1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:32,480 Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Lisa, 7 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 1: you ever think of moving to Toronto, perhaps maybe living 8 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:38,879 Speaker 1: the same kind of cosmopolitan, sophisticated life but at a 9 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,640 Speaker 1: lower price point with people. Yes, indeed, and we have 10 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 1: one in our studio right now. Derek Holt is the 11 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:48,480 Speaker 1: vice president and head of Capital market Economics for Scotia Bank. 12 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:51,160 Speaker 1: He's based in Toronto, but he joins us here because 13 00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 1: he was participating in a panel that took place earlier 14 00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 1: this morning, a Canada's housing outlook from Bubble to Buffett. 15 00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 1: Thank you very much for being here. Thank you. Well. Okay, 16 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:05,400 Speaker 1: so my setup was at one point, Toronto and Canada 17 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:09,800 Speaker 1: indeed was thought of as a less expensive alternative to 18 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 1: perhaps other high priced real estate in other North American cities. 19 00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:17,280 Speaker 1: Not so anymore correct. It depends on what currency you 20 00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 1: have to invest and if you have US dollars in 21 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:22,960 Speaker 1: this kind of a marketplace. Internationally speaking, Toronto Vancouver there's 22 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:25,040 Speaker 1: still well down the list in terms of the world's 23 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:27,679 Speaker 1: most expensive cities, so I think it still provides some value. 24 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 1: What about people in Canada, people that actually use the 25 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:33,039 Speaker 1: looney on a regular basis, that's a bit of a 26 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:36,280 Speaker 1: different picture. That is a story of strained affordability and 27 00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:39,399 Speaker 1: markets like Toronto and Vancouver where we are probably probably 28 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:41,800 Speaker 1: seen the best of housing markets over the course of 29 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 1: the cycle of the past ten of fifteen years or so. 30 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: But it's we're still encouraged by the outlook. We don't 31 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:48,880 Speaker 1: think we're going through a big pullback as opposed to 32 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:51,880 Speaker 1: a temporary hiccup. Well yeah, and just over the summer, 33 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:56,280 Speaker 1: prices in Toronto did decline pretty significantly, although they're still 34 00:01:56,280 --> 00:01:58,360 Speaker 1: ahead of where they were a year ago, and part 35 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 1: of the issue is that people aren't leaving their homes. 36 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 1: That also, you said that this market could offer value 37 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:09,679 Speaker 1: to outside infestors who are coming in and squeezing out 38 00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:13,960 Speaker 1: local residents. How much lower do you think Toronto home 39 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,160 Speaker 1: prices could fall. The real test will be next spring, 40 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:19,800 Speaker 1: given how seasonal the housing market is. But I suspect 41 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 1: that over the course of between now and then, we'll 42 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:24,919 Speaker 1: see a bottoming a series of evidence unfold, and over 43 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 1: the longer term, I'd expect price gains per year in 44 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:29,640 Speaker 1: and around the five percent range. So how are you 45 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:32,960 Speaker 1: so sanguine when you also expect the Bank of Canada 46 00:02:33,040 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: to raise interest rates three more times from now through 47 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,359 Speaker 1: the end of next year. Well, let me clarify, though, 48 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 1: I do expect a cooling housing market environment nationwide, in 49 00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: part because the cost of borrowing is going up, and 50 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:46,919 Speaker 1: in part because the price gains and the affordability is 51 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:50,960 Speaker 1: relatively strained. It's just that the interest rate reset risk 52 00:02:51,040 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 1: on the mortgage book applied to the whole housing market 53 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:56,000 Speaker 1: is relatively modest in Canada because the five year mortgages 54 00:02:56,240 --> 00:03:00,160 Speaker 1: dominates about of outstanding mortgages, and so the rate reset 55 00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:04,000 Speaker 1: occurs on gradually over time. In the context of income growth, 56 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:06,520 Speaker 1: and what are you seeing in terms of income growth, 57 00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:08,280 Speaker 1: that's been a big topic here in the United States. 