Derrick Henry gave him

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>with a short passing game. Only problem is they didn't

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have Julio Jones or A J. Brown mos at this time.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Now they do, so I think that that mitigates the

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive line trouble. But we'll see. Some people just have

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a strict policy they don't take road teams, and that

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>would forbid them from taking Tennessee. So then you're from

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. So then you're left with Tennessee or Arizona.

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Arizona at all. I think the coast

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>will be favored by the time they kicked that game,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so I would be forced if I didn't play a

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>road team to take Tennessee in the game. The answer

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is this an impossible choice. It's a Hobson's choice hops

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>good college Hobson's choice named after Butch Hobson. But you

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>know I was it after Dennis Hopson, and they just

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>spilled it road. What or the other wasn Dennis Hopson

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't play ball some Ohio states. I think he was

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in there with Granville Waiters somewhere during Grandville's eighteen years

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in Columbus. Grandville Waiters the last NBA player that didn't

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>shave the head. He just decided, I'm gonna let it

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>grow out on my sides and I'm gonna have a

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>huge bald spot on baldhead on top of it. He

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>was starting to bald while he was still in Columbus.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he was there that long. But yes, it's well.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>He played early Jordan's He was on the court with

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Granville Waiter. He had a COVID year dat I believe. Alright,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So then, Todd, how did we do last week on

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>this here show? Well, I just I want to say

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a Christmas festivous miracle because Michael Palm took

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>it real bad last week. He went oh and three

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 1>with the Brownies, which he did not deserve to lose,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Miami Dolphins, which he probably deserved to lose,

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and the over forty six and a half in Atlanta

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, which was one of the worst losses. They

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>had about a hundred billion points in the third order,

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, I can see it

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>coming from a mile away. I was like, I was

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rooting against you the whole fourth quarter. I was like,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>come on. Every time Mattie Ice would get it inside

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the ten with his Philip Rivers junior impersonation, I was like, Mike,

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be real upset when he doesn't get it

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in here and you ended up with an oh and three.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Just move just to be accurate about that before you

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>give the records. Uh, Atlanta went for it down eighteen well,

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>first of all, fourth and goal at the one two

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes into the game, right and you

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna knock him out and knock the forty

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>niners out with a touchdown, only take the boys. Just

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>kick the field, just kick it. You ran it, ran it,

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it in kick the field. Not only that,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>cour Darryl Patterson was in the end zone on first

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>own and they and they reversed it to no touchdown.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>He by the way, they blew it on second and

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>third down also from goal line. Cordarrel Patterson stuffed on

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>third down and so then they go for it fourth

0:06:54.839 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and one and they missed. Then Uh, fourth down eighteen thirteen,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one at the eight ten forty two left

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they failed to convert. Then fourth and go at the

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>one down thirty one thirteen, they failed to convert. It

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is an eighteen point deficit. Like you have to have

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>three scores, the one with twelve minutes left is unforgiven.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I forget to get it down to two scores. Yes, yes,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but anyways, I was laughing my head off every time

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on third and six they'd get five yards. It was

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>impossibly on top of what, on top of what happened

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to Mike in his regular picks. In his teaser pick,

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he has the Carolina Panthers plus seventeen. It's fourth and two.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>They're down ten from the eleven yard line, and the

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Bills could either kick the field go to go up thirteen,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or they could just run it into the line to

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>get the first down, or run in the line don't

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>get the first down. Instead they fake it and throw

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a little dinker pass for the touchdown and they lose

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>my seventeen. So it was everything could possibly go wrong.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>My good friend Mikey Palm went wrong, so he pushed

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>his teaser as well. So anyways, Gilly had an nice week,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he heard him at the end. But me and gil

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>both want somehow we both won with the Bengals there,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gil Um. You know, late in the first half there

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was a huge, huge situation where Denver missed the field

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>goals and and then the Bengals got a lucky field goal,

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it was you know, at that point, I

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>was thought, Okay, now we're gonna we're gonna cover this,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's just let's give the details on that. So

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>McManus misses a fifty one yard field goal with about

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seconds left, somewhere in that pocket, and I just

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>figured the first half, first half because I just thought

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bengal I had the Bengals first half. I was like, oh,

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>thank god, he missed it. Oh my god, I'm gonna

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>get the push. I had the money line and it

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>was tied at three a piece and push yes. So

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of lose my you know, attention, and I'm

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>doing something else, and all of a sudden, like I

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>hear the announcer going big pass from Borrow. I'm like, wait,

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they ran a play, not only they want to play.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like a seventeen or I think it was a

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen yard pass play. He gets mcfierson a fifty eight

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>yard attempt and he sinks it. It would have been good.

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>From we think about that game against Screen Bay where

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he missed all the game. He's been great. He really

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>had one bad core of the entire season, and it's

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the one everyone remembers and to guild to your point.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I had legitimately gotten up from my chair and got

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>back and so wait a second, you're lining up for

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle on there. But look, that's just that's just

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Fannie pack Vick and in his glory, they're getting us

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that extra three. And who at the end who also

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>blew it at the end of the game. He blew

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the time outs because Cincinnati. So Cincinnati's up fifteen to

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>tend the eventual final score at the end of the game,

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and Fangio ended up calling a time out too early,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and so Cincinnati ended up with a fourth down at

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the two minute warning. Denver had no time outs. Had

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Fangio used it earlier, Cincinnati would have had to have

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>run their fourth down play prior to the to the

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>two minute warning, and they would have had two minutes

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to work with instead. He just completely screwed the Broncos,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>screwed his old team. But they weren't going to score anyways.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. No, no, I'm with you, no, no, no,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you about all that. I'm just saying. We

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>know the Broncos, they weren't getting in touchdown and anyways,

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they weren't getting a touchdown, and the two point conversion

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>to beat us Todd. They had the greatest drive in

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the history of the league at the end of the game,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>down five, where they went backwards and then Lock fired

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball fifty yards at a bounce on fourth and eighteen.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we were talking about this, Matt Brown

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and on a primes I was like, we we both

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>had the Bengals too. And when Locke came in the game,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Lock is just scary enough where you're not really thrilled

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>with it, where you're like that guy. He when he's bad,

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>he's bad, but when he's good, he's kind of really good. Variance.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So and and you know, you felt bad for Teddy

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater got knocked down the third quarter, but that was

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>not a that was not a you know, a happy

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>thing to see Lock come in. Anyway. I'm sorry interrupted you,

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but so we ended up anyways. Anyway, So you went

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>too and one Gilly to now Gilly Ice moved into

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>first plance a Mike and and I am a half

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>game behind Mike yet nineteen and twenty six we are struggling.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh one other thing, one other thing. Can I just

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>give a shout out to whoever? And Mike probably knows

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the name of the referee, but whoever the referee was.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the Bears game, I had the

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Bears plus eleven. I had the Bears plus. I had

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Bears plus fifteen, and the Bears plus the team was

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>already in, but had Bears plus eleven. And every time

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they get down there in the fourth quarter, they had

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like a thousand chances to cut it from fourteen to

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>seven to fourteen to eight or whatever it is at

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, and they they were that touchdown, by the way,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that and by the way, that touchdown helped me, and

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I want that was not a touchdown. The guy didn't.