58 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:11,440 Speaker 1: What about in Canada. It's also been very mixed. In 59 00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 1: terms of the disposable income. We've been growing by three 60 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:17,600 Speaker 1: to four percent nationwide year over year average hourly wages, 61 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:19,680 Speaker 1: just as soft as in the United States, in fact 62 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:21,440 Speaker 1: software at the start of the year, but they're starting 63 00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:23,560 Speaker 1: to accelerate and in fact into next year. I wouldn't 64 00:03:23,560 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 1: be surprised to see two and after three percent wage growth, 65 00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: So that would be good for the housing market. It 66 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:33,959 Speaker 1: would also along the same lines and of population dynamics 67 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:36,680 Speaker 1: and a market like Toronto, for example, the country raised 68 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:40,240 Speaker 1: its immigration targets. You're seeing people return home to the 69 00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:42,600 Speaker 1: province of Ontario and the city of Toronto from the 70 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:47,119 Speaker 1: resource based parts of the country. Those overall population dynamics 71 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 1: are favorable, and they're not returning home to misfortune. They're 72 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:53,520 Speaker 1: getting jobs in a booming job market in Canada. So 73 00:03:53,560 --> 00:03:58,360 Speaker 1: I'm wondering how concerned you are about NAFTA negotiations and 74 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 1: these sort of uh increasing tensions with United States with 75 00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:05,840 Speaker 1: respect to trade. Do you think that this could have 76 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:09,440 Speaker 1: a bad outcome and could potentially hurt the economy of 77 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: Canada could have potentially Yes, I'm less inclined to treat 78 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:15,200 Speaker 1: it as a macro event now than I was perhaps 79 00:04:15,200 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 1: at the end of last year or earlier this year, 80 00:04:16,880 --> 00:04:19,159 Speaker 1: when there was much more loose talk about a border tax, 81 00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 1: which seems to be dead in the United States right now, 82 00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:23,839 Speaker 1: or tearing up the NAFTA and walking away. I don't 83 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:26,359 Speaker 1: find that threat to be credible in the current context, 84 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:30,040 Speaker 1: as opposed to something that's more sector specific and where 85 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:34,360 Speaker 1: we we renegotiate the individual industry prospects going forward. In 86 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:38,480 Speaker 1: the context of the the dividing line, the strongest thing 87 00:04:38,520 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 1: that matters to Canada and Mexico is to retain those 88 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:44,200 Speaker 1: trade tribunals, the independent trade experts, and not to be 89 00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 1: subject to the vagaries of the U. S. Court system. 90 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 1: To me, that's at the end of the day, what 91 00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 1: is going to keep Canada at the bargaining table. Can 92 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,479 Speaker 1: you explain how that would work what you're talking about 93 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:57,240 Speaker 1: with respect to who would oversee the actual trade deals 94 00:04:57,760 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 1: versus the U S. Court system. Well, right now, it's 95 00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:02,359 Speaker 1: an independent panel of experts drawn from all three countries 96 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:05,440 Speaker 1: that judge the trade disputes on a sector sector's case 97 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,680 Speaker 1: by case basis. And you want to keep it that way, 98 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 1: in my opinion, outside of the political cycle in either 99 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 1: of those three countries and outside of the court systems, 100 00:05:14,360 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: in order to make sure that these are as well 101 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:19,800 Speaker 1: informed impartial judges as possible. If you don't have that, 102 00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: and the whole idea of a rules based trading system 103 00:05:22,200 --> 00:05:24,599 Speaker 1: that everybody has confidence in goes right out the window. 104 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:27,080 Speaker 1: And so I think that's the final straw for each 105 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 1: of the countries. Maybe just to give people just a 106 00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 1: quick idea of the relationship, particularly when it comes to 107 00:05:32,279 --> 00:05:35,799 Speaker 1: let's say the automotive industry. The relationship between the economy 108 00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:38,679 Speaker 1: and the United States and the economy and Canada linked 109 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:40,360 Speaker 1: in no matter what you do at a trade table, 110 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 1: You're very right. I mean, one third of GDP in 111 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:45,200 Speaker 1: Canada is export driven, and on almost three quarters of 112 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:47,159 Speaker 1: that goes to the United States. So there's still a 113 00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:50,520 Speaker 1: very very strong connection between the U S economy. In fact, 114 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 1: if you were to correlate GDP growth between the two 115 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:55,280 Speaker 1: countries over time, there's a very very strong correlations so 116 00:05:55,320 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: that the two are hitched at the hip to a 117 00:05:57,279 --> 00:06:01,560 Speaker 1: significant degree. Still, so going forward, do you think that 118 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:03,280 Speaker 1: things are still on track though? And you don't. You're 119 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:06,640 Speaker 1: not concerned that it'll just sort of be dissolved the 120 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 1: whole agreement. No, I don't find that to be credible. 