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>He babbled the ball, did you see what a quick

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what a quick review it? Once though, I mean, like

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>like what to the reviewing and all they popped the

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>score up final like getting the touchdown. Well, no, they

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>said they changed I think it was a New York

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>deal where they changed it on the field before the review.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>So they said, they said that they really should have

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>reviewed it, but they changed it on the field and

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>they said, first no, tesch and they said, on the

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>field the score is a touchdown. And then we're not

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>reviewing it, which you know I was. I was going crazy,

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hallelujah that that I get the cover, but you know,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a cover you certainly deserve if you have the Bears

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>plus eleven on the in game at that point, the

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Bears were inside that you know, the ten yard line

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of Minnesota in the fourth quarter, like I don't know

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>th times Cousins through for seventy seven yard It was

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a joke, it was I think about it. We've had

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>winning quarterbacks now. Cousins through for eighty seven, Carson Wentz

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>through for fifty seven and that win over the Colts,

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>and then most famously Mac Jones through for nineteen that

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>came against the Bills. That's the greatest thing ever. I

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>never got. What you didn't understand was that I was

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>swirling winds. Cousins does everything you can't do to help. Anyways,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what are the team? The teaser? The teaser records Gilly

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>moves to seven seven and one. Mikey is also seven

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>seven and one, and I am nine and six. So

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where we are on the teasers. So hopefully we

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.599
<v Speaker 1>can turn it around here. It's a looks tough to

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>me this week again, so we'll see. Alright, Uh, let's

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about game tonight. Any plays here, I already have

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the Titans plus three and a half. I'm on the Titans.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the return of A J. Brown and Julio Jones,

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, who can't finish games with hamsteing problems,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but apparently it's fine to go here tonight. I actually

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's a huge thing. I know that the Titans

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are without two of their offensive linemen, including Taylor the lawn,

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but you get when it was three and a half,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I grabbed it. I think the Titans are extremely hard

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate because their last three losses they've been minus

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in turnovers, minus thirteen. They held the Steelers to

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>twelve first downs in a hundred sixty eight total yards.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Their defense has been playing well. So I like the

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Titans tonight. Todd, do you have any thoughts on this one.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I lean Titans too because I like, I'm not gonna

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>play it, but I lean Titans just because I like

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Rabel in this kind of scenario where you know he's

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>playing a good team, they're at home, Jimmy g who

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>knows what you're gonna get? He could, you know, throw

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>three accidental picks and they drop him where they catch him.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this just this just smells to me

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like Titans at home. Plus three sounds like a lot

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to get. So if I anything, I'd lean on the Titans.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>They're showing Game six of the World Series between the

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Cubs and the Indians up here. I'll take. I'll take.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think of the Cubs. I'm not sure. Russell Grant

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>slam later in the game. Arietta, right, Arietta come back

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in one game six for them. I don't remember. I

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, I remember fake to All I remember is

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Raji davis Is seven game seven home run, three run

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>homer to tie it up off with a choked up

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to strike back would have been if Cleveland had held on,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>would have been one of the greatest moments in modern

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>baseball history. And no one talks about it more because

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they lost. No agree with you there, Gil, And then

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that was what a what a what a great baseball game?

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Now was really well, it's kind of like the sport

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>peaked and at that exact moment, so great. Okay, you guys,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike and he thought on the game, I like it over,

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you do, I do like it over. I think San

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco is moving the ball despite Garoppolo, right, I mean

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, when I watched Jimmy Garoppolo, it's like the

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>angle of the football when he throws it right. I

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>mean he he gets the angle wrong coming out of

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>his hand and it can go way high. I can

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>go release. Yeah, But the angle of the football when

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he releases it like that, the nose of the football.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>You gotta watch that because he gets out of kilter

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with it and then it takes him a while. But

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think both these teams I agree with Gil. I

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think Tennessee will be able to move the ball to

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>not a little bit on San Francisco. At to Todd's point,

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo can score for both teams. You know he can.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>He can do that. So I'm gonna go back to

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the well bet in a forty nine years game over

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this is my third best bet Todd over forty four

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half over forty four and a half Titans.

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make the Titans plus three my third as well.

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Now it's not three and a half, which I have

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in my account, but I'll take it. I'll take the

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>plus three is my third best. Tennessee plus three, yes, sir,

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>no no official play here. I would lean to the

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Niners they're just playing so well. The only concern I

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>understand getting Brown back is a big deal for the Titans,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But the big issue more than anything for San Francisco

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is that travel on a short week. We're going two

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>time zones. It's about as long as they're gonna make

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a team travel on a short week. So a little

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of a concern there, But in the end, I

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just think the Niners are much better than the Titans

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, even with Brown and Jones playing. Uh,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to me when Derrick Henry is back into into

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>three weeks for Tennessee and its whole different story. Though

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee one of these teams that can still get a

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>number one seed. They can still be knocked out of

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs in the a f C. All right, let's

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>start with the best bets then, Jeff, you are the guest.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Parles, Ladies and gentlemen, par lay your number one

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>best bet would be well, as we sat down, because

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we can't go more than five minutes without COVID news

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Uh, my number one play is going

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to stay despite the bad news against the side. I

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like Dalvin Cook is on the COVID list. Dalvin Cook

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is unvaccinated, so he is not going to be able

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to play Jesus. But Gil, as you've mentioned in the past,

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>they have as good of a backup as anyone behind

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook, and he was just activated yesterday from the

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>COVID list. So Alexander Madison is going to be able

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to go. And they play the Rams. They're getting three.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see we're gonna see a three and

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a half on this game. I would imagine, uh soon

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>behind us three minus one fifteen on the Rams. So

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we'll see a three and a half. But even

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at three, I like Minnesota in this game getting the

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>points against the Rams. Are you seeing the line on

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this anywhere right now? I'm seeing it, and I'm seeing

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it in spots you guys, Yeah, I still see three,

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>um on this. I know off the board in some spots. Um,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But I would imagine what Cook's gonna mean a half

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>point appointed most So Look, it's good at good at three,

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>good to three and a half, obviously better than four.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But look, even though the Rams beat Arizona two weeks ago,

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you have to take that win with a grain of

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>salt after what we saw from Arizona against Detroit, and

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what we saw really Arizona was was was backtracking a

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit leading in to that loss against the Rams

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 1>and Minnesota. They're playing for the playoff lives if they

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lose a game. Now the news in New Orleans kind

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of makes that a little a little more complicated that race.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>But if they lose a game, it's hard for them

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to get in because Philadelphia probably is gonna be his

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>big favorite this week, gonna be favorite on the road

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in Washington next week, and then Dallas might not play

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>their guys week eight teen. So I like Minnesota plus

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the three that will be my number one for this week.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So what can I just say? Also something that the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs make absolutely no difference. Did you see the

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee running backs Foreman running for like a million yards

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers? If if there are holes, there are holes, nausea.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Harris is a fantastic running back. There are no holes.

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, okay, if if there take the wrong example.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>The one team where it does matter is the Tennessee

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>No I understand. I know Derrick Henry Is is a standout,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and He's all I'm trying to say is the best

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>running back is like ten better than the worst running back,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas other positions it can be sixty and better. Yes,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's all I'm trying to say. And Derrick Henry might,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and Derrick Henry might be the number one running back

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>who's better than all other running backs, and he's a

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>one point two versus everybody else is a one. You

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>agree with what I'm saying. I agree generally, speaking with

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. Yes, that running back is not a

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is not a super important position, but there are outliers everywhere,

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and Derrick Henry would be the one outlier. Uh. I

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>only used the example of Foreman just because it shows

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that Tennessee has a good line and that's why. It's

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>another reason why Derrick Henry looks so good. Now, granted

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he's fantastic. Let me get back on on on point here.

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>What what Jeff was referring to in case those have

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>missed it again, We're doing this Thursday morning, and every

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>moment there's a different bit of COVID news. So he's

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about Dalvin Cook is on the COVID list, Alexander

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Madison came back off the COVID list onto the team yesterday.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>What what we were referring to with the Saints. Is

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that In case you missed it, this morning, Trevor Simeon

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>first was announced on the COVID list for the New

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints, and then about a two hours later we'd

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>say Taysom Hill was placed on the COVID list, which

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>means that the New Orleans Saints on Monday night, a

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>game of tow seven and sevens playing each other. Ian

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Book is going to be the Saints starting quarterback on

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, So that game, that game is completely off

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the board. Couldn't even score against Clemson in the semifinal

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Ian Book, so he's also so there's no line in

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some places from Minnesota. Some places there are, but there

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>is no line anywhere from the New Orleans Miami game. Uh,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Mikey here first, best bet you know, I'm gonna talk

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about or piggy tail off what you

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>did um about Drew lock and I like the Raiders

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>this week. I don't see how Denver can win this

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>game the Raiders through fortune here, I mean the Browns

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>too scared to go play action or throw a pass

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on third down. I mean, you know, if you listen

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to Stefanski's comments the next day about you would have

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>thought we, you know, we would have given Mullins to

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball and try to make four yards. He said that, Yes,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he said that. I got something before you continue with this.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So I brought this up on a Numbers game yesterday.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I was venging out between shows and around the Horn

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was on and they did a pretty much an entire

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>segment on how they couldn't believe that the Browns didn't

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>go for it on fourth and three at their own

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty and I watched it in horror, and I'm just like,

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>what are they talking about? They had a third string quarterback,

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know Nick Mullins played well, but he's still

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 1>your third string quarterback if you don't get the three

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>yards there. The Raiders are automatically in field goal position

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and they can actually gain yards and get a better

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Yes, I at it, they punted, and yes,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it, the car got it them downfield, and yes,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I get at the Carlson hit the game winning field goal.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But we've gotten to the point now I have so

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I have two huge pet peeves. Now we've got to

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the point that people who rail against analytics have no

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>fucking idea what they're talking about, because they don't even

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>know what analytics isn't what analytics isn't right, They're like, oh,

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's analytics for every time. Listen, I'm an analytics guy.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>They should have punted. I'm an analytist guy. I'm I'm

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pro field goals in lots of situations. What you're talking

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>about half the time is not analytics. The other thing

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that that I'm saying with this around the horn thing

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is people think it's cool to go on four People

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think now who aren't into analytics think that it's correct

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to go on fourth down every time now, and I'm

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>watching around the horn, I'm like, of course they should

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>have punted the foot, But what are you guys talking about.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>They lost the game. Remember after the holding penalty or

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was, or man downfield, they didn't tackle him,

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't. They let him get like that was the game,

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the big It's a good point, like because

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that has been completely forgotten where Foster Moreau was down

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and you could have had a tackled into bounds for

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a five yard game. Instead they did They did the

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>little for a shoulder, shivered to tiptoe, tiptoe the sidelines,

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>gotten next or seven yards and got out of bounty.

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>And look the other thing is too like as soon

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as you knew that you were getting inside fifty five yards,

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you knew Carlson was making the kid. Yeah, he's money.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>When do you have tod can I also ask you

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how can you harbor when he when he gets the

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to go down eight, of all the people that

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>would do the new for two things, he decides not

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to go for two. That screwed me big time. But

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, I don't I have no idea what this

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>guy is doing. Sometimes he is, sometimes he Isn't I

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's going on? Correct, And so that's

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that his his was the cleanest example of what I'm

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about how people who rail against analytics have no

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>idea what they're talking about because they don't even understand

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what analytics are going for two down eight. That's analytics

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>going for two at the end of the game to

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>try to win it down one is just a coach's

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>coin flip decision. That's not analytics. So there's like we

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have people, oh, analytics, it's not analytics. You don't even

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>know what you're you're screaming about. In fact, how did

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he make the decision he went over. They have him

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on NFL. Mike Big guys, you want to go for it? Yeah,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I think we can get it. Okay, let's go for it.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Let's right. But everything but everything that goes wrong is analytics,

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything that goes right is take that analytic. I

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>thought it. Give me a fucking bak. I thought that

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if Baltimore had scored with fifteen seconds left, I have

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>no problem with the decision. But even if he makes

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it to Rogers is forty one seconds and the time out,

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not out of the woods. You're probably losing either

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>way in all honesty, Mike, just just because Rogers what

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they they a time out two left for green bag

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, he's getting a field goal range. It's

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of cross. Yeah. You and I agree

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>though on one thing, which is the Chiefs Chargers game,

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>because that was the first game this week brought up

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all of this. I loved all of Brandon Staley's place,

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I really did, except for the one at the end

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of the first half. No advantage to even at the

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one over kick the field goal and go up seven

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and you get the ball back again, like stop it,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>stop it. On top of that. But on top of that,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>how can you make any determinations about analytics or not

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>analytics on three plays? It's meaningless. You need to see

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>three thousand plays or three hundred plays, what happens on

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth and goal from the three to a hundred times,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>then come back and tell me. Don't tell me. And

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, had he made them all that wasn't

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the right decision either. You have to look at the math,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and the math is the math. It's not analytics, folks,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it's math. So if you look at math and it

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>says shows three hundred times they went for it, and

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you get a better expected value by going for it,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're talking about. And it doesn't mean he's

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong because you're By the way, you can flip a

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>coin and get seven heads in a row. Would you

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>still want to play a game where you gave me

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a dollar ten for every it's in the dollar for

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>every tales? No, you wouldn't, So it's ridiculous. This whole

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion is ridiculous. Well, because we're getting a cottage industry now, Todd.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>The reason that that it's it's so ridiculous is that

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we're getting in the starry recursing. But that's how ridiculous

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it is. And we're allowing this to spread like wildfire,

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's intelligent radio and it's not. And I wish

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we would stop. Is that we have this cottage industry

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of people who think they're the cool guys saying how

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>analytics is stupid and they don't even don't they don't

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>even understand what analytics. Yeah, but they don't even understand

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what it is. And it's like this, Oh, you're cooler

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>than we are. No, you're the one who can't see

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>two sides of it. It's the analytics people who actually

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>can see both sides, what's correct and what's not. And

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm so tired of this. By the way, Jason, you

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can cut out about five of those, but we've a

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>couple in the bottom line is you could it doesn't

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>prove anything because Brandon's Staley missed it three times. Nothing

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>does that prove If if I flip a coin I

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>get three heads, does it mean that this coin will

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>only get heads for the rest of time? I mean,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>it's so ridiculous. By the way, it's not cool if

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you're in the media and you're taking the approach that

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you're you're tired of that, you're you're not good at

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>your job. You don't have to agree with it, but

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to know what is and what is an analytics.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I was on I was on This Morning

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the morning show before yours, and one of my no

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>hyperboles was specifically Arthur Smith not taking the field goal

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>down eighteen. I'm with you, should have kicked One of

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the host that's filling in said said to me, I'm

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>with you. I don't like this analytics. That's not what

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I was saying. I was talking about that specific situation.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But then why don't you bring why don't you raise

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>your voice and say that exactly to that very very

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>hard out there, and I still had I still had

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>three more to get to. That was a very hard

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in six minutes, and I still had well the the

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Atlanta game for a second, because

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the one thing, and I agree with both of you,

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that they should have kicked down by eighteen. They were

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the one situation and where legitimately every freaking time

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they got it the fourth and one, which was the

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>only time that Archer Smith the worst thing in the world.