121 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:14,120 Speaker 1: I think it would be political anathema, even domestically within 122 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:16,120 Speaker 1: the United States to go down that path because there 123 00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:20,159 Speaker 1: are so many people whose Republican senators and congressman in general, 124 00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: whose fortunes rest upon the NAFTA prospects across the Northern States, 125 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:26,479 Speaker 1: and so to walk away from that and impose a 126 00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:29,520 Speaker 1: border text I think would be politically ruin us, even domestically. 127 00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 1: Derek Holt, thank you so much for joining us. Derek Coult, 128 00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: vice president and head of capital market Economics for Scotia Bank, 129 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:38,839 Speaker 1: which is based in Toronto, but he is here today 130 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:53,839 Speaker 1: in the Bloomberg eleven Thrio studio. Earlier today, the chief 131 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 1: executive of Equifax decided he had had enough and to 132 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:00,120 Speaker 1: help us understand what's going on. But the company we 133 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:03,920 Speaker 1: have a Jenny surname. She is a Bloomberg financial reporter 134 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:06,560 Speaker 1: and as in our studio here to tell us more. 135 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:08,360 Speaker 1: I was looking at the stock. A stock is not 136 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 1: reacting happily to I mean, investors are still selling it 137 00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:15,120 Speaker 1: mean from the time that the Equifax hack was released. 138 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:19,280 Speaker 1: I'm looking at the shares there down about thirty percent. 139 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:22,800 Speaker 1: What can you tell us about who's leaving and what 140 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:27,640 Speaker 1: does this leave Equifax? So does so I think obviously 141 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,120 Speaker 1: investors are not happy about the breach. At all. I mean, 142 00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: when you're a data company, to have your data stole 143 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:37,560 Speaker 1: in UM, that's no good. UM. I think you know, 144 00:07:37,600 --> 00:07:40,520 Speaker 1: today though, the weakness is actually kind of interesting. Um, 145 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:44,040 Speaker 1: the CEO announces he's resigning. They've got this guy who's 146 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:46,600 Speaker 1: been there for seven years stepping in in the interim. UM. 147 00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:49,160 Speaker 1: But I think investors really did actually like Rick Smith, 148 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: you know, under him, he took over in two thousand five. 149 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 1: The stock has just been on a tear if you 150 00:07:54,720 --> 00:07:59,640 Speaker 1: exclude these last three weeks obviously, UM, and he actually 151 00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:02,280 Speaker 1: has edited with building Equifax into the company that it 152 00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 1: is today. And so I think for a lot of 153 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:09,320 Speaker 1: investors there's some worry like will this next guy or woman, UM, 154 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 1: will this next person be able to continue his legacy? UM? 155 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:16,800 Speaker 1: Minus the breach? Obviously? Well, Jenny, it was sort of interesting. 156 00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 1: Sun Trust analysts came out today and said that the 157 00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:23,680 Speaker 1: equity that that the Equifax departure of Richard Smith the CEO, 158 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:26,680 Speaker 1: is incrementally negative. And they said this is because the 159 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,760 Speaker 1: board is going to have to sort a CEO transition 160 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,440 Speaker 1: during this incredibly delicate time. You know, does this sort 161 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:38,040 Speaker 1: of limit their options for a CEO and create uncertainty 162 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,679 Speaker 1: at a time where the company is trying to regain 163 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:44,160 Speaker 1: its reputation. Yeah, I think it's a it's a good question. 164 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:47,760 Speaker 1: I mean, so it's ah, they've said that they're going 165 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:51,800 Speaker 1: to look internally and externally. Um, there's very few topics 166 00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:54,760 Speaker 1: acts that weren't actually implicated in this breach, and so 167 00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 1: the internal hires might be a little difficult, But you know, externally, 168 00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:00,679 Speaker 1: I think there's, um, there's a lot And first of all, 169 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:03,760 Speaker 1: if you're turnaround CEO, you're very interested. But beyond that, 170 00:09:03,800 --> 00:09:07,199 Speaker 1: you know, Equifax has just this massive amount of data 171 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:09,680 Speaker 1: and and they're always looking for new sources of data 172 00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 1: in new ways to package it. Um And and obviously 173 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:16,040 Speaker 1: internationally there there's a lot of room to grow. So um, 174 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 1: this is definitely an overhang on the stock. This this 175 00:09:18,600 --> 00:09:21,400 Speaker 1: breach was a you know, a terrible thing for US consumers. 