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about this before. The it's the it's the

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the cruel trick of getting all the yards but one right,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>because it makes you you would have kicked the field

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>if it was fourth. Matt Ryan throws every other passing

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>through in that game, wide and high and incomplete. You

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>see Coo out there to get the field goal, to

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>get into it. It was automatic, but it was It

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't missing. It was automatic. But because it's the cruel

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>trick of getting every yard but one, it all of

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden changes your entire thinking with these coaches, like

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going for it, let's go. I don't care for it.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually trademark that which rule trick of getting every hard

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but one, the cruel trick it is. It's almost like

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that Grievances segment that turned into hyper Bowl. I hope

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope Todd that you took You took some solace

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that the progeny of grievances like the

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Catholics are the project Name of the Jews won the

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Mitchi Award for Best Segment, and I was still overcoming

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>overcoming two of the numbers game out rushmore and you

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the awards named after the show that he's on.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, me getting thirty of of an award

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that is named after you. You went over you hit

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the over there. Congratulations, Gills. I feel so great about it.

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you. I don't store me. This morning

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I said I almost put my guys in the desert

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>winning Best PM Show in no hyperbole. She's what you

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in store me where you were. Guys were very serious

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about she was I had no she ambushed me. I

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't know she would call on the whole V. G. K.

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Disney Empire to take me down. Mikey. No one was

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>more serious than you were. No. No, I found out

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm the first person to win for mitchi' Jeff. I

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have known that, but someone pointed out, what did

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you point it out there? Rest of my kid pointed

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it out to himself. That's exactly what happened. I'm I

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>won the I won the last eight Toddy Awards. Do

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know you were in a category? Did you even

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>know that? Yes? Yes, I don't know. Intrigued on the

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Hot Toddy Awards that would be yes. Did you give

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your your pick then full dissertation? Is it a pick? Todd?

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you have? The number? And I see someone Raiders.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Pick Todd, You're number one. I'm gonna do it with

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the Woofties. M Dallas Cowboys. Dallas Cowboys don't really impress me.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So you beat up on all these teams that are

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>completely decimated. You beat the Giants, you beat Washington, Uh,

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you beat New Orleans. Now you're gonna go and give

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>how many ten and a half points? Do you guys? Have?

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Ten and a half or ten? Uh? Across ten and

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a half cross the board on my screen. Okay, So

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Wifties plus ten and a half.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think hopefully Heinie he is back to play for them,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I just you know, it's an NFL game.

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of points in an NFL game. And

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the wolf These are that bad, you know.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even with their you know, fourteen string quarterback.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>They hung in that game against the Eagles for a while.

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh, I'll take the wolf These plus ten

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Yeah. The point is it wasn't even

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>their fourteen string quarterback. They literally had to sign a

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>dude off another team's practice squad. Like I mean, I

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>talked with all my Washington football fan friends we don't

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>even know how to feel afterwards. It's like, really, we're

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna look back on this season. We're like, remember we

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>played a game in the middle of a playoff race

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with a dude from another team's brand. What happened to

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the kid from Vanderbilt? I thought he was going to

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>be the quarter Scharmer. He's terrible Fritch Scharmer's son, right Patch,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Kyle Schmer. Yeah, I thought that he was in

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>line to get the start I was in. The Steelers

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>once played this. You know, a great organization, The Pittsburgh

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Steels once played a game with a guy named Duck

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback for a numerous games in the road. That

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>better than Mason Rudolph. Okay, Todd is better than Mason Rudolph.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>They're both mats. Uh My number one we already said

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was the Titans. So we're at the number two, Jeff. See,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>now this is where this gets difficult because we have

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>no idea where who's gonna test positive for COVID next

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and miss these games. We also don't know if guys

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna clear, Like we still don't know if Baker

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield still in the list. K Keenum, we don't.

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, so this is not a pick, but

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I just want to bring something up on the New

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Miami game because the lines are off the board

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>when we're recording this with no Taysom Hill and no

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Simeons. Malcolm Perry is on that roster. Malcolm Perry

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best quarterbacks ever to play at Navy.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't you think Sean Payton would be smart enough to

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>get a package on bare minimum on Malcolm Perry and

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>then on Malcolm Perry many times in college he was awesome.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So just throwing that out there as a possibility because

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm in Mikey's camp on Ian book that guy.

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So Malcolm Barry would play the Taysom Hill rolling. Yeah,

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>possibly he is on the roster, so that that is

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at least worth a look there. Potentially have time to

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>install the triple option. Do you have an extra day day? Right?

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Every days? Why? Why the hell out? At this point,

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the Philadelphia Eagles. Laying nine and a

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>half is my next pick against the Giants. Um, I

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>just the Giant. I'll lay ten. Then that's fine, it

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. What the number is. I

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>know Siriani's out with COVID. I know there could be

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>some more COVID concerns, but the Giants are just so

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.959
<v Speaker 1>unfathomly awful on offense at this point. I don't care

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's Glennon, I don't care if it's from Uh,

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. They're not moving the ball against Philadelphia's defense.

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Who I thought again, I know is Garret Gilbert. But

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>even before that, other than the first half against the Jets,

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have played very well for the last month or so. Uh. Look,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts had the worst game he's had all year

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants the first time. He was clearly injured

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in that game, and and he's been healthy though over

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the last six weeks, Jalen Hurts has showed pretty well. Uh.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And the Eagles need this game in order to keep

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>stay in the playoff hunt. Now with the news in

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, they have a real chance of getting the

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>seventh seed. So I don't care if it's nine and

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a half, ten, whatever the number you'll give me, Todd,

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll lay and with Philadelphia against the Giants. Wow. Mike

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Glennon and Jake from Ladies and gentlemen, Daniel Jones shut

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>down for the season. Mikey number two. I have the

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>same pick, Yes, number two. Ten's your one, are your two?

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's my two and we already left. I only have

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a two left. You can't trade up or down. Yeah, man, Mike,

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going the opposite direction as you guys because Tennessee

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was my three. Todd, you're number two. Uh, you know what,

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna. I hate to do this, but I'm gonna.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Denver. I mean, I don't like betting with

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>those idiots. With that Fangio guy, I can't stand him.

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the Raiders are not a good

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>team and they constantly do dumb things. Now, granted, they

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>won the game the other night, but you know what

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this so they beat Mullins. I mean, when does Mullins

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is an NFL He's not an NFL quarterback in my opinion.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>And they barely held on for that game. The three

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>games prior to that, they got crushed by Kansas City.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>The Woofties beat him at home. Uh, they didn't have

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that miracle game against Dallas. But you know, I just

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in the Raiders, and to me, this is

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of those who cannot lose it

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>versus who can win it. And I think Denver is

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better at not losing it. And as

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we know in the NFL, a lot of it is

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't lose the game. Let the other team lose

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the game. And that's why I'm going to take Denver.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Pick them. You're taking lock over Car. I'm taking lock

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>over Car. Yes, And we still don't have a d

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Lack. We still don't the way I

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can't stand him. We don't have a Darren Waller update

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>yet do we not trend? And well he didn't practice yesterday.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>My number two is going to be the Detroit football lock.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>There we go. Uh, they're catching five and a half?

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I believe it is. What is it, Todd? What do

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you say? The Detroit Lions are catching five and a half? Yes,

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. Um, Listen. They're coming off an

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen point win against Arizona. Game before that was sort

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Minnesota fallout game where they won on the

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>last second touchdown. It was their first win of the

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>year against Minnesota. They got crushed by Denver in between.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But if you throw out that Denver game, which I

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>would like to for the purposes of this discussion. They've

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>last games besides that Denver game. They beat Arizona by eighteen.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>They beat the Vikings by two, they lost to the

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Bears by two, they lost to Cleveland by three, they

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>tied with Pittsburgh. That's the Detroit Lions since October. They've

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>really had one bad outing one and they're catching five

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half at Atlanta against the Maddie Ices Jared

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>goff By. I don't know if you've seen these Jared

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Goff is on the COVID list, but I don't know

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if you've seen the reports from the Lions about Jared

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Goff how he's feeling. They have made a point now

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on multiple occasions to let everybody know Jared golf is

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling perfect. They're sort of like it's their passive aggressive

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>way of telling the NFL, Hey, if you really want

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to play, as if you're really if you're really serious

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>about asymptomatic players coming back and playing, we just want

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to let you know Jared Goff is completely asymptomatic. So

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he goes and I'll take the five and

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a half on the Detroit Lions Jeffrey number three. I'm

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna follow Totty and take the ten and a half

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Washington football team on Sunday night. Look, Washington

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>with Heinrich is a playoff back end, playoff caliber team. Yes,

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And Dallas breach, we we have you and I have

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on a numbers game. Dallas's offense since

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott hurt himself in Foxborough just has not been

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the same and there's serious there. There's something still going

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on with that, with the with the calf for the

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lower leg or whatever it is with Dad, because that

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>offense just has not been the same since he suffered

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that injury on the last play of the game in

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>New England. So look, I'll take the ten and a

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>half in Washington. They're stolen the race too, I mean

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if they get uh, if Minnesota goes down, New Orleans

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>goes down, it will come down to that game and

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in Land over next week against Philadelphia again. So I'll

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.720
<v Speaker 1>take the ten and a half with the Washington football

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>team on Sunday night. Totty and I have some potty.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go skinnies. Mikey number one for you. My one

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was the was the Raiders, so he already has three.

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>He is Vegas, and Okay, Todd your number three. I'm

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with the over. In the Lions Atlanta Falcons game.

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's over forty three, over forty three Lions

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and um Atlanta. I just think that the Lions are

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>showing me a little bit more on offense. I'm not

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>impressed with at Lana's defense at all. I think I

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think Detroit should be able to get you some point.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>It's over forty three is not a real high number

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in an NFL game. And Atlanta sometimes they can score,

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean last week they should have a

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>lot more than thirteen points against the good San Francisco defense.

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, they scored twenty nine in Carolina, they scored

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one at Jacksonville, twenty seven in New Orleans. Sometimes

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>they can get you a lot of points. So I'm

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna go over forty three in the lines. Atlanta maybe

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 1>get a win, and uh, somebody wine it goes over me. Okay,

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and my number one pick, because I remember I've been

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this in the hours. Order is and he guesses

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with the Cincinnati Bengals. Yeah, giving three to

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens obviously like the better two and a half,

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but I like them given three. There's a couple of

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.959
<v Speaker 1>things here. One, I think everybody's feeling real good about

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Huntley. I think he's solid. I've even heard Chrissie

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Andrews was like, oh, Pittsburgh should trade for all Right.

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen enough of Tyler Huntley to be making

0:39:57.880 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the proclamations that others have, but yes, he played a

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>great game against Green Bay. That's one thing. The biggest

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thing though here for me, is is that the Ravens

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>still don't have a secondary and what do the Bengals have,

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe above every team in the league except for maybe

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple great trio of wide receivers. And I think

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow gets the ball to Jamaar Chase pro bowler

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase by the way uh to uh Tyler Boyd

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh to T Higgins, And I think they absolutely

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 1>exploit the Ravens weakness in the secondary. I think this

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is the Bengals coming out party once and for all.

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>This game is for the lead in the a f

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>C North. I like the Cincinnati Bengals by the way

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>they whacked They whacked them that was a game though

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't hardball went for some fourth downs in their

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>own territory and got out of hand. Yeah, but since

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but Cincinnati dominated that game offensively, Chase did whatever he

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted in this and the one one quick thing on

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals here. Warren Sharp us sent this out earlier

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>today and I thought it was interesting. So the Pols

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are coming up playing Denver last week, the Denver Broncos

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the last since week so the last six opponents that

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos have faced are averaging thirty eight and a

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>half points a game after playing the Denver Broncos, after

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>going under their team total by an average of seven

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half points in the previous in the in

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the game against Denver. So from a betting perspective, a

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 1>game against the Broncos almost minimizes what the market feels

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about their opponent. In the following, correct kind of thing? Correct?

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I like that? Thank you, Warren Sharp, Thank you Parley.

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Are we already on teasers? Todd wishnev with the lead.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I have the leading against the Todd, will you repeat

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to teaser records? The teaser records are met at nine

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and six, and you and Gilly both at seven, seven

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and one al right, which means, Todd, by the way,

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>how did Derrick Stephens do last week in his picks?

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a record of that? By the way, yes,

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Stephens. Uh. He went. He had Detroit with a winner,

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he had the Rams minus four and a half um

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and he had Miami minus nine and a half, which

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was which was a loser. And then his his teaser

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was the Ellie Clippers, Chargers and the Rams. So we

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hit so yeah, so hit. By the way, I got

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>robbed on my teaser with the Pats plus eight and

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a half. The game was over there, just trying to

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>run out the clog and Jonathan Taylor runs into the house.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.439
<v Speaker 1>That was not very fortunate. Even with that loss, even

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:34.879
<v Speaker 1>with my game, I'm still a game and a half

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>behind you with teasers. Yeah, I didn't realize that fall

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in that far behind. All right, Todd, your first then

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>on the teaser, I'm gonna go with the Green Bay

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Packers minus the one and a half. I am not

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>a believer in the Cleveland Browns football team. I don't

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>care who's playing quarterback. Give me the Green Bay Packers

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>just to win by one and a half points. And

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>also give me the Bills plus eight and a half

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>exact be going against going against my beloved Patriots. But

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the Bills are good enough to

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>hang in. Remember the game a couple of weeks ago

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>when Bill Belichick took us back to football and ran

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball on every single play and was they somehow win?

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But they did not win by more than they only

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>one by four. And I don't think, I mean, the

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are not designed to you know, they're a run team,

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Bills are a good team. The Bill should

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>be able to hold, you know, hang in there. Point

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of clarification, are we continuing these records into the post

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>season or these regular season tally's I'm I'm up for

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever you guys want to do. I think we should

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>continue into the post season. In that case, I have

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact same teaser that Todd does, because that is

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the best teaser on the board. Green Bay on Christmas

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Day down through the seven and the three, and then

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills up through the three and the I'm

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Packers and the Chiefs, Oh, the Chiefs

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be what do you have him at ten? Right?

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Are they at ten? Right now. She that's it looks like,

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? Seven and seven and a half?

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You see seven half. I don't even see any seven halves.

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I just see tens and nines and eights. So we're

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him. We're going to give him and half

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>off Shore to give me eight. Make it, make it

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Okay, Chiefs minus two, and I'm looking at

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm looking at one of the big off shores.