176 00:09:21,440 --> 00:09:24,840 Speaker 1: But um, you know, in terms of finding Richard Smith's replacement, 177 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:27,440 Speaker 1: I'm not sure that it will be all two typicult. 178 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,199 Speaker 1: Jenny Suraine, thank you so much for joining us. Jenny 179 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:33,439 Speaker 1: Serene is a Bloomberg News reporter. We've been talking about 180 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:37,959 Speaker 1: the Aquifax CEO deciding to retire. Obviously, this company has 181 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 1: been under tremendous dress after a massive hack that revealed 182 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:46,160 Speaker 1: a lot of information about frankly, almost half of all 183 00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:49,560 Speaker 1: American residents. I'm Lisa Robo, what's along with my co 184 00:09:49,640 --> 00:10:07,920 Speaker 1: host pim Fox. This is Bloomberg. The Chinese Ministry of 185 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:11,400 Speaker 1: Finance said last week that it was a wrong decision 186 00:10:11,480 --> 00:10:16,360 Speaker 1: for SMP to downgrade China's sovereign credit rating. Indeed, the 187 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:18,600 Speaker 1: Ministry of Finance said it was a pity for SMB 188 00:10:18,720 --> 00:10:22,440 Speaker 1: to focus on China's fast credit growth because it was 189 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:26,680 Speaker 1: also ignoring the country's distinctive financing structure. And here to 190 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,400 Speaker 1: tell us more is Brendan Hearn. He's the chief investment 191 00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:32,800 Speaker 1: officer of Crane Shares. Brendan, thank you for being with us. 192 00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:35,080 Speaker 1: I wonder if you could speak to this issue that 193 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:40,200 Speaker 1: the Ministry of Finance raised about these distinctive financing structures 194 00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:43,520 Speaker 1: and whether the SMP downgrade of Chinese sovereign debt was 195 00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:46,559 Speaker 1: really warranted. Well, I think an element of the sp 196 00:10:46,679 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 1: downrade was falling in the footsteps of Moody's down grade 197 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 1: earlier this year. I think, if anything, you've seen a 198 00:10:53,120 --> 00:10:58,360 Speaker 1: high emphasis on trying to constrain potentially contracts the credit 199 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:01,440 Speaker 1: growth in China, so I think the reaction by the 200 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:03,920 Speaker 1: market has been very muted as well as many China 201 00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: watchers would say maybe S ANDPS a step or two 202 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 1: behind the trend that we're seeing taking place. But Brendan, 203 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:14,679 Speaker 1: we did see a pretty significant response in property stocks 204 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:17,280 Speaker 1: after as property stocks in Hong Kong, I should say, 205 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:23,440 Speaker 1: after a number of Chinese municipalities tightened the conditions on 206 00:11:23,760 --> 00:11:26,880 Speaker 1: mortgages for and frankly I'm buying in general on the 207 00:11:26,880 --> 00:11:29,800 Speaker 1: property markets there in their regions. What do you think 208 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:32,120 Speaker 1: of this? Is this going to be just the beginning 209 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 1: taste of more substantial tightening to come? Well, I think 210 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:39,200 Speaker 1: in general, I think this is part of a trend 211 00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:43,000 Speaker 1: around the upcoming nineteenth Party Congress taking place October eighteenth 212 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:47,640 Speaker 1: in Beijing. Fairly significant turnover within political leadership, so there's 213 00:11:47,679 --> 00:11:50,160 Speaker 1: a high degree of emphasis on getting in front of 214 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:54,280 Speaker 1: potential problem areas. Housing is one area where you're seeing 215 00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:58,000 Speaker 1: prices continue to rise, and I think the policymakers are 216 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 1: trying to tap the brakes on trying to control some 217 00:12:00,760 --> 00:12:05,200 Speaker 1: of those uh, skyrocketing prices. Well, okay, so if those 218 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 1: prices are in a sense controlled either by credit or 219 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:11,600 Speaker 1: by any kind of change in the way that the 220 00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:15,800 Speaker 1: individuals are allowed to borrow money. What do you say 221 00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:18,360 Speaker 1: is to the people that look at these results in 222 00:12:18,920 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: these companies and say, you know what, we don't believe 223 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:23,680 Speaker 1: the accounts, and we have to figure out a way 224 00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:27,520 Speaker 1: to consolidate the lending industry in China so that we 225 00:12:27,520 --> 00:12:30,199 Speaker 1: can get our hands around it. Yeah, I mean, I 226 00:12:30,520 --> 00:12:33,600 Speaker 1: do think housing has been um as much a form 227 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:37,400 Speaker 1: of investment for a lot of local citizens, and so 228 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:41,520 Speaker 1: you have a multitude of housing purchases, uh that that's 229 00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:45,280 Speaker 1: raised prices due to the contraction and supply and continued 230 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:48,640 Speaker 1: urbanization creates more and more demand on an annual basis. 