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Rams game is off the board. The Kansas City

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and Miami games are not even to be found listed.

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not even up here. So what the Kansas City game? Why?

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Because we still don't know about Travis Kelsey Kelsey and

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Tyree Kill. But you're willing to risk keep betting. Let's

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>keep betting him because Tomlin can afford to lose now

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's back to five, you know what I mean,

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because he will not be less than five now he

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 1>can If he would have lost, I can't go against him.

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But he can't afford to lose a game now that

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he's won a game. If the Pittsburgh Steelers somehow make

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the post easy, unbelievable, It's incredible. I thought they were

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>dead in the water. Down thirteen and nothing against the Titans.

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I gave them no shot. That would have made a

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>large I would have made a large money line beat

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Titans, had I had you been been not sweating.

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Mikey, how did you like the

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>fourth and fourth down spot? I mean, how did these guys?

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this wasn't. This wasn't. By the way, I

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>needed them to score because I had a bet on that,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but I won't tell you what that was. But the

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>point was I wanted them to score and fourth then

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, are you kidding me? You're giving I mean,

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the first down, But it was it was

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>so far away. How could you even miss it by

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that much? They missed it by yard and a half?

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was the rest from the Army Missouri

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>game last night. They only needed nine yards for first

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>downs in the fourth quarters, the clock stopping area a

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>yard short one on the one at the end of

0:45:57.760 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. One way were MISSOO got the first got

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the fourth got the third down conversion was bad. The

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>one that Army got Army was legitimately too yards. It

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>was I don't know. I said that, I see the

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>clock stop right now? He's calling it time out here

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and they're moving to change. So glad we brought this

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>up though, the one in the one in the Pittsburgh game.

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I I was on Tennessee right, so I'm like, oh

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>my god, he didn't make it. And then the next

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>thing you know, it's like this measurement and oh no.

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:25.439
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Tennessee was trying to rush the place

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're like, oh my god, I think it might

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>have give him his first down. Then the measurement where

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they put the ball, it was like credit card thin.

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 1>But they they would have challenged, they would have challenged.

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>It's clearly yard. But but what Jeff is talking about

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:45.720
<v Speaker 1>last night, dude, Oh my this this this game was hihilarious.

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So missoo. On their final touchdown drive, I literally I

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>had I had Army on the money line, which got

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there thankfully as the last leg of the parlay, but

0:46:56.160 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I had so Massou's matriculating the ball down the field.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They're in the red zone and I'm like, fun, i

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta stop them, Oh my god. And then there's a

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.399
<v Speaker 1>play where I'm like, again, we were talking about walking

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>away from the TV and the Denver since in any

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>game it's clearly fourth and one, right, clearly fourth and one.

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I do that thing where you lose your concentration for

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment, and I'm like, okay, fourth and one and

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>pass and then I'm like and then I'm like, why

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't there and he throws up. I'm like, first and

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>second intent. I think it was. I think it was

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>actually third and one. No, no, no, it was fourth

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're right that the yeah, no, it was fourth

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and one. And then next thing I knew on the

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>incomplete pass, I'm like, second and ten because you know

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom of the screen they put forth in

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one after the play and oh I didn't see that.

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.359
<v Speaker 1>But then if you watch, they change it to first

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>intend and then he threw away and complete just threw

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it away. So that one was bad enough because it

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was a yard. But the but just talking about them,

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>they not only they not only moved the chains, they

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>kept the clock running so nobody and they stopped it.

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>They stopped it for two seconds, yeah, because I said, well,

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I would mon can call it time out in this spot.

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And then they see a movement that they wounded with

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like thirty eight, they started the game clock again. It's

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so arbitrary in these bowl games. You're betting on this,

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, whatever, it's very arbitrary when you're bet in

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>college total skill. And I do this because there's a

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of crews in the Big Ten. When they get

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the first down, they start winding. They don't have the

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>ball in the hash right. There's a couple of these

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>guys that are thirty seven are wind and others. It

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>goes down to twenty eight before they start the game. Class.

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I noticed there was one arbitrary Bowl game a couple

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>of days ago where they I don't think they even

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>stopped at they just let it's amazing. By the way,

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys are wrong. It was third and one, as

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I said it was. It would have been third and one,

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>not fourth and one on that play because I knew.

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh my god, now it's gonna be

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>third and one, and I'm looking at the play by play.

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It would have been third and one at the Army seventeen,

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not fourth and one. But still the points still stands

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that it was a ridiculous call. It would have been

0:48:57.520 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're correct. I think this was further

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 1>up the field. This was around midfield. Midfield By the way,

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>don't you feel fortunate that Missouri stayed in hurry up?

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Once they had first to go with a minute and

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty ago. They kept could they could have they could

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.959
<v Speaker 1>have made amuse his time outs, but they didn't. Well,

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and then forget forget at all. I mean the cook

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>legitimately missed the guy who had no one within fourteen

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>miles down show i'd open. You know what I'm really

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>upset about is they didn't spike the ball. Corney Thomas,

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go back and find this game on demanding

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just listen to it. It is a It is a

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Shakespeare of bad announcing what's Parley's what's part my teaser?

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>You go ahead, Todd. Just you can look at the

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>play by play and you'll see we will, we will. Todd,

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>You're probably right, because you're never wrong my teaser. My

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>teaser is the same as Todd and Gills. I don't

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>know how I with the way the numbers are right now.

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you can't go with with green

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Bay in Buffalo. I expect that game in Foxboro to

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>be close, and I expect green Bay to wax h Clive,

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>especially if Baker is in there. Um it was second

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and six from the Army twenty three with one thirty

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>eight left. He passed it for six yards. According to

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the thing for Army first down, it really should have

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>been third and one right right, But Todd, what I'm

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:16.800
<v Speaker 1>saying is, so follow the play by play, so it

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.800
<v Speaker 1>would have been third and one there right right, and

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>then then the the next place is then complete to

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>make it second and tend So the next play, the

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:28.960
<v Speaker 1>next play, no, no, this is but this is what

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. So I didn't explain, right, So the next play,

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>when it's an incomplete pass, then I'm thinking it's a

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one, but instead it's the second and ten.

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what's That's what I'm talking. Yeah, right, Uh, your

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>teaser is the same as you're in, Todd. Yeah, same one.

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Packers Packers and Bills, Packers Bills, best teaser in the world.

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>What could go wrong? What it'll be like, They'll be

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like that Cleveland that that campas Cleveland Raider teaser from

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks that's right. By the way, did you

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>guys think, because Jeff and I disagreed of this, did

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you think Belichick should not have kicked the field goal

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with nine minutes left to cut it to ten. Did

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you think that that was a terrible move? No? I

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't either. I think you could argue with a lot

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of time. It was a lot of time left. The

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>big the big concern and that and and it ended

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>up happening, even though New England scored quickly after. Was

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>my concern was that New England was only going to

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.359
<v Speaker 1>have time for one possession left because of the way

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis plays offense. That was my That was my big

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 1>concern on that. That's why I would have would have

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>gone for now. If it was like fourth and twelve,

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say, fine, you gotta kick it. But it

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was fourth and six. I just find a lot of

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this stuff not you necessary. But I'm just saying a

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people just say, oh, that's terrible. Not the

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>same situation. But remember people crucified him for kicking the

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 1>field goal to go down twenty eight six and the

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Remember wait, no, didn't they I thought it

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was twenty nine it was it was kicked to go

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to six. No, no, it was a touchdown. They went

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for two to make it eleven and missed twelve. He

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>kicked the field That the reason that I know it

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>was nine is because at the south point they had

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge liability on nine. If New England had finished

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>with nine points, another one of those Zach White deals, Yeah,

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it would have been. It would have been six figures.