231 00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:52,680 Speaker 1: So I do think there's a um emphasis on trying 232 00:12:52,720 --> 00:12:54,920 Speaker 1: to address this inequality of a lot of people aren't 233 00:12:54,920 --> 00:12:58,440 Speaker 1: going to be able to afford to buy houses in China. Um. 234 00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:01,240 Speaker 1: So I think I think at least it is it 235 00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:04,960 Speaker 1: is trying to get in front of this issue of 236 00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:09,600 Speaker 1: prices rising, trying to dampen some of that enthusiasm. You know, Brendan, 237 00:13:09,640 --> 00:13:11,360 Speaker 1: I've been kind of surprised this year, I've got to 238 00:13:11,400 --> 00:13:15,880 Speaker 1: be honest, because Chinese bonds have done very well even 239 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,880 Speaker 1: dollars denominated debt, which they're trying to raise more of. Now. 240 00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:22,480 Speaker 1: There's been plenty of appetite, and there seems to be 241 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 1: this complacency that China will be able to navigate a 242 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:32,120 Speaker 1: soft landing and won't disrupt markets throughout Asia. Frankly, do 243 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:36,240 Speaker 1: you think that there is too much optimism currently baked 244 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:39,720 Speaker 1: into markets? Well, I think one of the real surprises 245 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 1: for the year has been the appreciation of the remvy 246 00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:45,400 Speaker 1: versus the dollar. I mean, that's that's reversed a little 247 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:47,719 Speaker 1: bit of late, but I think it just shows that 248 00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 1: there's a lot of potential misperceptions around China, and in 249 00:13:51,400 --> 00:13:55,160 Speaker 1: terms of credit, I think that the policymers do want 250 00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:57,840 Speaker 1: to get in front of these issues in advance, and 251 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:01,040 Speaker 1: there's going to be bankruptcy. I don't think it's gonna 252 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 1: be wide scale reformist state owned enterprises. You're seeing the 253 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:08,280 Speaker 1: large become larger, the mega caps are getting even bigger 254 00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 1: through mergers and acquisitions. But the tail end of some 255 00:14:11,160 --> 00:14:13,600 Speaker 1: of these companies is that they're they well go away. 256 00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:16,319 Speaker 1: So we shouldn't be shocked by potential a few more 257 00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:19,800 Speaker 1: bankruptcies within China's bond market. The big issue is China's 258 00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:23,520 Speaker 1: bond debt is all c and why it's all renembi denominated, 259 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:27,160 Speaker 1: And it's really when when countries or companies issue foreign 260 00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 1: denominated that that they tend to get into an issue 261 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:31,800 Speaker 1: that's not where we're seeing in China. The other thing 262 00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:34,920 Speaker 1: is is that there's been uh an incredible lack of 263 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:39,200 Speaker 1: concern expressed by markets about the potential effect on China's 264 00:14:39,200 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: economy from the escalating tensions between North Korea and the US. 265 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:47,040 Speaker 1: And you know, even if this doesn't get violent, which 266 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 1: which a lot of people fear that it could, this 267 00:14:50,280 --> 00:14:54,880 Speaker 1: could have some substantial effects on Chinese economy. Now, well, 268 00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 1: I I think that you have the potential for a 269 00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:02,040 Speaker 1: risk off environment due to escalating tensions. And that's a 270 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:06,800 Speaker 1: worry for any investor in any capital market globally. Um 271 00:15:06,880 --> 00:15:09,440 Speaker 1: you know, you know, having recently been in the region, 272 00:15:09,760 --> 00:15:14,120 Speaker 1: I think, Um, I'm not a politician, so um, you know, 273 00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:15,880 Speaker 1: this is kind of my own person that the take was, 274 00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:18,840 Speaker 1: this was a lot of posturing as you potentially enter 275 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:23,560 Speaker 1: into a negotiating a negotiation that ultimately the consequence of 276 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:27,560 Speaker 1: any sort of military action is uh just so runious 277 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:31,200 Speaker 1: for for all sides that it's it's by a lot 278 00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:35,520 Speaker 1: of people locally, was considered unlikely. Um, so you know, 279 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:38,280 Speaker 1: we're certainly optimistic that this is hopefully just that that 280 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:42,360 Speaker 1: posturing as you potentially see negotiations and maybe the weeks 281 00:15:42,400 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 1: or months to come. Well, you know, the Commerce Secretary 282 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:49,920 Speaker 1: Will Burross, he was speaking earlier today in Hong Kong 283 00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:54,040 Speaker 1: after visiting with the top economic officials in China, and 284 00:15:54,320 --> 00:15:57,920 Speaker 1: he said that he believes that the