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh in liability. You have Tampa Beta score zero points.

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Last week it was plus twelve billion. So by the way, Todd,

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you talked about the last play with the Bears game

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and the overrule change on the field, we had a

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:27.839
<v Speaker 1>guy make a very large wager and laid minus three

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>forty that there would be a score. There would not

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be a scoreless quarter, so we blow. It was a

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:34.879
<v Speaker 1>huge swing for us by that being that there would

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>not Yes, no, will there be a scoreless quarter? He said, no,

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter would have been scoreless if they don't

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>score in the last play. So he laid he laid

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>three forty fe mid five figures and he gets there

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>with that last touch the goodness. And by the way,

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people had the Bears plus uh plus seven,

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like myself, And that's the Minneapolis miracle rule. You don't

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>need to be don't but it does not change the

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>result of the game. Yeah, though, when you google articles

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>from right after that rule change. A lot of people

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like if it's the winning score, So I had to

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>actually look it up in the rules, and it is

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.520
<v Speaker 1>any score. It is any score. What's happened a number

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of times now that where they get the touchdown the

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:18.320
<v Speaker 1>last place and they don't kick. Alright, we're down to

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the final two questions. Are we already here? I believe

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we are. We are all right? Uh, final two questions,

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the first of which is which of the big favorites

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely to lose? Outright? Outright in this

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Let me get back to the board. By the way,

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chris Andrews, it's as if he's listening in

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to the megapod because I just mentioned how there's a

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 1>prominent off shore that has three games off the board.

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>He just texted me randomly to tell me that the

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>other prominent offshore, Pinnacle, has nine games currently off the board.

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:53.879
<v Speaker 1>So Pinnacle, the arbiter of beating closing line value, has

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>nine NFL games off the board as we do this

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Thursday morning. Interesting. Interesting me ask you how many of

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 1>them canna have off the board at about one forty

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:06.320
<v Speaker 1>five on Sunday. No, but you understand the point, Oh no,

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>do you understand my point. We can bet all these games.

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>After the game started and we see who's playing, we

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>see who's doing what. You might as well just wait, folks,

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you want to go to the picnic. I

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 1>know you want to go to the barbecue and get

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your bets in. You don't need to go to the

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 1>damn barbecue. Todd wishing everybody a lot of Christmas barbecue, picnic,

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of picnics on Christmas? Okay, whatever, you get my point.

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I can go picked up her son some other times

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. What's that Jewish holiday with the cheesecake? Todd

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lewis let The Gentiles love barbecue. We love it, they

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 1>really do. Okay, it's not but you get my point.

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 1>These people, they insist they got the game. Let's get

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:57.919
<v Speaker 1>let's slaughter one of the Oxen Barbecue. Alright. So here

0:54:58.160 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>here are the big favorites. There's the most likely to

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a Christmas bar because a big deal, isn't it

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>out in the backyard? Yeah, as long as the major

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't catch fire? Tampa Bay? What do they do on Christmas? Wait,

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 1>let me ask Mikey, what's the big deal on Christmas?

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 1>A big Christmas dinner Christmas Day lunch for a lot

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of families. That's going to Mass at midnight on Christmas Eve?

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Do you do that? Yeah? We always do.

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:24.440
<v Speaker 1>We always go at midnight even now. Yeah, yes, If

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff and then Jeff Schwartz were here, he would have

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lost his mind right now. Old, Sorry, Well, there are

0:55:30.000 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 1>questions about diet and calories. I'm convinced. I like to

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 1>know what Mikey is doing on Christmas. So he goes

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 1>midnight Mass. Then you wake up late because you're up

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so late, right, I wake up late and open the

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>presents and then go to the grandparents house in the afternoon.

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh nice, it's good and it's a big meal. There's

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a big meal, a big meal at the grandparents house.

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Because what do you have? No? No, is it turkey

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Flippino food? What is Filipino Christmas? Is it not turkey

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and stuff? Or what is it? No? What's their own food?

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just they do not that they change. It's not

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's Lumpia and Olumpia, Olympia's dig I had

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Lumpia plus two nine fans. You know, the noodles and

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:10.439
<v Speaker 1>all this. You know what I'll bet I'll be eating

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese food on Christmas for sure. Christmas story, yes man, alright,

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. Which of these is most likely to lose?

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Out right? Tampa Bay? Uh? Ten point favorites on the

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>road against Carolina Philly, nine and a half of ten

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:26.920
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home against the Giants, Chargers ten points

0:56:26.960 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road against Houston. Banka Banga. Should I keep

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>sepp in there? All right? I'll take Kansas City though,

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half point favorites at home against Pittsburgh

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and Dallas ten and a half ten point favorites at

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>home against the Washington Football teamers. Who's the most likely

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to lose? Outright, Todd, I'll take uh, God, I guess

0:56:56.200 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll take what to beat the Cowboys? Cowboys? Jeff? Kansas City,

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City? No way are the Stillers beating the Kansas

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>City Stillers. I love the Picksburgh Stollers. I'll be the

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>first person to tell, Yeah, have some parogies, have a bermanies,

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to have. But we're not gonna go dinner.

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>We can't go down at Kansas City and think we're

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:23.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna come out with can't. We just don't have enough

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side of the ball. Thank you, Pet Todd.

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I will I will say this, the Steelers have reached

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the point where they are so horrible that they are

0:57:33.440 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 1>still that that you know, the the old SA It's

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>so bad, it's good. That's kind of where we're at

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Steelers, where they're so terrible and they're still

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably find a way to have a chance to

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>win the division. We gay team, Mikey, because we're a

0:57:45.800 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>great organizations. I don't know that any of them are losing,

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>or think that any of them are. But I'd have

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to go to the one with the coach coaching mismatch.

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll take uh the Texans to beat the Chargers. Do

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>what you said set up. You can't wait when he

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 1>wins coaching there not this year. This year, I'm gonna

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna agree with my buddy Jeff Parlay and I'm

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:15.480
<v Speaker 1>going with the Kansas City Omaha Chiefs. You're just playing

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 1>against that you're worried about. The second here about the Steelers.

0:58:21.600 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing about the Steelers. They have on defense

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like four legitimate awesome players Bushes on COVID though, but

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like Fitzpatrick, T J. Watt of course, Joe Hayden. They

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have players on defense that could mess with a especially

0:58:38.200 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 1>if either Kelsey or Hill can't go. Uh. I don't

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 1>know how pens we're scoring. That's another story, but I

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's the most likely. It was our right because

0:58:45.400 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a scenario. And then the final question,

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, with all these COVID things, who knows right here?

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But you have to make a play in every single game,

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but you're allowed one free pass? Jeffrey, what's the game?

0:58:59.200 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You want? No part of the Jacksonville Jaguars at my

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets. I second that, I'm going Denver, Oakland.

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of that or Denver at

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. Pardon me. I would not want to bet

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins against the Ian Book led New Orleans Saints. Uh,

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't. You're starting to see some picks reposted Todd.