relationship is going 285 00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:01,320 Speaker 1: to be positive for the trip planned by President Donald 286 00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 1: Trump later this year. Do you believe that to be so? 287 00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 1: I believe Mr Ross's trip was to pave the way 288 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:14,280 Speaker 1: for President Trump's um um proposed meeting in November, setting 289 00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:18,040 Speaker 1: the agenda, getting things in place for us for both 290 00:16:18,040 --> 00:16:20,120 Speaker 1: parties to be able to come away on a successful, 291 00:16:20,400 --> 00:16:23,760 Speaker 1: successful trip for both presidents. So yeah, I would agree 292 00:16:23,760 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: with that, Phim okay so and and and just quickly 293 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:29,480 Speaker 1: this idea that all right, if they are able to 294 00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:33,680 Speaker 1: reach some kind of negotiated agreement between the Chinese and 295 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:38,160 Speaker 1: US negotiators, what effect, if any, would that have on 296 00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:42,560 Speaker 1: the high savings rate of the Chinese because they in 297 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: a sense, oh, the debt to themselves, not necessarily there's 298 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 1: no outside uh creditors. Yeah. I think one of the 299 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:55,200 Speaker 1: big policies within China's been trying to raise domestic consumption. 300 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:58,520 Speaker 1: That that addresses one that's very very high savings rate. 301 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 1: Your savings going to deposits bank lender's deposits, that becomes debt. 302 00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:06,320 Speaker 1: So if you can raise consumption, that actually alleviates some 303 00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:10,159 Speaker 1: of the credit issue um At the same time, raising 304 00:17:10,200 --> 00:17:14,920 Speaker 1: domestic consumption helps also helps alleviate export dependencies. So there's 305 00:17:14,920 --> 00:17:19,439 Speaker 1: a dual, dual gain for Chinese policy Martin policy makers 306 00:17:19,480 --> 00:17:23,399 Speaker 1: to incanitize davers to spend a little bit more. Brendon 307 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:25,199 Speaker 1: to her and thank you so much for joining us 308 00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,480 Speaker 1: as always truly a pleasure. Brendan hern is chief investment 309 00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:31,639 Speaker 1: officer for Crane Shares in New York, and I just 310 00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:35,159 Speaker 1: want to mention that the Washington Post just published an 311 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:38,800 Speaker 1: exclusive report saying that North Korean officials have been quietly 312 00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 1: trying to arrange talks with Republican linked analysts in Washington 313 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:46,040 Speaker 1: to try to understand President Trump and his confusing messages better. 314 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:01,080 Speaker 1: Let's turn our attention now to Carlos Capistron. He is 315 00:18:01,119 --> 00:18:04,399 Speaker 1: the head of Canada and Mexico Economics at Bank of 316 00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:07,840 Speaker 1: America Merrill Lynch. He was a participant earlier today in 317 00:18:07,920 --> 00:18:11,359 Speaker 1: our Canadian Fixed Income conference and he spoke on the 318 00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:15,520 Speaker 1: panel Canada's economy is their life after oil? Well, Carlos 319 00:18:15,560 --> 00:18:19,720 Speaker 1: tell us, is their life after oil? Because another participant 320 00:18:19,760 --> 00:18:23,119 Speaker 1: that we spoke with earlier, Derek called He mentioned that 321 00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:26,199 Speaker 1: there were many people who were moving from the resource 322 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 1: rich areas of Canada, like oil, natural gas, mining and 323 00:18:29,640 --> 00:18:33,480 Speaker 1: so on, and they're moving back to Toronto and that's 324 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 1: been good for the Toronto real estate market. But then 325 00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:38,359 Speaker 1: that means there's something going on in the energy markets 326 00:18:38,400 --> 00:18:41,760 Speaker 1: that we need to pay attention to. What are you seeing? Yeah, well, 327 00:18:41,800 --> 00:18:44,080 Speaker 1: thank you very much for fermentation to be here. But 328 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:46,240 Speaker 1: you know, there are a lot of things going on 329 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:49,080 Speaker 1: for the Canadian economy right now. He's not only all 330 00:18:49,359 --> 00:18:53,280 Speaker 1: I mean energy, I mean he's of the economy right now. 331 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:57,240 Speaker 1: So there are a lot of other things going on, services, manufacturing, 332 00:18:57,320 --> 00:19:00,320 Speaker 1: a lot of things. And I think also there is 333 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:04,199 Speaker 1: life after all, especially now with en after negotiations, I 334 00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:06,600 Speaker 1: think there's a lot of room for an update too. 335 00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:09,280 Speaker 1: N After you know that it's beneficial for the three countries. 336 00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:12,200 Speaker 1: The three countries together, Canada, the US, and Mexico form 337 00:19:12,280 --> 00:19:15,919 Speaker 1: the largest economy in the world. I do have to wonder, 338 00:19:16,240 --> 00:19:19,080 Speaker 1: you know, how well the Canadian economy will be able 339 00:19:19,119 --> 00:19:22,479 Speaker 1: to withstand the interest rate hikes at the Bank of 340 00:19:22,520 --> 00:19:26,159 Speaker 1: Canada is expected to make. How many are you expecting 341 00:19:26,400 --> 00:19:31,080 Speaker 1: and how much was the slow asset prices? So we 342 00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:34,359 Speaker 1: are expecting three more hikes, but we're expecting those hikes 343 00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:37,399 Speaker 1: to take place next year, so not this year. So 344 00:19:37,480 --> 00:19:39,040 Speaker 1: this would be part of what we see as a 345 00:19:39,119 --> 00:19:42,600 Speaker 1: gravel hiking cycle. I think this is not going to 346 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:44,840 Speaker 1: be a drug for the economy. I mean, there's a 347 00:19:44,920 --> 00:19:47,560 Speaker 1: lot of monetori stia moves right now. Real rates are 348 00:19:47,640 --> 00:19:50,080 Speaker 1: negative and even with these three hikes, they could only 349 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:54,639 Speaker 1: bring the real rate to zero. So, especially if the 350 00:19:54,680 --> 00:19:57,479 Speaker 1: FED is also hiking at the same time, this is 351 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:00,600 Speaker 1: not going to be a lot of titan So I 352 00:20:00,600 --> 00:20:04,560 Speaker 1: think the kind of economy can can withstand these these hikes. 353 00:20:04,840 --> 00:20:07,360 Speaker 1: The Bank of Canada has a tricky to do here 354 00:20:07,400 --> 00:20:09,840 Speaker 1: because if they don't hike, then you know, there's a 355 00:20:09,920 --> 00:20:13,840 Speaker 1: risk of some excessive mistaking behavior. If they hike too fast, 356 00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:17,240 Speaker 1: then they can hurt the part of the economy that 357 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:20,320 Speaker 1: is highly leveled. So it's a tricky role that they 358 00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:24,440 Speaker 1: need to follow, but I'm sure they're gonna be doing 359 00:20:24,480 --> 00:20:27,080 Speaker 1: a good job of getting the writer mont if you 360 00:20:27,080 --> 00:20:29,120 Speaker 1: can speak to the issue of tax reform and its 361 00:20:29,160 --> 00:20:32,280 Speaker 1: relationship to companies that are currently doing business in Mexico 362 00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:35,360 Speaker 1: as well as in Canada, would a lower US corporate 363 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:40,520 Speaker 1: tax rate make those companies more susceptible to produce and 364 00:20:40,760 --> 00:20:44,200 Speaker 1: and and create operations in the United States? Yes, for sure. 365 00:20:44,320 --> 00:20:47,760 Speaker 1: So this is an important risk for both for Canada 366 00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 1: and for Mexico. I mean lower tag rates here in 367 00:20:50,880 --> 00:20:55,040 Speaker 1: the US. There, these two countries have different room to 368 00:20:55,119 --> 00:20:57,640 Speaker 1: deal with this. I see. I think that kinda has 369 00:20:57,680 --> 00:21:00,640 Speaker 1: more room to deal with these they they can they 370 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:04,760 Speaker 1: have some space to lower rates there, whereas in Mexico 371 00:21:04,840 --> 00:21:07,720 Speaker 1: they don't have room to lower rate. So it's probably 372 00:21:07,800 --> 00:21:10,720 Speaker 1: something that could affect Mexico a little bit more, but 373 00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: it's definitely a downslide risk for both economies. You know, 374 00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:17,480 Speaker 1: we're speaking earlier with they're called head of Capital Market 375 00:21:17,480 --> 00:21:20,240 Speaker 1: Economics Scotia Bank, and he was saying he doesn't expect 376 00:21:20,840 --> 00:21:25,160 Speaker 1: the ongoing NAFTA negotiations to end with something that could 377 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:29,480 Speaker 1: potentially substantially harm the Canadian economy, which is intricately connected 378 00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 1: to the U S is do you agree, yes? So 379 00:21:32,320 --> 00:21:34,600 Speaker 1: the hour but and Bank of American AMERYA. Lynch is 380 00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:36,800 Speaker 1: basically that there is room to have the NAFTA. And 381 00:21:36,840 --> 00:21:39,640 Speaker 1: when you see room in a negotiation for to get 382 00:21:39,680 --> 00:21:42,080 Speaker 1: benefit for all the parts involved, that usually where you 383 00:21:42,119 --> 00:21:44,920 Speaker 1: where you get to. Of course, there's still risks that 384 00:21:45,040 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 1: you know, we would take a turn, and there is 385 00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:49,159 Speaker 1: even the risk that the US or any other country 386 00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:51,679 Speaker 1: withdraws from NAFTA. So the risk is still there. We 387 00:21:51,720 --> 00:21:54,679 Speaker 1: believe it's a small risk, but is there. What I 388 00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:58,080 Speaker 1: don't think we're gonna get is is the timing, right. 389 00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 1: I mean, I think these these negotiations are going to 390 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:02,760 Speaker 1: take a little bit more time than what people is suspecting. 391 00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:04,240 Speaker 1: But I think that at the end of the road, 392 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:06,480 Speaker 1: we're going to see an update that is going to 393 00:22:06,560 --> 00:22:09,159 Speaker 1: be good for the trick countries, and you think that 394 00:22:09,200 --> 00:22:12,200 Speaker 1: the economy will remain stable where it is and not 395 00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:14,760 Speaker 1: upset those plants, because if you get some kind of 396 00:22:14,760 --> 00:22:18,679 Speaker 1: big economic problem that could affect the government's response to 397 00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:22,080 Speaker 1: these kinds of negotiations exactly. But right, now, the prospect 398 00:22:22,080 --> 00:22:24,200 Speaker 1: for North America good. I mean, we have the US 399 00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,480 Speaker 1: growing slightly above two percent, we have Mexico decelerating a 400 00:22:27,560 --> 00:22:30,000 Speaker 1: little bit from two percent, and kind of of course 401 00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:31,919 Speaker 1: it is booming, is growing up close to four percent 402 00:22:32,040 --> 00:22:34,760 Speaker 1: right now. Respect that to deceler rate, but two rates 403 00:22:34,760 --> 00:22:39,120 Speaker 1: closer to So North America it's it's it's it's having 404 00:22:39,160 --> 00:22:41,240 Speaker 1: good growth right now. I want to talk a little 405 