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You still wouldn't consider Miami even even at a coin

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:30.920
<v Speaker 1>flip against Ian Book. Well, I mean, the Saints won

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a game without a quarterback last week, so why can't

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they do it again? I don't know, I don't. I

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like that game. I'm not I'm not I'm not

0:59:37.840 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins is not a game I wanted total might

0:59:40.600 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>go down to thirty five. I'm just possible. We had this.

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:47.200
<v Speaker 1>We had this discussion on the numbers game. Dude to

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I say, conservatively, he's a top half NFL quarterback, probably

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth or fourteenth, even if you rank all the quarterbacks

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in the league. You say, what, I don't know. I

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think you know. I I think that once you get

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like past eight nine, that from ten to is like

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what makes my statement correct. If you go

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>if you can go through every single team, I defy

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you to find fifteen quarterbacks better than two a taga

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>La plus two for the second straight year. So last

1:00:19.040 --> 1:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>year he had the smallest separation between his receivers and

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the defenders, so he had to throw it into the

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>smallest windows of any quarterback in the NFL. This year,

1:00:26.040 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>same thing. If you take Waddle out and you could

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about all his other receivers two point two yards

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of separation, the guy has no help whatsoever. And by

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, Miami is still obsessed with the Shawn Watson.

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So after this season, I wouldn't be surprised if they

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>picked up the Shaun Watson. I would happily take to

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>h in the Burgundy and Gold. Where did you get

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that stat about the about the thing and who who's

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback? Get who has the most? Uh? That I

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do not know where did you get the stat? Though?

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>A little Bertie, little Bertie, because I'd love to I'd

1:00:57.480 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>love to see Dr Eric, Dr Eric, as the stats

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>told me. Yeah, I was guessing. That's just a guess.

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know that was Dr Eric, But

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where it came here because it's a

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>huge it's a huge thing that that whole who has

1:01:10.080 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>room to throw too? If you watch these games, uh,

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a gigantic thing. And people think they can,

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can rank the quarterbacks solely, just you can't.

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So much of it is who you're throwing too, and

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>who if they're open, if they're not open, and all

1:01:24.800 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Another example of how the human eye doesn't

1:01:28.160 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>process that. But guess what does analytics? And also guilt?

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>How about the telltale sign of all with this Tom Brady,

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who legitimately was going to waltz to another m v

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>P award. All of these guys get hurt. No one

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>can get open against New Orleans And now we're Tom

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Brady's the second favorite, after looking like he's gonna waltz another.

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Can I say that m v P should be abolished

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League? It is a pure team game,

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the m v P. I know, Visa loves to talk

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about m VPS all day long in the in the

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, like like if I if I listen to

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the Numbers game, we're gonna have the m v P

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and the G league discussion of the NBA. I'm the

1:02:09.640 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>least guilty of that. We've talked about it, maybe for

1:02:14.520 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>five minutes a week, just a numbers game. Numbers game. Okay, sorry,

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I take it back, I take it back. Not a

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers game. But I hear this endless talk of m

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>vps and and everything. Okay, fine, maybe people like it,

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. But in the National Football League, for God's sakes,

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a team game. It is not a a game

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>where that leads itself to m VPS but the people

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to win money. Though, that's all I understand. I

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have no problem because of the swift dispensation of all

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the necessary things in this show, and we finished a

1:02:46.360 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>few minutes early. Do we have time for a Christmas message?

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael with his annual Christmas. But why is he laughing?

1:02:52.880 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that we have I'm laughing because because you

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>can't just be Christmas like one day of the year.

1:02:58.360 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But go ahead, you love of my Christmas is for

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>more than Christians two years ago in the holiday reflection,

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and I believe our audience is ecumenical. Right, There's there's

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of creeds. We are now just a

1:03:14.560 --> 1:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>few days from Christmas, and many of us are preparing

1:03:17.560 --> 1:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate that birth of birth that happened over two

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago in an occupied Middle Eastern country. Ideally,

1:03:24.840 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the birth of any child is a product or manifestation

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of love. A baby should be loved into life, irrespective

1:03:31.240 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of the parents or circumstances. Birth is full of wonder.

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>People can easily become captivated staring into the face of

1:03:39.320 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the newborn. Such joy, such a miracle. But preparing for

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Christmas can be overwhelming. The decorating cards, sending Christmas plays

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and office parties, the ordering and shipping and shopping. Add

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to that the problems we face as a society. Rampant inflation,

1:03:56.000 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>supply chain shortages, stock market gyrations, new vaccine man dates,

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>water shortages, riots, arson, mass shootings, smash and grab robberies,

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and political descent, and now a new, rapidly spreading strain

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the virus. How do we keep ourselves safe? How

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>do we keep our children safe? And, for many of us,

1:04:13.440 --> 1:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the most important question, how do we keep our elderly

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>parents safe? That sense of being overwhelmed can easily turn

1:04:19.600 --> 1:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>into a sense of desperation or even defeat. So let's

1:04:23.520 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>not forget the words of Luke. Fear not, for behold,

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I bring you good news of great joy that will

1:04:29.080 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be for all people. For unto you is born this

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>day in the City of David, a savior who is

1:04:34.080 --> 1:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Christ the Lord. Do not be afraid. This isn't the

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>first time we've heard this message. These words were spoken

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to Zechariah, to Joseph, to marry and to the shepherds.

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>They were even spoken by the Lord himself to the

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>first witnesses of the resurrection. These are the words which

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>signify God's deepest message of love and care toward us.

1:04:53.360 --> 1:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Rather than wringing our hands over the worrisome state of

1:04:55.800 --> 1:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>our nation and world, we should celebrate instead a tiny baby,

1:04:59.600 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>wrapped swaddling clothes and lying in the Bethlehem, Manger continues

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to overcome hate with love, evil with sacrifice, and wrong

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with right from our families. Dr gil Alexander Todd wished,

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if myself our guest Jeff Parls, we wish you and

1:05:14.160 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>yours a very blessed and joyful Christmas. One of the

1:05:17.040 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>most glorious messes in the world is the mess created

1:05:19.920 --> 1:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in the living room on Christmas Day. Don't clean it

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>up too quickly, Michael Palm. Everybody very nice. And that's

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the way it ended on this megapod Week sixty to

1:05:32.520 --> 1:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League. Good luck with all your I

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just have to that with can you do the ice pond?

1:05:39.040 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you do the ice fund on? Mikey. That's my

1:05:41.880 --> 1:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite line from Mike. I grew up. We grew up,

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we grew we grew up Catholics. We were just skeptical Catholics.

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>We believe Jesus. We believe Jesus walked on water. We

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just thought was probably in the wintertime. My notes would be,

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I like the last line where you say, don't clean

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it up too quickly, so I could have done without

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Christ of the Lord part. Believe differently, Todd and

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I wins a little bit on that he didn't how

1:06:09.080 --> 1:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he was sitting back in the chair and join it. No,

1:06:11.320 --> 1:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I find I find the whole thing hysterical

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>because we're all gonna act christ Like on one day

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and three sixty four days a year,

1:06:19.480 --> 1:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna act the way the normal thing is. But whatever,

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all good. Well, I think it's a lovely in spirit.

1:06:25.760 --> 1:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a lovely message, thank you, thank you, Like Palm,

1:06:28.560 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>known for many things, including his yearly Christmas message, good

1:06:32.600 --> 1:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>luck with all your bets and by the way, can

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I end it? That's ended? Good luck with all your bets.

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Week sixty to the NFL. Happy holidays, everybody,