00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:44,159 Speaker 1: bit about Mexico, if that's okay, especially in light of 406 00:22:44,320 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 1: the devastating earthquake Mexico City. How will that natural disaster 407 00:22:50,600 --> 00:22:52,879 Speaker 1: affect the economy in Mexico? Is that gonna Is that 408 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:56,360 Speaker 1: going to be on the radar at all? Well, of course, 409 00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:58,800 Speaker 1: it being very hard what's been going on in Mexico 410 00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:01,919 Speaker 1: right now. When you look at the impact on the 411 00:23:01,960 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 1: macro economy, you realize is that this is going to 412 00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:08,000 Speaker 1: have a negative impact in the third quarter. So probably 413 00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:10,320 Speaker 1: the third quarter is going to be going to be 414 00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:14,440 Speaker 1: growing slowly lower than the respected before. But then there 415 00:23:14,520 --> 00:23:17,439 Speaker 1: is a lot of help already going on for private 416 00:23:17,480 --> 00:23:20,080 Speaker 1: sources but also from the government, and the government is 417 00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:22,280 Speaker 1: in a good position to to help that they have 418 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 1: other funds that they can use precisely for this type 419 00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:28,800 Speaker 1: of disaster. So actually what we respect is that this 420 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:33,320 Speaker 1: help from the government actually brings more more more growth 421 00:23:33,359 --> 00:23:36,760 Speaker 1: in the following quarters. Well, that also include any investment 422 00:23:36,800 --> 00:23:39,879 Speaker 1: in PAMAX into the National Oil Company, which seems to 423 00:23:39,920 --> 00:23:44,720 Speaker 1: pay what the majority of the taxes for from Mexico. Well, now, 424 00:23:44,840 --> 00:23:46,560 Speaker 1: right now the country is in the middle of a 425 00:23:46,560 --> 00:23:52,359 Speaker 1: fiscal consolidation, and that consolidation goes through lower in expenditure 426 00:23:52,400 --> 00:23:54,919 Speaker 1: at POMICS. This is part of the energy reform, So 427 00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:58,399 Speaker 1: Mexico is hoping to get more private investment into the 428 00:23:58,480 --> 00:24:01,680 Speaker 1: energy sector and is reduced the role that the MIX 429 00:24:01,760 --> 00:24:04,880 Speaker 1: is playing in that sector and also as a taxpayer. 430 00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:08,719 Speaker 1: But having said that, again, there are some savings that 431 00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:10,879 Speaker 1: the government of Mexico has been doing and that they 432 00:24:10,960 --> 00:24:15,280 Speaker 1: can deploy precisely for this kind of of disasters like 433 00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:17,919 Speaker 1: they like the earthquake. You know, Carlos, I'm sure that 434 00:24:17,960 --> 00:24:22,000 Speaker 1: you hear the rhetoric from President Trump about Mexico and 435 00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:26,480 Speaker 1: built that wall. Still is committed to building that wall, 436 00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 1: he says, although there have been questions raised about that. 437 00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:34,000 Speaker 1: This is clearly sourge relations between the two countries. Do 438 00:24:34,080 --> 00:24:37,440 Speaker 1: you think that there will be economic consequences from that, Well, 439 00:24:37,480 --> 00:24:39,920 Speaker 1: there could be, Yeah, there could be. And for sure, 440 00:24:39,920 --> 00:24:42,040 Speaker 1: the most important part is not done then after the 441 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:45,680 Speaker 1: negotiations and and a lot a lot of hangs on that. 442 00:24:46,600 --> 00:24:48,760 Speaker 1: But to be honest is when you look at the 443 00:24:48,800 --> 00:24:52,399 Speaker 1: three countries, they produce things together now and because they 444 00:24:52,440 --> 00:24:55,879 Speaker 1: do that, people realize all the benefits of working together. 445 00:24:56,160 --> 00:24:57,879 Speaker 1: I would love to get your final thoughts and what, 446 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:02,359 Speaker 1: from your perspective holds the best value as an investment 447 00:25:02,520 --> 00:25:06,119 Speaker 1: within Canada right now. I think it's just growth. I 448 00:25:06,119 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 1: mean Joe's bettom growth. I mean again, the Canada economy 449 00:25:08,680 --> 00:25:11,480 Speaker 1: is Joe's growing four percent right now. We have it 450 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 1: growing above potential in the following quarters. So I think 451 00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:19,879 Speaker 1: betting on growth through equity or digent markets, I think 452 00:25:19,920 --> 00:25:22,720 Speaker 1: it's it's a good bit on the fact fixing market 453 00:25:23,160 --> 00:25:25,920 Speaker 1: on the country. We're expecting some depreciation of the Canadian 454 00:25:25,960 --> 00:25:30,280 Speaker 1: dollar and that's what we're thinking about now. There. Thank 455 00:25:30,280 --> 00:25:33,080 Speaker 1: you very much for being with us, Much appreciated. Carlos 456 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:35,880 Speaker 1: Copistron is the head of Canada and Mexico Economics at 457 00:25:35,880 --> 00:25:39,240 Speaker 1: Bank of America Merrill Lynch. He was participating in the 458 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:44,199 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Canada Fixed Income summit that took place earlier today 459 00:25:44,240 --> 00:25:49,639 Speaker 1: here at Bloomberg World Headquarters. Thanks for listening to the 460 00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:52,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen 461 00:25:52,800 --> 00:25:56,960 Speaker 1: to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform 462 00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:00,920 Speaker 1: you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Pam Fox. 463 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:04,720 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. 464 00:26:04,760 --> 00:26:07,359 Speaker 1: You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio